DOCSLIB.ORG

Summer 2005 Airline Schedule

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Summer 2005 Airline Schedule 29 March 2005 Narita International Airport Corporation Summer 2005 Airline Schedule (1) International Service （Unit：Flights) ＊ This chart has been compiled by NAA based on IATA Weekly Flights Increase/decrease Weekly Flights Increase/decrease adjusted data and differs in part to that compiled Category Code Airline Category Code Airline Win 04 ① Sum 05 ② ②－① Win 04 ① Sum 05 ② ②－① by the MLIT. ＡＡＬ American Airlines 80 82 2 ＡＦＬ Aeroflot-Russian Airlines 8 10 2 ＡＣＩ Air Caledonie International 10 10 ＡＦＲ Air France 8 8 ＡＦＲ Air France 34 40 6 ＡＨＫ※ Air Hong Kong 10 10 ＡＺＡ Alitalia 20 20 ＡＮＡ All Nippon Airways 24 24 ＊ The summer '05 schedule figures are based on actual ＢＡＷ British Airways 28 28 ＣＡＬ China Airlines 4 4 figures for the 7 day period from 10 to 16 Apr 2005. ＣＰＡ Cathay Pacific Airways 70 70 ＣＥＳ China Eastern Airlines 4 4 ＦＩＮ Finnair 4 4 ＣＰＡ Cathay Pacific Airways 14 14 ＫＡＬ Korean Air 98 98 ＤＬＨ※ Lufthansa Cargo 6 6 ＊ The winter '04 schedule figures are based on actual ＫＬＭ KLM Royal Dutch Airlines 14 14 ＦＤＸ※ Federal Express 104 104 figures for the 7 day period from 21 to 27 Nov 2004. ＮＷＡ Northwest Airlines 308 310 2 ＪＡＡ Japan Asia Airways 10 10 Terminal 1 ＳＩＡ Singapore Airlines 54 54 ＪＡＬ Japan Airlines 92 90 △ 2 ＴＨＴ Air Tahiti Nui 6 6Cargo Services ＫＡＬ Korean Air 8 8 ＵＡＬ United Airlines 210 196 △ 14 ＭＡＳ Malaysia Airlines 2 2 ＵＳＡ US Airways ＮＣＡ※ Nippon Cargo Airlines 88 82 △ 6 ＶＩＲ Virgin Atlantic Airwyas 14 14 ＮＷＡ Northwest Airlines 72 67 △ 5 ＶＲＧ VARIG-Brazilian Airlines 8 8 ＰＡＣ※ Polar Air Cargo 18 18 Sub-total （16 Airlines） 958 954 △ 4 ＳＱＣ※ Singapore Airlines Cargo 2 2 ＡＡＲ Asiana Airlines 56 56 ＵＰＳ※ United Parcel Service 52 52 ＡＣＡ Air Canada 28 28 Total cargo flights （18 Airlines） 526 515 △ 11 ＡＦＬ Aeroflot-Russian Airlines 14 14 Total international flights （66 Airlines） 3,316 3,319 3 ＡＩＣ Air India 8 8 Daily average 474 474 ＡＪＸ Air Japan 14 14 *The 66 airlines on international service include 59 passenger services and 7(※) of the 18 cargo services. ＡＬＫ SriLankan Airlines 6 6 ＡＮＡ All Nippon Airways 302 312 10 (2) Domestic Service (Passenger Flights） (4) Usage rate of Runways A and B' ＡＮＧ Air Niugini 2 2 （Unit： Flights) （Unit： Flights) ＡＮＫ Air Nippon 14 14 Weekly Flights rease/decrease Code Airline Runway･ Slots Winter '04 Summer '05Usage Rate ＡＮＺ Air New Zealand 14 14 Win 04 ① Sum 05 ② ②－① ＡＵＡ Austrian Airlines 12 12 （ＡＬＳ） (Air Central) 28 △ 28 Runway A 2,562 2,519 2,517 98.2% ＢＢＣ Biman Bangladesh Airlines 2 2 ＡＮＡ All Nippon Airways 84 112 28 ＣＡＬ China Airlines 54 54 ＦＲＩ IBEX Airlines 70 70 Runway B' 1,232 1,035 1,040 84.4% ＣＣＡ Air China 64 64 ＪＡＬ Japan Airlines 42 56 14 ＣＥＳ China Eastern Airlines 44 44 （ＪＡＲ） (J-AIR) 14 △ 14 Total 3,794 3,554 3,557 93.8% ＣＭＩ Continental Micronesia 42 42 Total domestic flights （3 Airlines） 238 238 ＣＯＡ Continental Airlines 28 28 Daily average 34 34 Passenger Service ＣＳＮ China Southern Airlines 30 30 ＣＳＨ Shanghai Airlines ＤＡＬ Delta Air Lines 14 14 (3) Grand Total (5) Comparison with Summer 2004 Schedule ＤＬＨ Lufthansa German Airlines 26 26 （Unit：Flights) （Unit：Flights) ＥＶＡ EVA Airways 28 28 Weekly Flights ncrease/decrease Weekly Flights Increase/decrease Category Category ＦＪＩ Air Pacific 6 6 Win 04 ① Sum 05 ② ②－① Sum 04 ③ Sum 05 ② ②－③ ＧＩＡ Garuda Indonesia 14 14 Total international and domestic flights 3554 3557 3 Total 2,768 2,804 36 Terminal 2 Passenger ＨＤＡ Dragonair 14 14 Daily average 508 508 0 Day avg. 395 401 6 ＨＶＮ Vietnam Ailines 22 22 Total 526 515 △ 11 Cargo･ ＩＢＥ Iberia Day avg. 75 74 △ 1 ＩＲＡ Iran Air 4 4 Total 3,294 3,319 25 Total ＪＡＡ Japan Asia Airways 54 56 2 