LIST OF ACRONYMS
AO Assisting Organization ASU Administrative Support Unit CBFM Community Based Forest Management CENRO Community Environment and Natural Resources Office CFDF Community Forest Development Fund CIC CENRO Inspection Committee CRMF Community Resource Management Framework CSD Comprehensive Site Development DOLE Department of Labor and Employment FSP Forestry Sector Project GIS Geographical Information System ICM Inspection Chart Mapping IEC Information, Education and Communication JBIC Japan Bank for International Cooperation LGU Local Government Unit M & E Monitoring and Evaluation NGAMRAI Nian Green Acres Mangrove Reforestation Association, Inc. OGA Other Government Agencies PAMCED Pisaan Agricultural Multi-Purpose Cooperative for Economic Development
PEACE, Inc. Philippine Environmental Access for Community Education, Inc. PISU-ICLAS Pisaan-Sungayan Integrated Cooperation for Livelihood and Services PO Peoples Organization SMP Survey, Mapping and Planning SUSIMO Subproject Site Management Office WFP Work and Financial Plan
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Summary ------i
I. Subproject Description ------1 1. Purpose/ Objectives 2. Subproject Scope and Dimension
II. Subproject Implementation ------17 1. Organizations for Implementing Subproject 2. Implementation Period 3. Subproject Cost 4. Comments on Performance of AO, AP, PO, M&E, and Infra Contractors 5. Other Matters Relating to Subproject Implementation
III. Action taken by the AO, AP, and PO Relating To Recommendation(s) ------27 1. Recommendations made by the SUSIMO 2. Action Taken and Results
IV. Initial Operation and Maintenance Of the Subproject Facilities ------29 1. Present Condition of Facilities 2. Organization for Operation and Maintenance 3. Annual Budget or Actual Expenditure For Operation and Maintenance (by year) 4. Maintenance Method
V. Benefits Derived from the Project ------39 1. Indirect Effects
VI. Conclusions and Recommendations ------42
LIST OF TABLES:
Table 1: Trainings Attended by the PO------43
Table 2: Subproject Performance ------44
Table 3: Subproject Site Management Office Equipment ------45
Table 4: Trainings Attended by the SUSIMO------46
Table 5a: Fish Culture Livelihood Project (PISU-ICLAS) ------47
Table 5b: Rice Trading Livelihood Project (PISU-ICLAS) ------48
Table 5c: Agar-Agar Buying Livelihood Project (PISU-ICLAS) ------49
Table 5d: Agar-Agar Buying Livelihood Project (PISU-ICLAS) ------50
Table 5e: Tapay-Tapay Livelihood Project (Tarakan) ------51
Table 5f: Tapay-Tapay Livelihood Project (Sungayan) ------52
Table 5g: Lending Livelihood Project (Balabawan) ------53
Table 5h: Agar-Agar Farming Livelihood Project (Sungayan) ------54
Table 5i: Agar-Agar Farming Livelihood Project (Pisaan) ------55
Table 5j: Agar-Agar Farming Livelihood Project (Tagadaya) ------56
Table 5k: Agar-Agar Farming Livelihood Project (Tarakan) ------57
Table 5l: Agar-Agar Farming Livelihood Project (Dimataling) ------58
Table 5m: Agar-Agar Farming Livelihood Project (Samabato) ------59
Table 5n: Agar-Agar Farming Livelihood Project (Buburay) ------60
Table 5o: Agar-Agar Farming Livelihood Project (Tipangi) ------61
Table 5p: Agar-Agar Farming Livelihood Project (Balong-Balong) ------62
Table 5q: Lending Livelihood Project (Liasan) ------63
Table 5r: Cassava Plantation Livelihood Project (Balabawan) ------64
Table 5s: Deep Sea Fishing Livelihood Project (Buburay) ------65
Table 5t: Deep Sea Fishing Livelihood Project (Pisaan) ------66
Table 5u: Agar-Agar Farming Livelihood Project (Liasan) ------67
Table 5v: Imbaw Culture Livelihood Project (Balabawan) ------68
Table 6: Subproject Status Report ------69
Table 7: Community Organizing Cost Per Activity ------70
Table 8: Cost Estimate for Reforestation Per Activity ------71
Table 9: Monitoring and Evaluation Cost Estimate Per Activity ------72
Table 10: Infrastructure Project ------73
Table 11: Annual Work and Financial Plan ------74
ANNEXES:
1. Organizational Charts ------77
1a. CO (NGAMRAI) 1b. PO (PISU-ICLAS) 1c. M&E (PEACE, Inc.) 1d. SUSIMO 1e. Infra (SARDS Construction)
2. Pictures ------82
3. CSD Accomplishment Map ------84 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Pisaan-Sungayan Mangrove Rehabilitation Subproject is located within the 11 Barangays from the three Municipalities of Zamboanga del Sur: Dinas, Dimataling, and Pitogo. The Mangrove forests functioned importantly as source of marine products. Villagers depend much on the marine produce of the area for their living.
Subproject implementation started in the year 2000, the take-off of Community Organizing activities. A Non-government Organization or Assisting Organization (AO) was contracted to organize the communities into People’s Organization (PO). Initially, the two original covered barangays, Pisaan and Sungayan at the Municipalities of Dinas, identified during appraisal was organized. The area of the two barangays suitable for planting was only 368 hectares. Hence, the covered barangays expanded to eleven (11) Barangays of the Municipalities of Dinas, Dimataling, and Pitogo to accommodate the 850 hectares area for development. Eleven Cooperatives were established and federated under the Pisaan-Sungayan Integrated Cooperation for Livelihood and Services, Inc. (PISU-ICLAS).
Comprehensive Site Development activities started in December 2000. The PO established a total of 859 hectares Bacauan Plantation, also they maintained and protected 3,415 hectares natural forest. On May 15, 2003, Community-Based Forest Management Agreement (CBFMA) covering a total area of 4,265 hectares was awarded to PISU-ICLAS Cooperatives. CBFMA is a 25 years tenurial instrument, renewable for a like period, gives pride and sense of ownership to the PO that ensures the sustainability of the developed plantations. The PO generated savings from the accomplished CSD activities. These savings were invested into viable livelihood projects that would ensure financial resources for the maintenance and protection of the plantation. The generated income from livelihood would also support the activities of the Cooperatives.
The established plantations and the intense maintenance and protection of the PO improved the diversity of the marine ecosystem. The communities experienced more harvest than before. The developed vegetative cover of the area also created habitat for wild animals. The Subproject greatly improved the socio- economic condition of the participating communities. Poverty was alleviated and education has been accessible in the area, increasing the literacy rate of the concerned barangays. The constructed infrastructures support the livelihood activities of the PO that would further ensure the continuous development of the area. The great transformation of the communities, since subproject implementation, was the increased awareness on the sustainable use of mangrove forest resources, prevention of illegal activities in the area, and restoration of peace and order.
i SUBPROJECT COMPLETION REPORT
of
PISAAN-SUNGAYAN MANGROVE REHABILITATION SUBPROJECT
Loan Agreement No. PH-P 135 Forestry Sector Project
I. Subproject Description
Pisaan-Sungayan Mangrove Rehabilitation Subproject is located within the municipalities of Dinas, Dimataling, and Pitogo, all in the Province of Zamboanga del Sur. Particularly, the subproject is located at Barangays Pisaan, Sungayan, Tarakan, and Binuatan of Dinas municipality; Barangays Poblacion, Sumbato, Tipangi, and Buburay of the municipality of Dimataling; and Barangays Balong-balong, Liasan, and Balabawan, of Pitogo municipality. It is geographically situated between 7 degrees 23’ 20” latitude and 123 degrees 23’ 13” longitude. It is bounded in the west by the municipalities of Dimataling, Pitogo and Tabina; on the south by the Municipalities of Dumalinao and Pagadian City; and on the east by the municipalities of San Miguel, Margosatubig, and Lapuyan. The mangrove forests functioned importantly as a source of marine products. Villagers depend much on the marine produce of the area for their living.
1. Purpose/Objectives
A) Original
(1) To rehabilitate and protect 850 hectares of open and degraded mangrove ecosystem; (2) To instill awareness on the importance of mangrove forest through community involvement;
1 (3) To provide employment and other livelihood projects for the community; (4) To maintain and protect the remaining mangrove forest resources within the subproject and adjacent areas; (5) To enlist the participation of the community in the proper conservation of the mangrove forest in the area; and (6) To provide legal access to the community to other resources found in the area, which could be the basis for sustainable livelihood projects.
B) Modification
a. Modified purpose/objectives (There was no modification made)
I. Reasons for the modification (Not applicable) (with detailed explanation of the discrepancy between the original and modified basic plans, where applicable)
2. Subproject Scope and Dimension
A. Comparison of Original and Actual Scope and Dimensions.
A.1. Please check: There has been ( revision and/or modification or no revision and/or modification) of the Subproject scope and dimensions.
A.2. If “revision and/or modification”, please complete the Table.
