DOCSLIB.ORG

JAGUAR DRAFT RECOVERY PLAN (Panthera Onca)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
JAGUAR DRAFT RECOVERY PLAN (Panthera Onca) JAGUAR DRAFT RECOVERY PLAN (Panthera onca) Southwest Region U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Albuquerque, New Mexico December 20, 2016 Approved: _________ DRAFT_________________ Date: ________________________ Regional Director, Region 2 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service JAGUAR DRAFT RECOVERY PLAN (Panthera onca) Prepared by: The Technical Subgroup of the Jaguar Recovery Team in conjunction with the Implementation Subgroup of the Jaguar Recovery Team and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Prepared for: Region 2, Southwest Region U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Albuquerque, New Mexico DRAFT December 20, 2016 2 Table of Contents DISCLAIMER ................................................................................................................................ v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................................................ vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... ix PART 1: BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Introduction and Recovery Planning ................................................................................... 1 1.2 Legal Status of the Species .................................................................................................. 3 1.2.1 Rangewide ..................................................................................................................... 3 1.2.2 Mexico ........................................................................................................................... 4 1.2.3 United States ................................................................................................................. 4 1.3 Evolutionary History, Description, and Taxonomy ............................................................. 4 1.4 Distribution, Connectivity, Abundance, and Population Trends ......................................... 7 1.4.1 Rangewide ..................................................................................................................... 7 1.4.2 Mexico ........................................................................................................................... 8 1.4.3 United States ............................................................................................................... 10 1.5 Life History and Ecology ................................................................................................... 12 1.5.1 Reproduction and Lifespan ......................................................................................... 12 1.5.2 Diel Activity Patterns .................................................................................................. 12 1.5.2 Diet .............................................................................................................................. 12 1.5.3 Genetic Fitness ............................................................................................................. 14 1.5.4 Disease and Epizootics ................................................................................................. 15 1.5.5 Home Range ................................................................................................................ 16 1.5.6 Movement and Dispersal Distances ............................................................................. 17 1.5.7 Density ......................................................................................................................... 21 1.6 Habitat Characteristics and Use ......................................................................................... 30 1.6.1 Habitat Modeling ........................................................................................................ 33 1.7 Critical Habitat ................................................................................................................... 40 1.8 Population Modeling .......................................................................................................... 41 1.9 Reasons for Listing/Threats Assessment ........................................................................... 45 1.9.1 Factor A. The present or threatened destruction, modification, or curtailment of its habitat or range .................................................................................................................... 45 i 1.9.2 Factor B. Overutilization for commercial, recreational, scientific, or educational purposes ................................................................................................................................ 47 1.9.2 Factor C. Disease or predation .................................................................................. 47 1.9.4 Factor D. The inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms .................................. 47 1.9.5 Factor E. Other natural or manmade factors affecting its continued existence ......... 51 1.10 Conservation Efforts ........................................................................................................ 57 1.10.1 Rangewide ................................................................................................................. 57 1.10.2 Mexico ....................................................................................................................... 59 1.10.3 United States ............................................................................................................. 65 1.11 Biological Constraints and Needs .................................................................................... 69 1.12 Jaguar As an Umbrella Species........................................................................................ 70 PART 2: RECOVERY STRATEGY ........................................................................................... 71 2.1 Recovery Units................................................................................................................... 72 2.1.1 Northwestern Recovery Unit ....................................................................................... 73 2.1.2 Pan American Recovery Unit...................................................................................... 74 2.1.3 Core, Secondary, and Peripheral Areas ..................................................................... 75 PART 3: RECOVERY GOAL, OBJECTIVES, AND CRITERIA ............................................. 78 3.1. Recovery Goal .................................................................................................................. 78 3.2. Recovery Objectives ......................................................................................................... 