DOCSLIB.ORG

New Security Mechanisms for Network Time Synchronization Protocols

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
New Security Mechanisms for Network Time Synchronization Protocols New Security Mechanisms for Network Time Synchronization Protocols Karen O’Donoghue Dieter Sibold Steffen Fries Internet Society PTB Siemens AG, CT RDA ITS Reston, Virgina, USA Braunschweig, Germany Munich, Germany [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Abstract— As evolving security concerns have prevailed, the Task Force (IETF), to provide updated security mechanisms network time synchronization protocol community has been for NTP. actively engaged in the development of improved security mechanisms for both the IEEE 1588 Precision Time Protocol The Precision Time Protocol (PTP, IEEE 1588) was (PTP) and the IETF Network Time Protocol (NTP). These originally published in 2002 with a focus on precision activities have matured to the point where this year should see synchronization for instrumentation, industrial automation, and the finalization of the first new security mechanisms for time military applications. The second version was finalized in 2008 protocols in ten years. This paper provides an overview of the [6] including more application use cases, such as telecom and two solutions being developed, compares and contrasts those enterprise environments. While the first version of PTP solutions, and discusses relevant use cases and deployment contained no security mechanisms, the second version was scenarios. published with an Experimental Annex (Annex K). Annex K specified a security solution that provided group source Keywords—time synchronization protocols; PTP; IEEE 1588; authentication, message integrity, and replay attack protection. NTP; NTS; security; authentication; integrity. However, Annex K was not well adopted and implemented, and a number of studies were published regarding its weaknesses. Therefore, the ongoing effort to revise IEEE 1588 I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND includes a plan to provide updated security mechanisms for Network time synchronization protocols have been PTP. evolving for over thirty years. At the beginning, security was There has been growing recognition by the network time not a priority because the security of timestamps was not seen synchronization community that the operational environment as an immediate need based on the requirements and use cases and the application use cases have changed significantly, and under consideration at the time. The protocols were lightweight security must now be addressed in a thorough and systematic and not deemed to put a burden onto the infrastructure. The manner. This evolution of time synchronization protocol perceived risk of attacks targeting clocks was quite low. This security requirements and motivations is discussed in some environment resulted in time synchronization protocols that did detail in [7]. This paper goes on to discuss the resulting work in not include security functionality in the initial designs. In the the IETF TICTOC working group and the IEEE PTP security intervening years synchronized time has become an important subcommittee to identify time synchronization security requirement not only in applications but also in security requirements. RFC 7384 [8] documents the results of that mechanisms themselves. Hence, as for other protocols and analysis. applications, security functionality has been identified as a necessary and integral part of network time synchronization The security approaches discussed in this paper provide approaches. security counter measures addressing these requirements. It connects to the previous work and provides an overview about The Network Time Protocol (NTP) was published as RFC the current state of standardization of the two emerging time 958 [1] initially in 1985 with the current version being synchronization approaches, IEEE 1588 (PTP) with integrated published as a standards track RFC (RFC 5905 [2]) in 2010. security and the IETF Network Time Security (NTS). As of These early versions of NTP provided a basic pre-shared key July 2017, the effort to address security in both the NTP and scheme for authentication of time servers by clients. However, the PTP technical communities is still in progress; however, it the pre-shared key approach did not scale enough for large has reached significant technical consensus over the past year. scale network deployments or the global Internet. Therefore, This paper is intended to provide the community with the the Autokey Authentication Protocol (RFC 5906 [3]) was technical highlights of both of the security approaches. published in 2010 to address the scaling issue. With Autokey, clients authenticate time servers using public key infrastructure II. PTP SECURITY (PKI) mechanisms. Security analysis, however, has The IEEE 1588 revision defines four solution classes demonstrated a number of security issues with Autokey. [4] (called prongs) to address the diversity of application [5]. Because of the shortcomings of pre-shared key and requirements and considerations identified in [8]. These Autokey, there is an ongoing effort in the Internet Engineering solution classes can be used individually or in combination. Instant key sharing is typically achieved by group based These classes of solutions include: A) integrated PTP security key management protocols like the Group Domain Of mechanisms; B) external transport security mechanisms; C) Interpretation (GDOI) and specified in RFC 6407 [9]. The architectural mechanisms; and D) monitoring and availability of the group key enables immediate security management. These classes are explained with more detail in processing of the received