ARTICLE IN PRESS
Atmospheric Environment 41 (2007) 7588–7602 www.elsevier.com/locate/atmosenv
Atmospheric oxalic acid and SOA production from glyoxal: Results of aqueous photooxidation experiments
Annmarie G. Carltona, Barbara J. Turpinb,Ã, Katye E. Altieric, Sybil Seitzingerc, Adam Reffd, Ho-Jin Lime, Barbara Ervensf
aASMD, ARL, NOAA, Mail Drop E-243-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA bDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Rutgers University, 14 College Farm Road, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA cInstitute of Marine and Coastal Sciences, Rutgers University, Rutgers/NOAA CMER Program, 71 Dudley Road, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA dAMD, NERL, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA eDepartment of Environmental Engineering, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 702-701, Republic of Korea fDepartment of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
Received 12 February 2007; received in revised form 3 May 2007; accepted 16 May 2007
Abstract
Aqueous-phase photooxidation of glyoxal, a ubiquitous water-soluble gas-phase oxidation product of many compounds, is a potentially important global and regional source of oxalic acid and secondary organic aerosol (SOA). Reaction kinetics and product analysis are needed to validate and refine current aqueous-phase mechanisms to facilitate prediction of in-cloud oxalic acid and SOA formation from glyoxal. In this work, aqueous-phase photochemical reactions of glyoxal and hydrogen peroxide were conducted at pH values typical of clouds and fogs (i.e., pH ¼ 4–5). Experimental time series concentrations were compared to values obtained using a published kinetic model and reaction rate constants from the literature. Experimental results demonstrate the formation of oxalic acid, as predicted by the published aqueous phase mechanism. However, the published mechanism did not reproduce the glyoxylic and oxalic acid concentration dynamics. Formic acid and larger multifunctional compounds, which were not previously predicted, were also formed. An expanded aqueous-phase oxidation mechanism for glyoxal is proposed that reasonably explains the concentration dynamics of formic and oxalic acids and includes larger multifunctional compounds. The coefficient of determination for oxalic acid prediction was improved from 0.001 to 40.8 using the expanded mechanism. The model predicts that less than 1% of oxalic acid is formed through the glyoxylic acid pathway. This work supports the hypothesis that SOA forms through cloud processing of glyoxal and other water-soluble products of alkenes and aromatics of anthropogenic, biogenic and marine origin and provides reaction kinetics needed for oxalic acid prediction. r 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Secondary organic aerosol; Aqueous-phase atmospheric chemistry; Glyoxal; Oxalic acid; Organic PM; Cloud processing
1. Introduction
The generally poor understanding of the sources ÃCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 732 932 9800x6219; fax: +1 732 932 8644. and formation of secondary organic particulate E-mail address: [email protected] (B.J. Turpin). matter (PM) is a major source of uncertainty in
1352-2310/$ - see front matter r 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.05.035 ARTICLE IN PRESS A.G. Carlton et al. / Atmospheric Environment 41 (2007) 7588–7602 7589 predictions of aerosol concentrations and properties pH values typical of clouds. Differences between that affect health, visibility and climate (EPA, 2004; aqueous- and gas-phase chemistry suggest that SOA IPCC, 2001; Kanakidou et al., 2005). There is formation from aldehydes is more favorable in the growing evidence suggesting that, like sulfate, aqueous phase than in the gas phase. The aqueous secondary organic aerosol (SOA) is formed through medium enables formation of new structures (i.e., aqueous-phase reactions in clouds, fogs and aero- gem diols) whose functional groups are oxidized sols (Blando and Turpin, 2000; Warneck, 2003; during reactions with dOH and other oxidants, Ervens et al., 2004; Crahan et al., 2004; Gelencser while the C–C bond structure is initially preserved. and Varga, 2005; Lim et al., 2005; Carlton et al., In contrast, in the gas phase, C–C bonds are usually 2006; Altieri et al., 2006). However, this formation broken yielding smaller, more volatile compounds pathway is poorly understood. As was the case for (e.g., GLY oxidizes to form volatile