The Dynamics of Inclusion and Exclusion of Settler Colonialism: the Case of Palestine

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Dynamics of Inclusion and Exclusion of Settler Colonialism: the Case of Palestine NEAR EAST UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS PROGRAM WHO IS ELIGIBLE TO EXIST? THE DYNAMICS OF INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION OF SETTLER COLONIALISM: THE CASE OF PALESTINE WALEED SALEM PhD THESIS NICOSIA 2019 WHO IS ELIGIBLE TO EXIST? THE DYNAMICS OF INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION OF SETTLER COLONIALISM: THE CASE OF PALESTINE WALEED SALEM NEAREAST UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS PROGRAM PhD THESIS THESIS SUPERVISOR ASSOC. PROF. DR. UMUT KOLDAŞ NICOSIA 2019 ACCEPTANCE/APPROVAL We as the jury members certify that the PhD Thesis ‘Who is Eligible to Exist? The Dynamics of Inclusion and Exclusion of Settler Colonialism: The Case of Palestine’prepared by PhD Student Waleed Hasan Salem, defended on 26/4/2019 4 has been found satisfactory for the award of degree of Phd JURY MEMBERS ......................................................... Assoc. Prof. Dr. Umut Koldaş (Supervisor) Near East University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of International Relations ......................................................... Assoc. Prof.Dr.Sait Ak şit(Head of Jury) Near East University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of International Relations ......................................................... Assoc. Prof.Dr.Nur Köprülü Near East University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of Political Science ......................................................... Assoc. Prof.Dr.Ali Dayıoğlu European University of Lefke Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of International Relations ......................................................... Assistant Prof.Dr. İlksoy Aslım European University of Lefke Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of International Relations ......................................................... Prof. Dr.Mustafa Sağsan Graduate School of Social Sciences Director DECLARATION I, Waleed Salem, hereby declare that this dissertation entitled ‘Who Is Eligible to Exist? The Dynamics of Inclusion And Exclusion Of Settler Colonialism: The Case Of Palestine ’ has been prepared myself under the guidance and supervision of ‘Assoc. Prof. Dr. UmutKoldaş’ in partial fulfilment of the Near East University, Graduate School of Social Sciences regulations and does not to the best of my knowledge breach and Law of Copyrights and has been tested for plagiarism and a copy of the result can be found in the Thesis. o The full extent of my Thesis can be accesible from anywhere. o My Thesis can only be accesible from Near East University. o My Thesis cannot be accesible for two (2) years. Date Signature Name Surname iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Waleed Salem the PhD student at Near East University, student number 20157156, who prepared this PhD thesis in International Relations about the Dynamics of Inclusion and exclusion of Settler Colonialism: The Case of Palestine, would like to present his thanks and gratitude to the Near East University in The Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC), for all the assistance and the guidance given during my study for PhD in the International Relations Department in the University. Special thanks should be sent to my Supervisor Assoc. Prof. Dr. UmutKoldaş for all his precious advices, and for his patience and follow up of the thesis development in all its stages. Further gratitude goes also the other Jury members Assoc. Prof. Dr. Sait Akşit, and Assoc. Prof. Dr. Nur Köprülü also from Near East University- International Relations and Politial Science Departments. Additional gratitude goes to the other two Jury members from the European University of Lefke- EUL, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ali Dayıoğlu, and Assist. Prof. Dr. İlksoyAslım.Besides that, one will not forget to extend the necessary gratitude to all the scholars at the “Graduate School of Social Sciences”, and the Director of the School Prof. Dr. Mustafa Sağsan. Gratitude