CORE STRATEGY 2008 responses to poole core strategy submission document and sustainability appraisal

CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL contents

1 Consultation Process 9

2 Responses 11

Submission Stage 16 Tables of Representations Table 2.1 - List of Respondents 11 Table 2.2 - Poole Core Strategy Submission Document 16 Table 2.3 - Introduction 17 Table 2.4 - Picture 1.1 Poole's Town Centre 22 Table 2.5 - Paragraph 1.5 23 Table 2.6 - Paragraph 1.6 24 Table 2.7 - Paragraph 1.9 25 Table 2.8 - Paragraph 1.10 26 Table 2.9 - Paragraph 1.13 26 Table 2.10 - Paragraph 1.14 27 Table 2.11 - Paragraph 1.16 28 Table 2.12 - Paragraph 1.21 29 Table 2.13 - Paragraph 1.23 30 Table 2.14 - Paragraph 2.2 31 Table 2.15 - 3 Issues, Problems and Challenges 32 Table 2.16 - Paragraph 3.3 34 Table 2.17 - Paragraph 3.6 34 Table 2.18 - Paragraph 3.7 35 Table 2.19 - Paragraph 3.12 36 Table 2.20 - Paragraph 3.15 37 Table 2.21 - Paragraph 3.16 38 CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL contents

Table 2.22 - Paragraph 3.18 39 Table 2.23 - Paragraph 3.19 40 Table 2.24 - Paragraph 3.21 41 Table 2.25 - Paragraph 3.22 43 Table 2.26 - Paragraph 3.23 44 Table 2.27 - Paragraph 3.24 46 Table 2.28 - Paragraph 3.25 50 Table 2.29 - Paragraph 3.32 52 Table 2.30 - Paragraph 3.34 54 Table 2.31 - Paragraph 3.35 56 Table 2.32 - Paragraph 3.36 57 Table 2.33 - Paragraph 3.39 57 Table 2.34 - Paragraph 3.40 58 Table 2.35 - Paragraph 3.46 59 Table 2.36 - 4 Spatial Vision and Strategic Objectives 60 Table 2.37 - Paragraph 4.1 60 Table 2.38 - Paragraph 4.4 62 Table 2.39 - Strategic Objective 1 66 Table 2.40 - Strategic Objective 2 70 Table 2.41 - Strategic Objective 3 75 Table 2.42 - Strategic Objective 4 83 Table 2.43 - Strategic Objective 5 85 Table 2.44 - Strategic Objective 6 87 Table 2.45 - Strategic Objective 7 89 Table 2.46 - Strategic Objective 8 92 Table 2.47 - Statement 1 Housing 93 Table 2.48 - 6 The Detailed Strategy: Core Policies for Issues and Places 96 CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL contents

Table 2.49 - Paragraph 6.1 100 Table 2.50 - Paragraph 6.2 101 Table 2.51 - Paragraph 6.3 104 Table 2.52 - Paragraph 6.4 106 Table 2.53 - Paragraph 6.5 107 Table 2.54 - Paragraph 6.6 108 Table 2.55 - Paragraph 6.7 109 Table 2.56 - Paragraph 6.8 110 Table 2.57 - Paragraph 6.9 111 Table 2.58 - Policy 1 112 Table 2.59 - Figure 6.1 Location of Existing Employment Areas in Poole 117 Table 2.60 - Policy 2 119 Table 2.61 - Paragraph 6.12 121 Table 2.62 - Paragraph 6.13 122 Table 2.63 - Paragraph 6.14 124 Table 2.64 - Paragraph 6.15 125 Table 2.65 - Picture 6.3 Fleets Corner - Indicative Masterplan Area 126 Table 2.66 - Paragraph 6.17 127 Table 2.67 - Paragraph 6.18 128 Table 2.68 - Paragraph 6.19 129 Table 2.69 - Policy 3 131 Table 2.70 - Policy 4 134 Table 2.71 - Paragraph 6.27 135 Table 2.72 - Paragraph 6.28 136 Table 2.73 - Paragraph 6.29 138 Table 2.74 - Policy 5 139 Table 2.75 - Meeting Poole's Housing Needs 143 CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL contents

Table 2.76 - Paragraph 6.34 144 Table 2.77 - Paragraph 6.35 151 Table 2.78 - Paragraph 6.36 155 Table 2.79 - Paragraph 6.37 163 Table 2.80 - Policy 6 166 Table 2.81 - Paragraph 6.38 185 Table 2.82 - Paragraph 6.39 187 Table 2.83 - Paragraph 6.40 189 Table 2.84 - Paragraph 6.41 191 Table 2.85 - Paragraph 6.41 193 Table 2.86 - Policy 7 196 Table 2.87 - Policy 8 206 Table 2.88 - Policy 9 207 Table 2.89 - Paragraph 6.54 213 Table 2.90 - Policy 10 214 Table 2.91 - Paragraph 6.55 215 Table 2.92 - Picture 6.4 Poole Town Centre 216 Table 2.93 - Paragraph 6.56 217 Table 2.94 - Policy 11 218 Table 2.95 - Paragraph 6.59 223 Table 2.96 - Policy 12 224 Table 2.97 - Paragraph 6.60 231 Table 2.98 - Paragraph 6.61 232 Table 2.99 - Paragraph 6.62 233 Table 2.100 - Paragraph 6.63 235 Table 2.101 - Paragraph 6.64 236 Table 2.102 - Paragraph 6.65 237 CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL contents

Table 2.103 - Policy 13 238 Table 2.104 - Paragraph 6.66 246 Table 2.105 - Paragraph 6.67 247 Table 2.106 - Paragraph 6.68 248 Table 2.107 - Paragraph 6.69 249 Table 2.108 - Paragraph 6.70 250 Table 2.109 - Policy 14 252 Table 2.110 - Paragraph 6.78 257 Table 2.111 - Paragraph 6.79 259 Table 2.112 - Paragraph 6.80 259 Table 2.113 - Paragraph 6.81 261 Table 2.114 - Paragraph 6.82 261 Table 2.115 - Policy 16 262 Table 2.116 - Policy 17 264 Table 2.117 - Policy 18 265 Table 2.118 - Policy 19 266 Table 2.119 - Policy 20 267 Table 2.120 - Policy 21 267 Table 2.121 - Paragraph 6.109 269 Table 2.122 - Policy 23 270 Table 2.123 - Paragraph 6.124 273 Table 2.124 - Policy 24 273 Table 2.125 - Paragraph 6.125 280 Table 2.126 - Policy 27 283 Table 2.127 - Policy 28 286 Table 2.128 - Policy 29 287 Table 2.129 - Paragraph 6.147 291 CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL contents

Table 2.130 - Policy 30 293 Table 2.131 - Paragraph 6.151 297 Table 2.132 - Paragraph 6.158 298 Table 2.133 - Paragraph 6.162 298 Table 2.134 - Paragraph 6.163 299 Table 2.135 - Policy 32 299 Table 2.136 - Policy 33 300 Table 2.137 - Paragraph 6.172 308 Table 2.138 - Paragraph 6.173 311 Table 2.139 - Policy 34 313 Table 2.140 - Policy 35 319 Table 2.141 - Policy 36 325 Table 2.142 - Policy 37 326 Table 2.143 - Policy 38 329 Table 2.144 - 8 Key Diagram 340 Table 2.145 - 9 Appendix 1: Character Area Profiles 342 Table 2.146 - Sustainability Appraisal Representations 343 9

1 Consultation Process

Purpose of this Document

1.1 This document provides a schedule of the representations received to the Poole Core Strategy Submission Document May 2008. There were 367 representations made to various parts of the document, from 47 organisations and individuals. These representations will be considered by the Inspector at the Public Examination scheduled to commence in November.

Availability and Distribution of the Document

1.2 The Core Strategy Submission Document was made available to view and comment on between 28th May 2008 to 8th July 2008 , via a downloadable form or online at www.boroughofpoole.com/Corestrategy Paper copies of the document were made available at the same time in all of the Borough's 10 public libraries and on request. Notice that the document was made available on the Council's web site. The following documents were posted / e-mailed:

Specific Consultees: The consultees defined as 'Specific Consultees' in Planning Policy Statement 12 - Local Development Frameworks. This comprised of approximately 65 organisations, such as parish councils, local authorities, the Highways Agency, Environment Agency, Regional Development Agency, among others. These contacts received paper copies of the full document or notice of the on-line address for viewing. Government Departments: The Government Office for the South West was consulted as well as 5 Central Government Departments including Department for Education and Skills, DfTransport, DEFRA, Department for Trade and Industry and the Home Office. These departments were sent the same documentation as the Specific Consultees. Wider Stakeholders: The summary leaflet and public notice was e-mailed or sent to around 520 wider stakeholders who had expressed an interest being involved in the LDF process. Stakeholders were mainly contacted by e-mail although some were written to where they had expressed a preference for paper correspondence or an e-mail address was unavailable. CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

10 one consultation process 11

2 Responses

Respondent Title First Name Surname Organisation ID 848 Mr Mark Axford (Goadsby) Bournemouth and West Hampshire Water Plc

1095 Ms Margaret Baddeley (Nathaniel Lichfield and Partners) Bourne Leisure Limited

1261 Mr Craig Blatchford (Blue Sky Planning Limited) Siemens Real Estate Ltd

1268 Bertie Bowman Dorset Lake Residents' Association

1085 Mrs Susan Chapman Resident

1035 Mr Tony Christie Grosvenor Shopping Centre Fund

1252 Mr Graham Clarke Dorset County Council

1017 Ms Vanessa Clipstone (RPS Planning) Highcross Group Ltd

1034 Mr Jamie Cowen Sainsbury's Supermarkets Ltd

1259 Mr Ken Cross Talbolt and Branksome Wood Resident Association

1273 Mr Geoff Cross (Savills) W H White plc

801 Mr Martin Drennan Sport England - South West Region

1275 Mr D S Dunlop (D2 Planning Limited) L and C Properties Ltd CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

12 two responses

Respondent Title First Name Surname Organisation ID 326 Ms Rose Freeman The Theatres Trust

1256 Mr Tony Hamilton Poole Agenda 21

1270 Mr Simon Hawley (Harris Lamb Proprty Consultancy) Bridgehouse Capital

189 Mr Renny Henderson RSPB South West Region

1241 Mr Michael Holm Environment Agency

1111 Mrs Joan Jarvis Resident

1096 Mr Stuart Laird Bournemouth University

1263 Mr Richard Lemon (Roger Tym & Partners) Somerfield Stores Ltd

1253 Mr David Maddox (Maddox & Associates) Mr Nigel Turner

1077 Ms Theresa McManus Poole Agenda 21

1265 Mr Martin Miller (Terence O'Rourke ) Zatman & Co

660 Mr Justin Milward Woodland Trust

1250 Mr Robert Naylor (RPS Planning Consultants (Agents)) Costco Wholesale UK Ltd

560 Mr David Ogborne Wessex Water 13

Respondent Title First Name Surname Organisation ID 527 Ms Alice Ordidge South West RDA

1257 Mr Ken Parke Ken Parke Planning Consultants

1134 Mr Roger Parker Bournemouth Town Centre

1102 Mr Ian Parsons Highways Agency

1267 Mr Martin Pendlebury (Atisreal) Mr Barry Houlston

649 Ms Carroll Rawlings Blandford Road Action Group Upton

805 Mrs Ann Smeaton Holes Bay Residents & Preservation Association

1254 Mr Andrew Smith Resident

101 Mr Nick Squirrell Natural England

188 Mr Terry Stewart CPRE - Dorset Branch

1100 Mr Jamie Sulivan (Tetlow King Planning) South West RSL Planning Consortium

1276 Ms Lindsay Thompson (Terence O'Rourke) Neptune Consulting Limited

1277 Ms Lindsay Thompson (Terence O'Rourke) Patch Properties

1243 Mr Rohan Torkildsen English Heritage CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

14 two responses

Respondent Title First Name Surname Organisation ID 1046 Mr Alex Bateman McCarthy & Stone

525 Mr Tim Watton House Builders Federation Ltd

1271 Ms Joanne Webb (Savills) MDL Development Ltd

1239 Mr Neal Whitehead South West Regional Assembly

1163 Ms Simone Wilding GOSW

1109 Ms Frances Young (Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners) Talbot Village Trust

Table 2.1 List of Respondents Nature of Responses

2.1 There have been 367 separate representations received from 47 respondents to Poole Core Strategy Submission Document, and 3 representations from 2 respondents to Poole Core Strategy Sustainability Appraisal Submission Document. There were 34 responses received by e-mail, 11 received online, and 11 received by letter. The tables below set out responses in order of the Poole Core Strategy Submission Document structure. The tables are:

2.2 Table 2.2 ‘Poole Core Strategy Submission Document’

2.3 1. Introduction

2.4 Table 2.3 ‘Introduction’

2.5 2. Characteristics of the Area

2.6 Table 2.14 ‘Paragraph 2.2’

2.7 3. Issues, Problems and Challenges 15

2.8 Table 2.15 ‘3 Issues, Problems and Challenges’

2.9 4. Spatial Vision and Strategic Objectives

2.10 Table 2.36 ‘4 Spatial Vision and Strategic Objectives’

2.11 5. A Spatial Strategy for Poole

2.12 Table 2.47 ‘Statement 1 Housing’

2.13 6. The Detailed Core Strategy: Core Policies for Issues and Places

2.14 Table 2.48 ‘6 The Detailed Strategy: Core Policies for Issues and Places’

2.15 7. Monitoring and Implementation Framework

2.16 Table 2.142 ‘Policy 37’

2.17 8. Key Diagram

2.18 Table 2.144 ‘8 Key Diagram’

2.19 Appendix 1

2.20 Table 2.145 ‘9 Appendix 1: Character Area Profiles’

2.21 Sustainability Appraisal Representations

2.22 Table 2.146 ‘Sustainability Appraisal Representations’ CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

16 two responses

Submission Stage

Poole Core Strategy Submission Document

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Poole Core Strategy 560 Mr David 2576 I acknowledge the Core Strategy document and the focus for the provision of new Submission Ogborne (Wessex development as directed from the Regional Spatial Strategy. The principal areas Document Water) considered for new development include the Town Centre, major Local Centres and Prime Transport Corridors. These areas are currently served by existing infrastructure and Wessex Water is willing to participate in any appraisals required to establish the necessary improvements to the water and sewerage infrastructure to satisfy future development requirements. Many of the known development sites have already been considered and these may need updating with current information where planning approvals are requested. Wessex Water supports the use of water efficiency measures to reduce the impact upon water resources. I note that a number of the planning objectives consider the effects of coastal flooding upon the area and there may be opportunities to reduce the risk of sewer flooding where redevelopment occurs. We look forward to working with Poole Borough Council to promote the use of SuDs along the established principles of Quantity, Quality and Amenity.

Table 2.2 Poole Core Strategy Submission Document 17

Introduction:

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Introduction 1257 Mr Ken Parke 2284 Unsound Core Strategy Policy 6 - objection, Planning policy seeks to make better and efficient (Ken Parke Planning use of urban land towards the objectives of sustainability. It would be inappropriate to Consultants) prevent development which makes better use of existing land where such development does not cause harm to character or to amenity. A basic planning principle is development which does not result in material harm should be approved. PPS3 tells us that development which is inappropriate to its context or which fails to improve its surroundings should not be permitted. The converse is also true. Flats development takes many forms and makes a useful contribution to the housing needs of the Borough. Provided the detailed layout and design is appropriate there is no good reason to refuse it. Any objection to flats in principle is converse to basic planning principles. The LPA are seeking to direct flats development to specific locations along existing traffic corridors and to central areas. Such a policy is fundamentally flawed, it assumes there will be sufficient land available along these routes to meet the recognised need for 1 or 2 units, it assumes that such development can take place without harm to character, appearance or amenity and it assumes that such intensive developments will be acceptable in highways terms when the LPA constantly resist the intensification of or the creation of new accesses off classified roads. There are also requirements for other types of development within the central areas to serve the communitys needs resulting in less available residential land. Concentration of 1 and 2 bedroom units in certain locations and preventing such units in other locations will result in a polarisation of development types and will not help achieve mixed communities. The existing policy framework has worked well. Inappropriate development has been successfully resisted and appropriate development allowed. There is no need to introduce further restrictive policies or those which try to dictate what type of residential development goes where. The evidence base for the LDF recognises a need for all types of accommodation and also the desire to create mixed communities. Directing 1 or 2 bedroom units to certain locations and retaining 3 and 4 in another will not achieve mixed and balanced communities. We therefore strongly object to the inclusion of this policy and would advocate the retention of Policies H4 and H13, recently saved, as these policies provide the flexibility required to meet all manner of situations and circumstances. CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

18 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Introduction 1258 Mr Ken Cross 2287 Unsound New Residential Areas The Association notes that new residential development is (talbot&branksome favoured where it will relate closely to major roads. We would object to any proposals woods res assoc) that are likely to increase traffic levels and air pollution on Wallisdown Road, Talbot Avenue and Road and Branksome Wood Road, all of which are overloaded now at all times of the day, not just rush hours, and , particularly, in the week ends and holiday season. Talbot Village Trust land: We have noted that there now is increased capacity in identified Brownfield land. There is therefore, no need to pursue the proposals for the Talbot Village Trust land because of the reduced potential of the Greenfield land (reduced because of the need to protect the adjacent Heathland). We believe that it would be beneficial to all if this land was re-allocated for recreational use and contribute to reducing pressures on the Heathland., not increasing them. Wallisdown Cross Roads. For reasons set out above, we do not support the identification of this location as a Priority Area for Investment and Improvement unless that Improvement was restricted to Environmental Improvement. There is no justification for additional uses which will generate additional traffic and pollution onto this already very congested junction. Half of the area is within Bournemouth Borough. There is no reference to any agreement or discussion on this draft Policy, with the Borough. We will have to confer with our local Councillors on this matter. Consultations: We hope that these views will be brought to the attention of your Council and that we continue the be made aware of future progress on the Strategy 19

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Introduction 1271 MDL 2415 Unsound The contents does not include the appropriate chapters, and therefore the appropriate Development Ltd strategies that would ensure a balanced approach to creating sustainable communities in Poole have not been considered fully. The document should include chapters on Historic Environment, Culture, Leisure and Tourism and Health and Caring, all of which are important for creating an integrated and balanced society.

1127 Ms Joanne Poole Core Rep Form - Contents.pdf Webb (Savills (Representing Poole Core Rep Form - para 6.125.pdf Bournemouth & Poole College)) Poole Core Rep Form - PCS6.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS7.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS9.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS11.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS12.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS12.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS14.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 27.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 30.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 33.pdf CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

20 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 34.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 35.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 38.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - Strategic Objectives.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - vision 1.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - visions 2.pdf

Introduction 1256 Mr Tony 2577 The Core Strategy put forward by the Borough of Poole is a conventional document Hamilton (Poole which assumes that UK and world economic development is going to continue much Agenda 21) as at present. Within this assumption it makes sensible proposals for the development of Poole. However in Poole Agenda 21 we believe that this assumption is incorrect and that as a consequence the strategy fails to grapple with the real problems which we, along with the rest of the world, face. In Poole Agenda 21 we have considerable sympathy for councillors and planners as they attempt to define the way forward for Poole; sympathy because of the inadequate information and policy directives, which come from the government and which provide the framework within which they are asked to plan; nevertheless we should be making better attempts to plan realistically for the future. The problem is that that future is extremely uncertain. The scientific predictions are that global warming is likely to cause horrendous problems for mankind within quite a short timescale (decades). In addition it has become apparent that because of human overpopulation, all the resources, which we currently enjoy, are increasingly going to become inadequate to meet world demand with the result that price rises and shortages are going to become inevitable. Within this scenario conventional planning, which assumes that things will continue much as at present, is inevitably going to fail to meet the coming challenges. The seriousness of the threat of global warming is not adequately recognised by governments, either our own or those of the majority of other 21

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

countries. The most recent IPCC report makes it clear that the world is already almost certain to experience what has been recognised for 20 years as “dangerous” climate change (this is evaluated as a temperature rise of 20C) although those same governments which are refusing to recognise this, are at the same time continuing to claim that they are committed to preventing such a temperature rise from occurring. Further the IPCC report goes on to make it clear that not only are we almost certain to experience a 20C but that if we carry on as we are currently doing that rise is likely to be 3 or 40C. Such temperature rises move from “dangerous” to very dangerous or catastrophic. Nor have we adequately recognised that a world population of 6 billion is much more than can be sustained by the planet at anything approaching today’s average lifestyle. (Currently ecologists estimate that already we need 3 planets or 3x’s the Earth’s resources to maintain ourselves sustainably.) With ever more people in developing countries raising their standards of living and with a world population that is predicted (though ignoring coming disasters) to rise to 9 billion it is obvious that we are going to have to meet huge resource challenges. The present rise in fuel and food prices is not some temporary aberration but is the shape of things to come. We should be planning for a population which will have less real spending power and which will be struggling to meet its basic needs for food, shelter, and warmth. Our current planning takes it as given that UK and world prosperity will continue to increase. Within the belief that prosperity will continue to grow, the objective of planning is to see that Poole gets its share of the growth and that we use it to improve the facilities and lives of the people of Poole. This has resulted in the strategy of retail led growth – which hopes to make the town prosperous and provide the money to improve facilities. Yet given the scenario of population growth and resource shortages outlined in the section above, this is very unlikely to be the context of the future. The range of possible UK and international responses to the problem of global warming add a further element to the problem of retail led growth. At present measures and plans for combating the threat are completely inadequate. In the short term the economy will continue much as at present though the shortage induced increasing price of goods will cause an ever-growing downturn. But in the medium term unchecked global warming will begin to cause catastrophies with unpredictable but serious consequences for the economy. Thus further undermining the retail led growth strategy. Alternatively it remains possible that nations and governments will awake to the threat and put serious measures in place to mitigate the CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

22 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

temperature rise. Such measures must involve a reduction and re-focussing of consumption (carbon rationing is being seen as a possibility). This too will lead to a reduction in retailing, again undermining the retail lead growth strategy. These problems make a retail-led growth strategy inappropriate.

Table 2.3 Introduction

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Picture 1.1 Poole's 1077 Ms Theresa 2267 Unsound The key principle which needs to be adopted in all activities undertaken by BoP, local Town Centre McManus (Poole businesses and local residents, is sustainability. This is required in order to combat Agenda 21) climate change. We must adopt measures that reduce our emissions of CO2e in line with the data presented by the latest IPCC reports (see Table 5.1 in the Synthesis of the Fourth Assessment Report where CO2e reductions of 85% are required by 2050 in order to restrict global temperature increase to 2 degress Celsius) , and those measures must be sustainable. Consequently, I would like this to be made clear in the first paragraph of the introduction. He is a suggestion for alternative wording. Poole is a town which is gaining a new sense of direction. It contains some of the South West regions best urban regeneration opportunities, and a real asset for Poole is that these opportunities are at the heart of the town. This gives Poole a realistic prospect of stepping up to the challenge of meeting its housing needs, transforming the economy and revitalising the Town Centre, in a manner that supports sustainable living.

Table 2.4 Picture 1.1 Poole's Town Centre 23

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 1.5 1163 Ms Simone 2519 Poole's Local Development Framework and the Role of the Core Strategy. Paragraph Wilding (GOSW) 1.5 and the table on p. 5ff explains about the various DPDs that Poole Borough Council is currently working on as per the authority's Local Development. Scheme of April 2007 and their interrelationship with the Core Strategy. Given Poole being part of a much wider conurbation it would have been helpful to put this into the sub-regional perspective, i.e. highlight those areas where plans are being prepared jointly - even if plans are not yet sufficiently firm to have been reflected in the 2007 LDS. In particular, the situation on joint working on a waste management Core Strategy should be clarified, as this does not appear to have been referenced under the joint working section in the document either. GOSW - Simone Wilding Rep

Table 2.5 Paragraph 1.5 CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

24 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 1.6 1077 Ms Theresa 2268 Unsound 1.6 introduces the Sustainable Communities Strategy as a strategy which will make McManus (Poole the people of Poole bright and prosperous. Whilst bright is a woolly but inoffensive term, Agenda 21) it is not appropriate to encourage a focus on wealth or economic growth. A truly sustainable future is not compatible with continued economic growth. I suggest that, where appropriate, the focus is instead in improving the wellbeing of the people of Poole. Below is a suggested change of wording. 1.6 Pooles Sustainable Community Strategy 2006-2012, Shaping Pooles Future, has been prepared by Poole Partnership, which is the local strategic partnership. This is made up of representatives from a wide array of organisations and other stakeholders in the local community. Widespread consultation has also taken place with local communities and individual members of the public in shaping the Sustainable Community Strategy.

Paragraph 1.6 1256 Mr Tony 2279 Unsound The Core Strategy assumes that "a bright and prosperous future for all of its residents" Hamilton (Poole is the context against which it is planned. However the twin threats of global warming Agenda 21) and increasing world shortages of resources make this extremely unlikely. The core strategy should adopt a more defensive approach to the uncertain future.