compounds, sulfate, model simulation is needed to evaluate the HO2, CO, HCHO, in the gas phase; Atkinson et al., regional and global importance of SOA formed as a 2006). result of aqueous-phase atmospheric chemistry. GLY is the gas-phase oxidation product of many This effort is hampered by the lack of kinetic data compounds of anthropogenic (Kleindienst et al., for recognized pathways and because many pro- 1999; Atkinson, 2000; Volkamer et al., 2001; ducts and pathways are unknown. Magneron et al., 2005; Volkamer et al., 2005), A large gap between measurements and model biogenic (Atkinson, 2000; Spaulding et al., 2003), predictions of organic PM was recently observed in and marine (Miller and Moran, 1997; Warneck, the free troposphere (Heald et al., 2005). This 2003) origin. It is found widely in the environment discrepancy might arise from atmospheric processes in the gas and aerosol phases and in cloud, fog and not yet parameterized in current models, such as in- dew water (Sempere and Kawamura, 1994; Matsu- cloud SOA formation. In-cloud SOA formation is moto et al., 2005). While GLY is present at likely to enhance organic PM concentrations in the concentrations (5–280 mM in cloud water; Munger free troposphere and organic aerosol concentrations et al., 1990) lower than SO2, at cloud relevant pH in locations affected by regional pollutant transport. the water solubility of GLY (effective Henry’s law 5 1 Predictions and experiments provide strong support constant, Heff43 10 M atm at 25 1C; Betterton for the following. Alkene and aromatic emissions and Hoffmann, 1988) is 3 orders of magnitude are oxidized in the interstitial spaces of clouds; the greater than that of SO2. (Cloud processing is an water-soluble products partition into cloud dro- important pathway for particulate sulfate formation plets, where they oxidize further forming low from SO2; Seinfeld and Pandis, 1998.) Also, GLY volatility compounds that remain at least in part has fast uptake by droplets (Schweitzer et al., 1998), in the particle phase after droplet evaporation, is observed in cloud water, and is highly reactive in forming SOA (Blando and Turpin, 2000; Warneck, the aqueous phase (Buxton et al., 1997). Therefore, 2003; Ervens et al., 2004; Crahan et al., 2004; since GLY is ubiquitous in the environment, can Gelencser and Varga, 2005; Lim et al., 2005; enter a cloud or fog droplet readily, and is predicted Carlton et al., 2006; Altieri et al., 2006). Recent to form low volatility compounds through aqueous- kinetic modeling supports in-cloud oxalic acid and phase photooxidation, SOA formation through thus SOA formation from glyoxal (GLY) and other cloud processing of GLY is likely. It is important gas-phase precursors (Warneck, 2003; Ervens et al., to note that low volatility products (e.g., glyoxylic 2004; Lim et al., 2005). Measured atmospheric and oxalic acids) are expected from aqueous-phase concentration dynamics suggest that GLY is an in- GLY oxidation but gas-phase oxidation produces cloud precursor for carboxylic acids (Chebbi and high volatility compounds (e.g., HO2, CO, HCHO) Carlier, 1996) that likely contribute to SOA due to not expected to contribute to SOA directly (Ervens their low volatility (e.g., glyoxylic and oxalic acids). et al., 2004). Other similar water-soluble organics Batch photochemical experiments support the in- are found in clouds (Kawamura et al., 1996a, b) and cloud SOA hypothesis through product analysis are likely to contribute to in-cloud SOA formation that demonstrates low volatility product formation as well (e.g., methylglyoxal and glycolaldehyde; from GLY (e.g., glyoxylic acid, Buxton et al., 1997) Warneck, 2003; Ervens et al., 2004; Lim et al., and pyruvic acid (e.g., glyoxylic and oxalic acids, 2005). Carlton et al., 2006, and larger oligomeric com- Dicarboxylic acids are similarly ubiquitous in the pounds, Altieri et al., 2006; Guzman et al., 2006)at atmosphere and oxalic acid is the most abundant ARTICLE IN PRESS 7590 A.G. Carlton et al. / Atmospheric Environment 41 (2007) 7588–7602 dicarboxylic acid (Kawamura et al., 1996a, b; Yu (OH) CHCH(OH) a 2 2 et al., 2005). Primary sources of oxalic acid exist (glyoxal-hydrated) ·OH c (e.g., fossil fuel combustion), however they are b k = 3E10 ·OH k = 5E3 insufficient to support measured ambient concen- ·OH k = 1.1E8 H O 2 2 large trations (Yu et al., 2005). There is growing evidence ·OH H2O2 multifunctional (OH) CHCOOH HCOOH from atmospheric observations that oxalic acid is a 2 compounds (glyoxylic