DOCSLIB.ORG

Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area Historic Buildings

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area Historic Buildings Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area National Park Service New Jersey, Pennsylvania US Department of the Interior Draft Historic Buildings Strategy July 2021 SUMMARY This document provides a strategy that prioritizes funding and preservation efforts for historic buildings within Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area (“the park”) based on historic significance, condition, interpretive value, and potential for adaptive reuse. There are 286 buildings within the park that are listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places and are considered “historic.” Many buildings are found in groupings, such as on a former farmstead where there is a house, outbuildings, and agricultural landscape features such as fields and fencerows. These are referred to as “historic properties” in the Historic Buildings Strategy (HBS). There are 97 historic properties within the park. The number and condition of the buildings exceed the park’s ability to provide for maintenance. This HBS is a tool to assist the National Park Service in making strategic, prioritized maintenance and preservation decisions for the historic properties in the park. In order to determine which properties to include in the plan and which priority to assign to each property, each was evaluated for historical significance, the physical condition of buildings, and their interpretive value as it relates to their historic context. The HBS assigns a priority to each property—A, B, C, or D. Each category and identifies the types of treatments that would be appropriate under each category. The HBS does not prescribe specific treatments (e.g., specific repair and maintenance work), funding mechanisms, or uses for the property. Category A properties are the most historically significant properties in the park, are in good or fair condition and have high interpretive value. There are 48 Category A properties, of which 20 are currently vacant. Category B properties are often not as historically significant as Category A properties but are in good or fair condition and have high or moderate interpretive value. There are 27 Category B properties, of which 15 are currently vacant. Category C properties may have some historic significance but are in fair or poor condition and have fair or poor interpretive value. There are 11 Category C properties, of which 9 are currently vacant. Category D properties are in fair to poor condition and have poor interpretive value. There are 11 Category D properties, of which 9 are currently vacant. i Table of Contents Project Background............................................................................................................................... 1 Methodology for Inclusion and Evaluation in the Historic Buildings Strategy ................................... 1 Step 1: Determine Which Properties Should be Included in the HBS ................................................ 1 National Register Criteria for Evaluation ..................................................................................... 2 “Contributing” and “Non-Contributing” Buildings ...................................................................... 3 Step 2: Filter by Historic Significance ............................................................................................... 3 National or State Significance ..................................................................................................... 3 Historic Districts ......................................................................................................................... 4 Rarity ......................................................................................................................................... 4 Historic Integrity ......................................................................................................................... 4 Exemplification of Multiple Historic Contexts ............................................................................ 4 Step 3: Group Properties into Priorities Based on Condition and Historic Context/Interpretive Value. 5 Prioritization of Individual Buildings within a Historic Property.................................................. 6 Vacant Properties and “Adaptive Reuse” ..................................................................................... 6 Step 4: Assign a Management Strategy to Each Category .................................................................. 7 Types of Treatments for Historic Buildings ................................................................................. 7 Types of Uses for Historic Properties .......................................................................................... 8 NPS Administrative Use ....................................................................................................... 8 NPS Employee Housing ....................................................................................................... 8 Leasing ................................................................................................................................. 9 Partnerships and Other Agreements ...................................................................................... 9 Management Strategies Assigned to Each Prioritization Category ................................................... 10 Management Strategies for Category A Properties ........................................................................... 10 Management Strategies for Category B Properties ........................................................................... 10 Management Strategies for Category C Properties ........................................................................... 