Table 2.6 Paragraph 1.6 25

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 1.9 1163 Ms Simone 2520 We welcome the close link which seems to have been formed with the Sustainable Wilding (GOSW) Community Strategy (SCS) inter alia through sharing the same vision and reflecting Local Area Agreement (LAA) priorities throughout the strategy (given that the LAA is the main delivery plan for the SCS). We would like to point out though that the LAA referred to in the document has recently been superseded by the 08/09 to 2010/11 Poole LAA which was formally approved by Government on 1 July 2008. Given the significantly shorter time frame of LAAs (3 years) in comparison to the Core Strategy, it may be more appropriate to refer to the LAA as a delivery vehicle more generally and indicating which parts of the LAA are likely to remain priorities over more than one LAA period due to their complex nature requiring long-term solutions.

Paragraph 1.9 1256 Mr Tony 2578 Our current planning takes it as given that UK and world prosperity will continue to Hamilton (Poole increase. Within the belief that prosperity will continue to grow, the objective of planning Agenda 21) is to see that Poole gets its share of the growth and that we use it to improve the facilities and lives of the people of Poole. This has resulted in the strategy of retail led growth – which hopes to make the town prosperous and provide the money to improve facilities. Yet given the scenario of population growth and resource shortages outlined in the section above, this is very unlikely to be the context of the future. The range of possible UK and international responses to the problem of global warming add a further element to the problem of retail led growth. At present measures and plans for combating the threat are completely inadequate. In the short term the economy will continue much as at present though the shortage induced increasing price of goods will cause an ever-growing downturn. But in the medium term unchecked global warming will begin to cause catastrophies with unpredictable but serious consequences for the economy. Thus further undermining the retail led growth strategy. Alternatively it remains possible that nations and governments will awake to the threat and put serious measures in place to mitigate the temperature rise. Such measures must involve a reduction and re-focussing of consumption (carbon rationing is being seen as a possibility). This too will lead to a reduction in retailing, again undermining the retail lead growth strategy. These problems make a retail-led growth strategy inappropriate.

Table 2.7 Paragraph 1.9 CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

26 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 1.10 1163 Ms Simone 2521 We welcome the close link which seems to have been formed with the Sustainable Wilding (GOSW) Community Strategy (SCS) inter alia through sharing the same vision and reflecting Local Area Agreement (lAA) priorities throughout the strategy (given that the lAA is the main delivery plan for the SCS). We would like to point out though that the lAA referred to in the document has recently been superseded by the 08/09 to 2010/11 Poole lAA which was formally approved by Government on 1 July 2008. Given the significantly shorter time frame of lAAs (3 years) in comparison to the Core Strategy, it may be more appropriate to refer to the lAA as a delivery vehicle more generally and indicating which parts of the lAA are likely to remain priorities over more than one LAA period due to their complex nature requiring long-term solutions.

Table 2.8 Paragraph 1.10

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 1.13 1077 Ms Theresa 2269 Unsound Why does the Core Strategy have to conform to the higher order policy framework ? McManus (Poole At the very least I would like to see mention of the process that enables the Core Agenda 21) Strategy to obtain approval for deviations from the higher order policy framework.

Table 2.9 Paragraph 1.13 27

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 1.14 1252 Mr Graham 2298 Unsound Change required:“As the Regional Spatial Strategy is still in transition; for the time Clarke (Dorset County being, the Core Strategy must also continue to have regard to the Bournemouth, Dorset Council) and Poole Structure Plan (CSP28) adopted in July 2000.”Why this change makes the Core Strategy sound:It is necessary to mention the structure plan as this document provides the strategic planning context for Poole until such time as the Secretary of State issues the approved Regional Spatial Strategy.

Graham Clarke DCC.doc

Graham Clarke DCC.msg

Table 2.10 Paragraph 1.14 CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

28 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 1.16 1077 Ms Theresa 2270 Unsound It is good that it is recognised that Poole, as part of the South East Dorset conurbation, McManus (Poole provides opportunities to reduce the need for travel.Being one of the largest conurbations Agenda 21) in the UK, it also offers the possibility of encouraging more people to transfer to lower-carbon forms of transport. This opportunity can be most effectively grasped by incorporating the DARTS scheme into the Core Strategy : Dorset Area Rapid Transport System (see http://www.geocities.com/poole_la21/train_orig.htm Proposals). This scheme provides a rail network for the conurbation, incorporating a number of hubs (e.g. Castlepoint, Hurn, Ferndown, Wimborme, Broadstone) in additional to Bournemouth, Poole and Christchurch from which bus services can then be run. This would then provide an effective and fast public transport system to the suburbs, thus removing a significant amount of traffic from the roads. In addition to this, a key part of the scheme is transport integration, so that residents in the conurbation can get on a bus and go anywhere in the conurbation by bus on a single ticket, regardless of service provider. Suggested alterations to wording :- 1.16 In practise, this has led to a greater focus on the role of our towns and cities. Such places are able to offer a wide range of facilities relatively near to hand and so can reduce the need to travel further distances. They also offer good potential for economic growth. If our towns and cities are to meet the challenges of the 21st Century, they will have to be attractive places which allow people to gain easy access to well-paid jobs, good schools, healthcare, affordable and good quality housing, culture and leisure facilities and efficient public transport. The draft Regional Spatial Strategy identifies Poole as being amongst the South West's Strategically Significant Cities or Towns. It is also part of the South East Dorset Conurbation. As a result, Poole, together with Bournemouth, Christchurch and East Dorset, are planning to implement the following strategies: - integrated ticketing for public transport within the conurbation - the Dorset Area Rapid Transport System 1.16 In practise, this has led to a greater focus on the role of our towns and cities. Such places are able to offer a wide range of facilities relatively near to hand and so can reduce the need to travel further distances. They also offer good potential for economic growth. If our towns and cities are to meet the challenges of the 21st Century, they will have to be attractive places which allow people to gain easy access to well-paid jobs, good schools, healthcare, affordable and good quality housing, culture and leisure facilities and efficient public transport. The draft Regional Spatial Strategy identifies 29

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Poole as being amongst the South West's Strategically Significant Cities or Towns. It is also part of the South East Dorset Conurbation.

Table 2.11 Paragraph 1.16

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 1.21 188 Mr Terry Stewart 2369 We are concerned at the ongoing threat to Poole’s Green Belt. Para 6.148 says the (Agent for CPRE & Green Belt will not be changed apart from the addition of some protected areas, but Canford Cliffs & this introductory para shows the growing conflict between the residents who want to Sandbanks keep the Green Belt permanently and the business community who want to invade it Neighbourhood Watch) CPRE Poole Core Strategy Response July 1 2008.msg

Table 2.12 Paragraph 1.21 CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

30 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 1.23 188 Mr Terry Stewart 2370 Para 1.23 This highlights 3 of the key issues in the Strategy : a) There is not enough (Agent for CPRE & Council tight control and guidance on architectural design. Widespread concern has Canford Cliffs & been expressed at some of the recent developments such as Seldown Bridge, so it is Sandbanks essential that the very large development of Poole over the next 10 years is of the Neighbourhood highest design and urban concept. Look at the differences on the Hamworthy power Watch) station site with Gallaghers. b) The RSS is demanding 48,100 additional houses in the Poole/Bournemouth HMA, but Region is not prepared to fund ANY infrastructure, telling us that it must be funded by developer contributions. The unreality of this is highlighted by the developer unwillingness to fund the 2nd Lifting Bridge. c) The Plan does not state where the Bus Station will be moved to. This is critical in achieving inter-modal transfer, and affects other decisions on the Town Centre North Area.

CPRE Poole Core Strategy Response July 1 2008.msg

Table 2.13 Paragraph 1.23 31

2 Characteristic of the Area:

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 2.2 1095 NLP (Bourne 2506 Unsound Paragraph 2.2 of the Core Strategy Submission Document summarises the Leisure Ltd) environmental attributes of Poole, in terms of its coastal location and surrounding environment, all of Which,in Bourne Leisure's opinion, are important and directly relevant 1093 Ms Margaret to Poole's tourism role. Yet Section 2 fails to make direct reference to the Borough's Baddeley (Nathaniel tourism role in relation to the area's characteristics, which Bourne Leisure considers to Lichfield and be a key and unacceptable omission. The Company therefore feels that in order to be Partners) consistent with subsequent sections of the Core Strategy, for example, paragraph 6.9, which refers specifically to the town's considerable tourism potential, and to meet the test of soundness 6, direct reference should be made in paragraph 2.2 to the borough's importance for tourism. Bourne Leisure Ltd - Frances Young pf 1-8.pdf Bourne Leisure Ltd - Frances Young pf 9-15.pdf Bourne Leisure Ltd - Frances Young pg 16-24.pdf

Table 2.14 Paragraph 2.2 CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

32 two responses

3 Issues, Problems, and Challenges:

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

3 Issues, Problems 1095 NLP (Bourne 2507 Unsound Bourne Leisure considers that Section 3 of the Core Strategy Submission Document and Challenges Leisure Ltd) fails to fully recognise the tourism potential of the area. Emerging regional policy guidance in paragraph 8.5.4 of the draft RSS for the South West (June, 2006) recognises 1093 Ms Margaret that tourism is one of the region's key economic sectors but also states at paragraph Baddeley (Nathaniel 8.5.4 that, "oo.a key challenge for the South West is how the tourism industry can Lichfield and improve its position (in the face of increasing overseas competition) whilst sustaining Partners) and improving the quality of its overall 'offer". Paragraph 8.5.6 of the draft RSS goes on to state that: "In order to achieve more sustainable tourism, the region's approach is to enhance the tourism 'offer' by investing in existing attractions and destinations. oo." . Moreover, paragraph 8.5.8 of the draft RSS specifically recognises that: "The quality and provision of accommodation in the region is clearly important to the health of the tourism industry. The tourism industry should focus on maintaining and enhancing the diversity, quality and provision of accommodation stoc/{'. Bourne Leisure considers that in order to meet the test of soundness 4C, section 3 of the Core Strategy Submission Document should recognise and reflect these issues aims and objectives, with a revised section on Spatial Vision and Strategic Objectives for the Borough, which refers to promoting and enhancing tourism. Other regional documents also recognise the importance of tourism, but also the challenges that the area faces. The South West Regional Economic Strategy 2006-2015 (2006) identifies tourism as one of the Reqion's eiqht prioritv sectors for specific intervention and as a sector undergoing major transformation, in need of assistance to meet the challenges of that change. Page 23 of the Regional Economic Strategy states "existing businesses need a climate in which they are able to become more competitive and grow in a way that is sustainable". Moreover, page 29 states specifically in relation to tourism states: "Traditionally important to the region, tourism drives the perception and reputation of the South West and provides employment to many in otherwise marginal economies. There is a pressing need to improve the quality of the offer and to make the industry more productive and more sustainable. "Moreover, Towards 2015: Shaping Tomorrow's Tourism (the Tourism Strategy for the south West of England) notes that tourism is worth more than £8 billion annually, attracts 26 million visitors and provides jobs for over 300,000 people (page 33

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

3). Moreover, a key objective for2015 is to increase the value of tourism by 40% (page 15). In order to meet the test of soundness 4C, Section 3 of the Core Strategy should fully acknowledge both the existing importance of tourism and the need to improve the quality of the tourism offer, including accommodation, as a challenge facing Poole

3 Issues, Problems 1256 Mr Tony 2580 So What Should Be The Heart of the Core Strategy for Poole? Many of the conventional and Challenges Hamilton (Poole features of the Core Strategy are excellent within their context. The major problem Agenda 21) remains that the seriousness of the threats consequent upon global warming are insufficiently recognised and the threats consequent upon world over-population are not recognised at all. Yet these will have huge impacts on the town within the next 50 years and we need to be aware of them now and to start the process of adjustment that will be required. Given our vulnerability to sea-level rise and the likelihood of a reduction in retailing consequent upon global warming and resource scarcity. It is apparent that a retail led strategy is inappropriate. Instead we should focus on measures to increase the security of Poole residents in the difficult times ahead.

Table 2.15 3 Issues, Problems and Challenges CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

34 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 3.3 1256 Mr Tony 2579 The Core-Strategy recognises the problem of sea-level rise. However this recognition Hamilton (Poole is based on government advice and again this is inadequate. Agenda 21)

Table 2.16 Paragraph 3.3

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 3.6 1077 Ms Theresa 2271 Unsound How does creating 35,000 square metres of retail and leisure space contribute towards McManus (Poole increased sustainability ? Particularly, how are big stores sustainable ? Poole should Agenda 21) not encourage wantonly irresponsible organisations like GAP or Walmart to locate in the area. Here are some alternative suggestions : 1. Use some of the space for allotments, to encourage people living in densely populated areas to grow their own food. 2. Use some of the space as public spaces for people to relax in and enjoy. 3. Use some of the space to create opportunities for small traders, like the Old Market Place used to be, to encourage small local businesses to grow.

Table 2.17 Paragraph 3.6 35

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 3.7 1096 Mr Stuart Laird 2453 Sound We welcome the recognition that Bournemouth University is key asset for the subregion (Bournemouth with a vital role in enabling growth of the skilled employment sector (page 26, paragraph University) 3.7). The University’s wide range of courses promote links with local business and support the development of knowledge-based industries that have the potential to attract increased inward investment to the Borough. University courses are also structured to provide students with the skills necessary to make the transition into business when they graduate.

29 Mr Peter Lamb Rep Form.pdf (Terence O'Rourke Ltd) L 080708 PL PBC.pdf

Table 2.18 Paragraph 3.7 CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

36 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 3.12 1111 Mrs Joan Jarvis 2491 “The draft Regional Spatial Strategy for the South West indicates that Poole will need to provide between 450 and 500 dwellings per annum between 2006 and 2026…” This target out to be reconsidered. “Poole is expected to deliver up to 70% of its new homes, as well as a significant increase in commercial development within the Town Centre, in the first half of the plan period…” (3.30). In view of the extent of areas at risk from flooding in these central locations, need to reduce carbon footprint and for time to improve home standards, housing policies ought to be reviewed. “Lifetime homes” Policy 9 provide the much needed break-through in removing some of the social problems engendered by current designs. During the past three decades, the Bournemouth – Poole conurbation experienced rapid increases in economically active, in migration, population growth. Vast housing estates mushroomed throughout the area without sufficient thought for the environmental and social consequences. Growth pressures should be allowed to slow down to ensure the past mistakes are not repeated. Some planning trends help to bring out the best in human nature, others bring out the worst. National and local government should now take time to resolve more of the problems that have bedevilled society during the past thirty years.

Mrs Joan Jarvis.doc

Table 2.19 Paragraph 3.12 37

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 3.15 848 (Bournemouth 2304 Sound Support the recognition in the paragraph that opportunities will need to be maximised and West Hampshire in order to provide appropriate levels of health care for the population. Water Plc)

24 Mr Mark Axford Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps para 3.15 06.08.doc (Goadsby) Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps para 3.46 06.08.doc

Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps para 6.7 06.08.doc

Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps para 6.28 06.08.doc

Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps para SO5 06.08.doc

Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps PCS1 06.08.doc

Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps PCS5 06.08.doc

Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps SS 06.08.doc

Table 2.20 Paragraph 3.15 CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

38 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 3.16 527 Ms Alice Ordidge 2496 The South West RDA note that the document is based upon employment projections (South West RDA) and employment space/land requirements which are consistent with the growth levels anticipated by the RES and RSS and are closely aligned with the emerging findings of the Bournemouth, Dorset, Poole Workspace Strategy. Consequently, the South West RDA support the general approach of the document in respect of employment land provision. It is recognised that the document focuses on the role of employment in driving economic growth. As such, the aim to identify an appropriate supply of quality employment sites and premises whilst protecting existing employment land from alternative forms of development is welcomed. With a view to helping deliver the RES, the document should also recognise more explicitly the need to achieve improvements in productivity levels as a key driver of future growth. Whilst para 3.16 of the document confirms that the RES identifies the Bournemouth/Poole conurbation as having the potential to play a far greater role in the economic growth of the region, this should be expanded to also include reference to raising productivity levels through enhanced skills and competitiveness as well as accommodating employment growth. This uplift in productivity is implicit in the projections underpinning economic and employment growth forecasts (e.g. 13,700 jobs) and if productivity improvements are not achieved, the evidence suggests that a considerable increase in employment (and hence potentially employment land) will be required to maintain the same level of growth. This is highlighted within Poole Borough Council’s LAA ‘Closing the Gap’ under the heading of Enterprise and Economic Development. It is therefore essential that the document articulates how it will support ongoing increases in productivity through an emphasis on key drivers such as skills, innovation, the environment, enterprise and transport and communications infrastructure. It is suggested that paras 3.21 – 3.23 be expanded to cover this point together with reference to increased productivity within part 7 of the Vision.

Alice Ordidge - SWRDA.doc

Table 2.21 Paragraph 3.16 39

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 3.18 1273 Mr Geoff Cross 2434 Unsound The Core Strategy needs to take account of the review of the sub-regional framework (Savills) (W H White needed prior to the review of the RSS for the provision of employment land (Panel plc) recommendation 8.1.2), comprising the search for 110 ha of employment land across the conurbation (Panel recommended policy SR 7.3). Following the search for additional employment land recommended by the RSS Panel to the Secretary of State, amend the Core Strategy by the addition of required new sites (with an amendment to PCS 1) and include any phasing requirements to provide flexibility and recognise the Core Strategy regeneration focus. In particular land at Canford (off Magna Road in the north of Poole) is proposed in supporting documentation as a suitable strategic employment site.

Objections to submitted Poole Core Strategy May 2008.pdf

Canford sustainable employment location.jpg

Objection version Illustrative Masterplan p2.jpg

Objection version Illustrative Masterplan pg1.jpg

Objection version Illustrative Masterplanpg3.jpg

Table 2.22 Paragraph 3.18 CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

40 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 3.19 188 Mr Terry Stewart 2371 Para 3.19. There is internal conflict where this para says the 2nd bridge will be completed (Agent for CPRE & in early 2010, while Strategic Objective 3 says it will “start by 2010.” Since the developers Canford Cliffs & will not fund the balance of the bridge costs, and there is some uncertainty whether the Sandbanks Regional Development Agency will help, this needs to be recognized and a “Plan B” Neighbourhood spelt out for a 5-8 year delay. The Bridge is so critical to the whole of the Core Strategy, Watch) centrally for the transport of building materials for the whole Regeneration Area.

CPRE Poole Core Strategy Response July 1 2008.msg

Table 2.23 Paragraph 3.19 41

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 3.21 1085 Mrs Susan 2263 Unsound There seems to be no awareness of the need to skill up for power-down. It would be Chapman great if Poole were to become a Transition Town, like many others now. The emphasis on growth should be not the economy but on paths of survival to face the twin challenges of peak oil (and consequent resource depletion) and dangerous climate change. Poole Agenda 21 has produced a paper (based on the IPCC Synthesis Report of 2007) showing that the world is set to breach the internationally-agreed figure of climate-damage-limitation of 2 degrees centigrade. Lord Stern has spoken of climate change as a market failure and has (since his famous report of 2006) in 2008 spoken of a need to beef up the action as the science continues to become more frightening. Michael Meacher, Labour MP, has urged Blitz Spirit in the face of this international emergency. Best practice from Scandinavian & European countries where feed-in-tariffs allow householders to financially benefit from renewables means that Portugal (34% now, 45% by 2010-wind,wave,solar,hydro) is well on the way to true sustainability. Germany employs 250,000 in the renewables industry. In Finland,a much colder country than ours, nobody dies of hypothermia due to brilliant levels of insulation etc. Sutton here in the UK aims to become the first zero-carbon town. The Isle of Wight can probably help Poole as it aims to become self-sufficient by 2020 (a transition island). Protection of green belt, heathland and encouragement of public transport here in the DPD is welcomed. Public Transport should be communally owned to serve the whole community so that we all get out of our private metal jackets. Children should be taught how to grow,keep and cook their own food. The Optimum Population Trust now advises Stop at Two (cf advice here in the 70s "Two will Do." A population policy, the discussion of valuing people for themselves, irrespective of the need to reproduce, and making responsible life choices, needs to be in the public arena. Dig for Victory, Make Do and Mend, Reduce,Reuse, Recycle etc -useful slogans in a resource-depleted world. Also to be discussed: How big is a community for people to feel involved? Everyone has skills and talents to help the sub-town with energy and resources. How involved are the schools and institutes of learning in this consultation? Are their ideas being used? CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

42 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 3.21 527 Ms Alice Ordidge 2497 The South West RDA note that the document is based upon employment projections (South West RDA) and employment space/land requirements which are consistent with the growth levels anticipated by the RES and RSS and are closely aligned with the emerging findings of the Bournemouth, Dorset, Poole Workspace Strategy. Consequently, the South West RDA support the general approach of the document in respect of employment land provision. It is recognised that the document focuses on the role of employment in driving economic growth. As such, the aim to identify an appropriate supply of quality employment sites and premises whilst protecting existing employment land from alternative forms of development is welcomed. With a view to helping deliver the RES, the document should also recognise more explicitly the need to achieve improvements in productivity levels as a key driver of future growth. Whilst para 3.16 of the document confirms that the RES identifies the Bournemouth/Poole conurbation as having the potential to play a far greater role in the economic growth of the region, this should be expanded to also include reference to raising productivity levels through enhanced skills and competitiveness as well as accommodating employment growth. This uplift in productivity is implicit in the projections underpinning economic and employment growth forecasts (e.g. 13,700 jobs) and if productivity improvements are not achieved, the evidence suggests that a considerable increase in employment (and hence potentially employment land) will be required to maintain the same level of growth. This is highlighted within Poole Borough Council’s LAA ‘Closing the Gap’ under the heading of Enterprise and Economic Development. It is therefore essential that the document articulates how it will support ongoing increases in productivity through an emphasis on key drivers such as skills, innovation, the environment, enterprise and transport and communications infrastructure. It is suggested that paras 3.21 – 3.23 be expanded to cover this point together with reference to increased productivity within part 7 of the Vision.

Alice Ordidge - SWRDA.doc 43

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 3.21 1077 Ms Theresa 2589 The strategy embraces continued economic growth. This is both unlikely and McManus (Poole unsustainable. A more appropriate focus would be on the wellbeing of the whole Agenda 21) community.

Table 2.24 Paragraph 3.21

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 3.22 527 Ms Alice Ordidge 2498 The South West RDA note that the document is based upon employment projections (South West RDA) and employment space/land requirements which are consistent with the growth levels anticipated by the RES and RSS and are closely aligned with the emerging findings of the Bournemouth, Dorset, Poole Workspace Strategy. Consequently, the South West RDA support the general approach of the document in respect of employment land provision. It is recognised that the document focuses on the role of employment in driving economic growth. As such, the aim to identify an appropriate supply of quality employment sites and premises whilst protecting existing employment land from alternative forms of development is welcomed. With a view to helping deliver the RES, the document should also recognise more explicitly the need to achieve improvements in productivity levels as a key driver of future growth. Whilst para 3.16 of the document confirms that the RES identifies the Bournemouth/Poole conurbation as having the potential to play a far greater role in the economic growth of the region, this should be expanded to also include reference to raising productivity levels through enhanced skills and competitiveness as well as accommodating employment growth. This uplift in productivity is implicit in the projections underpinning economic and employment growth forecasts (e.g. 13,700 jobs) and if productivity improvements are not achieved, the evidence suggests that a considerable increase in employment (and hence potentially employment land) will be required to maintain the same level of growth. This is highlighted within Poole Borough Council’s LAA ‘Closing the Gap’ under the heading CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

44 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

of Enterprise and Economic Development. It is therefore essential that the document articulates how it will support ongoing increases in productivity through an emphasis on key drivers such as skills, innovation, the environment, enterprise and transport and communications infrastructure. It is suggested that paras 3.21 – 3.23 be expanded to cover this point together with reference to increased productivity within part 7 of the Vision.

Alice Ordidge - SWRDA.doc

Table 2.25 Paragraph 3.22

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 3.23 1096 Mr Stuart Laird 2454 The positive linkages that exist between University and local businesses are further (Bournemouth recognised on page 31, paragraph 3.23 and this positive statement is welcomed. The University) University recognises that enhancing graduate skills and establishing links with local employers will contribute towards addressing the outward migration of skilled young people from the sub-region. We therefore welcome the spatial vision to create a high quality urban environment, which will form the basis of a strategy for retaining students from the University and other local educational establishments (page 44).