goes as well to the ‘International Relations Department’ of Near East University. Finally, a special gratitude goes to my beloved wife EmanRatrout, who was very generous in assisting in all the technical matters related to this thesis, and who was the one that convinced me to go ahead in this adventure till the end regardless of the hesitations that I had. The same gratitude goes also to my family for bearing with me and with the heavy conditions imposed in our house during the preparation of the thesis. Waleed Salem iv ABSTRACT WHO IS ELIGIBLE TO EXIST? THE DYNAMICS OF INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION OF SETTLER COLONIALISM: THE CASE OF PALESTINE This PhD thesis aims to expand on the ‘logic of elimination’ of the settler colonial projects by analyzing in depth its dynamics of inclusion and exclusion, who is eligible to exist, and /or to be counted in these projects with a specific focus on Palestine as a case study; compared with three cases of The United States, South Africa and Ireland/ Northern Ireland.The thesis assumed that the Zionist project is characterized by ‘Demographic Elimination’ as the main feature of its inclusion and inclusion dynamics, combining the erasure of the land: place, space, territory, and the landscape; together with the displacement of the indigenous population internally and externally, and the replacement of them by settler colonialists brought from outside. These processes were practiced during the period of the Zionist Settler colonial project in Palestine in the 19th century leading to the establishment of the Israeli State in 1948,and continued after 1948 and 1967 by that State of Israel as being a “Settler Colonial State” in expansion. These methods are implemented in the frameworks of belligerent occupation, Apartheid, and Settler/ Internal Colonialism, combined with the structures of “Settler Democracy” and “Herrenvolk Democracy” that are both ethnically exclusive to the other politically, legally, economically (Through the settler colonial political economy), socially, and culturally. Since the 1940s the United States of America played the role as a ‘mother country’ to Israel and its settler colonial inclusion and exclusion ongoing project. Previously Britain played the mother country role. Before that the Evangelical Americans, German and the British created a Zionist Approach to conquer and settler Palestine in the early nineteenth century before Zionism emerged. The study is going over five chapters, and ends with a brief overview of the possibilities for decolonization, and for re-inclusion. v Keywords: Settler Colonialism. Eligibility to Exist: Inclusion and exclusion politics. Logic of Elimination. Demographic Elimination. Ireland. South Africa. The United States. Israel. Palestine. vi ÖZ KİM VAROLMA HAKKINA SAHİP? YERLEŞİMCİ SÖMÜRGECİLİĞİNİN İÇLEME VE DIŞLAMA DİNAMİKLERİ BAĞLAMINDA FİLİSTİN ÖRNEĞİ Bu doktora tezi yerleşimci sömürgeci projelerin “tasviye/yok etme mantığını” Filistin örneğinden hareketle ayrıntılı bir şekilde açıklamayı ve tartışmayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda tez, temel olarak bu projelerin yerli halkı tasviye etme mantığındaki içindeleme-dışlama; var olma hakkı kaniliği; ve süreçte sayılma hakkı vasfı gibi dinamikleri derinliğine incelemekte ve Filistin örneğini Amerika Birleşik Devletleri, Güney Afrika ve Irlanda/Kuzey Irlanda örnekleriyle karşılaştırarak irdelemektedir. Tez bir yerleşimci sömürü projesi olan “Siyonist projenin” temel niteliklerinin içindeleme ve dışlama dinamiklerinin temel unsuru olan nüfus tasviyesi; uzam, mıntıka ve arazi terkinine dayalı bir toprak tasviyesi; ve yerli halkın dışarıdan getirilmiş yerleşimciler tarafından hem Filistin içinde hem de dışında yerlerinden edilmesi ve yerlerine yerleşilmesi olduğu değerlendirmesi üzerine kurulmuştur. Bu sürecin tarihsel olarak 19. yüzyılda başladığını iddia eden tez, sürecin İsrail devletinin kuruluşundan sonra da Yerleşimci Sömürgeci İsrail Devleti yürütücülüğünde 1948 ve 1967 savaşları sonrasında genişletilerek devam ettirildiğini savunmaktadır. Bu sürecin yürütülmesinde dış güçlerin etkisini de irdeleyen tezde 1940’lı yıllardan itibaren “ana ülke” rolünü üstelenen Amerika Birleşik Devletleri’nin bu konuda ilk