acid-hydrated) (formic acid) product of cloud processing (Kawamura and Gagosian, 1987; Kawamura and Usukura, 1993; ·OH ·OH ·OH Chebbi and Carlier, 1996; Crahan et al., 2004; Yu et ·OH HOOCCOOH CO al., 2005; Sorooshian et al., 2006; Heald et al., (oxalic acid) 2 2006). For example, Crahan et al. (2004) measured in-cloud and below-cloud oxalate in the coastal Fig. 1. Aqueous-phase glyoxal oxidation pathways. Glyoxal, marine atmosphere and found that, as for sulfate glyoxylic acid and glyoxylate are predominantly hydrated in solution (Ervens et al., 2003b). The initial mechanism (pathway with a known in-cloud production mechanism, the ‘‘b’’, shaded) is adapted from Ervens et al. (2004). Pathways ‘‘a’’ in-cloud concentration was approximately three and ‘‘c’’ are supported by experimental evidence contained times the below-cloud concentration and the size herein. distributions of sulfate-containing and oxalate- containing particles were similar. Sorooshian et al. Table 1 (2006) compared measured and modeled in-cloud Glyoxal experimental design oxalate concentrations from the International Con- sortium for Atmospheric Research on Transport Initial glyoxal conc. 2 mM and Transformation (ICARTT) study and con- Initial H2O2 conc. 10 mM Number of experiments 2 cluded that cloud processing was the major source pH 4.1–4.8 of atmospheric oxalate. They observed that (1) the Temperature 2571 1C detection frequency and particulate oxalate concen- Experiment GLY+UV+H2O2 tration in cloud-free air parcels were significantly UV control GLY+H2O2 lower than for samples collected in-cloud, (2) the H2O2 control GLY+UV Organic control UV+H O highest oxalate concentrations (aerosol and droplet 2 2 residuals) were observed in clouds influenced by Note: GLY ¼ glyoxal. anthropogenic plumes, and (3) sulfate and oxalate were correlated though they are not linked by hypothesis that SOA forms through cloud proces- production chemistry. sing. Current aqueous-phase models that predict in- cloud oxalic acid formation from GLY assume 2. Methods GLY is oxidized to glyoxylic acid and subsequently to oxalic acid (shaded pathway, Fig. 1). However, 2.1. Batch reactions organic product analysis in previous GLY aqueous oxidation experiments was limited to glyoxylic acid Batch photochemical aqueous reactions of (Buxton et al., 1997); oxalic acid formation was not GLY and hydrogen peroxide were conducted as confirmed, nor was the potential formation of other described previously in detail (Carlton et al., 2006). low volatility products investigated. The controlled Experimental conditions are listed in Table 1.UV laboratory experiments and product analysis pre- photolysis of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) provided sented below demonstrate the formation of oxalic a source of dOH for GLY oxidation. The UV acid and other low volatility products from aqueous source was a low-pressure monochromatic (254 nm) photooxidation of GLY at pH values typical of mercury lamp (Heraeus Noblelight, Inc. Duluth, clouds. Detailed product analysis was used to GA) in a quartz immersion well in the center identify major mechanistic revisions that enabled of a 1 L borosilicate reaction vessel (ACE Glass accurate prediction of oxalic acid formation in the Inc., Vineland, NJ). For each experiment reaction vessel. The expanded reaction mechanism (GLY+UV+H2O2), three types of control experi- can be used to refine cloud chemistry models. The ments were performed: (1) GLY+H2O2 without formation of low volatility species through aqueous UV, (2) GLY+UV without H2O2, and (3) photooxidation of GLY provides support to the H2O2+UV without GLY. ARTICLE IN PRESS A.G. Carlton et al. / Atmospheric Environment 41 (2007) 7588–7602 7591
Reaction solutions were prepared in 1 L volu- 2.2. Analytical procedures metric flasks and then poured into the reaction vessel. Solutions were continuously mixed, main- 2.2.1. High-performance liquid chromatography tained at constant temperature and ambient UV (HPLC)– UV/Vis analysis of organic acids penetration was minimized. All experiments began Organic acid analysis is described in detail in the with oxygen-saturated solutions. Samples for H2O2 supporting information of Carlton et al. (2006). and organic analysis were taken as follows. The first Briefly, all standards and samples were analyzed in sample was taken directly from the volumetric flask. triplicate for carboxylic acids by HPLC with UV The second sample was taken immediately after the absorbance detection at 205 nm (Beckman