ITEM Original Scope and Revised/Modified Dimensions (At the (Actual) time of appraisal/Planned) 1. REFORESTATION/ WATERSHED/CBFM
A. SMP 1,113 has 1,113 has
B. CO1 Area: 850 has Area: 850 has Schedule: Sept. 11, Schedule: Sept. 11, 2000- Sept. 10, 2002 2000 – February 16, Activities: 2003 Year 1 and 2 o Information o Information Dissemination Dissemination o Organizational o Organizational Building & Social Building & Social
2 Preparation Preparation o Technical and o Technical and Social Training Social Training o Empowerment & o Empowerment & Institutionalizati Institutionalization on o Procurement of o Procurement of Seeds Seeds o Infrastructure o Infrastructure o M&E for billing purposes o M&E for billing Extension Period: The purposes same activities in Year 1 and 2 were continued
C. CSD 1. SOIL EROSION CONTROL/SOIL WATERSHED CONSERVATION
a. Infrastructure N/A N/A b. Trail and footpath N/A N/A c. Riverbank Stabilization N/A N/A
2. VEGETATIVE MEASURES2 a. Agroforestry N/A N/A b. Assisted Natural Regeneration N/A N/A c. Enrichment Planting N/A N/A d. Tree Plantation d.1. Bamboo d.2. Rattan d.3. Mangrove Reforestation 850.0 hectares 850.0 hectares
d.4. Plantation Sp. N/A N/A
e. Timber Stand Improvement N/A N/A
3 3. INVENTORY RESIDUAL N/A N/A FOREST
4. INCOME N/A N/A ENHANCEMENT SUBPROJECT
5. INFRASTRUCTURE a. Bunkhouse 2 units 2 units b. Look-out tower 4 units 14 units c. Graveled Trail 6 km. N/A d. Office N/A 2 units
D INFRASTRUCTURE N/A
o Small scale 1.5 kilometers Irrigation System
o Concrete Drying 900 square meters Yard with Warehouse;
E. MONITORING & EVALUATION
Physical Component Area: 850 hectares Area: 850 hectares Schedule: December Schedule: December 23, 2002 to May 23, 23, 2002 to May 23, 2003 2003 Activities: Activities: o Verification of o Verification of boundaries, UTM boundaries, UTM monuments and monuments and block Corner block Corner Posts Posts o Seedling o Seedling Production Production Inventory/Analy Inventory/Analy sis sis o Survival Counting o Survival Counting with 20% with 20% sampling sampling intensity intensity
4 including including mapping of mapping of developed areas developed areas o Height and o Height and diameter diameter measurement, measurement, assessment of assessment of overall health overall health appearance appearance o Physical o Physical inspection of inspection of Infrastructure Infrastructure o Project o Project Management Management Cost and Report Cost and Report preparation preparation
Socio-Institutional Area: 850 has Area: 850 has Component Schedule: December Schedule: December 23, 2002 to April 23, 23, 2002 to April 23, 2003 2003 Activities: Activities: o Courtesy Calls o Courtesy Calls and Pre- and Pre- assessment assessment Meetings Meetings o Data Collection o Data Collection and Preliminary and Preliminary Assessment Assessment - Secondary - Secondary Data Gathering Data Gathering - Primary Data - Primary Data Gathering Gathering o Preparation and o Preparation and Presentation of Presentation of Draft Report Draft Report o Preparation and o Preparation and Submission of Submission of Final Report Final Report
2. SUSIMO o Equipment 1 unit KIA Ceres provided to the 3 units Boat/ Banca Office3 3 units Motorcycle
5 1 unit Power Generator 1 unit Computer 1 unit Printer 1 unit UPS 1 set GIS Maptitude 1 unit GPS 2 units Handheld Radio 1 unit Base Radio 2 pcs Forester's Transit 1 unit Manual Typewriter 4 pcs Brunton Compass 2 pcs Steel Nylon Tape 2 pcs Diameter Tape 1 pc Planimeter 4 pcs Abney Hand Level 1 unit Rain Guage 3 units Binocular 1 Lettering Set 1 SUSIMO Office o Researches N/A conducted o Trainings - Orientation Seminar Attended on Mangrove Subproject Implementation under FSP
- FSP Mangrove Action Planning Workshop Workshop on the Implementation of Capital Build-up System for Community-Based Forest Management Project
- FSP Year-end Physical and Financial Reconcillation Workshop for CY 2001
6 Planning Workshop
- FSP Mid-Year Physical and Financial Assessment and Action Planning Workshop
- Hands-on Training on the Application of Global Positioning System (GPS) Receiver
- Re-orientation Course of Project Implementors of Mangrove Subproject Sites
- FSP Phase-out/ Phase- in Planning Workshop o Others - Office 20 sq. meters
- Staff 8 from CENRO Guipos 1 from NFDO 1Please refer to Table 1 for the details on trainings attended by the Pos 2Table 2 details the subproject performance in terms of area planted 3Table 3 shows the details of the equipment provided to the SUSIMO 4Please refer to TABLE 4 for the trainings attended by the SUSIMO staff
B. Reasons for Revision/Modification of scope and Dimensions
B.1. Where there has been “revision/modification” of the Subproject scope and dimensions.
Please choose the reason(s) from the following list and check.
Revision of the superior plan (e.g. sector development plan, etc.) Revision of the supply-and-demand estimate Large fluctuation in the Subproject cost Substantial revision of design due to the unforeseeable physical condition at the time of the original design (e.g. poor soil condition, etc.)
7 Natural disaster/unseasonable weather Unusual circumstances beyond the control of the Executing Agency Structural and organizational problems of the agencies concerned (e.g. lack of staff, inadequate coordination with other agencies, etc.) Availability of funds (e.g. lack of funds, use of contingency, fluctuation of the exchange rate, etc.) Unrealistic initial plan/Technical problems Procurement problems Performance of contractor/supplier Performance of consultant Change in construction period Others
B.2. Detailed statement of reasons (with background)
Substantial revision of design due to the unforeseeable physical condition at the time of the original design Unrealistic initial plan/Technical problems
The original plan of the subproject was to establish 850 hectares mangrove plantation in the Barangays of Pisaan and Sungayan, in the Municipality of Dinas, Zamboanga del Sur. However, during the first year of the project implementation, it was discovered that only 368 hectares was of good soil condition while the rest was sandy, which was not suited for planting. The appraisal team was not able to identify that major part of the target site was sandy. In effect, the target area was expanded to the adjacent barangays covering the Municipalities of Dimataling and Pitogo, all in the Province of Zamboanga del Sur. The total participating barangays expanded to eleven (11) from its original two (2) barangays of Dinas Municipality.
From the stipulated target, it was planned to establish 2 look-out towers, 2 bunkhouses, and 6 km. graveled trail. In the actual implementation, 14 look-out towers were built to facilitate maintenance and protection activities of the 11 POs. Cost of the construction of the 12 look-out towers was from the funds for maintenance and protection. Two bunkhouses were built, but the construction of the 6 km graveled trail was disregarded because it was found out that the construction of such was unnecessary. Further, 2 PO offices were built from the savings of the PO.
8 The expansion of the covered barangays led to the extension period of the implementation of the Community Organizing activities. Both the AO and the SUSIMO worked double time in order to meet the target schedule. The organizing activities and plantation establishment activities were done simultaneously to the 9 expansion barangays. A total of 11 cooperatives/organizations were formed and was united under a Federation-PISU-ICLAS.
In the implementation of the Comprehensive Site Development, PISU-ICLAS was able to develop 850 hectares Bacauan Babae plantation. Originally, PISU-ICLAS should develop 10 hectares of Pagatpat Species and 840 hectares of Bacauan Species. The planting of Pagatpat did not push through because of the limited time schedule of project implementation. Seedling production of Pagatpat requires ample time, which the situation did not permit. The schedule for plantation establishment was behind the original target schedule because of the time incurred in search for replacement areas. The original target was to plant Bacauan Lalake within the 840 hectares area. There was a scarce resource of the species in the area and planting the said species resulted to a very low survival rate, which led to the decision of planting the whole of 840 hectares with Bacauan Babae.
C. Contribution of Subproject to Relevant (Sub) Sector(s)
C.1. (Sub) Sector(s) to which the Subproject belongs
Electric power and Gas Telecommunication Social services (Multipurpose) Dams Telecommunications Water supply Power Plants Broadcasting Sewerage Transmission lines Education Distribution Systems Irrigation and Flood control Health Gas Irrigation Tourism Others Flood control Others
Transportation Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Roads Agriculture and Forestry Bridges Fisheries Railways Airport Mining and Manufacturing Ports Mining Marine Transportation Manufacturing Others
9 C.2. Original (At the time of appraisal/Planned)
Item Description
Mangrove rehabilitation o The subproject would enhance development of the vegetative the economic welfare of the cover. area through the restoration of fishery resources.
o Through the mangrove rehabilitation and development, the natural ecosystem would be restored thus, the population of fish was expected to increase in the area, subsequently, fishing operation as one of the income generating options of the community would become sustainable.
o The diversity of marine ecosystem would be improved due to the restoration of mangrove forest. Yield of fishery harvest is expected to increase by the diversification thus there would be an incremental benefit.
o There would be an increased in number of productive fishpond operation.
o Accumulation of wood biomass was expected because of the planting of mangrove species.
o There would be a soil nutrient recharge through litterfalls of the mangrove forest rehabilitated by the project.
o There were intangible benefits
10 that can also be derived from the project, such as; protection of coastal area from erosion; protection of the community from strong wind; keeping the marine ecosystem from community wastes by the massive root system; providing the habitat and nesting place for wildlife and migratory birds, and improvement of vegetative cover and scenery contribute to the overall balance of the environment.
Provision of Community Based o Creating people’s pride and Forest Management Agreement as ownership for the mangrove a Land Tenure Right over the area would encourage active area. participation of the community members in deterring illegal fishing and cutting of mangrove species.
o Riffle effects to the surrounding communities as a successful model case. It would create environmental awareness among adjacent communities.
Employment Creation/ Increase in o Development of the area would Household Income bring employment to the target communities that would implement the Comprehensive Site Development activities. It was also expected that the PO would establish livelihood projects that would support the sustainability of the organization and the continuous Maintenance and Protection of the plantations. Thus, this income generating
11 activities would surely increase the average household income of the involved communities.
C.3. Present situation and outlook for the future
Item Description
Issuance of the Community Based o Before the implementation Forest Management Agreement of the subproject, other (CBFMA) as a Land Tenure Right tenurial instruments were over the area. awarded to the community. Those include Fishpond Lease Agreement and Certificates of Stewardship Contract (CSCs) under the Integrated Social Forestry Program. During implementation, those tenurial instruments were integrated into the Community-Based Forest Management Program through CBFMA awarded to the community with a total of 1,113.00 hectares covering the Barangays of Pisaan and Sungayan.
o Now, the CBFMA covers 11 participating barangays with a total area of 4,265 hectares compose of 850 hectares established plantation and 3,415 hectares natural forest. It was awarded on May 15, 2003.
o Through this tenurial instrument, it is expected, that sustainable development of the CBFMA areas shall be continued. Its present
12 development as well as its existing resources shall be sustainably managed.
Establishment of viable livelihood o Through its formulated projects.5 CRMF, various future endeavors and ventures were perceived by the communities involved for the upliftment of their socio- economic well-being with emphasis on sustainable development of their resources, especially the marine resources.
o Initiated livelihood projects will be further developed with subsidized funding from their accumulated CFDF and share from Retention Fee.
o Available investment capital will be used for planned livelihood opportunities.
Development of the Mangrove area o The vegetative cover of the area was improved. The restoration of the mangrove area improved the diversity of the marine ecosystem. It was observed that the quantity of fish and shells improved. Marine products are easily seen in the area, near the shoreline. The Bagungan and Bacalan shells, native in that area are readily available for export unlike before project implementation those were about to vanish.
Habitat for Wild Animals o The area is found to be a
13 shelter and serves as protection for wild animals like Bats and Wild Boar. protection. More, PO members are now aware of protecting them. They are planning to request the DENR to declare the place as protected zone.
Employment Generation/ Increase o The project provided in Household Income employment to the community members of the 11 barangays through the Comprehensive Site Development. Because of this, the 11 organized cooperatives and the Federation had established livelihood projects to continuously support the protection and maintenance requirements of the area, as well as the organization/cooperative. Further, individual members had also established their own businesses. Some was able to buy pump boats and motorcycles.
o The great manifestation of the increase in income was the improvement of their living condition. Their houses were transformed from a simple Nipa Hut into concrete walls and galvanized iron roofs.
Education was brought to the o Barangay Sungayan was one community/ Increased in the of the poorest Barangays in literacy rate of the area Dinas, Zamboanga del Sur. The arrival of the project
14 brought progress and education in the area. Before the start of the project, community members were not able to attend school because of poverty and with the fact that there was no school built within the area. With the implementation of the project, the economic power of people in Sungayan was developed and increased. In effect, the demand for education was apparent. A school was built and is presently being enjoyed by the residents.
o This is also true to other member barangays where PO members were able to send their children to school.
o Education gives hope for a better future for the children of the concerned communities. Increasing the literacy rate of the communities would bring further development and progress.
Construction of Small Scale o Barangay Sungayan was an Irrigation System and Concrete area with no supply of Drying Yard potable water for domestic use. With the help of the Subproject through the infrastructure component, a small-scale irrigation system was built. Residents in the area are now enjoying potable water for domestic use and for irrigation purposes of their
15 agricultural lands. While in Barangay Pisaan, 1 unit of drying yard was constructed to support the livelihood activities of the residents such as seaweed farming and other agricultural crops.
