Legal Pluralism and the Implementation of International
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Problematic Legal Pluralism: Causes and Some Potential ‘Cures’ 2014 Shaun Larcom1
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Apollo PROBLEMATIC LEGAL PLURALISM: CAUSES AND SOME POTENTIAL ‘CURES’ 2014 SHAUN LARCOM1 Abstract The tools of analytical positivism and economic analysis are applied to the phenomenon of legal pluralism. An analytical framework is developed to ascertain when legal pluralism is problematic in the control of wrongdoing. It is demonstrated that there are three specific cases; rivalrous compliance, sanctions for wrong behaviour that are deemed to be wrongs themselves and the uncoordinated sanctioning of common wrongs. Then there is a discussion of the consequences and some approaches that can be used to ameliorate each case that has been identified. It is hoped that this framework will be used to guide future practical and theoretical discussions on legal pluralism and its potential problems. Keywords: legal pluralism, law and economics, legal dissonance, norms, criminal law, religious law 1. INTRODUCTION This article provides a framework for organising and guiding theoretical and practical discussion that relates to the phenomenon of legal pluralism. It is suggested that legal pluralism can only become a truly useful concept for those concerned with institutional design if there is greater analytical clarity and a more systematic analysis of its problematic manifestations. It is hoped that this article provides some much needed progress in these areas, something that seems all the more important given that the term is growing both in recognition and use, especially by policy makers and development practitioners.2 We know that non-state groupings can greatly enhance the quality and meaning of people’s lives. -
3. Acheampong 2910
Peer-Reviewed Article Volume 10, Issue SI (2021), pp. 39-56 Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education Special Issue: Schooling & Education in Ghana ISSN: 2166-2681Print 2690-0408 Online https://ojed.org/jise Promoting Assessment for Learning to Ensure Access, Equity, and Improvement in Educational Outcomes in Ghana Eugene Owusu-Acheampong Cape Coast Technical University, Ghana Olivia A. T. Frimpong Kwapong University of Ghana, Ghana ABSTRACT This study looked at assessment for learning as a criterion for promoting inclusiveness and equitable access to educational opportunities in Ghana. It compared assessment for learning and assessment of learning and recommended measures to evaluate students’ performance to allow for equitable access and progression in education. The study found the deployment of assessment of learning as discriminatory, restrictive, and ineffective for judging the overall worth of students after several years of learning. It is recommended that to ensure equitable access and fairness such that no child is left behind in the Ghanaian educational system, the criteria for progression of students be based on interest and academic strengths using assessment for learning approaches and not necessarily standardized tests. Keywords: access, assessment of learning, assessment for learning, educational outcomes, equity, formative, summative - 37 - INTRODUCTION Education is key to development. The heart of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, which was adopted by the Member States of the United Nations in the year 2015, was the 17 Sustainable Development Goals. The fourth goal focuses on quality education (UN, n.d.). As noted by Kopnina (2020), the SDG Goal 4 on quality education expects all learners to acquire the knowledge and skills that are required for sustainable development. -
Legal Pluralism, Sharia Courts, and Constitutional Issues in Ethiopia * *
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by IDS OpenDocs Legal Pluralism, Sharia Courts, and Constitutional Issues in Ethiopia * * Mohammed Abdo * Abstract State laws employ different approaches in addressing the effect of pluralistic normative ordering in a multicultural setting. A legal regime may resort to the uniform application of state laws and reject religious and customary norms, or may recognize and allow the application of the norms and practices of identity groups as long as they are in conformity with constitutional and human rights standards. Another option is to adopt a hands-off approach whereby the norms and practices of cultural and/or religious groups are permitted to operate and are not necessarily required to meet constitutional and human rights standards. Against the backdrop of the notion of legal pluralism adopted by the FDRE Constitution, this article examines whether final decisions rendered by sharia courts in Ethiopia are required to meet constitutional standards (such as the supremacy clause, gender equality and non-discrimination). Based on the analysis of the relevant provisions of the law and literature, it is argued that decisions of sharia courts (whose jurisdiction is not compulsory, but based on the consent of litigating parties) seem to be exempted from constitutional standards even where they may be in conflict with state laws. Key words: Legal pluralism, sharia courts, constitutional standards, a hand-off approach, Ethiopia. Introduction The 1995 Federal -