PTP messages. An example for the corresponding subsections. In addition to the four prongs, delayed key sharing is based on TESLA as specified in RFC the IEEE 1588 revision provides some additional information 4082 [10]. Here, the key is shared after its active usage time on security practices and considerations that can be used to and enables the security processing on the receiver side. The improve the security posture of the overall system. latter option requires the storage of the messages for later security checks but also enables source authentication directly. A. Integrated Security Mechanism The first approach utilizes a group key and enables immediate The first solution class being defined by the IEEE 1588 actions, but only ensures that a member of the group has Security Subcommittee is a security mechanism integrated into provided the message and not which member exactly. PTP itself. This solution class is intended to be deployable by any PTP system regardless of the underlying transport being The support of these various options stems from the nature used. It provides both authentication of the PTP entity and of multicast communication. Here, source authentication is integrity protection of the PTP message. It does not aim to viewed in two different ways: protect the confidentiality of the PTP message itself because of - The authentication source is a key distribution server the non-secret nature of the included timestamps. resulting in a distributed group key or The foundation of the PTP integrated security mechanism - The authentication source is the receiver of a PTP is a Security TLV (Tag Length Value) that is added as an packet directly resulting in a delayed key disclosure. extension to the PTP message being secured. The content of the securityTLV depends on the PTP entity communicating and the key management protocol being utilized. The format of the newly defined securityTLV is shown in Figure 1 below. As shown, the securityTLV is added at the end of the PTP message and contains, beyond other information, an Integrity Check Value (ICV), which ensures the authenticity of the PTP information. The ICV is built using a hash function (HMAC- SHA-256-128) or AES in MAC mode (AES-GMAC-128). The secret key is provided by the associated key management. The current draft of the IEEE 1588 revision does not require a FIGURE 2: SECURITY TLV CONTENT specific key management scheme, choosing instead to allow Figure 2 shows the general structure of the securityTLV. different key management approaches. There is an informative The detailed content is as follows: annex that suggests two specific approaches for different scenarios. These approaches are discussed in more detail - Security Parameter Pointer (SPP): Together with below. information from the PTP header like the source port identity, the SPP is used to find the right security association containing necessary key management parameter - secParamIndicator: indicates which of the optional fields are used - keyID: identifies the currently used key - disclosedKey: contains the disclosed key in the case of a delayed key sharing approach. This field is only used after a defined time period and is optional. - sequenceNumber: is an optional field to extend the sequence number field as part of the original PTP header FIGURE 1: SECURITY TLV EMBEDDED IN PTP MESSAGE - RES: is an optional reserved field for potential future use With the current definition of the securityTLV, both unicast - ICV: carries the integrity check value of the PTP and multicast PTP communication can be secured. This degree packet for the packet content as marked in Figure 1 of freedom was achieved by requiring an out-of-band key management mechanism. One of the primary challenges for the As stated above, PTP itself does not mandate any specific definition of the securityTLV in conjunction with key key management approach, but recommends two schemes, management was the need to provide the utilized key instantly which are outlined in the following
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Option 33: Dual Internal NTP Server Setup and Operation Guidelines
    -DISCONTINUED PRODUCT- Option 33: Dual Internal NTP Server Setup and Operation Guidelines Document No. PD0042100D – April 2009 Arbiter Systems, Inc. 1324 Vendels Circle, Suite 121 Paso Robles, CA 93446 U.S.A. (805) 237-3831, (800) 321-3831 http://www.arbiter.com mailto: [email protected] 1 Option 33: Dual Internal NTP Server 1.1 General Description Option 33, Dual Internal Network Time Protocol (NTP) Server, is used in the Arbiter Systems line of 19-inch, rack mount Satellite-Controlled Clocks. This option comes with a six-foot phone cable and RJ-11 to DB-9F adapter for connecting to the RS-232, or NTP Setup, port. 1.1.1 Option 33 Option 33 allows the clock to act as time server over an Ethernet network using the network time protocol operating in server mode - symmetric operation modes are not supported. Time is distributed over the network interface to computers, controllers and other equipment needing the correct time. Option 33 understands NTP Version 1, Version 2, and Version 3 frames, and optionally supports authentication via DES and MD5 cryptographic checksums. If authentication is not used, the controller can typically be used for hundreds of clients without overloading it. Authentication requires typically 40 ms for checking and generating the cryptograms, which is covered and averaged out by the protocol. Option 33 supports full SNTP and all NTP functions required for reliable server operation. Functions not required for server operation are not implemented. 1.1.2 Hardware Configuration. Option 33 consists of two building blocks; two OEM NTP modules and an interface to the GPS clock.