Coulter, solution transfer to the reaction vessel, with a third System Gold, Fullerton, CA). The HPLC employed sample taken after 5 min. Samples were then an Alltech, organic acid ion exclusion column (OA taken at 10 min intervals for the 1 h experiment 2000) with the corresponding guard column. The (Experiment 1) and 30 min intervals, with an extra stationary phase was sulfonated polystyrene divi- sample during the first hour, for the 5+ h nylbenzene and is specifically designed to retain experiment (Experiment 2). H2O2 in the experiment only compounds with organic acid and/or alcohol and control samples was destroyed through the functional groups (www.alltechweb.com). Com- 1 addition of catalase (H2O2-H2O) (0.25 mL1mL pounds containing multiple functional groups are of sample) immediately after sampling (Stefan expected to interact with the column multiple times et al., 1996). Samples were stored frozen until and generate broad peaks, according to column analysis. specifications. Compounds without these function- Initial GLY concentrations in the experiments alities, should they be present, are not retained by were greater than those typically found in cloud the column and elute immediately. In the chroma- and fog droplets (Matsumoto et al., 2005), but togram unretained products are contained within concentrations this high have occasionally been the void volume, the initial peak associated with observed in the ambient atmosphere (Munger et al., sample injection. The mobile phase was H2SO4 1995). It is worth noting also that cloud droplet (pH ¼ 2.3); the flow rate was 0.7 mL min 1 and the evaporation leaves aerosol particles with very column temperature was maintained at 45 1C. The concentrated aqueous solutions (i.e., exceeding mean absorbance (71 standard deviation of tripli- concentrations used in these experiments). End cate analyses) was used for quantitation. Multi- products and reaction rate constants for GLY variate calibration was used to quantify organic experiments are not expected to be concentration acids analyzed by HPLC–UV. Partial least squares dependent below 1 M (above 1 M, GLY poly- (PLS) regression models (Martens and Naes, 1989) merizes) (Whipple, 1970; Kunen et al., 1983; were built from concentrations and chromatograms Hastings et al., 2005). of calibration standards spanning the range of Reaction solutions were prepared with excess sample concentrations and applied to experimental oxidant in order to have pseudo-first-order kinetics samples using Statistical Analysis System software with regard to GLY. However, initial oxidant levels (SAS, V8.2, Cary, NC). A set of 25 calibration were limited by the need to keep quenching times mixtures with orthogonal concentrations (Brereton, (i.e., time to completely destroy H2O2 in the 1997) was used to quantify glyoxylic and oxalic samples) short and maintain laboratory safety acid. Formic and acetic acids were calibrated with (e.g., by using H2O2 concentrations and H2O2-to- single component standards at five concentration catalase ratios that have been previously employed; values. GLY and catalase were analyzed alone and Stefan et al., 1996). The quenching time was less added to 12% of the calibration standards. Neither than 2 min for the first sample and sharply was detected in the chromatograms, and chromato- decreased with time as the H2O2 concentration in grams of standards with and without GLY and the reaction solutions decreased. Initial modeling catalase were indistinguishable. (GLY was detected using state-of-the-art aqueous-phase mechanisms by electrospray ionization–mass spectrometry, for GLY (Ervens et al., 2004; Lim et al., 2005) ESI–MS; see below.) Ten percent of the mixture suggested that the initial conditions of Table 1 standards were re-analyzed and independent single would yield intermediate and end product concen- component standards were analyzed to assess trations that would be sufficiently above detection analytical accuracy. Recoveries for individual acids limits on the time scale of the experiments. were calculated by placing standards in the reaction ARTICLE IN PRESS 7592 A.G. Carlton et al. / Atmospheric Environment 41 (2007) 7588–7602 vessel and sampling the solution as for experimental a capillary voltage of 3000 V. Nitrogen was the samples. Ten percent of experiment samples drying gas (350 1C, 24 psig, 10 L min 1). The unit were collected in duplicate to determine method mass resolution spectra were recorded on Agilent precision. software (Chemstation version A.07.01) and ex- ported to Access and Excel (Microsoft, Inc.) for 2.2.2. Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) statistical analysis and interpretation. H2O2 in the time series samples was quantified by The ESI–MS uses a soft ionization process that the triiodide method (Klassen et al., 1994) within 1 h does not fragment compounds at the low voltages of sampling. Solutions were prepared according to used and provides molecular weight information Allen et al. (1952) and were not stored longer than 1 with unit mass resolution. The positive ionization month. Calibration was performed with 5 H2O2 mode protonates compounds with basic functional concentration values and a blank of milli-Q water groups (e.g. methyl, carbonyl) while the negative (18 MO). All samples were analyzed in triplicate, ionization mode deprotonates compounds with one calibration standard was re-analyzed after acidic functional groups (e.g. carboxylic acids). sample analysis and one independent standard was Single and mixed standards of GLY, glyoxylic acid analyzed during calibration. Method detection and oxalic acid (plus H2O2 at a 1:2 ratio and limits were determined from analysis of 8 indepen- catalase (0.5%)) were analyzed using the same dent blank solutions, 8 times. instrument conditions as the experimental samples (see Supporting Information, Figure S-1). Oxalic 2.2.3. Photon flux acid (m/z 89) and glyoxylic acid (m/z 73) were The lamp intensity was measured before and after detected as monomers in the negative mode as the GLY experiments using iodide–iodate actino- would be expected for carboxylic acids (Figure S-1). metry (Rahn et al., 2003). Briefly, a 1 L actinometer GLY was detected in the positive mode as a dimer solution of 0.6 M KI, 0.1 M KIO3 and 0.01 M (m/z 117; twice molecular weight plus one). Na2B4O7 10H2O (borax) at pH 9.25 is prepared Aldehyde dimerization is common during ESI immediately prior to the photon flux measurement. analysis, in particular for GLY (Hastings et al., The reactor is filled with actinometer solution and 2005; Loeffler et al., 2006). In addition to the GLY exposed to the mercury lamp. Samples are collected dimer ion, a second qualifying ion (m/z 131) was as quickly as possible ( every 40 s). The absorbance detected for GLY. The composition of this ion is of the solution is measured immediately with a unknown, but it appears in concert with the main spectrometer at 476 nm. An absorbance blank of GLY ion, and linearly increases in ion abundance milli-Q water was subtracted from the sample when GLY concentration increases. The qualifier absorbances for photon flux calculations, described ion was used for identification purposes only. below. The intensity of the irradiation source received by solutions in the reaction vessel was calculated using the method described by Murov (1973). 2.2.5. Dissolved organic carbon (DOC), pH, dissolved oxygen and temperature 2.2.4. ESI– MS Samples were analyzed for bulk DOC using a Selected samples were analyzed by ESI/MS (HP- Shimadzu 5000A high-temperature combustion Agilent 1100) as described previously (Seitzinger et analyzer (Sharp et al., 1993). The initial and final al., 2005; Altieri et al., 2006). Qualitative ESI results pH (Oakton Instruments Vernon Hills, IL) and are presented here. An autosampler injected sample dissolved oxygen (DO; YSI Inc., Yellowsprings, solutions (20 mL) from individual vials into a liquid OH) concentrations were also measured. The pH chromatography (LC) system, which introduces the meter was calibrated at pH ¼ 4, 7, and 10; verifica- sample into the ESI source region. All samples were tion standards (pH ¼ 2, H2SO4;pH¼ 3, HClO4) analyzed with no LC column attached. The mobile were analyzed each day of use. DO readings were phase was 60:40 v/v 100% methanol and 0.05% verified daily using O2-saturated solutions with formic acid in deionized water with a flow rate of known saturation values. Temperature was mea- 0.220 mL min 1. Samples were analyzed in the sured throughout the experiment with an alcohol negative and positive mode over the mass range thermometer that was verified 72 1Cattwo 50–1000 amu with a fragmentor voltage of 40 V and temperatures. ARTICLE IN PRESS A.G. Carlton et al. / Atmospheric Environment 41 (2007) 7588–7602 7593