olmadığını yerleşimci sömürgeci projenin kuruluşundan önce ve Siyonizme dönüşüm sürecinde Siyonist yaklaşımı bir fetih ve control aracı olarak görerek oluşumunda ve gelişiminde rol oynayan Evanjelistlerin ve Birleşik Krallık’ın Amerika Birleşik Devletleri’nden çok önce “ana” rolünü üstlenen dış aktörler olduğu da değerlendirilmektedir. Yerleşimci sömürgeci projenin yöntemlerini muharip işgal, apartheid, Yerleşimci/İç Sömürgecilik, Etnici Dışlayıcı Yerleşimci Demokrasisi ya da Üstün Irk Demokrasisi kavramsal çerçevelerinde tartışan ve 5 bölümden oluşan tez, ortaya koymuş olduğu hipotez ve araştırma çerçevesinde dekolonizasyon ve yeniden kapsayıcı bir yapıya dönüş olasılıkları hakkında yeni tartışmalara ışık tutacak bir değerlendirmeyi de içermektedir. vii Anahtar Kelimeler: Yerleşimci Sömürgeciliği, varolmaya kanilik, içindeleme ve dışlama politikaları, Tasviye mantığı, demografik yok ediş, İrlanda, Güney Afrika, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri, İsrail, Filistin. viii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACCEPTANCE/APPROVAL DECLARATION ACKNOWLEDGMENTS………………...………………………………………iii ABSTRACT………...........................................……………………...……iv ÖZ……………………………………………………………………………...………vi TABLE OF CONTENTS……………………………….……………………… viii ABBREVIATIONS ………………….…….……………….….…........................xi INTRODUCTION …………………………………………………………………. 1 i.Theoretical Framework ……………….………..………...………………………..1 ii. Problem statement
Recommended publications
  • Colony and Empire, Colonialism and Imperialism: a Meaningful Distinction?
    Comparative Studies in Society and History 2021;63(2):280–309. 0010-4175/21 © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History doi:10.1017/S0010417521000050 Colony and Empire, Colonialism and Imperialism: A Meaningful Distinction? KRISHAN KUMAR University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA It is a mistaken notion that planting of colonies and extending of Empire are necessarily one and the same thing. ———Major John Cartwright, Ten Letters to the Public Advertiser, 20 March–14 April 1774 (in Koebner 1961: 200). There are two ways to conquer a country; the first is to subordinate the inhabitants and govern them directly or indirectly.… The second is to replace the former inhabitants with the conquering race. ———Alexis de Tocqueville (2001[1841]: 61). One can instinctively think of neo-colonialism but there is no such thing as neo-settler colonialism. ———Lorenzo Veracini (2010: 100). WHAT’ S IN A NAME? It is rare in popular usage to distinguish between imperialism and colonialism. They are treated for most intents and purposes as synonyms. The same is true of many scholarly accounts, which move freely between imperialism and colonialism without apparently feeling any discomfort or need to explain themselves. So, for instance, Dane Kennedy defines colonialism as “the imposition by foreign power of direct rule over another people” (2016: 1), which for most people would do very well as a definition of empire, or imperialism. Moreover, he comments that “decolonization did not necessarily Acknowledgments: This paper is a much-revised version of a presentation given many years ago at a seminar on empires organized by Patricia Crone, at the Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Schlaglicht Israel Nr. 17/20 Aktuelles Aus Israelischen Tageszeitungen 1
    Schlaglicht Israel Nr. 17/20 Aktuelles aus israelischen Tageszeitungen 1.-15. Oktober Die Themen dieser Ausgabe 1. Gespräche zwischen Israel und Libanon ...................................................................................................................... 1 2. Demonstrationen gegen Netanyahu trotz Lockdown ................................................................................................... 3 3. Ultraorthodoxe im Abseits .............................................................................................................................................. 4 4. Medienquerschnitt ........................................................................................................................................................... 