International Criminal Justice, Legal Pluralism, and the Margin of Appreciation Lessons from the European Convention on Human Rights
\\jciprod01\productn\H\HLH\33-1\HLH102.txt unknown Seq: 1 14-SEP-20 9:53 International Criminal Justice, Legal Pluralism, and the Margin of Appreciation Lessons from the European Convention on Human Rights Fr´ed´eric M´egret1 Abstract: This Article explores the potential of the margin of appreciation to conceptualize the pluralism of international criminal justice. A growing debate in international criminal justice concerns the extent to which it can and ought to be conceived pluralistically. That debate has often remained theoretical, however, lacking a broad understanding of how that pluralism could be justified and implemented in international law. This Article ar- gues that the notion of the margin of appreciation, as developed in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights, makes an impor- tant contribution to our understanding of the potential pluralism of inter- national criminal justice. Developed as a tool to reconcile European human rights principles with the diversity of European societies, the margin of appreciation provides arguments to better justify pluralism as both prag- matic and principled. Moreover, the margin of appreciation provides gui- dance in considering how far domestic criminal justice systems should stray from central norms of international criminal justice. The article concludes with some thoughts on the way forward in forging a pluralistic interna- tional criminal justice jurisprudence that does not sacrifice a universalist commitment. TABLE OF CONTENTS The Case for Pluralism: The View from the Margin of Appreciationv ......................................... 67 R The Merely Pragmatic Case for Pluralism .................. 68 R 1. Full Professor and Dawson Scholar, Faculty of Law, McGill University. -
(SHS) and Quality University Education in Ghana: the Role of the University Teacher
E-ISSN 2240-0524 Journal of Educational and Social Research Vol 10 No 5 ISSN 2239-978X www.richtmann.org September 2020 . Research Article © 2020 Adu-Gyamfi et.al.. This is an open access article licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) Free Senior High School (SHS) and Quality University Education in Ghana: The Role of the University Teacher Samuel Adu-Gyamfi1 Charles Ofosu Marfo2 Ali Yakubu Nyaaba1 Kwasi Amakye-Boateng1 Mohammed Abass1 Henry Tettey Yartey1 1Department of History and Political Studies, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana 2Department of Language and Communication Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana DOI: https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2020-0101 Abstract Ghana’s education system has gone through several reforms in the post-independence period in the bid to increase access, ensure equity and quality at all levels (basic to tertiary). However, these goals seem to be a mirage especially on issues concerning quality at the secondary and tertiary levels. Against this backdrop, it has become imperative to raise relevant questions for the development of a new synthesis that is practical enough to allow for the necessary action to push forward the quality discourse which is a major concern among stakeholders. This paper intends to at least, serve the purpose of refreshing our memories concerning how we have individually or collectively, as citizens and academics, pondered over free secondary education, quality education and the role of the university teacher within the melting pot of the quality discourse in Ghana. -
Global Legal Pluralism As a Normative Project
GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works Faculty Scholarship 2018 Global Legal Pluralism as a Normative Project Paul Schiff Berman George Washington University Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.gwu.edu/faculty_publications Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Berman, Paul Schiff, Global Legal Pluralism as a Normative Project (2018). 8 UC Irvine L. Rev. 149 (2018).; GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 2018-76; GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2018-76. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3288690 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. First to Printer_Berman (Do Not Delete) 8/30/2018 10:42 AM Global Legal Pluralism as a Normative Project Paul Schiff Berman* Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 149 I. Global Legal Pluralism As a Descriptive Project ................................................... 154 II. From Descriptive to Normative .............................................................................. 156 III. Legal Pluralism and the Idea of Communication Across Difference ............. 158 IV. Building a Normative Global Legal Pluralism ..................................................... 161 -
Legal Pluralism, Plurality of Laws, and Legal Practices: Theories, Critiques, and Praxiological Re-Specification