    [Show full text]
  • Netflix and Twitch Traffic Characterization
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies The Vault: Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2015-09-30 NetFlix and Twitch Traffic Characterization Laterman, Michel Laterman, M. (2015). NetFlix and Twitch Traffic Characterization (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. doi:10.11575/PRISM/27074 http://hdl.handle.net/11023/2562 master thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY NetFlix and Twitch Traffic Characterization by Michel Laterman A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE GRADUATE PROGRAM IN COMPUTER SCIENCE CALGARY, ALBERTA SEPTEMBER, 2015 c Michel Laterman 2015 Abstract Streaming video content is the largest contributor to inbound network traffic at the University of Calgary. Over five months, from December 2014 { April 2015, over 2.7 petabytes of traffic on 49 billion connections was observed. This thesis presents traffic characterizations for two large video streaming services, namely NetFlix and Twitch. These two services contribute a significant portion of inbound bytes. NetFlix provides TV series and movies on demand. Twitch offers live streaming of video game play. These services share many characteristics, including asymmetric connections, content delivery mechanisms, and content popularity patterns.
    [Show full text]
  • Network Time Protocol (NTP) General Overview
    Network Time Protocol (NTP) General Overview David L. Mills University of Delaware http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~mills mailto:[email protected] alautun, Maya glyph 2-Aug-04 1 Introduction z Network Time Protocol (NTP) synchronizes clocks of hosts and routers in the Internet. z NIST estimates 10-20 million NTP servers and clients deployed in the Internet and its tributaries all over the world. Every Windows/XP has an NTP client. z NTP provides nominal accuracies of low tens of milliseconds on WANs, submilliseconds on LANs, and submicroseconds using a precision time source such as a cesium oscillator or GPS receiver. z NTP software has been ported to almost every workstation and server platform available today - from PCs to Crays - Unix, Windows, VMS and embedded systems, even home routers. z The NTP architecture, protocol and algorithms have been evolved over the last two decades to the latest NTP Version 4 described in this and related briefings. 2-Aug-04 2 The Sun never sets on NTP z NTP is argueably the longest running, continuously operating, ubiquitously available protocol in the Internet – USNO and NIST, as well as equivalents in other countries, provide multiple NTP primary servers directly synchronized to national standard cesium clock ensembles and GPS – Over 230 Internet primary serversare in Australia, Canada, Chile, France, Germany, Isreal, Italy, Holland, Japan, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, UK, and US. z Well over a million Internet servers and clients all over the world – National and regional service providers BBN, MCI, Sprint, Alternet, etc. – Agencies and organizations: US Weather Service, US Treasury Service, IRS, PBS, Merrill Lynch, Citicorp, GTE, Sun, DEC, HP, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Which Time Server Option Is Best for Synchronizing Your Clocks
    WHICH TIME SERVER OPTION IS BEST FOR SYNCHRONIZING YOUR CLOCKS? Any electronic device that automatically displays REGARDING MASTER the current local time – your clocks, phone, tablet, TIME CONTROLLERS computer and even most TVs – has to pull that time from a time server. AND The time server acts as a messenger of sorts; IP NETWORK CLOCKS it reads the time from a reference clock and distributes that information via a computer network (ETHERNET OR WI-FI) to your device when the device requests it. The time server could be a local network time server or an internet time server. SNTP, or Simple Network Time Protocol, is an internet standard protocol that allows a clock or device to contact a server and get the current time. It’s a simplification of the more robustNTP (Network Time Protocol) and is used in most embedded devices and computers. Once the device receives the current Coordinated Universal Time (UTC), the device applies offsets such as time zone or daylight saving time considerations, as well as the time spent on the network retrieving the time, before displaying the accurate local time. January 2018 AMERICAN TIME WHITE PAPER BY: MAX BLOM When it comes to syncing time for your organization’s clocks, you have 3 options: Let’s take a look at how each of these options work, their pros and cons, and our recommendation. Port 123 is reserved specifically for External Server IP Address NTP/SNTP communication 1 The NIST – the U.S. Department of Commerce’s National Institute of Standards and Technology – is the primary source for synchronizing time systems in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Endrun TECHNOLOGIES Præcis Cntp Network Time Server