6 1. Gespräche zwischen Israel und Libanon Peace with Lebanon? Not so fast Seit Jahrzehnten zum ersten Mal treffen sich Vertre- Lebanon has never been a strong nation. (…) Saudi ter_innen aus Israel und dem Libanon zu Gesprä- Arabia (…) is now keeping its distance. Other Arab chen über ihre Meeresgrenze. Schauplatz ist der and Western nations have also turned their back on UN-Stützpunkt in Nakura im Südlibanon. Besonders Lebanon (…) French President Emmanuel Macron, umstritten ist ein Keil von 860 Quadratkilometern vor who felt obligated to come to Lebanon's aid, came der Küste beider Länder. Dort werden Gasfelder ver- back empty-handed when his plan to form a techno- mutet. Von der schweren Finanzkrise getroffen er- cratic government failed due to sectarian bickering. teilte
    [Show full text]
  • Jerusalem's Women
    Jerusalem’s Women The Growth and Development of Palestinian Women’s movement in Jerusalem during the British Mandate period (1920s-1940s) Nadia Harhash Table of Contents Jerusalem’s Women 1 Nadia Harhash 1 Abstract 5 Appreciations 7 Abbreviations 8 Part One : Research Methodological Outline 9 I Problem Statement and Objectives 10 II Research Tools and Methodology 15 III Boundaries and Limitations 19 IV Literature Review 27 Part Two : The Growth and Development of the Palestinian Women’s Movement in Jerusalem During the British Mandate (1920s-1940s) 33 1 Introduction 34 2 The Photo 41 4 An Overview of the Political Context 47 5 Women Education and Professional Development 53 6 The Emergence of Charitable Societies and Rise of Women Movement 65 7 Rise of Women’s Movement 69 8 Women’s Writers and their contribution 93 9 Biographical Appendix of Women Activists 107 10 Conclusion 135 11 Bibliography 145 Annexes 152 III Photos 153 Documents 154 (Endnotes) 155 ||||| Jerusalem’s Women ||||| Abstract The research discusses the development of the women’s movement in Palestine in the early British Mandate period through a photo that was taken in 1945 in Jerusalem during a meeting of women activists from Palestine with the renowned Egyptian feminist Huda Sha’rawi. The photo sheds light on the side of Palestinian society that hasn’t been well explored or realized by today’s Palestinians. It shows women in a different role than a constructed “traditional” or “authentic” one. The photo gives insights into a particular constituency of the Palestinian women’s movement: urban, secular-modernity women activists from the upper echelons of Palestinian society of the time, women without veils, contributing to certain political and social movements that shaped Palestinian life at the time and connected with other Arab women activists.
    [Show full text]
  • The Late Sheikh Abdullah Azzam's Books
    Combating Terrorism Center Guest Commentary The Late Sheikh Abdullah Azzam’s Books Part III: Radical Theories on Defending Muslim Land through Jihad LCDR Youssef Aboul‐Enein, MSC, USN The Combating Terrorism Center United States Military Academy West Point, NY http://www.ctc.usma.edu Please direct all inquiries to Brian Fishman [email protected] 845.938.2801 Introduction Sheikh Abdullah Azzam is a name that only gets attention among true students of Islamist militancy, yet he has had a tremendous impact on Usama Bin Laden and left him with the tools needed to establish a global jihadist network. Azzam was born in Jenin, Palestine in 1941, and was evicted from his hometown of Jenin in the 1967 Six‐Day War. He spent years pursuing his studies in Islamic jurisprudence attending university in Syria and graduating with a doctorate in Islamic studies from the prestigious Al‐Azhar University in Cairo, Egypt. He was nicknamed the fighting cleric for his obsession with jihadist ideology and the militant works of ibn Taymiyyah (1258 AD). Azzam believed the only way to reclaim his lost homeland was through violent jihad which later became his bsession. On or about 1980, Azzam realized that the Arab jihadists fighting the Soviets in Afghanistan required organization, safe house, and structure. He established Maktab al‐Khidmat lil Mujahideen (The Services Offices for Arab Jihadists) which attracted Usama Bin Laden, then graduating from King Abdul‐ Aziz University to join his new venture. Azzam convinced Bin Laden that his financial connections, business experience, and dedication would be of great use to his new organization in Pakistan.
