New Mass and Orbital Constraints of J1407b

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

New Mass and Orbital Constraints of J1407b New Mass and Orbital constraints of J1407b Bharath Chowdhary Nagam Technische Universiteit Delft New constraints on mass and orbital parameters of J1407b by Bharath Chowdhary Nagam in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Aerospace Engineering at the Delft University of Technology, to be defended publicly on Monday July 24, 2017 at 2:00 PM. Supervisor: Dr. Matthew Kenworthy(external) Dr. Daphne Stam(internal) Thesis committee: Ir. Prem Sundaramoorthy, TU Delft Samiksha Mestry M.Eng, TU Delft This thesis is confidential and cannot be made public until July 24, 2017. An electronic version of this thesis is available at http://repository.tudelft.nl/. Acknowledgement First and foremost, I thank the Almighty for giving me the strength, knowledge and opportunity to undertake this research and complete it satisfactorily. I sincerely thank Dr.Daphne Stam of TU Delft, who gave me this opportunity and referred me to Dr.Matthew Kenworthy of Leiden University. I also thank her for her numerous suggestions and insightful inputs in the end to make this thesis report more meaningful and attractive to read. I also sincerely thank Dr.Matthew Kenworthy, who , in spite of his very busy schedule, solely guided me in completion of this project. His advice and teachings will not only help me in just completing this course, but also for my entire career. I thank my Parents, who have supported me throughout my life to successfully become a graduate and a professional. Lastly, my friends in Delft , who provided me with great moral support and helped me in various difficult situations throughout my master’s. Thanks for all your encouragement and support! Bharath Chowdhary Nagam Delft, July 2017 iii Contents List of Figures vii List of Tables xi 1 Abstract 1 2 Introduction 3 2.1 Introduction to Exoplanets . 3 2.2 J1407b-An exoplanet with giant ring system . 4 2.3 Overview . 10 3 Earlier research on J1407 and its companion 13 3.1 About the star-J1407 . 13 3.2 Light Curve . 14 3.3 Possible explanations for the eclipse . 15 3.4 Modelling of the ring system . 16 3.5 Orbital Constraints. 19 3.5.1 Direct Imaging . 19 3.5.2 Photometry . 20 3.5.3 Radial Velocity . 20 3.5.4 휉 constraint . 21 3.5.5 Eccentricity Limit. 21 3.5.6 Mass and Period Limits . 24 3.6 Conclusion . 25 4 Introduction to Orbital Parameters and Observation Techniques 27 4.1 Definition of Orbital Parameters . 27 4.2 Visualisation of orbital parameters . 28 4.2.1 visualisation of inclination(i) . 28 4.2.2 visualisation of Ω . 28 4.2.3 visualisation of 휔 . 31 v vi Contents 4.3 Development of Algorithm. 31 4.4 Introduction to Direct Imaging . 35 4.5 Introduction to Transit photometry . 36 4.5.1 Importance of photometry. 37 4.6 Introduction to Radial Velocity(RV) . 38 4.7 Conclusion . 39 5 Inclination and Eccentricity Constraint 41 5.1 Introduction . 41 5.2 Eccentricity Constraints. 41 5.3 Inclination constraint . 43 5.4 Conclusion . 43 6 Direct Imaging 45 6.1 Observations of J1407. 45 6.2 Conclusion . 49 7 Photometry 51 7.1 Photometry data of J1407 . 51 7.2 Conclusion . 53 8 Radial Velocity 57 8.1 Radial Velocity data of J1407 . 57 8.2 Constraints for Circular Orbit . 57 8.3 Constraints for Elliptical Orbit . 59 8.4 Conclusion . 59 9 Results and Conclusion 63 9.1 Combined constraints for circular orbits . 63 9.2 Combined constraints for elliptical orbits . 63 9.3 Result . 65 9.4 Conclusion . 65 10 Recommendations 69 11 Appendix 71 11.1Appendix-a . 71 11.2Appendix-b . 71 Bibliography 75 List of Figures 2.1 Habitable zone of recently discovered exoplanets[1] ............... 4 2.2 Transit Method[2] .................................... 5 2.3 Dip in brightness flux of J1407[3] .......................... 5 2.4 J1407b (described by black circle) and its ring system described in series of colors of brown,cyan,blue,orange,gray, if present at the centre of earth-sun system , will tend to fill the entire gap between earth(yellow circle) and sun(red circle) and will even tend to extend beyond. ....................................... 6 2.5 Rings of J1407b [4] ................................... 7 2.6 Transit curve showing successive dips of flux in the HAT-P7 system[5] ... 7 2.7 Change in Radial Velocity of the star due to the gravitational tug of companion[6] ................................................ 8 2.8 Direct imaging of an exoplanet orbiting the star 1RXS J160929.1 – 210524 [7] 9 2.9 Number of Exoplanets detected by various methods[8] ............. 9 3.1 CTIO spectra of four standard stars[9] ....................... 14 3.2 superWASP photometry light curve of J1407[9] .................. 15 3.3 ASAS photometry light curve of J1407[9] ...................... 15 3.4 A basic ring model to fit superWASP data[9] .................... 16 3.5 Geometry of the ring model[3] ............................ 17 3.6 Ring model fit to the data[3] .............................. 18 3.7 Simulation of prograde and retrograde models[10] ................ 18 3.8 Eclipse duration for different models[10] ...................... 