Int'l. Service Day avg. 471 474 4 ＪＡＬ Japan Airlines 609 614 5 Total 224 238 14 Dom. Service･･ ＪＡＺ JALways 99 98 △ 1 Day avg. 32 34 2 ＭＡＳ Malaysia Airlines 28 28 Total 3,518 3,557 39 Grand Total ＭＧＬ MIAT Mongolian Airlines 4 6 2 Day avg. 503 508 6 ＭＳＲ Egyptair 6 6 ＭＸＡ Mexicana ＰＡＬ Phillipine Airlines 26 24 △ 2 ◎ No. of Airlines at Narita Airport: 67 airlines (39 countries & 2 regions) As of 29 Mar. 2005 ＰＩＡ Pakistan International Airlines 4 4 ＱＦＡ Qantas Airways 62 62 1. New airlines: 0 ＳＡＳ SAS Scandinavian Airlines System 14 14 ＊ New airline on int'l service scheduled on 19 May 2005: Xiamen Airlines (code share service using JAL aircraft). ＳＷＲ Swiss International Air Lines 10 12 2 ＴＨＡ Thai Airways International 42 42 2. The 2 regions refer to Hong Kong (Cathay Pacific Airlines, Air Hong Kong, Dragonair) and Taiwan (EVA Airways, China Airlines). ＴＨＹ Turkish Airlines 8 8 ＵＺＢ Uzbekistan Airways 4 4 3. ALS slots will be operated by ANA and JAR slots by JAL. Sub-total （43 Airlines） 1,832 1,850 18 Total passenger flights （59 Airlines） 2,790 2,804 14.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • My Personal Callsign List This List Was Not Designed for Publication However Due to Several Requests I Have Decided to Make It Downloadable
    - www.egxwinfogroup.co.uk - The EGXWinfo Group of Twitter Accounts - @EGXWinfoGroup on Twitter - My Personal Callsign List This list was not designed for publication however due to several requests I have decided to make it downloadable. It is a mixture of listed callsigns and logged callsigns so some have numbers after the callsign as they were heard. Use CTL+F in Adobe Reader to search for your callsign Callsign ICAO/PRI IATA Unit Type Based Country Type ABG AAB W9 Abelag Aviation Belgium Civil ARMYAIR AAC Army Air Corps United Kingdom Civil AgustaWestland Lynx AH.9A/AW159 Wildcat ARMYAIR 200# AAC 2Regt | AAC AH.1 AAC Middle Wallop United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 300# AAC 3Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 400# AAC 4Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 500# AAC 5Regt AAC/RAF Britten-Norman Islander/Defender JHCFS Aldergrove United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 600# AAC 657Sqn | JSFAW | AAC Various RAF Odiham United Kingdom Military Ambassador AAD Mann Air Ltd United Kingdom Civil AIGLE AZUR AAF ZI Aigle Azur France Civil ATLANTIC AAG KI Air Atlantique United Kingdom Civil ATLANTIC AAG Atlantic Flight Training United Kingdom Civil ALOHA AAH KH Aloha Air Cargo United States Civil BOREALIS AAI Air Aurora United States Civil ALFA SUDAN AAJ Alfa Airlines Sudan Civil ALASKA ISLAND AAK Alaska Island Air United States Civil AMERICAN AAL AA American Airlines United States Civil AM CORP AAM Aviation Management Corporation United States Civil
    [Show full text]
  • 4Th Quarter 2016 Report
    4th Quarter 2016 Report Fly Quiet Program Chicago O’Hare International Airport Visit the O’Hare Noise Webpage on the Internet at www.flychicago.com/ORDNoise th 4 Quarter 2016 Report Background On June 17, 1997, the City of Chicago announced that airlines operating at O’Hare International Airport had agreed to use designated noise abatement flight procedures in accordance with the Fly Quiet Program. The Fly Quiet Program was implemented in an effort to further reduce the impacts of aircraft noise on the surrounding neighborhoods. The Fly Quiet Program is a voluntary program that encourages pilots and air traffic controllers to use designated nighttime preferential runways and flight tracks developed by the Chicago Department of Aviation in cooperation with the O'Hare Noise Compatibility Commission, the airlines, and the air