DOCSLIB.ORG

Aldous Huxley (1894–1963)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Aldous Huxley (1894–1963) Chapter 1 Aldous Huxley (1894–1963) Aldous Leonard Huxley was born on July 26, 1894, in Godalming, Surrey. He came from a distinguished intellectual lineage: his grandfather was T.H. Huxley, who was nicknamed “Darwin’s bulldog” for his advocacy of evolution- ary theory; and his great-uncle was the poet and critic Matthew Arnold. His childhood was marked by three traumatic episodes: in 1908, his mother Julia died of cancer; three years later, at the age of sixteen, he contracted an eye infection (keratitis punctata) that permanently impaired his eyesight; and in 1914, his brother Trevenen committed suicide.1 The unforgiving satire and cyni- cal assessments of human nature that mark Huxley’s early work can be inter- preted as a response to these tragedies.2 After attending Eton, Huxley read English at Balliol College, Oxford (1913– 1916). He had originally intended to study biology like his brother Julian (1887–1975), but his damaged eyesight rendered lab work impossible.3 At the outbreak of World War i, he initially shared the patriotic enthusiasm of his peers, but by March 1916 he was expressing his disgust with the war in a letter to Julian, and maintaining that in retrospect he’d have been a “conscientious objector, or nearly so”.4 But he never had to take this stance officially as he was rejected for military service as a result of his poor eyesight.5 His sympathy for conscientious objectors may have been encouraged by his friendship with Lady Ottoline Morrell, who invited Huxley to her home, Garsington Manor, on November 28, 1915,6 and thereafter he became a frequent guest, and socialised 1 See Nicholas Murray, Aldous Huxley: An English Intellectual (London: Abacus, 2003), 20, 29–30, 37–38. 2 See David Bradshaw, “Aldous Huxley (1894–1963)”, in Brave New World (London: Vintage, 2004), xvii–xviii and Julian Huxley, Memories, 2 vols. (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1972–73), 1: 65. 3 David Bradshaw, “‘A Blind Stay-at-Home Mole’: Huxley at Oxford, 1913–1916”, Aldous Huxley Annual 12/13 (2012–13): 196. 4 Smith, Letters, 97. 5 See Murray, Aldous Huxley, 60, 100. 6 Much to my chagrin, I have twice previously given this date in articles as November 29, 1915. I was led astray by the fact that Huxley’s name appears in the Garsington visitor’s book un- der this date (see George J. Zytaruk and James T. Boulton, eds., The Letters of D.H. Lawrence, vol. 2 [Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981], 452). However, in Smith, Letters, 86, Huxley writes to his father on December 8, 1915, that he visited Garsington “on Sunday”, i.e. the twenty-eighth, rather than Monday November 29. This also makes sense of the fact that © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, ���9 | doi:�0.��63/978900440690�_003 <UN> 14 chapter 1 with notable pacifists such as Bertrand Russell, Clive Bell and Lytton Strachey. It was through the agency of Morrell that in December 1915 Huxley met D.H. Lawrence, who became a great friend and mentor to Huxley a decade later.7 At Garsington, Huxley first encountered many eminent artists and in- tellectuals, including T.S. Eliot, Virginia Woolf, Katherine Mansfield, Dorothy Brett and Dora Carrington, as well as the Belgian refugee Maria Nys (1898– 1955), whom he married in 1919. While W.B. Yeats also became a Garsington regular, his first visit was in December 1919,8 after Huxley’s visits had all but petered out (Huxley spent a week at Garsington at the end of July 1920 and did not visit again before quarrelling with Morrell over Crome Yellow in December 1921), and there is no evidence that they met.9 It was as an undergraduate at Oxford that Huxley became interested in mys- ticism. In a letter to Julian in December 1915, he affirms: “One cannot escape mysticism; it positively thrusts itself, the only possibility, upon one”.10 There’s a jaunty pageantry in Huxley’s early letters and I’ve no doubt that Huxley is being hyperbolical here. One might expect Julian Huxley, as a scientist, to be sceptical about mysticism, but as a boy at Eton he reports a few episodes of ex- trovertive experience.11 In an interview in 1961, Huxley recalled reading Jacob Boehme at Oxford and “having various Catholic friends who knew a certain amount about the mystical tradition in Catholicism”; he read mystical texts during this period “with a mixture of admiration and hostility”.12 In a letter to the critic Chad Walsh, Huxley reports that he derived the title of his first volume of poetry, The Burning Wheel (1916), from Boehme.13 Huxley may well have read Boehme as a result of references to him in Blake, whose work he D.H. Lawrence’s name appears under the November 29 entry, but Morrell notes that when Huxley visited, she and her husband were alone. 