29 Mr Peter Lamb Sound Rep Form.pdf (Terence O'Rourke Ltd) L 080708 PL PBC.pdf 45

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 3.23 527 Ms Alice Ordidge 2499 The South West RDA note that the document is based upon employment projections (South West RDA) and employment space/land requirements which are consistent with the growth levels anticipated by the RES and RSS and are closely aligned with the emerging findings of the Bournemouth, Dorset, Poole Workspace Strategy. Consequently, the South West RDA support the general approach of the document in respect of employment land provision. It is recognised that the document focuses on the role of employment in driving economic growth. As such, the aim to identify an appropriate supply of quality employment sites and premises whilst protecting existing employment land from alternative forms of development is welcomed. With a view to helping deliver the RES, the document should also recognise more explicitly the need to achieve improvements in productivity levels as a key driver of future growth. Whilst para 3.16 of the document confirms that the RES identifies the Bournemouth/Poole conurbation as having the potential to play a far greater role in the economic growth of the region, this should be expanded to also include reference to raising productivity levels through enhanced skills and competitiveness as well as accommodating employment growth. This uplift in productivity is implicit in the projections underpinning economic and employment growth forecasts (e.g. 13,700 jobs) and if productivity improvements are not achieved, the evidence suggests that a considerable increase in employment (and hence potentially employment land) will be required to maintain the same level of growth. This is highlighted within Poole Borough Council’s LAA ‘Closing the Gap’ under the heading of Enterprise and Economic Development. It is therefore essential that the document articulates how it will support ongoing increases in productivity through an emphasis on key drivers such as skills, innovation, the environment, enterprise and transport and communications infrastructure. It is suggested that paras 3.21 – 3.23 be expanded to cover this point together with reference to increased productivity within part 7 of the Vision.

Alice Ordidge - SWRDA.doc

Table 2.26 Paragraph 3.23 CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

46 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 3.24 1252 Mr Graham 2299 Unsound Change required:“Housing provision and employment growth in the Borough of Poole Clarke (Dorset County should be balanced so as not to place pressure on surrounding areas for additional Council) housing, or cause an increase in net commuting into the Borough.”Why this change makes the Core Strategy sound:The Bournemouth, Dorset and Poole Structure Plan (CSP28) states in paragraph 4.23 that, “Within each District it is important that the location of new employment land should accord with the principle of sustainable development. One of the most important considerations is the need to reduce the number and length of journeys to work by private car.” The Structure Plan’s concern with sustainability has been given greater urgency by more recent national and regional policies. Dorset County Council has noted with some concern that development of employment land in Poole since 1994 has been significantly higher than that put forward in the Structure Plan (150% of the total allocation 1994-2011), while residential completions have only reached 66% of Structure Plan provision. The County Council has also noted the significant change in commuting patterns between 1991 and 2001 as evidenced by Census data. In 1991Poole had a net inflow of 160, but by 2001 there had been an increase to 3,600. Development that has occurred in Poole since 2001 seems likely to have exacerbated the imbalance and increased still further commuting into the town.

Graham Clarke DCC.doc

Graham Clarke DCC.msg 47

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 3.24 188 Mr Terry Stewart 2372 Para 3.24. Traffic Congestion is the biggest threat to residents Quality of Life in the (Agent for CPRE & conurbation. Chris Francombe has confirmed that we should plan on 1.25 cars for each Canford Cliffs & new home, so 48,100 extra homes will mean some 60,000 extra cars in the conurbation. Sandbanks 40,000 extra jobs will mean at least 5,000 extra commercial vehicles and HGVs also. Neighbourhood The S.E. Dorset Planning & Transportation Joint Committee recognized this problem Watch) in their May 25, 2005 report “The traffic modelling exercise…made it clear that levels of congestion within the conurbation are set to grow to unacceptable levels.” (The number of houses have increased by 25% since that statement !) also “Air quality is clearly at risk” and plans must “allow the future introduction of road pricing.”

CPRE Poole Core Strategy Response July 1 2008.msg CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

48 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 3.24 1102 Mr Ian Parsons 2551 The Agency supports the aim of reducing the need to travel within the conurbation, and (Highways Agency) particularly the number of trips made by single occupancy vehicles. In addition the reference made to the South East Dorset Local Transport Plan 2006-2011 (LTP2) is commended as the Agency recognises the need for integration of transport planning with spatial planning. We would therefore look to the Core Strategy to contain evidence based policies to influence travel behaviour and manage traffic demand to deliver an increased share for sustainable modes of travel. However, it is not clear to what extent the policies will deliver the aim of reducing trips in single occupancy vehicles. The Agency recognises the importance of Prime Transport Corridors and the need to promote walking, cycling and public transport to mitigate community severance and problems associated with congestion, including air pollution. Although the Council wishes to see better connections to the A31 and north to Bristol, we would wish to see the implications of this proposal on the A31 fully considered as, by 2026, the A31 north of Poole is forecast to be operating in excess of capacity, leading to congestion during both peak and off-peak times. Improved connections to the SRN would need to be matched with appropriate infrastructure improvements, and projects beyond the Agency’s existing programme would be likely to require funding from the Regional Funding Allocation, Growth Point initiative or other non-Agency sources. 49

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 3.24 1077 Ms Theresa 2582 Whilst it is good too see that it is recognised that Poole, as part of the South East Dorset McManus (Poole conurbation, provides opportunities to reduce the need for travel, not enough is made Agenda 21) of this opportunity. Being one of the largest conurbations in the UK, it also offers the possibility of encouraging more people to transfer to lower-carbon forms of transport. This opportunity can be most effectively grasped by incorporating the DARTS scheme into the Core Strategy : Dorset Area Rapid Transport System (see http://www.geocities.com/poole_la21/train_orig.htm#Proposals). This scheme provides a rail network for the conurbation, incorporating a number of hubs (e.g. Castlepoint, Hurn, Ferndown, Wimborme, Broadstone) in additional to Bournemouth, Poole and Christchurch from which bus services can then be run. This would then provide an effective and fast public transport system to the suburbs, thus removing a significant amount of traffic from the roads. In addition to this, a key part of any improved transport scheme is transport integration, so that residents in the conurbation can get on a bus or train and go anywhere in the conurbation on a single ticket, regardless of service provider.

Table 2.27 Paragraph 3.24 CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

50 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 3.25 1102 Mr Ian Parsons 2552 The Agency supports the aim of reducing the need to travel within the conurbation, and (Highways Agency) particularly the number of trips made by single occupancy vehicles. In addition the reference made to the South East Dorset Local Transport Plan 2006-2011 (LTP2) is commended as the Agency recognises the need for integration of transport planning with spatial planning. We would therefore look to the Core Strategy to contain evidence based policies to influence travel behaviour and manage traffic demand to deliver an increased share for sustainable modes of travel. However, it is not clear to what extent the policies will deliver the aim of reducing trips in single occupancy vehicles. The Agency recognises the importance of Prime Transport Corridors and the need to promote walking, cycling and public transport to mitigate community severance and problems associated with congestion, including air pollution. Although the Council wishes to see better connections to the A31 and north to Bristol, we would wish to see the implications of this proposal on the A31 fully considered as, by 2026, the A31 north of Poole is forecast to be operating in excess of capacity, leading to congestion during both peak and off-peak times. Improved connections to the SRN would need to be matched with appropriate infrastructure improvements, and projects beyond the Agency’s existing programme would be likely to require funding from the Regional Funding Allocation, Growth Point initiative or other non-Agency sources. 51

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 3.25 1077 Ms Theresa 2583 Whilst it is good too see that it is recognised that Poole, as part of the South East Dorset McManus (Poole conurbation, provides opportunities to reduce the need for travel, not enough is made Agenda 21) of this opportunity. Being one of the largest conurbations in the UK, it also offers the possibility of encouraging more people to transfer to lower-carbon forms of transport. This opportunity can be most effectively grasped by incorporating the DARTS scheme into the Core Strategy : Dorset Area Rapid Transport System (see http://www.geocities.com/poole_la21/train_orig.htm#Proposals). This scheme provides a rail network for the conurbation, incorporating a number of hubs (e.g. Castlepoint, Hurn, Ferndown, Wimborme, Broadstone) in additional to Bournemouth, Poole and Christchurch from which bus services can then be run. This would then provide an effective and fast public transport system to the suburbs, thus removing a significant amount of traffic from the roads. In addition to this, a key part of any improved transport scheme is transport integration, so that residents in the conurbation can get on a bus or train and go anywhere in the conurbation on a single ticket, regardless of service provider.

Table 2.28 Paragraph 3.25 CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

52 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 3.32 1077 Ms Theresa 2272 Unsound 3.32 Such approaches are useful because they promote a comprehensive approach McManus (Poole in which a mix of energy efficiency and renewable energy sources can combine to Agenda 21) reduce carbon emissions, depending upon the circumstances of the development. With regard to renewable energy, some technologies have greater potential in an urban area like Poole than others. A good example of such a technology is combined heat and power (CHP). This is a simple concept in which heat liberated from electricity generation is recycled rather than being lost to the atmosphere. It is important, however, to allow for emerging technologies and innovative solutions which, over time, are likely to become more widely available. The Local Authority could consider exploring the potential on its land holdings to deliver some form of renewable energy generation where opportunities arise. It can also help to provide greater certainty for innovative energy solutions in such circumstances, for instance through the use of Forward Procurement Commitment. 12 PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE make this a certainty not just aspirational: Please replace with "Poole will implement a district CHP system in support of any further development." and ""The Local Authority will deliver renewable energy from its landholdings and buildings."

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 3.33 1256 Mr Tony 2280 Unsound Government advice concerning sea-level rise is inadequate, consequently the plans in Hamilton (Poole the Core Strategy are also inadequate. The latest IPCC report says in effect that Agenda 21) sea-level rise, consequent upon the melting of the Greenland ice-sheet, is unpredictable, there is quite a lot of scientific evidence that threatens large rises. Poole as a town at risk should take greater note of this threat. 53

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 3.33 1111 Mrs Joan Jarvis 2487 Areas at risk from flooding due to sea level rise, surface water run-off, or combination of the two could suffer accumulative effects. Apparently forecasts of rising sea levels are already higher than originally predicted and such reports frequently amended. Further alterations in weather pattern are also generally expected. Unknown factors could arise. Flooding can be sudden and drastic. Adaptation and mitigation measures at present envisage may not be adequate. It would be erroneous to rely on such long distant forecasting at this early stage. A slow-down on growth is advisable. The Core Strategy is not adequately flexible but it maybe possible to introduce more flexibility through the monitoring and review process (taking into account changes in climate change, the environment, economy, population and house building etc.) provided the system is able to incorporate change in strategy.

Mrs Joan Jarvis.doc

Table 2.29 Paragraph 3.32 CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

54 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 3.34 1077 Ms Theresa 2273 Unsound Isn't this the same as saying "it's not a good idea, but we're going to do it anyway ?" McManus (Poole The areas at risk from coastal flooding are Sandbanks, Liliput, the Town Centre sites, Agenda 21) Hamworthy, Creekmoor and Canford Heath. Of course it is difficult to find alternative areas within the current Poole boundaries ! Any redvelopment needs to be on higher ground: Broadstone, Corfe Mullen, Merley, Upper Parkstone; beyond Poole. Poole has to move. What is the point of doing any redevelopment so close to sea level? How does it make sense ? The conclusion in 3.26 reflects a very short-term view. Any redevelopment should be built to last in order to be sustainable - ie it needs to be still standing in 100 - 200 years time. With this in mind, and the increasing likelihood of melting ice-caps (not included in the IPCC model), we should be forward planning for the worst-case scenario of a 15 - 20 metre rise in sea-levels. 55

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 3.34 1111 Mrs Joan Jarvis 2488 Areas at risk from flooding due to sea level rise, surface water run-off, or combination of the two could suffer accumulative effects. Apparently forecasts of rising sea levels are already higher than originally predicted and such reports frequently amended. Further alterations in weather pattern are also generally expected. Unknown factors could arise. Flooding can be sudden and drastic. Adaptation and mitigation measures at present envisage may not be adequate. It would be erroneous to rely on such long distant forecasting at this early stage. A slow-down on growth is advisable. The Core Strategy is not adequately flexible but it maybe possible to introduce more flexibility through the monitoring and review process (taking into account changes in climate change, the environment, economy, population and house building etc.) provided the system is able to incorporate change in strategy.

Mrs Joan Jarvis.doc

Table 2.30 Paragraph 3.34 CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

56 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 3.35 1111 Mrs Joan Jarvis 2489 Areas at risk from flooding due to sea level rise, surface water run-off, or combination of the two could suffer accumulative effects. Apparently forecasts of rising sea levels are already higher than originally predicted and such reports frequently amended. Further alterations in weather pattern are also generally expected. Unknown factors could arise. Flooding can be sudden and drastic. Adaptation and mitigation measures at present envisage may not be adequate. It would be erroneous to rely on such long distant forecasting at this early stage. A slow-down on growth is advisable. The Core Strategy is not adequately flexible but it maybe possible to introduce more flexibility through the monitoring and review process (taking into account changes in climate change, the environment, economy, population and house building etc.) provided the system is able to incorporate change in strategy.

Mrs Joan Jarvis.doc

Table 2.31 Paragraph 3.35 57

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 3.36 1111 Mrs Joan Jarvis 2490 Areas at risk from flooding due to sea level rise, surface water run-off, or combination of the two could suffer accumulative effects. Apparently forecasts of rising sea levels are already higher than originally predicted and such reports frequently amended. Further alterations in weather pattern are also generally expected. Unknown factors could arise. Flooding can be sudden and drastic. Adaptation and mitigation measures at present envisage may not be adequate. It would be erroneous to rely on such long distant forecasting at this early stage. A slow-down on growth is advisable. The Core Strategy is not adequately flexible but it maybe possible to introduce more flexibility through the monitoring and review process (taking into account changes in climate change, the environment, economy, population and house building etc.) provided the system is able to incorporate change in strategy.

Mrs Joan Jarvis.doc

Table 2.32 Paragraph 3.36

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 3.39 188 (Agent for CPRE 2373 Overall we agree with this list, but would comment : Para 3.39. The Heathland & Canford Cliffs & Regulations are only interim until December 2010, and it is possible that Brussels will Sandbanks tighten the final rules to extend the 400 metre restriction – and certainly ban Poole’s Neighbourhood policy of allowing development within the 400 metres as long as new residents do not Watch) keep pets. CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

58 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

CPRE Poole Core Strategy Response July 1 2008.msg

Table 2.33 Paragraph 3.39

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 3.40 188 (Agent for CPRE 2374 Overall we agree with this list, but would comment :Para 3.40. We believe the 15 & Canford Cliffs & sub-areas of Character Assessment will be powerless to protect the character of these Sandbanks areas. Reasons expended later. Neighbourhood Watch) CPRE Poole Core Strategy Response July 1 2008.msg

Table 2.34 Paragraph 3.40 59

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 3.46 848 (Bournemouth 2305 Sound Support the recognition in the paragraph that the Borough will have to provide for quality and West Hampshire healthcare facilities. Water Plc)

24 Mr Mark Axford Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps para 3.15 06.08.doc (Goadsby) Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps para 3.46 06.08.doc

Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps para 6.7 06.08.doc

Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps para 6.28 06.08.doc

Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps para SO5 06.08.doc

Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps PCS1 06.08.doc

Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps PCS5 06.08.doc

Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps SS 06.08.doc

Table 2.35 Paragraph 3.46 CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

60 two responses

4 Spatial Vision and Strategic Objectives

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

4 Spatial Vision and 1102 Mr Ian 2553 The Agency is encouraged by the principles set out in the Spatial Vision, in particular the aspiration to meet Strategic Objectives Parsons environmental challenges effectively by reducing the need to travel by car and creating self-contained communities. (Highways We acknowledge the additional development proposed for Poole, but it is essential that the appropriate infrastructure Agency) is delivered in parallel, with new development located at the most sustainable locations with access to a range of alternative modes of transport. The Vision indicates local centres will be a ‘focus for local shops, services, and public transport’ which the Agency welcomes in principle. However, we would also wish to see greater emphasis given towards the provision of cycle and pedestrian networks to facilitate more sustainable patterns of movement throughout the Borough.

Table 2.36 4 Spatial Vision and Strategic Objectives

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 4.1 1243 Mr Rohan 2397 Vision Understandably Poole sees its future success as dependent on creating high Torkildsen (English quality places which respond to its identity, character and local distinctiveness (para Heritage) 3.4). The policy and spatial response to this issue is commendable, particularly in identifying and requiring development to respond to 15 character areas, but it is disappointing this commitment is not reflected in the Strategy’s vision, as it should. This needs to be addressed. 61

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

response to Core Strategy submission version.pdf

Table 2.37 Paragraph 4.1 CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

62 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

1271 MDL 2432 Unsound The vision is not consistent with National Planning Policy. PPS12 (June 2008) identifies Development Ltd that ‘The vision should be informed by an analysis of the characteristics of the area and its constituent parts and the key issues and challenges facing them’. The Vision does not include reference to all the important characteristics such as Leisure and Tourism, both of which are important to Poole particularly given its waterfront setting. Vision 7 should include a reference to the importance that Leisure and Tourism plays in the local economy. The Vision, as it is currently set out, could be considered to be restrictive, not sufficiently flexible to allow for changing circumstances and difficult to implement and monitor. The Vision is meant to be formed at a high level and linked into the detailed strategy. A more appropriate approach could be two or three concise sentences that clearly set out the Vision for Poole and incorporate elements that cover the key areas such as Economy (all sectors including Leisure and Tourism), Housing, Transport/Infrastructure and the Environment to allow flexibility to deal with changing circumstances. This Vision would have to be linked to the Strategic Objectives. This approach would make the Vision easier to implement and monitor.

Poole Core Rep Form - Contents.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - para 6.125.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS6.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS7.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS9.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS11.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS12.pdf 63

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

1127 Ms Joanne Poole Core Rep Form - PCS12.pdf Webb (Savills (Representing Poole Core Rep Form - PCS14.pdf Bournemouth & Poole College)) Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 27.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 30.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 33.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 34.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 35.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 38.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - Strategic Objectives.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - vision 1.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - visions 2.pdf CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

64 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 4.4 527 Ms Alice Ordidge 2500 The South West RDA note that the document is based upon employment projections (South West RDA) and employment space/land requirements which are consistent with the growth levels anticipated by the RES and RSS and are closely aligned with the emerging findings of the Bournemouth, Dorset, Poole Workspace Strategy. Consequently, the South West RDA support the general approach of the document in respect of employment land provision. It is recognised that the document focuses on the role of employment in driving economic growth. As such, the aim to identify an appropriate supply of quality employment sites and premises whilst protecting existing employment land from alternative forms of development is welcomed. With a view to helping deliver the RES, the document should also recognise more explicitly the need to achieve improvements in productivity levels as a key driver of future growth. Whilst para 3.16 of the document confirms that the RES identifies the Bournemouth/Poole conurbation as having the potential to play a far greater role in the economic growth of the region, this should be expanded to also include reference to raising productivity levels through enhanced skills and competitiveness as well as accommodating employment growth. This uplift in productivity is implicit in the projections underpinning economic and employment growth forecasts (e.g. 13,700 jobs) and if productivity improvements are not achieved, the evidence suggests that a considerable increase in employment (and hence potentially employment land) will be required to maintain the same level of growth. This is highlighted within Poole Borough Council’s LAA ‘Closing the Gap’ under the heading of Enterprise and Economic Development. It is therefore essential that the document articulates how it will support ongoing increases in productivity through an emphasis on key drivers such as skills, innovation, the environment, enterprise and transport and communications infrastructure. It is suggested that paras 3.21 – 3.23 be expanded to cover this point together with reference to increased productivity within part 7 of the Vision.

Alice Ordidge - SWRDA.doc 65

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 4.4 527 Ms Alice Ordidge 2501 The spatial vision for Poole is welcomed with specific reference to Poole’s economy (South West RDA) being restructured to meet the challenge of the 21st Century and a focus upon business and retail growth in the Town Centre, new investment in existing employment areas and a continued commitment to Poole Port. Reference to skills and training is noted as are the measures designed to retain graduates in the area. This will be of central importance in moving towards a more productive economy. The need for careful monitoring of the achievement of the jobs forecast for Poole is strongly supported as is the need for a degree of flexibility and choice in meeting economic growth potential. Similarly, the need to adapt to a changing economy is important to ensure that the number of jobs are created over the period of the Core Strategy.

Alice Ordidge - SWRDA.doc

Paragraph 4.4 1095 NLP (Bourne 2508 Unsound A Vision for Poole. The Vision in the Core Strategy Submission Document is that: "Poole Leisure Ltd) is a vibrant town, with strong communities, where people enjoy healthy lifestyles, care about their environment and support each othet". The Vision then sets out seven themes: 1093 Ms Margaret promoting a sustainable environment; strengthening our communities; investing in Baddeley (Nathaniel Poole's children and young people; valuing our older people; promoting health and Lichfield and well-being; keeping Poole safe and feeling safe; and developing a dynamic economy. Partners) Bourne Leisure considers however that the Vision for Poole does not reflect the area's importance as a tourism destination adequately and moreover, does not take into account regional policy guidance (such as policies T01 and T02) which promotes tourism development. The Vision therefore does not meet the test of soundness 4C. Bourne Leisure's view is that in order for the Core Strategy to meet the test of Soundness 4C, the Vision should include another theme, i.e. that of, "... being a high quality tourism destination. "

Table 2.38 Paragraph 4.4 CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

66 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Strategic Objective 1 1256 Mr Tony 2281 Unsound The retail-led development and the increase in retail floor space is not a viable approach Hamilton (Poole given a likely down-turn in the economy consequent upon global warming and shortages. Agenda 21)

Strategic Objective 1 188 Mr Terry Stewart 2375 Sound Strategic Objective 1 : We strongly support the demand that “Poole will continue to be (Agent for CPRE & contained within the South East Dorset Green Belt.” And that Open Spaces will be Canford Cliffs & protected. However we believe that, with the strong retail led growth of the town centre, Sandbanks the “year on year decrease in car park movements” will not be achievable. Neighbourhood Watch) CPRE Poole Core Strategy Response July 1 2008.msg 67

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Strategic Objective 1 1270 Bridgehouse 2401 Sound Strategic Objectives 1 – To Transform and Revitalise the Town Centre of Poole The Capital Policy states that Poole will continue to be contained by the South East Dorset Green Belt. We support the approach that deliverable brownfield sites and greenfield sites within the urban area should be allocated for development before Green Belt sites. However, as worded the Core Strategy is not sufficiently flexible enough to ensure that future housing and employment targets are met. The Core Strategy does not allocate land for development. In addition, as information on specific sites has not been collected, there is limited information on the capacity and availability of sites. As such, the Core Strategy should be sufficiently flexible to allow for the Green Belt to be amended if it is required to meet the housing and employment targets. The Policy should make reference to a sequential approach to the selection of land for employment purposes. The following sequential approach should be applied. •Firstly, deliverable brownfield sites in the urban area that are not required for an alternative purposes •Secondly, deliverable greenfield sites in the urban area that are not required for an alternative purposes •Thirdly, Greenbelt sites Test of Soundness: •Justified – the above approach provides the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives. It allows the Land Allocations DPD to ensure that the strategic housing and employment targets are met by allocations the most suitable sites for development •Effective – the above approach ensures that the strategic housing and employment targets can be delivered within the Core Strategy policy framework. The suggested amendment increases the flexibility of the Core Strategy without compromising the objective of the policy.

1269 Mr Simon Poole Core Strategy Reps SH 04.doc Hawley (Harris Lamb Proprty Consultancy) CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

68 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Strategic Objective 1 1134 Mr Roger Parker 2494 Presently retail activity is the largest single employment sector in the conurbation of (Bournemouth Town Poole, Bournemouth, and Christchurch. It has shown the strongest sector sustainability Centre) in recent years. However recent economic indicators are causing retailers to reappraise their growth plans. The existing conurbation is very well served for retail, specifically the three town centres, a number of ‘district centres’ and a plethora of ‘ out of town shopping areas’. Such that the combination of the volume of local retail offer, and the regional competition is, I believe, causing all conurbation retail sites to sub optimise their function (this should be well demonstrated by footfall figures). Add to this position the (hopefully short term nature) of the existing economic climate and I believe the situation facing ambitious retail growth to be fragile. It is against this backdrop that I would urge you to ensure that some of the estimates used in informing your document from a retail perspective are fully current and broadly based. I have found it to be the case that ‘property consultants’ tend to overestimate the potential for sustainable retail activity. Their assumptions are often based on square footage/ densities expectations, and not necessarily on a retail practitioners outlook, or related to current patterns of retail trends and performance. It follows therefore that the potential exists for over expectation of the degree of retail sustainability that can be achieved, and as you will be aware there is nothing more debilitating than town centres where there are plenty of voids (paragraph 3.6). I also believe it is vital, if sustainability is to be achieved that the full function of retail activity is properly heeded in accordance with the sub-regional spatial strategy, and also takes accord of the regional position regarding retail delivery and competition (i.e. Southampton and Exeter). 69

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Strategic Objective 1 1163 Ms Simone 2524 Strategic Objectives We welcome the clear layout of the strategic objectives (SOs), Wilding (GOSW) indicating the key outcomes expected to fulfill these and specifying measurable indicators and targets which will allow the monitoring of the implementation of the strategy. There are, however, a number of minor observations we would like to highlight concerning the strategic objectives: It would be helpful if for each key outcome an indicator of achievement and respective target (trajectory) would be set out. While mostly this has been done, there seem to be a few key outcomes without corresponding indicator/target as e.g. S01 currently doesn't include an indicator target on 'number of trips by public transport, walking and cycling, despite it being a key outcome. For each target the monitoring mechanism (including baseline) to be used should be set out as well as how frequently progress against the target (preferably a trajectory) will be reviewed in order to determine whether or not the strategy is delivering as intended. I.e. the monitoring mechanism should •2• provide sufficient detail for the early years to judge progress against but also provide a direction of travel across the plan period as in many cases the target specified is around 2011 and it is unclear what is proposed to happen thereafter. It would also seem sensible to use where possible/appropriate a national indicator (NI), as information for these is collected anyway (i.e. it would keep down the additional monitoring burden to the authority) and provide comparability and consistency with other areas across the country. E.g. in the 41h row of the table on page 46 the indicator 'Engagement in Arts' is measured by NI 11. The current target would seem nnecessarily restrictive. Similarly air quality (S04 51 row in table on page 51), is measured by NI 94whereas the currently proposed target is unclear concerning which pollutants it refers to and what happens after 2010. Bus journeys are measured NI 177 which therefore seems relevant for 2" row of table on page 51.• Row 5 of S01 as currently suggested could lead to unintended side-effects as e.g. making more car parking spaces in the town centre long stay would also decrease the number of town centre car park movements.