11 Management Strategies for Category D Properties ........................................................................... 11 Process for Re-Evaluation of Categories ............................................................................................ 12 Timing and Needs for Re-Evaluation of Individual Buildings or Properties...................................... 12 Evaluation of Newly Acquired Properties ........................................................................................ 13 Next Steps ............................................................................................................................................ 13 References and Bibliography .............................................................................................................. 14 Appendix A: “Strategy For Prioritizing Historic Properties” Flowchart .......................................... 21 Appendix B: Descriptions of Individual Historic Properties in New Jersey ...................................... 23 Appendix C: Descriptions of Individual Historic Properties in Pennsylvania .................................. 97 Appendix D: Historic Contexts at Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area....................... 137 ii PROJECT BACKGROUND Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area (DEWA or “the park”) was established in 1965. The National Park Service (NPS) acquired more than 1,000 buildings from the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) as a result of the Tocks Island Dam Project and subsequent establishment of the park. Incidental to the land procurement process by the USACE, the buildings on that land were also acquired. The buildings were not critical to the subsequently established park’s mission, many were vacant, and there were inadequate resources to repair or maintain all of them. It is unlikely that adequate resources will be available in the future to preserve all historic buildings in the park; therefore, a strategy is needed that determines the highest priorities for long-term preservation. There are over 700 buildings within the park, of which 286 are listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places and are considered “historic.” 171 of those buildings are in New Jersey and 115 are in Pennsylvania. Many buildings are found in groupings, such as on a former farmstead where there is a house, outbuildings, and agricultural landscape features such as fields and fencerows. These are referred to as “historic properties” in the Historic Buildings Strategy (HBS). There are 97 historic properties within the park. There are 65 historic properties in New Jersey, and 32 in Pennsylvania. The HBS is a means to help the National Park Service prioritize which historic properties in the park will be preserved and maintained in the long term. In order to determine which properties to include in the plan and which priority to assign to each property, the properties were evaluated for historical significance, the physical condition of buildings, and their interpretive value related to their historic context. METHODOLOGY FOR INCLUSION AND EVALUATION IN THE HISTORIC BUILDINGS STRATEGY In consultation with New Jersey and Pennsylvania State Historic Preservation Offices, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, the public, and other interested entities such as park partner and volunteer organizations, the National Park Service formulated a multi-step prioritization process that takes into account the property’s listing or eligibility for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP or National Register), historic significance, condition, and interpretive value to park visitors. The section below outlines this process in detail. Please see appendix A, “Strategy for Prioritizing Historic Properties,” for a flowchart
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Adaptive Reuse Architecture Documentation and Analysis Dafna Fisher-Gewirtzman* Faculty of Architecture & Town Planning, Technion – IIT, Haifa, Israel
    al Eng tur ine ec er Fisher-Gewirtzman, J Archit Eng Tech 2016, 5:3 it in h g c r T e DOI: 10.4172/2168-9717.1000172 A c f h o n Journal of Architectural l o a l n o r g u y o J Engineering Technology ISSN: 2168-9717 Research Article Open Access Adaptive Reuse Architecture Documentation and Analysis Dafna Fisher-Gewirtzman* Faculty of Architecture & Town Planning, Technion – IIT, Haifa, Israel Abstract Buildings have been reused throughout history. The current discourse of diverse trends in preservation together with awareness for sustainable environments has led to a surge in adaptive reuse projects. The combination of new and old architecture ensures the retaining of authentic character while providing an appropriate new use and revitalizing the structure. Learning from precedents is one of the most important knowledge bases for architects. It has many layers of knowledge referring to the old building and its original use, the transformed building and its new use, and the transformation itself. The objective of this work is to propose a theoretical and practical background for a systematic process to support adaptive reuse architecture precedent E-learning. A procedure for the analysis has been developed to fit the specific nature of this architecture data. This paper is presenting the analysis principles and demonstrates the system as a powerful infrastructure for E-learning. Keywords: Adaptive reuse of Buildings; Formal analysis; Learning and to enhance it rather than break it or try to diminish it. Such from precedents; Creative design; Design process structures must be studied carefully for their physical and metaphysical qualities and designers must consider all aspects and decide on tactics Introduction and strategies for their actions.