7 See James Sexton, ed., Selected Letters of Aldous Huxley (Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, 2007), 20. For more on the influence of Lawrence, see Chapter 2 and Jake Poller, “The Philosophy of Life-Worship: D.H. Lawrence and Aldous Huxley”, D.H. Lawrence Review 34–35 (2010): 75–91. 8 See R.F. Foster, W.B. Yeats: A Life, vol. 2., 1915–1939 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003), 158. 9 See Smith, Letters, 188–189, for his letters from Garsington in July 1920, in which he men- tions the presence of Eliot at a party on August 1 but not Yeats. 10 Smith, Letters, 88. 11 See Julian Huxley, Memories, 1: 50. 12 From Sybille Bedford’s transcript of the BBC John Chandos interview with Aldous Huxley recorded on July 7 and 11, 1961, in the Huxley archive of the Harry Ransom Humanities Research Center, University of Texas, Austin. 13 Chad Walsh, “Pilgrimage to the Perennial Philosophy: The Case of Aldous Huxley”, Journal of Bible and Religion 16, no. 1 (January 1948): 7. <UN>.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Yasha Gall, Julian Sorell Huxley, 1887-1975
    Julian Sorell Huxley, 1887-1975 Yasha Gall Published by Nauka, St. Petersburg, Russia, 2004 Reproduced as an e-book with kind permission of Nauka Science editor: Academician AL Takhtajan Preface by the Science Editor The 20th century was the epoch of discovery in evolutionary biology, marked by many fundamental investigations. Of special significance were the works of AN Severtsov, SS Chetverikov, S Wright, JBS Haldane, G De Beer JS Huxley and R Goldschmidt. Among the general works on evolutionary theory, the one of greatest breadth was Julian Huxley’s book Evolution: The Modern Synthesis (1942). Huxley was one of the first to analyze the mechanisms of macro-evolutionary processes and discuss the evolutionary role of neoteny in terms of developmental genetics (the speed of gene action). Neoteny—the most important mechanism of heritable variation of ontogenesis—has great macro-evolutionary consequences. A Russian translation of Huxley’s book on evolution was prepared for publication by Professor VV Alpatov. The manuscript of the translation had already been sent to production when the August session of the VASKNIL in 1948 burst forth—a destructive moment in the history of biology in our country. The publication was halted, and the manuscript disappeared. I remember well a meeting with Huxley in 1945 in Moscow and Leningrad during the celebratory jubilee at the Academy of Sciences. He was deeply disturbed by the “blossoming” of Lysenkoist obscurantism in biology. It is also important to note that in the 1950s Huxley developed original concepts for controlling the birth rate of the Earth’s population. He openly declared the necessity of forming an international institute at the United Nations, since the global ecosystem already could not sustain the pressure of human “activity” and, together with humanity, might itself die.
    [Show full text]
  • AWAR of INDIVIDUALS: Bloomsbury Attitudes to the Great
    2 Bloomsbury What were the anti-war feelings chiefly expressed outside ‘organised’ protest and not under political or religious banners – those attitudes which form the raison d’être for this study? As the Great War becomes more distant in time, certain actions and individuals become greyer and more obscure whilst others seem to become clearer and imbued with a dash of colour amid the sepia. One thinks particularly of the so-called Bloomsbury Group.1 Any overview of ‘alter- native’ attitudes to the war must consider the responses of Bloomsbury to the shadows of doubt and uncertainty thrown across page and canvas by the con- flict. Despite their notoriety, the reactions of the Bloomsbury individuals are important both in their own right and as a mirror to the similar reactions of obscurer individuals from differing circumstances and backgrounds. In the origins of Bloomsbury – well known as one of the foremost cultural groups of the late Victorian and Edwardian periods – is to be found the moral and aesthetic core for some of the most significant humanistic reactions to the war. The small circle of Cambridge undergraduates whose mutual appreciation of the thoughts and teachings of the academic and philosopher G.E. Moore led them to form lasting friendships, became the kernel of what would become labelled ‘the Bloomsbury Group’. It was, as one academic described, ‘a nucleus from which civilisation has spread outwards’.2 This rippling effect, though tem- porarily dammed by the keenly-felt constrictions of the war, would continue to flow outwards through the twentieth century, inspiring, as is well known, much analysis and interpretation along the way.
