Plasticity in Female Mate Choosiness
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Dissertations and Theses in Biological Sciences Biological Sciences, School of 5-2014 Plasticity in Female Mate Choosiness: A Result of Variation in Perceived Predation Risk and the Interaction of Female Age and Male Density Ashley Atwell University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/bioscidiss Part of the Behavior and Ethology Commons, and the Biology Commons Atwell, Ashley, "Plasticity in Female Mate Choosiness: A Result of Variation in Perceived Predation Risk and the Interaction of Female Age and Male Density" (2014). Dissertations and Theses in Biological Sciences. 67. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/bioscidiss/67 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Biological Sciences, School of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses in Biological Sciences by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. PLASTICITY IN FEMALE MATE CHOOSINESS: A RESULT OF VARIATION IN PERCEIVED PREDATION RISK AND THE INTERACTION OF FEMALE AGE AND MALE DENSITY by Ashley N. Atwell A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of The Graduate College at the University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements For the Degree of Master of Science Major: Biological Sciences Under the Supervision of Professor William E. Wagner, Jr. Lincoln, Nebraska May 2014 PLASTICITY IN FEMALE MATE CHOOSINESS: A RESULT OF VARIATION IN PERCEIVED PREDATION RISK AND THE INTERACTION OF FEMALE AGE AND MALE DENSITY Ashley N. Atwell, M.S. University of Nebraska, 2014 Advisor: William E. Wagner, Jr. In many species, female mate choices can be a strong source of sexual selection. Females often prefer a certain male phenotype, and this can be due to benefits females gain from mating with preferred males. However, such benefits can sometimes be outweighed by the cost of searching for a preferred male. These costs and benefits often change concomitantly with changes in environmental (e.g., predator abundance and conspecific density) and internal factors (e.g., female age). Thus, female mate choosiness (the degree to which preferences for certain males are expressed) should often be plastic. Plasticity in female mate choosiness may be complicated because environmental and internal factors may often interact naturally with one another. Therefore, it is important to understand how plasticity in mate choosiness is affected by such interactions. A small, yet growing, number of studies have investigated interactions on female mate choosiness, and have found interesting yet sometimes contradictory results. We conducted two experiments on the variable field cricket, Gryllus lineaticeps. One tested the effect of the interaction between female age (young, intermediate, and old) and male calling density (high and low), and the other tested the effect of the interaction of female age and perceived predation risk (predation chemical cues present or not) from sympatric, cursorial, wolf spider predators Hogna sp. Our results indicate a significant effect of the interaction between female age and male density, as well as a significant effect of perceived predation risk, on the plasticity of female mate choosiness. Young females exhibited the most plasticity in response to variation in male densities: young females were the most choosy in high male density environments and least choosy in low male density environments. Females, regardless of age, responded to variation in perceived predation risk the same: females were choosy when predation cues were absent, but decreased their choosiness when predation cues were present. Overall, these results suggest females who have the highest reproductive potential are the most responsive to changes in environmental and internal factors, but also that these factors can either interact with or overshadow each other to influence female mate choosiness. iv AUTHOR’S ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The past two years have been unforgettable, fun, and full of crickets. I would like to thank everyone who gave me their time, support, and advice throughout these projects. I truly do not know what I would have done without you. I first want to thank my advisor, William Wagner. He is a fantastic mentor who has guided me through what it means to successfully develop and carry out research projects, write scientifically, and perform proper statistics. He did this with the utmost patience, understanding, and thoughtfulness. I also want to thank the rest of my committee, Alexandra Basolo and Eileen Hebets. They provided extensive and helpful feedback and ideas which improved the quality of these experiments. The Wagner- Basolo-Hebets-Shizuka lab meeting members provided invaluable criticisms on the earlier drafts of these chapters, and for that I am very thankful. I would like to thank the graduate students in the School of Biological Sciences. They kept me sane and entertained, and they are some of the best people, friends, and scientists I could ever have hoped to meet. Finally, I would like to thank my family. I can always count on my mom and dad to be there for me, whether it’s helping me move across state lines or letting me take all the leftovers and tupperware. My sister and her husband are always great for talking about anything, and their dogs are always a great source of laughter. Thank you all. v TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Page..............................................................................................................................i Abstract................................................................................................................................ii Author’s Acknowledgements..............................................................................................iv Table of Contents.................................................................................................................v Chapter 1. Females Can't Always Get What They Want, But They Get What They Need: The Effect of the Interaction Between Male Density and Female Age on Female Mate Choice Plasticity...................................................................................................................1 Abstract....................................................................................................................1 Introduction..............................................................................................................2 Methods....................................................................................................................6 Study System...............................................................................................6 Experimental Treatments.............................................................................7 Measuring Female Choosiness....................................................................8 Statistics.....................................................................................................10 Results....................................................................................................................11 Discussion..............................................................................................................12 Acknowledgments..................................................................................................17 References..............................................................................................................17 Multimedia Objects................................................................................................25 Figure 1.1...................................................................................................25 vi Figure 1.2...................................................................................................26 Table 1.1.....................................................................................................27 Figure 1.3...................................................................................................28 Chapter 2. Along Came a Spider Who Sat Down Beside Her: A Study of the Effect of Predation on the Plasticity of Female Mate Choice...........................................................29 Abstract..................................................................................................................29 Introduction............................................................................................................30 Methods..................................................................................................................33 Study System.............................................................................................33 Experimental Treatments...........................................................................35 Measuring Female Choosiness..................................................................38 Statistics.....................................................................................................40 Results....................................................................................................................41 Discussion..............................................................................................................41 Acknowledgments..................................................................................................44 References..............................................................................................................45