    Smarter Timing Solutions EndRun TECHNOLOGIES Præcis Cntp Network Time Server User’s Manual Præcis Cntp Network Time Server User’s Manual EndRun Technologies 1360 North Dutton Avenue #200 Santa Rosa, California USA 95401 Phone 707-573-8633 • Fax 707-573-8619 Preface Thank you for purchasing the Præcis Cntp Network Time Server. Our goal in developing this product is to bring precise, Universal Coordinated Time (UTC) into your network quickly, easily and reliably. Your new Præcis Cntp is fabricated using the highest quality materials and manufacturing processes available today, and will give you years of troublefree service. About EndRun Technologies Founded in 1998 and headquartered in Santa Rosa, California, we are the leaders in the exciting new time and frequency distribution technology based on the Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) mobile telecommunications infrastructure. Our innovative designs and painstaking attention to the details of efficient manufacturability have made us the first to bring this technology to the broad synchronization market at prices small businesses can afford. EndRun Technologies markets this technology in three major product lines: Network Time Sources/Servers – These units are configured for optimum performance in operation with network servers/networks running the Internet protocol known as the Network Time Protocol (NTP). Instrumentation Time and Frequency References – These products provide UTC traceable time and frequency signals for use in precision test and measurement instrumentation. OEM Time and Frequency Engines – These products provide the core time and frequency capabilities to our customers who require lower cost and tighter integration with their own products. About this manual This manual will guide you through simple installation and set up procedures.
    [Show full text]
  • Networkingsimple Network Time Protocol
    IBM i Version 7.2 Networking Simple Network Time Protocol IBM Note Before using this information and the product it supports, read the information in “Notices” on page 11. This document may contain references to Licensed Internal Code. Licensed Internal Code is Machine Code and is licensed to you under the terms of the IBM License Agreement for Machine Code. © Copyright International Business Machines Corporation 1998, 2013. US Government Users Restricted Rights – Use, duplication or disclosure restricted by GSA ADP Schedule Contract with IBM Corp. Contents Simple Network Time Protocol...............................................................................1 PDF file for Simple Network Time Protocol.................................................................................................1 SNTP concepts............................................................................................................................................. 1 SNTP client............................................................................................................................................. 2 SNTP server............................................................................................................................................ 2 Scenario: Synchronizing clocks with IBM i..................................................................................................3 Configuring System A as an SNTP client and server..............................................................................5 Configuring
    [Show full text]
  • NBAR2 Standard Protocol Pack 1.0
    NBAR2 Standard Protocol Pack 1.0 Americas Headquarters Cisco Systems, Inc. 170 West Tasman Drive San Jose, CA 95134-1706 USA http://www.cisco.com Tel: 408 526-4000 800 553-NETS (6387) Fax: 408 527-0883 © 2013 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 Release Notes for NBAR2 Standard Protocol Pack 1.0 1 CHAPTER 2 BGP 3 BITTORRENT 6 CITRIX 7 DHCP 8 DIRECTCONNECT 9 DNS 10 EDONKEY 11 EGP 12 EIGRP 13 EXCHANGE 14 FASTTRACK 15 FINGER 16 FTP 17 GNUTELLA 18 GOPHER 19 GRE 20 H323 21 HTTP 22 ICMP 23 IMAP 24 IPINIP 25 IPV6-ICMP 26 IRC 27 KAZAA2 28 KERBEROS 29 L2TP 30 NBAR2 Standard Protocol Pack 1.0 iii Contents LDAP 31 MGCP 32 NETBIOS 33 NETSHOW 34 NFS 35 NNTP 36 NOTES 37 NTP 38 OSPF 39 POP3 40 PPTP 41 PRINTER 42 RIP 43 RTCP 44 RTP 45 RTSP 46 SAP 47 SECURE-FTP 48 SECURE-HTTP 49 SECURE-IMAP 50 SECURE-IRC 51 SECURE-LDAP 52 SECURE-NNTP 53 SECURE-POP3 54 SECURE-TELNET 55 SIP 56 SKINNY 57 SKYPE 58 SMTP 59 SNMP 60 SOCKS 61 SQLNET 62 SQLSERVER 63 SSH 64 STREAMWORK 65 NBAR2 Standard Protocol Pack 1.0 iv Contents SUNRPC 66 SYSLOG 67 TELNET 68 TFTP 69 VDOLIVE 70 WINMX 71 NBAR2 Standard Protocol Pack 1.0 v Contents NBAR2 Standard Protocol Pack 1.0 vi CHAPTER 1 Release Notes for NBAR2 Standard Protocol Pack 1.0 NBAR2 Standard Protocol Pack Overview The Network Based Application Recognition (NBAR2) Standard Protocol Pack 1.0 is provided as the base protocol pack with an unlicensed Cisco image on a device.