traffic controllers. These preferred routes direct aircraft over less-populated areas, such as forest preserves, highways, as well as commercial and industrial areas. As part of the Fly Quiet Program, the Chicago Department of Aviation prepares a Quarterly Fly Quiet Report. This report is shared with Chicago Department of Aviation officials, the O'Hare Noise Compatibility Commission, the airlines, and the general public. The Fly Quiet Report contains detailed information regarding nighttime runway use, flight operations, flight tracks, and noise complaints and 24-hour tracking of ground run-ups. The data presented in this report is compiled from the Airport Noise Management System (ANMS) and airport operation logs. Operations O’Hare has seven runways that are all utilized at different times depending on a number of conditions including weather, airfield pavement and construction activities and air traffic demand.
    [Show full text]
  • ANA and NCA Agree to a Strategic Business Partnership ~To Continue Contributing to Japan’S Economic Development ~
    ANA and NCA Agree to a Strategic Business Partnership ~To continue contributing to Japan’s economic development ~ TOKYO, March 1, 2018 – All Nippon Airways (ANA) and Nippon Cargo Airlines (NCA) signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to enhance both, the service and the corporate value of the two airlines by building a strategic business partnership. The three key elements of this partnership which will give added value to ANA’s and NCA’s customers, and will provide them with seamless logistics experiences are: 1. Code Share Within the first half of the fiscal year 2018, ANA and NCA plan to add codeshares to each other’s flights(*). The codeshares will offer a broad network of flights and a wider range of choices to the partner’s customers, allowing seamless and convenient connections with outstanding Japan-quality service, and especially leveraging the synergy effect of ANA’s Boeing 767 operation to China and Asia, and NCA’s Boeing 747 freighter operation to North America and Europe. ANA’s plans to introduce Boeing 777 freighters will further increase the customer choice. 2. Block Space Through this partnership, the two airlines plan to expand the existing interline and block space agreement, with the aim to effectively utilize each other’s cargo space and provide a reliable and convenient connection service. 3. Maintenance Support Finally, the MOU includes a maintenance support agreement, by which ANA will allocate maintenance resources to support NCA’s operation. The agreement will enable active sharing of knowledge and enhancement of the technical abilities of both carriers. With this new partnership, ANA and NCA hope to provide their customers access to a large global freight network, highest quality of service, and convenient and flexible choices, responding to the growing demand.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Statements for the Years Ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, Supplemental Schedules for the Year Ended June 30, 2003 and Independent Auditors' Report
    State of Hawaii Department of Transportation - Airports Division (An Enterprise Fund of the State of Hawaii) Financial Statements for the Years Ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, Supplemental Schedules for the Year Ended June 30, 2003 and Independent Auditors' Report STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - AIRPORTS DIVISION (An Enterprise Fund of the State Of Hawaii) TABLE OF CONTENTS JUNE 30, 2003 AND 2002 Page Independent Auditors' Report 1-2 Management's Discussion and Analysis 3-14 Financial Statements as of and for the