78 3.3. Recovery Criteria .............................................................................................................. 79 3.3.1 Downlisting Criteria ................................................................................................... 79 3.3.2 Delisting Criteria ........................................................................................................ 81 3.3.3 Recovery Criteria with Justifications.......................................................................... 82 PART 4: RECOVERY PROGRAM ............................................................................................ 91 4.1. Threats Tracking Table ...................................................................................................... 91 4.2. Recovery Action Outline and Narrative ............................................................................ 94 PART 5: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE........................................................................... 115 5.1 Responsible Parties and Cost Estimates ........................................................................... 115 5.2 Recovery action priorities and abbreviations .................................................................... 116 PART 6: LITERATURE CITED ............................................................................................... 158 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................. 194 APPENDICES ........................................................................................................................... 197 ii Table of Figures Figure 1. Map of the extent of the Northwestern Jaguar Recovery Unit (NRU), as updated by Sanderson and Fisher (2013). ......................................................................................... 184 Figure 2. Map of the extent of the Pan American Jaguar Recovery Unit (PARU) in relation to the Northwestern Recovery Unit, modified from Rabinowitz and Zeller (2010). .......... 185 Figure 3. Map of potential jaguar carrying capacity in the Northwestern Recovery Unit using jaguar habitat model version 13 (Sanderson and Fisher 2013). ...................................... 186 Figure 4. Map of habitat connectivity and roadways of interest in the Borderlands Secondary Area as modeled by Stoner et al. (2015). ........................................................................ 187 Figure 5. Map of habitat connectivity and a roadway of interest through the Sonora Core Area of the Northwestern Jaguar Recovery Unit as modeled by Stoner et al. (2015). ................ 188 Figure 6. Map of habitat connectivity and roadways of interest in the Sinaloa Secondary Area
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The All-Bird Bulletin
    Advancing Integrated Bird Conservation in North America Spring 2014 Inside this issue: The All-Bird Bulletin Protecting Habitat for 4 the Buff-breasted Sandpiper in Bolivia The Neotropical Migratory Bird Conservation Conserving the “Jewels 6 Act (NMBCA): Thirteen Years of Hemispheric in the Crown” for Neotropical Migrants Bird Conservation Guy Foulks, Program Coordinator, Division of Bird Habitat Conservation, U.S. Fish and Bird Conservation in 8 Wildlife Service (USFWS) Costa Rica’s Agricultural Matrix In 2000, responding to alarming declines in many Neotropical migratory bird popu- Uruguayan Rice Fields 10 lations due to habitat loss and degradation, Congress passed the Neotropical Migra- as Wintering Habitat for tory Bird Conservation Act (NMBCA). The legislation created a unique funding Neotropical Shorebirds source to foster the cooperative conservation needed to sustain these species through all stages of their life cycles, which occur throughout the Western Hemi- Conserving Antigua’s 12 sphere. Since its first year of appropriations in 2002, the NMBCA has become in- Most Critical Bird strumental to migratory bird conservation Habitat in the Americas. Neotropical Migratory 14 Bird Conservation in the The mission of the North American Bird Heart of South America Conservation Initiative is to ensure that populations and habitats of North Ameri- Aros/Yaqui River Habi- 16 ca's birds are protected, restored, and en- tat Conservation hanced through coordinated efforts at in- ternational, national, regional, and local Strategic Conservation 18 levels, guided by sound science and effec- in the Appalachians of tive management. The NMBCA’s mission Southern Quebec is to achieve just this for over 380 Neo- tropical migratory bird species by provid- ...and more! Cerulean Warbler, a Neotropical migrant, is a ing conservation support within and be- USFWS Bird of Conservation Concern and listed as yond North America—to Latin America Vulnerable on the International Union for Conser- Coordination and editorial vation of Nature (IUCN) Red List.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Outline for the Jaguar (Panthera Onca) April 2012
    Recovery Outlinea for the Jaguar (Panthera onca) April 2012 PREPARED BY: The Technical Subgroup of the Jaguar Recovery Team in conjunction with the Implementation Subgroup of the Jaguar Recovery Team and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service a This outline is meant to serve as an interim guidance document to direct recovery efforts, including recovery planning, for the jaguar until a full recovery plan is developed and approved. A preliminary strategy for recovery of the species is presented here, as are recommended high priority actions to stabilize and recover the species. The recovery outline is intended primarily for internal use by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) as a preplanning document. Formal public participation will be invited upon the release of the draft recovery plan for this species. However, any new information or comments that members of the public may wish to offer as a result of this recovery outline will be taken into consideration during the recovery planning process. Recovery planning began in January 2010, and the draft recovery plan is targeted for completion in winter 2012. The USFWS invites public participation in the planning process. Interested parties may contact the Arizona Ecological Services Office. 1 Recovery Outline for the Jaguar (Panthera onca) April 2012 PREPARED BY: The Technical Subgroup of the Jaguar Recovery Team in conjunction with the Implementation Subgroup of the Jaguar Recovery Team and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service I. INTRODUCTION A. Species Name: Jaguar (Panthera onca) B. Listing Status and Date: Prior to the current listing rule (62 FR 39147), the jaguar was listed as endangered from the United States (U.S.) and Mexico international border southward to include Mexico and Central and South America (37 FR 6476, March 30, 1972; 50 CFR 17.11, August 20, 1994).