    [Show full text]
  • New Milestone in Network Time Security As Internet Draft Approved
    New milestone in Network Time Security as Internet Draft approved Stockholm, Sweden - 27 March 2020- Netnod, a leading provider of interconnection and DNS services, is pleased to announce that the Internet Draft ‘Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol’ has been approved as a Proposed Standard. The approval came from the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG) on 25 March during the virtual IETF meeting. Netnod staff have been instrumental in developing this protocol which adds a much needed layer of security to the Network Time Protocol (NTP) and follows from Netnod’s launch of one of the first NTS-enabled NTP services in October 2019. The new standard (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-28) adds an important layer of security to NTP in a similar way that Transport Layer Security (TLS) adds security to the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP), which users can see in their web browsers as a closed padlock. As described in the Proposed Standard, NTS is: ”a mechanism for using Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Authenticated Encryption with Associated Data (AEAD) to provide cryptographic security for the client-server mode of the Network Time Protocol (NTP).” NTP, the most popular protocol in use for synchronizing time, is more than 30 years old and vulnerable to Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attacks. With many of today’s most important security processes dependent on accurate time, the consequences of receiving time from a malicious source are serious. Everything from establishing encrypted TLS sessions and using DNSSEC to time-stamping financial transactions and preventing online fraud depends on accurate and secure time.
    [Show full text]
  • IBM Z Server Time Protocol Guide
    Front cover Draft Document for Review August 3, 2020 1:37 pm SG24-8480-00 IBM Z Server Time Protocol Guide Octavian Lascu Franco Pinto Gatto Gobehi Hans-Peter Eckam Jeremy Koch Martin Söllig Sebastian Zimmermann Steve Guendert Redbooks Draft Document for Review August 3, 2020 7:26 pm 8480edno.fm IBM Redbooks IBM Z Server Time Protocol Guide August 2020 SG24-8480-00 8480edno.fm Draft Document for Review August 3, 2020 7:26 pm Note: Before using this information and the product it supports, read the information in “Notices” on page vii. First Edition (August 2020) This edition applies to IBM Server Time Protocol for IBM Z and covers IBM z15, IBM z14, and IBM z13 server generations. This document was created or updated on August 3, 2020. © Copyright International Business Machines Corporation 2020. All rights reserved. Note to U.S. Government Users Restricted Rights -- Use, duplication or disclosure restricted by GSA ADP Schedule Contract with IBM Corp. Draft Document for Review August 3, 2020 8:32 pm 8480TOC.fm Contents Notices . vii Trademarks . viii Preface . ix Authors. ix Comments welcome. .x Stay connected to IBM Redbooks . xi Chapter 1. Introduction to Server Time Protocol . 1 1.1 Introduction to time synchronization . 2 1.1.1 Insertion of leap seconds . 2 1.1.2 Time-of-Day (TOD) Clock . 3 1.1.3 Industry requirements . 4 1.1.4 Time synchronization in a Parallel Sysplex. 6 1.2 Overview of Server Time Protocol (STP) . 7 1.3 STP concepts and terminology . 9 1.3.1 STP facility . 9 1.3.2 TOD clock synchronization .