    [Show full text]
  • An Orientation to Preservation & Adaptive Reuse
    MODULE Preservation Toolkit An Orientation to Preservation & 01 Adaptive Reuse Preservation and reuse can mean different things to different people. From “freezing places in time” as a museum, to repairing and adapting places for a new active use. This orientation will introduce you to common preservation terms and resources, explain what listing in the National Register of Historic Places does and does not do, and outline standards for rehabilitation. Background The first noted preservation effort in the United States was Ann Pamela Cunningham and the Mt. Vernon Ladies Association’s crusade in the 1850s to save Mount Vernon. 1906 marked the beginning of the U.S. government’s involvement in historic preservation with the passage of the Antiquities Act and the creation of the National Monuments program. Today, preservation in the United States is guided by the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, which introduced Historic Preservation Offices in each state, and created the National Register of Historic Places. Later federal additions to the field include the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards, which guide and promote preservation throughout the country; and Historic Tax Credits, a major incentive for rehabilitation of historic properties. What is Preservation? Preservation “is a movement in planning designed to conserve old buildings and areas in an effort to tie a place’s history to its population and culture. It is also an essential component to green building in that it reuses structures that are already present as opposed to new construction.”1 Preservation compliments the fields of community planning, architecture, and history. Historic buildings and sites embody the story of a place – the values, culture, craftsmanship, and resources of its people.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Update and Boundary Increase Nomination
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Expires 5/31/2012) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional certification comments, entries, and narrative items on continuation sheets if needed (NPS Form 10-900a). 1. Name of Property historic name Fort Monroe (2013 Update and Boundary Increase) other names/site number VDHR #114-0002 2. Location street & number At the intersection of Mercury Boulevard and Mellon Street not for publication city or town Fort Monroe vicinity state Virginia code 51 county Hampton (Ind. City) code 650 zip code 23651 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this x nomination request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property x meets does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following level(s) of significance: x national statewide local ____________________________________ Signature of certifying official Date ____________ ____________________________________ ________________________________________ __ Title State or Federal agency/bureau or Tribal Government In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Dutch Gable Carport Recommended Instruction Manual
    DUTCH GABLE CARPORT RECOMMENDED INSTRUCTION MANUAL This document remains the property of FBHS (Aust) Pty Ltd September 2015 Table of Contents Introduction 2 Components 3 Step 1a – Marking out the Perimeter of the Carport with Footing only 4 Step 2a – Footing Set-Out for Concrete Block Pad Footing 5 Step 1b – Marking out the Perimeter of the Carport with Slab 6 Step 2b – Footing Set-Out for Concrete Slab 7 Step 3 – Preparation of Carport Posts 8 Step 4a – Post Sleeve on Base Plate Set-out on Footing only 9 Step 4b – Post Sleeve on Base Plate Set-out on Slab 10 Step 5 - Fitting of Intermediate Rafters with Apex Bracket 11 Step 6 - Fitting of End Rafters with Apex Bracket and Cross Beam Assembly 12 Step 7 - Fitting of Columns with Haunch Bracket 14 Step 8 - Fitting of Sidewall Eave Purlin (SW) to Post 15 Step 9 – Fixing of Cover Flashing to Sidewall Eave Purlin (SEP) 16 Step 10 - Gutter 16 Step 11 - Sidewall Frame Assembly 18 Step 12 - Other Sidewall Frame Assembly 18 Step 13- Standing First Sidewall Frame Assembly 18 Step 14 - Standing Second Sidewall Frame Assembly 19 Step 15- Fixing of Endwall Eave Purlin(EEP) to Sidewall Eave Purlin (SEP) on the Rear Endwall 19 Step 16- Installation of Rear Endwall Rafter 20 Step 17- Fixing of Dutch Cross Beam 21 Step 18 - Fixing of Rafter Frame Bracket to Cross Beam End Bracket 21 Step 19 - Fixing of Internal Hip Bracket 22 Step 20 - Fixing of Dutch Hip Rafter 23 Step 21- Fixing of Dutch Hip Rafter to the opposite corner 25 Step 22 - Fixing of Crown Rafter 26 Step 23 - Installation of Intermediate Rafters
    [Show full text]
  • Adaptive Reuse: Recent Hotel Conversions in Downtown Philadelphia Catherine S