18 3.9 RV data of J1407[11] .................................. 21 3.10 period and mass limits for circular orbit of J1407b[11] .............. 22 3.11 period and mass limits for elliptical orbit of J1407b[11] ............. 23 3.12 Combined period and mass limits for circular orbit of J1407b[11] ....... 24 3.13 Combined period and mass limits for elliptical orbit of J1407b[11] ....... 25 4.1 Plot describing inclination(i) of arbitrary companion in the plane of sky ... 29 4.2 Plot describing Ω of arbitrary companion in the plane of sky .......... 30 4.3 Plot describing 휔 ..................................... 32 4.4 Plot describing function of 휔 .............................. 33 vii viii List of Figures 4.5 Position coordinates in the sky ............................ 34 4.6 Direct Imaging of HR8799 system[12] ....................... 36 4.7 Integrated image showing the path of Venus transit[13] ............ 37 4.8 Illustration of a transit curve[14] ........................... 37 4.9 Plot describing the change in Radial Velocity of a star versus time [15] .... 39 5.1 Eccentricity values satisfying the velocity constraint ............... 42 5.2 Critical eccentricity values from Kenworthy et al.(2015)[11] .......... 42 5.3 Critical inclination values which satisfies the modelled value of impact param- eter ............................................. 44 6.1 Constraints for circular orbit of J1407b[11] ..................... 46 6.2 Direct imaging constraint of J1407b(circular orbit) ................ 47 6.3 Position of Secondary Companion during various epochs of direct imaging .. 48 6.4 Direct Imaging constraints for elliptical orbits ................... 50 7.1 3.2 days phase folded results from van Werkhoven et al.(2014)[16] ..... 52 7.2 3.2 day period folding result for transit data of J1407b ............. 52 7.3 Photometry constraints of J1407b .......................... 53 7.4 Photometry data of PDS 110[17] ........................... 53 7.5 superWASP photometry light curve of J1407[9] .................. 54 7.6 Transit light curve of J1407 for the past 5 years[18] ............... 55 8.1 (a) represents the variation of RV of J1407 with time. (b) represents the FWHM of the star implying heavy stellar activity. (c) representing slope of bisector also is inline with the FWHM, implying high stellar activity. (d) represents the RV vs slope of bisector plot showing very high anti correlation. ............................. 58 8.2 RV Constraints for circular orbit ............................ 59 8.3 RV Constraints for elliptical orbit from Kenworthy et al(2015)[11] ...... 60 8.4 updated RV Constraints for elliptical orbit from the latest data of CORALIE observation ........................................ 61 9.1 Combined constraints for circular orbits ....................... 64 9.2 Combined constraints of RV, DI and photometry for elliptical orbits. The Mean mass for each case of 휔(in increasing order) are 7.32,9.10,9.56,10.04,10.43,1.74,14.48 and 24.98 Jupiter masses respectively. ............................. 67 11.1 RV constraint for circular orbits[11] ......................... 72 11.2 RV constraint result 휔 = 90 and n=9 ......................... 72 11.3 RV constraint result 휔 = 270 and n=11 ........................ 72 List of Figures ix 11.4 Direct imaging result for circular orbits ....................... 73 11.5 Direct imaging constraint[11] ............................. 73 List of Tables 3.1 Stellar Properties of J1407[9] ............................. 14 3.2 Disk model parameters[3] ............................... 17 9.1 Mean mass of J1407b for different cases of 휔 .................... 64 xi 1 Abstract Objective: The main objective of this research study is to combine the constraints from the value of impact parameter, transit, direct imaging and the radial velocity data to yield the final constraint of the mass and period of J1407b. Inclination constraints:In the previous research work of J1407 (kenworthy et al.(2015)[11]), it has been assumed that the orbit of J1407b is edge on(푖 = 90∘). However, since the impact parameter of J1407b is known from the modelling of the ring system (Kenworthy and Mamajek(2014)[3]), we use the modelled value of impact parameter to find the value of inclination as function of mass and period of J1407b for different values of argument of periastron. Combination of constraints : New data from Radial Velocity, Direct Imaging and Transit technique are combined to yield the final result of this research work as constraint limit for mass and period of J1407b for different values of argument of periastron. Result: The maximum mass of J1407b is limited to 63.5 Jupiter masses(푀) for all probable cases of argument of periastron.A table containing average expected value of mass of secondary companion for each case of argument of periastron is also presented. Recommendation: Out of all the exoplanet detection techniques, another set of observation by direct imaging technique will provide the most useful constraint in constraining further the mass limit of J1407b and ruling out the higher orbital period values.