    [Show full text]
  • Keynes and the Ethics of Socialism Edward W
    THE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS VOLUME 22 | No. 2 | 139–180 | SUMMER 2019 WWW.QJAE.ORG Keynes and the Ethics of Socialism Edward W. Fuller* JEL Classification: B22, B24, E12, P20 Abstract: This paper examines John Maynard Keynes’s ethical theory and how it relates to his politico-economic thought. Keynes’s ethical theory represents an attack on all general rules. Since capitalism is a rule-based social system, Keynes’s ethical theory is incompatible with capitalism. And since socialism rejects the general rules of private property, the Keynesian ethical theory is consistent with socialism. The unexplored evidence presented here confirms Keynes advocated a consistent form of non-Marxist socialism from no later than 1907 until his death in 1946. However, Keynes’s ethical theory is flawed because it is based on his defective logical theory of probability. Consequently, Keynes’s ethical theory is not a viable ethical justification for socialism. INTRODUCTION ohn Maynard Keynes (1883–1946) was the most influential Jeconomist of the twentieth century. However, ethics and prob- ability were Keynes’s primary intellectual interests for the first seventeen years of his academic career. In fact, his early ideas on ethics and probability inspired and suffused his politico-economic theory. His biographer, Robert Skidelsky, agrees: “His theories of politics and economics were expressions of his beliefs about ethics * Edward W. Fuller ([email protected]), MBA, is a graduate of the Leavey School of Business. Quart J Austrian Econ (2019) 22.2:139–180 https://qjae.scholasticahq.com/ 139 Creative Commons doi.org/10.35297/qjae.010010 BY-NC-ND 4.0 License 140 Quart J Austrian Econ (2019) 22.2:139–180 and probability” (1991, 104).
    [Show full text]
  • Lady Ottoline Morrell Papers (1896-1938) (Add MS 88886) Table of Contents
    British Library: Western Manuscripts Lady Ottoline Morrell Papers (1896-1938) (Add MS 88886) Table of Contents Lady Ottoline Morrell Papers (1896–1938) Key Details........................................................................................................................................ 1 Arrangement..................................................................................................................................... 1 Provenance........................................................................................................................................ 1 Add MS 88886/1/1–3 Add MS 88886/1 Letters.Add MS 88886/1/1–3. Lady Ottoline Morrell Papers. Vols. i–iii. Letters of Lady....................................................................................................... 2 Add MS 88886/2/1–32 Add MS 88886/2 Diaries. (1905–1938)............................................................ 4 Add MS 88886/3/1–15 Add MS 88886/3 Notebooks. (1896–1937)...................................................... 20 Add MS 88886/4/1–41 Add MS 88886/4. Journals. (1901–1937)......................................................... 29 Add MS 88886/5/1–3 Add MS 88886/5 Visitors' Books. Add MS 88886/5/1–3. Lady Ottoline Morrell Papers. Vols. xcii–xciv. .......................................................................................................... 50 Add MS 88886/6/1–20 Add MS 88886/6 Transcriptions. (1907–1997)................................................. 52 Key Details Collection Area British Library:
    [Show full text]
  • Carrington, Dora (1893-1932) by Ray Anne Lockard
    Carrington, Dora (1893-1932) by Ray Anne Lockard Encyclopedia Copyright © 2015, glbtq, Inc. Entry Copyright © 2002, glbtq, Inc. Dora Carrington with Reprinted from http://www.glbtq.com Lytton Strachey. Dora de Houghton Carrington was an English painter, designer and decorative artist whose life and relationships were complex. She is best known for her deep attachment to the homosexual writer Lytton Strachey, but she had affairs with both men and women. Carrington painted only for her own pleasure, did not sign her works, and rarely exhibited them, hence she was not well known as a painter during her lifetime. Even though she was a founding member of the Omega Workshop with Roger Fry, her decorative art also remained unknown to the public until the late 1960s. Born in Hereford, England on March 29, 1893, Dora Carrington was the fourth child of Samuel Carrington and Charlotte Houghton. When Dora was ten years old the family moved to Bedford where she attended a girls' high school and took extra art classes. Seven years later, in 1910, Dora won a scholarship to the Slade School of Art in London where she studied with Henry Tonks and Fred Brown until 1914. During her years at Slade, the artist dropped her first name, becoming known simply as Carrington, and cut her hair into a bowl cut. She was a successful student at the Slade School and was awarded several prizes during her years there. When Carrington was eighteen she met Mark Gertler (1897-1939), a fellow artist who had the most influence on her early years.