Years Ended June 30, 2003 and 2002: Statements of Net Assets 15-17 Statements of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Assets 18-19 Statements of Cash Flows 20-22 Notes to Financial Statements 23-44 Supplementary Information - Schedules as of and for the Year Ended June 30, 2003: 1 - Operating Revenues and Operating Expenses Other Than Depreciation 45 2 - Calculations of Net Revenues and Taxes and Debt Service Requirement 46-47 3 - Summary of Debt Service Requirements to Maturity 48 4 - Debt Service Requirements to Maturity - Airports System Revenue Bonds 49 5 - Debt Service Requirements to Maturity - General Obligation Bonds 50 6 - Airports System Charges - Fiscal Year 1995-97 Lease Extension 51-53 7 - Approved Maximum Revenue Landing Weights and Airport Landing Fees - Signatory Airlines 54 8 - Approved Maximum Revenue Landing Weights and Airport Landing Fees - Nonsignatory Airlines 55 Deloitte & Touche LLP Suite 1200 1132 Bishop Street Honolulu, Hawaii 96813· 2870 Tel: (808) 543-0700 Fax: (808) 526-0225 www.us.deloitte.com Deloitte &Touche INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT The Director Department of Transportation State of Hawaii: We have audited the statements of net assets of the Airports Division, Department ofTransportation, State of Hawaii (an enterprise fund of the State of Hawaii) (Airports Division) as of June 30, 2003 and 2002, and the related statements of revenues, expenses and changes in net assets, and of cash flows for the years then ended.
    [Show full text]
  • Jan. 31, 2019 Our Response to the Administrative Measures for Nippon
    [Translation Purpose Only] January 31, 2019 Whom it may concern Company Name: Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha Representative: Tadaaki Naito, President (Stock Code: 9101, First Sections of the Tokyo Stock Exchange and the Nagoya Stock Exchange) Inquiries: Ushio Koiso, General Manager of Corporate Communication Group (TEL. 03-3284-5151) Our Response to the Administrative Measures for Nippon Cargo Airlines Co., Ltd. We take seriously the Administrative Measures for the Business Improvement and the Operations Improvement (hereinafter “Administrative Measures”) issued by the Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (hereinafter the “MLITT”), for inappropriate aircraft maintenance operation carried out by Nippon Cargo Airlines Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “NCA”), our consolidated subsidiary company, and hereby report that we have decided on the measures to be taken based on the investigation report of the NCA investigation committee published by NCA today. 1. Background On July 20, 2018, MLITT issued the Administrative Measures to NCA for its inappropriate maintenance operations over a period of several years. On the 27th of the same month, NCA established an investigation committee (hereinafter the “NCA Investigation Committee”) chaired by the president, and conducted an investigation (hereinafter “NCA Investigation”) to clarify the whole picture and investigate the causes. In order to support and supervise NCA's efforts to improve its business operations appropriately, strengthen its compliance system, and prevent a recurrence, we, along with the external law firm, Nagashima Ohno and Tsunematsu, established a Response Committee chaired by the president of NYK. 1 2. Summary of NCA investigation results NCA Investigation Committee's report and the NCA news were released on January 31, 2019, for information on the findings of inappropriate maintenance cases, the direct causes, background and factors found through the NCA Investigation, and reoccurrence preventive measures taken by the NCA.