Recommended publications
  • Lurking in the Shadows: Wide-Separation Gas Giants As Tracers of Planet Formation
    Lurking in the Shadows: Wide-Separation Gas Giants as Tracers of Planet Formation Thesis by Marta Levesque Bryan In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Pasadena, California 2018 Defended May 1, 2018 ii © 2018 Marta Levesque Bryan ORCID: [0000-0002-6076-5967] All rights reserved iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost I would like to thank Heather Knutson, who I had the great privilege of working with as my thesis advisor. Her encouragement, guidance, and perspective helped me navigate many a challenging problem, and my conversations with her were a consistent source of positivity and learning throughout my time at Caltech. I leave graduate school a better scientist and person for having her as a role model. Heather fostered a wonderfully positive and supportive environment for her students, giving us the space to explore and grow - I could not have asked for a better advisor or research experience. I would also like to thank Konstantin Batygin for enthusiastic and illuminating discussions that always left me more excited to explore the result at hand. Thank you as well to Dimitri Mawet for providing both expertise and contagious optimism for some of my latest direct imaging endeavors. Thank you to the rest of my thesis committee, namely Geoff Blake, Evan Kirby, and Chuck Steidel for their support, helpful conversations, and insightful questions. I am grateful to have had the opportunity to collaborate with Brendan Bowler. His talk at Caltech my second year of graduate school introduced me to an unexpected population of massive wide-separation planetary-mass companions, and lead to a long-running collaboration from which several of my thesis projects were born.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1809.07342V1 [Astro-Ph.SR] 19 Sep 2018
    Draft version September 21, 2018 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 11/10/09 FAR-ULTRAVIOLET ACTIVITY LEVELS OF F, G, K, AND M DWARF EXOPLANET HOST STARS* Kevin France1, Nicole Arulanantham1, Luca Fossati2, Antonino F. Lanza3, R. O. Parke Loyd4, Seth Redfield5, P. Christian Schneider6 Draft version September 21, 2018 ABSTRACT We present a survey of far-ultraviolet (FUV; 1150 { 1450 A)˚ emission line spectra from 71 planet- hosting and 33 non-planet-hosting F, G, K, and M dwarfs with the goals of characterizing their range of FUV activity levels, calibrating the FUV activity level to the 90 { 360 A˚ extreme-ultraviolet (EUV) stellar flux, and investigating the potential for FUV emission lines to probe star-planet interactions (SPIs). We build this emission line sample from a combination of new and archival observations with the Hubble Space Telescope-COS and -STIS instruments, targeting the chromospheric and transition region emission lines of Si III,N V,C II, and Si IV. We find that the exoplanet host stars, on average, display factors of 5 { 10 lower UV activity levels compared with the non-planet hosting sample; this is explained by a combination of observational and astrophysical biases in the selection of stars for radial-velocity planet searches. We demonstrate that UV activity-rotation relation in the full F { M star sample is characterized by a power-law decline (with index α ≈ −1.1), starting at rotation periods & 3.5 days. Using N V or Si IV spectra and a knowledge of the star's bolometric flux, we present a new analytic relationship to estimate the intrinsic stellar EUV irradiance in the 90 { 360 A˚ band with an accuracy of roughly a factor of ≈ 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Walker 90/V590 Monocerotis