    [Show full text]
  • Al-Qaida Sanctions List Last Updated on 12 December 2014
    Al-Qaida Sanctions List Last updated on 12 December 2014 The List established and maintained by the Al-Qaida Sanctions Committee with respect to individuals, groups, undertakings and other entities associated with Al-Qaida Last updated on: 12 December 2014 Composition of the List The list consists of the two sections specified below: A. Individuals associated with Al Qaida B. Entities and other groups and undertakings associated with Al Qaida Information about de-listing may be found on the Committee's website at: http://www.un.org/sc/committees/1267/delisting.shtml . A. Individuals associated with Al-Qaida QI.A.12.01. Name: 1: NASHWAN 2: ABD AL-RAZZAQ 3: ABD AL-BAQI 4: na وان د ارزاق د ا :(Name (original script Title: na Designation: na DOB: 1961 POB: Mosul, Iraq Good quality a.k.a.: a) Abdal Al-Hadi Al-Iraqi b) Abd Al-Hadi Al-Iraqi Low quality a.k.a.: Abu Abdallah Nationality: Iraqi Passport no.: na National identification no.: na Address: na Listed on: 6 Oct. 2001 (amended on 14 May 2007, 27 Jul. 2007) Other information: Al-Qaida senior official. In custody of the United States of America, as of July 2007. Review pursuant to Security Council resolution 1822 (2008) was concluded on 15 Jun. 2010. QI.A.157.04. Name: 1: ABD AL WAHAB 2: ABD AL HAFIZ 3: na 4: na د اوھب د اظ :(Name (original script Title: na Designation: na DOB: 7 Sep. 1967 POB: Algiers, Algeria Good quality a.k.a.: a) Ferdjani Mouloud b) Rabah Di Roma c) Abdel Wahab Abdelhafid, born 30 Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • In Search of the Center
    In Search of the Center By Dahlia Scheindlin After the Second Intifada (2000-2005), Israel appeared to be hurtling towards rightwing politics with no end in sight. From 2009, the towering figurehead of the right, Benjamin Netanyahu, won election after election. As public sentiment veered to the right, parties competed for extreme nationalist and expansionist policies, and there seemed to be no stopping the trend. Yet the party that finally came close to beating Netanyahu in April 2019, then surpassed Likud in a second round in September that year, was not a competitor from the right but a rival from the Israeli center. Blue and White was an unlikely challenger. The party was cobbled together ad hoc ahead of the April 2019 elections, led by three former generals with no obvious political ideology, party institutions or base of support beyond the voters of one of the constituent parties in its joint slate, Yesh Atid. The latter was largely viewed as center-left. Yet somehow, voters knew instinctively where Blue and White fit on Israel’s map – the center. The party’s own leaders worked hard to convey a centrist image as their brand, as well. But do centrist political movements ever succeed in Israel? Can a centrist party become a defining force of Israeli politics, and if so, what exactly does centrism mean in Israel? The Pull of the Center On the face of it, centrist politics sound like a potential antidote to Israel’s notoriously polarized, fragmented, and aggressive political culture. A center party could become a vehicle to promote moderation and pragmatic policies, in theory.
    [Show full text]
  • The American University in Cairo Press
    TheThe AmericanAmerican 2009 UniversityUniversity inin Cairo Cairo PressPress Complete Catalog Fall The American University in Cairo Press, recognized “The American University in Cairo Press is the Arab as the leading English-language publisher in the region, world’s top foreign-language publishing house. It has currently offers a backlist of more than 1000 publica- transformed itself into one of the leading players in tions and publishes annually up to 100 wide-ranging the dialog between East and West, and has produced academic texts and general interest books on ancient a canon of Arabic literature in translation unmatched and modern Egypt and the Middle East, as well as in depth and quality by any publishing house in the Arabic literature in translation, most notably the works world.” of Egypt’s Nobel laureate Naguib Mahfouz. —Egypt Today New Publications 9 Marfleet/El Mahdi Egypt: Moment of Change 22 Abdel-Hakim/Manley Traveling through the 10 Masud et al. Islam and Modernity Deserts of Egypt 14 McNamara The Hashemites 28 Abu Golayyel A Dog with No Tail 23 Mehdawy/Hussein The Pharaoh’s Kitchen 31 Alaidy Being Abbas el Abd 15 Moginet Writing Arabic 2 Arnold The Monuments of Egypt 30 Mustafa Contemporary Iraqi Fiction 31 Aslan The Heron 8 Naguib Women, Water, and Memory 29 Bader Papa Sartre 20 O’Kane The Illustrated Guide to the Museum 9 Bayat Life as Politics of Islamic Art 13 al-Berry Life is More Beautiful than Paradise 2 Ratnagar The Timeline History of Ancient Egypt 15 Bloom/Blair Grove Encyclopedia of Islamic Art 33 Roberts, R.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Tlie Rabin Assassination
