Pages 25839±25982 Vol. 60 5±15±95 No. 93 federal register May 15,1995 Monday this issue. Boston, MAseeannouncementontheinsidecoverof For informationonbriefingsinWashington,DCand Briefings onHowToUsetheFederalRegister 1 II Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995
SUBSCRIPTIONS AND COPIES
PUBLIC Subscriptions: Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 FEDERAL REGISTER Published daily, Monday through Friday, Assistance with public subscriptions 512–1806 (not published on Saturdays, Sundays, or on official holidays), by Online: the Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Telnet swais.access.gpo.gov, login as newuser 2 III Contents Federal Register Vol. 60, No. 93 Monday, May 15, 1995 Agriculture Department Executive Office of the President See Food Safety and Inspection Service See Presidential Documents See Forest Service Federal Aviation Administration Assassination Records Review Board RULES NOTICES Air traffic operating and flight rules: Meetings; Sunshine Act, 25941 Afghanistan; prohibition against certain flights within territory and airspace (SFAR No. 67), 25980–25981 Census Bureau PROPOSED RULES NOTICES Airworthiness directives: 2000 Census; redistricting data program, 25884–25885 AlliedSignal Engines, 25869–25871 Class E airspace, 25871–25872 Children and Families Administration NOTICES NOTICES Exemption petitions; summary and disposition, 25935– Agency information collection activities under OMB 25937 review, 25918–25919 Meetings: Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee, 25937 Coast Guard Aviation Security Advisory Committee, 25937–25938 NOTICES Research, Engineering, and Development Advisory Meetings: Committee, et al., 25938 Oil spill removal organization program; workshop, 25935 Federal Communications Commission Commerce Department RULES See Census Bureau Radio stations; table of assignments: See Foreign-Trade Zones Board Arkansas, 25852–25853 See International Trade Administration California, 25852 See National Institute of Standards and Technology Missouri et al., 25851–25852 See National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Nevada, 25852 See National Technical Information Service PROPOSED RULES Commodity Futures Trading Commission Radio stations; table of assignments: Oklahoma, 25879 NOTICES Television broadcasting: Contract market proposals: Prime time access rule; legal and policy justifications Chicago Mercantile Exchange— assessment, 25879–25880 Fluid milk, 25893 NOTICES Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Agency information collection activities under OMB NOTICES review, 25908–25909 Recommendations: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Cylinders containing depleted uranium; improved safety, NOTICES 25893–25894 Foreclosure consent and redemption rights: Education Department Liquidation update list, 25909–25910 NOTICES Agency information collection activities under OMB Federal Emergency Management Agency review, 25894–25895 NOTICES Agency information collection activities under OMB Employment and Training Administration review, 25910 NOTICES Disaster and emergency areas: Emergency unemployment compensation program: Oklahoma, 25910 Extended benefit periods; changes, 25930 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Energy Department NOTICES See Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Electric rate and corporate regulation filings: See Hearings and Appeals Office, Energy Department Citizens Power & Light Corp. et al., 25898–25900 Southern Energy Marketing, Inc., et al., 25900–25902 Environmental Protection Agency Natural gas certificate filings: NOTICES Transwestern Gathering Co. et al., 25902–25903 Agency information collection activities under OMB Applications, hearings, determinations, etc.: review, 25907–25908 CNG Transmission Corp., 25898 Meetings: Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America, 25896 Urban revitalization and brownfields; public dialogues, NorAm Gas Transmission Co., 25896 25908 Paiute Pipeline Co., 25895–25897 IV Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Contents Sea Robin Pipeline Co., 25897 NOTICES Southern Natural Gas Co., 25896 Grants and cooperative agreements; availability, etc.: South Georgia Natural Gas Co., 25897 Managed care impact on people with significant physical Tennessee Power Co., 25898 and mental disabilities; research projects, 25921– Transwestern Pipeline Co., 25895–25896 25926 Westcoast Power Marketing Inc., 25897–25898 Hearings and Appeals Office, Energy Department Federal Maritime Commission NOTICES NOTICES Cases filed, 25903–25907 Ocean freight forwarders, marine terminal operations, and Decisions and orders, 25906 passenger vessels: Tariff cancellations, 25910–25917 Immigration and Naturalization Service PROPOSED RULES Federal Reserve System Immigration: NOTICES Benefits applicants; designated outside entities Agency information collection activities under OMB certification to take fingerprints, 25856–25868 review, 25917 Applications, hearings, determinations, etc.: Indian Affairs Bureau Andover Bancorp, Inc., et al., 25917–25918 NOTICES Tribal-State Compacts approval; Class III (casino) gambling: Fish and Wildlife Service Pueblo of Acoma, NM, 25978 PROPOSED RULES Pueblo of Nambe, NM, 25978 Endangered and threatened species: Western snowy plover, Pacific Coast population— Interior Department Critical habitat designation, 25882–25883 See Fish and Wildlife Service See Indian Affairs Bureau Food and Drug Administration See Land Management Bureau NOTICES See Minerals Management Service Animal drugs, feeds, and related products: See Reclamation Bureau Export applications— See Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement Office Marbofloxacin, 25919–25920 Committees; establishment, renewal, termination, etc.: Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research; standing International Boundary and Water Commission, United oversight committee to review use of refusal to file States and Mexico practices, 25920 NOTICES Meetings: Environmental statements; availability, etc.: Viral safety and evaluation of viral clearance from Lower Rio Grande Flood Control Project— biopharmaceutical products; international scientific Main Floodway; Quisto Energy Corp. gas well, 25928– conference, 25920–25921 25929 Food Safety and Inspection Service International Trade Administration PROPOSED RULES NOTICES Meat and poultry inpection: Antidumping: Pathogen reduction; hazard analysis and critical control Antifriction bearings (other than tapered roller bearings) point (HACCP) systems; technical conference and parts from— Meeting, 25869 France, 25887 Antidumping and countervailing duties: Foreign-Trade Zones Board Administrative review requests, 25885–25886 NOTICES United States-Canada free-trade agreement; binational panel Applications, hearings, determinations, etc.: reviews: Michigan, 25886–25887 Corrosion-resistant carbon steel products from— Canada, 25887–25888 Cut-to-length carbon steel plate from— Forest Service Canada, 25888 NOTICES Environmental statements; availability, etc.: Southwestern Region; Mexican spotted owl and northern Interstate Commerce Commission goshawk habitat management, 25884 NOTICES Railroad operation, acquisition, construction, etc.: Harry S. Truman Scholarship Foundation California Northern Railroad Co. Ltd. Partnership, 25929 NOTICES Meetings; Sunshine Act, 25941 Justice Department See Immigration and Naturalization Service Health and Human Services Department See National Institute of Justice See Children and Families Administration See Food and Drug Administration Labor Department See Public Health Service See Employment and Training Administration Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Contents V Land Management Bureau NOTICES NOTICES West Coast salmon fisheries; northwest emergency Environmental statements; availability, etc.: assistance plan, 25891–25892 Tohono O’odham Nation, Papago Indian Reservation, AZ; Cyprus Tohono Corp. mine expansion; correction, National Technical Information Service 25926 NOTICES Realty actions; sales, leases, etc.: Meetings: Nevada, 25926–25927 Advisory Board, 25892–25893 Mexico and United States, International Boundary and Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation Water Commission NOTICES See International Boundary and Water Commission, United Meetings; Sunshine Act, 25941 States and Mexico Nuclear Regulatory Commission Minerals Management Service NOTICES NOTICES Meetings: Agency information collection activities under OMB Reactor Safeguards Advisory Committee, 25933 review, 25927 Applications, hearings, determinations, etc.: Georgia Power Co. et al., 25931 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Northeast Nuclear Energy Co., 25932–25933 RULES University of Illinois, at Urbana-Champaign, 25931– Tracking and data relay satellite system; use and 25932 reimbursement policy, 25843 Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation National Capital Planning Commission RULES NOTICES Multiemployer and single-employer plans: Environmental statements; availability, etc.: Valuation of plan benefits and plan assets following mass Washington, D.C.; sports and entertainment arena; withdrawal— construction and operation, 25930 Interest rates, 25843–25846 Meetings: NOTICES Washington D.C.; sports and entertainment arena; Agency information collection activities under OMB construction and operation Historic preservation review, 25933–25934 issues, 25930–25931 Presidential Documents National Highway Traffic Safety Administration PROCLAMATIONS PROPOSED RULES Special observances: Motor vehicle safety standards: Mother’s Day (Proc. 6797), 25839 Air and hydraulic brake systems; heavy vehicles burnish Safe Boating Week, National (Proc. 6798), 25841–25842 procedures, 25880–25882 NOTICES Motor vehicle safety standards; exemption petitions, etc.: Public Health Service General Motors Corp., 25938–25940 See Food and Drug Administration NOTICES National Institute of Justice Clinical Laboratories Improvement Act: Laboratory test systems, assays, and examinations, NOTICES specific list; categorization by complexity, 25944– Grants and cooperative agreements; availability, etc.: 25976 Policing research and evaluation, 25929–25930 National Institute of Standards and Technology Reclamation Bureau PROPOSED RULES NOTICES Manufacturing extension partnership; infrastructure Agency information collection activities under OMB development projects, 25872–25877 review, 25928 NOTICES Information processing standards, Federal: Securities and Exchange Commission Profiles for Open Systems Internetworking NOTICES Technologies(POSIT) and Government Network Applications, hearings, determinations, etc.: Management Profile (GNMP), 25888–25890 Pan World Minerals International, Inc., 25934 Meetings: Advanced Technology Visiting Committee, 25890–25891 State Department Patent licenses; non-exclusive, exclusive, or partially RULES exclusive: International child abduction; Office of Children’s Issues Technical Instrument Co., 25891 designated as U.S. Central Authority, 25843 NOTICES National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Meetings: RULES Indigenous issues in United Nations; briefing, 25935 Fishery conservation and management: International Telecommunications Advisory Committee, Atlantic surf clam and ocean quahog, 25853–25855 25934 VI Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Contents Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement Office PROPOSED RULES RULES Adjudication; pensions, compensation, dependency, etc.: Permanent program and abandoned mine land reclamation Eligibility verification reporting requirements, 25877– plan submissions: 25879 Colorado, 25846–25850 Transportation Department Separate Parts In This Issue See Coast Guard See Federal Aviation Administration Part II See National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Services, 25944–25976 Treasury Department Part III NOTICES Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, 25978 Organization, functions, and authority delegations: Commissioner, Financial Management Service, 25940 Part IV Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Truman, Harry S, Scholarship Foundation Administration, 25980–25981 See Harry S. Truman Scholarship Foundation United States Information Agency Reader Aids NOTICES Additional information, including a list of public laws, Art objects; importation for exhibition: telephone numbers, and finding aids, appears in the Reader Culture and Power in France: Treasures from the Aids section at the end of this issue. Bibliotheque Nationale, 25940 Veterans Affairs Department Electronic Bulletin Board RULES Free Electronic Bulletin Board service for Public Law Board of Veterans Appeals: numbers, Federal Register finding aids, and a list of Rules of practice; consideration of evidence by agency of documents on public inspection is available on 202–275– orginal jurisdication; waiver, 25850–25851 1538 or 275–0920. Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Contents VII CFR PARTS AFFECTED IN THIS ISSUE A cumulative list of the parts affected this month can be found in the Reader Aids section at the end of this issue. 3 CFR Proclamations 6797...... 25839 6798...... 25841 8 CFR Proposed Rules: 103...... 25856 299...... 25856 9 CFR Proposed Rules: 308...... 25869 310...... 25869 318...... 25869 320...... 25869 325...... 25869 326...... 25869 327...... 25869 381...... 25869 14 CFR 91...... 25980 1215...... 25843 Proposed Rules: 39...... 25869 71...... 25871 15 CFR Proposed Rules: 292...... 25872 22 CFR 94...... 25843 29 CFR 2619...... 25843 2676...... 25843 30 CFR 906...... 25846 38 CFR 20...... 25850 Proposed Rules: 3...... 25877 47 CFR 73 (4 documents) ...... 25851, 25852 Proposed Rules: 73 (2 documents) ...... 25879 49 CFR Proposed Rules: 571...... 25880 50 CFR 652...... 25853 Proposed Rules: 17...... 25882 25839 Federal Register Presidential Documents Vol. 60, No. 93 Monday, May 15, 1995 Title 3— Proclamation 6797 of May 11, 1995 The President Mother’s Day, 1995 By the President of the United States of America A Proclamation Each year, Americans pause on the second Sunday of May to celebrate the gift of motherhood. Mother’s Day reminds all of us to honor our mothers and to show them our love and appreciation—on this day and throughout the year. Whether we embrace our mothers in person or hold fast to a loving memory, the strength of their spirit and the blessing of their compas- sion stay with us for a lifetime. Americans’ vitality as a people flows from the health of our families. The heart and soul of our national life, mothers rise each day to take on myriad tasks, from driving a carpool to directing a city council. They are an anchor to generations past and a bridge to the world of the future. Meeting the challenge of motherhood is one of society’s greatest responsibilities, and those who do this work every day do a service to all humanity. Whether biological, foster, or adoptive, mothers have a unique ability to caution and care for their children and to instill in them the values of honesty, respect, and faith. As role models for their children, mothers show by example the infinite possibilities of life. No matter our age, our mothers are ready to understand, to love, and to listen. We best observe this special day by living our lives to reflect the love they have given us and by teaching our children to hope for a brighter tomorrow. To honor all mothers and their special place in our hearts, the Congress, by a joint resolution approved May 8, 1914 (38 Stat. 770), has designated the second Sunday in May each year as ‘‘Mother’s Day’’ and requested the President to call for its appropriate observance. NOW, THEREFORE, I, WILLIAM J. CLINTON, President of the United States of America, do hereby proclaim Sunday, May 14, 1995, as ‘‘Mother’s Day.’’ I urge all Americans to consider how much mothers have contributed to the well-being of our Nation. I call upon our citizens to observe this day with appropriate programs, ceremonies, and activities. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this eleventh day of May, in the year of our Lord nineteen hundred and ninety-five, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and nineteenth. [FR Doc. 95–12038 œ– Filed 5–11–95; 3:13 pm] Billing code 3195–01–P Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Presidential Documents 25841 Federal Register Presidential Documents Vol. 60, No. 93 Monday, May 15, 1995 Title 3— Proclamation 6798 of May 11, 1995 The President National Safe Boating Week, 1995 By the President of the United States of America A Proclamation Recreational boating has become one of this Nation’s most popular leisure- time activities. It is estimated that in 1995, more than 76 million Americans will enjoy our country’s scenic waterways, engaging in pastimes from fishing and cruising to waterskiing, sailing, and sightseeing. Most Americans will act responsibly in these activities, ensuring the safety of their families and friends. Yet much work remains to be done if we are to make boating safe for all of us. Studies indicate that in more than 85 percent of the fully documented recreational boating fatalities, the victim was not wearing any type of life jacket. This tragic statistic highlights a simple fact: personal flotation devices can help prevent more than 600 fatalities annually. I urge all Americans to wear them regularly when on our waterways. The United States Coast Guard, the National Safe Boating Council, and the many State and local recreational boating organizations and governmental agencies are working with volunteer organizations across the country to educate the boating public about the importance of wearing life jackets. This advice applies not only to boat operators but also to passengers and all individuals participating in sporting activities on the waterways. Falling overboard and capsizing are the leading causes of boating fatalities, and more than half of all boating accidents are alcohol-related. But with respon- sible behavior and the proper precautions, families and friends can experi- ence the joys of boating for years to come. In recognition of the importance of safe boating practices, the Congress, by joint resolution approved June 4, 1958 [36 U.S.C. 161], as amended, has authorized and requested the President to proclaim annually the seven day period prior to the Memorial Day Weekend, as ‘‘National Safe Boating Week.’’ NOW, THEREFORE, I, WILLIAM J. CLINTON, President of the United States of America, do hereby proclaim May 20 through May 26, 1995, as National Safe Boating Week. I encourage the Governors of the 50 States and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and officials of other areas subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, to join in observing this week. I urge all Americans to practice safe recreational boating during these days and throughout the year. 25842 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Presidential Documents IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this eleventh day of May, in the year of our Lord nineteen hundred and ninety-five, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and nineteenth. [FR Doc. 95–12039 œ– Filed 5–11–95; 3:14 pm] Billing code 3195–01–P 25843 Rules and Regulations Federal Register Vol. 60, No. 93 Monday, May 15, 1995 This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER The National Aeronautics and Space ACTION: Final rule. contains regulatory documents having general Administration has determined that this applicability and legal effect, most of which rule is not subject to the requirements SUMMARY: The U.S. Central Authority for are keyed to and codified in the Code of of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 the Hague Abduction Convention has Federal Regulations, which is published under U.S.C. 601–612, since it will not exert been changed from the Office of Citizens 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510. a significant economic impact on a Consular Services to the Office of Children’s Issues. The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by substantial number of small entities, the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of and it is not a major rule as defined in EFFECTIVE DATE: May 15, 1995. new books are listed in the first FEDERAL Executive Order 12291. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: REGISTER issue of each week. Beth H. Cooper, Office, Office of Policy List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 1215 Review and Interagency Liaison, Satellites, Tracking and Data Relay Overseas Citizens Services, tele: (202) NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND Satellite System, Communications 647–3666, fax: (202) 647–6201. SPACE ADMINISTRATION equipment, Government contract. List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 94 14 CFR Part 1215 For reasons set out in the preamble, 14 CFR part 1215 is amended as follows: Infants and Children, Treaties. RIN 2700±AA29 For the reasons set out in the PART 1215ÐTRACKING AND DATA preamble, 22 CFR part 94 is amended as Tracking and Data Relay Satellite RELAY SATELLITE SYSTEM (TDRSS) follows: System (TDRSS) 1. The authority citation for 14 CFR PART 94ÐINTERNATIONAL CHILD AGENCY: National Aeronautics and part 1215 continues to read as follows: ABDUCTION Space Administration. Authority: Sec. 203, Pub. L. 85–568, 72 1. The authority citation for 22 CFR ACTION: Final rule. Stat. 429, as amended; 42 U.S.C. 2473. Part 94 continues to read as follows: 2. Appendix A is revised to read as SUMMARY: NASA is revising Appendix A Authority: Hauge Convention on the Civil to reflect the estimated service rates in follows: Aspects of International Child Abduction: 1996 dollars for Tracking and Data Appendix A—[Amended] The federal ‘‘International Child Abduction Relay Satellite System (TDRSS) Remedies Act,’’ Pub. L. 100–300. standard services, based on NASA Appendix A to Part 1215—Estimated Service Rates in 1996 Dollars for TDRSS 2. Section 94.2 is revised to read as escalation estimates. 14 CFR part 1215 follows: sets forth the policy governing the Standard Services (Based on NASA Escalation Estimate) TDRSS user service rates § 94.2 Designation of central authority. Tracking and Data Relay Satellite for services rendered in CY–96 based on System (TDRSS) services provided to current projections in 1996 dollars are as The Office of Children’s Issues in the non-U.S. Government users and the follows: Bureau of Consular Affairs is designated reimbursement for rendering such 1. Single Access Service—Forward as the U.S. Central Authority to services. The TDRSS represents a major command, return telemetry, or tracking, or discharge the duties which are imposed investment by the U.S. Government any combination of these, the base rate is by the Convention and the International with the primary goal of providing $186.00 per minute for non-U.S. Government Child Abduction Remedies Act upon improved communications and tracking users. such authorities. services to spacecraft in low earth orbit 2. Multiple Access Forward Service—Base Dated: April 28, 1995. or to mobile terrestrial users such as rate is $42.00 per minute for non-U.S. aircraft or balloons. Government users. Mary A. Ryan, 3. Multiple Access Return Service—Base Assistant Secretary of State for Consular EFFECTIVE DATE: May 15, 1995. rate is $13.00 per minute for non-U.S. Affairs. ADDRESSES: Office of Space Government users. [FR Doc. 95–11835 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] Communications, Code O, NASA Dated: April 13, 1995. BILLING CODE 4710±06±M Headquarters, Washington, DC 20546. Charles T. Force, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Associate Administrator for Space Wilson Lundy, 202–358–2030. Communications. PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This [FR Doc. 95–11824 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] CORPORATION regulation was first published in the BILLING CODE 7510±01±M Federal Register on March 9, 1983 (48 29 CFR Parts 2619 and 2676 FR 9845). Each year since that time, 14 Valuation of Plan Benefits in Single- CFR part 1215 has been amended by DEPARTMENT OF STATE revising Appendix A to reflect the rate Employer Plans; Valuation of Plan changes for the appropriate calendar 22 CFR Part 94 Benefits and Plan Assets Following years (CY). Since this revision of Mass Withdrawal; Amendments Appendix A to 14 CFR part 1215 reflects [Public Notice 2201] Adopting Additional PBGC Rates the rate changes for CY 1996 and Office of Overseas Citizens Services; AGENCY: Pension Benefit Guaranty involves NASA management procedures International Child Abduction Corporation. and decisions, no public comment is ACTION: Final rule. required. AGENCY: Department of State. 25844 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Rules and Regulations SUMMARY: This final rule amends the sections 4219(c)(1)(D) and 4281(b) of Because of the need to provide Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation’s ERISA. immediate guidance for the valuation of regulations on Valuation of Plan Appendix B to part 2619 sets forth the benefits in single-employer plans whose Benefits in Single-Employer Plans and interest rates and factors under the termination dates fall during June 1995, Valuation of Plan Benefits and Plan single-employer regulation. Appendix B and in multiemployer plans that have Assets Following Mass Withdrawal. The to part 2676 sets forth the interest rates undergone mass withdrawal and have former regulation contains the interest and factors under the multiemployer valuation dates during June 1995, the assumptions that the PBGC uses to regulation. Because these rates and PBGC finds that good cause exists for factors are intended to reflect current value benefits under terminating single- making the rates and factors set forth in conditions in the financial and annuity employer plans. The latter regulation this amendment effective less than 30 markets, it is necessary to update the contains the interest assumptions for days after publication. valuations of multiemployer plans that rates and factors periodically. have undergone mass withdrawal. The The PBGC issues two sets of interest The PBGC has determined that this amendments set out in this final rule rates and factors, one set to be used for action is not a ‘‘significant regulatory adopt the interest assumptions the valuation of benefits to be paid as action’’ under the criteria set forth in applicable to single-employer plans annuities and one set for the valuation Executive Order 12866, because it will with termination dates in June 1995, of benefits to be paid as lump sums. The not have an annual effect on the and to multiemployer plans with same assumptions apply to terminating economy of $100 million or more or valuation dates in June 1995. The effect single-employer plans and to adversely affect in a material way the of these amendments is to advise the multiemployer plans that have economy, a sector of the economy, public of the adoption of these undergone a mass withdrawal. This productivity, competition, jobs, the assumptions. amendment adds to appendix B to parts environment, public health or safety, or 2619 and 2676 sets of interest rates and State, local, or tribal governments or EFFECTIVE DATE: June 1, 1995. factors for valuing benefits in single- communities; create a serious FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: employer plans that have termination inconsistency or otherwise interfere Harold J. Ashner, Assistant General dates during June 1995 and with an action taken or planned by Counsel, Office of the General Counsel, multiemployer plans that have Pension-Benefit Guaranty Corporation, undergone mass withdrawal and have another agency; materially alter the 1200 K Street, NW., Washington, DC valuation dates during June 1995. budgetary impact of entitlements, 20005, 202–326–4024 (202–326–4179 For annuity benefits, the interest rates grants, user fees, or loan programs or the for TTY and TDD). will be 6.80% for the first 20 years rights and obligations of recipients following the valuation date and 5.75% thereof; or raise novel legal or policy SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule thereafter. For benefits to be paid as issues arising out of legal mandates, the adopts the June 1995 interest lump sums, the interest assumptions to President’s priorities, or the principles assumptions to be used under the be used by the PBGC will be 5.50% for set forth in Executive Order 12866. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation’s the period during which benefits are in Because no general notice of proposed regulations on Valuation of Plan pay status, 4.75% during the seven-year rulemaking is required for this Benefits in Single-Employer Plans (29 period directly preceding the benefit’s CFR part 2619, the ‘‘single-employer placement in pay status, and 4.0% amendment, the Regulatory Flexibility regulation’’) and Valuation of Plan during any other years preceding the Act of 1980 does not apply. See 5 U.S.C. Benefits and Plan Assets Following benefit’s placement in pay status. The 601(2). Mass Withdrawal (29 CFR part 2676, the above annuity interest assumptions List of Subjects ‘‘multiemployer regulation’’). represent a decrease (from those in Part 2619 sets forth the methods for effect for May 1995) of .10 percent for 29 CFR Part 2619 valuing plan benefits of terminating the first 20 years following the valuation single-employer plans covered under date and are otherwise unchanged. The Employee benefit plans, Pension title IV of the Employee Retirement lump sum interest assumptions are insurance, and Pensions. Income Security Act of 1974, as unchanged from those in effect for May 29 CFR Part 2676 amended. Under ERISA section 4041(c), 1995. all single-employer plans wishing to Generally, the interest rates and Employee benefit plans and Pensions. terminate in a distress termination must factors under these regulations are in In consideration of the foregoing, value guaranteed benefits and ‘‘benefit effect for at least one month. However, parts 2619 and 2676 of chapter XXVI, liabilities,’’ i.e., all benefits provided the PBGC publishes its interest under the plan as of the plan assumptions each month regardless of title 29, Code of Federal Regulations, are termination date, using the formulas set whether they represent a change from hereby amended as follows: forth in part 2619, subpart C. (Plans the previous month’s assumptions. The PART 2619Ð[AMENDED] terminating in a standard termination assumptions normally will be published may, for purposes of the Standard in the Federal Register by the 15th of 1. The authority citation for part 2619 Termination Notice filed with PBGC, the preceding month or as close to that continues to read as follows: use these formulas to value benefit date as circumstances permit. liabilities, although this is not required.) The PBGC has determined that notice Authority: 29 U.S.C. 1301(a), 1302(b)(3), In addition, when the PBGC terminates and public comment on these 1341, 1344, 1362. an underfunded plan involuntarily amendments are impracticable and pursuant to ERISA section 4042(a), it contrary to the public interest. This 2. In appendix B, Rate Set 20 is added uses the subpart C formulas to finding is based on the need to to Table I, and a new entry is added to determine the amount of the plan’s determine and issue new interest rates Table II, as set forth below. The underfunding. Part 2676 prescribes and factors promptly so that the rates introductory text of both tables is rules for valuing benefits and certain and factors can reflect, as accurately as republished for the convenience of the assets of multiemployer plans under possible, current market conditions. reader and remains unchanged. Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Rules and Regulations 25845 ≤ Appendix B to Part 2619ÐInterest contributions upon death), the PBGC shall n1 TABLE I [Lump Sum Valuations] For plans with a Immediate Deferred annuities (percent) valuation date annuity Rate set rate (per- On or after Before cent) i1 i2 i3 n1 n2 ******* 20 ...... 6±1±95 7±1±95 5.50 4.75 4.00 4.00 7 8 Annuity Valuations In determining the value of interest factors of the form v0:n (as defined in § 2619.49(b)(1)) for purposes of applying the formulas set forth in § 2619.49 (b) through (i) and in determining the value of any interest factor used in valuing annuity benefits under this subpart, the plan administrator shall use the values of it prescribed in Table II hereof. The following table tabulates, for each calendar month of valuation ending after the effective date of this part, the interest rates (denoted by i1, it, . . . , and referred to generally as it) assumed to be in effect between specified anniversaries of a valuation date that occurs within that calendar month; those anniversaries are specified in the columns adjacent to the rates. The last listed rate is assumed to be in effect after the last listed anniversary date. TABLE II [Annuity Valuations] The values of it are: For valuation dates occurring in the monthÐ it for t= it for t= it for t= ******* June 1995 ...... 0680 1±20 .0575 >20 N/A N/A PART 2676Ð[AMENDED] Appendix B to Part 2676ÐInterest (2) For benefits for which the deferral ≤ Rates Used to Value Lump Sums and period is y years (y is an integer and 0 TABLE I [Lump Sum Valuations] For plans with a Immediate Deferred annuities (percent) valuation date annuity Rate set rate (per- On or after Before cent) i1 i2 i3 n1 n2 ******* 20 ...... 6±1±95 7±1±95 5.50 4.75 4.00 4.00 7 8 Annuity Valuations 0 n In determining the value of interest factors of the form v : (as defined in § 2676.13(b)(1)) for purposes of applying the formulas set forth in § 2676.13 (b) through (i) and in determining the value of any interest factor used in valuing annuity benefits under this subpart, the plan administrator shall use the values of it prescribed in the table below. The following table tabulates, for each calendar month of valuation ending after the effective date of this part, the interest rates (denoted by i1, i2, . . ., and referred to generally as it) assumed to be in effect between specified anniversaries of a valuation date that occurs within that calendar month; those anniversaries are specified in the columns adjacent to the rates. The last listed rate is assumed to be in effect after the last listed anniversary date. TABLE II [Annuity Valuations] The values of it are: For valuation dates occurring in the monthÐ it for t= it for t= it for t= ******* June 1995 ...... 0680 1±20 .0575 >20 N/A N/A Issued in Washington, DC, on this 10th day SMCRA and the implementing Federal coal mines. Colorado proposed that this of May 1995. regulations. MOU would replace a January 21, 1985, Martin Slate, EFFECTIVE DATE: May 15, 1995. MOU. Executive Director, Pension Benefit Guaranty FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: OSM announced receipt of the Corporation. Thomas E. Ehmett, Telephone: (505) proposed MOU in the April 7, 1994, [FR Doc. 95–11896 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] 766–1486. Federal Register (59 FR 16578), BILLING CODE 7708±01±M provided an opportunity for a public SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: hearing or meeting on its substantive I. Background on the Colorado Program adequacy, and invited public comment On December 15, 1980, the Secretary on its adequacy (administrative record DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR of the Interior conditionally approved No. CO–606). Because no one requested a public hearing or meeting, none was Office of Surface Mining Reclamation the Colorado program. General background information on the held. The public comment period ended and Enforcement Colorado program, including the on May 9, 1994. During its review of the proposed 30 CFR Part 906 Secretary’s findings, the disposition of comments, and the conditions of MOU, OSM identified concerns relating Colorado Regulatory Program approval of the Colorado program can to certain provisions of item No. 2 of the be found in the December 15, 1980, ‘‘Enforcement’’ section of the proposed ACTION: Final rule; approval of Federal Register (45 FR 82173). MOU. These concerns pertain to amendment. Subsequent actions concerning Colorado’s reliance on referenced 2 Colorado’s program and program Code of Colorado Regulations (CCR) SUMMARY: OSM is approving a proposed amendments can be found at 30 CFR 407.2, Rule 4.05, which provides amendment to the Colorado regulatory 906.11, 906.15, 906.16, and 906.30. general authority for the enforcement of program (hereinafter referred to as the Federal and State water quality laws, ‘‘Colorado program’’) under the Surface II. Proposed Amendment but does not provide specific Mining Control and Reclamation Act of By letter dated March 18, 1994, enforcement authority for effluent 1977 (SMCRA). Colorado proposed Colorado submitted a proposed limitation violations under 40 CFR Part revisions to a memorandum of amendment to its program pursuant to 434. OSM notified Colorado of the understanding (MOU) between the SMCRA (administrative record No. CO– concerns by letter dated June 16, 1994 Division of Minerals and Geology 604). Colorado submitted the proposed (administrative record No. CO–627). (DMG) of the Colorado Department of amendment in response to a letter dated Colorado responded to OSM’s Natural Resources and the Water April 7, 1993 (administrative record No. concerns in a letter dated June 23, 1994, Quality Control Division (WQCD) of the CO–539), that OSM sent to Colorado in by submitting additional explanatory Colorado Department of Health for accordance with 30 CFR 732.17(c). The information (administrative record No. water quality management at coal amendment consisted of a MOU dated CO–629). Based upon the additional mines. The amendment revises the February 9, 1994, between DMG and explanatory information for the Colorado program to be consistent with WQCD for water quality management at proposed MOU submitted by Colorado, Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Rules and Regulations 25847 OSM reopened the public comment the integrity of the programs For the above-stated reasons, the period in the July 29, 1994, Federal implemented by DMG and WQCD; and Director finds that the ‘‘Purpose,’’ Register (59 FR 38575, administrative (4) foster enhanced communications ‘‘Understanding,’’ and ‘‘Understanding record No. CO–637). The public and working relationships between Between the Parties’’ sections of the comment period ended on August 15, DMG and WQCD. proposed MOU are not inconsistent 1994. The ‘‘Understanding’’ section of the with sections 515(b)(10) and 517 of During its review of the additional proposed MOU provides recognition of SMCRA and 30 CFR 816.41 through information submitted by Colorado, the specific and separate statutory 816.57, Part 840, and 732.17(b)(5). OSM identified concerns pertaining to responsibilities of DMG and WQCD to Therefore, the Director approves these the enforcement of effluent standards review permit applications, monitor and sections of the proposed MOU. and the actual standards for effluent inspect field sites, and take enforcement 2. Review of Permit Applications limits. OSM notified Colorado of the action. It also provides recognition of concerns by letter dated September 16, the potential for duplication and In the ‘‘Review of Permit 1994 (administrative record No. CO– inconsistent actions by DMG and WQCD Applications’’ section of the proposed 646). in the management of the hydrologic MOU, Colorado provides that DMG and Colorado responded to OSM’s balance and water quality issues with WQCD will coordinate the review of concerns in a letter dated December 7, respect to the responsibilities of each hydrologic information submitted with 1994, by submitting additional party and provides that the MOU will a coal mining permit application with explanatory information (administrative address each area of responsibility respect to information relevant to the record No. CO–651). Based upon the separately. Colorado Discharge Permit System (CDPS) permits for process/mine water additional explanatory information for These ‘‘Purpose’’ and and stormwater point source discharges. the proposed MOU submitted by ‘‘Understanding’’ sections provide Such coordination includes (1) DMG Colorado, OSM reopened the public clarity and detail that are not and WQCD advising potential coal mine comment period in the December 30, inconsistent with the hydrologic permit applicants during pre- 1994, Federal Register (59 FR 67690, protection provisions of section application meetings of the need to administrative record No. CO–654). The 515(b)(10) of SMCRA and the contact the other party to the MOU; (2) public comment period ended on implementing Federal regulations at 30 January 17, 1994. DMG reviewing coal permit applications CFR 816.41 through 816.57, and the to determine whether sediment control III. Director’s Findings inspection and monitoring provisions of structures are designed to meet As discussed below, the Director, in section 517 of SMCRA and the technology-based effluent limitations accordance with SMCRA and 30 CFR implementing Federal regulations at 30 and to ensure that any stormwater 732.15 and 732.17, finds that the CFR Part 840. control technologies are in conformance proposed MOU submitted by Colorado The ‘‘Understanding Between the with the Rules and Regulations for Coal on March 18, 1994, and as Parties’’ section of the proposed MOU Mining and Colorado Revised Statutes supplemented with additional indicates that DMG and WQCD may 34–33–101 et seq., the Colorado Surface explanatory information on June 23 and modify the MOU by written Coal Mining Reclamation Act; (3) DMG December 7, 1994, is no less effective concurrence of both parties, that the and WQCD conferring, as appropriate, than the requirements of the MOU replaces a previous MOU entered during the course of permit review and corresponding Federal regulations and into by DMG and WQCD on January 21, drafting, to coordinate where there may no less stringent than SMCRA. 1985, that nothing in the MOU shall be be duplication of effort or potential Accordingly, the director approves the construed to preempt or alter the conflict between DMG and WQCD, and proposed MOU. statutory or regulatory responsibilities to keep each other apprised of the and authorities of DMG and WQCD, and technical developments of the other 1. Purpose, Understanding, and that the MOU shall remain in effect Division; and (4) WQCD providing Understanding Between the Parties until either party decides to terminate it. copies to DMG of all final CDPS permit Colorado entitled the introductory For the purposes of this document, actions for coal mines at the time of sections of the proposed MOU as the Director wishes to clarify that this issuance and DMG providing copies to ‘‘Purpose,’’ ‘‘Understanding,’’ and proposed MOU replaces not only the WQCD of all notices of final action on ‘‘Understanding Between the Parties.’’ 1985 MOU, which OSM had not coal mining permits. In the ‘‘Purpose’’ section of the reviewed and approved as part of the The ‘‘Review of Permit Applications’’ proposed MOU, Colorado states that the Colorado program, but it also replaces a section of the proposed MOU is not MOU defines the respective December 15, 1980, MOU that OSM had inconsistent with the permit approval or responsibilities of DMG and WQCD approved (December 15, 1980, 45 FR denial requirements of section 510 of regarding coal mining activities as they 82173, 82211). With respect to the SMCRA and the Federal regulation impact the hydrologic balance. This statement that the MOU will remain in requirements for permit processing at 30 section of the MOU indicates that the effect until either DMG or WQCD CFR Part 773. Therefore, the Director purpose of the MOU is to (1) ensure that terminates it, the Director wishes to approves this section of the proposed appropriate corrective actions are clarify that any revision or termination MOU. applied to minimize the period of of this MOU, which is a part of the noncomplaint discharge; (2) ensure that Colorado program, must be approved by 3. Training noncomplaint discharges are OSM in accordance with 30 CFR 732.17. In the ‘‘Training’’ section of the appropriately cited in a timely manner As required by 30 CFR 732.17(b)(5), proposed MOU, Colorado provides that and do not receive an economic benefit Colorado must notify OSM of any WQCD will provide water quality over other facilities as a result of changes in this agreement. Based upon sample collection training to DMG staff noncompliance; (3) provide for this understanding, the ‘‘Understanding upon the request of DMG and that each coordination of enforcement actions in Between the Parties’’ section of the party will provide general inspection order to minimize dual enforcement to proposed MOU is not inconsistent with training upon the request of the other the extent possible, while maintaining 30 CFR 732.17(b)(5). party to the MOU. 25848 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Rules and Regulations There is no section of SMCRA or the protection pertaining to the 629), that WQCD is solely responsible Federal regulations that corresponds to requirements for design and for enforcement of the CDPS program this section of the proposed MOU. maintenance of structures and the relating to mine water and stormwater However, this section is not inconsistent requirements to minimize disturbance point source discharges and DMG is with SMCRA and the implementing to the hydrologic balance from sources responsible for enforcement of Federal Federal regulations. Therefore, the other than the point of discharge,’’ and water quality standards at 40 CFR Part Director approves the ‘‘Training’’ the Department of Health (DOH) [of 434. Through these provisions, Colorado section of the proposed MOU. which WQCD is a part], ‘‘will be has clarified that DMG retains its responsible for enforcing water quality responsibility to enforce effluent 4. Inspections, Monitoring, and Sample control standards at the point of limitations that are part of its coal Analysis discharge.’’ OSM concluded that DNR mining program pursuant to SMCRA. In the ‘‘Inspections, Monitoring and had ceded its authority to enforce Through these clarifications, Colorado Sample Analysis’’ section of the effluent limitations to DOH, which was has satisfied the concerns raised by proposed MOU, Colorado provides that a significant change from the December OSM in its April 7, 1993, 30 CFR Part DMG and WQCD will coordinate 15, 1980, MOU approved by OSM as a 732 letter. DMG’s enforcement of the inspections, monitoring, and sample part of the Colorado program. effluent limitations at 40 CFR Part 434 analysis. Such coordination includes (1) In response to the 30 CFR part 732 is consistent with section 515 of DMG, at item 1 of this section, letter, Colorado proposed, in the SMCRA and with the Federal regulation collecting, in those instances where introductory paragraph of the at 30 CFR 816.42, which specifically effluent violations are suspected, water ‘‘Enforcement’’ section of the proposed requires that discharges of water from quality samples at CDPS discharge MOU, that ‘‘[a]s a matter of general areas disturbed by surface mining points during the course of conducting practice, DMG will be responsible for activities shall be in compliance with normal site inspection obligations, and, enforcing the requirements for design the effluent limitations for coal mining in those instances where an and maintenance of water quality promulgated by the U.S. Environmental unpermitted discharge is suspected, protection structures and the Protection Agency at 40 CFR Part 434. DMG collecting a water quality sample requirements to minimize the However, OSM expressed a concern for analysis; (2) DMG including, in its disturbance to the hydrologic balance in about the introductory paragraph and inspection reports which accompany a accordance with the Rules for Coal item No. 2 of this section of the sample result specified in item 1, a Mining at section 4.05,’’ and ‘‘WQCD proposed MOU that both cite Rule 4.05 detailed description of site conditions will be responsible for enforcing CDPS as a basis for DMG enforcing the Federal and a discussion as to whether a permit conditions, including effluent effluent limitations at 40 CFR Part 434 precipitation event has occurred at the limitations, and provisions of site (administrative record No. CO–627). site within the preceding 24 hours; (3) specific stormwater management plans OSM was concerned that, since this rule WQCD paying, to the extent funds that are unique to the CDPS permit.’’ does not explicitly incorporate the allow, for the cost of analysis for Colorado also proposed in the Federal effluent limitations at 40 CFR samples collected pursuant to item 1, ‘‘Enforcement’’ section of the proposed Part 434, it might not serve as an and then delivering such samples to the MOU at item No. 1, that WQCD is solely adequate legal authority for Colorado to Laboratory Division of the Colorado responsible for enforcement of the CDPS indicate in the MOU that DMG will Department of Health for analysis, with permit program against point source enforce the effluent limitations at 40 DMG absorbing the cost of obtaining the discharges of pollutants into the State’s CFR Part 434 by issuing a notice of samples and transmitting them to the surface waters that are conducted violation if an exceedance of these lab; and (4) DMG following, for its without an effective CDPS permit and limitations has occurred. sample collections, all chain-of-custody for the enforcement of CDPS permit In response to this concern, Colorado and other normal enforcement conditions; at item No. 2, that DMG provided in its December 7, 1994, letter procedures to ensure sample integrity. shall, upon receipt of the completed to OSM an Attorney General’s opinion The ‘‘Inspections, Monitoring and analysis, determine whether a violation that the general language of the water Sample Analysis’’ section of the of the Rules for Coal Mining at section quality protection provisions of CRS 34– proposed MOU is not inconsistent with 4.05 has occurred, as determined by 33–120(2)(b) and (j)(ii)(a) and Rules the inspection and monitoring comparison with the Federal effluent 4.05(1)(b) and 4.05.2(8), which require requirements of section 517 of SMCRA limitation guidelines found at 40 CFR compliance with applicable Federal and the Federal. regulation part 434, and if DMG determines a laws and regulations, serve as adequate requirements for inspection and violation has occurred, it shall issue a legal authority for Colorado’s enforcement at 30 CFR Part 840. notice of violation within 3 days of enforcement of the effluent limitations Therefore, the Director approves this receipt of the completed analysis, and it at 40 CFR Part 434 (administrative section of the proposed MOU. will provide a copy of the NOV and all record No. CO–651). Nevertheless, other pertinent information to WQCD; Colorado has agreed to revise Rule 4.05 5. Enforcement and at item No. 7, that, if an incident to explicitly incorporate the 40 CFR Part As discussed below, Colorado other than those described in items 1 434 effluent limitations by reference proposed several MOU provisions and 2 above occurs and such incident is (administrative record No. CO–629). concerning enforcement. a violation of requirements under the Item No. 7 of the ‘‘Enforcement’’ a. Enforcement of effluent limitations. jurisdiction of both DMG and WQCD, section of the proposed MOU provides In its April 7, 1993, 30 CFR Part 732 then the two Divisions shall meet to that if an incident occurs that is a letter requiring Colorado to revise its coordinate enforcement proceedings violation of requirements under the program, OSM cited the January 21, and minimize, to the maximum extent jurisdiction of both DMG and WQCD, 1985, MOU which stated that ‘‘as a possible, duel enforcement. then the two Divisions will coordinate matter of general practice, the The introductory paragraph and item enforcement proceedings and minimize, Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Nos. 1 and 2 of this section of the to the maximum extent possible, dual [of which DMG is a part], will be proposed MOU state, and Colorado has enforcement. This provision is not responsible for enforcing water quality affirmed (administrative record No. CO– inconsistent with section 515 of SMCRA Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Rules and Regulations 25849 and with the Federal regulations at 30 30 CFR Parts 840 and 843. Therefore, IV. Summary and Disposition of CFR 816.42. However, the Director the Director approves this part of the Comments wishes to emphasize that DMG is the proposed MOU. Following are summaries of all c. Other enforcement provisions. designated regulatory authority for substantive oral and written comments Colorado stated in the ‘‘Enforcement’’ Colorado’s SMCRA-approved program on the proposed amendment that were section of the proposed MOU (1) At under the documentation it provided to received by OSM, and OSM’s responses OSM in accordance with the item No. 3, that, when WQCD pursues to them. requirements of 30 CFR 731.14(d), and a violation based upon evidence as the designated regulatory authority, it collected by a DMG inspector, the DMG 1. Public Comments inspector will be available to present must ensure that the State program is OSM invited public comments on the testimony and expertise to WQCD, and properly implemented, administered, proposed amendment, but none were WQCD staff will be available to assist and enforced. When situations arise in received. which the enforcement responsibilities DMG in any enforcement action in of DMG and WQCD are not clearly which WQCD has knowledge and may 2. Federal Agency Comments defined by the MOU, DMG must ensure be of assistance; (2) at item No. 4, that Pursuant to 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(i), that the enforcement requirements of DMG shall not issue notices of violation OSM solicited comments on the the approved program are fully and for self-reported exceedances as proposed amendment from various completely met. submitted on WQCD Discharge Federal agencies with an actual or In conclusion, the introductory Monitoring Report forms; (3) at item No. potential interest in the Colorado paragraph and item Nos. 1, 2, and 7 of 6, that, for other violations at coal program. the ‘‘Enforcement’’ section of the mining sites identified by WQCD, In a letter dated April 12, 1994, the proposed MOU satisfy the concerns compliance and enforcement activities Soil Conservation Service stated that it raised by OSM in its 30 CFR Part 732 will be consistent with the procedures did not have any comment at that time letter and are no less stringent than the and time frames provided in Colorado’s (administrative record No. CO–608). corresponding Federal provisions of Enforcement Management System However, in a subsequent letter dated section 515 of SMCRA and no less guidance document; and (4) at item No. August 2, 1994, the Soil Conservation effective than the Federal regulations at 8, that, if during a coal mine inspection Service stated that it would recommend 30 CFR 816.42. Therefore, the Director DMG determines that there is imminent no changes in the current provisions of approves these parts of the proposed danger to the health or safety of the MOU. public or significant environmental item No. 1 of the proposed MOU, but it b. Pattern-of-violations and show- harm to land, air, or water resources, felt that with regard to item No. 2, it was cause processes. Colorado proposed at DMG shall issue a cessation order extremely important that the permitting item No. 5 of the ‘‘Enforcement’’ section pursuant to the Rules for Coal Mining at procedures associated with mine of the proposed MOU, that DMG shall, 5.03.2. discharges and effluent limitations, as within 90 days of execution of the Item Nos. 3, 4, 6, and 8 of the described in 40 CFR Part 434, be made proposed MOU, initiate rulemaking so ‘‘Enforcement’’ section of the proposed as specific and understandable as that the notices of violation issued by MOU are not inconsistent with the possible (administrative record No. CO– WQCD that cite a 1-day exceedance inspection and monitoring requirements 638). It also stated that Colorado should shall be incorporated into DMG’s of section 517 of SMCRA, the incorporate at the soonest possible date processes for patterns of violations and enforcement requirements of section a reference to 40 CFR Part 434 in its show-cause orders. These processes are 521 of SMCRA, and the inspection and rules. OSM acknowledges the Soil those addressed in Rules 5.03.3 (1) and enforcement requirements of 30 CFR Conservation Service’s concerns. As (2) that require Colorado to issue an Parts 840, 842, and 843. Therefore, the discussed in finding No. 5a, Colorado order to a permittee to show cause why Director approves these parts of the has agreed to submit a proposed his or her permit and right to mine proposed MOU. amendment to its rules at 2 CCR 407.2 should not be suspended or revoked Rule 4.05 to require compliance with because of a pattern of violations caused 6. Coordination the effluent limits at 40 CFR Part 434. by the permittee’s willful or In the ‘‘Coordination’’ section of the OSM is engaged in conversations with unwarranted noncompliance with proposed MOU, Colorado provides that Colorado to encourage it to submit the Colorado’s coal mining program or in the event that a conflict develops proposed amendment in a timely permit requirements. regarding the issuance of a notice of manner. Colorado has informally submitted to violation or other permit matters, DMG In separate telephone conversations OSM for review an amendment to these and WQCD will, as soon as practical, on April 19 and July 29, 1994, and rules. In accordance with 30 CFR meet to resolve any differences. This January 18, 1995, the Bureau of Mines 732.17(f)(2), OSM has requested a section also provides for quarterly or stated it had no comments on the timetable for Colorado’s enactment of more frequent meetings between DMG proposed MOU (administrative record these rules in its formal State and WQCD for the purposes of Nos. CO–610, CO–636, and CO–656). rulemaking process and a timetable for enhancing each Division’s knowledge of The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers submission of a formal amendment to the respective priorities, issues, and responded on April 28 and August 10, OSM. administrative procedures of the other 1994, and January 31, 1995, that it Based on the foregoing discussion, Division. found the changes to be satisfactory and Colorado’s steps to amend its There is no section of SMCRA or the (administrative record Nos. CO–613, program to make it consistent with this Federal regulations that corresponds to CO–639, and CO–660). portion of the MOU, the Director finds this section of the proposed MOU. By letters dated July 21 and that item No. 5 of the ‘‘Enforcement’’ However, this section is not inconsistent September 8, 1994, the Mine Safety and section of the proposed MOU is not with SMCRA and the implementing Health Administration (MSHA) stated inconsistent with the pattern-of- Federal regulations. Therefore, the that the amendment had been reviewed violation and show-cause order Director approves the ‘‘Coordination’’ by MSHA personnel and that it processes at section 521 of SMCRA and section of the proposed MOU. appeared there were no conflicts with 25850 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Rules and Regulations the requirements of 30 CFR as they Federal standards without undue delay. significant economic effect upon a pertain to mine safety (administrative Consistency of State and Federal substantial number of small entities. record Nos. CO–633 and CO–645). standards is required by SMCRA. Accordingly, this rule will ensure that existing requirements previously 3. Environmental Protection Agency VI. Procedural Determinations promulgated by OSM will be (EPA) Concurrence and Comments 1. Executive Order 12866 implemented by the State. In making the Pursuant to 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(ii), This rule is exempt from review by determination as to whether this rule OSM is required to solicit the written the Office of Management and Budget would have a significant economic concurrence of EPA with respect to (OMB) under Executive Order 12866 impact, the Department relied upon the those provisions of the proposed (Regulatory Planning and Review). data and assumptions for the program amendment that relate to air or counterpart Federal regulations. water quality standards promulgated 2. Executive Order 12778 List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 906 under the authority of the Clean Water The Department of the Interior has Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) or the Clean conducted the reviews required by Intergovernmental relations, Surface Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.). section 2 of Executive Order 12778 mining, Underground mining. On April 6, 1994, OSM solicited (Civil Justice Reform) and has Dated: May 9, 1995. EPA’s concurrence with the proposed determined that this rule meets the Charles E. Sandberg, MOU (administrative record No. CO– applicable standards of subsections (a) 605). By letters dated May 9 and July 28, Acting Regional Director, Western Regional and (b) of that section. However, these Coordinating Center. 1994, and February 1, 1995 standards are not applicable to the (administrative record Nos. CO–616, actual language of State regulatory For the reasons set out in the CO–634, and CO–659), EPA stated that programs and program amendments preamble, Title 30, Chapter VII, it believed that the proposed MOU since each such program is drafted and Subchapter T of the Code of Federal would have no impact on water quality promulgated by a specific state, not by Regulations is amended as set forth standards promulgated under the OSM. Under sections 503 and 505 of below: authority of the Clean Water Act, as SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1253 and 1255) and PART 906ÐCOLORADO amended (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.). the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 4. State Historic Preservation Officer 730.11, 732.15, and 732.17(h)(10), 1. The authority citation for Part 906 (SHPO) and the Advisory Council on decisions on proposed State regulatory continues to read as follows: Historic Preservation (ACHP) programs and program amendments Authority: 30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq. submitted by the States must be based Pursuant to 30 CFR 732.17(h)(4), OSM solely on a determination of whether the 2. Section 906.15 is amended by solicited comments on the proposed submittal is consistent with SMCRA and adding paragraph (r) to read as follows: MOU from the SHPO and ACHP its implementing Federal regulations (administrative record No. CO–605). § 906.15 Approval of regulatory program and whether the other requirements of amendments. Neither the SHPO nor ACHP responded 30 CFR Parts 730, 731, and 732 have to OSM’s request. * * * * * been met. (r) The proposed February 9, 1994, V. Director’s Decision 3. National Environmental Policy Act memorandum of understanding (MOU) Based on the above findings, the No environmental impact statement is between the Division of Minerals and Director approves Colorado’s proposed required for this rule since section Geology of the Colorado Department of MOU as submitted on March 18, 1994, 702(d) of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1292(d)) Natural Resources and the Water and as supplemented with additional provides that agency decisions on Quality Control Division of the Colorado explanatory information on June 23 and proposed State regulatory program Department of Health for water quality December 7, 1994. provisions do not constitute major management at coal mines, as submitted Specifically, the Director approves the Federal actions within the meaning of to OSM on March 18, 1994, and as following portions of the MOU, as section 102(2)(C) of the National supplemented with explanatory discussed in: Finding No. 1, concerning Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 information on June 23 and December 7, purpose, understanding, and U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)). 1994, is approved effective May 15, understanding between the parties; 1995. 4. Paperwork Reduction Act finding No. 2, concerning review of [FR Doc. 95–11887 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] permit applications; finding No. 3, This rule does not contain BILLING CODE 4310±05±M concerning training; finding No. 4, information collection requirements that concerning inspections, monitoring, and require approval by OMB under the sample analysis; finding No. 5a, Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS concerning enforcement of effluent 3507 et seq.). AFFAIRS limitations; finding No. 5b, concerning 5. Regulatory Flexibility Act pattern-of-violation and show-cause 38 CFR Part 20 processes; finding No. 5c, concerning The Department of the Interior has other enforcement provisions, and determined that this rule will not have RIN 2900±AH47 finding No. 6, concerning coordination. a significant economic impact on a The Federal regulations at 30 CFR substantial number of small entities Rules of Practice: Waiver of 906, codifying decisions concerning the under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 Consideration of Evidence by Agency Colorado program, are being amended to U.S.C. 601 et seq.). The State submittal of Original Jurisdiction implement this decision. This final rule that is the subject of this rule is based AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs. is being made effective immediately to upon counterpart Federal regulations for ACTION: Final rule. expedite the State program amendment which an economic analysis was process and to encourage States to bring prepared and certification made that SUMMARY: This document amends the their programs into conformity with the such regulations would not have a Rules of Practice of the Board of Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Rules and Regulations 25851 Veterans’ Appeals (Board) with respect review and preparation of a FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS to evidence accepted by the Board after Supplemental Statement of the Case.’’ COMMISSION transfer of the record to the Board to This amendment is necessary because 47 CFR Part 73 specify that an appellant’s there has been confusion as to whether representative may waive the right to such a waiver may only be made by an have such evidence referred to the appellant. This amendment is intended [MM Docket No. 93±224; RM±8291, 8325, agency of original jurisdiction. This 8358, 8360] to provide clarification and to be amendment is necessary because there has been confusion as to whether such consistent with general principles Radio Broadcasting Services; Bismark, a waiver may only be made by an permitting use of representatives by VA Centerville, Farmington, Ironton, MO, appellant. This amendment is intended claimants. Also, this amendment will and Herrin, IL help expedite the handling of appeals. to provide clarification and to be AGENCY: Federal Communications consistent with general principles This final rule concerns agency Commission. permitting use of representatives by VA procedure or practice and, ACTION: Final rule. claimants. Also, this amendment will consequently, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553 help expedite the handling of appeals. is exempt from notice and comment SUMMARY: This document allots Channel EFFECTIVE DATE: May 15, 1995. requirements. 258C3 to Bismarck, Missouri, as that FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Secretary hereby certifies that community’s first local service, in Steven L. Keller, Counsel to the this final rule will not have a significant response to a counterproposal filed by Chairman, Board of Veterans’ Appeals, economic impact on a substantial KREI, Inc. See 58 FR 42522, August 10, Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 number of small entities as they are 1993. The coordinates for Channel Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC defined in the Regulatory Flexibility 258C3 are 37–38–43 and 90–32–54. 20420; (202) 233–2978. Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612. This rule will There is a site restriction 15.3 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Board affect VA beneficiaries and will not kilometers (9.5 miles) southeast of the community. The counterproposal filed provides final appellate review within affect small businesses. Therefore, by Wayne E. Tate for Ironton, Missouri, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), this final of questions of law and fact relating to and Herrin, Illinois, has been dismissed rule is exempt from the initial and final benefit determinations concerning (RM–8325). The counterproposal filed regulatory flexibility analyses veterans, their dependents, and their by Wayne E. Tate and David E. Smith requirements of sections 603 and 604. survivors. This document amends the Communications, Inc. for Ironton, Board’s Rules of Practice, which are set List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 20 Missouri, Herrin, Illinois and forth at 38 CFR Part 20. Centerville, Missouri, has been When a case is appealed to the Board Administrative practice and dismissed (RM-8360). The petition filed the evidence of record is transferred to procedure, Claims, Lawyers, Legal by KREI, Inc. for Farmington, Missouri, the Board for review. After the record services, Veterans. has been dismissed (RM-8291). With has been transferred to the Board, Approved: May 2, 1995. this action, this proceeding is additional evidence may be received terminated. Jesse Brown, and accepted by the Board under DATES: Effective June 23, 1995. The § 20.1304 of the Board’s Rules of Secretary of Veterans Affairs. window period for filing applications Practice and § 19.37(b) of the Board’s For the reasons set out in the for Channel 258C3 at Bismarck, Appeals Regulations (38 CFR Part 19). preamble, 38 CFR Part 20 is amended as Missouri, will open on June 23, 1995, With respect to such ‘‘additional set forth below: and close on July 24, 1995. evidence,’’ 38 CFR 20.1304(c), FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: immediately prior to the effective date PART 20ÐBOARD OF VETERANS' Kathleen Scheuerle, Mass Media of this document, stated: APPEALS: RULES OF PRACTICE Bureau, (202) 418–2180. (c) Consideration of additional evidence by SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a agency of original jurisdiction. Any pertinent 1. The authority citation for part 20 summary of the Commission’s Report evidence submitted by the appellant or continues to read as follows: representative which is accepted by the and Order, MM Docket No. 93–224, Board under the provisions of this section, as Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(a). adopted May 1, 1995, released May 9, well as any such evidence referred to the 1995. The full text of this Commission Board by the originating agency under § 20.1304 [Amended] decision is available for inspection and § 19.37(b) of this chapter, must be referred to 2. In § 20.1304, the first sentence in copying during normal business hours the agency of original jurisdiction for review paragraph (c) is amended by adding ‘‘or in the Commission’s Reference Center and preparation of a Supplemental Statement (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW, of the Case unless this procedural right is representative’’ immediately after ‘‘unless this procedural right is waived Washington, D.C. The complete text of waived by the appellant or unless the Board this decision may also be purchased determines that the benefit, or benefits, to by the appellant’’. which the evidence relates may be allowed from the Commission’s copy [FR Doc. 95–11888 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] on appeal without such referral. Such waiver contractors, International Transcription must be in writing or, if a hearing on appeal BILLING CODE 8320±01±P Services, Inc., 2100 M Street, NW, Suite is conducted, formally entered on the record 140, Washington, D.C. 20037, (202) 857– orally at the time of the hearing. 3800. This document amends § 20.1304(c) List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73 to specify that the appellant ‘‘or representative,’’ and not solely the Radio broadcasting. appellant, may waive the right to have Part 73 of Title 47 of the Code of the additional evidence referred to the Federal Regulations is amended as ‘‘agency of original jurisdiction for follows: 25852 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Rules and Regulations PART 73Ð[AMENDED] from the Commission’s copy inspection and copying during normal contractors, International Transcription business hours in the FCC Reference 1. The authority citation for Part 73 Service, Inc., (202) 857–3800, located at Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW, continues to read as follows: 1919 M Street, NW, Room 246, or 2100 Washington, D.C. The complete text of Authority: Secs. 303, 48 Stat., as amended, M Street, NW, Suite 140, Washington, this decision may also be purchased 1082; 47 U.S.C. 154, as amended. D.C. 20037. from the Commission’s copy contractor, International Transcription Service, § 73.202 [Amended] List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73 Inc., (202) 857–3800, 2100 M Street, 2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Radio broadcasting. NW, Suite 140, Washington, D.C. 20037. Allotments under Missouri, is amended by adding Bismarck, Channel 258C3. Part 73 of Title 47 of the Code of List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73 Federal Regulations is amended, as Radio broadcasting. Federal Communications Commission. follows: John A. Karousos, Part 73 of Title 47 of the Code of Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules PART 73Ð[AMENDED] Federal Regulations is amended as Division, Mass Media Bureau. follows: 1. The authority citation for Part 73 [FR Doc. 95–11818 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] continues to read as follows: PART 73Ð[AMENDED] BILLING CODE 6712±01±F Authority: Secs. 303, 48 Stat., as amended, 1. The authority citation for Part 73 1082; 47 U.S.C. 154, as amended. continues to read as follows: 47 CFR Part 73 § 73.202 [Amended] Authority: Secs. 303, 48 Stat., as amended, [MM Docket No. 92±202; RM±8051] 2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM 1082; 47 U.S.C. 154, as amended. Allotments under California, is § 73.202 [Amended] Radio Broadcasting Services; amended by adding Newberry Springs, Newberry Springs, CA Channel 279A. 2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Nevada, is amended AGENCY: Federal Communications Federal Communications Commission. by adding Ely, Channel 243A. Commission. John A. Karousos, Federal Communications Commission. ACTION: Final rule. Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules John A. Karousos, Division, Mass Media Bureau. Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules SUMMARY: This document allots Channel [FR Doc. 95–11819 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] 279A to Newberry Springs, California, Division, Mass Media Bureau. BILLING CODE 6712±01±F as that community’s first local aural [FR Doc. 95–11820 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] transmission service, in response to a BILLING CODE 6712±01±F petition for rule making filed on behalf 47 CFR Part 73 of Hills Broadcasting. See 57 F 41719, September 11, 1992. Coordinates used [MM Docket No. 93±274; RM±8372] 47 CFR Part 73 for Channel 279A at Newberry Springs Radio Broadcasting Services; Ely, NV [MM Docket No. 94±135; RM±8541] are 34–49–42 and 116–41–12. As Newberry Springs is located within 320 AGENCY: Federal Communications Radio Broadcasting Services; Atkins, kilometers (199 miles) of the United Commission. AR States-Mexico border, concurrence of ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: Federal Communications the Mexican government in this Commission. proposal was obtained. With this action, SUMMARY: The Commission, at the the proceeding is terminated. request of Keith E. Lamonica, allots ACTION: Final rule. DATES: Effective June 23, 1995. The Channel 243A to Ely, NV, as the SUMMARY: This document allots FM window period for filing applications community’s third local FM service. See Channel 257A to Atkins, Arkansas, as for Channel 279A at Newberry Springs, 58 FR 63319, December 1, 1993. that community’s first local aural California, will open on June 23, 1995, Channel 243A can be allotted to Ely in transmission service, in response to a and close on July 24, 1995. compliance with the Commission’s petition for rule making filed on behalf FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: minimum distance separation of Atkins Broadcasting. See 59 FR Nancy Joyner, Mass Media Bureau, (202) requirements without the imposition of 60947, November 29, 1994. Coordinates 418–2180. Questions related to the a site restriction, at coordinates North used for Channel 257A at Atkins are window application filing process for Latitude 39–14–51 and West Longitude North Latitude 35–14–49 and West Channel 279A at Newberry Springs 114–53–16. With this action, this Longitude 92–52–53. With this action, should be addressed to the Audio proceeding is terminated. the proceeding is terminated. Services Division, FM Branch, (202) DATES: Effective June 23, 1995. The DATES: Effective June 23, 1995. The 418–2700. window period for filing applications window period for filing applications SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a will open on June 23, 1995, and close on Channel 257A at Atkins, Arkansas, synopsis of the Commission’s Report on July 24, 1995. will open on June 23, 1995, and close and Order, MM Docket No. 92–202, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: on July 24, 1995. adopted May 1, 1995, and released May Leslie K. Shapiro, Mass Media Bureau, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 9, 1995. The full text of this (202) 634–6530. Nancy Joyner, Mass Media Bureau, (202) Commission decision is available for SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a 418–2180. Questions related to the inspection and copying during normal synopsis of the Commission’s Report window application filing process for business hours in the FCC’s Reference and Order, MM Docket No. 93–274, Channel 257A at Atkins, Arkansas, Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW, adopted May 1, 1995, and released May should be addressed to the Audio Washington, D.C. The complete text of 9, 1995. The full text of this Services Division, FM Branch, (202) this decision may also be purchased Commission decision is available for 418–2700. Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Rules and Regulations 25853 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a clams and ocean quahogs from the quahog fisheries were fully exploited synopsis of the Commission’s Report exclusive economic zone in 1995. and at medium levels of biomass. The and Order, MM Docket No. 94–135, EFFECTIVE DATE: January 1, 1995 to report also suggested that the surf clam adopted May 3, 1995, and released May December 31, 1995. quota be reduced by 16 percent and the 9, 1995. The full text of this ADDRESSES: Copies of the Mid-Atlantic ocean quahog quota be reduced by Commission decision is available for Fishery Management Council’s analysis approximately 18 percent from quota inspection and copying during normal and recommendations are available levels set for 1994. This reduction was business hours in the FCC’s Reference from David R. Keifer, Executive necessary to accomplish a 50-percent Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW, Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery probability of achieving the Council’s Washington, D.C. The complete text of Management Council, Room 2115, supply-year goals. However, despite the this decision may also be purchased Federal Building, 300 South New Street, updated management advice, the from the Commission’s copy Dover, DE 19901–6790. Copies of the Council did not revise its earlier contractors, International Transcription Report of the 19th Northeast Regional recommendation of a 10-percent Service, Inc., (202) 857–3800, located at Stock Assessment Workshop (19th SAW reduction in the surf clam quota and a 1919 M Street, NW, Room 246, or 2100 Report) are available from Helen 12.5-percent reduction in the ocean M Street, NW, Suite 140, Washington, Mustafa, NMFS, Woods Hole quahog quota. D.C. 20037. Laboratory, 166 Water Street, Woods The quota-setting process for these List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73 Hole, MA 02543–1097. fisheries relies upon a high degree of FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: public participation. Early in the Radio broadcasting. Myles Raizin (Resource Policy Analyst) process, the industry was invited to Part 73 of Title 47 of the Code of 508–281–9104. attend meetings and discussions where Federal Regulations is amended as SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The NMFS scientists presented survey follows: Fishery Management Plan for the results and other data on the status of Atlantic Surf Clam and Ocean Quahog the fishery. The industry was given PART 73Ð[AMENDED] Fisheries (FMP) directs NMFS, in many opportunities to testify or 1. The authority citation for Part 73 consultation with the Mid-Atlantic comment on the Council’s proposals, continues to read as follows: Fishery Management Council (Council), and written comments were submitted to specify quotas for surf clams and during the open comment period Authority: Secs. 303, 48 Stat., as amended, provided after proposed quotas were 1082; 47 U.S.C. 154, as amended. ocean quahogs on an annual basis from an established range of values to published in the Federal Register. § 73.202 [Amended] represent the OY for each fishery. It is The 1995 surf clam and ocean quahog 2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM the policy of the Council that the levels specifications are based on the 1992 surf Allotments underArkansas, is amended selected will allow fishing to continue clam abundance survey, as reported in by adding Atkins, Channel 257A. at that level for at least 10 years for surf the 1993 stock assessment report. Reliance on the 1992 survey is based on Federal Communications Commission. clams and 30 years for ocean quahogs. two factors. First, the 19th SAW report John A. Karousos, In addition to this constraint, the quotas are set at a level that meets the and the 1994 abundance survey it Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules contains were not available for the Division, Mass Media Bureau. estimated annual demand. For surf clams, the quota must fall Council to analyze before the Council [FR Doc. 95–11821 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] within the OY range of 1.85 million voted initially on proposed BILLING CODE 6712±01±F bushels (652 thousand hectoliters (hL)) specifications for surf clams and ocean and 3.4 million bushels (1.2 million hL). quahogs for 1995. Second, the NMFS For ocean quahogs, the quota must fall scientists reported that the 1994 surf DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE within the OY range of 4 million clam abundance survey was a statistical bushels (1.4 million hL) to 6 million anomaly and raised serious biological National Oceanic and Atmospheric bushels (2.1 million hL). These ranges questions when compared with the Administration are specified in 50 CFR 652.21 (a) and survey data from prior years. The Director, Northeast Region, NMFS 50 CFR Part 652 (b) of the regulations. Final fishing quotas for the 1995 (Regional Director) agreed and decided [Docket No. 950126030±5131±02; I.D. fishing year are: Surf clams—2.565 that utilization of the 1994 survey 111794A] million bushels (90.4 thousand kiloliters information was not prudent at this (kL)); ocean quahogs—4.9 million time. NMFS has accepted comments Atlantic Surf Clam and Ocean Quahog bushels (172.7 thousand kL). NMFS has based on the 1994 survey, however, and Fisheries; 1995 Final Fishing Quotas considered all comments and has will consider these comments when the AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries determined that these are the 1994 survey data is reexamined. In Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and appropriate quotas, in accordance with determining the final quota amounts, Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), § 652.21(a)(3) of the regulations. These NMFS considered the recommendations Commerce. quotas are identical to those of the Council, the findings of the 19th ACTION: Final 1995 fishing quotas for recommended by the Council and SAW Report, and concerns regarding surf clams and ocean quahogs. published as proposed on February 6, the impact on the public and the 1995 (60 FR 6977). The public comment resource. The 19th SAW Report SUMMARY: NMFS issues these final period ended on March 6, 1995. recommended that the 1995 quota be set quotas for the Atlantic surf clam and The 19th Stock Assessment Workshop even lower than the Council’s proposed ocean quahog fisheries for 1995. These (SAW) Report was not available to the specifications. However, the Council’s quotas were selected from a range Council when the Council voted on the specifications remain within the range defined as optimum yield (OY) for each proposed quotas for surf clams and of estimated supply years. Therefore, fishery. The intent of this action is to ocean quahogs. That report declared NMFS has concluded that the Council’s establish allowable harvests of surf that both the surf clam and ocean recommendation remains sufficiently 25854 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Rules and Regulations prudent and further reductions are not as reported in the 1993 stock assessment and surf clam products and adversely warranted at this time. report, as the basis for its affect the individual transferable quota recommendations for the annual quotas market. Comments and Responses for surf clams and ocean quahogs In fact, NMFS remains so concerned Eight sets of comments, which represents the best scientific for the long-term sustainability of this altogether made nine separate points, information available at the time. resource that the agency may advise the were received on the proposed 1995 Comment: Based on the 1992 Council that it should revise these quotas of 2.565 million bushels (904 abundance survey, the Council chose to definitions prior to setting the 1996 thousand hL) for surf clams and 4.9 assume 9 years of surf clams available quotas. The overfishing definitions for million bushels (1.7 million hL) for for harvest, when they could have both surf clams and ocean quahogs, as ocean quahogs. One commenter favored chosen up to 12 years. The correct contained in the FMP, may be the proposed quotas, while eight approach would have been to assume inadequate to protect the long-term commenters were in opposition. the mean number of years—10.5. productivity of these resources. Comment: The refusal of NMFS and Response: In 1994, in a written report Comment: The Council ignored the Council to use results of the 1994 containing their analyses and empirical information provided by abundance survey to measure the recommendations (see ADDRESSES), the fishermen on increased levels of biomass of surf clams and ocean Council chose to recommend a recruitment and continues to assume a quahogs was not consistent with basing conservative approach to protect the low level of recruitment in both the surf the specifications on the best scientific stocks by assuming 9 years of clam and ocean quahog fisheries. information available. availability at current harvest levels. Response: There has been conflicting Response: The Stock Assessment NMFS has accepted this conservative testimony from fishermen regarding the Review Committee (SARC) for the 19th approach in specifying the 1995 surf level of recruitment in both fisheries. SAW, comprised of scientists from clam quota. The recruitment to this The fact that the Council did not adopt NMFS, academia, state facilities, and fishery is at low levels and does not the more conservative SARC estimate of staffs of the New England and Mid- offset annual removals from the fishery. a remaining 7-year surf clam supply, or Atlantic Fishery Management Councils, Consequently, a high probability exists the more conservative ocean quahog made the determination not to include that this fishery will be severely quota recommended by the Council staff the 1994 abundance survey results in depleted at the end of 10 years. This (i.e., 4.6 million bushels (1.6 million the stock assessment. Those results were means that fishing will be dramatically hL)), reflects that the Council did take markedly and scientifically curtailed. Concomitantly, the value of into account the industry’s testimony incompatible with the rest of the time- individual transferable quotas may be regarding increased recruitment. series developed from the 19 previous severely affected. Comment: The 1994 survey showed survey cruises. The 1994 abundance The most sound approach is to take increases in surf clam recruits per tow survey results could not have been no action that could accelerate the from 13.5 in 1992 to 27.2 in 1994 for attributable to a major recruitment severe depletion of the fishery. This northern New Jersey and from 7.5 in event. Since the size-structure of the necessitates a reasonably conservative 1992 to 39.2 in 1994 for Delmarva. This clams caught in the 1994 survey was approach to management. If, in the shows significant increases in similar to the size-structure detected in future, the results of the 1994 survey are recruitment and would constitute the the previous surveys, evidence of invested with some scientific validity, best scientific information available. increased recruitment for at least some or a major recruitment event occurs, The survey also showed large increases age-classes should have been detected then the Council would have a basis on in recruitment to the ocean quahog in the previous surveys. The only which to adopt less conservative quotas. fishery. conclusion that can be drawn is that the The 1995 quota specifications do not Response: The Council and NMFS did capture efficiency of the clam dredge even represent the most conservative not use the results from the 1994 used in the 1994 survey was higher than quota recommendations for these abundance survey for the reasons it was in previous years. fisheries. At present levels of harvest, mentioned above. However, if the 1994 Furthermore, the 1994 abundance the SARC estimates a 50-percent survey data were used, the 19th SAW survey results alone do not constitute probability that only a 7-year supply of report calculated that the number of surf the best scientific information available. surf clams remains in northern New clam recruits relative to all sizes would They represent an anomaly in a very Jersey and in Delaware, Maryland, and comprise 20.9 percent of each tow for long time-series of survey results. It Virginia (Delmarva). These areas jointly 1994, as compared to 20.4 percent in would not be scientifically sound to account for approximately 90 percent of 1992. accept the 1994 survey results by the harvest. If NMFS were to base the For the reasons outlined above, the assuming that there is a sudden and final quota on this most conservative 1994 survey results for ocean quahog dramatic increase for almost every year- estimate, a 16-percent reduction from were also discounted. Annual class for both species. These results the 1994 surf clam quota would be recruitment per unit area for ocean need to be scientifically vetted before required for 1995, as opposed to the 10- quahogs is very low, as would be they can be used to modify existing percent reduction recommended by the expected for a long-lived bivalve. In the data. The results have not been Council and adopted by NMFS. One 1994 and previous surveys, there is no discarded. If future survey results reason for not using the most evidence of substantial recruitment in replicate the 1994 survey results, then a conservative estimate is that NMFS any region other than the Gulf of Maine. sounder scientific basis would exist for believes that harvest patterns show the (From the Advisory Report and making an adjustment to the annual fishery to be moving northward; the Summary report (p. 182).) quota. percentage harvested from the Delmarva Comment: The report containing the A number of scientific questions have and northern New Jersey area may not Council’s analysis and been asked regarding the validity of the comprise 90 percent of the harvest over recommendations concluded that no 1994 dredge survey data. As a result, the 10-year period. Also, a decrease of significant recruitment occurred in the NMFS and the Council believe that use this magnitude may cause severe surf clam or ocean quahog fisheries. of the 1992 surf clam abundance survey, disruptions in the markets for surf clams When the Council and scientists were Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Rules and Regulations 25855 asked to define ‘‘significant conservative approach to selecting the procedures with advance notice and recruitment,’’ they could not answer. remaining surf clam supply. These opportunity to comment. Response: The answer to the question statements appear to contradict each Comment: One commenter supported ‘‘What is significant recruitment?’’ was other. the proposed specifications, because the not as clear as it might have been. Response: The Council’s report (1995 process of specifying quotas has worked Basically, two kinds of recruitment Surf Clam and Ocean Quahog Quota for 18 years and is consistent with the events occur for surf clams—a continual Recommendations), containing analysis structure designed by the Magnuson low level of recruitment and a and recommendations, states that the Act. Historically, the Council and the substantial recruitment event. The latter declining CPUE ‘‘suggests’’ a industry have worked together to type of event can be characterized as conservative approach. The report does manage the fishery. The Council has ‘‘significant’’ and last occurred for surf not state that the declining CPUE always carefully weighed all clams in 1976 and 1977 off the New requires a conservative approach. information on economic, social, and Jersey and Delmarva coasts, However, the Council’s Chairman may ecological factors before making quota respectively. Since then, only a low have misspoken in his attempt to recommendations. That strategy rebuilt level of recruitment has occurred in this convey the fact that declining CPUE was our surf clam stocks and has promoted fishery. Current harvest rates in these only one of many factors considered. In a healthy industry for many years. areas exceed current stock any event, the record is clear that Response: NMFS agrees with the replenishment rates due to this steady declining CPUE was not the sole basis commenter that a careful weighing of all low recruitment. for the Council’s recommendation. information by both the Council and Comment: One commenter offered a Comment: One commenter claimed industry is an important component of table drawn from the northern New that the Council’s ‘‘10-year supply’’ the surf clam and ocean quahog fishery Jersey DeLury model found in the 19th formula constitutes a rule that is null management strategy. and void, because it was not adopted SAW report to show that estimated total The final quotas for the 1995 Atlantic through the rulemaking process and biomass of surf clams for the years 1991 surf clam and ocean quahog fisheries are constitutes an unadopted, and therefore through 1994 had not declined at all, as follows: even though estimated recruitment was inapplicable, administrative rule. Response: The Council process gives approximately 12 percent of the biomass FINAL 1995 SURF CLAM/OCEAN for each year. interested persons an opportunity to Response: The table provided by the participate in all aspects of the rule QUAHOG QUOTAS making process. Through the Council’s commenter shows estimated total 1995 final 1995 final biomass decreasing from 91.8 thousand process, the surf clam and ocean quahog Fishery quotas quotas metric tons (mt) in 1992 to 88.8 industry had adequate opportunity to (bu) (kL) thousand mt tons in 1994. Although the participate in the establishment of the 1994 estimate is slightly above the 1991 supply policies. In June 1993, the Surf Surf clam ...... 2,565,000 90,390 estimate of 88.5 thousand mt, the Clam and Ocean Quahog Committee and Ocean quahog ...... 4,900,000 172,700 current trend shows estimated total the Scientific and Statistical Committee biomass to be in decline. discussed and voted on the surf clam Classification Comment: The Council’s analysis 10-year supply policy, as well as the This action is authorized by 50 CFR cited in the Federal Register (60 FR ocean quahog 30-year supply policy, in part 652 and is exempt from review 6979, February 6, 1995) states that the formally noticed public meetings and under E.O. 12866. alleged rapid decline in catch per unit accepted written comments. In the of effort (CPUE) requires the Council meeting of June 1–3, 1993, the Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq. ‘‘conservative selection of a 9-year Council discussed and voted to adopt Dated: May 9, 1995. remaining surf clam supply.’’ However, the policy. The Council used this policy Gary Matlock, the Council’s Chairman claimed that as an underlying rationale in setting the Program Management Officer, National declining CPUE was not used neither in 1994 and 1995 quota amounts. These Marine Fisheries Service. the decision to set 1995 quotas at quota amounts were published pursuant [FR Doc. 95–11926 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] current levels nor in taking a to Administrative Procedures Act BILLING CODE 3510±22±W 25856 Proposed Rules Federal Register Vol. 60, No. 93 Monday, May 15, 1995 This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: recommended that the Service adopt a contains notices to the public of the proposed Background policy of encouraging Service local issuance of rules and regulations. The offices to provide fingerprinting purpose of these notices is to give interested Applicants for various types of services. Where that was not feasible, persons an opportunity to participate in the immigration benefits are required to the working group recommended that rule making prior to the adoption of the final submit a set of fingerprints on Form FD– rules. the district director designate outside 258, Applicant Fingerprint Card, along entities to do the job. The district with their applications. The applicants’ director would assess the unique local fingerprints are forwarded to the Federal DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE situation prior to deciding whether to Bureau of Investigation (FBI) for checks certify DOEs or to renew them when the Immigration and Naturalization Service for criminal history that may render an initial certification of 3 years expires. alien ineligible for immigration benefits. The working group concluded that Traditionally, applicants for 8 CFR Parts 103 and 299 certification of DOEs is the most cost- immigration benefits have been effective way to restore integrity to the fingerprinted at Service local offices. [INS No. 1666±94] process in the short term and that it Over the past few years, because of should be implemented as soon as resource shortages and uncontrollable possible. Based on these RIN 1115±AD75 overcrowding, most Service field offices recommendations, the Service is have been forced to stop fingerprinting Certification of Designated Outside undertaking rulemaking to establish applicants for immigration benefits. Entities to Take Fingerprints eligibility criteria, certification Since other law enforcement agencies requirements, application procedures, AGENCY: Immigration and Naturalization have not been able to meet the demand, and a date on which the Service will Service, Justice. applicants have turned to private stop accepting fingerprint cards ACTION: Proposed rule. enterprises for fingerprints. Under these circumstances, the Service typically prepared by unauthorized entities. SUMMARY: The Immigration and does not know the identity of the person The Service is aware that the Naturalization Service (Service) is or organization that prepared the objectives of the proposed DOE- proposing to certify designated outside fingerprints. certification program cannot be fulfilled entities (DOEs) to take fingerprints of In a February 1994 inspection report, unless the outside entities are carefully applicants for immigration benefits. the Office of Inspector General (OIG) of screened and monitored. The Service is This rule would establish eligibility the Department of Justice identified two contemplating three complementary criteria and application procedures to major deficiencies in the current methods for the monitoring of DOEs: on- certify DOEs. The proposed rule would fingerprinting process that required site review of DOE operations; facilitate processing of applications for corrective action: the reliance on completion of an attestation form immigration benefits and protect the unknown and untrained outside entities (discussed later) which the applicant is integrity of the fingerprinting process, to prepare fingerprints; and the lack of to submit to the Service with the while relieving the strain on Service identity verification of the individuals fingerprint cards; and, in many cases, resources. fingerprinted. In addition, the OIG physical verification of benefit- pointed out that fingerprint cards applicants’ fingerprints during their DATES: Written comments must be interviews with Service officers. The received on or before July 14, 1995. submitted by the applicants were often of poor quality and had to be rejected latter is possible because the Service has ADDRESSES: Please submit written by the FBI. The OIG recommended that been developing imaging capability in comments, in triplicate, to the Policy the Service establish procedures to its Computer Linked Adjudication and Directives and Instructions Branch, institute control and oversight of the Information Management System Immigration and Naturalization Service, fingerprint process. The Committee on (CLAIMS). This imaging capability can 425 I Street NW., Room 5307, Appropriation of the United States be used to capture, store, and reproduce Washington, DC 20536, Attn: Public Senate also expressed concern about the the digitalized image of the fingerprints Comment Clerk. To ensure proper current fingerprint process and directed submitted by applicants for benefits. At handling, please reference INS No. in its report dated July 14, 1994, that the interview time, the adjudicating officer 1666–94 in your correspondence. Service implement a fingerprint will be able to compare a system- Comments are available for public collection system which accepts only generated image of the applicant’s right inspection at this location by calling fingerprints taken by authorized index fingerprint with a freshly taken (202)–514–3048 to arrange an entities, including trained Service print of the interviewee’s right index appointment. employees, recognized law enforcement finger to ascertain that they belong to FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: agencies, or Service certified outside the same person. Pearl Chang, Senior Examiner, Jack entities. It should be emphasized that the Rasmussen, Senior Examiner, or Ray In May 1994, the Service convened a working group gave serious thought to Jaroneski, Senior Examiner, working group, which was comprised of the feasibility of resuming fingerprinting Adjudications Division, Immigration representatives from various Service services at all Service field offices. and Naturalization Service, 425 I Street components along with advisors from However, acquiring additional staff and NW., Room 3214, Washington, DC the FBI and the OIG, to recommend facilities is a time-consuming process. 