    [Show full text]
  • Info Sheet (Air Cargo) (SRG) (2.10.16)
    AIR CARGO ANTITRUST SETTLEMENTS U.S. District Court NY ED 1:06-md-01775 Overview: Plaintiffs allege that Defendants conspired to fix, raise, maintain, or stabilize prices of Airfreight Shipping Services by, among other things, coordinating surcharges (such as fuel and security surcharges) and by agreeing to eliminate or prevent discounting of surcharges. They claim that purchasers paid more for Airfreight Shipping Services than they otherwise would have paid. This summary is for informational purposes only, based on SRG’s review of publicly available information regarding the settlement. Claimants may file a no-cost claim on their own, and more information can be found on the Court’s docket and on the claims administrator’s website www.aircargosettlement5.com Class: All persons or entities (but excluding Defendants, their parents, predecessors, successors, subsidiaries, affiliates, as well as government entities) who purchased Airfreight Shipping Services for shipments to, from or within the United States directly from any of the Settling Defendants, any other Defendant, or from any of their parents, predecessors, successors, subsidiaries, or affiliates, at any time during the period January 1, 2000 up to and including September 11, 2006. Airfreight Shipping Services are defined as paid private air transport of freight or other cargo by an airline acting as a provider of such services Defendants: AC Cargo LP EVA Airways Corporation Aerolineas Brasileiras A.A (Absa) Japan Airlines International Co., Ltd. Air Canada Kenya Airways Limited Air China Cargo Company Ltd. KLM Air China Ltd. Korean Airlines Co., Ltd. Air India Lan Airlines S.A. (Lan Chile) Air Mauritius Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Airline Name & Code Tên & Mã Các Hãng Hàng Không
    HANLOG LOGISTICS TRADING CO.,LTD No. 4B, Lane 49, Group 21, Tran Cung Street Nghia Tan Ward, Cau Giay Dist, Hanoi, Vietnam Tel: +84 24 2244 6555 Hotline: + 84 913 004 899 Email: [email protected] Website: www.hanlog.vn AIRLINE NAME & CODE TÊN & MÃ CÁC HÃNG HÀNG KHÔNG SCAC CODE Tên hãng hàng không/ Airline Name SU AEROFLOT RUSSIAN AIRLINES AM AEROMEXICO VV AEROSVIT AIRLINES LD AHK AIR HONG KONG AK AIR ASIA D7 AIR ASIA X BX AIR BUSAN SB AIR CALEDONIE INTERNATIONAL AC AIR CANADA CA AIR CHINA INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AF AIR FRANCE KJ AIR INCHEON AI AIR INDIA NQ AIR JAPAN NX AIR MACAU COMPANY LIMITED NZ AIR NEW ZEALAND EL AIR NIPPON CO.,LTD. PX AIR NIUGINI FJ AIR PACIFIC LIMITED AD AIR PARADISE TN AIR TAHITI NUI JW AIRASIA JAPAN CO.,LTD. RU AIRBRIDGE CARGO AIRLINES LLC AZ ALITALIA NH ALL NIPPON AIRWAYS CO.,LTD. HP AMERICA WEST AIRLINES AA AMERICAN AIRLINES,INC. 9N ANA & JP EXPRESS 8G ANGEL AIR AN ANSETT AUSTRALIA OZ ASIANA AIRLINES INC. 5Y ATLAS AIR INC. AO AUSTRALIAN AIRLINES OS AUSTRIAN AIRLINES AG PG BANGKOK AIRWAYS CO.,LTD. BG BIMAN BANGLADESH AIRLINES BA BRITISH AIRWAYS P.L.C. 8B BUSINESS AIR K6 CAMBODIA ANGKOR AIR 2G CARGOITALIA CV CARGOLUX AIRLINES INT'L S.A. C8 CARGOLUX ITALIA S.P.A. CX CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS 5J CEBU PACIFIC AIR CI CHINA AIRLINES CK CHINA CARGO AIRLINES LTD. MU CHINA EASTERN AIRLINES WH CHINA NORTHWEST AIRLINES 8Y CHINA POSTAL AIRLINES LTD. CZ CHINA SOUTHERN AIRLINES SZ CHINA SOUTHWEST AIRLINES. CO CONTINENTAL AIRLINES,INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Flight Path to New Horizons Annual Report 2012 for the Year Ended March 31, 2012
    Flight Path to New Horizons Annual Report 2012 For the Year Ended March 31, 2012 Web Edition Shinichiro Ito President and Chief Executive Officer Editorial Policy The ANA Group aims to establish security and reliability through communication with its stakeholders, thus increasing corporate value. Annual Report 2012 covers management strategies, a business overview and our management struc- ture, along with a wide-ranging overview of the ANA Group’s corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities. We have published information on CSR activities that we have selected as being of particular importance to the ANA Group and society in general. Please see our website for more details. ANA’s CSR Website: http://www.ana.co.jp/eng/aboutana/corporate/csr/ Welcome aboard Annual Report 2012 The ANA Group targets growth with a global business perspective. Based on our desire to deliver ANA value to customers worldwide, our corporate vision is to be one of the leading corporate groups in Asia, providing