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES : ISSUE 1 Legal Pluralism, Plurality of Laws, and Legal Practices: Theories, Critiques, and Praxiological Re-specification Baudouin Dupret* Legal pluralism has become a major theme in socio-legal studies. However, under this very broad denomination, one can identify many different trends which share little but the very basic idea that law is much more than state law. Despite their eclectic character, these many conceptions of legal pluralism also share some common fundamental premises concerning the nature of law, its function, and its relationship with its cultural milieu. This contribution aims at critically addressing these premises and at suggesting some re- specification of the question of law, its plural sources, and the many practices that enfold in relationship with it. In its spirit, this re-specification can be characterised as realistic and praxiological. Indeed, I shall argue that it is at best useless and at worst wrong to start from a label like “legal pluralism” so as to describe something which is presumed to be an instance of such label. My contention here is that law is what people consider as law, nothing more nothing less, and that occurrences of legal plurality are limited to these situations where people explicitly orient themselves to the fragmented spectrum of law. Instead of looking at the hypothetical pluralistic model of law which something like, e.g., Egyptian law, would be an instance of, the task of social scientists is, rather, to describe the situations, the mechanisms and the processes through which people orient to something legal which they identify as pluralistic. -
Petrie, Jennifer Accepted Dissertation 08-20-15 Fa15.Pdf
Music and Dance Education in Senior High Schools in Ghana: A Multiple Case Study A dissertation presented to the faculty of The Patton College of Education of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Education Jennifer L. Petrie December 2015 © 2015 Jennifer L. Petrie. All Rights Reserved. 2 This dissertation titled Music and Dance Education in Senior High Schools in Ghana: A Multiple Case Study by JENNIFER L. PETRIE has been approved for the Department of Educational Studies and The Patton College of Education by William K. Larson. Associate Professor of Educational Studies Renée A. Middleton Dean, The Patton College of Education 3 Abstract PETRIE, JENNIFER L., Ed.D., December 2015, Educational Administration Music and Dance Education in Senior High Schools in Ghana: A Multiple Case Study Director of Dissertation: William K. Larson This dissertation examined the state of senior high school (SHS) music and dance education in the context of a growing economy and current socio-cultural transitions in Ghana. The research analyzed the experience of educational administrators, teachers, and students. Educational administrators included professionals at educational organizations and institutions, government officials, and professors at universities in Ghana. Teachers and students were primarily from five SHSs, across varying socioeconomic strata in the Ashanti Region, the Central Region, and the Greater Accra Region. The study employed ethnographic and multiple case study approaches. The research incorporated the data collection techniques of archival document review, focus group, interview, observation, and participant observation. Four interrelated theoretical perspectives informed the research: interdisciplinary African arts theory, leadership and organizational theory, post- colonial theory, and qualitative educational methods’ perspectives. -
Integrating Legal Pluralism to ICRC's Task of Enhancing
Integrating Legal Pluralism to ICRC’s Task of Enhancing Compliance with International Humanitarian Law by Maria del Pilar Vanegas Guzman Faculty of Law McGill University, Montreal August, 2010 A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Laws (LL.M.) © Maria del Pilar Vanegas Guzman 2010 Abstract The latest public reports by the International Committee of the Red Cross demonstrate its increased operational tendency granting importance to diversity and contextualization in the multiple contexts where the humanitarian institution operates. These reports call for the use of imagination and creativity to face challenges not yet overcome though recognized at least a decade back -notably the recurrent record of non-compliance with the law of armed conflict while the numbers of victims of war grow at a worrying pace. This thesis explores whether the predominant positivist legal character within the ICRC -typical of the western legal tradition- contributes or instead constitutes an obstacle to the current operational trends. It is argued here that complementing the marked positivist view of law at the ICRC with pluralist perspectives would help ease the tension and bridge the gap that it is argued exists at the ICRC between the legal and the operational minds. The ground is ripe for the integration of positivist and pluralist approaches at the ICRC, since a pluralist vision of law is in line with the pragmatic operational perspectives at the ICRC. A pluralist vision would entail open appeal to the moral ingredient of law in an inclusive and non-hierarchical dialogue which would integrate the diversity of actors at war as active participants in the legal enterprise. -