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlands Network Celebrates 25 Years of Reconnecting Nature Across North America
    For the Wild Wildlands Network Celebrates 25 Years of Reconnecting Nature Across North America Twenty-five years. Half the lifespan of a chimpanzee, or a scarlet macaw lighting the tropical sky. Twice the age of an old wild cougar, who somehow eluded highways and guns. A few blinks of the eye for a bowhead whale, her baleen sifting the Beaufort across two centuries or more. And the silver anniversary of couples of our own kind, honoring the hard-earned stories they’ve created along the way. Wildlands Network, too, has accrued many stories since The eyes of the future are looking back at our founding twenty-five years ago, an impassioned union of science and activism on behalf of wild nature. us and they are praying for us to see The collection that follows celebrates this union and beyond our own time. They are kneeling the dedicated community of people—scientists, artists; with hands clasped that we might act with wild advocates, all—working to heal broken landscapes and rewild our hearts. restraint, that we might leave room for the life that is destined to come. To protect There’s no question that wild creatures great and small need our help even more today than they did a quarter- what is wild is to protect what is gentle. century ago; as Terry Tempest Williams tells us, “wild Perhaps the wilderness we fear is the mercy is in our hands.” May the essays, poems, and pause between our own heartbeats, the excerpts comprising this silver anniversary publication inspire you to explore the wild within, and to join us in silent space that says we live only by going for the gold—for the wild.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts for the February 5-7, 2015
    ABSTRACTS FOR THE 48TH JOINT ANNUAL MEETING NEW MEXICO AND ARIZONA CHAPTERS OF THE WILDLIFE SOCIETY AND ARIZONA/NEW MEXICO CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN FISHERIES SOCIETY FEBRUARY 5-7, 2015 HOTEL ENCANTO DE LAS CRUCES LAS CRUCES, NEW MEXICO Wildlife Best Student Paper Competition Matthew J. Gould: Ph.D. Student, Department of Biology, New Mexico State University, P.O. Box 30003, MSC 4901, Las Cruces, New Mexico 88003, mjgould@nmsu.edu. Dr. James W. Cain III: Co-advisor, U.S. Geological Survey, New Mexico Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Fish, Wildlife and Conservation Ecology, New Mexico State University. Dr. Gary W. Roemer: Co-advisor, Department of Fish, Wildlife and Conservation Ecology, New Mexico State University. Dr. William R. Gould: Co-PI, Department of Economics, Applied Statistics, and International Business, New Mexico State University. Stewart G. Liley: Big Game Program Manager, New Mexico Department of Game and Fish. Estimating abundance and density of American black bears (Ursus americanus) in New Mexico using noninvasive genetic sampling-based capture-recapture methods Introduction One of the main challenges for a resource agency in charge of managing game species is to set harvest levels that ensure the long-term persistence of populations. Due to financial constraints, management agencies often lack relevant estimates of vital rates for all populations or subpopulations for which they must set harvest quotas. There has been recent concern and criticism voiced by different segments of the public regarding harvest objectives set for black bears (Ursus americanus) in New Mexico. Some members of the public would like to see fewer bears harvested whereas others believe that sustainable harvest levels can be increased for many populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Bird Surveys and Habitat Assessments Along the Aros-Yaqui River Corridor on and Around the Northern Jaguar Reserve
    Bird surveys and habitat assessments along the Aros-Yaqui river corridor on and around the Northern Jaguar Reserve Summarizing results of field work in December 2011 & July 2012 Prepared by: Aaron D. Flesch and Sky Jacobs School of Natural Resources and the Environment University of Arizona 325 Biological Sciences East Tucson Arizona 85721 flesch@ag.arizona.edu skyjacobs@gmail.com Prepared for: Diana Hadley and Megan Southern Northern Jaguar Project 2114 W Grant Rd Tucson, Arizona 85745 www.northernjaguarproject.org Common Black Hawk © A. Flesch Río Aros © A. Flesch August 2013 Introduction Ten years ago, two conservation organizations, Naturalia and Northern Jaguar Project, began purchasing private ranches in a remote region of northwest Mexico in an effort to protect the largest remaining