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Theses (Historic Preservation) Graduate Program in Historic Preservation 1-1-2005 Adaptive Reuse: Recent Hotel Conversions in Downtown Philadelphia Catherine S. Jefferson University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses Part of the Historic Preservation and Conservation Commons Jefferson, Catherine S., "Adaptive Reuse: Recent Hotel Conversions in Downtown Philadelphia" (2005). Theses (Historic Preservation). 30. http://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/30 Presented to the Faculties of the University of Pennsylvania in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Historic Preservation 2005. Advisor: David Hollenberg This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. http://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/30 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Adaptive Reuse: Recent Hotel Conversions in Downtown Philadelphia Disciplines Historic Preservation and Conservation Comments Presented to the Faculties of the University of Pennsylvania in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Historic Preservation 2005. Advisor: David Hollenberg This thesis or dissertation is available at ScholarlyCommons: http://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/30 ADAPTIVE REUSE: RECENT HOTEL CONVERSIONS IN DOWNTOWN PHILADELPHIA Catherine Sarah Jefferson A THESIS in Historic Preservation Presented to the Faculties of the University of Pennsylvania in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN HISTORIC PRESERVATION 2005 _____________________________ _____________________________ Advisor Reader David Hollenberg John Milner Lecturer in Historic Preservation Adjunct Professor of Architecture _____________________________ Program Chair Frank G. Matero Associate Professor of Architecture ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis would not have been possible without the assistance and support of a number of people.
    [Show full text]
  • Dutch Gable Freestanding Carport
    DUTCH GABLE FREESTANDING CARPORT STRATCO OUTBACK® ASSEMBLY INSTRUCTIONS. Your complete guide to building a FREESTANDING Outback DUTCH GABLE CARPORT BEFORE YOU START Carefully read these instructions. If you do not have all the necessary tools or information, contact Stratco for advice. Before starting lay out all components and check them against the delivery docket. The parts description identifies each key part, and the component location diagram indicates their fastening position. PARTS DESCRIPTION RIDGE KNUCKLE FOOTING PLATE EAVES KNUCKLE FOOTING COLUMNS AND Slots inside the gable rafters to Slots inside column Slots inside gable rafter and KNUCKLE RAFTERS form connection at the ridge to form on concrete column to form connection at Slots inside Pre cut 120 outback footing connection. eaves. column to form beam make up an in ground rafters and columns footing connection PURLINS HIP PLATE RIDGE CAP BARGE CAP INFILL PANELS Purlins provide support for Connects purlins to This flashing covers the roof The barge cap covers Sufficient number of sheets are cladding the hip rafter. sheets at the gable ridge. the area where the provided, from which the required deck finishes at portal dutch gable infill panels can be HIP FLASHING frame cut. Covers the roof sheet ends along the hip rafter. WEATHER STRIP HEX HEAD SELF DRILLING BOLTS AND RIVETS 68 mm PURLIN Weather strip supports infill SCREWS Bolt types vary depending BRACKET panel and covers the sheet Screw types vary depending upon upon the connection, ensure This bracket ends at the collar
    [Show full text]
  • A Feasibility Study for the Hancock Heritage Center
    DRAFT Feasibility Study for the Hancock Heritage Center by Adam Blond Robert Owen Robert Carr John Stewart Tim Donovan Glen Stollberger Kim Foster Laura Sullivan Katy Johnson Chad Wagner Katie Marsh Steven Woods Tom Mattioli Edited by: Diane Kuehn Assistant Professor Fall, 2007 Tourism and Commercial Recreation (FOR 476/676) SUNY ESF 1 Introduction Hancock, N.Y., is located in the Catskill region of New York, roughly 40 miles southeast of Binghamton and 140 miles northwest of New York City. It is located at the confluence of the east and west branches of the Delaware River, the longest free-flowing river in the east. The natural resources of this area are astounding, providing Hancock residents and visitors with tremendous recreation opportunities. An industry-based history and blooming art culture of the area are important sources of community pride that need to be shared between residents of all ages. The purpose of this tourism plan is to assess the potential for establishing a heritage center in the village of Hancock. The Hancock Heritage Center (HHC) would act as a gathering place for local residents for community activities, and as the center for information and education about the natural, historic, and cultural resources of the Hancock area for visitors. Certain concerns of residents and issues facing the Hancock area need to be considered before HHC development and promotion can occur. These concerns and issues are outlined below, as are the proposed vision, goals, and educational theme for the HHC. Following these report sections is the class’s assessment of local resources, attractions, and the potential heritage center site, as well as recommendations for the development of the HHC.