    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Faculty Publications 2008-05-17 The enigmatic young object: Walker 90/V590 Monocerotis M. D. Joner [email protected] M. R. Perez B. McCollum M. E. van dend Ancker Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/facpub Part of the Astrophysics and Astronomy Commons, and the Physics Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Joner, M. D.; Perez, M. R.; McCollum, B.; and van dend Ancker, M. E., "The enigmatic young object: Walker 90/V590 Monocerotis" (2008). Faculty Publications. 189. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/facpub/189 This Peer-Reviewed Article is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. A&A 486, 533–544 (2008) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:200809933 & c ESO 2008 Astrophysics The enigmatic young object: Walker 90/V590 Monocerotis, M. R. Pérez1, B. McCollum2,M.E.vandenAncker3, and M. D. Joner4 1 Los Alamos National Laboratory, PO Box 1663, ISR-1, MS B244, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA e-mail: [email protected] 2 Caltech, SIRTF Science Center, MS, 314-6, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA e-mail: [email protected] 3 European Southern Observatory, Karl-Schwarzschild-Strasse 2, 85748, Garching bei München, Germany e-mail: [email protected] 4 Brigham Young University, Dept. of Physics and Astronomy – ESC – N488, Provo, Utah 84602, USA e-mail: [email protected] Received 8 April 2008 / Accepted 17 May 2008 ABSTRACT Aims.
    [Show full text]
  • Super Earths and Dynamical Stability of Planetary Systems: First Parallel GPU Simulations Using GENGA
    Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 000, 000{000 (0000) Printed 27 January 2021 (MN LATEX style file v2.2) Super Earths and Dynamical Stability of Planetary Systems: First Parallel GPU Simulations Using GENGA S. Elser,1 S. L. Grimm,1 J. G. Stadel1 1Universit¨atZ¨urich,Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 Z¨urich,Switzerland 27 January 2021 ABSTRACT We report on the stability of hypothetical Super-Earths in the habitable zone of known multi-planetary systems. Most of them have not yet been studied in detail concerning the existence of additional low-mass planets. The new N-body code GENGA developed at the UZH allows us to perform numerous N-body simulations in parallel on GPUs. With this numerical tool, we can study the stability of orbits of hypothetical planets in the semi-major axis and eccentricity parameter space in high resolution. Massless test particle simulations give good predictions on the extension of the stable region and show that HIP 14180 and HD 37124 do not provide stable orbits in the habitable zone. Based on these simulations, we carry out simulations of 10M⊕ planets in several systems (HD 11964, HD 47186, HD 147018, HD 163607, HD 168443, HD 187123, HD 190360, HD 217107 and HIP 57274). They provide more exact information about orbits at the location of mean motion resonances and at the edges of the stability zones. Beside the stability of orbits, we study the secular evolution of the planets to constrain probable locations of hypothetical planets. Assuming that planetary systems are in general closely packed, we find that apart from HD 168443, all of the systems can harbor 10 M⊕ planets in the habitable zone.
    [Show full text]
  • An Extreme Planetary System Around HD 219828 One Long-Period Super Jupiter to a Hot-Neptune Host Star?,??