Strategic Objective 1 1102 Mr Ian Parsons 2554 The Agency welcomes Strategic Objective 1 indicating Poole Town Centre will be the (Highways Agency) main focus for change in meeting housing needs and economic growth potential over the Plan period, along with the intended key outcome of a higher share of trips by public transport, cycling and walking. However, we reserve the right to comment on site specific CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

70 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

suitability until the appropriate traffic modelling and transport assessments have been conducted for each site. We would also want to be involved at the earliest opportunity in future Area Action Plans/Regeneration Proposals for the Borough to ensure that they meet sustainable transport objectives and do not have a detrimental impact on the SRN. The focus on mixed use development, as set out in the Town Centre North Area Action Plan, is strongly supported by the Agency given the need for self-containment within Poole.

Table 2.39 Strategic Objective 1

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Strategic Objective 2 188 Mr Terry Stewart 2376 Sound Strategic Objective 2 : WE support the need to retain family homes. The fact that (Agent for CPRE & currently there are apparently 1,500 flats for sale in Poole/Bournemouth – which are Canford Cliffs & not selling, while there is still demand for family homes with gardens, shows the need Sandbanks to support affordable family homes. The mix needs to spell out not just bedroom Neighbourhood numbers, but the split between flats and garden homes. Watch) CPRE Poole Core Strategy Response July 1 2008.msg 71

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Strategic Objective 2 1270 Bridgehouse 2402 Sound Strategic Objective 2 – To Meet Poole’s Housing Needs and Provide the Right Homes Capital in the Right Place This policy, amongst other things, seeks to deliver a minimum of 500 additional care home bed spaces by 2026. This ambitious target will have significant land take implications and therefore specific sites should be allocated for their development through the Land Allocations DPD. This should be referenced in the Core Strategy for the purposes of clarity. Depending on the nature of the care home, and the level of care involved, care homes can be either a C2 or C3 use class. If they are C2, the units provided do not count towards the strategic housing target. As such, land allocated for care homes should be in addition to the land allocated to meet the strategic housing target. This should be referenced in the Core Strategy for the purposes of clarity. These comments also related to Policy PCS8 – Care Homes. Test of Soundness: •Effective – the proposed amendment will help ensure that the Council’s ambitions care home requirement can be delivered.

1269 Mr Simon Poole Core Strategy Reps SH 04.doc Hawley (Harris Lamb Proprty Consultancy) CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

72 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Strategic Objective 2 1100 RSL (South 2409 Unsound We welcome the inclusion of this proposed objective, in particular the commitment to West RSL Planning providing affordable homes of different tenures to meet the needs of the residents of Consortium) Poole.

1219 Mr Jamie 1010-08.m4.PDF Sulivan (Tetlow King Planning) Representation form.PDF

Strategic Objective 2 1046 2495 McCarthy and Stone feel that the Core Strategy should aim to include all forms of housing to support the needs of the town. The introduction of further Sheltered Housing (McCarthy & Stone) schemes would result in many benefits across areas such as employment, transport and economic development. The Strategic Objective 2 should continue the statements made in other paragraphs and should be supported by a specific policy; such as can be found for Lifetime Homes and Care Homes. 41 Mr Alexander Bateman (The Planning Bureau Ltd (Representing McCarthy & Stone)) 73

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Strategic Objective 2 1109 (Talbot Village 2512 Talbot Village Trust supports Objective 2 which states that "across the Borough new Trust) residential development will be expected to support the provision of affordable homes... it is important that Poole meets its housing needs so that people can find a home and 12 Ms Frances Young Sound the economy is able to grow, and in a sustainable manner, with the highest densities (Nathaniel Lichfield & in the most accessible places which are capable of accommodating them. In meeting Partners) housing needs, it is essential that development does not adversely affect the integrity of the Dorset Heathlands or Poole Harbour SPAJRamsar sites'. However, in terms of promoting affordable housing and high density housing schemes, TVT considers that it will be important for the specific characteristics of each site and its surrounding area to be taken into account, as well as the economic viability of the scheme.

Strategic Objective 2 1163 Ms Simone 2525 Strategic Objectives We welcome the clear layout of the strategic objectives (SOs), Wilding (GOSW) indicating the key outcomes expected to fulfill these and specifying measurable indicators and targets which will allow the monitoring of the implementation of the strategy. There are, however, a number of minor observations we would like to highlight concerning the strategic objectives:It would be helpful if for each key outcome an indicator of achievement and respective target (trajectory) would be set out. While mostly this has been done, there seem to be a few key outcomes without corresponding indicator/target as e.g. S01 currently doesn't include an indicator target on 'number of trips by public transport, walking and cycling, despite it being a key outcome. • For each target the monitoring mechanism (including baseline) to be used should be set out as well as how frequently progress against the target (preferably a trajectory) will be reviewed in order to determine whether or not the strategy is delivering as intended. I.e. the monitoring mechanism should •2• provide sufficient detail for the early years to judge progress against but also provide a direction of travel across the plan period as in many cases the target specified is around 2011 and it is unclear what is proposed to happen thereafter. It would also seem sensible to use where possible/appropriate a national indicator (NI), as information for these is collected anyway (i.e. it would keep down the additional monitoring burden to the authority) and provide comparability and consistency with other areas across the country. E.g. in the 41h row of the table on page 46 the CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

74 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

indicator 'Engagement in Arts' is measured by NI 11. The current target would seem necessarily restrictive.

Strategic Objective 2 1163 Ms Simone 2532 Housing Delivery It is welcomed that as part of meeting Poole's housing need a Wilding (GOSW) front-loaded housing trajectory is proposed in line with Poole's role as a New Growth Point. It would be desirable for commitment to this to be more strongly expressed, e.g. through inclusion of a target to this effect in SO 2 (e.g. total net additions of homes as indicator with the trajectory to provide the targets including 7,000 by 2016).

Strategic Objective 2 1163 Ms Simone 2535 It is welcomed that SO 2 seeks as one of its key outcomes the provision of affordable Wilding (GOSW) homes to meet needs. However, it should be clarified that these ought to be net additions over the period and is being measured by NI 155. It would also appear that the current target of 3,000 additional affordable dwellings (Le. 30% out of an overall housing target of 10,000) should be reconsidered, given that Poole is one of the most unaffordable areas in the South West: In 2007 it ranked 3" and 6th most unaffordable for the ratio of lower quartile and median house prices to incomes respectively (as per CLG live tables on housing market and house prices).

Table 2.40 Strategic Objective 2 75

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Strategic Objective 3 188 (Agent for CPRE 2377 Strategic Objective 3 : The rate of economic growth is unrealistic – especially in the & Canford Cliffs & current Credit Crunch. This was one of the most contentious issues at the EIP, when Sandbanks CPRE used the report from Chris Elton to challenge the RDA’s assumption of 3.2% Neighbourhood growth. An average of 2.8% over the 20 year Plan Period is possible, but challenging. Watch) We MUST NOT allow Poole to be highjacked by the RDA’s mission to maximize growth. The start date for the 2nd Bridge is unachievable. In the current economic climate are the number of houses and jobs in the short term achievable ??

CPRE Poole Core Strategy Response July 1 2008.msg CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

76 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Strategic Objective 3 1270 Bridgehouse 2403 Unsound Strategic Objective 3 – To Nurture Economic Prosperity The delivery of appropriate Capital levels of employment land in Poole is supported. However, the proposed wording of the policy is inflexible and overly specific. These comments also relate to the Introduction of Section 5.0 – The Spatial Strategy. The policy states that Fleets Corner and Sopers Lane offer the potential for new employment development. This fails to reflect the circumstances of the Sopers Lane site. Sopers Lane currently has significant access issues and is an inappropriate employment access road. A planning application, which is now time expired, has been submitted seeking a new access point onto Broadstone Way to serve the site. However, the nature of the employment use makes the delivery of this access commercially unviable. One of the units on site has been marketed for a considerable period of time. However, no serious interest has been shown in the premises and it remains on the market. In addition, Siemens are in the process of preparing a planning application for the development of a new building on the adjoining site in their ownership. This will result in Siemens relocating from the Sopers Lane site leaving it entirely vacant. In order for the site be brought into active use, an alternative development solution must be found. If the site were brought forward for a mixed use development, which would increase the land value of the site, the higher value uses would pump prime the employment land elements allowing for the provision of the additional access infrastructure and the redevelopment of the site. In addition, depending on the nature of the employment land provided, there is the possibility of increasing the employment density on site. As such, whilst the employment site size may be decreased, it will employ more people than it would in its current use. It is appreciated that at the present time the Council believe that there is a shortfall of employment land in Poole, however, the LDF provides the opportunity to allocate additional land for employment purposes. As such, a sufficient supply of employment land can be provided in Poole whilst ensuring the most appropriate use comes forward on the Sopers Lane site, and other sites which are similarly constrained for redevelopment. The policy should reflect the guidance contained within the consultation draft version of PPS4. Draft PPS4 recognises that there are a range of industries that can contribute towards job creation that sit outside of B use classes. The Policy should be amended to make reference to non B class uses coming forward on employment sites where they contribute towards job creation. Test of Soundness: •Justified – The policy is not founded on a robust and 77

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

credible evidence base. The policy states that the Sopers Lane site offers the potential for new employment development. Part of the site has been vacant and marketed for some time for employment purposes with no interest. The remainder of the site is to be vacated shortly. In addition, there are considerable access issues associated with Sopers Lane which detract from the employment status of the site. The policy fails to acknowledge these constraints. •Effective - The Core Strategy is required to be deliverable. Part of the site has been marketed for a considerable period of time, as such, it is questionable whether it is deliverable as an employment commitment. There are considerable access difficulties associated with the site that are likely to hinder its use or redevelopment as an employment site. In order to bring this suitable brownfield site back into active use an alternative development approach is required.

1269 Mr Simon Poole Core Strategy Reps SH 04.doc Hawley (Harris Lamb Proprty Consultancy) CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

78 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

1271 MDL 2431 Unsound The Strategic objectives are not consistent with the recommendations made in National Development Ltd Planning Policy (PPS12) (June 2008). Para 4.3 of PPS12 identifies that ‘the strategic objectives form the link between the high level vision and the detailed strategy’. The Vision and Strategic Objectives are not consistent; Vision 7 ‘Developing a Dynamic Economy’ is referred to in Objective 3, however it does not refer to all sections of the economy. Strategic Objective 3 should identify the strategic manner in which Poole will achieve a dynamic economy, which in addition to those stated should include a recognition of the importance of the Leisure and Tourism sector and the need for Poole to invest in this sector. Linking the Vision and the Strategic Objectives more concisely will ensure consistency within the Core Strategy.

Poole Core Rep Form - Contents.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - para 6.125.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS6.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS7.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS9.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS11.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS12.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS12.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS14.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 27.pdf 79

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

1127 Ms Joanne Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 30.pdf Webb (Savills (Representing Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 33.pdf Bournemouth & Poole College)) Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 34.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 35.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 38.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - Strategic Objectives.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - vision 1.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - visions 2.pdf CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

80 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Strategic Objective 3 1273 Mr Geoff Cross 2436 Unsound The Core Strategy needs to take account of the review of the sub-regional framework (Savills) (W H White needed prior to the review of the RSS for the provision of employment land (Panel plc) recommendation 8.1.2), comprising the search for 110 ha of employment land across the conurbation (Panel recommended policy SR 7.3). Following the search for additional employment land recommended by the RSS Panel to the Secretary of State, amend the Core Strategy by the addition of required new sites (with an amendment to PCS 1) and include any phasing requirements to provide flexibility and recognise the Core Strategy regeneration focus. In particular land at Canford (off Magna Road in the north of Poole) is proposed in supporting documentation as a suitable strategic employment site.

Objections to submitted Poole Core Strategy May 2008.pdf

Canford sustainable employment location.jpg

Objection version Illustrative Masterplan p2.jpg

Objection version Illustrative Masterplan pg1.jpg

Objection version Illustrative Masterplanpg3.jpg 81

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Strategic Objective 3 1017 (Highcross 2459 Unsound Support is given to the recognition that the land at Fleets Corner has potential for new Group Ltd) employment development. However this needs to include a mix of other employment generating uses such as hotel and retail as enabling development. It is inappropriate to set a minimum requirement for new employment and it is recommended that job creation numbers are set as estimates and not minimum targets.

1016 Ms Vanessa Vanessa Clipstone - Highcross Group Ltd.pdf Clipstone (RPS Planning)

Strategic Objective 3 1095 (Bourne Leisure 2509 Bourne Leisure objects to Strategic Objective 3, as it fails to refer to and to recognise Limited) tourism as an important economic sector within Poole, or to include improvements to tourism as a key outcome. This is in spite of the fact that earlier versions of the emerging 1093 Ms Margaret Unsound Core Strategy recognised the importance of tourism. For example, the Core Element: Baddeley (Nathaniel Nurturing Economic Prosperity in the April 2007 Core Strategy Preferred Options stated: Lichfield and "Improving the quality of tourism in Poole can have economic benefits. Tourism assets Partners) and good quality tourist accommodation will need to be retained, protected and promoted'. Bourne Leisure strongly considers that either Objective 3 should be expanded to promote tourism and encourage investment in visitor accommodation and attractions, or that a specific new objective promoting tourism should be included in the Core Strategy. Moreover, the Company considers that Objective 3 as currently written fails to meet the tests of soundness 4B and 4C, in that it does not adequately reflect national or regional policy guidance on the promotion of tourism, particularly given the obvious importance of tourism to the area. CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

82 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Strategic Objective 3 1163 Ms Simone 2522 The Multi Area Agreement (MM) has been submitted to ministers on 20 June 2008 Wilding (GOSW) seeking approval by July 2008. As such it is amongst the first MMs to be submitted nationally and can therefore be seen as an indication of the good progress that has been made on joint working in the Bournemouth, Poole and Dorset area and we welcome the links that have been made to it in the Core Strategy. We would suggest though that the targets included in the MM can be reflected in the Core Strategy in due course where appropriate. In particular, in the tables of Strategic Objective 3, 1" row and Strategic Objective 5, 2" row respectively the target for the indicator "proportion of working age population qualified to at least level 4 or higher" should be shown as 35.1% by 2011 - in comparison to 29.6% baseline in 2006. However, to date no target has been included in the submitted MM on "achievement of 5 or more A'-C at GCSE or equivalent (...and can therefore not provide the target for the l' indicator of Strategic Objective 5. While this may still be included in a future refresh of the MM, it is suggested that an alternative target/monitoring process is considered. Furthermore it should also be considered in principle how the Core Strategy and the MM can remain aligned over the period of the Core Strategy, given that the MM is an evolving delivery mechanism and the need for the Core Strategy to address the longer time horizon up to 2026, Le. beyond 2011.

Strategic Objective 3 1102 Mr Ian Parsons 2555 In terms of Strategic Objective 3, the Agency acknowledges the importance of the Port (Highways Agency) of Poole in terms of future economic prosperity and as a valuable transport asset. However, in the absence of findings from the SEDMMTS the Agency reserves the right to make representations on future development of the Port. Any future development here needs to take into account that associated transport infrastructure will have to be secured through the development process.

Table 2.41 Strategic Objective 3 83

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Strategic Objective 4 1256 Mr Tony 2282 Unsound The target for increasing bus journeys of 10% in 7 years from 2004 is pathetic, and ? Hamilton (Poole probably already achieved. Bus travel is vital to a reduction of car use. We should be Agenda 21) aiming for more than 10% per annum.

Strategic Objective 4 188 Mr Terry Stewart 2378 Strategic Objective 4 : With the increase in petrol prices, and the bus companies cutting (Agent for CPRE & out unprofitable routes, we believe that a 12% increase in bus passengers by 2011 is Canford Cliffs & unrealistic unless there is a large increase in Council subsidies to bus companies – is Sandbanks this realistic ? As explained, with the increase in car and commercial vehicle journeys Neighbourhood in the conurbation, a 10% reduction in pollutants by 2010 is very questionable. Watch) CPRE Poole Core Strategy Response July 1 2008.msg CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

84 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Strategic Objective 4 1102 Mr Ian Parsons 2556 The Agency welcomes the aim to reduce car travel under Strategic Objective 4 through (Highways Agency) the promotion of safe, sustainable and convenient access. The Core Strategy will need to demonstrate that development will be delivered in a manner that will minimise adverse impacts on the safe and efficient operation of the highway network, particularly the SRN, either through choice of location or the adoption of appropriate mitigating measures. The Core Strategy should also fully consider the need for, and deliverability of, transport measures required to support future development of the area. Resources for transport investment are constrained and we would emphasise that any infrastructure improvements, traffic management or other mitigation measures required for the SRN as a result of development, will need to be funded by non-Agency sources such as developers, the Regional Funding Allocation and the DCLG Growth Points initiative

Table 2.42 Strategic Objective 4 85

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Strategic Objective 5 848 (Bournemouth 2308 Sound Strategic Objective 5 correctly emphasises that access to improved health care will and West Hampshire benefit the Borough population. Support the recognition in the paragraph that Water Plc) opportunities will need to be maximised in order to provide appropriate levels of health care for the population.

24 Mr Mark Axford Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps para 3.15 06.08.doc (Goadsby) Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps para 3.46 06.08.doc

Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps para 6.7 06.08.doc

Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps para 6.28 06.08.doc

Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps para SO5 06.08.doc

Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps PCS1 06.08.doc

Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps PCS5 06.08.doc

Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps SS 06.08.doc CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

86 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Strategic Objective 5 1096 Mr Stuart Laird 2455 Sound To attract and retain students the University must offer a high quality establishment (Bournemouth and educational experience, not only in respect of the range and quality of courses University) available but also the supporting social and welfare facilities and the standard of accommodation (both residential and academic). Therefore our client welcomes Strategic Objective 5, which supports the diversification of the University and the provision of new student and academic accommodation. Providing the necessary flexibility to enable the University to expand or provide new facilities (including student accommodation) is essential for its continued success. The University must continue to provide high quality academic and student accommodation if it is to improve its status and strengthen links with the business community during the plan period.

29 Mr Peter Lamb Rep Form.pdf (Terence O'Rourke Ltd) L 080708 PL PBC.pdf

Strategic Objective 5 1163 Ms Simone 2523 The Multi Area Agreement (MM) has been submitted to ministers on 20 June 2008 Wilding (GOSW) seeking approval by July 2008. As such it is amongst the first MMs to be submitted nationally and can therefore be seen as an indication of the good progress that has been made on joint working in the Bournemouth, Poole and Dorset area and we welcome the links that have been made to it in the Core Strategy. We would suggest though that the targets included in the MM can be reflected in the Core Strategy in due course where appropriate. In particular, in the tables of Strategic Objective 3, 1" row and Strategic Objective 5, 2" row respectively the target for the indicator "proportion of working age population qualified to at least level 4 or higher" should be shown as 35.1% by 2011 - in comparison to 29.6% baseline in 2006. However, to date no target has been included in the submitted MM on "achievement of 5 or more A'-C at GCSE or equivalent (...and can therefore not provide the target for the l' indicator of Strategic Objective 5. While this may still be included in a future refresh of the MM, it is suggested 87

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

that an alternative target/monitoring process is considered. Furthermore it should also be considered in principle how the Core Strategy and the MM can remain aligned over the period of the Core Strategy, given that the MM is an evolving delivery mechanism and the need for the Core Strategy to address the longer time horizon up to 2026, Le. beyond 2011.

Strategic Objective 5 1163 Ms Simone 2526 Strategic Objectives We welcome the clear layout of the strategic objectives (SOs), Wilding (GOSW) indicating the key outcomes expected to fulfill these and specifying measurable indicators and targets which will allow the monitoring of the implementation of the strategy. There are, however, a number of minor observations we would like to highlight concerning the strategic objectives:We suggest considering the inclusion of an additional key outcome (plus related indicator and target) under SO 5: 'access to green infrastructure'.

Table 2.43 Strategic Objective 5

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Strategic Objective 6 188 Mr Terry Stewart 2379 Strategic Objective 6 : We believe that the 15 sub-areas will not achieve the objective (Agent for CPRE & of limiting damaging development which antagonizes local residents. To be effective Canford Cliffs & they must provide hard planning reasons for rejecting unwanted blocks of flats and Sandbanks other harmful development, but Peter Watson initially stated that the area descriptions Neighbourhood will be too vague to provide that protection. The 14 Residents’ Associations’ protest Watch) meeting with Brian Leverett and John McBride showed that there is not “improvements in satisfaction levels.”

CPRE Poole Core Strategy Response July 1 2008.msg CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

88 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Strategic Objective 6 1243 Mr Rohan 2398 Strategic objective 6 is welcomed however reference to conservation areas, historic Torkildsen (English parks and gardens, and locally distinctive buildings fails to address the range of heritage Heritage) assets and excludes for example known and unknown archaeology which is often ‘at risk’. You may, therefore, consider including the following inclusive definition of the historic environment or refer explicitly to the components of the historic environment referred to. All designated historic assets should be considered together with potential impacts on non-designated features of local historic or architectural interest and value since these can make an important contribution to creating a sense of place and local identity. Statutory designations include Listed Buildings, Scheduled Monuments plus other nationally important archaeological sites, Registered Historic Parks and Gardens, Registered Battlefields, Conservation Areas, and the settings of all these assets. Other important elements of the historic environment, which are often without any statutory protection, include other archaeological sites, locally listed buildings, parks and gardens, landscape and townscape features, the character of wider the landscape / townscape, as well as the potential for as yet unrecorded archaeology.A key outcome/achievement of achievement of strategic objective 6 must be the preservation and enhancement of the historic environment as this is clearly one of the main reasons for it. Such reference would also help to ensure consistency with national planning policy guidance PPG15 and 16 (Test of Soundness iv). Other outcomes/indicators of achievement might also include the completion of Conservation Area Appraisals; that year on year Poole will become a more attractive place; that year on year there will be less heritage assets at risk etc

response to Core Strategy submission version.pdf

Table 2.44 Strategic Objective 6 89

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Strategic Objective 7 189 Mr Renny 2350 Unsound This objective sets out the rationale for protecting wildlife sites, but is silent on promoting Henderson (RSPB new and better sites.The Borough has potential for enhancing its biodiversity resource, South West Region) both through better management of existing sites but also through new opportunities to create space for wildlife and people. Both strands should be promoted and supported in the Plan in accordance with PPS9 paragraph 5. A number of research initiatives are underway assessing the habitat creation opportunities and we would recommend that the Plan distils and sets these out, including representation an improved proposals plan. Natural England would be able to advise on this point, and RSPB has spatial information on heathland creation opportunities.

PCS Submission Form Biodiversity in new developments.doc

PCS Submission Form Biodiversity of existing development.doc

PCS Submission Form Habitat creation.doc

PCS Submission Form HRA.doc

PCS Submission Form Networks.doc

PCS Submission Form Proposals Map.doc

PCS Submission Form SSSIs.doc CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

90 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Strategic Objective 7 189 Mr Renny 2352 Unsound We welcome the mention of improved and new green links within SO7. We consider Henderson (RSPB however that these need to be tied down to meet the requirements of Para 12 of PPS9. South West Region) Networks of natural habitats provide a valuable resource and should be promoted. We consider a policy is needed which recognises the value of networks and seeks to promote them. These networks should also be mapped. Much work is underway with respect to possible new green space in conjunction with the forthcoming heathland DPD. Appropriate connections need to be made by the Borough to join up work on recreation open space, mitigation-inspired green space and ‘other’ green space for biodiversity.We also believe that the target ‘no net downward trend’ is weak and un-ambitious. Measures should be taken to enhance biodiversity, and targets should be established which reflect this, tied perhaps to UK BAP/local biodiversity targets.