Awareness of the community in the o Before, community members sustainable use of mangrove forest were into rampant forest resources and care for the extraction with emphasis on environment charcoal making and tree harvesting, without prejudice on its outcome in the future. Nowadays, with the communities’ enlightenment on resource use, sustainability was given emphasis. Maintenance and protection activities were not only focused along the established plantations, but also along the remaining mangrove forests. Cutting of trees along the remaining mangrove area was prohibited. Penalties were imposed to violators. The enumerated activities committed by the POs would ensure the protection of the mangrove areas. The PO shared to their children the importance and the need of continuous protection of the mangrove forest.
Unity among residents/ tribes and o Tribal wars, called Redu, restoration of Peace and Order in were very much evident the area before the implementation of the Subproject. Since the communities were organized by the subproject, the occurrence of Redu was
16 avoided. Families and tribes were united focusing in one goal of rehabilitating the denuded mangrove area. The continuous maintenance and protection of the area would ensure the restoration of peace in the area.
5Please refer to Table 5 for the livelihood project being implemented by the POs
II. Subproject Implementation
1. Organizations for Implementing Subproject
Function in the Name of Organization Reasons for Subproject (1) Original (2) Changed Change Implementation
1. SMP By Admin N/A
2. AO for CO Nian Green Acres N/A Mangrove Reforestation Association, Inc. (NGAMRAI)
3. Assisting N/A N/A Professional
4. People’s Pisaan-Sungayan N/A Organization Integrated Cooperation for Livelihood and Services (PISU- ICLAS) Inc.
5. M&E Philippine N/A Contractor Environmental Access for Community Education (PEACE) Inc.
17 6. Infrastructure SARDS N/A Contractor Construction
Please state:
1.1 Reasons for the change (No changes took place)
1.2 Problems arising, counter measures adopted and results
Community Organizing The recommended area for development from the created appraisal report was not able to provide the required area of 850 hectares. This was realized after a year of project implementation or after the first year of the CO implementation. The AO, NGAMRAI has no choice but to comply with the requirement of the subproject beyond what was stipulated in the contract. The AO was well supported by the SUSIMO and PO in finding additional barangays. Considering that the POs were trying to meet the target implementation plan for CSD, the AO together with the SUSIMO worked double time in organizing the 9 barangays. From the 2 original barangay the subproject expanded into 11 Barangays. The development of the barangay members into a cooperative was done at the same time accomplishing Comprehensive Site Development activities. For a more systematic, effective, and efficient management of the project, an organization/cooperative was formed from each barangay and were federated into one umbrella organization. Below is the list of the established cooperatives:
1. Pisaan Agricultural Multi-Purpose for Economic Development (PAMCED), Pisaan, Dinas ZDS 2. Sungayan Fisherfolks Multi-Purpose Cooperative, Sungayan, Dinas, ZDS 3. Tagadaya Fisherfolks Multi-Purpose Cooperative, Binuatan,, Dinas ZDS 4. Tarakan Fisherfolks Multi-Purpose Cooperative, Tarakan, Dinas, ZDS 5. Burubay Fisherfolks Multi-Purpose Cooperative, Burubay, Dimataling, ZDS 6. Tipangi Fisherfolks Multi-Purpose Cooperative, Tipangi, Dimatiling, ZDS 7. Sumbato Fisherfolks Multi-Purpose Cooperative, Tipangi, Dimataling, ZDS
18 8. Dimataling Fisherfolks Multi-Purpose Cooperative, Poblacion, Dimataling, ZDS 9. Balabawan Mangrove Reforestation Multi-Purpose Cooperative, Balabawan, Pitogo ZDS 10. Balong-balong Fisherfolks Multi-Purpose Cooperative, Balong-balong, Pitogo, ZDS 11. Liasan Multi Purpose Cooperative, Liasan, Pitogo, ZDS
Comprehensive Site Development Majority of the target area identified during the appraisal is sandy and not plantable During the first year of plantation establishment, instead of accomplishing 400 hectares of Bacauan plantation, the PO established only 368 hectares. It was because 368 hectares were the only available area suitable for planting. The PO, with the SUSIMO and the AO identified areas for replacement. This hampered the smooth implementation of the subproject. Also, based on the original CSD contract the PO should plant 10 hectares of Pagatpat species. But because the implementation of the subproject was already late and the seedling production activities of Pagatpat would entail much time, it was replaced to Bacauan Species. Nine barangays were organized to meet the required area for development. The 850 hectares target was successfully planted with Bacauan Babae species.
Scarcity of Propagules Bacauan propagules were not readily available within the site. Old plantations of Bacauan in the area have occupants that refused to share their propagules. The PO has to search in other places for the needed propagules. Originally, the PO should plant both Bacauan babae and Bacauan lalake propagules. But because of scarce resource of Bacauan species in the nearby area, it was harder to find Bacauan lalake species because it was grown seasonally. The PO decided to drop Bacauan lalake from the list and planted only one species (Bacauan babae) in the entire 850 hectares plantation. The required Bacauan Babae propagules were provided and were planted in the 850 hectares area.
Longer period of neap tide The longer period of neap tide in the area reduced the working period of the POs for plantation establishment. Target to be accomplished per month was not achieved. In order to address this problem, the PO worked overtime during low tide up until midnight.
19 Infestation “Maggots” infested about 76 hectares of the established plantation. It penetrated the propagule that led to its mortality. A sample of the infested propagule was sent to Manila for study, but they were not able to know the results. They replanted the area but still faced the same problem. The PO and the SUSIMO decided to find another area for replacement. The required area was transferred but still within the subproject site, it was established successfully.
Untoward human activities Transportation of fishermen like pumpboats/ bancas pass over the plantation during high tide. This hampers the growth of the plantation. The PO strengthened its monitoring and protection activities, and regularly checked the condition of the perimeter fence surrounding the plantations. With the rigid monitoring activities of the POs, the plantations attained a very high survival rate of 84%.
Organizational Crises The first set of officers of PISU-ICLAS showed poor performance in managing the organization. The development of the organization was one year backward from its target. General Assembly and Election of Officers were conducted, that replaced the pioneer officers of new ones in a democratic way. But the outgoing president refused to leave his position. The SUSIMO settled the issue and supported the new sets of officers. The new sets of officers started to implement policies to manage the organization properly. They also provided guidance to member cooperatives. Since then, the mother organization as well as the member organizations was managed well bringing optimum service to the members.
1.3 The latest organization chart (or equivalent) for the implementation of the Subproject is ( attached or not available). 1.4 If the organizational chart (or equivalent) is not available, please state the reason.
2. Implementation Period
A. Comparison of Original Schedule and Actual Period
Please fill in the following blanks with actual period for each item.
20
ITEM ORIGINAL SCHEDULE ACTUAL PERIOD
1) Contract for SMP
2) Contract of AO for Sept. 11, 2000- Sept. Sept. 11, 2000 – CO 10, 2002 February 16, 2003
3) Contract of PO for December 15, 2000 to Dec. 15, 2000 to CSD June 30, 2003 July 31, 2003
4) Contract of NGO December 23, 2002 to December 23, for M&E Physical May 23, 2003 2002 to May 23, 2003
Institutional December 23, 2002 to December 23, April 23, 2003 2002 to April 23, 2003
5) Contract of Nov. 29, 2002 to June November 29, Infrastructure 02, 2003 2002 to August Component 30, 2003
Completion June 2003 December 2003 (Completion of Subproject)
Please refer to Table 6 for the subproject status report
Notes: Completion of the Subproject was defined as ( completion ceremony or final disbursement or other than the above.
The completion date was scheduled for the completion of all CSD activities as indicated in the approved Work and Financial Plan (at the time of appraisal) and is indicated (thus ) in the above Table.
B. Reasons for Delay or Early Completion
B.1. In case of delay or early completion, please choose the reason(s) from the following list and check.
Change in scope/dimensions
21 Natural disaster/Unseasonable weather (e.g. earthquake, typhoon, etc.) Shortage of funds/Fluctuation of the exchange rate Problems in procurement (propagules) Inflation Unusual circumstances beyond the control of the Executing Agency Structural and organizational problems of the agencies concerned (e.g. lack of staff, inadequate coordination with other agencies, etc.) Legislative matters Unrealistic initial plan/Technical problems Performance of contractor/supplier Performance of consultant Others B.2. Reasons and background for delay or early completion
Change in Scope and Dimension Community Organizing The contract of the Assisting Organization for community organizing was extended because of the expansion of the subproject from 2 barangays to 11 barangays.
Problems in Procurement of Propagules Comprehensive Site Development PISU-ICLAS requested for the extension of their contract to replant the 76 hectares infested area. The needed propagules for the replanting activity were brought in Osamis. While transporting the propagules to Zamboanga del Sur the Osamis Police prohibited the handling and confiscated the propagules. This happened in June, so the PO requested the extension of their contract to July while trying to claim the propagules.
Natural Disaster/Unseasonable Weather Infrastructure Component Delay in the completion of the Infrastructure project was mainly due to harsh weather condition and strong waves that impeded the on- time delivery of construction materials.
C. Remedial Action Taken in Each Case of Delay
Community Organizing The SUSIMO helped or even led the AO on how to facilitate the organizing of the additional 9 Barangays. Their contract was extended
22 considering the change of scope as result of a technical problem. The granted extension period did not entail additional cost.
Comprehensive Site Development In order to transport the propagules to Pisaan-Sungayan, PISU- ICLAS coordinated with the LGU of Osamis and at the same time with the LGUs of Dinas, Pitogo, and Dimataling Zamboanga del Sur. Soon, the propagules were released and PISU-ICLAS sought the approval of 1 month extension.
Infrastructure Component The contractor has to wait until the roads in Barangay Sungayan were passable by trucks for the delivery of construction materials for the Small Scale Irrigation. To materialize the delivery of construction materials for the Drying Yard in Barangay Pisaan, the contractor used big boats to counter the strong waves.
3. Subproject Cost
A. Comparison of Original Estimated Cost and Actual Expenditure (by Component)
Original Cost Actual Expenditures Item (based on appraisal) (in M pesos) (in M pesos)
Survey Mapping and By Admin By Admin Planning
Community Organization 1.530000 1.530000
Comprehensive Site 8.990000 12.693174 Development
Monitoring 0.753050 0.753050 and Evaluation
Infrastructure Dev’t 3.397460 3.371707
Subproject 2.325980 2.325980 Coordinating Office GRAND TOTAL 16.996490 20.673911 Please refer to Tables 7, 8, 9 for the details on cost of CO, CSD and M&E. List of Infra project/s with its corresponding cost is also attached as Table 10.
23 B. Reasons for Difference between Original Estimated Cost and Actual Expenditure
B.1. If there is any difference between Table a.1 and Table a.2 in Paragraph a, please choose the reason(s) from the following list and check. Increase in reconstruction cost arising from natural disaster/unreasonable weather (e.g. earthquake, typhoon, etc.) Increase or decrease arising from a change in construction period Increase or decrease arising from inflation Increase or decrease arising from fluctuation in the exchange rate Increase or decrease arising from a change in the scope/work volume of the Subproject Decrease arising from keen competition in tender Unusual circumstances beyond the control of the Executing Agency Unrealistic cost estimates/Technical problems Others
B.2. Description of the detailed reason(s) and background
Comprehensive Site Development Additional costs were given to facilitate further the maintenance and protection activities of the PO. The amount was added in the regular pass of the second year activity in order to improve the quality of the established plantation.