    Tlie Rabin Assassination: The Israel American Jews Should Support hroughout the 1970s and '80s, Israel's lads hinted at deep spiritual instincts, however identity as a Jewish state seemed unfocused, among secularists. As a people whose immutable. Diplomatically ghettoized, daily lives are constandy violated by death, Israelis and led by Holocaust survivors have a far greater need for religious expression TMenachem Begin and Yitzhak Shamir, Israelis than many of them know. felt a grim, if natural, link with the Jewish past. But those instincts and needs are not being Orthodox West Bank settlers displaced secular translated into new Israeli forms of Judaism. kibbutzniks as the new pioneering elite. Leading Jewishness and Israeliness are detaching into bohemian artists and actors became ultra- warring camps. Orthodox penitents, lending a new, if uneasy, Clearly, Israel must become more Israeli— legitimacy to religion. more democratic—extending national identity But in the 1990s a confluence of powerful to its nonjewish citizens not with a grudging for­ counter-trends is challenging the country's mality, but vigorously and unequivocally. It is Jewish identity. With the end of communism and absurd that a Diaspora Jew, with no intention of the beginning of the Mideast peace process, ever living here, can feel a greater sense of Israel has become an accepted member of the belonging to the modern state of Israel than a community of nations, eroding its sense of nonjewish Israeli who was born and will die in Jewish "otherness." Economic prosperity has shat­ Israel. A more democratic Israel means a less for­ Yossi Klein Halevi, a tered pioneering ideology and with it the mally Jewish one led by a secular government senior writer for The romance of the settlement movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel: Background and U.S. Relations in Brief
    Israel: Background and U.S. Relations in Brief Updated January 27, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R44245 SUMMARY R44245 Israel: Background and U.S. Relations in Brief January 27, 2021 The following matters are of particular significance to U.S.-Israel relations. Jim Zanotti Domestic issues: March 2021 election. After the collapse of its power-sharing Specialist in Middle government in December 2020, Israel is scheduled to hold another election for its Eastern Affairs Knesset (parliament) on March 23, 2021. The election will be Israel’s fourth in the past two years—a frequency without parallel in the country’s history. Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu has managed to maintain power despite an ongoing criminal trial on corruption charges that is set to resume in February 2021. Netanyahu apparently hopes to create a coalition government that will grant him legal immunity or to remain indefinitely as caretaker prime minister (as he did from December 2018 to May 2020) by preventing anyone from forming a coalition without him and his Likud party. Palestinians and Arab state normalization. On the decades-old Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Trump Administration policies largely sided with Israeli positions, thus alienating Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) Chairman and Palestinian Authority (PA) President Mahmoud Abbas. In the second half of 2020, the Administration pivoted from its January 2020 Israeli-Palestinian peace proposal to helping Israel reach agreements—known as the Abraham Accords—on normalizing its relations with the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Bahrain, Sudan, and Morocco. In connection with its deal with the UAE, Israel agreed in August 2020 to suspend plans to annex part of the West Bank, though announcements related to settlement activity have accelerated since then.