    [Show full text]
  • Lytton Strachey
    Lytton Strachey: An Inventory of His Collection at the Harry Ransom Humanities Research Center Descriptive Summary Creator Strachey, Lytton, 1880-1932 Title Lytton Strachey Collection Dates: 1885-1957 Extent 5 boxes (2.08 linear feet) Abstract This collection documents the life and works of the English Bloomsbury group writer. The collection consists of manuscripts of Strachey's major biographical works Portraits in Miniature (1931) and Queen Victoria (1921), and drafts of essays, notes, and correspondence. RLIN record # TCRC98-A26 Language English. Access Open for research Administrative Information Acquisition Purchases, 1960-1970 (R919, R1452, R2848, R3849, R3948, R4152, R5174) Processed by Chelsea S. Jones, 1998 Repository: Harry Ransom Humanities Research Center, University of Texas at Austin Strachey, Lytton, 1880-1932 Biographical Sketch Giles Lytton Strachey was born in 1880, the eleventh of thirteen children, to General Sir Richard Strachey and his wife Jane Grant. Though he spent some years at boarding schools, including Abbotsholme and Leamington College, he received much of his education at home. His mother enjoyed strong interests in literature and politics and Strachey met many of the leading writers and thinkers of the day when they came to visit Lady Strachey. Strachey's secondary education was completed at University College in Liverpool where he studied Latin, Greek, mathematics, and English literature and history. It was at University College that he met and was influenced by Walter Raleigh, a professor of English literature and well known biographer. After failing to receive a scholarship to Oxford in 1899, Strachey decided to attend Cambridge where he developed many friendships which lasted the rest of his life.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Season 2
    1 2017 SEASON 2 Eugene Onegin, 2016 Absolutely everything was perfection. You have a winning formula Audience member, 2016 1 2 SEMELE George Frideric Handel LE NOZZE DI FIGARO Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart PELLÉAS ET MÉLISANDE Claude Debussy IL TURCO IN ITALIA Gioachino Rossini SILVER BIRCH Roxanna Panufnik Idomeneo, 2016 Garsington OPERA at WORMSLEY 3 2017 promises to be a groundbreaking season in the 28 year history of Cohen, making his Garsington debut, and directed by Annilese Miskimmon, Garsington Opera. Artistic Director of Norwegian National Opera, who we welcome back nine years after her Il re pastore at Garsington Manor. We will be expanding to four opera productions for the very first time and we will now have two resident orchestras as the Philharmonia Orchestra joins us for Our fourth production will be a revival from 2011 of Rossini’s popular comedy, Pelléas et Mélisande. Il turco in Italia. We are delighted to welcome back David Parry, who brings his conducting expertise to his 13th production for us, and director Martin Duncan Our own highly praised Garsington Opera Orchestra will not only perform Le who returns for his 6th season. nozze di Figaro, Il turco in Italia and Semele, but will also perform the world premiere of Roxanna Panufnik’s Silver Birch at the conclusion of the season. To cap the season off we are very proud to present a brand new work commissioned by Garsington from composer Roxanna Panufnik, to be directed Pelléas et Mélisande, Debussy’s only opera and one of the seminal works by our Creative Director of Learning & Participation, Karen Gillingham, and I of the 20th century, will be conducted by Jac van Steen, who brought such will conduct.
    [Show full text]
  • Biographies and Autobiographies of Historians, Edited by Doug Munro and John G
    7 Intersecting and Contrasting Lives: G.M. Trevelyan and Lytton Strachey Alastair MacLachlan This essay is about history and biography in two senses. First, it examines two parallel and intersecting, but contrasting lives: that of George Macaulay Trevelyan (b. 1876), probably the most popular historian and political biographer of early twentieth-century England – a Fellow and in old age the Master of Trinity College, Cambridge, an independent scholar for 25 years and, for 12 years, Regius Professor of Modern History – and that of his slightly younger Trinity protégé, Giles Lytton Strachey (b. 1880), a would-be academic rejected by the academy, who set himself up as a critical essayist and a historical gadfly – the writer credited with the transformation of a moribund genre of pious memorialisation into a ‘new’ style of biography. Second, the essay explores their approaches to writing nineteenth-century history and biography, and it assesses their works as products of similar but changing times and places: Cambridge and London from about 1900 to the 1930s.1 1 I shall therefore ignore Trevelyan’s later writings (he died in 1962), and concentrate on the biographies written by Strachey (S) and Trevelyan (T), with a focus on their nineteenth-century studies. 137 CLIO'S LIVES ‘Read no history’, advised Disraeli, ‘nothing but biography, for that is life without theory’. But ‘life without theory’ can be intellectually emaciated, and a comparative biography may have the advantage of kneading into the subject theoretical muscle sometimes absent in single lives, highlighting the points where the two lives intersected and what was common and what distinctive about them.