Infrastructure Component The cost of the Infrastructure component of the subproject was decreased because there were activities identified during the original plan, which in the construction process were not necessary to undertake.
C. Action taken in Case of Cost Overrun and Results
The Project Management Office (National Level) obligated additional funds for the implementation of the Comprehensive Site Development activities, which led to the revision of the work and financial plan of the CSD contract. The additional amount addressed the required intensive maintenance and protection activities for the established
24 plantations. The plantation attained an average survival rate of 84%. The revised contract cost (12,693,173.95) was fully utilized/ disbursed.
D. Comparison of Original Estimated Expenditure and Actual Expenditure (by Year)
Calendar Original Cost Actual Expenditures Year (based on appraisal)
2000 0.805800 0.481363 2001 4.399840 3.750692 2002 5.148110 7.932525 2003 6.642740 8.509331 Total 16.996490 20.673911 Please refer to Table 11 for the details of the Annual Work and Financial Plan
4. Comments on Performance of Assisting Organizations (AOs), Assisting Professionals (APs), Peoples Organizations (POs), M&E and Infrastructure contractors.
Please describe the performance of each organization after checking the item(s) in the relevant lists on which you have any comment.
A. Performance of Assisting Organizations & Assisting Professionals (if any) Peoples Organizations, M&E and Infrastructure contractors a.1. Overall performance Design Contract administration Construction supervision Expertise Staff qualifications Coordinating ability Compliance with Contracts Performance related to any other than the Subproject scope, if any. Others
A.2 Description (in detail)
Overall Performance/ Compliance with Contract/ Expertise Assisting Organization The Assisting Organization did a satisfactory performance in accomplishing all the activities stipulated in their work and financial plan. Additional credit should be given, because despite the expansion of the covered barangays they managed to perform the activities without additional cost but sought
25 extension of their contract. Though the AO did not deploy additional staff for the organizing of expansion barangays, it was compensated with the caliber of staff implementing the organizing activities. The AO deployed staff expert in Community Organizing. It is also important to mention the AO’s coordinating ability.
People’s Organization – PISU-ICLAS The PO performed well in the development and maintenance of the 850 hectares Bacauan Plantation with 82% average survival rate. On the institutional aspect, it is rated satisfactorily having achieved the required milestones. The 11 established cooperative under the PISU-ICLAS were strengthened organizationally with each managing their own livelihood project.
Monitoring and Evaluation Contractor The contractor performed satisfactorily. They have completed the planned activities on time in accordance to the approved Work and Financial Plan.
Infrastructure Component Contractor It was observed that the performance of the contractor was very poor. The contract duration was not strictly followed. They started the construction only in April in contrast to the original schedule of November. Thus, the construction was not completed as scheduled.
Coordinating Ability Assisting Professional NGAMRAI was able to establish coordination with the Provincial Government. As a result, the Local Government Units were very supportive with the implementation of the Subproject. Further, the AO was able to link the PO with the Provincial Government for livelihood opportunities.
People’s Organization – PISU-ICLAS The PO was able to link with Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR) for livelihood project development. Fortunately, BFAR donated 2 fish cages to the PO.
5. Other matters relating to Subproject Implementation
26 Please choose the item(s) from the following list on which you have any comment, check it (them), and describe it (them) with measure and results in (B) below. A. Technical Financial Institutional Economic Social/Distributional Others
B. Description (in detail)
Social Distributional In the initial take-off of the project implementation, there were families that were hesitant to join the project. They did not believe in the good intention of the programs being offered by the subproject. The continuous Information, Education, and Communication (IEC) Campaign conducted by the PO, AO, and SUSIMO convinced the hesitant residents to join the subproject. The IEC campaign was focused on the CBFMA, the importance of rehabilitating the mangrove area, and the long-term and short-term monetary benefits to be derived in implementing the subproject. The genuine intentions of the subproject were vindicated with the actual experiences of members that further persuaded the other to be part of the implementation of the subproject.
III. Action Taken by the AOs, APs and POs relating to Recommendation(s)
1. Recommendation(s) made by SUSIMO
SUSIMO check: This article is ( applicable. The recommendations are given or not applicable. There has been no recommendation with regard to the Subproject).
2. Action Taken and Results
Issue/Recommendation Action Taken Results 1. The AO was not able to Because of the The additional 9 submit their reports on- expansion of the Barangays were time because all the covered barangay from organized into staffs were deployed in the original plan of 2 Cooperatives. The organizing the expansion became 11, the AO had backlog of the PO in barangays. The SUSIMO a hard time in plantation advice the AO to deploy/ accomplishing all establishment was hire additional staff to activities at the same facilitated. facilitate process time. The AO could not documentation of the CO follow the activities. recommendation of
27 the SUSIMO since there was no additional cost in organizing the additional 9 barangays. Instead the SUSIMO gave their full support to the AO in order to meet the target on- time. Punctual submission of reports was facilitated. 2. The SUSIMO The AO revised its All required requested for the work and financial plan trainings were revision of the AO’s that contained implemented and the Work and Financial for broader perspective POs had a chance to the training needs of the for the 11 covered cross visit the expansion barangays. barangays. Mangrove Plantation in Bohol (Banacon Island). 3. Poor growth The PO planted The survival rate of performance of Bacauan Bacauan Babae instead the planted Lalake along seaward of Bacauan Lalake propagules portion of the planting increased, attaining area. The SUSIMO an 82% survival rate suggested to the PO to during M&E and 84% look for alternative during the final Mangrove Species that validation. would thrive in the area. 4. Poor performance of New sets of officers The organization the first elected officers were elected. was managed well of PISU-ICLAS. The and started the SSIMO suggested for establishment of the conduct of General Livelihood Project. Assembly and Election of Officers. 5. The PO has no clear The Board of Funds of the PO guidelines on financial Directors of PISU- were properly disbursement. The ICLAS passed a disbursed. SUSIMO convinced the resolution of financial new set of officers to disbursement. create a resolution stipulating procedures on financial disbursement.
28 6. The SUSIMO advised The PO agreed and Financial activities the PO to conduct regular their finances were of the PO were audit of their finances properly audited properly recorded.
IV. Initial Operation and Maintenance of Subproject Facilities
1. Present Condition of Facilities
A.Please check: This article is ( applicable due to problem(s) or not applicable. No particular problem has occurred since the initial operation started). If there have been any problems, please check the relevant space in the Table.
PO-PISU-ICLAS Item Status Initial Mainte- Manage- Others Operation nance ment 2 units PO Serviceable Office 2 units Serviceable √ Bunkhouse 14 units Look-out Serviceable √ Tower 11 Perimeter Serviceable √ Fencing 1 unit Serviceable √ Typewriter 3 units Mobile Serviceable Phone 2 units Camera 1 Serviceable 1 nonServiceable 1 unit Hand-held Serviceable Radio 1 unit Isuzu Elf Serviceable 3 units Boat 2 Serviceable √ (Susimo Boat 1 nonServiceable maintained/ used by PO)
29 SUSIMO Item Status Initial Mainte Manage- Others Operation nance ment 1 unit KIA Ceres Serviceable
3 units Boat/Banca 2 Serviceable 1 non Service- able
3 units Motorcycle Serviceable
1 unit Power Serviceable Generator
1 unit Computer Serviceable
1 unit Printer Serviceable
1 unit UPS Serviceable
1 set GIS Serviceable Maptitude
1 unit GPS Serviceable
2 units Handheld 1 Serviceable Radio 1 non Service- able
1 unit Base Non Serviceable Radio
2 pcs Forester's 1 Serviceable Transit 1 non Service- able
1 unit Manual Serviceable √ Typewriter
3 pcs Brunton Serviceable Compass
2 pcs Steel Serviceable Nylon Tape
2 pcs Diameter Serviceable Tape
30 1 pc Planimeter Serviceable √ √
4 pcs Abney Serviceable √ Hand Level
1 unit Rain Gauge Serviceable √
3 units Binocular 2 Serviceable 1 non Serviceable
√ 1 Lettering Set Serviceable
1 SUSIMO Serviceable √ Office
B. Please check: The Problem(s) has arisen owing to the following reason(s).
Technical Financial Institutional Economic Social/Distributional Others
C. Description (in detail)
Technical The PO and the SUSIMO encountered problems in the technical aspects of the equipment. Over time, the equipment loses its durability thus regular maintenance and repair were necessary. In the case of the KIA Ceres, it undergone general repair of the engine, windshield, and its upholstery upon turn over to the SUSIMO.
Others (Natural Calamity/ Bad weather condition) Due to bad weather condition and natural calamities experience in the subproject area, regular maintenance of the Bunkhouse, Look-out tower, and perimeter fences were necessary. In the same manner, the working condition of the motor vehicles used by the SUSIMO was greatly affected by these. Maintenance and repair of the vehicles were done more frequently.
Others (Availability of Spare Parts) The SUSIMO encountered problems in the repair of the Base Radio because the unavailability of the needed spare parts. Until now, the base radio is non-serviceable because of this reason
31 D. Aspect of utilizing the Subproject facilities
PO-PISU-ICLAS Item Original Plan Actual Operation 2 units PO Office For PISU-ICLAS use For PISU-ICLAS use 2 units Bunkhouse For PISU-ICLAS use For PISU-ICLAS use 14 units Look-out For PISU-ICLAS use For PISU-ICLAS use Tower 11 Perimeter For PISU-ICLAS use For PISU-ICLAS use Fencing 1 unit Typewriter For PISU-ICLAS use For PISU-ICLAS use 3 units Mobile Phone For PISU-ICLAS use For PISU-ICLAS use 2 units Camera For PISU-ICLAS use For PISU-ICLAS use 1 unit Hand-held For PISU-ICLAS use For PISU-ICLAS use Radio 1 unit Isuzu Elf For PISU-ICLAS use For PISU-ICLAS use 3 units Boat (Susimo For SUSIMO use For SUSIMO and PO Boat maintained/ use used by PO)
SUSIMO Item Original Plan Actual Operation 1 unit KIA Ceres ADB Loan 1/ CENRO SUSIMO use Pagadian City 3 units Boat/ Banca For SUSIMO use For SUSIMO and PO 3 units Motorcycle - do - use 1 unit Power - do - For SUSIMO use Generator - do - 1 unit Computer - do - For SUSIMO and 1 unit Printer - do - CENRO Guipos use 1 unit UPS - do - - do - 1 set GIS - do - - do - Maptitude For SUSIMO use 1 unit GPS - do - For SUSIMO and 2 units Handheld - do - CENRO Guipos use Radio For SUSIMO use 1 unit Base Radio - do - 2 pcs Forester's - do - For SUSIMO and PO Transit use 1 unit Manual - do - For SUSIMO use Typewriter 4 pcs Brunton - do - For SUSIMO and
32 Compass CENRO Guipos use 2 pcs Steel Nylon - do - - do - Tape 2 pcs Diameter Tape - do - - do - 1 pc Planimeter - do - 4 pcs Abney Hand - do - - do - Level - do - 1 unit Rain Guage - do - - do - 3 units Binocular - do - 1 Lettering Set - do - - do - 1 SUSIMO Office - do - - do - - do - For SUSIMO use
2. Organization for Operation and Maintenance
A. Name of PO/ SUSIMO
A.1. Please give the name of PO and/or Body in charge of O/M.