    A&A 592, A13 (2016) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628374 & c ESO 2016 Astrophysics An extreme planetary system around HD 219828 One long-period super Jupiter to a hot-Neptune host star?,?? N. C. Santos1; 2, A. Santerne1, J. P. Faria1; 2, J. Rey3, A. C. M. Correia4; 5, J. Laskar5, S. Udry3, V. Adibekyan1, F. Bouchy3; 6, E. Delgado-Mena1, C. Melo7, X. Dumusque3, G. Hébrard8; 9, C. Lovis3, M. Mayor3, M. Montalto1, A. Mortier10, F. Pepe3, P. Figueira1, J. Sahlmann11, D. Ségransan3, and S. G. Sousa1 1 Instituto de Astrofísica e Ciências do Espaço, Universidade do Porto, CAUP, Rua das Estrelas, 4150-762 Porto, Portugal e-mail: [email protected] 2 Departamento de Física e Astronomia, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal 3 Observatoire de Genève, Université de Genève, 51 ch. des Maillettes, 1290 Sauverny, Switzerland 4 CIDMA, Departamento de Física, Universidade de Aveiro, Campus de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal 5 ASD, IMCCE-CNRS UMR 8028, Observatoire de Paris, PSL Research University, 77 Av. Denfert-Rochereau, 75014 Paris, France 6 Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS, Laboratoire d’Astrophysique de Marseille UMR 7326, 13388 Marseille Cedex 13, France 7 European Southern Observatory (ESO), 19001 Casilla, Santiago, Chile 8 Observatoire de Haute-Provence, CNRS/OAMP, 04870 Saint-Michel-l’Observatoire, France 9 Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris, UMR 7095 CNRS, Université Pierre & Marie Curie, 98bis boulevard Arago, 75014 Paris, France 10 SUPA, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, KY16 9SS, UK 11 European Space Agency (ESA), Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA Received 24 February 2016 / Accepted 10 May 2016 ABSTRACT Context.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae - 24 March 2020
    Dr. Eric E. Mamajek Curriculum Vitae - 24 March 2020 Jet Propulsion Laboratory Phone: (818) 354-2153 4800 Oak Grove Drive FAX: (818) 393-4950 MS 321-162 [email protected] Pasadena, CA 91109-8099 https://science.jpl.nasa.gov/people/Mamajek/ Positions 2020- Discipline Program Manager - Exoplanets, Astro. & Physics Directorate, JPL/Caltech 2016- Deputy Program Chief Scientist, NASA Exoplanet Exploration Program, JPL/Caltech 2017- Professor of Physics & Astronomy (Research), University of Rochester 2016-2017 Visiting Professor, Physics & Astronomy, University of Rochester 2016 Professor, Physics & Astronomy, University of Rochester 2013-2016 Associate Professor, Physics & Astronomy, University of Rochester 2011-2012 Associate Astronomer, NOAO, Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory 2008-2013 Assistant Professor, Physics & Astronomy, University of Rochester (on leave 2011-2012) 2004-2008 Clay Postdoctoral Fellow, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics 2000-2004 Graduate Research Assistant, University of Arizona, Astronomy 1999-2000 Graduate Teaching Assistant, University of Arizona, Astronomy 1998-1999 J. William Fulbright Fellow, Australia, ADFA/UNSW School of Physics Languages English (native), Spanish (advanced) Education 2004 Ph.D. The University of Arizona, Astronomy 2001 M.S. The University of Arizona, Astronomy 2000 M.Sc. The University of New South Wales, ADFA, Physics 1998 B.S. The Pennsylvania State University, Astronomy & Astrophysics, Physics 1993 H.S. Bethel Park High School Research Interests Formation and Evolution
    [Show full text]
  • Binocular Universe: You're My Hero! December 2010
    Binocular Universe: You're My Hero! December 2010 Phil Harrington on't you just love a happy ending? I know I do. Picture this. Princess Andromeda, a helpless damsel in distress, chained to a rock as a ferocious D sea monster loomed nearby. Just when all appeared lost, our hero -- Perseus! -- plunges out of the sky, kills the monster, and sweeps up our maiden in his arms. Together, they fly off into the sunset on his winged horse to live happily ever after. Such is the stuff of myths and legends. That story, the legend of Perseus and Andromeda, was recounted in last month's column when we visited some binocular targets within the constellation Cassiopeia. In mythology, Queen Cassiopeia was Andromeda's mother, and the cause for her peril in the first place. Left: Autumn star map from Star Watch by Phil Harrington Above: Finder chart for this month's Binocular Universe. Chart adapted from Touring the Universe through Binoculars Atlas (TUBA), www.philharrington.net/tuba.htm This month, we return to the scene of the rescue, to our hero, Perseus. He stands in our sky to the east of Cassiopeia and Andromeda, should the Queen's bragging get her daughter into hot water again. The constellation's brightest star, Mirfak (Alpha [α] Persei), lies about two-thirds of the way along a line that stretches from Pegasus to the bright star Capella in Auriga. Shining at magnitude +1.8, Mirfak is classified as a class F5 white supergiant. It radiates some 5,000 times the energy of our Sun and has a diameter 62 times larger.