passenger and cargo transportation around the world. The ANA Group will achieve this vision by responding quickly to its rapidly changing operating environment and continuing to innovate in each of its businesses. We are working toward our renaissance as a stronger ANA Group in order to make further meaningful progress. Annual Report 2012 follows the ANA Group on its journey through the skies as it vigorously takes on new challenges to get on track for further growth. Annual Report Flight 2012 is now departing. Enjoy your flight! Targeted Form of the ANA Group ANA Group Corporate Philosophy ANA Group Corporate Vision Our Commitments On a foundation of security and reliability, With passenger and cargo the ANA Group will transportation around the world • Create attractive surroundings for customers as its core field of business, • Continue to be a familiar presence the ANA Group aims to be one of the • Offer dreams and experiences to people leading corporate groups in Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • Ventress V. Japan Airlines; Civil No
    Case 1:07-cv-00581-LEK-RLP Document 154 Filed 09/28/10 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: <pageID> IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII MARTIN VENTRESS, ) Civil No. 07-00581 SOM/LEK ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND ) DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S vs. ) MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION ) JAPAN AIRLINES; JALWAYS CO., ) LTD.; and HAWAII AVIATION ) CONTRACT SERVICES, INC, ) ) Defendants. ) _____________________________ ) ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION Before the court is pro se Plaintiff Martin Ventress’s Motion for Clarification. Ventress seeks clarification from the court regarding: (1) the status of the stay that has been issued in this case; (2) his proposed “production” of the “‘Agreement Between Japan Air Charter’ (‘JALways’) and HACS”; and (3) his status given a letter sent to Ventress by counsel for Defendant Hawaii Aviation Contract Services (“HACS”) accusing Ventress of being a vexatious litigant. Mot. at 1-3. The court addresses these issues seriatim.1 On August 31, 2010, Magistrate Judge Leslie E. Kobayashi denied Ventress’s motion to unseal records on the ground that no records have been sealed in this case. See Order 1This matter is suitable for disposition without a hearing. See Local Rule LR7.2(d). Case 1:07-cv-00581-LEK-RLP Document 154 Filed 09/28/10 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: <pageID> Denying Martin Ventress’ Mot. to Unseal U.S. Dist. Ct. Records, Filed Mar. 19, 2010 (“Order Denying Motion to Unseal”), ECF No. 151. Ventress requests clarification of language contained in the Order Denying Motion to Unseal regarding the stay in place in this case.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
    FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MARTIN VENTRESS, No. 12-15066 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 1:07-cv-00581- LEK-RLP JAPAN AIRLINES; JALWAYS CO., LTD.; HAWAII AVIATION CONTRACT SERVICES, INC., OPINION Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawai‘i Leslie E. Kobayashi, District Judge, Presiding Submitted February 20, 2014* Honolulu, Hawai‘i Filed March 28, 2014 Before: Michael Daly Hawkins, M. Margaret McKeown, and Carlos T. Bea, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge McKeown; Concurrence by Judge Bea * The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 2 VENTRESS V. JAPAN AIRLINES SUMMARY** Preemption / Federal Aviation Act The panel affirmed the district court’s judgment in favor of Japan Airlines based on the Federal Aviation Act’s preemption of the pro se plaintiff’s state claims. Plaintiff, a former flight engineer, alleged that Japan Airlines retaliated against him for reporting safety concerns and constructively terminated him for reasons related to his medical and mental fitness. The panel held that plaintiff’s California state law claims were preempted by the Federal Aviation Act because they required the factfinder to intrude upon the federally occupied field of aviation safety by deciding questions of pilot medical standards and qualifications. The panel also held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration. Judge Bea concurred in part because he believes that plaintiff only appealed the district court’s decision denying his motion for reconsideration, and therefore he only joined that part of the majority’s opinion.
