Ship Operations & Management

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ship Operations & Management SHIP OPERATIONS & MANAGEMENT _________________________________________ LESSON ONE SHIP OWNERS, OPERATORS AND MANAGERS THE SHIP MANAGER There is much more to ship owning than simply buying a ship, finding the right cargoes and carrying them. In this course it will be seen how many different activities are involved in managing and operating ships and that the tasks require distinctly separate areas of skills; so separate that several experienced individuals have to be involved. The first decision that a shipowner has to make, therefore, is who to use for this work. The first thought would be to hire the necessary personnel and create all the requisite departments in one’s own company. This ‘in-house’ approach has much to commend it. The obvious one is close control by the owner of all aspects of the management activity. The amount of money tied up in the owning of a ship makes the idea of having day-to-day contact with all those involved in its care such an advantage that the decision seems obvious. Obvious that is until the question of cost is considered. Skilled managers quite rightly command high salaries and wish to be employed in positions which are sufficiently challenging to be satisfying. If, therefore, the owner has very few ships, the costs to be allocated against each ship to cover the management function becomes uneconomical. Furthermore, with only a few ships to manage, the senior personnel will not have enough work to fill a satisfying day so they will become bored and seek more challenging employment elsewhere. This is not a problem for the owners of large fleets. The management costs are spread over more units and thus will be at an acceptable level. Moreover, the higher income will permit the engagement of top-class staff with adequate support staff, all of whom will have plenty of work to fill their days. What, then, is the solution for the owner with a small fleet apart from the obvious one of buying more ships? The answer lies in the employment of the services of an independent ship management company. There are now many such companies based in different parts of the world. These companies contain all the different departments needed to provide an efficient service for which they charge a fee. Because of their size they are able to attract top-class executives and the large numbers of ships under their management enable them to enjoy economies of scale. This is another way of saying that their fees charged to each individual ship is reduced in proportion to the number of ships they serve. There is, of course a dilemma for the medium sized shipowner who will have to consider the benefits of using his own staff over which he has direct control and balance this against the economies in using a third party to manage his ships. Sometimes that problem is solved by sub-contracting only a part of the management function which is possible in view of the clear demarcation between the different activities in ship management. A particular aspect of this partial sub-contracting will be covered later. Another device that has successfully overcome the lack of economies of scale for the medium sized shipowner has been contracting to manage other owners’ ships by the same personnel as are employed in caring for the owner’s own vessels. The management agreement In view of the large amounts of money and capital assets involved, a very clear written agreement is essential if disputes and misunderstandings are to be avoided. Each management agreement is probably unique but the Baltic & International Maritime Council (BIMCO) has compiled a printed Standard Ship Management Agreement known as ‘ SHIPMAN 98’ which, even if it is not used in its entirety, provides a first class check-list of all the matters that should be considered in making such a contract. (See Appendix 1). Boxes 5 to 14 of Part I of this agreement identify all the different duties that may be sub-contracted by the ship owner to a ship manager and these headings are a useful index to the duties that must be carried out if the management is handled in-house. The clauses in Section 3 of Part II of the agreement expand on the duties to be carried out under each heading and between them offer a reasonably comprehensive guide to these functions. Students should familiarise themselves with these. Each actual management agreement will be individual because the ship owner may choose to handle some of the activities itself or use a different manager for example to handle crewing (3.1). The other clauses in the agreement relate to the way in which the management contract itself will be carried out. For example Clause 6.3 is most important as it provides that all insurance policies will be in the names of both owners and managers, this means that both parties have the benefit of the protection, in the Lesson on insurance it will become clear how important this is. Clause 7 provides for the separation of the ship owners money from that of the Manager. The manager is paid for its services by way of a Management Fee (Clause 8.) Clause 9 describes how the management of the vessels shall be budgeted and how the Manager will report to the owner on financial performance. Clause 11 contains some very important responsibility clauses. These should be studied but in brief, they provide that the managers are not liable for any loss etc. unless they were negligent, that the owners will indemnify them against such losses. The ‘Himalaya’ clause (11.4) provides that the manager is acting as the agent of the shipowner and has the same protection as the owner in respect of any applicable avoidance or limitation of liability. The remaining clauses relate to administration, termination, law and jurisdiction and are self explanatory. There is provision for a series of Appendices A to D which are not reproduced but which provide space for recording the vessels’ details, crew details, budget information etc. STRUCTURE OF SHIPOWNING & MANAGEMENT ORGANISATIONS A number of the issues dealt with in this introductory lesson will be dealt with later in the course in much greater depth. The purpose at this stage is to give a general overview of all those matters that fall within the overall responsibility of the ship manager. At the top of any ship owning or operating corporate structure will be a Board of Directors headed by a Chairman or President and a Managing Director. It is their task to