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ubvri and Infrared Colour Indices of the Sun and Sun-Like Stars
    The 19th Cambridge Workshop on Cool Stars, Stellar Systems, and the Sun Edited by G. A. Feiden THE UBVRI AND INFRARED COLOUR INDICES OF THE SUN AND SUN-LIKE STARS Mehmet TANRIVER1, Ferhat Fikri ÖZEREN1 1 Erciyes University, Astronomy and Space Sciences Department, 38039, Kayseri, Turkey Abstract The Sun is not a point source, the photometric observational techniques that are utilised for observing other stars cannot be utilised for the Sun, meaning that it is dicult to derive its colours accurately for astronomical work from direct measurements in dierent passbands. The solar twins are the best choices because they are the stars that are ideally the same as the Sun in all parameters, and also, their colours are highly similar to those of the Sun. From the 60 articles on the Sun and Sun-like stars in the literature from 1964 until today, the solar colour indices in the optic and infrared regions have been estimated. 1 INTRODUCTION Table 1: The obtained average colour indices values of the The Sun is an average-low-mass star in the main sequence Sun with standart deviation (±σ)( Tanrıver (2012), Tanrıver of the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram. Moreover, the Sun is (2014a), Tanrıver (2014b) ). not a point source, the photometric observational techniques that are utilised for observing other stars cannot be utilised B-V 0.6457 ± 0.0421 V-J 1.1413 ± 0.1063 for the Sun. Therefore, the colours and colour indices of the H-K 0.0572 ± 0.0351 U-B 0.1463 ± 0.0596 sun-like stars are used in order to determine the sun’s colour V-H 1.4613 ± 0.1183 J-K 0.3777 ± 0.0494 indices.
    [Show full text]
  • Stability of Planets in Binary Star Systems
    StabilityStability ofof PlanetsPlanets inin BinaryBinary StarStar SystemsSystems Ákos Bazsó in collaboration with: E. Pilat-Lohinger, D. Bancelin, B. Funk ADG Group Outline Exoplanets in multiple star systems Secular perturbation theory Application: tight binary systems Summary + Outlook About NFN sub-project SP8 “Binary Star Systems and Habitability” Stand-alone project “Exoplanets: Architecture, Evolution and Habitability” Basic dynamical types S-type motion (“satellite”) around one star P-type motion (“planetary”) around both stars Image: R. Schwarz Exoplanets in multiple star systems Observations: (Schwarz 2014, Binary Catalogue) ● 55 binary star systems with 81 planets ● 43 S-type + 12 P-type systems ● 10 multiple star systems with 10 planets Example: γ Cep (Hatzes et al. 2003) ● RV measurements since 1981 ● Indication for a “planet” (Campbell et al. 1988) ● Binary period ~57 yrs, planet period ~2.5 yrs Multiplicity of stars ~45% of solar like stars (F6 – K3) with d < 25 pc in multiple star systems (Raghavan et al. 2010) Known exoplanet host stars: single double triple+ source 77% 20% 3% Raghavan et al. (2006) 83% 15% 2% Mugrauer & Neuhäuser (2009) 88% 10% 2% Roell et al. (2012) Exoplanet catalogues The Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia http://exoplanet.eu Exoplanet Orbit Database http://exoplanets.org Open Exoplanet Catalogue http://www.openexoplanetcatalogue.com The Planetary Habitability Laboratory http://phl.upr.edu/home NASA Exoplanet Archive http://exoplanetarchive.ipac.caltech.edu Binary Catalogue of Exoplanets http://www.univie.ac.at/adg/schwarz/multiple.html Habitable Zone Gallery http://www.hzgallery.org Binary Catalogue Binary Catalogue of Exoplanets http://www.univie.ac.at/adg/schwarz/multiple.html Dynamical stability Stability limit for S-type planets Rabl & Dvorak (1988), Holman & Wiegert (1999), Pilat-Lohinger & Dvorak (2002) Parameters (a , e , μ) bin bin Outer limit at roughly max.
