Reform of the International Monetary System and New Global Economic Governance: How the EU May Contribute Brussels, 6 June
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Robert Triffin International Robert Triffin International Association - RTI Reform of the International Monetary System and new global economic governance: how the EU may contribute Brussels, 6 June 2017, Jean Monnet Network kick-off event and Triffin Annual Lecture 2017 International Monetary Issues n°3 Reform of the International Monetary System and new global economic governance: how the EU may contribute Brussels, 6 June 2017, Jean Monnet Network kick-off event and Triffin Annual Lecture 2017 The kick-off meeting of the Jean Monnet Network on “Crisis-Equity-Democracy for europe and latin america” was supported – in addition to the Eramus+ programme of the EU – by the Robert Triffin International Association, the Gutt Fund, the Caisse des Dépôts et Consignation, the Royal Egmont Institute and IRELAC. Fonds Robert Triffin Camille International Gutt The co-financing of the Jean Monnet Network on “Crisis-Equity-Democracy for Europe and Latin America” by the European Union in the Framework of its ERASMUS+ programme does not involve any responsibility of the European Commission as regards the content of this publication and its use, which remain of the exclusive responsibility of the authors of the researches and their publications. © 2018 Versant Sud Boulevard Général Jacques, 20 B-1050 Bruxelles [email protected] www.versant-sud.com All rights reserved No part of this publication may be copied, entered into any databank or published in any form whatsoever, whether electronic, mechanical, by photocopy, photography or any other medium, without the prior written approval of the publisher. Graphics and Layout: Sébastien Vellut / lautobus.be ISBN: 978-2-930938-00-4 Legal deposit: D/2018/9445/9 Robert Triffin International Association - RTI Reform of the International Monetary System and new global economic governance: how the EU may contribute Brussels, 6 June 2017, Jean Monnet Network kick-off event and Triffin Annual Lecture 2017 Index Introduction 7 CHRISTIAN GHYMERS On behalf of the Jean Monnet Network The persistence of the Triffin dilemma today: A plan for overcoming it and ensuring a stable international financial architecture 11 CHRISTIAN GHYMERS RTI/UCL, and IRELAC, Belgium The New Global Economic Governance: Can Europe Help Win the Peace? 23 MARCO BUTI DG ECFIN, European Commission Reform of the International Monetary System and the IMF comments on Marco Buti’s presentation 41 STEPHANY GRIFFITH-JONES IRELAC & Columbia University Summing up of the Panel of 2017 Annual Triffin Lecture 47 BERNARD SNOY ET D’OPPUERS Chairman of Robert Triffin International Association – RTI/UCL Introduction Christian Ghymers On behalf of the Jean Monnet Network1 The Jean Monnet Network “Crisis-Equity-Democracy for Europe and Latin America” is a research project selected and financed at 80% by the European Commission and, the rest, by a consortium of five academic institutions from Europe and Latin America. These institutions are coordinated by IRELAC – the Interdisciplinary Institute for the Relations between European Union and Latin America and the Caribbean – based in Brussels. The project is organized as a network of bi-regional comparative research on crisis, its management and its social and democratic implications in Europe and Latin America with the aim to mutually learn from each other and to develop policy advice by offering a platform for an exchange of viewpoints to policy makers, academia and the civil society. Latin America and Europe can both learn from their respective experi- ences on crisis response and the distributive and democratic implications at national and regional levels. Democratic and distributive aspects of crisis response (monetary, financial & economic policies and institu- tional reforms) are key but they have not been adequately addressed in literature yet. Furthermore, opening a bi-regional dialogue in the field of socio-macroeconomic policies and crisis management would provide an additional strategic content to the Strategic Alliance that the Summits EU-CELAC are supposed to build. There is now a broad consensus among economists, political scientists and journalists about the nature of the EU crisis: it is not only an economic crisis, but a governance crisis coupled to a democracy crisis, and this is not only a European disease but a global one as the economic crisis is too. Latin 1. Research project co-financed by the Erasmus+ Programme of the European Union 7 America is also affected by the global nature of the crisis. Our Jean Monnet Network has the purpose to try to better identify the roots of this crisis by a comparative analysis between both regions. This ambitious goal requires as a first step to deal with the most global issue which affects both regions: the dysfunctions in the international monetary system, which could even be at the basis of the global crisis. Therefore, it was decided to start the project – the so-called kick-off meetings of our Network – with an international workshop and an international