PO: Pisaan-Sungayan Integrated Cooperation for Livelihood and Services (PISU-ICLAS) Represented by: Omar Ubpon (President)
SUSIMO: Pisaan-Sungayan Mangrove Rehabilitation Subproject Site Management Office SMO: For. Ma. Socorro Jessica A. Casipong
A.2. Please check: The latest organization chart (or equivalent) for O/M of the Subproject facilities is ( attached or not available). See Annex 2
A.3. If the organization chart (or equivalent) is not available, please state the reason.
B. Number of staff/workers of the PO or Body for Operation and Maintenance of Subproject Facilities.
PO: 10 Officers and 11 Board of Directors SUSIMO: 9 Staff
C. Please check and explain the following.
C.1. The number of staff is currently ( sufficient or insufficient).
33 If “Insufficient”, please describe your estimate of the optimum number of staff and your plan for providing them.
C.2. Average employment period of the present staff
PO: 3 years SUSIMO: 10 Year
C.3. Availability of training program to promote the vocational ability of the staff, its contents and expected effects. N/A
3. Annual Budget or Actual Expenditure for Operation and Maintenance (by Year)
A. Original Expected Expenditure
PO-PISU-ICLAS Since the funds of the PO came from the billings of their accomplished activities of the CSD, they were not able to plan or allocate funds for the repair and maintenance of their equipment and facilities. But with the completion of the project and the retention fee that they received, the PO will create a plan of proper allocation of their finances including the repair and maintenance of their equipment and facilities.
SUSIMO Item Maintenance Operation Total Calendar year
2000 0.265000 0.265000
2001 0.045000 0.157000 0.202000
2002 0.040000 0.290000 0.330000
2003 0.100000 0.504900 0.604900 TOTAL 0.185000 1.216800 1.401900
34 C. Actual and Currently Expected Expenditure
PO-PISU-ICLAS Maintenance & Item Mainte- Operation Operation Total Calendar year nance (For expanded portion) 2001 - PO Office 0.033980 0.033980 (Supplies and other items) - Typewriter 0.000500 0.000500 - Camera 0.010000 0.010000 - Boat 0.020000 0.020000 Subtotal 0.064480 0.064480
2002 - PO Office 0.059950 0.059950 (Supplies and other items) - Typewriter 0.000500 0.000500 - Mobile Phone 0.003600 0.003600 - Camera 0.010000 0.010000 - Boat 0.006000 0.020000 0.026000 Subtotal 0.006000 0.094050 0.100050
2003 - PO Office 0.040074 0.040074 (Supplies and other items) - Bunkhouse 0.010000 0.010000 - Perimeter 0.055000 0.055000 Fencing - Typewriter 0.001000 0.000500 0.001500 - Mobile Phone 0.003600 0.003600 - Camera 0.010000 0.010000 - Handheld 0.001500 0.001500 Radio 0.015000 0.015000 - Boat Subtotal 0.066000 0.070674 0.136674 Total 0.072000 0.229204 0.301204
35 SUSIMO Maintenance Item Mainte- Operation and Operation Total Calendar year nance For expanded Operation
2001 -KIA Ceres 0.057150 0.020317 0.077467 -Office 0.084595 0.084595 (Supplies and Communications)
Subtotal 0.057150 0.104912 0.162062
2002 -Motorcycle 0.045875 0.045875 - Motorcycles 0.101053 0.101053 and KIA - Office 0.088564 0.088564 (Supplies and Communications) Subtotal 0.045875 0.189617 0.235492
2003 -KIA Ceres 0.034490 0.034490 -Motorcycle 0.008359 0.008359 - Motorcycles 0.015744 0.015744 and KIA - Office 0.057484 0.057484 (Supplies and Communications) - Typewriter 0.000500 0.000500
Subtotal 0.034990 0.081588 0.116578
2003 -KIA Ceres 0.073167 0.008560 0.081727 -Motorcycle 0.005442 0.005442 - Motorcycles 0.126272 0.126272 and KIA -Office 0.14962 0.149627 (Supplies and Communications)
36 Subtotal 0.078609 0.284459 0.363068
2004 - Office 0.025000 0.025000 (Supplies and Communications) - Repair and 0.020000 0.020000 Maintenance of KIA and Motorcycle - Gasoline, Oil, & 0.015000 0.015000 Lubricants for KIA and Motorcycle
Subtotal 0.020000 0.040000 0.060000 Total 0.937200
Note: Actual and currently expected expenditure for expansion, replacement or any other improvement purposes
Please describe the basis for the above estimate and your financing plan for the same. The PO has no designed plan for their finances. Projections were not done because their finances were based from the CSD billings. But after project funding, with the claimed retention fee and income from livelihood projects, the PO has started to practice projecting their expenses.
The financing plan for the SUSIMO was based on previous implemented projects with the same nature. Activities for financing were identified actual needs in consonance with Subproject activities.
4. Maintenance Method
A. Content of Method B. Frequency C. Others, if any.
37 PO-PISU-ICLAS Equipment/ Facility Method Frequency 1. Bunkhouse Repair of roofing. As needed Purchased bamboo for the repair of flooring and pathway 2. Perimeter Fence Purchase binder, nails, As needed post, and piles for the restoration of damaged fence due to strong waves. 3. Typewriter Cleaning and As needed Lubrication
Ribbon Replacement Once a Year 4. Boat Cleaning and Every week Maintenance of Hull
Change oil Every three months
Replacement of As needed crossed joined/ Bearing
Replacement of As needed Propeller Shaft and Propeller Blade
Replacement of Every three months Busted Sparkplug
SUSIMO Equipment/ Facility Method Frequency 1. KIA Ceres Repair of Upholstery Initial operation
Replacement of Initial Operation windshield
Replacement of Initial Operation Differential
Replacement of tire Initial Operation and rim
38 Repair of transmission Three times, as because of broken needed since acquired bearing
Change oil Every three months 2. Motorcycle Replacement of Thrice a year Sparkplug
Replacement of Once a year sprocket
Replacement and Twice a year Repair of Roller Chain
Replacement of As needed Connecting Rod, Reboring of Cylinder, Replacement of Piston kit, and Refacing of Camshaft
Replacement of Tire Once a year 3. Typewriter Replacement of roller Once and cleaning
V. Benefits derived from Subproject
1. Indirect Effects
A. Please choose and check the item(s) which are dealt with this Article by you. Technological transfer (e.g. application of technology used in the Subproject to other similar projects and subprojects) Employment creating (e.g. during construction, contribution to the sector(s) after completion) Income-raising (e.g. income of the residents in the region) Other intended or unintended effects on the relevant sector(s) and/or the region concerned
39 B. Please give details for each of the item(s) you checked.
B.1 Employment Generation Members of the participating PO’s were hired as laborers to accomplish activities involved in the establishment of plantations and its maintenance and protection. A considerable number of laborers were needed to such voluminous work, which started from the collection of propagules to planting and later on, maintenance and protection that includes removal of barnacles, debris to replanting. A total of 334 persons were constantly employed through the implementation of Subproject.
B.2. Income Raising Employment generation provided additional income in the form of wages of work accomplished. This has greatly improved the economic condition of the project beneficiaries. Other forms of income were from the business ventures of the PO’s livelihood activities and individual income generating activities of the members (such as cash crops & palay production and fishery). Before the start of the project, the covered communities had an average annual gross income of Php 30,156.50 including off-farm, on-farm, and non-farm activities. During project implementation, considering the off-farm, on-farm, non-farm activities and the salary/wages provided by the subproject not including their income in the established livelihood, the covered communities have an average annual income of Php 41,577.00. This is manifested in the improvement of the living condition of the PO members. Houses were transformed from a simple Nipa Hut into concrete walls and galvanized iron roofing.
B.3. Other intended or unintended effects on the relevant sector(s) and/or the region concerned
1. Increased the literacy rate of the concerned Barangays.
2. Construction of the infrastructures to support the livelihood of the communities. The small-scale irrigation system supplies potable water to the communities of Barangay Sungayan for domestic and irrigation purposes. The concrete drying yard in Barangay Pisaan is very useful for the post harvest activities of their produce. These infrastructure facilities were officially
40 turned over to the LGU to ensure the maintenance of the said facilities.
3. Restoration of Peace and Order. Through the Subproject, the communities were united and the occurrence of tribal wars called Redu was avoided. 4. Through the subproject, the participating communities were linked to the Local Government Units in the area, to other Government Agencies and NGO’s.
41 VI. Conclusion and Recommendation
The implementation of the Pisaan-Sungayan mangrove Rehabilitation Subproject had generated immeasurable milestones especially within the vicinities of the municipalities of Dinas, Dimataling, and Pitogo, in the province of Zamboanga del Sur. Its positive effects do not only confined in the province of Zamboanga del Sur, but rather it goes as far as the nearby provinces of Zamboanga Sibugay and del Norte, as well as in the province of Misamis Occidental where the collection of propagules was reached by the PO’s. Another notable effect of the project is the increased awareness among the mangrove settlers the necessity to conserve our environment especially the marine ecosystem where most of their livelihood activities were concentrated.
Recommendations:
1. With the positive effects the project had endowed to its beneficiaries, it is worth recommending that such similar projects be replicated. It is important to note that the project has greatly improved the socio- economic condition of the participating communities.
2. Special attention, however, should be given in executing the Survey, Mapping, Planning, and Appraisal of the area. The Appraisal stage would identify the target area for development that would be a basis for staging the development plan of the whole subproject. In the experience of this subproject, the appraisal team committed blunder in identifying the sites for 850 hectares target area. It was found out during the first year of plantation establishment that the 482 hectares, which was part of the 850 hectares appraised area, was found to be sandy.
This affected the smooth implementation of the project, from the conduct of the Community Organizing activities through the conduct of the Comprehensive Site Development activities.
3. It is also recommended that continuing monitoring and evaluation of the project should likewise be given preferential attention in order to document its progress in the future.