Critical Legal Pluralism and the Law of the Ulayat: Resistant Legalities in a Plural Legal Reality”
“Critical Legal Pluralism and the Law of the Ulayat: Resistant Legalities in a Plural Legal Reality” Observing the Impact of RUPES in Paninggahan, West Sumatra: Implementation, Integration, and Reactions of Normative Reward Frameworks and Assessments for the Future Dr Lucy Finchett-Maddock School of Law, Birkbeck College Report, ICRAF Fellowship Bogor and Paninggahan 1 Abstract This paper reports on research conducted evaluating the appropriateness of a critical legal pluralist framework for understanding the complex relations between natural resources, law, the different stakeholders and their resultant actions, in Payments for Environmental Services (PES) schemes in legal pluralist settings. Suggestions will be made as to how this methodology can be utilised for the successful implementation of future schemes. Themes Critical Legal Pluralism; Legal Pluralism; Stakeholder Relations (Actor Interests); Embeddedness; Forum-Shopping; Natural Resource Management; Project Law; Rewards; Resistant Legalities; Payments for Environmental Services (PES) 2 Abbreviations BAL Basic Agrarian Law 1960 BMN Badan Perwakilan Anak Nagari BPAN Badan Perwakilan Anak Nagari CDM Clean Development Mechanism CLP Critical Legal Pluralism CLS Critical Legal Studies ES Environmental Services GPS Global Positioning System HuMa Perkumpulan untuk Pembaharuan Hukum Berbasis Masyarakat dan Ekologis ICRAF World Agroforestry Centre IMF International Monetary Fund KAN Kerapatan Adat Nagari PES Payments for Environmental Services RaTA Rapid Land Tenure Assessment Manual -
Articles Indigenizing Intellectual Property Law: Customary Law, Legal Pluralism, and the Protection of Indigenous Peoples'
\\server05\productn\T\TWL\15-2\TWL203.txt unknown Seq: 1 14-OCT-09 11:22 ARTICLES INDIGENIZING INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW: CUSTOMARY LAW, LEGAL PLURALISM, AND THE PROTECTION OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES’ RIGHTS, IDENTITY, AND RESOURCES Danielle M. Conway* I. INTRODUCTION Cultures live and cultures die. Cultures live by the transmission of law, knowledge, land, and resources from one generation to the next.1 Cultures die, in large measure, because of exploitation of peoples and * Professor of Law & Director, University of Hawai‘i Procurement Institute, University of Hawai‘i at Manoa, ¯ William S. Richardson School of Law. I wish to thank the traditional owners of the lands of First Peoples. A significant portion of this work was based upon my research and experiences as a 2006-2007 Fulbright Senior Scholar to Australia. My Fulbright experience was made possible by the Council for the International Exchange of Scholars, the Australian-American Fulbright Commis- sion, Canberra, ACT, Australia, Mark Darby, Lyndell Wilson, the William S. Richard- son School of Law, Ka Huli Ao Center of Excellence in Native Hawaiian Law, La Trobe University Faculty of Law and Management, Bundoora, VIC, Australia, and Artists in the Black, Sydney, NSW, Australia. I also wish to thank Terri Janke, Liz Cavanagh, Nick Parmeter, Tom Calma, Leah Lui-Chivizhe, Stewart O’Connell, Raelene Webb QC, Jackie Huggins, and Michael “Mick” Dodson for the education, community absorption, and the “Welcome to Country.” I am also grateful to the Texas Wesleyan University School of Law for inviting me to present this paper at the 2008 Law Review Symposium. For their support, I wish to thank Professor Jill J. -
Legal Pluralism 101
7 Legal Pluralism 101 William Twining I. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this chapter is to try to demystify the mainstream literature on legal pluralism for foreign consultants or activists concerned with poverty reduction in the global South. The chapter proceeds on the working assumption that such interventions are legitimate, welcome, and well informed. My standpoint is that of a British jurist interested in jurisprudence, legal anthro- pology, “Law and Development,” and the implications of “globalization” for the discipline and practice of law.1 The mainstream literature on legal pluralism draws on several disciplines and does not belong to a single intellectual tradition. It is accordingly difficult to generalize about it. However, I suggest that a high proportion of the anthropological and sociolegal literature up to the mid-1990s approximates to a single ideal type, here characterized as social fact legal pluralism (sflp). In the past fifteen years, the idea of global legal pluralism (glp) has become fashionable, but I argue that this is in many respects based on a qualitatively different lot of concerns and that, if there is a single subject or field encompassed by this idea, it needs to be relabeled. The mainstream literature contains a rich heritage of particular studies and some rather less satisfactory theorizing. One of the problems is that it has been bedeviled by an obsession with perennial jurisprudential problems surrounding the concept of law and legal positivism. It has rather neglected other theoretical issues about both pluralism and general normative theory. Part of the problem is that there is almost systematic ambiguity with regard to some of the central concepts.