    [Show full text]
  • 20-Century Building Adaptive-Reuse: Office Buildings Converted to Apartments
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Theses (Historic Preservation) Graduate Program in Historic Preservation 2020 20-Century Building Adaptive-Reuse: Office Buildings Converted to Apartments. Yujia Zhang Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses Part of the Historic Preservation and Conservation Commons Zhang, Yujia, "20-Century Building Adaptive-Reuse: Office Buildings Converted to Apartments." (2020). Theses (Historic Preservation). 697. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/697 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/697 For more information, please contact [email protected]. 20-Century Building Adaptive-Reuse: Office Buildings Converted to Apartments. Abstract Adaptive re-use is a solution to avoiding the obsolescence of buildings in urban development. It is beneficial for the city, for the culture, for the environment, and for the building itself. Recently in the United States, historical office buildings converted into apartments have demonstrated a way to extend the life of these buildings. This thesis aims to analyze 20-century office buildings in Nework Y City converted to apartments in order to examine the possibility of this kind of adaptive-reuse solution for historic office buildings in China. It investigates the history, policy, and design of adaptive-reuse of 20th-Century New York City office building into residential apartments for 21th-century living. It analyzes three cases to understand the requirements for a successful building transformation and speculates about future potential for adaptive re-use of modern office buildings. In addition, it identifies reasons why modern Chinese cities lack similar conversion projects and speculates on whether Chinese cities are suitable for adaptive re-use strategies like those developed in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • MANAGING CHANGE: Preservation and Rightsizing in America Chairman’S Message
    MANAGING CHANGE: Preservation and Rightsizing in America Chairman’s Message The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) is pleased to present this report addressing rightsizing and historic preservation in America. This issue of rightsizing and its implications for historic preservation have been the focus of considerable attention since 2011 when the devastating effects of the economic downturn on historic properties within legacy cities became apparent to the preservation community. Residents urged the ACHP to assist in managing the effects of major changes occurring to historic properties in local neighborhoods across the country. Recognizing the important role the ACHP could play in advising stakeholders on how to incorporate historic preservation goals and requirements into community efforts, I designated a task force in 2011 to address this issue. The result of our efforts is incorporated in this report, Managing Change: Preservation and Rightsizing in America, which makes key recommendations for ensuring that historic preservation is a vital part of the solution for communities looking to reinvent themselves. The report documents the ACHP’s findings based on site visits to legacy cities, participation in conferences and meetings, and research. In addition, it makes recommendations to federal agencies and the diverse stakeholders involved in rightsizing in legacy cities and other communities. The phenomenon of rightsizing is similar to challenges presented decades ago by the Urban Renewal Program that resulted in the substantial loss of local historic assets. The lessons learned during that period have positioned us now to ensure that historic preservation informs the revitalization of our communities and is not considered an impediment to economic recovery.
    [Show full text]
  • Montague Township 4Th Grade Bus Tour June 4, 2015
    Montague Township 4th Grade Bus Tour June 4, 2015 “Indians, the American Revolutionary War, and the Civil War” From the Montague School Driveway, make a right onto Rt 206 North, towards the Milford Bridge. On your left where you see the baseball field is the beginning of the Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area. This is a very large park that is on both sides of the Delaware River in both New Jersey and in Pennsylvania. Montague is the northern most part of the park on the New Jersey side. Most of the property along the river from this ball field, past the Montague/Milford Bridge, almost all the way to Port Jervis, is part of the National Park Service. This Park includes the Nelden-Roberts Stonehouse, the Minisink Reformed Church, the Foster-Armstrong House, and the Grange. Continue right along Rt 206 North, do not turn onto Clove Road. After passing Clove Road, look for driveway on the right for the Nelden-Roberts Stonehouse. Pull right into the driveway and turn the bus around so that the children can enter the front of the building. The ground is solid under all the grass area, so you can turn and park wherever you want to. If you back into the back area, the students can see the water pump and outhouse from inside the bus. We’re going to be stopping now at the Nelden-Roberts Stonehouse, where two members of MARCH, the Montague Historical Society, are going to be giving us a tour of the first and second floor of one of the original schoolhouses in Montague.