42 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. PH - P135
Table 1. Trainings Attended by People's Organization
NO. OF INCLUSIVE TRAINING TRAINORS PARTICI- DATES PANTS
1. Cooperative Education DA Personnel, AO, 67 January 4-6, 2001 and Pre-Membership SUSIMO Training 2. Plantation Management Dr. Dante Oporto/ 64 January 7-9, 2001 Training PENRO Personnel, AO, SUSIMO 3. Organizational PENRO Personnel, 50 January 10-12, 2001 Management Training AO, SSIMO
4. Initial Training on PENRO Personnel, 80 October 23-25, Comprehensive Site AO, SSIMO 2000 Development 5. Cooperative Management Mr. Sebelino 19 July 17-18, 2001 Seminar Belloan, PCU, AO, SUSIMO 6. Organizing and AO Staff, 19 July 19, 2001 Leadership Training SUSIMO 7. Orientation Seminar on For. Ellen Dador- 30 November 14, 2001 CBFM FSP Focal Person, AO, SUSIMO 8. Orientation Seminar on For. Ellen Dador- 32 November 15, 2001 CBFM FSP Focal Person, AO, SUSIMO 9. PMES and CBFM AO, SUSIMO 25 July 25-26, 2002 Training 10. PMES and CBFM AO, SUSIMO 25 July 30-31, 2002 Training 11. PMES and CBFM AO, SUSIMO 30 August 1-2, 2002 Training 12. Financial Management DENR-R9, 36 January 27, 2003 Training Accounting Personnel
43 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. PH - P135
Table 2. Subproject Performance
Area Year Planted Component Species Planted Survival Planted
2001 REFO Bacauan Babae 368 83%
2002 REFO Bacauan Babae 482 85%
TOTAL AREA PLANTED 850 hectares
AVERAGE SURVIVAL RATE 84%
44 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. PH - P135
Table 3. Subproject Site Management Office Equipment
Date/year ITEM Specifications Qty Cost (PhP) procured
1. Boat / Banca Small 3 January 2002 270,000.00 2. Motorcycle Honda MC, XL 125 3 January 2002 252,825.84 3. Power Generator Engine, gosoline, GS, 1 April 23, 2001 44,096.00 3.5 KVA 4. Computer HP Brio PC Intel 1 February 20, 2001 70,850.00 Pentium III 733 mhg 5. Printer HP Deskjet Model 1 April 27, 2001 5,811.52 849 C 6. UPS Gamatronic Compact 1 April 15, 2001 5,720.00 model 520VA 7. GIS Maptitude Comb. Of Software 1 March 28, 2001 44,460.00 & Geographic Data 8. GPS Global Positioning 2 March 28, 2001 210,000.00 Power 9. Handheld Radiio VHF/FM COM model 2 January 12, 2001 29,933.28 IC-F3GT 10. Base Radio VHF/FM ICOM 1 January 12, 2001 64,789.92 11. Forester's Surveying Compass, 2 May 21, 2001 65,680.00 Transit Ushikita, model S-27
12. Manual Olivetti, 18 carriage 1 March 28, 2001 8,309.60 Typewriter 13. Brunton Compass Kataoka br., model 4 March 28, 2001 19,552.00 BCD-90 14. Steel Nylon Tape Tajima br. 2 April 23, 2001 2,700.00 15. Diameter Tape 2 March 29, 2001 1,330.20 16. Planimeter OSKK KOIZUMI 1 October 26, 2001 7,800.00 17. Abney Hand Model: OSK 17251 4 May 21, 2001 9,568.00 Level 18. Rain Guage Digital Rainwise 1 May 28, 2001 6,300.00 19. Binocular 3 May 28, 2001 12,168.00 20. Lettering Set Leroy set 1 May 28, 2001 4,992.00
45 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. PH - P135
Table 4. Trainings Attended by SUSIMO
N0. OF INCLUSIVE TRAINING TRAINORS PARTICIPANTS DATES
1. Orientation Seminar on NFDO, FSP-TA, 9 August 16-17, Mangrove Subproject and RFDO 2000 Implementation under FSP
2. FSP Mangrove Action NFDO, FSP-TA, 9 December 7-9, Planning Workshop and RFDO 2000
3. Workshop on the DENR-R9, 9 Decmber 14, Implamantation of Capital Technical 2000 Build-up System for Personnel Community-Based Forest Management Project
4. FSP Year-end Physical NFDO, FSP-TA, 9 December 15-17, and Financial Reconcillation and RFDO 2000 Workshop for CY 2001 Planning Workshop
5. FSP Mid-Year Physical NFDO, FSP-TA, 9 June 26-28, and Financial Assessment and RFDO 2001 and Action Planning Workshop
6. Hands-on Training on the NFDO, FSP-TA, 9 April 2-4, 2002 Application of Global and RFDO Posistioning System (GPS) Receiver
7. Re-orientation Course of NFDO and FSP- 9 April 19-22, Project Implementors of TA 2002 Mangrove Subproject Sites
8. FSP Phase-out/ Phase-in NFDO and FSP- 9 December 10-13, Planning Workshop TA 2002
46 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. Ph-P 135
Table 5a. Fish Culture Livelihood Project (PISU-ICLAS) Name of Livelihood Project : Fish Culture
Implementor : PISU-ICLAS (Federation)
No. of Beneficiaries : 334
Amount of investment : 102,000
Date of Feasibility Study : Jan-03
Date started : May-03
Status : On-going
Net Income : Php 48,000
CFDF/CBU : Php 316,000
Linkages Developed : Provincial Government of Zamboanga del Sur, BFAR, MURID, and MOCCARD
47 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. Ph-P 135
Table 5b. Rice Trading Livelihood Project (PISU-ICLAS) Name of Livelihood Project : Rice Trading
Implementor : PISU-ICLAS (Federation)
No. of Beneficiaries : 334
Amount of investment : 20,000
Date of Feasibility Study : No FS but with Proposal
Date started : May-03
Status : On-going
Net Income : Php 4,770.00
CFDF/CBU : Php 316,000
Linkages Developed : Provincial Government of Zamboanga del Sur, BFAR, MURID, and MOCCARD
48 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. Ph-P 135
Table 5c. Agar-Agar Buying Livelihood Project (PISU-ICLAS)
Name of Livelihood Project : Agar-Agar Buying
Implementor : PISU-ICLAS (Federation-Pob. Dimataling)
No. of Beneficiaries : 334
Amount of investment : 50,000
Date of Feasibility Study : No FS but with Proposal
Date started : Aug-03
Status : On-going
Net Income : Php 3,851.35
CFDF/CBU : Php 316,000
Linkages Developed : Provincial Government of Zamboanga del Sur, BFAR, MURID, and MOCCARD
49 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. Ph-P 135
Table 5d. Agar-Agar Buying Livelihood Project (PISU-ICLAS) Name of Livelihood Project : Agar-Agar Buying
Implementor : PISU-ICLAS (Federation-Tarakan, Dinas)
No. of Beneficiaries : 337
Amount of investment : 35,000
Date of Feasibility Study : No FS but with Proposal
Date started : Sep-03
Status : On-going
Net Income : Php 3,000.00
CFDF/CBU : Php 316,000 Linkages Developed : Provincial Government of Zamboanga del Sur, BFAR, MURID, and MOCCARD
50 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. Ph-P 135
Table 5e. Tapay-Tapay Livelihood Project (Tarakan) Name of Livelihood Project : Tapay-Tapay (Basnig) Implementor : Tarakan Fisherfolks Multi-Purpose Cooperative, Tarakan, Dinas, ZDS
No. of Beneficiaries : 20
Amount of investment : 100,000 (Grant from Provincial Gov't of ZDS)
Date of Feasibility Study : N/A
Date started : Nov-03
Status : Deferred
Net Income :
CFDF/CBU : Php 316,000
Linkages Developed : Provincial Government of Zamboanga del Sur, BFAR, MURID, and MOCCARD
51 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. Ph-P 135
Table 5f. Tapay-Tapay Livelihood Project (Sungayan)
Name of Livelihood Project : Tapay-Tapay (Basnig)
Implementor : Sungayan Fisherfolks Multi-Purpose Cooperative, Sungayan, Dinas, ZDS
No. of Beneficiaries : 15 Amount of investment : 75,000 (Grant from Provincial Gov't of ZDS)
Date of Feasibility Study : N/A
Date started : Mar-03
Status : Deferred
Net Income :
CFDF/CBU : Php 316,000
Linkages Developed : Provincial Government of Zamboanga del Sur, BFAR, MURID, and MOCCARD
52 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. Ph-P 135
Table 5g. Lending Livelihood Project (Balabawan)
Name of Livelihood Project : Lending
Implementor : Balabawan Mangrove Reforestation Multi- Purpose Cooperative, Balabawan, Pitogo, ZDS
No. of Beneficiaries : 37
Amount of investment : 50,000 (Grant from Provincial Gov't of ZDS)
Date of Feasibility Study : N/A
Date started : Nov-02
Status : On-going
Net Income :
CFDF/CBU : Php 316,000
Linkages Developed : Provincial Government of Zamboanga del Sur, BFAR, MURID, and MOCCARD
53
Forestry Sector Project Loan No. Ph-P 135
Table 5h.Agar-Agar Farming Livelihood Project
Name of Livelihood Project : Agar-Agar Farming
Implementor : Sungayan Fisherfolks Multi-Purpose Cooperative, Sungayan, Dinas, ZDS
No. of Beneficiaries : 15
Amount of investment : 110,305.00
Date of Feasibility Study : Jan-03
Date started : Jul-2003/ Dec-2003
Status : On-going
Net Income : Php 3,000.00
CFDF/CBU : Php 316,000
Linkages Developed : Provincial Government of Zamboanga del Sur, BFAR, MURID, and MOCCARD
54 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. Ph-P 135
Table 5i. Agar-Agar Farming Livelihood Project (Pisaan)
Name of Livelihood Project : Agar-Agar Farming
Implementor : Pisaan Agricultural Multi-Purpose Cooperation for Economic and Development (PAMCED), Pisaan, Dinas, ZDS
No. of Beneficiaries : 30
Amount of investment : 10,000/ 63,799.6
Date of Feasibility Study : Jan-03
Date started : Jul-2003/ Jan-2004
Status : On-going
Net Income : Php 3,000.00
CFDF/CBU : Php 316,000
Linkages Developed : Provincial Government of Zamboanga del Sur, BFAR, MURID, and MOCCARD
55 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. Ph-P 135
Table 5j. Agar-Agar Farming Livelihood Project (Tagadaya)
Name of Livelihood Project : Agar-Agar Farming
Implementor : Tagadaya Fisherfolks Multi-Purpose Cooperative, Binuatan, Dinas, ZDS
No. of Beneficiaries : 22
Amount of investment : 10,000/ 83,750
Date of Feasibility Study : Jan-03
Date started : Jul-2003/ Feb-2004
Status : On-going
Net Income : Php 3,000.00
CFDF/CBU : Php 316,000
Linkages Developed : Provincial Government of Zamboanga del Sur, BFAR, MURID, and MOCCARD
56 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. Ph-P 135
Table 5k. Agar-Agar Livelihood Project (Tarakan)
Name of Livelihood Project : Agar-Agar Farming
Implementor : Tarakan Fisherfolks Multi-Purpose Cooperative, Tarakan, Dinas, ZDS
No. of Beneficiaries : 20
Amount of investment : 10,000/ 29,702
Date of Feasibility Study : Jan-03
Date started : Jul-2003/ Jan-2004
Status : On-going
Net Income : Php 3,000.00
CFDF/CBU : Php 316,000
Linkages Developed : Provincial Government of Zamboanga del Sur, BFAR, MURID, and MOCCARD
57 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. Ph-P 135
Table 5l. Agar-Agar Farming Livelihood Project (Dimataling) Name of Livelihood Project : Agar-Agar Farming Implementor : Dimataling Fisherfolks Multi-Purpose Cooperative, Poblacion, Dimataling, ZDS
No. of Beneficiaries : 23
Amount of investment : 10,000/ 90,567
Date of Feasibility Study : Jan-03