PCS Submission Form Biodiversity in new developments.doc

PCS Submission Form Biodiversity of existing development.doc

PCS Submission Form Habitat creation.doc

PCS Submission Form HRA.doc

PCS Submission Form Networks.doc

PCS Submission Form Proposals Map.doc

PCS Submission Form SSSIs.doc 91

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Strategic Objective 7 188 (Agent for CPRE 2380 Strategic Objective 7 : As explained the Heathland Regulations may be tightened, and & Canford Cliffs & we strongly oppose Poole’s policy of allowing some development within the 400 metre Sandbanks zone. Neighbourhood Watch) CPRE Poole Core Strategy Response July 1 2008.msg

Strategic Objective 7 1163 Ms Simone 2527 Strategic Objectives We welcome the clear layout of the strategic objectives (SOs), Wilding (GOSW) indicating the key outcomes expected to fulfill these and specifying measurable indicators and targets which will allow the monitoring of the implementation of the strategy. There are, however, a number of minor observations we would like to highlight concerning the strategic objectives:2"" bullet point of S07 should refer to production 'and implementation' of a heathlands mitigation strategy. We also suggest considering the inclusion of reference to the coastal flood management plan and protection of coastline under S07. This may also be the appropriate place to clarify how waste management is going to be addressed. We understand that Poole will be preparing a joint sub-regional Waste Core Strategy jointly with Dorset County Council and Bournemouth Borough Council. This should be made explicit in the Core Strategy in order to clarify the interrelationship between the two (see also my comments above on Poole's LDF framework).

Table 2.45 Strategic Objective 7 CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

92 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Strategic Objective 8 1077 Ms Theresa 2274 Unsound Targets too low for CO2 reductions. The aim should be 85% reduction of CO2e on 2000 McManus (Poole levels by 2020, in line with the IPCC recommendation. Agenda 21)

Strategic Objective 8 1256 Mr Tony 2283 Unsound Lots of good things here. BUT We must have a plan to improve the energy efficiency Hamilton (Poole of existing homes. Sea level rise threatens to be much more serious than the objectives Agenda 21) and targets indicate.

Strategic Objective 8 1017 (Highcross 2460 Strategic Objective 8 should be revised to accord with PPS22 and the Supplement to Group Ltd) PPS1 to provide clarification between on site renewable energy and the provision of renewable energy projects such as wind farms.

1016 Ms Vanessa Unsound Vanessa Clipstone - Highcross Group Ltd.pdf Clipstone (RPS Planning)

Table 2.46 Strategic Objective 8 93

5 A Spatial Strategy for Poole

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Statement 1 Housing 848 (Bournemouth 2311 Sound Welcome the recognition that job growth in the health sector contributes to the overall and West Hampshire employment needs of the Borough. Water Plc)

24 Mr Mark Axford Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps para 3.15 06.08.doc (Goadsby) Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps para 3.46 06.08.doc

Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps para 6.7 06.08.doc

Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps para 6.28 06.08.doc

Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps para SO5 06.08.doc

Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps PCS1 06.08.doc

Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps PCS5 06.08.doc

Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps SS 06.08.doc

Statement 1 Housing 188 Mr Terry Stewart 2381 Unsound We disagree with the statements on “Areas where change will be carefully managed” (Agent for CPRE & : a) NO development should be allowed within the 400 metre zone.b) NO change should Canford Cliffs & be allowed to Poole’s Green Belt. We are concerned at the admission of “Worsening Sandbanks air quality on Prime Transport Corridors” on residents’ satisfaction ratings. Neighbourhood Watch) CPRE Poole Core Strategy Response July 1 2008.msg CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

94 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Statement 1 Housing 1017 (Highcross 2461 Unsound Greater flexibility is required in terms of the range of employment uses, which should Group Ltd) allow for retail. The Core Strategy should not be prescriptive about employment sectors, occupiers or the type of premises. Job numbers should not be set out as a minimum requirement.

1016 Ms Vanessa Vanessa Clipstone - Highcross Group Ltd.pdf Clipstone (RPS Planning)

Statement 1 Housing 1095 (Bourne Leisure 2510 Unsound The Spatial Strategy in section 5 of the Core Strategy Submission Dooument recognises Limited) that "Poole will see much change over the Plan period' and that Poole will become "a more sustainable, attractive town which offers a better quality of life for its residents'. 1093 Ms Margaret Bourne Leisure once again objects to the absence of any reference here to the Baddeley (Nathaniel attractiveness of Poole to visitors, and the lack of recognition within section 5 on the Lichfield and Spatial Strategy of the importance of tourism and the economic benefits to the Borough Partners) brought by visitors. As such, the Spatial Strategy section of the Submission Document fails to meet the test of soundness 4B and 4C. 95

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Statement 1 Housing 1102 Mr Ian Parsons 2558 The Agency welcomes the emphasis on higher density housing developments in areas (Highways Agency) that provide opportunities for reducing the need to travel and encouraging non-car journeys, such as the town centre, major local centres, and key hubs of transport and community activity. We agree with a hierarchy of preferred housing densities prioritising access to local facilities and public transport. It is of concern however that 2,500 of the 10,000 dwellings to be delivered are anticipated in areas which do not at present benefit from high quality public transport provision within a 400m walking distance (PCS6). Whilst 7,500 houses are set to be provided in areas which may be deemed accessible by public transport, the remaining allocation appear to be directed towards less sustainable locations. The Core Strategy does not appear to indicate how sustainable access to these developments will be addressed. In terms of the overall Spatial Strategy, CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

96 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

the Agency believes that there is a need for this to be informed by the SEDMMTS, estimated to be available after the summer of 2009.

Table 2.47 Statement 1 Housing 6 The Detailed Strategy: Core Policies for Issues and Places

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

6 The Detailed 1095 (Bourne Leisure 2511 Unsound The Detailed Strategy Bourne Leisure agrees with the statements specifically on tourism Strategy: Core Limited) in paragraph 6.9 of the Core Strategy Submission Document, that: "Poole's position on Policies for Issues Poole Harbour, the quality of its beaches, the historic interest provided by the Old Town and Places and Quay, the fact that Poole is a continental ferry port, and cultural attractions such as the Lighthouse and museums all point to the town's considerable potential as a tourist destination....Key locations such as the beaches, harbour and quay will continue to be valuable assets to Poole and it is important that the town is able to offer high quality attractions and accommodation". However, the Company then strongly objects to the fact that there are then no core policies for tourism-and can see no reasoning for this approach to have been taken. Indeed, there is only a brief reference at PCS 1: Principal Locations for Economic Investment to tourism being a suitable employment use within the Regeneration Area and the town centre. Bourne leisure therefore strongly considers that the Core Strategy Submission Document fails tests of soundness 4B 97

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

1093 Ms Margaret and 4C in this regard. If the Core Strategy is to meet the test of soundness 4B and fUlly Baddeley (Nathaniel reflect national lanning policy (and in particular the CLG Good Practice Guide on Lichfield and Planning for Tourism (May 006), which acknowledges at paragraph 1.1 that the planning Partners) system has a vital role to play in terms of facilitating the development and improvement of tourism in appropriate locations), specific policies within the Core Strateqy should support the development of a hiqh quality high-value tourism sector through the enhancement of existing tourism-related facilities and the provision and retention of key attractions and a range of good quality accommodation. Such good quality accommodation would include existing caravan and chalet parks, such as Rockley Park. Moreover, specific recognition of, and policy support for improving existing caravan and chalet sites within the Borough would reflect the significance of holiday, touring caravan and chalet parks to the tourism industry as a whole, as detailed at Annex A of the new Good Practice Guide, which notes that:"In the UK as a whole, the parks industry accounts for tourist spend of some £3.23 billion each year, accommodating 22% of all holiday bed nights'. The wording of key tourism policies in the Core Strategy should also reflect the following guidance in the Good Practice Guide: • paragraph 20, which states that "planners should carefully weigh the objective of providing adequate facilities and sites with the need to protect landscapes and environmentally sensitive sites'; • paragraph 21, which notes that planning provides an opportunity to improve the attractiveness of visually or environmentally-intrusive parks, both for those who visit them and as features in the landscape; and • paragraph 22, which states that there may be valid reasons for extending or improving existing holiday parks that are not located close to existing settlements, by virtue of their support for successful local businesses and the provision of employment. To then meet the Test of Soundness 4C, Bourne Leisure considers that the Core Strategy should also reflect regional policy guidance on tourism development, as set out in the draft Regional Spatial Strategy (RSS) for the South West, as modified by the Panel Report (December, 2007). In particular, Policy T01: Sustainable Tourism of the draft RSS (as modified) states that: "Local authorities, regional partners, stakeholders and the tourism industry ... should have regard to the development of sustainable tourism by:..... • Improving the quality and diversity of existing facilities and accommodation throughout the region, particularly where this would increase out of season visitors, especially in the winter and spring CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

98 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

periods. " A new core strategy policy on tourism development should also reflect Policy T02: Safeguarding and Investing in Tourism Destinations of the draft RSS (as modified), which states that: "Within the context of Policy TOt, Local Authorities, Destination Management Organisations and stakeholders should collaborate across administrative boundaries to define the future role of tourism in each of the recognized destination zones, identify the measures required to support it, and develop action plans for their delivery. Such plans should identify: • The need to allocate specific sites for new tourism related investment; • The development needs of existing businesses to tackle the seasonality challenge; • The nature and mix of new investment required; and • The necessarv infrastructure and investment required to support the industry within the context of the need for regeneration and economic viability". Bourne Leisure therefore considers that in order to meet the tests of soundness 4B and 4C, the following new policy should be added to the Poole Core Strategy: "The Council will support and encourage the retention, consolidation, enhancement, diversification and intensification/expansion of existing self-catering accommodation n, including holiday caravan and chalet parks, subject to any necessary environ mental and other development control criteria, where the proposals would result in permanent and significant improvements to the layout and appearance of the site and its setting in the surrounding landscape". The supporting text to the new core policy should then explain the benefits of enhancing/improving existing tourist accommodation and of the area having a variety of better quality (and more diverse range of) accommodation. Such benefits would include the extension of the visitor season, as well as employment creation and a strengthened local economy. The text should also recognise that proposals to enhance tourist accommodation could inter alia include: the development of new site facilities; the provision of improved internal layouts; new and improved on- and off-site landscaping; and the expansion of sites. The Core Strategy's explanatory text on tourism development should also acknowledge that on low density or less viable sites, in order to fund the necessary improvements (in terms of enhancing the quality and attractiveness of existing sites), it may be necessary to increase the number of units. The text should also acknowledge that enhancement proposals should not necessarily be considered to be 'one-off', as in order for existing tourism accommodation to remain attractive and competitive, it is often necessary to undertake a phased 99

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

approach to improvement, upgrading and/or extension over several years, ensuring that the existing visitor operation is not disrupted and that each proposal caters appropriately for current and forecast visitor needs and demands.

Table 2.48 6 The Detailed Strategy: Core Policies for Issues and Places

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Realising Poole's 1017 (Highcross 2470 Unsound Delivery Framework– page 86 The key outcomes should be amended to refer to ‘Use Economic Potential Group Ltd) Classes B1, B2, B8 and a hotel. PPS6 compliant retail development could be permitted’. The expected timeframe for outcome should also be amended to a start date of 2009 in order to tie in with the expected adoption of the Core Strategy.

1016 Ms Vanessa Vanessa Clipstone - Highcross Group Ltd.pdf Clipstone (RPS Planning) CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

100 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.1 1273 Mr Geoff Cross 2437 Unsound The Core Strategy needs to take account of the review of the sub-regional framework (Savills) (W H White needed prior to the review of the RSS for the provision of employment land (Panel plc) recommendation 8.1.2), comprising the search for 110 ha of employment land across the conurbation (Panel recommended policy SR 7.3). Following the search for additional employment land recommended by the RSS Panel to the Secretary of State, amend the Core Strategy by the addition of required new sites (with an amendment to PCS 1) and include any phasing requirements to provide flexibility and recognise the Core Strategy regeneration focus. In particular land at Canford (off Magna Road in the north of Poole) is proposed in supporting documentation as a suitable strategic employment site.

Objections to submitted Poole Core Strategy May 2008.pdf

Canford sustainable employment location.jpg

Objection version Illustrative Masterplan p2.jpg

Objection version Illustrative Masterplan pg1.jpg

Objection version Illustrative Masterplanpg3.jpg

Paragraph 6.1 1163 Ms Simone 2528 Potential It is noted that the Core Strategy is predicated on employment forecast figures Wilding (GOSW) of 13,700 (2006 to 2026) in Poole Borough based on the recent (2008) employment forecasting by Roger Tym Associates. While the emerging RSS indicates that at least 19,000 jobs are to be provided within the Poole Travel to work Area (TTWA) over the same period, there does not appear to be a conflict with the proposed Core strategy as the former relates solely to the Borough of Poole whereas the latter relates to the wider TTWA. It is also noted that the Poole Core Strategy is based upon a GVA growth rate of 3.2% p.a. and is therefore in line with both the emerging RSS and the Regional 101

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Economic Strategy (RES). It would be beneficial if the latter could also be referenced in paragraph 6.1.

Table 2.49 Paragraph 6.1

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.2 1085 Mrs Susan 2264 Unsound Airships may be a feasibility in the future but the emphasis now on employment at Chapman Bournemouth International Airport is to be discouraged as aviation is clearly unsustainable in terms of emissions. Poole Agenda 21 raised this issue on 21st June 2007 at the Civic Offices when stakeholders were invited to speak for/against expansion of Hurn Airport. Expansion runs counter to all sustainability as emissions are 2.7 to 4 times as polluting as CO2 emitted on the ground. Clearly the reliance on kerosene means the airline industry looks increasingly unhelpful (if not immoral) in terms of resource use. CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

102 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.2 1273 Mr Geoff Cross 2438 Unsound The Core Strategy needs to take account of the review of the sub-regional framework (Savills) (W H White needed prior to the review of the RSS for the provision of employment land (Panel plc) recommendation 8.1.2), comprising the search for 110 ha of employment land across the conurbation (Panel recommended policy SR 7.3). Following the search for additional employment land recommended by the RSS Panel to the Secretary of State, amend the Core Strategy by the addition of required new sites (with an amendment to PCS 1) and include any phasing requirements to provide flexibility and recognise the Core Strategy regeneration focus. In particular land at Canford (off Magna Road in the north of Poole) is proposed in supporting documentation as a suitable strategic employment site.

Objections to submitted Poole Core Strategy May 2008.pdf

Canford sustainable employment location.jpg

Objection version Illustrative Masterplan p2.jpg

Objection version Illustrative Masterplan pg1.jpg

Objection version Illustrative Masterplanpg3.jpg 103

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.2 1017 (Highcross 2462 Paragraph 6.2 advises “Sopers Lane and Fleets Corner will provide another 11 hectares Group Ltd) ofland between them”. This sentence should be deleted or be more carefully worded. The Fleets Corner site itself amounts to some 11ha in total and therefore could potentially, as a consequence of redevelopment, provide the 11ha alone.

1016 Ms Vanessa Unsound Vanessa Clipstone - Highcross Group Ltd.pdf Clipstone (RPS Planning)

Paragraph 6.2 1239 Mr Neal 2598 We do note however that the Panel Report (para 4.7.23e-24) was strongly minded that Whitehead (South there was a demand for some 85 ha of land with only a supply of 13ha. Furthermore West Regional the Panel identified the potential shortage of employment land as a significant issue Assembly) across the conurbation and recommended in Policy SR7.3, that a search for 110ha of employment land should be conducted across the conurbation. Your document (para 6.2) in contrast considers that some 39 ha of land (or equivalent) is required and would be available to meet the jobs forecast consistent with the RSS. We do note that para 6.2 explains that this estimate is based on recent work, published after the EiP, undertaken by Dorset Strategic Authorities and Grimley GVA. We have no reason to dispute the findings of this later study, but do think that it would be helpful if you were to set out more clearly why the 39ha is now considered to be a robust and realistic assessment of employment land needs compared with the clear recommendations of the Panel Report.

Table 2.50 Paragraph 6.2 CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

104 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.3 1273 Mr Geoff Cross 2440 Unsound The LPA has been unwilling to discuss the employment strategy, and the complexity (Savills) 1272 (W H of the issues about the inadequacy of employment land in the South East Dorset White plc) conurbation. The lack of response to the RSS EiP Panel’s recommendations warrants a wide strategic examination of the Core Strategy employment land proposals.

Objections to submitted Poole Core Strategy May 2008.pdf

Canford sustainable employment location.jpg

Objection version Illustrative Masterplan p2.jpg

Objection version Illustrative Masterplan pg1.jpg

Objection version Illustrative Masterplanpg3.jpg 105

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.3 1163 Ms Simone 2529 The proposed distribution of job growth appears to be well evidenced and developed. Wilding (GOSW) As the success of the proposed strategy does appear to depend to a large degree on the success of both the Regeneration Area and also the Town entre North (Which together are to provide around 50% of the job growth), close monitoring of the implementation of the strategy is the more important, to ensure that corrective measures can be taken should this be necessary. It is therefore considered that the delivery framework should be more specific on milestones expected to be delivered by certain dates before 2016. Currently 2016 is given as the end date for most key deliverables and seems too far into the plan period to provide a meaningful monitoring benchmark for the early years of the strategy (see also comments above on monitoring of SOs). It is noted that the strategy suggests to provide a degree of flexibility in delivering the job growth, mainly through joint working on the issue across the conurbation and he possibility of additional allocations in the Site Specific Allocations DPD. It is, however, unclear how much scope there is in the Borough for additional employment allocations and it should also be noted that proposals for additional employment development at Bournemouth International Airport (BIA) would seem dependent on substantial infrastructure improvements. It would therefore seem currently unclear how many additional jobs can be provided at BIA over the short- to medium term.

Table 2.51 Paragraph 6.3 CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

106 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.4 1273 Mr Geoff Cross 2441 Unsound The LPA has been unwilling to discuss the employment strategy, and the complexity (Savills)1272 (W H of the issues about the inadequacy of employment land in the South East Dorset White plc) conurbation. The lack of response to the RSS EiP Panel’s recommendations warrants a wide strategic examination of the Core Strategy employment land proposals. Soundness: Following the search for additional employment land recommended by the RSS Panel to the Secretary of State, amend Policy PCS1 by the addition of required new sites and include any phasing requirements to provide flexibility and recognise the Core Strategy regeneration focus.

Objections to submitted Poole Core Strategy May 2008.pdf

Canford sustainable employment location.jpg

Objection version Illustrative Masterplan p2.jpg

Objection version Illustrative Masterplan pg1.jpg

Objection version Illustrative Masterplanpg3.jpg

Table 2.52 Paragraph 6.4 107

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.5 1273 Mr Geoff Cross 2443 Unsound The LPA has been unwilling to discuss the employment strategy, and the complexity (Savills)1272 (W H of the issues about the inadequacy of employment land in the South East Dorset White plc) conurbation. The lack of response to the RSS EiP Panel’s recommendations warrants a wide strategic examination of the Core Strategy employment land proposals.

Objections to submitted Poole Core Strategy May 2008.pdf

Canford sustainable employment location.jpg

Objection version Illustrative Masterplan p2.jpg

Objection version Illustrative Masterplan pg1.jpg

Objection version Illustrative Masterplanpg3.jpg

Paragraph 6.5 1017 (Highcross 2464 Unsound The table should be amended to allow for a greater range of employment uses, including Group Ltd) B8, and not be too prescriptive.. It should also be corrected to state that the site area is 11ha.

1016 Ms Vanessa Vanessa Clipstone - Highcross Group Ltd.pdf Clipstone (RPS Planning)

Table 2.53 Paragraph 6.5 CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

108 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.6 188 Mr Terry Stewart 2382 Para 6.6 : We are concerned at the forecast of 1,000 new jobs at Bournemouth Airport, (Agent for CPRE & since this is bound to lead to extra car commuting. If these workers are resident across Canford Cliffs & Poole, there is unlikely to be adequate bus services from their homes to the airport. Sandbanks Neighbourhood CPRE Poole Core Strategy Response July 1 2008.msg Watch)

Paragraph 6.6 1273 Mr Geoff Cross 2444 Unsound The LPA has been unwilling to discuss the employment strategy, and the complexity (Savills)1272 (W H of the issues about the inadequacy of employment land in the South East Dorset White plc) conurbation. The lack of response to the RSS EiP Panel’s recommendations warrants a wide strategic examination of the Core Strategy employment land proposals. Soundness: Following the search for additional employment land recommended by the RSS Panel to the Secretary of State, amend Policy PCS1 by the addition of required new sites and include any phasing requirements to provide flexibility and recognise the Core Strategy regeneration focus.

Objections to submitted Poole Core Strategy May 2008.pdf

Canford sustainable employment location.jpg

Objection version Illustrative Masterplan p2.jpg

Objection version Illustrative Masterplan pg1.jpg

Objection version Illustrative Masterplanpg3.jpg

Table 2.54 Paragraph 6.6 109

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.7 1273 Mr Geoff Cross 2445 Unsound The LPA has been unwilling to discuss the employment strategy, and the complexity (Savills)1272 (W H of the issues about the inadequacy of employment land in the South East Dorset White plc) conurbation. The lack of response to the RSS EiP Panel’s recommendations warrants a wide strategic examination of the Core Strategy employment land proposals. Soundness: Following the search for additional employment land recommended by the RSS Panel to the Secretary of State, amend Policy PCS1 by the addition of required new sites and include any phasing requirements to provide flexibility and recognise the Core Strategy regeneration focus.

Objections to submitted Poole Core Strategy May 2008.pdf

Canford sustainable employment location.jpg

Objection version Illustrative Masterplan p2.jpg

Objection version Illustrative Masterplan pg1.jpg

Objection version Illustrative Masterplanpg3.jpg

Table 2.55 Paragraph 6.7 CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

110 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.8 1273 Mr Geoff Cross 2446 Unsound The LPA has been unwilling to discuss the employment strategy, and the complexity (Savills)1272 (W H of the issues about the inadequacy of employment land in the South East Dorset White plc) conurbation. The lack of response to the RSS EiP Panel’s recommendations warrants a wide strategic examination of the Core Strategy employment land proposals. Soundness: Following the search for additional employment land recommended by the RSS Panel to the Secretary of State, amend Policy PCS1 by the addition of required new sites and include any phasing requirements to provide flexibility and recognise the Core Strategy regeneration focus.

Objections to submitted Poole Core Strategy May 2008.pdf

Canford sustainable employment location.jpg

Objection version Illustrative Masterplan p2.jpg

Objection version Illustrative Masterplan pg1.jpg

Objection version Illustrative Masterplanpg3.jpg

Paragraph 6.8 1096 Mr Stuart Laird 2456 Sound Our client welcomes the recognition of the opportunities that exist in the Town Centre (Bournemouth and Town Centre North area for the development of student accommodation and links University) with creative business and other education establishments. (Spatial Strategy, page 63 and p72, paragraph 6.8).

29 Mr Peter Lamb Rep Form.pdf (Terence O'Rourke Ltd) L 080708 PL PBC.pdf

Table 2.56 Paragraph 6.8 111

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.9 1273 Mr Geoff Cross 2447 Unsound The LPA has been unwilling to discuss the employment strategy, and the complexity (Savills)1272 (W H of the issues about the inadequacy of employment land in the South East Dorset White plc) conurbation. The lack of response to the RSS EiP Panel’s recommendations warrants a wide strategic examination of the Core Strategy employment land proposals. Soundness: Following the search for additional employment land recommended by the RSS Panel to the Secretary of State, amend Policy PCS1 by the addition of required new sites and include any phasing requirements to provide flexibility and recognise the Core Strategy regeneration focus.

Objections to submitted Poole Core Strategy May 2008.pdf

Canford sustainable employment location.jpg

Objection version Illustrative Masterplan p2.jpg

Objection version Illustrative Masterplan pg1.jpg

Objection version Illustrative Masterplanpg3.jpg

Table 2.57 Paragraph 6.9 CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

112 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 1 1252 Mr Graham 2300 Unsound Change required:“The rate of development of this land will be monitored to ensure that Clarke (Dorset County the jobs generated remain in balance with the labour supply and further increases in Council) the level of commuting into the Borough do not arise.”Why this change makes the Core Strategy sound:The submitted Core Strategy relies heavily on long term forecasts of jobs and employment land requirements commissioned by the SWRA and SWRDA. This work updates earlier research prepared as part of the South East Dorset Strategy which only indicated a need for 21 hectares. There are considerable uncertainties associated with all such forecasts and a degree of flexibility is desirable. Dorset County Council’s own labour market accounts, based on 2004 household representative rates, indicate a balance of job growth and labour supply in Poole up to 2016, assuming a continuation of existing commuting patterns. Thereafter, there could be a shortage of labour because much of the housing development is likely to be completed in the earlier period. We do not wish to overemphasise this point because of the uncertainties of forecasting mentioned earlier. The County Council’s overarching concern is that employment and housing development must in future be better balanced and more sustainable. The submitted Core Strategy does not appear to acknowledge this or set out how it is to be achieved.