    [Show full text]
  • Encryption Is Futile: Delay Attacks on High-Precision Clock Synchronization 1
    R. ANNESSI, J. FABINI, F.IGLESIAS, AND T. ZSEBY: ENCRYPTION IS FUTILE: DELAY ATTACKS ON HIGH-PRECISION CLOCK SYNCHRONIZATION 1 Encryption is Futile: Delay Attacks on High-Precision Clock Synchronization Robert Annessi, Joachim Fabini, Felix Iglesias, and Tanja Zseby Institute of Telecommunications TU Wien, Austria Email: fi[email protected] Abstract—Clock synchronization has become essential to mod- endanger control decisions, and adversely affect the overall ern societies since many critical infrastructures depend on a functionality of a wide range of (critical) services that depend precise notion of time. This paper analyzes security aspects on accurate time. of high-precision clock synchronization protocols, particularly their alleged protection against delay attacks when clock syn- In recent years, security of clock synchronization received chronization traffic is encrypted using standard network security increased attention as various attacks on clock synchronization protocols such as IPsec, MACsec, or TLS. We use the Precision protocols (and countermeasures) were proposed. For this Time Protocol (PTP), the most widely used protocol for high- reason, clock synchronization protocols need to be secured precision clock synchronization, to demonstrate that statistical whenever used outside of fully trusted network environments. traffic analysis can identify properties that support selective message delay attacks even for encrypted traffic. We furthermore Clock synchronization protocols are specifically susceptible to identify a fundamental conflict in secure clock synchronization delay attacks since the times when messages are sent and between the need of deterministic traffic to improve precision and received have an actual effect on the receiver’s notion of the need to obfuscate traffic in order to mitigate delay attacks.
    [Show full text]
  • Simple Network Time Protocol
    IBM i 7.3 Networking Simple Network Time Protocol IBM Note Before using this information and the product it supports, read the information in “Notices” on page 15. This document may contain references to Licensed Internal Code. Licensed Internal Code is Machine Code and is licensed to you under the terms of the IBM License Agreement for Machine Code. © Copyright International Business Machines Corporation 1998, 2013. US Government Users Restricted Rights – Use, duplication or disclosure restricted by GSA ADP Schedule Contract with IBM Corp. Contents Simple Network Time Protocol...............................................................................1 What's new for IBM i 7.3..............................................................................................................................1 PDF file for Simple Network Time Protocol.................................................................................................1 SNTP and NTP concepts.............................................................................................................................. 2 SNTP client............................................................................................................................................. 2 SNTP server............................................................................................................................................ 3 NTP client................................................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Ipv6-Security Monitoring
    Security Monitoring ITU/APNIC/MICT IPv6 Security Workshop 23rd – 27th May 2016 Bangkok Last updated 22 July 2014 1 Managing and Monitoring IPv6 Networks p SNMP Monitoring p IPv6-Capable SNMP Management Tools p NetFlow Analysis p Syslog p Keeping accurate time p Intrusion Detection p Managing the Security Configuration 2 Using SNMP for Managing IPv6 Networks 3 What is SNMP? p SNMP – Simple Network Management Protocol p Industry standard, hundreds of tools exist to exploit it p Present on any decent network equipment p Query/response based: GET / SET p Monitoring generally uses GET p Object Identifiers (OIDs) p Keys to identify each piece of data p Concept of MIB (Management Information Base) p Defines a collection of OIDs What is SNMP? p Typical queries n Bytes In/Out on an interface, errors n CPU load n Uptime n Temperature or other vendor specific OIDs p For hosts (servers or workstations) n Disk space n Installed software n Running processes n ... p Windows and UNIX have SNMP agents What is SNMP? p UDP protocol, port 161 p Different versions n v1 (1988) – RFC1155, RFC1156, RFC1157 p Original specification n v2 – RFC1901 ... RFC1908 + RFC2578 p Extends v1, new data types, better retrieval methods (GETBULK) p Used is version v2c (simple security model) n v3 – RFC3411 ... RFC3418 (w/security) p Typically we use SNMPv2 (v2c) SNMP roles p Terminology: n Manager (the monitoring station) n Agent (running on the equipment/server) How does it work? p Basic commands n GET (manager → agent) p Query for a value n GET-NEXT (manager → agent) p Get next value (e.g.
    [Show full text]