determine the overall policy of the business and future direction that the company will take. Policy areas which will be decided the by top management might include: • The philosophy of the company's strategy. • The type and size of vessels used. • Fleet replacement policy (owning and chartering options). • Flag policy • The trades or routes that the company will serve. • In-house ship management or contracted out. • Financial performance. Having established the policy the board will delegate the management of these functions to various in-house departments or contract them out as appropriate The structure of ship management The way in which these practical services are dealt with and especially how the various functions are grouped together will differ, however all these different activities will need to be provided either from within the company or by contracting out to independent ship management or crewing companies. Acquisition of vessels Before the company can operate it must have some vessels under its control. 1. Outright purchase The traditional way of procuring ships is to buy them outright. The company will either use its own cash resources to buy the vessel or more likely obtain a loan or mortgage secured on the vessel. The very largest companies may employ their own naval architects and design staff to create the type and size of new buildings they want for the future or this function may be delegated to independent naval architects. More commonly companies may buy vessels built to a pre-existing shipyard design that will be ‘tailored’ to its needs. Other companies may concentrate on building up their fleet by buying second hand tonnage and for this purpose will use the services of a Sale and Purchase Broker. 2. “Finance based” long term chartered Increasingly shipowning companies are using more ‘innovative’ ways to procure new ships through intermediaries. This is because either the company does not have sufficient borrowing capability for all the ships it wants to operate, or an intermediary is in a better position to obtain tax benefits from purchasing ships than the operating company. In concept, the approach can be seen as analogous to leasing rather than owning a car. The ship owner may still be heavily involved in the design of the ship and may indeed have the ‘lifetime’ use of the vessel sometimes with an option to purchase after (say) 25 years for a nominal sum. A typical ‘tax driven’ approach is the German “KG” scheme where German individuals or companies who own vessels can secure favourable tax treatment, part of the benefit of which they can pass on through competitive charter rates to the liner company. Ships under these arrangements can be bareboat chartered (where the charterer is responsible for crewing, maintenance, etc.) or time chartered where the actual owner performs these functions. 3. Time charters Other companies will time charter suitable tonnage from other shipowning companies. Time charters are also used to acquire tonnage to meet short term commitments or fluctuations in the fleet, perhaps to replace tonnage during a dry dock programme or to meet a seasonal high level of demand.
Recommended publications
  • Shipbreaking Bulletin of Information and Analysis on Ship Demolition # 60, from April 1 to June 30, 2020
    Shipbreaking Bulletin of information and analysis on ship demolition # 60, from April 1 to June 30, 2020 August 4, 2020 On the Don River (Russia), January 2019. © Nautic/Fleetphoto Maritime acts like a wizzard. Otherwise, how could a Renaissance, built in the ex Tchecoslovakia, committed to Tanzania, ambassador of the Italian and French culture, carrying carefully general cargo on the icy Russian waters, have ended up one year later, under the watch of an Ukrainian classification society, in a Turkish scrapyard to be recycled in saucepans or in containers ? Content Wanted 2 General cargo carrier 12 Car carrier 36 Another river barge on the sea bottom 4 Container ship 18 Dreger / stone carrier 39 The VLOCs' ex VLCCs Flop 5 Ro Ro 26 Offshore service vessel 40 The one that escaped scrapping 6 Heavy load carrier 27 Research vessel 42 Derelict ships (continued) 7 Oil tanker 28 The END: 44 2nd quarter 2020 overview 8 Gas carrier 30 Have your handkerchiefs ready! Ferry 10 Chemical tanker 31 Sources 55 Cruise ship 11 Bulker 32 Robin des Bois - 1 - Shipbreaking # 60 – August 2020 Despina Andrianna. © OD/MarineTraffic Received on June 29, 2020 from Hong Kong (...) Our firm, (...) provides senior secured loans to shipowners across the globe. We are writing to enquire about vessel details in your shipbreaking publication #58 available online: http://robindesbois.org/wp-content/uploads/shipbreaking58.pdf. In particular we had questions on two vessels: Despinna Adrianna (Page 41) · We understand it was renamed to ZARA and re-flagged to Comoros · According
    [Show full text]
  • The Lloyd's List Top
    Lloyd’s List One Hundred | Edition Seven The most influential people in the shipping industry Maritime intelligence | CONTENTS The rankings Top 10 lists 04 | 37 | Introduction Marine insurance top 10 08 | 51 | Numbers 1-10 Ship finance top 10 26 | 64 | Numbers 11-20 Regulation top 10 40 | 81 | Numbers 21-30 Maritime lawyers top 10 55 | 132 | Numbers 31-40 Classification top 10 70 | 140 | Numbers 41-50 Box ports top 10 82 | Numbers 51-60 93 | Numbers 61-70 104 | Numbers 71-80 116 | Numbers 81-90 128 | Numbers 91-102 Top 100 Editor Chief executive Advertising Production Manager No part of this publication may be reproduced, Helen Kelly Michael Dell Mark Leech stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, Lloyd’s List Managing Editor Head of Marketing Services Design photographic, recorded or otherwise without the Richard Meade Fergus Gregory Kapusniak Design written permission of the publisher of Lloyd’s List. Lloyd’s List Asia Editor Advertising Sales Printing Lloyd’s List is available online in every country Abdul Hadhi To advertise please email: St Ives plc in the world by placing a subscription with the [email protected] Lloyd’s List Deputy Editor Editoral, advertising and sponsorship inquiries: publishers in London, Informa UK Ltd. Please place Craig Eason Head of Sales – Maritime Marketing Services Lloyd’s List, Christchurch Court, 10-15 Newgate your order with the Lloyd’s List marketing team at Rafael Fernandes Street, London, EC1A 7AZ Lloyd’s List News Editor Informa. This special supplement is issued free to Tel: +44 (0)20 7017 5000 Gary Howard Asia Pacific subscribers.