Graham Clarke DCC.doc

Graham Clarke DCC.msg 113

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 1 848 (Bournemouth 2309 Sound Support the need to provide for 2,500 jobs in the health, care and educational sectors. and West Hampshire Water Plc)

24 Mr Mark Axford Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps para 3.15 06.08.doc (Goadsby) Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps para 3.46 06.08.doc

Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps para 6.7 06.08.doc

Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps para 6.28 06.08.doc

Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps para SO5 06.08.doc

Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps PCS1 06.08.doc

Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps PCS5 06.08.doc

Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps SS 06.08.doc

Policy 1 188 Mr Terry Stewart 2394 PCS1 We strongly support the statement that the whole Green Belt area will be protected (Agent for CPRE & Canford Cliffs & CPRE Poole Core Strategy Response July 1 2008.msg Sandbanks Neighbourhood Watch) CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

114 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 1 1270 Bridgehouse 2404 Unsound PCS1 – Principal Locations for Economic Investment This table in Policy PS1 and table Capital 6.5 (New Jobs in Poole: 2006 – 2026) makes reference to the delivery of the Sopers Lane site for 27,000 sqm of B1/B2 high tech R&D uses. This allocation would not appear to be supported by credible and robust market evidence. Siemens are expected to vacate the site in the near future. There has been no interest shown for the vacant units on site. In order to demonstrate deliverability, the policy should identify how the Council believe that the access issues on site can be resolved and the that that there is market demand for the identified uses in this location taking into account the marketing that has taken place to date. No new employment land is allocated for employment purposes. If any of the identified sites fail to deliver, or deliver jobs below the densities proposed, an insufficient number of jobs will be created. All of the sites are brownfield, and a number of the sites require the rationalisation of exiting developments. If there is evidence to suggest that the rationalisation of these land uses is likely to take place, such as land owner support, than this should be included in the policy. If not, additional locations for development should be identified. It is appreciated that this may require the development of greenfield, and potentially greenbelt sites. The policy makes reference to the delivery of 27,000 sqm of floorspace on the Sopers Lane site. If this level of floorspace is achieved on a section of the site, alternative uses should be allowed to be delivered on the remainder. Test of Soundness: •Justified – The policy is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base. •Effective – It is questionable whether the identified employment allocation are deliverable. In addition, if they are not deliverable, the policy is not flexible enough for additional sites to come forward as no reserve employment sites are identified.

1269 Mr Simon Poole Core Strategy Reps SH 04.doc Hawley (Harris Lamb Proprty Consultancy) 115

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 1 1273 Mr Geoff Cross 2433 Unsound The Core Strategy needs to take account of the review of the sub-regional framework (Savills)1272 (W H needed prior to the review of the RSS for the provision of employment land (Panel White plc) recommendation 8.1.2), comprising the search for 110 ha of employment land across the conurbation (Panel recommended policy SR 7.3). Following the search for additional employment land recommended by the RSS Panel to the Secretary of State, amend the Core Strategy by the addition of required new sites (with an amendment to PCS 1) and include any phasing requirements to provide flexibility and recognise the Core Strategy regeneration focus. In particular land at Canford (off Magna Road in the north of Poole) is proposed in supporting documentation as a suitable strategic employment site.

Objections to submitted Poole Core Strategy May 2008.pdf

Canford sustainable employment location.jpg

Objection version Illustrative Masterplan p2.jpg

Objection version Illustrative Masterplan pg1.jpg

Objection version Illustrative Masterplanpg3.jpg CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

116 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 1 1017 (Highcross 2465 Unsound Greater flexibility is required in terms of the range of employment uses, which should Group Ltd) allow for retail. The Core Strategy should not be prescriptive about employment sectors, occupiers or the type of premises. Job numbers should not be set out as a minimum requirement.

1016 Ms Vanessa Vanessa Clipstone - Highcross Group Ltd.pdf Clipstone (RPS Planning)

Policy 1 1163 Ms Simone 2530 It would also seem helpful if the approach towards the Port and its expected contribution Wilding (GOSW) could be clarified, how this is going to be monitored and if necessary acted upon. In particular, it would be helpful if policy PCS1 could identify separately how many jobs are expected to be provided at the port and for pages 82f and policy PCS4 to give a clear directional statement about the likely future position of the port. How much is it expected to expand and what are the implications? Is expansion dependent on road links - if so, then this should be stated. How will expansion be delivered? A factual correction is also required in PCS 4 (iv): insert the word "not".

Table 2.58 Policy 1 117

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Figure 6.1 Location of 1250 (Costco 2266 Unsound Planning Policy Statement 12 (PPS12) published in June 2008 states that all Core Existing Employment Wholesale UK Ltd) Strategies should be sound. To be sound the Core Strategy should be JUSTIFIED, Areas in Poole EFFECTIVE and consistent with NATIONAL POLICY. In terms of the effectiveness of the Core Strategy it must be: Deliverable;Flexible; and Able to be monitored. (Paragraph 4.44) With regard to flexibility PPS12 states that a strategy is unlikely to be effective if it cannot deal with changing circumstances. The built environment is a dynamic environment adjusting and changing over time. Plans therefore need to show that they are able to handle contingencies and thus are flexible. This representation contends that the Poole Core Strategy with particular regard to the Realising Pooles Economic Potential is not flexible and therefore is not considered sound. Objection This objection is raised against Policy PCS2 of the Poole Core Strategy Submission as it is considered to fail the test for soundness in that the plan is not flexible to enable it to deal with CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

118 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

1249 Mr Robert changing circumstances. This lack of flexibility is highlighted by PCS2, with regard to Naylor (RPS Planning existing employment areas. The policy indicates that land and premises within Poole's Consultants) existing employment areas will be reserved for uses which generate employment, and where they do not compromise the activities of the employment area or conflict with other policy objectives of the LDF.Previous representations have been made by RPS (Ref: 1069) on the Core Strategy at the Preferred Options stage, indicating that employment uses should be amended to recognise the valuable job creation opportunities that arise from a range of businesses that fall outside of B use classes. The Consultation Report produced by the Council states in its Outcomes that: The submission document will contain a policy which sets out the 'Principal Locations for Economic Investment'. This will identify a broad range of employment uses (beyond Use Classes B1, B2 and B8) which are suitable for specific locations identified in the policy.Whilst it is acknowledged that Policy PCS1 - 'Principal Locations for Economic Investment' indicates suitable employment uses outside the B use class, these only relate to new economic investment and job growth in specific areas. However, it is considered that further flexibility could be introduced through the inclusion of a definition of other uses appropriate on employment land to create some guidance and certainty for the Local Planning Authority and Developers. The lack of definition could potentially cause conflict in the future and may prohibit employment-generating sui generis uses locating within the Poole area. It would therefore represent a lost opportunity in terms of clarifying suitable employment generation, and protecting employment land. Therefore it is considered that Policy PCS2 could have been worded to include a reference to appropriate sui generis uses, such as: The principal activity falling within Use Classes B1, B2 or B8 and appropriate sui generis uses. Without the inclusion of a definition of employment land, the Poole Core Strategy does not have the flexibility to enable it to deal with changing circumstances such as sui generis applications within employment land allocations and therefore not considered sound in accordance with PPS12.

Table 2.59 Figure 6.1 Location of Existing Employment Areas in Poole 119

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 2 1270 Bridgehouse 2405 Unsound PSC2 – Existing Employment Areas This policy makes reference to the Sopers Lane Capital site being used for high technology business and research and medical and health related development. One of the units on site has been vacant for sometime and no interest has been expressed in this unit for any of the above uses, or by any employment use in general. It is highly likely that Siemens will leave the site resulting in the entire area becoming vacant. If it can be demonstrate that the site will not come forward for an employment use a mixed use scheme should be considered. The policy also makes reference to the site being well place to make good use of existing road links in to Poole and the Port. Currently, access to the site is taken from Sopers Lane, which is a substandard route. Previous attempts to address these access issues by providing a secondary access have proved to uneconomically viable. The policy is inflexible. It seeks to protect all current employment sites for employment purposes regardless of whether these sites are capable of delivering employment development. Even if all of the currently allocated employment sites were capable of contributing towards the Borough’s employment land supply at the present time, this could change through the life of the Core Strategy. If it can be demonstrated that the site is not a suitable employment allocation, or an employment use will not come forward on site, an alternative use should be permitted by the policy. This approach accords with the guidance contained in PPS3 – Housing. Test of Soundness: •Justified – The policy is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base. It is questionable whether all employment sites will come forward for development. •Effective – It is questionable whether the identified employment allocation are deliverable. In addition, if they are not deliverable, the policy is not flexible enough for additional sites to come forward for alternative land uses. CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

120 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

1269 Mr Simon Poole Core Strategy Reps SH 04.doc Hawley (Harris Lamb Proprty Consultancy)

Policy 2 1017 (Highcross 2466 Unsound Allocation of Fleets Corner as an existing employment area is supported as are the Group Ltd) principal activities being Use Classes B1, B2 and B8. As a general comment we consider the wording throughout the policy is not clear and concise and should be reworded in its entirety.

1016 Ms Vanessa Vanessa Clipstone - Highcross Group Ltd.pdf Clipstone (RPS Planning)

Policy 2 527 Ms Alice Ordidge 2502 The priority of retaining existing employment areas where they continue to meet the (South West RDA) needs of business is strongly supported as their efficient use and re-use is critical to meeting regional growth forecasts and PCS 2 is therefore particularly welcomed.

Alice Ordidge - SWRDA.doc

Table 2.60 Policy 2 121

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.12 1261 Siemens Real 2290 Siemens Real Estate are the owners of land at Sopers Lane occupied by various Estate Ltd Siemens companies (see attached plan). Currently, Siemens occupy a building on land to the wet of its ownership (know as A Shop) on a leasehold basis. Siemens are due to vacate the western half of the site in 2010. In addition, there are proposals to potentially relocate other Siemens businesses from elsewhere in the sub-region. Siemens are in discussion with Poole Borough Council I relation to a planning application for a new production facility on the vacant land within its retained site. The proposals, particularly the external appearance of the propose facility, have been worked in consultations with officers of the Borough Council. It is anticipated that this application will be made in Summer 2008. Siemens supports the Core Strategy Submission Document in so far as it proposes continued employment use on land within its ownership. However, we consider the Core Strategy should be amended as follows: 1) The Core Strategy advocates a Master Plan approach to guide development. It is intended that this would be prepared alongside the Site-Specific Allocations Development Plan Document. Siemens do not object in principle to the preparation of the Master Plan to guide development. However, its development requirements are specific in terms of design (layout, design, building height and plot size) to the processes undertaken. Furthermore, the programme for the delivery of the new facility most likely will be in advance of the preparation of the Master Plan or the Site-specific Allocations Development Plan Document. Therefore, Siemens propose that the Core Strategy provides sufficient flexibility to allow for employment development within the Master Plan area in advance of the Master Plan or the Site-Specific Allocations Development Plan Document being prepared subject to the general criteria within PCS 2 – Existing Employment Areas. 2) Siemens support the objective of sustainable development generally and specifically at this site. Siemens support the approach that all major applications should be supported by an energy and resources framework and that the aspiration should be to strive for the highest possible standards in terms of energy efficiency and renewable energy generation. Nethertheless, Siemens consider that Policy PCS 3 is too prescriptive in its aim for the BREEAM “excellent” and 20% on-site renewable energy. Policy PCS 3 or the explanatory text should acknowledge site specific circumstances and allow for the submission of a full and complete explanation in those circumstances where the target can not be met. These comments also apply to PCS34. CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

122 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

1260 Mr Craig Unsound Craig Blatchford - Blue Sky - Siemens Real Estate.msg Blatchford (Blue Sky Planning Limited) Craig Blatchford - Blue Sky - Siemens Real Estate.pdf

Table 2.61 Paragraph 6.12

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.13 1261 Siemens Real 2291 Unsound Siemens Real Estate are the owners of land at Sopers Lane occupied by various Estate Ltd Siemens companies (see attached plan). Currently, Siemens occupy a building on land to the wet of its ownership (know as A Shop) on a leasehold basis. Siemens are due to vacate the western half of the site in 2010. In addition, there are proposals to potentially relocate other Siemens businesses from elsewhere in the sub-region. Siemens are in discussion with Poole Borough Council I relation to a planning application for a new production facility on the vacant land within its retained site. The proposals, particularly the external appearance of the propose facility, have been worked in consultations with officers of the Borough Council. It is anticipated that this application will be made in Summer 2008. Siemens supports the Core Strategy Submission Document in so far as it proposes continued employment use on land within its ownership. However, we consider the Core Strategy should be amended as follows: 1) The Core Strategy advocates a Master Plan approach to guide development. It is intended that this would be prepared alongside the Site-Specific Allocations Development Plan Document. Siemens do not object in principle to the preparation of the Master Plan to guide development. However, its development requirements are specific in terms of design (layout, design, building height and plot size) to the processes undertaken. Furthermore, the programme for the delivery of the new facility most likely will be in advance of the preparation of the Master Plan or the Site-specific Allocations Development Plan Document. Therefore, Siemens propose that the Core Strategy provides sufficient flexibility to allow for employment development within the Master Plan area in advance of the Master Plan or the Site-Specific Allocations Development Plan Document being prepared subject to the general criteria within PCS 2 – Existing Employment Areas. 2) Siemens support the objective of sustainable development 123

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

generally and specifically at this site. Siemens support the approach that all major applications should be supported by an energy and resources framework and that the aspiration should be to strive for the highest possible standards in terms of energy efficiency and renewable energy generation. Nethertheless, Siemens consider that Policy PCS 3 is too prescriptive in its aim for the BREEAM “excellent” and 20% on-site renewable energy. Policy PCS 3 or the explanatory text should acknowledge site specific circumstances and allow for the submission of a full and complete explanation in those circumstances where the target can not be met. These comments also apply to PCS34.

1260 Mr Craig Craig Blatchford - Blue Sky - Siemens Real Estate.msg Blatchford (Blue Sky Planning Limited) Craig Blatchford - Blue Sky - Siemens Real Estate.pdf

Table 2.62 Paragraph 6.13 CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

124 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.14 1261 Siemens Real 2292 Unsound Siemens Real Estate are the owners of land at Sopers Lane occupied by various Estate Ltd Siemens companies (see attached plan). Currently, Siemens occupy a building on land to the wet of its ownership (know as A Shop) on a leasehold basis. Siemens are due to vacate the western half of the site in 2010. In addition, there are proposals to potentially relocate other Siemens businesses from elsewhere in the sub-region. Siemens are in discussion with Poole Borough Council I relation to a planning application for a new production facility on the vacant land within its retained site. The proposals, particularly the external appearance of the propose facility, have been worked in consultations with officers of the Borough Council. It is anticipated that this application will be made in Summer 2008. Siemens supports the Core Strategy Submission Document in so far as it proposes continued employment use on land within its ownership. However, we consider the Core Strategy should be amended as follows: 1) The Core Strategy advocates a Master Plan approach to guide development. It is intended that this would be prepared alongside the Site-Specific Allocations Development Plan Document. Siemens do not object in principle to the preparation of the Master Plan to guide development. However, its development requirements are specific in terms of design (layout, design, building height and plot size) to the processes undertaken. Furthermore, the programme for the delivery of the new facility most likely will be in advance of the preparation of the Master Plan or the Site-specific Allocations Development Plan Document. Therefore, Siemens propose that the Core Strategy provides sufficient flexibility to allow for employment development within the Master Plan area in advance of the Master Plan or the Site-Specific Allocations Development Plan Document being prepared subject to the general criteria within PCS 2 – Existing Employment Areas. 2) Siemens support the objective of sustainable development generally and specifically at this site. Siemens support the approach that all major applications should be supported by an energy and resources framework and that the aspiration should be to strive for the highest possible standards in terms of energy efficiency and renewable energy generation. Nethertheless, Siemens consider that Policy PCS 3 is too prescriptive in its aim for the BREEAM “excellent” and 20% on-site renewable energy. Policy PCS 3 or the explanatory text should acknowledge site specific circumstances and allow for the submission of a full and complete explanation in those circumstances where the target can not be met. These comments also apply to PCS34. 125

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

1260 Mr Craig Craig Blatchford - Blue Sky - Siemens Real Estate.msg Blatchford (Blue Sky Planning Limited) Craig Blatchford - Blue Sky - Siemens Real Estate.pdf

Table 2.63 Paragraph 6.14

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.15 1261 Siemens Real 2293 Unsound Siemens Real Estate are the owners of land at Sopers Lane occupied by various Estate Ltd Siemens companies (see attached plan). Currently, Siemens occupy a building on land to the wet of its ownership (know as A Shop) on a leasehold basis. Siemens are due to vacate the western half of the site in 2010. In addition, there are proposals to potentially relocate other Siemens businesses from elsewhere in the sub-region. Siemens are in discussion with Poole Borough Council I relation to a planning application for a new production facility on the vacant land within its retained site. The proposals, particularly the external appearance of the propose facility, have been worked in consultations with officers of the Borough Council. It is anticipated that this application will be made in Summer 2008. Siemens supports the Core Strategy Submission Document in so far as it proposes continued employment use on land within its ownership. However, we consider the Core Strategy should be amended as follows: 1) The Core Strategy advocates a Master Plan approach to guide development. It is intended that this would be prepared alongside the Site-Specific Allocations Development Plan Document. Siemens do not object in principle to the preparation of the Master Plan to guide development. However, its development requirements are specific in terms of design (layout, design, building height and plot size) to the processes undertaken. Furthermore, the programme for the delivery of the new facility most likely will be in advance of the preparation of the Master Plan or the Site-specific Allocations Development Plan Document. Therefore, Siemens propose that the Core Strategy provides sufficient flexibility to allow for employment development within the Master Plan area in advance of the Master Plan or the Site-Specific Allocations Development Plan Document being prepared subject to the general criteria within PCS 2 – Existing Employment Areas. 2) Siemens support the objective of sustainable development CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

126 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

generally and specifically at this site. Siemens support the approach that all major applications should be supported by an energy and resources framework and that the aspiration should be to strive for the highest possible standards in terms of energy efficiency and renewable energy generation. Nethertheless, Siemens consider that Policy PCS 3 is too prescriptive in its aim for the BREEAM “excellent” and 20% on-site renewable energy. Policy PCS 3 or the explanatory text should acknowledge site specific circumstances and allow for the submission of a full and complete explanation in those circumstances where the target can not be met. These comments also apply to PCS34.

1260 Mr Craig Craig Blatchford - Blue Sky - Siemens Real Estate.msg Blatchford (Blue Sky Planning Limited) Craig Blatchford - Blue Sky - Siemens Real Estate.pdf

Table 2.64 Paragraph 6.15

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Picture 6.3 Fleets 1017 (Highcross 2467 Unsound We note that ‘Picture 6.3 Fleets Corner – Indicative Masterplan Area’ does not reflect Corner - Indicative Group Ltd) our clients ownership. The area to the east annotated as ‘Nuffield Industrial Estates’ is Masterplan Area in a separate ownership. This should be amended accordingly to separate Fleets Corner from the adjoining land to the east.

1016 Ms Vanessa Vanessa Clipstone - Highcross Group Ltd.pdf Clipstone (RPS Planning)

Table 2.65 Picture 6.3 Fleets Corner - Indicative Masterplan Area 127

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.17 1017 (Highcross 2468 Unsound The paragraph should be adapted to make reference to Use Classes B1, B2 and B8 Group Ltd) to reflect the criteria in Policy PCS2 and a mix of other employment generating uses such as hotel and PPS6 compliant retail. Reference to specific employment sectors should be deleted as there is no evidence to support the identification of Fleets Corner specifically for this employment sector.

1016 Ms Vanessa Vanessa Clipstone - Highcross Group Ltd.pdf Clipstone (RPS Planning)

Table 2.66 Paragraph 6.17 CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

128 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.18 1261 Siemens Real 2294 Unsound Siemens Real Estate are the owners of land at Sopers Lane occupied by various Estate Ltd Siemens companies (see attached plan). Currently, Siemens occupy a building on land to the wet of its ownership (know as A Shop) on a leasehold basis. Siemens are due to vacate the western half of the site in 2010. In addition, there are proposals to potentially relocate other Siemens businesses from elsewhere in the sub-region. Siemens are in discussion with Poole Borough Council I relation to a planning application for a new production facility on the vacant land within its retained site. The proposals, particularly the external appearance of the propose facility, have been worked in consultations with officers of the Borough Council. It is anticipated that this application will be made in Summer 2008. Siemens supports the Core Strategy Submission Document in so far as it proposes continued employment use on land within its ownership. However, we consider the Core Strategy should be amended as follows: 1) The Core Strategy advocates a Master Plan approach to guide development. It is intended that this would be prepared alongside the Site-Specific Allocations Development Plan Document. Siemens do not object in principle to the preparation of the Master Plan to guide development. However, its development requirements are specific in terms of design (layout, design, building height and plot size) to the processes undertaken. Furthermore, the programme for the delivery of the new facility most likely will be in advance of the preparation of the Master Plan or the Site-specific Allocations Development Plan Document. Therefore, Siemens propose that the Core Strategy provides sufficient flexibility to allow for employment development within the Master Plan area in advance of the Master Plan or the Site-Specific Allocations Development Plan Document being prepared subject to the general criteria within PCS 2 – Existing Employment Areas. 2) Siemens support the objective of sustainable development generally and specifically at this site. Siemens support the approach that all major applications should be supported by an energy and resources framework and that the aspiration should be to strive for the highest possible standards in terms of energy efficiency and renewable energy generation. Nethertheless, Siemens consider that Policy PCS 3 is too prescriptive in its aim for the BREEAM “excellent” and 20% on-site renewable energy. Policy PCS 3 or the explanatory text should acknowledge site specific circumstances and allow for the submission of a full and complete explanation in those circumstances where the target can not be met. These comments also apply to PCS34. 129

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

1260 Mr Craig Craig Blatchford - Blue Sky - Siemens Real Estate.msg Blatchford (Blue Sky Planning Limited) Craig Blatchford - Blue Sky - Siemens Real Estate.pdf

Table 2.67 Paragraph 6.18

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.19 1261 Siemens Real 2295 Unsound Siemens Real Estate are the owners of land at Sopers Lane occupied by various Estate Ltd Siemens companies (see attached plan). Currently, Siemens occupy a building on land to the wet of its ownership (know as A Shop) on a leasehold basis. Siemens are due to vacate the western half of the site in 2010. In addition, there are proposals to potentially relocate other Siemens businesses from elsewhere in the sub-region. Siemens are in discussion with Poole Borough Council I relation to a planning application for a new production facility on the vacant land within its retained site. The proposals, particularly the external appearance of the propose facility, have been worked in consultations with officers of the Borough Council. It is anticipated that this application will be made in Summer 2008. Siemens supports the Core Strategy Submission Document in so far as it proposes continued employment use on land within its ownership. However, we consider the Core Strategy should be amended as follows: 1) The Core Strategy advocates a Master Plan approach to guide development. It is intended that this would be prepared alongside the Site-Specific Allocations Development Plan Document. Siemens do not object in principle to the preparation of the Master Plan to guide development. However, its development requirements are specific in terms of design (layout, design, building height and plot size) to the processes undertaken. Furthermore, the programme for the delivery of the new facility most likely will be in advance of the preparation of the Master Plan or the Site-specific Allocations Development Plan Document. Therefore, Siemens propose that the Core Strategy provides sufficient flexibility to allow for employment development within the Master Plan area in advance of the Master Plan or the Site-Specific Allocations Development Plan Document being prepared subject to the general criteria within PCS 2 – Existing Employment Areas. 2) Siemens support the objective of sustainable development CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

130 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

generally and specifically at this site. Siemens support the approach that all major applications should be supported by an energy and resources framework and that the aspiration should be to strive for the highest possible standards in terms of energy efficiency and renewable energy generation. Nethertheless, Siemens consider that Policy PCS 3 is too prescriptive in its aim for the BREEAM “excellent” and 20% on-site renewable energy. Policy PCS 3 or the explanatory text should acknowledge site specific circumstances and allow for the submission of a full and complete explanation in those circumstances where the target can not be met. These comments also apply to PCS34.