Date started : Jul-2003/ Dec-2003
Status : On-going
Net Income : Php 3,000.00
CFDF/CBU : Php 316,000
Linkages Developed : Provincial Government of Zamboanga del Sur, BFAR, MURID, and MOCCARD
58 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. Ph-P 135
Table 5m. Agar-Agar Farming Livelihood Project (Samabato)
Name of Livelihood Project : Agar-Agar Farming
Implementor Sumabato Fisherfolks Multi-Purpose : Cooperative, Tipangi, Dimataling, ZDS
No. of Beneficiaries : 18
Amount of investment : 10,000/ 35,058
Date of Feasibility Study : Jan-03
Date started : Jul-2003/ Jan-2004
Status : On-going
Net Income : Php 3,000.00
CFDF/CBU : Php 316,000
Linkages Developed : Provincial Government of Zamboanga del Sur, BFAR, MURID, and MOCCARD
59 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. Ph-P 135
Table 5n. Agar-Agar Farming Livelihood Project (Buburay)
Name of Livelihood Project : Agar-Agar Farming
Implementor : Buburay Fisherfolks Multi-Purpose Cooperative, Buburay, Dimataling, ZDS
No. of Beneficiaries : 20
Amount of investment : 10,000
Date of Feasibility Study : Jan-03
Date started : Jul-03
Status : On-going
Net Income : Php 3,000.00
CFDF/CBU : Php 316,000
Linkages Developed : Provincial Government of Zamboanga del Sur, BFAR, MURID, and MOCCARD
60 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. Ph-P 135
Table 5o. Agar-Agar Farming Livelihood Project (Tipangi)
Name of Livelihood Project : Agar-Agar Farming
Implementor : Tipangi Fisherfolks Multi-Purpose Cooperative, Tipangi, Dimataling, ZDS
No. of Beneficiaries : 25
Amount of investment : 10,000/ 45,769
Date of Feasibility Study : Jan-03
Date started : Jul-2003 / Dec -2003
Status : On-going
Net Income : Php 3,000.00
CFDF/CBU : Php 316,000
Linkages Developed : Provincial Government of Zamboanga del Sur, BFAR, MURID, and MOCCARD
61 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. Ph-P 135
Table 5p. Agar-Agar Farming Livelihood Project (Balong-Balong)
Name of Livelihood Project : Agar-Agar Farming
Implementor : Balong-balong Fisherfolks Multi-Purpose Cooperative, Balong-balong, Pitogo, ZDS
No. of Beneficiaries : 73
Amount of investment : 10,000/ 51,613
Date of Feasibility Study : Jan-03
Date started : Jul-2003/ Jan-2004
Status : On-going
Net Income : Php 3,000.00
CFDF/CBU : Php 316,000
Linkages Developed : Provincial Government of Zamboanga del Sur, BFAR, MURID, and MOCCARD
62 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. Ph-P 135
Table 5q. Lending Livelihood Project (Liasan)
Name of Livelihood Project : Lending
Implementor : Liasan Multi-Purpose Cooperative, Liasan, Pitogo, ZDS
No. of Beneficiaries : 37
Amount of investment : 10,000
Date of Feasibility Study : N/A
Date started : Jul-03
Status : On-going
Net Income : Php 3,000.00
CFDF/CBU : Php 316,000 Linkages Developed : Provincial Government of Zamboanga del Sur, BFAR, MURID, and MOCCARD
63 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. Ph-P 135
Table 5r. Cassava Plantation Livelihood Project (Balabawan)
Name of Livelihood Project : Cassava Plantation
Implementor : Balabawan Mangrove Reforestation Multi-Purpose Cooperative, Balabawan, Pitogo, ZDS
No. of Beneficiaries : 56
Amount of investment : 10,000/ 35,665
Date of Feasibility Study : No FS but with Proposal
Date started : Jul-2003/ Dec-2003
Status : On-going
Net Income : Php 2,000.00
CFDF/CBU : Php 316,000
Linkages Developed : Provincial Government of Zamboanga del Sur, BFAR, MURID, and MOCCARD
64 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. Ph-P 135
Table 5s. Deep Sea Fishing Livelihood Project (Buburay)
Name of Livelihood Project : Deep Sea Fishing
Implementor : Buburay Fisherfolks Multi-Purpose Cooperative, Buburay, Dimataling, ZDS
No. of Beneficiaries : 20
Amount of investment : Php 47231
Date of Feasibility Study : No FS but with Proposal
Date started : Jan-04
Status : On-going
Net Income :
CFDF/CBU : Php 316,000
Linkages Developed : Provincial Government of Zamboanga del Sur, BFAR, MURID, and MOCCARD
65 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. Ph-P 135
Table 5t. Deep Sea Fishing Livelihood Project (Pisaan)
Name of Livelihood Project : Deep Sea Fishing
Implementor : Pisaan Agricultural Multi-Purpose Cooperation for Economic and Development (PAMCED), Pisaan, Dinas ZDS
No. of Beneficiaries : 18
Amount of investment : 194,168
Date of Feasibility Study : No FS but with Proposal
Date started : Dec-03
Status : On-going
Net Income : Php 3,000.00
CFDF/CBU : Php 316,000
Linkages Developed : Provincial Government of Zamboanga del Sur, BFAR, MURID, and MOCCARD
66 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. Ph-P 135
Table 5u. Agar-Agar Farming Livelihood Project (Liasan)
Name of Livelihood Project : Agar-Agar Farming
Implementor : Liasan Multi-Purpose Cooperative, Liasan, Pitogo, ZDS
No. of Beneficiaries : 37
Amount of investment : 34,834
Date of Feasibility Study : Jan-03
Date started : Jan-04
Status : On-going
Net Income :
CFDF/CBU : Php 316,000
Linkages Developed : Provincial Government of Zamboanga del Sur, BFAR, MURID, and MOCCARD
67 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. Ph-P 135
Table 5v. Imbao Culture Livelihood Project (Balabawan)
Name of Livelihood Project : Imbao Culture
Implementor : Balabawan Mangrove Reforestation Multi-Purpose Cooperative, Balabawan, Pitogo, ZDS
No. of Beneficiaries : 20
Amount of investment : 15,000
Date of Feasibility Study : N/A
Date started : Dec-03
Status : On-going
Net Income :
CFDF/CBU : Php 316,000
Linkages Developed : Provincial Government of Zamboanga del Sur, BFAR, MURID, and MOCCARD
68 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. PH - P135
Table 6. Subproject Status Report STATUS OF PROGRESS PROJECT PROJECT (O:on going C:Completion) NAME/ LOCATION Region AREA COST M of the Subproject (ha) (Mil peso) SMP CO CSD & INFRA E PISAAN- SUNGAYAN MANGROVE REHABILITATION IX SUBPROJECT 850.00 18.347931 C C C C C Dinas, Dimataling, and Pitogo Zamboanga del Sur
69 Forestry Sector Project Loan No.PH-P135
Table 7. Community Organizing Cost Estimate Per Activity
UNIT of UNIT ACTIVITIES TARGET TOTAL COST MEASURE COST
1. Social Investigation 850 has 97.65 83,000.00
2. Information and 850 has Education Campaign 220.07 187,060.00
3. Documentation Process
4. Identification of 850 has 108.24 92,000.00 Possible CBFMA
5. Organizing Activities 850 has 188.24 160,000.00
6. Community Activities 850 has 651.76 554,000.00
7. PMC 850 has 534.05 453,940.00
Total 850 has 1,800.00 1,530,000.00
70 Forestry Sector Project Loan No.PH-P135
Table 8. Cost Estimate for Reforestation Per Activity UNIT OF TARGET ACTIVITY Unit Cost TOTAL COST MEASURE OUTPUT
I. SEEDLING PRODUCTION 1. Procurement of Planting Materials a. gathering seedlings 630,000 2.60 1,636,175.12 b. handling seedlings 630,000 0.34 212,500.01 Sub-total 1,848,675.13 II. PLANTATION ESTABLISHMENT 1. Site preparation has 850 500.29 425,250.00 2. Alignment/Staking has 850 784.72 667,012.50 3. Hauling of Propagules has 850 150.00 127,500.00 4. Planting has 850 1,144.00 972,400.00 Sub-total 2,192,162.50 III. MAINTENANCE & PROTECTION 1. Clearing and Removal of Debris Year 1 - 4 passes has 850 675.53 574,200.00 Year 2 - 6 passes has 850 3,640.71 3,094,602.00 Year 3 - 5 passes has 850 2,808.00 2,386,808.00 2. Replanting has 850 488.45 415,185.00 3. Patrol/Inspection has 850 116.08 98,670.83 4. Tools and materials Sub-total 6,569,465.83 IV. INFRASTRUCTURE 1. Bunkhouse units 2 85,500.00 171,000.00 2. Look-out Tower units 2 27,625.00 55,250.00 3. PO Office units 2 94,500.00 189,000.00 Sub-total 415,250.00 VI. ADMINISTRATION & SUPERVISION 1. First Year has 368 739.85 272,263.28 2. Second Year has 850 957.21 813,629.14 3. Third Year has 850 349.18 296,800.07 Sub-total 1,382,692.49
G R A N D T O T A L has 850.00 14,597.94 12,408,245.95
71
Forestry Sector Project Loan No. PH - P135
Table 9. Monitoring & Evaluation Cost Estimate Per Activity
TARGET Unit of UNIT ACTIVITIES TOTAL COST OUTPUT MEASURE COST
Physical Validation
1. Verification of boundaries, 850 has 25.00 21,250.00 UTM Monuments and Block Corner Post 2. Seedling Production 850 has 20.00 17,000.00 Inventory/ Analysis 3. Survival Counting with 20% 850 has 400.00 340,000.00 Sampling Intensity including mapping of developed areas 4. Height and Diameter 850 has 30.00 25,500.00 Measurement, Assessment of Overall Health Appearance 5. Physical Inspection of 850 has 40.00 34,000.00 Infrastructure 6. Project Management Cost and 850 has 118.00 100,300.00 Report Preparation
Subtotal 850 has 633.00 538,050.00
Institutional Validation
1. Preliminary Activities a. Courtesy Calls and Pre- 3 Meetings 7,000.00 21,000.00 Assessment b. Data Collection and Preliminary Assessment b.1 Secondary Data 1 Subproject 15,000.00 15,000.00 Gathering b.2 Primary Data 11 Barangays 8,000.00 88,000.00 Gathering c. Preparation and 1 Report 20,000.00 20,000.00 Presentation of Draft Report d. Preparation and 1 Report 15,000.00 15,000.00 Submission of Final Report 2. Project Management Cost 1 Subproject 56,000.00 56,000.00
Subtotal 850 has 252.94.00 215,000.00
GRAND TOTAL 850 has 885.94.00 753,050.00
72
Forestry Sector Project Loan No. PH - P135
Table 9. Monitoring & Evaluation Cost Estimate Per Activity Infrastructure Project : Construction of Small Scale Irrigation System and Concrete Drying Yard with Shed Location : Sungayan and Pisaan, Dinas Zamboanga del Sur
Contractor : Sards Construction and Supplies
Contract Cost : Php 3,397,459.61
Contract Duration : 6 months
Effectivity of Notice to proceed : November 29, 2002
Expected Completion date : June 2, 2003
Revised Completion date : August 31, 2003
Date of MOA with LGU : August 29, 2003 Brief description : The concrete drying yard with shed/ warehouse located in Pisaan has an area of 900 sq. m. and the small scale irrigation system has a total length of 1.5 kms from the distribution tank which can stock 43, 200 liters of potable water. The concrete Drying Yard with Shed/ warehouse in Pisaan is intended for use by all residents who are engaged in seaweed production and also for drying and storing agricultural products. The water system facility in Sungayan was enjoyed by all residents for domestic use.