High-level Conference dedicated to focus on the asymmetric International Monetary System. For this purpose, the best partner is the Robert Triffin International association (RTI), which develops analysis along the lines initiated by Triffin sixty years ago about the dysfunctions of a system based mainly upon the US dollar, issuing massive spill overs upon global economy without either effective adjustment mechanism to correct global imbalances nor rational means to moderate or accelerate the growth of global liquidity. Based on this diagnosis, the exchanges of views examine how Europe could act through the present global governance to improve the situation. The present publication has been made possible thanks to the support of the Camille GUTT Funds, RTI, IRELAC and the (French) Caisse des Dépôts et Consignation (CDC). It points to present, first, the synthesis written by Christian Ghymers, co-coordinator of the Monnet Network, presenting the positions of the Robert Triffin International association – RTI, which were pre- sented and debated in the workshop analysing the major defect of the present International Monetary System. It was shown that the “Triffin dilemma” is still fully at work. Indeed, the use of a national currency, the US $, as the main international reserve currency introduces necessarily an asymmetry which feeds important spill overs on the world’s economy. This “built-in destabilizer” produces big liquidity waves with important side-effects on the monetary policies in the rest of the world, but also on the US federal reserve. The present difficulties of the global economy and the challenges that the Central Banks are facing with the effects of their quantitative easing measures and how to get out of them are also a result of the flaw of the IMS, which impedes a rational control of global liquidities. These positions were developed with a view to debate feasible solutions along the logical multilateral coherence of the main option, which consists in improving the Special Drawing Right – SDR by making of it a genuine multilateral currency allowing for a collegial control of global liquidities with a minimum of loss of national sovereignty. 8 The second part of the kick-off meetings was organized around the Annual Triffin’s lecture dedicated this year to analyse how significant Europe’s role has been in shaping the new global governance. This part is presented in three contributions. First, the key-note speech, delivered by Marco Buti, Director General, DG for Economic and Financial Affairs, European Commission, has demonstrated once more the continuing relevance of Robert Triffin’s ideas, and the renewed search for Global Economic Governance in the after- math of the 2008 economic and financial crisis and the rising role played by the Group of Twenty (G20). Second, Stephany Griffith Jones (IRELAC and Columbia University) intervened as discussant and presented her views on the need to ensure a more stable way to provide international reserves in a very Triffinian way by developing the use of the SDR. The last part of this publication is a summary written by Bernard Snoy, Chairman of RTI, of the exchanges in the panel of this 2017 Triffin Lecture. Upon these bases, the project will organize its successive researches and events in both regions in order to develop a bi-regional socio-economic research net- work, which could serve as a nucleus of a possible larger EU-CELAC academic network in the future and thus, promote bi-regional cooperation in this area. We are especially grateful to Viscount Etienne Davignon and Marc Otte, respectively President and Director General of the Royal EGMONT Institute, to Marco Buti from the European Commission, to the Erasmus+ Jean Monnet project, to Baron Michel Vanden Abeele, President of the GUTT Fund, to Baron Snoy et d’Oppuers, President of RTI and to Christophe Bourdillon from the CDC. 9 The persistence of the Triffin dilemma today: A plan for overcoming it and ensuring a stable international financial architecture Christian Ghymers RTI/UCL,2 and IRELAC3, Belgium The Triffin dilemma More than 50 years ago, the Belgian-American economist Robert Triffin (1911– 1993) denounced the dangerous incoherence of the “dollar system”, not the general peg-regime against the dollar created in Bretton Woods 1944, but more generally the use of a national currency as the main international reserve currency. His warning was coined the “Triffin dilemma” expressing merely that due to the inner logics of a currency to be a debt-at-sight, any system based mainly on the use of a national currency for supplying international reserve assets to the rest of the world, was doomed to conflicting objectives leading inevitably to generate global macroeconomic instability. The reason is the inescapable dilemma the issuer of this currency faces between either going ever deeper into debt in order to satisfy the growing world demand for liquidity, with the danger that this will undermine its creditworthiness on the one hand, or failing to satisfy this demand by giving priority to its creditworthiness exposing the world to a reserve shortage with a consequent conflictive deflation on the other hand.