    [Show full text]
  • S Election Results
    The Challenge of Israel’s Election Results I wrote the following for the latest newsletter of the World Union of Meretz, from the J Street Conference in Washington, DC. Representatives of all of the Israeli opposition gathered there, meeting together with its counterparts from American Jewry, who clearly represent the majority of American Jews. The final polls allowed on Friday the 13th, four days before election day, had given the Zionist Union (Labor & Hatnua) led by Herzog and Livni a lead of 24 to 20 seats, with an even chance to lead the next government. Netanyahu then went into emergency mode, using every demagogic trick in the book to turn the results around. He warned the leadership of the settlers that “the left” was on the verge of winning, and would begin to evacuate settlements, so they mobilized en masse, coming in thousands to Likud strongholds in the outlying and development towns to get out the vote. Mobilizing the extreme right to abandon Naftali Bennet’s Jewish Home party, Lieberman’s Yisrael Beiteinu and the ultra-right Yachad party (led by Shas refugee Eli Yishai in alliance with Kahanist Baruch Marzel), Netanyahu renounced his support for a two-state solution, and on election day warned that Israeli Arabs were voting in droves, being “bussed in by Jewish left-wingers” supported by foreign money. This last claim was ridiculous, since Israeli Arab citizens were simply walking to the polling booths, exercising their democratic right to vote, and energized by the fact that the four Arab parties had united in a Joint Arab List to ensure that they would pass the minimum voter threshold that had been raised to try to prevent them from entering the Knesset.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ḥaram Al-Sharīf No. 302 (MSR XXII 2019)
    An Arabic Marriage Contract and Subsequent Divorce from Mamluk Jerusalem: The Ḥaram al-Sharīf No. 302 iruhammaMuhamMuhaMBruham A Marriage Contract and Divorce Muhammad N. Abdul-Rahman King Faisal University An Arabic Marriage Contract and Subsequent Divorce from Mamluk Jerusalem: The Ḥaram al-Sharīf No. 302 Introduction Documents from the Ḥaram al-Sharīf 1 are considered to be among the most im- portant historical sources from Mamluk Jerusalem because there are so few nar- 10.6082/pkrn-4q45 rative or documentary sources that chronicle the city in this period. In addition, URI they are the oldest extant documents concerning the affairs of the city’s Muslims in particular, and its Jews and Christians in general. Among the most important of the Ḥaram al-Sharīf documents are those related to the situation of dhimmīs in Jerusalem during the Mamluk era. 2 As is well known, the Jews and Christians shared their lives in Jerusalem with Muslims, and the mingling of customs and traditions was a defining characteristic of the society of medieval Jerusalem. This is a revised version of a paper given at Writing Semitic: Scripts, Documents, Languages in Historical Context: The Sixth International Society for Arabic Papyrology Conference, hosted by the Committee of Semitic Philology of the Bavarian Academy of Sciences and Humanities, 7–10 October 2014. I would like to thank Matt Malczycki and Lucian Reinfandt, as well as the anonymous reader, for their helpful remarks on my edition of the document and for their useful comments on this paper. I am also grateful to them for checking my English.
    [Show full text]
  • To Download / View the Haaretz English Ad As A
    They have already given their interpretation of democracy Minister Naftali Bennett and Knesset Members Zeev Elkin, Gila Gamliel, Aryeh Deri, Tzachi Hanegbi, Tzipi Hotovely and Ayelet Shaked have cancelled their participation in the Haaretz Conference on Democracy because the New Israel Fund is among its sponsors. For the boycotters, democracy means disregard of the weak, the rejected, those who lack rights, those who are discriminated against economically and those who are excluded because of their beliefs. To the glory of the state of Israel, the New Israel Fund exists with the understanding that democracy is also the defense of minority rights and it expressly extends a hand to the weak, the discriminated against and the excluded, aiding the existence of non-profit organizations that promote their rights. The politicians of the right and Aryeh Deri (defender of the transparent) cannot tolerate this. Here is a detailed list of the organizations funded by the NIF and its supporters in 2013 (from the Fund’s internet site): Core Grants Noar Kahalcha 30,000 Hotline for Migrant Workers 71,063.57 Darna- Jaffa Popular Committee for Land Allocation 4,577.79 Ne’emanei Torah Va’Avodah 7,000 emocracy and Human and Civil Rights Sister for Women in Israel 116,000 Human Rights Defenders Fund (HRDF) 43,920.24 Economic Empowerment for Women 7,500 Oranim: Hamidrasha Center for Study Fellowship 28,873.71 Adalah: Legal Center for Arab Minority Rights in Israel 57,875 Social Economic Association (SEA) 67,000 Humans Without Borders 6,818.32 Fidel: Association
    [Show full text]