73 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. PH - P135
TABLE 11. ANNUAL WORK & FINANCIAL PLAN
2000 Planned Actual ACTIVITIES Planned Actual Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Cost Total Cost Target Budget Target Budget
1. REFORESTATION/WATERSHED/CBFM 17,259.42 14,670,509.61 21,585.80 18,347,931.27 A. SMP B. CO 1,800.00 1,530,000.00 1,800.00 1,530,000.00 850.00 477,800.00 850.00 155,600.00 1. Old Sites - Year 1 -Year 2 2. New Sites 850.00 477,800.00 850.00 155,600.00 - Year 1 850.00 477,800.00 850.00 155,600.00 - Year 2 C. CSD 10,576.47 8,990,000.00 14,933.15 12,693,173.90 1. Delineation, Landuse Survey & Mapping 335.21 284,928.00 335.21 284,928.00 2. Soil Erosion Control/SWC a. Infrastructure b. Trails and footpath 3. Vegetative Measures (Plantation Establishment) 10,241.26 8,705,072.00 14,597.94 12,408,245.90 a. Agroforestry b. Assisted Natural Regeneration c. Enrichment Planting d. Tree Plantation 10,241.26 8,705,072.00 14,597.94 12,408,245.90 d.1. Bamboo d.1. Bamboo d.2. Riverbank Protection d.2. Rattan d.3. Mangrove 10,241.26 8,705,072.00 14,597.94 12,408,245.90 d.3.1. Reforestation 10,241.26 8,705,072.00 14,597.94 12,408,245.90 d.4. Plantation Species e. Timber Stand Improvement 4. Inventory Residual Forest 5. Income Enhancement Project D. Infrastructure Component 3,397,459.61 3,371,707.32 E. Monitoring & Evaluation 885.94 753,050.00 885.94 753,050.00 -Year 1 885.94 753,050.00 885.94 753,050.00 -Year 2 2. SUSIMO 2,325,980.00 2,325,980.00 328,000.00 325,763.02 Equipment provided to the Office Researches conducted Trainings Others GRAND TOTAL 19,995.87 16,996,489.61 24,322.25 20,673,911.27 805,800.00 481,363.02 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. PH - P135
TABLE 11. ANNUAL WORK & FINANCIAL PLAN
2001 2002 ACTIVITIES Planned Actual Planned Actual Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget
1. REFORESTATION/WATERSHED/CBFM A. SMP B. CO 850.00 537,800.00 850.00 408,860.00 850.00 514,400.00 850.00 140,160.00 1. Old Sites - Year 1 -Year 2 2. New Sites 850.00 537,800.00 850.00 408,860.00 850.00 514,400.00 850.00 140,160.00 - Year 1 850.00 537,800.00 850.00 408,860.00 - Year 2 850.00 514,400.00 850.00 140,160.00 C. CSD 1,513.00 3,179,040.00 1,481.00 2,611,915.86 850.00 4,102,710.00 850.00 7,298,979.14 1. Delineation, Landuse Survey & Mapping 1,113.00 284,928.00 1,113.00 284,928.00 2. Soil Erosion Control/SWC a. Infrastructure b. Trails and footpath 3. Vegetative Measures (Plantation Establishment) 400.00 2,894,112.00 368.00 2,326,987.86 850.00 4,102,710.00 850.00 7,298,979.14 a. Agroforestry b. Assisted Natural Regeneration c. Enrichment Planting d. Tree Plantation 400.00 2,894,112.00 368.00 2,326,987.86 850.00 4,102,710.00 850.00 7,298,979.14 d.1. Bamboo d.1. Bamboo d.2. Riverbank Protection d.2. Rattan d.3. Mangrove 400.00 2,894,112.00 368.00 2,326,987.86 850.00 4,102,710.00 850.00 7,298,979.14 d.3.1. Reforestation 400.00 2,894,112.00 368.00 2,326,987.86 850.00 4,102,710.00 850.00 7,298,979.14 d.4. Plantation Species e. Timber Stand Improvement 4. Inventory Residual Forest 5. Income Enhancement Project D. Infrastructure Component E. Monitoring & Evaluation -Year 1 -Year 2 2. SUSIMO 683,000.00 729,916.82 531,000.00 493,385.56 Equipment provided to the Office Researches conducted Trainings Others GRAND TOTAL 4,399,840.00 3,750,692.68 5,148,110.00 7,932,524.70 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. PH - P135
TABLE 11. ANNUAL WORK & FINANCIAL PLAN
2003 Planned (TOTAL) Actual (TOTAL) ACTIVITIES Planned Actual Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget
1. REFORESTATION/WATERSHED/CBFM 850.00 14,670,509.61 850.00 18,347,931.27 A. SMP B. CO - - 850.00 825,380.00 850.00 1,530,000.00 850.00 1,530,000.00 1. Old Sites - Year 1 -Year 2 2. New Sites 850.00 825,380.00 850.00 1,530,000.00 850.00 1,530,000.00 - Year 1 850.00 1,015,600.00 850.00 564,460.00 - Year 2 850.00 825,380.00 850.00 514,400.00 850.00 965,540.00 C. CSD 850.00 1,708,250.00 850.00 2,782,278.90 850.00 8,990,000.00 850.00 12,693,173.90 1. Delineation, Landuse Survey & Mapping 850.00 284,928.00 850.00 284,928.00 2. Soil Erosion Control/SWC a. Infrastructure b. Trails and footpath 3. Vegetative Measures (Plantation Establishment) 850.00 1,708,250.00 850.00 2,782,278.90 850.00 8,705,072.00 850.00 12,408,245.90 a. Agroforestry b. Assisted Natural Regeneration c. Enrichment Planting d. Tree Plantation 850.00 1,708,250.00 850.00 2,782,278.90 850.00 8,705,072.00 850.00 12,408,245.90 d.1. Bamboo d.1. Bamboo d.2. Riverbank Protection d.2. Rattan d.3. Mangrove 850.00 1,708,250.00 850.00 2,782,278.90 850.00 8,705,072.00 850.00 12,408,245.90 d.3.1. Reforestation 850.00 1,708,250.00 850.00 2,782,278.90 850.00 8,705,072.00 850.00 12,408,245.90 d.4. Plantation Species e. Timber Stand Improvement 4. Inventory Residual Forest 5. Income Enhancement Project D. Infrastructure Component 3,397,459.61 3,371,707.37 3,397,459.61 3,371,707.37 E. Monitoring & Evaluation 850.00 753,050.00 850.00 753,050.00 850.00 753,050.00 850.00 753,050.00 -Year 1 850.00 753,050.00 850.00 753,050.00 850.00 753,050.00 850.00 753,050.00 -Year 2 2. SUSIMO 783,980.00 776,914.60 2,325,980.00 2,325,980.00 Equipment provided to the Office Researches conducted Trainings Others GRAND TOTAL 6,642,739.61 8,509,330.87 850.00 16,996,489.61 850.00 20,673,911.27 NIAN GREEN ACRES MANGROVE REFORESTATION ASSOCIATION, INC. (NGAMRAI) (CO CONTRACTOR)
MOHAIYA S. PUA President
FERRER T. MARCABAN JONIE A. AGCONG SITTIE RASAM LUMINOG U. BUTITO Training Specialist Liaison Officer CO-Specialist Livelihood Specialist
Pisaan – Sungayan Integrated Cooperation for Livelihood and Services, Inc. (PISU-ICLAS) (Peoples Organization)
OMAR UBPON BOARD OF President DIRECTORS
PAQUITO OMISOL EMBANG BONGA VP Internal VP External
NARAIDA TAUG OSCAR LIMARE ROGELIO ANDALE JIMBOY MUTIA NASRODIN ELIAN Treasurer Secretary ROMEO OMISOL ABBAS BUTTO PIO Secretary Bus. Manager
PHILIPPINE ACCESS FOR COMMUNITY EDUCATION (PEACE) INC. (M & E Contractor)
WARLITO C. GOLTIANO President
BOARD OF ROMEO C. DAABAY TRUSTEES Treasurer
EDGARDO B. BOHOLST JIMMY P. TACBOBO RAMIL T. ECONAR VP Internal Secretary Bookkeeper
JIMMY P. TACBOBO PROJECT ENGR. ELDAB MALICAY Technical COORDINATOR Technical Director Director/Forestry (Survey)
JESSIE MASIAS PLACIDO MOLLION TRAINING ANDREW SANCHEZ RAMIR ECONAR Technical Writer Community STAFF Liaison Officer Computer Operator Organizing OLIVER BACUS Documentor
Subproject Site Management Office (SUSIMO)
MA. SOCORRO JESSICA CASIPONG Subproject Site Management Officer
GRACE D. BOLAÑO ROEL SUPERALES REXP. CHAVEZ LOTERO M. ANDO Chief, COSU Chief, VBU Chief, SDMU Chief, ASU
ROEL A. ROSAL WILSON T. FLORDELIZA NAPOLEON E. ARAOJO Staff, COSU Staff, SDMU Staff, ASU
RICARDO E. ANIÑON Driver
SARDS CONSTRUCTION Infrastructure Contractor
ENGR. JOVIE SARDUA Project Manager LEOPOLDO DAEL ALVIN Y. JAYME Surveyor Administrative Officer
RODOLFO B. HILOT, JR. ROMMEL DEOCARIZA JEORGE ESTABAS ONIOT Project/Safety Engineer Equipment Supervisor Quality Control/ Materials Engineer
CHIEF MECHANIC OPERATORS/DRIVERS MATERIALS LAB. TECHNICIAN ALBERTO B. CAO Construction Foreman
SKILLED/SEMI-SKILLED HELPERS LABORERS HELPERS
The first CSD Training conducted in A plantation establishment
Pisaan-Sungayan Mangrove activity of the POs Rehabilitation Subproject in Pitogo, Zamboanga Del Sur
Mangrove plantation located in Bgy. Liasan, Pitogo, Zamboanga Del Sur
Closer shots of growing Bakauan located in Balong-Balong, Pitogo,
Zamboanga Del Sur
82
One of the activities of the maintenance and protection is the regular inspection of Bakauan plantations done by SUSIMO and PO
Bunkhouse constructed by the POs
Lookout tower constructed by the People’s Organization
83
The newly constructed Multi-Purpose Solar Dryer with shed
Intake Box and Control Room Distribution tank The constructed Small Scale Irrigation System
84
This Subproject Completed Report was produced by the National Forestation Development Office (NFDO) through the valuable assistance and contribution from the DENR, REGION IX PENRO, Pagadian CENRO, Guipos and staff of the Subproject Site Management Office (SUSIMO)-PISAAN-SUNGAYAN