    [Show full text]
  • Flying High 20 Years of Progress Flying High 20 Years of Progress
    Flying High 20 years of progress Flying High 20 years of progress An open nose cargo door NCA's first aircraft takes off from Anchorage on a winter day (Photo by Katsu Aoki) Transporting an elephant sent from Thailand to celebrate the birth of Princess Aiko In Indianapolis Returning to Narita Unloading a race car Unloading a Boeing 777 engine Beginning cargo unloading Cargo waits to be loaded Towed by a tractor Transporting an elephant sent from Thailand to celebrate the birth of Princess Aiko Transporting an elephant sent from Thailand to celebrate the birth of Princess Aiko In Indianapolis Unloading a race car In Indianapolis Unloading a race car Transporting race cars for the Indy Japan 300 (Indianapolis) Loading a helicopter Transporting race cars for the Indy Japan 300 (Indianapolis) Aircraft inspection Engine Maintenance Overhead work Jacking up an aircraft Maintenance team Changing tires Between-flight maintenance Briefing Daybreak (Photo by Katsu Aoki) Taxiing on a rainy day (Photo by Katsu Aoki) Amsterdam Branch Frankfurt Branch Milan Branch London Branch New York Branch San Francisco Branch Los Angeles Branch Chicago Branch Anchorage Flight Operation Office Boston Office Message Upon publication of our 20-year history In May 2005, Nippon Cargo Airlines celebrated the 20th anniversary of its commencement of service. As part of that celebration, we are publishing Flight: NCA’s 20-Year Progress, the history of our first 20 years of operation. Previously, we published A Brief History of NCA’s First 10 Years of Operation. Now, ten years later, we have compiled another brief history that both looks back upon the path opened by those who preceded us and looks ahead to the new era that lies before us.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Disability-Related Complaint Data Foreign Carriers
    Summary of Disability-Related Complaint Data Foreign Carriers Total number of complaints submitted: 1,654 Carrier Name Number of Complaints AER LINGUS LIMITED 11 AEROENLACES NACIONALES S.A. DE C.V. 0 AEROFLOT RUSSIAN AIRLINES 0 AEROGAL 0 AEROLINEAS ARGENTINAS, S.A. 0 AEROSUR, S.A. 0 AEROSVIT AIRLINES 0 AEROVIAS DE MEXICO, S.A. DE C.V. 6 AIR ATLANTA-ICELANDIC 0 AIR BERLIN 11 AIR CANADA 370 AIR CHINA 1 AIR EUROPA LINEAS AEREAS, S.A.U. 1 AIR INDIA 4 AIR JAMAICA LIMITED 2 AIR JAPAN, CO., LTD. 5 AIR NEW ZEALAND LIMITED 11 AIR PACIFIC LIMITED 0 AIR TAHITI NUI AIRLINES 2 AIR TRANSAT A.T., INC. 6 AIRES 1 ALITALIA COMPAGNIA AEREA ITALIANA 41 ALL NIPPON AIRWAYS CO., LTD. 15 ARKIA ISRAELI AIRLINES, LTD. 0 ASIANA AIRLINES, INC. 2 ASTRAEUS D/B/A ICELAND EXPRESS 0 AUSTRIAN AIRLINES AG 1 AVIANCA, S.A. 15 AVIATION MATTERS, INC. 0 BAHAMASAIR HOLDINGS LIMITED 2 BRITISH AIRWAYS PLC 237 BWIA WEST INDIES AIRWAYS LIMITED 11 CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS LIMITED 11 CAYMAN AIRWAYS LIMITED 0 CHINA AIRLINES, LTD. 2 CHINA EASTERN AIRLINES CORPORATION 0 COMLUX AVIATION AG 0 COMLUX MALTA LTD. 0 COMPANIA MEXICANA DE AVIACION, S.A. 1 COMPANIA PANAMENA DE AVIACION, S.A. 10 CONDOR FLUGDIENST GMBH 2 CORSAIR 0 CZECH AIRLINES 1 DC AVIATION GMBH 0 DEUTSCHE LUFTHANSA AG 151 EGYPTAIR 1 EL AL ISRAEL AIRLINES LTD. 23 EMIRATES 24 ETHIOPIAN AIRLINES ENTERPRISE 0 ETIHAD AIRWAYS P.J.S.C. 6 EUROATLANTIC AIRWAYS TRANSPORTES AE 0 EVA AIRWAYS CORPORATION 6 FINNAIR OY D/B/A FINNAIR OYJ 1 FIRST AIR 0 GLOBAL JET LUXEMBOURG S.A.
    [Show full text]