    [Show full text]
  • Juneau Townsite Historic Building Survey Summary Statement
    E JUNEAU o SITE I TORI BUILDIN URVEY CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU, ALASKA SEPTEMBER 1988 John Olds House t 1903 Davis House 1,18941 8-9 8-10 \ J.M.Davis House 1893 8-29 t St. Nichola. Ru••ian Orthodox Church 1893-1894 Davis House 3,1894 8-6 8-36 Jaeger HouH,1912 St. Ann'. CompJex B-32 1890-1918 B-31 WllllamalUvte DeVighnelOapcMch HOUH ,1913 Circa 1901 B-1 8-71 MI••ion Presbyterian Church 1 BI.hop/Coon AptL Christian Science Church CIrca 1915 (before move) 1906 B-2 B-18 WiUlama/Scy HOUH,1913 PHOTO CREDIT 8-72 JUNEAU TOWNSITE-CIRCA 1913 Scothorn Collection peA 31-25 Alaska State Library ACKNOilLEDGEMENTS This publication was prepared by the City and Borough of Juneau, Departrnent of Community Development with consultants Glenda Choate and Gary H. Gillette, Architect. It was financed in part with federal funds from the National Park Service, Department of the Interior administered through the Office of 'History and Archeology, Alaska Department of i~atural Resources. However the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute its endorsement or recommendation. City and Borough of Juneau, Alaska Department of Community Development Karen Boorman, Director Gabrielle E. LaRoche, Project Manager Jeanette st. George, cartographer Patricia L. Ward, Planner Aide Yvonne L. Davis, Secretary Historic District Advisory Corrunittee Jody Vick, Chairman f1erle Bottge Gerald H. Clark Robert N. DeArmond Gary H. Gillette Jay Johnson Rich Poor Glenda Choate, Historian Archivist Gary H.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Tours
    Eight Self-Guided Tours of Regina’s Built History Regina Heritage Walking Tours: Eight Self-Guided Tours of Regina’s Built History Fourth Edition, 2007 City of Regina ISBN: 978-1-896348-60-5 Previously published under the titles: Regina’s Heritage Tours: The Cathedral Area The Crescents Downtown General Hospital Area “Germantown” 11th Avenue East Old Lakeview The Transitional Area The Warehouse District City of Regina Queen Elizabeth II Court 2476 Victoria Avenue P.O. Box 1790 Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada Tel.: 306-777-7000 Fax.: 306-777-6774 www.regina.ca 2 3 Acknowledgements The City of Regina would like to thank William (Bill) Henderson and J. William (Bill) Brennan for their relentless leadership, and members of Heritage Regina for their dedicated support for the publication of this legacy manuscript. In particular, the City of Regina acknowledges and thanks Bill Brennan for his overall review and editing of the text of this publication and his coordination of Heritage Regina's contributors and volunteers, and Bill Henderson for his authorship of the "Architectural Styles" and "Glossary" of definitions sections, and for his contributions to the illustrative graphics of this publication. The City of Regina also acknowledges and thanks the following volunteers for directly assisting in editing the various walking tour sections of this publication: Grace Alexopoulos Bruce Anderson Will Chabun Aydon Charlton Sharon Howell Margaret Hryniuk Keith Knox Susan Luchuck Don Meikle This book was published by the City of Regina in collaboration with Heritage Regina, with the financial support of the Government of Canada, through the Cultural Capitals of Canada, a program of the Department of Canadian Heritage.
    [Show full text]