2.3. Modeling glyoxylic acid (m/z 73) and oxalic acid (m/z 89) were detected in the negative mode. Note that Carboxylic acid concentration time profiles were formic acid has a molecular weight below the predicted using a commercially available differential ESI–MS instrument detection limit (m/z 50). The equation solver (FACSIMILE; AEA Technology, ESI–MS and HPLC control experiment results are Oxfordshire, UK). Initial kinetic modeling was provided in Supporting Information. based on the aqueous-phase mechanism of Ervens et al. (2004), which is summarized in Fig. 1 (shaded 3.2. Photon flux pathway) and reactions 1–16 in Table 2. The corollary anion reactions and the acid/base equili- The calculated mean intensities from photon bria are not depicted in Fig. 1 though they occur fluence measurements conducted before and after (Stefan et al., 1996; Ervens et al., 2003a, b) and were d the GLY experiments agreed within one standard included in the model. The concentration of OH d deviation. Hence, these experiments demonstrated was not explicitly measured; the OH concentration that the received lamp intensity was constant during time series was predicted (Table 2, reactions 1–4; the experiments and the H O photolysis reaction Liao and Gurol, 1995) and the accuracy of these 2 2 rates (reaction 1 in Table 2) were constant across the predictions was verified with H O measurements as 2 2 experiments. The photolysis reaction rate constant shown below. After examination of the concentra- (k in Table 2) was determined as described below. tion dynamics of products, an expanded reaction 1 mechanism was proposed (all pathways, Fig. 1; all reactions, Table 2). The expanded mechanism, 3.3. Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) measured concentrations and the differential equa- d tion solver were used to fit unknown reaction rate The photolytic decomposition of H2O2 to OH in constants and predict the formation of newly pure water is well understood (Liao and Gurol, identified products. 1995; Stefan et al., 1996) and is described in the first 4 reactions of Table 2.H2O2 concentrations from 3. Quality control results H2O2+UV control experiments (N ¼ 2) and model predictions agree well (Fig. 2) providing confidence 3.1. Organic measurements that concentrations of dOH are described well in the experiments. (Note that reaction rate constants The HPLC analysis was used for identification k2–k4 are known and the photolysis rate (k1) and quantification of compounds, while the depends on photon fluence from the lamp and was ESI–MS analysis was used only for identification a fitted parameter.) While experimental and control of compounds. The PLS and single-acid calibrations solutions were prepared with 10 mM H2O2,anH2O2 described more than 96% of the variance in concentration of 8 mM was used to initialize the concentration of each carboxylic acid in the com- model simulation because H2O2 concentrations in plex mixture standards analyzed by the HPLC. the GLY+H2O2 control experiments were stable at Quality control measures for organic acids are given 8 mM (see Supporting Information, Figure S-2). d in Table 3. Recoveries were high, and the lowest This is reasonable because H2O2 photolyzes to OH recovery (80%) was obtained for the most volatile at wavelengths (l) present in ambient light and the compound (formic acid) as expected. (Formic acid solution was exposed to ambient light for the 3- concentrations were corrected for recoveries.) Meth- 4 min required for solution preparation and transfer od detection limits were determined from analysis of into the shielded reaction vessel. H2O2 was not eight ‘‘organic control’’ (i.e., H2O2 and UV) samples detected in the GLY+UV control samples. H2O2 (Greenberg et al., 1991). Method precision is the photodecomposition experiments (H2O2+UV) pooled coefficient of variation of concentrations have also been performed at an initial H2O2 measured in duplicate samples. Accuracy was concentration of 20 mM (i.e., as part of the pyruvic calculated as the percent difference between the acid experiments; Carlton et al., 2006). The model actual and measured concentrations of independent also successfully reproduced these measurements. standards of individual compounds not used in the These experiments provided a photolysis reaction calibration models. In the ESI–MS, GLY (m/z 117, rate constant of 1.0(70.2) 10 4 s 1, which was 131) was detected in the positive mode, while used in model simulations (Table 2, reaction 1) and ARTICLE IN PRESS 7594 A.G. Carlton et al. / Atmospheric Environment 41 (2007) 7588–7602
Table 2 Glyoxal oxidation mechanism (initial: reactions 1–16; expanded: reactions 1–28)
Reaction Rate constant (M 1 s 1) Reference Estimated, measured or fitted