20536, telephone (202) 514–3240. This solutions. After considering various Even with a fee increase, it would take is not a toll-free number. options, the working group up to 3 years to implement a fully Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Proposed Rules 25857 functional fingerprinting operation at all rule would be necessary to Service invites comments from the local Service offices. It is simply not accommodate that broader role. public on these issues. feasible for all Service field offices to Since the FBI fingerprint-check is the Proposed Regulation for Certification of resume the fingerprinting service in a only practical means available to the DOEs short time. The working group believed Service to positively identify any known that the establishment of an automated 1. DOE Eligibility criminal history, this rule would require outside entity employees with fingerprint information system would As stated earlier, the purpose of the fingerprinting responsibility to submit ultimately resolve the current problems, fingerprints-clearance requirement is to their own fingerprints for an FBI check. yet it is not a solution that could be ensure that the applicants for Fingerprints submitted to support implemented immediately. Thus, the immigration benefits (e.g., adjustment to applications for certification as a DOE fingerprint working group permanent residence, citizenship, would have to be taken by designated recommended the use of DOEs as an adoption of foreign orphans, etc.), do interim solution while the Service is Service personnel at local offices. not have criminal records that would The proposed rule would also provide actively working on automating the render them ineligible. Because the fingerprinting process. for a streamlined registration process for validity of the fingerprints is an Federal, state, or local law enforcement Upon development of an automated essential premise for carrying out the facilities and military police facilities fingerprint information system, the Service’s obligation to identify and deny which provide fingerprinting service. Service will decide if there is a benefits to ineligible aliens, it is These local police stations and military continued need for the DOEs’ services important that the fingerprinting police facilities would be automatically and, if so, whether they should switch process is not entrusted to persons eligible for DOE status provided that to newer technologies, such as acquiring whose past criminal conduct or other they register with the Service on Form automated fingerprinting equipment wrongdoing makes them unsuitable for I–850, Application for Certification as that meet the Service’s specifications. In such responsibility. Designated Outside Entity to Take either event, the Service shall issue a Thus, the proposed regulation would Fingerprints. No FBI fingerprint check, public notification or make a new rule, preclude from certification as outside application fee, or additional training as appropriate. entities those applicants who have been would be required of their personnel convicted of any aggravated felony as charged to take fingerprints. Once During the deliberation of the defined in section 101(a)(43) of the At registered, the Service would include fingerprinting options, the Service or of any crime involving dishonesty or these police stations and military police explored contracting as a possible false statement, who have been facilities on the listing of DOEs and solution, but determined that subjected to a civil penalty for fraud make available to them the Service’s contracting was not viable. A controlled under section 274C of the Act or any fingerprinting regulations and procurement contract requires the other law. (If the applicant is an instructions. contracting agency and the contractor to organization, these standards would enter into a binding agreement also be applied to its principal officers, 2. Requirements involving appropriated funds, and these directors, or partners.) Moreover, an As set forth in § 103.2(e) of the required conditions do not exist. On the outside entity’s employee who has been proposed regulation, a DOE would be other hand, section 103 (a) and (b) of the convicted of an aggravated felony or a required to take legible and classifiable Immigration and Nationality Act (‘‘the crime involving dishonesty or false fingerprints of applicants, or be required Act’’) confers upon the Attorney statement, or subjected to a civil penalty to retake the fingerprints deemed to be General, and the Commissioner of the for fraud, would not be eligible to take illegible free of charge. A DOE would be Service by delegation, the authority to fingerprints, unless the outside entity allowed to charge an additional fee, establish regulations necessary for can establish to the Service’s however, if a good set of fingerprints is carrying out the provisions of the Act. satisfaction that the circumstances are rendered illegible due to improper For reasons explained earlier in this such (because of the person’s youth at handling by the applicant. As part of the preamble, rulemaking appears to be a the time of the conduct, the number of fingerprinting procedures, a DOE would reasonable and practical way to solve years that have passed since then, or be required to check the identification the fingerprinting problem. other convincing factors) that there can of the person being fingerprinted by In this rulemaking, the Service is be no reasonable questions as to the comparing the information on the proposing the creation of a new person’s reliability in taking fingerprints fingerprint cards with that of his or her paragraph (e) in 8 CFR 103.2, to in conformity with these rules. passport, alien registration card, or any In interpreting the terms ‘‘dishonesty establish eligibility standards, other Service issued photo-ID. The DOE or false statement’’, the Service may take responsibilities, and application would be required to maintain clean general guidance to the degree that it is procedures for DOE certification. and suitable facilities that are accessible appropriate by analog to the judicial to the general public. The DOE would Public comments are encouraged and interpretations of crimes involving be required to use only fingerprint cards must be received by the Service on or ‘‘dishonesty or false statement’’ as that (Forms FD–258) or any other forms that before July 14, 1995. It has also been phrase is used in Rule 609(a)(2) of the are specified and supplied by the suggested that DOEs certified as a result Federal Rules of Evidence and prior Service. Reproduced copies of Form of this rulemaking could ultimately be cases. For example, Government of FD–258 would be rejected. endorsed and utilized by other federal, Virgin Islands v. Toto, 529 F.2d 278 (3d A DOE could charge a reasonable fee state, or local government agencies Cir. 1976), includes criminal for taking the fingerprints. Even though which require fingerprints from convictions involving ‘‘perjury or the Service has not imposed a fee applicants for various types of benefits subornation of perjury, false statement, limitation, a DOE would be required to or programs under this jurisdiction. criminal fraud, embezzlement, false make its fee known to the Service at the Comments are also solicited on the pretense, or any other offense which time its application for DOE- feasibility of such an expansion in the involves some element of deceitfulness, certification is filed and when there is role of DOEs and on what changes to the untruthfulness or falsification’’. The a fee change. The Service believes that 25858 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Proposed Rules competition in the marketplace would the second inspection, the Service could employees to take fingerprints. The keep the DOEs’ fees at a reasonable revoke its DOE status. district director would consider all level. Each local Service office would supporting materials submitted and 3. Attestation compile a list of the DOEs in its request other evidence of eligibility for jurisdiction, giving their names, To assure the Service of the integrity certification as he or she may deem addresses, telephone numbers, and fees, of the fingerprint cards submitted, the necessary. The initial certification is and make the list available the public to proposed rule would require all DOE valid for three years and, if the district encourage healthy competition. fingerprints to fill out an attestation director finds a continuing need, may be A DOE would be required to each time they take fingerprints for an renewed by applying to the district immediately notify the Service director immigration benefit applicant. In turn, director having jurisdiction over the having jurisdiction over his or her place applicants for immigration benefits DOE’s place of business on a new Form of business of any changes in personnel would file this attestation together with I–850, with the required fee, at least 90 who take fingerprints. All DOE the fingerprint card. The attestation days before it expires. personnel charged with the must be signed and dated by the responsibility to take fingerprints would fingerprinter and state: (1) That he or 5. Fee be required to undergo and pass an FBI she has properly checked the identity of As previously mentioned, an criminal history check, as discussed. the person being fingerprinted and application for DOE certification would A DOE would be required to ensure entered, on the form, information be filed on Form I–850, with the that its employees receive adequate pertaining to the individual’s passport, required fee of $370. (The fee for filing training in fingerprinting techniques alien registration card, or other an application for renewal of DOE and photo-ID verification procedures. A acceptable Service issued photo-ID; (2) certification would be $200.) The qualifying outside entity applying for that he or she is an employee of a application fee would underwrite the certification would be required to show certified DOE, giving the DOE’s name, Service’s processing and administrative that all of its personnel charged with the address, certification number (as costs incurred in the DOE certification fingerprinting responsibility have been assigned by the Service) and expiration process, such as staffing, training of trained by the Service or the FBI, are date; (3) that he or she understands the Service personnel on the DOE scheduled to receive such training prior fingerprinting requirements as certification process, adjudication of to the approval of the application, or established by this remaking and has applications, oversight or DOEs, as well can otherwise demonstrate proficiency. received adequate training to perform as providing fingerprinting training After certification, a DOE, however, his or her responsibilities, giving his or (including instructional material and would be allowed to train its new her name and ID number (as assigned by training videos) to DOEs. The proposed employees, provided that the trainer the Service); and (4) the name, fee amount is based on estimates of was initially trained by the Service or signature, and identification provided these costs and is supported by a fee the FBI. The proposed rule would by the person being fingerprinted (the analysis, which is available upon condition the grant of DOE status to the benefit applicant). The DOE’s request. Since the FBI fingerprint-check entity’s successful completion of the fingerprinters would be required to and related processing currently costs required training. Training could be execute the attestations in duplicate in the Service $23 per person, an employer arranged through local Service offices. the presence of the benefit applicants. would also be required to pay an An applicant who has been previously The original copy would be given to the additional fee of $23 for each of its trained in fingerprinting by the Service person being fingerprinted, to be filed employees submitted for the Service’s or the FBI, or who can otherwise with the Service along with the approval to take fingerprints. A fee demonstrate proficiency, could be fingerprint cards. The second copy, would not be charged for filing a request exempt from this training requirement. which may be a reproduced copy of the for adding new employees to a prior A DOE would be required to first one, would be kept on file by the approved list, but the employer would immediately notify the Service of any DOE for at least 3 months for Service have to pay the fingerprint-check fee of conviction for an aggravated felony or a inspection. The Service would provide $23 for each of the new employees. criminal offense involving dishonesty or a standardized attestation, Form I–850A, 6. Revocation false statement or of any civil penalty Attestation by Designated Outside for fraud committed by an employee Entities Certified to Take Fingerprints, DOE certification would be charged to take fingerprints. Since these to DOEs for their convenience. The automatically revoked when the DOE types of activities cast doubt on an DOEs would be allowed to use withdraws its application, or goes out of individual’s credibility as a responsible reproduced copies of Form I–850A. business prior to the expiration of the person, the Service would need to be Most of the information on the form approval. The district director may also alerted. could be preprinted, except for the revoke on notice the certification of a A DOE would be required to permit fingerprinter’s signature, the date, and DOE that is providing poor quality the Service to make periodical on-site the information pertaining to the person prints, cannot provide adequate inspection of its operations to ensure being fingerprinted. assurance as to the identity of persons compliance with required procedures. If being fingerprinted or the integrity of its a DOE was found to be in violation of 4. Application employees, or otherwise has violated the established regulations and To obtain certification as a DOE, a the fingerprinting requirements. In that procedures, and in the absence of qualifying outside entity would be case, the district director would issue a evidence of willful misconduct, it required to file an application on Form notice of intent to revoke detailing the would be given the opportunity to I–850, including the required fee, with reasons for the intended action. Within submit rebuttal evidence or request a the district director having jurisdiction 30 days of the receipt of the notice, the reinspection following corrective over the applicant’s place of business. A DOE could submit evidence of rebuttal. actions. If the DOE failed to submit DOE would also use Form I–850 to If the district director is not satisfied evidence of rebuttal or take corrective apply for renewal of its certification, to with the evidence of rebuttal or if the actions within a 30-day period, or if change its address or fee, or to seek DOE fails to respond within the 30-day unsatisfactory conditions persisted at approval for new or replacement period, the district director would notify Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Proposed Rules 25859 the DOE of the revocation, and of its the Federal Register, the Service would the applicants. Moreover, in the absence right to appeal. If the violations are phase out all uncertified fingerprinters. of a system to designate entities to take egregious, such as failure to verify the As indicated, the Service does not fingerprints, the Service often does not identity of the individuals seeking plan to implement the new know who took the fingerprints and fingerprinting, the district director fingerprinting process to a full scale lacks ready means to determine if the could issue a suspension order and until 6 months after the final rule has fingerprints are actually those of the place the DOE on immediate taken effect, but it would begin to person submitting them. suspension. If the reason for suspension implement the attestation provision of The objectives of this proposed rule is correctable, the DOE under the proposed regulation before the end are to facilitate processing of suspension could submit evidence of of the transitional period. As of 90 days applications for immigration benefits, corrective action to the district director from the date of publication of the final protect the integrity of the fingerprinting within 30 days and request a second rule in the Federal Register, the Service process, and relieve strain on Service inspection. Upon approval by the would require that all fingerprint cards resources by establishing criteria for the district director, the DOE would be submitted by benefit applicants be certification of designated outside allowed to resume fingerprinting on accompanied by an attestation on Form entities to take fingerprints. The legal probation pending the results of the I–850A by the fingerprinter. An outside basis for this rule is the authority reinspection. entity that has completed and filed an conferred upon the Attorney General application for DOE status prior to 90 and, by delegation, upon the Service by 7. Confidentiality days from the date of publication of the section 103 (a) and (b) of the Section 264(b) of the Act provides final rule in the Federal Register may, Immigration and Nationality Act to that all registration and fingerprint pending the Service’s action upon its establish such regulations as are records made under Title II are application, take fingerprints and necessary to carry out its provision. This confidential and may be made available complete the Form I–850A, indicating rule will substantially promote the only (1) to Federal, State, and local law that its application for DOE status is Service’s ability to identify and deny enforcement agencies, upon request, pending. This provisional authority will benefits to ineligible aliens, and to pursuant to section 287(f)(2) of the Act, cease if its application is denied or as promptly and effectively administer the and (2) to such persons and agencies as of 180 days from the date of publication immigration laws of the United States may be designated by the Attorney of the final rule in the Federal Register. by reducing unnecessary delays caused The information collection General. To preserve confidentiality, the by poor fingerprint cards. requirements contained in this rule have proposed regulation would prohibit a The Service believes that there are been cleared by the Office of DOE from releasing the fingerprints approximately 3,000 outside entities Management and Budget, under the taken pursuant to the provisions of 8 provisions of the Paperwork Reduction which are taking fingerprints for CFR 103.2(e), other than to the Service Act. Clearance numbers for these immigration benefit applicants. Because or to the subject or as otherwise collections will be contained in 8 CFR the entities providing fingerprinting provided in the Service’s regulations. 299.5, Display of Control Numbers. services at present are primarily small This restriction is not intended to businesses, the Service has developed preclude law enforcement agencies Regulatory Flexibility Act and reviewed this proposed rule with registered under 8 CFR 103.2(e) from The Service has examined the impact the needs and circumstances of small using the fingerprints they have of this proposed rule in light of businesses specifically in mind. The collected for immigration purposes in Executive Order 12866 and the Service is not aware of any relevant other law enforcement pursuits. Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 603, Federal rules which duplicate, overlap or conflict with this proposed rule. 8. Effective Date et seq.) and has drafted this rule in a way to minimize the impact that it has The Service has considered Upon publication of the final on small business while meeting its significant alternatives to this proposed regulation in the Federal Register, intended objectives. rule which accomplish the objectives qualifying outside entities may apply to As set forth more fully elsewhere in and which minimize any significant the district director having jurisdiction the preceding supplemental economic impact of this rule on small over the location of their businesses for information, the current fingerprinting entities, including the use of contracting certification as a DOE. During the initial process does not adequately ensure or greater use of Service facilities. The certification phase, the Service will either the quality or the integrity of Service has sought to avoid burdens on allow an overlapping period to give fingerprints submitted to the Service by outside entities beyond those outside entities sufficient time to obtain applicants for immigration benefits. requirements needed to improve the certification. To facilitate a smooth This rulemaking action is being quality of the fingerprints taken and to transition to the new fingerprinting conducted in order to address the provide assurance to the Service that the environment, the Service intends to concerns of the Justice Department’s fingerprints it receives are genuine. As implement the certification process, Office of the Inspector General (OIG) appropriate, requirements have been within a 6-month period, in two stages: and the Committee on Appropriations of drafted as performance standards, for (1) As of 120 days from the date of the United States Senate regarding the example: that the fingerprints DOEs take publication of the final rule in the current fingerprinting process. be legible and classifiable; that DOE Federal Register, the service would According to an OIG report issued in personnel charged with the require that all fingerprints submitted February 1994, 11% of the total number responsibility to take fingerprints pass by immigration benefit applicants be of fingerprint cards submitted by the an FBI criminal history records check; taken by either a Service employee, a Service to the FBI during fiscal year and that such DOE personnel be trained DOE fingerprinter, or an outside entity 1993 were rejected by the FBI as in fingerprinting or otherwise be able to who has completed and filed an unclassifiable. That is a high level of demonstrate their proficiency. application for certification with the rejection based on the quality of the The Service considered the purposes Service; and (2) As of 180 days from the fingerprints, resulting in unnecessary for certification and made the following date of publication of the final rule in burdens on the Service, the FBI , and determinations: 25860 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Proposed Rules 1. This rule must improve the quality inspection within 30 days. The Service economic impact on small entities. of fingerprints taken for immigration will only take actions against those DOEs will be able to recoup the cost of benefit applicants by providing for the DOEs which have failed to submit the fee through the fees they charge for training of persons taking fingerprints or evidence of rebuttal or take corrective their fingerprinting services. by their demonstration of proficiency in actions within the 30-day period. 7. In addition to the cost of doing so. A beneficial result of 5. There should be a three-month certification and renewals, it is improving the quality of fingerprints transitional period during which an estimated that each applicant would be will be to reduce amount of time wasted outside entity may continue to take required to expend approximately two by the applicant and by the Service in fingerprints. Entities that apply for and half hours every three years the processing and retaking of smeared certification during this three-month completing the appropriate application or otherwise unusable fingerprints. This period will be grandfathered, pending for certification or renewal of rule must also improve the integrity of the Service’s decision to grant or deny certification. The Service is not asking the fingerprint process. This is certification. This will allow the Service the applicants to provide more accomplished by the licensing of DOE’s to regain control of the fingerprinting information than what is necessary for and by the requirement that attestations process at the earliest possible date adjudicating their applications. be submitted along with the without disrupting an outside entity’s 8. The Service will give the public fingerprints. A beneficial result of ability to conduct routine business. sufficient time to comment on the improving the integrity will be to reduce After the transitional period, an outside proposal for rulemaking, especially, the number of immigration benefits entity which has applied for those small business entities that will be improperly granted. certification before the end of the affected by it. To that end, the Service Many outside entities currently taking transitional period may continue to take has set a 60-day comment period. The fingerprints do so with acceptable fingerprints until the Service acts on its Service will consider all comments standards of quality control and application, as long as it completes a received within the comment period applicant verification. The Service standard attestation, Form I–850A, for and make changes, as appropriate. believes that such entities will have no each of the immigration benefit difficulty qualifying under this rule. The applicants it fingerprints and indicates Executive Order 12866 eligibility criteria of this rule have been that its application for certification is This rule is considered by the minimized as far as possible while pending. Department of Justice, Immigration and remaining consistent with the achieving The Service has designed the Naturalization Service, to be a of Service objectives in order to allow attestation form to allow the DOEs to ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under outside entities which at present do not partially fill in the information Executive Order 12866, section 3(f), meet acceptable standards to raise their concerning the DOE, then provide Regulatory Planning and Review, and standards to acceptable levels without reproduced copies of the partially has been reviewed by the Office of undue burden. completed form for its fingerprinters to Management and Budget. As noted in 2. Training requirements should be use. The person who actually takes the the supplementary section of the rule, flexible in order to avoid unduly fingerprints would then easily be able to this action is intended to facilitate burdening DOEs. Accordingly, the complete the form with the information processing of applications for Service will exempt from the training specific to the person being immigration benefits and protect the requirement those individuals who have fingerprinted. integrity of the fingerprinting process, been previously trained by the Service 6. The Service will charge DOEs an while reviewing the strain on Service or the FBI, or who can otherwise application fee that is based on actual resources. demonstrate proficiency. Furthermore, cost. The Service is proposing to charge the Service will allow a DOE to train its $370 for an initial application and $200 Executive Order 12612 for a renewal to underwrite the new employees with an employee who The regulation will not have was initially trained by the Service or processing and administrative costs substantial direct effects on the States, the FBI. incurred in the DOE certification on the relationship between the national 3. DOEs should decide for themselves process. The proposed fee, which is what is a reasonable fee for the services supported by an estimated fee analysis, government and the States, or on the they provide. Instead of setting a is based on costs relating to staffing, distribution of power and fingerprinting fee for the DOEs, the training of Service personnel on DOE responsibilities among the various Service believes that the appropriate certification process, adjudication of levels of government. Therefore, in amount should be determined by the applications, oversight of DOEs, as well accordance with Executive Order 12612, marketplace. Therefore, the proposed as providing fingerprinting training to it is determined that this rule does not regulation would require that a DOE DOEs. In addition, due to concerns for have sufficient federalism implications make its fee known to the Service when national security, the Service is to warrant the preparation of a applying for certification. The Service proposing to require all employees of Federalism Assessment. would encourage healthy competition outside entities responsible for taking Executive Order 12606 by compiling a DOE fee list and making fingerprints to pass an FBI fingerprint- The Commissioner of the Immigration it available to the public. check. Since the fingerprint check and 4. The regulation is a mechanism for related processing currently costs the and Naturalization Service certifies that setting guidelines for quality control Service about $23 per person, an she has addressed this rule in light of and should be educational in nature. employer will also be required to pay an the criteria in Executive Order 12606 The regulation is designed to stress additional fee of $23 for each of its and has determined that it will not have training and voluntary compliance. In employees submitted for approval or any impact on family well-being. the absence of willful misconduct, the each change of employees. Although List of Subjects DOEs, found to be in violation of the this rule imposes a fee on qualified established regulations are not subject to small business entities to conduct 8 CFR Part 103 sanctions until they had been given an fingerprinting services, the fee is Administrative practice and opportunity for a rebuttal or a second minimal and will not have a significant procedure, Authority delegations Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Proposed Rules 25861 (Government agencies), Reporting and the Federal Register may, pending the establish to the Service’s satisfaction recordkeeping requirements. Service’s action upon its application, that the circumstances of the crime are take fingerprints and complete the Form such (because of the person’s youth at 8 CFR Part 299 I–850A, indicating that its application the time of the conduct, and/or the Immigration, Reporting and for DOE status is pending. This number of years that have passed since recordkeeping requirements. provisional authority for an outside then) that there can be no reasonable Accordingly, chapter I of title 8 of the entity shall cease if its application is doubt as to the person’s reliability in Code of Federal Regulations is proposed denied or as of 180 days from the date taking fingerprints in conformity with to be amended as follows: of publication of the final rule in the these rules. Federal Register, whichever occurs first. (6) Requirements. Except as provided PART 103ÐPOWERS AND DUTIES OF (4) Eligibility for DOE. An outside under paragraph (e)(9), an outside entity SERVICE OFFICERS; AVAILABILITY entity applying for DOE status may be seeking certification as a DOE must OF SERVICE RECORDS either a business, a not-for-profit agree that it will: organization, a Federal, state, or local (i) Abide by Service regulations 1. The authority citation for part 103 law enforcement facility, or an governing certification of DOEs; continues to read as follows: individual. (ii) Permit Service personnel to make Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552, 552a; 8 U.S.C. (i) An individual must establish that on-site inspections to ensure 1101, 1103, 1201, 1252 note, 1252b, 1304, he or she is a United States citizen or compliance with required procedures; 1356; 31 U.S.C. 9701; E.O. 12356, 47 FR lawful permanent resident, and has not (iii) Ensure that the personnel 14874, 15557, 3 CFR, 1982 Comp., p. 166; 8 been convicted of an aggravated felony responsible for taking fingerprints CFR part 2. or any crime involving dishonesty or received training in fingerprinting 2. In § 103.2 a new paragraph (e) is false statement or subjected to a civil procedures by the Service or FBI added to read as follows: penalty for fraud. (exceptions can be made for those who (ii) A business or a not-for-profit have previously received training from § 103.2 Applications, petitions, and other organization must establish that it is of documents. the FBI or the Service or who can no known disrepute, that the majority otherwise demonstrate proficiency); (e) Fingerprinting. Service regulations (more than 50%) of its ownership is (iv) If training in fingerprinting is in require that applicants for various types comprised of United States citizen(s) or progress or has been scheduled and will of immigration benefits submit their lawful permanent resident(s), and that be conducted prior to the approval of fingerprints with the applications. The its principal officers, directors or the application, notification of fingerprinting of these benefit partners meet the standard for completion of training must be made to applicants must be carried out pursuant individual applicants. Subsidiaries of the district director where the to the provisions contained in this foreign corporations may be exempted application was filed; paragraph (e). from the ownership requirement, (v) Use only FBI or Service-trained (1) Fingerprinting by the Service. provided that the subsidiary is employees to train its new employees Where feasible, a Service local office incorporated in the United States. on fingerprinting procedures shall provide fingerprinting service to (iii) A Federal, state or local law (exceptions can be made for those who applicants for immigration benefits. The enforcement facility may register as a have previously received training from district director shall assess available designated outside entity but does not the FBI or the Service) to conduct resources in his or her district office to need to comply with the requirements periodic refresher training as needed; determine whether the district office in this paragraph regarding operating (vi) Make every reasonable effort to can provide such service. licenses, identification and training of take legible and classifiable fingerprints, (2) Certification of designated outside employees or application fees. using only black ink; entities. Where the district director (5) Criminal history records check. (vii) Retake the applicants’ prints free determines that the district office does (i) An identification and criminal of charge if the DOE initially fails to not have the resources to provide history record check is required for each take legible and classifiable prints; fingerprinting services, the district person listed on the application for DOE (viii) Use only fingerprint cards director may certify one or multiple certification. The district director shall (Forms FD–258 or other Service outside entities as a designated outside designate Service personnel of the specified forms) that were provided by entity (DOE) to provide the service. district office to obtain and transmit the Service for all fingerprints taken for Where a district office does not have the fingerprints to the Federal Bureau of immigration purposes; resources to fingerprint all applicants, Investigation (FBI) for such checks. If a (ix) Ensure that the fingerprint cards the district director may certify outside DOE needs to add new or replacement are correctly completed using FBI entities to take fingerprints to employees to the personnel approved by prescribed identity codes; supplement the district’s efforts. the Service, it must file a new (x) Ensure that the fingerprint cards (3) Transition to use designated application, with the required fee for the are signed by the applicants in their outside entities. As of 180 days from the FBI fingerprint check, with the district presence, and by the fingerprinter; date of publication of the final rule in director having jurisdiction over the (xi) Verify the identification of the the Federal Register, the Service will DOE’s place of business. The Service person being fingerprinted by not accept fingerprint cards for will accept fingerprints from an comparing the information on the immigration benefits unless they are applicant for DOE-certification only if fingerprint card, Form FD–258, or other taken by: the fingerprints were taken by Service specified forms with the (i) Designated Service employees; designated Service personnel. applicant’s passport, alien registration (ii) A DOE accompanied by a (ii) An employee who has been card, or other acceptable Service issued completed attestation, Form I–850A; or convicted of an aggravated felony or a photo-ID; (iii) An outside entity that has crime involving dishonesty or false (xii) Complete an attestation on Form completed and filed an application for statement, or subjected to a civil penalty I–850A and provide it to the person DOE status prior to 90 days from the for fraud, may not be assigned to take being fingerprinted along with the date of publication of the final rule in fingerprints, unless the DOE can fingerprint cards; 25862 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Proposed Rules (xiii) Note on the fingerprint card, 850, Application for Certification as a collected for immigration purposes in Form FD–258, or other Service specified Designated Outside Entity to Take other law enforcement efforts. forms that it has been certified by INS Fingerprints, to the director having (11) Approval of application. The as a DOE, giving its DOE certification jurisdiction over the applicant’s place of district director shall consider all number (including the fingerprinter’s ID business. The application must include supporting documents submitted and number), expiration date, name, and the following: may request additional documentation address; (i) The required fee; as he or she may deem necessary. When (xiv) Charge no more than a (ii) A copy of all business licenses or the application has been approved, the reasonable fee, if a fee is charged, and permits required for its operations; district director shall assign a make that amount known to the Service; (iii) The names and signatures of certification to the DOE and individual (xv) Immediately notify the director personnel who will take fingerprints of ID numbers to its approved fingerprints. having jurisdiction over the applicant’s applicants for immigration benefits; The approval will be valid for a period place of business of any changes in (iv) A set of fingerprints taken by a of 3 years and may be renewed in personnel responsible for taking Service employee on Form FD–258 for accordance with paragraph (e)(13) of fingerprints; each employee whose name appears on this section. The district director shall (xvi) Request approval for any new the application form pursuant to notify the applicant of the approval and personnel to take fingerprints according paragraph (e)(4) of this section, and the include in the notice of approval the to the procedures set forth in paragraphs required fee (for each employee) for the following items: (e) (4), (5), (6), (8), and (9) of this FBI criminal history record check; (i) Instructions on how to prepare section; (v) A statement on Form I–850 Applicant Fingerprint Cards, Form FD– (xvii) Notify the Service of any indicating the fee, if any, it will charge 258; conviction for a crime involving for the fingerprinting service; and (ii) A listing of acceptable Service dishonesty or false statement or civil (vi) A signed statement on Form I–850 issued photo-IDs; and penalty for fraud subsequent to the attesting that it will abide by the Service (iii) A statement detailing the DOE’s DOE’s certification of an employee regulation governing fingerprinting and responsibilities and rights, including the authorized to take fingerprints; and the certification of DOEs. renewal and revocation procedures as (xviii) Maintain clean and suitable (9) Registration of police stations or provided by paragraph (e) of this facilities that are accessible to the military police facilities. section. general public. (i) Federal, state, or local police (12) Denial of the application. The (7) Attestation. stations or military police facilities may applicant shall be notified of the denial (i) To ensure the integrity of the individually register to take fingerprints of an application, the reasons for the fingerprint cards submitted by of applicants for immigration benefits denial, and the right to appeal under 8 applicants for benefits, all DOE by filing a Form I–850, Application for CFR part 103. fingerprinters must fill out an attestation Certification as Designated Outside (13) Renewal. on Form I–850A each time they take Entity to Take Fingerprints, completing (i) Subject to paragraph (e)(13)(ii) of fingerprints for an immigration benefit only the relevant parts of the form. No this section, a DOE may apply for applicant. Such attestation must be fee or fingerprint cards need to be renewal of its certification at least signed and dated by the fingerprinter submitted for their personnel charged ninety (90) days prior to the expiration and show: with the fingerprinting responsibility; date to prevent interruption in its ability (A) The fingerprinter’s name and ID nor are these personnel required to have to provide fingerprinting services. An number (as assigned by the Service) and additional training in fingerprinting application for renewal must be made a statement that the requirements of techniques and procedures. on Form I–850 with the required fee and § 103.2(e) have been met; Furthermore, law enforcement agencies documentation as continued in (B) The name, address, certification registered to take fingerprints under this paragraph (e)(8) of this section. In number (as assigned by the Service) and paragraph are not subject to on-site considering an application for renewal, expiration date of the certified DOE; inspections by the Service. The Service the Service will give particular weight (C) That he or she has checked the will communicate with these agencies to the volume and nature of complaints identity of the person he or she through regular liaison channels at the or issues that have been raised in the fingerprinted and has listed the local level. past with respect to the DOE, by the identification number from the (ii) A police department may request Service, the FBI, or the public, or the individual’s passport, alien registration registration on behalf of all of its absence of such complaints or issues. card, or other acceptable Service issued subordinate stations on a single Each renewal shall be valid for 3 years. photo-ID; and application by listing their precinct Failure to apply for renewal will result (D) That it is signed and dated by the numbers and addresses. Once in the expiration of the outside entity’s benefit applicant. registered, the Service will include the DOE status. (ii) DOE fingerprinters must execute individual police stations and military (ii) The Service will certify and renew the attestations in duplicate in the police facilities on the DOE listings and DOEs as long as the need for their presence of the applicant. The original make available to them the Service’s service exists. Following the copy must be given to the applicant to fingerprinting regulations and development of an automated be filed with the Service with his or her instructions. fingerprint information system, the fingerprint card, and the second copy, (10) Confidentiality. A DOE is Service will determine if there is a which may be a reproduced copy of the prohibited from releasing fingerprints continued need for the DOEs’ services, first one, must be kept on file at the DOE taken pursuant to certification, other and if so, whether they should switch to for at least three months for Service than to the Service or to the applicant newer technologies, such as acquiring inspection. or as otherwise provided in the compatible automated fingerprinting (8) Application. An outside entity Service’s regulations. Law enforcement equipment. In either event, the Service seeking certification as a DOE, or a DOE agencies enumerated under paragraph shall issue a public notification or make seeking approval for personnel change, (e)(9) of this section are not precluded a new rule, as appropriate. Nothing in must submit an application on Form I– from using the fingerprints they have this paragraph shall preclude the Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Proposed Rules 25863 Service from discontinuing the DOE (D) The district director shall consider Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1101, 1103; 8 CFR part certification program after the initial all timely submitted evidence and 2. three years. decide whether to revoke the DOE’s (14) Revocation of certification. The approval. 5. Section 299.1 is amended by district director shall revoke an (iii) If the Service’s investigation adding to the listing of forms, in approval of application for DOE status uncovers evidence of material numerical sequence, the entry for Forms under the following circumstances: misconduct, the Service may, in ‘‘I–850 and I–850A’’ to read as follows: (i) Automatic revocation. The addition to revocation, refer the matter § 299.1 Prescribed forms. approval of any application is for action pursuant to section 274C of * * * * * automatically revoked if the DOE: the Act (civil document fraud), 18 (A) Goes out of business prior to the U.S.C. 1001 (false statement), or other Edition expiration of the approval; or appropriate enforcement action. Form No. Title (B) Files a written withdrawal of the date (15) Appeal of revocation of approval. application. (ii) Revocation on notice. The Service The revocation of approval may be ***** shall revoke on notice the certification appealed to the Associate Commissioner I±850 ...... XXXXX ... Application for Certifi- of a DOE which has violated the for Examinations under 8 CFR part 103. cation as Des- regulations governing the fingerprinting There is no appeal from an automatic ignated Outside process as established in paragraph (e) revocation. Entity to Take Fin- gerprints. of this section. (16) List of DOEs. Each district office (A) If the district director finds a DOE shall make available a list of the DOEs I±850A ... XXXXX ... Attestation by Des- ignated Outside fails to meet the required standards, he it has certified to take fingerprints. Such list shall contain the name, address, Entities Certified to or she will issue a notice of intent to Take Fingerprints. revoke detailing reasons for the telephone number, if available, and the fee of each DOE certified in the district. intended revocation. Within 30 days of * * * * * the receipt of the notice, the DOE may (17) Change of address or in fee. A submit evidence of rebuttal or request DOE shall promptly report to the 6. Section 299.5 is amended by an inspection following corrective Service, on Form I–850, any change of adding to the listing of forms, in proper actions. The district director shall address or in the fee it is charging. The numerical sequence, the entry for Forms cancel the notice of intent to revoke if district office shall update the list of ‘‘I–850 and I–850A’’ to read as follows: DOEs and their fees upon receipt of the he or she is satisfied with the evidence § 299.5 Display of control numbers. presented by the DOE or the results of notice of changes. a reinspection. 3. In § 103.7, paragraph (b)(1) is * * * * * (B) For egregious violations, such as amended by adding to the listing of failure to verify the identity of the forms, in numerical sequence, the entry Currently INS form INS form title assigned persons seeking fingerprinting, the for ‘‘Form I–850’’ to read as follows: No. OMB district director may, in his or her discretion, issue a suspension order and § 103.7 Fees. place the DOE on immediate * * * * * ***** (b) * * * I±850 ...... Application for Cer- 1115±0166 suspension. The DOE under suspension tification as Des- may submit a plan for corrective action (1) * * * ignated Outside to the district director within 30 days * * * * * Entity to Take and request a reinspection. If the district Form I–850. For filing application for Fingerprints. director approves the plan, he or she certification as designated outside I±850A ... Attestation by Des- 1115±0194 shall permit the DOE to resume entity—$370 plus $23 for each ignated Outside fingerprinting on probation pending the fingerprint check for initial certification; Entities Certified results of the reinspection. The district $200 for renewal of certification; and to Take Finger- prints. director shall cancel the suspension $23 for each fingerprint check for order if he or she finds the results of a adding or replacing employees. No fee reinspection satisfactory. will be charged to police stations or * * * * * (C) If the DOE fails to submit evidence military police facilities registering Dated: March 24, 1995. of rebuttal or corrective actions within pursuant to § 103.2(e)(9). Doris Meissner, the 30-day period, or if unsatisfactory * * * * * Commissioner, Immigration and conditions persist at the second Naturalization Service. inspection, the district director shall PART 299ÐIMMIGRATION FORMS notify the DOE of the revocation Note: Appendix A and B will not appear decision, detailing the reasons, and of 4. The authority citation for part 299 in the Code of Federal Regulation. its rights to appeal. continues to read as follows: BILLING CODE 4410±10±M 25864 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Proposed Rules Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Proposed Rules 25865 25866 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Proposed Rules Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Proposed Rules 25867 25868 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Proposed Rules [FR Doc. 95–11733 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410±10±C Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Proposed Rules 25869 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE significant amount of meat and poultry The actions specified by the proposed products to consumers. AD are intended to prevent total loss of Food Safety and Inspection Service engine power, inflight engine shutdown, Agenda for the Briefing and possible damage to the aircraft. 9 CFR Parts 308, 310, 318, 320, 325, The day will consist of two sessions. DATES: Comments must be received by 326, 327 and 381 The first session will run from 1:00 p.m. July 14, 1995. [Docket No. 95±023N] to 4:00 p.m., and will consist of a ADDRESSES: Submit comments in briefing by Agency officials and a triplicate to the Federal Aviation Pathogen Reduction; Hazard Analysis question and answer period. Attendees Administration (FAA), New England and Critical Control Point (HACCP) will have an opportunity to submit Region, Office of the Assistant Chief Systems: Notice of Briefing and Public written questions about the proposal. Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket No. Meeting Questions will be answered by a panel 93–ANE–64, 12 New England Executive of FSIS subject matter experts, who will AGENCY: Food Safety and Inspection Park, Burlington, MA 01803–5299. be conducting the briefing. Service, USDA. Comments may be inspected at this The second session will run from 5:00 ACTION: Notice of public meeting. location between 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., p.m. to 8:00 p.m., and will begin with Monday through Friday, except Federal SUMMARY: The Food Safety and presentations by State agriculture and holidays. Inspection Service (FSIS) is holding an inspection officials. After these The service information referenced in information briefing and public meeting presentations, FSIS will accept oral the proposed rule may be obtained from for owners and representatives of small comments on the proposal from AlliedSignal Engines, 550 Main Street, meat and poultry establishments and attendees. Oral comments will be Stratford, CT 06497. This information other affected small businesses to limited to 5 minutes per commenter. may be examined at the FAA, New discuss its February 3, 1995, food safety Mr. Thomas Billy, Associate England Region, Office of the Assistant proposal. Administrator, FSIS, will be joined by a Chief Counsel, 12 New England DATES: May 22, 1995; 1:00 p.m. to 8:00 panel consisting of: Richard Carnevale, Executive Park, Burlington, MA. p.m. William James, Patricia Stolfa, and FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Edward McEvoy, all of FSIS. ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Eugene Triozzi, Aerospace Engineer, Transcripts of the second session will the Best Western Inn Conference Center, Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine be available for review in the FSIS 501 Southwest Boulevard, Kansas City, and Propeller Directorate, 12 New Docket Clerk’s office, Room 4352, South Kansas. England Executive Park, Burlington, MA Agriculture Building, FSIS, USDA, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 01803–5299; telephone (617) 238–7148, Ron Washington, DC, 20250. Niemeyer, Planning Coordination and fax (617) 238–7199. Done at Washington, DC, on: May 10, 1995. Analysis Unit, Planning Office, Policy, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Evaluation and Planning Staff, Food Michael R. Taylor, Safety and Inspection Service, USDA, Acting Under Secretary for Food Safety. Comments Invited (202) 501–7136. [FR Doc. 95–11994 Filed 5–11–95; 12:40 pm] Interested persons are invited to BILLING CODE 3410±DM±P participate in the making of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: proposed rule by submitting such On February 3, 1995, FSIS published written data, views, or arguments as a proposed rule ‘‘Pathogen Reduction; DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION they may desire. Communications Hazard Analysis and Critical Control should identify the Rules Docket Point (HACCP) Systems’’ (60 FR 6774). Federal Aviation Administration number and be submitted in triplicate to In that document, the Agency proposed the address specified above. All a number of regulatory changes 14 CFR Part 39 communications received on or before applicable to Federal- and State- the closing date for comments, specified [Docket No. 93±ANE±64] inspected meat and poultry above, will be considered before taking establishments. The proposed changes Airworthiness Directives; AlliedSignal action on the proposed rule. The are designed to reduce the occurrence Engines (Formerly Textron Lycoming) proposals contained in this notice may and numbers of pathogenic LTS 101 Series Turboshaft and LTP be changed in light of the comments microorganisms in meat and poultry 101 Series Turboprop Engines received. products as well as control other Comments are specifically invited on hazards, thereby reducing the incidence AGENCY: Federal Aviation the overall regulatory, economic, of foodborne illness associated with the Administration, DOT. environmental, and energy aspects of consumption of these products. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking the proposed rule. All comments On February 27, 1995, FSIS (NPRM). submitted will be available, both before announced a series of outreach activities and after the closing date for comments, to assist the public in understanding the SUMMARY: This document proposes the in the Rules Docket for examination by proposed rule and in providing adoption of a new airworthiness interested persons. A report comments on the proposed rule. As part directive (AD) that is applicable to summarizing each FAA-public contact of this effort, FSIS hereby announces its AlliedSignal Engines (formerly Textron concerned with the substance of this intent to hold an information briefing Lycoming) LTS 101 series turboshaft proposal will be filed in the Rules and forum for oral comment about the and LTP 101 series turboprop engines. Docket. food safety proposal for owners and This proposal would require removal Commenters wishing the FAA to representatives of small meat and from service of suspect disks for a one- acknowledge receipt of their comments poultry establishments and other time inspection of the disk tenon area of submitted in response to this notice affected small businesses. FSIS desires the gas generator turbine disk. This must submit a self-addressed, stamped to work closely with small proposal is prompted by a report of a postcard on which the following establishments because they provide a gas generator turbine disk tenon failure. statement is made: ‘‘Comments to 25870 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Proposed Rules Docket Number 93–ANE–64.’’ The between the national government and requirements of this AD is affected, the postcard will be date-stamped and the States, or on the distribution of owner/operator must use the authority returned to the commenter. power and responsibilities among the provided in paragraph (b) to request approval various levels of government. Therefore, from the FAA. This approval may address Availability of NPRMs in accordance with Executive Order either no action, if the current configuration Any person may obtain a copy of this eliminates the unsafe condition, or different 12612, it is determined that this actions necessary to address the unsafe NPRM by submitting a request to the proposal would not have sufficient FAA, New England Region, Office of the condition described in this AD. Such a federalism implications to warrant the request should include an assessment of the Assistant Chief Counsel, Attention: preparation of a Federalism Assessment. effect of the changed configuration on the Rules Docket No. 93–ANE–64, 12 New For the reasons discussed above, I unsafe condition addressed by this AD. In no England Executive Park, Burlington, MA certify that this proposed regulation (1) case does the presence of any modification, 01803–5299. is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ alteration, or repair remove any engine from Discussion under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not the applicability of this AD. a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the DOT Compliance: Required as indicated, unless The Federal Aviation Administration Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 accomplished previously. (FAA) has received a report of a gas FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) if To prevent total loss of engine power, generator turbine disk tenon failure on promulgated, will not have a significant inflight engine shutdown, and possible an AlliedSignal Engines (formerly economic impact, positive or negative, damage to the aircraft, accomplish the Textron Lycoming) LTS 101 turboshaft on a substantial number of small entities following: engine. The FAA investigation revealed (a) Remove from service suspect disks and under the criteria of the Regulatory perform a one-time inspection of the disk that the disk had sharp-edged grooves in Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft the disk blade slots created in the tenon area of the gas generator turbine disk, regulatory evaluation prepared for this and replace, if necessary, with a serviceable broaching operations that occurred action is contained in the Rules Docket. during manufacturing. These grooves part, in accordance with Textron Lycoming A copy of it may be obtained by Service Bulletin (SB) No. LT 101–72–50– significantly reduce the cyclic life of contacting the Rules Docket at the 0150, dated September 1, 1993, as follows: disk tenons. This condition, if not location provided under the caption (1) For disks with greater than 5,000 cycles corrected, could result in total loss of ADDRESSES. since new (CSN) on the effective date of this engine power, inflight engine shutdown, AD, remove within 235 cycles in service and possible damage to the aircraft. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 (CIS). On October 28, 1994, AlliedSignal, Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation (2) For disks with 4,501 to 5,000 CSN on Inc. purchased the turbine engine safety, Safety. the effective date of this AD, remove within product line of Textron Lycoming. 285 CIS. The FAA has reviewed and approved The Proposed Amendment (3) For disks with 4,001 to 4,500 CSN on the technical contents of Textron the effective date of this AD, remove within Accordingly, pursuant to the 350 CIS. Lycoming Service Bulletin (SB) No. LT authority delegated to me by the 101–72–50–0150, dated September 1, (4) For disks with 3,501 to 4,000 CSN on Administrator, the Federal Aviation the effective date of this AD, remove within 1993, that describes procedures for Administration proposes to amend part 450 CIS. removal from service of suspect disks 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (5) For disks with 3,001 to 3,500 CSN on for a one-time inspection of the disk (14 CFR part 39) as follows: the effective date of this AD, remove within tenon area of the gas generator turbine 600 CIS. disk. PART 39ÐAIRWORTHINESS (6) For disks with 2,501 to 3,000 CSN on Since an unsafe condition has been DIRECTIVES the effective date of this AD, remove within identified that is likely to exist or 800 CIS, or prior to accumulating 3,400 CSN, develop on other products of this same 1. The authority citation for part 39 whichever occurs later. type design, the proposed AD would continues to read as follows: (7) For disks with 2,001 to 2,500 CSN on the effective date of this AD, remove within require removal from service of suspect Authority: 49 U.S.C. App. 1354(a), 1421 1,100 CIS, or prior to accumulating 3,400 disks for a one-time inspection of the and 1423; 49 U.S.C. 106(g); and 14 CFR CSN, whichever occurs later. 11.89. disk tenon area of the gas generator (8) For disks with less than 2,000 CSN on turbine disk. The actions would be § 39.13 [Amended] the effective date of this AD, remove prior to required to be accomplished in accumulating 3,400 CSN. accordance with the service bulletin 2. Section 39.13 is amended by (b) An alternative method of compliance or described previously. adding the following new airworthiness adjustment of the compliance time that The FAA estimates that 618 engines directive: provides an acceptable level of safety may be installed on aircraft of U.S. registry AlliedSignal Engines: Docket No. 93–ANE– used if approved by the Manager, Engine would be affected by this proposed AD, 64. Certification Office. The request should be that it would take approximately 6.5 Applicability: AlliedSignal Engines forwarded through an appropriate FAA work hours per engine to accomplish (formerly Textron Lycoming) LTS 101 series Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may the proposed actions, and that the turboshaft and LTP 101 series turboprop add comments and then send it to the Manager, Engine Certification Office. average labor rate is $60 per work hour. engines installed on but not limited to AlliedSignal Engines has advised that Aerospatiale AS 350 and SA366G, Bell 222, Note: Information concerning the existence they will supply disks or rotors on an and Messerschmitt-Bolkow-Blohm (MBB) of approved alternative methods of BK117 helicopters; and Piaggio P166–DL3 compliance with this airworthiness directive, exchange basis at no cost to the and Airtractor AT302 airplanes. if any, may be obtained from the Engine operator. Based on these figures, the Note: This AD applies to each engine Certification Office. total cost impact of the proposed AD on identified in the preceding applicability (c) Special flight permits may be issued in U.S. operators is estimated to be provision, regardless of whether it has been accordance with sections 21.197 and 21.199 $229,896. modified, altered, or repaired in the area of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR The regulations proposed herein subject to the requirements of this AD. For 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the aircraft to would not have substantial direct effects engines that have been modified, altered, or a location where the requirements of this AD on the States, on the relationship repaired so that the performance of the can be accomplished. Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Proposed Rules 25871 Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on and energy-related aspects of the listed in this document would be May 1, 1995. proposal. Communications should published subsequently in the Order. James C. Jones, identify the airspace docket number and The FAA has determined that this Acting Manager, Engine and Propeller be submitted in triplicate to the address proposed regulation only involves an Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. listed above. Commenters wishing the established body of technical [FR Doc. 95–11903 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] FAA to acknowledge receipt of their regulations for which frequent and BILLING CODE 4910±13±P comments on this notice must submit routine amendments are necessary to with those comments a self-addressed, stamped postcard on which the keep them operationally current. 14 CFR Part 71 following statement is made: Therefore, this proposed regulation—(1) is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ [Airspace Docket No. 95±ACE±01] ‘‘Comments to Airspace Docket No. 95– ACE–01’’ The postcard will be date/time under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not Proposed Amendment to Class E stamped and returned to the a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT Airspace, Nebraska City, NE. commenter. All communications Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 received on or before the closing date FR 11034; February 16, 1979); and (3) AGENCY: Federal Aviation for comments will be considered before does not warrant preparation of a Administration (FAA), DOT. taking action on the proposed rule. The Regulatory Evaluation as the anticipated ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. proposal contained in this notice may impact is so minimal. Since this is a be changed in light of comments routine matter that will only affect air SUMMARY: This notice proposes to received. All comments submitted will traffic procedures and air navigation, it amend the Class E airspace area at be available for examination in the is certified that this proposed rule will Nebraska City, NE. The intended effect Rules Docket both before and after the not have a significant economic impact of this proposal is to provide additional closing date for comments. A report on a substantial number of small entities controlled airspace for aircraft executing summarizing each substantive public the new Nondirectional Radio Beacon under the criteria of the Regulatory contact with FAA personnel concerned Flexibility Act. (NDB) Standard Instrument Approach with this rulemaking will be filed in the Procedures (SIAP) at Nebraska City docket. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 Municipal Airport. This action will change the airport status from VFR to Availability of NPRMs Airspace, Incorporation by reference, IFR. Navigation (air). Any person may obtain a copy of this DATES: Comments must be received on Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) The Proposed Amendment or before June 23, 1995. by submitting a request to the Federal ADDRESSES: Send comments on the Aviation Administration, Office of Accordingly, pursuant to the proposal in triplicate to: Manager, Air Public Affairs, Attention: Public Inquiry authority delegated to me, the Federal Traffic Operations Branch, ACE–530, Center, APA–230, 800 Independence Aviation Administration proposes to Federal Aviation Administration, Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591, or amend part 71 of the Federal Aviation Docket No. 95–ACE–01, 601 East 12th by calling (202) 267–3484. Regulations (14 CFR part 71) as follows: Street, Kansas City, MO 64106. Communications must identify the The official docket may be examined notice number of this NPRM. Persons PART 71Ð[AMENDED] in the Office of the Assistant Chief interested in being placed on a mailing Counsel for the Central Region at the list for future NPRMs should also 1. The authority citation for part 71 same address between 9:00 a.m. and request a copy of Advisory Circular No. continues to read as follows: 3:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, 11–2A, which describes the procedures. Authority: 49 U.S.C. app. 1348(a), 1354(a), except Federal holidays. The Proposal 1510; E.O. 10854; 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– An informal docket may also be 1963 Comp., p. 389; 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 14 CFR examined during normal business hours The FAA is considering an 11.69. in the office of the Manager, Air Traffic amendment to part 71 of the Federal Operations Branch, Air Traffic Division, Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 71) to § 71.1 [Amended] at the address listed above. provide additional controlled airspace 2. The incorporation by reference in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: for Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) 14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation Brenda Doney, ACE–530A, 601 East procedures at the Nebraska City Administration Order 7400.9B, Airspace 12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri Municipal Airport. The additional Designations and Reporting Points, 64106; telephone number: (816) 426– airspace would segregate aircraft 3409. dated July 18, 1994, and effective operating under VFR conditions from September 16, 1994, is amended as SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: aircraft operating under IFR procedures. follows: The area would be depicted on Comments Invited appropriate aeronautical charts thereby Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas Interested parties are invited to enabling pilots to circumnavigate the extending from 700 feet or more above participate in this proposed rulemaking area or otherwise comply with IFR the surface of the earth. by submitting such written data, views, procedures. Class E airspace * * * * * or arguments as they may desire, event designations for airspace areas ACE NE E5 Nebraska City, NE. [New] that provides the factual basis extending upward from 700 feet or more Nebraska City Municipal Airport, NE. supporting the views and suggestions above the surface of the earth are (Lat. 40°36′31′′ N, long 95°52′09′′ W) presented are particularly helpful in published in paragraph 6005 of FAA That airspace extending upward from 700 developing reasoned regulatory Order 7400.9B, dated July 18, 1994, and feet above the surface within a 7-mile radius decisions on the proposal. Comments effective September 16, 1994, which is of the Nebraska City Municipal Airport. are specifically invited on the overall incorporated by reference in 14 CFR * * * * * regulatory, economic, environmental, 71.1. The Class E airspace designation 25872 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Proposed Rules Issued in Kansas City, MO, on April 21, nonprofit manufacturing extension training, tools and techniques, and 1995. centers. The purpose of this rule is to information infrastructure. MEP Herman J. Lyons, Jr., provide for the development of assumes a broad definition of Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division Central infrastructure capability to effectively manufacturing, and recognizes a wide Region. support the national manufacturing range of technology and concepts, [FR Doc. 95–11892 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] extension system and to codify the including durable goods production; BILLING CODE 4910±13±M process by which NIST will solicit and chemical, biotechnology, and other select applications for financial materials processing; electronic assistance, typically for cooperative component and system fabrication; and DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE agreements, on projects which have the engineering services associated with benefit of enhancing the ability of the manufacturing, as lying within the National Institute of Standards and extension system to promote the definition of manufacturing. Technology competitiveness of smaller U.S. manufacturers. Proposals from qualified Classification 15 CFR Part 292 organizations will periodically be This notice relating to public [Docket No. 950330085±5085±01] solicited for projects which accomplish any one of the following objectives: property, loans, grants, benefits, or contracts is exempt from all Manufacturing Extension Partnership; Development and Deployment of Training: Infrastructure Development Projects To support the delivery of effective technical requirements of section 553 of the assistance to smaller manufacturers by Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. AGENCY: National Institute of Standards trained service delivery personnel at the 553(a)(2)) including notice and and Technology, Commerce. manufacturing extension centers. Specific opportunity for comment. Therefore, a ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. categories of training and mechanisms of Regulatory Flexibility Analysis is not deployment may be specified in solicitations. required and was not prepared for this SUMMARY: The purpose of the proposed Development of Technical Assistance rule would be to provide for the Tools, Practices, Techniques, and Analyses: notice for purposes of the Regulatory introduction of effective training, tools, To support the initial development, Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 603 and 604). practices, techniques and analyses, and implementation, and analysis of tools, The program is not a major Federal techniques, or practices which will aid information systems into the national action requiring an environmental manufacturing extension organizations in assessment under the National manufacturing extension system and to providing effective services to smaller codify the process by which NIST will manufacturers. Specific categories of tools, Environmental Policy Act. This notice solicit and select applications for techniques, practices, or types of analysis does not contain policies with cooperative agreements and financial may be specified in solicitations. Federalism implications sufficient to assistance on projects for providing Information Infrastructure: To support and warrant preparation of a Federalism improved training, tools, practices, act as a catalyst for the development and assessment under Executive Order implementation of information infrastructure techniques and analyses, and services and pilots which will aid 12612. This notice contains collection of information systems to the national manufacturing extension organizations and information requirements subject to the manufacturing extension system. The smaller manufacturers in accessing the Paperwork Reduction Act which have intended effect is to increase the technical information they need or will been approved by the Office of effectiveness of the extension system by accelerate the rate of adoption of electronic Management and Budget (OMB Control providing improved infrastructure commerce. Specific industry sectors or Numbers 0693–0010, 0348–0043 and capability to promote the subcategories of information infrastructure projects may be specified in solicitations. 0348–0044). Public reporting burden for competitiveness of smaller U.S. this collection of information is In general, eligible applicants for manufacturers. estimated to average 40 hours per these projects include all for profit and DATES: Comments on the proposed response, including the time for nonprofit organizations including program must be received no later than reviewing instructions, searching June 14, 1995. private companies, universities, community colleges, state governments, existing data sources, gathering the data ADDRESSES: Comments on the proposed state technology programs, and needed, and completing and reviewing program must be submitted in writing independent nonprofit organizations. the collection of information. Send to: MEP Infrastructure Development However, specific limitations on comments regarding this burden Projects Rule Comments, Attention eligibility may be specified in estimate or any other aspect of this Kathryn Leedy, National Institute of solicitations. collection of information, including Standards and Technology, Building Announcements of solicitations will suggestions for reducing this burden, to 301 Room C121, Gaithersburg, MD be made in the Commerce Business the address shown above; and to the 20899–0001. Daily. Office of Information and Regulatory FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: In accordance with the provisions of Affairs, Office of Management and Kathryn Leedy, The Manufacturing the National Institute of Standards and Budget, Washington, DC 20503. Extension Partnership Infrastructure Technology Act (15 U.S.C. 272(b)(1) and It has been determined that this rule Development Projects Manager, 301– (c)(3) and 2781), as amended, NIST will is not significant for purposes of EO 975–5020. provide assistance to the national 12866. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The manufacturing extension system. Under purpose of the National Institute of the NIST Manufacturing Extension List of Subjects in 15 CFR Part 292 Standards and Technology Partnership (MEP), NIST will Manufacturing Extension Partnership is periodically make merit-based awards to Grant programs—science and to promote the competitiveness of develop and deploy infrastructure technology, Reporting and smaller U.S. manufacturers. This is improvements into extension centers recordkeeping requirements, Science done primarily through technical and to other organizations for the and technology, Technical assistance. assistance provided by a network of development and deployment of Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Proposed Rules 25873 Dated: May 5, 1995. an application under this program must (v) A statement of worth that Samuel Kramer, not exceed the indirect cost rate discusses the specific tasks to be carried Associate Director. negotiated and approved by a cognizant out, including a schedule of measurable For the reasons set out in the Federal agency prior to the proposed events and milestones. preamble, it is proposed that 15 CFR effective date of the award or 100 (vi) A completed Standard Form 424, part 292 be added to read as follows: percent of the total proposed direct 424A, and 424B (Rev 4–92) prescribed costs dollar amount in the application, by the applicable OMB circular, PART 292ÐMANUFACTURING whichever is less. Standard Form LLL, and Form CD–511, EXTENSION PARTNERSHIP; (e) Proposal format. The proposal Certification Regarding Debarment, INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT must contain both technical and cost Suspension and Other Responsibility PROJECTS information. The proposal page count Matters; Drug-Free Workplace shall include every page, including Requirements and Lobbying. SF–424, Sec. pages that contain words, table of 424A, 424B (Rev 4–92), SF LLL, and 292.1 Program description. Form CD–511 will not be considered 292.2 Training development and contents, executive summary, deployment projects. management information and part of the page count of the proposal. 292.3 Technical tools, techniques, qualifications, resumes, figures, tables, (2) The application requirements and practices, and analyses projects. and pictures. All proposals shall be the standard form requirements have 292.4 Information infrastructure projects. printed such that pages are single-sided, been approved by OMB (OMB Control 292.5 Proposal selection process. with no more than fifty-five (55) lines Number 0693–0010, 0348–0043 and 292.6 Additional requirements. per page. Use 21.6 x 27.9 cm (81⁄2′′ x 0348–0044). Authority: 15 U.S.C. 272 (b)(1) and (c)(3) 11′′) paper or A4 metric paper. Use an (g) Applicable federal and and 2781. easy-to-read font of not more than about departmental guidance. The Administrative Requirements, Cost § 292.1 Program description. 5 characters per cm (fixed pitch font of 12 or fewer characters per inch or Principles, and Audits are dependent (a) Purpose. In accordance with the upon type of Recipient organization as provisions of the National Institute of proportional font of point size 10 or larger). Smaller type may be used in follows: Standards and Technology Act (15 (1) Nonprofit organizations. (i) OMB U.S.C. 272 (b)(1) and (c)(3) and 2781), as figures and tables, but must be clearly legible. Margins on all sides (top, Circular A–110—Uniform amended, NIST will provide financial Administrative Requirements for Grants assistance to develop the infrastructure bottom, left and right) must be at least 2.5 cm. (1′′). Length limitations for and Agreements with Institutions of of the national manufacturing extension Higher Education, Hospitals, and Other system. Under the NIST Manufacturing proposals will be specified in solicitations. The applicant may submit Nonprofit Organizations. Extension Partnership (MEP), NIST will (ii) OMB Circular A–122—Cost periodically make merit-based awards to a separately bound document of appendices, containing letters of Principles for Nonprofit Organizations. develop and deploy training capability (iii) 15 CFR Part 29b—Audit support for the proposal. The proposal and technical tools, techniques, Requirements for Institutions of Higher should be self-contained and not rely on practices, and analyses. In addition, Education and Other Nonprofit the appendices for meeting criteria. NIST will develop and implement Organizations (implements OMB Excess pages in the proposal will not be information infrastructure services and Circular A–133—Audits for Institutions considered in the evaluation. pilots. MEP assumes a broad definition of Higher Education and Other Applicants must submit one signed of manufacturing, and recognizes a wide Nonprofit Organizations). original plus six copies of the proposal range of technology and concepts, (2) State/local governments. (i) 15 and Standard Form 424, 424A, and including durable goods production; CFR Part 24—Uniform Administrative 424B (Rev 4/92), Standard Form LLL, chemical, biotechnology, and other Requirements for Grants and and Form CD–511. Applicants for whom materials processing; electronic Cooperative Agreements to State and the submission of six copies presents component and system fabrication; and Local Governments. engineering services associated with financial hardship may submit one (ii) OMB CIrcular A–87—Cost manufacturing, as lying within the original and two copies of the Principles for State and Local definition of manufacturing. application. Governments. (b) Announcements of solicitations. (f) Content of proposal. (1) The (iii) 15 CFR Part 29a—Audit Announcements of solicitations will be proposal must, at a minimum, include Requirements for State and Local made in the Commerce Business Daily. the following: Governments (implements OMB Specific information on the level of (i) An executive summary Circular A–128—Audit of State and funding available and the deadline for summarizing the planned project Local Governments). proposals will be contained in that consistent with the Evaluation Criteria (3) Educational institutions. (i) OMB announcement. in addition, any specific stated in this part. Circular A–110—Administrative industry sectors or types of tools and (ii) A description of the planned Requirements for Grants and techniques to be focused on will be project sufficient to permit evaluation of Agreements with Institutions of Higher specified in the announcement. the proposal in accordance with the Education, Hospitals, and Other (c) Proposal workshops. Prior to an proposal Evaluation Criteria stated in Nonprofit Organizations. announcement of solicitation, NIST may this part. (ii) OMB Circular A–21—Cost announce opportunities for potential (iii) A budget for the project which Principles for Educational Institutions. applicants to learn about these projects identifies all sources of funds and (iii) 15 CFR Part 29b—Audit through workshops. The time and place which breaks out planned expenditures Requirements for Institutions of Higher of the workshop(s) will be contained in by both activity and object class (e.g., Education and Other Nonprofit a Commerce Business Daily personnel, travel, etc.). Organizations (implements OMB announcement. (iv) A description of the qualifications Circular A–133—Audits for Institutions (d) Indirect costs. The total dollar of key personnel who will be assigned of Higher Education and Other amount of the indirect costs proposed in to work on the proposed project. Nonprofit Organizations). 25874 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Proposed Rules (4) For profit organizations. (i) OMB materials. Projects must be completed (3) Delivery and implementation Circular A–110—Administrative within the scope of the effort proposed mechanisms. The proposal must set Requirements for Grants and and should not require on-going federal forth clearly defined, effective Agreements with Institutions of Higher support. mechanisms for delivery and/or Education, Hospitals, and Other (c) Award period. Projects initiated implementation of proposed services to Nonprofit Organizations. under this category may be carried out the target population. The proposal also (ii) 48 CFR Part 31—Federal over a period of up to three years. If an must demonstrate that training activities Acquisition Regulation, Contract Cost application is selected for funding, DOC will be integrated into and will be of Principles and Procedures. has no obligation to provide any service to the NIST Manufacturing (iii) 15 CFR Part 29b—Audit additional future funding in connection Extension Centers. Factors that may be Requirements for Institutions of Higher with that award. Renewal of an award considered include: Ease of access to the Education and Other Nonprofit to increase funding or extend the period training activity especially for MEP Organizations (implements OMB of performance is at the total discretion extension centers; methodology for Circular A–133). of DOC. disseminating or promoting (h) Availability of forms and circulars. (d) Matching requirements. Matching involvement in the training especially (1) Copies of forms referenced in this fund requirements for these proposals within the MEP system; and part may be obtained from the will be specified in solicitations demonstrated interest in the training Manufacturing Extension Partnership, including the breakdown of cash and in- activity especially by MEP extension National Institute of Standards and kind requirements. For those projects centers. Technology, Room C121, Building 301, not requiring matching funds, the (4) Coordination with other relevant Gaithersburg, MD 20899. presence of match will be considered in organizations. Wherever possible the (2) Copies of OMB Circulars may be the evaluation under the Financial Plan project should be coordinated with and obtained from the Office of criteria. leverage other organizations which are Administration, Publications Office, 725 (e) Training development and developing or have expertise with 17th ST., NW., Room 2200, New deployment projects evaluation criteria. similar training. If no such organizations Executive Office Building, Washington, Proposals will be evaluated and rated on exist, the proposal should show that this is the case. Applicants will need to DC 20503. the basis of the following criteria listed describe how they will coordinate to in descending order of importance: § 292.2 Training development and allow for increased economies of scale deployment projects. (1) Demonstration that the proposed and to avoid duplication. Factors that project will meet the training needs of (a) Eligibility criteria. In general, may be considered include: technical assistance providers and eligible applicants for these projects Demonstrated understanding of existing include all for profit and nonprofit manufacturers in the target population. organizations and resources relevant to organizations including universities, The target population must be clearly the proposed project; adequate linkages community colleges, state governments, defined and the proposal must and partnerships with existing state technology programs and demonstrate that it understands the organizations and clear definition of independent nonprofit organizations. population’s training needs within the those organizations’ roles in the However, specific limitations on proposed project area. The proposal proposed activities; and that the eligibility may be specified in should show that the efforts being proposed activity does not duplicate solicitations. Organizations may submit proposed meet the needs identified. existing services or resources. multiple proposals under this category Factors that may be considered include: (5) Program evaluation. The applicant in each solicitation for unique projects. A clear definition of the target should specify plans for evaluation of (b) Project objective. The purpose of population, size and demographic the effectiveness of the proposed these projects is to support the distribution; demonstrated training activity and for ensuring development and deployment of understanding of the target population’s continuous improvement of the training. training programs which will aid training needs; and appropriateness of Factors that may be considered include: manufacturing extension organizations the size of the target population and the Thoroughness of evaluation plans, in providing services to smaller anticipated impact for the proposed including internal evaluation for manufacturers. While primarily directed expenditure. management control, external toward the field agents/engineers of the (2) Development/deployment evaluation for assessing outcomes of the extension organizations, the training methodology and use of appropriate activity, and ‘‘customer satisfaction’’ may also be of direct use by the smaller technology and information sources. measures of performance. manufacturers themselves. Specific The proposal must describe the (6) Management and organizational industry sectors to be addressed and technical plan for the development or experience and plans. Applicants sub-categories of training may be deployment of the training, including should specify plans for proper specified in solicitations. Examples of the project activities to be used in the organization, staffing, and management training topic areas include, but are not training development/deployment and of the implementation process. Factors limited to, manufacturing assessment the sources of technology and/or that may be considered include: functions, business systems information which will be used to create Appropriateness and authority of the management, quality assurance or deploy the training activity. Sources governing or managing organization to assistance, and financial management may include those internal to the conduct the proposed activities; activities. Examples of training program proposer or from other organizations. qualifications of the project team and its deployment include, but are not limited Factors that may be considered include: leadership to conduct the proposed to, organization and conduct of training Adequacy of the proposed technical activity; soundness of any staffing plans, courses, development and conduct of plan; strength of core competency in the including recruitment, selection, train-the-trainer courses, preparation proposed area of activity; and training, and continuing professional and delivery of distance learning demonstrated access to relevant development; and appropriateness of activities, and preparation of self- technical or information sources the organizational approach for carrying learning and technical-guideline external to the organization. out the proposed activity. Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Proposed Rules 25875 (7) Financial plan. Applicants should (d) Matching requirements. Matching (4) Coordination with other relevant show the relevance and cost fund requirements for these proposals organizations. Wherever possible the effectiveness of the financial plan for will be specified in solicitations project should be coordinated with and meeting the objectives of the project; the including the breakdown of cash and in- leverage other organizations which are firmness and level of the applicant’s kind requirements. For those projects developing or have expertise on similar total financial support for the project; not requiring matching funds, the tools, techniques, practices, or analyses. and a plan to maintain the program after presence of match will be considered in If no such organizations exist, the the cooperative agreement has expired. the evaluation under the Financial Plan proposal should show that this is the Factors that may be considered include: criteria. case. Applicants will need to describe Reasonableness of the budget, both in (e) Tools, techniques, practices, and how they will coordinate to allow for income and expenses; strength of analyses projects evaluation criteria. increased economies of scale and to commitment and amount of the Proposals from applicants will be avoid duplication. Factors that may be proposer’s cost share, if any; evaluated and rated on the basis of the considered include: Demonstrated effectiveness of management plans for following criteria listed in descending understanding of existing organizations control of budget; appropriateness of order of importance: and resources relevant to the proposed matching contributions; and plan for (1) Demonstration that the proposed project; adequate linkages and maintaining the program after the project will meet the technical partnerships with exiting organizations cooperative agreement has expired. assistance needs of technical assistance and clear definition of those providers and manufacturers in the organizations’ roles in the proposed § 292.3 Technical tools, techniques, activities; and that the proposed activity practices, and analyses projects. target population. Target population does not duplicate existing services or (a) Eligibility criteria. In general, must be clearly defined. The proposal must demonstrate that it understands resources. eligible applicants for these projects (5) Program evaluation. The applicant include all for profit and nonprofit the population’s tool or technique needs within the proposed project area. The should specific plans for evaluation of organizations including universities, the effectiveness of the proposed tool or community colleges, state governments, proposal should show that the efforts being proposed meet the needs technique and for ensuring continuous state technology programs and improvement of the tool. Factors that independent nonprofit organizations. identified. Factors that may be considered include: A clear definition of may be considered include: However, specific limitations on Thoroughness of evaluation plans, the target population, size and eligibility may be specified in including internal evaluation for demographic distribution; demonstrated solicitations. Organizations may submit management control, external understanding of the target population’s multiple proposals under this category evaluation for assessing outcomes of the tools or technique needs; and in each solicitation for unique projects. activity, and ‘‘customer satisfaction’’ appropriateness of the size of the target (b) Project objective. The purpose of measures of performance. these projects is to support the initial population and the anticipated impact (6) Management experience and development, implementation, and for the proposed expenditure. plans. Applicants should specify plans analysis of tools, techniques, and (2) Development methodology and use for proper organization, staffing, and practices which will aid manufacturing of appropriate technology and management of the implementation extension organizations in providing information sources. The proposal must process. Factors that may be considered services to smaller manufacturers and describe the technical plan for the include: Appropriateness and authority which may also be of direct use by the development of the tool or resource, of the governing or managing smaller manufacturers themselves. including the project activities to be organization to conduct the proposed Specific industry sectors to be used in the tool/resource development activities; qualifications of the project addressed and sub-categories of tools, and the sources of technology and/or team and its leadership to conduct the techniques, practices, and analyses may information which will be used to create proposed activity; soundness of any be specified in solicitations. Examples the tool or resource. Sources may staffing plans, including recruitment, of tools, techniques, and practices include those internal to the proposer or selection, training, and continuing include, but are not limited to, from other organizations. Factors that professional development; and manufacturing assessment tools, may be considered include: Adequacy appropriateness of the organizational benchmarking tools, business systems of the proposed technical plan; strength approach for carrying out the proposed management tools, quality assurance of core competency in the proposed area activity. assistance tools, financial management of activity; and demonstrated access to (7) Financial plan. Applicants should tools, software tools, practices for relevant technical or information show the relevance and cost partnering, techniques for urban or rural sources external to the organization. effectiveness of the financial plan for firms, and comparative analysis of (3) Degree of integration with the meeting the objectives of the project; the assessment methods. Projects must be manufacturing extension partnership. firmness and level of the applicant’s completed within the scope of the effort The proposal must demonstrate that the total financial support for the project; proposed and should not require on- tool or resource will be integrated into and a plan to maintain the program after going federal support. and will be of service to the NIST the cooperative agreement has expired. (c) Award period. Projects initiated Manufacturing Extension Centers. Factors that may be considered include: under this category may be carried out Factors that may be considered include: Reasonableness of the budget, both in over a period of up to three years. If an Ability to access the tool or resource income and expenses; strength of application is selected for funding, DOC especially for MEP extension centers; commitment and amount of the has no obligation to provide any methodology for disseminating or proposer’s cost share, if any; additional future funding in connection promoting use of the tool or technique effectiveness of management plans for with that award. Renewal of an award especially within the MEP system; and control of budget; appropriateness of to increase funding or extend the period demonstrated interest in using the tool matching contributions; and plan for of performance is at the total discretion or technique especially by MEP maintaining the program after the of DOC. extension centers. cooperative agreement has expired. 25876 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Proposed Rules § 292.4 Information infrastructure projects. The proposal should also show that the organization, staffing, and management (a) Eligibility criteria. In general, efforts being proposed meet the needs of the project. Factors that may be eligible applicants for these projects identified. Factors that may be considered include: Appropriateness include all for profit and nonprofit considered include: A clear definition of and authority of the governing or organizations including universities, the customer base, size and managing organization to conduct the community colleges, state governments, demographic distribution; demonstrated proposed activities; qualifications of the state technology programs and understanding of the customer base’s project team and its leadership to independent nonprofit organizations. needs within the project area; and conduct the proposed activity; However, specific limitations on appropriateness of the size of the soundness of any staffing plans, eligibility may be specified in customer base and the anticipated including recruitment, selection, solicitations. Organizations may submit impact for the proposed expenditure. training, and continuing professional multiple proposals under this category (2) Development plans and delivery/ development; and appropriateness of in each solicitation for unique projects. implementation mechanisms. The the organizational approach for carrying (b) Project objective. The purpose of proposal must set forth clearly defined, out the proposed activity. these projects is to support and act as a effective plans for the development, (5) Financial plan. Applicants should catalyst for the development and delivery and/or implementation of show the relevance and cost implementation of information proposed services to the customer base. effectiveness of the financial plan for infrastructure services and pilots. These The proposal must delineate the sources meeting the objectives of the project; the projects will aid manufacturing of information which will be used to firmness and level of the applicant’s extension organizations and smaller implement the project. Sources may total financial support for the project; manufacturers in accessing the technical include those internal to the center and the ability of the project to continue information they need or will accelerate (including staff expertise) or from other after the cooperative agreement has the rate of adoption of electronic organizations. Factors that may be expired without federal support. While commerce. Specific industry sectors to considered include: Adequacy of plans; projects that appear to require on-going be addressed or subcategories of potential effectiveness and efficiency of public support will be considered, in information infrastructure projects proposed delivery and implementation general, they will be evaluated lower include, but are not limited to, pilot systems; demonstrated capacity to form than those which show a strong ability demonstration of electronic data effective linkages; partnerships to become self-sufficient. Factors that interchange in a supplier chain, necessary for success of the proposed may be considered include: implementation of an electronic activity; strength of core competency in Reasonableness of the budget, both in information service for field engineers at the proposed area of activity; and income and expenses; strength of MEP extension centers, and industry demonstrated access to relevant commitment and amount of the specific electronic information services technical or information sources proposer’s cost share, if any; for MEP centers and smaller external to the organization. effectiveness of management plans for manufacturers. (3) Coordination with other relevant control of budget; appropriateness of (c) Award period. Projects initiated organizations. Wherever possible the matching contributions; and plan for under this category may be carried out project should be coordinated with and maintaining the program after the over a period of up to three years. If an leverage other organizations which are cooperative agreement has expired. application is selected for funding, DOC developing or have expertise within the (6) Evaluation. The applicant should has no obligation to provide any project area. In addition, the project specify plans for evaluation of the additional future funding in connection should demonstrate that it does not effectiveness of the proposed project with that award. Renewal of an award duplicate efforts which already are and for ensuring continuous to increase funding or extend the period being performed by the private sector improvement. Factors that may be of performance is at the total discretion without government support. considered include: Thoroughness of of DOC. Applicants will need to describe how evaluation plans, including internal (d) Matching requirements. Matching they will coordinate to allow for evaluation for management control, fund requirements for these proposals increased economies of scale and to external evaluation for assessing will be specified in solicitations avoid duplication. If the proposer will outcomes of the activity, and ‘‘customer including the breakdown of cash and in- not be partnering with any other satisfaction’’ measures of performance. kind requirements. For those projects organizations, then the proposal should not requiring matching funds, the clearly explain why the project will be § 292.5 Proposal selection process. presence of match will be considered in more successful if implemented as The proposal evaluation and selection the evaluation under the Financial Plan proposed. A proposal which makes a process will consist of three principal criteria. credible case for why there are no, or phases: Proposal qualifications; (e) Information infrastructure projects very limited, partnerships will not be proposal review and selection of evaluation criteria. Proposals from penalized in evaluation. Factors that finalists; and award determination as applicants will be evaluated and rated may be considered include: follows: on the basis of the following criteria Demonstrated understanding of existing (a) Proposal qualification. All listed in descending order of organizations and resources relevant to proposals will be reviewed by NIST to importance: the proposed project; Adequate linkages assure compliance with the proposal (1) Demonstration that the proposed and partnerships with relevant existing content and other basic provisions of project will meet the needs of the target organizations; clear definition of the this part. Proposals which satisfy these customer base. The target customer base roles of partnering organizations in the requirements will be designated must be clearly defined and, in general, proposed activities; and that the qualified proposals; all others will be will be technical assistance providers proposed activity does not duplicate disqualified at this phase of the and/or smaller manufacturers. The existing services or resources. evaluation and selection process. proposal should demonstrate a clear (4) Management and organizational (b) Proposal review and selection of understanding of the customer base’s experience and plans. Applicants finalists. NIST will appoint an needs within the proposed project area. should specify plans for proper evaluation panel to review and evaluate Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Proposed Rules 25877 all qualified proposals in accordance NW, Washington, DC 20420, or hand- beneficiary and, if applicable, his or her with the evaluation criteria and values deliver written comments to: Office of spouse. A Social Security number is set forth in this part. Evaluation panels Regulations Management, Room 1176, considered to be verified when the will consist of NIST employees and in 801 Eye Street, NW, Washington, DC identifying information associated with some cases other federal employees or 20001. Comments should indicate that that number in VA records (e.g., name, non-federal experts who sign non- they are in response to ‘‘RIN 2900– date of birth, sex) matches identifying disclosure agreements. A site visit may AH18.’’ All written comments received information associated with the number be required to make full evaluation of a will be available for public inspection in in SSA records. SSA verifies the Social proposal. From the qualified proposals, the Office of Regulations Management, Security numbers of VA beneficiaries a group of finalists will be numerically Room 1176, 801 Eye Street, NW, and spouses twice each year. ranked and recommended for award Washington, DC 20001, between the VA is required by 38 U.S.C. 5312 to based on this review. hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., increase current pension and parents’ (c) Award determination. The Director Monday through Friday (except DIC rates by the same percentage and on of the NIST, or her/his designee, shall holidays). the same date as the Social Security select awardees based on total FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul COLA, and for that reason we evaluation scores, geographic Trowbridge, Consultant, Regulations automatically update Social Security distribution, and the availability of Staff, Compensation and Pension income information in our records at the funds. All three factors will be Service, Veterans Benefits time of a Social Security COLA. VA considered in making an award. Upon Administration, 810 Vermont Avenue, then receives a computer extract from the final award decision, a notification NW, Washington, DC 20420, telephone SSA showing the actual Social Security will be made to each of the proposing (202) 273–7210. income which beneficiaries will receive based upon the new COLA and organizations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The term reconciles any differences between data § 292.6 Additional requirements. ‘‘eligibility verification report’’ means a in VA’s records and data provided by Federal policies and procedures. VA form which requests information SSA. Based on this review of Social Recipients and subrecipients are subject needed to determine or verify eligibility Security data, we are confident of the to all Federal laws and Federal and for VA’s income-based benefit programs timeliness and accuracy of the Social Department of Commerce policies, (pension and parents’ DIC). A series of Security income match and, in our regulations, and procedures applicable forms, rather than one universal form, is judgment, it is not necessary to require to Federal financial assistance awards. used because specific entitlement beneficiaries with verified Social factors vary depending on the benefit Security numbers who have no income, [FR Doc. 95–11701 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] involved and the status of the or whose only income is Social BILLING CODE 3510±13±M beneficiary. However, all EVR forms Security, to submit an annual EVR. request income and marital status VA will also require beneficiaries who information and have a similar format. receive income other than Social DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS Until recently VA was required by Security to submit an EVR. These AFFAIRS law (38 U.S.C. 1315(e) and 38 U.S.C. beneficiaries must submit an EVR 1506(2)) to secure a completed EVR at because VA is unable to verify the 38 CFR Part 3 least once a year from every pension receipt and amount of other types of RIN 2900±AH18 beneficiary and every parents’ DIC income with the same accuracy that it beneficiary under the age of 72. Public can verify Social Security income. Eligibility Reporting Requirements Law 103–271, the Board of Veterans’ Even if all relevant Social Security Appeals Administrative Procedures numbers have been verified and neither AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs. Improvement Act of 1994, amended 38 the beneficiary nor the beneficiary’s ACTION: Proposed rule. U.S.C. 1315 and 1506 to give the spouse received income other than Secretary of Veterans Affairs Social Security, VA will still require SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans discretionary authority to require completion of an EVR if it determines Affairs (VA) is proposing to amend its submission of income and resource that submission of an EVR is necessary adjudication regulations regarding reports by recipients of income-based to preserve program integrity. The eligibility verification reports (EVRs) for benefits. These implementing regulatory phrase ‘‘necessary to preserve program income-based benefits. This amendment amendments outline the manner in integrity’’ applies when it is necessary implements recent legislation which which the secretary will exercise this for VA, or an agency with oversight eliminated the mandatory requirement discretionary authority each year to authority over VA, to verify that EVR- for submission of EVRs on an annual determine which claimants and exempt beneficiaries are accurately basis from recipients of pension or beneficiaries must complete an EVR. reporting changes in entitlement factors. parents’ dependency and indemnity The proposed rule would require an 38 U.S.C. 1315(e) establishes a compensation (DIC) and gives VA EVR in three instances. First, VA will statutory exemption from filing an EVR discretionary authority to require such require submission of an EVR by any for parents who have attained the age of reports where necessary to determine beneficiary whose Social Security 72 and who have been paid Dependency eligibility. This amendment is necessary number, or whose spouse’s Social and Indemnity Compensation for two to set forth the guidelines that the Security number, has not been verified consecutive years. However, when Secretary will use in exercising this by the Social Security Administration Congress removed the mandatory discretionary authority. (SSA). VA conducts periodic computer requirement for annual reporting by DATES: Comments must be received on matches with SSA. These matches persons who have received old law or or before July 14, 1995. permit VA to verify the information section 306 pension or parents’ DIC for ADDRESSES: Mail written comments to: upon which payment of VA benefits is two consecutive years and are at least 72 Director, Office of Regulations based. However, these matches cannot years old, it indicated that removal of Management (02D), Department of be conducted unless VA records contain this reporting requirement did not affect Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, accurate Social Security numbers for the VA’s authority to require clarification or 25878 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Proposed Rules proof of income, when indicated, for factors. Paragraph (c) shows when VA hours to approximately 162,500 hours. this group (see Pub. L. No. 91–588, will require completion of an EVR. (2) Also, under current regulations §§ 2(d) and 6, 84 Stat. 1583, 1584 These amendments do not change any approximately 190,000 individuals must (1970)). Therefore, VA will apply the substantive rules concerning eligibility independently report changes in factors same criteria for determining when for VA benefits, alter the recipient’s affecting entitlement. The proposed persons who are 72 years or older and obligation to report changes that may regulations (see proposed §§ 3.256(a) have received the particular benefit for affect the rate of VA benefits payable, or and 3.277(b)) would not cause a change two consecutive calendar years must limit VA’s authority to require evidence in this reporting requirement. It is submit an EVR. of entitlement factors in an individual estimated that such a report takes Although beneficiaries will be case. The amendments merely set out approximately 15 minutes to complete. required to file an EVR only if requested VA’s policy on requiring completion of Accordingly, the estimated total annual to do so by VA, they have an affirmative an EVR. reporting hours for independent reports obligation to advise VA promptly of Regulatory Flexibility Act because of changes in factors affecting changes in factors such as income, entitlement would be approximately marital status, etc. which affect The Secretary hereby certifies that 47,500 hours. entitlement. This affirmative obligation these regulatory amendments will not As required by section 3504(h) of the appears at §§ 3.256(a) and 3.277(b) of have a significant economic impact on Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, VA is the amendments. a substantial number of small entities as submitting a copy of this proposed rule When VA sends a beneficiary an EVR they are defined in the Regulatory to OMB for its review of these to be completed, it advises the Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612. information collection requirements. beneficiary in writing that the The reason for this certification is that Organizations and individuals desiring completed form must be returned to VA these amendments would not directly to submit comments regarding these at the address shown within 60 days affect any small entities. Only VA burden estimates or any aspect of these and that failure to return the completed beneficiaries could be directly affected. information collection requirements, form will result in interruption of Therefore, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), including suggestions for reducing benefits. If the completed form is not these amendments are exempt from the burdens, should direct them to VA’s received within the specified period, initial and final regulatory flexibility Director, Office of Regulations VA will suspend payment and send a analysis requirements of sections 603 Management (address above) and the letter to the beneficiary advising that and 604. Office of Information and Regulatory completion of the EVR form is required. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 Affairs, OMB, Room 10235, New The beneficiary’s continued failure to Executive Office Bldg., Washington, DC This proposed rule contains 20503, Attn: Desk Officer for VA. return the EVR will result in information collections which are termination of the award under the subject to review by the Office of The Catalog of Federal Domestic provisions of 38 CFR 3.661. Management and Budget (OMB) under Assistance program numbers are 64.104, If a claimant with a pending claim the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980. 64.105, and 64.110. fails to return an EVR when requested The title, description of agency need, List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 3 to do so, VA will disallow the claim and and respondents of the information Administrative practice and notify the claimant of the reason for the collections are shown below with disallowance. The notification will procedure, Claims, Health care, estimates of reporting burdens. Individuals with disabilities, Pensions, furnish notice of procedural and Title: Eligibility Verification Reports. Reporting and recordkeeping appellate rights and will advise the Description of Agency Need: These requirements, Veterans. claimant that no further action can be information collections are to be used to taken on the claim unless the EVR is verify entitlement to or continued Approved: February 3, 1995. returned within 1 year of the date it was eligibility for pension or parents’ DIC Jesse Brown, originally requested. VA will consider and to determine whether adjustments Secretary of Veterans Affairs. the claim abandoned under 38 CFR in the rate of payment are necessary. For the reasons set forth in the 3.158 if the EVR is not received within Respondents: Recipients of pension or preamble, 38 CFR part 3 is proposed to one year of the date it was originally parents’ DIC who come within the be amended as follows: requested. circumstances described in proposed We are proposing to change the §§ 3.256(b) or 3.277(c) for submitting an PART 3ÐADJUDICATION heading of 38 CFR 3.256 from ‘‘Annual annual EVR or claimants or recipients income and net worth questionnaires’’ who have a change affecting entitlement Subpart AÐPension, Compensation, to the more general ‘‘Eligibility as specified in proposed §§ 3.256(a) or and Dependency and Indemnity reporting requirements’’ to better 3.277(b). Compensation describe the content of the section. The Estimates of Reporting Burdens: (1) text of 38 CFR 3.256 is similarly Under current regulations all of the 1. The authority citation for part 3, changed to reflect the new reporting 825,000 recipients of pension or subpart A continues to read as follows: requirements and set out the criteria for parents’ DIC are required to submit an Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(a), unless determining which recipients are annual EVR. It is estimated that under otherwise noted. required to complete an EVR. proposed §§ 3.256(b) and 3.277(c) the 2. Section 3.256 is revised to read as The heading of 38 CFR 3.277 is number of persons required to submit follows: changed from ‘‘Income and net worth an EVR during a calendar year would be reports’’ to ‘‘Eligibility reporting reduced from 825,000 to 325,000. It is § 3.256 Eligibility reporting requirements. requirements’’ to better describe the estimated that an EVR takes (a) Obligation to report changes in content of the section. Paragraph (b) approximately 30 minutes to complete. factors affecting entitlement. Any emphasizes a pension claimant or Accordingly, the estimated total annual individual who has applied for or beneficiary’s responsibility to notify VA reporting hours for annual EVRs would receives pension or parents’ of any material change in entitlement be reduced from approximately 412,500 dependency and indemnity Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Proposed Rules 25879 compensation must promptly notify the affecting entitlement in any of the allot Channel 277A to Wright City, OK, Secretary in writing of any change following: as the community’s first local aural affecting entitlement in any of the (1) Income; service. See 59 FR 59744, November 18, following: (2) Net worth or corpus of estate; 1994. No interest in applying for the (1) Income; (3) Marital status; channel was received by the (2) Net worth or corpus of estate; (4) Nursing home patient status; Commission. With this action, this (3) Marital status; (5) School enrollment status of a child proceeding is terminated. (4) Nursing home patient status; 18 years of age or older; or FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: (5) School enrollment status of a child (6) Any other factor that affects Leslie K. Shapiro, Mass Media Bureau, 18 years of age or older; or entitlement to benefits under the (202) 418–2180. (6) Any other factor that affects provisions of this Part. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a entitlement to benefits under the (c) Eligibility verification reports. (1) synopsis of the Commission’s Report provisions of this part. For purposes of this section the term and Order, MM Docket No. 94–127, (b) Eligibility verification report. (1) eligibility verification report means a adopted May 3, 1995, and released May For purposes of this section the term form prescribed by the Secretary that is 10, 1995. The full text of this eligibility verification report means a used to request income, net worth, Commission decision is available for form prescribed by the Secretary that is dependency status, and any other inspection and copying during normal used to request income, net worth (if information necessary to determine or business hours in the FCC Reference applicable), dependency status, and any verify entitlement to pension. Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW, other information necessary to (2) The Secretary shall require an Washington, D.C. The complete text of determine or verify entitlement to eligibility verification report under the this decision may also be purchased pension or parents’ dependency and following circumstances: from the Commission’s copy contractor, indemnity compensation. (i) If the Social Security International Transcription Service, (2) The Secretary shall require an Administration has not verified the Inc., (202) 857–3800, 2100 M Street, eligibility verification report under the beneficiary’s Social Security number NW, Suite 140, Washington, D.C. 20037. following circumstances: and, if the beneficiary is married, his or (i) If the Social Security her spouse’s Social Security number; Federal Communications Commission. Administration has not verified the (ii) If there is reason to believe that John A. Karousos, beneficiary’s Social Security number the beneficiary or his or her spouse may Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules and, if the beneficiary is married, his or have received income other than Social Division, Mass Media Bureau. her spouse’s Social Security number; Security during the current or previous [FR Doc. 95–11855 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] (ii) If there is reason to believe that calendar year; or BILLING CODE 6712±01±F the beneficiary or, if the spouse’s (iii) If the Secretary determines that income could affect entitlement, his or an eligibility verification report is her spouse may have received income necessary to preserve program integrity. 47 CFR Part 73 other than Social Security during the (3) An individual who applies for or [MM Docket No. 94±123, DA 95±1055] current or previous calendar year; or receives pension as defined in § 3.3 shall, as a condition of receipt or Television Broadcasting; Prime Time (iii) If the Secretary determines that Access Rule an eligibility verification report is continued receipt of benefits, furnish necessary to preserve program integrity. the Department of Veterans Affairs an AGENCY: Federal Communications (3) An individual who applies for or eligibility verification report upon Commission. receives pension or parents’ request. ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of dependency and indemnity (d) If VA requests that a claimant or reply comment period. compensation as defined in § 3.3 or 3.5 beneficiary submit an eligibility SUMMARY: shall, as a condition of receipt or verification report but he or she fails to The Commission granted a continued receipt of benefits, furnish do so within 60 days of the date of the request by the Coalition to Enhance the Department of Veterans Affairs an VA request, the Secretary shall suspend Diversity for an extension of time for eligibility verification report upon the award or disallow the claim. filing reply comments in this proceeding. The Commission request. * * * * * (c) If VA requests that a claimant or determined that the extension of time [FR Doc. 95–11880 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] was warranted in light of the time beneficiary submit an eligibility BILLING CODE 8320±01±P verification report but he or she fails to necessary to compile information do so within 60 days of the date of the critical to resolution of the numerous and complex issues raised in this VA request, the Secretary shall suspend FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS the award or disallow the claim. proceeding. This action will facilitate COMMISSION the development of a full and complete (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1315(e) and 1506) record on these issues. 47 CFR Part 73 3. Section 3.277 is amended by DATES: Reply comments are now due on revising the heading and paragraphs (b) [MM Docket No. 94±127; RM±8537] May 26, 1995. and (c) and by adding paragraph (d) to Radio Broadcasting Services; Wright ADDRESSES: Federal Communications read as follows: City, OK Commission, Washington, D.C. 20554. § 3.277 Eligibility reporting requirements. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: AGENCY: Federal Communications Alan E. Aronowitz, Mass Media Bureau, * * * * * Commission. (202) 776–1653. (b) Obligation to report changes in ACTION: Proposed rule; dismissal of. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: factors affecting entitlement. Any individual who has applied for or SUMMARY: The Commission, at the Adopted: May 8, 1995. receives pension must promptly notify request of Texarkana Broadcasting, Released: May 8, 1995. the Secretary in writing of any change Incorporated, dismisses its request to By the Chief, Mass Media Bureau: 25880 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Proposed Rules 1. On October 25, 1994, the extension of time will serve the public medium and heavy vehicles. The agency Commission released a Notice of interest by permitting a more thorough has determined that it would be Proposed Rule Making in MM Docket public and industry review of the unnecessary to extend the period during No. 94–123, 59 FR 55402 (1994) economic data, which would, in turn, which a manufacturer may choose (‘‘Notice’’), soliciting comment on the facilitate the submission of reply between two burnish procedures since legal and policy justifications, in light of comments that will prove more useful manufacturers have been certifying current economic and technological in generating the comprehensive record compliance to the brake standards based conditions, for the Prime Time Access that the Commission seeks in this on the ‘‘new’’ more representative Rule, Section 73.658(k) of the proceeding. burnish procedure since September Commission’s Rules, and to consider the 4. As set forth in § 1.46 of the 1994. continued need for the rule in its Commission’s Rules, 47 CFR 1.46, it is FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. current form. By an Order adopted on our policy that extensions of time for Richard C. Carter, Office of Vehicle December 7, 1994, the deadline for filing comments in rulemaking Safety Standards, National Highway filing comments was extended to March proceedings shall not be routinely Traffic Safety Administration, 400 7, 1995, and the deadline for filing reply granted. However, under the Seventh Street, SA., Washington, DC comments was extended to April 6, circumstances described above, we 20590. (202–366–5274). 1995. See Order Granting Extension of believe that the requested extension of Time for Filing Comments and Reply time to file reply comments is SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Comments in MM Docket No. 94–123, warranted. This extension of time I. Background 59 FR 64382 (1994). At the request of a should facilitate the development of a Standard No. 105, Hydraulic Brake number of commenters in this full and complete record on the issues Systems, and Standard No. 121, Air proceeding, the time for filing reply raised in the Notice and, thus, it appears Brake Systems (49 CFR 571.121), specify comments was substantially extended to reasonable to provide the commenting tests to measure whether medium and May 12, 1995. See Order Granting parties additional time to analyze and heavy vehicles 1 equipped with Extension of Time for Filing Comments address these issues. hydraulic or air brakes comply with the and Reply Comments in MM Docket No. 5. Accordingly, It is Ordered that the standards’ performance requirements. 94–123, 60 FR 18793 (April 13, 1995). above-mentioned motion for an These vehicles are subject to ‘‘burnish’’ 2. On May 3, 1995, a motion for a extension of time Is Granted, and that procedures conducted at the outset of further extension of time for filing reply the time for filing reply comments in road testing and dynamometer testing. comments in this proceeding was filed this proceeding is Extended to May 26, The burnish procedures serve to by the Coalition to Enhance Diversity, 1995. which states that it is authorized to 6. This action is taken pursuant to simulate the breaking-in of the brakes represent the Association of authority found in Sections 4(i) and on new vehicles under normal driving Independent Television Stations, Inc., 303(r) of the Communications Act of conditions. Until September 1, 1994, the Capital Cities/ABC, Inc., CBS Inc., King 1934, as amended, and § 0.204(b), 0.283, standards contained old and new World Productions, Inc., the Media and 1.45 of the Commission’s Rules. Access Project, the Motion Picture burnish procedures, identified in the Association of America, Inc., the Federal Communications Commission. standards as option ‘‘a’’ and option ‘‘b,’’ National Broadcasting Company, Inc., Roy J. Stewart, respectively. The old burnish procedure the Network Affiliated Stations Chief, Mass Media Bureau. consisted of a series of brake Alliance, and Viacom, Inc. (‘‘Joint [FR Doc. 94–11856 Filed 5–12–94; 8:45 am] applications, known as ‘‘snubs,’’ that Petitioners’’) in this request. The motion BILLING CODE 6712±01±M result in the brakes being heated to not requests that the deadline for filing more than the specified maximum reply comments be extended from May temperature of 550 °F. 12, 1995, to May 26, 1995. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION In response to a petition from 3. The Joint Petitioners contend that International Harvester, the agency the comments filed in this proceeding National Highway Traffic Safety amended the burnish procedures in a include detailed economic studies on all Administration final rule published on March 14, 1988 sides of the issues raised in the Notice. (49 FR 8191). The agency initiated In order to properly evaluate these 49 CFR Part 571 rulemaking because the temperature various economic studies, the parties [Docket No. 70±27, Notice 33 and Docket limit, which was established with drum have agreed to make available certain No. 83±07, Notice 7] brake designs in mind, appeared data underlying those studies, which inappropriate for disc brake designs. information has recently become RIN 2127±AF13 Disc brake systems are designed to available and accessible for review at operate at appreciably higher Federal Motor Vehicle Safety the Commission. (To accommodate the temperatures than are drum brake Standards; Burnish Procedures for parties, this information is available at systems. As a result, it had been Heavy Vehicles the Commission’s Washington, D.C., difficult to avoid exceeding the headquarters and at the field office in AGENCY: National Highway Traffic specified maximum temperature during Hayward, California.) These parties, Safety Administration (NHTSA), the burnish of vehicles with disc brake who take differing views on the Department of Transportation. systems. continued need for the Prime Time ACTION: Termination of rulemaking After issuing several notices, the Access Rule, state that a brief extension proceeding. agency added a new burnish procedure of time will permit the completion of in 1988 providing that the brakes on the evaluations and critiques of the SUMMARY: This notice terminates heavy duty vehicles are to be burnished comprehensive economic analyses rulemaking to amend Standard No. 105, by 500 snubs slowing the vehicle from submitted in this proceeding as called Hydraulic Brake Systems, and Standard 40 mph to 20 mph, without regard to for in the Notice. These parties maintain No. 121, Air Brake Systems, with that the grant of this request for a short respect to the burnish procedures for 1 Hereafter, referred to as heavy vehicles. Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Proposed Rules 25881 brake temperatures generated during the Rockwell, Lucas, Carlisle, and Ford.2 and four brake manufacturers (Eaton, burnish. NHTSA believes that under the According to these representatives of Rockwell International, Lucas, and new burnish procedure, brakes will be the heavy truck industry, the new Midland-Grau. The commenters burnished in a manner that is more burnish procedure would result in requested that vehicle manufacturers be realistic and representative of the significant variability problems and permitted to use either the old or new breaking-in that vehicle brakes actually potential compliance problems. burnish procedure indefinitely. receive in service without favoring Accordingly, they requested that AAMA submitted test data on the drum brake designs over disc brake NHTSA either (1) Delay the September braking performance of combination designs. 1, 1993 effective date, (2) allow either vehicles, including a vehicle tested at NHTSA allowed a five-year transition procedure indefinitely, or (3) develop a NHTSA’s Vehicle Research Testing period for implementing the new new burnish procedure. Center (VRTC). AAMA stated that these burnish procedure. The agency tests indicate that the proposed stopping provided this longer than normal lead III. Interim Final Rule and Notice of distance requirements and braking-in-a- time to minimize the rulemaking’s cost Proposed Rulemaking curve test could not be consistently met impact by allowing manufacturers to On August 30, 1993, NHTSA unless the initial brake temperature was phase-in any required changes to brake published two notices in response to the reduced to between 150°F and 200°F systems as design changes were made. petitions for rulemaking from Eaton and from 250° and 300°F. Specifically, During the transition period, AAMA: an interim final rule extending AAMA said that the proposed increase manufacturers could choose between the period during which either the old in initial brake temperature 3 would the old and new burnish procedures. As or new burnish procedures could be cause an increase in stopping distance, established in the 1988 final rule, the used until September 1, 1994 (58 FR and thus would cause a vehicle to fail period lasted until September 1, 1993. 45459); and a notice of proposed to comply with the proposed stopping On and after that date, the only burnish rulemaking (NPRM) proposing to extend distance requirements. procedure in the standards was to be the the optional period for the new burnish As explained above, the new burnish new one. procedure an additional 18 months to procedures took effect on September 1, March 1, 1996. (58 FR 45476) 1994. Since that date, vehicle II. Petitions In justifying these notices, NHTSA manufacturers have been required to NHTSA received petitions from Eaton explained that the March 14, 1988 final certify compliance to the braking Corporation and the American rule was not intended to impose standards using the new burnish Automobile Manufacturers Association additional or more stringent procedures and have not been permitted (AAMA) concerning the effective date performance requirements for heavy to burnish brakes using the old for the new burnish procedure. Eaton vehicles. Instead, the adoption of the procedures. In proposing to extend petitioned the agency either to permit new burnish procedure was intended to optional compliance with the old the old burnish procedure as an option ensure that the compliance tests are procedure until March 1996, the agency indefinitely or at least to postpone the more representative of actual vehicle sought to simplify compliance for date on which the new procedure break-in and to eliminate the current vehicle manufacturers by only having became the only procedure, to allow the burnish procedure’s bias against new them conduct the braking tests once if agency to investigate problems brake designs. they relied on the old burnish associated with that procedure. NHTSA stated that the time period procedures. However, this consideration The AAMA petitioned NHTSA to during which either burnish procedure became moot because the new burnish delete the effective date for the new may be used should be extended. The procedures went into effect in brake burnish procedure. If AAMA’s agency explained that without the delay September and the agency was unable to request were granted, a choice between to September 1, 1994, vehicle issue the stopping distance and stability the old and new burnish procedures manufacturers would have faced a and control rulemakings prior to that would be allowed indefinitely. AAMA significant cost burden related to date. stated that specifying only the new compliance testing and product Based on these considerations, procedure would result in increased development, without corresponding NHTSA has decided to terminate the variability that could adversely affect safety benefits. The agency further burnish rulemaking that would have brake effectiveness. The petitioner also explained that, under a February 23, permitted optional compliance to the believed that the new procedure would 1993 proposal to reinstate stopping old burnish procedures until March 1, increase the stringency of the parking distance requirements for heavy 1996. As explained in the stopping brake requirements because, it claimed, vehicles, manufacturers would have had distance final rule, ‘‘vehicle braking performance generally degrades to conduct two sets of compliance manufacturers have had sufficient time at lower burnish temperatures. In testing using both the old and new to conduct any additional testing and to addition, AAMA stated that many burnish procedures within the comment make any necessary design changes in current vehicles that comply with the period. (58 FR 11003, 11009). It further order to meet the requirements of brake standards after being subjected to explained that the agency needed to Standard No. 121, with the new burnish the old burnish procedure will not assess the petitioners’ contention that procedures.’’ (60 FR 13286, 13292) As a comply when tested after being the new burnish procedures result in a result, vehicles must be burnished subjected to the new burnish procedure. more stringent requirement. pursuant to the new brake burnish It suggested that this noncompliance In response to the proposal to extend procedure set forth in S7.4.2.1(b) of was not indicative of a safety problem, the optional burnish procedure until Standard No. 105 and in S6.1.8.1(b) of noting that it is not aware of any safety March 1, 1996, the agency received Standard No. 121. problem arising from the braking comments from AAMA, the Heavy Duty performance of vehicles tested after Brake Manufacturers Council (HDBMC), 3 In the stopping distance NPRM, NHTSA using the old procedure. proposed an initial brake temperature of 250°F to Ford, General Motors (GM), Chrysler, 300°F. However, in the final rule the agency After receiving these petitions, concluded that an initial brake temperature of NHTSA staff met with representatives of 2 A memo has been placed in the docket between 150°F to 200°F is more appropriate. 60 FR Eaton, Freightliner, PACCAR, Navistar, summarizing these meetings. 13292. 25882 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Proposed Rules NHTSA believes that the new burnish DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: procedure is more valid because it has Ms. Karen J. Miller, Sacramento Field a lower energy input level that is closer Fish and Wildlife Service Office, at the above address (telephone to the burnish achieved in actual use. (916) 979–2725). Accordingly, it would be inappropriate 50 CFR Part 17 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: to permit the old procedure indefinitely. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife The agency further believes that Background and Plants; Notice of Public Hearing achieving compliance using the new and Extension of Public Comment The Pacific coast population of the burnish procedure is feasible given the Periods on Proposed Critical Habitat western snowy plover breeds primarily industry’s considerable progress in Designation and Draft Economic on coastal beaches from southern developing new brake linings that can Analysis for the Pacific Coast Washington to southern Baja California. meet the brake system performance Population of the Western Snowy Other less common nesting habitat requirements when using the new Plover (Charadrius alexandrinus includes salt pans, coastal dredge burnish procedures. The agency notes nivosus) disposal sites, dry salt ponds and salt that the additional year allowed by the pond levees. Historically, the Pacific coast population of the western snowy interim final rule, together with the AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service initial five year transition period, Interior. plover nested at over 80 locations on the provided ample time for vehicle and coast of California, Oregon, and brake manufacturers to evaluate brake ACTION: Proposed rule; notice of public Washington. Today only 28 major block materials. hearing and extension of public nesting areas remain. In addition to loss comment periods. of nesting areas, the size of the coastal NHTSA believes that there is only population also has decline. Human very limited validity to the SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife activity on beaches (walking, jogging, manufacturers’ argument that the new Service (Service), under the Endangered walking pets, off-road vehicle use, burnish procedure is more stringent. Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act), horseback riding, etc.) during the plover breeding season, and encroachment of The objections to the new burnish gives notice that public hearings will be exotic European beachgrass procedure come from those held on the proposed designation of critical habitat for the Pacific coast (Ammophilia arenaria) are primary manufacturers whose existing brake factors in the observed decline of the systems have to be burnished to peak population of the western snowy plover (Charadrius alexandrinus nivosus). The western snowy plover on the Pacific perfection in order to pass the minimum coast. The Service expects that only requirements. The new burnish hearings will allow all interested parties to submit oral or written comments on small portions (5 to 15 percent) of these procedure is more stringent only in the beaches would be affected by this sense that it does not produce the proposal. In addition, the Service extends the public comment period on designation, if made final. The Pacific temperatures that are as high as the old coast population of the western snowy procedure and in the sense that the all aspects of this proposed critical habitat designation including the draft plover was listed as a threatened species lower temperature of the burnish economic analysis. without critical habitat on march 5, reduces brake performance. NHTSA 1993. notes that brake manufacturers are DATES: The public hearings will be held A proposal was published in the continuing to develop brake block from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m. on Wednesday, Federal Register (60 FR 11763) on materials that are less sensitive to June 7, 1995, in Florence, Oregon; from March 2, 1995, to designate 28 critical burnish and do not require high 6 p.m. to 8 p.m. on Tuesday, June 13, habitat areas for the coastal population temperatures of the old burnish to 1995, in Monterey, California; and from of the western snowy plover. These 28 complete the manufacturing process. As 2 p.m to 4 p.m. and 6 p.m. to 8 p.m. on areas total approximately 20,000 acres these materials are developed, the new Thursday, June 15, 1995, in Eureka, and about 210 miles of coastline, or procedure’s already limited effect will California. The public comment period about 10 percent of the coastline in become progressively smaller. now closes on June 30, 1995. Any California, Oregon, and Washington. comments received by the closing date Two of the proposed critical habitat Authority: 49 U.S.C. 322, 30111, 30162; will be considered in the final decision areas are in Washington, seven are in delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.50 and on this proposal. Oregon, and 19 are in California. The 501.8. areas range in size form less than 10 ADDRESSES: Public hearings will be held acres to over 2,000 acres. Issued on: May 10, 1995. in Florence, Oregon, at the Driftwood Subsection 4(b)(5)(E) of the Act, Shores Conference Center, 88416 First requires that a public hearing be held if Barry Felrice, Avenue; in Monterey, California, at the it is requested within 45 days of the Hyatt Regency, 1 Old Golf Course Road; Associate Administrator for Safety publication of a proposed rule. The Performance Standards. and in Eureka, California, at the Eureka Service received several written Inn, 518 7th Street. Written comments requests for public hearings from private [FR Doc. 95–11927 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] and materials may be submitted at the citizens and organizations. As a result, hearings or sent directly to Mr. Joel A. the Service has scheduled three public BILLING CODE 4910±59±P Medlin, Field Supervisor, U.S. Fish and hearings to be held on Wednesday, June Wildlife Service, Sacramento Field 7, 1995, from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m. in Office, 2800 Cottage Way, Room E– Florence Oregon at the Driftwood 1803, Sacramento, California 95825– Shores Conference Center, 88416 First 1846. Comments and materials received Avenue; Tuesday, June 13, 1995, from 6 will be available for public inspection p.m. to 8 p.m. in Monterey, California, during normal business hours, by at the Hyatt Regency, 1 Old Golf Course appointment, at the above address. Road; and Thursday, June 15, 1995, Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Proposed Rules 25883 from 2 p.m. to 4 p.m. and 6 p.m. to 8 p.m. in Eureka, California at the Eureka Inn, 518 7th Street. Parties wishing to make statements for the record should bring a copy of their statements to the hearing. Oral statements may be limited in length, if the number of parties present at the hearing necessitates such a limitation. There are, however, no limits to the length of written comments or materials presented at the hearing or mailed to the Service. The comment period closes on June 30, 1995. Written comments should be submitted to the Service in the ADDRESSES section. Author The primary author of this notice is Ms. Karen J. Miller, Sacramento Field Office, at the above address. Authority: The authority for this action is the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). Dated: May 9, 1995. Thomas Dwyer, Acting Regional Director, Region 1, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. [FR Doc. 95–11886 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310±55±M 25884 Notices Federal Register Vol. 60, No. 93 Monday, May 15, 1995 This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER for this process was circulated in Decision will be delayed until October, contains documents other than rules or December, 1994. 1995, to allow a minimum of 30 days for proposed rules that are applicable to the Concurrent to this process, a separate the public to review and comment on public. Notices of hearings and investigations, timber analysis and forest plan the final environmental impact committee meetings, agency decisions and amendment process was being statement and to coordinate the rulings, delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency conducted for the Kaibab National Regional Forester decision with the final statements of organization and functions are Forest. A notice of intent to prepare an Mexican Spotted Owl Recovery Plan. examples of documents appearing in this environmental impact statement for this In the short period of time between section. process was filed in the Federal now and the Regional Forester decision Register (Vol. 56, No. 37, pages 7659– of October, 1995, the Regional Forester 7660) on February 25, 1991. A draft has directed continued protection of the DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE environmental impact statement was Mexican spotted owl and northern circulated for comment in July, 1994. goshawk in all project level ground Forest Service Public comments received from both disturbing activities. The Regional environmental impact statement Forester intends for consultation with Southwestern Region: Arizona, New processes requested that the two USDI–FWS to continue for all Mexico, West Texas and Oklahoma separate procedures be combined. The management activities that may affect Amendment of National Forest Plans in revised notice of intent published on the Mexican spotted owl. the Southwestern Region to Include March 20, 1995, stated the intent of Guidelines for Management of Habitat Dated: May 9, 1995. combining both environmental impact John R. Kirkpatrick, for the Mexican Spotted Owl and statements into a single process. This Northern Goshawk Deputy Regional Forester, Southwestern most recent revised notice of intent does Region. not affect the decision to combine the AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA. [FR Doc. 95–11883 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] two previous EIS efforts. Comments ACTION: Revised Notice of Intent to BILLING CODE 3410±11±M received from review of both draft Prepare an Environmental Impact environmental impact statements will Statement. be considered. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE SUMMARY: The Southwestern Region of The notice of intent published on the Forest Service published a revised March 20, 1995, also gave notice that a Bureau of the Census notice of intent to prepare an new draft environmental impact environmental impact statement in the statement would be issued in January, [Docket No. 950426115±5115±01] Federal Register (Vol. 60, No. 53, pages 1996, with a final environmental impact statement released in fall of 1996. 2000 Census Public Law 94±171 14719–14720) on March 20, 1995. This Program revised notice was issued to change a Several factors have caused the Regional notice of intent to prepare an Forester to reconsider this time AGENCY: Bureau of the Census, environmental impact statement that schedule. The U.S. Department of Commerce. appeared in the Federal Register (Vol. Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service ACTION: Notice of program. 57, No. 122, pages 28171–28172) on (USDI–FWS) intends to finalize the June 24, 1992. Several factors affecting Recovery Plan for the Mexican Spotted SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the management of the Mexican spotted Owl in fall of 1995. The accelerated Public Law 94–171 (Title 13, United owl and northern goshawk now make it Forest Service planning schedule will States Code, Section 141 (c)), the necessary to further revise the notice of facilitate better coordination with the Director of the Census Bureau is intent. USDI–FWS on Mexican spotted owl required to provide the ‘‘officers or management. public bodies with initial responsibility RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: The Regional The Regional Forester has decided Forester, Southwestern Region, is the for legislative apportionment or that more permanent management responsible official for decisions that districting of each state . . .’’ with the direction for northern goshawks should affect Southwestern Region Forest Land opportunity to specify the small be in place as soon as possible. Recent and Resource Management Plans. geographic areas (for example, election Federal Court rulings have necessitated precincts, voting districts, wards) for FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: changes in forest planning and which they wish to receive decennial Director of Ecosystems Management endangered species consultation census population totals for the purpose Planning, Southwestern Regional Office, processes with respect to the proposed of reapportionment or redistricting. (505) 842–3210. amendment of Southwestern Region By April 1 of the year following the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Land and Resource Management Plans. decennial census, the Director is original environmental impact Present management guidelines for required to furnish these state officials statement (EIS) process was initiated to northern goshawk management shall or their designees with population totals amend Southwestern Region Forest continue in effect until permanent for standard census areas (for example, Plans to include guidelines for direction in forest plans is finalized. counties, cities, census tracts, and management of the Mexican spotted owl This notice serves to document the blocks) and for state-specified voting and northern goshawk. This process did intent of the Regional Forester to issue districts (for example, election not include the Kaibab National Forest. a final environmental impact statement precincts, wards) that meet Census A draft environmental impact statement in September, 1995. The Record of Bureau technical criteria as established Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices 25885 under the provisions of Public Law 94– In accordance with the provisions of forth) and census blocks statewide by 171. Therefore, in accordance with these Public Law 94–171 (Title 13, United April 1, 2001. provisions of Public Law 94–171 (Title States Code, Section 141 (c)), the State participation in Phase 1 and 13, United States Code, Section 141 (c)), Director of the Census Bureau is Phase 2 of the 2000 Census Redistricting the Director of the Census Bureau is announcing the commencement of Data Program under Public Law 94–171 announcing the establishment of the Phase 1, the Block Boundary Suggestion is voluntary. A state may choose to limit 2000 Census Redistricting Data Program. Project, of the 2000 Census Redistricting its participation to only Phase 1 or FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Data Program. The Census Bureau has Phase 2 and may elect to include only Marshall L. Turner, Jr., Chief, Census provided technical guidelines for state selected areas (that is, whole counties or 2000 Redistricting Data Office, U.S. participation in the BBSP to the parishes) when participating. Address Bureau of the Census, Washington, DC governor, secretary of state, and majority questions concerning any aspect of the 20233. Telephone (301) 457–4039; fax and minority legislative leaders of each 2000 Census Redistricting Data Program (301) 457–4348; email state legislature. Copies of these to the Director, U.S. Bureau of the [email protected]. guidelines are available on request from Census, Washington, DC 20233. the Director, U.S. Bureau of the Census, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Dated: May 2, 1995. As in the Washington, DC 20233. 1990 census, the 2000 Census If a state plans to participate in the Martha Farnsworth Riche, Redistricting Data Program will have BBSP, the Census Bureau asks the Director, Bureau of the Census. three phases. governor and the majority and minority [FR Doc. 95–11490 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] Phase 1 legislative leaders (as well as any other BILLING CODE 3510±07±P state officials with initial responsibility Block Boundary Suggestion Project for reapportionment/redistricting) to (BBSP). Beginning in late summer 1995, designate jointly a contact person or International Trade Administration states choosing to participate will begin persons with whom Census Bureau staff Initiation of Antidumping and to receive, on a flow basis, new census will communicate for this Program. The map sheets showing natural (for deadline for states to notify the Census Countervailing Duty Administrative example, rivers, streams) and Bureau that they wish to participate in Reviews and Requests for Revocation constructed (for example, streets, the BBSP is June 30, 1995. In late in Part highways, canals) features that are summer of 1995 the Census Bureau will AGENCY: Import Administration, visible on the ground. States will be begin to transmit census maps to the International Trade Administration, asked to specify which of these features participating states for BBSP. Department of Commerce. they wish the Census Bureau to ‘‘hold’’ In mid-1997 the Census Bureau will as outer boundaries of census blocks to ACTION: Notice of initiation of announce the technical and other antidumping and countervailing duty be used in the 2000 census. criteria for participation in Phase 2, the administrative reviews and requests for If states do not take part in the BBSP, Voting District Project. The VTDP will revocation in part. the Census Bureau cannot ensure that take place in 1998–1999. Participation the 2000 census blocks can be in the BBSP is not a prerequisite for SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce cumulated to provide census population participation in Phases 2 or 3 of the (the Department) has received requests totals for local voting districts (VTDs) Public Law 94–171 Program. A state to conduct administrative reviews of used by the state to redistrict the may decide not to participate in the various antidumping and countervailing legislature or other elective bodies. BBSP activities but later participate in duty orders and findings with April Phase 2 the VTDP and submit VTD boundaries anniversary dates. In accordance with using groups of whole 1 census blocks as the Commerce Regulations, we are Voting District Project (VTDP). shown on census maps. initiating those administrative reviews. Beginning in mid-1998, the Census Phase 3 will begin in early 2001. By The Department also received requests Bureau will provide requesting states April 1 of 2001, the Director of the to revoke two antidumping duty orders with map sheets outlining the Census Bureau will, in accordance with and one finding in part. boundaries of blocks to be used in the Public Law 94–171, furnish the EFFECTIVE DATE: May 15, 1995. 2000 census. Participating states can governor and state legislative leaders, specify which whole blocks make up both majority and minority, with 2000 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: each designated VTD. States cannot census population totals for standard Holly A Kuga, Office of Antidumping subdivide whole census blocks during census tabulation areas (for example, Compliance, Import Administration, the VTDP. counties, cities, towns, census tracts, International Trade Administration, and blocks) and for any VTDs that the U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Phase 3 state submitted and the Census Bureau Street and Constitution, N.W., Delivery of Census 2000 Redistricting accepted during Phase 2. If the state Washington, D.C. 20230, telephone: Data. By the legal deadline of April 1, does not participate in Phase 2, the state (202) 482–4737. 2001 (Title 13, United States Code, need take no further action. The SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 141(c)), the Census Bureau will Director of the Census Bureau will provide to the governor, legislature, or provide these nonparticipating states Background other bodies having initial with 2000 census population totals for The Department has received timely responsibility for redistricting/ standard census tabulation areas (for requests, in accordance with 19 CFR reapportionment, census 2000 example, counties, cities, towns, and so 353.22(a) and 355.22(a) (1994), for population totals for the state, each administrative reviews of various county, city, town, census tract, census 1 States may not split whole census blocks. antidumping and countervailing duty block, and any state-specified VTDs that However, states may use any parts of blocks that are orders and findings with April shown on census maps. These ‘‘parts’’ result from meet the technical criteria established Census Bureau splits required to recognize standard anniversary dates. The Department also by the Census Bureau under the census tabulation areas such as counties, cities, and received timely requests to revoke in provisions of this law. towns. part the antidumping duty orders on 25886 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices certain fresh cut flowers from Mexico administrative review of any exporters These initiations and this notice are and color television receivers from and/or producers who were not named in accordance with section 751(a) of the Korea, and the antidumping finding on in a review request because such Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 roller chain, other than bicycle, from exporters and/or producers were not U.S.C. 1675(a)) and 19 CFR 353.22(c)(1) Japan. specified as required under § 353.22(a) and 355.22(c)(1). (19 CFR 353.22(a)). We intend to issue Initiation of Reviews the final results of these reviews not Dated: May 10, 1995. In accordance with sections 19 CFR later than April 30, 1996. Roland L. MacDonald 353.22(c) and 355.22(c), we are Interested parties must submit Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for initiating administrative reviews of the applications for disclosure under Compliance following antidumping and administrative protective orders in [FR Doc. 95–12017 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] countervailing duty orders and findings. accordance with 19 C.F.R. 353.34(b) and BILLING CODE 3510±DS±M The Department is not initiating an 355.34(b). Period to be Antidumping duty proceedings reviewed Brazil: Ferrosilicon A±351±820 Companhia Ferrolingas Minas, Gerais-Minasligas 1 ...... 03/01/94±02/28/96 Japan: Roller Chain, Other Than Bicycle A±588±028 Daido Kogyo, Daido Tsusho/Daido Corporation, Enuma Chain, Hitachi Metals/Hitachi Maxco, Izumi, Peer Chain Company, Pulton Chain, RK Excel (Takasago) ...... 04/01/94±03/31/95 Korea: Color Television Receivers A±580±008 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd...... 04/01/94±03/31/95 Mexico: Certain Fresh Cut Flowers A±201±601 Rancho El Aguaje, Rancho Guacatay, Rancho El Toro ...... 04/01/94±03/31/95 Norway: Fresh and Chilled Atlantic Salmon A±403±801 Skaarfish ...... 04/01/94±03/31/95 Taiwan: Color Television Receivers, Except for Video Monitors A±583±009 Proton Electronics Indus. Co ...... 04/01/94±03/31/95 Countervailing Duty Proceedings Argentina: Wool C±357±002 01/01/94±12/31/94 Mexico: Leather Wearing Apparel 2 C±201±001 01/01/94±12/31/94 Suspension Agreements Colombia: Miniature Carnations 3 C±301±601 01/01/94±12/31/94 1 Inadvertently omitted from previous initiation notice. 2 The Government of Mexico requested a country-wide review under 19 CFR 355.22(a)(1). Two companies also requested company-specific reviews under 19 CFR 355.22(a)(2). The Department is currently reviewing these requests to ensure that they meet the requirements for individ- ual company reviews. 3 Inadvertently omitted from previous initiation notice. Foreign-Trade Zones Board area, within the Detroit, Michigan, (Board Order 453, 54 FR 50258) and Customs port of entry. The application April 20, 1990 (Board Order 471, 55 FR [Docket 20±95] was submitted pursuant to the 17775). The general-purpose zone Foreign-Trade Zone 70ÐDetroit, provisions of the Foreign-Trade Zones currently consists of eleven sites and Michigan Application for Expansion Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), seventeen special-purpose subzones in and the regulations of the Board (15 CFR the Detroit, Michigan area. An application has been submitted to Part 400). It was formally filed on May the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the The applicant is now requesting 4, 1995. Board) by the Greater Detroit Foreign authority to further expand the general- Trade Zone, Inc., grantee of Foreign- FTZ 70 was approved on July 21, purpose zone to include jet fuel storage Trade Zone 70, requesting authority to 1981 (Board Order 176, 46 FR 38941) and distribution facilities at the Detroit expand its zone in the Detroit, Michigan and expanded on November 27, 1989 Metropolitan Wayne County Airport. Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices 25887 The facilities (49 acres) include the Department) published the final results sale freight, and therefore, the decision airport fuel farm and related fuel of its administrative reviews of the of the Court of Appeals for the Federal delivery systems (5 acres); an off-airport antidumping duty orders on antifriction Circuit in Ad Hoc Committee of AZ-NM- bulk storage facility (44 acres, 8503 S. bearings (other than tapered roller TX-FL Producers of Grey Portland Inkster Rd., Taylor, MI); and connecting bearings) and parts thereof (AFBs) from Cement v. United States should have pipelines. France, et al. (60 FR 10900). On April had no effect on SNR’s domestic inland The system is operated by Northwest 10, 1995, the Court of International freight expense. We agree that we made Airlines, Inc., which plans to make the Trade (CIT) ordered the Department to an error in treating SNR’s domestic foreign-trade zone status jet fuel correct a ministerial error in the final inland freight as an indirect selling available to all carriers operating results with respect to AFBs from expense, and we have corrected this international flights at the airport. France sold by SNR Roulements (SNR). error for these amended final results of No specific manufacturing requests Accordingly, we are amending our final review by deducting the expenses from are being made at this time. Such results of administrative review of the foreign market value. requests would be made to the Board on antidumping duty orders on AFBs from Based on the correction of the a case-by-case basis. France with respect to SNR. The ministerial error in our calculations for In accordance with the Board’s reviews cover the period May 1, 1992, SNR, we have determined that the regulations, a member of the FTZ Staff through April 30, 1993. The ‘‘classes or following percentage weighted-average has been designated examiner to kinds’’ of merchandise covered by these margins exist for the period May 1, investigate the application and report to reviews are ball bearings and parts 1992, through April 30, 1993: the Board. thereof (BBs) and cylindrical roller Public comment on the application is bearings and parts thereof (CRBs). Company BBs CRBs invited from interested parties. EFFECTIVE DATE: May 15, 1995. Submissions (original and 3 copies) SNR ...... 1.89 2.58 shall be addressed to the Board’s FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Executive Secretary at the address Michael Rill, Office of Antidumping Based on these results, the below. The closing period for their Compliance, Import Administration, Department will instruct the Customs receipt is July 14, 1995. Rebuttal U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Service to collect cash deposits of comments in response to material Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W., estimated antidumping duties on all submitted during the foregoing period Washington, D.C. 20230; telephone appropriate entries in accordance with may be submitted during the subsequent (202) 482–4733. the procedures discussed in the final 15-day period (to July 31, 1995). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: results of these reviews. These deposit A copy of the application and requirements are effective for all accompanying exhibits will be available Background shipments of the subject merchandise for public inspection at each of the On February 28, 1995, the Department entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, following locations: published the final results of for consumption on or after the date of U.S. Department of Commerce, District antidumping duty administrative publication of this notice and shall Office, 477 Michigan Avenue, 1140 review, partial termination, and remain in effect until publication of the McNamara Building, Detroit, revocation in part of antidumping duty final results of the next administrative Michigan 48226 orders on antifriction bearings (other review. Office of the Executive Secretary, than tapered roller bearings) and parts This notice serves as a reminder to Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room thereof from France, et al. (60 FR importers of their responsibility under 3716, U.S. Department of Commerce, 10900). The reviews of AFBs from 19 CFR 353.26 to file a certificate 14th and Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., France covered six manufacturers/ regarding the reimbursement of Washington, DC 20230 exporters. The review period is May 1, antidumping duties prior to liquidation Dated: May 5, 1995 1992, through April 30, 1993. The of the relevant entries during the review John J. Da Ponte, Jr., classes or kinds of merchandise covered period. Failure to comply with this Executive Secretary. by these reviews are BBs and CRBs. For requirement could result in the Secretary’s presumption that [FR Doc. 95–11922 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] a detailed description of the products covered under these classes or kinds of reimbursement of antidumping occurred BILLING CODE 3510±DS±P merchandise, including a compilation of and the subsequent assessment of all pertinent scope determinations, see double antidumping duties. International Trade Administration the ‘‘Scope Appendix’’ of the final This amendment of final results of results referenced above. review and notice are in accordance [A±427±801] One respondent, SNR, challenged the with section 751(f) of the Tariff Act (19 final results before the CIT alleging a U.S.C. 1673(d)) and 19 CFR 353.28(c). Antifriction Bearings (Other Than ministerial error. On April 10, 1995, the Tapered Roller Bearings) and Parts Dated: May 8, 1995. CIT ordered the Department to correct Thereof From France; Amended Final Susan G. Esserman, the error and publish the amended final Results of Antidumping Duty Assistant Secretary for Import results in the Federal Register. Administrative Reviews Administration. Amended Final Results of Review [FR Doc. 95–11923 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] AGENCY : Import Administration, BILLING CODE 3510±DS±M International Trade Administration, We have corrected the ministerial Department of Commerce. error in SNR’s margin calculation for the ACTION: Notice of amended final results period May 1, 1992, through April 30, United States-Canada Free-Trade of antidumping duty administrative 1993. SNR alleged that the Department’s Agreement, Article 1904 Binational reviews. treatment of its domestic inland freight Panel Reviews; Decision of Panel expense as an indirect selling expense SUMMARY: On February 28, 1995, the was in error. SNR claimed that it did not AGENCY: North American Free-Trade Department of Commerce (the incur or report any home market pre- Agreement (NAFTA) Secretariat, United 25888 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices States Section, International Trade redetermination made by the amended by Amendments to the Rules Administration, Department of International Trade Administration on of Procedure for Article 1904 Binational Commerce. January 30, 1995. Panel Reviews, published in the Federal ACTION: Notice of decision of Binational The Binational Panel instructed ITA Register on December 27, 1989 (54 FR Panel. to provide its determination on remand 53165). A a consolidated version of the within 30 days of the panel decision (by amended Rules was published in the SUMMARY: By an opinion dated May 1, May 31, 1995). Federal Register on June 15, 1992 (57 1995, the Binational Panel reviewing the Dated: May 9, 1995. FR 26698). The Rules were further final affirmative dumping determination James R. Holbein, amended and published in the Federal made by the International Trade United States Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat. Register on February 8, 1994 (59 FR Administration (ITA) respecting Certain [FR Doc. 95–11853 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] 5892). The panel review in this matter Corrosion-Resistant Carbon Steel was conducted in accordance with the BILLING CODE 3510±GT±M Products from Canada (Secretariat File Rules, as amended. No. USA–93–1904–03), affirmed in part Panel Decision and remanded in part the January 30, United States-Canada Free-Trade 1995 redetermination to the ITA for Agreement, Article 1904 Binational On May 1, 1995, the Binational Panel further action. A Copy of the complete Panel Reviews; Decision of Panel affirmed in part and remanded in part panel decision is available from the the final affirmative dumping AGENCY: North American Free-Trade NAFTA Secretariat. redetermination made by the Agreement (NAFTA) Secretariat, United International Trade Administration on FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: States Section, International Trade January 30, 1995. James R. Holbein, United States Administration, Department of Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat, Suite The Binational Panel instructed ITA Commerce. to provide its determination on remand 2061, 14th and Constitution Avenue, ACTION: Notice of decision of Binational Washington, DC 20230, (202) 482–5438. within 30 days of the panel decision (by Panel. May 31, 1995). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Chapter 19 of the United States-Canada Free- SUMMARY: By an opinion dated May 1, Dated: May 9, 1995. Trade Agreement (‘‘Agreement’’) 1955, the Binational Panel reviewing the James R. Holbein, establishes a mechanism to replace final affirmative dumping United States Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat. redetermination made by the domestic judicial review of final [FR Doc. 95–11854 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] determinations in antidumping and International Trade Administration BILLING CODE 3510±GT±M countervailing duty cases involving (ITA) respecting Certain Cut-To-Length imports from the other country with Carbon Steel Plate from Canada review by independent binational (Secretariat File No. USA–93–1904–04) National Institute of Standards and panels. When a Request for Panel affirmed in part and remanded in part Technology Review is filed, a panel is established to the January 30, 1995 redetermination to act in place of national courts to review the ITA for further action. A copy of the [Docket No. 950215052±5052±01] expeditiously the final determination to complete panel decision is available from the NAFTA Secretariat. Approval of Federal Information determine whether it conforms with the Processing Standards Publications antidumping or countervailing duty law FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James R. Holbein, United States (FIPS) 146±2, Profiles for Open of the country that made the Systems Internetworking determination. Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat, Suite 2061, 14th and Constitution Avenue, Technologies, and 179±1, Government Under Article 1904 of the Agreement, Network Management Profile which came into force on January 1, Washington, DC 20230, (202) 482–5438. 1989, the Government of the United SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Chapter AGENCY: National Institute of Standards States and the Government of Canada 19 of United States-Canada Free-Trade and Technology (NIST), Commerce. established Rules of Procedure for Agreement (‘‘Agreement’’) establishes a ACTION: The purpose of this notice is to Article 1904 Binational Panel Reviews mechanism to replace domestic judicial announce that the Secretary of (‘‘Rules’’). The Rules were published in review of final determinations in Commerce has approved two revised the Federal Register on December 30, antidumping and countervailing duty standards, which will be published as 1988 (53 FR 53212). The Rules were cases involving imports from the other FIPS Publication 146–2, Profiles for amended by Amendments to the Rules country with review by independent Open Systems Internetworking of Procedure for Article 1904 Binational binational panels. When a Request for Technologies (POSIT), and FIPS 179–1, Panel Reviews, published in the Federal Panel Review is filed, a panel is Government Network Management Register on December 27, 1989 (54 FR established to act in place of national Profile (GNMP). 53165). A consolidated version of the courts to review expeditiously the final amended Rules was published in the determination to determine whether it SUMMARY: On September 14, 1994 (59 Federal Register on June 15, 1992 (57 conforms with the antidumping or FR 47119–47121), notice was published FR 26698). The Rules were further countervailing duty law of the country in the Federal Register that revisions to amended and published in the Federal that made the determination Federal Information Processing Register on February 8, 1994 (59 FR Under Article 1904 of the Agreement, Standard 146–1, Version 2 of the 5892). The panel review in this matter which came into force on January 1, Government Open Systems was conducted in accordance with the 1989, the Government of the United Interconnection Profile (GOSIP), and rules, as amended. States and the Government of Canada FIPS 179, Government Network established Rules of Procedure for Management Profile, (GNMP) were Panel Decision Article 1904 Binational Panel Reviews being proposed for Federal use. On May 1, 1995, the Binational Panel (‘‘Rules’’). The Rules were published in The written comments submitted by affirmed in part and remanded in part the Federal Register on December 30, interested parties and other material the final affirmative dumping 1988 (53 FR 53212). The Rules were available to the Department relevant to Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices 25889 the revised standards were reviewed by 1. Name of Standard. Profiles for products implementing open, NIST. On the basis of this review, NIST Open Systems Internetworking voluntary standards such as those recommended that the Secretary Technologies (POSIT)(FIPS PUB 146–2). developed by the Internet Engineering approve the revised Federal Information 2. Category of Standard. Hardware Task Force (IETF), the International Processing Standards Publications, and and Software Standards, Computer Telecommunication Union, prepared a detailed justification Network Protocols. Telecommunication Standardization document for the Secretary’s review in 3. Explanation. FIPS 146–1 adopted Sector (ITU–T; formerly the support of that recommendation. the Government Open Systems Consultative Committee on The detailed justification document Interconnection Profile (GOSIP) which International Telegraph and which was presented to the Secretary is defines a common set of Open Systems Telephone [CCITT]), and the part of the public record and is available Interconnection (OSI) protocols that International Organization for for inspection and copying in the enable systems developed by different Standardization (ISO). Department’s Central Reference and vendors to interoperate and the users of 8. Specifications. See documents in Records Inspection Facility, Room 6020, different applications on those systems Implementation Section. Herbert C. Hoover Building, 14th Street to exchange information. This change 9. Applicability. Open, voluntary between Pennsylvania and Constitution modifies FIPS 146–1 by removing the standards should be used by Federal Avenues, NW., Washington, DC 20230. requirement that Federal agencies Government agencies when acquiring specify GOSIP protocols when they These FIPS contain two sections: (1) computer networking products and acquire networking products and An announcement section, which services and communications systems services and communications systems provides information concerning the or services. and services. This change references applicability, implementation, and 10. Implementation. The Industry additional specifications that Federal maintenance of the standards; and (2) a Government Open Systems agencies may use in acquiring data specifications section which deals with Specification (IGOSS) issued as NIST communications protocols. Special Publication 500–217 updates the technical requirements of the 4. Approving Authority. Secretary of standards. Only the announcement the OSI protocols in FIPS 146–1 and Commerce. may be used immediately by Federal sections of both standards is provided in 5. Maintenance Agency. U.S. Government agencies when they wish to this notice. Department of Commerce, National acquire computer networking products EFFECTIVE DATE: Institute of Standards and Technology These revised standards and services and communications (NIST), Computer Systems Laboratory may be used immediately by Federal systems or services that are based on Government agencies. (CSL). 6. Related Documents. OSI standards. ADDRESSES: Interested parties may a. NIST Special Publication 500–217, In addition, other specifications based purchase copies of these revised Industry Government Open Systems on open, voluntary standards such as standards, including the technical Specification (IGOSS), or subsequent those cited in paragraph 7 may be used. specifications sections, from the versions, May 1994. The National Institute of Standards National Technical Information Service b. Internet Official Protocol and Technology has described a testing (NTIS). Specific ordering information Standards, Internet RFC 1610, or program in IGOSS Industry/Government from NTIS for these standards is set out subsequent versions. Open Systems Specification Testing in the Where to Obtain Copies Section c. NIST Special Publication 500–224, Framework, (NISTIR 5438). This testing of the announcement section of each Stable Implementation Agreements for is voluntary and limited to the protocols standard. Open Systems Interconnection that conform to the standards included FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Protocols, or subsequent versions. in the IGOSS. However, this and other test methodologies may be adapted for Mr. Gerard F. Mulvenna, telephone Note: This reference is the most recent use in testing compliance to other (301) 975–3631, National Institute of version of the Stable Implementation profiles whenever government agencies Standards and Technology, Agreements. The Stable Implementation have demonstrable need for more Gaithersburg, MD 20899. Agreements are updated at regular intervals, but no more than once a year. Interested stringent testing. Dated: May 9, 1995. parties should contact NIST for information 11. Special Information. The National Samuel Kramer, about the latest available version. Institute of Standards and Technology Associate Director. d. NISTIR 5438, Industry/Government plans to work with other government agencies and with industry to develop Federal Information Processing Open Systems Specification Testing additional profiles based on open, Standards Publication 146–2 Framework, or subsequent versions, June 1994. voluntary standards and to publish (Date) 7. Objectives. The primary objectives these profiles in separate documents. Announcing the Standard for Profiles of this standard are: Future versions of this standard will for Open Systems Internetworking —To promote interconnection and reference these additional profiles and Technologies (POSIT) interoperability of computers and will contain information related to systems that are acquired from recommended use of such additional Federal Information Processing different manufacturers in an open profiles. Standards Publications (FISP PUBS) are systems environment; Interoperability is a key requirement issued by the National Institute of —To reduce the costs of computer for the effective usage of information Standards and Technology after network systems by increasing technology. Consequently, Federal approval by the Secretary of Commerce alternative sources of supply; agencies are strongly encouraged to pursuant to Section 111(d) of the —To facilitate the use of advanced acquire components that have either Federal Property and Administrative technology by the Federal been tested for interoperability or Services Act of 1949 as amended by the Government; otherwise demonstrably meet the Computer Security Act of 1987, Public —To provide guidance for the agencies’ interoperability requirements. Law 100–235. acquisition and use of networking The appropriate extent of such testing 25890 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices will be determined by the affinity for Standardization (ISO), and the The OMNIPoint which references IETF groups developing the profiles and by International Telecommunications and OSI standards can serve as an the acquiring agencies. Union, Telecommunication example for the development of such 12. Where to Obtain Copies. Copies of Standardization Sector (ITU–T; formerly specifications. this publication are for sale by the the Consultative Committee on 12. Special Information. The National National Technical Information Service International Telegraph and Telephone Institute of Standards and Technology (NTIS), U.S. Department of Commerce, [CCITT]). plans to work with other government Springfield, VA 22161. When ordering, 4. Approving Authority. Secretary of agencies and with industry to develop refer to Federal Information Processing Commerce. additional profiles based on open, Standards Publication 146–2 5. Maintenance Agency. U.S. voluntary standards and to publish (FIPSPUB146–2), and title. Specify Department of Commerce, National these profiles in separate documents. microfiche if desired. Payment may be Institute of Standards and Technology Future versions of this standard will made by check, money order, or NTIS (NIST), Computer Systems Laboratory reference these additional profiles and deposit account. (CSL). will contain information related to 6. Cross Index. recommended use of such additional Federal Information Processing a. NIST Special Publication 500–202, profiles. Standards Publication 179–1 Stable Implementation Agreements for Interoperability is a key requirement (Date) Open Systems Interconnection for the effective usage of information technology. Consequently, federal Announcing the Standard for Protocols, Version 5, Edition 1, NIST Workshop for Implementators of Open agencies are strongly encouraged to Government Network Management acquire components that have either Profile (GNMP) Systems Environment, June 1992. (NOTE: This reference is not the most been tested for interoperability or Federal Information Processing recent version of the Stable otherwise demonstrably meet the Standards Publications (FIPS PUBS) are Implementation Agreements; however, agencies’ interoperability requirements. issued by the National Institute of it is the source of specifications for The appropriate extent of such testing Standards and Technology after GNMP, Version 1.0). will be determined by the affinity approval by the Secretary of Commerce b. FIPS PUB 146–2, Profiles for Open groups developing the profiles and by pursuant to Section 111(d) of the Systems Internetworking Technologies. the acquiring agencies. Federal Property and Administrative 7. Related Documents. Related 13. Where to Obtain Copies. Copies of Services Act of 1949 as amended by the documents are listed in the Reference this publication are for sale by the Computer Security Act of 1987, Public Section of the GNMP document. National Technical Information Service Law 100–235. 8. Objectives. The primary objectives (NTIS), U.S. Department of Commerce, 1. Name of Standard. Government of this standard are: Springfield, VA 22161. When ordering, Network Management Profile (GNMP) —To promote interconnection and refer to Federal Information Processing (FIPS PUB 179–1). Standards Publication 179–1 2. Category of Standard. Hardware interoperability of computers and systems that are acquired from (FIPSPUB179–1), and title. Specify and Software Standards, Computer microfiche if desired. Payment may be Network Protocols. different manufacturers in an open systems environment; made by check, money order, or NTIS 3. Explanation. This Federal deposit account. Information Processing Standard adopts —To reduce costs of computer network the Government Network Management systems by increasing alternative [FR Doc. 95–11917 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] Profile (GNMP) Version 1.0. The GNMP sources of supply; BILLING CODE 3510±CN±M specifies the common management —To facilitate the use of advanced information exchange protocol and technology by the Federal National Institute of Standards and services, specifies management Government; Technology Visiting Committee on functions and services, and the syntax —To provide guidance for the Advanced Technology and semantics of the management acquisition and use of networking products implementing open, information required to support AGENCY: National Institute of Standards monitoring and control of the network voluntary standards such as those and Technology, Department of and system components and their cited in paragraph 3. Commerce. resources. 9. Specifications. GNMP ACTION: Notice of public meeting. The primary source of specifications specifications in FIPS 179. in the Version 1.0 GNMP is part 18 of 10. Applicability. Open, voluntary SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal the OIW Stable Implementation standards should be used by the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app. Agreements, June 1992, developed by Government agencies when acquiring 2, notice is hereby given that the the Open Systems Environment computer networking products and National Institute of Standards and Implementors Workshop (OIW) services and communications systems Technology (NIST) will meet Tuesday, sponsored by NIST and the IEEE or services. These include the June 6, 1995, from 8:30 a.m. to 4:45 Computer Society. This source provides specifications referenced above. p.m,, and on Wednesday, June 7, 1995, implementation for network 11. Implementation. This from 8:30 a.m. to 9:45 a.m. The Visiting management based on the service and specification may be used immediately Committee on Advanced Technology is protocol standards issued by the by Federal Government agencies when composed of nine members appointed International Organization for they wish to acquire computer by the Director of NIST who are eminent Standardization (IOS). networking products and services and in such fields as business, research, new Additional profiles will be developed communications systems or services product development, engineering, implementing open, voluntary that are based on OSI standards. labor, education, management standards such as those developed by In addition, other specifications based consulting, environment, and the Internet Engineering Task Force on open, voluntary standards such as international relations. The purpose of (IETF), the International Organization those cited in paragraph 3 may be used. this meeting is the review and make Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices 25891 recommendations regarding general embodied in U.S. Patent Serial Number National Oceanic and Atmospheric policy for the Institute, its organization, 08/360,963, titled, ‘‘Strut Structure and Administration its budget, and its programs within the Rigid Joint Therefor’’ to Technical [Docket No. 950120020±5129±02; I.D. framework of applicable national Instrument Company, having a place of 040695B] policies as set forth by the President and business in San Jose, California. The the Congress. On June 6, 1995, the patent rights in this invention have been RIN 0648±AG75 agenda will include an update on NIST assigned to the United States of West Coast Salmon Fisheries; programs by NIST Director Prabhakar; America. evaluation of the Applied Technology Northwest Emergency Assistance Program, the Manufacturing Extension FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Program; Proposed Amendment Partnership, and the Malcolm Baldrige Bruce E. Mattson, National Institute of AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries National Quality Award Program; a Standards and Technology, Technology Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and laboratory tour; and presentations on Development and Small Business Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), biotechnology and communications Program, Building 221, Room B–256, Commerce. strategy. On June 7, 1995, there will be Gaithersburg, MD 20852. ACTION: Program for financial assistance; a presentation on standards and proposed amendment. international trade. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The prospective exclusive license will be SUMMARY: The Vessel Permit Buyout DATES: The meeting will convene June Program (Buyout Program) established 6, 1995, at 8:30 a.m. and will adjourn at royalty-bearing and will comply with under the Northwest Emergency 9:45 p.m. on June 7, 1995. the terms and conditions of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. The prospective Assistance Program (NEAP) has been ADDRESSES: On June 6, 1995, from 8:30 exclusive license may be granted unless, developed in consultation with NMFS a.m. to 11:20 a.m., the meeting will be by the Washington Department of Fish held in the Conference Room (seating within sixty days from the date of this published Notice, NIST receives written and Wildlife (WDFW). For purposes of capacity 33, includes 27 participants) at the Buyout Program only, the the Clarion Harvest House, 1345–28th evidence and argument which establish that the grant of the license would not definitions of ‘‘commercial fishery’’ and Street, Boulder, Colorado; and from 1:25 ‘‘commercial fisheries income’’ are be consistent with the requirements of p.m. to 3:45 p.m., the meeting will be proposed to be modified to clarify the 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. held at NIST-Boulder in Conference exclusion of Puget Sound gill net permit Room 1107 (seating capacity 45, U.S. Patent Serial Number 08/360,963 holders from the Buyout Program, and includes 27 participants) in the Radio is a system of mechanical joints and Puget Sound commercial fishing income Building, Boulder, Colorado. On June 7, clamps for assembling lightweight struts from the uninsured loss calculations 1995, from 8:30 to 9:45 a.m., the into a rigid structure. associated with the Buyout Program. meeting will be held in the Conference NIST may enter into a Cooperative Also, a definition of ‘‘coastal waters’’ is Room (seating capacity 33, includes 26 proposed in order to clarify the sources participants) at the Clarion Harvest Research and Development Agreement (‘‘CRADA’’) to perform further research of commercial fisheries income that can House, 1245–28th Street, Boulder, be used to qualify for the Buyout on the invention for purposes of Colorado. Program. This proposed amendment is commercialization. The CRADA may be FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: intended to limit the Buyout Program to Chris E. Kuyatt, Visiting Committee conducted by NIST without any those permit holders most impacted by Executive Director, National Institute of additional charge to any party that the ocean chinook and coho salmon Standards and Technology, licenses the patent. NIST may grant the disaster declared by the Secretary of Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, licensee an option to negotiate for Commerce on May 26, 1994. telephone number (301) 975–6090. royalty-free exclusive licenses to any DATES: Written comments must be Dated: May 9, 1995. jointly owned inventions which arise received by May 30, 1995. from the CRADA as well as an option to Samuel Kramer, ADDRESSES: Comments should be sent to negotiate for exclusive royalty-bearing Associate Director. Stephen P. Freese, Northwest licenses for NIST employee inventions [FR Doc. 95–11899 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] Emergency Assistance Program, Trade which arise from the CRADA. and Industry Services Division, BILLING CODE 3510±13±M The availability of the invention for Northwest Regional Office, National licensing was published in the Federal Marine Fisheries Service, Bin C15700, National Institute of Standards and Register, Vol. 60, No. 55 (60 FR 15126, 7600 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA Technology March 22, 1995). A copy of the patent 98115. application may be obtained from NIST FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Prospective Grant of Exclusive Patent at the foregoing address. Bruce Morehead, (301) 713–2358, or License Stephen Freese, (206) 526–6113. Dated: May 9, 1995. AGENCY: National Institute of Standards Samuel Kramer, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: and Technology, Commerce. Associate Director. Background ACTION: Notice of Prospective Grant of [FR Doc. 95–11916 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] Exclusive Patent License. NEAP was described in the following BILLING CODE 3510±13±M documents: Revisions to program for SUMMARY: This is notice in accordance financial assistance (60 FR 5908, with 35 U.S.C. 209(c)(1) and 37 CFR January 31, 1995); program for financial 404.7(a)(1)(i) that the National Institute assistance (59 FR 51419, October 11, of Standards and Technology (‘‘NIST’’), 1994); notice of proposed program (59 U.S. Department of Commerce, is FR 46224, September 7, 1994); and contemplating the grant of an exclusive advance notice of proposed rulemaking license to practice the invention (59 FR 28838, June 3, 1994). 25892 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices The Buyout Program is intended to (defined as those waters between the Subsistence fisheries do not fall under compensate commercial fishermen for a baseline from which the territorial sea of this definition. For purposes of the percentage of their uninsured, and the United States is measured, and the Vessel Permit Buyout Program, uncompensated by other Federal or outer boundary of the exclusive commercial fishery is defined as a State programs, lost income suffered as economic zone, i.e., 200 nautical miles fishery conducted under a 1994 a result of the salmon fishery resource seaward of the baseline), and the waters Washington State troll, salmon delivery, disaster and to aid the long-term of Grays Harbor, Willapa Bay, and the Willapa Bay/Columbia River salmon gill viability of the fishery resource by Columbia River. net, Grays Harbor/Columbia River reducing fishing effort on the stocks. Excluding Puget Sound gill net salmon gill net, or salmon charter The program description published in licenses would focus the Buyout license. (Note that a salmon delivery the October 11, 1994, Federal Register Program principally on those gear license is only for fishing in the Federal (59 FR 51419) indicated that the Buyout groups most associated with the Snake exclusive economic zone and landing Program would be applied to the River Recovery Team recommendations. the fish in Washington State. Salmon Washington State troll and gill net fleets Limiting commercial fishing income troll licenses are only for fishing within and that Washington State may elect to would focus the aid to those fishermen 3 miles off the coast.) include the charterboat fleets. most dependent on chinook and coho, Commercial fishery income, for Federal support for the Buyout fisheries that have been under the most purposes of the Habitat and Data Program stems from recommendations, severe restrictions because of the Collection Jobs Programs, is income particularly those of the Snake River conditions underlying the declaration of derived from participation in the Salmon Recovery Team, for reducing the fishery resource disaster. (Note that commercial fishery. For purposes of the long-term effects on the salmon Puget Sound fishermen—who mainly Vessel Permit Buyout Program, resources. As part of the recovery plan harvest sockeye, pink, and chinook commercial fishery income is income for Snake River sockeye, spring/summer salmon, and have undergone fishing derived from participation in a chinook, and fall chinook under the restrictions to protect chinook and coho commercial salmon fishery in the Endangered Species Act, this team salmon—have access to the Habitat and coastal waters of Washington, Oregon, specifically recommended that a buyout Data Collection Jobs Programs, where and California, and the waters of Grays program to reduce fishing capacity in the income eligibility criteria include Harbor, Willapa Bay, and the Columbia the ocean troll, charterboat, and in-river income from all West Coast salmon.) River. gill net fisheries be undertaken in In developing this program, WDFW conjunction with decreased quotas and/ relied on extensive public input that Classification or fishing times and places. These included: Six informal meetings with a This action has been determined to be recommendations are now part of the total of 70 commercial salmon fishing not significant for the purposes of E.O. Proposed Salmon Recovery Plan that industry leaders; a notification by mail 12866. was issued by NMFS Northwest Region of the pending Buyout Program to all The application mentioned in this on March 20, 1995. potentially affected license holders; a notice is subject to the Paperwork In consultation with NMFS, WDFW mailing of proposed state administrative Reduction Act. It has been approved by has designed a permit buyout program rules to more than 1,300 potential the Office of Management and Budget consistent with state and Federal applicants, industry associations, under control number 0648–0288. management and grant regulations, media, and public officials; and a public Authority: 16 U.S.C. 4107(d). including a permit offer application that hearing including receipt of written allows assessment of the uninsured, and testimony and comment. To explain the Dated: May 9, 1995. otherwise uncompensated, loss of the WDFW program and the draft Henry R. Beasley, applicant. WDFW, in consultation with applications, 20 workshops were held in Acting Assistant Administrator, National NMFS, also has the right to reject any 10 different geographic locations, Marine Fisheries Service. and all bids. involving more than 400 fishermen. [FR Doc. 95–11924 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] The Buyout Program limits eligibility BILLING CODE 3510±22±F to holders of these Washington State Proposed Amendments commercial salmon fishery licenses in For purposes of NEAP, the following 1994: Salmon troll license, salmon definition of ‘‘coastal waters’’ is National Technical Information Service delivery license, Willapa Bay/Columbia proposed, and changes are proposed to River salmon gill net license, Grays the previously published definitions of NTIS Advisory Board Meeting Harbor/Columbia River salmon gill net ‘‘commercial fishery’’ and ‘‘commercial AGENCY: National Technical Information license, or salmon charter license. (Note fishery income’’: Service, Technology Administration, that a salmon delivery license is only for Coastal waters means those waters U.S. Department of Commerce. fishing in the Federal exclusive between the baseline from which the ACTION: Notice of Partially Closed economic zone and landing the fish in territorial sea of the United States is Meeting. Washington State. Salmon troll licenses measured, and the outer boundary of the are only for fishing within 3 miles off exclusive economic zone (i.e., 200 SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal the coast.) The 1994 license requirement nautical miles seaward of the baseline). Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app. is a prerequisite for the Buyout Program, Commercial fishery, for purposes of 2, notice is hereby given that the and not part of the definition of loss the Habitat and Data Collection Jobs National Technical Information Service established in 60 FR 5910 (January 31, Programs, is defined as the salmon Advisory Board (the ‘‘Board’’) will meet 1995). For purposes of determining the fishery off the coasts and in the state on Tuesday, June 6, 1995, from 9:00 uncompensated loss and thus the waters of Washington, Oregon, and a.m. to 4:00 p.m. and on Wednesday, maximum bid an applicant may make, California for purposes of either selling June 7, 1995, from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. the Buyout Program allows an applicant the salmon harvested or providing a The session on Wednesday, June 7, 1995 to use only income from salmon vessel for hire that carries recreational will be closed to the Public. fisheries in the coastal waters of fishermen to engage in fishing for a fee The Board was established under the Washington, Oregon, and California (e.g., charterboats and headboats). authority of 15 U.S.C. 3704b(c), and was Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices 25893 Chartered on September 15, 1989. The COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING Secretariat at the Commission’s Board is composed of five members COMMISSION headquarters in accordance with 17 CFR appointed by the Secretary of Commerce 145.7 and 145.8. who are eminent in such fields as Applications of the Chicago Mercantile Any person interested in submitting information resources management, Exchange as a Contract Market in Fluid written data, views, or arguments on the information technology, and library and Milk Futures and Options Contracts proposed terms and conditions, or with respect to other materials submitted by information services. The purpose of the AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading meeting is to review and make the CME, should send such comments Commission. to Jean A. Webb, Secretary, Commodity recommendations regarding general ACTION: Notice of availability of the policies and operations of NTIS, Futures Trading Commission, 2033 K terms and conditions of proposed Street, NW., Washington, DC 20581 by including policies in connection with commodity futures and option the specified date. fees and charges for its services. The contracts. agenda will include a progress report on Issued in Washington, DC, on May 8, 1995. NTIS activities, an update on the SUMMARY: The Chicago Mercantile Blake Imel, progress of FedWorld, and a discussion Exchange (CME or Exchange) has Acting Director. of NTIS’ long range plans. The closed applied for designation as a contract [FR Doc. 95–11831 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] session discussion is scheduled to begin market in futures and futures options on BILLING CODE 6351±01±P at 9:00 a.m. and end at 4:00 p.m. on fluid milk. The Director of the Division June 7, 1995. The session will be closed of Economic Analysis (Division) of the because premature disclosure of the Commission, acting pursuant to the DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES information to be discussed would be authority delegated by Commission SAFETY BOARD likely to significantly frustrate Regulation 140.96, has determined that publication of the proposals for [Recommendation 95±1] implementation of NTIS’ business plan. comment is in the public interest, will Improved Safety of Cylinders DATES: The meeting will convene on assist the Commission in considering Containing Depleted Uranium June 6, 1995 at 9:00 a.m. and adjourn at the views of interested persons, and is 4:00 p.m. and convene again on June 7, consistent with the purposes of the AGENCY: Defense Nuclear Facilities 1995 at 9:00 a.m. and adjourn at 4:00 Commodity Exchange Act. Safety Board p.m. DATES: Comments must be received on ACTION: Notice; recommendation. or before June 14, 1995. ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in SUMMARY: The Defense Nuclear ADDRESSES: Interested persons should Room 2029, U.S. Department of Facilities Safety Board has made a submit their views and comments to Commerce, National Technical recommendation to the Secretary of Jean A. Webb, Secretary, Commodity Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Energy pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 2286a Futures Trading Commission, 2033 K Road, Springfield, Virginia 22161. concerning improved safety of cylinders Street NW., Washington, DC 20581. containing depleted uranium. The PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: The meeting will Reference should be made to the CME Board requests public comments on this be open to public participation on June contract markets on fluid milk. recommendation. 6, 1995 and closed on June 7, 1995. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: DATES: Approximately thirty minutes will be Comments, data, views, or Please contact Fred Linse of the arguments concerning this set aside on June 6, 1994 for comments Division of Economic Analysis, recommendation are due on or before or questions as indicated in the agenda. Commodity Futures Trading June 14, 1995. Seats will be available for the public Commission, 2033 K Street NW., ADDRESSES: Send comments, data, and for the media on a first-come, first- Washington, DC 20581, telephone 202– views, or arguments concerning this served basis. Any member of the public 254–7303. recommendation to: Defense Nuclear may submit written comments SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Copies of Facilities Safety Board, 625 Indiana concerning the Board’s affairs at any the terms and conditions will be Avenue, NW., Suite 700, Washington, time. Copies of the minutes, of the open available for inspection at the Office of DC 20004. session meeting, will be available the Secretariat, Commodity Futures FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Trading Commission, 2033 K Street, within thirty days of the meeting from Kenneth M. Pusateri or Carol C. Morgan NW., Washington, DC 20581. Copies of the address given below. at the address above or telephone (202) the terms and conditions can be 208–6400. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: obtained through the Office of the Barbara Pickering, NTIS Advisory Board Secretariat by mail at the above address John T. Conway, Secretary, National Technical or by phone at (202) 254–6314. Chairman. Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Other materials submitted by the CME The three large gaseous diffusion Road, Springfield, Virginia 22161. in support of the applications for plants that were operated by the Telephone: (703) 487–4612; Fax (703) contract market designation may be Department of Energy (DOE) and its 487–4093. available upon request pursuant to the predecessors produced enriched Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. uranium, some for defense use and Dated: May 8, 1995. 552) and the Commission’s regulations some for incorporation into nuclear fuel Donald R. Johnson, thereunder (17 CFR part 145 (1987)), for civilian reactors in the United States Director. except to the extent they are entitled to and other countries. In the course of [FR Doc. 95–11822 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] confidential treatment as set forth in 17 isotope separation, most of the uranium BILLING CODE 3510±04±M CFR 145.5 and 145.9. Requests for ended up as the part depleted in U–235, copies of such materials should be made designated as ‘‘tails’’ or ‘‘tailings’’. to the FOI, Privacy and Sunshine Act Enriched uranium at all desired assays Compliance Staff of the Office of the was simultaneously extracted from the 25894 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices plants, for all purposes, and so no provide within one year a uranium SUMMARY: The Director, Information amount of tails can be identified as inventory study that would include Resources Group, invites comments on related to enrichment solely for either among other matters recommendations the proposed information collection defense or civilian purposes. Most of all for the future use and disposition of requests as required by the Paperwork uranium ever mined in the United inventories of all Government-owned Reduction Act of 1980. States or imported into the United uranium or uranium equivalents, States remains in tails at the gaseous including depleted tailings. The DATES: Interested persons are invited to diffusion plants. These tails are stored Department has not yet complied with submit comments on or before June 14, onsite at the three plants in large steel this requirement, presumably at least in 1995. containers, normally termed part because the matters addressed by ADDRESSES: Written comments should ‘‘cylinders’’, as the chemical compound Congressional action are very be addressed to the Office of UF6. comprehensive and require extensive Information and Regulatory Affairs, Members of the staff of the Defense decisions on future courses of action. Nuclear Facilities Safety Board recently Attention: Dan Chenok: Desk Officer, It is clear to the Board that directions Department of Education, Office of had an opportunity to visit the gaseous developed in response to section 1016 Management and Budget, 725 17th diffusion plants, to follow up on of Public Law 102–486 will affect the Street, NW., Room 3208, New Executive information that had been obtained on long-term future of the vast inventory of safety of storage of the tails. A short depleted uranium tails. However, the Office Building, Washington, DC 20503. report documenting the results of their very size of that inventory means that Requests for copies of the proposed review is attached. It was found that no matter what actions may be taken, information collection requests should DOE has approximately 50,000 they will require a long time to be addressed to Patrick J. Sherrill, cylinders in outdoor storage at the three consumate, with deterioration of the Department of Education, 400 Maryland diffusion plants, containing more than cylinders continuing all the while. Avenue, SW., Room 5624, Regional 500,000 metric tons of UF6. Poor To protect against the dispersal of Office Building 3, Washington, DC maintenance and storage conditions, large amounts of uranium to soil and 20202–4651. combined with mechanical damage ground water in years to come, an early FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: suffered during handling, have led to start to remedial action should be corrosion and subsequent breaching of planned and then instituted. The Patrick J. Sherrill (202) 708–9915. several of these carbon steel cylinders. alternative could be a massive problem Individuals who use a Cylinders have surface coatings with extraordinary financial costs. telecommunications device for the deaf (paint) of varying quality and integrity, Therefore, the Board recommends (TDD) may call the Federal Information which in a large number of cases is that: Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339 severely degraded. Cylinders are kept 1. An early program be started to between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern time, outdoors, some stacked on pads and renew the protective coating of Monday through Friday. some directly on the ground. Some cylinders containing the tails from the older cylinders have been in storage in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section historic production of enriched excess of forty years. Although general 3517 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of uranium. external corrosion seems to increase 1980 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires 2. The possibility of additional with time, handling damage and measures be explored, to protect these that the Office of Management and localized corrosion attributable to cylinders from the damaging effects of Budget (OMB) provide interested electrolytic attack appear to be more exposure to the elements, as well as any Federal agencies and the public an early important factors in deterioration. opportunity to comment on information The corrosion-resistant coatings have additional handling that may be called for. collection requests. OMB may amend or not been maintained, leaving the vast waive the requirement for public majority of cylinders vulnerable to 3. A study be instituted to determine consultation to the extent that public localized corrosion. Visual inspections whether a more suitable chemical form participation in the approval process have shown abundant pitting and crevic should be selected for long-term storage corrosion of the cylinders, as well as of the depleted uranium. would defeat the purpose of the galvanic attack near bronze valves and The Board designated Mr. Steven information collection, violate State or plugs. Since neither localized corrosion Krahn as its principal staff member for Federal law, or substantially interfere rates nor the extent of existing defects discussions with those in DOE whom with any agency’s ability to perform its in the cylinders are well known or well you may designate to act on this statutory obligations. The Director of the understood, it is uncertain how many recommendation and matters that may Information Resources Group, publishes cylinders may be expected to fail in the arise concerning it. this notice containing proposed near future. DOE and MMES (Martin- John T. Conway, information collection requests prior to Marietta Energy Systems) are attempting Chairman. submission of these requests to OMB. to evaluate the extent of the erosion [FR Doc. 95–11870 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] Each proposed information collection, rates and their consequences; results are BILLING CODE 3670±01±M grouped by office, contains the very preliminary, but they indicate that following: (1) Type of review requested, more than 1,000 cylinders have a e.g., new, revision, extension, existing potential to breach before the year 2020 or reinstatement; (2) Title; (3) Frequency of no remedial actions are taken, with DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION of collection; (4) The affected public; (5) the result that their components of more Proposed Information Collection Reporting burden; and/or (6) than 10,000 tons of uranium could Requests Recordkeeping burden; and (7) Abstract. become accessible to release to the OMB invites public comment at the environment. AGENCY: Department of Education. address specified above. Copies of the In section 1016 of Public Law 102– ACTION: Notice of proposed information requests are available from Patrick J. 486 (October 24, 1992), Congress collection requests. Sherrill at the address specified above. directed the Department of Energy to Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices 25895 Dated: May 10, 1995. through to its customers based upon the be effective May 4, 1995, amended 18 Gloria Parker, Commission’s Northwest order, and that CFR 284.243(h) of the Commission’s Director, Information Resources Group. the methodology utilized to allocate the capacity release regulations. In this amounts among its customers is the Order, the Commission has extended Office of the Under Secretary same methodology used in Paiute’s the exception from advance posting and Type of Review: New. December 21, 1992 filing in Docket No. bidding to one full calendar months. Title: Survey on Management of College RP93–49–000. The Order also revises provisions Endowments. Paiute requests that the tendered tariff regarding roll-overs of exempted Frequency: One time. sheet be accepted for filing to become releases by providing for a 28 (rather Affected Public: Not-for-profit effective June 1, 1995. than 30) day hiatus during which institutions. Paiute states that copies of the filing shippers that release capacity at less Reporting Burden: were served upon all of Paiute’s than the maximum rate cannot re- Responses: 63 customers and affected state regulatory release capacity to the same Burden Hours: 126 commissions, and upon all parties on replacement shipper (at less than Recordkeeping Burden: the service list in Docket No. RP93–49– Recordkeepers: 0 000. maximum rate). Burden Hours: 0 Any person desiring to protest said In addition, Transwestern is Abstract: The Department of Education filing should file a protest with the proposing to revise Section 30.4(b) of its needs to collect information on the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, capacity release provisions relating to investment practices of developing 825 North Capitol Street NE., posting certain information regarding postsecondary institutions, so as to Washington, DC 20426, in accordance pre-arranged deals. Transwestern is help endowment challenge grantees with Rule 211 of the Commission’s submitting tariff sheets that would make more effective use of Title III Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR remove the requirement to post the funds. Data from this survey will help 385.211). All such protests should be following: (1) The name of the Pre- colleges improve investment filed on or before May 16, 1995. Protests Arranged Shipper; and (2) whether the performance. Respondents are will be considered by the Commission Pre-Arranged Shipper is an affiliate of postsecondary institutions eligible for in determining the appropriate action to the Releasing Shipper or Transwestern. Title III funds. be taken, but will not serve to make Transwestern believes that this change [FR Doc. 95–11915 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] protestants parties to the proceeding. is consistent with the spirit of Order No. Copies of this filing are on file with the BILLING CODE 4000±01±M 636. With respect to pre-arranged deals Commission and area available for the Commission’s goal was to ensure public inspection in the public that the released capacity was allocated reference room. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY pursuant to the best offer regardless of Lois D. Cashell, the identity of the Pre-Arranged Federal Energy Regulatory Secretary. Shipper. Transwestern submits that it Commission [FR Doc. 95–11878 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] will continue to post information BILLING CODE 6717±01±M [Docket No. RP93±49±001] regarding the identity of the Pre- Arranged Shipper and its affiliation to Paiute Pipeline Company; Notice of [Docket No. RP95±279±000] the Releasing Shipper or Transwestern Proposed Changes in FERC Gas Tariff on an after-the-fact basis, thereby Transwestern Pipeline Company; allowing interested parties to monitor May 9, 1995. Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC affiliate transactions. Take notice that on May 4, 1995, Gas Tariff Paiute Pipeline Company (Paiute) Transwestern states that copies of the tendered for filing to be a part of its May 9, 1995. filing were served on its gas utility FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Take notice that on May 4, 1995, customers, interested state Volume No. 1–A, the following tariff Transwestern Pipeline Company commissions, and all parties to this sheet. (Transwestern) tendered for filing as proceeding. First Revised Sheet No. 11 part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Any person desiring to be heard or to Revised Volume No. 1, the following protest said filing should file a motion Paiute states that it is submitting the tariff sheets: proposed tariff sheet in order to make to intervene or protest with the Federal adjustments to the fixed take-or-pay Effective May 4, 1995: Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 2nd Revised Sheet No. 95A North Capitol Street NE., Washington, buyout and buydown charges to be 3rd Revised Sheet No. 95C collected by Paiute from its shippers as D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules 2nd Revised Sheet No. 95D 211 and 214 of the Commission’s Rules the result of a recent order issued in 2nd Revised Sheet No. 95E Docket No. RP92–229 with respect to 2nd Revised Sheet No. 95F of Practice and Procedure. All such Paiute’s upstream pipeline, Northwest 2nd Revised Sheet No. 95K motions or protests should be filed on Pipeline Corporation (Northwest). 1st Revised Sheet No. 95M or before May 16, 1995. Protests will be According to Paiute, that order 2nd Revised Sheet No. 95N considered by the Commission in authorized Northwest to assess Paiute Effective June 5, 1995: determining the appropriate action to be an amount of $758,291, including 3rd Revised Sheet No. 95B taken, but will not serve to make interest as of January 31, 1995, in Transwestern states that the purpose protestants parties to the proceeding. addition to the fixed take-or-pay charges of this filing is to revise certain portions Any person wishing to become a party previously paid by Paiute to Northwest. of its tariff to comply with the must file a motion to intervene. Copies Paiute indicates that its filing only Commission’s Final Rule, Order No. 577 of this filing are on file with the proposes to revise the amounts of the (Order), issued March 29, 1995 in fixed take-or-pay charges to be passed Docket No. RM95–5–000. This Order, to 25896 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices Commission and are available for public [Docket No. RP95±285±000] tariff sheets, to be effective as of the inspection. dates shown below: Natural Gas Pipeline Company of Lois D. Cashell, America; Notice of Proposed Changes June 3, 1995 Secretary. in FERC Gas Tariff Second Revised Sheet Nos. 98–99 [FR Doc. 94–11877 Filed 5–12–94; 8:45 am] First Revised Sheet No. 177 May 9, 1995. First Revised Sheet No. 180 BILLING CODE 6717±01±M Second Revised Sheet No. 219 Take notice that on May 5, 1995, May 4, 1995 Natural Gas Pipeline Company of First Revised Sheet No. 169 [Docket No. RP95±284±000] America (Natural) tendered for filing as First Revised Sheet No. 173 part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Sixth First Revised Sheet No. 178 NorAm Gas Transmission Company; Revised Volume No. 1, Twelfth Revised Second Revised Sheet No. 275 Notice of Proposed Changes In FERC Sheet No. 14 and Tenth Revised Sheet Southern states that the purpose of Gas Tariff No. 25, to be effective June 1, 1995. this filing is to (1) eliminate the Natural states that the tendered tariff requirement to submit a prepayment May 9, 1995. sheets align the rates for all remaining with a request for firm transportation Take notice that on May 4, 1995, shippers on Natural’s system that are service, (2) eliminate the provision that NorAm Gas Transmission Company not parties to any of its gas supply allows Releasing Shippers to require realignment (GSR) costs settlements, (NGT) tendered for filing as part of its prepayments from the Acquiring with the rates applicable to the settling FERC Gas Tariff, Fourth Revised Shippers, and (3) comply with the shippers. The tariff sheets are proposed Volume No. 1, to be effective May 4, provisions of Commission Order No. to become effective on June 1, 1995. 577 which revise its Regulations 1995: Natural requests whatever waivers governing non-posted, capacity release First Revised Sheet No. 286 may be necessary to permit the tariff transactions. Southern has requested an sheets as submitted herein to become effective date of June 3, 1995, for the NGT states that the revised tariff sheet effective June 1, 1995. first two revisions and an effective date is being filed in compliance with the Natural states that copies of the filing of May 4, 1995, the effective date of Commission’s March 29, 1995, Docket are being mailed to Natural’s Order No. 577, for the third revision. No. RM95–5–000, Order No. 577. NGT jurisdictional customers and interested Southern states that copies of the states that it is revising Section 19.11(f) state regulatory agencies. filing will be served upon its shippers of its General Terms and Conditions, Any person desiring to be heard or to and interested state commissions. which deals with rereleases of capacity protest said filing should file a motion Any person desiring to be heard or to to the same shippers, to implement the to intervene or a protest with the protest said filing should file a motion changes to the capacity release Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, to intervene or protest with the Federal mechanism made by the Commission in 825 North Capitol Street NE., Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 the March 29, 1995 order. Washington, DC 20426, in accordance North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, NGT states that copies of the filing with § 385.214 and 385.211 of the D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules has been served on each of NGT’s Commission’s Rules and Regulations. 211 and 214 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR customers and interested state All such motions or protests should be 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions commissions. filed on or before May 16, 1995. Protests will be considered by the Commission and protests should be filed on or before Any person desiring to be heard or to in determining the appropriate action to May 16, 1995. Protests will not be protest said filing should file a motion be taken, but will not serve to make considered by the Commission in to intervene or protest with the Federal protestants parties to the proceeding. determining the parties to the Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 Any person wishing to become a party proceeding. Any person wishing to North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, to the proceeding must file a motion to become a party must file a motion to D.C., 20426, in accordance with Rules intervene. Copies of this filing are on intervene. 211 and 214 of the Commission’s Rules file with the Commission and are Copies of this filing are on file with of Practice and Procedure. All such available for public inspection in the the Commission and are available for motions or protets should be filed on or Public Reference Room. public inspection. before May 16, 1995. Protests will be Lois D. Cashell, Lois D. Cashell, considered by the Commission in Secretary. Secretary. determining the appropriate action to be [FR Doc. 95–11875 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] [FR Doc. 95–11874 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717±01±M taken, but will not serve to make BILLING CODE 6717±01±M protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party [Docket No. RP95±280±000] must file a motion to intervene. Copies [Docket No. RP95±283±000] of this filing are on file with the Paiute Pipeline Company; Notice of Commission and are available for public Southern Natural Gas Company; Proposed Changes in FERC Gas Tariff inspection. Notice of Proposed Changes To FERC May 9, 1995. Lois D. Cashell, Gas Tariff Take notice that on May 4, 1995, Secretary. May 9, 1995. Paiute Pipeline Company (Paiute) [FR Doc. 95–11876 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] Take notice that on May 4, 1995, tendered for filing to be a part of its BILLING CODE 6717±01±M Southern Natural Gas Company FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised (Southern) tendered for filing as part of Volume No. 1–A, the following tariff its FERC Gas Tariff, Seventh Revised sheets: Volume No. 1, the following revised First Revised Sheet No. 103 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices 25897 First Revised Sheet No. 110 and releases at the maximum rate. Order South Georgia has requested an First Revised Sheet No. 111 No. 577 also decreased the number of effective date of June 3, 1995, for the Paiute states that the purpose of its days that the releasing shipper and first revision and an effective date of filing is to propose changes to the prearranged bidder must wait until they May 4, 1995, the effective date of Order Capacity Release provisions contained can perform another non-posted release No. 577, for the other revision. in Section 14 of the General Terms and for a month or less to 28 days. South Georgia states that copies of the Conditions of Paiute’s FERC Gas Tariff. Sea Robin has requested any waivers filing will be served upon its shippers Paiute states that the changes are necessary to make this sheet effective on and interested state commissions. necessary to conform Paiute’s tariff with May 4, 1995, the implementation date of Any person desiring to be heard or to the changes made in Order No. 577 to Order No. 577. protest said filing should file a motion the Commission’s regulations governing Sea Robin states that copies of the to intervene or protest with the Federal pipeline capacity release mechanisms. filing will be served upon its shippers Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 Paiute requests that the tendered tariff and interested state commissions. North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, sheets be accepted for filing to become Any person desiring to be heard or to D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules effective May 4, 1995, which is the protest said filing should file a motion 211 and 214 of the Commission’s Rules effective date of Order No. 577. to intervene or protest with the Federal of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR Paiute states that copies of the filing Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions were served upon all of Paiute’s North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, and protests should be filed on or before customers and affected state regulatory D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules May 16, 1995. Protests will not be commissions. 211 and 214 of the Commission’s Rules considered by the Commission in Any person desiring to be heard or to of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR determining the parties to the protest said filing should file a motion 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions proceeding. Any person wishing to to intervene or a protest with the and protests should be filed on or before become a party must file a motion to Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, May 16, 1995. Protests will not be intervene. Copies of this filing are on 825 North Capitol Street, NE., considered by the Commission in file with the Commission and are Washington, DC 20426, in accordance determining the parties to the available for public inspection. with Rules 211 and 214 of the proceeding. Any person wishing to Lois D. Cashell, Commission’s Rules of Practice and become a party must file a motion to Secretary. Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). intervene. Copies of this filing are on [FR Doc. 95–11871 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] All such motions or protests should be file with the Commission and are BILLING CODE 6717±01±M filed on or before May 16, 1995. Protests available for public inspection. will be considered by the Commission Lois D. Cashell, in determining the appropriate action to Secretary. [Docket No. ER95±378±000] be taken, but will not serve to make [FR Doc. 95–11872 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] Westcoast Power Marketing Inc., protestants parties to the proceeding. BILLING CODE 6717±01±M Notice of Issuance of Order Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies May 10, 1995. [Docket No. RP95±281±000] of this filing are on file with the On January 3, and February 21, 1995, Commission and are available for public South Georgia Natural Gas Company; Westcoast Power Marketing Inc. inspection in the public reference room. Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC (Westcoast Power) submitted for filing a Lois D. Cashell, Gas Tariff rate schedule under which Westcoast Secretary. Power will engage in wholesale electric [FR Doc. 95–11873 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] May 9, 1995. power and energy transactions as a BILLING CODE 6717±01±M Take notice that on May 4, 1995, marketer. Westcoast Power also South Georgia Natural Gas Company requested waiver of various Commission (South Georgia) tendered for filing as regulations. In particular, Westcoast [Docket No. RP95±282±000] part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Power requested that the Commission Revised Volume No. 1, the following grant blanket approval under 18 CFR Sea Robin Pipeline Company: Notice revised tariff sheets, to be effective as of Part 34 of all future issuances of of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas the dates shown below: securities and assumptions of liability Tariff June 3, 1995 by Westcoast Power. May 9, 1995. Second Revised Sheet No. 21 On April 20, 1995, pursuant to Take notice that on May 4, 1995, Sea Second Revised Sheet No. 104 delegated authority, the Director, Robin Pipeline Company (Sea Robin) May 4, 1995 Division of Applications, Office of tendered for filing as part of its FERC First Revised Sheet Nos. 66–67 Electric Power Regulation, granted Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, First Revised Sheet No. 71 requests for blanket approval under Part First Revised Sheet No. 74 the following tariff sheet: 34, subject to the following: First Revised Sheet No. 76 Within thirty days of the date of the Second Revised Sheet No. 64 Second Revised Sheet No. 124 order, any person desiring to be heard Sea Robin states that the purpose of South Georgia states that the purpose or to protest the blanket approval of this filing is to comply with the of this filing is to (1) eliminate the issuances of securities or assumptions of provisions of Commission Order No. requirement to submit a prepayment liability by Westcoast Power should file 577, effective May 4, 1995, which has with a request for firm transportation a motion to intervene or protest with the revised the Commission’s Regulations service, and (2) comply with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, governing capacity release transactions provisions of Commission Order No. 825 North Capitol Street, N.E., to extend the exemption from advance 577 which revise its Regulations Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance posting requirements to prearranged governing non-posted capacity release with Rules 211 and 214 of the releases for one calendar month or less transactions. Commission’s Rules of Practice and 25898 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 211 and 214 of the Commission’s Rules Any person desiring to be heard or to 385.214). of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR protest said filing should file a motion Absent a request for hearing within 385.211 and 385.214). to intervene or protest with the Federal this period, Westcoast Power is Absent a request for hearing within Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 authorized to issue securities and this period, TPCO is authorized to issue North Capitol Street NE., Washington, assume obligations or liabilities as a securities and assume obligations or D.C., 20426, in accordance with Rules guarantor, endorser, surety, or otherwise liabilities as a guarantor, indorser, 211 and 214 of the Commission’s Rules in respect of any security of another surety, or otherwise in respect of any of Practice and Procedure. All such person; provided that such issuance or security of another person; provided motions or protests should be filed on assumption is for some lawful object that such issuance or assumption is for or before May 16, 1995. Protests will be within the corporate purposes of the some lawful object within the corporate considered by the Commission in applicant, and compatible with the purposes of the applicant, and determining the appropriate action to be public interest, and is reasonably compatible with the public interest, and taken, but will not serve to make necessary or appropriate for such is reasonably necessary or appropriate protestants parties to the proceeding. purposes. for such purposes. Any person wishing to become a party The Commission reserves the right to The Commission reserves the right to must file a motion to intervene. Copies require a further showing that neither require a further showing that neither of this filing are on file with the public nor private interests will be public nor private interests will be Commission and are available for public adversely affected by continued adversely affected by continued inspection. approval of Westcoast Power’s issuances approval of TPCO’s issuances of Lois D. Cashell, of securities or assumptions of liability. securities or assumptions of liability. Notice is hereby given that the Secretary. Notice is hereby given that the [FR Doc. 95–11861 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] deadline for filing motions to intervene deadline for filing motions to intervene BILLING CODE 6717±01±M or protests, as set forth above, is May 22, or protests, as set forth above, is May 30, 1995. 1995. Copies of the full text of the order are Copies of the full text of the order are [Docket No. ER89±401±022, et al.] available from the Commission’s Public available from the Commission’s Public Reference Branch, Room 3308, 941 Reference Branch, Room 3308, 941 Citizens Power & Light Corporation, et North Capitol Street NE., Washington, North Capitol Street, N.E. Washington, al., Electric Rate and Corporate D.C. 20426. D.C. 20426. Regulation Filings Lois D. Cashell, Lois D. Cashell, May 9, 1995. Secretary. Secretary. Take notice that the following filings [FR Doc. 95–11862 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] [FR Doc. 95–11863 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] have been made with the Commission: BILLING CODE 6717±01±M BILLING CODE 6717±01±M 1. Citizens Power & Light Corporation [Docket No. RP95±278±000] [Docket No. ER89–401–022] [Docket No. ER95±581±000] Take notice that Citizens Power & CNG Transmission Corp.; Notice of Light Corporation (Citizens) on April 27, Tennessee Power Co.; Notice of Section 4 Filing Issuance of Order 1995, tendered for filing its quarterly May 9, 1995. report in the above-referenced docket. May 10, 1995. Take notice that on May 4, 1995, CNG Citizens reports no transactions for the On February 8 and March 13, 1995, Transmission Corporation (CNG) period ending March 31, 1995. Tennessee Power Company (TPCO) tendered for filing pursuant to Section 2. PowerNet submitted for filing a rate schedule 4 of the Natural Gas Act, a notice of [Docket No. ER94–931–004] under which TPCO will engage in termination of gathering service for wholesale electric power and energy specified uncertificated gathering lines. Take notice that PowerNet on April transactions as a marketer. TPCO also CNG states that the uncertificated 28, 1995, tendered for filing its quarterly requested waiver of various Commission lines are being sold or abandoned in report in the above-referenced docket. regulations. In particular, TPCO place. CNG further states that although PowerNet reports no transactions for the requested that the Commission grant no contract for transportation service period ending March 31, 1995. blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 34 with CNG will be canceled or 3. Morgan Stanley Capital Group, Inc. of all future issuances of securities and terminated, the meter receipt points will assumptions of liability by TPCO. change under some or all of the related [Docket No. ER94–1384–005] On April 28, 1995, pursuant to Pool Operating Agreements. CNG asserts Take notice that Morgan Stanley delegated authority, the Director, that the receipt point(s) into its system Capital Group, Inc. (Morgan Stanley) on Division of Applications, Office of will either be moved downstream of the April 28, 1995, tendered for filing its Electric Power Regulation, granted current points or, in the case of quarterly report in the above-referenced requests for blanket approval under Part abandonment in place, eliminated. CNG docket. Morgan Stanley reports no 34, subject to the following: states that a new downstream receipt transactions for the period ending Within thirty days of the date of the point may also become an allocated March 31, 1995. order, any person desiring to be heard receipt point under the pooling 4. Williams Power Trading Company or to protest the blanket approval of agreements where the purchasers of gas (formerly Transco Power Trading issuances of securities or assumptions of must agree to an allocation of deliveries Company) liability by TPCO should file a motion to CNG at that receipt point. to intervene or protest with the Federal CNG indicates that it has notified all [Docket No. ER95–305–001] Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 parties in either the related Take notice that on May 1, 1995, North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, transportation agreement of the related Williams Power Trading Company D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules polling agreement of this filing. (WPT), formerly Transco Power Trading Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices 25899 Company, filed its report for the first This Tariff, approved by FERC on April NUSCO states that a copy of this filing quarter of 1995 on power marketing 15, 1994, and which has an effective has been mailed to BED. activity under the rate schedule date of March 13, 1993, will allow NUSCO requests that the Service authorized March 10, 1995 in this NMPC and Montaup to enter into Agreement become effective on May 1, docket. WPT reported no transactions separately scheduled transactions under 1995. for the first quarter. which NMPC will sell to Montaup Comment date: May 23, 1995, in capacity and/or energy as the parties 5. Associated Power Services, Inc. accordance with Standard Paragraph E may mutually agree. at the end of this notice. [Docket No. ER95–933–000] In its filing letter, NMPC also Take notice that on April 21, 1995, included a Certificate of Concurrence 10. Pennsylvania Power & Light Associated Power Services, Inc. (APSI) executed by the Purchaser. Company tendered for filing a letter from the NMPC requests an effective date of Docket No. [ER95–955–000] Executive Committee of the Western April 10, 1995. NMPC has requested Take notice that on April 26, 1995, Systems Power Pool (WSPP) indicating waiver of the notice requirements for Pennsylvania Power & Light Company that APSI had completed all the steps good cause shown. (PP&L), tendered for filing with the for pool membership. APSI requests that NMPC has served copies of the filing Federal Energy Regulatory Commission the Commission amend the WSPP upon the New York State Public Service (the Commission) a Supplement dated Agreement to include it as a member. Commission and Montaup. March 7, 1995 to a Power Supply APSI requests an effective date of Comment date: May 23, 1995, in Agreement (Agreement) between PP&L March 31, 1995, for the proposed accordance with Standard Paragraph E and the Borough of Olyphant, amendment. Accordingly, APSI requests at the end of this notice. Pennsylvania (Olyphant) dated May 3, waiver of the Commission’s notice 8. Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation 1994. The Supplement proposes requirements for good cause shown. changing the delivery voltage of electric Copies of the filing were served upon [Docket No. ER95–949–000] energy for PP&L’s sale to Olyphant the WSPP Executive Committee. Take notice that on April 26, 1995, under the original Agreement. PP&L Comment date: May 23, 1995, in Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation states that the rates under which electric accordance with Standard Paragraph E (NMPC) tendered for filing with the energy will be sold are identical to the at the end of this notice. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission rates approved by the Commission in 6. Northeast Utilities Service Company an executed Service Agreement between PP&L’s in Docket No. ER94–945–000, NMPC and Commonwealth Electric [Docket No. ER95–947–000] the wholesale rate case in which the Company (ComElectric). This Service Commission approved the original Take notice that on April 24, 1995, Agreement specifies that ComElectric Agreement. Northeast Utilities Service Company has signed on to and has agreed to the PP&L has requested the proposed (NUSCO), tendered for filing, on behalf terms and conditions of NMPC’s Power change be effective March 7, 1995. of The Connecticut Light and Power Sales Tariff designated as NMPC’s FERC Pursuant to 18 CFR 35.11, PP&L Company, Western Massachusetts Electric Tariff, Original Volume No. 2. requests waiver of the sixty-day prior Electric Company, Holyoke Water This Tariff, approved by FERC on April notice filing requirement in 18 CFR Power Company, Holyoke Power and 15, 1994, and which has an effective 35.2(e). PP&L also requests waiver of 18 Electric Company and Public Service date of March 13, 1993, will allow CFR 35.13(e) to permit it to adopt by Company of New Hampshire (together, NMPC and ComElectric to enter into reference in this filing information the NU System Companies) an separately scheduled transactions under previously submitted to the Commission amendment to the Capacity Agreement which NMPC will sell to ComElectric in Docket No. ER94–945–00. Because no previously filed by NUSCO in the capacity and/or energy as the parties other wholesale purchasers will be above-referenced docket. may mutually agree. NUSCO renews its request that the In its filing letter, NMPC also affected by a change in delivery voltage proposed rate schedule changes be included a Certificate of Concurrence of electric energy provided to Olyphant, permitted to become effective April 1, executed by the Purchaser. PP&L has requested waiver of the 1995. NUSCO states that a copy of the NMPC requests an effective date of requirement in 18 CFR 35.11 that all of filing has been mailed or delivered to May 1, 1995; NMPC has requested PP&L’s wholesale customers be served the affected parties. waiver of the notice requirements for with a copy of this filing. Comment date: May 23, 1995, in good cause shown. PP&L states that a copy of its filing accordance with Standard Paragraph E NMPC has served copies of the filing was provided to Olyphant and to the at the end of this notice. upon the New York State Public Service Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission and ComElectric. Commission. 7. Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation Comment date: May 23, 1995, in Comment date: May 23, 1995, in [Docket No. ER95–948–000] accordance with Standard Paragraph E accordance with Standard Paragraph E Take notice that on April 26, 1995, at the end of this notice. at the end of this notice. Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation 9. Northeast Utilities Service Company 11. New England Power Company (NMPC) tendered for filing with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Docket No. [ER95–953–000] [Docket No. ER95–956–000] an executed Service Agreement between Take notice that on April 26, 1995, Take notice that on April 27, 1995, NMPC and Montaup Electric Company Northeast Utilities Service Company New England Power Company tendered (Montaup). This Service Agreement (NUSCO), tendered for filing a Service for filing an addition to the Service specifies that Montaup has signed on to Agreement and a Certificate of Agreement between New England and has agreed to the terms and Concurrence with the Burlington Power Company and Boston Edison conditions of NMPC’s Power Sales Electric Department (BED) under the NU Company for transmission service under Tariff designated as NMPC’s FERC System Companies System Power Sales/ NEP’s FERC Electric Tariff, Original Electric Tariff, Original Volume No. 2. Exchange Tariff No. 6. Volume No. 3. 25900 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices Comment date: May 23, 1995, in Comment date: May 23, 1995, in [Docket No. ER95±976±000, et al.] accordance with Standard Paragraph E accordance with Standard Paragraph E at the end of this notice. at the end of this notice. Southern Energy Marketing, Inc., et al., Electric Rate and Corporate Regulation 12. Madison Gas and Electric Company 16. Green Mountain Power Corporation Filings [Docket No. ER95–957–000] [Docket No. ER95–978–000] May 8, 1995. Take notice that on April 27, 1995, Take notice that on April 28, 1995, Take notice that the following filings Madison Gas and Electric Company Green Mountain Power Corporation have been made with the Commission: (MGE), tendered for filing a service (GMP) tendered for filing a revised agreement with LG&E Power Marketing, definition of ‘‘Additional Charges’’ 1. Southern Energy Marketing, Inc. Inc., under MGE’s Power Sales Tariff. contained in its FERC Electric Tariff, [Docket No. ER95–976–000] MGE requests an effective date 60 days Original Volume No. 2 (‘‘Opportunity Take notice that on April 28, 1995, from the filing date. Transactions Tariff’’) to provide Comment date: May 23, 1995, in Southern Energy Marketing, Inc. (SEMI) expressly for recovery under filed an application with the Federal accordance with Standard Paragraph E appropriate circumstances of one mill at the end of this notice. Energy Regulatory Commission per kilowatt-hour to compensate for requesting acceptance of SEMI’s 13. Madison Gas and Electric Company difficult-to-quantify costs. GMP has proposed Rate Schedule No. 1, requested waiver of the Commission’s Docket No. [ER95–958–000] authorizing market-based rates, waiver Regulations to the extent necessary to of certain Commission Regulations, and Take notice that on April 27, 1995, permit the change to become effective as the granting of certain blanket Madison Gas and Electric Company of May 1, 1995. approvals. Consistent with these (MGE), tendered for filing a service Comment date: May 23, 1995, in requests, SEMI seeks authority to engage agreement with Cenergy, Inc., under accordance with Standard Paragraph E in the business of power marketing and MGE’s Power Sales Tariff. MGE requests at the end of this notice. brokering and to sell power at market- an effective date 60 days from the filing based rates. date. 17. York County Energy Partners, L.P. SEMI is a subsidiary of The Southern Comment date: May 23, 1995, in [Docket No. QF95–229–000] accordance with Standard Paragraph E Company (Southern), a registered On April 27, 1995, York County at the end of this notice. holding company under the Public Energy Partners, L.P. (York County) Utility Holding Company Act of 1935. 14. Consumers Power Company tendered for filing an amendment to its SEMI is also an associate company of [Docket No. ER95–959–000] filing in this docket. Southern’s electric utility operating The amendment pertains to companies: Alabama Power Company, Take notice that on April 27, 1995, information relating to the technical Georgia Power Company, Gulf Power Consumers Power Company aspects of York County’s cogeneration Company, Mississippi Power Company, (Consumers) tendered for filing a facility. No determination has been and Savannah Electric and Power Transmission Service Agreement with made that the submittal constitutes a Company. Alpena Power Company. The filed complete filing. Service Agreement makes available Comment date: May 22, 1995, in Short-Term Non-Firm transmission Comment date: May 30, 1995, in accordance with Standard Paragraph E service. A copy of the filing was served accordance with Standard Paragraph E at the end of this notice. at the end of this notice. upon Alpena Power Company and the 2. New England Power Company Michigan Public Service Commission. Standard Paragraphs [Docket No. ER95–910–000] Comment date: May 23, 1995, in accordance with Standard Paragraph E E. Any person desiring to be heard or Take notice that on May 1, 1995, New at the end of this notice. to protest said filing should file a England Power Company tendered an motion to intervene or protest with the amendment to its filing in this docket. 15. Northern States Power Company Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Comment date: May 22, 1995, in (Minnesota) 825 North Capitol Street, NE., accordance with Standard Paragraph E [Docket No. ER95–960–000] Washington, DC 20426, in accordance at the end of this notice. Take notice that on April 27, 1995, with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and 3. Public Service Company of New Northern States Power Company Mexico (Minnesota) (NSP) tendered for filing Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR the Construction Agreement between 385.214). All such motions or protests [Docket No. ER95–965–000] NSP and the City of New Ulm (New should be filed on or before the Take notice that on April 27, 1995, Ulm) dated April 11, 1995. This comment date. Protests will be Public Service Company of New Mexico agreement allows NSP to replace the considered by the Commission in (PNM) tendered for filing a Notice of existing 4/0 ACSR sections of conductor determining the appropriate action to be Termination of Service Schedule B between the switch structure at the New taken, but will not serve to make (Economy Energy Brokerage) and C Ulm North Side Substation Tap and the protestants parties to the proceeding. (Power Exchange) to the interconnection Fort Ridgely Substation (1.5 miles) with Any person wishing to become a party Agreement PNM and M–S–R Public 336 26/7 ACSR. must file a motion to intervene. Copies Power Agency (‘‘M–S–R’’). Termination NSP requests that the Commission of this filing are on file with the of Service Schedules B and C is to be accept for filing this agreement effective Commission and are available for public effective as of April 30, 1995. PNM as of July 31, 1995. NSP requests that inspection. requests waiver of the applicable the Agreement be accepted as a Lois D. Cashell, requirements. supplement to Rate Schedule No. 398, Secretary. Copies of the Notice of Termination the rate schedule for previously filed [FR Doc. 95–11865 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] have been served upon M–S–R and the agreement between NSP and New Ulm. BILLING CODE 6717±01±P New Mexico Public Utility Commission. Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices 25901 Comment date: May 22, 1995, in will provide wholesale firm full 9. Selkirk Cogen Partners, L.P. accordance with Standard Paragraph E requirements service to Cap Rock under [Docket No. QF89–274–012] at the end of this notice. the Tariff for load located outside the Electric Reliability Council of Texas. On April 25, 1995, Selkirk Cogen 4. PECO Energy Company NCR also requests waiver of the Partners, L.P. (Applicant), submitted for [Docket No. ER95–970–000] Commission’s Regulations to permit the filing an amendment to its filing in this Tariff and related agreements with Cap docket. Take notice that on April 28, 1995, The amendment provides additional Rock to become effective on May 1, PECO Energy Company (PECO) information pertaining to the ownership tendered for filing an Agreement 1995. Rate Schedule WP included in the of its cogeneration facility. No between PECO and Pennsylvania Power determination has been made that the & Light Company (PL) dated April 17, Tariff is a formulary rate designed to recover NCR’s cost of service by means submittal constitutes a complete filing. 1995. Comment date: May 26, 1995, in PECO states that the Agreement sets of periodic adjustment without further application to the Commission. The rate accordance with Standard Paragraph E forth the terms and conditions for the at the end of this notice. sale of system energy which it expects is developed using comprehensive cost to have available for sale from time to of service formula, also included in the 10. Northern States Power Company time and the purchase of which will be Tariff. The formula provides for (Minnesota) recovery of costs as defined and economically advantageous to PL. In [Docket No. ER95–977–000] order to optimize the economic functionalized by the Uniform System of Accounts. Take notice that on April 28, 1995, advantage to both PECO and PL, PECO Northern States Power Company requests that the Commission waive its NCR has served copies of its filing on the Cap Rock and the Public Utility (Minnesota) (NSP) tendered for filing customary notice period and permit the Notice of Termination of Resale Electric agreement to become effective on April Commission of Texas. Comment date: May 22, 1995, in Service Agreements for the cities of 28, 1995. accordance with Standard Paragraph E Anoka, Arlington, Brownton, Chaska, PECO states that a copy of this filing at the end of this notice. North St. Paul, Shakopee and Winthrop. has been sent to PL and will be Each of these cities tendered a Notice of furnished to the Pennsylvania Public 7. Wisconsin Power and Light Company Termination effective July 1, 1995 (July Utility Commission. [Docket No. ER95–974–000] 18, 1995 for the City of Shakopee) after Comment date: May 22, 1995, in Take notice that on April 28, 1995, which each cities electrical accordance with Standard Paragraph E Wisconsin Power and Light Company requirements will be provided by the at the end of this notice. (WP&L) tendered for filing a signed Minnesota Municipal Power Agency. 5. Duke Power Company Service Agreement under WP&L’s Bulk Comment date: May 22, 1995, in accordance with Standard Paragraph E [Docket No. ER95–972–000] Power Tariff between itself and Cenergy, Inc. WP&L respectfully requests a at the end of this notice. Take notice that on April 28, 1995, waiver of the Commission’s notice Duke Power Company (Duke) tendered 11. Oregon Trail Electric Consumers requirements, and an effective date of Cooperative, Inc. for filing with the Commission April 12, 1995. Supplement No. 8 to Supplement No. 24 Comment date: May 22, 1995, in [Docket No. ES95–31–000] to the Interchange Agreement between accordance with Standard Paragraph E Take notice that on May 1, 1995, Duke and Carolina Power & Light at the end of this notice. Oregon Trail Electric Consumers Company (CP&L) dated June 1, 1961, as Cooperative, Inc. (Oregon Trail) filed an 8. PECO Energy Company amended (Interchange Agreement). application under § 204 of the Federal Supplement No. 8 changes Duke’s [Docket No. ER95–975–000] Power Act seeking authorization to monthly transmission capacity rate Take notice that on April 28, 1995, enter into and borrow funds under a under the Interchange Agreement from PECO Energy Company (PECO) two-year, $5 million line-of-credit $1,1409 per KW per month to $1.0908 tendered for filing an Agreement agreement. Under the agreement, per KW per month. Duke has proposed between PECO and Baltimore Gas and Oregon Trail will be obligated to repay an effective date of July 1, 1995, for the Electric Company (BGE) dated March any advances with interest within 360 revised charge. 24, 1995. days of the advance. Also, Oregon Trail Copies of this filing were mailed to PECO states that the Agreement sets requests exemption from the Carolina Power & Light Company, the forth the terms and conditions for the Commission’s competitive bidding and North Carolina Utilities Commission, sale of system energy which it expects negotiated placement regulations. and the South Carolina Public Service to have available for sale from time to Comment date: May 31, 1995, in Commission. time and the purchase of which will be accordance with Standard Paragraph E Comment date: May 22, 1995, in economically advantageous to BGE. In at the end of this notice. accordance with Standard Paragraph E order to optimize the economic Standard Paragraphs at the end of this notice. advantage to both PECO and BGE, PECO 6. NewCorp Resources, Inc. requests that the Commission waive its E. Any person desiring to be heard or customary notice period and permit the to protest said filing should file a [Docket No. ER95–973–000] agreement to become effective on May 1, motion to intervene or protest with the Take notice that NewCorp Resources, 1995. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Inc., (NCR), on April 28, 1995, tendered PECO states that a copy of this filing 825 North Capitol Street, N.E., for filing as an initial rate a Tariff for has been sent to BGE and will be Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance Electric Service (Tariff). furnished to the Pennsylvania Public with Rules 211 and 214 of the NCR also filed a Service Agreement Utility Commission. Commission’s Rules of Practice and and Supplement Agreement between Comment date: May 22, 1995, in Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR NCR and Cap Rock Electric Cooperative, accordance with Standard Paragraph E 385.214). All such motions or protests Inc., (Cap Rock) pursuant to which NCR at the end of this notice. should be filed on or before the 25902 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices comment date. Protests will be and services, by transfer to TGC. (Westar) Gray 4-inch interconnection, considered by the Commission in Essentially, Transwestern proposed to all located in Gray and Wheeler determining the appropriate action to be spindown to TGC all of its facilities Counties, Texas. Transwestern also taken, but will not serve to make functionalized as gathering in the seeks authorization to abandon by protestants parties to the proceeding. refunctionalization proceeding. reconveyance to GPM Gas Corporation Any person wishing to become a party On December 5, 1994, TGC filed its (GPM), successor in interest to Phillips must file a motion to intervene. Copies Petition for Declaratory Order in Docket Petroleum Company (Phillips), 6 miles of this filing are on file with the No. CP95–112–000 seeking the of 16-inch pipeline located in Gray Commission and are available for public Commission to declare that upon County, Texas, pursuant to an exchange inspection. completion of the acquisition by TGC of agreement dated September 18, 1972. Lois D. Cashell, the facilities being spun down from In addition, Transwestern seeks Secretary. Transwestern, such facilities and the abandonment of the FTS–2 [FR Doc. 95–11864 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] services provided through them would Transportation Service Agreement dated be exempt from Commission BILLING CODE 6717±01±P March 8, 1993 between Transwestern jurisdiction. and the City of Lefors. It is stated that concurrently, Comment date: May 30, 1995, in [Docket No. CP95±112±001, et al.] Transwestern has filed an amendment accordance with Standard Paragraph F to its application in Docket No. CP95– at the end of this notice. Transwestern Gathering Company, et 70–000 to spindown certain facilities. al.; Natural Gas Certificate Filings Because the facilities addressed in 3. Columbia Gas Transmission Transwestern’s amendment are the same Corporation May 9, 1995. facilities which will be transferred to Take notice that the following filings [Docket No. CP95–482–000] TGC by Transwestern, TGC proposes to have been made with the Commission: Take notice that on May 3, 1995, incorporate by reference the exhibits to Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation 1. Transwestern Gathering Company Transwestern’s amendment, and (Columbia), 1700 MacCorkle Avenue, [Docket No. CP95–112–001] requests the same revisions and S.E., Charleston, West Virginia 25314, corrections be made in the instant Take notice that on December 5, 1994, filed in Docket No. CP95–482–000 a docket. Transwestern Gathering Company request pursuant to Sections 157.205 Comment date: May 30, 1995, in and 157.211 of the Commission’s (TGC), P.O. Box 1188, Houston, Texas accordance with the first paragraph of 77251–1188, filed in Docket No. CP95– Regulations under the Natural Gas Act Standard Paragraph F at the end of this (18 CFR 157.205, 157.211) for 112–001 an amendment (Amendment) notice. to its original petition for an order authorization to construct and operate a declaring that upon the completion of 2. Transwestern Pipeline Company delivery point in Northampton County, Pennsylvania under Columbia’s blanket the acquisition by TGC of certain [Docket No. CP95–378–000] certificate issued in Docket No. CP83– gathering and processing facilities from Take notice that on May 1, 1995, Transwestern Pipeline Company 76–000 pursuant to Section 7 of the Transwestern Pipeline Company Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set (Transwestern), such facilities will be (Transwestern), Post Office Box 1188, exempt from the Commission’s forth in the request that is on file with Houston, Texas 77251–1188 filed an the Commission and open to public jurisdiction. application pursuant to Section 7(b) of It is stated that in response to a June inspection. the Natural Gas Act for permission and Columbia proposes to construct a new 7, 1994, data request from the approval to abandon certain facilities Commission in the refunctionalization delivery point consisting of a 12-inch located in its Lefors transmission system tap, separation equipment, electronic proceeding in Docket No. CP94–254– by sale to NGC Intrastate Pipeline 000, Transwestern conducted an in- measurement, and approximately 200 Company (NGC), all as more fully set feet of 16-inch pipeline that will depth review and analysis of each forth in the application which is on file facility in its entire system, resulting in provide interruptible transportation with the Commission and open to service for Pennsylvania Power and a different functionalization of the public inspection. facilities from that originally filed. It is Light Company. Under a Sale Agreement dated April Comment date: June 23, 1995, in stated that the response was filed 27, 1995, Transwestern agreed to sell to September 6, 1994. accordance with Standard Paragraph G NGC certain facilities in the Lefors at the end of this notice. On October 3, 1994, Transwestern transmission system of a price of supplemented its data response by $525,000. Transwestern proposes to sell 4. Columbia Gas Transmission making some substantial, but mostly to NGC the Lefors compressor station 1 Corporation, Columbia Gulf miscellaneous corrections and revisions consisting of five compressors with a Transmission Company, and to the refunctionalization of facilities. It total horsepower of 8,600 and Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line is stated that on November 14, 1994, appurtenant facilities, 6.5 miles of 10- Corporation Transwestern again supplemented its inch pipeline, 17.4 miles of 8-inch [Docket No. CP95–485–000] data response with a summary on its pipeline and two delivery points—the proposed adjustments to plant and City of Lefors 2-inch meter station and Take notice that on May 4, 1995, depreciation resulting from the the Westar Transmission Company Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation refunctionalization proposed in the data (Columbia Gas), formerly United Fuel response. 1 Transwestern states that the Lefors compressor Gas Company, 1700 MacCorkle Avenue, Also on November 14, 1994, station was originally proposed to be abandoned in SE., Charleston, West Virginia 25314– Transwestern filed an application in Docket No. CP94–751–000, as amended. However, 1599, Columbia Gulf Transmission Docket No. CP95–70–000 proposing to since the Lefors compressor station is now being Company (Columbia Gulf), 1700 sold to NGC, Transwestern states that it has spindown certain compression, plants, amended Docket No. CP94–751–000 by removing MacCorkle Avenue, SE., Charleston, metering, dehydration and pipeline the compressor facilities from the abandonment West Virginia 25314–1599, and facilities, along with certain agreements proceeding. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices 25903 Corporation (Transco), 2800 Post Oak with the requirements of the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a Boulevard, Houston, Texas 77056, Commission’s Rules of Practice and protest to the request. If no protest is jointly as the Companies, filed in Docket Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211) filed within the time allowed therefor, No. CP95–485–000 an application and the Regulations under the Natural the proposed activity shall be deemed to pursuant to Section 7(b) of the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.10). All protests be authorized effective the day after the Gas Act for permission and approval to filed with the Commission will be time allowed for filing a protest. If a abandon three exchange services, all as considered by it in determining the protest is filed and not withdrawn more fully set forth in the application appropriate action to be taken but will within 30 days after the time allowed which is on file with the Commission not serve to make the protestants parties for filing a protest, the instant request and open to public inspection. to the proceeding. Any person wishing shall be treated as an application for The exchange services, it is said, were to become a party to a proceeding or to authorization pursuant to Section 7 of authorized by Order issued May 1, 1971 participate as a party in any hearing the Natural Gas Act. in Docket No. CP71–98 and performed therein must file a motion to intervene Lois D. Cashell, pursuant to Columbia Gas’ Rate in accordance with the Commission’s Secretary. Schedule X–12, Columbia Gulf’s Rate Rules. [FR Doc. 95–11866 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] Schedule X–6 and Transco’s Rate Take further notice that, pursuant to BILLING CODE 6717±01±P Schedule X–39. the authority contained in and subject to It is stated that the exchange services the jurisdiction conferred upon the were once required to permit the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Office of Hearing and Appeals exchange of gas between Columbia Gulf by Sections 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas and Transco in Evangeline Parish, Act and the Commission’s Rules of Louisiana, at additional points of Notice of Cases Filed During the Week Practice and Procedure, a hearing will of February 27 Through March 3, 1995 exchange at natural gas processing be held without further notice before the plants and at other common points Commission or its designee on this During the week of February 27 where both Columbia Gulf and Transco application if no motion to intervene is through March 3, 1995, the appeals and accepted deliveries of natural gas from filed within the time required herein, if others. It is further stated that deliveries applications for exception or other relief the Commission on its own review of listed in the Appendix to this Notice and receipt of gas by Columbia Gulf the matter finds that a grant of the were made for the account of Columbia were filed with the Office of Hearings certificate and/or permission and Gas, the company for which Columbia and Appeals of the Department of approval for the proposed abandonment Gulf transported volumes through its Energy. are required by the public convenience pipeline system. Under DOE procedural regulations, 10 and necessity. If a motion for leave to It is said that volumes were last CFR part 205, any person who will be intervene is timely filed, or if the exchanged in August 1991 and there are aggrieved by the DOE action sought in Commission on its own motion believes no outstanding imbalances. It is further these cases may file written comments that a formal hearing is required, further said that the transportation authority is on the application within ten days of notice of such hearing will be duly no longer required, as the exchange service of notice, as prescribed in the given. agreements have been terminated. procedural regulations. For purposes of Comment date: May 30, 1995, in Under the procedure herein provided the regulations, the date of service of accordance with Standard Paragraph F for, unless otherwise advised, it will be notice is deemed to be the date of at the end of this notice. unnecessary for applicant to appear or publication of this Notice or the date of be represented at the hearing. Standard Paragraphs receipt by an aggrieved person of actual G. Any person or the Commission’s notice, whichever occurs first. All such F. Any person desiring to be heard or staff may, within 45 days after issuance comments shall be filed with the Office to make any protest with reference to of the instant notice by the Commission, of Hearings and Appeals, Department of said application should on or before the file pursuant to Rule 214 of the Energy, Washington, DC 20585. comment date, file with the Federal Commission’s Procedural Rules (18 CFR Energy Regulatory Commission, 385.214) a motion to intervene or notice Dated: May 5, 1995. Washington, DC 20426, a motion to of intervention and pursuant to Section George B. Breznay, intervene or a protest in accordance 157.205 of the Regulations under the Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals. LIST OF CASES RECEIVED BY THE OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS [During the Week of February 27 Through March 3, 1995] Date Name and location of applicant Case No. Type of submission Feb. 27, 1995 ...... Dorchester Master Limited Partnership, VEF±0005 Implementation of Special Refund Procedures. If granted: Houston, Texas. The Office of Hearings and Appeals would implement Spe- cial Refund Procedures pursuant to 10 C.F.R. Part 205, Subpart V, in connection with the April 4, 1988 Consent Order entered into with Dorchester Master Limited Partner- ship. Do ...... Howell Corporation, Washington, DC ..... VEF±0006 Implementation of Special Refund Procedures. If granted: The Office of Hearings and Appeals would implement Spe- cial Refund Procedures pursuant to 10 C.F.R. Part 205, Subpart V, in connection with the February 23, 1989 Con- sent Order entered into with Howell Corporation. 25904 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices LIST OF CASES RECEIVED BY THE OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALSÐContinued [During the Week of February 27 Through March 3, 1995] Date Name and location of applicant Case No. Type of submission Do ...... Mid-Missouri Nuclear Weapons Freeze, VFA±0029 Appeal of an Information Request Denial. If granted: The Inc., Columbia, Missouri. January 30, 1995 Freedom of Information Request Denial issued by the Office of Nuclear Energy would be re- scinded, and Mid-Missouri Nuclear Weapons Freeze, Inc. would receive access to certain Department of Energy in- formation relating to a research project with the Massachu- setts Institute of Technology (MIT) regarding the Integral Fast Reactor. Do ...... Vessels Gas Processing Company, VEF±0007 Implementation of Special Refund Procedures. If granted: Washington, DC. The Office of Hearings and Appeals would implement Spe- cial Refund Procedures pursuant to 10 C.F.R. Part 205, Subpart V, in connection with the December 17, 1987 Consent Order entered into with Vessels Gas Processing Company. Feb. 28, 1995 ...... Placid Oil Company, Washington, DC .... VEF±0008 Implementation of Special Refund Procedures. If granted: The Office of Hearings and Appeals would implement Spe- cial Refund Procedures pursuant to 10 C.F.R., Part 205, Subpart V, in connection with the February 11, 1985 Deci- sion and Order Case No. BRO±1433, and April 18, 1985 Decision and Order, Case No. HRX±0117, issued to Placid Oil Company. Do ...... Town of Bristol, Bristol, Rhode Island .... RR272±190 Request for Modification/Rescission in Crude Oil Refund Pro- ceeding. If granted: The February 8, 1995 Dismissal, Case No. RF272±84693, issued to Town of Bristol would be modified regarding the firm's application for refund submit- ted in the Crude Oil Refund Proceeding. Do ...... Village of Cornwall-on-Hudson, Corn- RR272±193 Request for Modification/Rescission in the Crude Oil Refund wall-on-Hudson, New York. Proceeding. If granted: The December 29, 1994 Dismissal, Case No. RF272±85889, issued to Village of Cornwall-on- Hudson would be modified regarding the firm's application for refund submitted in the Crude Oil Refund Proceeding. Mar. 1, 1995 ...... Carolina Power and Light Company, Ra- VFA±0030 Appeal from Special Assessment to the Uranium Enrichment leigh, North Carolina. Decontamination and Decommissioning Fund. If granted: The written determination issued by the Department of En- ergy on February 2, 1995 would be rescinded and Caro- lina Power and Light Company would receive a refund of payments made to the Decontamination and Decommis- sioning Fund, all future obligations of Carolina Power and Light Company would be cancelled, and Carolina Power and Light Company's assessment would be adjusted to zero. Do ...... Physicians for Social Responsibility, Inc., VFA±0030 Appeal of an Information Request Denial. If granted: The Berkely, California. January 30, 1995 Freedom of Information Request Denial issued by the Office of the Executive Secretariat would be rescinded, and Physicians For Social Responsibility, Inc. would receive access to certain Department of Energy in- formation relating to a research project with the Massachu- setts Institute of Technology (MIT) regarding the Integral Fast Reactor. Mar. 3, 1995 ...... Durham Schools, Lisbon Falls, Maine .... RR272±192 Request for Modification/Rescission in the Crude Oil Refund Proceeding. If granted: The January 17, 1995 Dismissal Letter, Case Number RF272±79966, issued to Durham Schools would be modified regarding the firm's application for refund submitted in the Crude Oil Refund Proceeding. Do ...... J. Eileen Price, Fort Collins, Colorado .... VFA±0031 Appeal of an Information Request Denial. If granted: The February 8, 1995 Freedom of Information Request Denial issued by the Western Area Power Administration would be rescinded, and J. Eileen Price would receive Depart- ment of Energy information regarding her employment. Do ...... Lisbon Schools, Lisbon Falls, Maine ...... RR272±191 Request for Modification/Rescission in the Crude Oil Refund Proceeding. If granted: The January 17, 1995 Dismissal Letter, Case Number RF272±79965, issued to Lisbon Schools would be modified regarding the firm's application for refund submitted in the Crude Oil Refund Proceeding. Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices 25905 REFUND APPLICATIONS RECEIVED [Week of February 27 Through March 3, 1995] Date received Name of refund proceeding/name of refund application Case No. 2/27/95 Continental Grain Company ...... RC272±281 2/27/95 Continental Grain Company ...... RC272±282 2/27/95 Crawford Garden Supplies, Inc ...... RF300±21824 2/27/95 Crawford Garden Supplies, Inc ...... RF300±21825 3/1/95 Doug's Texaco ...... RF321±21059 3/1/95 Benton County Co-Op Assn ...... RG272±30 3/3/95 Air Molokai, Ltd ...... RC272±283 3/3/95 Mort Hall Ford, Inc ...... RC272±284 3/3/95 Noromis Quarry Company ...... RG272±31 [FR Doc. 95–11920 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] and Appeals of the Department of the regulations, the date of service of BILLING CODE 6450±01±P Energy. Submissions inadvertently notice is deemed to be the date of omitted from earlier lists have also been publication of this Notice or the date of included. receipt by an aggrieved person of actual Notice of Cases Filed During the Week Under DOE procedural regulations, 10 notice, whichever occurs first. All such of March 13 Through March 17, 1995 CFR Part 205, any person who will be comments shall be filed with the Office of Hearings and Appeals, Department of During the week of March 13 through aggrieved by the DOE action sought in Energy, Washington, D.C. 20585. March 17, 1995, the appeals and these cases may file written comments applications for exception or other relief on the application within ten days of Dated: May 5, 1995. listed in the Appendix to this Notice service of notice, as prescribed in the George B. Breznay, were filed with the Office of Hearings procedural regulations. For purposes of Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals. LIST OF CASES RECEIVED BY THE OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS [Week of March 13 to March 17, 1995] Date Name and Location of Applicant Case no. Type of Submission Feb. 24, 1995 ...... Amerbelle Corporation, Rockville, Con- RR272±194 Request for Modification/Rescission in the Crude Oil Refund necticut. Proceeding. If granted: The April 27, 1989 Supplemental Crude Oil payment, Case No. RF272±1412, issued to Amerbelle Corporation would be modified regarding the firm's application for refund submitted in the Crude Oil re- fund proceeding. Mar. 13, 1995 ...... Albuquerque Operations Office, Albu- VSO±0025 Request for Hearing under 10 CFR Part 710. If granted: An querque, New Mexico. individual whose security clearance was suspended by the Albuquerque Operations Office would receive a hearing under 10 CFR Part 710. Do ...... do ...... VSA±0005 Request for Review of Opinion under 10 CFR Part 710. If granted: The February 9, 1995 Opinion of an Office of Hearings and Appeals Hearing Officer, Case Number VSO±0005, would be reviewed at the request of an indi- vidual employed at the Albuquerque Operations Office. Do ...... National Security Archive, Washington, VFA±0033 Appeal of an Information Request Denial. If granted: The D.C. February 3, 1995 Freedom of Information Request Denial issued by the Department of Energy's Oakland Office would be rescinded, and the National Security Archive would receive access to certain Department of Energy in- formation. Do ...... International Paper Co., Memphis, Ten- RR321±176 Request for Modification/Rescission in the Texaco Refund nessee. Proceeding. If granted: The December 15, 1994 Decision and Order, Case No. RF321±20823, issued to Inter- national Paper Co. would be modified regarding the firm's application for refund submitted in the Texaco Refund Pro- ceeding. Mar. 15, 1995 ...... Bermans Motor Express/Holmes Trans- RR272±195, Request for Modification/Rescission in the Crude Oil Refund portation, Inc., Hackensack, New Jer- RR272±196 Proceeding. If granted: The August 8, 1989 and February sey. 12, 1991 Decision and Orders, Case Nos. RF272±37179 and RF272±63845, issued to Bermans Motor Express and Holmes Transportation Inc., would be modified regarding the firm's applications for refund submitted in the Crude Oil Refund Proceeding. 25906 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices REFUND APPLICATIONS RECEIVED [Week of March 13 to March 17, 1995] Date received Name of refund proceeding/name of refund application Case No. 3/13/95 Charles William Newell ...... RF321±21061 3/13/95 Well Treating Service ...... RG272±35 3/16/95 Skilo Mfg. Inc...... RC272±285 3/17/95 Farmers Co-Op Assn. of Garwood ...... RG272±36 [FR Doc. 95–11919 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] information from the two responsive BILLING CODE 6450±01±P documents could now be released but that the remainder of the withheld Gulf Oil Cor- RF300±20084 04/14/95 information in the documents were poration/ Issuance of Decisions and Orders properly classified and withheld Walton's During the Week of April 10 through pursuant to Exemption 3. The DOE also Auto Service et al. April 14, 1995 found that it possessed no unclassified Shell Oil Com- RF315±8277 . 04/14/95 graphs other than the ones already in pany/How- During the week of April 10 through NRDC’s possession and that in regard to April 14, 1995 the decisions and orders ard Shell. potentially responsive classified graphs, Texas Gas RF272±77212 04/14/95 summarized below were issued with such graphs were properly classified Trans- respect to appeals and applications for under the current classification mission other relief filed with the Office of guidelines. Further, the DOE Corp. Hearings and Appeals of the Department determined that it was impossible to Dismissals of Energy. The following summary also declassify any currently classified contains a list of submissions that were graphs by deletion of a particular The following submissions were dismissed by the Office of Hearings and element of the graph without risking the dismissed: Appeals. release of classified information. Name Case No. Appeal Consequently, NRDC’s Appeal was granted in part. Bacon Towing Co., Inc...... RF272±96133 Natural Resources Defense Council, 4/ # 14/95, KFA–0071 Refund Application Drumm Service Center 2 .... RF321±17133 Herzog Contracting Corp ...... RF321±20158 The Natural Resources Defense Charter Co./California, 4/10/95 RM23– United Coal & Oil Company . RF321±20179 Council (NRDC) filed an Appeal from a 288 University of Maine ...... RF272±77609 determination issued to it by the Office The DOE issued a Decision and Order of Military Application (OMA) of the granting a Motion for Modification of a Copies of the full text of these Department of Energy (DOE). The previously-approved refund plan filed decisions and orders are available in the determination partially denied three by the State of California in the Charter Public Reference Room of the Office of Requests for Information which NRDC Company second stage refund Hearings and Appeals, Room 1E–234, submitted under the Freedom of proceeding. California requested Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Information Act (FOIA). In its Requests, permission to reallocate $300,000 in Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20585, NRDC asked for copies of two previously disbursed Charter monies to Monday through Friday, between the documents and various unclassified the Sacramento City Intermodal Transit hours of 1:00 p.m. and 5:00 p.m., except graphs regarding the force structure of Access Project. The project is intended federal holidays. They are also available the United States’ nuclear weapon to improve connections between in Energy Management: Federal Energy stockpile. In its determination, OMA different forms of public transit in the Guidelines, a commercially published provided NRDC with redated copies of Sacramento area. In accordance with loose leaf reporter system. the two requested documents and prior Decisions that noted the benefits Dated: May 5, 1995. further stated that the graphs were being of similar plans, the DOE granted George B. Breznay, withheld in their entirety since they California’s Motion. were contained in another classified Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals. document. Since the withheld Refund Applications [FR Doc. 95–11921 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] information was classified, OMA stated The Office of Hearings and Appeals BILLING CODE 6450±01±P that the information was being withheld issued the following Decisions and under Exemptions 1 and 3 of the FOIA. Orders concerning refund applications, NRDC argued that the two documents it which are not summarized. Copies of Office of Hearing and Appeals was provided were improperly redacted the full texts of the Decisions and Cases Filed; Week of March 6 Through and that OMA’s reason for withholding Orders are available in the Public March 10, 1995 the graphs was invalid. Additionally, Reference Room of the Office of NRDC argued that classified graphs Hearings and Appeals. During the week of March 6 through potentially responsive to its requests March 10, 1995, the appeals and could be made unclassified by redacting applications for exception or other relief an axis of the graph and provided Atlantic Rich- RF304±14136 04/14/95 listed in the Appendix to this Notice examples of various responsive graphs field Com- were filed with the Office of Hearings which had been released to the public. pany/Klein and Appeals of the Department of The DOE determined that under current Trucking et Energy. classification guidelines, additional al. Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices 25907 Under DOE procedural regulations, 10 procedural regulations. For purposes of comments shall be filed with the Office CFR part 205, any person who will be the regulations, the date of service of of Hearings and Appeals, Department of aggrieved by the DOE action sought in notice is deemed to be the date of Energy, Washington, D.C. 20585. these cases may file written comments publication of this Notice or the date of Dated: May 5, 1995. on the application within ten days of receipt by an aggrieved person of actual George B. Breznay, service of notice, as prescribed in the notice, whichever occurs first. All such Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals. LIST OF CASES RECEIVED BY THE OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS [Week of March 6 Through March 10, 1995] Date Name and location of applicant Case No. Type of submission Mar. 3, 1995 ...... David K. Hackett, Knoxville, Tennessee . VFA±0032 ..... Appeal of an Information Request Denial. If granted: The February 22, 1995 Freedom of Information Request Denial issued by the Oak Ridge Operations Office would be re- scinded, and David K. Hackett would receive access to certain Department of Energy information. Mar. 6, 1995 ...... Consolidated Edison Company of New VEA±0006 ..... Appeal from Special Assessment to the Uranium Enrichment York, Inc., New York, New York. Decontamination and Decommissioning Fund. If granted: The written determination issued by the Department of En- ergy on February 2, 1995 would be rescinded and Consoli- dated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (Con Ed) would receive a refund of payments made to the Decontamina- tion and Decommissioning Fund, all Con Ed's future obli- gations would be cancelled and Con Ed's assessment would be adjusted to zero. Mar. 6, 1995 ...... Albuquerque Operations Office, Albu- VSO±0023 ..... Request for Hearing under 10 CFR part 710. If granted: An querque, New Mexico. individual whose security clearance was suspended by the Albuquerque Operations Office would receive a hearing under 10 CFR part 710. Mar. 8, 1995 ...... Eton Trading Corporation, Amarillo, VEF±0009 ..... Implementation of Special Refund Procedures. If granted: Texas. The Office of Hearings and Appeals would implement Spe- cial Refund Procedures pursuant to 10 CFR part 205, sub- part V to distribute funds received by the DOE as a result of a December 5, 1986 Remedial Order issued to Eton Trading Corporation. Do ...... Oak Ridge Operations Office, Oak VSO±0024 ..... Request for Hearing under 10 CFR part 710. If granted: An Ridge, Tennessee. individual employed at the Oak Ridge Operations Office would receive a hearing under 10 CFR part 710. Do ...... Rodgers Hydrocarbon Corporation, VEF±0010 ..... Implementation of Special Refund Procedures. If granted: Amarillo, Texas. The Office of Hearings and Appeals would implement Spe- cial Refund Procedures pursuant to 10 CFR part 205, sub- part V to distribute funds received by the DOE as a result of a July 20, 1989 Remedial Order issued to Rodgers Hy- drocarbon Corporation. REFUND APPLICATION RECEIVED [Week of March 6 to March 10, 1995] Date received Name of refund proceeding/Name of refund application Case No. 3/6/95 Keller Construction Co ...... RG272±00032 3/7/95 Airport Texaco ...... RF321±21060 3/8/95 Wes & Diane Eral ...... RG272±00033 3/10/95 Conrad Co-Op ...... RG272±00034 [FR Doc. 95–11918 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] ACTION: Notice. DATES: Comments must be submitted on BILLING CODE 6450±01±P or before June 14, 1995. For further SUMMARY: In compliance with the information, or to obtain a copy of this Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. ICR, contact: Sandy Farmer at EPA, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 3501 et seq.), this notice announces that (202) 260–2740. AGENCY the Information Collection Request (ICR) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: [FRL±5207±1] abstracted below has been forwarded to Office of Air and Radiation the Office of Management and Budget Agency Information Collection (OMB) for review and comment. The Title: New Source Performance Activities Under OMB Review ICR describes the nature of the Standards (NSPS) for Asphalt information collection and its expected Processing and Asphalt Roofing AGENCY: Environmental Protection cost and burden. Manufacturers (Subpart UU)— Agency (EPA). Information Requirements (EPA ICR 25908 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices #661.05; OMB# 2060–0002). This is a Regulatory Affairs, 725 17th Street Francisco, CA, and (5) Thursday, July 20 request for an extension of a currently NW., Washington, D.C. 20503. in Atlanta, GA. approved collection without any change Dated: May 9, 1995. 1. Boston, Massachusetts, Monday, June to the substance or the method of Joseph Retzer, 5, 1995, Time: 9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m., collection. Director, Regulatory Information Division. Roxbury Community College Student Abstract: Owners or operators of Center, Room 205, 1234 Columbus [FR Doc. 94–11851 Filed 5–12–94; 8:45 am] asphalt processing and asphalt roofing Avenue, Roxbury, Massachusetts, plants must record and notify EPA or BILLING CODE 6560±50±M Contacts: Sha-King Alston/508–934– the delegated State regulatory authority 3296, James Younger (US EPA)/617– of construction, modification, [FRL±5207±2] 565–3403 anticipated startup date, actual startups, 2. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, shutdowns, malfunctions, and the date Comprehensive Environmental Wednesday, June 7, 1995, 9:00 a.m. - and results of the initial performance Response, Compensation and Liability 5:00 p.m., Forty Sixth Street Baptist test. Owners or operators of asphalt Act (CERCLA) or Superfund, Section Church, 1261 S. 46th Street, processing and asphalt roofing plants 104; Announcement of Public Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Contacts: must install a continuous monitoring Dialogues on Urban Revitalization and Maurice Sampson/215–686–9242, system (CMS) to monitor and record the Brownfields Joise Matsinger (US EPA)/215–597– temperature in specified pollution AGENCY: Environmental Protection 3182 control devices, and must notify EPA of Agency. 3. Detroit, Michigan, Friday, June 9, the delegated authority of the date of 1995, 9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m., Belle Isle ACTION: Notice of the Series of Public demonstration of the CMS. Records of Park, Belle Isle Nature Center, Detroit, Dialogues on Urban Revitalization and temperature measurements must be Michigan, Contacts: Donnelle Brownfields: Envisioning Healthy and kept, but no excess emissions reports Wilkins/313–894–1030, Mardi Klevs Sustainable Communities. are required. The notifications and (US EPA)/312–353–5490 reports enable EPA or the delegated The National Environmental Justice 4. San Francisco, California, Tuesday, authority to determine that best Advisory Council’s (NEJAC) Waste and July 18, 1995, 9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m., demonstrated technology is installed, Facility Siting Subcommittee and the Place: To Be Announced, Contacts: properly operated and maintained, and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Martha Matsuoka/415–788–3666, to schedule inspections. (EPA) will convene a series of public Sherry Nikzat (US EPA)/415–744– The standard currently applies to 43 dialogues on environmental justice 2360 sources, and is expected to apply to two issues related to urban revitalization 5. Atlanta, Georgia, Thursday, July 20, new or modified sources per year over and Brownfields. The NEJAC is a body 1995, 9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m., Place: To the next three years. Particulate matter of non-federal experts established to Be Announced, Contacts: Sulaiman is the pollutant regulated under these advise EPA on environmental justice Madhi/404–524–5249, Vivian Malone standards. issues. The NEJAC recognizes the Jones (US EPA)/404–347–4294. Burden Statement: The public reporting compelling need to address the FOR MORE INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT: burden for this collection of environmental justice concerns that are NEJAC Waste Subcommittee: Charles information is estimated to average 66 pivotal to issues of urban revitalization Lee/212–870–2077, Lillian Kawasaki/ hours for both reporting and and creating healthy and sustainable 213–580–1046 recordkeeping, annually. This communities. The NEJAC has identified US EPA: Jan Young/202–260–1691, estimate includes the time needed to Brownfields clean-up and Katherine Dawes/202–260–8394. review instructions, search existing redevelopment as potentially Dated: May 9, 1995. data sources, gather the data needed contributing to the urban revitalization Timothy Fields, Jr., and review the collection of that is occurring within the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of information. environmental justice communities. Solid Waste and Emergency Response. Respondents: Owners or operators of These dialogues will provide an [FR Doc. 95–11850 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] opportunity for grassroots asphalt processing and asphalt roofing BILLING CODE 6560±50±P plants which commenced environmental justice activists and construction or modification after residents of impacted communities to articulate their aspirations, concerns, November 18, 1980. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS and recommendations for developing Estimated No. of Respondents: 46. COMMISSION Estimated No. of Responses per healthy and sustainable urban Respondent: Variable. communities—including Brownfields Public Information Collection Estimated Total Annual Burden on redevelopment. Upon completion of Requirement Submitted to Office of Respondents: 3,033 hours. these dialogues, the NEJAC will give Management and Budget for Review Frequency of Collection: Variable. EPA its formal response to the May 5, 1995. Send comments regarding the burden Brownfields Initiative Action Agenda. The Federal Communications estimate, or any other aspect of the EPA has committed that the dialogues Commission has submitted the information collection, including will have a demonstrable role in following information collection suggestions for reducing the burden, to: shaping its Brownfields initiatives. The public dialogues are titled, requirements to OMB for review and Sandy Farmer, U.S. Environmental ‘‘Urban Revitalization and Brownfields: clearance under the Paperwork Protection Agency, Regulatory Envisioning Healthy and Sustainable Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 3507). Information Division (2136), 401 M Communities’’ and will take place Copies of these submissions may be Street SW., Washington, D.C. 20460 during 1995 on (1) Monday, June 5 in purchased from the Commission’s copy and Boston, MA, (2) Wednesday, June 7 in contractor, International Transcription Chris Wolz, Office of Management and Philadelphia, PA, (3) Friday, June 9 in Service, Inc., 2100 M Street, NW, Suite Budget, Office of Information and Detroit, MI, (4) Tuesday, July 18 in San 140, Washington, DC 20037, (202) 857– Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices 25909 3800. For further information on this Needs and Uses: In the Report and institutions in liquidation were submission contact Dorothy Conway, Order and Further Notice of Proposed published in the July 2, 1992 issue of Federal Communications Commission, Rulemaking in MM Docket 93–215, 9 the Federal Register (57 FR 29491). The (202) 418–0217 or via internet at FCC Rcd 4527, 4692 (1994); the following is a list of financial [email protected]. Persons wishing Commission delegated to Cable Services institutions which have been placed in to comment on this information Bureau the authority to conduct cost liquidation since publication of the last collection should contact Timothy Fain, studies of cable industry in order to updated list on June 14, 1994 (59 FR Office of Management and Budget, provide the Commission with the 30585). Room 10214 NEOB, Washington, DC information necessary for establishing, The following is an updated office list 20503, (202) 395–3561. under certain circumstances, rates based from the Division of Depositor and OMB Number: N/A. on cost. General cost studies of the cable Asset Services (formerly the Division of Title: Notification to File Progress industry will be used to provide Liquidation): Report. information that will help to determine Northeast Service Center, 11 Founders Form No.: FCC 218I. whether any changes should be made in Action: New collection. Plaza, East Hartford, CT 06128 the Commission’s interim framework for Franklin (MA) Consolidated Office, 124 Respondents: Individuals or cost of service regulation. households; Businesses or other for- Grove Street, Franklin, MA 02038 profit. Federal Communications Commission. States: Connecticut, Maine, Frequency of Response: On occasion. William F. Caton, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Estimated Annual Burden: 750 Acting Secretary. Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, responses; 1 hour burden per response; [FR Doc. 95–11817 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] Rhode Island, Vermont, Puerto Rico, 750 hours total annual burden. BILLING CODE 6712±0l±F and the Virgin Islands Needs and Uses: Section 95.833 Midwest Service Center, 500 West requires licensees to notify the Monroe, Chicago, IL 60661 Commission at certain benchmar FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE States: Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, periods from license grant that they CORPORATION Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, have made service available in Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South accordance with the terms of the Update to Notice of Financial Dakota, and Wisconsin license. The data is used by Commission Institutions for Which the Federal Southeast Service Center, 1201 West staff to determine whether the licensee Deposit Insurance Corporation Has Peachtree St., NE, Atlanta, GA 30309 is entitled to their authorization to Been Appointed Either Receiver, States: Alabama, Delaware, District of operate. Liquidator, or Manager Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, OMB Number: N/A. Maryland, Mississippi, North Title: FCC Survey of Cable Industry AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Costs. Corporation. Virginia, and West Virginia Form No.: N/A. ACTION: Updated listing of financial Southwest Service Center, 5080 Action: New collection. institutions in liquidation. Respondents: Business or other for- Spectrum Drive, Dallas, TX 75248 profit; Federal Government; State, Local SUMMARY: The Federal Deposit States: Arkansas, Colorado, Louisiana, or Tribal Government. Insurance Corporation (Corporation) has New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas Frequency of Response: One time adopted a policy statement concerning Western Service Center, 4 Park Plaza, Survey. section 219(2) of the Financial Newport Beach, CA 92714 Estimated Annual Burden: 560 Institutions Reform, Recovery, and States: Alaska, Arizona, California, responses; 25 hours burden per Enforcement Act of 1989 (12 U.S.C. and Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, response; 14,000 hours total annual 28 U.S.C. 2410(c)). The policy statement Oregon, Utah, Washington, Wyoming, burden. and an initial listing of financial and Guam FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, ACTIVE INSTITUTIONS IN LIQUIDATION, ALPHA LISTING (NAME) Institution name Date closed city/state region Ref. No. Bank of Hartford, Hartford, CT ...... 06/10/94, Northeast SC ...... 4610 Bank of Newport, Newport Beach, CA ...... 08/12/94, Western SC ...... 4616 Bank of San Pedro, Los Angeles, CA ...... 07/15/94, Western SC ...... 4613 Barbary Coast National Bank, San Francisco, CA ...... 05/19/94, Western SC ...... 4609 Capital Bank, Downey, CA ...... 08/26/94 Western SC ...... 4617 Commerce Bank, Newport Beach, CA ...... 07/29/94, Western SC ...... 4614 Commercial Bank & Trust Co., Lowell, MA ...... 05/06/94, Northeast SC ...... 4608 Ludlow Savings Bank, Ludlow, MA ...... 10/20/94, Northeast SC ...... 4618 M Bank Bonnett, Dallas, TX ...... 11/02/94, Southwest SC ...... 3970 Meriden Trust & Safe Dep Co, Meriden, CT ...... 07/07/94, Northeast SC ...... 4612 NE Region Servicer-CP, East Hartford, CT ...... 05/20/94, Northeast SC ...... 3969 Pioneer Bank, Fullerton, CA ...... 07/08/94, Western SC ...... 4611 Western Community Bank, Corona, CA ...... 07/29/94, Western SC ...... 4615 First Trust Bank, Ontario, CA ...... 03/03/95, Western SC ...... 4620 Guardian Bank, Los Angeles, CA ...... 01/20/95, Western SC ...... 4619 Los Angeles Thrift and Loan Company, Los Angeles, CA ...... 03/31/94, Western SC ...... 4621 25910 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices Dated: May 9, 1995. Estimate of Total Annual Reporting consolidated under the major disaster Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. and Recordkeeping Burden: 252,000 declaration. Robert E. Feldman, hours. Federal funding for debris removal to eliminate immediate threats to public health Acting Executive Secretary. Number of Respondents: 14,000. Estimated Average Burden Time per and safety, emergency protective measures to [FR Doc. 95–11879 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] save lives and protect public health and Response: NFIRS–1, 1 hour; NFIRS–2, BILLING CODE 6714±01±M safety, shall remain at 100 percent Federal 55 minutes; NFIRS–3, 50 minutes; funding, as I previously authorized under NFIRS–4, 30 minutes; NFIRS–5, 30 Section 501(b) of the Stafford Act and my FEDERAL EMERGENCY minutes; NFIRS–HMI, 45 minutes. declaration of April 19. Frequency of Response: On occasion, MANAGEMENT AGENCY The Federal share for reimbursement for annually, or quarterly. permanent Public Assistance work including the repair and reconstruction of uninsured Public Information Collection Dated: May 3, 1995. public and private non-profit facilities and Requirements Submitted to OMB for Wesley C. Moore, hazard mitigation is limited to 75 percent of Review Director, Program Services Division, total eligible and reasonable costs. Operations Support Directorate. ACTION: Notice. Temporary housing assistance, mortgage/ [FR Doc. 95–11884 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] rental assistance, crises counseling assistance SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency BILLING CODE 6718±01±M and disaster unemployment assistance will Management Agency (FEMA) has continue to be 100 percent Federally funded. submitted to the Office of Management The law specifically prohibits a similar and Budget the following public [FEMA±1048±DR] waiver for funds provided to States for the Individual and Family Grant program. These information collection requirements for Oklahoma; Amendment to Notice of a funds will continue to be reimbursed at 75 review and clearance in accordance Major Disaster Declaration percent of total eligible costs. with the Paperwork Reduction Act of This amended declaration is consistent 1980, 44 U.S.C. chapter 35. AGENCY: Federal Emergency with the request made by the Governor of the DATES: Comments on this information Management Agency (FEMA). State of Oklahoma. collection must be submitted on or ACTION: Notice. Please notify the Governor of the State of before July 14, 1995. Oklahoma and the Federal Coordinating SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice Officer of this amendment to my major ADDRESSES: Direct comments regarding disaster declaration. the burden estimate or any aspect of this of a major disaster for the State of information collection, including Oklahoma, (FEMA–1048–DR), dated I do hereby determine the following suggestions for reducing this burden, to: April 26, 1995, and related area of the State of Oklahoma to have The FEMA Information Collections determinations. been affected adversely by this declared Clearance Officer at the address below; EFFECTIVE DATES: May 5, 1995. major disaster: and to Donald Arbuckle, Office of FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The City of Oklahoma City for Public Management and Budget, 3235 New Pauline C. Campbell, Response and Assistance. Executive Office Building, Washington, Recovery Directorate, Federal (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. DC 20503, (202) 395–7340, within 60 Emergency Management Agency, 83.516, Disaster Assistance) days of this notice. Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–3606. Dated: May 9, 1995. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is James L. Witt, Copies of the above information hereby given that, in a letter dated May Director. collection request and supporting 5, 1995, the President amended the [FR Doc. 95–11885 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] documentation can be obtained by declaration to include Public Assistance BILLING CODE 6718±02±M calling or writing Muriel B. Anderson, and to reflect the cost-sharing FEMA Information Collections arrangements concerning Federal funds Clearance Officer, Federal Emergency provided for emergency work and debris FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., removal under the authority of the Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–2624. Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Cancellation of Tariffs of Common Type: Extension of 3067–0161. Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. Carriers by Water in the Foreign Title: National Fire Incident Reporting 5121 et seq.), in a letter to James L. Witt, Commerce of the United States for System (NFIRS). Director of the Federal Emergency Failure to File Anti-Rebate Abstract: NFIRS forms are used by fire Management Agency, as follows: Certifications departments at the local, State, and Federal level as a standard method of I have determined that the damage The Federal Maritime Commission’s resulting from the explosion at the Alfred P. regulations at 46 CFR 582.1(a) and collecting information concerning fire Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, incidents. The data collected is used to on April 19, 1995, in the State of Oklahoma 582.3(a) require every common carrier quantify the national experience and to is of sufficient severity and magnitude that by water and licensed ocean freight formulate intervention strategies which special conditions are warranted regarding forwarder in the foreign commerce of target loss reduction from fire. Five the provision of assistance provided under the United States to file an Anti-Rebate forms are used as the vehicle for data the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Certification (‘‘ARC’’) with the collection: NFIRS–1, Incident Report: Emergency Assistance Act (the Stafford Act). Commission no later than December 31 NFIRS–2, Civilian Casualty Report; Therefore, I amend my previous major of each even-numbered year. NFIRS–3, Fire Service Casualty Report; disaster declaration of April 26 to authorize By certified letter dated February 21, the addition of the Public Assistance 1995, the Commission wrote to certain NFIRS–4, Fire Department Identification program. Report; NFIRS–5, Report of Submitted On this date, with the addition of Public common carriers and/or licensed ocean Incidents; and NFIRS–HMI, Hazardous Assistance to the major disaster declaration, freight forwarders who had failed to file Materials Incident Report. my emergency declaration of April 19 is the ARC due in December 1994. In that Type of Respondents: State, Local, closed. All future operations and funding letter, and in a notice published in the Tribal Government (fire departments). associated with the explosion are Federal Register on February 28, 1995, Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices 25911 the Commission advised that, if within Acronym: Asia Top Shipping Limited Acronym: Empresa Naviera Andina S.A. 45 days of the certified letter’s date, they Org. No.: 012220 Org. No.: 009405 had not either filed an ARC or Acronym: Asiamerica Lines Acronym: Empresa Naviera Santa Ltd. established that it had been filed, the Org. No.: 008492 Org. No.: 012122 Acronym: Asian Shipping, Ltd. Acronym: EOS/McArthur (Belgium) BVBA tariffs of the common carriers would be Org. No.: 012373 Org. No.: 008863 cancelled in accordance with 46 CFR Acronym: Atlas Intermodal Services, Inc. Acronym: Euro-Link Cargo Service Ltd. 514.1(c)(1)(iii)(C) and/or the licenses of Org. No.: 012291 Org. No.: 005731 the ocean freight forwarders would be Acronym: Aton Shipping Corporation Acronym: First Maritime Company, Inc. suspended in accordance with 46 CFR org. No.: 011570 Org. No.: 012455 510.16(a)(6). Acronym: Babun Shipping Corporation Acronym: Freight Liner SA There were 640 common carriers and/ Org. No.: 008549 Org. No.: 012025 or licensed ocean freight forwarders Acronym: Bank Line East Africa Limited Acronym: Freshtainer Operations Limited listed in the February 28th Notice Org. No.: 012560 Org. No.: 010715 Acronym: Basle Line Nigeria Limited Acronym: Fushiki Kairiku Unso Co., Ltd. published in the Federal Register. Four Org. No.: 012228 Org. No.: 012227 hundred seventy four (474) of these Acronym: Bosco Atlantic Lines Inc. Acronym: Global Container Lines Limited carriers/forwarders filed the required Org. No.: 009604 Org. No.: 009697 ARC or demonstrated that it had been Acronym: Brazilian Overseas Shipping Acronym: Glorious Shipping previously filed. Accordingly, these Services Ltd. Org. No.: 012555 parties have satisfied the filing Org. No.: 000010 Acronym: Goldline Limited requirement, thus their tariffs will not Acronym: C.A. Venezolana De Navegacion Org. No.: 010375 be cancelled nor will their licenses be Org. No.: 012898 Acronym: Gruenhut International Ltd. Acronym: Caicos Seafreight, Ltd. Org. No.: 008901 suspended. (These parties are listed in Org. No.: 011378 Acronym: Gulf and Eastern Steamship & 1 Attachment B.) The remaining parties, Acronym: Cargo Trader, Inc., The Chartering Corp. all of whom are common carriers, either Org. No.: 012292 Org. No.: 011383 did not respond by filing an ARC or if Acronym: Cargo Transport Lines, Inc. Acronym: Gulf Coast Shipping they did respond indicated that they are Org. No.: 012221 Org. No.: 011573 no longer common carriers in the Acronym: Caribbean Express Line, Inc. Acronym: Gulf-Atlantic Refrigerated Line, foreign commerce of the United States. Org. No.: 010864 Inc. Notice is hereby given that the foreign Acronym: Caribe U.S.A., Inc. Org. No.: 011150 tariffs for the common carriers listed in Org. No.: 012849 Acronym: Han Maritime Limited Attachment A are cancelled effective the Acronym: Central America Shippers L.L.C. Org. No.: 012534 Org. No.: 010790 Acronym: Hintex International Limited date of publication of this notice in the Acronym: Central American Container Line, Org. No.: 013100 Federal Register. These firms were S.A. Acronym: Horizon Steamship Line Ltd. notified of this action by certified mail, Org. No.: 010627 Org. No.: 012535 return receipt requested on May 16, Acronym: Central States Transport Ltd. Acronym: Imex Trans Line Inc. 1995. Notice is further given that the Org. No.: 011103 Org. No.: 011414 common carriers and licensed ocean Acronym: Cheng Ho Forwarding Co., Ltd. Acronym: Inchcape Shipping Services (HK) freight forwarders listed in Attachment Org. No.: 011245 Ltd. B have either filed ARC’s, cancelled Acronym: China Express Forwarders Co., Org. No.: 011151 their foreign tariffs or have had their Ltd. Acronym: Jet Compania Naviera S.A. Org. No.: 011388 Org. No.: 011014 ocean freight forwarder licenses Acronym: City Cargo International Acronym: Jet-Speed Sea Freight Ltd. revoked. Org. No.: 012329 Org. No.: 012673 Therefore it is ordered that the tariffs Acronym: Clear Link Shipping Company Inc. Acronym: Latinmar, Inc. of the carriers listed in Attachment A Org. No.: 011240 Org. No.: 010923 are cancelled. Acronym: Colombia Transport Line, Acronym: Lianfeng Shipping Co. Ltd. Bryant L. VanBrakle, Incorporated Org. No.: 012020 Director, Bureau of Tariffs, Certification and Org. No.: 001537 Acronym: Lockson Services Limited Licensing. Acronym: Companhia De Navegacao Org. No.: 009696 Maritima Netumar Acronym: Logistics International Attachment A: Common Carriers by Water Org. No.: 007590 Management Services in the Foreign Commerce of the United Acronym: Conship Maritime Agency, Inc. Org. No.: 012564 States That Have Not Filed Anti-Rebate Org. No.: 007527 Acronym: Lonkon Investments Limited Certifications Acronym: Consorcio Naviero Del Occidente, Org. No.: 011571 Org. No.: 012328 C.A. Acronym: Lucky Accord Co. Ltd. Acronym: A.M.Z. International Shipping Co. Org. No.: 009624 Org. No.: 011973 Org. No.: 010967 Acronym: Covenant Container Line, Inc. Acronym: Lucky Ocean Shipping Limited Acronym: Airtrade Express, Inc. Org. No.: 011862 Org. No.: 012826 Org. No.: 012251 Acronym: Danfast Freight Limited Acronym: Magenta Overseas Limited Acronym: American Rate Inc. Org. No.: 012862 Org. No.: 011974 Org. No.: 005871 Acronym: Deep-Sea Consolidation AB Acronym: Main Chain, America Corporation Acronym: Amership Inc. Org. No.: 012695 Org. No.: 011498 Org. No.: 009678 Acronym: Dynasty Express Co., Ltd. Acronym: Marmex Line, S.A. Acronym: Amexcaribe, Inc. Org. No.: 001775 Org. No.: 012245 Org. No.: 011292 Acronym: Ecuadorian Line, Inc. Acronym: Marquez, Rolando L. Acronym: Arctic Shipping Management S.A. Org. No.: 011358 Org. No.: 009742 Org. No.: 011997 Acronym: Empremar/CTE Agreement No. Acronym: Massworld Maritime Ltd. 207–011397 Org. No.: 009507 1 Attachment B also includes certain forwarders Org. No.: 009333 Acronym: Master Freight Ltd. whose licenses were revoked for other reasons Acronym: Empresa Mocambicana De Org. No.: 010855 subsequent to the publication of the Notice in the Navegacao Internaciona Acronym: Max International Freight Service Federal Register on February 28, 1995. Org. No.: 012223 Ltd. 25912 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices Org. No.: 011352 Acronym: Seamar Shipping Corporation Acronym: AA Forwarding Inc. Acronym: Maxcaribe, Inc. Org. No.: 012385 Org. No.: 012754 Org. No.: 010386 Acronym: Seven Seas Steamship Line, Inc. Acronym: ABCO International Freight (H.K.) Acronym: MCC Distribution AB Org. No.: 012584 Ltd. Org. No.: 009789 Acronym: Sextans S.A. Cia. Argentina De Org. No.: 002158 Acronym: Meng Horng Shipping PTE Ltd Navegacion Acronym: Ace Shipping Corp. Org. No.: 011968 Org. No.: 010788 Org. No.: 013097 Acronym: Merks Southern Star Line Ltd. Acronym: Sino Ocean Shipping (HK) Co. Acronym: Action Cargo International, Inc. Org. No.: 012821 Org. No.: 007982 Org. No.: 010553 Acronym: Mexus Ro/Ro Line, Inc. Acronym: Societe Nationale Malgache De Acronym: Active Cargo Services Limited Org. No.: 011228 Transports Mari Org. No.: 004030 Acronym: MM Lines Inc. Org. No.: 011376 Acronym: Advance Brokers, Ltd. Org. No.: 012746 Acronym: Southern Oceans Container Line Org. No.: 012403 Acronym: Modern Line Services, Inc. Limited Acronym: AFS Freight Management (USA) Org. No.: 011177 Org. No.: 010654 Inc. Acronym: Morex Line Corp. Acronym: Sunrise Agency Ltd. Org. No.: 012720 Org. No.: 011953 Org. No.: 011562 Acronym: Air Market Express Limited Acronym: Multimodal Shipping Company, Acronym: Sunshine Shipping Ltd. Org. No.: 007319 Inc. Org. No.: 011639 Acronym: Air Tiger Express (U.S.A.), Inc. Org. No.: 012229 Acronym: Taehwa Areosea Forwarders Inc. Org. No.: 004758 Acronym: Naviera Comerical Naylamp S.A. Org. No.: 008922 Acronym: Air-Mar Shipping, Inc. Org. No.: 006809 Acronym: Taiwan Dispatch Forwarding Inc. Org. No.: 010629 Acronym: Naviera Interamericana Org. No.: 009516 Acronym: Airfreight Master Limited, The ‘‘Navicana’’, S.A. Acronym: Tak Shing Transportation Co., Ltd. Org. No.: 012827 Org. No.: 001536 Org. No.: 013156 Acronym: Airtruk/Seatruk Inc. Acronym: Net Ocean, Inc. Acronym: Tetramaris Agencies, S.A. Org. No.: 010619 Org. No.: 012457 Org. No.: 012422 Acronym: Alfons Koster Acronym: Norstar Shipping Agency, Inc. Acronym: Tigerline Inc. Org. No.: 012901 Org. No.: 012264 Org. No.: 011142 Acronym: All Shipping Company Inc. Acronym: Norte/Sar Americana Logistics Acronym: Top Freight Systems, Inc. Org. No.: 012887 Org. No.: 010612 Org. No.: 011754 Acronym: All State International Freight Inc. Acronym: Ocean Horizon Shipping Co. Acronym: Tormont Shipping Inc. Org. No.: 010608 Org. No.: 007088 Org. No.: 012843 Acronym: Allegro International Service Acronym: Ocean Marine Line Acronym: Treasure Coast Transport Org. No.: 011242 Org. No.: 012413 Company, Inc. Acronym: Aloyd International, Corp. Acronym: Oceanic Comp. Ltd. Org. No.: 012218 Org. No.: 11440 Org. No.: 012648 Acronym: Tri-Star Industries, Inc. Acronym: Alpha Cargo Services, Inc. Acronym: P&O Swire Containers Ltd. Org. No.: 011756 Org. No.: 008556 Org. No.: 012333 Acronym: Tri-Star Marine, Inc. Acronym: Alpine Express Corporation Acronym: P.O.L. (HK) Ltd. Org. No.: 011330 Org. No.: 008709 Org. No.: 012683 Acronym: Trinity Shipping Line, Inc. Acronym: Alternative Freight Services, Inc. Acronym: Pacific Ameritrans Shipping Org. No.: 010716 Org. No.: 012523 Corporation Acronym: Turbo Express Int’l Corp. Acronym: Amco Shipping International Org. No.: 012281 Org. No.: 011387 Limited Acronym: Pacific Glory Shipping Limited Acronym: UKL Shipping Company Limited Org. No.: 012831 Org. No.: 011036 Org. No.: 010728 Acronym: Amerasa Rapid Transport USA Acronym: Pangaea Enterprises Acronym: Uni-Sea & Air Freight Co., Ltd. Inc. Org. No.: 006584 Org. No.: 007059 Org. No.: 007266 Acronym: Pearcy Marine, Inc. Acronym: Unison Shipping Co., Ltd. Acronym: America First International, Inc. Org. No.: 011420 Org. No.: 010892 Org. No.: 013140 Acronym: Peninsula Navigation Corporation Acronym: UTS International Forwarding Ltd. Acronym: American Caribbean Express Org. No.: 010972 Org. No.: 012269 Shipping Co., Inc. Acronym: Poseidon Freight Forwarding Co., Acronym: W.B.E. International Ltd. Org. No.: 013231 Ltd. Org. No.: 010221 Acronym: American Liner System Inc. Org. No.: 013015 Acronym: Wah Shun Shipping Co., Ltd. Org. No.: 012847 Acronym: Professional Cargo Services Int’l Org. No.: 012845 Acronym: American Ship Management, Inc. Inc. Acronym: Waterway Maritime Co., Ltd. Org. No.: 005862 Org. No.: 011306 Org. No.: 001791 Acronym: American Tri-Net Express Inc. Acronym: Protexa Burlington International- Acronym: Westwind Africa Line Limited Org. No.: 013119 Bahamas, Ltd Org. No.: 011984 Acronym: American Vanpac Carriers, Inc. Org. No.: 011693 Acronym: Wide Tech Shipping Limited Org. No.: 012172 Acronym: RAE Cargo Services Org. No.: 012515 Acronym: Ameripack Freight Systems Org. No.: 011318 Acronym: Windward Supplies Limited Org. No.: 007461 Acronym: Red Oak Industries, Inc. Org. No.: 010373 Acronym: Ameritrans Express, Inc. Org. No.: 008594 Acronym: Woo Shin International Transport Org. No.: 008795 Acronym: Riva International Freight Co., Ltd. Acronym: Amzone International, Inc. Management Ltd. Org. No.: 012470 Org. No.: 006385 Org. No.: 013028 Acronym: A & M International Service Corp. Acronym: Apollo International Forwarders Acronym: Sampaguita Group, The Org. No.: 002518 Inc. Org. No.: 012080 Acronym: A. A. Freight Forwarding, Inc. Org. No.: 011990 Acronym: Scanfreight Limited Org. No.: 005160 Acronym: Armada Anz Parcel Service B.V. Org. No.: 011682 Acronym: A.J. Gugliatto Org. No.: 013257 Acronym: SDV Management Services, Inc. Org. No.: 012259 Acronym: Arms Ocean Systems, Inc. Org. No.: 011308 Acronym: A.L.S. Associazione Logistica Org. No.: 012544 Acronym: Seabridge Transport (HK) Ltd. Spedizionieri Acronym: Arrow Freight Services, Inc. Org. No.: 010718 Org. No.: 009386 Org. No.: 011413 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices 25913 Acronym: Arrow Shipping Limited Org. No.: 008655 Org. No.: 008941 Org. No.: 004622 Acronym: Carpe Air & Sea Shipping, Inc. Acronym: Cross Ocean International, Inc. Acronym: ASG Forwarding, Inc. Org. No.: 012581 Org. No.: 012105 Org. No.: 012115 Acronym: Catcor Services, Inc. Acronym: CTL Maritime (USA) Inc. Acronym: Asia Fortune Shipping Inc. Org. No.: 000754 Org. No.: 012187 Org. No.: 011996 Acronym: CCAL (Canada) Inc. Acronym: D.T. Gruelle Company Acronym: Asia Pacific Shipping Inc. Org. No.: 012551 Org. No.: 011642 Org. No.: 012481 Acronym: CCCA/FNC Acronym: Dammers Chartering N.V. Acronym: Asia Transportation Co., Ltd. Org. No.: 004345 Org. No.: 011167 Org. No.: 008033 Acronym: Charles A. Redden, Inc. Acronym: Dantransport (UK) Limited Acronym: Atlantic International Freight Org. No.: 011260 Org. No.: 008448 Forwarders Inc. Acronym: Chat, Inc. Acronym: Dart Express (Los Angeles) Inc. Org. No.: 011991 Org. No.: 012343 Org. No.: 008497 Acronym: Atlas Freight Consolidators, Inc. Acronym: Chavez, Ninfa V. Acronym: Dateline Forwarding Services, Inc. Org. No.: 010650 Org. No.: 008681 Org. No.: 000920 Acronym: Aust-Asia Worldwide Shipping Acronym: Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc. Acronym: Dean Forwarding Company, Inc. Pty. Ltd. Org. No.: 005191 Org. No.: 013164 Org. No.: 011722 Acronym: Chicago Cargo Corporation Acronym: Deckwell Sky Express Ltd. Acronym: Australian Freight Services Ltd. Org. No.: 000747 Org. No.: 012293 Org. No.: 012184 Acronym: China National Foreign Trade Acronym: Dennis Shipping & Photography Acronym: Automated Freight Systems, Inc. Transportation C Co. Org. No.: 013116 Org. No.: 013152 Org. No.: 004931 Acronym: Bahl, Vandana C. Acronym: China Trading Service USA, Inc. Acronym: Dependable Freight Forwarding, Org. No.: 004697 Org. No.: 011060 Inc. Acronym: Barnes, Robert Field Acronym: Choice Container Corp. Org. No.: 011059 Org. No.: 012869 Org. No.: 011999 Acronym: Devoted Cargo Services (H.K.) Ltd. Acronym: Barry, Christopher Kevin Acronym: Clare Freight International, Inc. Org. No.: 009934 Org. No.: 005328 Org. No.: 011636 Acronym: DSR/Senator Joint Service Acronym: Bekins Moving & Storage Acronym: Clipper Shipping Ltd. Org. No.: 013135 Org. No.: 012863 Org. No.: 012199 Acronym: E.R.A. Freight Forwarding Inc. Acronym: Bench, Julia G. Acronym: Club Prestige Antilles N.V. Org. No.: 011163 Org. No.: 013151 Org. No.: 011178 Acronym: Eagle Warehousing, Inc. Acronym: Benemerito, Lisenio R. Acronym: CMB Transport NV Org. No.: 011132 Org. No.: 013002 Org. No.: 007321 Acronym: East Indies Shipping Company Acronym: Bering Orient Inc. Acronym: CMS International Co. Org. No.: 013236 Org. No.: 013010 Acronym: Best Air & Sea Services (HK) Ltd. Org. No.: 006487 Acronym: Eastern Mediterranean Shipping Org. No.: 012796 Acronym: Cole Forwarding, Inc. Corp. Acronym: Best Freight Forwarding Inc. Org. No.: 001811 Org. No.: 007780 Org. No.: 004360 Acronym: Colex Ltd. Acronym: Eastern Worldwide Company, Acronym: Bill Pokinhorn, Inc. Org. No.: 012000 Limited Org. No.: 010439 Acronym: Colombo Marine Cargo, Inc. Org. No.: 011246 Acronym: Bogo Shipping Co., Ltd. Org. No.: 004718 Acronym: Eastop Shipping Ltd. Org. No.: 011947 Acronym: Colombo Service, Inc. Org. No.: 012674 Acronym: Bolivian Intermodal Containers Org. No.: 004682 Acronym: Econolines Ltd. Lines S.R.L. Acronym: Commodity Forwarders, Inc. Org. No.: 010227 Org. No.: 011074 Org. No.: 009587 Acronym: EES Shipping (Australia) Pty Ltd Acronym: Bravo, Mario C. Acronym: Commonwealth Shipping Ltd. Org. No.: 001228 Org. No.: 012574 Org. No.: 000787 Acronym: Egyptian Navigation Company Acronym: Brazil Consolidating Services Inc. Acronym: Compagnie Nationale Algerienne Org. No.: 011013 Org. No.: 010582 de Navigation Acronym: Empremar/Msc Agreement Acronym: Brighten Ocean Forwarding Ltd. Org. No.: 012453 Org. No.: 001929 Org. No.: 013207 Acronym: Complete Cargo Services, Inc. Acronym: Encinal Terminals Acronym: C & T International N.V. Org. No.: 010482 Org. No.: 007464 Org. No.: 011008 Acronym: Con-Carriers Gmbh Acronym: Enterprise Forwarders, Inc. Acronym: C Port Miami Corporation Org. No.: 005484 Org. No.: 011959 Org. No.: 004679 Acronym: Condor Shipping Company, Inc. Acronym: Esbo Shipping Inc. Acronym: C. J. Swift & Co., Inc. Org. No.: 012120 Org. No.: 011944 Org. No.: 008856 Acronym: Container Development Group Acronym: Euro Trans International, Inc. Acronym: Calberson International Paris Nord Corporation Org. No.: 010805 II Org. No.: 007913 Acronym: Ever Concord Ltd. Org. No.: 010909 Acronym: Conterm Consolidation Services Org. No.: 006930 Acronym: Camota, Virgilio A. (USA) Inc. Acronym: Express Line Corporation Org. No.: 012836 Org. No.: 008189 Org. No.: 006170 Acronym: Cargo Co-Ordinators Shipping Acronym: Conti-Lines N.V. Acronym: Express Service International, Inc. (H.K.) Ltd. Org. No.: 012818 Org. No.: 012038 Org. No.: 012195 Acronym: Continental Container Lines Ltd. Acronym: Exx-Ortz International, Inc. Acronym: Cargonauts, Inc. Org. No.: 007318 Org. No.: 011496 Org. No.: 005649 Acronym: Continental Seacorp Shipping, Acronym: F C Wright International Ltd. Acronym: Cari World International, Inc. Ltd. Org. No.: 013001 Org. No.: 012626 Org. No.: 002700 Acronym: F.P. International Corporation Acronym: Caribbean Freight Forwarders, Inc. Acronym: Continental World Movers, Inc. Org. No.: 012599 Org. No.: 006284 Org. No.: 012121 Acronym: F.S. Cargo Inc. Acronym: Caribe Basin Services, Inc. Acronym: Corporate World Relocation Org. No.: 005288 Org. No.: 009766 International, Inc. Acronym: Fabian Forwarding Company, Inc. Acronym: Carnisco International Custom Org. No.: 011097 Org. No.: 012327 House Brokers Acronym: Croatia Line Acronym: Falcon Forwarding, Inc. 25914 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices Org. No.: 010347 Acronym: Guardship America, Inc. Acronym: International Consolidators & Acronym: Falcon Freight International Org. No.: 004558 Freight Forward Limited Acronym: Guerra, Rosendo H. Org. No.: 013168 Org. No.: 010823 Org. No.: 012325 Acronym: International Express Acronym: Far Eastern Shipping Company Acronym: Gulf-Ocean shipping Corporation Consolidators Co. Org. No.: 007465 Org. No.: 004172 Org. No.: 012701 Acronym: Farag, Nabil M. Acronym: H. G. Ollendorff, Inc. Acronym: International Express Shipping Org. No.: 011187 Org. No.: 010799 Co., Ltd. Acronym: Fari International, Inc. Acronym: H. P. Blanchard & Co. Org. No.: 011500 Org. No.: 008607 Org. No.: 009867 Acronym: International Freight Agency Acronym: Fast Cargo U.S. (LA), Inc. Acronym: H. Schumacher Associates Org. No.: 008971 Org. No.: 008862 Org. No.: 009837 Acronym: International Tomax Consolidators Acronym: Fast Forward Container Line Acronym: Haewoo Air & Shipping Co., Ltd. Ltd. Org. No.: 012104 Org. No.: 010807 Org. No.: 012336 Acronym: Filipinas Cargo Forwarders Acronym: Hallmark Transport (Taiwan) Co. Acronym: International Transport Systems Org. No.: 007541 Ltd. Org. No.: 008220 Acronym: Florida Worldwide Citrus Products Org. No.: 011363 Acronym: International Transportation and Group, Inc. Acronym: Hamda International Freight Ltd. Cargo Servic Org. No.: 009467 Org. No.: 010633 Org. No.: 012867 Acronym: Fontana International, Inc. Acronym: Hanshin Air Cargo USA Inc. Acronym: International Transportation Org. No.: 011280 Org. No.: 011583 Network Inc. Acronym: Fordson Shipping Limited Acronym: Harvey Yaffe Forwarding, Inc. Org. No.: 001377 Org. No.: 011336 Org. No.: 008783 Acronym: Intersped Inc. Acronym: Formerica Consolidation Service, Acronym: Helka Express International Ltd. Org. No.: 004543 Inc. Org. No.: 012708 Acronym: Irwin Brown Company, The Org. No.: 010863 Acronym: Henriques, Beverly Org. No.: 012071 Acronym: Foss Maritime Company Org. No.: 006454 Acronym: Isabella Shipping Company Org. No.: 011469 Acronym: Hip Forwarding Co Inc. Limited (Bermuda) Acronym: Frama Forwarding Corp. Org. No.: 012522 Org. No.: 007861 Org. No.: 013029 Acronym: Hudson Int’l Transport (Taiwan) Acronym: J-Mar Overseas Transport, Inc. Acronym: Franco Vago International Inc. Corp. Org. No.: 004728 Org. No.: 008346 Org. No.: 012624 Acronym: J.B. Fong & Co., Inc. Acronym: Freight Connections International, Acronym: Hudson Shipping (Hong Kong) Org. No.: 004364 Ltd. Ltd. Acronym: J.R. Michels, Inc. Org. No.: 013112 Org. No.: 010663 Org. No.: 012239 Acronym: Freightlink International Inc. Acronym: Hyaline Shipping (H.K.) Co., Ltd. Acronym: J.G. International Freight Org. No.: 013178 Org. No.: 011563 Forwarding, Inc. Acronym: French International Movers, Inc. Acronym: Hycob Maritime, Inc. Org. No.: 012691 Org. No.: 010779 Org. No.: 005349 Acronym: J.R.C. Corp. Acronym: Frontier Liner Services Inc. Acronym: Ideal Cargo Service, Inc. Org. No.: 001403 Org. No.: 011864 Org. No.: 004652 Acronym: Jagro Customs Brokers & Acronym: Fuchuen Transportation Company Acronym: Imperial Freight Brokers, Inc. International Freight Limited Org. No.: 004626 Org. No.: 012509 Org. No.: 008464 Acronym: Independent Cargo Services, Inc. Acronym: Jamar Shipping, Inc. Acronym: Fuji Unyu Co., Ltd. Org. No.: 009370 Org. No.: 011495 Org. No.: 011692 Acronym: Industrial Maritime Carriers, Inc. Acronym: Jardine Shoushan Int’l Co., Ltd. Acronym: Fund On Shipping Limited Org. No.: 004818 Org. No.: 012834 Org. No.: 013133 Acronym: Inexco Corporation Acronym: Jasper Freight Inc. Acronym: G & G International, Inc. Org. No.: 008923 Org. No.: 013088 Org. No.: 007078 Acronym: Integrated Traffic Systems, Acronym: Jefferson Shipping Ltd. Acronym: Gateway Express Co., Inc. Incorporated Org. No.: 010519 Org. No.: 005169 Org. No.: 010587 Acronym: Jeuro Incorporation Acronym: Gayo International Forwarders, Acronym: Inteks Inc. Org. No.: 012053 Inc. Org. No.: 002770 Acronym: Jiangsu Commercial Org. No.: 013098 Acronym: Inter-American Moving Services, Transportation (HK) Co. Lt Acronym: GCI Forwarding Company, Inc. Org. No.: 012444 Incorporated Org. No.: 004509 Acronym: JMS International Services Org. No.: 012717 Acronym: Inter-Continental Corporation Org. No.: 012444 Acronym: GFI Express Corp. Org. No.: 004011 Acronym: JMS International Services Org. No.: 012552 Acronym: Inter-Orient Corporation Org. No.: 000727 Acronym: Global Forwarding Ltd. Org. No.: 002402 Acronym: John Cassidy & Sons, Inc. Org. No.: 010392 Acronym: Interamerican World Transport Org. No.: 004680 Acronym: Global International Forwarding Corporation Acronym: Jones, Richard L. Ltd. Org. No.: 013131 Org. No.: 012671 Org. No.: 007842 Acronym: Interamericana Shipping Line Inc. Acronym: K Line Air Service (U.S.A.) Inc. Acronym: Global Worldwide, Inc. Org. No.: 012627 Org. No.: 011952 Org. No.: 012086 Acronym: Intercarga U.S.A. Corporation Acronym: K.S. Shipping Line Acronym: Globe Cargo, Inc. Org. No.: 011115 Org. No.: 006938 Org. No.: 012912 Acronym: Intercontinental Cargo Express, Acronym: Kaitone Shipping Co., Ltd. Acronym: Globus International Packing, Ltd. Org. No.: 006585 Shipping & Movi Org. No.: 001352 Acronym: KAM International Line Org. No.: 008850 Acronym: Intermar Steamship Corp. Org. No.: 010564 Acronym: Graybar Navigation Inc. Org. No.: 005833 Acronym: Kawanishi Shipping Service (H.K.) Org. No.: 011364 Acronym: International Caribbean Shipping Ltd. Acronym: Green Sail Ltd. (USA) Inc. Org. No.: 004263 Org. No.: 008016 Org. No.: 005114 Acronym: Keegan, Arthur Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices 25915 Org. No.: 005012 Org. No.: 005528 Org. No.: 012757 Acronym: Kenehan, John W. Acronym: Martinez, Miriam Acronym: Ocean Conco Line, Inc. Org. No.: 010595 Org. No.: 011341 Org. No.: 009571 Acronym: Khana Enterprise Co., Ltd. Acronym: Masco International Inc. Acronym: Ocean Focus Int’l (USA) Inc. Org. No.: 005464 Org. No.: 009468 Org. No.: 002789 Acronym: Kim, Young S. Acronym: Massan Shipping Industries, Inc. Acronym: Oceangate Container Line Org. No.: 009664 Org. No.: 011296 Org. No.: 007381 Acronym: Kintetsu Intermodal (Taiwan) Inc. Acronym: Master Air Cargo, Inc. Acronym: Oceangate Forwarding, Inc. Org. No.: 011677 Org. No.: 002001 Org. No.: 011192 Acronym: KNL International, Inc. Acronym: Maust Corporation, The Acronym: Oceanic Lloyd Limited Org. No.: 005091 Org. No.: 013085 Org. No.: 010226 Acronym: Konoike Hayakawa Forwarding, Acronym: Maverick Distribution Services Acronym: Oceanlink Forwarder Co., Ltd. Inc. Inc. Org. No.: 004809 Org. No.: 010192 Org. No.: 010493 Acronym: Olympic International Freight Acronym: Kunyoung Shipping Co., Ltd. Acronym: Max Gruenhut Gmbh Forwarders Inc. Org. No.: 011555 Org. No.: 011695 Org. No.: 011680 Acronym: Kurz-Allen, Inc. Acronym: Maxfine Shipping Limited Acronym: Omega Shipping, Inc. Org. No.: 009661 Org. No.: 010418 Org. No.: 011054 Acronym: KWE-Kintetsu World Express (S) Acronym: MCC (Mercantile Europe) Gmbh Acronym: Omni-Express International Inc. PTE Ltd. Org. No.: 005240 Org. No.: 010507 Org. No.: 008397 Acronym: Meiko America, Inc. Acronym: Orient Freight International, Inc. Acronym: L.C. Shipping, Inc. Org. No.: 006489 Org. No.: 011398 Org. No.: 010938 Acronym: Meteor Air Freight Inc. Acronym: Orient Overseas Container Line Acronym: Lancer International Corp. Org. No.: 012539 Ltd. Org. No.: 004904 Acronym: Miller Intermodal Logistics Org. No.: 007802 Acronym: Latin American Express Corp. Services Acronym: Orient Star Trading & Shipping, Org. No.: 013122 Org. No.: 004139 Inc. Acronym: Latin Freight Corporation Acronym: Milton Snedeker Corporation Org. No.: 010961 Org. No.: 004268 Org. No.: 012068 Acronym: Orion Express Line Acronym: Laufer Shipping Co., Inc. Acronym: Mondial Freight (HK) Limited Org. No.: 009618 Org. No.: 010651 Org. No.: 010991 Acronym: Overseas International Corporation Acronym: Leader Ocean Freight Forwarder, Acronym: Mountain Air Delivery Org. No.: 013074 Inc. Org. No.: 012300 Acronym: Overseas Transportation Org. No.: 004467 Acronym: MSS Maritime Shipping Services, Corporation Acronym: Leading Export Service Corp. Ltd. Org. No.: 011283 Org. No.: 010880 Org. No.: 011326 Acronym: Pacific Champion Express Co., Ltd. Acronym: Leadway Express Co., Ltd. Acronym: Multimodal Services (NY) Inc. Org. No.: 012726 Org. No.: 011589 Org. No.: 002226 Acronym: Page International, Inc. Acronym: Lee, Johnson Acronym: Myers Maritime International Ltd. Org. No.: 000977 Org. No.: 005247 Org. No.: 012398 Acronym: Pakistan National Shipping Acronym: Lewis, Leslie David Acronym: N.G.K., Inc. Corporation Org. No.: 013165 Org. No.: 012875 Org. No.: 007964 Acronym: Lextrans Co. Acronym: Naimoli, Anthony Acronym: Palm Beach Forwarding Org. No.: 001608 Org. No.: 011375 International, Inc. Acronym: Lineas Agromar S.A. Acronym: National Container Line (H.K.) Org. No.: 010407 Org. No.: 008546 Limited Acronym: Pan Trans International Freight Acronym: Ling Bridge Transport Org. No.: 001497 Service Co., L Incorporation Acronym: National Shipping Company of Org. No.: 009474 Org. No.: 013113 Saudi Arabia, TH Acronym: Panama Line, Inc. Acronym: Logistics Services Incorporated Org. No.: 011046 Org. No.: 008092 Org. No.: 013093 Acronym: Navimar Lines, C.A. Acronym: Pantainer Ltd. Acronym: M.I. International, Inc. Org. No.: 007561 Org. No.: 013086 Org. No.: 005532 Acronym: Nedrac Incorporated Acronym: Partec Forwarding Corporation Acronym: Maarten Intermodal Expeditors Org. No.: 004522 Org. No.: 006643 Org. No.: 001639 Acronym: Nettles & Co., Inc. Acronym: Pasha International, Inc. Acronym: MACS Maritime Carrier Shipping Org. No.: 004920 Org. No.: 010573 Gmbh & Company Acronym: New England Household Acronym: Peltransport Ltd. Org. No.: 009382 International Org. No.: 004505 Acronym: Magnus International Org. No.: 010584 Acronym: Phil Thomas & Son International Org. No.: 005494 Acronym: New Zealand Van Lines Ltd. Co. Acronym: Manufacturers Export Service, Inc. Org. No.: 012787 Org. No.: 013142 Org. No.: 004698 Acronym: Newport Cargo Consolidated, Inc. Acronym: Piff Shipping Ltd. Acronym: Mara Shipping, Inc. Org. No.: 008685 Org. No.: 010526 Org. No.: 012351 Acronym: Newport Cargo Consolidators, Inc. Acronym: Polamer, Inc. Acronym: Marco Forwarding International Org. No.: 012410 Org. No.: 011090 Co. Acronym: Noble Shipping Corporation Acronym: Polar Steamship and Commerce Org. No.: 012128 Org. No.: 013141 Company Inc Acronym: Mares Transport Acronym: North Star Airlines, Inc. Org. No.: 007965 Org. No.: 012485 Org. No.: 008337 Acronym: Poseidon Forwarding Company, Acronym: Marine Cargo Containers Acronym: North Star Ocean Services, Inc. Inc. Org. No.: 012536 Org. No.: 011038 Org. No.: 004801 Acronym: Marine Shipping Lines, Inc. Acronym: Norvanco International, Inc. Acronym: Posey International, Inc. Org. No.: 005475 Org. No.: 004477 Org. No.: 008604 Acronym: Maritime Connections Corp. Acronym: O’Hanneson Worldwide Acronym: PPS Enterprise Org. No.: 001678 Org. No.: 004873 Org. No.: 004388 Acronym: Marlin Marine Services, Inc. Acronym: Oakland Van & Storage, Inc. Acronym: Premier Shipping Company, Inc. 25916 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices Org. No.: 011148 Acronym: Sea Link Corporation Acronym: Topocean Consolidation Service Acronym: Puma International Forwarding Org. No.: 012222 Ltd. Service Acronym: Sea Star Marine Corporation Org. No.: 005214 Org. No.: 013027 Org. No.: 008514 Acronym: Total Cargo International, Inc. Acronym: R.T. Shipping Limited Acronym: Seajet Express, Inc. Org. No.: 011438 Org. No.: 013139 Org. No.: 007564 Acronym: Total Transport, Inc. Acronym: R.F.S. International, Corp. Acronym: Seanav International, Ltd. Org. No.: 010846 Org. No.: 009854 Org. No.: 011365 Acronym: Trade Air, Inc. Acronym: RAF International Forwarding Inc. Acronym: Seawinds Freight Services, Inc. Org. No.: 010577 Org. No.: 013250 Org. No.: 001133 Acronym: Traders Freight Systems (U.S.A.) Acronym: Rainbow World Transport, Inc. Acronym: Sesko Marine Trailers, Inc. Inc. Org. No.: 011675 Org. No.: 007634 Org. No.: 012672 Acronym: Ralex International Corp. Acronym: Sharp Base Shipping and Acronym: Traders of Miami, Inc. Org. No.: 010611 Transport Ltd. Org. No.: 009790 Acronym: Rambaud International Org. No.: 011668 Acronym: Trans AM Sea Freight (HK) Ltd. Org. No.: 011683 Acronym: Shipair Express (HK) Limited Org. No.: 008414 Acronym: Rapid Transport Ltd. Org. No.: 013175 Acronym: Trans Power International Org. No.: 004228 Acronym: Shippers, Inc. Forwarder Corp. Acronym: Reedy Forwarding Co Inc Org. No.: 012602 Org. No.: 013195 Org. No.: 004824 Acronym: Shui Nam Navigation (H.K.) Ltd. Acronym: Trans-Global Expeditors Acronym: Reliable International, Inc. Org. No.: 013102 Forwarding, Inc. Org. No.: 010422 Acronym: Siam Paetra International Co., Ltd. Org. No.: 013149 Acronym: Rennies Group Limited Org. No.: 006365 Acronym: Trans-World Shipping APS Org. No.: 004164 Acronym: Sino-American Corporation Org. No.: 009681 Acronym: Resolution, Inc. Org. No.: 012011 Acronym: Transcontinental Maritime Ltd. Org. No.: 008347 Acronym: Sofrana Holding Limited Org. No.: 012655 Acronym: Rewico America Inc. Org. No.: 005108 Acronym: Transglobal Forwarding Co., Ltd. Org. No.: 010710 Acronym: Solano, John J. Org. No.: 012486 Acronym: Rockwood International Freight Org. No.: 012670 Acronym: Translink Navigation S.A. Limited Acronym: Sotbi Trading Inc. Org. No.: 010857 Org. No.: 004861 Org. No.: 005769 Acronym: Transnation Freight Services, Inc. Acronym: Roger Baum International, Inc. Acronym: South Atlantic Cargo Shipping NV Org. No.: 000604 Org. No.: 004969 Org. No.: 011107 Acronym: Transportacion Maritime Acronym: Rome International Freight Acronym: Southern Caribbean Shipping, Inc. Mexicana, S.A. De C.V. Consultants, Inc. Org. No.: 004323 Org. No.: 011607 Org. No.: 013150 Acronym: Southern Steamship Agency Acronym: Transtec Ocean Express Inc. Acronym: Rong-Shang International Corp. Org. No.: 008310 Org. No.: 013174 Org. No.: 011301 Acronym: Speedtrans (Int’l) Consolidator Co., Acronym: Transway International Co., Ltd. Acronym: Rusflot Shipping Line N.V. Ltd. Org. No.: 007881 Org. No.: 012784 Org. No.: 012419 Acronym: Transworld Freight Services, Inc. Acronym: Ryan Freight Services, Inc. Acronym: Speedy Freight Systems Inc. Org. No.: 008972 Org. No.: 004489 Org. No.: 011272 Acronym: Transworld Transportation Co., Acronym: S. Swartz Co. Acronym: Stalwart Shipping, Inc. Ltd. Org. No.: 011625 Org. No.: 009844 Org. No.: 010330 Acronym: S.A.F.E. Shipping USA, Inc. Acronym: Star Ocean Shipping Company Acronym: Travima S.A. Org. No.: 004174 Org. No.: 006554 Org. No.: 013115 Acronym: S.A.I.M.A. America, Inc. Acronym: Struyk, Carrie D. Acronym: Treset Corporation Org. No.: 012346 Org. No.: 011961 Org. No.: 011544 Acronym: S.J. Stile Associates, Ltd. Acronym: Sunlex Shipping Limited Acronym: Triple Freight Corp. Org. No.: 010545 Org. No.: 008622 Org. No.: 010903 Acronym: Safco International Freight Corp. Acronym: Suntrans International, Inc. Acronym: Triple Freight Marine Corp. Org. No.: 010732 Org. No.: 012505 Org. No.: 012800 Acronym: Samson Transport Company (UK) Acronym: T C International Marketing Acronym: Trust Forwarding International, Ltd. Network, Inc. Inc. Org. No.: 010400 Org. No.: 012379 Org. No.: 010574 Acronym: Samson Transport Company A/S Acronym: T.V.L. Shipping (H.K.) Co., Ltd. Acronym: U.C.S. Group Inc. Org. No.: 011522 Org. No.: 010331 Org. No.: 011338 Acronym: San Diego Freight Services, Inc. Acronym: Taiwan Consolidation Co., Ltd. Acronym: U.C.T. International, Inc. Org. No.: 001070 Org. No.: 005775 Org. No.: 007785 Acronym: Sanki Steamship Co. Ltd., The Acronym: TBI Limited Acronym: U.S. Atlantic Freight Lines, Inc. Org. No.: 007821 Org. No.: 000512 Org. No.: 011476 Acronym: Sankyu U.S.A., Incorporated Acronym: TDY Freight Services, Ltd. Acronym: U.S. Brokers, Inc. Org. No.: 005125 Org. No.: 011704 Org. No.: 013190 Acronym: Saudinvest Transportation & Acronym: Tellux Shipping Ltd. Acronym: U.S. Intermodal Maritime Ltd. Traffic Services Org. No.: 005781 Org. No.: 004930 Org. No.: 013191 Acronym: Texas American Shipping Corp. Acronym: U.S.A. Shipping Corporation Acronym: Savino Del Bene (Texas) Ind. Org. No.: 005648 Org. No.: 007781 Org. No.: 009858 Acronym: Thomas Hudson Enterprises, Inc. Acronym: UAL Universal Africa (USA) Lines Acronym: SCAC (USA), Inc. Org. No.: 010896 N.V. (N.A.) Org. No.: 013087 Acronym: Thompson Express Co. Org. No.: 009777 Acronym: Scanam Transport (USA) Inc. Org. No.: 002337 Acronym: UCI Consolidator Ltd. Org. No.: 004578 Acronym: Tientsin Marine Shipping Org. No.: 012364 Acronym: Schick Moving & Storage Company Company Acronym: Ultra Cargo Lines, Inc. Org. No.: 012577 Org. No.: 007779 Org. No.: 011251 Acronym: SCN Container Line, Inc. Acronym: Tokyo Container Lines Co., Ltd. Acronym: Unifreight Forwarder Inc. Org. No.: 012797 Org. No.: 012067 Org. No.: 011304 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices 25917 Acronym: Union Marine International Co., Acronym: World Express Co., Ltd. U.S.C. §§225(a), 263, and 353-359] and Ltd. Org. No.: 011467 is given confidential treatment [5 U.S.C. Org. No.: 009883 Acronym: Worldlink International, Inc. Y552(b)(4)]. Acronym: Union Star Line Limited Org. No.: 012678 Abstract: Since 1995 the Federal Org. No.: 002766 Acronym: Worldwide Ocean & Air Shipping Reserve has conducted surveys of Acronym: Unipac Shipping Inc. Lines Inc. Org. No.: 013052 Org. No.: 006551 domestic finance companies every five Acronym: Unishipping Acronym: Worldwide Shipping Inc. years on consumer and business credit Org. No.: 009870 Org. No.: 013146 and on major assets and liabilities of Acronym: Unitainer System Forwarder Inc. Acronym: Wu, Yvonne (Yihong) finance companies. The FR 3033p is a Org. No.: 007836 Org. No.: 009346 one-page questionnaire that determines Acronym: United American Consolidators Acronym: Y.K. Shipping International (USA), which finance companies are in Corp. Inc. existence and for those that are, Org. No.: 006161 Org. No.: 009339 information is requested about the Acronym: United Distribution Service (Far Acronym: Yamato Transport (HK) Ltd. company’s total receivables, areas of East) Ltd. Org. No.: 010887 specialization, and other characteristics. Org. No.: 000056 Acronym: Yatari Express Co., Ltd. Acronym: United Intermodal Line Org. No.: 012353 Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Org. No.: 012567 Acronym: Yetion Shipping Ltd. System, May 9, 1995. Acronym: Unitrans Shipping & Air Cargo Org. No.: 011459 William W. Wiles, Limited Acronym: Yoon, In Joong Secretary of the Board. Org. No.: 013095 Org. No.: 007358 [FR Doc. 95–11848 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45am] Acronym: Universal Maritima S.L. Acronym: Zappola, Denise Org. No.: 012155 Org. No.: 009709 BILLING CODE 6210±01±F Acronym: US International Transport, Inc. Acronym: Zonn Agency Org. No.: 005685 Acronym: Van Ommeren Bulk Shipping BV [FR Doc. 95–11833 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] Andover Bancorp, Inc., et al.; Org. No.: 012185 BILLING CODE 6730±01±M Formations of; Acquisitions by; and Acronym: Vantage International Shipping, Mergers of Bank Holding Companies Inc. Org. No.: 007627 FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM The companies listed in this notice Acronym: Vav Universal Shipping have applied for the Board’s approval Org. No.: 012640 Agency Forms Under Review under section 3 of the Bank Holding Acronym: Vector International Freight (HK) Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1842) and § Ltd. Background 225.14 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 Org. No.: 012424 Notice is hereby given of the final CFR 225.14) to become a bank holding Acronym: Venconav USA Ltd. company or to acquire a bank or bank Org. No.: 007292 approval of a proposed information Acronym: Venezuelan Container Line, C.A. collection by the Board of Governors of holding company. The factors that are Org. No.: 012357 the Federal Reserve System (Board) considered in acting on the applications Acronym: Venture Shipping Inc. under OMB delegated authority, as per are set forth in section 3(c) of the Act Org. No.: 011585 5 C.F.R. 1320.9 (OMB Regulations on (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). Acronym: Vialoma Trading Corporation Controlling Paperwork Burdens on the Each application is available for Org. No.: 012589 Public). immediate inspection at the Federal Acronym: Vicon Shipping Corp. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reserve Bank indicated. Once the Org. No.: 009770 application has been accepted for Acronym: Victory Van Lines, Inc. Federal Reserve Board Clearance Officer—Mary M. McLaughlin— processing, it will also be available for Org. No.: 005341 inspection at the offices of the Board of Acronym: Viking Sea Freight Inc. Division of Research and Statistics, Org. No.: 010951 Board of Governors of the Federal Governors. Interested persons may Acronym: Votainer Europe B.V. Reserve System, Washington, D.C. express their views in writing to the Org. No.: 011175 20551 (202-452-3829). Reserve Bank or to the offices of the Acronym: Walker, Alicia Seneca OMB Desk Officer—Milo Sunderhauf— Board of Governors. Any comment on Org. No.: 010211 Office of Information and Regulatory an application that requests a hearing Acronym: Weita International Corporation Affairs, Office of Management and must include a statement of why a Org. No.: 011565 written presentation would not suffice Acronym: West Coast Line, Inc. Budget, New Executive Office Building, Room 3208, Washington, in lieu of a hearing, identifying Org. No.: 006375 specifically any questions of fact that Acronym: Western Bulk Carriers A/S D.C. 20503 (202-395-7340). Org. No.: 004888 Final approval under OMB delegated are in dispute and summarizing the Acronym: Westwind Overseas Limited authority of the implementation of the evidence that would be presented at a Org. No.: 012545 following report: hearing. Acronym: Williams Shipping & Delivery 1. Report title: Finance Company Unless otherwise noted, comments Services, Inc. Questionnaire. regarding each of these applications Org. No.: 011428 Agency form number: FR 3033p. must be received not later than June 8, Acronym: Wilson (F.E.) Ltd. OMB Docket number: 7100-0277. 1995. Org. No.: 012315 Frequency: One-time. A. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston Acronym: Winspeed Shipping Ltd. Reporters: Domestic finance companies. (Robert M. Brady, Vice President) 600 Org. No.: 012139 Annual reporting hours: 775. Atlantic Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts Acronym: Woodlands International Transport Company Lim Estimated average hours per response: 02106: Org. No.: 013129 0.25. 1. Andover Bancorp, Inc., Andover, Acronym: World Cargo Corporation Number of respondents: 3,100. Massachusetts; to acquire 100 percent of Org. No.: 011147 Small businesses are affected. voting shares of Finest Financial Acronym: World Destinations, Inc. General description of report: This Corporation, Pelham, New Hampshire, Org. No.: 011631 information collection is voluntary [12 and thereby indirectly acquire Pelham 25918 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices Bank and Trust Company, Pelham, New OMB No.: 0970–0047 Welfare Services, and Subpart 2, Family Hampshire. Description: States and Indian Tribes Preservation and Support Services; 45 CFR B. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago are required under the Family part 92; ACYF–PI–94–01; ACYF–PI–94–04; (James A. Bluemle, Vice President) 230 Preservation and Support Services Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 59 FR 50646, October 4, 1994. South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois Program, of the Social Security Act to Overview: This Program Instruction 60690: submit a five year plan. The plan is provides guidance to States and eligible 1. Milford Bancorporation, Milford, used by States and Indian Tribes to Indian Tribes on actions they need to take in Iowa; to merge with Ocheyedan develop and implement services and order to receive their allotments for fiscal Bancorporation, Ocheyedan, Iowa, and to receive their allocation of years 1995 and 1996 authorized under title thereby indirectly acquire Ocheyedan appropriated funds. IV–B, subparts 1 and 2. These State and Savings Bank, Ocheyedan, Iowa. Respondents: State governments and Tribal actions will involve: (1) developing and submitting a five-year plan for family 2. Panhandle Aviation, Inc., Clarinda, Indian Tribes Iowa; to acquire 100 percent of the preservation and support services; (2) Annual Number of Respondents: 93 completing and submitting the Annual voting shares of Essex Iowa sites Budget Requests for title OV–B, subparts 1 Bancorporation, Inc., Essex, Iowa, and Number of responses per respondent: 2 and 2, and the Annual Summary of Child and thereby indirectly acquire First National Total annual responses: 186 Family Services. Bank of Essex, Essex, Iowa. Hours per response: 253 The FY 1994 Program Instructions (PIs) C. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Total Annual Burden Hours: 47,058 issued to States and eligible Indian Tribes on (Randall C. Sumner, Vice President) 411 Additional Information: This January 18, 1994, and the Notice of Proposed Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63166: information collection is being Rulemaking (NPRM) for the Family 1. First Bank, Inc., Clayton, Missouri; Preservation and Support Services Program submitted to OMB on an expedited published in the Federal Register on October to acquire at least 70 percent of the schedule with a request for approval 4, 1994, informed States and eligible Indian voting shares of QCB Bancorp, Long within 60 days. The collection of Tribes that the legislation required the Beach, California, and thereby indirectly information in this notice is presented development and submission of five-year acquire Queen City Bank, National in the accompanying Program plans for family preservation and support by Association, Long Beach, California. instruction. June 30, 1995. The PIs and the NPRM 2. General Bancshares, Inc., Little OMB Comment: Written comments and provided a general orientation to planning for the development of the five-year plan, and Rock, Arkansas; to become a bank recommendations for the proposed holding company by acquiring 100 encouraged numerous activities such as the information collection should be sent consolidation of title IV–B, subparts 1 and 2. percent of the voting shares of directly to the following: Office of States and Indian Tribes are currently Sparkman Bancshares, Inc., Sparkman, Management and Budget, Paperwork involved in joint planning with Arkansas, and thereby indirectly acquire Reduction Project, 725 17th Street, Administration on Children and Families 100 percent of the voting shares of NW., Washington, DC 20503, Attn: (ACF) Regional Staff. The development of Merchants & Planters Bank, Sparkman, Ms. Wendy Taylor. five-year plans appears to be progressing Arkansas. extremely well, and we expect this positive 3. Poplar Bluff Banc Company, Poplar Dated: May 9, 1995. momentum to be maintained. States and Bluff, Missouri; to become a bank Roberta Katson, Tribes are working diligently and creatively holding company by acquiring 100 Acting Director, Office of Information as they build on their existing reform efforts Resource Management. and engage in extensive outreach in the percent of Poplar Bluff Bancshares, Inc., course of designing new and/or expanded Poplar Bluff, Missouri, and thereby U.S. Department of Health and Human family preservation and community-based indirectly acquire 87.2 percent of the Services family support services. voting shares of First Midwest Bank of This Program Instruction restates that Administration on Children, Youth and statutory requirements for the five-year plan Poplar Bluff, Poplar Bluff, Missouri. Families Immediately upon consummation, and reiterates recommendations, such as Poplar Bluff Bancshares, Inc. will be 1. Log No. ACYF–PI–95– consolidation, which were articulated in the 2. Issuance Date: May, 1995 merged with and into Poplar Bluff Banc NPRM. No new plan requirements are being 3. Originating Office: Children’s Bureau added to this time, and we want to reaffirm Company, and First Midwest Bank of 4. Key Word: Family Preservation and that consolidation remains an option. Poplar Bluff will become a direct support The variation among States and Indian subsidiary of Poplar Bluff Banc Program Instruction Tribes in their five-year planning processes Company. and the various cycles both use for their title To: State Agencies and Indian Tribes IV–B, subpart 1, planning necessitates Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Administering the Title IV–B Child and System, May 9, 1995. clarification of the specific requirements they Family Services Program. must meet in order to obtain their FY 1995 Jennifer J. Johnson, Subject: Requirements for Acquisition of and 1996 title IV–B, subpart 1 and 2, Deputy Secretary of the Board. Fiscal Year 1995 and 1996 Title IV–B allotments. [FR Doc. 95–11847 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] Allotments. This Program Instruction is divided into a Purpose: In the interim, until the Final BILLING CODE 6210±01±F background section and two attachments. Rule for the Family Preservation and Support ★ The background section provides Services Program is published, this Program general information on the enactment and Instruction’s purpose is to provide States and purposes of the Family Preservation and DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND eligible Indian Tribes with guidance on the Support Services Program along with HUMAN SERVICES development and submission of their Five- principles and themes guiding its Year Plans for Family Preservation and implementation. Administration for Children and Support, and additional instructions on ★ Attachment A addresses the five-year Families obtaining their Fiscal Year (FY) 1995 and plan. 1996 allotments for the Child Welfare Attachment A.1 provides guidance to Agency Information Collection Under Services program (title IV–B, subpart 1) and States and eligible Indian Tribes, on OMB Review the Family Preservation and Support completing the development of their five- Services Program (title IV–B, subpart 2). year plan. Included in Attachment A.1 are: Title: Family Preservation and Support Legal and Related References: Title IV–B of A.1a—Content guidelines for the five-year Services Five Year Plan the Social Security Act, Subpart 1, Child plan; Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices 25919 A.1b—A list of all required assurances that Description: The information collected Medicine (HFV–114), Food and Drug must be submitted with the plan; is used to develop our apportionment Administration, 7500 Standish Pl., A.1c—Copies of all certifications that are to request for appropriated Low-Income Rockville, MD 20855, 301–594–1617. be complied with and clarification about Home Energy Assistance Programs which one will have to be signed and SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The drug (LIHEAP) funds and to make grant actually submitted with the plan. export provisions in section 802 of the awards based on the funding needs of Attachment A.2 presents the statutory basis Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act States and Tribes. for five-year plan approval. (the act) (21 U.S.C. 382) provide that Respondents: State and tribal Attachment A.3 presents the statutory basis FDA may approve applications for the governments for exempting eligible Indian Tribes from export of drugs that are not currently inappropriate requirements. Annual Number of Respondents: 55 approved in the United States. Section ★ Attachment B addresses the new CFS– sites 802(b)(3)(B) of the act sets forth the 101, which consists of the State Annual Number of responses per respondent: 1 Budget Requests for title IV–B, subparts 1 Total annual responses: 55 sites requirements that must be met in an and 2, and the State annual Summary of Hours per response: .25 application for approval. Section Child Welfare Services. The new CFS–102 is Total Annual Burden Hours: 14 802(b)(3)(C) of the act requires that the essentially an updated CWS–101 and Additional Information: Copies of the agency review the application within 30 requests some new information so States can days of its filing to determine whether receive their subpart 2 allotment: request for approval may be obtained from Bob Sargis of the Office of the requirements of section 802(b)(3)(B) Attachment B.1 provides a general have been satisfied. Section 802 orientation to the new CFS–101. Included in Information Resource Management, Attachment B.1 are: ACF, by calling (202) 690–7275. (b)(3)(A) of the act requires that the B.1a—Information on the development of OMB Comment: Consideration will be agency publish a notice in the Federal the CFS–101; given to comments and suggestions Register within 10 days of the filing of B.1b–General directions and timeframes for received within 30 days of an application for export to facilitate submission of the CFS–101. publication. Written comments and public participation in its review of the Attachment B.2 provides instructions for recommendations for the proposed application. To meet this requirement, filling out the three forms which constitute the agency is providing notice that the CFS–101: information collection should be sent directly to the following: Office of Pfizer, Inc., 235 East 42d St., New York, (Form 1) Part I: Annual Budget Request for NY 10017, has filed application number Title IV–B, Subpart 1, Child Welfare Management and Budget, Paperwork Services. Part I is the same as the old CWS– Reduction Project, 725 17th Street, 6936 requesting approval for the export 101 Part I: Annual Budget Request; N.W., Washington, D.C. 20503, Attn: of a specific amount of the bulk form of (Form 2) Part I Supplement: Annual Ms. Wendy Taylor. the new drug substance marbofloxacin Budget Request for Title IV–B, Subpart 2. to France for further manufacture of the Part I Supplement is a new form for States Dated: May 8, 1995. finished dosage form Marbocyl, 5 to request funds from the Family Roberta Katson, milligram Tablets (antimicrobial for Preservation and Support Services Program; Acting Director, Office of Information treatment of dogs and cats). The tablets (Form 3) Part II: Annual Summary of Child Resource Management. will then be shipped to the United and Family Services. Part II is essentially the [FR Doc. 95–11826 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] Kingdom where they are approved for same as the old CWS–101 Part II, except that BILLING CODE 4184±01±M some new information relevant to marketing. The application was received implementation of the Family Preservation and filed in the Center for Veterinary and Support Services Program is being Medicine on April 24, 1995, which shall requested Food and Drug Administration be considered the filing date for Copies of all the forms are enclosed. [Docket No. 95N±0109] purposes of the act. Submittals: The Five-Year Plan Interested persons may submit Animal Drug Export; Marbofloxacin An original and two copies of the plan relevant information on the application must be submitted to the Administration for AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, to the Dockets Management Branch Children and Families (ACF) Federal HHS. (address above) in two copies (except Regional Office by June 30, 1995. Guidelines that individuals may submit single ACTION: Notice. can be found in Attachment A. copies) and identified with the docket The CFS–101 SUMMARY: The Food and Drug number found in brackets in the heading of this document. These The due dates for the Annual Budget Administration (FDA) is announcing Requests and the Annual Summary of that Pfizer, Inc., has filed an application submissions may be seen in the Dockets Services for FYs 1995 and 1996 vary requesting approval for the export of a Management Branch between 9 a.m. and depending upon a number of different specific amount of the bulk form of the 4 p.m., Monday through Friday. circumstances. Explicit instructions can be new drug substance marbofloxacin to The agency encourages any person found in Attachment B. France. who submits relevant information on Submit the original (with original ADDRESSES: Relevant information on the application to do so by May 25, signature) and two copies to the 1995, and to provide an additional copy Administration for Children and Families this application may be directed to the (ACF) Federal Regional Office. Dockets Management Branch (HFA– of the submission directly to the contact 305), Food and Drug Administration, person identified above, to facilitate [FR Doc. 95–11825 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] rm. 1–23, 12420 Parklawn Dr., consideration of the information during BILLING CODE 4184±01±M Rockville, MD 20857, and to the contact the 30-day review period. person identified below. Any future This notice is issued under the inquiries concerning the export of Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act Agency Information Collection Under animal drugs under the Drug Export OMB Review (sec. 802 (21 U.S.C. 382)) and under Amendments Act of 1986 should also be authority delegated to the Commissioner Title: ACF—535 LIHEAP Quarterly directed to the contact person. of Food and Drugs (21 CFR 5.10) and Estimates FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: redelegated to the Center for Veterinary OMB No.: 0970–0037 Gregory S. Gates, Center for Veterinary Medicine D(21 CFR 5.44). 25920 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices Dated: May 5, 1995. ELA’s, and supplements to PLA’s and because they will contain confidential Robert C. Livingston, ELA’s. The managed review process commercial information, summaries of Director, Office of New Animal Drug focuses on specific milestones or the committee’s deliberations, with all Evaluation, Center for Veterinary Medicine. intermediate goals so that a quality such confidential commercial [FR Doc. 95–11930 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] review is conducted within specified information omitted, will be available BILLING CODE 4160±01±F time periods. The establishment and from the FDA Chief Mediator and first meeting of CBER’s RTF oversight Ombudsman. If, following the committee, announced and described in committee’s review, an RTF decision Product and Establishment License this notice, continue CBER’s effort to changes, the reviewing division will Applications, Refusal To File; promote the timely, efficient, and notify the sponsor of the change. Establishment of Refusal to File consistent review of PLA’s and ELA’s. Dated: May 5, 1995. Oversight Committee CBER recognizes that the practice of submitting incomplete or inadequate William B. Schultz, AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, PLA’s and ELA’s and then providing Deputy Commissioner for Policy. HHS. additional information to FDA during [FR Doc. 95–11827 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] ACTION: Notice. an extended review period is inherently BILLING CODE 4160±01±F SUMMARY: The Food and Drug inefficient and wasteful of FDA Administration (FDA) is announcing the resources. Such practice is also unfair to those sponsors who fulfill their International Scientific Conference on establishment of a standing oversight Viral Safety and Evaluation of Viral committee in the Center for Biologics scientific and legal obligations by submitting complete applications; the Clearance From Biopharmaceutical Evaluation and Research (CBER) to Products; Public Meeting conduct periodic reviews of CBER’s use review of complete applications may be of its refusal to file (RTF) practices on delayed while incomplete applications, AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, product license applications (PLA’s) submitted earlier, undergo review and HHS. repair. and establishment license applications ACTION: By means of an RTF notification, Notice. (ELA’s). CBER’s RTF oversight CBER in general declines to file a committee will examine RTF decisions SUMMARY: The Food and Drug sponsor’s PLA or ELA because of to assess consistency across CBER Administration (FDA), Center for omissions or inadequacies so severe as offices and divisions in RTF decisions Biologics Evaluation and Research to render the application incomplete on and to determine whether the guidance (CBER), is announcing a meeting to its face. Although not a final currently available to sponsors needs to discuss viral safety of determination, an RTF decision is a be revised. biopharmaceutical products. FDA is significant step that delays, at least for cosponsoring the meeting with the ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for a time, full review of an application. single copies of the CBER RTF guidance National Institute of Allergy and CBER believes that an RTF decision is, Infectious Diseases (NIAID), the U.S. document to the Office of External in general, of benefit to sponsors as an Affairs, Industry Liaison Staff (HF–50), Department of Agriculture (USDA), the early signal that the application has National Vaccine Program Office Food and Drug Administration, rm. 15– major deficiencies. 61, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD (NVPO), and the International FDA regulations on filing PLA’s and Association of Biological 20857. ELA’s are found in §§ 601.2(a) and 601.3 Standardization (IABS). The meeting is FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean (21 CFR 601.2(a) and 601.3). A sponsor intended to provide an exchange of M. Olson, Center for Biologics who receives an RTF notification may information related to the viral safety of Evaluation and Research (HFM–635), request an informal conference with biological products, including Food and Drug Administration, 1401 CBER, and thereafter the sponsor may information relevant to an International Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852, ask that the application be filed over Conference on Harmonization (ICH) 301–594–3074. protest, similar to the procedure for guideline on viral testing and validation SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The drugs described under § 314.101(a)(3) that is presently under development. importance to the public health of (21 CFR 314.101(a)(3) (see 57 FR 17950, getting new biological products on the April 28, 1992). DATES: The public meeting will be held market as efficiently as possible has CBER has formed a standing RTF on June 14 and 15, l995, from 8:30 a.m. made improving the biological product oversight committee, consisting of to 5 p.m., and on June 16, 1995, from evaluation process an FDA priority, as senior CBER officials, a senior official 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Participants may evidenced by initiatives, such as the from FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation pick up their information packages and following: (1) Procedures to expedite and Research, and FDA’s Chief Mediator badges for admission to the sessions marketing approval for therapies for and Ombudsman. Meetings will be held beginning at approximately 7:30 a.m. serious or life threatening illnesses (53 once a quarter to review all of the RTF each morning. FR 41516, October 21, 1988; 57 FR decisions. The purpose of such a review ADDRESSES: The public meeting will be 58942, December 11, 1992); (2) is to assess the consistency within CBER held at the National Institutes of Health, procedures and policies to make such in rendering RTF decisions and to Bldg. 45, Main Auditorium of the therapies available prior to marketing determine whether the currently Natcher Conference Center, 9000 approval through mechanisms such as available guidance provided to sponsors Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD. There is the treatment investigational new drug needs to be revised or supplemented. no registration fee for this meeting. (52 FR 19466, May 22, 1987) and the Because the committee’s deliberations Space is limited, and all interested parallel track (57 FR 13250, April 15, will deal with confidential commercial parties are encouraged to register early 1992); (3) announcement of the information, all meetings will be closed (see the contact person listed below). availability of a CBER RTF guidance to the public. The committee’s FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: document for sponsors (58 FR 38770, deliberations will be reported in the For information regarding registration, July 20, 1993); and (4) implementation minutes of the meeting. Although those housing, and other arrangements: of a managed review process for PLA’s, minutes will not be publicly available Tammy Lowry, KRA Corp., 1010 Wayne Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices 25921 Ave., suite 850, Silver Spring, MD assistance with daily living tasks. 401–7733. Written technical questions 20910, 301–495–1591, FAX 301–495– Specific groups of disabled individuals should be addressed to Dr. Hennessy or 9410. included in this definition are children Mr. Frank at the above address. For other information: William Freas, and working aged adults 18–65 with (Application submissions may not be Scientific Advisors and Consultants physical disabilities, mental retardation, faxed.) Staff (HFM–21), Food and Drug developmental disabilities and ELIGIBLE APPLICANTS: The Department Administration, 1401 Rockville Pike, persistent mental illness. seeks applications from universities, Rockville, MD 20852–1448, 301–827– post-secondary degree granting entities, 0314, FAX 301–827–0294. SUMMARY: The primary goal of this grant announcement is to support research managed care organizations, private SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The employers and insurers, and other purpose of this meeting is to present which employs the analysis of existing data and experience to inform policies independent researchers. (For-profit and discuss the available scientific organizations are advised that no grant evidence and experience relating to: related to disability and managed health care. Data sets which permit the funds may be paid as profit to any Characterization of cell substrates for recipient of a grant or subgrant.) Profit the presence of viruses, evaluation of Department to compare the service use, expenditures and outcomes of children is any amount in excess of allowable virus removal and inactivation, and direct and indirect costs of the grantee. other issues relating to viral and working age adults (18–64) with characterization. The symposium will disabilities in managed care with SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: similar persons in the fee-for-service discuss in detail topics related to the Part I viral safety of biological products, system or that allow for an assessment Legislative Authority including topics relevant to an ICH of utilization and costs prior to and international guideline on viral testing following managed care enrollment are This cooperative agreement is and validation that is presently under of particular interest. Such data sets authorized by Section 1110 of the Social development. could include information from: Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1310) and Plenary sessions will be held on the Medicaid management information awards will be made from funds mornings of June 14, 15, and 16, 1995. systems; community provider networks appropriated under Public Law 103–112 Concurrent technical breakout sessions including community health centers; (DHHS Appropriations Act for FY will be held on the afternoons of June private insurers and health plans; 1995). 14 and 15, l995. employers; social security records; hospital records and other accessible Project History and Purpose Dated: May 9, 1995. data sets which contain relevant Rising health care expenditures have William B. Schultz, analytical variables. These projects are attracted considerable attention and Deputy Commissioner for Policy. intended to foster new analyses of concern over the past decade. Of [FR Doc. 95–11828 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] existing data sources by encouraging the particular concern to state and federal BILLING CODE 4160±01±F use of data sets from states, local areas, governments, Medicaid spending had or facilities in order to address issues of increased from $41 billion in 1985 to quality, cost, access and outcomes. We $138 billion by 1994. In an effort to Office of the Secretary estimate that the scope and level of control spiraling Medicaid costs, states effort will require from 12 to 24 months are increasingly turning to managed Grants and Cooperative Agreements; to accomplish. Availability, etc.: Managed Care Impact care, with estimates that approximately DATES: The closing date for submitting on People With Significant Physical 25% of current Medicaid recipients are applications under this announcement and Mental Disabilities covered by a form of managed care, is July 14, 1995. although participation remains AGENCY: Office of the Assistant ADDRESSES: Send application to Grants concentrated in a relatively few states. Secretary for Planning and Evaluation Officer, Office of the Assistant Secretary With the demise of national health care (ASPE), Department of Health and for Planning and Evaluation, reform this trend is expected to Human Services (HHS). Department of Health and Human accelerate. ACTION: Request for applications to Services, ASPE/IO, 200 Independence Over 93% of Medicaid payments are conduct research to better understand Avenue, SW., Room 405F, Hubert H. now made on a fee-for-service basis. the impact of managed care on people Humphrey Building, Washington, DC Why is such a small proportion of with significant physical and mental 20201. Attention: Albert A. Cutino, Medicaid payments affected by the disabilities. Projects will analyze Grants Officer. movement to managed care? An existing data sets to explore issues of FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: important reason is that about 70% of utilization, access, quality, costs and Application Instructions and Forms Medicaid expenditures goes to support outcomes for people with disabilities in should be requested from and submitted the health care of the disabled and for managed care systems. In addition, to: Grants Officer, Department of Health long term care—neither of which is where possible proposed applications and Human Services, ASPE/IO, 200 included in state managed care shall capitalize on linking state and Independence Avenue, SW., Room arrangements to any great extent. local data sets containing data on 405F, Hubert H. Humphrey Building, Although research on the impact of functioning and health status for Washington, DC 20201, Telephone: managed care is still relatively new, disabled individuals to utilization and (202) 690–8794. Requests for Forms will studies of the public sector suggest that cost data. For purposes of applications be accepted and responded to up to 30 costs savings can be achieved without requested under this announcement, days prior to closing date of receipt of significant compromising quality. To ‘‘individuals with disabilities’’ includes Applications. Technical questions beleaguered states trying to find ways to those under the age of 64 with ongoing should be directed to Andreas Frank or tame their Medicaid budget, the desire conditions or chronic illnesses of such Kevin Hennessy, ASPE/IO, Telephone to incorporate their disabled and long severity that they result in a need for (202) 690–6443 or (202) 690–7272. term care populations under managed extra or specialized health services or Questions also may be faxed to (202) care is understandable. 25922 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices In theory, managed care should have begun. A variety of critical questions Assistant Secretary to dividing available significant potential for improving demand answers. For example: funds among all qualified applicants or services to people with disabilities • How well does managed care serve to make any award. The selection of the including: (1) Increased flexibility to people with disabilities in comparison final awards will be determined by the design treatment programs tailored to to the fee-for-service system? Assistant Secretary on the basis of the their special needs; (2) more resources • What health care and related availability of funds, the criteria in Part for preventative services and care services do people with disabilities III of this announcement, and coverage management/coordination; and (3) need? of the Policy Research Area(s) in Part II • lower out-of-pocket burdens. However, How should quality and of this announcement. people with disabilities are concerned effectiveness of care for people with Period of Performance that overemphasis on cost reduction disabilities be measured? • may overshadow the potentially How can financial incentives be Award(s) pursuant to this positive benefits of managed care. They created for health plans to adequately announcement will be made on or about worry that the financial incentives serve people with disabilities? September 1, 1995. • How can capitation payments be resulting from a capitation system will Part II. Policy Research Areas result in reduced access to needed developed which reflect the service use patterns of disabled populations? Research conducted under grants services, and that those providers with • specialized expertise in disability may What are the most effective ways of awarded through this announcement be discouraged from participating in managing the care of special needs should be addressed to research managed care arrangements. populations? questions related to a combination of State interest in incorporating It is essential that careful attention is the following topics: (a) defining and disabled persons into Medicaid directed to adequately addressing these measuring disability in health care managed care systems—either through and other important questions, system, (b) analyzing the impact of 1915(b) or 1115 waiver authorities—has especially at a time in which federal, managed care on access to health care grown dramatically in recent years. state, and private insurers have strong services, service use patterns and Currently, Oregon, Florida, Tennessee incentives to enroll disabled expenditures, (c) assessing the impact of and Arizona have approved 1115 populations into managed care. managed care on individual outcomes To develop information which waivers that enroll one or more and other quality indicators, (d) evaluates the impact of managed care on segments of their disabled population financing and reimbursement incentives persons with disabilities and supports into managed care. Another 16 states which encourage/impede participation the development of approaches which have received freedom of choice waivers in managed care, and (e) organization of efficiently and effectively respond to (1915b) under which they have the delivery system for disabled their needs, the Office of the Assistant mandated enrollment of certain populations enrolled in managed care. Secretary for Planning and Evaluation segments of the SSI disabled population has developed a broad-based research A. Definition and Measurement of into managed care. However, most of plan. This plan includes the following Disability these 1915(b) efforts involve primary components: In principle, the movement of both care cases management (PCCM) rather 1. Studies which track the service use, than capitation and the assumption of Medicaid programs and large employers cost and outcomes of non-elderly SSI to managed care delivery systems financial risk. recipients enrolled in managed care The greatest momentum toward affords an opportunity to study the under state-wide Medicaid 1115 health managed care remains in the private impact of managed care on large reform demonstrations. numbers of disabled individuals. The sector. Among employer-based plans, 2. Studies of the experiences of difficulty is in determining ways to and rapid increase in enrollment in disabled populations enrolled in large, identify such persons so that their managed care plans is well documented. privately insured, employer-based experience can be tracked and Along with this general trend is a series managed care plans. of developments which directly links 3. Studies which document the best compared to others without disabilities private sector managed care practices of innovative public and and with similarly disabled persons in arrangements to populations with private managed care plans that serve the fee-for-service system. Further special needs e.g., the development of people with disabilities. complicating this problem is the often subacute care in hospitals and skilled 4. A program of grants to encourage large variation in service use patterns of nursing facilities; the development of experts in a variety of settings to people with similar disabling contracts between providers of identify and analyze existing data sets conditions. rehabilitation services and employer- which can inform the development of The goals of this research area are to based health plans; new forms of home managed care policies and practices encourage exploration of alternative health care for high risk populations, which are responsive to special needs approaches to defining and measuring carve-outs for managed behavioral populations. disability and to examine the results of health services (including alcohol and This grant announcement these measures in health care settings. substance abuse services). encompasses the fourth component of ASPE is particularly interested in the In short, the movement toward the above research strategy. health care experience of children and managed care in the public and private working age adults with significant sectors is an important and continuing Available Funds disability including persons with trend that is likely to have a significant 1. The Assistant Secretary has physical disabilities, the MR/DD impact on people with disabilities. Yet available $800,000 for awards in the population, and persons with serious the development of a knowledge base $50,000 to $150,000 range. mental illness. Questions of interest that is available to state and federal 2. We will consider application over include: policy makers, insurers and health $150,000, but should be submitted as a • What measures or indicators can be plans, and consumers to facilitate separate additional application(s). used to group people with disabilities in informed decision-making about 3. Nothing in this application should ways that are clinically meaningful? managed care and disability has barely be construed as committing the How can these measures be applied to Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices 25923 managed care settings? What are the extent do people with disabilities C. Quality and Outcomes strengths and limitations of such enrolled in managed care systems have A fundamental question for the measures and how does this effect their improved access to benefits, services disability community and for state and potential usefulness? and/or more flexible services delivery federal policy makers is whether • What conditions, health care patterns? managed health care provides quality consumption patterns or other • Is there any evidence of substitution services and produces satisfactory indicators are particularly good markers of certain services as a result of outcomes for people with special health of severe disability in working age managed care practices (e.g. preventive care needs. To address this question adults and in children? care and rehabilitation for other services • How do managed care providers requires an understanding of what the such as in-patient care and emergency basic health care needs of the disabled identify high-risk people with special room services)? care needs who may require intensive • actually are and what services in what To what extent do managed care amounts are more or less effective in care management? plans favor physician and hospital • meeting these needs. What do we know about the services over home health care and prevalence and participation of various Of particular importance in rehabilitation services? addressing the above issue is finding groups of disabled persons in both • How does access to services by public and private managed care outcome measures which can be applied disabled enrollees in managed care vary to populations whose characteristics arrangements? What are the by payment source, type of managed characteristics of enrollees vs. those and needs are quite distinct from one care plan and severity of disabling another. For example, the needs of enrolled in fee-for-service, including the condition? nature and severity of their conditions? people with physical disabilities are Public and Private Health Care likely to be markedly different than B. Impact on Access, Service Use, and Expenditures persons with chronic mental illness. Expenditures One approach to this issue is to examine • What are the health care Some aspects of managed care have the impact of health services on the expenditures of people with disabilities the potential to be more advantageous functioning of people with chronic in managed care arrangements and how than traditional fee-for-service health care conditions. Questions in this do they compare to the fee-for-service arrangements for people with research area include: system? How do these expenditures disabilities. Managed care plans can vary according to source of payment, Quality ensure providers more discretion than disabling condition, level of • the traditional fee-for-service system in What disability-specific functioning/need, date of onset of allocating resources. Theoretically, the performance measures do managed care disabling condition? ability to access a more comprehensive plans employ to assess how well they • What factors most contribute to the range of services and providers can are doing with special needs costs of health care for the disabled? enhance continuity of care, populations, and what are the results of Which are most susceptible to coordination, and appropriateness of applying these measures? Are there modification? services provided. However, many satisfaction measures that specifically • Are there cost savings associated aspects of managed care are potentially address the concerns of disabled with managed care use for disabled disadvantageous to people with individuals, and how do they compare persons and how are they achieved? Are disabilities. The major concern is that to measurement of satisfaction in non- some types of managed care plans more more emphasis on cost savings will disabled populations? effective than others in realizing cost • translate into greater risk for less care or How do states monitor the savings? inappropriate care for the most performance of managed care • What impact does managed care vulnerable populations. arrangements in which they enroll Cost-effectiveness remains a critical have on total, out of pocket and per significant numbers of disabled persons feature of managed care in that it claims capita expenditures for disabled and how does such monitoring affect to achieve measurable cost savings for populations, and how does this vary the quality of services for disabled people with disabilities through better among different disabled groups (i.e., beneficiaries? mentally ill, mentally retarded/ care management and the substitution of Outcomes of Disabled in Managed Care lower for higher cost services. developmentally disabled, physically disabled, children, adults)? • What measures are the most useful Unfortunately, there are few data to • inform either public payers or health How do different cost sharing in predicting outcomes for people with plans about whether such cost savings arrangements under managed care disabilities in managed care? To what can be realized. Within this issue area, impact on access and utilization for extent should they be condition specific the following types of questions are people with disabilities? or specific to a particular disabled • pertinent: Is there any evidence that managed category? Can these outcomes be linked care plans serving people with to the presence/absence of specific Access and Service Use disabilities in either the public or services and treatments? If so, what • What types of health benefits and private sector shift costs to open ended measures of performance are created related services do people with payment systems such as Medicaid and how well do managed care plans disabilities receive in current managed institutional and community based rate on such measures? To what extent care systems? What variables best services and programs, state funded can their performance be compared with explain variation in service use? How programs and community hospitals? the fee-for-service system? does service use vary among the most • How do financing sources such as • What impact does managed care prevalent disabling conditions? by private insurance, Medicaid, workman’s have on level of functioning of persons indicators of functioning? compensation and short-term disability with disabilities? Is this a good measure • How does managed care affect insurance interest with one another in of quality of care received? health service utilization patterns when financing services for disabled • How does managed care plans compared to fee-for-service? To what populations enrolled in managed care? compare to fee-for-service plans 25924 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices compare in areas of mortality and E. Organization of the Delivery System managed care, will integrate the various morbidity, enrollment and Greater attention is necessary to components of the ASPE research disenrollment, and satisfaction, for determine how managed care plans strategy described in Section II. The comparably-disabled populations? Are should be organized to address the Government will to pay for travel to and some types of managed care plans better needs of people with disabilities. from Washington for this TAG performers than others (e.g., specialized Whether plans which specialize in regardless of whether the grant period programs vs. plans where the disabled disability will work better than plans has ended or remains in effect. are a small subset of enrollees, PPOs vs. which include the disabled in a larger, Part III. Application Preparation and HMOs)? Are sub-populations of the healthier population of enrollees is not Evaluation Criteria disabled community better or worse off clear. Another key design issue in under managed care (i.e. children with This part contains information on the organizing managed care systems for preparation of an application for functional impairments, adults with people with disabilities is the extent to cognitive and mental impairments, submission under this announcement, which and how long term care services the forms necessary for submission and adults with significant physical should be integrated/coordinated with disabilities)? the evaluation criteria under which the acute care services, given that people applications will be reviewed. Potential D. Financing and Reimbursement with significant disabilities may need applicants should read this part access to both. The incentives created carefully in conjunction with the Financial incentives which would by leaving one system open-ended encourage health plans and providers to information and questions provided in while the other is capped are obvious. Part II. include people with significant In addition, there are a variety of models disabilities in managed care are largely Applications should be assembled as of managed care, and it remains unclear follows: lack in today’s system. In the absence of whether some are better than others in such incentives, managed care plans can 1. Abstract: Provide a one-page providing beneficiaries with good summary of the proposed project. improve their financial results by quality services without exposing the selecting ‘‘good risks’’ while avoiding 2. Goals, Objectives, and Usefulness plan to unacceptable financial risk. of Project: Include an overview which bad ones. While this issue area, the following Providers who encourage the describes the need for the proposed types of questions are pertinent: project; indicates the background and enrollment of disabled individuals in • What are the advantages and policy significance of the issue area(s) to plans that are fully capitated face disadvantages of specialized managed significant challenges. First, there is be researched including a critique of care plans which only serve the related disability specific studies; little empirical basis for predicting the disabled compared with general plans added costs (if any) of serving a outlines the specific quantitative and which incorporate the disabled in a qualitative questions to be investigated; population with disabilities. To the larger population of healthier persons in extent that a managed care plan or and describes how the proposed project terms of benefits and costs? will advance scientific knowledge and provider does try to cover more high • Which managed care models (e.g., policy development on the impact of risk populations in private plans, staff and group HMOs, PPOs, open premium rates must be adjusted or the managed care on people with panel HMOs) are more (or less) effective disabilities. plan could end up losing money. in serving people with special needs However, if premium rates are adjusted 3. Methodology and Design: Provide a and to the extent they are more description and justification of how the too high, more health participants will effective. how do they do it? opt out of the plan. Within this issue proposed research project will be • What differences are there in implemented, including methodologies, area, the following types of questions outcomes and consumer satisfaction are pertinent: approach to be taken, data sources to be when services are integrated vertically used, and proposed research and • How are capitation rates sets for versus through networking strategies? analytic plans. Identify any theoretical health plans enrolling significant • To what extent do managed care or empirical basis for the methodology numbers of people with disabilities? plans serving people with disabilities and approach proposed. In addition, How and to what extent are disability coordinate their benefits with the long provide evidence of access to data set(s) characteristics taken into account in term care system? proposed to be studied. setting such rates? How well do the • What non-financial incentives are Proposals, where data sets permit, rates work for all interested parties? important to encouraging health plans • should address the areas highlighted in How do different risk sharing to offer more comprehensive services to Section II as well as the following mechanisms affect the willingness/ people with disabilities? quantitative and qualitative issues: capacity of the managed care plan to • How do managed care plans • Utilization of services—both enroll disabled populations and insure manage care for those people consuming volume and mix of services; access to a broader range of services for the most services? • Tracer measures of specific disabled populations (e.g., risk pools, F. Requirement of All Potential Grantees conditions (e.g., readmission for mental reinsurance, sharing costs with other diagnosis, prophylactic treatment for payers, etc.)? Part of the resultant grant, we AIDS cases, use of rehabilitative • What are the advantages and requiring that grantees commit services); disadvantages of various risk sharing participate in a one-day meeting in • Selection bias; arrangements? How do various Washington with a Technical Advisory • Enrollment trends of disabled arrangements affect service use patterns Group. All applicants will be required individuals in managed car and outcomes of care? to attend a Technical Advisory Group organizations, including reasons for • What are some of the more (TAG) meeting upon completion of the disenrollment; promising strategies, or insurance two year grant award cycle, regardless of • Outcome analyses such as mortality market reforms, to offset the incentives the fact that some awards may be rates, use of emergency services, of managed care plans to select out completed prior to two years. The TAG, changes in functional status, satisfaction potentially high risk persons? comprised of experts on disability and information, and hospital readmissions; Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices 25925 • Overall health care expenditures by to seek intergovernmental review of Length of Application disabled groups; their applications with the constraints • Applications should be as brief and Cost savings practice patterns (e.g., of E.O. No. 12372. concise as possible, but assure referrals to cost-effective providers, Deadline for Submission of Application successful communication of the specialized case management practices, applicant’s proposal to the reviewers. In provider discounted fees, concurrent The closing date for submission of applications under this announcement no case shall an application (excluding utilization review practices); the resume appendix and other • Access to specialty care; is July 14, 1995. Applications must be appropriate attachments) be longer than • Benefit package (e.g., long-term postmarked or hand-delivered to the 30 single spaced pages; it should neither rehabilitation services, durable medical application receipt point no later than be unduly elaborate nor contain equipment); 4:30 p.m. on July 14, 1995. • Availability of specialty providers; Hand-delivered applications will be voluminous supporting documentation. • Coordination with auxiliary accepted Monday through Friday prior Selection Process and Evaluation services; to and on July 14, 1995. During the Criteria • Risk sharing mechanisms; hours of 9:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. in the • Risk adjustment and capitation rate lobby of the Hubert H. Humphrey Selection of the successful development; building located at 200 Independence applicant(s) will be based on the • Coordination and integration of Avenue, SW., in Washington, DC. When technical criteria laid out in this services. hand-delivering an application, call announcement. Reviewers will 4. Experience of Personnel/ 690–8794 from the lobby for pick-up. A determine the strengths and weaknesses Organizational Capacity: Briefly staff person will be available to receive of each application in terms of the describe the applicant’s organizational applications. evaluation criteria listed below, provide capabilities and experience in An application will be considered as comments and assign numerical scores. conducting pertinent research projects. meeting the deadline if it is either: (1) The review panel will prepare a Identify the key staff who are expected Received at, or hand-delivered to, the summary of all applicant scores and to carry out the research project and mailing address on or before July 14, strengths/weaknesses and provide a curriculum vitae for each 1995, or (2) on the closing date of recommendations and submit it to the person. Provide a discussion of how key receipt from applications and received ASPE for final decisions on award(s). staff will contribute to the success of the in time to be considered during the The point value following each project. competitive review process (within two criterion heading indicates the 5. Budget: Submit a request for weeks of the deadline date). maximum numerical weight that each Federal funds using Standard Form When mailing application packages, section will be given in the review 424A and provide a proposed budget applicants are strongly advised to obtain process. An unacceptable rating on any using the categories listed on this form. a legibly dated receipt from a individual criterion may render the commercial carrier (such as UPS, application unacceptable. Consequently, Review Process and Funding Federal Express, etc.), or from the U.S. applicants should take care to ensure Information Postal Service as proof of mailing by the that all criteria are fully addressed in A panel of at least three independent deadline date. If there is a question as the applications. Applications will be experts will review and score all to when an application was mailed, reviewed as follows: applications that are submitted by the applicants will be asked to provide Applications will be initially screened deadline date and which meet the proof of mailing by the deadline date. for compliance with the timeliness and screening criteria (all information and When proof is not provided, an completeness. If judged in compliance, documents as required by this application will not be considered for the application then will be reviewed by Announcement.) The panel will review funding. Private metered postmarks are government personnel, augmented by the applications using the evaluation not acceptable as proof of timely outside experts where appropriate. criteria listed below to score each mailing. Three (3) copies of each application are application. These evaluation criteria Applications which do not meet the required. Applicants are encouraged to will be the primary elements used by July 14, 1995 deadline are considered send an additional three (3) copies of the ASPE in making funding decisions. late applications and will not be their application to ease processing, but HHS reserves the option to discuss considered or reviewed in the current applicants will not be penalized if these applications with other Federal competition. HHS will send a letter to extra copies are not included. The agencies, Central or Regional Office this effect to each late applicant. length of the application is limited to 30 staff, specialists, experts, States and the HHS reserves the right to extend the single spaced pages; extraneous general public. Comments from these deadline for all applications due to acts materials such as videotapes and sources, along with those of the of God, such as floods, hurricanes or brochures should not be included and independent experts, may be considered earthquakes; due to acts of war; if there will not be reviewed. in making an award decision. is widespread disruption of the mail; or Evaluation criteria if HHS determines a deadline extension State Single Point of Contact (E.O. No. 1. Goals, Objectives, and Potential 12372) to be in the best interest of the Government. However, HHS will not Usefulness of the Quantitative and The Department of Health and Human waive or extend the deadline for any Qualitative Analyses (30 points). The Services has determined that this applicant unless the deadline is waived potential usefulness of the objectives program is not subject to Executive or extended for all applicants. and how the anticipated results of the Order No. 12372, Intergovernmental proposed project will advance scientific Review of Federal Programs, because it Applications Forms knowledge and policy development on is a program that is national in scope See section entitled ‘‘Components of a the impact of managed care on disabled and the only impact on State and local Complete Application.’’ All of these populations. governments would be through documents must accompany the 2. Methodology and Design (35 subgrants. Applicants are not required application package. points). The appropriateness, 25926 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices soundness, and cost-effectiveness of the (d) Organizational Experience, and Dated: May 8, 1995. methodology, including research design, (e) Budget Narrative; David J. Miller, statistical techniques, analytical 9. Any appendices/attachments; Associate District Manager. strategies, degree of inclusion of 10. Certification Regarding Drug-Free [FR Doc. 95–11928 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] utilization, cost and functional data and Workplace; BILLING CODE 4310±32±M information, innovative and creative 11. Certification Regarding selection of existing data sets, and other Debarment, Suspension and Other procedures. The applicant is encouraged Responsibility Matters; and Bureau of Land Management to specifically address how they intend, 12. Certification and, if necessary, [NV±930±05±1430±01; N±59758] when applicable, to examine the Disclosure Regarding Lobbying; quantitative and qualitative areas 13. Application for Federal Assistance Notice of Realty Action, Direct Sale of previously outlined. Checklist. Public Land to Pershing County, 3. Experience and Qualifications of Dated: May 3, 1995. Nevada Personnel (35 points). The qualifications David T. Ellwood, and experience of the project personnel SUMMARY: The following described land for conducting the proposed research Assistant Secretary for Planning and has been found suitable for direct sale and indications of innovative Evaluation. under Sections 203 and 209 of the approaches and creative potential [FR Doc. 95–11832 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] Federal Land Policy and Management BILLING CODE 4151±04±M Reports Act of October 21, 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1713 and 1719), at not less than fair market The grantee must submit annual value: progress reports and a final report. The DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR specific format and content for these Mount Diablo Meridian, Nevada reports will be provided by the project Bureau of Land Management T. 30 N., R. 34 E., officer. Sec. 24: SE1⁄4SW1⁄4NW1⁄4SE1⁄4. [AZ±020±7122±02±5491] Containing approximately 2.50 acres. Disposition of Applications Notice of Correction of Availability of The lands are not required for federal 1. Approval, disapproval, or deferral. purposes. Disposal is consistent with On the basis of the review of an the Cyprus Tohono Corporation Proposed Mine Expansion Final the Bureau’s planning for this area and application, the ASPE will either (a) would be in the public’s interest. This approve the application in whole, as Environmental Impact Statement, Phoenix District, Arizona land is being offered by direct sale to revised, or in part for such amount of Pershing County. It has been determined funds and subject to such conditions as AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, that the subject parcel contains no are deemed necessary or desirable for Interior. known mineral values, except oil and the research project; (b) disapprove the ACTION: Correction. gas and geothermal steam and related application; or (c) defer action on the geothermal resources. Acceptance of a application for such reasons as lack of SUMMARY: In compliance with the direct sale offer will constitute an funds or a need for further review. Federal Land Policy and Management application for conveyance of those 2. Notification of disposition. The Act of 1976, section 102(2)(c) of the mineral interests having no knwon ASPE will notify the applicants of the National Environmental Policy Act of value. The applicant will be required to disposition of their application. A 1969, and The United States Department pay a $50.00 non-refundable filing fee signed notification of award will be of the Interior Secretarial Order No. for conveyance of the said mineral issued to notify the applicant of the 3087, Section 5, Amendment No. 1, The interests. approved application. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has The land will not be offered for sale Components of a Complete Application prepared an Environmental Impact until at least 60 days after publication A complete application consists of the Statement (EIS) for the Cyprus Tohono of this notice in the Federal Register. following items in this order: Corporation’s (Cyprus) proposed mine FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ken 1. Application for Federal Assistance expansion on the Tohono O’odham Detweiler, Realty Specialist, Bureau of (Standard Form 424, Revised 4–88); Nation (Nation), Papago Indian Land Management, 705 E. 4th St., 2. Budget Information—Non- Reservation. For additional detail see Winnemucca, NV 89445 (702) 623– construction Programs (Standard Form Federal Register, Vol. 60, No. 81, page 1500. 424A, Revised 4–88); 20737, dated Thursday, April 27, 1995. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 3. Assurances—Non-construction The April 27, 1995 Notice incorrectly public lands are being offered to Programs (Standard Form 424B, Revised stated the appeal procedures. The Pershing County for operation of a trash 4–88); correct appeal procedure can be found transfer station for Unionville, Nevada. 4. Table Contents; at 43 CFR 4.400. The site will be used for placement of 5. Budget Justification for Section B— DATES: Appeals must be filed within 30 a large trash container. The container Budget Categories; days of the Notice of Filing by the 6. Proof of non-profit status, if will be removed from the site on a United States Environmental Protection regular basis. This site is necessary appropriate; Agency in the Federal Register on May 7. Copy of the applicant’s approved since closure of the Unionville dump is 5, 1995. These procedures can be found indirect cost rate agreement if necessary; anticipated. No trash will remain on site 8. Project Narrative Statement, in the Code of Federal Regulations (43 permanently. organized in five sections addressing the CFR 4.400). The above described land is hereby following topics; FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: segregated from appropriation under the (a) Understanding of the Effort, Bureau of Land Management, Attn: public land laws, including the mining (b) Project Approach, Moon Hom, 2015 West Deer Valley laws, but not from sale under the above (c) Staffing Utilization, Staff Road, Phoenix, Arizona 85027; (602) cited statutes, for 270 days from the date Background, and Experience, 780–8090. of publication of this notice, or until Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices 25927 title transfer is completed or the office buildings and associated parking days from the date of publication of this segregation is terminated by publication areas. notice in the Federal Register. in the Federal Register, whichever The lease and/or patent, when issued, Dated: April 28, 1995. occurs first. will contain the following reservations Ron Wenker, A patent, when issued, will contain to the United States: District Manager, Winnemucca. the following reservations to the United 1. A right-of-way thereon for ditches [FR Doc. 95–11842 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] States: and canals constructed by the authority 1. A right-of-way thereon for ditches of the United States pursuant to the Act BILLING CODE 4310±HC±P or canals constructed by the authority of of August 30, 1890 (43 U.S.C. 945). the United States pursuant to the Act of 2. All mineral deposits in the lands so Minerals Management Service August 30, 1890 (43 U.S.C. 945). patented, and to it, or persons 2. The oil, gas, and geothermal steam authorized by it, the right to prospect Information Collection Submitted to in the land so patented. For a period of for, mine, and remove such deposits the Office of Management and Budget 45 days from the date of publication of from the same under applicable law and for Review Under the Paperwork this notice in the Federal Register, such regulations as the Secretary of the Reduction Act interested parties may submit comments Interior may prescribe. to the District Manager, Winnemucca And will be subject to: The collection of information listed District Office, Bureau of Land An easement 30 feet in width along below has been submitted to the Office Management, 705 E. 4th St., the north, east, south, and west of Management and Budget for Winnemucca NV 89445. In the absence boundaries of the parcel, for road and reapproval under the provisions of the of timely objections, this proposal shall public utility purposes to insure Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. become the final determination of the continued ingress and egress to adjacent Chapter 35). Copies of the proposed Department of the Interior. lands. information collection and related forms Upon publication of this notice in the may be obtained by contacting Dennis Bud C. Cribley, Jones at 303–231–3046. Comments and Acting District Manager. Federal Register, the lands will be segregated from all forms of suggestions on this information Dated: May 2, 1995 appropriation under the public land collection should be made directly to [FR Doc. 95–11843 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] laws, including the general mining laws, the Bureau Clearance Officer at the BILLING CODE 4310±HC±P except for lease or conveyance under telephone number listed below and to the R&PP Act and leasing under the the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (1010– Bureau of Land Management mineral leasing laws. For a period of 45 days from the date 0040), Washington, DC 20503, telephone 202–395–7340. [NV±930±05±1430±01; N±59451] of publication of this notice in the Federal Register, interested persons Title: Production Accounting and Notice of Realty Action, Lease and may submit comments regarding the Auditing System Oil and Gas Reports. Abstract: Production Accounting and Sale of Public Lands for Recreation & proposed lease/conveyance or Auditing System information is needed Public Purposes (R&PP) Act classification of the lands to the District to provide comprehensive production Application N±59451, Humboldt Manager, Winnemucca District Office, and disposition data on oil and gas County, NV Bureau of Land Management, 705 E. 4th produced from Federal onshore and St., Winnemucca NV 89445. SUMMARY: In response to an application offshore leases, and from Indian leases. from Word of Light Fellowship for a Classification Comments The Minerals Management Service church/school complex, the following Interested parties may submit (MMS) uses the data to monitor described land has been identified as comments involving the suitability of production, for audits, and to compare suitable for lease and sale and will be the land for a church/school complex. reported production with sales data classified for lease and sale under the Comments on the classification are reported in the MMS Auditing and R&PP Act of June 14, 1926, as amended restricted to whether the land is Financial System. (43 U.S.C. 869 et seq.): physically suited for the proposal, Bureau Form Numbers: MMS–3160, MMS–4051, MMS–4054, MMS–4055, Mount Diablo Meridian, Nevada whether the use will maximize the future use or uses of the land, whether MMS–4056, and MMS–4058. T. 36 N., R. 38 E., Sec. 32: Frequency: Monthly, quarterly, 1 2 1 4 1 4 1 4 the use is consistent with local planning W ⁄ NW ⁄ NW ⁄ SW ⁄ , annually. and zoning, or if the use is consistent Containing approximately five acres. Description of Respondents: with state and federal programs. The lands are not required for federal Companies producing and processing purposes. Disposal is consistent with Application Comments oil and gas from Federal onshore and the Bureau’s land use plan for the area Interested parties may submit offshore leases, and from Indian leases. Estimated Completion Time: One- and is in the public’s interest. comments regarding the specific use quarter to one-half hour. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ken proposed in the application and plan of Annual Responses: 361,650. Detweiler, Realty Specialist, Bureau of development, whether the BLM Annual Burden Hours: 105,275. Land Management, Winnemucca followed proper administrative District Office, 705 E. 4th St., Bureau Clearance Officer: Arthur procedures in reaching the decision, or Quintana, (703) 787–1101. Winnemucca NV 89445 (702) 623–1500. any other factor not directly related to SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The the suitability of the land for a church/ Dated: March 14, 1995. public lands are being offered to the school complex. Donald T. Sant, Word of Light Fellowship for a church/ Any adverse comments will be Acting Associate Director for Royalty school complex. The complex would reviewed by the State Director. In the Management. include a church building, school absence of any adverse comments, the [FR Doc. 95–11869 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] buildings, recreation/playground area, classification will become effective 60 BILLING CODE 4310±MR±P 25928 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices Bureau of Reclamation provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Regulations (40 CFR parts 1500 through Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). Copies of the 1508); and the Operational Procedures Information Collection Submitted to proposed collection of information and of the United States Section, the Office of Management and Budget related forms may be obtained by International Boundary and Water for Review Under the Paperwork contacting the Bureau of Reclamation’s Commission, United States and Mexico Reduction Act (Reclamation) clearance officer at the (USIBWC), for implementing section telephone number listed below. 102 of NEPA, published in the Federal The proposal for the collection of Comments and suggestions on the Register September 2, 1981 (46 FR information listed below has been proposal should be made directly to 44083–44094); the USIBWC hereby submitted to the Office of Management Reclamation’s clearance officer and to gives notice that the Final and Budget for approval under the the Office of Management and Budget, Environmental Assessment and Final provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Paperwork Reduction Project (1006– Finding of no Significant Impact for Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). Copies of the 0005), Washington, DC 20503, Quisto Energy Corporation (Quisto) to proposed collection of information and Telephone 202–395–7340. construct, operate, and maintain a gas related forms may be obtained by Title: Individual Landholder’s well located on the Main Floodway of contacting the Bureau of Reclamation’s Certification and Reporting Forms for the Lower Rio Grande Flood Control (Reclamation) clearance officer at the Acreage Limitation, 43 CFR 426. Project (LRGFCP) are available. The telephone number listed below. OMB approval number: 1006–0005. USIBWC finds that the proposed action Comments and suggestions on the Abstract: This information collection to issue a license to Quisto for such proposal should be made directly to requires certain landholders to complete works is not a major federal action that Reclamation’s clearance officer and the forms demonstrating their compliance would have a significant adverse effect Office of Management and Budget, with the acreage limitation provisions of on the quality of the human Paperwork Reduction Project (1006– Reclamation law. The forms establish environment. A Notice of Finding of No 0006), Washington, DC 20503, each landholder’s status with respect to Significant Impact was signed April 3, Telephone 202 395–7340. landownership limitations, full-cost Title: Certification Summary Form 1995, (60 FR 19081–19082) and pricing thresholds, lease requirements, provided a thirty (30) day review and and Reporting Summary Form for and other provisions of reclamation law. Acreage Limitation, 43 CFR Part 426. comment period before making the Reclamation form numbers: 7–2178A, finding final. OMB approval number: 1006–0006. 7–2179A, 7–2180, 7–2180–EZ, 7–2181, Abstract: These forms are to be used 7–2183, 7–2184, 7–2187, 7–2188, 7– ADDRESSES: Mr. Yusuf E. Farran, by water district offices to summarize 2189, 7–2190, 7–2190–EZ, 7–2191, 7– Division Engineer, Environmental individual landholder certification and 2193, 7–2194, 7–2197, 7–2198, and 7– Management Division, International reporting forms as required by the 2199. Boundary and Water Commission, Reclamation Reform Act of 1982 (Title Frequency: Annually. United States and Mexico, United States II of Public Law 97–293) and 43 CFR Description of respondents: Owners Section, 4171 North Mesa Street, C–310, Part 426, Rules and Regulations for and lessees of land on Federal El Paso, Texas 79902–1441. Telephone: Projects Governed by Federal Reclamation projects. 915/534–6704, Fax: 915/534–6680. Reclamation Law. This information Estimated completion time: .32 hours. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: allows Reclamation to establish water Annual responses: 43,863. users’ compliance with Reclamation Annual burden hours: 14,116. Proposed Action law. Reclamation clearance officer: The action proposed is for the Reclamation form numbers: 7–1781A Marilyn Rehfeld, 303–236–0305 (X459). USIBWC to issue a license to Quisto to and 7–1781B. Dated: April 5, 1995. Frequency: Annually. construct, operate, and maintain a gas Alonzo D. Knapp, well and install related features within Description of respondents: # Contracting organizations for Manager, Reclamation Law, Contracts, and Smith-Coates Well 1 Drilling Unit on Repayment Office. Reclamation project irrigation water. Lot 2, Block 15 of John Closer Estimated completion time: 40 hours. [FR Doc. 95–11838 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] Subdivision, Hidalgo County, Texas. Annual responses: 318. BILLING CODE 4310±94±M The gas well is proposed to be located Annual burden hours: 12,720. on privately owned land within the Reclamation clearance officer: Main Floodway of the USIBWC LRGFCP Marilyn Rehfeld, 303–236–0305 (X459). INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY AND approximately 8 kilometers south of WATER COMMISSION, UNITED Pharr. Access to the drilling site is by Dated: April 5, 1995. STATES AND MEXICO way of existing county and private roads Alonzo D. Knapp, and a proposed 274-meter long road. Manager, Reclamation Law, Contracts, and Availability of Final Environmental Repayment Office. Assessment and Finding of No Alternatives Considered [FR Doc. 95–11839 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] Significant Impact Three alternatives were considered in BILLING CODE 4310±94±M AGENCY: United States Section, the Final Environmental Assessment International Boundary and Water (EA): Information Collection Submitted to Commission, United States and Mexico. The Proposed Action Alternative is the Office of Management and Budget ACTION: Notice of Availability of Final for Quisto to construct, operate, and for Review Under the Paperwork Environmental Assessment and Finding maintain a gas well in a cultivated field Reduction Act of No Significant Impact. within the Main Floodway of the USIBWC LRGFCP. This proposed action The proposal for the collection of SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 102(2)(C) will require the USIBWC to issue a information listed below has been of the National Environmental Policy license to ensure that such works do not submitted to the Office of Management Act of 1969; the Council on cause an obstruction to flood flows and Budget for approval under the Environmental Quality Final within the floodway or interfere with Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices 25929 the operation and maintenance of the Dated: May 4, 1995. As a condition to the use of this LRGFCP. Suzette Zaboroski, exemption, any employees adversely The No Action Alternative is for Staff Counsel. affected by the trackage rights will be Quisto to not construct, operate, and [FR Doc. 95–11840 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] protected under Norfolk and Western maintain a gas well within the Main BILLING CODE 4710±03±M Ry. Co.—Trackage Rights—BN, 354 Floodway of the LRGFCP. The no action I.C.C. 605 (1978), as modified in alternative will not require the USIBWC Mendocino Coast Ry., Inc.—Lease and to issue a license since no work will be INTERSTATE COMMERCE Operate, 360 I.C.C. 653 (1980). done within the LRGFCP. The no action COMMISSION Decided: May 9, 1995. alternative will result in the denial of [Finance Docket No. 32673] By the Commission, David M. Konschnik, access to the mineral owner to rightfully Director, Office of Proceedings. owned minerals, loss of tax revenues to Vernon A. Williams, the State of Texas, and result in an California Northern Railroad Company unrecoverable clean energy source. Limited PartnershipÐTrackage Secretary. The Directional Well Alternative is for RightsÐSouthern Pacific [FR Doc. 95–11900 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] Quisto to drill a well from outside the Transportation Company BILLING CODE 7035±01±P Main Floodway to a depth below the Southern Pacific Transportation proposed surface location. The Company (SPT) has agreed to grant DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE directional well alternative will not overhead trackage rights to California require the USIBWC to issue a license Northern Railroad Company Limited National Institute of Justice since no work will be done within the Partnership (CNR) over approximately LRGFCP. The directional well 28.95 miles of rail line. The trackage [OJP (NIJ) No.1051] alternative is considered not workable rights will permit CNR to operate over: ZRIN 1121±ZA14 because of technical problems (1) A portion of SPT’s line known as the associated with a bottomhole location Sacramento Line from Davis, CA, at National Institute of Justice some 305 meters or more from the SPT’s milepost 75.4 to Suisun-Fairfield, Solicitation for Policing Research and surface location and subsurface CA, at SPT’s milepost 47.8; (2) a portion Evaluation geological hazards endemic to the area. of SPT’s line known as the West Valley AGENCY: U.S. Department of Justice, Finding of the Final Environmental Line which includes trackage at Davis, Office of Justice Programs, National Assessment CA, from SPT’s milepost 75.58 to SPT’s Institute of Justice. The Final EA finds that the proposed milepost 75.4; and (3) a portion of SPT’s line known as the Shellville Branch ACTION: Announcement of the action for Quisto to construct, operate, availability of the National Institute of and maintain a gas well within the Main which includes trackage at Suisun- Fairfield, CA, from SPT’s milepost 48.97 Justice Solicitation for Policing Research Floodway of the USIBWC LRGFCP (and and Evaluation. the USIBWC to issue a license for such to SPT’s milepost 47.8. The trackage rights will include the double track work) does not constitute a major ADDRESSES: currently in place on the Sacramento National Institute of Justice, federal action which would cause a 633 Indiana Avenue, NW., Washington, significant local, regional, or national Line, all operating sidings used for the purpose of meeting and passing trains, DC 20531. adverse impact on the environment DATES: The deadline for receipt of based on the following facts: and SPT-owned portions of existing connections. The trackage rights were to proposals is close of business on July 1. The United States Army Corps of 14, 1995. Engineers has determined that no waters become effective on or after May 1, of the United States including wetlands 1995. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: will be impacted by the proposed gas The proposed transaction will Winifred Reed, Lois Mock, or Robert well and related features. facilitate more economic and efficient Langworthy at (202) 307–0499, National 2. The United States Fish and Wildlife operations by permitting direct Institute of Justice, 633 Indiana Avenue, Service has determined that federally movement of CNR’s trains between NW., Washington, DC 20531. listed endangered or threatened species Davis and Suisun-Fairfield. CNR SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The are unlikely to be adversely affected by currently interchanges traffic with SPT following supplementary information is the proposed gas well and related at Davis and at Suisun-Fairfield for provided: trains moving from the West Valley Line features. Authority 3. The Texas Historical Commission to the Shellville Branch. The trackage and Department of Antiquities rights will allow CNR to conduct This action is authorized under the Protection has determined that no operations between these two lines Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets survey is required and the project may without incurring the cost and delay of Act of 1968, sections 201–03, as proceed. two interchanges. amended, 42 U.S.C. 3721–23 (1988). This notice is filed under 49 CFR 4. The USIBWC has determined that Background the proposed gas well and related 1180.2(d)(7). If the notice contains false features will have no significant effect or misleading information, the The National Institute of Justice is upon the flood carrying capacity of the exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to soliciting proposals for policing Main Floodway. revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. research and evaluation. The focus is on 10505(d) may be filed at any time. The proposals responsive to Title I of the Availability filing of a petition to revoke will not Violent Crime Control and Law Single copies of the Final stay the transaction. Pleadings must be Enforcement Act of 1994. Interested Environmental Assessment and Final filed with the Commission and served organizations should call the National Finding of No Significant Impact may be on: Mark H. Sidman, 1350 New York Criminal Justice Reference Service obtained by request at the above Avenue, N.W., Suite 800, Washington, (NCJRS) at 1–800–851–3420 to obtain a address. DC 20005–4797. copy of ‘‘NIJ Invites Proposals for 25930 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices Policing Research and Evaluation’’ (refer Signed at Washington, D.C., on May 8, anticipates that release date to be in to document no. SL000122). The 1995. mid-June 1995. solicitation is available electronically Doug Ross, The EIS will analyze the via the NCJRS Bulletin Board, which Assistant Secretary of Labor for Employment environmental impacts and mitigation can be accessed via Internet. Telnet to and Training. options associated with the construction ncjrsbbs.aspensys.com, or gopher to [FR Doc. 95–11881 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] and operation of a sports and ncjrs.aspensys.com 71. Those without BILLING CODE 4510±30±M entertainment arena that would seat Internet access can dial the NCJRS approximately 20,600 persons and would be located in downtown Bulletin Board via modem: dial 301– Washington, DC. In addition, the EIS 738–8895. Set modem at 9600 baud, 8– NATIONAL CAPITAL PLANNING will consider alternative actions. At N–1. COMMISSION present, those alternatives may include Jeremy Travis, (1) Construction of a new arena at the Director, National Institute of Justice. Intent To Prepare Environmental Gallery Place site which includes the Impact Statement [FR Doc. 95–11846 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] following: Square 455 which is bounded BILLING CODE 4410±18±P AGENCY: National Capital Planning by G Street NW., 6th Street NW., F Commission. Street NW. and 7th Street NW.; the 600 block of G Street NW.; and ACTION: Proposed construction and approximately the southern fifth of operation of a sports and entertainment Square 454 which is bounded by H DEPARTMENT OF LABOR arena in Washington, DC. Street NW., 6th Street NW., G Street Employment and Training SUMMARY: In a Notice of Intent NW., and 7th Street NW. (2) Administration published in the Federal Register on Construction of a new arena over the air January 13, 1995 (60 FR 3273), the rights behind Union Station; (3) A No Notice of a Change in Status of an National Capital Planning Commission Action Alternative, which would result Extended Benefit (EB) Period for the advised that in conjunction with the in no new construction in Washington, State of Rhode Island District of Columbia Government it was DC. Topics for environmental analysis conducting an Environmental will include short-term construction- This notice announces a change in Assessment for the proposed related impacts; long-term effects on benefit period eligibility under the EB construction and operation of a new historic resources, visual resources, Program for the State of Rhode Island. sports and entertainment area in public transportation, traffic and Washington, DC. The Notice stated that parking, socio-economic conditions, Summary if it became apparent, either through the land use, and physical-biological The following change has occurred scoping process or during the analysis resources within the project area, and the cumulative impacts associated with since the publication of the last notice and documentation of environmental this and other reasonably foreseeable regarding States’ EB status: impacts, that an Environmental Impact projects. • Statement was the appropriate April 9, 1995—Rhode Island’s 13- environmental document, a FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE week insured unemployment rate for Supplemental Notice would be issued. CONTACT: National Capital Planning the week ending March 25, 1995 rose A Draft Environmental Assessment Commission, 801 Pennsylvania Avenue, above 6.0 percent, causing the State to was published on March 31, 1995, with NW., Suite 301, Washington, DC. 20576. trigger ‘‘on’’ EB effective April 9, 1995. a comment period closing on May 1, Attention: Ms. Sandra H. Shapiro, General Counsel, Phone: (202) 724– Information for Claimants 1995. The National Capital Planning Commission (Commission) and the 0174. The duration of benefits payable in District of Columbia Government now Sandra H. Shapiro, the EB Program, and the terms and announce their intent to prepare an General Counsel, National Capital Planning conditions on which they are payable, Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Commission. are governed by the Federal-State for the proposed D.C. Arena pursuant to [FR Doc. 95–11898 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] Extended Unemployment Compensation Section 106(2)(c) of the National BILLING CODE 7502±02±M Act of 1970, as amended, and the Environment Policy Act (NEPA) of operating instructions issued to the 1969, as implemented by the Council on States by the U.S. Department of Labor. Environmental Quality regulations (40 District of Columbia Historic Preservation Review Board In the case of a State beginning an EB CFR Parts 1500–1508), and in accordance with the Environmental period, the State employment security AGENCY: National Capital Planning Policies and Procedures implemented agency will furnish a written notice of Commission. by the Commission. potential entitlement to each individual ACTION: Proposed sports and who has exhausted all rights to regular SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As entertainment arena; public meeting on benefits and is potentially eligible for indicated in the January 13, 1995 historic issues; change of date. extended benefits (20 CFR 615.13(c)(1)). Notice, all comments and responses on the scope of alternatives and potential SUMMARY: In a notice published on April Persons who believe they may be impacts received in response to that 25, 1995 (60 FR 20288), the National entitled to EB benefits, or who wish to notice as well as those received during Capital Planning Commission inquire about the rights under the the scoping process, the public meeting (Commission) announced that as part of programs, should contact the nearest held February 13, 1995, and in response the State Historic Preservation Officer’s State employment service office or to the Draft EA will be considered in the Review of the potential effects on unemployment compensation claims EIS. The public is encouraged to historic properties of the proposed office in their locality. provide additional comments once the sports and entertainment arena, the Draft EIS is released. The Commission Historic Preservation Review Board Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices 25931 would hold a public meeting on May 24, 3, we will be in the Red Cedar Room. intervene. Requests for a hearing and a 1995. The purpose of that meeting was On June 5 we will be located at: petition for leave to intervene shall be to review the Section 106 The Summerville Ballroom, The filed in accordance with the documentation which identifies affected Partridge Inn, 2110 Walton Way, Commission’s ‘‘Rules of Practice for historic properties, assesses the Augusta, GA 30904, (706) 737–8888. Domestic Licensing Proceedings’’ in 10 potential impacts, and discusses There will be no hearing on May 29–30. CFR part 2. If a request for a hearing or potential measures to mitigate or avoid Evening sessions are expected on May petition for leave to intervene is filed by the adverse effects, including 24, June 1 and June 7. All dates and the above date, the Commission or an consideration of alternative sites. times are subject to revision in order to Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, The date of that meeting has changed. meet the needs of the proceeding. designated by the Commission or by the The meeting will now be held on July Chairman of the Atomic Safety and For the Atomic Safety and Licensing Licensing Board Panel, will rule on the 10, 1995 at 10:00 a.m., 441 4th Street Board. NW. (#1 Judiciary Square), Room 220 request and/or petition and the Peter B. Bloch, South (Zoning Commission Hearing Secretary or the designated Atomic Chairman. Room). Safety and Licensing Board will issue a The documentation to be considered [FR Doc. 95–11858 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] notice of a hearing or an appropriate will be available to the Board and to the BILLING CODE 7590±01±M order. general public on or after June 9, 1995 As required by 10 CFR 2.714, a and may be reviewed by calling the [Docket No. 50±356] petition for leave to intervene shall set Historic Preservation Division. forth with particularity the interest of FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: University of Illinois at Urbana- the petitioner in the proceeding, and Nancy Witherell, National Capital Champaign Low Power Reactor how that interest may be affected by the Planning Commission, 801 Assembly; Notice of Proposed results of the proceeding. The petition Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Suite 301, Issuance of Orders Authorizing should specifically explain the reasons Washington, DC 20576, Phone: (202) Disposition of Component Parts why intervention should be permitted 724–0174 or Steve Raiche, D.C. with particular reference to the The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory following factors: (1) The nature of the Department of Consumer & Regulatory Commission (the Commission) is petitioner’s right under the Act to be Affairs, 614 H Street NW., Room 305, considering issuance of an Order made a party to the proceeding; (2) the Washington, DC 20001, Phone: (202) authorizing the University of Illinois at nature and extent of the petitioner’s 727–7360. Urbana-Champaign (the licensee) to property, financial, or other interest in Sandra H. Shapiro, partially dismantle the Low Power the proceeding; and (3) the possible General Counsel. Reactor Assembly (LOPRA). This would effect of any order which may be [FR Doc. 95–11897 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] return the reactor to a subcritical entered in the proceeding on the BILLING CODE 7502±02±M assembly. After transfer of all LOPRA petitioner’s interest. The petition should byproduct and special nuclear material also identify the specific aspect(s) of the to the Illinois Advanced TRIGA Reactor subject matter of the proceeding as to NUCLEAR REGULATORY (TRIGA), Facility License No. R–115, which petitioner wishes to intervene. COMMISSION the Commission would consider an Any person who has filed a petition for Order authorizing termination of leave to intervene or who has been [Docket Nos. 50±424±OLA±3; 50±425±OLA± Facility License No. R–117, for the admitted as a party may amend the 3] LOPRA, in accordance with the petition without requesting leave of the licensee’s application dated February Atomic Safety and Licensing Board; Board up to fifteen (15) days prior to the 10, 1995. Evidentiary Hearing first prehearing conference scheduled in The first of these Orders would be the proceeding, but such an amended Before Administrative Judges: Peter B. issued following the Commission’s petition must satisfy the specificity Bloch, Chairman, Dr. James H. Carpenter, review and approval of the licensee’s requirements described above. Thomas D. Murphy. disposition plan for the LOPRA. This Not later than fifteen (15) days prior Re: License Amendment (Transfer to Order would authorize implementation to the first prehearing conference Southern Nuclear) of the approved plan. Following scheduled in the proceeding, a ASLBP No. 93–671–01–OLA–3 completion of the authorized activities petitioner shall file a supplement to the May 9, 1995. and verification by the Commission that petition to intervene which must In the matter of: Georgia Power Company, transfer of all radioactive material to the include a list of the contentions which et al. (Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Units TRIGA license has been achieved, the are sought to be litigated in the matter, 1 and 2). Commission would issue a second and the bases for each contention set Order terminating the LOPRA facility forth with reasonable specificity. An evidentiary hearing will be held in license. Prior to issuance of each Order, Contentions shall be limited to matters Augusta, Georgia beginning on May 22 the Commission will have made the within the scope of the action under from 1 pm to 5 pm. Thereafter, ordinary findings required by the Atomic Energy consideration. A petitioner who fails to times for the hearing are from 9 am to Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and file such a supplement which satisfies 5 pm. The principal location of the the Commission’s regulations. these requirements with respect to at hearing is: By June 14, 1995, the licensee may least one contention will not be Savannah Rapids Pavilion, 3300 Evans- file a request for a hearing with respect permitted to participate as a party. to-Locks Road, Martinez, Georgia to issuance of the subject Orders and Those permitted to intervene become 30907, (706) 868–3349 or 3431. any person whose interest may be parties to the proceeding, subject to any The week of May 22–26 the proceeding affected by this proceeding and who limitations in the order granting leave to will be in the Loblolly Pine Room. On wishes to participate as a party in the intervene, and have the opportunity to May 31–June 2 and June 6–9, we will be proceeding must file a written request participate in the conduct of the located in the White Oak Room. On June for a hearing and a petition for leave to hearing, including the opportunity to 25932 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices present evidence and cross-examine [Docket No. 50±245] intervals during each 10-year service witnesses. period. Section III.D.1.(a) also requires Exemption A request for a hearing or a petition that the third Type A test of each 10- for leave to intervene must be filed with In the Matter of Northeast Nuclear Energy year service period be conducted when the plant is shut down for the 10-year the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Company (Millstone Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 3). plant inservice inspections. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, The licensee proposes two Washington, DC 20555, Attention: I exemptions to this section. These Docketing and Services Branch, or may Northeast Nuclear Energy Company, exemptions would (1) extend the 10- be delivered to the Commission’s Public (NNECO, the licensee) is the holder of year Appendix J test interval to Document Room, the Gelman Building, Facility Operating License No. NPF–49, refueling outage 6, a nominal increase of 2120 L Street, NW, Washington, DC by which authorizes operation of Millstone 12 months, and (2) eliminate the the above date. Where petitions are filed Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 3 (the requirement to perform the third Type during the last ten (10) days of the facility). The license provides, among A test coincident with the 10-year notice period, it is requested that the other things, that Millstone Unit 3 is ASME inservice inspections. petitioner or representative for the subject to all rules, regulations, and The Commission has determined, for petitioner promptly so inform the Orders of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory the reasons discussed below, that Commission by a toll-free telephone call Commission (the Commission or NRC) pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12(a)(1) this to Western Union at 1–(800) 248–5100 now or hereafter in effect. exemption is authorized by law, will not (in Missouri 1–(800) 342–6700). The The facility is a pressurized water present an undue risk to the public Western Union operator should be given reactor located at the licensee’s site in health and safety, and is consistent with Dataram Identification Number N1023 New London County, Connecticut. the common defense and security. The Commission further determines that and the following message addressed to II special circumstances, as provided in 10 Seymour H. Weiss: petitioner’s name Section III.D.1.(a) of Appendix J to 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii), are present justifying and telephone number; date petition CFR part 50 requires the performance of the exemption; namely, that application was mailed; the University of Illinois three Type A containment integrated of the regulation in the particular LOPRA; and publication date and page leakage rate tests (ILRTs), at circumstances is not necessary to number of this Federal Register notice. approximately equal intervals during achieve the underlying purpose of the A copy of the petition should also be each 10-year service period of the rule. The underlying purpose of the sent to the Office of the General primary containment. The third test of requirement to perform Type A Counsel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory each set shall be conducted when the containment leak rate tests at intervals Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555, plant is shut down for the 10-year during the 10-year service period is to and to Mr. Byron H. Higgins, University inservice inspection of the primary ensure that any leakage through the Legal Counsel, 258 Henry containment. containment boundary is identified Administration Building, 506 South within a limited time span that prevents III Wright Street, Urbana, Illinois 61801, significant degradation from continuing attorney for the licensee. By letter dated September 28, 1994, as or becoming unknown. supplemented February 24, 1995, The NRC staff has reviewed the basis Nontimely filings of petitions for Northeast Nuclear Energy Company and supporting information provided by leave to intervene, amended petitions, requested exemptions from 10 CFR part the licensee in the exemption request. supplemental petitions and/or requests 50, Appendix J, Section III.D.1.(a) for The NRC staff notes that the licensee for a hearing will not be entertained Millstone Unit 3 (1) to eliminate the has a good record of ensuring a leak- absent a determination by the requirement to perform the third Type tight containment. All Type A tests have Commission, the presiding officer or the A test coincident with the 10-year passed with significant margin and the presiding Atomic Safety and Licensing American Society of Mechanical licensee has noted that the results of the Board that the petition and/or request Engineers (ASME) inservice inspections, Type A testing have been confirmatory should be granted based upon a and (2) to extend the 10-year Appendix of the Type B and C tests which will balancing of the factors specified in 10 J test until refueling outage 6, a nominal continue to be performed. The licensee CFR 2.714(a)(1)(i)–(v) and 2.714(d). increase of 12 months. These has stated to the NRC Project Manager For further details with respect to this exemptions would permit the licensee that the general containment inspection will be performed during refueling action, see the licensee’s application to perform the third Type A test of the outage 5 although it is only required by dated February 10, 1995, which is first 10-year period during refueling outage 6 scheduled for April 1997 rather Appendix J (Section V.A.) to be available for public inspection at the performed in conjunction with Type A Commission’s Public Document Room, than during the refueling outage 5. The licensee’s request cites the tests. The NRC staff considers that these the Gelman Building, 2120 L Street, special circumstance of 10 CFR inspections, though limited in scope, NW, Washington, DC. 50.12(a)(2)(ii), as the basis for these provide an important added level of Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 9th day exemptions. This special circumstance confidence in the continued integrity of of May 1995. states that the application of the the containment boundary. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. regulation in this particular The NRC staff has also made use of the information in a draft staff report, Seymour H. Weiss, circumstance is not necessary to achieve the underlying purpose of the rule. NUREG–1493 ‘‘Performance-Based Director, Non-Power Reactors and Containment Leak-Test Program,’’ Decommissioning Project Directorate, IV which provides the technical Division of Project Support, Office of Nuclear Section III.D.1.(a) of Appendix J to 10 justification for the present Appendix J Reactor Regulation. CFR part 50 states that a set of three rulemaking results of the effort which [FR Doc. 95–11859 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] Type A leakage rate tests shall be includes a 10-year test interval for Type BILLING CODE 7590±01±M performed at approximately equal A tests. The integrated leakage rate test, Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices 25933 or Type A test, measures overall degradation. As a result, the application Oral statements may be presented by containment leakage. However, of the regulation in these particular members of the public with the operating experience with all types of circumstances is not necessary to concurrence of the Subcommittee containments used in this country achieve the underlying purpose of the Chairman; written statements will be demonstrates that essentially all rule. accepted and made available to the containment leakage can be detected by The preoperational Type A test Committee. Electronic recordings will local leakage rate tests (Types B and C). required by Appendix J was performed be permitted only during those portions According to results given in NUREG– in July 1985. Millstone Unit 3 started of the meeting that are open to the 1493, out of 180 ILRT reports covering commercial operation on April 23, 1986. public, and questions may be asked only 110 individual reactors and The staff considers this date to also be by members of the Subcommittee, its approximately 770 years of operating the start of the licensee’s first 10-year consultants, and staff. Persons desiring history, only 5 ILRT failures were found Type A test period. The extension of the to make oral statements should notify which local leakage rate testing could Type A test interval for Millstone Unit the cognizant ACRS staff person named not detect. This is 3% of all failures. 3 discussed in this document is below five days prior to the meeting, if This study agrees well with previous referenced to this starting date. Based on possible, so that appropriate NRC staff studies which show that generic and plant specific data, the NRC arrangements can be made. Types B and C testing can detect a very staff finds the basis for the licensee’s Further information regarding topics large percentage of containment leaks. proposed exemptions to be acceptable. to be discussed, the scheduling of The Millstone Unit 3 experience has Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.32, the sessions open to the public, whether the also been consistent with these results. Commission has determined that meeting has been cancelled or The Nuclear Management and granting this Exemption will have no rescheduled, the Chairman’s ruling on Resources Council (NUMARC), now the significant impact on the quality of the requests for the opportunity to present Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI), collected human environment (60 FR 22415). oral statements, and the time allotted and provided the NRC staff with This Exemption is effective upon therefore can be obtained by contacting summaries of data to assist in the issuance and shall expire at the the cognizant ACRS staff person, Dr. Appendix J rulemaking effort. NUMARC completion of the 1997 refueling outage. John T. Larkins (telephone: 301/415– collected results of 144 ILRTs from 33 Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 8th day 7360) between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. units; 23 ILRTs exceeded 1.0La. Of (EDT). Persons planning to attend this these, only nine were not due to Type of May 1995. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. meeting are urged to contact the above B or C leakage penalties. The NEI data named individual one or two working Steven A. Varga, also added another perspective. The NEI days prior to the meeting to be advised data show that in about one-third of the Director, Division of Reactor Projects—I/II, of any changes in schedule, etc., that Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. cases exceeding allowable leakage, the may have occurred. as-found leakage was less than 2La; in [FR Doc. 95–11860 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] Dated: May 9, 1995. one case the leakage was found to be BILLING CODE 7590±01±M approximately 2La; in one case the as- Sam Duraiswamy, found leakage was less than 3La; one Chief, Nuclear Reactors Branch. case approached 10La; and in one case Advisory Committee on Reactor [FR Doc. 95–11857 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] the leakage was found to be Safeguards Subcommittee Meeting on BILLING CODE 7590±01±M approximately 21La. For about half of Planning and Procedures; Notice of the failed ILRTs the as-found leakage Meeting was not quantified. These data show The ACRS Subcommittee on Planning PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY that, for those ILRTs for which the CORPORATION leakage was quantified, the leakage and Procedures will hold a meeting on values are small in comparison to the June 7, 1995, Room T–2B1, 11545 Request for Approval of a Modification leakage value at which the risk to the Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. in an Approved Collection of public starts to increase over the value The entire meeting will be open to Information; PBGC Form 10±SP, public attendance, with the exception of of risk corresponding to La Optional Reportable Event Form for a portion that may be closed pursuant (approximately 200La, as discussed in Small Plans NUREG–1493). to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (2) and (6) to discuss The licensee also addressed the organizational and personnel matters AGENCY: Pension Benefit Guaranty possible increase in risk due to that relate solely to internal personnel Corporation. extending this test interval. The licensee rules and practices of ACRS, and ACTION: Notice of Request for OMB concluded that any increase in risk matters the release of which would approval. would be negligible. This is consistent constitute a clearly unwarranted with independent staff studies invasion of personal privacy. SUMMARY: The Pension Benefit Guaranty documented in NUREG–1493. The agenda for the subject meeting Corporation has requested that the Therefore, based on these shall be as follows: Office of Management and Budget considerations, it is unlikely that an approve, under the Paperwork extension of one cycle for the Wednesday, June 7, 1995—2 p.m. Until Reduction Act, a modification in its performance of the Appendix J, Type A the Conclusion of Business currently approved collection of test at Millstone Unit 3 would result in The Subcommittee will discuss information for the reporting significant degradation of the overall proposed ACRS activities and related requirements under section 4043 of the containment integrity. Likewise, matters. The purpose of this meeting is Employee Retirement Income Security performance of the third test in a to gather information, analyze relevant Act of 1974 (OMB control number refueling outage other than when the issues and facts, and to formulate 1212–0013; expires February 28, 1996). plant is shut down for the 10-year plant proposed positions and actions, as This modification would simplify inservice inspections has no connection appropriate, for deliberation by the full compliance for small plans by providing to the detection of overall containment Committee. the plan administrator and contributing 25934 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices sponsor of a single-employer plan with To provide plan administrators and the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT May 10, fewer than 500 participants with the contributing sponsors of such plans 1995 through 11:59 p.m. EDT on May option of using PBGC Form 10–SP when with the option of using Form 10–SP 23, 1995. notifying the PBGC that a reportable when notifying the PBGC that a By the Commission. event has occurred. The effect of this reportable event has occurred, the PBGC Jonathan G. Katz, notice is to advise the public of the has asked OMB to approve this Secretary. PBGC’s request for OMB approval of information collection instrument as a and to solicit public comment on the modification in its currently approved [FR Doc. 95–11902 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] modification. collection of information. The PBGC BILLING CODE 8010±01±M ADDRESSES: All written comments (at believes that Form 10–SP would least three copies) should be addressed increase the likelihood that it will to Office of Management and Budget, receive initial critical information DEPARTMENT OF STATE Paperwork Reduction Project (1212– within the prescribed time period, and 0013), Washington, DC 20503. The it anticipates that in most cases the plan PBGC’s request for approval will be administrators and contributing [Public Notice 2203] available for inspection at the PBGC’s sponsors of small plans would not United States International Communications and Public Affairs provide any further information to the Telecommunications Advisory Department, Suite 240, 1200 K Street, PBGC. However, the PBGC is not at this Committee (ITAC)ÐAd Hoc on Citel; NW., Washington, DC 20005–4026, time predicting a reduction in the total Meeting Notice between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday burden hours under its reportable through Friday. events regulation (40 hours per year, The Department of State announces 1 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: based on 80 filings at ⁄2 hour per filing). that the United States International Harold J. Ashner, Assistant General The PBGC is in the process of Telecommunications Advisory Counsel, Office of the General Counsel, determining whether and to what extent Committee (ITAC) Ad Hoc on CITEL Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, to revise its burden hour estimate to Activities will hold its first meeting 1200 K Street, NW., Washington, DC reflect the new RPA reportable events, June 7, 1995, in Room 1205, 1:30 to 5:00 20005–4026, 202–326–4024 (202–326– and plans to note any decrease resulting p.m., at the Department of State, 2201 4179 for TTY and TDD). from Form 10 when it requests OMB ‘‘C’’ Street, NW., Washington, DC. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The paperwork approval for its proposed The agenda of the meeting will Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation amendments to its reportable events include: reports on the work programs administers the pension plan regulation to implement RPA. and activities of the Permanent termination insurance program under Issued in Washington, DC this 9th day of Consultative Committees (PCCs); Title IV of the Employee Retirement May, 1995. discussion of the Legal Working Group, Income Security Act of 1974, as Martin Slate, including its terms of reference and amended (29 U.S.C. 1301 et seq.). Part Executive Director, Pension Benefit Guaranty relationship to other elements of the 2615, Subpart A, of the PBGC’s Corporation. CITEL structure; review of future regulations (29 CFR part 2615, subpart [FR Doc. 95–11841 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] meeting schedule; and planning of A) implements the requirements of BILLING CODE 7708±01±M preparatory activities for upcoming ERISA section 4043 (29 U.S.C. 1343). In meetings of the PCCs and CITEL’s particular, the regulations prescribe Executive Committee (COM/CITEL, rules for the notice that, except where SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE November 1995). There will also be a expressly waived, must be provided to COMMISSION discussion of the specific objectives of the PBGC no later than 30 days after a the Summit of the Americas Plan of [File No. 500±1] single-employer plan administrator Action, with particular emphasis on the knows or has reason to know a In the Matter of: PanWorld Minerals role of CITEL in accordance with its reportable has occurred. These reporting International, Inc.; Order Directing terms of reference and assigned requirements currently are approved by Suspension of Trading responsibilities. Questions regarding the the Office of Management and Budget agenda or Ad Hoc activities in general (‘‘OMB’’) (control number 1212–0013; May 10, 1995. may be directed to Gary Fereno, expires February 28, 1996). It appears to the Securities and Department of State (202–647–0200). The PBGC has now developed an Exchange Commission that there is a Members of the general public may information collection instrument— lack of adequate current information attend the meetings and join in the PBGC Form 10–SP, Optional Reportable concerning the securities of PanWorld discussions, subject to the instructions Event Form for Small Plans—that it Minerals International, Inc. of the chair and seating availability. In believes will facilitate and simplify (‘‘PanWorld’’) and that questions have this regard, entry to the building is compliance with regulatory been raised about the adequacy and controlled. All persons planning to requirements. In particular, Form 10–SP accuracy of publicly disseminated attend should advise the Department by (including its instructions) will help information concerning, among other leaving a message on 202–647–0201, no contributing sponsors and plan things, the accuracy and adequacy of later than two days before the meeting. administrators of small plans (fewer PanWorld’s financial statements; and Enter through the main lobby on C than 500 participants) understand what agreements between PanWorld and Street. A picture ID will be required for events must be reported. In addition, it others. admittance. will provide a simple reporting Therefore, it is Ordered, pursuant to mechanism. The form takes into account Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Dated: May 3, 1995. certain recent amendments to section Act of 1934, that trading in the Richard E. Shrum, 4043 made by the Retirement Protection securities of PanWorld Minerals ITAC Executive Director. Act of 1994 (Title VII, Subtitle F of Pub. International, Inc., over-the-counter, on [FR Doc. 95–11837 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] L. 103–465). NASDAQ or otherwise, is suspended for BILLING CODE 4710±45±M Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices 25935 [Public Notice 2208] program. The Coast Guard will conduct to location or dates of the workshop will a workshop to obtain information from be announced in the Federal Register. Department of State Briefing on the affected community and the general The Coast Guard also plans to hold a Indigenous Issues in the United public. workshop on June 14, 1995, at the same Nations; Notice of Meeting DATES: The workshop will be held June location to discuss the National The Department of State, led by the 15, 1995 from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. Preparedness for Response Exercise Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, Comments on proposed issues to be Program (PREP). A separate notice will and Labor, in conjunction with other raised at the workshop should be be published in the Federal Register to offices in the Department of State, will submitted by May 30, 1995. Individuals address the PREP workshop. hold a briefing on June 3, 1995 to interested in attending the public Dated: May 9, 1995. discuss recent developments on workshop should contact LT Terry G.N. Naccara, indigenous issues within the United Hoover by June 8, 1995. Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Chief, Nations system. The briefing will follow ADDRESSES: The workshop will be held Office of Marine Safety, Security and the Northwest Regional Listening at the Best Western Old Colony Inn, 625 Environmental Protection. Conference being convened by the 1st Street, Alexandria, Virginia. Written [FR Doc. 95–11889 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] Department of Justice for tribal leaders comments should be mailed to BILLING CODE 4910±14±P in Salt Lake City on June 2. The briefing Commandant (G–MEP–2), Room 2100, will be open to the public. U.S. Coast Guard, 2100 Second Street, The focus of the briefing will be the SW., Washington, DC 20593–0001, Federal Aviation Administration indigenous issues discussed at the 51st ATTN: LT Terry Hoover. [Summary Notice No. PE±95±20] session of the United Nations Human FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LT Rights Commission in Geneva, Petitions for Exemption; Summary of including the status of governmental Terry Hoover, Marine Environmental Protection Division (G–MEP), U.S. Coast Petitions Received; Dispositions of consideration of the draft ‘‘United Petitions Issued Nations Declaration on the Rights of Guard, 2100 Second Street, SW., Indigenous Peoples.’’ This briefing is Washington, DC 20593–0001, telephone AGENCY: Federal Aviation part of an ongoing effort to inform (202) 267–0448. Administration (FAA), DOT. interested persons and organizations of SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The OSRO ACTION: Notice of petitions for international developments on program was established to allow vessel exemption received and of dispositions indigenous issues. and facility owners and operators to list of prior petitions. The briefing is scheduled for a Coast Guard evaluated OSRO in an Saturday, June 3, 1995, at 9 a.m. at the OPA 90 response plan in lieu of SUMMARY: Pursuant to FAA’s rulemaking Red Lion Inn, Salt Lake City, Utah. providing a detailed list of oil spill provisions governing the application, Please notify Maryedna Proctor at (202) response equipment. Through the plan processing, and disposition of petitions 647–1696 no later than May 30, 1995 if development and plan review processes, for exemption (14 CFR Part 11), this you plan to attend. Please be prepared inefficiencies have been identified in notice contains a summary of certain to have photo identification with you in the OSRO classification process. petitions seeking relief from specified order to be admitted. Because of these identified requirements of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR Chapter I), Dated: May 9, 1995. inefficiencies, the Coast Guard intends to revise the OSRO program. dispositions of certain petitions Charles P. Henry, The Coast Guard held a similar previously received, and corrections. Director, Office of External Affairs, Bureau The purpose of this notice is to improve of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor. workshop in January 1994, with the intent of reviewing how the program the public’s awareness of, and [FR Doc. 95–11834 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] was serving the customer and participation in, this aspect of FAA’s BILLING CODE 4710±09±M potentially modifying the OSRO regulatory activities. Neither publication program. However, since revisions of this notice nor the inclusion or would have been implemented during omission of information in the summary DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION the critical response plan preparation is intended to affect the legal status of any petition or its final disposition. Coast Guard and submission period, it was determined that modifying the OSRO DATES: Comments on petitions received [CGD 95±039] program might adversely disrupt the must identify the petition docket ongoing planning process. The issues number involved and must be received Oil Spill Removal Organization raised at the January 1994 workshop on or before May 31, 1995. Program Workshop will be summarized at the June 1995 ADDRESSES: Send comments on any AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT. workshop. petition in triplicate to: Federal ACTION: Notice. The workshop format will consist of Aviation Administration, Office of the a briefing on the current program, a Chief Counsel, Attn: Rule Docket (AGC– SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is review of difficulties reported, a verbal 200), Petition Docket No. ll, 800 considering revisions to its Oil Spill summary of written comments received Independence Avenue, SW., Removal Organization (OSRO) to date, and a structured but open forum Washington, DC 20591. Comments may classification process. The Coast Guard discussion on ideas to improve the also be sent electronically to the has identified a number of economic, system. Written comments or questions following internet address: programmatic, and operational may be submitted before or after the [email protected]. inefficiencies in the current process. In workshop. All comments or questions The petition, any comments received, order to fully understand and properly after the workshop should be submitted and a copy of any final disposition are address these concerns with a focus on prior to July 1, 1995. The Coast Guard filed in the assigned regulatory docket meeting our customer needs, the Coast intends to publish a revised process no and are available for examination in the Guard intends to revise the OSRO later than August 1, 1995. Any changes Rules Docket (AGC–200), room 915G, 25936 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices FAA Headquarters Building (FOB 10A), Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR Description of Relief Sought/ 800 Independence Avenue, SW., 61.187(b) Disposition: To extend Exemption No. Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202) Description of Relief Sought: To permit 5330, as amended, which permits 267–3132. FlightSafety International to utilize Cochise Community College to enroll FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: certificated flight instructors who students in the ground school portion Mr. D. Michael Smith, Office of have given more than 500 hours of of its Flight Instructor-Airplane Rulemaking (ARM–1), Federal Aviation dual instruction, but have held a Certification Course who have not yet Administration, 800 Independence flight instructor certificate for less completed the flight portion of the Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; than 24 months preceding the date of Commercial Pilot-Airplane telephone (202) 267–7470. instruction given, to train and Certification/Instrument-Airplane This notice is published pursuant to recommend flight instructor Rating Course. GRANT, April 26, paragraphs (c), (e), and (g) of § 11.27 of candidates for initial instruction 1995, Exemption No. 5330B Part 11 of the Federal Aviation certification. Docket No.: 25748 Regulations (14 CFR Part 11). Docket No.: 28142 Petitioner: Popular Rotorcraft Issued in Washington, DC, on May 10, Petitioner: Berkshire Balloons Association, Inc. 1995. Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR Donald P. Byrne, 145.57(a) 91.319(a) (1) and (2) Assistant Chief Counsel for Regulations. Description of Relief Sought: To permit Description of Relief Sought/ Berkshire Balloons’ certificated repair Disposition: To extend Exemption No. Petitions for Exemption station to perform maintenance, 5209, as amended, which permits Docket No.: 15078 repairs, experimental/amateur-built Popular Rotorcraft Association, Inc., Petitioner: U.S. Department of Justice hot air balloons that are no longer and its member flight instructors to Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR owned by the aircraft builder. conduct pilots and flight instructor training in an experimental gyropance 91.111(b); 91.117 (a), (b), and (c); Dispositions of Petitions 91.119(c); 91.127(c); 91.159(a); and for compensation or hire. GRANT, 91.209 (a) and (d) Docket No.: 22690 April 14, 1995, Exemption No. 5209C Description of Relief Sought: To extend Petitioner: Boeing Commercial Airplane Docket No.: 26877 Exemption No. 5506, which allows Group Petitioner: Detroit Metropolitan Airport the Department of Justice, Drug Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR Enforcement Administration, to 61.57 (c) and (d) 61.55(b) continue to conduct certain Description of Relief Sought/ Description of Relief Sought/ operations when necessary to Disposition: To extend Exemption No. Disposition: To extend Exemption No. complete its law enforcement 4779, as amended, which allows 5647, which permits General Motors mission. Boeing and pilots employed as Air Transport Section pilots serving Docket No.: 26608 aircrews for Boeing to continue to as second in command to comply Petitioner: Alaska Airlines, Inc./Atlantic meet the recency of experience with company-required proficiency Richfield Company/British Petroleum requirements of § 61.57 (c) and (d) for reviews in lieu of the requirements of Exploration, Alaska, Inc. all types of Boeing aircraft by meeting § 61.55(b), subject to certain Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR the requirements for takeoff and conditions and limitations. GRANT, 43.3(a), 43.7(a), 91.213(a), landing recency of experience in any April 19, 1995, Exemption No. 5647A 91.407(a)(2), 91.417(a)(2)(v), and type of Boeing airplane or in Level B, Docket No.: 26976 121.379. C, or D simulators. GRANT, April 26, Petitioner: United States Coast Guard Description of Relief Sought: To extend 1995, Exemption No. 4779E Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR and amend Exemption No. 5667, Docket No.: 23430 91.119(c) which allows Alaska Airlines, Inc. Petitioner: McDonnell Douglas Description of Relief Sought/ (ASA), to perform maintenance, Corporation Disposition: To extend Exemption No. preventive maintenance, alterations, Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 5614, as amended, which permits the inspections, major repairs, and major 61.57 (c) and (d) Coast Guard to operate over other alterations on the Boeing 737–200 Description of Relief Sought/ than congested areas at an altitude of series aircraft leased by and operated Disposition: To extend Exemption No. less than 500 feet and, in operations by the Atlantic Richfield Company 3754, as amended, which allows over open water or sparsely populated (ARCO) and British Petroleum McDonnell Douglas and pilots areas, at a distance closer than 500 Exploration, Alaska, Inc. (BPX), and, employed as aircrews for McDonnell feet to any person, vessel, vehicle, or subsequently, return to service the Douglas to continue to meet the structure for the purpose of rescuing aforementioned aircraft. The recency of experience requirements of and aiding persons and protecting and amendment, if granted, would allow § 61.57 (c) and (d) for all types of saving property. This extension of ARCO and BPX to continue to use McDonnell Douglas aircraft by exemption is modified to correct the procedures specifically authorized for meeting the requirements for takeoff exemption number for the extension air carrier operations under the FAR and landing recency of experience in of Exemption No. 5614, as amended, with respect to the use of ASA’s FAA- any type of McDonnell Douglas issued on February 23, 1995. GRANT, approved minimum equipment list airplane or in Level B, C, or D April 26, 1995, Exemption No. 5614B and FAA-approved continuous simulators. GRANT, April 26, 1995, Docket No.: 27120 airworthiness maintenance program Exemption No. 3754F Petitioner: Flight Training International, for the Boeing 737–200 series aircraft Docket No.: 25652 Inc. leased by and operated by ARCO and Petitioner: Cochise Community College Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR BPX. Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 61.55(b)(2); 61.56(c)(1); 61.57 (c) and Docket No.: 28102 paragraphs 3 (c)(1) and (c)(3), (d); 61.58 (c)(1) and (d); 61.63 (c)(2) Petitioner: FlightSafety International appendix H, part 141 and (d) (2) and (3); 61.65 (c), (e) 2 and Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices 25937 3, and (g); 61.67(d)(2); 61.157(d) (1) approved traffic alert and collision Aviation Rulemaking Advisory and (2) and (e) (1) and (2); 61.191(c); avoidance system (TCAS) in part 135 Committee Meeting on Air Carrier and appendix A, part 61 operations from December 31, 1995, Operations Description of Relief Sought/ to March 31, 1997. DENIAL, April 13, Disposition: To extend Exemption No. 1995, Exemption No. 6066 ACTION: Notice of meeting. 5629, which permits Flight Training Docket No.: 28054 SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice International, Inc., to use FAA- Petitioner: Air Vegas, Inc. to advise the public of a meeting of the approved simulators to meet certain Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR Federal Aviation Administration flight experience requirements of part 135.143(c)(2) Aviation Rulemaking Advisory 61 of the FAR. GRANT, April 21, Description of Relief Sought/ Committee to discuss air carrier 1995, Exemption No. 5629A Disposition: To permit Air Vegas, Inc., operations issues. Docket No.: 27913 to operate without a TSO–C112 (Mode DATES: The meeting will be held on May Petitioner: Alaska Air Carriers S) transponder installed on its aircraft 31, 1995, at 12:30 p.m. operating under the provisions of part Association ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 135. GRANT, April 21, 1995, the Air Transport Association, 1301 135.180 Exemption No. 6067 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, Description of Relief Sought/ Docket No.: 28103 DC. Disposition: To hold permanent Petitioner: Silverhawk Aviation, Inc. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: exemption to the extent necessary to Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR Ms. Dwonna Johnson, Flight Standards allow Alaska Air Carriers Association- 135.143(c)(2) Service, Air Transportation Division member air carriers to operate turbine Description of Relief Sought/ (AFS–200), 800 Independence Avenue, powered airplanes having passenger Disposition: To permit Silverhawk SW., Washington, DC 20591, telephone seat configurations, excluding any Aviation, Inc. to operate without a (202) 267–8166. pilot seat, of 10 to 30 seats, without TSO–C112 (Mode S) transponder SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: an approved traffic alert and collision installed on its aircraft operating Pursuant avoidance system (TCAS) within the under the provisions of part 135. to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal airspace of the State of Alaska and GRANT, April 19, 1995, Exemption Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92– 463, 5 U.S.C. App II), notice is hereby any foreign airspace as approved by No. 6065 given of a meeting of the Aviation the foreign civil aviation authority, Docket No.: 28119 Rulemaking Advisory Committee to be after February 9, 1995. DENIAL, April Petitioner: Black Swan Jet Charter held on May 31, 1995, at 12:30 p.m. at 14, 1995, Exemption No. 6057 Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR the Air Transport Association, 1301 Docket No.: 27914 135.143(c)(2) Description of Relief Sought/ Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, Petitioner: Peninsula Airways, Inc. DC. The agenda for this meeting will Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR Disposition: To permit Black Swan Jet Charter to operate without a TSO– include status reports on the All 135.180 Weather Operations Working Group, the Description of Relief Sought/ C112 (Mode S) transponder installed Single Engine Operations Working Disposition: To hold permanent on its aircraft operating under the Group, and the Fatigue exemption to the extent necessary to provisions of part 135. GRANT, April Countermeasures and Alertness allow Peninsula Airways, Inc., to 21, 1995, Exemption No. 6068 Management Working Group. operate Fairchild SA–227 Metroliner Docket No.: 28179 Attendance is open to the interested aircraft without an approved traffic Petitioner: Washington Flight Program, public but may be limited to the space alert and collision avoidance system Federal Aviation Administration available. The public must make (TCAS) within the airspace of the Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR arrangements in advance to present oral State of Alaska and foreign airspace as 135.251 and 135.255 and appendices statements at the meeting or may approved by the foreign civil aviation I and J, part 121 present written statements to the authority, after February 9, 1995. Description of Relief Sought/ committee at any time. Arrangements DENIAL, April 14, 1995, Exemption Disposition: To allow the Washington may be made by contacting the person No. 6058 Flight Program relief from the drug listed under the heading FOR FURTHER Docket No.: 28039 and alcohol testing requirements specified in the above mentioned INFORMATION CONTACT. Petitioner: Grand Aire Express, Inc. Sign and oral interpretation can be Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR sections, because the Program is already covered by Department of made available at the meeting, as well 91.511(a)(2) and 135,165(a) (1) and (6) as an assistive listening device, if and (b) (6) and (7) Transportation guidelines for such testing. GRANT, April 21, 1995, requested 10 calendar days before the Description of Relief Sought/ meeting. Disposition: To permit Grand Aire Exemption No. 6074 Express, Inc., to operate its turbojet Docket No.: 28180 Issued in Washington, DC, on May 8, 1995. airplanes equipped with one high Petitioner: Nasera Corporation Quentin J. Smith, Jr., frequency communication system Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR Assistant Executive Director for Air Carrier (HF) and one long-range system 25.562 Operations, Aviation Rulemaking Advisory (LRNS). GRANT, March 31, 1995, Description of Relief Sought/ Committee. Exemption No. 6051 Disposition: To permit Nasera [FR Doc. 95–11895 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] Corporation relief from § 25.562 on its BILLING CODE 4910±13±M Docket No.: 28041 Lockheed Model 382G airplanes Petitioner: SkyWest Airlines Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR modified by installation of Nasera’s QC interior. GRANT, April 11, 1995, Meeting of the Aviation Security 135.180 Advisory Committee Description of Relief Sought/ Exemption No. 6056 Disposition: To allow SkyWest to [FR Doc. 95–11891 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] DATES: The meeting will be held June 6, operate aircraft not equipped with an BILLING CODE 4910±13±M 1995, from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m. 25938 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in at the Sheraton Reston Hotel, 11810 SW, Washington, DC 20590. Ms. Gray’s the MacCracken Room, tenth floor, Sunrise Valley Drive, Reston, Virginia telephone number is (202) 366–1740. Federal Aviation Administration, 800 22091. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On Independence Avenue, SW, On both Monday, June 5, and January 5, 1995, General Motors Washington, DC 20591, telephone 202– Tuesday, June 6, the meeting will begin Corporation (‘‘GM’’) filed with NHTSA 267–7451. at 8 a.m. and end at 5 p.m. The agenda a petition for exemption from the parts- SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant will include review and discussion of marking requirements of the Federal to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal the draft report of the Aeronautics and motor vehicle theft prevention standard Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92– Aviation Subcommittee of the National (49 CFR Part 541) for the Chevrolet 463; 5 U.S.C. App. II), notice is hereby Science and Technology Council of the Lumina and Buick Regal car lines. Both given of a meeting of the Aviation White House Office of Science and car lines are currently designated as Security Advisory Committee to be held Technology Policy. The draft report is high-theft car lines subject to the parts- June 6, 1995, in the MacCracken Room, an integrated, 10-year Federal strategic marking requirements of the theft tenth floor, Federal Aviation plan for investments in aeronautics and prevention standard, 49 CFR Part 541, Administration, 800 Independence aviation. Appendix A. GM submitted its petition Attendance is open to the interested Avenue, SW., Washington, DC. The pursuant to 49 CFR Part 543, Exemption public but limited to space available. agenda for the meeting will include From Vehicle Theft Prevention With the approval of the two committee reports on the Universal Access Standard, and requested an exemption chairmen, members of the public may prototype test, Implementation Plan for based on the installation of a theft present oral statements at the meeting. Explosive Detection Systems, ACS Plan deterrent device as standard equipment persons wishing to present oral for implementation of Internet with for the Chevrolet Lumina and Buick statements, or obtain information, industry and our counterparts in Regal car lines. At the same time, GM should contact Lee Olson at the Federal government, Review of cargo measures, requested confidential treatment for Aviation Administration, AAR–200, 800 and the revision of FAR Parts 107/108. much of the information submitted in Independence Avenue, SW., Attendance at the June 6, 1995, support of its petition, including the Washington, DC 20591 (202) 267–7358. meeting is open to the public but is Members of the public may present a model year and date of introduction of limited to space available. Members of written statement to the committee at the car lines. In a letter dated February the public may address the committee any time. 13, 1995, NHTSA granted the only with the written permission of the petitioner’s request for confidential chair, which should be arranged in Issued in Washington, DC on May 8, 1995. treatment. advance. The chair may entertain public Andres G. Zellweger, In its petition, GM provided a detailed comment if, in its judgment, doing so Executive Director, Research, Engineering and description of the identity, design and will not disrupt the orderly progress of Development Advisory Committee. location of the components of the the meeting and will not be unfair to [FR Doc. 95–11893 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] antitheft device for the Chevrolet any other person. Members of the public BILLING CODE 4910±13±M Lumina and Buick Regal car lines, are welcome to present written material including diagrams of the components to the committee at any time. Persons and their location in the vehicle. GM wishing to present statements or obtain National Highway Traffic Safety stated that the system, known as ‘‘PASS- information should contact the Office of Administration Key II,’’ is a second-generation version the Associate Administrator for Civil Petition for Exemption From the of the ‘‘PASS-Key’’ system introduced Aviation Security, 800 Independence Vehicle Theft Protection Standard; by GM in 1988. According to GM, the Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591, General Motors Corporation ‘‘PASS-Key II’’ system continues to telephone 202–267–7451. provide the same kind of functions and Issued in Washington, DC on May 9, 1995. AGENCY: National Highway Traffic protection as its predecessor. On Bruce Butterworth, Safety Administration (NHTSA), February 7, 1992, NHTSA notified GM Department of Transportation. that the differences between the first Director of Civil Aviation Security Policy and Planning. ACTION: Grant of petition for exemption. and second generation systems were de minimis. [FR Doc. 95–11894 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] SUMMARY: This notice grants in full the GM stated that in the ‘‘PASS-Key II’’ BILLING CODE 4910±13±M petition of General Motors Corporation system, the resistance value measured (GM) for an exemption from the parts- in the key pellet is compared to a fixed marking requirements of the vehicle resistance in the vehicle’s decoder Research, Engineering and theft prevention standard for the Development Advisory Committee; module. If the key pellet’s resistance Chevrolet Lumina and Buick Regal car matches that in the decoder module, the Joint Meeting With National lines for model year (confidential). This Aeronautics and Space Administration starter enable relay is energized and a petition is granted because the agency signal is transmitted to the engine NASA Advisory Council, Aeronautics has determined that the antitheft Advisory Committee control module (‘‘ECM’’). Recognition of devices to be placed on these car lines that signal by the ECM permits fuel to Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the as standard equipment are likely to be flow. Should the resistance in the key Federal Advisory Committee Act (Public as effective in reducing and deterring pellet not match that in the decoder Law 92–463; 5 U.S.C. App. 2), notice is motor vehicle theft as compliance with module, the system will shut down for hereby given of a meeting of the FAA the parts-marking requirements. a period of three minutes (plus or minus Research, Engineering and Development DATES: The exemption granted by this 18 seconds), preventing any further Advisory Committee. The meeting will notice is effective beginning with the attempt to make resistance comparisons be held in conjunction with the NASA (confidential) model year. during that time. The length of Advisory Council, Aeronautics FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. shutdown time is controlled by a timer Advisory Committee. The joint meeting Barbara A. Gray, Office of Market within the decoder module and is not a will take place on June 5 and 6, 1995, Incentives, NHTSA, 400 Seventh Street, programmable feature. After the module Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices 25939 timer has completed its three-minute To support its belief, GM provided preventing operation of the vehicle by cycle, any further comparisons with a theft data published by NHTSA on car unauthorized entrants; and ensuring the key pellet of improper resistance will lines equipped with the PASS-Key theft reliability and durability of the device. cause the module to shut down for an deterrent system. The Chevrolet The PASS-Key II system does not additional three-minute period. The car Camaro, Pontiac Firebird, Cadillac have a device for attracting attention to cannot be started by either cutting the Eldorado and Seville car lines had the the efforts of an unauthorized person to wires and reapplying them or directly PASS-Key system as standard enter or move the vehicle by means activating the starter alone, since, in equipment beginning with MY 1989; the other than a key, 49 CFR § 543.6(a)(ii). order for fuel to flow, the ECM must Cadillac DeVille/Fleetwood, Buick The agency continues to believe that also have received a signal from the Riviera and Oldsmobile Toronado car such a feature is desirable for an decoder module. lines all had the PASS-Key system as antitheft system. Such a device may Based on its theft rate comparisons standard equipment beginning with MY deter a thief from trying to steal the between GM vehicles using the PASS- 1990. Theft rates indicate a significant vehicle or from entering the vehicle and Key or PASS-Key II systems and decrease for the Riviera (80 per cent), destroying the dashboard or steering Corvettes using the ‘‘VATS’’ system, GM Toronado (58 per cent) for the MY column. believes that an alarm is unnecessary, 1987–1990 period; and for the DeVille Nevertheless, theft data for 1992 and that the lack of a visible or audible Fleetwood (32 per cent) from MY 1989 shows that theft rates have continued to alarm or other attention-attracting to MY 1990. decline for the 12 car lines equipped device in the ‘‘PASS-Key II’’ system Based on the system performance of with the PASS-Key system that have does not compromise the system’s PASS-Key on other car lines, the received partial exemptions from the performance as a theft deterrent. In reduction of theft rates for GM car lines agency. (The agency granted these addition, a yellow ‘‘security’’ light will using the PASS-Key system, and the vehicle lines partial rather than full be included on the instrument panel for similarities in design and function of exemptions because it concluded that the Chevrolet Lumina and Buick Regal the PASS-Key and PASS-Key II systems, these vehicles still needed parts- lines. The light is designed to illuminate GM believes that the PASS- Key system marking protection for their most in the event that a key with a correct is extremely effective in deterring motor interchangeable parts (the engine and mechanical but incorrect electronic vehicle theft and that the PASS-Key II transmission) because of the PASS-Key code is used to try to start the vehicle. system will be at least as effective as its system’s lack of an audible or visual When this happens, it will be necessary predecessor. Accordingly, GM believes alarm, one of the elements listed in 49 to delay a further attempt to start the that the agency should determine that CFR § 543.6. See e.g., 557 FR 10518 engine with the proper key until the the PASS-Key II system is likely to be (Mar. 26, 1992).) In addition, the agency ‘‘PASS-Key II’’ timer has run its three- as effective as parts marking in reducing has granted GM’s petition for a full minute cycle. The security light will and deterring motor vehicle theft, and exemption for the MY 1995 Buick also come on if the proper key with a that inclusion of that system (which is Riviera and Oldsmobile Aurora car lines dirty or contaminated resistor pellet is completely passive) on the Chevrolet based on the installation of the PASS- used. Under such conditions, the Lumina and Buick Regal car lines Key II system as standard equipment on vehicle will not start. If this happens, should qualify those lines for full those lines. GM states that it will be necessary to exemption from the Part 541 theft As required by 49 U.S.C. 33106(c)(2) clean the key and observe the three- prevention standard. and 49 CFR § 543.6(a)(4), the agency minute delay before trying to start the The agency’s review of the theft data also finds that GM has provided vehicle again. for these vehicle lines shows results adequate reasons for its belief that the The security light illuminates briefly consistent with GM’s analysis. In the antitheft device will reduce and deter during engine starting to indicate that three model years beginning with 1989, theft. This conclusion is based on the the bulb and its circuits are functioning the model year in which the PASS-Key information GM provided about its properly. The light will go out and system was introduced on the Chevrolet device, much of which is confidential. remain out after the engine has started. Camaro and Pontiac Firebird as This information included a If the light does not function as standard equipment, the theft rate for confidential description of reliability prescribed, or illuminates while driving, the Firebird has declined from 8.9873 to and functional tests conducted by GM servicing of the system is required. 5.3202 (a 41 per cent reduction) and the for the antitheft device and its GM stated that, if any unauthorized rate for the Camaro has declined from components, which was granted person enters the vehicle, the entrant 8.6893 to 6.2142 (a 28 per cent confidential treatment by the agency. would be unable to start the vehicle reduction). In addition, over a longer For the foregoing reasons, the agency with anything but the proper key. period, the rate for the Corvette has hereby grants in full GM’s petition for GM stated that it believes that the declined by 26 per cent from MY 1987 exemption of the Chevrolet Lumina and antitheft device on the Chevrolet (the first year that line received an Buick Regal car lines from the Lumina and Buick Regal car lines will exemption) to MY 1992. requirements of 49 CFR Part 541. be at least as effective as parts marking NHTSA believes that there is If GM decides not to use the in reducing and deterring motor vehicle substantial evidence that the antitheft exemption for these car lines, it should theft. GM bases its belief on the past device that will be installed on the formally notify the agency. If such a performance of the PASS-Key II system Chevrolet Lumina and Buick Regal car decision is made, the car lines must be on other models and the similarities of lines will likely be as effective in fully marked according to the the PASS-Key II and PASS-Key systems reducing motor vehicle theft as requirements of 49 CFR 541.5 and 541.6 in design and function. In addition, GM compliance with the theft prevention (marking of major components and reported that the theft rates, as reported standard (49 CFR Part 541). The GM replacement parts. by NHTSA, are lower for the GM models system will provide four of the five The agency notes that the limited and equipped with a PASS-Key system than types of performance listed in Section apparently conflicting data on the those for earlier GM models of similar 543.6(a)(3): promoting activation; effectiveness of the pre-standard parts- appearance and construction that were preventing defeat or circumventing of marking programs continue to make it parts-marked. the device by unauthorized persons; difficult to compare the effectiveness of 25940 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices an antitheft device with the DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY UNITED STATES INFORMATION effectiveness of the theft prevention [Directive 16±21] AGENCY standard. The statute clearly invites such a comparison, which the agency Disposal of Obligations, Including Culturally Significant Objects Imported has made on the basis of the limited Bonds, Notes or Other Securities for Exhibition; Determination data available. With implementation of the requirements of the ‘‘Anti Car Theft May 3, 1995. Notice is hereby given of the Act of 1992,’’ NHTSA anticipates more 1. Delegation. By the authority following determination: Pursuant to probative data upon which comparisons granted to the Fiscal Assistant Secretary the authority vested in me by the Act of may be made. by Treasury Order (TO) 101–05, the October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985, 22 U.S.C. Commissioner, Financial Management NHTSA notes that if GM wishes in the 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March Service, is delegated the authority to 27, 1978 (43 FR 13359, March 29, 1978), future to modify the device on which dispose of obligations, including bonds, this exemption is based, the company and Delegation Order No. 85–5 of June notes or other securities, acquired by the 27, 1985 (50 FR 27393, July 2, 1985), I may have to submit a petition to modify Secretary of the Treasury for the United hereby determine that the objects in the the exemption. Section 543.7(d) states States Government or delivered by an exhibit, ‘‘Culture and Power in France: that a Part 543 exemption applies only executive agency pursuant to 31 U.S.C. to vehicles that belong to a line 324, and to perform any functions Treasures from the Bibliotheque 1 exempted under this part and equipped necessary to effect such disposition. The Nationale’’ (see list ) imported from with the antitheft device upon which Commissioner, Financial Management abroad for the temporary exhibition that lines exemption is based. Further, Service, shall be responsible for without profit within the United States, § 543.9(c)(2) provides for the submission referring to the Fiscal Assistant are of cultural significance. These of petitions ‘‘[t]o modify an exemption Secretary any matters on which action objects are imported pursuant to a loan to permit the use of an antitheft device should be appropriately taken by the agreement with the foreign lender. I also similar to but differing from the one Fiscal Assistant Secretary. determine that the temporary exhibition specified in that exemption.’’ 2. Redelegation. The Commissioner, of the objects at the Library of Congress, The agency wishes to minimize the Financial Management Service, may Jefferson Building, Washington, D.C. redelegate this authority, and it may be administrative burden which from on or about September 5, 1995, to exercised in the individual capacity and § 543.9(c)(2) could place on exempted on or about December 56, 1995, is in the under the individual title of each vehicle manufacturers and itself. The national interest. official receiving such authority. agency did not intend in drafting Part 3. Cancellation. Treasury Directive Public notice of this determination is 543 to require the submission of a 16–21, ‘‘Stock Assigned to the Secretary ordered to be published in the Federal petition for every change to the of the Treasury,’’ dated October 22, Register. components or design of an antitheft 1992, is superseded. Dated: May 10, 1995. device. The significance of many such 4. Authorities. Les Jin, changes could be de minimis. Therefore, a. TO 101–05, ‘‘Reporting NHTSA suggests that if the Relationships and Supervision of General Counsel. manufacturer contemplates making any Officials, Offices and Bureaus, [FR Doc. 95–11914 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] changes the effects of which might be Delegation of Certain Authority, and BILLING CODE 8230±01±M characterized as de minimis, it should Order of Succession in the Department consult the agency before preparing and of the Treasury.’’ submitting a petition to modify. b. 31 U.S.C. 324. 5. Office of Primary Interest. Office of Authority: 49 U.S.C. 33106; delegation of the Assistant Commissioner for authority at 49 CFR 1.50. Financial Information, Financial Issued on: May 10, 1995. Management Service. 1 A copy of this list may be obtained by Ricardo Martinez, Gerald Murphy, contacting Ms. Neila Sheahan of the Office of the Administrator. Fiscal Assistant Secretary. General Counsel of USIA. The telephone number is [FR Doc. 95–11929 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] [FR Doc. 95–11830 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] 202/619–5030, and the address is Room 700, U.S. Information Agency, 301 4th St. S.W., Washington, BILLING CODE 4910±59±P BILLING CODE 4810±25±P D.C. 20547. 25941 Sunshine Act Meetings Federal Register Vol. 60, No. 93 Monday, May 15, 1995 This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER PLACE: The Doniphan Room, Brown PLACE: Neighborhood Reinvestment contains notices of meetings published under Hall, William Jewell College, Liberty, Corporation, 1325 G Street, NW., Suite the ``Government in the Sunshine Act'' (Pub. MO 64068. 800, Board Room, Washington, DC L. 94-409) 5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3). STATUS: The meeting will be open to the 20005. public. STATUS: Open. ASSASSINATION RECORD REVIEW BOARD MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED : CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: TIME AND DATE: 1 p.m., May 18, 1995. 1. Call to order and welcome, Chairman Jeffrey T. Bryson, General Counsel/ PLACE: 600 E Street, NW., Second Floor, Staats. Secretary, 202/376–2441. Washington, DC 20530. 2. Approval of the Minutes of 1994 STATUS: Closed. Trustees Meeting. AGENDA: 3. Introduction of New Trustees and status MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Review of of vacancies. I. Call to Order documents postponed in part or in full 4. Overview on Foundation progress. II. Approval of Minutes: by federal agencies under the standards 5. Report on the 1995 Summer Institute. March 17, 1995, Regular Meeting of the Assassination Records Collection 6. Report of the Executive Secretary. III. Election of Chairman Act of 1992, 44 U.S.C. § 2107 note. 7. New Business. Election of Vice Chairman 8. Adjournment. CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: IV. Committee Appointments: Thomas Samoluk, Press and Public CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: a. Audit Committee Affairs Officer, 600 E Street, NW., Louis H. Blair, Executive Secretary, b. Budget Committee Second Floor, Washington, DC 20530. Telephone: (202) 395–4831. c. Personnel Committee Telephone: (202) 724–0088; Fax: (202) Louis H. Blair, V. Election of Officers 724–0457. Executive Secretary. VI. Board Appointments David G. Marwell. [FR Doc. 95–12022 Filed 5–11–95; 2:21 pm] VII. Treasurer’s Report Executive Director. BILLING CODE 9500±01±M VIII. Executive Director’s Quarterly Management Report [FR Doc. 95–11961 Filed 5–11–95; 9:21 am] IX. Adjourn BILLING CODE 6820±TD±M NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT Jeffrey T. Bryson, CORPORATION General Counsel/Secretary. HARRY S TRUMAN SCHOLARSHIP Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Board [FR Doc. 95–11985 Filed 5–11–95; 10:39 am] FOUNDATION of Directors BILLING CODE 7570±01±M TIME AND DATE: 4:00–5:30 p.m., TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m., Thursday, Saturday, June 3, 1995. May 25, 1995. federal register May 15,1995 Monday Examinations byComplexity;Notice Laboratory TestSystems,Assays,and Specific ListforCategorizationof Public HealthService Services Health andHuman Department of Part II 25943 25944 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND Due to staffing and resource withdrawn by procedures such as HUMAN SERVICES limitations, we cannot accept facsimile phlebotomy, or, in the case of blood, (FAX) copies of comments. Nor can we diverted from the circulatory path. The Public Health Service accept comments by telephone. circulatory path is defined as either the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: body’s normal circulatory blood flow or Specific List for Categorization of Rosemary C. Bakes-Martin, (404) 488– a path established by a life-sustaining Laboratory Test Systems, Assays, and 7655. apparatus such as the ‘‘heart-lung’’ Examinations by Complexity machine. To be considered as a normal SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: All circulatory path, the ‘‘heart-lung’’ AGENCY: Public Health Service, HHS. requests for recategorization received machine blood flow must be for the during the 30 day comment period ACTION: Notice with comment period. purpose of sustaining life and not for provided in the July 26, 1993 Federal the purpose of performing testing. The Register notice (59 FR 39860) resulted SUMMARY: Regulations codified at 42 examination of materials removed or in extensive review of available product CFR 493.17, implementing the Clinical diverted from either of these circulatory information and the original complexity Laboratory Improvement Amendments paths (normal or life sustaining) meets scoring for the individual test system, of 1988 (CLIA), Public Law 100–578, the definition of ‘‘in-vitro’’ testing and assay, or examination under require that the Secretary provide for is subject to the CLIA regulations. An consideration. If the requestor submitted the categorization of specific laboratory example of this type of procedure is new information, the test system was test systems, assays, and examinations ‘‘ex-vivo’’ blood gas testing performed by level of complexity. The criteria for rescored taking into account the new on a specimen diverted or removed by such categorizations also are set forth in information. Any changes in means of an indwelling radial catheter. those regulations. categorization or reasons for not making (This indwelling catheter has not been A compiled list of approximately changes are addressed in this Notice established for the purpose of sustaining 12,000 specific clinical laboratory test under the section Comments and life and is outside the circulatory flow.) systems, assays, and examinations Responses. All tests that meet the definition of ‘‘in- categorized by level of complexity was Comments in response to the July 26, vitro’’ testing are subject to CLIA published in the Federal Register on 1993 Notice, that requested additional regulations. ‘‘In-vivo’’ testing, i.e. testing July 26, 1993 (58 FR 39860). This notice laboratory tests be waived of specific that is not removed or diverted from a contains responses to the comments CLIA requirements, were deferred in normal or life sustaining circulatory submitted on those aspects of the July light of the moratorium declared on path, is not subject to CLIA regulation 26, 1993 publication that were subject to classifying testing devices as waived at the present time. An example of this comment. This Notice also announces tests on February 18, 1993. The CDC type of testing is pulse oximetry. Please approximately 2900 additional test lifted the moratorium on waiver on note, however, that we are presently systems, assays, and examinations that December 19, 1994, and has now investigating the definitional and have been categorized since the resumed reviewing requests for waiver technical issues, and necessary publication of the compiled test list. status. On the date that the moratorium revisions to the regulations that would Included in this list of additional was lifted, a letter was sent to make ‘‘in-vivo’’ testing subject to CLIA. categorizations are those test systems manufacturers of laboratory testing Should it be determined at a later date which received 510(k) or premarket devices, that included guidelines that that it is subject to CLIA, proper notice approval from the Food and Drug manufacturers may use to submit their and opportunity for public comment Administration (FDA) during the period requests for waiver. Requests for waiver will be provided before this testing is from September 1, 1992 to March 15, will be evaluated in the order in which subject to CLIA regulation. 1995. Also included are additional test they are received. The context in which the test results systems that were cleared prior to that The public has requested that test are being evaluated, i.e. monitoring period and noted by commenters as categorization information be made versus measurement, is not a missing from the compiled test list. available electronically. CDC is consideration for test complexity. providing computer access to this Comment: A few manufacturers DATES: Effective date: The information via the Internet. For further commented that some of their test categorizations on this list were information regarding this capability, systems should not be categorized for effective on the date of the test please call (404) 488–7655. certain analytes because the company categorization notification letter sent to did not supply the reagents for Comments and Responses the manufacturer. Written comments on performing these tests on the the tests initially categorized in this Comment: A manufacturer requested instruments listed. Notice will be considered if they are clarification of what determines Response: Although the company received at the address indicated below, whether a testing device is subject to which manufactures a test system may by no later than 5 p.m. on June 14, 1995. CLIA regulations. The commenter had not have developed an assay procedure CDC reserves the right to reevaluate and concerns about measuring versus for a particular analyte, it is quite recategorize tests based on the monitoring devices and ‘‘in-vitro’’ possible that another company could comments received in response to this versus ‘‘in-vivo’’ testing. design an assay procedure that has been Notice. Response: All clinical laboratory tests cleared by the FDA for use on the test ADDRESSES: Comments on the performed on materials derived from the system. In such a situation, the analyte categorization of tests initially human body for the purpose of will be listed as being available on the categorized in this Notice should be providing information for the diagnosis, test system. If the assay developed by addressed to Public Health Service, prevention, or treatment of any disease, the reagent manufacturer does not Attention: CLIA Federal Register Notice, or the assessment of the health of, perform as it should on the test system, Centers for Disease Control and human beings are subject to CLIA it is the responsibility of the laboratory Prevention, Mail Stop F–11, 4770 regulations. The term ‘‘derived from the performing the testing or the Buford Highway, NE., Atlanta, Georgia human body’’ refers to any specimen manufacturer of the test system to 30341–3724. that is expelled from the human body, inform the FDA. Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices 25945 Comment: Abbott Laboratories Response: In response to the enumerate the cellular elements under commented that the compiled list continuing concerns regarding the evaluation, generally scored as moderate published on July 26, 1993 in the categorization of HDL cholesterol, CDC complexity. Federal Register did not specifically once again reassessed the assigned Comment: One manufacturer state whether the analytes Toxoplasma scores for HDL as performed by requested recategorization of some gondii Antibodies, Cytomegalovirus automated methods. The original CLIAC alpha-fetoprotein procedures from high Antibodies, and Rubella Antibodies on discussion had focused on the question complexity to moderate complexity. the Abbott IMX were for determining of the training and experience, and Response: Material serum alpha- IgG, IgM, or total antibodies. interpretation and judgment necessary fetoprotein (AFP) procedures require Response: The analyte nomenclature for the analyst to make appropriate extensive training, interpretation and for antibodies to cytomegalovirus, decisions (e.g., evaluation of the judgment. The analyst must use patient toxoplasmosis, and rubella does not supernatant’s turbidity in the information related to the weeks of specify that the antibodies are total, IgG, pretreatment precipitation step) during gestation in conjunction with the or IgM antibodies. In those instances the testing process. It was on this issue procedure value to obtain a reportable where a kit is used to identify the that CDC determined that analyst result. Amniotic fluid specimens for antibodies, the test system name will interaction was of a lesser degree for AFP may require preanalytic testing to frequently specify that the antibodies some automated methods than for determine the presence of interfering being detected are either total others. Therefore, following the CLIAC substances which can lead to result antibodies, or IgG or IgM specific recommendation for reevaluation of misinterpretation or they may need antibodies. When the test system name these score assignments, some HDL manipulation of the sample to produce does not include the specific antibody, procedures were recategorized from a clear supernatant. Extensive as is the case with the automated high to moderate complexity. In interpretive and judgment skills are also analyzers, then the generic response to the comments on the July necessary to resolve technical problems, nomenclature for the antibody can refer 26, 1993 test list that announced this such as improper specimen collection, to total or specific antibodies. We do not group of recategorizations, we have or determine the need for repeat testing. see this nomenclature as a problem reevaluated all HDL procedures for All of these considerations are in because the test complexity for the consistency in applying the criteria addition to those related to the procedure will be the same regardless of ‘‘Reagents and Materials Preparation’’. methodology of the testing procedure. whether the antibodies being detected Under this criteria, a score of ‘‘1’’ is At the present time, all procedures for are total are specific antibodies. assigned when the manufacturer maternal serum AFP and amniotic fluid Comment: One organization, after provides that analyst with an automated AFP score in the high complexity learning of the recommendation by the method of adding quantitative amounts category. Clinical Laboratory Improvement of precipitating reagent to the sample so Comment: On professional Advisory Committee (CLIAC) and that analyst intervention is minimal, or organization voiced support for the high subsequent move of some HDL when the manufacturer provides the complexity scores given to any test that procedures from high to moderate analyst with a dedicated tube containing involves the interpretation of cultures complexity, requested recategorization a single precipitating reagent. As a and requires multiple steps for the of HDL procedures back to high result of reevaluating the application of achievement of accurate results. This complexity. The organization felt that this criteria, the following HDL organization suggested that other tests all HDL procedures should receive a procedures have been recategorized now categorized as moderate complexity score of ‘‘3’’ for the criteria from high complexity to moderate complexity should be categorized as ‘‘Training and Experience’’ and complexity: Abbott TDX, Abbott TDX high complexity for the same reasons. ‘‘Calibration, Quality Control or FLX, Abbott Vision Non Whole Blood The example given was the direct Proficiency Testing Materials.’’ Another HDL Procedure, and the BioAutoMed Coombs test, which the organization manufacturer requested that numerous ASCA. indicated would yield a false negative HDL procedures be recategorized from Comment: One commenter result if the patient read blood cells high complexity to moderate recommended the recategorization of were washed insufficiently. complexity. Other commenters ‘‘large’’ hematology analyzers and Response: We appreciate the indicated that based upon the process microscopy procedures from moderate organization’s statement of support for recategorization of 16 HDL to high complexity. concerning the categorization scores of procedures from high to moderate Response: Using the seven criteria microbiology culture methods. In regard complexity announced in the July 26, established for categorization, to the direct antiglobulin test (DAT), or 1993 Notice, there were some automated hematology analyzers, in direct Coombs, we feel that this assay is inconsistencies in the application of this general, scored as moderate complexity. appropriately categorized as moderate process to other HDL procedures. The Although the large automated complexity since the procedural skills commenters felt that the reagent instruments used in hematology apply are easily acquired, the reagents are preparation requirements for some of multiple principles in their operation, stable and ready to use, and limited the HDL procedures that remained high the instruments do not require extensive knowledge and judgment is required. complexity were not sufficiently analyst intervention or highly The CLIA regulations to do relieve the complicated to warrant a higher score specialized knowledge for operation. laboratory of its responsibility to than those HDL procedures that were Microscopy procedures were also evaluate the competency of its staff or recategorized to moderate complexity. categorized by complexity using the provide sufficient training on The commenters requested that the criteria established for test supervision for the correction of any scores of these HDL procedures be categorization. Those procedures which technical deficiencies. Training on lowered from ‘‘2’’ to ‘‘1’’ in the criterion do not require an extensive level of proper wash techniques to prevent false ‘‘Reagents and Materials Preparation’’ knowledge or training to perform the negative DAT results should be an and that these procedures be evaluation, or do not require an integral part of the training of all recategorized from high complexity to extensive level of judgment or analysts performing these procedures. moderate complexity. interpretive skill to recognize or We do not feel that the degree of 25946 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices decision making, interpretation, and of the test system when the primary high complexity due to the advanced judgment required to perform a DAT media is observed to determine whether level of interpretation, judgment, approaches the level required to isolate growth is present after an incubation knowledge, and experience required to and identify organisms from culture. period. We have previously stated that obtain an accurate result. Comment: Several commenters if a culture is read even to the point of Response: The test systems for expressed confusion concerning the providing a result of ‘‘No growth’’ it is dermatophytes that have been categorization of rapid strep test kits. considered to be an identification from categorized as moderate complexity are Some referred to them as high culture, and, therefore, the laboratory tests performed on selective media that complexity procedures. reporting the result must be certified to detect the presence or absence of Response: Most of the tests that detect perform the entire culture procedure. In dermatophytes, but do not identify these streptococcal antigen directly from a response to the confusion as to whether fungi. These test systems require throat swab are categorized as moderate the determination that there is either significantly less knowledge, complexity tests. They require some growth or no growth on primary culture experience, interpretation, and knowledge, training and judgment to plates, including the final reporting of a judgment than high complexity cultures accurately perform the procedure. They ‘‘No growth’’ culture result, falls into for isolation and complete identification are not categorized as high complexity the moderate or high complexity of fungi, in which organisms must be tests because they do not require the category, we have created a new test transferred and identification level of knowledge, training, experience system designation, (22167) ‘‘Growth/ procedures performed. Based on the and interpretative skill that is required No Growth of Bacteria on Solid Culture information we have received to date, of a high complexity procedure such as Media’’, which is categorized as we believe that the test systems for isolation and identification of an moderate complexity. This test system dermatophytes using selective media are organism from culture. designation applies to a result appropriately categorized as moderate Comment: Several commenters determined after examining a culture complexity. requested that throat and urine cultures, from any body site, that was initially Comment: Several commenters and urine susceptibility testing be inoculated on solid culture agar or requested that the following analytes recategorized from high to moderate media. It does not apply to cultures and test systems be recategorized from complexity. A few other commenters inoculated into a broth medium such as moderate to high complexity: agreed with high complexity heart infusion broth, thioglycollate categorization of microbiology cultures N. gonorrhoeae (from urogenital or medium, or to conventional broth blood rectal only) due to the advanced level of cultures. Final reports for this moderate interpretation, judgment, knowledge, Test system—All presumpt. ID using complexity test system are limited to select, media, oxidase, and gram and experience required to obtain an ‘‘Growth’’, ‘‘Growth—referred for accurate result when performing these stain identification or interpretation’’, or ‘‘No Streptococcus, group A (from throat procedures. growth’’. A result of ‘‘No growth’’ means Response: Isolation, identification, only) that there are NO bacterial colonies on Test system—All presumpt. ID w/ and susceptibility testing of the media after incubation. The microorganisms from culture is a selective media, hemolysis, and presence of ‘‘normal flora’’, bacitracin complex process regardless of the contaminants, or any organism not source of the culture. It requires considered a pathogen could not be Response: These two tests for significant knowledge, training, and interpreted or reported as ‘‘No growth’’. presumptive identification of a single interpretation for the selection and Individual biochemical tests that are microorganism on selective media from performance of the individual test performed as part of the total culture of a specific body site were components in this process, which may identification process (e.g. oxidase, placed in the moderate complexity include staining for microscopic catalase) are not categorized as separate category because the knowledge, evaluation, subculturing, and tests. Those test systems or kits that training, interpretation and judgment performing the appropriate biochemical usually contain a group of biochemical required is significantly less than that analyses. Taking these factors into or serological tests, and result in the needed to distinguish multiple consideration when scoring for definitive identification of a organisms and determine the presence complexity, these test systems are microorganism are categorized. Several of pathogens, normal flora, or appropriately categorized as high selective culture media that do not contamination in a culture initially complexity. require transfer from the initial plate, inoculated on general nonselective Comment: One commenter asked and result in preliminary identification culture media. For these reasons, we whether the use of general microbiology of a specific microorganism, have been disagree with these commenters, and culture media, such as sheep blood agar, categorized as moderate complexity these tests will remain categorized as was categorized. There has also been tests. The degree of training and moderately complex. some confusion as to whether experience, judgment and interpretive Comment: One commenter requested inoculation of primary culture media or skills required to recognize one specific that Gram stain procedures performed the determination of a ‘‘No growth’’ colony type or reaction on these on endocervical specimens be final culture result is considered a high selective media is significantly less than recatogorized from moderate to high complexity test. what is required for selecting specific complexity. Response: Primary inoculation of colonies from the growth on primary Response: Gram stains from urethral microbiology culture media (e.g. blood culture plates, and performing definitive and endocervical smears are categorized agar, chocolate agar, MacConkey agar, identification tests on pure cultures of as moderate complexity procedures, heart infusion broth) is not considered these organisms. while Gram stains from other sources a complete test system under the CLIA Comment: One commenter requested are categorized as high complexity regulations. The process of isolation and that all of the test systems for procedures as determined by the scoring identification from the primary culture dermatophytes that have been criteria established for test is considered a total test system. The categorized and published as moderate categorization. Smears from urethral inoculation of the media becomes part complexity should be recategorized as and endocervical sources do not tend to Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices 25947 contain the variety of microorganisms or result reading and data reduction. glucose monitoring devices cleared by cell types that can be seen on smears Regardless of the reading system used, the FDA specifically for home use’’ as taken from other sources. Therefore, the the analyst must prepare multiple waived tests. The Ames Glucometers are knowledge, training and experience, reagents prior to testing, some of which glucose monitoring devices that were interpretation and judgment required to require special handling; the process recently cleared by the FDA for home interpret a Gram stained smear from requires manual addition of specimen to use; therefore, they are now listed as urethral or endocervical sources is not the chamber using a syringe, followed waived tests. as extensive as that required to interpret by timed incubation, multiple wash Please note that in this list of gram stain smears from other sources. steps, addition of reagents, a second additions to the CLIA test categorization Although we agree that there is a timed incubation and more wash steps. list, we have included the test systems difference in the interpretation and It is only after these second wash steps (58311) Separation Technology STI judgment required for Gram stained are completed that the CLA–1 HemataStat II and (58309) Separation smears from urethral versus Chemiluminescent Analyzer automates Technology STI HemataStat Model C70 endocervical sources, we do not believe the photodevelopment, result reading under the analyte (9581) Spun that difference is sufficient to place the and data reduction, while the Microhematocrit as waived procedures. Gram stain evaluations performed on Densitometer system requires manual On previous lists of waived procedures, endocervical smears into high photodevelopment, followed by result we did not list individual test systems complexity. This issue was presented to, reading and data reduction on the capable of obtaining results for spun and discussed by, CLIAC. The CLIAC instrument. hematocrit, but rather listed the all- felt that CDC’s assessment of the level We have reviewed the MAST CLA inclusive test system designation of difficulty for performing the Allergy System taking into account both (04420) ‘‘All Spun Microhematocrit evaluations was appropriate, thus the methods of final result determination Procedures’’. The two Separation Gram stain of endocervical smears will and have concluded that due to the Technology test systems have been remain in the moderate complexity knowledge, training and skills necessary listed in response to requests from the category. to perform the IgE assays properly, this public to clarify that these test systems Comment: One commenter requested test system belongs in the high are indeed spun microhematocrit that the MAST CLA–1 Luminometer complexity category. However, for procedures. The all-inclusive test System be recategorized from high to purposes of clarification, we have listed system designation (04420) will moderate complexity. The commenter the system in this Notice in such way continue to be included on the waived noted that this is a different request that the method of result determination list to indicate that, at the present time, from earlier correspondence requesting is clearly specified, and it is now listed all spun microhematocrit test systems that the MAST Allergy Densitometer twice, as follows: (40176) MAST CLA are waived procedures. We do System be recategorized from high to Allergy System (densitometer) and encourage the public to contact us if moderate complexity. (40177) MAST CLA–1 there are questions about whether other Response: We would like to Chemiluminescent Allergy System. Both specific test systems meet this emphasize that we assess the are categorized as high complexity. definition. In the future, we will include complexity of every analyte on each Comment: One commenter requested all test systems by manufacturer’s name individual instrument and do not that the Scandipharm CF INDICATOR on the waived list. categorize instruments by complexity SWEAT TEST SYSTEM (CFIS) be given without analytes. Additionally, the the same status as the physician- Additions entire testing process of preanalytic, performed microscopy procedures so In this publication, we are analytic, and postanalytic steps, that access to cystic fibrosis screening announcing the categorization of two including the process for determination would not be restricted. laboratory procedures that are normally of results, are evaluated for Response: The Scandipharm CF performed in dental offices. The dental categorization. Thus the instrument INDICATOR SWEAT TEST SYSTEM procedures for (4965) Proteolytic used to read the final results is not (CFIS) does not meet the criteria for enzymes are listed in the speciality of graded independently of the total testing physician-performed microscopy General Chemistry, and for (1317) process. The analytes for which the procedures (PPM). The PPM Dental plaque, in bacteriology. MAST CLA Allergy System has been examinations include only specific categorized as a high complexity test microscopic procedures performed on Corrections system are ‘‘allergen specific IgE’’ and specimens that are derived from The following corrections to the list of ‘‘immunoglobulins IgE’’. patients as part of the physical test systems, assays and examinations As in our earlier response regarding examination. We have received published previously in the Federal the MAST CLA Allergy System, we numerous comments suggesting that Register are based on supplemental maintain that high complexity is the another level of complexity be information provided by the appropriate complexity rating for the established that is intermediate between commenters during the comment period MAST CLA Allergy System. While it is waived and moderate complexity. HHS or as a result of corrections of data entry true that there are two different means is taking these suggestions under errors. The CDC should be notified of to measure test results for this advisement. any changes in manufacture or test procedure, i.e., by densitometer or by system names so that these changes can Additions to Waived Category using the MAST Chemiluminescent be included in the next published test Analyzer (CLA–1), these measuring The Ames Glucometer ENCORE QA list. devices do not significantly change the Blood Glucose Meter (04423) and the complexity of the entire testing process. Ames Glucometer QA Blood Glucose Scandipharm CF Indicator (58240): Substantial training and experience are Meter (04422) have been deleted from The Scandipharm CF Indicator required to perform the complete the list of moderate complexity tests and (58240) (Cystic Fibrosis Sweat Test) has procedure. The steps in the procedure have been added to the list of waived been deleted from the high complexity are manually executed and are tests. Section § 493.15(c) of the CLIA category and placed in the moderate performed in the same way except for regulations lists ‘‘blood glucose by complexity category based upon new 25948 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices information supplied by the Analytes, Nonautomated. These entries analytes: (0410) Adenovirus, (2828) manufacturer regarding the sample have been corrected to read Bio-Scan Influenza A, (2829) Influenza B, (4959) collection. Previous information had Bio-Gen in this notice. Parainfluenza 1, (4960) Parainfluenza 2, indicated that the amount of analyst (4961) Parainfluenza 3, and (5503) Access Medical Systems ImmunoClone involvement in the collection of the Respiratory syncytial virus. HCG Test (04377): sample was more extensive than that (0456) Antithrombin III (ATIII): indicated in the new information. Upon An entry under HCG, Serum, evaluation of this information supplied Qualitative, was incorrectly listed as Instrumentation Laboratory IL ACL by the manufacturer, it was determined Access Medical Systems ImmunoClone 100 (28073) has been deleted from the that the training and experience and (direct Ag/visual) (04311) and has been analyte (0456) Antithrombin III (ATIII) interpretation and judgment required by revised to read Access Medical Systems because this analyte is not available on the analyst to successfully perform the ImmunoClone HCG Test (04377). this system. sample collection is not as extensive as bioMerieux Vitek Vidas (07434): (0703) Beta-2 microglobulin: originally indicated. As a result of the adjustment of scores for relevant The test system bioMerieux Vitek Du Pont Medical Products aca II criteria, the Scandipharm CF Indicator Vidas (07434) for the analyte (6111) (13172) has been deleted from the now registers a total score that places it Thyroxine, Free (FT4) has been revised analyte beta-2 microglobulin because in the moderate complexity category. to Vitek Systems Vidas (67038) for this analyte is not available on this consistency in the listing of test system. International Technidyne Corporation: systems, assays, and examinations. (4908) Platelet Count: As noted in the preamble to the Incorrect Test System Codes compiled test list, the analyte heparin The test systems Abbott Cell-Dyn 400 was removed from the International Incorrect test system codes were (04230), Abbott Cell-Dyn 500 (04231), Technidyne Corporation systems inadvertently assigned to several and Abbott Cell-Dyn 700 (04233) have because the relevant analytes were systems on the previous test list and been deleted from the analyte platelet either (2539) heparin dose response have been corrected as follows: count because these instruments do not (HDR) or (2538) heparin/protamine Gen-Probe Legionella Rapid Diag. analyze this analyte. Systems (including culture) was titration (HPT). These systems were Analyte Nomenclature and Use inadvertently omitted in the compiled incorrectly assigned the test system test list for the analytes HDR or HPT. code (22126). The correct code is We will use the term ‘‘direct This error has been corrected in the (22160). bilirubin’’ to refer to the analyte Gen-Probe M. Pneumoniae Rapid database and the systems are listed in ‘‘conjugated bilirubin’’. Diag. Systems (including culture) was this Notice under the appropriate Due to the different nomenclature incorrectly assigned the test system analytes. systems associated with many flow code (22127). The correct code is cytometer analytes, we will list each (2502) HCG, Serum, Quantitative: (22161). analyte by the terminology furnished by The analyte, HCG, Serum, Gull Laboratories RSV-Mab Test the manufacturer. Quantitative, has been clarified as (direct antigen) was incorrectly assigned Thyroid Peroxidase Autoantibodies (2502) HCG, Beta, Serum, Quantitative. the test system code (22128). The (TPO) and Anti-Thyroid Microsomal correct code is (22162). Antibodies (AMA) refer to the same (4945) Protamine Rate Titration (PRT) Seradyn Colorvue—Giardia (direct analyte. To avoid confusion, we will list The analyte (4945) Protamine Rate Ag/visual) was incorrectly assigned the the analyte nomenclature used by the Titration for the International test system code (58100). The correct manufacturer in the package insert for Technidyne Hemochron test systems code is (58296). the test system being categorized. has been corrected to (4945) Protamine Seradyn Colorvue—Cryptosporidium For purposes of clarification, the Response Test (PRT). (direct Ag/visual) was incorrectly analyte (1033) for Cortisol, Urine has assigned the test system code (58101). been modified to read Cortisol, Urine MicroProbe Affirm VP Identification Kit The correct code is (58297). (direct procedure), and a new analyte (40135) for the detection and Deletions (1095) Cortisol, Urine (extraction identification of (2212) Gardnerella procedure) has been established. vaginalis: (4023) Myoglobin: Speciality/Subspeciality Changes Identification of G. vaginalis using the The analyte myoglobin was listed in MicroProbe Affirm VP Identification Kit both the General Chemistry and In previous publications of the Test is categorized as a moderate complexity Immunology speciality areas. It has been Categorization List, analyte/test systems test, and is correctly listed as such on deleted from the Immunology speciality were assigned to speciality/ page 39879 of the July 26, 1993 Federal area. subspeciality categories based upon the Register notice, in the List of Previously most recognized area in the clinical Unpublished Categorizations. The (0444) Anti-Reticulin Antibodies: laboratory where these procedures are erroneous listing of this analyte and test Anti-Reticulin Antibodies on the generally performed. In an effort to system as high complexity in the Scimedx Auto Screen Test System coordinate regulatory responsibilities compiled test list of categorizations has (58016) has been deleted because it has between the Health Care Financing been corrected in this Federal Register not been cleared by FDA for use in the Administration (HCFA) and the CDC, Notice. clinical laboratory. we have redefined the speciality/ subspeciality categories for some Bio-Scan Bio-Gen: (5503) Respiratory viruses (Influenza analytes to conform to HCFA’s common The manufacturer’s name was A&B, parainfluenza): procedure coding system for Medicare inadvertently omitted from several The analyte Respiratory viruses payment. Consequently, in this entries for Bio-Gen test systems, listed (Influenza A&B, parainfluenza) has been publication, you will note that the under (9641) Urine Dipstick or Tablet deleted and replaced with the following analytes (0476) Acetylcholine/choline, Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices 25949 (0426) Aminoglycosides, (0705) Blood (2533) Human Placental Lactogen (hPL) Difco EZ Streak Urine Culture Device Lead, (1012) Carboxyhemoglobin, (2541) (2812) Insulin (colony court only) (13311) Histamine, and (3712) Lithium have (2818) Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 Savyon Diagnostic DIASLIDE (colony been moved to Toxicology; the analytes (IGF–1) count only) (58290) (0424) Alpha Fetoprotein—tumor (3713) Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Traditional Blood Agar Streak Plate (colony count only) (61131) marker, (1051) C1-Esterase Inhibitor (4025) Metanephrines, Urine Vitek Systems Bac-T-Screen 2000 (C1INH), and (4927) Platelet Antibody— (4934) Parathyroid Hormone—C- (bacteriuria) (67039) detection have