    [Show full text]
  • Love Between the Lines: Paradigmatic Readings of the Relationship Between Dora Carrington and Lytton Strachey Janine Loedolff Th
    Love Between The Lines: Paradigmatic Readings of the Relationship between Dora Carrington and Lytton Strachey Janine Loedolff Thesis presented in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts at the University of Stellenbosch Department of English Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences Supervisor: Dr S.C. Viljoen Co-supervisor: Prof. E.P.H. Hees November 2007 Declaration I, the undersigned, hereby declare that the work contained in this thesis is my own original work and has not previously in its entirety or in part been submitted at any university for a degree. Signature: Date: Copyright ©2008 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved ii Acknowledgements Dr Shaun Viljoen, for teaching me about uncommon lives; My co-supervisor, Prof. Edwin Hees; Mathilda Slabbert, for telling me the story for the first time, and for her inspirational enthusiasm; Roshan Cader, for her encouragement and willingness to debate the finer points of performativity with me; Sarah Duff, for continuously demanding clarity, and for allowing me to stay at Goodenough College; Dawid de Villers, for translations; Evelyn Wiehahn, Neil Micklewood, Daniela Marsicano, Simon Pequeno and Alexia Cox for their many years of love and friendship; Larry Ferguson, who always tells me I have something to say; My father, Johan, and his extended family, for their continual love and support and providing me with a comforting refuge; My family in England – Chicky for taking me to Charleston, and Melanie for making her home mine while I was researching at the British Library; and Joe Loedolff, for eternal optimism, words of wisdom, and most importantly, his kinship.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter Edition 2019/2020
    Hullarious Winter Edition 2019/2020 Hullarious Winter Edition 2019/2020 “There are things known and there are things unknown, and in between are the doors of perception.” ― Aldous Huxley -Jessica Bernatschek, editor -Brenda Greene, layout and design Hullarious Contents Winter 2019/2020 ‘Taking Responsibility’ by Caroline Plichta Page 3 ‘Environmental Series 2’ by Gina Landtwing Page 4 ‘Wildemann Foundation’ by Vinvent Lujic Page 7 ‘My Afternoon with the Video Club’ by Robin Widmer Page 9 Mathematics Department Visit to the ETH Page 10 ‘Model United Nations’ by Lisa Beissner and Ben Stephenson Page 11 Physics Swiss Olympiad at Hull’s School Page 13 ‘My Experience with the Physics Olympiad’ by Anastasia Sandamirskaya Page 14 ‘Dance in Heaven’ by Gergö Farkas Page 15 ‘Joining as a new student in EC3’ by Selina Roberts Page 17 LGT - Emilia von Albertini Page 18 ‘How attending Hull’s laid the foundation for my becoming a tutor at HSG’ by Dimitry Parisi Page 23 Red Cross Food Drive Project Page 24 ‘Gap Years and Hong Kong’ by Max Behrend Page 25 Former Hull's School Student- Roger Weishaupt Page 28 Interview with Ms. Graham by Cedrik Schwegler Page 30 Interview with Ms. Tucker by Gina Landtwing Page 31 Interview with Ms. Wagner by Robin Widmer Page 33 ‘Huxley Collection’ by Robin Hull Page 35 School Events Page 37 2 Hullarious Winter 2019/2020 By Caroline Plichta EC3 Taking Responsibility If people want to believe it or not, Climate change is a sad reality. We climate change is happening. As we are need to keep doing our best by the next generation, we have to care choosing our actions carefully.