population of breeding jaguars (Panthera onca) in northwest Mexico. Since that time, the reserve has grown to 20,140 ha and its mission has broadened to focus more generally on biodiversity conservation in this wild region. Today, the Northern Jaguar Reserve (NJR) is the only reserve in Mexico that protects large areas of Foothills (Sinaloan) Thornscrub. Foothills Thornscrub is the dominant vegetation community in the foothills and valleys west of the northern Sierra Madre Occidental and forms a broad transition zone between tropical and temperate environments. The NJR is situated near the northern extent of Foothills Thornscrub, directly west of the northern end of the Sierra Madre Occidental. It is surrounded on three sides by deep, lowland canyons of the lower Río Aros and upper Río Yaqui, which includes the largest remaining section of free-flowing river in northwest Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology of an Ocelot Population at the Northern Edge of the Species' Distribution in Northern Sonora, Mexico
    Ecology of an ocelot population at the northern edge of the species' distribution in northern Sonora, Mexico James C. Rorabaugh1, Jan Schipper2, Sergio Avila-Villegas3, Jessica A. Lamberton-Moreno4 and Timothy Flood5 1 Saint David, AZ, USA 2 Arizona Center for Nature Conservation, Phoenix Zoo, South Mountain Environmental Education Center, Phoenix, AZ, United States of America 3 Sierra Club, Tucson, AZ, USA 4 Coalition for Sonoran Desert Protection, Tucson, AZ, USA 5 Friends of Arizona Rivers, Phoenix, AZ, USA ABSTRACT We used data from eight years of camera trapping at Rancho El Aribabi, a cattle ranch and conservation property in northern Sonora, Mexico, to examine the ecology of the northern-most known breeding population of ocelots (Leopardus pardalis). Ocelots were found mostly in two discrete and disjunct areas: a riverine riparian canyon at just less than 1,000 masl elevation and along arroyos in an oak-mesquite savanna in the Sierra Azul at 1,266–1,406 masl. An ocelot was also detected at a site between those two areas, in an area of a Sonoran desertscrub-foothills thornscrub ecotone at 1,300 masl. At least 18 ocelots, both males and females, were detected during the 2007– 2011 and 2014–2018 sampling periods. A female with a kitten was documented in 2011. No individual ocelots were photographed in both areas, which are separated by a minimum of 11.29 km, and no individuals were photographed in both time periods. In a binary logistic regression, key environmental variables predicting ocelot presence were, in order of importance, distance to a paved road, distance to human habitation, proximity to water, and an anthropogenic influences index that was dominated by Submitted 8 July 2019 cattle.
    [Show full text]
  • Jaguar Interactions with Pumas and Prey at the Northern Edge of Jaguars’ Range
    Jaguar interactions with pumas and prey at the northern edge of jaguars' range Carmina E. Gutiérrez-González1,2,* and Carlos A. López-González1,* 1 Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Querétaro, México 2 Northern Jaguar Project, Tucson, AZ, USA * These authors contributed equally to this work. ABSTRACT We present the first study that evaluates jaguar-puma interactions in the arid lands of northern Mexico, where jaguars have their northernmost breeding population and both predators are persecuted for livestock depredation. We tested whether jaguars are the dominant species in this unique ecosystem, where: (1) pumas outnumber jaguars, (2) pumas are better adapted to arid environments, and (3) jaguars and pumas are of similar size. We analyzed four years of data with two approaches; a two species conditional occupancy model and an activity patterns analysis. We used camera location and prey presence as covariates for jaguar and puma detection and presence probabilities. We also explored overlap in activities of predators and prey. Where both species were detected, peccary presence was positively correlated with both jaguar and puma presence, whereas in areas where jaguars were detected but pumas were not, deer presence explained the probability of jaguar presence. We found that both predators were more likely to co-occur together than to be found independently, and so we rejected the hypothesis that jaguars were the dominant species in our study area. Predators were mainly nocturnal and their activity patterns overlapped by 60%. Jaguar, as compared with puma, overlapped more with deer and calves; puma overlapped with calves more than with other prey, suggesting a preference.
    [Show full text]