1260 Mr Craig Craig Blatchford - Blue Sky - Siemens Real Estate.msg Blatchford (Blue Sky Planning Limited) Craig Blatchford - Blue Sky - Siemens Real Estate.pdf

Table 2.68 Paragraph 6.19 131

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 3 1261 Siemens Real 2296 Unsound Siemens Real Estate are the owners of land at Sopers Lane occupied by various Estate Ltd Siemens companies (see attached plan). Currently, Siemens occupy a building on land to the wet of its ownership (know as A Shop) on a leasehold basis. Siemens are due to vacate the western half of the site in 2010. In addition, there are proposals to potentially relocate other Siemens businesses from elsewhere in the sub-region. Siemens are in discussion with Poole Borough Council I relation to a planning application for a new production facility on the vacant land within its retained site. The proposals, particularly the external appearance of the propose facility, have been worked in consultations with officers of the Borough Council. It is anticipated that this application will be made in Summer 2008. Siemens supports the Core Strategy Submission Document in so far as it proposes continued employment use on land within its ownership. However, we consider the Core Strategy should be amended as follows: 1) The Core Strategy advocates a Master Plan approach to guide development. It is intended that this would be prepared alongside the Site-Specific Allocations Development Plan Document. Siemens do not object in principle to the preparation of the Master Plan to guide development. However, its development requirements are specific in terms of design (layout, design, building height and plot size) to the processes undertaken. Furthermore, the programme for the delivery of the new facility most likely will be in advance of the preparation of the Master Plan or the Site-specific Allocations Development Plan Document. Therefore, Siemens propose that the Core Strategy provides sufficient flexibility to allow for employment development within the Master Plan area in advance of the Master Plan or the Site-Specific Allocations Development Plan Document being prepared subject to the general criteria within PCS 2 – Existing Employment Areas. 2) Siemens support the objective of sustainable development generally and specifically at this site. Siemens support the approach that all major applications should be supported by an energy and resources framework and that the aspiration should be to strive for the highest possible standards in terms of energy efficiency and renewable energy generation. Nethertheless, Siemens consider that Policy PCS 3 is too prescriptive in its aim for the BREEAM “excellent” and 20% on-site renewable energy. Policy PCS 3 or the explanatory text should acknowledge site specific circumstances and allow for the submission of a full and complete explanation in those circumstances where the target can not be met. These comments also apply to PCS34. CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

132 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

1260 Mr Craig Craig Blatchford - Blue Sky - Siemens Real Estate.msg Blatchford (Blue Sky Planning Limited) Craig Blatchford - Blue Sky - Siemens Real Estate.pdf

Policy 3 1270 Bridgehouse 2406 PSC3 – Sopers Lane and Fleets Corner This policy proposes the preparation of a Capital Masterplan for the Sopers Lane site. We do not object to the preparation of a Masterplan for the site, however, the mix of uses on site needs to be discussed in detail with the landowners in order to ensure the development is deliverable and achievable. As set out above, we do not believe that the site is capable of delivering an employment across the entire site. Test of Soundness: •Effective – the Masterplan needs to be discussed in detail with the landowners to ensure it is deliverable.

1269 Mr Simon Poole Core Strategy Reps SH 04.doc Hawley (Harris Lamb Proprty Consultancy) 133

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 3 1017 (Highcross 2469 Unsound There is no need for a master plan approach. This policy should be deleted and replaced Group Ltd) with site-specific policies.

1016 Ms Vanessa Vanessa Clipstone - Highcross Group Ltd.pdf Clipstone (RPS Planning)

Policy 3 1102 Mr Ian Parsons 2560 The Agency notes the proposed principal locations for economic investment and housing, (Highways Agency) but would reiterate its previous comments relating to reserving judgement until the findings from the SEDMMTS are known and appropriate traffic modelling and transport assessments have been conducted relating to site specific proposals. We welcome the Master Plan approach for the Sopers Lane and Fleets Corner developments outlined in PCS 3, including travel plan frameworks which demonstrate how the need to travel by car will be minimised and other modes of transport supported.

Table 2.69 Policy 3 CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

134 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 4 1163 Ms Simone 2531 It would also seem helpful if the approach towards the Port and its expected contribution Wilding (GOSW) could be clarified, how this is going to be monitored and if necessary acted upon. In particular, it would be helpful if policy PCS1 could identify separately how many jobs are expected to be provided at the port and for pages 82f and policy PCS4 to give a clear directional statement about the likely future position of the port. How much is it expected to expand and what are the implications? Is expansion dependent on road links - if so, then this should be stated. How will expansion be delivered? A factual correction is also required in PCS 4 (iv): insert the word "not".

Table 2.70 Policy 4 135

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.27 1267 Mr Barry 2344 Unsound Whilst we support the principle of Council’s approach to ‘Isolated Employment Sites’ Houlston we consider that the policy is unduly restrictive in its wording by not recognising or making provision for exceptional circumstances where there are clear overriding community, social or economic benefits to allowing some other form of land use. Accordingly we recommend inserting after the word “prohibitive” at the end of the first sentence “; or where there are clear overriding environmental, community and/or economic benefits to the roposed regeneration of the site.” Atisreal request to be notified, at the above specified address, of the publication of the recommendations of the Inspector and/or the adoption of the DPD.

1266 Mr Martin Poole BC Core Strategy Sub Stage Reps Form 1v3m.pdf Pendlebury (Atisreal) Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 2.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 3.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 4.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 5.pdf

Table 2.71 Paragraph 6.27 CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

136 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.28 848 (Bournemouth 2307 Sound Support the need to provide for 2,500 jobs in the health, care and educational sectors. and West Hampshire Water Plc)

24 Mr Mark Axford Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps para 3.15 06.08.doc (Goadsby) Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps para 3.46 06.08.doc

Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps para 6.7 06.08.doc

Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps para 6.28 06.08.doc

Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps para SO5 06.08.doc

Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps PCS1 06.08.doc

Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps PCS5 06.08.doc

Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps SS 06.08.doc 137

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.28 1267 Mr Barry 2345 Unsound Whilst we support the principle of Council’s approach to ‘Isolated Employment Sites’ Houlston we consider that the policy is unduly restrictive in its wording by not recognising or making provision for exceptional circumstances where there are clear overriding community, social or economic benefits to allowing some other form of land use. Accordingly we recommend inserting after the word “prohibitive” at the end of the first sentence “; or where there are clear overriding environmental, community and/or economic benefits to the roposed regeneration of the site.” Atisreal request to be notified, at the above specified address, of the publication of the recommendations of the Inspector and/or the adoption of the DPD.

1266 Mr Martin Poole BC Core Strategy Sub Stage Reps Form 1v3m.pdf Pendlebury (Atisreal) Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 2.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 3.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 4.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 5.pdf

Table 2.72 Paragraph 6.28 CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

138 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.29 1267 Mr Barry 2346 Unsound Whilst we support the principle of Council’s approach to ‘Isolated Employment Sites’ Houlston we consider that the policy is unduly restrictive in its wording by not recognising or making provision for exceptional circumstances where there are clear overriding community, social or economic benefits to allowing some other form of land use. Accordingly we recommend inserting after the word “prohibitive” at the end of the first sentence “; or where there are clear overriding environmental, community and/or economic benefits to the roposed regeneration of the site.” Atisreal request to be notified, at the above specified address, of the publication of the recommendations of the Inspector and/or the adoption of the DPD.

1266 Mr Martin Poole BC Core Strategy Sub Stage Reps Form 1v3m.pdf Pendlebury (Atisreal) Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 2.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 3.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 4.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 5.pdf

Table 2.73 Paragraph 6.29 139

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 5 848 (Bournemouth 2310 Sound Support the Policy emphasis on allowing for alternative uses, such as care and health and West Hampshire facilities, on existing more marginally located employment sites. Water Plc)

24 Mr Mark Axford Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps para 3.15 06.08.doc (Goadsby) Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps para 3.46 06.08.doc

Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps para 6.7 06.08.doc

Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps para 6.28 06.08.doc

Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps para SO5 06.08.doc

Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps PCS1 06.08.doc

Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps PCS5 06.08.doc

Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps SS 06.08.doc CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

140 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 5 1267 Mr Barry 2347 Whilst we support the principle of Council’s approach to ‘Isolated Employment Sites’ Houlston we consider that the policy is unduly restrictive in its wording by not recognising or making provision for exceptional circumstances where there are clear overriding community, social or economic benefits to allowing some other form of land use.

1266 Mr Martin Unsound Pendlebury (Atisreal) Accordingly we recommend inserting after the word “prohibitive” at the end of the first sentence “; or

where there are clear overriding environmental, community and/or economic benefits to the proposed regeneration of the site.”

Atisreal request to be notified, at the above specified address, of the publication of the

recommendations of the Inspector and/or the adoption of the DPD.

Poole BC Core Strategy Sub Stage Reps Form 1v3m.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 2.pdf 141

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 3.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 4.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 5.pdf

Policy 5 1035 Mr Tony Christie 2364 Sound The key outcome within the Delivery Framework Table supporting Policy PCS 5 should (Grosvenor Shopping be changed to:“Town Centre North: 35,000 sq m retail floorspace and up to 6,200 gross Centre Fund) sq m of leisure space”This would ensure the target is consistent with the findings of the ‘Borough of Poole Retail and Leisure Capacity Study update 2007’.

1113 Mr David Roach PCS 5.doc (GVA Grimley) PCS 13 Rep.doc

PCS 14 Rep.doc

PCS 33 Rep.doc

PCS 34 Rep.doc

Policy 5 1270 Bridgehouse 2407 Unsound PSC5 – Isolated Employment Areas We support the recognition that residential Capital development may be appropriate where allocated employment sites cannot deliver an employment use. The Policy makes reverence to the delivery of health sector 1269 Mr Simon employment specialisms on site. We can confirm that part of the site has been marketed Hawley (Harris Lamb for a considerable time, with no interest shown in the site for any medical related uses. Proprty Consultancy) As set out above, the site is unlikely to come forward for an employment related use. As such, a mixed use scheme is the most appropriate use of the site delivering an element of employment use alongside an alternative land use. We would welcome the opportunity to discuss this issue in more detail with the Council. We support the CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

142 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

recognition that to delivery the land use objectives for the Sopers Lane sites private sector support from the land owner is required. Test of Soundness: •Justified – The policy is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base. Evidence to date has shown that there is little interest in the site, at least in part, for employment purposes.

Poole Core Strategy Reps SH 04.doc

Policy 5 527 Ms Alice Ordidge 2503 The retention of “Isolated employment sites” is also important to the Core Strategy and (South West RDA) its success in achieving the growth in employment. It is recognised that a minority of sites may no longer meet the needs of business or are poorly located for economic development purposes, and may therefore need to be reviewed and considered for alternative uses. The sequential approach of policy PCS 5 is supported in this respect. It is considered that single-use residential schemes should not be encouraged and therefore part iii of PCS 5 should be amended to refer to mixed use redevelopment including residential use taking account of the potential for higher employment densities. Single use residential schemes on such sites should be a last resort.

Alice Ordidge - SWRDA.doc

Table 2.74 Policy 5 143

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Meeting Poole's 1163 Ms Simone 2533 It is welcomed that as part of meeting Poole's housing need a front-loaded housing Housing Needs Wilding (GOSW) trajectory is proposed in line with Poole's role as a New Growth Point. It would be desirable for commitment to this to be more strongly expressed, e.g. through inclusion of a target to this effect in SO 2 (e.g. total net additions of homes as indicator with the trajectory to provide the targets including 7,000 by 2016). As the delivery of the strategy is again dependent to a large degree on the successful delivery of the Regeneration Area and other parts of the town centre as a whole (40% of total supply), particularly careful monitoring would seem to be required in order to ensure that the strategy delivers as intended (see also comments above on monitoring of SOs). It is therefore suggested that the delivery framework, especially with regards to when key outcomes are expected, should be further refined. Refining the delivery framework with further key milestones to be achieved during the 1" half of the plan period should also be reconsidered for each of the delivery frameworks set out after each section despite not repeating it here in every case. It is positively recognized that a pro-active approach has been taken to meeting the needs of Gypsies and Travelers including a commitment to providing the number of fixed and transit Gypsies and Traveler pitches required by the emerging RSS.

Table 2.75 Meeting Poole's Housing Needs CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

144 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

525 Mr Tim Watton 2312 Unsound Paragraph 6.34 and the proportions set out in the accompanying table are inconsistent (House Builders with Strategic Objective 3. The Council is seeking to create more jobs in strong and Federation Ltd) growing employment sectors which will change the economic base of the Borough. It therefore needs to ensure that the assumptions drawn from the BHMA do not restrict the ability to provide the right type of accommodation for a more diverse and economically successful workforce. The current proportions of attributed to the private housing market for more one and two bedroom based upon a survey of the aspirations of the existing population will not meet the needs of establishing a long term wider economically active residents who are able to find accommodation to meet their needs within the Borough of Poole.The proportions of new housing should be representative of the evidence set out in the Strategic Housing Market Assessment in that it should reflect the proportions for the owner occupied sector that requires more 2, 3 and 4 bedroom properties, in particular 2 and 3 bedroom accommodation along with less 1 bedroom properties. The current proportions ignore the recommendations from such evidence and are unsound. This will not aid the balancing of the housing market in the context of a more prosperous economic base.

Final Submission 6 34 - ecoonic impact.doc

Final Submission - 6.34 lifetime homes.doc

Final Submission - p6.34.doc

Final Submission PCS6 windfall.doc

Final Submission PCS7 affordable housing.doc

Final Submission PCS9 lifetime homes buildign control.doc

Final Submission PCS11.doc 145

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Final Submission PCS33 - energy targets.doc

Final Submission PCS33 - viabilty.doc

Final Submission PCS33.doc CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

146 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary 147

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

525 Mr Tim Watton 2313 Unsound Paragraph 6.34 sets out in the accompanying table the proportions of new dwellings (House Builders by size and category. This is based upon the Balancing Housing Market Assessment Federation Ltd) (BHMA) contained within the Poole SHMA. The proportions set out in the Core Strategy are, however, not based upon the evidence presented and are unsound on the following basis: 1.The proportions of market housing are not proportional to the demand for such housing as is concluded within the BHMA evidence; 2.The proportions of market housing are negatively influenced by the private rented market sector proportions which are not comparable; and 3.The proportions will not deliver a balance sustainable housing market as is the aspirationThe Council has sought to provide a profile of the likely proportions for the type of new housing required in the Borough. While the HBF objects to such inflexible policies seeking to establish long term requirements over a housing market that has the ability to change far quicker than a policy document, that can take some 5 years to recognise change and react to it, it also has a fundamental objection to the proportions set out in the table presented at paragraph 6.34.The Council has combined the proportions of social rented housing and intermediate housing to provide a profile of the likely type of housing required to meet the affordable housing requirements, on the basis that the two markets are similar. However, it has adopted the same position in relation to the market housing by combining the owner occupation market with the private rented sector. This is not sound and will not lead to a balanced housing market. It will also be detrimental to the delivery of market housing as the proportions are not representative of demand. The owner–occupation and private rented sectors operate in two distinctively different markets and should not be mistaken as the same. This is the rationale for the evidence base treating them separately. To combine them undermines the evidence base. It is not therefore appropriate to determine the requirements are the same, especially as the evidence is clearly contrary to this position. The HBF has replicated table 11.1 from the Council’s BHMA (see in the attached file) along with table 6.34 of the Submission Core Strategy. It can be clearly seen that the differences in the requirement for all property types within the owner occupied and private rented sector are vastly different and to combine the two are incorrect. The Council has ignored the recommendations of it’s own BHMA evidence in this respect which states that the majority of shortfall in the owner occupation sector is for two and three bedroom properties NOT in the one and two bedroom properties as the Submission CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

148 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Core Strategy indicates. With reference to the private rented sector the BHMA concludes that there is a shortage of 1 and 2 bedroom homes with a surplus of three and four bedroom accommodation.The Council’s Core Strategy has combined the private market sector requirements with that of the private owner-occupied sector to arrive at a position that is not reflective of what the major sector (72%) requires in order to balance the housing market. The Council has subtracted the surplus in the 3 and 4 bed properties from the demand for that in the owner occupied sector to arrive at a figure that is not proportionally representative of demand. People who can afford to purchase 3 and 4 bedroom properties and who require them cannot be accommodated by surplus stock in the other sector. This is an unsound approach to plan for the future, especially when the Council’s evidence is explicitly broken down to represent the need needs of two distinctly different sectors.This is particularly pertinent as paragraph 6.37 states that the majority of new supply (75%) will be by way of 1 and 2 bedroom properties and indicates that this is suitable for those wishing to down-size into smaller properties and hence freeing up larger properties of the existing stock. However given the 75% figure has been heavily influenced by the private rented sector requirements, the supply will be will have been influenced by the private rented sector profile. This is an unsound assumption as often people down-sizing are releasing equity from their properties and do not require rented accommodation of this profile. The profile of people down-sizing is more highly likely to be that of those requiring owner occupied accommodation. Therefore the assumption that larger properties will be freed up by those down sizing is flawed and unsound as the Council is not planning to meet the needs of those potentially down-sizing and requiring houses aligned to the owner occupied housing profile.The proportions of new housing should be representative of the evidence set out in the Strategic Housing Market Assessment in that it should reflect the proportions for the owner occupied sector that requires more 2, 3 and 4 bedroom properties, in particular 2 and 3 bedroom accommodation along with less 1 bedroom properties. The current proportions ignore the recommendations from such evidence and are unsound. This will not aid the balancing of the housing market.

Final Submission 6 34 - ecoonic impact.doc 149

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Final Submission - 6.34 lifetime homes.doc

Final Submission - p6.34.doc

Final Submission PCS6 windfall.doc

Final Submission PCS7 affordable housing.doc

Final Submission PCS9 lifetime homes buildign control.doc

Final Submission PCS11.doc

Final Submission PCS33 - energy targets.doc

Final Submission PCS33 - viabilty.doc

Final Submission PCS33.doc CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

150 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.34 188 Mr Terry Stewart 2383 Para 6.34 : See the stated need to split requirement between flats and family garden (Agent for CPRE & homes. Canford Cliffs & Sandbanks CPRE Poole Core Strategy Response July 1 2008.msg Neighbourhood Watch)

Table 2.76 Paragraph 6.34 151

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

525 Mr Tim Watton 2314 Unsound Paragraph 6.34 sets out in the accompanying table the proportions of new dwellings (House Builders by size and category. This is based upon the Balancing Housing Market Assessment Federation Ltd) (BHMA) contained within the Poole SHMA. The proportions set out in the Core Strategy are, however, not based upon the evidence presented and are unsound on the following basis: 1.The proportions of market housing are not proportional to the demand for such housing as is concluded within the BHMA evidence; 2.The proportions of market housing are negatively influenced by the private rented market sector proportions which are not comparable; and 3.The proportions will not deliver a balance sustainable housing market as is the aspirationThe Council has sought to provide a profile of the likely proportions for the type of new housing required in the Borough. While the HBF objects to such inflexible policies seeking to establish long term requirements over a housing market that has the ability to change far quicker than a policy document, that can take some 5 years to recognise change and react to it, it also has a fundamental objection to the proportions set out in the table presented at paragraph 6.34.The Council has combined the proportions of social rented housing and intermediate housing to provide a profile of the likely type of housing required to meet the affordable housing requirements, on the basis that the two markets are similar. However, it has adopted the same position in relation to the market housing by combining the owner occupation market with the private rented sector. This is not sound and will not lead to a balanced housing market. It will also be detrimental to the delivery of market housing as the proportions are not representative of demand. The owner–occupation and private rented sectors operate in two distinctively different markets and should not be mistaken as the same. This is the rationale for the evidence base treating them separately. To combine them undermines the evidence base. It is not therefore appropriate to determine the requirements are the same, especially as the evidence is clearly contrary to this position. The HBF has replicated table 11.1 from the Council’s BHMA (see in the attached file) along with table 6.34 of the Submission Core Strategy. It can be clearly seen that the differences in the requirement for all property types within the owner occupied and private rented sector are vastly different and to combine the two are incorrect. The Council has ignored the recommendations of it’s own BHMA evidence in this respect which states that the majority of shortfall in the owner occupation sector is for two and three bedroom properties NOT in the one and two bedroom properties as the Submission CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

152 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Core Strategy indicates. With reference to the private rented sector the BHMA concludes that there is a shortage of 1 and 2 bedroom homes with a surplus of three and four bedroom accommodation.The Council’s Core Strategy has combined the private market sector requirements with that of the private owner-occupied sector to arrive at a position that is not reflective of what the major sector (72%) requires in order to balance the housing market. The Council has subtracted the surplus in the 3 and 4 bed properties from the demand for that in the owner occupied sector to arrive at a figure that is not proportionally representative of demand. People who can afford to purchase 3 and 4 bedroom properties and who require them cannot be accommodated by surplus stock in the other sector. This is an unsound approach to plan for the future, especially when the Council’s evidence is explicitly broken down to represent the need needs of two distinctly different sectors.This is particularly pertinent as paragraph 6.37 states that the majority of new supply (75%) will be by way of 1 and 2 bedroom properties and indicates that this is suitable for those wishing to down-size into smaller properties and hence freeing up larger properties of the existing stock. However given the 75% figure has been heavily influenced by the private rented sector requirements, the supply will be will have been influenced by the private rented sector profile. This is an unsound assumption as often people down-sizing are releasing equity from their properties and do not require rented accommodation of this profile. The profile of people down-sizing is more highly likely to be that of those requiring owner occupied accommodation. Therefore the assumption that larger properties will be freed up by those down sizing is flawed and unsound as the Council is not planning to meet the needs of those potentially down-sizing and requiring houses aligned to the owner occupied housing profile.The proportions of new housing should be representative of the evidence set out in the Strategic Housing Market Assessment in that it should reflect the proportions for the owner occupied sector that requires more 2, 3 and 4 bedroom properties, in particular 2 and 3 bedroom accommodation along with less 1 bedroom properties. The current proportions ignore the recommendations from such evidence and are unsound. This will not aid the balancing of the housing market.

Final Submission 6 34 - ecoonic impact.doc 153

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Final Submission - 6.34 lifetime homes.doc

Final Submission - p6.34.doc

Final Submission PCS6 windfall.doc

Final Submission PCS7 affordable housing.doc

Final Submission PCS9 lifetime homes buildign control.doc

Final Submission PCS11.doc

Final Submission PCS33 - energy targets.doc

Final Submission PCS33 - viabilty.doc

Final Submission PCS33.doc CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

154 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Table 2.77 Paragraph 6.35 155

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

525 Mr Tim Watton 2315 Unsound Paragraph 6.34 sets out in the accompanying table the proportions of new dwellings (House Builders by size and category. This is based upon the Balancing Housing Market Assessment Federation Ltd) (BHMA) contained within the Poole SHMA. The proportions set out in the Core Strategy are, however, not based upon the evidence presented and are unsound on the following basis: 1.The proportions of market housing are not proportional to the demand for such housing as is concluded within the BHMA evidence; 2.The proportions of market housing are negatively influenced by the private rented market sector proportions which are not comparable; and 3.The proportions will not deliver a balance sustainable housing market as is the aspirationThe Council has sought to provide a profile of the likely proportions for the type of new housing required in the Borough. While the HBF objects to such inflexible policies seeking to establish long term requirements over a housing market that has the ability to change far quicker than a policy document, that can take some 5 years to recognise change and react to it, it also has a fundamental objection to the proportions set out in the table presented at paragraph 6.34.The Council has combined the proportions of social rented housing and intermediate housing to provide a profile of the likely type of housing required to meet the affordable housing requirements, on the basis that the two markets are similar. However, it has adopted the same position in relation to the market housing by combining the owner occupation market with the private rented sector. This is not sound and will not lead to a balanced housing market. It will also be detrimental to the delivery of market housing as the proportions are not representative of demand. The owner–occupation and private rented sectors operate in two distinctively different markets and should not be mistaken as the same. This is the rationale for the evidence base treating them separately. To combine them undermines the evidence base. It is not therefore appropriate to determine the requirements are the same, especially as the evidence is clearly contrary to this position. The HBF has replicated table 11.1 from the Council’s BHMA (see in the attached file) along with table 6.34 of the Submission Core Strategy. It can be clearly seen that the differences in the requirement for all property types within the owner occupied and private rented sector are vastly different and to combine the two are incorrect. The Council has ignored the recommendations of it’s own BHMA evidence in this respect which states that the majority of shortfall in the owner occupation sector is for two and three bedroom properties NOT in the one and two bedroom properties as the Submission CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

156 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Core Strategy indicates. With reference to the private rented sector the BHMA concludes that there is a shortage of 1 and 2 bedroom homes with a surplus of three and four bedroom accommodation.The Council’s Core Strategy has combined the private market sector requirements with that of the private owner-occupied sector to arrive at a position that is not reflective of what the major sector (72%) requires in order to balance the housing market. The Council has subtracted the surplus in the 3 and 4 bed properties from the demand for that in the owner occupied sector to arrive at a figure that is not proportionally representative of demand. People who can afford to purchase 3 and 4 bedroom properties and who require them cannot be accommodated by surplus stock in the other sector. This is an unsound approach to plan for the future, especially when the Council’s evidence is explicitly broken down to represent the need needs of two distinctly different sectors.This is particularly pertinent as paragraph 6.37 states that the majority of new supply (75%) will be by way of 1 and 2 bedroom properties and indicates that this is suitable for those wishing to down-size into smaller properties and hence freeing up larger properties of the existing stock. However given the 75% figure has been heavily influenced by the private rented sector requirements, the supply will be will have been influenced by the private rented sector profile. This is an unsound assumption as often people down-sizing are releasing equity from their properties and do not require rented accommodation of this profile. The profile of people down-sizing is more highly likely to be that of those requiring owner occupied accommodation. Therefore the assumption that larger properties will be freed up by those down sizing is flawed and unsound as the Council is not planning to meet the needs of those potentially down-sizing and requiring houses aligned to the owner occupied housing profile.The proportions of new housing should be representative of the evidence set out in the Strategic Housing Market Assessment in that it should reflect the proportions for the owner occupied sector that requires more 2, 3 and 4 bedroom properties, in particular 2 and 3 bedroom accommodation along with less 1 bedroom properties. The current proportions ignore the recommendations from such evidence and are unsound. This will not aid the balancing of the housing market.