    [Show full text]
  • Holmi Postájából Móritz Mátyás: a Tisztes Hátrány • 1070 Bán Zsófia: Egyben (Balassa Péterrôl) • 1071 Radnóti Sándor: Balassa Péter Halálára (1947–2003) • 1073
    Szerkeszti: Réz Pál (fôszerkesztô), Radnóti Sándor (bírálat), Várady Szabolcs (vers), Závada Pál (széppróza), Fodor Géza, Szalai Júlia Szerkesztôbizottság: Bodor Ádám, Dávidházi Péter, Domokos Mátyás, Göncz Árpád, Kocsis Zoltán, Lator László, Ludassy Mária, Rakovszky Zsuzsa, Vásárhelyi Júlia. Tördelôszerkesztô: Környei Anikó. A szöveget gondozta: Zsarnay Erzsébet TARTALOM Lôcsei Péter: „Kedves Fôtisztelendô Úr” (Weöres Sándor levelei Székely Lászlóhoz) • 955 Falcsik Mária: Egy utazás képei • 985 Alkaioszi • 986 Kôrizs Imre: Karácsonyi ódi • 987 Non omnia moriar • 988 Az élet (már megint • 990 Térey János: A gyermek • 990 Göncz Árpád: A veszélyes és életet adó szó • 992 Katherine Mansfield leveleibôl (I) (Mesterházi Mónika válogatásában, fordításában és jegyzeteivel) • 996 Gombár Csaba: Leonard Woolfról • 1019 Leonard Woolf: Újrakezdés (Vallasek Júlia fordítása) • 1022 Szabó T. Anna: Az erô • 1036 Fehér • 1037 Totem • 1038 Csengery Kristóf: Köd, bot, kutya, kiáltás • 1039 Fogmûtét után • 1040 Egy megrendelés története • 1041 Belsô kalandok • 1041 Halasi Zoltán: Anód-katód • 1042 Mi négyen • 1043 954 • Tartalom FIGYELÔ Nagy András: Délvidéki aranytalanság (Gion Nándor: Aranyat talált) • 1044 Csûrös Miklós: „(A nehezén túl vagyunk? A neheze hátravan?)” (Szilágyi István: Hollóidô) • 1047 Kálmán C. György: Árnyképek (Kántor Péter: Lóstaféta) • 1055 Ferencz Gyôzô–Bodor Béla: Két bírálat egy könyvrôl (Nádasdy Ádám: A rend, amit csinálok) • 1059 Fogarassy Miklós: „Ami fölfénylett épp odabent...” (Bodor Béla: Ragtime a Vérnôszô Barommal) • 1066 A Holmi postájából Móritz Mátyás: A tisztes hátrány • 1070 Bán Zsófia: Egyben (Balassa Péterrôl) • 1071 Radnóti Sándor: Balassa Péter halálára (1947–2003) • 1073 Megjelenik havonta. Felelôs kiadó: Réz Pál. Vörösmarty Társaság Levélcím: HOLMI c/o Réz Pál, 1137 Budapest, Jászai Mari tér 4/A Terjeszti a Nemzeti Hírlapkereskedelmi Rt.
    [Show full text]
  • GARSINGTON OPERA to MOVE to WORMSLEY ESTATE, HOME of the GETTY FAMILY, in 2011 Submitted By: Clare Adams Publicity Thursday, 29 April 2010
    GARSINGTON OPERA TO MOVE TO WORMSLEY ESTATE, HOME OF THE GETTY FAMILY, IN 2011 Submitted by: Clare Adams Publicity Thursday, 29 April 2010 The Directors of Garsington Opera (http://www.garsingtonopera.org) are pleased to announce that Wormsley Estate, the home of the Getty family, is the preferred site for Garsington Opera with effect from the 2011 season. Garsington Opera, founded by the late Leonard Ingrams and his wife Rosalind in 1989, has established an enviable reputation over the last twenty-one years for promoting opera of the highest professional quality in an outdoor setting for a short summer season. Wormsley Estate is set within a magnificent historic landscape in the Chiltern Hills, in an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. An elegant pavilion auditorium will be created, to be assembled annually, sited close to an attractive collection of flinted buildings, not far from Wormsley House, and nestling in the beautiful deer park. After twenty-one years at Garsington Manor, Garsington Opera has been seeking a new location over the last two years and has reached agreement with Mark Getty to hold the festival at the Wormsley Estate from the summer of 2011. Garsington Opera has now started consultations with the local community, relevant authorities and other interested parties and shall be applying for planning consent. As well as being the setting of the famous cricket ground established by Sir Paul Getty, Wormsley enjoys an impressive two acre 18th century walled garden, a short drive away from the opera pavilion. The estate straddles the Oxfordshire / Buckinghamshire border. It is located close to the M40, is less than fifteen miles from Garsington Manor, and under an hour from central London.
    [Show full text]