    [Show full text]
  • Naming the Extrasolar Planets
    Naming the extrasolar planets W. Lyra Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, K¨onigstuhl 17, 69177, Heidelberg, Germany [email protected] Abstract and OGLE-TR-182 b, which does not help educators convey the message that these planets are quite similar to Jupiter. Extrasolar planets are not named and are referred to only In stark contrast, the sentence“planet Apollo is a gas giant by their assigned scientific designation. The reason given like Jupiter” is heavily - yet invisibly - coated with Coper- by the IAU to not name the planets is that it is consid- nicanism. ered impractical as planets are expected to be common. I One reason given by the IAU for not considering naming advance some reasons as to why this logic is flawed, and sug- the extrasolar planets is that it is a task deemed impractical. gest names for the 403 extrasolar planet candidates known One source is quoted as having said “if planets are found to as of Oct 2009. The names follow a scheme of association occur very frequently in the Universe, a system of individual with the constellation that the host star pertains to, and names for planets might well rapidly be found equally im- therefore are mostly drawn from Roman-Greek mythology. practicable as it is for stars, as planet discoveries progress.” Other mythologies may also be used given that a suitable 1. This leads to a second argument. It is indeed impractical association is established. to name all stars. But some stars are named nonetheless. In fact, all other classes of astronomical bodies are named.
    [Show full text]
  • David Charbonneau Refereed Publications As of May 2015
    David Charbonneau Refereed Publications as of May 2015 160. Low False Positive Rate of Kepler Candidates Estimated From A Combination Of Spitzer And Follow-Up Observations Désert, Jean-Michel; Charbonneau, David; Torres, Guillermo; Fressin, François; Ballard, Sarah; Bryson, Stephen T.; Knutson, Heather A.; Batalha, Natalie M.; Borucki, William J.; Brown, Timothy M.; Deming, Drake; Ford, Eric B.; Fortney, Jonathan J.; Gilliland, Ronald L.; Latham, David W.; Seager, Sara The Astrophysical Journal, Volume 804, Issue 1, article id. 59 (2015). 159. The Mass of Kepler-93b and The Composition of Terrestrial Planets Dressing, Courtney D.; Charbonneau, David; Dumusque, Xavier; Gettel, Sara; Pepe, Francesco; Collier Cameron, Andrew; Latham, David W.; Molinari, Emilio; Udry, Stéphane; Affer, Laura; Bonomo, Aldo S.; Buchhave, Lars A.; Cosentino, Rosario; Figueira, Pedro; Fiorenzano, Aldo F. M.; Harutyunyan, Avet; Haywood, Raphaëlle D.; Johnson, John Asher; Lopez-Morales, Mercedes; Lovis, Christophe; Malavolta, Luca; Mayor, Michel; Micela, Giusi; Motalebi, Fatemeh; Nascimbeni, Valerio; Phillips, David F.; Piotto, Giampaolo; Pollacco, Don; Queloz, Didier; Rice, Ken; Sasselov, Dimitar; Ségransan, Damien; Sozzetti, Alessandro; Szentgyorgyi, Andrew; Watson, Chris The Astrophysical Journal, Volume 800, Issue 2, article id. 135 (2015). 158. An Empirical Calibration to Estimate Cool Dwarf Fundamental Parameters from H-band Spectra Newton, Elisabeth R.; Charbonneau, David; Irwin, Jonathan; Mann, Andrew W. The Astrophysical Journal, Volume 800, Issue 2, article
    [Show full text]
  • Magnetism, Dynamo Action and the Solar-Stellar Connection
    Living Rev. Sol. Phys. (2017) 14:4 DOI 10.1007/s41116-017-0007-8 REVIEW ARTICLE Magnetism, dynamo action and the solar-stellar connection Allan Sacha Brun1 · Matthew K. Browning2 Received: 23 August 2016 / Accepted: 28 July 2017 © The Author(s) 2017. This article is an open access publication Abstract The Sun and other stars are magnetic: magnetism pervades their interiors and affects their evolution in a variety of ways. In the Sun, both the fields themselves and their influence on other phenomena can be uncovered in exquisite detail, but these observations sample only a moment in a single star’s life. By turning to observa- tions of other stars, and to theory and simulation, we may infer other aspects of the magnetism—e.g., its dependence on stellar age, mass, or rotation rate—that would be invisible from close study of the Sun alone. Here, we review observations and theory of magnetism in the Sun and other stars, with a partial focus on the “Solar-stellar connec- tion”: i.e., ways in which studies of other stars have influenced our understanding of the Sun and vice versa. We briefly review techniques by which magnetic fields can be measured (or their presence otherwise inferred) in stars, and then highlight some key observational findings uncovered by such measurements, focusing (in many cases) on those that offer particularly direct constraints on theories of how the fields are built and maintained. We turn then to a discussion of how the fields arise in different objects: first, we summarize some essential elements of convection and dynamo theory, includ- ing a very brief discussion of mean-field theory and related concepts.
    [Show full text]