    [Show full text]
  • Download File
    No.75 No. Format for Electronic Exchange and Standard 75 Reports (June (cont) 2001) (Rev.1 Feb 2015 Complete revision) Abstract: This document details “Unified Data Exchange Format (UDEF)” for electronic exchange of class and statutory data between IACS Member Societies and Flag States. Page 1 of 21 IACS Rec. 2001/Rev.1 2015 No.75 1. Electronic Access to Class and Statutory Data No. 1.1 Introduction 75 (cont) 1.1.1 This document details the data requirements that have been developed to facilitate the exchange of class and statutory data by IACS Member Societies with flag state administrations. Two means of exchange are defined in this document: • Electronic exchange: Data definitions and data fields for the electronic exchange of data are detailed. The mechanism of exchange is explained below. • Formats and Layout standards are shown for the visual presentation of the data using an online system. 1.2 Electronic Exchange and online viewing 1.2.1 The societies shall not provide printed information except by special cases. It is the responsibility of individual flag states to access the information and produce any relevant reports based on the data collected. 1.2.2 Access to the information shall be at the discretion of the individual society. Each society is invited to develop and run at its server the converting software to make the society’s data compatible with the data format as described below. 1.2.3 This implementation of Unified Data Exchange Format (UDEF) will make data from all societies available and harmonized for further processing and allow arrangement of Single window reporting, were any end user may collect complete and reliable data.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020-09 Detention List
    SHORT GUIDANCE TO THE MONTHLY LIST OF DETENTIONS OF THE PARIS MOU • INFORMATION IN THE LIST The monthly list of detentions of the Paris MOU contains information about ships which were detained in the Paris MOU region during the month under review. An alphabetical index on ship’s name and an index on IMO number are provided with the list. The information listed for each ship is conform Annex 4 Publication of Information related to Detentions and Inspections. (As referred to in Section 5.2 of the Memorandum) https://www.parismou.org/inspections-risk/library-faq/memorandum Some of these items require an explanation: RO related deficiencies: a ‘Yes’ in this column indicates that one or more of the deficiencies mentioned under ‘Reasons for detention’ are the responsibility of the Recognized Organization which has issued the relevant certificate(s). This is not necessarily the Recognized Organization mentioned in the list (see below)! Port and date of release from detention: details of detentions are entered in the information system of the Paris MOU after the ship has been released. Therefore, the details on a detention of a ship detained in September but released in October are only available in October. Recognized Organization: the Recognized Organization mentioned is not necessarily the party issuing the certificates relevant for all deficiencies which were reasons for detention. ‘Ship allowed to sail to nearest repair yard for repairs’: in general, a ship is not released from detention before all necessary repairs have been made. However, sometimes it is not possible to repair all defects at the place of detention.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020-10 Detention List
    SHORT GUIDANCE TO THE MONTHLY LIST OF DETENTIONS OF THE PARIS MOU • INFORMATION IN THE LIST The monthly list of detentions of the Paris MOU contains information about ships which were detained in the Paris MOU region during the month under review. An alphabetical index on ship’s name and an index on IMO number are provided with the list. The information listed for each ship is conform Annex 4 Publication of Information related to Detentions and Inspections. (As referred to in Section 5.2 of the Memorandum) https://www.parismou.org/inspections-risk/library-faq/memorandum Some of these items require an explanation: RO related deficiencies: a ‘Yes’ in this column indicates that one or more of the deficiencies mentioned under ‘Reasons for detention’ are the responsibility of the Recognized Organization which has issued the relevant certificate(s). This is not necessarily the Recognized Organization mentioned in the list (see below)! Port and date of release from detention: details of detentions are entered in the information system of the Paris MOU after the ship has been released. Therefore, the details on a detention of a ship detained in September but released in October are only available in October. Recognized Organization: the Recognized Organization mentioned is not necessarily the party issuing the certificates relevant for all deficiencies which were reasons for detention. ‘Ship allowed to sail to nearest repair yard for repairs’: in general, a ship is not released from detention before all necessary repairs have been made. However, sometimes it is not possible to repair all defects at the place of detention.
    [Show full text]