been moved to General Terminal Vitek Systems Bac-T-Screen 402A Immunology; the analytes (1049) Cancer (4924) Parathyroid Hormone—Intact (bacteriuria) (67049) Antigen 125 (CA125), (1013) (4925) Parathyroid Hormone—Mid- Vitek Systems Bac-T-Screen 500 Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA), molecule (PTH–M) (bacteriuria) (67050) (1015) Ceruloplasmin, (2511) (4914) Progesterone ANALYTE: Chlamydia (1016) Haptoglobin, (3717) Lysozyme, (4911) (4915) Prolactin TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Prealbumin, (4919) Prostatic Specific (5515) Renin EXAMINATION: Antigen (PSA), (4920) Protein Fractions, (5820) Serotonin Abbott TestPack Chlamydia (direct (6114) Transferrin, and (6129) Trypsin (5819) Sex Hormone Binding Globulin antigen/visual) (04518) have been moved to General Chemistry; (6102) Testosterone Wampole Clearview Chlamydia (direct antigen/visual) (70140) the analyte (4021) Malarial Parasite has (6122) Testosterone, Free been moved to Parasitology. Also, a (6110) Thyroid Binding Globulin (TBG) ANALYTE: Clostridium difficile (1022) (6106) Thyroid Stimulating Hormone TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR number of analytes that were previously EXAMINATION: listed under the speciality of General (TSH) Meridian Diagnostics ImmunoCard C. Chemistry or the subspeciality of (6107) Thyroid Stimulating Hormone difficile (dir.Ag/visual) (40165) (TSH) (Neonatal) Toxicology are now listed under the ANALYTE: Gardnerella vaginalis (2212) subspeciality of Endocrinology. These (6108) Thyroid Stimulating Hormone— TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR analytes, with their respective codes, high sens. (TSH–HS) EXAMINATION: are: (6109) Thyroxine (T4) MicroProbe Affirm VP Microbial (0106) 17 Ketosteroid (6123) Thyroxine (T4), Neonatal Identification Test Kit (40135) (0102) 17 OH Progesterone (6110) Thyroxine Binding Globulin MicroProbe Affirm VPIII Microbial (0103) 17 OH Progesterone, Neonatal (TBG) Identification Test (40163) (0101) 5-Hydroxyindolacetic Acid (5- (6111) Thyroxine, Free (FT4) ANALYTE: Helicobacter pylori (2512) HIAA) (6119) Triiodothyronine (T3) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (6120) Triiodothyronine Uptake (T3U) EXAMINATION: (0472) Adenosine Monophosphate, Serim PyloriTek Test Kit (58338) Cyclic (cAMP) (TU) ANALYTE: Streptococcus, group A (5810) (0458) Adrenocorticotropic Hormone (6121) Triiodothyronine, Free (FT3) (6710) Vanillylmandelic Acid (VMA) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (ACTH) EXAMINATION: (0459) Aldosterone Dated: May 2, 1995. Becton Dickinson Precise STREP A (direct (0466) Androstanediol Glucuronide (3 Philip R. Lee, antigen/visual) (07426) alpha-diol G) Assistant Secretary for Health. Syntron QuikPac Strep A (EIA) Test (direct (0460) Androstenedione antigen/visual) (58291) (0479) Angiotensin I List of Previously Unpublished Wampole Clearview Strep A (direct (1040) Calcitonin Categorizations antigen/visual) (70141) (1056) Catecholamines, Plasma The test categorization scoring ANALYTE: Streptococcus, group A (from (1055) Catecholamines, Urine scheme was based on an assessment of throat only) (5828) (1032) Cortisol TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR the complexity of the operation of the EXAMINATION: (1033) Cortisol, Urine (direct procedure) test procedure and not on an evaluation Medix Biotech BESTest Strep A (40193) (1095) Cortisol, Urine (extraction of data documenting the procedure’s Quidel QuickVue One-Step Strep A Test procedure) performance over time. Therefore, the (52024) (1043) Cyclic AMP categorization of a test system, assay or ANALYTE: Streptococcus, group B (5811) (1309) Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) examination as moderate or high TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (1310) Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulfate complexity should not be interpreted as EXAMINATION: (DHEA–SO4 an indication of the acceptability or BioStar Strep B OIA (direct antigen/visual) (1611) Erythropoietin unacceptability of the accuracy, (07540) (1605) Estradiol precision or overall performance of the ANALYTE: Vibrio cholerae (6716) (1606) Estriol-Total procedure. TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR EXAMINATION: (1607) Estriol-unconjugated COMPLEXITY: MODERATE (1908) Follicle Stimulating Hormone New Horizons CholeraScreen (43084) (FSH) SPECIALITY/SUBSPECIALITY: Bacteriology SPECIALITY/SUBSPECIALITY: (2205) Gastrin ANALYTE: Aerobic &/or Anaerobic Endocrinology (2206) Glucagon Organisms-unlimited sources (0412) ANALYTE: Cortisol (1032) (2502) HCG, Beta, Serum, Quantitative TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (2501) HCG, Serum, Qualitative EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: Difco ESP Blood Culturing System (13275) Boehringer Mannheim ES 300 AL (07524) (2555) HCG, Total, Serum, Quantitative Growth/No Growth of Bacteria on Solid (2503) HCG, Urine, Qualitative (non- Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) Culture Media (22167) Ciba Corning ACS 180 (10046) waived procedures) Organon Teknika Bact/Alert 120 (46148) Cirrus Diagnostics Immulite (10159) (2534) HCG, Urine, Quantitative ANALYTE: Aerobic Organisms from urine Sanofi Pasteur Access Immunoassay (2543) HCG, Whole Blood, Qualitative specimens only (0468) System (58257) (2545) Homovanillic Acid (HVA) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Schiapparelli Biosystems ACE Clinical (2547) Human Growth Hormone EXAMINATION: Chemistry System (58288) 25950 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices Vitek Systems Vidas (67038) PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS Magnum Boehringer Mannheim ES 300 AL (07524) ANALYTE: Cortisol, Urine (direct procedure) (49097) Du Pont ACA III with aca plus (1033) PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS PLUS Immunoassay System (13253) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (49098) Du Pont ACA IV with aca plus EXAMINATION: Sanofi Pasteur Access Immunoassay Immunoassay System (13254) Abbott TDX (04071) System (58257) Du Pont ACA Star with aca plus Sanofi Pasteur Access Immunoassay Syva Vista Immunoassay System (58221) Immunoassay System (13358) System (58257) Vitek Systems Vidas (67038) Du Pont ACA V with aca plus Wallac Oy AutoDELFIA (70167) Immunoassay System (13255) ANALYTE: Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) Organon Teknika AuraFlex (46152) (1309) ANALYTE: HCG, Serum, Qualitative (2501) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS Magnum TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (49097) EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: Abbott TestPack PLUS hCG COMBO PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS PLUS Serono Baker SR 1 (58090) (04375) (49098) ANALYTE: Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulfate Access Medical Systems ImmunoCLONE Roche Cobas Core (55119) (DHEA–SO4) (1310) hCG Test (04377) Sanofi Pasteur Access Immunoassay TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Applied Biotech SureStep Combo hCG System (58257) EXAMINATION: (04528) Syva Vista Immunoassay System (58221) Cirrus Diagnostics Immulite (10159) Disease Detection International Pro-Step Vitek Systems Vidas (67038) ANALYTE: Estradiol (1605) PT hCG (13271) Wallac Oy AutoDELFIA (70167) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Disease Detection International Pro-Step ANALYTE: Parathyroid Hormone—Intact EXAMINATION: hCG (13270) (4924) Baxter Stratus II (07051) King’s Bay Prelude hCG Combo Kit (34062) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Baxter Stratus IIntellect (07376) Mainline Technology MAINLINE Confirms EXAMINATION: Boehringer Mannheim ES 300 AL (07524) hCG (40190) Cirrus Diagnostics Immulite (10159) Ciba Corning ACS 180 (10046) Princeton BioMeditech BioSign hCG One ANALYTE: Progesterone (4914) Cirrus Diagnostics Immulite (10159) Step Pregnancy Test (49080) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS (49001) Quidel QuickVue One-Step hCG Combo EXAMINATION: PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS Magnum Test (52022) Baxter Stratus II (07051) (49097) SA Scientific SAS Serum/Urine hCG Baxter Stratus IIntellect (07376) PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS PLUS (58283) Boehringer Mannheim ES 300 AL (07524) (49098) Stanbio QuPid Plus hCG Pregnancy Test Ciba Corning ACS 180 (10046) TOSOH A1A–1200 (61040) (58326) Cirrus Diagnostics Immulite (10159) TOSOH A1A–600 (61039) Syntron Bioresearch QuikPac II hCG TOSOH A1A–1200 (61040) Vitek Systems Vidas (67038) Combo Kit (58353) TOSOH A1A–600 (61039) Wallac Oy AutoDELFIA (70167) TECH–CO Visual HCG Pregnancy Test Wallac Oy AutoDELFIA (70167) (61099) ANALYTE: Estriol-unconjugated (1607) ANALYTE: Prolactin (4915) True Medix Beta Spec hCG (61139) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Unipath Clearview HCG DUO (64031) EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: Wallac Oy AutoDELFIA (70167) ANALYTE: HCG, Total, Serum, Quantitative Abbott AxSYM (04532) (2555) ANALYTE: Follicle Stimulating Hormone Boehringer Mannheim ES 300 AL (07524) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Cirrus Diagnostics Immulite (10159) (FSH) (1908) EXAMINATION: TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Du Pont ACA III with aca plus Ciba Corning ACS 180 (10046) Immunoassay System (13253) EXAMINATION: PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS (49001) Abbott AxSYM (04532) Du Pont ACA IV with aca plus PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS Magnum Immunoassay System (13254) Boehringer Mannheim ES 300 AL (07524) (49097) Du Pont ACA III with aca plus Du Pont ACA SX with aca Immunoassay PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS PLUS System (13313) Immunoassay System (13253) (49098) Du Pont ACA IV with aca plus Du Pont ACA Star with aca plus Immunoassay System (13254) ANALYTE: HCG, Urine, Qualitative (non- Immunoassay System (13358) Du Pont ACA SX with aca plus waived procedures) (2503) Du Pont ACA V with aca plus Immunoassay System (13313) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Immunoassay System (13255) EXAMINATION: Du Pont ACA Star with aca plus PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS Magnum Applied Biotech Pregslide HCG Test Immunoassay System (13358) (49097) (04498) Du Pont ACA V with aca plus PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS PLUS Diagnostic Specialties Pregna-Cert (13276) Immunoassay System (13255) (49098) J & S Medical Accutex B–HCG Latex Test Organon Teknika AuraFlex (46152) Roche Cobas Core (55119) (31011) PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS Magnum Sanofi Pasteur Access Immunoassay SA Scientific SAS Direct Monoclonal hCG (49097) System (58257) (58319) PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS PLUS Syva Vista Immunoassay System (58221) SA Scientific SAS Monoclonal HCG-Slide (49098) Vitek Systems Vidas (67038) (58281) Roche Cobas Core (55119) Wallac Oy AutoDELFIA (70167) Sanofi Pasteur Access Immunoassay ANALYTE: Human Growth Hormone (GH) ANALYTE: Sex Hormone Binding Globulin System (58257) (2547) (5819) Syva Vista Immunoassay System (58221) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Vitek Systems Vidas (67038) EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: Wallac Oy AutoDELFIA (70167) Wallac Oy AutoDELFIA (70167) Cirrus Diagnostics Immulite (10159) ANALYTE: HCG, Beta, Serum, Quantitative ANALYTE: Insulin (2812) ANALYTE: Testosterone (6102) (2502) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: Boehringer Mannheim ES 300 AL (07524) Ciba Corning ACS 180 (10046) Abbott AxSYM (04532) ANALYTE: Luteinizing Hormone (LH) (3713) ANALYTE: Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Boehringer Mannheim ES 300 AL (07524) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (TSH) (6106) Du Pont ACA Star with aca plus EXAMINATION: TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Immunoassay System (13358) Abbott AxSYM (04532) EXAMINATION: Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices 25951 Bio-Rad RADIAS System (07493) Bio-Rad RADIAS System (07493) Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 1800 Cirrus Diagnostics Immulite (10159) Boehringer Mannheim ES 300 AL (07524) (28323) Du Pont ACA Star with aca plus Cirrus Diagnostics Immulite (10159) Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 900 Immunoassay System (13358) Organon Teknika AuraFlex (46152) (28322) Organon Teknika AuraFlex (46152) PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS (49001) Kodak Ektachem 550 XRC Analyzer PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS Magnum Roche Cobas Core (55119) (34056) (49097) Sanofi Pasteur Access Immunoassay Kodak Ektachem 700 Analyzer C Series PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS PLUS System (58257) (34054) (49098) Technicon Immuno 1 System (61042) Kodak Ektachem 750 XRC Analyzer Roche Cobas Core (55119) Vitek Systems Vidas (67038) (34055) Vitek Systems Vidas (67038) Wallac Oy AutoDELFIA (60167) Kodak Ektachem 950 IRC (34087) Wallac OY AutoDELFIA (70167) ANALYTE: Triiodothyronine (T3) (6119) Kodak Ektachem DT II (34057) ANALYTE: Thyroid Stimulating Hormone TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR LSI ASCA Chemistry System (37069) (TSH) (Neonatal) (6107) EXAMINATION: Olympus AU 5041 (46145) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Abbott AxSYM (04532) Olympus AU 5200 (46143) EXAMINATION: Boehringer Mannheim ES 300 AL (07524) PrismaSystems PROCHEM (49105) Bio-Rad RADIAS System (07493) Organon Teknika AuraFlex (46152) Schiapparelli Biosystems ACE Clinical Chemistry System (58288) ANALYTE: Thyroid Stimulating Hormone— PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS Magnum (49097) Technicon OPERA Clinical Chemistry high sens. (TSH–HS) (6108) System (61161) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS PLUS ANALYTE: Albumin (0414) EXAMINATION: (49098) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Bio-Rad RADIAS System (07493) Roche Cobas Core (55119) EXAMINATION: Boehringer Mannheim ES 300 AL (07524) Sanofi Pasteur Access Immunoassay Abbott Spectrum CCX (04515) Sanofi Pasteur Access Immunoassay System (58257) Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) System (58257) TOSOH A1A–120DX (61154) Behring Nephelometer II (07563) Wallac Oy AutoDELFIA (70167) Vitek Systems Vidas (67038) Wallac Oy AutoDELFIA (70167) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) ANALYTE: Thyroxine (T4) (6109) Du Pont ACA Star (13357) ANALYTE: Triiodothyronine Uptake (T3U) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Du Pont Dimension XL (13355) (TU) (6120) EXAMINATION: Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 1800 TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Abbott AxSYM (04532) (28323) EXAMINATION: Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 900 Abbott TDX FLx (04072) Becton Dickinson IQ Immunochemical (28322) Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) System (07429) Kodak Ektachem 550 XRC Analyzer Becton Dickinson IQ Immunochemical Boehringer Mannheim ES 300 AL (07524) (34056) System (07429) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 911 (07377) Kodak Ektachem 700 Analyzer C Series Boehringer Mannheim ES 300 AL (07524) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) (34504) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) Du Pont ACA Star (13357) Kodak Ektachem 750 XRC Analyzer Du Pont ACA Star (13357) Du Pont Dimension XL (13355) (34055) LSI ASCA Chemistry System (37069) LSI ASCA Chemistry System (37069) Kodak Ektachem 950 IRC (34087) Olympus AU 5041 (46145) Olympus AU 5041 (46145) Kodak Ektachem DT II (34057) Olympus AU 5121 (46087) Olympus AU 5121 (46087) LSI ASCA Chemistry System (37069) Olympus AU 5200 (46143) Olympus AU 5200 (46143) Olympus AU 5041 (46145) Organon Teknika AuraFlex (46152) Organon Teknika AuraFlex (46152) Olympus AU 5200 (46143) PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS Magnum PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS Magnum PrismaSystems PROCHEM (49105) (49097) (49097) Schiapparelli Biosystems ACE Clinical PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS PLUS PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS PLUS Chemistry System (58288) (49098) (49098) Technicon OPERA Clinical Chemistry Sanofi Pasteur Access Immunoassay Roche Cobas Core (55119) System (61161) Sanofi Pasteur Access Immunoassay System (58257) ANALYTE: Albumin, Urinary (0516) System (58257) SPECIALITY/SUBSPECIALITY: General TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Schiapparelli Biosystems ACE Clinical Chemistry EXAMINATION: Chemistry System (58288) ANALYTE: Acid Phosphatase (0407) Du Pont ACA II (13172) Technicon OPERA Clinical Chemistry TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Du Pont ACA III (13173) System (61161) EXAMINATION: Du Pont ACA IV (13083) Vitek Systems Vidas (67038) Du Pont ACA Star (13357) Du Pont ACA Star (13357) Wallac Oy AutoDELFIA (70167) Du Pont Dimension XL (13355) Du Pont ACA V (13084) ANALYTE: Thyroxine Binding Globulin Kodak Ektachem 500 XRC Analyzer ANALYTE: Aldolase (0415) (TBG) (6110) (34056) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Kodak Ektachem 700 Analyzer C Series EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: (34054) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) Boehringer Mannheim ES 300 AL (07524) Kodak Ektachem 750 XRC Analyzer Technicon Immuno 1 System (61042) ANALYTE: Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) (34055) (0416) ANALYTE: Thyroxine Uptake (T4U) (TU) Kodak Ektachem 950 IRC (34087) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (6139) Kodak Ektachem DT II (34057) EXAMINATION: TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR LSI ASCA Chemistry System (37069) Abbott Spectrum CCX (04515) EXAMINATION: Olympus AU 5041 (46145) Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) Du Pont Dimension XL (13355) ANALYTE: Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) Schiapparelli Biosystems ACE Clinical (SGPT) (0404) Du Pont ACA Star (13357) Chemistry System (58288) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Du Pont Dimension XL (13355) Syva Vista Immunoassay System (58221) EXAMINATION: Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 1800 Vitek Systems Vidas (67038) Abbott Spectrum CCX (04515) (28323) ANALYTE: Thyroxine, Free (FT4) (6111) Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 900 TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) (28322) EXAMINATION: Du Pont ACA Star (13357) Kodak Ektachem 550 XRC Analyzer Abbott AxSYM (04532) Du Pont Dimension XL (13355) (34056) 25952 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices Kodak Ektachem 700 Analyzer C Series Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 704 (07161) PrismaSystems PROCHEM (49105) (34054) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 705 (07162) Schiapparelli Biosystems ACE Clinical Kodak Ektachem 750 XRC Analyzer Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 717 (07163) Chemistry System (58288) (34055) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 747 (07166) Technicon OPERA Clinical Chemistry Kodak Ektachem 950 IRC (34087) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 911 (07377) System (61161) Kodak Ektachem DT II (34057) ANALYTE: Apolipoprotein A1 (0462) ANALYTE: Bilirubin, Neonatal (0705) LSI ASCA Chemistry System (37069) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR EXAMINATION: Olympus AU 5041 (46145) EXAMINATION: Abbott Spectrum CCX (04515) Olympus AU 5200 (46143) Behring Nephelometer II (07563) Du Pont ACA Star (13357) PrismaSystems PROCHEM (49105) Instrumentation Laboratory IL Monarch Kodak Ektachem 550 XRC Analyzer Schiapparelli Biosystems ACE Clinical 1000 (28082) (34056) Chemistry System (58288) Instrumentation Laboratory IL Monarch Kodak Ektachem 700 Analyzer C Series Synermed IR 500 (58322) 2000 (28231) (34054) Technicon OPERA Clinical Chemistry Instrumentation Laboratory IL Monarch Kodak Ektachem 750 XRC Analyzer System (61161) Plus (28083) (34055) ANALYTE: Alpha-Hydroxybutyrate Olympus AU 5041 (46145) Kodak Ektachem DT II (34057) Dehydrogenase (HBDH) (0419) ANALYTE: Apolipoprotein B (0457) ANALYTE: Bilirubin, Total (0706) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) Behring Nephelometer II (07563) Abaxis EPOC 2000 (04547) Du Pont ACA Star (13357) Olympus AU 5041 (46145) Abbott Spectrum CCX (04515) ANALYTE: Ammonia, Plasma/Serum (0427) ANALYTE: Aspartate Aminotransferase Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (AST) (SGOT) (0405) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) EXAMINATION: TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Du Pont ACA Star (13357) Abbott Spectrum CCX (04515) EXAMINATION: Du Pont Dimension XL (13355) Abbott VP (04082) Abaxis EPOC 2000 (04547) Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 1800 Beckman Synchron CX 4 CE (07174) Abbott Spectrum CCX (04515) (28323) Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 900 Beckman Synchron CX 7 (07073) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) (28322) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 911 (07377) Du Pont ACA Star (13357) Kodak Ektachem 550 XRC Analyzer Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) Du Pont Dimension XL (13355) (34056) Du Pont ACA Star (13357) Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 1800 Kodak Ektachem 700 Analyzer C Series Du Pont Dimension XL (13355) (28323) (34054) Kodak Ektachem 550 XRC Analyzer Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 900 Kodak Ektachem 750 XRC Analyzer (34056) (28322) (34055) Kodak Ektachem 700 Analyzer C Series Kodak Ektachem 550 XRC Analyzer Kodak Ektachem 950 IRC (34087) (34054) (34056) Kodak Ektachem DT II (34057) Kodak Ektachem 750 XRC Analyzer Kodak Ektachem 700 Analyzer C Series LSI ASCA Chemistry System (37069) (34055) (34054) Olympus AU 5041 (46145) Kodak Ektachem 950 IRC (34087) Kodak Ektachem 750 XRC Analyzer Olympus AU 5200 (46143) Kodak Ektachem DT II (34057) (34055) PrismaSystems PROCHEM (49105) ANALYTE: Amylase (0429) Kodak Ektachem 950 IRC (34087) Schiapparelli Biosystems ACE Clinical TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Kodak Ektachem DT II (34057) Chemistry System (58288) EXAMINATION: LSI ASCA Chemistry System (37069) Techicon OPERA Clinical Chemistry Abbott Spectrum CCX (04515) Olympus AU 5041 (46145) System (61161) Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) Olympus AU 5131 (46088) ANALYTE: Blood Gases with pH (0708) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) Olympus AU 5200 (46143) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Du Pont ACA Star (13357) PrismaSystems PROCHEM (49105) EXAMINATION: Du Pont Dimension XL (13355) Schiapparelli Biosystems ACE Clinical AVL Compact 1 (04552) Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 1800 Chemistry System (58288) AVL Compact 2 (04555) (28323) Synermed IR 500 (58322) AVL OPTI 1 (04572) Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 900 Technicon OPERA Clinical Chemistry Ciba Corning 248 (10260) (28322) System (61161) Ciba Corning 840 (10250) Kodak Ektachem 550 XRC Analyzer ANALYTE: Bilirubin, Direct (0704) Ciba Corning 845 (10296) (34056) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Ciba Corning 850 (10251) Kodak Ektachem 700 Analyzer C Series EXAMINATION: Ciba Corning 855 (10297) (34054) Abbott Spectrum CCS (04515) Ciba Corning 860 (10269) Kodak Ektachem 750 XRC Analyzer Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) Ciba Corning 865 (10298) (34055) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) Diametrics Medical DMI Blood Gas Kodak Ektachem 950 IRC (34087) Du Pont ACA Star (13357) Analyzer (13274) Kodak Ektachem DT II (34057) Du Pont Dimension XL (13355) Diametrics Medical IRMA Blood Analysis LSI ASCA Chemistry System (37069) Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 1800 System (13362) Olympus AU 5041 (46145) (28323) I-STAT i-STAT 200 System (28344) Olympus AU 5200 (46143) Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 900 I-STAT i-STAT Portable Clinical Analyzer PrismaSystems PROCHEM (49105) (28322) (28186) Schiapparelli Biosystems ACE Clinical Kodak Ektachem 550 XRC Analyzer Instrumentation Laboratory Blood Gas Chemistry System (58288) (34056) 1610 (28335) Technicon OPERA Clinical Chemistry Kodak Ektachem 700 Analyzer C Series Instrumentation Laboratory Blood Gas System (61161) (34054) 1620 (28336) ANALYTE: Amylase, pancreatic isoenzymes Kodak Ektachem 750 XRC Analyzer Instrumentation Laboratory Blood Gas (p-Amylase) (0500) (34055) 1630 (28337) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Kodak Ektachem 950 IRC (34087) Instumentation Laboratory Blood Gas 1640 EXAMINATION: LSI ASCA Chemistry System (37069) (28338) Beckman Synchron CX 4 (07071) Olmpus AU 5041 (46145) Instrumentation Laboratory Blood Gas Beckman Synchron CX 5 (07072) Olympus AU 5200 (46143) 1650 (28339) Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices 25953 Instrumentation Laboratory IL 1430 Technicon OPERA Clinical Chemistry I–STAT i–STAT 200 System (28344) BGElectrolyte (28343) System (61161) Instrumentation Laboratory Blood Gas Nova Stat profile 7 (43035) ANALYTE: Carbon Dioxide, Total (CO2) 1650 (28339) Nova Stat Profile 9 (43086) (1003) Instrumentation Laboratory IL 1430 Nova Stat Profile Plus 10 (43063) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR BGElectrolyte (28343) Nova Stat Profile Ultra 11P Analyzer EXAMINATION: Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 1800 (43101) Abbott Spectrum CCX (04515) (28323) PPG Industries StatPal II Blood Gas Beckman Synchron CX 3 Delta (07548) Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 900 Analysis System (49092) Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) (28322) Radiometer ABL 5 (55136) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) Instrumentation Laboratory ILyte Na, K, C1 Radiometer ABL 620 (55137) Du Pont ACA Star (13357) System (28320) Ionetics Model 400/450 Electrolyte ANALYTE: Blood pH (no blood gases) Du Pont Dimension XL (13355) Analyzer (28324) (07221) Kodak Ektachem 550 XRC Analyzer Kodak Ektachem 550 XRC Analyzer TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (34056) (34056) EXAMINATION: Kodak Ektachem 700 Analyzer C Series (34054) Kodak Ektachem 700 Analyzer C Series AVL 9110 pH Analyzer (04523) (34054) AVL 988–4 (04556) Kodak Ektachem 750 XRC Analyzer (34055) Kodak Ektachem 750 XRC Analyzer Ionetics Model 400/450 Electrolyte (34055) Analyzer (28324) Kodak Ektachem 950 IRC (34087) Kodak Ektachem DT II (34057) Kodak Ektachem 950 IRC (34087) Medica EasyLyte Calcium Analyzer Kodak Ektachem DT II (34057) (40197) LSI ASCA Chemistry System (37069) Nova 16 (43103) LSI ASCA Chemistry System (37069) ANALYTE: Calcium, Ionized (1004) Olympus AU 5041 (46145) Nova 10 (with CRT) (43061) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Olympus AU 5121 (46087) Nova 16 (43103) EXAMINATION: Olympus AU 5200 (46143) Nova Stat Profile 9 (43086) AVL 988–4 (04556) Schiapparelli Biosystems ACE Clinical Nova Stat Profile Plus 10 (43063) Ciba Corning 850 (10251) Chemistry System (58288) Olympus AU 5041 (46145) Ciba Corning 855 (10297) Technicon OPERA Clinical Chemistry Olympus AU 5200 (46143) Ciba Corning 860 (10269) System (61161) PrismaSystems PROCHEM (49105) Ciba Corning 865 (10298) Radiometer ABL 620 (55137) ANALYTE: Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) Diametrics Medical IRMA Blood Analysis Radiometer EML 100 (55134) (1013) System (13362) Schiapparelli Biosystems ACE Clinical TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR I-STAT i-STAT 200 System (28344) Chemistry System (58288) EXAMINATION: I-STAT i-STAT Portable Clinical Analyzer Synermed IR 500 (58322) Boehringer Mannheim ES 300 (07160) (28186) Technicon OPERA Clinical Chemistry TOSOH A1A–600 (61039) Instrumentation Laboratory Blood Gas System (61161) 1640 (28338) ANALYTE: Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) ANALYTE: Chloride, Sweat (Cystic Fibrosis Ionetics Model 400/450 Electrolyte Protein (1014) Sweat Test) (1019) Analyzer (28324) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Medica EasyLyte Calcium Analyzer EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: (40197) Beckman Synchron CX 4 (07071) Scandipharm CF Indicator (9800) (58240) Nova Stat Profile 9 (43086) Beckman Synchron CX 4 CE (07174) Beckman Synchron CX 5 (07072) ANALYTE: Cholesterol (1020) Nova Stat Profile Ultra 11P Analyzer TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (43101) Beckman Synchron CX 7 (07073) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 704 (07161) EXAMINATION: Radiometer ABL 620 (55137) Abbott Spectrum CCX (04515) Radiometer EML 100 (55134) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 717 (07163) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 747 (07166) Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) ANALYTE: Calcium, Total (1005) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 911 (07377) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Du Pont ACA Star (13357) Du Pont ACA Star (13357) EXAMINATION: Du Pont Dimension XL (13355) Du Pont Dimension (13086) Abbott Spectrum CCX (04515) Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 1800 Du Pont Dimension AR (13087) Beckman Synchron AS–X (07069) (28323) Du Pont Dimension ES (13215) Beckman Synchron CX 3 Delta (07548) Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 900 Du Pont Dimension XL (13355) Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) (28322) Kodak Ektachem 550 XRC Analyzer Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) Kodak Ektachem 550 XRC Analyzer (34056) Du Pont ACA Star (13357) (34056) Kodak Ektachem 700 Analyzer C Series Du Pont Dimension XL (13355) Kodak Ektachem 700 Analyzer C Series (34054) Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 1800 (34054) Kodak Ektachem 750 XRC Analyzer (28323) Kodak Ektachem 750 XRC Analyzer (34055) Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 900 (34055) Kodak Ektachem 950 IRC (34087) (28322) Kodak Ektachem 950 IRC (34087) Kodak Ektachem 550 XRC Analyzer ANALYTE: Ceruloplasmin (1015) Kodak Ektachem DT II (34057) (34056) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR LSI ASCA Chemistry System (37069) Kodak Ektachem 700 Analyzer C Series EXAMINATION: Olympus AU 5041 (46145) (34054) Behring Nephelometer II (07563) Olympus AU 5200 (46143) Kodak Ektachem 750 XRC Analyzer ANALYTE: Chloride (1018) PrismaSystems PROCHEM (49105) (34055) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Schiapparelli Biosystems ACE Clinical Kodak Ektachem 950 IRC (34087) EXAMINATION: Chemistry System (58288) Kodak Ektachem DT II (34057) Beckman Synchron CX 3 Delta (07548) StatChem StatTest Sysem (58269) LSI ASCA Chemistry System (37069) Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) Technicon OPERA Clinical Chemistry Nova 10 (with CRT) (43061) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) System (61161) Olympus AU 5041 (46145) Ciba Corning 850 (10251) ANALYTE: Cholinesterase (1021) Olympus AU 5200 (46143) Ciba Corning 855 (10297) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR PrismaSystems PROCHEM (49105) Ciba Corning 860 (10269) EXAMINATION: Schiapparelli Biosystems ACE Clinical Ciba Corning 865 (10298) Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) Chemistry System (58288) Du Pont ACA Star (13357) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 911 (07377) Synermed IR 500 (58322) Du Pont Dimension XL (13355) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) 25954 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices Kodak Ektachem 550 XRC Analyzer Sanofi Pasteur Access Immunoassay Ciba Corning ACS 180 (10046) (34056) System (58257) Sanofi Pasteur Access Immunoassay Kodak Ektachem 700 Analyzer C Series ANALYTE: Creatinine (1035) System (58257) (34054) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR ANALYTE: Fructosamine (1914) Kodak Ektachem 750 XRC Analyzer EXAMINATION: TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (34055) Abbott Spectrum CCX (04515) EXAMINATION: Kodak Ektachem 950 IRC (34087) Beckman Synchron CX 3 Delta (07548) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 736 (07164) Kodak Ektachem DT II (34057) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) Technicon Chem 1 (61003) Du Pont ACA Star (13357) ANALYTE: Gamma Glutamyl Transferase Technicon Chem 1 Plus (61036) Du Pont Dimension XL (13355) (GGT) (2201) ANALYTE: Creatine Kinase (CK) (1034) Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 1800 TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (28323) EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 900 Abbott Spectrum CCX (04515) Abbott Spectrum CCX (04515) (28322) Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) Kodak Ektachem 550 XRC Analyzer Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) (34056) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) Du Pont ACA Star (13357) Kodak Ektachem 700 Analyzer C Series Du Pont Dimension XL (13355) Du Pont ACA Star (13357) (34054) Du Pont Dimension XL (13355) Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 1800 Kodak Ektachem 750 XRC Analyzer (28323) Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 1800 (34055) (28323) Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 900 Kodak Ektachem 950 IRC (34087) (28322) Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 900 Kodak Ektachem DT II (34057) (28322) Kodak Ektachem 550 XRC Analyzer LSI ASCA Chemistry System (37069) (34056) Kodak Ektachem 550 XRC Analyzer Nova 16 (43103) (34056) Kodak Ektachem 700 Analyzer C Series Olympus AU 5041 (46145) (34054) Kodak Ektachem 700 Analyzer C Series Olympus AU 5121 (46087) Kodak Ektachem 750 XRC Analyzer (34054) Olympus AU 5200 (46143) (34055) Kodak Ektachem 750 XRC Analyzer PrismaSystems PROCHEM (49105) Kodak Ektachem 950 IRC (34087) (34055) Schiapparelli Biosystems ACE Clinical Kodak Ektachem DT II (34057) Kodak Ektachem 950 IRC (34087) Chemistry System (58288) LSI ASCA Chemistry System (37069) Kodak Ektachem DT II (34057) Synermed IR 500 (58322) Olympus AU 5041 (46145) LSI ASCA Chemistry System (37069) Technicon OPERA Clinical Chemistry Olympus AU 5200 (46143) Olympus AU 5041 (46145) System (61161) PrismaSystems PROCHEM (49105) Olympus AU 5121 (46087) ANALYTE: Ferritin (1902) Schiapparelli Biosystems ACE Clinical Olympus AU 5200 (46143) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Chemistry System (58288) PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS (49001) EXAMINATION: Technicon OPERA Clinical Chemistry PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS Magnum Abbott AxSYM (04532) System (61161) (49097) Bio-Rad RADIAS System (07493) ANALYTE: Glucose (2203) PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS PLUS Boehringer Mannheim ES 300 AL (07524) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (49098) Cirrus Diagnostics Immulite (10159) EXAMINATION: Schiapparelli Biosystems ACE Clinical Du Pont ACA III with aca plus Abaxis EPOC 2000 (04547) Chemistry System (58288) Immunoassay System (13253) Abbott Spectrum CCX (04515) Technicon OPERA Clinical Chemistry Du Pont ACA IV with aca plus Beckman Synchron CX 3 Delta (07548) System (61161) Immunoassay System (13254) Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) Du Pont ACA Star with aca plus ANALYTE: Creatine Kinase MB Fraction Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) Immunoassay System (13358) (CKMB) (1002) Cholestech L.D.X. (10170) Du Pont ACA V with aca plus TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Ciba Corning 860 (10269) Immunoassay System (13255) EXAMINATION: Ciba Corning 865 (10298) Olympus Reply (46089) Abbott AxSYM (04532) Du Pont ACA Star (13357) PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS Magnum Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) Du Pont Dimension XL (13355) (49097) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) I–STAT i–STAT 200 System (28344) PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS PLUS Du Pont ACA Star (13357) Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 1800 (49098) Du Pont ACA Star with aca plus (28323) Roche Cobas Core (55119) Immunoassay System (13358) Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 900 Roche Cobas FARA (55040) Du Pont Dimension XL (13355) (28322) Roche Cobas FARA II (55041) Kodak Ektachem 550 XRC Analyzer Kodak Ektachem 550 XRC Analyzer Roche Cobas Mira Plus (55096) (34056) (34056) Sanofi Pasteur Access Immunoassay Kodak Ektachem 700 Analyzer C Series Kodak Ektachem 700 Analyzer C Series System (58257) (34054) (34054) Seradyn LPIA–100 (58294) Kodak Ektachem 750 XRC Analyzer Kodak Ektachem 750 XRC Analyzer Syva Vista Immunoassay System (58221) (34055) (34055) Vitek Systems Vidas (67038) Kodak Ektachem 950 IRC (34087) Kodak Ektachem 950 IRC (34087) Kodak Ektachem DT II 34057) ANALYTE: Folate (Folic acid) (1907) Kodak Ektachem DT II (34057) LSI ASCA Chemistry System (37069) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR LSI ASCA Chemistry System (37069) PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS Magnum EXAMINATION: Nova 16 (43103) (49097) Bio-Rad RADIAS System (07493) Nova Stat Profile 9 (43086) PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS PLUS Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 911 (07377) Nova Stat Profile Plus 10 (43063) (49098) Cirrus Diagnostics Immulite (10159) Nova Stat Profile Ultra 11P Analyzer Princeton BioMeditech AccuSign MI CK– Roche Cobas Mira Plus (55096) (43101) MB/Myoglobin (49143) Sanofi Pasteur Access Immunoassay Olympus AU 5041 (46145) Princeton BioMeditech CarePoint MI CK– System (58257) Olympus AU 5121 (46087) MB/Myoglobin (49141) Syva Vista Immunoassay System (58221) Olympus AU 5200 (46143) Princeton BioMeditech LifeSign MI CK– ANALYTE: Folate, Red Blood Cell (RBC PrismaSystems PROCHEM (49105) MB/Myoglobin (49140) Folate) (1930) Schiapparelli Biosystems ACE Clinical Princeton BioMeditech VitalSign MI CK– TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Chemistry System (58288) MB/Myoglobin (49142) EXAMINATION: StatChem StatTest System (58269) Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices 25955 Synermed IR 500 (58322) Beckman Synchron AS Xi (MHS SPINPRO) Ciba Corning 570 Alliance (MHS Technicon OPERA Clinical Chemistry (07573) SPINPRO) (10275) System (61161) Beckman Synchron CX 4 (DMA One Shots) Ciba Corning 580 Alliance (MHS Yellow Springs YSI Model 23A Blood (07620) SPINPRO) (10276) Glucose Analyzer (76006) Beckman Synchron CX 4 (MHS SPINPRO) Coulter Dacos (DMA One Shots) (10292) ANALYTE: Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Hgb (07574) Coulter Dacos (T-Am. Singles) (10277) A1C) (2204) Beckman Synchron CX 4 CE (DMA One Coulter Optichem (T-Am. Singles) (10278) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Shots) (07621) Coulter Optichem 100 (DMA One Shots) EXAMINATION: Beckman Synchron CX 4 CE (MHS (10293) Abbott IMX (04056) SPINPRO) (07575) Du Pont ACA (DMA One Shots) (13365) Beckman Synchron CX 4 (07071) Beckman Synchron CX 5 (DMA One Shots) Du Pont ACA (MHS SPINPRO) (13346) Beckman Synchron CX 5 (07072) (07622) Du Pont ACA II (DMA One Shots) (13366) Beckman Synchron CX 7 (07073) Beckman Synchron CX 5 (MHS SPINPRO) Du Pont ACA II (MHS SPINPRO) (13347) Bio-Rad RADIAS System (07493) (07576) Du Pont ACA III (DMA One Shots) (13367) Bio-Rad Variant (07498) Beckman Synchron CX 5 (T-Am. Singles) Du Pont ACA III (MHS SPINPRO) (13348) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 704 (07161) (07577) Du Pont ACA IV (DMA One Shots) (13368) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 717 (07163) Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (DMA One Du Pont ACA IV (MHS SPINPRO) (13349) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 747 (07166) Shots) (07623) Du Pont ACA V (DMA One Shots) (13369) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 911 (07377) Beckman Synchron CX 7 (DMA One Shots) Du Pont ACA V ((MHS SPINPRO) (13350) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) (07624) Du Pont Analyst (DMA One Shots) (13364) Roche Cobas FARA (55040) Beckman Synchron CX 7 (MHS SPINPRO) Du Pont Analyst (MHS SPINPRO) (13351) Roche Cobas Mira (55044) (07578) Du Pont Dimension (DMA One Shots) Beckman Synchron CX 7 (T-Am. Singles) (13370) ANALYTE: HDL Cholesterol (2550) (07579) Du Pont Dimension (MHS SPINPRO) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Bio-Chem Laboratory Systems ATAC 2000/ (13352) EXAMINATION: 2100 (DMA One Shots) (07634) Du Pont Dimension AR (DMA One Shots) Abbott Spectrum (DMA One Shots) (04598) Bio-Chem Laboratory Systems ATAC 6000 (13371) Abbott Spectrum (MHS SPINPRO) (04563) (DMA One Shots) (07626) Du Pont Dimension AR (MHS SPINPRO) Abbott Spectrum (T-Am. Singles) (04588) Bio-Chem Laboratory Systems ATAC 6000 (13353) Abbott Spectrum CCX (DMA One Shots) (T-Am. Singles) (07596) Du Pont Dimension ES (DMA One Shots) (04599) BioAutoMed ASCA (07192) (13372) Abbott Spectrum CCX (T-Am. Singles) BioAutoMed ASCA (DMA One Shots) Du Pont Dimension ES (MHS SPINPRO) (04587) (07625) (13354) Abbott Spectrum EPX (DMA One Shots) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 704 (DMA EM Diagnostic Systems EPOS (DMA One (04600) One Shots) (07627) Shots) (16099) Abbott Spectrum EPX (MHS SPINPRO) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 704 (MHS EM Diagnostic Systems EPOS (MHS (04564) Abbott Spectrum EPX (T-Am. Singles) SPINPRO) (07580) SPINPRO) (16094) (04565) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 704 (T-Am. Electronucleonics Gem-Profiler (DMA One Abbott Spectrum Series II (DMA One Singles) (07590) Shots) (16095) Shots) (04601) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 705 (DMA Electronucleonics Gemini (DMA One Abbott Spectrum Series II (MHS SPINPRO) One Shots) (07628) Shots) (16096) (04566) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 705 (MHS Electronucleonics Gemstar (DMA One Abbott Spectrum Series II (T-Am. Singles) SPINPRO) (07581) Shots) (16097) (04589) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 705 (T-Am. Electronucleonics Gemstar (T-Am. Singles) Abbott Spectrum Series II CCX (DMA One Singles) (07591) (16093) Shots) (04602) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 717 (DMA Electronucleonics Gemstar II (DMA One Abbott Spectrum Series II CCX (MHS One Shots) (07629) Shots) (16098) SPINPRO) (04567) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 717 (MHS Instrumentation Laboratory IL Monarch (T- Abbott Spectrum Series II CCX (T-Am. SPINPRO) (07582) Am. Singles) (28361) Singles) (04590) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 717 (T-Am. Instrumentation Laboratory IL Monarch Abbott TDX (04071) Singles) (07592) 1000 (DMA One Shots) (28380) Abbott TDX (MHS SPINPRO) (04568) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 736 (DMA Instrumentation Laboratory IL Monarch Abbott TDX FLx (04072) One Shots) (07630) 1000 (T-Am. Singles) (28362) Abbott TDX FLx (MHS SPINPRO) (04569) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 736 (MHS Instrumentation Laboratory IL Monarch Abbott VP (DMA One Shots) (04603) SPINPRO) (07583) 2000 (DMA One Shots) (28381) Abbott VP (MHS SPINPRO) (04570) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 736 (T-Am. Instrumentation Laboratory IL Monarch Abbott Vision, Non Whole Blood HDL Singles) (07593) 2000 (T-Am. Singles) (28363) Procedure (04451) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 737 (DMA Instrumentation Laboratory IL Monarch Abbott Vision, Non Whole Blood HDL One Shots) (07631) Plus (DMA One Shots) (28382) Procedure (MHS SPINPRO) (04571) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 737 (MHS Instrumentation Laboratory IL Monarch Ames Seralyzer (DMA One Shots) (04604) SPINPRO) (07584) Plus (T-Am. Singles) (28364) Ames Seralyzer III (DMA One Shots) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 737 (T-Am. Kodak Ektachem 250 (DMA One Shots) (04605) Singles) (07594) (34076) Baxter Paramax (DMA One Shots) (07618) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 747 (DMA Kodak Ektachem 250 (MHS SPINPRO) Baxter Paramax (MHS SPINPRO) (07566) One Shots) (07632) (34063) Baxter Paramax 720 ZX (DMA One Shots) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 747 (MHS Kodak Ektachem 400 (DMA One Shots) (07619) SPINPRO) (07585) (34077) Baxter Paramax 720 ZX (MHS SPINPRO) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 747 (T-Am. Kodak Ektachem 400 (MHS SPINPRO) (07567) Singles) (07595) (34064) Beckman Astra 8 (MHS SPINPRO) (07568) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 911 (MHS Kodak Ektachem 500 (DMA One Shots) Beckman Astra 8e (MHS SPINPRO) (07569) SPINPRO) (07586) (34078) Beckman Astra Ideal (MHS SPINPRO) Ciba Corning 550 Express (DMA One Kodak Ektachem 500 (MHS SPINPRO) (07570) Shots) (10291) (34065) Beckman Synchron AS–X (MHS SPINPRO) Ciba Corning 550 Express (MHS SPINPRO) Kodak Ektachem 550 XRC Analyzer (07571) (10274) (34056) Beckman Synchron AS–Xe (MHS Ciba Corning 550 Express (T-Am. Singles) Kodak Ektachem 550 XRC Analyzer (DMA SPINPRO) (07572) (10273) One Shots) (34079) 25956 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices Kodak Ektachem 700 (DMA One Shots) Roche Cobas FARA II (DMA One Shots) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) (34080) (55154) ANALYTE: Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) Kodak Ektachem 700 (MHS SPINPRO) Roche Cobas Fara (MHS SPINPRO) (55141) (3701) (34066) Roche Cobas Fara (T–Am. Singles) (55144) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Kodak Ektachem 700 Analyzer C Series Roche Cobas MIRA (DMA One Shots) EXAMINATION: (34054) (55155) Abbott Spectrum CCX (04515) Kodak Ektachem 700 Analyzer C Series Roche Cobas MIRA Plus (DMA One Shots) Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) (DMA One Shots) (34081) (55156) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) Kodak Ektachem 700 P (DMA One Shots) Roche Cobas MIRA S (DMA One Shots) Du Pont ACA Star (13357) (34082) (55157) Du Pont Dimension XL (13355) Kodak Ektachem 700 P (MHS SPINPRO) Roche Cobas Mira (MHS SPINPRO) (55142) Kodak Ektachem 550 XRC Analyzer (34067) Roche Cobas Mira (T–Am. Singles) (55145) (34056) Kodak Ektachem 700 XR (DMA One Shots) Schiapparelli Biosystems ACE (DMA One Kodak Ektachem 700 Analyzer C Series (34083) Shots) (58357) (34054) Kodak Ektachem 700 XR (MHS SPINPRO) Kodak Ektachem 750 XRC Analyzer (34068) Schiapparelli Biosystems ACE Clinical Chemistry System (58288) (34055) Kodak Ektachem 750 XRC (DMA One Kodak Ektachem 950 IRC (34087) Shots) (34084) Technicon Assist (DMA One Shots) (61181) Kodak Ektachem DT II (34057) Kodak Ektachem 750 XRC Analyzer LSI ASCA Chemistry System (37069) (34055) Technicon RA 100 (DMA One Shots) Olympus AU 5041 (46145) Kodak Ektachem 950 IRC (34087) (61182) Olympus AU 5121 (46087) Kodak Ektachem DT 60 (DMA One Shots) Technicon RA 1000 (DMA One Shots) Olympus AU 5200 (46143) (34085) (61183) PrismaSystems PROCHEM (49105) Kodak Ektachem DT 60 (MHS SPINPRO) Technicon RA 1000 (MHS SPINPRO) Schiapparelli Biosystems ACE Clinical (34069) (61162) Chemistry System (58288) Kodak Ektachem DT II (34057) Technicon RA 1000 (T–Am. Singles) Synermed IR 500 (58322) Kodak Ektachem DT II (DMA One Shots) (61164) Technicon OPERA Clinical Chemistry (34086) Technicon RA 2000 (DMA One Shots) System (61161) LSI ASCA Chemistry System (37069) (61184) LSI ASCA Chemistry System (DMA One Technicon RA 500 (DMA One Shots) ANALYTE: Lactate Dehydrogenase Heart Shots) (37096) (61185) Fraction (LDH–1) (3702) LSI ASCA Chemistry System (T-Am. Technicon RA 500 (T–Am. Singles) (61163) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Singles) (37095) Technicon RA XT (DMA One Shots) EXAMINATION: Olympus AU 5000 (DMA One Shots) (61186) Abbott Spectrum CCX (04515) (46173) Technicon RA XT (T–Am. Singles) (61165) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) Olympus AU 5021 (DMA One Shots) Du Pont ACA Star (13357) ANALYTE: Haptoglobin (2511) (46174) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR ANALYTE: Lactate Dehydrogenase Liver Olympus AU 5031 (DMA One Shots) EXAMINATION Fraction (LLDH) 3703) (46175) Behring Nephelometer II (07563) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Olympus AU 5041 (DMA One Shots) EXAMINATION: (46176) ANALYTE: Hemoglobin S (2536) Du Pont ACA Star (13357) Olympus AU 5061 (DMA One Shots) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 1800 (46177) EXAMINATION: (28323) Olympus AU 5121 (DMA One Shots) Histo-Med Sickle Cell Reagent Set (25164) Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 900 (46178) ANALYTE: Iron (2814) (28322) Olympus AU 5131 (DMA One Shots) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR ANALYTE: Lactic Acid (Lactate) (3704) (46179) EXAMINATION: TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Olympus AU 5200 (DMA One Shots) Abbott Spectrum CCX (04515) EXAMINATION: (46180) Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) Olympus AU 5211 (DMA One Shots) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) (46181) Du Pont ACA Star (13357) Ciba Corning 860 (10269) Olympus AU 5221 (DMA One Shots) Du Pont Dimension XL (13355) Ciba Corning 865 (10298) (46182) Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 1800 Du Pont ACA Star (13357) Olympus AU 5223 (DMA One Shots) (28323) Du Pont Dimension XL (13355) (46183) Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 900 Kodak Ektachem 550 XRC Analyzer Olympus AU 5231 (DMA One Shots) (28322) (46184) (34056) Kodak Ektachem 550 XRC Analyzer Kodak Ektachem 700 Analyzer C Series Olympus AU 800 (DMA One Shots) (34056) (46185) (34054) Kodak Ektachem 700 Analyzer C Series Kodak Ektachem 750 XRC Analyzer Olympus AU 5000 (MHS SPINPRO) (34054) (46161) (34055) Kodak Ektachem 750 XRC Analyzer Olympus AU 5000 (T-Am. Singles) (46166) Kodak Ektachem 950 IRC (34087) (34055) Olympus Demand (DMA One Shots) Kodak Ektachem DT II (34057) Kodak Ektachem 950 IRC (34087) (46186) Nova Stat Profile 9 (43086) Kodak Ektachem DT SC Module (34017) Olympus Demand (MHS SPINPRO) (46162) Nova Stat Profile Plus 10 (43063) LSI ASCA Chemistry System (37069) Olympus Demand (T–Am. Singles) (46164) Nova Stat Profile Ultra 11P Analyzer Olympus Reply (DMA One Shots) (46187) Olympus AU 5041 (46145) (43101) Olympus Reply (MHS SPINPRO) (46163) Olympus AU 5200 (46143) Technicon OPERA Clinical Chemistry Olympus Reply (T–Am. Singles) (46165) PrismaSystems PROCHEM (49105) System (61161) Olympus Reply/AU560 (DMA One Shots) Schiapparelli Biosystems ACE Clinical Yellow Springs YSI Model 23L Blood (46188) Chemistry System (58288) Lactoat Analyzer (76007) PrismaSystems PROCHEM (49105) Technicon OPERA Clinical Chemistry ANALYTE: Lactoferrin (3727) Roche Cobas Bio (DMA One Shots) (55152) System (61161) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Roche Cobas Bio (MHS SPINPRO) (55140) ANALYTE: Iron Binding Capacity, Unsat. EXAMINATION: Roche Cobas Bio (T–Am. Singles) (55143) (UIBC) no pretreat. (2823) TechLab LEUKO–TEST (61133) Roche Cobas FARA (DMA One Shots) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Touch Scientific LactoCard Tear (55153) EXAMINATION: Lactoferrin Immunoassay (61110) Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices 25957 Touch Scientific Lactoferrin MicroAssay Beckman Synchron CX 4 CE (07174) PrismaSystems PROCHEM (49105) System (61137) Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) Schiapparelli Biosystems ACE Clinical ANALYTE: Leucine Aminopeptidase (LAP) Beckman Synchron CX 7 (07073) Chemistry System (58288) (3709) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) Synermed IR 500 (58322) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Olympus AU 5041 (46145) Technicon OPERA Clinical Chemistry EXAMINATION: Olympus AU 800 (46110) System (61161) Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) ANALYTE: Microprotein, Urine (4027) ANALYTE: Potassium (4910) ANALYTE: Lipase (3711) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: Beckman Synchron CX 4 CE (07174) AVL 988–4 (04556) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) American Monitor Parallel (04144) Du Pont ACA Star (13357) Beckman Synchron CX 7 (07073) Beckman Synchron CX 3 Delta (07548) Du Pont Dimension XL (13355) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) Kodak Ektachem 550 XRC Analyzer Olympus AU 5041 (46145) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) (34056) Olympus AU 800 (46110) Ciba Corning 850 (10251) Kodak Ektachem 700 Analyzer C Series ANALYTE: Myoglobin (4023) Ciba Corning 855 (10297) (34054) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Ciba Corning 860 (10269) Kodak Ektachem 750 XRC Analyzer EXAMINATION: Ciba Corning 865 (10298) (34055) Behring Nephelometer II (07563) Diametrics Medical IRMA Blood Analysis Kodak Ektachem 950 IRC (34087) PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS Magnum System (13362) Kodak Ektachem DT 60 (34016) (49097) Du Pont Dimension XL (13355) Kodak Ektachem DT II (34057) PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS PLUS I–STAT i-STAT 200 System (28344) LSI ASCA Chemistry System (37069) (49098) Instrumentation Laboratory Blood Gas Olympus AU 5041 (46145) Princeton BioMeditech AccuSign MI CK– 1630 (28337) Instrumentation Laboratory Blood Gas ANALYTE: Magnesium (4002) MB/Myoglobin (49143) 1640 (28338) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Princeton BioMeditech CarePoint MI CK– Instrumentation Laboratory Blood Gas EXAMINATION: MB/Myoglobin (49141) 1650 (28339) Abbott Spectrum CCX (04515) Princeton BioMeditech LifeSign MI CK– Instrumentation Laboratory IL 1430 Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) MB/Myoglobin (49140) BGElectrolyte (28343) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) Princeton BioMeditech LifeSign MI Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 1800 Du Pont ACA Star (13357) Myoglobin (49122) (28323) Du Pont Dimension XL (13355) Princeton BioMeditech VitalSign MI CK– Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 900 Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 1800 MB/Myoglobin (49142) (28322) (28323) ANALYTE: Osmolality, Serum (4602) Instrumentation Laboratory ILye Na, K, Cl Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 900 TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR System (28320) (28322) EXAMINATION: Instrumentation Laboratory ILye Na, K, Li Kodak Ektachem 550 XRC Analyzer Advanced Instruments Model 3D3 System (28319) (34056) Osmometer (04520) Ionetics Model 400/450 Electrolyte Kodak Ektachem 700 Analyzer C Series ANALYTE: Osmolality, Urine (4603) Analyzer (28324) (34054) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Kodak Ektachem 550 XRC Analyzer Kodak Ektachem 750 XRC Analyzer EXAMINATION: (34056) (34055) Advanced Instruments Model 3D3 Kodak Ektachem 700 Analyzer C Series Kodak Ektachem 950 IRC (34087) Osmometer (04520) (34054) Kodak Ektachem DT II (34057) ANALYTE: Oxyhemoglobin/Oxygen Kodak Ektachem 750 XRC Analyzer LSI ASCA Chemistry System (37069) Saturation (4604) (34055) Nova 8 (43022) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Kodak Ektachem 950 IRC (34087) Olympus AU 5041 (46145) EXAMINATION: Kodak Ektachem DT II (34057) Olympus AU 5121 (46087) Ciba Corning 845 (10296) Medica EasyLyte Calcium Analyzer Olympus AU 5200 (46143) Ciba Corning 855 (10297) (40197) PrismaSystems PROCHEM (49105) Ciba Corning 865 (10298) Nova 10 (with CRT) (43061) Schiapparelli Biosystems ACE Clinical Radiometer ABL 620 (55137) Nova 16 (43103) Chemistry System (58288) Nova 8 (43022) Technicon Chem 1 Plus (61036) ANALYTE: Phosphorus (4906) Nova Stat Profile 9 (43086) Technicon OPERA Clinical Chemistry TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Nova Stat Profile Plus 10 (43063) System (61161) EXAMINATION: Abbott Spectrum CCX (04515) Nova Stat Profile Ultra 11P Analyzer ANALYTE: Magnesium, Ionized (4018) Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) (43101) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) Olympus AU 5041 (46145) EXAMINATION: Du Pont ACA Star (13357) Olympus AU 5200 (46143) AVL 988–4 (04556) Du Pont ACA Dimension XL (13355) PDX Stat K Rapid Potassium Test System Nova Stat Profile Ultra 11P Analyzer Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 1800 (49102) (43101) (28323) PrismaSystems PROCHEM (49105) ANALYTE: Methemoglobin (4032) Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 900 Radiometer ABL 620 (55137) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (28322) Radiometer EML 100 (55134) EXAMINATION: Kodak Ektachem 550 XRC Analyzer Schiapparelli Biosystems ACE Clinical Ciba Corning 845 (10296) (34056) Chemistry System (58288) Ciba Corning 855 (10297) Kodak Ektachem 700 Analyzer C Series StatChem StatTest Sysem (58269) Ciba Corning 865 (10298) (34054) Synermed IR 500 (58322) ANALYTE: Microalbumin (4019) Kodak Ektachem 750 XRC Analyzer Technicon OPERA Clinical Chemistry TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (34055) System (61161) EXAMINATION: Kodak Ektachem 950 IRC (34087) ANALYTE: Prealbumin (4911) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 747 (07166) Kodak Ektachem DT II (34057) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 911 (07377) LSI ASCA Chemistry System (37069) EXAMINATION: ANALYTE: Microprotein, CSF (4026) Olympus AU 5041 (46145) Behring Nephelometer II (07563) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Olympus AU 5121 (46087) ANALYTE: Prostatic Acid Phosphatase (PAP) EXAMINATION: Olympus AU 5200 (46143) (4918) 25958 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Ciba Corning 855 (10297) Beckman Synchron CX 4 CE (07174) EXAMINATION: Ciba Corning 860 (10269) Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) Cirrus Diagnostics Immulite (10159) Ciba Corning 865 (10298) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) ANALYTE: Prostatic Specific Antigen (PSA) Diametrics Medical IRMA Blood Analysis Du Pont ACA Star (13357) (4919) System (13362) Du Pont Dimension XL (13355) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Du Pont Dimension XL (13355) Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 1800 EXAMINATION: I-STAT i-STAT 200 System (28344) (28323) TOSOH A1A–1200 (61040) Instrumentation Laboratory Blood Gas Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 900 1630 (28337) ANALYTE: Protein, Total (4921) (28322) Instrumentation Laboratory Blood Gas TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Kodak Ektachem 550 XRC Analyzer 1640 (28338) EXAMINATION: (34056) Instrumentation Laboratory Blood Gas Abaxis EPOC 2000 (04547) Kodak Ektachem 700 Analyzer C Series 1650 (28339) Abott Spectrum CCX (04515) (34054) Instrumentation Laboratory IL 1430 Beckman Synchron CX 3 Delta (07548) Kodak Ektachem 750 XRC Analyzer BGElectrolyte (28343) Beckman Synchron CX 4 CE (07174) (34055) Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 1800 Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) Kodak Ektachem 950 IRC (34087) (28323) Behring Nephelometer II (07563) Kodak Ektachem DT II (34057) Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 900 Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) LSI ASCA Chemistry System (37069) (28322) Du Pont ACA Star (13357) Olympus AU 5041 (46145) Instrumentation Laboratory ILyte Na, K, Cl Du Pont Dimension XL (13355) Olympus AU 5121 (46087) System (28320) Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 1800 Olympus AU 5200 (46143) Instrumentation Laboratory ILyte Na, K, Li (28323) PrismaSystems Prochem (49105) System (28319) Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 900 Schiapparelli Biosystems ACE Clinical Ionetics Model 400/450 Electrolyte (28322) Chemistry System (58288) Analyzer (28324) Kodak Ektachem 550 XRC Analyzer Technicon OPERA Clinical Chemistry Kodak Ektachem 550 XRC Analyzer (34056) System (61161) (34056) Kodak Ektachem 700 Analyzer C Series Kodak Ektachem 700 Analyzer C Series ANALYTE: Troponin T (Tn T) (6140) (34054) (34054) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Kodak Ektachem 750 XRC Analyzer Kodak Ektachem 750 XRC Analyzer EXAMINATION: (34055) (34055) Boehringer Mannheim ES 300 (07160) Kodak Ektachem 950 IRC (34087) Kodak Ektachem 950 IRC (34087) ANALYTE: Urea (BUN) (6403) Kodak Ektachem DT II (34057) Kodak Ektachem DT II (34057) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR LSI ASCA Chemistry System (37069) Medica EasyLyte Calcium Analyzer EXAMINATION: Olympus AU 5041 (46145) (40197) Abbott Spectrum CCX (04515) Olympus AU 5121 (46087) Nova 10 (with CRT) (43061) Beckman Synchron CX 3 Delta (07548) Olympus AU 5200 (46143) Nova 16 (43103) Beckman Synchron CX 4 CE (07174) PrismaSystems PROCHEM (49105) Nova 8 (43022) Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) Schiapparelli Biosystems ACE Clinical Nova Stat Profile 9 (43086) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) Chemistry System (58288) Nova Stat Profile Plus 10 (43063) Du Pont ACA Star (13357) Synermed IR 500 (58322) Nova Stat Profile Ultra 11P Analyzer Du Pont Dimension XL (13355) Technicon OPERA Clinical Chemistry (43101) System (61161) I-STAT i-STAT 200 System (28344) Olympus AU 5041 (46145) Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 1800 ANALYTE: Protein, Total (urine) (4972) Olympus AU 5200 (46143) (28323) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Radiometer ABL 620 (55137) Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 900 EXAMINATION: Radiometer EML 100 (55134) (28322) Du Pont ACA Star (13357) Schiapparelli Biosystems ACE Clinical Kodak Ektachem 550 XRC Analyzer Du Pont Dimension (13086) Chemistry System (58288) (34056) Du Pont Dimension AR (13087) Synermed IR 500 (58322) Kodak Ektachem 700 Analyzer C Series Du Pont Dimension ES (13215) Technicon OPERA Clinical Chemistry (34054) Du Pont Dimension XL (13355) System (61161) Kodak Ektachem 750 XRC Analyzer ANALYTE: Pseudocholinesterase (4923) ANALYTE: Total Solids (Protein) (6131) (34055) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Kodak Ektachem 950 IRC (34087) EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: Kodak Ektachem DT II (34057) Du Pont ACA Star (13357) ATAGO A300CL Clinincal Refractometer LSI ASCA Chemistry System (37069) Du Pont Dimension XL (13355) (04575) Nova 16 (43103) ANALYTE: Reduced Hemoglobin (5523) ATAGO N Serum Protein Refractometer Nova Stat Profile Plus 10 (43063) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (04574) Olympus AU 5041 (46145) EXAMINATION: ATAGO SP–D Digital Serum Protein Olympus AU 5121 (46087) Ciba Corning 845 (10296) Refractometer (04579) Olympus AU 5200 (46143) Ciba Corning 855 (10297) ATAGO T–2 Clinical Refractometer PrismaSystems PROCHEM (49105) Ciba Corning 865 (10298) (04577) Schiapparelli Biosystems ACE Clinical ANALYTE: Retinol binding protein (5507) National Instrument Hand Protometer Chemistry System (58288) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (43085) Synermed IR 500 (58322) EXAMINATION: ANALYTE: Transferrin (6114) Technicon OPERA Clinical Chemistry Behring Nephelometer II (07563) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR System (61161) ANALYTE: Sodium (5805) EXAMINATION: ANALYTE: Uric Acid (6404) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Behring Nephelometer II (07563) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR EXAMINATION: Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 911 (07377) EXAMINATION: AVL 988–4 (04556) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) Abaxis EPOC 2000 (04547) Abbott Vision (04083) Technicon OPERA Clinical Chemistry Abbott Spectrum CCX (04515) American Monitor Parallel (04144) System (61161) Beckman Synchron CX 4 CE (07174) Beckman Synchron CX 3 Delta (07548) ANALYTE: Triglyceride (6118) Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) EXAMINATION: Du Pont ACA Star (13357) Ciba Corning 850 (10251) Abbott Spectrum CCX (04515) Du Pont Dimension XL (13355) Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices 25959 Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 1800 J & S Medical Accutex Antistreptolysin O Technicon OPERA Clinical Chemistry (28323) (ASO) Latex Text (31006) System (61161) Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 900 ANALYTE: Beta-2 microglobulin (0703) ANALYTE: Immunoglobulins IgE (2805) (28322) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Kodak Ektachem 550 XRC Analyzer EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: (34056) Beckman Array 360 (07052) Boehringer Mannheim ES 300 AL (07524) Kodak Ektachem 700 Analyzer C Series Cirrus Diagnostics Immulite (10159) Cirrus Diagnostics Immulite (10159) (34054) Du Pont ACA Star (13357) Roche Cobas Core (55119) Kodak Ektachem 750 XRC Analyzer Du Pont ACA V (13084) Sanofi Pasteur Access Immunoassay (34055) Wallac Oy AutoDELFIA (70167) System (58257) Kodak Ektachem 950 IRC (34087) Vitek Systems Vidas (67038) Kodak Ektachem DT II (34057) ANALYTE: C-Reactive Protein (CRP) (1001) LSI ASCA Chemistry System (37069) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR ANALYTE: Immunoglobulins IgG (2806) Olympus AU 5041 (46145) EXAMINATION: TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Olympus AU 5200 (46143) Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) EXAMINATION: PrismaSystems PROCHEM (49105) Behring Nephelometer II (07563) Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) Schiapparelli Biosystems ACE Clinical Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 747 (07166) Behring Nephelometer II (07563) Chemistry System (58288) Boehriner Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) Technicon OPERA Clinical Chemistry Du Pont ACA Star (13357) Du Pont ACA Star (13357) System (61161) Du Pont Dimension XL (13355) Technicon OPERA Clinical Chemistry Immunostics immuno/crp Test (28277) System (61161) ANALYTE: Vitamin B12 (6707) J & S Medical Accutex C-Reactive Protein TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR ANALYTE: Immunoglobulins IgG subclasses (CRP) Latex Text (31004) (2807) EXAMINATION: J & S Medical Eye Spot CRP test (31007) Bio-Rad RADIAS System (97493) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Pulse Scientific C-Reactive Protein (CRP) EXAMINATION: Roche Cobas Mira Plus (55096) Test (49075) Sanofi Pasteur Access Immunoassay Behring Nephelometer (07273) Technicon OPERA Clinical Chemistry Behring Nephelometer 100 (07272) System (58257) System (61161 Syva Vista Immunoassay System (58221) ANALYTE: Immunoglobulins IgM (2808) Technicon Immuno 1 System (61042) ANALYTE: Complement C3 (1029) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR EXAMINATION: SPECIALITY/SUBSPECIALITY: General EXAMINATION: Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) Immunology Behring Nephelometer II (07563) Behring Nephelometer II (07563) ANALYTE: Allergen specific IgE (0417) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Technicon OPERA Clinical Chemistry Du Pont ACA Star (13357) EXAMINATION: System (61161) Technicon OPERA Clinical Chemistry Cirrus Diagnostic Immulite (10159) ANALYTE: Complement C4 (1030) System (61161) In Vitro Technologies Allergy Profile TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR ANALYTE: Infectious Mononucleosis (28279) EXAMINATION: Antibodies (Mono) (2809) Sanofi Pasteur Access Immunoassay Behring Nephelometer II (07563) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR System (58257) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) EXAMINATION: ANALYTE: Alpha-1 Microglobin (0470) Technicon OPERA Clinical Chemistry Immunostics immuno/im test (28278) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR System (61161) J & S Medical Accutex Inf. Mono. Red Bld. EXAMINATION: ANALYTE: Cytomegalovirus Antibodies Cell (IM RBC) Test (31003) Beckman Array 360 (07052) (1039) J & S Medical Accutex Infectious Behring Nephelometer II (07563) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Mononucleosis Latex Test (31008) ANALYTE: Alpha-1-Acid Glycoprotein EXAMINATION: J & S Medical Eye Spot Infectious (orosomucoid) (0420) PB Diagnostics System OPUS (49001) Mononucleosis (IM) Test (31013) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS Magnum Meridian Diagnostics ImmunoCard Mono EXAMINATION: (49097) (40179) Behring Nephelometer II (07563) PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS PLUS Pacific Biotech Concise Plus Mono (49148) Princeton BioMeditech BioSign Mono Test Alpha-1-Antitrypsin (0421) (49098) (49100) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Vitek Systems Vidas (67038) EXAMINATION: ANALYTE: Helicobacter Pylori Antibodies ANALYTE: Kappa Light Chains (3402) Behring Nephelomoter II (07563) (2513) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR ANALYTE: Alpha-2 Macroglobulin (0422) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR EXAMINATION: TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR EXAMINATION: Behring Nephelometer II (07563) EXAMINATION: Meridian Diagnostics ImmunoCard H. ANALYTE: Lambda Light Chains (3705) Behring Nephelometer II (07563) pylori (40195) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR ANALYTE: Alpha-Fetoprotein—Tumor SmithKline FlexSure HP Test (58321) EXAMINATION: Marker (0424) ANALYTE: Hemopexin (2517) Behring Nephelometer II (07563) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR ANALYTE: Mumps Antibodies (4007) EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Boehringer Mannheim ES 300 AL (07524) Behring Nephelometer II (07563) EXAMINATION: ANALYTE: Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) ANALYTE: Hepatitis A Virus Antibody Vitek Systems Vidas (67038) (0441) (2519) ANALYTE: Mycoplasma pneumoniae TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Antibodies (4016) EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Bio-Rad Radias System (07493) Abbott IMX (04056) EXAMINATION: J & S Medical Accutex SLE Latex Test ANALYTE: Immunoglobulins IgA (2803) Meridian Diagnostics ImmunoCard (31002) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Mycoplasma (40196) ANALYTE: Anti-Streptolysin O (ASO) (0452) EXAMINATION: Murex Mycoplasma pneumoniae Antibody TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) Detection Kit (40175) EXAMINATION: Behring Nephelometer II (07563) ANALYTE: Rheumatoid Factor (RF) (5508) Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Behring Nephelometer II (07563) Du Pont ACA Star (13357) EXAMINATION: 25960 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices Behring Nephelometer II (07563) Helena Laboratories Cascade M (25156) Organon Teknika AuraTek FDP (46153) Immunostics immuno/undiluted ra Test HemoTec Automated Coagulation Timer II Vitek FDP Slidex direct (67084) (28275) (25180) ANALYTE: Fibrinogen (1905) J & S Medical Accutex Rheumatoid Factor Instrumentation Laboratory MCL 2 TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (RF) Latex Test (31005) Coagulation Analyzer (28297) EXAMINATION: J & S Medical Eye Spot Rheumatoid Factor International Technidyne Factor VI American Bioproducts STA Analyzer (RF) Test (31012) Premier (28296) (04594) Pulse Scientific Rheumatoid Factor (RF) International Technidyne Factor VI Behring Nephelometer II (07563) Test (49101) Premier SingleShot APTT (28293) Du Pont ACA Star (13357) Trinity Laboratories RHEUMA–LEX International Technidyne Factor VI Helena Laboratories Cascade M (25156) System (61116) Premier Vacu-APTT (28295) Instrumentation Laboratory MCL 2 ANALYTE: Rickettsia typhi Ab (Typhus International Technidyne Factor VI Coagulation Analyzer (28297) Antibodies) (5514) SingleShot APTT (28292) International Technidyne Factor VI (28093) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR International Technidyne Factor VI Vacu- International Technidyne Factor VI EXAMINATION: APTT (28294) Premier (28296) Integrated Diagnostics INDX DIP–S–TICKS International Technidyne Hemochron 400 International Technidyne Hemochron 400 R. typhi (28265) Cit. One-Step APTT (28287) (28094) ANALYTE: Rubella Antibodies (5510) International Technidyne Hemochron 400 International Technidyne Hemochron 401 TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Direct Draw APTT (28282) (28095) EXAMINATION: International Technidyne Hemochron 401 International Technidyne Hemochron 800 PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS Magnum Cit. One-Step APTT (28288) (28096) (49097) International Technidyne Hemochron 401 International Technidyne Hemochron 8000 PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS PLUS Direct Draw APTT (28283) (28298) (49098) International Technidyne Hemochron 800 International Technidyne Hemochron 801 Princeton BioMeditech BioSign Rubella Cit. One-Step APTT (28289) (28097) (49121) International Technidyne Hemochron 800 Medical Laboratory MLA Electra 1600C Wampole IMPACT Rubella Slide Test Direct Draw APTT (28284) (40167) (70165) International Technidyne Hemochron 8000 TOA Medical Electronics CA–1000 (61132) ANALYTE: Rubeola Antibodies (measles) (28298) TOA Medical Electronics CA–5000 (61135) (5511) International Technidyne Hemochron 8000 Vitek HEMOLAB (67075) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Cit. One-Step APTT (28291) ANALYTE: Hematocrit (2514) EXAMINATION: International Technidyne Hemochron 8000 TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Vitek Systems Vidas (67038) Direct Draw APTT (28286) EXAMINATION: International Technidyne Hemochron 801 ANALYTE: Toxoplasma gondii Antibodies Abbott Cell-Dyn 1700 (04607) Cit. One-Step APTT (28290) (6113) Abbott EnCounter (04525) International Technidyne Hemochron 801 TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Alicia Diagnostic Genesis I (04536) Direct Draw APTT (28285) EXAMINATION: Coulter ONYX (10254) International Technidyne Microsample Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) Coulter ONYX with Autoloader (10281) Biokit Toxogen (07494) Coagulation Analyzer (28267) DMA H12 (13284) PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS (49001) Medical Laboratory MLA Electra 1600C Danam Datacell 16CP (13363) PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS Magnum (40167) Diametrics Medical IRMA Blood Analysis (49097) Organon Teknika Multi Channel Discrete System (13362) PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS PLUS Analyzer (MDA–180) (46144) I-STAT i-STAT 200 System (28344) (49098) TOA Medical Electronics CA–1000 (61132) Infolab I–1600 (28379) Vitek Systems Vidas Toxo Competition TOA Medical Electronics CA–5000 (61135) Instrumentation Laboratory BGElectrolytes (TXC) Assay (67080) Vitek HEMOLAB (67075) (28063) ANALTYE: Varicella-Zoster Virus Antibodies ANALYTE: Antithrombin III (ATIII) (0456) Nova 16 (43103) (6704) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Nova Stat Profile 9 (43086) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR EXAMINATION: Nova Stat Profile Plus 10 (43063) EXAMINATION: Behring Nephelometer II (07563) Nova Stat Profile Ultra 11P Analyzer Vitek Systems Vidas (67038) Du Pont ACA Star (13357) (43101) Separation Technology STI HemataSTAT SPECIALITY/SUBSPECIALITY: Hematology ANALYTE: Body Fluid Microscopic Elements (0716) Model C70B (58310) ANALYTE: Activated Clotting Time (ACT) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Sysmex K–4500 (58358) (0461) EXAMINATION: Sysmex K–800 (58307) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR IRIS IRIScope Body Fld. Cell Count Sys. Sysmex SE–9000 (58318) EXAMINATION: (RBC/WBC enum. only) (28333) Technalysis CELLEXIS Hematology HemoTec Automated Coagulation Timer Analyzer (61102) High Range Heparinase (25184) ANALYTE: Capillary fragility (1093) Technicon H.3 RTC System (61103) HemoTec Automated Coagulation Timer II TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Technicon H. 3 RTX System (61104) (25180) EXAMINATION: Texas International Laboratories H12 HemoTec Automated Coagulation Timer II Capillary Fragility/Tourniquet Test (10247) (61128) High Range Heparinase (25185) ANALYTE: Fibrin Monomers (1927) ANALYTE: Hemoglobin (2515) International Technidyne Hemochron 8000 TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (28298) EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: International Technidyne Hemochron Jr. Ethanol Gel; Protamine Sulfate (no serial AVL 995 Hb (04021) Microcoagulation (28345) dilutions) (16044) Abbott Cell-Dyn 1700 (04607) ANALYTE: Activated Partial Thromboplastin ANALYTE: Fibrin Split Products (Fibrin Abbott EnCounter (04525) Time (APTT) (0409) Degradation) (1904) Alicia Diagnostics Genesis I (04536) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Artel HbM Hemoglobinometer (04551) EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: Ciba Corning 280 (10036) American Bioproducts STA Analyzer Baxter Diagnostic Dimertest Latex Assay Ciba Corning 288 (10037) (04594) (07552) Ciba Corning 845 (10296) Behring Fibrintimer A (07516) Baxter Diagnostic FDP Detection Set Ciba Corning 855 (10297) Cardiovascular Diagnostics TAS Analyzer (07551) Ciba Corning 865 (10298) (10257) Du Pont ACA Star (13357) Coulter ONYX (10254) Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices 25961 Coulter ONYX with Autoloader (10281) Behring Fibrintimer A (07516) International Technidyne Hemochron 400 DMA H12 (13284) Boehringer Mannheim CoaguChek System HiTT (28304) Danam Datacell 16CP (13363) (07496) International Technidyne Hemochron 401 I-STAT i-STAT 200 System (28344) Cardiovascular Diagnostics TAS Analyzer HNTT (28300) Infolab I–1600 (28379) (10257) International Technidyne Hemochron 401 Radiometer ABL 1 (55049) Helena Laboratories Cascade M (25156) HiTT (28305) Radiometer ABL 2 (55001) HemoTec Automated Coagulation Timer II International Technidyne Hemochron 800 Radiometer ABL 2 RA (55050) (25180) HNTT (28301) Radiometer ABL 3 (55002) Instrumentation Laboratory MCL 2 International Technidyne Hemochron 800 Radiometer ABL 3 M (55051) Coagulation Analyzer (28297) HiTT (28306) Radiometer ABL 300 (55004) International Technidyne Factor VI Jr. International Technidyne Hemochron 8000 Radiometer ABL 4 (55006) Microcoagulation (28346) (28298) Radiometer ABL 510 (55054) International Technidyne Factor VI International Technidyne Hemochron 8000 Radiometer ABL 520 (55055) Premier (28296) HNTT (28303) Separation Technology STI HemataSTAT International Technidyne Hemochron 8000 International Technidyne Hemochron 8000 Model C70B (58310) (28298) HiTT (28308) StatChem StatTest System (58269) International Technidyne Hemocrhon Jr. International Technidyne Hemochron 801 Sysmex K–4500 (58358) Microcoagulation (28345) HNTT (28302) Sysmex K–800 (58307) Medical Laboratory MLA Electra 1600C International Technidyne Hemochron 801 Sysmex SE–9000 (58318) (40167) HiTT (28307) Technalysis CELLEXIS Hematology Organon Teknika Multi Channel Discrete Medical Laboratory MLA Electra 1600C Analyzer (61102) Analyzer (MDA–180) (46144) (40167) Technicon H.3 RTC System (61103) TOA Medical Electronics CA–1000 (61132) TOA Medical Electronics CA–1000 (61132) Technicon H.3 RTX System (61104) TOA Medical Electronics CA–5000 (61135) TOA Medical Electronics CA–5000 (61135) Texas International Laboratories H12 Vitek HEMOLAB (67075) Vitek HEMOLAB (67075) (61128) ANALYTE: Red Blood Cell Count ANALYTE: White Blood Cell Count ANALYTE: Heparin (2518) (Erythrocyte Count) (RBC) (5502) (Leukocyte Count) (WBC) (7002) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: Du Pont ACA Star (13357) Abbott Cell-Dyn 1700 (04607) Abbott Cell-Dyn 1700 (04607) ANALYTE: Heparin Dose Response (HDR) Abbott EnCounter (04525) Abbott EnCounter (04525) (2539) Alicia Diagnostics Genesis I (04536) Alicia Diagnostics Genesis I (04536) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Coulter ONYX (10254) Coulter ONYX (10254) EXAMINATION: Coulter ONYX with Autoloader (10281) Coulter ONYX with Autoloader (10281) International Technidyne Factor VI (28093) DMA H12 (13284) DMA H12 (13284) International Technidyne Hemochron 400 Danam Datacell 16CP (13363) Danam Datacell 16CP (13363) (28094) Infolab I–1600 (28379) Infolab I–1600 (28379) International Technidyne Hemochron 401 Sysmex K–4500 (58358) Sysmex K–4500 (58358) (28095) Sysmex K–800 (58307) Sysmex K–800 (58307) International Technidyne Hemochron 800 Sysmex SE–9000 (58318) Sysmex SE–9000 (58318) (28096) Technalysis CELLEXIS Hematology Technalysis CELLEXIS Hematology International Technidyne Hemochron 8000 Analyzer (61102) Analyzer (61102) (28298) Technicon H.3 RTC System (61103) Technicon H.3 RTC System (61103) International Technidyne Hemochron 801 Technicon H.3 RTX System (61104) Technicon H.3 RTX (61104) (28097) Texas International Laboratories H12 Texas International Laboratories H12 ANALYTE: Plasminogen (4907) (61128) (61128) ANALYTE: Reticulocyte Count (5506) ANALYTE: White Blood Cell Differential TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (WBC Diff) (7001) EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Behring Nephelometer II (07563) Becton Dickinson FACSCAN (with retic EXAMINATION: Du Pont ACA Star (13357) count software) (07518) Abbott Cell-Dyn 1700 (04607) ANALYTE: Platelet Count (4908) Coulter MAXM (10078) Abbott EnCounter (04525) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Coulter STKS (10093) Alicia Diagnostics Genesis I (04536) EXAMINATION: Technicon H.3 RTC System (61103) Coulter ONYX (10254) Abbott Cell-Dyn 1700 (04607) Technicon H.3 RTX System (61104) Coulter ONYX with Autoloader (10281) Abbott EnCounter (04525) ANALYTE: Semen (5822) DMA H12 (13284) Alicia Diagnostics Genesis I (04536) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Danam Datacell 16CP (13363) Coulter ONYX (10254) EXAMINATION: Infolab I–1600 (28379) Coulter ONYX with Autoloader (10281) IRIS IRIScope Body Fld. Cell Count Sys. Sysmex K–4500 (58358) DMA H12 (13284) (sperm enum. only) (28334) Sysmex SE–9000 (58318) Danam Datacell 16CP (13363) ANALYTE: Thrombin Time (6105) Technalysis CELLEXIS Hematology Infolab I–1600 (28379) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Analyzer (61102) Sysmex K–4500 (58358) EXAMINATION: Technicon H.3 RTC System (61103) Sysmex K–800 (58307) American Bioproducts STA Analyzer Technicon H.3 RTX System (61104) Sysmex SE–9000 (58318) (04594) Texas International Laboratories H12 Technalysis CELLEXIS Hematology Helena Laboratories Cascade M (25156) (61128) Analyzer (61102) Instrumentation Laboratory MCL 2 SPECIALITY/SUBSPECIALITY: Mycology Technicon H.3 RTC System (61103) Coagulation Analyzer (28297) Technicon H.3 RTX System (61104) International Technidyne Factor VI ANALYTE: Dermatophytes (1302) Texas International Laboratories H12 Premier (28296) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (61128) International Technidyne Factor VI EXAMINATION: ANALYTE: Prothrombin Time (PT) (4922) Preimer Throm. Time Plus (28310) Biomed Diagnostics InTray DM Medium TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR International Technidyne Factor VI (07559) EXAMINATION: Thrombin Time Plus (28309) Troy Biologicals Dermatophyte Test American Bioproducts STA Analyzer International Technidyne Hemochron 400 Medium (61106) (04594) HNTT (28299) ANALYTE: Yeast, Candida only (7603) 25962 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Drug Screening Systems microLINE Schiapparelli Biosystems ACE Clinical EXAMINATION: Screens (13259) Chemistry System (58288) MicroProbe Affirm VPIII Microbial Du Pont ACA Star (13357) ANALYTE: Digitoxin (1303) Identification Test (40163) Olympus AU 5041 (46145) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR SPECIALITY/SUBSPECIALITY: Parasitology Olympus AU 5121 (46087) EXAMINATION: Olympus AU 5200 (46143) ANALYTE: Cryptosprodium (1109) Cirrus Diagnostics Immulite (10159) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR ANALYTE: Cannabinoids (THC) (1009) Du Pont ACA Star (13357) EXAMINATION: TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR ANALYTE: Digoxin (1304) Alexon ProSpecT Cryptosporidum Rapid EXAMINATION: TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Assay (dir. Ag/vis.) (04553) Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) EXAMINATION: ANALYTE: Giardia lamblia (2222) Biosite Triage Panel Drugs of Abuse plus Abbott AxSYM (04532) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Tricyl.Antidprsnt. (07528) Beckman Synchron CX 4 CE (07174) EXAMINATION: Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) Alexon ProSpecT Giardia Rapid Assay Du Pont ACA Star (13357) Boehringer Mannheim ES 300 AL (07524) (direct antigen/visual) (04364) Olympus AU 5041 (46145) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) Olympus AU 5121 (46087) Du Pont ACA Star (13357) ANALYTE: Scabies (5831) Olympus AU 5200 (46143) Du Pont Dimension XL (13355) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Princeton BioMeditech AbuSign DOA 4 Kodak Ektachem 250 (34037) EXAMINATION: (49130) Kodak Ektachem 950 IRC (34087) All Direct Wet Mount Preparations (04108) Princeton BioMeditech AbuSign THC PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS Magnum ANALYTE: Trichomonas (6116) (49133) (49097) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Princeton BioMeditech AccuSign THC PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS PLUS EXAMINATION: (49139) (49098) MicroProbe Affirm VPIII Microbial Princeton BioMeditech BioSign THC Sanofi Pasteur Access Immunoassay Identification Test (40163) (49137) System (58257) SPECIALITY/SUBSPECIALITY: Toxicology/ Princeton BioMeditech DOA–COC (49135) Schiapparelli Biosystems ACE Clinical TDM Roche OnTrak TESTCUP Collection/ Chemistry System (58288) ANALYTE: Acetaminophen (0406) Urinalysis Panel (55146) Technicon OPERA Clinical Chemistry TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR ANALYTE: Carbamazepine (1010) System (61161) EXAMINATION: TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Vitek Systems Vidas (67038) Du Pont ACA Star (13357) EXAMINATION: Wako Diagnostics 30R (70002) GDS Diagnostics Stat-Site Meter (22126) Abbott AxSYM (04532) ANALYTE: Ethanol (Alcohol) (1608) ANALYTE: Amikacin (0425) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Du Pont ACA Star (13357) EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 1800 Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) Du Pont ACA Star (13357) (28323) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 1800 Du Pont ACA Star (13357) ANALYTE: Amphetamines (0428) Du Pont Dimension XL (13355) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (28322) PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS Magnum Kodak Ektachem 950 IRC (34087) EXAMINATION: Olympus AU 5041 (46145) Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) (49097) Biosite Triage Panel Drugs of Abuse plus PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS Magnum ANALYTE: Ethosuximide (1609) Tricyl.Antidprsnt. (07528) (49098) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 911 (07377) Seradyn LPIA–100 (58294) EXAMINATION: Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) ANALYTE: Carboxyhemoglobin (1012) Du Pont ACA Star (13357) Drug Screening Systems microLINE TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR ANALYTE: Gentamicin (2202) Screens (13259) EXAMINATION: TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Du Pont ACA Star (13357) Ciba Corning 845 (10296) EXAMINATION: Olympus AU 5041 (46145) Ciba Corning 855 (10297) Abbott AxSYM (04532) Olympus AU 5121 (46087) Ciba Corning 865 (10298) Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) Olympus AU 5200 (46143) Radiometer ABL 620 (55137) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) Princeton BioMeditech AbuSign DOA 4 ANALYTE: Cocaine Metabolites (1023) Du Pont ACA Star (13357) (49130) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 1800 ANALYTE: Barbiturates (0701) EXAMINATION: (28323) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 900 (28322) EXAMINATION: Biosite Triage Panel Drugs of Abuse plus PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS Magnum Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) Tricyl.Antidprsnt. (07528) (49097) Biosite Triage Panel Drugs of Abuse plus Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 911 (07377) PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS PLUS Tricyl.Antidprsnt. (07528) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) (49098) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) Du Pont ACA Star (13357) Seradyn LPIA–100 (58294) Drug Screening Systems microLINE EDITEK VERDICT COCAINE (16078) Technicon OPERA Clinical Chemistry Screens (13259) Olympus AU 5041 (46145) System (61161) Du Pont ACA Star (13357) Olympus AU 5121 (46087) Olympus AU 5041 (46145) Olympus AU 5200 (46143) ANALYTE: Isonicotinic Acid (2819) Olympus AU 5121 (46087) Princeton BioMeditech AbuSign COC TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Olympus AU 5200 (46143) (49132) EXAMINATION: Schiapparelli Biosystems ACE Clinical Princeton BioMeditech AbuSign DOA 4 DynaGen MYCODYN URITEC Test Strips Chemistry System (58288) (49130) (13264) ANALYTE: Benzodiazepines (0702) Princeton BioMeditech AccuSign COC ANALYTE: Lidocaine (3710) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (49138) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR EXAMINATION: Princeton BioMeditech BioSign COC EXAMINATION: Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) (49136) Du Pont ACA Star (13357) Biosite Triage Panel Drugs of Abuse plus Princeton BioMeditech DOA–TCO (49134) ANALYTE: Lithium (3712) Tricyl.Antidprsnt. (07528) Roche OnTrak TESTCUP Collection/ TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) Urinalysis Panel (55146) EXAMINATION: Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices 25963 Instrumentation Laboratory ILyte Na, K, Li Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) Technicon OPERA Clinical Chemistry System (28319) Biosite Triage Panel Drugs of Abuse plus System (61161) Ionetics Model 400/450 Electrolyte Tricyl.Antidpresnt. (07528) ANALYTE: Primidone (4912) Analyzer (28324) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 911 (07377) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Kodak Ektachem 250 (34037) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) EXAMINATION Kodak Ektachem 400 (34012) Du Pont ACA Star (13357) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) Kodak Ektachem 500 (34013) EDITEK VERDICT OPIATES (16077) Du Pont ACA Star (13357) Kodak Ektachem 550 XRC Analyzer Olympus AU 5041 (46145) ANALYTE: Procainamide (4913) (34056) Olumpus AU 5121 (46087) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Kodak Ektachem 700 (34014) Olympus AU 5200 (46143) EXAMINATION: Kodak Ektachem 700 Analyzer C Series Princeton BioMeditech AbuSign DOA 4 Du Pont ACA Star (13357) (34054) (49130) PB Diagnostics System OPUS (49001) Kodak Ektachem 700 P (34024) Princeton BioMeditech AbuSign Opi Kodak Ektachem 700 XR (34015) (49144) ANALYTE: Propoxyphene (4917) Kodak Ektachem 750 XRC Analyzer Princeton BioMeditech AccuSign Opi TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (34055) (49146) EXAMINATION: Kodak Ektachem 950 IRC (34087) Princeton BioMeditech BioSign Opi Olympus AU 5041 (46145) Kodak Ektachem DT 60 (34016) (49147) Olympus AU 5121 (46087) Kodak Ektachem DT II (34057) Princeton BioMeditech DOA-Opi (49145) Olympus AU 5200 (46143) Kodak Ektachem DT SC II Module (34028) ANALYTE: Phencyclidine (PCP) (4901) ANALYTE: Quinidine (5202) Kodak Ektachem DT SC Module (34017) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Kodak Ektachem DTE Module (34018) EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: Nova 10 (with CRT) (43061) Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) Abbott AxSYM (04532) ANALYTE: Methadone (4003) Biosite Triage Panel Drugs of Abuse plus Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Tricyl.Antidprsnt. (07528) Du Pont ACA Star (13357) EXAMINATION: Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) ANALYTE: Salicylates (5801) Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) Du Pont ACA Star (13357) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Biosite Triage Panel for Drugs of Abuse EDITEK EZ-Screen:PCP (16073) EXAMINATION: (07195) Olympus AU 5041 (46145) Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) Olympus AU 5121 (46087) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) Du Pont ACA (13082) Olympus AU 5200 (46143) Du Pont ACA Star (13357) Du Pont ACA II (13172) Schiapparelli Biosystems ACE Clinical Du Pont Dimension XL (13355) Du Pont ACA III (13173) Chemistry System (58288) Kodak Ektachem 550 XRC Analyzer Du Pont ACA IV (13083) ANALYTE: Phenobarbital (4902) (34056) Du Pont ACA Star (13357) Kodak Ektachem 700 Analyzer C Series Du Pont ACA V (13084) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR EXAMINATION: (34054) Olympus AU 5041 (46145) Kodak Ektachem 750 XRC Analyzer Olympus AU 5121 (46087) Abbott AxSYM (04532) Baxter Paramax (07048) (34055) Olympus AU 5200 (46143) Kodak Ektachem 950 (IRC (34087) Roche Abuscreen ONTRAK (55099) Baxter Paramax 720 (07186) Baxter Paramax 720 ZX (07049) ANALYTE: Theophylline (6104) ANALYTE: Methamphetamines (4004) Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: Du Pont ACA Star (13357) Abbott AxSYM (04532) Biosite Triage Panel Drugs of Abuse plus Du Pont Dimension XL (13355) Baxter Paramax (07048) Tricyl.Antidprsnt. (07528) Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 1800 Baxter Paramax 720 (07186) ANALYTE: Methaqualone (4005) (28323) Baxter Paramax 720 ZX (07049) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 900 Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) EXAMINATION: (28322) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS Magnum Du Pont ACA Star (13357) Olympus AU 5041 (46145) (49097) Du Pont Dimension XL (13355) Olympus AU 5121 (46087) PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS PLUS Immunomatrix Theophylline Blood Olympus AU 5200 (46143) (49098) Monitoring System (28318) ANALYTE: Methotrexate (4006) Schiapparelli Biosystems ACE Clinical Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 1800 TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Chemistry System (58288) (28323) EXAMINATION: Seradyn LPIA–100 (58294) Instrumentation Laboratory ILAB 900 Du Pont ACA Star (13357) Technicon OPERA Clinical Chemistry (28322) ANALYTE: Morphine (4020) System (61161) Kodak Ektachem 550 XRC Analyzer TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR ANALYTE: Phenytoin (4903) (34056) EXAMINATION: TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Kodak Ektachem 700 Analyzer C Series Roche OnTrak TESTCUP Collection/ EXAMINATION: (34054) Urinalysis Panel (55146) Abbott AxSYM (04532) Kodak Ektachem 750 XRC Analyzer Sun Biomedical Labs Visualine II Baxter Paramax (07048) (34055) Morphine/Opiates/Heroin (58359) Baxter Paramax 720 (07186) Kodak Ektachem 950 IRC (34087) ANALYTE: N-Acetylprocainamide (NAPA) Baxter Paramax 720 ZX (07049) Kodak Ektachem DT II (34057) (4301) Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS Magnum TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) (49097) EXAMINATION: Du Pont ACA Star (13357) PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS PLUS Du Pont ACA Star (13357) Du Pont Dimension XL (13355) (49098) PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS (49001) Kodak Ektachem 250 (34037) Schiapparelli Biosystems ACE Clinical PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS Magnum Kodak Ektachem 950 IRC (34087) Chemistry System (58288) (49097) PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS Magnum Technicon OPERA Clinical Chemistry PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS PLUS (49097) System (61161) (49098) PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS PLUS Vitek Systems Vidas (67038) ANALYTE: Opiates (4601) (49098) ANALYTE: Tobramycin (6112) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Schiapparelli Biosystems ACE Clinical TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR EXAMINATION: Chemistry System (58288) EXAMINATION: 25964 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices Abbott AxSYM (04532) Orion Diagnostica Diarlex Rota-Adeno (dir. Sanofi Pasteur Chlamydia Micro. EIA Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) antigen/visual) (46154) Blocking (dir.ag/spec.) (58330) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 911 (07377) ANALYTE: Rotavirus (5509) Sanofi Pasteur Chlamydia Microplate EIA Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (dir. ag./spectro.) (58336) Du Pont ACA Star (13357) EXAMINATION: Syva MicroTrak II Chlamydia EIA Blocking PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS Magnum Abbott TestPack Rotavirus (direct antigen/ Assay (dir.ag/spec) (58335) (49097) visual) (04516) ANALYTE: Clostridium difficile (1022) PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS PLUS Meridian Diagnostics ImmunoCard TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (49098) Rotavirus (40189) EXAMINATION: Technicon OPERA Clinical Chemistry Orion Diagnostica Diarlex Rota-Adeno (dir. Alexon ProSpecT Clostridium difficile System (61161) antigen/visual) (46154) (direct Ag/spectro) (04540) ANALYTE: Tricyclic Antidepressants (6117) COMPLEXITY: High Alexon ProSpecT Clostridium difficile TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (direct Ag/visual) (04539) EXAMINATION: SPECIALITY/SUBSPECIALITY: Bacteriology Becton Dickinson CULTURETTE BRAND Biosite Triage Panel Drugs of Abuse plus ANALYTE: Aerobic &/or Anaerobic Toxin CD (dir. Ag/visual) (07486) Tricyl.Antidprsnt. (07528) Organisms-unlimited sources (0412) Becton Dickinson CULTURETTE BRAND Du Pont ACA Star (13357) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Toxin CD (dir. Ag/Spectro) (07487) ANALYTE: Valproic Acid (6701) EXAMINATION: TechLab C. difficile 1-hour TOX–A Test TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Alamar Bacterial Identification Panel (spectrophotometric) (61149) EXAMINATION: (including culture) (04531) TechLab C. difficile 1-hour TOX–A Test Abbott AxSYM (04532) Analytab API 20E/UniScept 20E (including (visual) (61148) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 704 (07161) culture) (04513) TechLab C. difficile Toxin/Antitoxin Kit Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 717 (07163) Becton Dickinson Crystal E/NF ID System (61107) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 911 (07377) (including culture) (07485) TechLab Clostridium difficile TOX–B Test Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) Becton Dickinson Crystal RS/E ID System (61147) Ciba Corning Biotrack 516 (10048) (including culture) (07484) ANALYTE: Dental plaque (1317) Du Pont ACA Star (13357) Micro Media Sys. Microdilution MIC/ID TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS Magnum Panels (inc. culture) (40201) EXAMINATION: (49097) Radiometer Microbat 12A & 12A∂12B G/ BioScan Video Phase Contrast Microscope PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS PLUS neg ID Sys (inc. cult.) (55115) (07499) (49098) Roche Oxi/Ferm II (including culture) ANALYTE: Escherichia coli (1604) Seradyn LPIA–100 (58294) (55116) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Vitek Systems Rapid NFT (including ANALYTE: Vancomycin (6703) EXAMINATION: culture) (67076) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Remel E. coli 0157:H7 Latex Test EXAMINATION: ANALYTE: Aerobic Organisms from urine (including culture) (55125) Abbott AxSYM (04532) specimens only (0468) ANALYTE: Legionella (3706) Du Pont ACA Star (13357) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS (49001) EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS Magnum Adams Scientific Selecticult-U Binax Legionella Urinary Antigen EIA (49097) (nonconfirmatory ID) (04548) (07527) PB Diagnostics Systems OPUS PLUS BioClinical Systems Bullseye Urine Plate (49098) (nonconfirm. ID) (07539) ANALYTE: N. gonorrhoeae (from urogenital SPECIALITY/SUBSPECIALITY: Urinalysis Culture Kits, Inc. Uri-Three or rectal only) (4317) (nonconfirmatory ID) (10262) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR ANALYTE: Total Solids (Specific Gravity) Future Medical Tech. Intl. Qualture EXAMINATION: (6125) (nonconfirmatory ID) (19022) Gen-Probe PACE 2C System (22171) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Innovative Diag. Systems IDS Rapid SS/U EXAMINATION: ANALYTE: Neisseria gonorrhoeae (4302) ATAGO A300CL Clinical Refractometer (including culture) (28053) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (04575) Troy Biologicals Bacti-Star II Urine Sys. EXAMINATION: ATAGO T–2 Clinical Refractometer (nonconfirm. ID) (61142) E–Y Laboratories Gonochek–II Kit (16027) (04577) Troy Biologicals Bacti-Star Urine Plate ANALYTE: Salmonella (5802) ATAGO UG–1 Digital Urine Specific (nonconfirm. ID) (61143) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Gravity Refractometer (04576) Troy Biologicals Bacti-Urine Plate EXAMINATION: ATAGO URICON–PN Urine Specific (nonconfirmatory ID) (61144) SMI MED. Salmonella O Grouping Gravity Refractometer (04578) Troy Biologicals Uri-Check Plus (including culture) (58255) (nonconfirmatory ID) (61145) Ames Clinitek Atlas Automated Urine ANALYTE: Staphyococcus (5807) Analyzer (04527) UTI-tect Bacteriuria Diag. Test System (nonconfirmatory ID) (64028) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR IRIS The Yellow IRIS Model 250 (28369) EXAMINATION: IRIS The Yellow IRIS Model 450 (28370) ANALYTE: Chlamydia (1016) Trinity Laboratories STAPH–A–LEX National Instrument Hand Protometer TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR System (including Culture) (61129) (43085) EXAMINATION: Unipath Staphytect–OD (including culture) ANALYTE: Urine Qualitative Dipstick DAKO IDEIA Chlamydia (direct Ag/ (64030) Chemistries (6406) spectrophoto) (13329) DAKO IDEIA Chlamydia (direct Ag/visual) ANALYTE: Streptococcus pneumoniae TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (5808) EXAMINATION: (13328) DAKO IMAGEN Chlamydia (direct antigen) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Ames Clinitek Atlas Automated Urine EXAMINATION: Analyzer (04527) (13334) Gen-Probe PACE 2C System (22171) AB Biodisk Etest for S. pneumoniae Boehringer Mannheim CHEMSTRIP Mini (including culture) (04561) UA Urine Analyzer (07565) Gen-Probe Pace2 Probe Competition Assay Boehringer Mannheim Chemstrip Super (PCA) (dir. Ag) (22166) ANALYTE: Streptococcus, group A (5810) UA Urine Analyzer (07520) NeoGenex C. trachomatis Antigen Test TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (direct antigen) (43099) EXAMINATION: SPECIALITY/SUBSPECIALITY: Virology NeoGenex C. trachomatis Antigen Test Becton Dickinson Precise STREP A ANALYTE: Adenovirus (0410) (inc. cell culture) (43098) (including culture) (07427) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Roche Amplicor Chlamydia Trachomatis Gen-Probe Group A Streptococcus Direct EXAMINATION: Test (55118) Test (22165) Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices 25965 Pro-lab Prolex Streptococcal Grouping Bioanalytical Systems Urinary SeaLite Sciences AquaLite hCG (58340) Latex (inc. culture) (49116) Catecholamine Kit (07560) Wallac Oy DELFIA hCG Kit (70147) Remel RIM Strep Grouping LA Test ANALYTE: Cortisol (1032) ANALYTE: Homovanillic Acid (HVA) (2545) (including culture) (55139) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Syntron QuikPac Strep A (EIA) Test EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: (including culture) (58293) Nichols Institute Chemiluminescence esa Coulochem Electrode Array System ANALYTE: Streptococcus, group B (5811) Cortisol Assay (43082) (CEAS) (16043) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Wallac Oy DELFIA Cortisol Kit (70159) ANALYTE: Human Growth Hormone (GH) EXAMINATION: elias usa Synelisa Cortisol (16048) (2547) Pacific Biotech Cards O.S. Strep B. ANALYTE: Cortisol, Urine (extraction TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (including culture) (49115) procedure) (1095) EXAMINATION: Pro-Lab Prolex Streptococcal Grouping TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Nichols Institute Chemiluminescence HGH Latex (inc. culture) (49116) EXAMINATION: Assay (43068) Remel RIM Strep Grouping LA Test Abbott TDX (04071) Wallac Oy DELFIA hGH Kit (70162) (including culture) (55139) Abbott TDX FLx (04072) ANALYTE: Insulin-like Grwth Factor Bind. ANALYTE: Streptococcus, group C (5812) Sanofi Pasteur Access Immunoassay Protein3 (IGFBP–3) (2832) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR System (58257) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR EXAMINATION: Vitek Systems Vidas (67038) EXAMINATION: Pro-Lab Prolex Streptococcal Grouping ANALYTE: Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) Diagnostic Systems Active IGFBP–3 IRMA Latex (inc. culture) (49116) (1309) Kit (13375) Remel RIM Strep Grouping LA Test TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Diagnostic Systems DSL–6700 IGFBP–3 (including culture) (55139) EXAMINATION: RIA Kit (13310)) ANALYTE: Streptococcus, group D (5813) Diagnositic Systems DSL–9000 Active Endocrine Sciences IGFBP–3 RIA Kit TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR DHEA RIA Kit (13309) (16060) EXAMINATION: Nichols Institute Chemiluminescence ANALYTE: Luteinizing Hormone (LH) (3713) Pro-Lab Prolex Streptococcal Grouping DHEA Assay (43079) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Latex (inc. culture) (49116) elias usa Synelisa DHEA Sulfate EIA Kit EXAMINATION: ANALYTE: Streptococcus, group F (5814) (16062) ICN ImmuChem LH–MW Elisa Kit (28269) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR ANALYTE: Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulfate Roche Cobas Core LH EIA (manual EXAMINATION: (DHEA-SO4) (1310) procedure) (55121) Pro-Lab Prolex Streptococcal Grouping TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR SeaLite Sciences AquaLite LH (58339) Latex (inc. culture) (49116) EXAMINATION: Wallac Oy DELFIA hLH Kit (70150) Remel RIM Strep Grouping LA Test Nichols Institute Chemiluminescence Wallac Oy DELFIA hLH Spec Kit (70151) (including culture) (55139) DHEA-S Assay (43083) ANALYTE: Parathyroid Hormone—Intact ANALYTE: Streptococcus, group G (5815) (4924) ANALYTE: Erythropoietin (1611) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: Pro-Lab Prolex Streptococcal Grouping Bio-Rad CoTube (07138) Genzyme Predicta Erythropoietin Kit Latex (inc. culture) (49116) Diagnostic Products Corp. Coat-A-Count Remel RIM Strep Grouping LA Test (22159) (13030) (including culture) (55139) Nichols Institute Cheiluminescence Immunodiagnostic Systems ltd Gamma- Erythropoietin Assay (43100) BCT Intact PTH (28351) SPECIALITY/SUBSPECIALITY: R & D Systems Quantikine Erythropoietin Endocrinology Immunodiagnostic Systems ltd OCTEIA ELISA (55114)) Intact PTH (28350) ANALYTE: 17 OH Progesterone, Neonatal R & D Systems Quantikine IVD Nichols Institute Chemiluminescence PTH (0103) Erythropoietin ELISA (55132) Assay (43080) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR ANALYTE: Estradiol (1605) ANALYTE: Progesterone (4914) EXAMINATION: TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Wallac Oy DELFIA Neo-17a-OHP Kit EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: (70157) Bio-Rad CoTube (07138) CyberFluor FIAgen Progesterone Assay Kit ANALYTE: 17 alpha-OH Progesterone (0109) Clinical Assays GammaCoat (10060) (10261) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Diagnostic Products Corp. Coat-a-Count Immunotech Progesterone RIA Kit (28325) EXAMINATION: Estradiol-6 (13317) Wallac Oy DELFIA Progesterone Kit Pantex NeoScreen ELISA 17 alpha- Wallac Oy DELFIA Estradiol Kit (70148) (70153) Hydroxyprogesterone (49124) ANALYTE: Estrone (1628) elias usa Synelisa Progesterone (16046) ANALYTE: 5-Hydroxyindolacetic Acid, TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR ANALYTE: Prolactin (4915) Urine (5-HIAA) (0101) EXAMINATION: TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Diagnostic Systems Estrone RIA Kit EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: (13314) Abbott RIA Bead (04061) esa Coulochem Electrode Array System ANALYTE: Follicle Stimulating Hormone Nichols Institute Chemiluminescence (CEAS) (16043) (FSH) (1908) Prolactin Assay (43069) ANALYTE: Adrenocorticotropic Hormone TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Roche Cobas Core Prolactin EIA (manual (ACTH) (0458) EXAMINATION: procedure) (55122) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Nichols Institute Chemiluminescence FSH Wallac Oy DELFIA Prolactin Kit (70152) EXAMINATION: Assay (43066) ANALYTE: Renin (5515) Nichols Institute Chemiluminescence Roche Cobas Core FSH EIA (manual TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR ACTH Assay (43074) procedure) (55124) EXAMINATION: ANALYTE: Aldosterone (0459) SeaLite Sciences AquaLite FSH (58342) Nichols Institute BV Active Renin RIA TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Wallac Oy DELFIA hFSH Kit (70149) (43062) EXAMINATION: ANALYTE: HCG, Beta, Serum, Quantitative ANALYTE: Sex Hormone Binding Globulin Diagnostic Systems DSL Active (2502) (5819) Aldosterone RIA Kit (13315) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR ANALYTE: Catecholamines, Urine (1055) EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Nichols Institute Chemiluminescence HCG Wallac Oy DELFIA SHBG Kit (70154) EXAMINATION: Assay (43081) ANALYTE: Testosterone (6102) 25966 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Nichols Institute Chemiluminescence Free TECO Diagnostics Amylase Reagent Set EXAMINATION: T3 Assay (43078) (manual procedure) (61156) Wallac Oy DELFIA Testosterone Kit ANALYTE: Vanillylmandelic Acid (VMA) ANALYTE: Angiotensin Converting Enzyme (70155) (6710) (ACE) (0481) ANALYTE: Thyroid Stimulating Hormone TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (TSH) (6106) EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR esa Coulochem Electrode Array System ALPCO Angiotensin Converting Enzyme EXAMINATION: (CEAS) (16043) REA (04562) Nichols Institute Chemiluminescence TSH SPECIALITY/SUBSPECIALITY: General ANALYTE: Anserine (0514) Assay (43065) Chemistry TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Roche Cobas Core TSH EIA (manual EXAMINATION: procedure) (55129) ANALYTE: 1-Methylhistidine (0107) Beckman System 6300 Series Amino Acid STC Diagnostics TSH Micro-Plate EIA TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Analyzer (07553) (58308) EXAMINATION: ANALYTE: Apolipoprotein A1 (0462) SeaLite Sciences AquaLite TSH (58350) Beckman System 6300 Series Amino Acid TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Wallac Oy DELFIA hTSH Kit (70142) Analyzer (07553) EXAMINATION: ANALYTE: Thyroid Stimulating Hormone ANALYTE: 3-Methylhistidine (0108) Nichols Institute Chemiluminescence APO–A1 Assay (43077) (TSH) (Neonatal) (6107) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR EXAMINATION: ANALYTE: Apolipoprotein B (0457) EXAMINATION: Beckman System 6300 Series Amino Acid TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Bioclone ELEGANCE Neonatal TSH ELISA Analyzer (07553) EXAMINATION: (computer calculate) (07555) ANALYTE: Alanine (0511) Nichols Institute Chemiluminescence APO–B Assay (43073) Bioclone ELEGANCE Neonatal TSH ELISA TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (manual calculations) (07554) EXAMINATION: ANALYTE: Arginine (0515) Pantex NEOSCREEN ELISA TSH (49126) Beckman System 6300 Series Amino Acid TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Wallac Oy DELFIA Neo-hTSH Kit (70156) Analyzer (07553) EXAMINATION: Beckman System 6300 Series Amino Acid ANALYTE: Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) ANALYTE: Thyroxine (T4) (6109) Analyzer (07553) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (SGPT) (0404) ANALYTE: Asparagine (0509) EXAMINATION: TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Abbott Tetrabead-125 (04519) EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: Becton Dickinson SimulTRAC (07106) STC Diagnostics ALT Micro-Plate Assay (58337) Beckman System 6300 Series Amino Acid Nichols Institute Chemiluminescence Total Analyzer (07553) T4 Assay (43070) ANALYTE: Albumin (0414) ANALYTE: Aspartic Acid (0508) Roche Cobas Core T4 EIA (manual TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR procedure) (55131) EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: Wallac Oy DELFIA T4 Kit (70145) Trace Scientific Albumin BCG Modified Beckman System 6300 Series Amino Acid Reactivity (Manual) (61118) ANALYTE: Thyroxine Binding Globulin Analyzer (07553) ANALYTE: Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) (TBG) (6110) ANALYTE: Beta-Alanine (0732) (0416) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: Wallac Oy DELFIA TBG Kit (70146) Beckman System 6300 Series Amino Acid ANALYTE: Thyroxine, Free (FT4) (6111) Hybritech Tandem-R Ostase (25170) Analyzer (07553) Synermed Test Kit (58260) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR ANALYTE: Beta-Aminoisobutyric Acid EXAMINATION: ANALYTE: Alpha-Amino-n-butyric Acid (0733) Immunotech Free T4 RIA Kit (28326) (0512) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Nichols Institute Chemiluminescence Free TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR EXAMINATION: T4 Assay (43071) EXAMINATION: Beckman System 6300 Series Amino Acid Roche Cobas Core FT4 EIA (manual Beckman System 6300 Series Amino Acid Analyzer (07553) Analyzer (07553) procedure) (55128) ANALYTE: Bilirubin, Direct (0704) STC Diagnostics Free T–4 Micro-Plate EIA ANALYTE: Alpha-Aminoadipic Acid (0510) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (58289) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR EXAMINATION: Wallac Oy DELFIA Free T4 Kit (70143) EXAMINATION: Horizon Direct Bilirubin Manual Procedure ANALYTE: Triiodothyronine (T3) (6119) Beckman System 6300 Series Amino Acid (25151) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Analyzer (07553) Synermed Test Kit (58260) EXAMINATION: ANALYTE: Aminoethylcysteine (0513) ANALYTE: Carbon Dioxide, Total (C02) Monobind Coated Tube RIA Test System TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (1003) (40164) EXAMINATION: TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Nichols Institute Chemiluminescence Total Beckman System 6300 Series Amino Acid EXAMINATION: T3 Assay (43072) Analyzer (07553) Intersect Systems Test Kit (28321) Roche Cobas Core T3 EIA (manual ANALYTE: Ammonia, Plasma/Serum (0427) ANALYTE: Carnosine (1108) procedure) (55130) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Wallac Oy DELFIA T3 Kit (70144) EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: ANALYTE: Triiodothyronine Uptake (T3U) Bekman System 6300 Series Amino Acid Beckman System 6300 Series Amino Acid (TU) (6120) Analyzer (07553) Analyzer (07553) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR ANALYTE: Amylase (0429) ANALYTE: Cholesterol (1020) EXAMINATION: TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Nichols Institute Chemiluminescence T3 EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: Uptake Assay (43087) Genzyme Test Kit (22164) King Diagnostics Test Kit (34051) ANALYTE: Triiodothyronine, Free (FT3) Intersect Systems Test Kit (28321) Randox Laboratories Test Kit (55106) (6121) Pointe Scientific Manual Amylase Test ANALYTE: Cholyglycine (Bile Acids) (1053) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (49103) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR EXAMINATION: Synermed Test Kit (58260) EXAMINATION: Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices 25967 Abbott CG RIA Kit (04517) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR ANALYTE: Citrulline (1105) EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Beckman System 6300 Series Amino Acid Beckman System 6300 Series Amino Acid EXAMINATION: Analyzer (07553) Analyzer (07553) Beckman System 6300 Series Amino Acid ANALYTE: Glutamic Acid (2217) ANALYTE: Hydroxyproline (2560) Analyzer (07553) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR ANALYTE: Creatine Kinase (CK) 1034) EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Beckman System 6300 Series Amino Acid Beckman System 6300 Series Amino Acid EXAMINATION: Analyzer (07553) Analyzer (07553) King Diagnostics Test Kit (34051) ANALYTE: Glutamine (2218) ANALYTE: Iron (2814) Pointe Scientific Manual Creatine Kinase TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Test (49104) EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: Randox Laboratories CK NAC-activated Beckman System 6300 Series Amino Acid King Diagnostics Test Kit (34051) Test Kit (55117) Analyzer (07553) Sigma Diagnostics Test Kit (58051) Synermed Test Kit (58260) ANALYTE: Glycine (2219) ANALYTE: Iron Binding Capacity (post ANALYTE: Creatine Kinase Isoenzymes (CK TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR saturation/separation) (2815) Isoenzymes) (1052) EXAMINATION: TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Beckman System 6300 Series Amino Acid EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: Analyzer (07553) Abbott Spectrum CCX (04515) Helena Laboratories REP E–Z CK–30 ANALYTE: Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Hgb Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) Isoenzyme Procedure (25153) A1C) (2204) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) ANALYTE: Creatine Kinase MB Fraction TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Du Pont ACA Star (13357) (CKMB) (1002) EXAMINATION: Du Pont Dimension XL (13355) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR LSI ASCA Chemistry System (37069) King Diagnostics Test Kit (34051) EXAMINATION: Pointe Scientific Glycohemoglobin Test Kit Kodak Ektachem 550 XRC Analyzer CHEMROY Creatine Kinase-MB (CK–MB) (49114) (34056) Reagent Set (10280) Primus Rapid Gel Glycated Hemoglobin Kodak Ektachem 700 Analyzer C Series Diagnostic Chemicals Ltd. Assay Kit (49129) (34054) (13210) TECO Glycohemoglobin Kit (61141) Kodak Ektachem 750 XRC Analyzer Helena Laboratories Cardio REP CK ANALYTE: HDL Cholesterol (2550) (34055) Isoenzyme Procedure (25139) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Kodak Ektachem 950 IRC (34087) Helena Laboratories Cardio REP CK EXAMINATION: LSI ASCA Chemistry System (37069) Isoforms Procedure (25140) Abbott Spectrum CCX (04515) Olympus AU 5041 (46145) Pointe Scientific Creatine Kinase-MB Beckman Synchron CX 5 CE (07491) Olympus AU 5200 (46143) (manual procedure) (49117) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 914 (07546) ANALYTE: Iron Binding Capacity, Unsat. ANALYTE: Creatinine (1035) Du Pont ACA Star (13357) (UIBC) no pretreat. (2823) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Du Pont Dimension XL (13355) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR EXAMINATION: Intersect Systems Test Kit (28321) EXAMINATION: Synermed Test Kit (58260) Olympus AU 5041 (46145) Sigma Diagnostics Test Kit (58051) ANALYTE: Cystathionine (1107) Olympus AU 5121 (46087) ANALYTE: Isoleucine (2833) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Olympus AU 5200 (46143) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR EXAMINATION: Technicon OPERA Clinical Chemistry EXAMINATION: Beckman System 6300 Series Amino Acid System (61161) Beckman System 6300 Series Amino Acid Analyzer (07553) ANALYTE: Hemoglobin C (2559) Analyzer (07553) ANALYTE: Cystine (1106) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR ANALYTE: Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR EXAMINATION: (3701) EXAMINATION: Isolab HemoCard Hemoglobin C Assay TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Beckman System 6300 Series Amino Acid (28340) EXAMINATION: Analyzer (07553) ANALYTE: Hemoglobin E (2556) HiChem LDH/L Reagent Kit (manual) ANALYTE: Ethanolamine (1629) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (25183) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR EXAMINATION: ANALYTE: Lactate Dehydrogenase EXAMINATION: Isolab HemoCard Hemoglobin E (28268) Isoenzymes (3721) Beckman System 6300 Series Amino Acid ANALYTE: Hemoglobin Fractions (2544) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Analyzer (07553) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR EXAMINATION: ANALYTE: Ferritin (1902) EXAMINATION: Helena Laboratories Cardio REP LD TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Helena Laboratories REP Alkaline Hb-15 Isoenzyme Procedure (25169) EXAMINATION: (25144) ANALYTE: Leucine (3749) Nichols Institute Chemiluminescence ANALYTE: Hemoglobin S (2536) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Ferritin Assay (43067) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR EXAMINATION: Roche Cobas Core Ferritin EIA (manual EXAMINATION: Beckman System 6300 Series Amino Acid procedure) (55123) Bio-Rad Variant (07498) Analyzer (07553) Wallac Oy DELFIA Ferritin Kit (70161) Isolab Quik-Sep Quantitative Hemoglobin ANALYTE: Lipase (3711) ANALYTE: Folate (Folic acid) (1907) S Assay (28353) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR ANALYTE: Histidine (2563) EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Meditech Diagnostic System Test Kit Bio-Rad Quantaphase II (07532) EXAMINATION: (40118) ANALYTE: Gamma Glutamyl Transferase Beckman System 6300 Series Amino Acid NuClin Diagnostics ElIpAse (43090) (GGT) (2201) Analyzer (07553) Sigma Diagnostics Lipase-PS (manual TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR ANALYTE: Homocystine (2561) procedure) (58323) EXAMINATION: TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR ANALYTE: Lipoprotein Fractions (3720) King Diagnostics Test Kit (34051) EXAMINATION: TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Synermed Test Kit (58260) Beckman System 6300 Series Amino Acid EXAMINATION: ANALYTE: Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid Analyzer (07553) Helena Laboratories REP Direct-Sep (2220) ANALYTE: Hydroxylysine (2562) Cholesterol (25179) 25968 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices Helena Laboratories REP HDL/LDL–30 TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR SPECIALITY/SUBSPECIALITY: General Electrophoresis System (25168) EXAMINATION: Immunology ANALYTE: Lysine (3750) Advanced Clinical Tech. Periocheck ANALYTE: Allergen Specific NgE (0417) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Enzyme Activity Kit (04526) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR EXAMINATION: ANALYTE: Sarcosine (5835) EXAMINATION: Beckman System 6300 Series Amino Acid TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Ciba Corning Magic Lite SQ Specific IgE Analyzer (07553) EXAMINATION: Immunoassay (10245) ANALYTE: Magnesium (4002) Beckman System 6300 Series Amino Acid Hycor Biomedical Specific IgE EIA– TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Analyzer (07553) TURBO (25146) EXAMINATION: ANALYTE: Serine (5834) Hycor Biomedical Specific IgE RIA Isotope Horizon Diagnostics Magnesium (manual TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Unit (25145) procedure) (25178) EXAMINATION: Hycor Ultra-EIA Specific IgE Assay (25166) King Diagnostics Test Kit (34051) Beckman System 6300 Series Amino Acid MAST CLA Allergy System (densitometer) ANALYTE: Methionine (4031) Analyzer (07553) (40176) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR ANALYTE: Surfactant/Albumin Ratio MAST CLA–1 Chemiluminescent Allergy EXAMINATION: (5833) System (40177) Beckman System 6300 Series Amino Acid TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR ANALYTE: Alpha-1-Acid Glycoprotein Analyzer (07553) EXAMINATION: (orosomucoid) (0420) ANALYTE: Microalbumin (4019) Abbott TDX (04071) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Abbott TDX FLx (04072) EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: ANALYTE: Taurine (6141) The Binding Site BIND A RID Human Synermed IR 500 (58322) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Alpha-1 Acid Glycoprotein (61140) ANALYTE: Microprotein, CSF (4026) EXAMINATION: ANALYTE: Anti-Arbovirus Antibodies (0498) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Beckman System 6300 Series Amino Acid TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR EXAMINATION: Analyzer (07553) EXAMINATION: DMA Test Kit (13216) ANALYTE: Threonine (6141) Hillcrest Biologicals Arbovirus (IgG) IFA Sterling Diagnostics Test Kit (58230) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Test (25141) Hillcrest Biologicals Arbovirus (IgM) IFA ANALYTE: Microprotein, Urine (4027) EXAMINATION: Test (25142) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Beckman System 6300 Series Amino Acid EXAMINATION: Analyzer (07553) ANALYTE: Anti-Cardiolipin Antibodies DMA Test Kit (13216) ANALYTE: Transferrin (6114) (0434) Sterling Diagnostics Test Kit (58230) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TRACE Scientific Test Kit (61044) EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: TRACE Scientific Test Kit (61044) Hemagen Cardiolipin Antibody Kit (25150) ANALYTE: Ornithine (4606) INOVA Diagnostics QUANTA Lite ACA TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR ANALYTE: Triglyceride (6118) Screen (28234) EXAMINATION: TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR INOVA Diagnostics QUANTA Lite IgA Beckman System 6300 Series Amino Acid EXAMINATION: ACA (28233) Analyzer (07553) Randox Laboratories Test Kit (55106) Immuno Concepts Anticardiolipin Ab ANALYTE: Phenylalanine (4942) ANALYTE: Trypsin (6129) Screening Test System (28280) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Louisville APL Diagnostics ApHL ELISA EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: Kit (37071) Beckman System 6300 Series Amino Acid NuClin Diagnostics NuCliTryp RIA (43089) Shield Diagnostics DIASTAT Total Anti- Analyzer (07553) ANALYTE: Tryptophan (6144) Cardiolipin Kit (58295) ICN ImmuChem Phenylalanine Microwell TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR elias usa Synelisa Cardiolipin Abs (IgA) Enzyme Assay (28384) EXAMINATION: (16055) Porton Cambridge Quantase Phenylalanine Beckman System 6300 Series Amino Acid elias usa Synelisa Cardiolipin Abs (IgG) Assay (49125) Analyzer (07553) (16056) ANALYTE: Phosphoethanolamine (4970) ANALYTE: Tyrosine (6143) elias usa Synelisa Cardiolipin Abs (IgM) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (16057) EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: elias usa elias Cardiolipin (IgA) Abs EIA Beckman System 6300 Series Amino Acid Beckman System 6300 Series Amino Acid (qualitative) (16066) Analyzer (07553) Analyzer (07553) elisa usa elias Cardiolipin (IgA) Abs EIA (semiquantitative) (16067) ANALYTE: Phosphoserine (4969) ANALYTE: Urea (BUN) (6403) ANALYTE: Anti-Centromere Antibodies TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (0487) EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Beckman System 6300 Series Amino Acid AMRESCO BUN Reagent (manual EXAMINATION: Analyzer (07553) procedure) (04554) Shield Diagnostics DIASTAT Anti- ANALYTE: Proline (4971) Beckman System 6300 Series Amino Acid Centromere Kit (58312) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Analyzer (07553) elias usa Synelisa ANA Profile (16058) EXAMINATION: ANALYTE: Uric Acid (6404) elias usa Synelisa Centromere Abs (16047) Beckman System 6300 Series Amino Acid TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR elias usa Synelisa ENA Screen (qualitative) Analyzer (07553) EXAMINATION: (16064) ANALYTE: Protein, Glycated (4963) Randox Laboratories Test Kit (55106) elias usa Synelisa ENA Screen TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Synermed Test Kit (58260) (semiquantitative) (16065) EXAMINATION: ANALYTE: Valine (6717) elias usa Varelisa Centromere Antibodies Diagnostic Specialties Protein-Bound TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (qualitative) (16085) Glucose Assay Kit (13286) EXAMINATION: elias usa Varelisa Centromere Antibodies ANALYTE: Protein, Total (4921) Beckman System 6300 Series Amino Acid (semi-quant.) (16086) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Analyzer (07553) ANALYTE: Anti-DNA Antibodies (0435) EXAMINATION: ANALYTE: Vitamin B12 (6707) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR STC Diagnostics Total Protein Micro-Plate TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR EXAMINATION: Assay (58347) EXAMINATION: Cambridge Life Sciences AUTOZYME ANALYTE: Proteolytic enzymes (4965) Bio-Rad Quantaphase II (07532) (10206) Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices 25969 Cambridge Life Sciences AUTOZYME elias usa Synelisa ENA Screen (semi- Cambridge Life Sciences AUTOZYME Screen (10263) quantitative) (16065) (10206) Cambridge Life Sciences SELISA Anti- elias usa Synelisa Jo-1 Antibodies EIA Kit Cambridge Life Sciences AUTOZYME nDNA Ab Kit (10264) (16038) Screen (10263) Clark Laboratories Encore dsDNA EIA Test elias usa Varelisa Jo-1 Antibodies Clark Laboratories ENA Combined Test Kit (10238) (qualitative) (16081) (10255) Helix Diagnostics EIA Anti-dsDNA Test elias usa Varelisa Jo-1 Antibodies (semi- Clark Laboratories Encore Sm/RNP Antigen (25171) quantitative) (16082) EIA Test (10240) Immco Diagnostics Anti-dsDNA Antibody ANALYTE: Anti-Mitochondrial Antibodies Helix Diagnostics EIA Extractable Nuclear Test (28276) (AMTA) (0439) Antigen Test (25157) Immco Diagnostics Anti-native DNA Hemagen ENA Screen 6 Kit (25160) Antibody Test (28312) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR EXAMINATION: INOVA Diagnostics QUANTA Lite RNP Sigma Anti-dsDNA Kit (58346) ELISA (28236) The Binding Site BINDAZYME a-dsDNA INOVA Diagnostics QUANTA Lite Mitochondria M2 ELISA (28270) Immco Diagnostics Anti-ENA Antibody EIA Kit (61112) Test (28317) The Binding Site Crithidia luciliae dsDNA Immco Diagnostics Autoantibody Test Immco Diagnostics Anti-RNP and Anti-Sm Kit (61109) System (28311) Antibody Test (28314) Zeus Autoantibody Profile-6 ELISA Test elias usa Synelisa M2 Antibodies EIA Kit Immunco Concepts RELISA ENA Antibody System (79042) (16036) Screening Test (28330) elias usa Synelisa dsDNA Antibodies ANALYTE: Anti-Myeloperoxidase (MPO) Molecular Immunodiagnostics RNP EIA (16019) Antibodies (0505) Test Kit (40184) elias usa elias dsDNA Abs EIA Kit (16031) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR The Binding Site ENA Screening CIE Kit EXAMINATION: ANALYTE: Anti-ENA Antibodies (0507) (61114) Shield Diagnostics DIASTAT Anti-MPO TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Zeus Autoantibody Profile-6 ELISA Test EXAMINATION: (qualitative) (58331) System (79042) INOVA Diagnostics QUANTA Lite ENA 5 Shield Diagnostics DIASTAT Anti-MPO Zeus ENA Profile-6 ELISA Test System ELISA (28365) (semi-quantitative) (58332) (79045) Shield Diagnostics DIASTAT ENA Single ANALYTE: Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasm elias usa Synelisa ENA Screen (qualitative) Well Screen Kit (58345) Antibodies (0440) (16064) Zeus ENA Screen ELISA Test System TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR elias usa Synelisa ENA Screen (79044) EXAMINATION: (semiquantitative) (16065) ANALYTE: Anti-Endomysial Antibodies Shield Diagnostics DIASTAT Anti-PR3 elias usa Synelisa Sm Abs/RNP-Sm Abs (EMA) (0497) (cANCA) (58329) (16037) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR ANALYTE: Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) ANALYTE: Anti-RNP-Sm Antibodies (0502) EXAMINATION: (0441) Immco Diagnostics Anti-Endomysial TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Antibody (EMA) Test (28281) EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: Helix Diagnostics Anti-SM/RNP EIA ANALYTE: Anti-Histone Antibodies (0437) INOVA Diagnostics QUANTA Lite ENA 4 Antibody Test (25165) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR ELISA (28235) elias usa Synelisa ANA Profile (16058) EXAMINATION: Immco Diagnostics Autoantibody Test elias usa Varelisa RNP-Sm Antibodies BioWhittaker RheumELISA II (07488) System (28311) (qualitative) (16079) Cambridge Life Sciences AUTOZYME Immuno Concepts HEp-2000 Fluorescent elias usa Varelisa RNP-Sm Antibodies Screen (10263) ANA Test System (28366) (semi-quantitative)(16080) INOVA Diagnostics QUANTA Lite Histone Light Diag. ANA Test Kit with Mouse Liver ANALYTE: Anti-Reticulin Antibodies (0444) ELISA (28332) Substrate (37097) Immco Diagnostics ImmuLisa Anti-Histone TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Light Diag. ANA Test Kit with Rat Liver Ab ELISA (28354) EXAMINATION: Substrate (37098) elias usa Synelisa Histone Antibodies EIA Immco Diagnostics Anti-Reticulin Shield Diagnostics Anti-Nuclear Antibody Kit (16041) Antibody (ARA) Test (28331) (ANA) Kit (58313) ANALYTE: Anti-SS-A/Ro (0446) ANALYTE: Anti-Jo-1 (0438) Tissue Culture Biotec ANA Test System TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (61108) EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: Zeus ANA Screen ELISA (79043) Advanced Biological Products ELISA– Advanced Biological Products ELISA– elias usa ANA Total EIA Kit (16063) DOXA Combi-4 (04505) DOXA Combi-6 (04504) elias usa Synelisa ANA Total (16054) Advanced Biological Products ELISA– Advanced Biological Products ELISA– elias usa Synelisa ANA–8 Screen (16074) DOXA Combi-6 (04504) DOXA Jo-1 (04503) elias usa Varelisa ANA–8 Screen (16071) BioWhittaker RheumELISA II (07488) Advanced Biological Products ELISA– Cambridge Life Sciences AUTOZYME ANALYTE: Anti-Parietal Cell Antibodies DOXA SSb Kit (04510) (10206) (0442) Apotex ANA Profile I (04507) Hemagen ENA Screen 6 Kit (25160) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Cambridge Life Sciences AUTOZYME Hemagen Jo-1 ENA Kit (qualitative) (25190) EXAMINATION: (10206) Hemagen Jo-1 ENA Kit (semi-quantitative) Immco Diagnostics Autoantibody Test Cambridge Life Sciences AUTOZYME (25195) System (28311) Screen (10263) INOVA Diagnostics QUANTA Lite Jo-1 elias usa Synelisa Parietal Cell Antibodies Clark Laboratories ENA Combined Test Kit ELISA (28273) EIA Kit (16040) (10255) Immuno Concepts RELISA ENA Antibody ANALYTE: Anti-RNP (Ribonucleoprotein) Clark Laboratories Encore SS–A Antigen Screening Test (28330) (0443) EIA Test (10241) Molecular Immunodiagnostics Jo-1 EIA TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Helix Diagnostics Anti–SS–A/Ro EIA Test Kit (40182) EXAMINATION: Antibody Test (25148) The Binding Site ENA Screening CIE Kit Advanced Biological Products ELISA– Helix Diagnostics EIA Extractable Nuclear (61114) DOXA Combi-4 (04505) Antigen Test (25157) Zeus ENA Profile-6 ELISA Test System Advanced Biological Products ELISA– Hemagen ENA Screen 6 Kit (25160) (79045) DOXA Combi-6 (04504) Hemagen SS–A (Ro) ENA Kit (qualitative) elias usa Synelisa ANA Profile (16058) Advanced Biological Products ELISA– (25187) elias usa Synelisa ENA Screen (qualitative) DOXA Sm/RNP Kit (04506) Hemagen SS–A (Ro) ENA Kit (semi- (16064) Apotex ANA Profile I (04507) quantitative) (25192) 25970 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices INOVA Diagnostics QUANTA Lite SS–A elias usa Varelisa SS–B/Ro Antibodies Hemagen Sm ENA Kit (qualitative) (25196) ELISA (28238) (semi-quantitative) (16090) Hemagen Sm ENA Kit (semi-quantitative) Immco Diagnostics Anti-ENA Antibody ANALYTE: Anti-Sal-70 (0448) (25197) Test (28317) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR INOVA Diagnostics QUANTA Lite SM Immco Diagnostics Anti–SS–A(Ro) and EXAMINATION: ELISA (28237) Anti–SS–B(La) Test (28315) Advanced Biological Products ELISA– Immco Diagnostics Anti-ENA Antibody Immuno Concepts RELISA ENA Antibody DOXA Combi–6 (04504) Test (28317) Screening Test (28330) Advanced Biological Products ELISA– Immco Diagnostics Anti–RNP and Anti– Molecular Immunodiagnostics Ro EIA Test DOXA Scl70 Kit (04511) Sm Antibody Test (28314) Kit (40183) BioWhittaker RheumELISA II (07488) Immuno Concepts RELISA ENA Antibody The Binding Site ENA Screening CIE Kit Cambridge Life Sciences AUTOZYME Screening Test (28330) (61114) (10206) Molecular Immunodiagnostics SM EIA Zeus Autoantibody Profile-6 ELISA Test Clark Laboratories ENA Combined Test Kit Test Kit (40185) System (79042) (10255) The Binding Site ENA Screening CIE Kit Zeus ANA Profile-6 ELISA Test System Hemagen ENA Screen 6 Kit (25160) (61114) (79045) Hemagen Scl-70 ENA Kit (qualitative) Zeus Autoantibody Profile-6 ELISA Test elias usa Synelisa ANA Profile (16058) (25188) System (79042) elias usa Synelisa ENA Screen (qualitative) Hemagen Scl-70 ENA Kit (semi- Zeus ANA Profile-6 ELISA Test System (16064) quantitative) (25193) (79045) elias usa Synelisa ENA Screen INOVA Diagnostics QUANTA Lite Scl-70 elias usa Synelisa ANA Profile (16058) (semiquantitative) (16065) ELISA (28274) elias usa Synelisa ENA Screen (qualitative) elias usa Synelisa Ro-Abs/La-Abs (16042) Immco Diagnostics Anti-Scl-70 Antibody (16064) elias usa Varelisa SS–A/Ro Antibodies Test (28316) elias usa Synelisa ENA Screen (qualitative) (16091) Immuno Concepts RELISA ENA Antibody (semiquantitative) (16065) elias usa Varelisa SS–A/Ro Antibodies Screening Test (28330) elias usa Synelisa Sm Abs/RNP-Sm Abs (semi-quantitative) (16092) Molecular Immunodiagnostics Scl-70 EIA (16037) Test Kit (40181) ANALYTE: Anti–SS–B/La (0447) elias usa Varelisa Sm Antibodies The Binding Site ENA Screening CIE Kit (qualitative) (16087) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (61114) EXAMINATION: elias usa Varelisa Sm Antibodies (semi- Zeus Autoantibody Profile-6 ELISA Test quantitative) (16088) Advanced Biological Products ELISA– System (79042) ANALYTE: Anti-Smooth Muscle Antibodies DOXA Combi-4 (04505) Zeus ANA Profile-6 ELISA Test System (ASMA) (0451) Advanced Biological Products ELISA– (79045) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR DOXA Combi–6 (04504) elias usa Synelisa ANA Profile (16058) EXAMINATION: Advanced Biological Products ELISA– elias usa Synelisa ENA Screen (qualitative) DOXA SSb Kit (04510) (16064) Immco Diagnostics Autoantibody Test Apotex ANA Profile I (04507) elias usa Synelisa ENA Screen System (28311) Cambridge Life Sciences AUTOZYME (semiquantitative) (16065) ANALYTE: Anti-Thyroglobulin Antibodies (10206) elias usa Synelisa Scl-70 Antibodies EIA (0453) Clark Laboratories ENA Combined Test Kit Kit (16039) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (10255) elias usa Varelisa Scl-70 Antibodies EXAMINATION: Clark Laboratories Encore SS–B Antigen (qualitative) (16083) Biomerica Anti-Thyroglobulin ELISA EIA Test (10243) elias usa Varelisa Scl-70 Antibodies (semi- (07531) Helix Diagnostics Anti–SS–B/La EIA quantitative) (16084) Clark Laboratories Encore Thyroglobulin Antibody Test (25147) ANALYTE: Anti-Skin Antibodies (0449) EIA Test (10239) Helix Diagnostics EIA Extractable Nuclear TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Cogent Diagnostics AUTOSTAT Antigen Test (25157) EXAMINATION: Autoantibody Test Kit (10207) Hemagen ENA Screen 6 Kit (25160) Immco Diagnostics Anti-Skin Antibody Cogent Diagnostics AUTOSTAT II Hemagen SS–B (La) ENA Kit (qualitative) Test (28313) Autoantibody Test Kit (10267) INOVA Diagnostics QUANTA Lite Thyroid (25186) ANALYTE: Anti-Sm (Smith) (0450) T ELISA (28271) Hemagen SS–B (La) ENA Kit (semi- TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Immunoprobe Thyroglobulin EIA Test Kit quantitative) (25191) EXAMINATION: (28348) INOVA Diagnostics QUANTA Lite SS–B Advanced Biological Products ELISA– Joldon Diagnostics Thyroglobulin Auto ELISA (28239) DOXA Combi-4 (04505) Antibody EIA Kit (31010) Immco Diagnostics Anti-ENA Antibody Advanced Biological Products ELISA– Test (28317) DOXA Combi–6 (04504) Nichols Institute Chemiluminescence Anti- Immco Diagnostics Anti–SS–A(Ro) and Advanced Biological Products ELISA– TG Assay (43075) Anti–SS–B(La) Test (28315) DOXA Sm Kit (04509) elias usa Synelisa TG Abs/TPO Abs EIA Kit Immuno Concepts RELISA ENA Antibody Advanced Biological Products ELISA– (16032) Screening Test (28330) DOXA Sm/RNP Kit (04506) elias usa elias TGAb EIA Kit (16034) Molecular Immunodiagnostics Ro EIA Test Apotex ANA Profile I (04507) ANALYTE: Anti-Thyroid Microsomal Kit (40186) Cambridge Life Sciences AUTOZYME Antibodies (AMA) (0455) The Binding Site ENA Screening CIE Kit (10206) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (61114) Cambridge Life Sciences AUTOZYME EXAMINATION: Zeus Autoantibody Profile-6 ELISA Test Screen (10263) Cogent Diagnostics AUTOSTAT System (79042) Clark Laboratories ENA Combined Test Kit Autoantibody Test Kit (10207) Zeus ANA Profile-6 ELISA Test System (10255) INOVA Diagnostics QUANTA Lite Thyroid (79045) Clark Laboratories Encore Sm Antigen EIA M ELISA (28272) elias usa Synelisa ANA Profile (16058) Test (10244) Immunoprobe Microsomal EIA Test Kit elias usa Synelisa ENA Screen (qualitative) Clark Laboratories Encore Sm/RNP Antigen (28349) (16064) EIA Test (10240) Joldon Diagnostics TMA Auto-Antibody elias usa Synelisa ENA Screen Helix Diagnostics EIA Anti–Sm Ab Test EIA Kit (31009) (semiquantitative) (16065) (25162) Polymedco LUMItest anti-TPO (computer elias usa Synelisa Ro-Abs/La-Abs (16042) Helix Diagnostics EIA Extractable Nuclear calculations) (49109) elias usa Varelisa SS–B/Ro Antibodies Antigen Test (25157) Polymedco LUMItest anti-TPO (manual (qualitative) (16089) Hemagen ENA Screen 6 Kit (25160) calculations) (49110) Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices 25971 elias usa elias TMAb EIA Kit (16035) Becton Dickinson FACSCount System TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR ANALYTE: Anti-Trypanosoma cruzi (07601) EXAMINATION: Antibodies (0503) ANALYTE: CD3/HLA–DR positive DAKO Helicobacter pylori IgG Test Kit TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Lymphocytes (1115) (13342) EXAMINATION: TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Meridian Premier H. pylori EIA Abbott COMMANDER System (04334) EXAMINATION: (spectrophotometric) (40199) Abbott Chagas Antibody EIA (IgG) (04535) Becton Dickinson FACScan Flow Meridian Premier H. pylori EIA (visual) Gull Laboratories Chagas IgG ELISA Cytometer (07497) (40198) (22173) ANALYTE: CD4 positive Lymphocytes (1116) United Biotech UBI MAGIWEL H. pylori ANALYTE: Anti-U1-snRNP Antibodies TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR IgG Test (64025) (0501) EXAMINATION: ANALYTE: Herpes simplex I and/or II TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Coulter CD4 Cytospheres Kit (10248) Antibodies (2530) EXAMINATION: ANALYTE: CD4/CD3 positive Lymphocytes TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR elias usa Synelisa ANA Profile (16058) (1117) EXAMINATION: elias usa Synelisa ENA Screen (qualitative) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Baxter Bartels Herpes simplex-1 Virus IgG (16064) EXAMINATION: PRIMA System EIA (07506) elias usa Synelisa ENA Screen Becton Dickinson FACSCount System Baxter Bartels Herpes simplex-1 Virus IgM (semiquantitative) (16065) (07601) PRIMA System EIA (07505) elias usa Synelisa U1-snRNP Antibodies ANALYTE: CD8 positive Lymphocytes (1118) Baxter Bartels Herpes simplex-2 Virus IgG EIA Kit (16033) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR PRIMA System EIA (07508) ANALYTE: B1 positive Lymphocytes (0735) EXAMINATION: Baxter Bartels Herpes simplex-2 Virus IgM TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Coulter CD8 Cyto-Spheres Kit (10270) PRIMA System EIA (07507) EXAMINATION: ANALYTE: CD8/CD3 positive Lymphocytes ANALYTE: Immunoglobulins—monoclonal/ Coulter Clone Immunophenotyping by (1119) polyclonal (2802) Fluorescence Microscopy (10253) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Coulter Epics Flow Cytometer (10246) EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: ANALYTE: B4 positive Lymphocytes (0736) Becton Dickinson FACSCount System Helena Laboratories REP ImmunoFix TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (07601) (25133) EXAMINATION: ANALYTE: Coxiella burnetti (Q Fever) Helena Laboratories Titan Gel Immunofix- Coulter Clone Immunophenotyping by Antibodies (1067) 9 Procedure (25149) Fluorescence Microscopy (10253) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR The Binding Site IFE and Zone Coulter Epics Flow Cytometer (10246) EXAMINATION: Electrophoresis Kit (61117) ANALYTE: Beta-2 microglobulin (0703) Hillcrest Biologicals Q Fever (IgG) IFA Test The Binding Site Immunofixation (IFE) Kit TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (25131) (61115) EXAMINATION: Hillcrest Biologicals Q Fever (IgM) IFA ANALYTE: Immunoglobulins IgA (2803) Coulter Beta-2 Microglobulin EIA (10205) Test (25130) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR T Cell Diagnostics CELLFREE Beta-2 M ANALYTE: Cytomegalovirus Antibodies EXAMINATION: Test Kit (61120) (1039) Crestat Diagnostics N-Assay TIA IgA Wallac Oy DELFIA B–2 Micro Kit (70158) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (manual procedure) (10258) ANALYTE: Blastomyces Antibodies (0724) EXAMINATION: ANALYTE: Immunoglobulins IgA subclasses TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Abbott CMV–M EIA (04524) (2827) EXAMINATION: Baxter Bartels Cytomegalovirus IgG PRIMA TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Meridian Diagnostics Premier Blastomyces System EIA (07502) EXAMINATION: Baxter Bartels Cytomegalovirus IgM EIA (40148) The Binding Site Human IgA Subclasses PRIMA System EIA (07501) ANALYTE: C-Reactive Protein (CRP) (1001) NL RID Kit (61111) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR DAKO IDEIA CMV–M (13339) DAKO IDEIA CMV–M (13338) ANALYTE: Immunoglobulins IgE (2805) EXAMINATION: TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Hemagen C-Relative Protein Kit (25172) Zeus CMV ELISA (simultaneous IgM & IgG) Test System (79040) EXAMINATION: ANALYTE: CD3 (IgG1) positive Lymphocytes Abbott IgE EIA (04472) ANALYTE: Epstein-Barr virus Antibodies (1111) Diagnostics Products Corp. AlaTOP (1603) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Microplate Allergy Screen (13293) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR EXAMINATION: Hycor HY–TEC Total IgE EIA (25161) Coulter Clone Immunophenotyping by EXAMINATION: Baxter Bartels Epstein-Barr Virus IgG MAST CLA Allergy System (densitometer) Fluorescence Microscopy (10253) (40176) Coulter Epics Flow Cytometer (10246) PRIMA System EIA (07504) Baxter Bartels Epstein-Barr Virus IgM MAST CLA–1 Chemiluminescent Allergy ANALYTE: CD3 (IgG1)/B4 positive PRIMA System EIA (07503) System (40177) Lymphocytes (1112) Fuller Laboratories EBV–EA IgG AB IFA Roche Cobas Core IgE Total EIA (manual TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Kit (19017) procedure) (55120) EXAMINATION: Fuller Laboratories EBV–EBNA IFA Kit The Binding Site IgE EIA Test Kit (61105) Coulter Epics Flow Cytometer (10246) (19018) Wallac Oy DELFIA Total IgE Kit (70163) ANALYTE: CD3 (IgG1)/T4 positive Fuller Laboratories EBV–VCA IgG Ab IFA ANALYTE: Immunoglobulins IgG (2806) Lymphocytes (1113) Kit (19016) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Incstar Clin–ELISA EBV EA(D) IgG (28266) EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: MRL Diagnostics Epstein-Barr Virus rVCA Crestat Diagnostics N-Assay TIA IgG Coulter Epics Flow Cytometer (10246) IgM (40194) (manual procedure) (10256) ANALYTE: CD3 (IgG1)/T8 positive Ortho Epstein-Barr Virus EA(D∂R)-IgG ANALYTE: Immunoglobulins IgG in tissue Lymphocytes (1114) Antibody ELISA Test (46146) samples (2830) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Ortho Epstein-Barr Virus EBNA-IgG TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR EXAMINATION: Antibody ELISA Test (46142) EXAMINATION: Coulter Epics Flow Cytometer (10246) Virion EBV Combi Test (67085) Ventana AEC Detection Kit (for tissue ANALYTE: CD3 positive Lymphocytes (1110) Zeus EBV–VCA IgG Elisa (79039) sample) (67081) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR ANALYTE: Helicobacter pylori Antibodies Ventana DAB Detection Kit (for tissue EXAMINATION: (2513) sample) (67083) 25972 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices Ventana Red, Alk.Phos. Fast Red Detect. TheraTest Laboratories EL–RF–IgM Kit TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Kit (tissue sample) (67082) (61134) EXAMINATION: ANALYTE: Immunoglobulins IgG subclasses ANALYTE: Rubella Antibodies (5510) Baxter Bartels Toxo IgG PRIMA System (2807) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR EIA (07515) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR EXAMINATION: Baxter Bartels Toxo IgG PRIMA System EXAMINATION: Baxter Bartels Rubella Virus IgG PRIMA EIA (07514) Research Diagnostics Human IgG Subclass System EIA (07513) DAKO IDEIA Toxo–G (13340) RID Combi Kit (55151) Baxter Bartels Rubella Virus IgM PRIMA DAKO IDEIA Toxo–M (13341) Research Diagnostics IgG Subclass ELISA System EIA (07512) Zeus Toxo IgM Test System (79041) Combi Kit (55138) DAKO IDEIA Rubella-G (13343) SPECIALITY/SUBSPECIALITY: Hematology DAKO IDEIA Rubella-M (13344) ANALYTE: Immunoglobulins IgM (2808) ANALYTE: Activated Partial Thromboplastin TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR ANALYTE: Rubeola Antibodies (measles) Time (APTT) (0409) EXAMINATION: (5511) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Crestat Diagnostics N-Assay TIA IgM TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR EXAMINATION: (manual procedure) (10259) EXAMINATION: Helena Laboratories APTT–ES (manual) ANALYTE: Immunoglobulins IgM in tissue Baxter Bartels Rubeola Virus IgG PRIMA (25158) samples (2831) System EIA (07511) MeDiTech APTT–ES (manual) (40192) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Baxter Bartels Rubeola Virus IgM PRIMA Vitek HEMOLAB Silimat (manual) (67089) System EIA (07510) EXAMINATION: ANALYTE: Activated Plasma Clotting Time Ventana AEC Detection Kit (for tissue ANALYTE: T1 positive Lymphocytes (6145) (APCT) (0499) sample) (67081) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Ventana DAB Detection Kit (for tissue EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: sample) (67083) Coulter Clone Immunophenotyping by All Manual Tilt-Tube Coagulation Ventana Red, Alk.Phos. Fast Red Detect. Fluorescence Microscopy (10253) Procedures (04424) Coulter Epics Flow Cytometer (10246) Kit (tissue sample) (67082) ANALYTE: Alpha-2-Antiplasmin (0463) ANALYTE: Interleukin-2 Receptor (IL–2R) ANALYTE: T11 positive Lymphocytes (6146) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (2821) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR EXAMINATION: TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR EXAMINATION: Medical Laboratory MLA Electra 1600C EXAMINATION: Coulter Clone Immunophenotyping by (40167) Fluorescence Microscopy (10253) T Cell Diagnostics CELLFREE Interleukin- ANALYTE: Antithrombin III (ATIII) (0456) 2 Receptor Kit (61119) ANALYTE: T11/B1 positive Lymphocytes TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR ANALYTE: Lyme Disease Antibodies (6147) EXAMINATION: (Borrelia burgdorferi Abs) (3714) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR American Bioproducts STA Analyzer TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR EXAMINATION: (04594) EXAMINATION: Coulter Epics Flow Cytometer (10246) Baxter Antithrombin III Chromogenic Baxter Bartels B. burgdorferi (Lyme) IgM ANALYTE: T11/B4 positive Lymphocytes Assay (07535) PRIMA System EIA (07509) (6148) Dade Thrombin-Antithrombin (TAT) ANALYTE: MY4 positive Lymphocytes TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Complex ELISA (13292) (4033) EXAMINATION: Kabi Pharmacia COATEST Antithrombin TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Coulter Epics Flow Cytometer (10246) (manual) (34061) EXAMINATION: ANALYTE: T3 positive Lymphocytes (6149) Medical Laboratory MLA Electra 1600C Coulter Clone Immunophenotyping by TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (40167) Fluorescence Microscopy (10253) EXAMINATION: Organon Teknika Multi Channel Discrete Coulter Epics Flow Cytometer (10246) Coulter Clone Immunophenotyping by Analyzer (MDA–180) (46144) ANALYTE: Mo2 positive Lymphocytes Fluorescence Microscopy (10253) Sigma ACCUCOLOR Antithrombin III (4034) Coulter Epics Flow Cytometer (10246) (58320) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR ANALYTE: T4 positive Lymphocytes (6150) Vitek HEMOLAB (67075) EXAMINATION: TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR ANALYTE: Coagulation Factors (1044) Coulter Clone Immunophenotyping by EXAMINATION: TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Fluorescence Microscopy (10253) Coulter Clone Immunophenotyping by EXAMINATION: Coulter Epics Flow Cytometer (10246) Fluorescence Microscopy (10253) Diagnostica Stago Deficient II Factor Assay (manual) (13297) ANALYTE: Mumps Antibodies (4007) Coulter Epics Flow Cytometer (10246) Diagnostica Stago Deficient V Factor Assay TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR ANALYTE: T4/T8 positive Lymphocytes (manual) (13296) EXAMINATION: (6151) Diagnostica Stago Deficient VII Factor Bion Mumps-G Antibody Test System TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Assay (manual) (13305) (07480) EXAMINATION: Coulter Epics Flow Cytometer (10246) Diagnostica Stago Deficient X Factor Assay ANALYTE: Mycoplasma pneumoniae (manual) (13306) ANALYTE: T8 positive Lymphocytes (6152) Antibodies (4016) Diagnostica Stago Deficient XI Factor TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Assay (manual) (13307) EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: Diagnostica Stago Deficient XII Factor Coulter Clone Immunophenotyping by Fuller Laboratories Mycoplasma Assay (manual) (13304) Fluorescence Microscopy (10253) pneumoniae IgG Antibody Kit (19021) Helena Laboratories Cascade M (25156) Coulter Epics Flow Cytometer (10246) Shared Systems M. pneumoniae Antibody Instrumentation Laboratory MCL 2 EIA Test System (58287) ANALYTE: Thyroid Peroxidase Coagulation Analyzer (28297) ANALYTE: Rheumatoid Factor (RF) (5508) Autoantibodies (TPO) (6135) International Technidyne Factor VI (28093) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR International Technidyne Factor VI EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: Premier (28296) Clark Laboratories Encore Rheumatoid Nichols Institute Chemiluminescence Anti- International Technidyne Hemochron 400 Factor (RF) EIA Test (10242) TPO Assay (43076) (28094) Immco Diagnostics ImmuLisa Rheumatoid elias usa Synelisa TG Abs/TPO Abs EIA Kit International Technidyne Hemochron 401 Factor ELISA (28352) (16032) (28095) Sigma Diagnostics Rheumatoid Factor IgM ANALYTE: Toxoplasma gondii Antibodies International Technidyne Hemochron 800 Kit (58333) (6113) (28096) Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices 25973 International Technidyne Hemochron 8000 SmithKline ESKALAB–CHS H5–M (58302) Texas International Laboratories Plt–4 (28298) SmithKline ESKALAB–CHS H7 (58304) (61126) International Technidyne Hemochron 801 Texas International Laboratories H10 ANALYTE: Protamine Response Test (PRT) (28097) (61127) (4945) MeDiTech Chromogenic Factor VIII:C Texas International Laboratories H3–Hgb TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Assay Kit (40180) (61122) EXAMINATION: Medical Laboratory MLA Electra 1600C Texas International Laboratories H5 International Technidyne Hemochron 8000 (40167) (61124) (28298) Organon Teknika Multi Channel Discrete Texas International Laboratories H5–M ANALYTE: Protein C (4929) Analyzer (MDA–180) (46144) (61123) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TOA Medical Electronics CA–1000 (61132) Texas International Laboratories H7 EXAMINATION: TOA Medical Electronics CA–5000 (61135) (61125) Behring Fibrintimer A (07516) Vitek HEMOLAB (67075) ANALYTE: Heparin (2518) Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 704 (07161) ANALYTE: Fibrin Monomers (1927) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 705 (07162) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR EXAMINATION: Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 717 (07163) EXAMINATION: Behring Berichrome Heparin (07481) Chromogenix COAMATE Protein C Protamine Sulfate (with serial dilutions) Biopool Spectrolyse Heparin (07526) (manual procedure) (10252) (49106) Vitek HEMOLAB (67075) Medical Laboratory MLA Electra 1600C ANALYTE: Fibrinogen (1905) Vitek HEMOLAB Heparichrom (67095) (40167) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR ANALYTE: Heparin, Low Molecular Weight Organon Teknika Multi Channel Discrete EXAMINATION: (LMWH) (2558) Analyzer (MDA–180) (46144) Roche Cobas Bio (55100) All Manual Tilt-Tube Coagulation TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Roche Cobas FARA (55040) Procedures (04424) EXAMINATION: Roche Cobas Mira (55044) Behring Multifibren U (manual) (07545) Instrumentation Laboratory IL Test The Binding Site Human Protein C RID Behring Multifibrin (manual) (07517) Heparin (Xa) (28341) Diagnostic Specialties EnZIP Test Kit (61180) Immunoturbidometric (manual) (13319) ANALYTE: Heparin/Protamine Titration Vitek HEMOLAB (67075) Helena Laboratories Fibrinogen Assay Kit (HPT) (2538) Vitek HEMOLAB Protein C chrom (manual (manual) (25152) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR procedure) (67086) EXAMINATION: The Binding Site Human Fibrinogen RID ANALYTE: Protein S (4930) International Technidyne Factor VI (28093) (61101) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR International Technidyne Hemochron 400 EXAMINATION: ANALYTE: Hematocrit (2514) (28094) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Instrumentation Laboratory IL ACL 100 International Technidyne Hemochron 401 (28073) EXAMINATION: (28095) DMA H10 (13283) Instrumentation Laboratory IL ACL 1000 International Technidyne Hemochron 800 (28074) DMA H3–HCT (13277) (28096) DMA H5 (13280) Instrumentation Laboratory IL ACL 200 International Technidyne Hemochron 801 (28075) DMA H5–M (13279) (28097) DMA H7 (13281) Instrumentation Laboratory IL ACL 2000 Mallinckrodt H5–M (40171) ANALYTE: Lupus Anticoagulants (3728) (28076) Mallinckrodt S–610 (40169) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Instrumentation Laboratory IL ACL 300 Mallinckrodt S–650 (40172) EXAMINATION: (28077) Mallinckrodt S–670 (40173) American Diagnostica DVVtest Instrumentation Laboratory IL ACL 300 SmithKline ESKALAB–CHS H10 (58305) &DVVconfirm (manual) (04543) Plus (28197) SmithKline ESKALAB–CHS H3–HCT Biopool Bioclot LA (manual procedure) Instrumentation Laboratory IL ACL 3000 (58300) (07522) (28078) SmithKline ESKALAB–CHS H5 (58303) Diagnostica Stago STACLOT LA (13285) Instrumentation Laboratory IL ACL 3000 SmithKline ESKALAB–CHS H5–M (58302) Diagnostica Stago STACLOT PNP (13273) Plus (28079) SmithKline ESKALAB–CHS H7 (58304) Gradipore Lupo-Test II & Lucor (22163) Instrumentation Laboratory IL ACL 810 Texas International Laboratories H10 ANALYTE: Plasminogen (4907) (28080) (61127) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR ANALYTE: Prothrombin Time (PT) (4922) Texas International Laboratories H3–HCT EXAMINATION: TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (61121) American Bioproducts STA Analyzer EXAMINATION: Texas International Laboratories H5 (04594) Helena Laboratories Thromboplastin (61124) Medical Laboratory MLA Electra 1600C Reagent-MI (manual) (25163) Texas International Laboratories H5–M (40167) ANALYTE: Red Blood Cell Count (61123) The Binding Site Plasminogen RID Test Kit (Erythrocyte Count) (RBC) (5502) Texas International Laboratories H7 (61159) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (61125) ANALYTE: Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor EXAMINATION: ANALYTE: Hemoglobin (2515) (PAI) (4936) DMA H10 (13283) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR DMA H3–HCT (13277) EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: DMA H3–Hgb (13278) DMA H10 (13283) Baxter Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 DMA H5 (13280) DMA H3–Hgb (13278) (PAI) (07521) DMA H5–M (13279) DMA H5 (13280) Biopool Spectrolyse/pL PAI (07482) DMA H7 (13281) DMA H5–M (13279) ANALYTE: Platelet Count (4908) Mallinckrodt H5–M (40171) DMA H7 (13281) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Mallinckrodt S–610 (40169) Mallinckrodt H5–M (40171) EXAMINATION: Mallinckrodt S–630 (40170) Mallinckrodt S–630 (40170) DMA H10 (13283) Mallinckrodt S–650 (40172) Mallinckrodt S–650 (40172) DMA Plt–4 (13282) Mallinckrodt S–670 (40173) Mallinckrodt S–670 (40173) Mallinckrodt Plt–4 (40174) SmithKline ESKALAB–CHS H10 (58305) SmithKline ESKALAB–CHS H10 (58305) SmithKline ESKALAB–CHS H10 (58305) SmithKline ESKALAB–CHS H3–HCT SmithKline ESKALAB–CHS H3–Hgb SmithKline ESKALAB–CHS Plt–4 (58306) (58300) (58301) Texas International Laboratories H10 SmithKline ESKALAB–CHS H3–Hgb SmithKline ESKALAB–CHS H5 (58303) (61127) (58301) 25974 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices SmithKline ESKALAB–CHS H5 (58303) Texas International Laboratories H5–M Seradyn Color Vue—Giardia (dir Ag/ SmithKline ESKALAB–CHS H5–M (58302) (61123) spectrophoto) (58183) SmithKline ESKALAB–CHS H7 (58304) Texas International Laboratories H7 Seradyn Color Vue—Giardia (direct Ag/ Texas International Laboratories H10 (61125) visual) (58296) (61127) ANALYTE: von Willebrand Factor Trend Scientific Giardia lamblia Direct Texas International Laboratories H3–HCT (Ristocetin Cofactor) (6711) Detection System (61019) (61121) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR ANALYTE: Pneumocystis (4926) Texas International Laboratories H3–Hgb EXAMINATION: TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (61122) Chrono-log Ristocetin Cofactor Assay EXAMINATION: Texas International Laboratories H5 (10282) Polysciences Fungi-Fluor Pneumocystis (61124) Texas International Laboratories H5–M SPECIALITY/SUBSPECIALITY: Mycology (49099) (61123) ANALYTE: Yeast (7601) SPECIALITY/SUBSPECIALITY: Toxicology/ Texas International Laboratories H7 TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TDM (61125) EXAMINATION: ANALYTE: Amphetamines (0428) ANALYTE: Reptilase Time (5521) Innovative Diag. Systems RapID Yeast Plus TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR System (inc. cult) (28383) EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: ANALYTE: Yeast, Cryptocococcus only Microdiagnostics MICRO EIA (40191) Behring Batroxobin (manual procedure) (7604) STC Diagnostics Amphetamines EIA Plate (07534) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Kit (58299) ANALYTE: Reticulocyte Count (5506) EXAMINATION: USDT Flow Immunoassay System (64026) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Trinity Laboratories CRYPTO–LEX System ANALYTE: Cannabinoids (THC) (1009) EXAMINATION: (61136) Becton Dickinson FACScan Flow TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR SPECIALITY/SUBSPECIALITY: Parasitology Cytometer (07497) EXAMINATION: STC Diagnostics Cannabinoids EIA Plate ANALYTE: Semen (5822) ANALYTE: Cryptosporidium (1109) Kit (58292) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR USDT Flow Immunoassay System (64026) EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: Serono Penetrak (58352) Alexon ProSpecT Cryptosporidium ANALYTE: Cocaine Metabolites (1023) Microtiter (dir Ag/spectro) (04326) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR ANALYTE: Thrombin Time (6105) Alexon ProSpecT Cryptosporidium TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR EXAMINATION: Microtiter (dir Ag/visual) (04325) EXAMINATION: USDT Flow Immunoassay System (64026) LMD Laboratories Cryptosporidium Ag Behring Test Thrombin (manual) (07495) ANALYTE: Digoxin (1304) Detect. Microtiter(vis) (37018) Vitek HEMOLAB Thrombicalci-Test TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Meridian Diagnostics MERIFLUOR (manual) (67090) EXAMINATION: Cryptosporidium (40100) ANALYTE: Thrombin/antithrombin III Diatron FAST Test System (13287) Meridian Diagnostics MERIFLUOR Wallac Oy DELFIA Digoxin Kit (70160) Complex (TAT) (6136) Cryptosporidium/Giardia (40095) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Seradyn Color Vue—Cryptosporidium (dir. ANALYTE: Morphine (4020) EXAMINATION: Ag/spectrophoto) (58184) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Behring Enzygnost TAT (07483) Seradyn Color Vue—Cryptosporidium EXAMINATION: ANALYTE: Tissue Plasminogen Activator (t- (direct, Ag/visual) (58297) Immunalysis Urine Morphine Direct RIA Kit (28342) PA) (6130) ANALYTE: Entamoeba histolytica (1631) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR ANALYTE: Opioates (4601) EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Biopool TintElize tPA (07525) Alexon ProSpecT Entamoeba histolytica EXAMINATION: ANALYTE: White Blood Cell Count (direct Ag/spectro) (04530) Microdiagnostics Micro EIA Opiate (Leukocyte Count) (WBC) (7002) Alexon ProSpecT Entamoeba histolytica Metabolites (40168) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (direct Ag/visual) (04529) STC Diagnostics Opiates EIA Plate Kit EXAMINATION: (58298) ANALYTE: Giardia lamblia (2222) DMA H10 (13283) USDT Flow Immunoassay System (64026) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR DMA H3–HCT (13277) EXAMINATION: ANALYTE: Phencyclidine (PCP) (4901) DMA H3–Hgb (13278) Alexon ProSpecT Giardia EZ Microplate TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR DMA H5 (13280) Assay (dir Ag/spectr) (04585) EXAMINATION: DMA H5–M (13279) USDT Flow Immunoassay System (64026) DMA H7 (13281) Alexon ProSpecT Giardia EZ Microplate Mallinckrodt H5–M (40171) Assay (dir Ag/visual) (04586) SPECIALITY/SUBSPECIALITY: Virology Alexon ProSpecT Giardia Microplate Assay Mallinckrodt S–610 (40169) ANALYTE: Adenovirus (0410) Mallinckrodt S–630 (40170) (dir Ag/spectro) (04557) Alexon ProSpecT Giardia Microplate Assay TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Mallinckrodt S–650 (40172) EXAMINATION: Mallinckrodt S–670 (40173) (dir Ag/visual) (04558) Alexon ProSpecT Giardia Microtiter (dir Baxter Bartels Viral Respiratory Kit SmithKline ESKALAB–CHS H10 (58305) (including cell cult) (07359) SmithKline ESKALAB–CHS H3–HCT Ag/spectrophoto) (04257) Alexon ProSpecT Giardia Microtiter (dir Light Diag. Respir. Panel 1 Screen & ID Kit (58300) (inc. cell cult) (37068) SmithKline ESKALAB–CHS H3–Hgb antigen/visual) (04099) (58301) Alexon ProSpecT/Giardia (tube) (dir Ag/ ANALYTE: Cytomegalovirus (1038) SmithKline ESKALAB–CHS H5 (58303) visual) (04338) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR SmithKline ESKALAB–CHS H5–M (58302) Antibodies Inc. Giard EIA (direct antigen/ EXAMINATION: SmithKline ESKALAB–CHS H7 (58304) visual) (04224) Diagnostic Products PathoDx Texas International Laboratories H10 LMD Laboratories G. lamblia Ag Detect. Cytomegalovirus (inc. cell cult) (13298) (61127) Microtiter (spectro) (37032) Light Diag. Cytomegalovirus Indirect Texas International Laboratories H3–HCT LMD Laboratories G. lamblia Ag Detect. Immunofluorescence Kit (37089) (61121) Microtiter (visual) (37019) NeoGenex CMV Early Antigen Test Texas International Laboratories H3–Hgb Meridian Diagnostics MERIFLUOR (including cell culture) (43092) (61122) Cryptosporidium/Giardia (40095) ANALYTE: Herpes simplex (2529) Texas International Laboratories H5 Meridian Diagnostics MERIFLUOR Giardia TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (61124) (40099) EXAMINATION: Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices 25975 DAKO IDEIA Herpes simplex (direct Ag) DAKO IMAGEN Parainfluenza virus Group TCPI One Step LH Test (61158) (13332) (inc. cell culture) (13373) ANALYTE: Urine HCG by Visual Color DAKO IMAGEN Herpes simplex (inc. cell DAKO IMAGEN Parainfluenza virus Types Comparison Tests (9642) culture) (13333) 1,2,3 (inc. cell cult) (13374) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR ANALYTE: Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Light Diag. Respir. Panel 1 Screen & ID Kit EXAMINATION: (2540) (inc. cell cult) (37068) ANI BIOCARD HCG (04549) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Symex ViraSTAT Anti-Parainfluenza ANI BIOTECH OY BIOCARD HCG (04502) EXAMINATION: MAbs (58315) Abbott TestPack HCG-combo (04074) Digene ViraType Plus HPV DNA Assay ANALYTE: Parainfluenza 3 (4961) Advanced Care Products 1 Easy Step (13323) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR ADVANCE Pregnancy Test (04591) ANALYTE: Influenza A (2828) EXAMINATION: Apotex ProPhase Plus (04534) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Baxter Bartels Viral Respiratory Kit (direct Apotex ProStrip HCG (04533) EXAMINATION: antigen) (07035) Apothecus VCF One Step Pregnancy Test Analytab API IMAGEN Influenza Virus Baxter Bartels Viral Respiratory Kit (04606) A&B (direct antigen) (04215) (including cell cult) (07359) Applied Biotech SureStep Combo hCG Analytab API IMAGEN Influenza Virus DAKO IMAGEN Parainfluenza virus Group (04528) A&B (inc.cell culture) (04512) (inc. cell culture) (13373) Applied Biotech SureStep HCG Pregnancy Baxter Bartels PRIMA Influenza A EIA DAKO IMAGEN Parainfluenza virus Types Test (04441) (direct Ag/spectro) (07490) 1,2,3 (inc. cell cult) (13374) Applied Biotech SureStick HCG Pregnancy Baxter Bartels PRIMA Influenza A EIA (inc. Light Diag. Respir. Panel 1 Screen & ID Kit Test (04522) cell culture) (07492) (inc. cell cult) (37068) Becton Dickinson Precise One-step Baxter Bartels Viral Respiratory Kit (direct Symex ViraSTAT Anti-Parainfluenza Pregnancy Test (07476) antigen) (07035) MAbs (58315) BioTech Atlantic UniStep HCG Pregnancy Baxter Bartels Viral Respiratory Kit ANALYTE: Respiratory syncytial virus (5503) Test Device (07544) (including cell cult) (07359) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR BioTech Atlantic UniStep HCG Pregnancy DAKO IMAGEN Influenza (direct antigen) EXAMINATION: Test Strips (07543) (13336) Baxter Bartels Viral Respiratory Kit (direct Biomed Diagnostics ProClinic One-Step DAKO IMAGEN Influenza (including cell antigen) (07035) DipStick Pregnancy (07478) culture) (13337) Baxter Bartels Viral Respiratory Kit Boehringer Mannheim BMIt EVATEST Gull Laboratories Influenza A Test (including cell cult) (07359) Test Strip (07550) (including cell culture) (22106) DAKO IMAGEN RSV (direct antigen) Boehringer Mannheim EVENT test strip Light Diag. Respir. Panel 1 Screen & ID Kit (13335) hCG (07533) (inc.cell cult) (37068) Diagnostic Products Corp. PathoDx RSV Disease Detection International Pro-Step NeoGenex Influenza A Antigen Test Kit (direct antigen) (13324) PT hCG (13271) (including cell culture) (40393) Diagnostic Products Corp. PathoDx RSV Disease Detection International Pro-Step ANALYTE: Influenza B (2829) Kit (inc. cell cult.) (13325) hCG (13270) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Light Diag. Respir. Panel 1 Screen & ID Kit Eucardio Laboratories UC QIK 1-Step HCG EXAMINATION: (inc. cell cult) (37068) Test (16072) Analytab API IMAGEN Influenza Virus NeoGenex RSV Antigen Test (including Eucardio Laboratory UC Qik Pregnancy A&B (direct antigen) (04215) cell culture) (43094) Test (16029) Analytab API IMAGEN Influenza Virus Sanofi/Kallestad RSV Microplate EIA King’s Bay Prelude hCG Combo Kit (34062) A&B (inc. cell culture) (04512) (direct Ag/spectro) (58286) Mainline Technology MAINLINE Confirms Baxter Bartels Viral Respiratory Kit (direct ANALYTE: Rotavirus (5509) hCG (40190) antigen) (07035) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Medix Biotech BESTest hCG Urine (40166) Baxter Bartels Viral Respiratory Kit EXAMINATION: Mizuho USA HCG Midstream (40178) (including cell cult) (07359) DAKO ELISA Rotavirus Kit (direct Ag/ Organon Teknika Predictor Pregnancy Test DAKO Diagnostics IMAGEN Influenza spectrophoto) (13331) (46151) (direct antigen) (13336) DAKO ELISA Rotavirus Kit (direct Ag/ Pacific Biotech Concise Plus HCG-Urine DAKO Diagnostics IMAGEN Influenza visual) (13330) (49123) (including cell culture) (13337) DAKO IDEIA Rotavirus (direct antigen/ Princeton BioMeditech BioStrip hCG Gull Laboratories Influenza B Test spectro) (13295) (49131) (including cell culture) (22107) DAKO IDEIA Rotavirus (direct antigen/ Princeton BioMeditech LifeSign 1 One- Light Diag. Respir. Panel 1 Screen & ID Kit visual) (13294) Step Home Preg. Test (49127) (inc. cell cult) (37068) ANALYTE: Varicella-Zoster viruses (6705) Princeton BioMeditech LifeSign Plus One NeoGenex Influenza B Antigen Test TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Step Home Pregnancy (49095) (including cell culture) (43096) EXAMINATION: Quidel Conceive 1-Step Pregnancy Test ANALYTE: Parainfluenza 1 (4959) Viro Varicella-Zoster Virus ID Reagent (52021) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR (direct antigen) (67093) Quidel QuickVue One-Step hCG Combo EXAMINATION: Viro Varicella-Zoster Virus ID Reagent (inc. Test (52022) Baxter Bartels Viral Respiratory Kit (direct cell culture) (67094) Quidel QuickVue One-Step hCG Test antigen) (07035) COMPLEXITY: WAIVED (52018) Baxter Bartels Viral Respiratory Kit Quidel RapidVue hCG (52025) (including cell cult) (07359) SPECIALITY/SUBSPECIALITY: SA Scientific Pregnancy Check (58328) DAKO IMAGEN Parainfluenza virus Group Endocrinology SA Scientific SAS One-Step Pregnancy (inc. cell culture) (13373) ANALYTE: Ovulation Test (LH) by Visual (58282) DAKO IMAGEN Parainfluenza virus Types Color Comparison (9461) SA Scientific SAS Pregnancy Strip (58284) 1, 2, 3 (inc. cell cult) (13374) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR SA Scientific SAS Serum/Urine hCG Light Diag. Respir. Panel 1 Screen & ID Kit EXAMINATION: (58283) (inc.cell cult) (37068) Applied Biotech Ovugen 1-Step Ovulation Stanbio QuPid Plus hCG Pregnancy Test Symex ViraSTAT Anti-Parainfluenza Prediction Test (04514) (58326) MAbs (58315) BioGenex OvuGen 1-Step Ovulation Stanbio QuPid visual one-step pregnancy ANALYTE: Parainfluenza 2 (4960) Prediction Test (07477) test (58325) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Disease Detection Internat. Pro-Step LH Stanbio QuStick visual one-step pregnancy EXAMINATION: Ovulation Pred. Tst (13316) test (58324) Baxter Bartels Viral Respiratory Kit Princeton BioMeditech OvuSign One-Step Sun Biomedical Laboratories Visualine II (including cell cult) (07359) Ovulation Prediction (49093) HCG (58341) 25976 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices Syntron Bioresearch Be Sure Plus One Step Ames Glucometer ENCORE Blood Glucose SPECIALITY/SUBSPECIALITY: Urinalysis Pregnancy Test (58285) Test Strips (04501) ANALYTE: Urine Dipstick or Tablet Syntron Bioresearch QuikPac II hCG Ames Glucometer ENCORE QA Blood Analytes, nonautomated (9641) Combo Kit (58353) Glucose Meter (04423) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TCPI PDQ (Pregnancy Detected Quickly) Ames Glucometer ENCORE System (04500) EXAMINATION: Wand (61166) Ames Glucometer QA Blood Glucose Meter Bio-Scan Bio-Gen 2 (07456) TCPI hCG Pregnancy One Step Test Strip (04422) Bio-Scan Bio-Gen 3 (07455) (61100) Boehringer Mannheim Accu-Chek TCPI hCG Pregnancy One Step Wand Bio-Scan Bio-Gen 4 (07454) Advantage (07523) Bio-Scan Bio-Gen 5 (07453) (61167) Cascade Medical CheckMate Plus Blood TECH-CO Visual HCG Pregnancy Test Bio-Scan Bio-Gen 6 (07452) Glucose System (10236) (61099) Bio-Scan Bio-Gen 7 (07451) Clinical Diagnostics GLUCOchek Visual TECO One-Step Pregnancy Test (61146) Bio-Scan Bio-Gen 8 (07450) The Mentholatum Co. BODYWISE Test Strips (10272) Bio-Scan Bio-Glu Ketone (07457) Pregnancy Test (61160) Diagnostic Solutions Quick Check One Bld Bio-Scan Bio-Glucose (07459) True Medix Beta Spec hCG (61139) Glucose Test Strips (13300) Bio-Scan Bio-Ketone (07458) Unipath Clearview HCG DUO (64031) Diagnostic Solutions Relief Plus Blood BioScan Reagent Strips (07541) Unipath Clearview HCG Test (64024) Glucose Test Strips (13299) Boehringer Mannheim Chemstrip 10 S–UA HemoCue B-Glucose System (25112) SPECIALITY/SUBSPECIALITY: General (07519) Home Diagnostics ULTRA+ Blood Glucose Chemistry Eiken UROPAPER Eiken 5 (16049) Reagent Strips (25154) Eiken UROPAPER Eiken 6B (16059) ANALYTE: Fecal Occult Blood (9191) Lifescan ONE TOUCH IIB Blood Glucose Eiken UROPAPER Eiken 7 (16053) TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Meter (37067) Eiken UROPAPER Eiken 8 (16052) EXAMINATION: Polymer Technology ‘‘655’’ Glucose Test Eiken UROPAPER Eiken AG (16050) Aerscher HemaPrompt (04544) Strips (49094) Eiken UROPAPER Eiken GK(16068) Propper Super Seracult (49096) SPECIALITY/SUBSPECIALITY: Hematology Eiken UROPAPER Eiken GP (16069) ANALYTE: Glucose Monitoring Devices Eiken UROPAPER Eiken HAG (16051) (FDA Cleared/Home Use) (9221) ANALYTE: Spun Microhematocrit (9581) Eli Lilly Tes-Tape (Glucose Enzymatic Test TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR TEST SYSTEM, ASSAY OR Strip) (16030) EXAMINATION: EXAMINATION: TECO Diagnostics Urine Reagent Strips 3 Ames Glucometer ELITE Blood Glucose Separation Technology STI HemataSTAT II (61153) Test Strips (04521) (58311) Ames Glucometer ELITE Diabetes Care Separation Technology STI HemataSTAT [FR Doc. 95–11653 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] System (04499) Model C70 (58309) BILLING CODE 4160±17±M federal register May 15,1995 Monday Notices the PueblosofAcomaandNambe,NM; Regarding ClassIII(Casino)Gambling, Approved Tribal-StateCompacts Bureau ofIndianAffairs Interior Department ofthe Part III 25977 25978 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DATES: This action is effective May 15, the Interior shall publish, in the Federal 1995. Register, notice of approved Tribal/State Bureau of Indian Affairs FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Compacts for the purpose of engaging in George T. Skibine, Director, Indian Class III (casino) gambling on Indian Indian Gaming Gaming Management Staff, Bureau of reservations. The Assistant Secretary— AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Indian Affairs, Washington, DC 20240, Indian Affairs, Department of the Interior. (202) 219–4068. Interior, through her delegated authority, has approved the Compact ACTION: Notice of approved Tribal/State Dated: April 24, 1995. Between the Pueblo of Acoma and the Compact. Ada E. Deer, State of New Mexico, which was Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs. SUMMARY: Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. § 2710, executed on February 15, 1995. [FR Doc. 95–11759 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of DATES: This action is effective May 15, 1988 (Pub. L. 100–497), the Secretary of BILLING CODE 4310±02±M 1995. the Interior shall publish, in the Federal FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Register, notice of approved Tribal/State Indian Gaming George T. Skibine, Director, Indian Compacts for the purpose of engaging in Gaming Management Staff, Bureau of Class III (casino) gambling on Indian AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Indian Affairs, Washington, D.C. 20240, reservations. The Assistant Secretary— Interior. (202) 219–4068. Indian Affairs, Department of the ACTION: Notice of approved Tribal/State Dated: April 24, 1995. Interior, through her delegated Compact. authority, has approved the Compact Ada E. Deer, Between the Pueblo of Nambe and the SUMMARY: Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. § 2710, Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs. State of New Mexico, which was of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of [FR Doc. 95–11760 Filed 5–12–95; 8:45 am] executed on March 1, 1995. 1988 (Pub. L. 100–497), the Secretary of BILLING CODE 4310±02±M federal register May 15,1995 Monday Afghanistan; FinalRule the TerritoryandAirspaceof Prohibition AgainstCertainFlightsWithin 14 CFRPart91 Federal AviationAdministration Transportation Department of Part IV 25979 25980 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Code, declares, as a matter of policy, over Afghanistan, including operations that the regulation of air commerce to using certain routes developed by the Federal Aviation Administration promote safety is in the public interest. Afghan Government or neighboring Section 44701(a) of Title 49, United countries. In January 1994, the Russian 14 CFR Part 91 States Code, provides the FAA with civil aviation authority released a [Docket No. 27744; Special Federal Aviation broad authority to carry out this policy service message warning that because of Regulation (SFAR) No. 67] by prescribing regulations governing the military aircraft operations around practices, methods, and procedures Kabul and in northern Afghanistan, civil RIN 2120±AF74 necessary to ensure safety in air aircraft were advised to avoid the Prohibition Against Certain Flights commerce. Termez-Mazare Sharif-Kabul air traffic Within the Territory and Airspace of In the exercise of these statutory corridor and to increase enroute flight Afghanistan responsibilities, the FAA issued SFAR levels as much as possible. These 67, prohibiting flight operations within advisories reflect the uncertain nature of AGENCY: Federal Aviation the territory and airspace of Afghanistan the situation and underscore the danger Administration (FAA), DOT. by any United States air carrier or to flights in Afghan airspace. ACTION: Final rule; extension of commercial operator, any person There also are indications that at least expiration date. exercising the privileges of an airman one faction in Afghanistan intends to certificate issued by the FAA, or any deliberately target civil aircraft. In SUMMARY: This action amends Special operator using an aircraft registered in September 1994, the Supreme Federal Aviation Regulation (SFAR) 67 the United States unless the operator of Coordination Council for the Islamic to extend the prohibition on flight such aircraft is a foreign air carrier. Revolution in Afghanistan issued a operations within the territory and Notice of SFAR 67 was published at 59 press release warning that it would airspace of Afghanistan by any United FR 25282 (May 13, 1994). The FAA attempt to shoot down any Afghan States air carrier and commercial issued SFAR 67 based upon a Ariana Airlines aircraft operating in operator, by any person exercising the determination that the ongoing civil war Afghan airspace. Although it seems privileges of an airman certificate issued in Afghanistan justified the imposition unlikely that any action in the civil war by the FAA, or by an operator using an of certain measures to ensure the safety would deliberately target a foreign- aircraft registered in the United States of U.S.-registered aircraft and operators flagged air carrier, the potential for unless the operator of such aircraft is a that are conducting flight operations in misidentification or inadvertent foreign air carrier. This action is taken the vicinity of Afghanistan’s territory targeting is a real possibility. The FAA to prevent an undue hazard to persons and airspace. has received at least one report that a and aircraft engaged in such flight Fighting between government and civil aircraft was the target of anti- operations as a result of the ongoing opposition forces continues throughout aircraft fire by Afghan government civil war in Afghanistan. Afghanistan at a similar level and forces. DATES: Effective date: May 10, 1995. intensity as was noted when SFAR 67 At the very least, central Afghan Expiration date: May 10, 1996. was originally issued. Government and government control over installations opposition forces still possess a wide critical to navigation and FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: range of sophisticated weapons that communication cannot be assured. Use Mark W. Bury, International Affairs and potentially could be used to attack civil of combat aircraft and SAMs by all Legal Policy Staff, AGC–7, Office of the aviation aircraft overflying Afghanistan factions in the conflict calls into Chief Counsel, Federal Aviation at cruising altitudes. These weapons question the security of Afghan airspace Administration, 800 Independence include Russian-made fighter and attack for civilian aircraft. An environment for Avenue, SW., Washington, D.C. 20591. aircraft armed with cannons and air-to- long-term stability in this troubled Telephone: (202) 267–3515. air missiles, and surface-to-air missile region has yet to emerge. (SAMs) systems. Although government SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Prohibition Against Certain Flights and opposition aircraft primarily have Availability of Document Within the Territory and Airspace of been used for ground attacks against Afghanistan Any person may obtain a copy of this airfields and other key facilities, air-to- document by submitting a request to the air encounters also have been observed. On the basis of the above information, Federal Aviation Administration, Office Press reports also suggest that a number and in furtherance of my of Public Affairs, Attention: Public of Afghan military and civilian aircraft responsibilities to promote the safety of Inquiry Center, APA–230, 800 have been shot down using SAMs. Large flight of civil aircraft in air commerce, Independence Avenue, SW., areas of the country continue to be the I have determined that continued action Washington, D.C. 20591, or by calling scene of factional fighting. Fluctuations by the FAA is required to prevent the (202) 267–3484. Communications must in the level and intensity of combat injury to or loss of certain U.S.- identify the number of this SFAR. create an unsafe environment for registered aircraft and U.S. operators Persons interested in being placed on a transiting civilian aircraft. conducting flights in the vicinity of mailing list for future rules should also As a result of the recent escalation in Afghanistan. I find that the current civil request a copy of Advisory Circular No. fighting, advisories have been issued by war in Afghanistan continues to present 11–2A, which describes the application the International Civil Aviation an immediate hazard to the operation of procedure. Organization (ICAO) and Russia urging civil aircraft in the territory and airspace civil air carriers to avoid Afghan of Afghanistan. Accordingly, I am Background airspace. In a letter dated April 8, 1994, ordering the amendment of SFAR 67 to The Federal Aviation Administration President Assad Kotaite of ICAO issued extend the prohibition on flight (FAA) is responsible for the safety of a notice urging air carriers to operations (excluding those operations flight in the United States and for the discontinue flights over Afghanistan. In approved by the U.S. Government and safety of U.S.-registered aircraft and U.S. a subsequent letter of November 14, certain emergency operations) within operators throughout the world. Section 1994, President Kotaite warned of the the territory and airspace of Afghanistan 40101(d)(1) of Title 49, United States continuing risks associated with flights by any United States air carrier and Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Rules and Regulations 25981 commercial operator, by any person by flying over Iran to between one and national government and the states, or exercising the privileges of an airman four hours by flying over Saudi Arabia on the distribution of power and certificate issued by the FAA, or by an (depending on where the flight responsibilities among the various operator using an aircraft registered in originated). levels of government. Therefore, in the United States unless the operator of Some U.S. operators use the alternate accordance with Executive Order 12612 such aircraft is a foreign air carrier. This route over Iran, thereby incurring little, (52 FR 41685; October 30, 1987), it is action is necessary to prevent an undue if any, additional flying time and determined that this regulation does not hazard to aircraft and to protect persons operating costs. Two U.S. operators use have federalism implications warranting and property on board those aircraft. routes over Saudi Arabia, which result the preparation of a Federalism Because the circumstances described in in additional costs of approximately Assessment. this notice warrant immediate action by $3,100 to $12,400 per flight. the FAA to maintain the safety of flight, Based on the potentially small costs of Conclusion I also find that notice and public navigating around Afghanistan and the For the reasons set forth above, FAA comment under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) are potentially devastating result of a U.S. has determined that this action is not a impracticable and contrary to the public air carrier being shot down, the FAA has ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under interest. Further, I find that good cause determined that the SFAR is cost- Executive Order 12866. This action is exists for making this rule effective beneficial. considered a ‘‘significant rule’’ under immediately upon issuance. I also find Regulatory Flexibility Determination DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures that this action is fully consistent with (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979). my obligations under 49 U.S.C. The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 Because revenue flights to Afghanistan 40105(b)(1)(A) to exercise my duties (RFA) was enacted by Congress to are not currently being conducted by consistently with the obligations of the ensure that small entities are not U.S. air carriers or commercial United States under international unnecessarily and disproportionately operators, the FAA certifies that this agreements. The Department of State burdened by Federal regulations. The rule will not have a significant has been advised of, and has no RFA requires a Regulatory Flexibility economic impact, positive or negative, objection to, the action taken herein. Analysis if a proposed rule would have on a substantial number of small entities The rule now contains an expiration ‘‘significant economic impact on a under the criteria of the Regulation date of May 10, 1996, but may be substantial number of small entities.’’ Flexibility Act. terminated sooner or extended through FAA Order 2100.14A outlines the FAA’s the publication of a corresponding procedures and criteria for List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 91 notice if circumstances so warrant. implementing the RFA. The FAA has Afghanistan, Aircraft, Airmen, Regulatory Evaluation determined that none of the U.S. air Airports, Air traffic control, Aviation carriers affected by the SFAR are ‘‘small safety, Freight. Over the past 10 years, there have entities’’ as defined by FAA Order been a number of instances worldwide 2100.14A. Thus, the SFAR would not The Amendment where civilian aircraft were either shot impose a ‘‘significant economic impact For the reasons set forth above, the at or shot down. In some instances, the on a substantial number of small Federal Aviation Administration is shooting was intentional, while in entities.’’ amending 14 CFR part 91 as follows: others the aircraft was mis-identified as an enemy aircraft. One such reported International Trade Impact Assessment PART 91ÐGENERAL OPERATING AND incident, described earlier, involved The SFAR could have an adverse FLIGHT RULES Afghan government forces mistakenly affect on the international flights of U.S. shooting at a civilian aircraft. This air carriers and commercial operators 1. The authority citation for part 91 incident highlights the risk that one side primarily because it could increase their continues to read as follows: in the Afghan civil war will mis-identify operating costs relative to foreign Authority: 49 U.S.C. app. 1301(7), 1303, a U.S. civil aircraft overflying carriers who continue to overfly 1344, 1348, 1352 through 1355, 1401, 1421 Afghanistan as a hostile aircraft. One Afghanistan. However, because of the through 1431, 1471, 1472, 1502, 1510, 1522, faction involved in the fighting in narrow scope of the SFAR and the small and 2121 through 2125; Articles 12, 29, 31, Afghanistan has specifically stated that incremental cost of some of the alternate and 32(a) of the Convention on International it would target the aircraft of an Afghan routes available to U.S. operators, the Civil Aviation (61 Stat. 1180); 42 U.S.C. 4321 air carrier. This stated threat increases et seq., E.O. 11514, 35 FR 4247, 3 CFR, 1966– FAA contends that the SFAR would 1790 Comp., p. 902; 49 U.S.C. 106(g). the risk of a U.S. aircraft being mis- have little, if any, affect on the sale of identified and shot down. U.S. aviation products and services in 2. Section 5 of Special Federal Navigating around Afghanistan will foreign countries. Aviation Regulation (SFAR) No. 67 is result in increased variable operating revised to read as follows: Paperwork Reduction Act costs (i.e., maintenance, fuel, and crew) * * * * * primarily for U.S. operators who This rule contains no information 5. Expiration. This Special Federal conduct flights between Europe and collection requests requiring approval of Aviation Regulation expires May 10, India. The FAA estimates that the the Office of Management and Budget 1996. weighted-average variable operating cost pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction for a wide-body air carrier is Act (44 U.S.C. 3507 et seq.). Issued in Washington, DC, on May 10, approximately $3,100 per hour. Based 1995. on data received from two U.S. carriers, Federalism Determination David R. Hinson, the amount of additional time it takes to The SFAR set forth herein will not Administrator. navigate around Afghanistan using have substantial direct effects on the [FR Doc. 95–11944 Filed 5–10–95; 4:45 pm] alternate routes ranges from 10 minutes states, on the relationship between the BILLING CODE 4910±13±M i Reader Aids Federal Register Vol. 60, No. 93 Monday, May 15, 1995 INFORMATION AND ASSISTANCE CFR PARTS AFFECTED DURING MAY Federal Register At the end of each month, the Office of the Federal Register Index, finding aids & general information 202±523±5227 publishes separately a List of CFR Sections Affected (LSA), which Public inspection announcement line 523±5215 lists parts and sections affected by documents published since the Corrections to published documents 523±5237 revision date of each title. Document drafting information 523±3187 Machine readable documents 523±4534 3 CFR 1494...... 21037 Proclamations: 1924...... 24540 Code of Federal Regulations 6778...... 25266 Proposed Rules: Index, finding aids & general information 523±5227 6792...... 21423 29...... 25624 Printing schedules 523±3419 6793...... 21696 278...... 25625 6794...... 21971 1007...... 25014 Laws 6795...... 22247 1099...... 25628 Public Laws Update Service (numbers, dates, etc.) 523±6641 6796...... 22453 1205...... 21999 Additional information 523±5230 6797...... 25839 1910...... 25629 6798...... 25841 1944...... 25629 Presidential Documents Executive Orders: 1951...... 25629 Executive orders and proclamations 523±5230 12959...... 24757 1965...... 25629 Public Papers of the Presidents 523±5230 12613 (Revoked in 3200...... 25594 Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents 523±5230 part by E.O. 3411...... 25594 12959) ...... 24757 8 CFR The United States Government Manual 12957 (Revoked in 103...... 21979 General information 523±5230 part by E.O. 12959) ...... 24757 208...... 21973 Other Services 210...... 21973 Administrative Orders: 523±4534 214...... 21979 Data base and machine readable specifications Presidential Determinations: Guide to Record Retention Requirements 523±3187 240...... 21973 No. 95±18 of April 21, 242...... 21973 Legal staff 523±4534 1995 ...... 22447 Privacy Act Compilation 523±3187 245a...... 21039, 21973 No. 95±19 of April 21, 247a...... 21973 Public Laws Update Service (PLUS) 523±6641 1995 ...... 22449 Proposed Rules: TDD for the hearing impaired 523±5229 No. 95±20 of May 1, 1...... 24573 1995 ...... 22245 13...... 24573 ELECTRONIC BULLETIN BOARD Notices: 103...... 24573, 25856 Free Electronic Bulletin Board service for Public Law May 10, 1995...... 25599 208...... 24573 numbers, Federal Register finding aids, and list of 5 CFR 242...... 24573 documents on public inspection. 202±275±0920 299...... 25856 Ch. XXI ...... 22249 FAX-ON-DEMAND 185...... 22249 9 CFR You may access our Fax-On-Demand service. You only need a fax 532...... 22455 78...... 24547 machine and there is no charge for the service except for long 630...... 22455 92...... 25119 distance telephone charges the user may incur. The list of 890...... 21590 94...... 21428, 25120 documents on public inspection and the daily Federal Register’s 1603...... 24535 98...... 25119 table of contents are available using this service. The document Proposed Rules: 113...... 24547 numbers are 7050-Public Inspection list and 7051-Table of 591...... 25150 Proposed Rules: Contents list. The public inspection list will be updated 870...... 21759 92...... 25151 immediately for documents filed on an emergency basis. 871...... 21759 98...... 25151 NOTE: YOU WILL ONLY GET A LISTING OF DOCUMENTS ON 872...... 21759 112...... 24584 FILE AND NOT THE ACTUAL DOCUMENT. Documents on 873...... 21759 113...... 24584 public inspection may be viewed and copied in our office located 874...... 21759 308...... 22311, 25869 at 800 North Capitol Street, N.W., Suite 700. The Fax-On-Demand 310...... 22311, 25869 telephone number is: 301±713±6905 7 CFR 318...... 22311, 25869 6...... 21425 320...... 22311, 25869 FEDERAL REGISTER PAGES AND DATES, MAY 28...... 21033 325...... 22311, 25869 75...... 21034 326...... 22311, 25869 110...... 25119 327...... 22311, 25869 21033±21424...... 1 24535±24760...... 9 354...... 24535 381...... 22311, 25869 21425±21698...... 2 24761±25118...... 10 400...... 21035 457...... 25601 10 CFR 21699±21972...... 3 25119±25600...... 11 704...... 22456 2...... 22461, 24549 21973±22246...... 4 25601±25838...... 12 723...... 22458 19...... 24549 22247±22454...... 5 25839±25982...... 15 911...... 24537 20...... 24549 915...... 24537 30...... 24549 22455±24534...... 8 958...... 24539 32...... 24549 1036...... 22255 40...... 24549 1410...... 22456 50...... 24549 1464...... 21036, 22458 51...... 22461, 24549 1468...... 22460 54...... 22461 ii Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Reader Aids 60...... 24549 772...... 25268 310...... 21590 202...... 21983 61...... 24549 774...... 25268 500...... 24808 70...... 24549 799...... 25480 582...... 24808 38 CFR 71...... 24549 Proposed Rules: 589...... 24808 20...... 25850 72...... 24549 292...... 25872 Proposed Rules: 22 CFR 73...... 24549 3...... 22016, 25877 16 CFR 74...... 24549 94...... 25843 17...... 25191 76...... 24549 Proposed Rules: 21...... 21486 150...... 24549 444...... 24805 24 CFR Proposed Rules: 200...... 21936 39 CFR 17 CFR 50...... 22010 203...... 21936 111...... 22270 211...... 24968 73...... 24803 3500...... 24734 Proposed Rules: Proposed Rules: 12 CFR 18 CFR 3001...... 22017 Ch. IX...... 21058 25...... 22156 2...... 22257, 22503 950...... 24597 40 CFR 203...... 22156, 22223 34...... 22503 990...... 24597 9...... 25492 228...... 22156 35...... 22257, 22503 52 ...... 21440, 21442, 21445, 265...... 22256 41...... 22503 26 CFR 21447, 21451, 21453, 21455, 308...... 24761 131...... 22503 1...... 21435, 25140 21456, 21702, 21703, 21706, 345...... 22156 292...... 22503 Proposed Rules: 21707, 21713, 21717, 22240, 563e...... 22156 294...... 22503 1 ...... 21475, 21482, 21779 22241, 22274, 22277, 22283, 707...... 21699, 25121 382...... 22503 301...... 24811, 24813 22284, 22285, 22287, 22289, Proposed Rule: 385...... 22503 22512, 22515, 22518 Ch. XVII ...... 25174 29 CFR 19 CFR 70...... 21720, 25143 1710...... 25162 7...... 21043 100...... 22269 80...... 21724 13 CFR 11...... 21043 2619...... 25843 81 ...... 21456, 22289, 25146 2676...... 25843 123...... 22495 12...... 21043 82 ...... 21682, 24676, 24970 Proposed Rules: Proposed Rule: 18...... 21043 131...... 22228, 22229 1926...... 22539 122...... 22311 19...... 21043 180 ...... 24782, 24784, 24785, 24...... 21043 2200...... 21058 24788 14 CFR 228...... 25147 54...... 21043 30 CFR 39 ...... 21041, 21429, 21976, 101...... 21043 260...... 25492 21977, 21979, 22496, 22498, 102...... 21043 906...... 25846 261...... 25492, 25619 22499, 22501, 24553, 24762, 111...... 21043 935...... 25140, 25613 262...... 25492 25122, 25124, 25604, 25606, 114...... 21043 944...... 21435 264...... 25492 25608, 25610, 25611 123...... 21043 Proposed Rules: 265...... 25492 71 ...... 21433, 21434, 21700, 128...... 21043 250...... 25178 266...... 25492 24555, 24556 132...... 21043 931...... 22332 268...... 25492 91...... 25980 134...... 21043 934...... 21484 270...... 25492 97 ...... 25125, 25127, 25128 141...... 21043 935...... 25660 271...... 22524, 24790 121...... 24765 145...... 21043 946...... 25185 273...... 25492 146...... 21043 302...... 25619 1215...... 25843 32 CFR 1245...... 21042 148...... 21043 Proposed Rules: Proposed Rules: 151...... 21043 706 ...... 22505, 22507, 22508, 52 ...... 21487, 21488, 21489, 39 ...... 21053, 21054, 21056, 152...... 21043 22509, 22510, 22511 21490, 21780, 21781, 21783, 177...... 21043 22334, 22335, 22336, 22337, 21470, 21471, 21772, 21774, 33 CFR 22011, 22013, 24587, 24589, 181...... 21043 22540, 22541, 24813 25869 191...... 21043 100...... 21982, 24557 81 ...... 21490, 22336, 22337 71 ...... 21473, 21776, 24592, 353...... 25130 110...... 21983 82...... 21490, 25010 24593, 24594, 24595, 25175, 355...... 25130 164...... 24767 156...... 21965 25871 Proposed Rules: 165...... 24557, 24558 170 ...... 21944, 21948, 21953, 91...... 25554 10...... 22312 Proposed Rules: 21955, 21960 12...... 22312 84...... 24598 180 ...... 21725, 21728, 21731, 15 CFR 101...... 25176 100...... 25187 21733, 21734, 21736, 21784 730...... 25268 102...... 22312 117...... 22014, 24599 185 ...... 21736, 21786, 24815 732...... 25268 134...... 22312 165...... 25189 186...... 24815 734...... 25268 177...... 22312 183...... 25191 228...... 25192 736...... 25268 162...... 21778 322...... 21061 300...... 21491, 21786 738...... 25268 439...... 21592 20 CFR 34 CFR 740...... 25268 41 CFR 742...... 25268 217...... 21982 690...... 21438 744...... 25268 226...... Proposed Rules: 201±23...... 22019 746...... 25268 232...... 22261 200...... 21400 201±24...... 22019 748...... 25268 344...... 22261 201...... 21400 750...... 25268 625...... 25560 203...... 21400 42 CFR 752...... 25268 Proposed Rules: 205...... 21400 2...... 22296 754...... 25268 702...... 22537 212...... 21400 6...... 22530 756...... 25268 703...... 22537 406...... 22533 758...... 25268 36 CFR 421...... 21048 21 CFR 760...... 25268 Proposed Rules: 762...... 25268 5...... 24766 242...... 24601 43 CFR 764...... 25268 172...... 21700 Public Land Orders: 766...... 25268 178...... 22269 37 CFR 7138...... 21984 768...... 25268 Proposed Rules: 1 ...... 21043, 21438, 25615 7139...... 22535 770...... 25268 173...... 21474 10...... 21438 7140...... 24560 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Reader Aids iii 7141...... 24792 76...... 24748 952...... 22298 1121...... 22035 7142...... 25149 78...... 24748 970...... 22298 79...... 24748 1503...... 21993 Proposed Rules: 50 CFR 11...... 24604 90...... 24748 1505...... 21993 91...... 24748 1513...... 21993 217...... 21741, 25620 44 CFR 95...... 24748 1514...... 21993 222...... 25620 64...... 21739 97...... 24748 1515...... 21993 227...... 21741, 25620 99...... 24748 1522...... 21993 649...... 21994 45 CFR 106...... 24748 1525...... 21993 651...... 21994 96...... 21332 150...... 24748 1542...... 21993 652...... 25853 154...... 24748 1552...... 21993 661...... 21746 46 CFR 174...... 24748 1852...... 22095 663...... 22303, 24572 188...... 24748 5452...... 21992 672...... 24800, 25623 15...... 24763 189...... 24748 50...... 24767 Proposed Rules: 675 ...... 22306, 24800, 25149 52...... 24767 47 CFR 32...... 25794 676...... 22307 45...... 22442 678...... 21468 56...... 24767 2...... 21048 52...... 22442 58...... 24767 15...... 21984 Proposed Rules: 219...... 22035 61...... 24767 73 ...... 22298, 22535, 22536, 10...... 24686 111...... 24767 17...... 25882 25851, 25852 49 CFR 381...... 24560 76...... 21464 100...... 24601 Proposed Rules: 90...... 21984, 21987 219...... 24765 216...... 22345 25...... 24748 Proposed Rules: 382...... 24765 217...... 25663 28...... 24748 25...... 24817 571...... 24562, 24797 222...... 25663 30...... 24748 73 ...... 22021, 22022, 22541, 654...... 24765 227...... 25663 31...... 24748 24606, 25879 821...... 25620 285...... 25665 35...... 24748 90...... 22023 1002...... 22303 625...... 21491 37...... 24748 95...... 25193 1011...... 22303 640...... 21493 40...... 24748 97...... 25194, 25661 1160...... 22303 649...... 25194 54...... 24748 1161...... 22303 650...... 25194 55...... 24748 48 CFR 1162...... 22303 651...... 25194 56...... 24748 502...... 21467 1163...... 22303 671...... 22542, 25677 61...... 24748 506...... 21467 Proposed Rules: 672...... 22542, 25677 70...... 24748 513...... 21467 214...... 22542 673...... 24822 71...... 24748 552...... 21467 383...... 24820 675...... 22542, 25677 72...... 24748 926...... 22298 571...... 25880 676...... 22542, 25677 iv Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Reader Aids CFR CHECKLIST Title Stock Number Price Revision Date 14 Parts: 1–59 ...... (869–026–00042–5) ...... 33.00 Jan. 1, 1995 This checklist, prepared by the Office of the Federal Register, is 60–139 ...... (869–026–00043–3) ...... 27.00 Jan. 1, 1995 published weekly. It is arranged in the order of CFR titles, stock 140–199 ...... (869–026–00044–1) ...... 13.00 Jan. 1, 1995 numbers, prices, and revision dates. 200–1199 ...... (869–026–00045–0) ...... 23.00 Jan. 1, 1995 An asterisk (*) precedes each entry that has been issued since last 1200–End ...... (869–026–00046–8) ...... 16.00 Jan. 1, 1995 week and which is now available for sale at the Government Printing 15 Parts: Office. 0–299 ...... (869–026–00047–6) ...... 15.00 Jan. 1, 1995 A checklist of current CFR volumes comprising a complete CFR set, 300–799 ...... (869–026–00048–4) ...... 26.00 Jan. 1, 1995 also appears in the latest issue of the LSA (List of CFR Sections 800–End ...... (869–026–00049–2) ...... 21.00 Jan. 1, 1995 Affected), which is revised monthly. 16 Parts: The annual rate for subscription to all revised volumes is $883.00 0–149 ...... (869–026–00050–6) ...... 7.00 Jan. 1, 1995 domestic, $220.75 additional for foreign mailing. *150–999 ...... (869–026–00051–4) ...... 19.00 Jan. 1, 1995 Mail orders to the Superintendent of Documents, Attn: New Orders, 1000–End ...... (869–026–00052–2) ...... 25.00 Jan. 1, 1995 P.O. Box 371954, Pittsburgh, PA 15250±7954. All orders must be accompanied by remittance (check, money order, GPO Deposit 17 Parts: ...... Account, VISA, or Master Card). Charge orders may be telephoned 1–199 (869–022–00054–3) 20.00 Apr. 1, 1994 ...... to the GPO Order Desk, Monday through Friday, at (202) 512±1800 200–239 (869–022–00055–1) 23.00 Apr. 1, 1994 240–End ...... (869–022–00056–0) ...... 30.00 Apr. 1, 1994 from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. eastern time, or FAX your charge orders to (202) 512-2233. 18 Parts: Title Stock Number Price Revision Date *1–149 ...... (869–026–00057–3) ...... 16.00 Apr. 1, 1995 150–279 ...... (869–022–00058–6) ...... 19.00 Apr. 1, 1994 1, 2 (2 Reserved) ...... (869–026–00001–8) ...... $5.00 Jan. 1, 1995 280–399 ...... (869–022–00059–4) ...... 13.00 Apr. 1, 1994 3 (1994 Compilation 400–End ...... (869–022–00060–8) ...... 11.00 Apr. 1, 1994 and Parts 100 and 19 Parts: 1 101) ...... (869–026–00002–6) ...... 40.00 Jan. 1, 1995 1–199 ...... (869–022–00061–6) ...... 39.00 Apr. 1, 1994 4 ...... (869–026–00003–4) ...... 5.50 Jan. 1, 1995 200–End ...... (869–022–00062–4) ...... 12.00 Apr. 1, 1994 5 Parts: 20 Parts: 1–699 ...... (869–026–00004–2) ...... 23.00 Jan. 1, 1995 1–399 ...... (869–022–00063–2) ...... 20.00 Apr. 1, 1994 700–1199 ...... (869–026–00005–1) ...... 20.00 Jan. 1, 1995 400–499 ...... (869–022–00064–1) ...... 34.00 Apr. 1, 1994 *1200–End, 6 (6 500–End ...... (869–022–00065–9) ...... 31.00 Apr. 1, 1994 Reserved) ...... (869–026–00006–9) ...... 23.00 Jan. 1, 1995 21 Parts: 7 Parts: 1–99 ...... (869–022–00066–7) ...... 16.00 Apr. 1, 1994 0–26 ...... (869–026–00007–7) ...... 21.00 Jan. 1, 1995 100–169 ...... (869–022–00067–5) ...... 21.00 Apr. 1, 1994 27–45 ...... (869–026–00008–5) ...... 14.00 Jan. 1, 1995 170–199 ...... (869–022–00068–3) ...... 21.00 Apr. 1, 1994 46–51 ...... (869–026–00009–3) ...... 21.00 Jan. 1, 1995 200–299 ...... (869–022–00069–1) ...... 7.00 Apr. 1, 1994 52 ...... (869–026–00010–7) ...... 30.00 Jan. 1, 1995 300–499 ...... (869–022–00070–5) ...... 36.00 Apr. 1, 1994 53–209 ...... (869–022–00011–0) ...... 23.00 Jan. 1, 1994 500–599 ...... (869–022–00071–3) ...... 16.00 Apr. 1, 1994 210–299 ...... (869–026–00012–3) ...... 34.00 Jan. 1, 1995 600–799 ...... (869–022–00072–1) ...... 8.50 Apr. 1, 1994 300–399 ...... (869–026–00013–1) ...... 16.00 Jan. 1, 1995 800–1299 ...... (869–022–00073–0) ...... 22.00 Apr. 1, 1994 400–699 ...... (869–026–00014–0) ...... 21.00 Jan. 1, 1995 1300–End ...... (869–022–00074–8) ...... 13.00 Apr. 1, 1994 700–899 ...... (869–026–00015–8) ...... 23.00 Jan. 1, 1995 900–999 ...... (869–026–00016–6) ...... 32.00 Jan. 1, 1995 22 Parts: 1000–1059 ...... (869–026–00017–4) ...... 23.00 Jan. 1, 1995 1–299 ...... (869–022–00075–6) ...... 32.00 Apr. 1, 1994 1060–1119 ...... (869–026–00018–2) ...... 15.00 Jan. 1, 1995 300–End ...... (869–022–00076–4) ...... 23.00 Apr. 1, 1994 1120–1199 ...... (869–026–00019–1) ...... 12.00 Jan. 1, 1995 23 ...... (869–022–00077–2) ...... 21.00 Apr. 1, 1994 1200–1499 ...... (869–026–00020–4) ...... 32.00 Jan. 1, 1995 24 Parts: 1500–1899 ...... (869–026–00021–2) ...... 35.00 Jan. 1, 1995 0–199 ...... (869–022–00078–1) ...... 36.00 Apr. 1, 1994 1900–1939 ...... (869–026–00022–1) ...... 16.00 Jan. 1, 1995 200–499 ...... (869–022–00079–9) ...... 38.00 Apr. 1, 1994 1940–1949 ...... (869–026–00023–9) ...... 30.00 Jan. 1, 1995 ...... 1950–1999 ...... (869–026–00024–7) ...... 40.00 Jan. 1, 1995 500–699 (869–022–00080–2) 20.00 Apr. 1, 1994 2000–End ...... (869–026–00025–5) ...... 14.00 Jan. 1, 1995 700–1699 ...... (869–022–00081–1) ...... 39.00 Apr. 1, 1994 1700–End ...... (869–022–00082–9) ...... 17.00 Apr. 1, 1994 8 ...... (869–026–00026–3) ...... 23.00 Jan. 1, 1995 25 ...... (869–022–00083–7) ...... 32.00 Apr. 1, 1994 9 Parts: 1–199 ...... (869–022–00027–6) ...... 29.00 Jan. 1, 1994 26 Parts: 200–End ...... (869–026–00028–0) ...... 23.00 Jan. 1, 1995 §§ 1.0-1–1.60 ...... (869–022–00084–5) ...... 20.00 Apr. 1, 1994 §§ 1.61–1.169 ...... (869–022–00085–3) ...... 33.00 Apr. 1, 1994 10 Parts: §§ 1.170–1.300 ...... (869–022–00086–1) ...... 24.00 Apr. 1, 1994 0–50 ...... (869–026–00029–8) ...... 30.00 Jan. 1, 1995 §§ 1.301–1.400 ...... (869–022–00087–0) ...... 17.00 Apr. 1, 1994 51–199 ...... (869–026–00030–1) ...... 23.00 Jan. 1, 1995 §§ 1.401–1.440 ...... (869–022–00088–8) ...... 30.00 Apr. 1, 1994 200–399 ...... (869–026–00031–0) ...... 15.00 6Jan. 1, 1993 §§ 1.441-1.500 ...... (869-022-00089-6) ...... 22.00 Apr. 1, 1994 400–499 ...... (869–026–00032–8) ...... 21.00 Jan. 1, 1995 §§ 1.501–1.640 ...... (869–022–00090–0) ...... 21.00 Apr. 1, 1994 500–End ...... (869–026–00033–6) ...... 39.00 Jan. 1, 1995 §§ 1.641–1.850 ...... (869–022–00091–8) ...... 24.00 Apr. 1, 1994 11 ...... (869–026–00034–4) ...... 14.00 Jan. 1, 1995 §§ 1.851–1.907 ...... (869–022–00092–6) ...... 26.00 Apr. 1, 1994 §§ 1.908–1.1000 ...... (869–022–00093–4) ...... 27.00 Apr. 1, 1994 12 Parts: §§ 1.1001–1.1400 ...... (869–022–00094–2) ...... 24.00 Apr. 1, 1994 1–199 ...... (869–026–00035–2) ...... 12.00 Jan. 1, 1995 §§ 1.1401–End ...... (869–022–00095–1) ...... 32.00 Apr. 1, 1994 200–219 ...... (869–026–00036–1) ...... 16.00 Jan. 1, 1995 2–29 ...... (869–022–00096–9) ...... 24.00 Apr. 1, 1994 220–299 ...... (869–026–00037–9) ...... 28.00 Jan. 1, 1995 30–39 ...... (869–022–00097–7) ...... 18.00 Apr. 1, 1994 300–499 ...... (869–026–00038–7) ...... 23.00 Jan. 1, 1995 40–49 ...... (869–022–00098–4) ...... 14.00 Apr. 1, 1994 500–599 ...... (869–026–00039–5) ...... 19.00 Jan. 1, 1995 50–299 ...... (869–022–00099–3) ...... 14.00 Apr. 1, 1994 600–End ...... (869–026–00040–9) ...... 35.00 Jan. 1, 1995 300–499 ...... (869–022–00100–1) ...... 24.00 Apr. 1, 1994 13 ...... (869–026–00041–7) ...... 32.00 Jan. 1, 1995 500–599 ...... (869–022–00101–9) ...... 6.00 4 Apr. 1, 1990 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Reader Aids v Title Stock Number Price Revision Date Title Stock Number Price Revision Date 600–End ...... (869–022–00102–7) ...... 8.00 Apr. 1, 1994 790–End ...... (869–022–00155–8) ...... 27.00 July 1, 1994 27 Parts: 41 Chapters: 1–199 ...... (869–022–00103–5) ...... 36.00 Apr. 1, 1994 1, 1–1 to 1–10 ...... 13.00 3 July 1, 1984 200–End ...... (869–026–00107–3) ...... 13.00 8Apr. 1, 1994 1, 1–11 to Appendix, 2 (2 Reserved) ...... 13.00 3 July 1, 1984 3–6 ...... 14.00 3 July 1, 1984 28 Parts: ...... 7 ...... 6.00 3 July 1, 1984 ...... 1-42 (869–022–00105–1) 27.00 July 1, 1994 8 ...... 4.50 3 July 1, 1984 ...... 43-end (869-022-00106-0) 21.00 July 1, 1994 9 ...... 13.00 3 July 1, 1984 29 Parts: 10–17 ...... 9.50 3 July 1, 1984 0–99 ...... (869–022–00107–8) ...... 21.00 July 1, 1994 18, Vol. I, Parts 1–5 ...... 13.00 3 July 1, 1984 100–499 ...... (869–022–00108–6) ...... 9.50 July 1, 1994 18, Vol. II, Parts 6–19 ...... 13.00 3 July 1, 1984 500–899 ...... (869–022–00109–4) ...... 35.00 July 1, 1994 18, Vol. III, Parts 20–52 ...... 13.00 3 July 1, 1984 900–1899 ...... (869–022–00110–8) ...... 17.00 July 1, 1994 19–100 ...... 13.00 3 July 1, 1984 1900–1910 (§§ 1901.1 to 1–100 ...... (869–022–00156–6) ...... 9.50 July 1, 1994 1910.999) ...... (869–022–00111–6) ...... 33.00 July 1, 1994 101 ...... (869–022–00157–4) ...... 29.00 July 1, 1994 1910 (§§ 1910.1000 to 102–200 ...... (869–022–00158–2) ...... 15.00 July 1, 1994 end) ...... (869–022–00112–4) ...... 21.00 July 1, 1994 201–End ...... (869–022–00159–1) ...... 13.00 July 1, 1994 1911–1925 ...... (869–022–00113–2) ...... 26.00 July 1, 1994 42 Parts: 1926 ...... (869–022–00114–1) ...... 33.00 July 1, 1994 1–399 ...... (869–022–00160–4) ...... 24.00 Oct. 1, 1994 1927–End ...... (869–022–00115–9) ...... 36.00 July 1, 1994 400–429 ...... (869–022–00161–2) ...... 26.00 Oct. 1, 1994 30 Parts: 430–End ...... (869–022–00162–1) ...... 36.00 Oct. 1, 1994 1–199 ...... (869–022–00116–7) ...... 27.00 July 1, 1994 43 Parts: 200–699 ...... (869–022–00117–5) ...... 19.00 July 1, 1994 1–999 ...... (869–022–00163–9) ...... 23.00 Oct. 1, 1994 700–End ...... (869–022–00118–3) ...... 27.00 July 1, 1994 1000–3999 ...... (869–022–00164–7) ...... 31.00 Oct. 1, 1994 31 Parts: 4000–End ...... (869–022–00165–5) ...... 14.00 Oct. 1, 1994 0–199 ...... (869–022–00119–1) ...... 18.00 July 1, 1994 44 ...... (869–022–00166–3) ...... 27.00 Oct. 1, 1994 200–End ...... (869–022–00120–5) ...... 30.00 July 1, 1994 45 Parts: 32 Parts: 1–199 ...... (869–022–00167–1) ...... 22.00 Oct. 1, 1994 1–39, Vol. I ...... 15.00 2 July 1, 1984 200–499 ...... (869–022–00168–0) ...... 15.00 Oct. 1, 1994 1–39, Vol. II ...... 19.00 2 July 1, 1984 500–1199 ...... (869–022–00169–8) ...... 32.00 Oct. 1, 1994 1–39, Vol. III ...... 18.00 2 July 1, 1984 1200–End ...... (869–022–00170–1) ...... 26.00 Oct. 1, 1994 1–190 ...... (869–022–00121–3) ...... 31.00 July 1, 1994 191–399 ...... (869–022–00122–1) ...... 36.00 July 1, 1994 46 Parts: 400–629 ...... (869–022–00123–0) ...... 26.00 July 1, 1994 1–40 ...... (869–022–00171–0) ...... 20.00 Oct. 1, 1994 630–699 ...... (869–022–00124–8) ...... 14.00 5 July 1, 1991 41–69 ...... (869–022–00172–8) ...... 16.00 Oct. 1, 1994 700–799 ...... (869–022–00125–6) ...... 21.00 July 1, 1994 70–89 ...... (869–022–00173–6) ...... 8.50 Oct. 1, 1994 800–End ...... (869–022–00126–4) ...... 22.00 July 1, 1994 90–139 ...... (869–022–00174–4) ...... 15.00 Oct. 1, 1994 140–155 ...... (869–022–00175–2) ...... 12.00 Oct. 1, 1994 33 Parts: 156–165 ...... (869–022–00176–1) ...... 17.00 7Oct. 1, 1993 1–124 ...... (869–022–00127–2) ...... 20.00 July 1, 1994 166–199 ...... (869–022–00177–9) ...... 17.00 Oct. 1, 1994 125–199 ...... (869–022–00128–1) ...... 26.00 July 1, 1994 200–499 ...... (869–022–00178–7) ...... 21.00 Oct. 1, 1994 200–End ...... (869–022–00129–9) ...... 24.00 July 1, 1994 500–End ...... (869–022–00179–5) ...... 15.00 Oct. 1, 1994 34 Parts: 47 Parts: 1–299 ...... (869–022–00130–2) ...... 28.00 July 1, 1994 0–19 ...... (869–022–00180–9) ...... 25.00 Oct. 1, 1994 300–399 ...... (869–022–00131–1) ...... 21.00 July 1, 1994 20–39 ...... (869–022–00181–7) ...... 20.00 Oct. 1, 1994 400–End ...... (869–022–00132–9) ...... 40.00 July 1, 1994 40–69 ...... (869–022–00182–5) ...... 14.00 Oct. 1, 1994 35 ...... (869–022–00133–7) ...... 12.00 July 1, 1994 70–79 ...... (869–022–00183–3) ...... 24.00 Oct. 1, 1994 36 Parts: 80–End ...... (869–022–00184–1) ...... 26.00 Oct. 1, 1994 1–199 ...... (869–022–00134–5) ...... 15.00 July 1, 1994 48 Chapters: 200–End ...... (869–022–00135–3) ...... 37.00 July 1, 1994 1 (Parts 1–51) ...... (869–022–00185–0) ...... 36.00 Oct. 1, 1994 37 ...... (869–022–00136–1) ...... 20.00 July 1, 1994 1 (Parts 52–99) ...... (869–022–00186–8) ...... 23.00 Oct. 1, 1994 2 (Parts 201–251) ...... (869–022–00187–6) ...... 16.00 Oct. 1, 1994 38 Parts: 2 (Parts 252–299) ...... (869–022–00188–4) ...... 13.00 Oct. 1, 1994 0–17 ...... (869–022–00137–0) ...... 30.00 July 1, 1994 3–6 ...... (869–022–00189–2) ...... 23.00 Oct. 1, 1994 18–End ...... (869–022–00138–8) ...... 29.00 July 1, 1994 7–14 ...... (869–022–00190–6) ...... 30.00 Oct. 1, 1994 39 ...... (869–022–00139–6) ...... 16.00 July 1, 1994 15–28 ...... (869–022–00191–4) ...... 32.00 Oct. 1, 1994 29–End ...... (869–022–00192–2) ...... 17.00 Oct. 1, 1994 40 Parts: 1–51 ...... (869–022–00140–0) ...... 39.00 July 1, 1994 49 Parts: 52 ...... (869–022–00141–8) ...... 39.00 July 1, 1994 1–99 ...... (869–022–00193–1) ...... 24.00 Oct. 1, 1994 53–59 ...... (869–022–00142–6) ...... 11.00 July 1, 1994 100–177 ...... (869–022–00194–9) ...... 30.00 Oct. 1, 1994 60 ...... (869-022-00143-4) ...... 36.00 July 1, 1994 178–199 ...... (869–022–00195–7) ...... 21.00 Oct. 1, 1994 61–80 ...... (869–022–00144–2) ...... 41.00 July 1, 1994 200–399 ...... (869–022–00196–5) ...... 30.00 Oct. 1, 1994 81–85 ...... (869–022–00145–1) ...... 23.00 July 1, 1994 400–999 ...... (869–022–00197–3) ...... 35.00 Oct. 1, 1994 86–99 ...... (869–022–00146–9) ...... 41.00 July 1, 1994 1000–1199 ...... (869–022–00198–1) ...... 19.00 Oct. 1, 1994 100–149 ...... (869–022–00147–7) ...... 39.00 July 1, 1994 1200–End ...... (869–022–00199–0) ...... 15.00 Oct. 1, 1994 150–189 ...... (869–022–00148–5) ...... 24.00 July 1, 1994 50 Parts: 190–259 ...... (869–022–00149–3) ...... 18.00 July 1, 1994 1–199 ...... (869–022–00200–7) ...... 25.00 Oct. 1, 1994 260–299 ...... (869–022–00150–7) ...... 36.00 July 1, 1994 200–599 ...... (869–022–00201–5) ...... 22.00 Oct. 1, 1994 300–399 ...... (869–022–00151–5) ...... 18.00 July 1, 1994 600–End ...... (869–022–00202–3) ...... 27.00 Oct. 1, 1994 400–424 ...... (869–022–00152–3) ...... 27.00 July 1, 1994 425–699 ...... (869–022–00153–1) ...... 30.00 July 1, 1994 CFR Index and Findings 700–789 ...... (869–022–00154–0) ...... 28.00 July 1, 1994 Aids ...... (869–026–00053–1) ...... 36.00 Jan. 1, 1995 vi Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 93 / Monday, May 15, 1995 / Reader Aids Title Stock Number Price Revision Date 1 Because Title 3 is an annual compilation, this volume and all previous volumes should be retained as a permanent reference source. Complete 1995 CFR set ...... 883.00 1995 2 The July 1, 1985 edition of 32 CFR Parts 1–189 contains a note only for Parts 1–39 inclusive. For the full text of the Defense Acquisition Regulations Microfiche CFR Edition: in Parts 1–39, consult the three CFR volumes issued as of July 1, 1984, containing those parts. Complete set (one-time mailing) ...... 188.00 1992 3 The July 1, 1985 edition of 41 CFR Chapters 1–100 contains a note only Complete set (one-time mailing) ...... 223.00 1993 for Chapters 1 to 49 inclusive. For the full text of procurement regulations in Chapters 1 to 49, consult the eleven CFR volumes issued as of July 1, Complete set (one-time mailing) ...... 244.00 1994 1984 containing those chapters. 4 Subscription (mailed as issued) ...... 264.00 1995 No amendments to this volume were promulgated during the period Apr. 1, 1990 to Mar. 31, 1994. The CFR volume issued April 1, 1990, should be Individual copies ...... 1.00 1995 retained. 5 No amendments to this volume were promulgated during the period July 1, 1991 to June 30, 1994. The CFR volume issued July 1, 1991, should be retained. 6 No amendments to this volume were promulgated during the period January 1, 1993 to December 31, 1994. The CFR volume issued January 1, 1993, should be retained. 7 No amendments to this volume were promulgated during the period October 1, 1993, to September 30, 1994. The CFR volume issued October 1, 1993, should be retained. 8 No amendments to this volume were promulgated during the period April 1, 1994 to March 31, 1995. The CFR volume issued April 1, 1994, should be retained.