Final Submission 6 34 - ecoonic impact.doc 157

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Final Submission - 6.34 lifetime homes.doc

Final Submission - p6.34.doc

Final Submission PCS6 windfall.doc

Final Submission PCS7 affordable housing.doc

Final Submission PCS9 lifetime homes buildign control.doc

Final Submission PCS11.doc

Final Submission PCS33 - energy targets.doc

Final Submission PCS33 - viabilty.doc

Final Submission PCS33.doc CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

158 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary 159

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

525 Mr Tim Watton 2316 Unsound Paragraph 6.34 sets out in the accompanying table the proportions of new dwellings (House Builders by size and category. This is based upon the Balancing Housing Market Assessment Federation Ltd) (BHMA) contained within the Poole SHMA. The proportions set out in the Core Strategy are, however, not based upon the evidence presented and are unsound on the following basis: 1.The proportions of market housing are not proportional to the demand for such housing as is concluded within the BHMA evidence; 2.The proportions of market housing are negatively influenced by the private rented market sector proportions which are not comparable; and 3.The proportions will not deliver a balance sustainable housing market as is the aspirationThe Council has sought to provide a profile of the likely proportions for the type of new housing required in the Borough. While the HBF objects to such inflexible policies seeking to establish long term requirements over a housing market that has the ability to change far quicker than a policy document, that can take some 5 years to recognise change and react to it, it also has a fundamental objection to the proportions set out in the table presented at paragraph 6.34.The Council has combined the proportions of social rented housing and intermediate housing to provide a profile of the likely type of housing required to meet the affordable housing requirements, on the basis that the two markets are similar. However, it has adopted the same position in relation to the market housing by combining the owner occupation market with the private rented sector. This is not sound and will not lead to a balanced housing market. It will also be detrimental to the delivery of market housing as the proportions are not representative of demand. The owner–occupation and private rented sectors operate in two distinctively different markets and should not be mistaken as the same. This is the rationale for the evidence base treating them separately. To combine them undermines the evidence base. It is not therefore appropriate to determine the requirements are the same, especially as the evidence is clearly contrary to this position. The HBF has replicated table 11.1 from the Council’s BHMA (see in the attached file) along with table 6.34 of the Submission Core Strategy. It can be clearly seen that the differences in the requirement for all property types within the owner occupied and private rented sector are vastly different and to combine the two are incorrect. The Council has ignored the recommendations of it’s own BHMA evidence in this respect which states that the majority of shortfall in the owner occupation sector is for two and three bedroom properties NOT in the one and two bedroom properties as the Submission CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

160 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Core Strategy indicates. With reference to the private rented sector the BHMA concludes that there is a shortage of 1 and 2 bedroom homes with a surplus of three and four bedroom accommodation.The Council’s Core Strategy has combined the private market sector requirements with that of the private owner-occupied sector to arrive at a position that is not reflective of what the major sector (72%) requires in order to balance the housing market. The Council has subtracted the surplus in the 3 and 4 bed properties from the demand for that in the owner occupied sector to arrive at a figure that is not proportionally representative of demand. People who can afford to purchase 3 and 4 bedroom properties and who require them cannot be accommodated by surplus stock in the other sector. This is an unsound approach to plan for the future, especially when the Council’s evidence is explicitly broken down to represent the need needs of two distinctly different sectors.This is particularly pertinent as paragraph 6.37 states that the majority of new supply (75%) will be by way of 1 and 2 bedroom properties and indicates that this is suitable for those wishing to down-size into smaller properties and hence freeing up larger properties of the existing stock. However given the 75% figure has been heavily influenced by the private rented sector requirements, the supply will be will have been influenced by the private rented sector profile. This is an unsound assumption as often people down-sizing are releasing equity from their properties and do not require rented accommodation of this profile. The profile of people down-sizing is more highly likely to be that of those requiring owner occupied accommodation. Therefore the assumption that larger properties will be freed up by those down sizing is flawed and unsound as the Council is not planning to meet the needs of those potentially down-sizing and requiring houses aligned to the owner occupied housing profile.The proportions of new housing should be representative of the evidence set out in the Strategic Housing Market Assessment in that it should reflect the proportions for the owner occupied sector that requires more 2, 3 and 4 bedroom properties, in particular 2 and 3 bedroom accommodation along with less 1 bedroom properties. The current proportions ignore the recommendations from such evidence and are unsound. This will not aid the balancing of the housing market.

Final Submission 6 34 - ecoonic impact.doc 161

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Final Submission - 6.34 lifetime homes.doc

Final Submission - p6.34.doc

Final Submission PCS6 windfall.doc

Final Submission PCS7 affordable housing.doc

Final Submission PCS9 lifetime homes buildign control.doc

Final Submission PCS11.doc

Final Submission PCS33 - energy targets.doc

Final Submission PCS33 - viabilty.doc

Final Submission PCS33.doc CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

162 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Table 2.78 Paragraph 6.36 163

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

525 Mr Tim Watton 2316 Unsound Paragraph 6.34 sets out in the accompanying table the proportions of new dwellings (House Builders by size and category. This is based upon the Balancing Housing Market Assessment Federation Ltd) (BHMA) contained within the Poole SHMA. The proportions set out in the Core Strategy are, however, not based upon the evidence presented and are unsound on the following basis: 1.The proportions of market housing are not proportional to the demand for such housing as is concluded within the BHMA evidence; 2.The proportions of market housing are negatively influenced by the private rented market sector proportions which are not comparable; and 3.The proportions will not deliver a balance sustainable housing market as is the aspirationThe Council has sought to provide a profile of the likely proportions for the type of new housing required in the Borough. While the HBF objects to such inflexible policies seeking to establish long term requirements over a housing market that has the ability to change far quicker than a policy document, that can take some 5 years to recognise change and react to it, it also has a fundamental objection to the proportions set out in the table presented at paragraph 6.34.The Council has combined the proportions of social rented housing and intermediate housing to provide a profile of the likely type of housing required to meet the affordable housing requirements, on the basis that the two markets are similar. However, it has adopted the same position in relation to the market housing by combining the owner occupation market with the private rented sector. This is not sound and will not lead to a balanced housing market. It will also be detrimental to the delivery of market housing as the proportions are not representative of demand. The owner–occupation and private rented sectors operate in two distinctively different markets and should not be mistaken as the same. This is the rationale for the evidence base treating them separately. To combine them undermines the evidence base. It is not therefore appropriate to determine the requirements are the same, especially as the evidence is clearly contrary to this position. The HBF has replicated table 11.1 from the Council’s BHMA (see in the attached file) along with table 6.34 of the Submission Core Strategy. It can be clearly seen that the differences in the requirement for all property types within the owner occupied and private rented sector are vastly different and to combine the two are incorrect. The Council has ignored the recommendations of it’s own BHMA evidence in this respect which states that the majority of shortfall in the owner occupation sector is for two and three bedroom properties NOT in the one and two bedroom properties as the Submission CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

164 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Core Strategy indicates. With reference to the private rented sector the BHMA concludes that there is a shortage of 1 and 2 bedroom homes with a surplus of three and four bedroom accommodation.The Council’s Core Strategy has combined the private market sector requirements with that of the private owner-occupied sector to arrive at a position that is not reflective of what the major sector (72%) requires in order to balance the housing market. The Council has subtracted the surplus in the 3 and 4 bed properties from the demand for that in the owner occupied sector to arrive at a figure that is not proportionally representative of demand. People who can afford to purchase 3 and 4 bedroom properties and who require them cannot be accommodated by surplus stock in the other sector. This is an unsound approach to plan for the future, especially when the Council’s evidence is explicitly broken down to represent the need needs of two distinctly different sectors.This is particularly pertinent as paragraph 6.37 states that the majority of new supply (75%) will be by way of 1 and 2 bedroom properties and indicates that this is suitable for those wishing to down-size into smaller properties and hence freeing up larger properties of the existing stock. However given the 75% figure has been heavily influenced by the private rented sector requirements, the supply will be will have been influenced by the private rented sector profile. This is an unsound assumption as often people down-sizing are releasing equity from their properties and do not require rented accommodation of this profile. The profile of people down-sizing is more highly likely to be that of those requiring owner occupied accommodation. Therefore the assumption that larger properties will be freed up by those down sizing is flawed and unsound as the Council is not planning to meet the needs of those potentially down-sizing and requiring houses aligned to the owner occupied housing profile.The proportions of new housing should be representative of the evidence set out in the Strategic Housing Market Assessment in that it should reflect the proportions for the owner occupied sector that requires more 2, 3 and 4 bedroom properties, in particular 2 and 3 bedroom accommodation along with less 1 bedroom properties. The current proportions ignore the recommendations from such evidence and are unsound. This will not aid the balancing of the housing market.

Final Submission 6 34 - ecoonic impact.doc 165

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Final Submission - 6.34 lifetime homes.doc

Final Submission - p6.34.doc

Final Submission PCS6 windfall.doc

Final Submission PCS7 affordable housing.doc

Final Submission PCS9 lifetime homes buildign control.doc

Final Submission PCS11.doc

Final Submission PCS33 - energy targets.doc

Final Submission PCS33 - viabilty.doc

Final Submission PCS33.doc CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

166 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Table 2.79 Paragraph 6.37

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 6 1253 Mr Nigel Turner 2262 Unsound as a key consideration in planning for housing. Principally, whilst a minimum density requirement should apply across the Borough (save for justified exception areas), we 1247 Mr David believe that upper density levels should be determined by the characteristics of an area Maddox (Maddox & (including the current and proposed mix of uses) as well as the desirability of achieving Associates) high quality well designed housing. Consequently, we suggest that policy PCS6 need only stipulate indicative minimum densities necessary to achieve an efficient use of land and that the best use of land is then determined through individual site analysis at the relevant development plan document/ supplementary planning guidance or planning application stage. 167

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 6 1257 Mr Ken Parke 2285 Unsound Planning policy seeks to make better and efficient use of urban land towards the (Ken Parke Planning objectives of sustainability. It would be inappropriate to prevent development which Consultants) makes better use of existing land where such development does not cause harm to character or to amenity. A basic planning principle is development which does not result in material harm should be approved. PPS3 tells us that development which is inappropriate to its context or which fails to improve its surroundings should not be permitted. The converse is also true. Flats development takes many forms and makes a useful contribution to the housing needs of the Borough. Provided the detailed layout and design is appropriate there is no good reason to refuse it. Any objection to flats in principle is converse to basic planning principles. The LPA are seeking to direct flats development to specific locations along existing traffic corridors and to central areas. Such a policy is fundamentally flawed, it assumes there will be sufficient land available along these routes to meet the recognised need for 1 or 2 units, it assumes that such development can take place without harm to character, appearance or amenity and it assumes that such intensive developments will be acceptable in highways terms when the LPA constantly resist the intensification of or the creation of new accesses off classified roads. There are also requirements for other types of development within the central areas to serve the community’s needs resulting in less available residential land. Concentration of 1 and 2 bedroom units in certain locations and preventing such units in other locations will result in a polarisation of development types and will not help achieve mixed communities. The existing policy framework has worked well. Inappropriate development has been successfully resisted and appropriate development allowed. There is no need to introduce further restrictive policies or those which try to dictate what type of residential development goes where. The evidence base for the LDF recognises a need for all types of accommodation and also the desire to create mixed communities. Directing 1 or 2 bedroom units to certain locations and retaining 3 and 4 in another will not achieve mixed and balanced communities. We therefore strongly object to the inclusion of this policy and would advocate the retention of Policies H4 and H13, recently saved, as these policies provide the flexibility required to meet all manner of situations and circumstances. CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

168 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

525 2317 The policy is not founded upon robust evidence and a 15 year housing supply cannot be demonstrated. The evidence base to support this policy is the Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA) which was prepared through engagement with the house building industry, however, the Council has purposely manipulated the SHLAA findings in order to support the objectives of Policy PCS6. The HBF does not support the current interpretation of the SHLAA evidence.The Council has set out that Policy PCS 6 will deliver 10,000 dwellings for the plan period which it states as 2006 – 2026. The HBF contests that the evidence is available to demonstrate that this is the case. Windfall AllowanceThe HBF consider this policy unsound against test 7 on the basis that:1. The policy was never intended to be delivered through a windfall allowance until the evidence upon which the policy was based was considered flawed prior to submission;2. The evidence has subsequently been retrospectively amended to include a windfall allowance to seek to support the policy and yet still remains flawed;The Council has set out in Policy PCS 6 that it will deliver 10,000 dwellings during the plan period but makes no reference to how it will actually be delivered within the Core Strategy other than to identify broad locations. In particular it makes no reference to the requirement to rely on a windfall allowance. This is as a result of the Council’s reliance upon an SHLAA evidence base that was founded upon supply coming forward on a broad location approach.This was the position at the point the Core Strategy was reported to and approved by the Borough of Poole’s Full Council on the 8th April. This was also the position also up until the 22nd May 2008, prior to the submission to the Secretary of State on 27th May 2008, as until this date the SHLAA illustrated the delivery of Policy PCS 6 would be through a broad locations approach and did not include a windfall allowance.The broad locations approach was contained within a draft SHLAA prepared in April 2008 which was available for the SHLAA Panel to comment on. This concluded that the SHLAA had a short fall in supply. On the basis of this, the council sought to include an assessment of broad locations in order to address the deficit. The draft SHLAA set out that in order to inform the Broad Locations approach, surveys were undertaken of sites within the 15 broad locations as determined by the Poole Landscape Character Assessment (2007). This identified that the areas had site specific sources with a capacity of 3,150 dwellings. It also states within the conclusions to the draft SHLAA that the assessment provides a robust and credible assessment of land available 169

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

within the Borough for housing and that it provides evidence to support the Council’s objective of protecting the Green Belt.The HBF, however, made the Council aware in writing that the process was fundamentally flawed on two counts. Firstly, if the Council can only rely on broad locations where it is not possible to identify site specific sources for years 11-15 (paragraph 55 of PPS3) then the Council’s own site survey work, which it considered robust enough to base the SHLAA findings upon and identified a capacity of 3,150 dwellings within the broad locations fundamentally undermines the justification for the use of broad locations in the first instance, as sites have been clearly identified. Such sites should be included within the general assessment of capacity as part of SHLAA. In addition if these were not identified initially, the HBF would expect the Council to have revisited it’s assumptions on site identification as part of Stage 8 of the SHLAA guidance in order to robustly defend the position that sites are not identifiable before moving to consider stage 10 and broad locations.Secondly, if the Council was to rely on broad locations for housing supply then the contribution of such areas could not count towards supply in years 1 through to 10 of the plan period. As set out in PPS3 and the attached letter from DCLG on the matter. This would therefore result in Policy PCS 6 being undeliverable and unsound.Following HBF representations made to the Panel Meeting on the 20th May, the Council amended the SHLAA methodology to withdraw the Broad Locations approach in the SHLAA and insert an section seeking to justify a windfall allowance. This was received by the Panel on the 22nd May in preparation for the Council to submit the Core Strategy to the Secretary of State on 27th May. In doing so the Council had removed the evidence from the SHLAA that survey work had been undertaken and specific sites identified to deliver some 3,150 dwellings. In place a windfall allowance for some 3,340 dwellings over the plan period had been included. The site specific information has therefore been omitted from the study despite being available. The HBF consider this manipulation of evidence in order to avoid identifying sites for development.The new windfall allowance justification is however not compliant with the requirements of PPS3. This requires genuine local circumstances that prevent sites from being identified. However in seeking to justify the windfall allowance in the SHLAA, the Council has sought justify the allowance based upon past trends rather than as PPS categorically requires it to do so. The HBF believes that this is incorrect and the approach has been adopted by the Council as it cannot CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

170 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

robustly defend the windfall allowance on the basis of the PPS3 requirement. It is evidently clear that sites are available in both the areas of search where the Council identified capacity for 3,150 dwellings along with areas excluded from the study on the basis that there is enough capacity within the urban areas to delivery the strategy. There is clearly no justification for the windfall allowance as set out in the SHLAA by way of the Council’s own evidence and therefore the Council should not seek to risk much needed housing delivery through hiding behind the difficult subject of identifying site specific sources and manipulation of evidence. It is not sufficient to seek to justify the protection of specific areas of the Borough such as Green Belt land when the housing delivery policies contained within the very same strategy are fundamentally flawed and unsound. If housing can be delivered on specific identified sites in both urban or edge of urban areas then it should be identified. Housing delivery is key to the delivery of many aspects of the Council’s strategy and as such it undermines the soundness of the strategy as a whole. The Strategy should be appraised in the context of a sound strategy for housing delivery.The HBF is therefore concerned that the Core Strategy Policy PCS 6 is unsound as it is not based upon robust evidence, has no reference or justification for windfall allowance within it and it’s evidence based has been prepared retrospectively.The HBF also consider this policy unsound as the Core Strategy policy does not refer to delivery through windfall but defers this by default to a footnote referring to the Council’s SHLAA. In this context, the Core Strategy is also unsound in relying on other documents to explain itself in terms of delivery, in particular the evidence base. The HBF makes particular reference to the Inspectors report into the Lichfield District Council’s Core Strategy on this issue, in which it is stated in 3.9.6 that the Core Strategy should be able to be read and understood without reference to other documents. The HBF has provided evidence to the effect that the reason that the Core Strategy does not refer to a windfall allowance is that the Council was never of the opinion that it intended windfall was part of the evidence for Policy PCS 6 as the Core Strategy and was intending to use a broad locations approach. Should the Council have sought to identify and include a windfall allowance within the Core Strategy, then the Core Strategy itself should refer to this and robustly defend it. If the Council is not in a position to robustly defend it’s housing delivery strategy based upon identifying site specific sources, then the policies contained within its submitted Core Strategy and the strategy itself is 171

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

unsound and should be readdressed. In order to be made sound the delivery of the policy needs to be clearly based upon a sound evidence base that does not include a windfall allowance as this was never the intention of this policy.

Mr Tim Watton Unsound Final Submission 6 34 - ecoonic impact.doc

(House Builders Final Submission - 6.34 lifetime homes.doc Federation Ltd)

Final Submission - p6.34.doc

Final Submission PCS6 windfall.doc

Final Submission PCS7 affordable housing.doc

Final Submission PCS9 lifetime homes buildign control.doc

Final Submission PCS11.doc

Final Submission PCS33 - energy targets.doc

Final Submission PCS33 - viabilty.doc

Final Submission PCS33.doc CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

172 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 6 1265 (Zatman & Co) 2324 Unsound Paragraph 4.33 of revised PPS12 (June 2008) states that in devising its strategy, the local planning authority should be consistent with national policy and in general conformity with the regional spatial strategy. We do not consider that Policy PCS6, and criterion (iv) in particular, is consistent with national planning policies or the emerging regional spatial strategy for the south west, because it seeks to prevent flats from being developed in roads which principally comprise houses, in advance of location, design or impact considerations. PPS1 and PPS3 support the intensification of urban land for housing, which often means replacing/converting existing houses to flats. Paragraph 49 of PPS3 indicates that if proper attention is paid to achieving good design, new development opportunities can be taken within Conservation Areas and other local areas of special character without causing adverse impacts on their character and appearance. Paragraph 50 of PPS3 states that the density of existing development should not dictate that of new housing by stifling change or requiring replication of existing style or form, and that if done well, imaginative design and layout of new development can lead to a more efficient use of land without compromising the quality of the local environment. There are no statements within PPS3 which state that flats can only be provided within existing areas of flats or that planning authorities can restrict the provision of flats in particular locations.

1264 Mr Martin Miller PCS6Test4.pdf (Terence O’Rourke) PCS6Test7.pdf 173

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 6 1265 (Zatman & Co) 2325 Unsound Paragraph 4.36 of revised PPS12 (June 2008) states that for core strategies to be justifiable, they must be the most appropriate strategy when considered against the reasonable alternatives, and founded on a robust and credible evidence base. We do not consider that Policy PCS6, and criterion (iv) in particular, meets either of these requirements. PPS1 and PPS3 support the intensification of urban land for housing, which often means replacing/converting existing houses to flats. Paragraph 49 of PPS3 indicates that if proper attention is paid to achieving good design, new development opportunities can be taken within Conservation Areas and other local areas of special character without causing adverse impacts on their character and appearance. Paragraph 50 of PPS3 states that the density of existing development should not dictate that of new housing by stifling change or requiring replication of existing style or form, and that if done well, imaginative design and layout of new development can lead to a more efficient use of land without compromising the quality of the local environment. There are no statements within PPS3 which state that flats can only be provided within existing areas of flats or that planning authorities can restrict the provision of flats in particular locations. Within Poole, and particularly the high value Sandbanks and Canford Cliffs areas which have always possessed a large number of flats due to the availability of coastal land with sea views, there are numerous examples of well designed, high quality flats co-existing alongside houses in an appropriate and acceptable manner. This contributes to the area’s unique character. Policy PCS6 stems from a political desire amongst Poole Borough Councillors to prevent the replacement of detached family houses in certain areas of the Borough, most notably within Canford Cliffs and Sandbanks, with flats. However, the adopted Poole Borough Local Plan already contains a suitable and appropriate policy (Policy H10 - Low Density Housing) for achieving this aim, and which has enabled the Council to successfully defend refusals of planning permission at appeal. This policy states that: “WITHIN THE AREAS OF LOW DENSITY HOUSING SHOWN ON THE PROPOSALS MAP, RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WILL TAKE THE FORM OF SINGLE DETACHED DWELLINGS IN SUBSTANTIAL PLOTS WHICH REFLECT THE CHARACTER OF THE AREA. THE SCALE, FORM,SITING AND PLOT COVERAGE OF NEW DWELLINGS IN THESE AREAS SHOULD RESPECT THEIR OPEN AND/OR TREED CHARACTER.” Rather than pursuing Policy PCS6, which is overly restrictive and not grounded in national planning CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

174 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

policy (please see our separate representations on why this policy does not meet the 4th test of soundness), the Council should simply extend the areas of the Borough that are covered by this proven policy. This is the most appropriate strategy when compared against Policy PCS6. In addition, elements of Policy PCS6 are not founded on a robust or credible evidence base. The “Dorset Survey of Housing Need and Demand – Poole (March 2008)” within which the Balanced Housing Model referred to in paragraphs 6.33-6.37 is contained, demonstrates that there is an identified need for dwelling types of all sizes across the Borough (our emphasis), and particularly two and three bedroom properties. Although the report was not location specific, it indicates that Canford Cliffs contains a large number of under-occupied properties and that there is a requirement for many residents of the Borough to down-size. Therefore, evidence in the Balanced Housing Market actually suggests that the replacement of large under-occupied houses with smaller units should in principle be supported by the Council across the Borough, and not restricted as is proposed by Policy PCS6. For Policy CS6 to meet the seventh test of soundness (and the fourth test as indicated under separate representations), we consider that criterion (iv) of Policy CS6 should be DELETED, and criterion (ii) REWORDED as follows: “Elsewhere to locations identified in (i) a-d, (on streets or parts of streets where flats predominate- crossed through), proposals for new flats will be permitted on condition that: a) The design contributes positively to the overall character b) Existing houses on the street do not become isolated from other houses c) Plot coverage, including buildings, car parking, access roads, cycle and bin storage and other hard surfacing does not exceed 50% of the site d) Car parking and vehicular access points avoid backing on to neighbouring gardens to the rear of the site e) Features such as front gardens and mature trees are retained or provided.” Please note that we have also made representations that elements of Policy CS6 do not meet the fourth text of soundness because they are not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and are not the most appropriate in all the circumstances having considered the relevant alternatives. These representations should be considered in tandem.

1264 Mr Martin Miller PCS6Test4.pdf (Terence O’Rourke) 175

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

PCS6Test7.pdf

Policy 6 188 Mr Terry Stewart 2384 PCS6 Criteria : Strongly support limitation on flats. (Agent for CPRE & Canford Cliffs & CPRE Poole Core Strategy Response July 1 2008.msg Sandbanks Neighbourhood Watch) CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

176 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 6 1270 Bridgehouse 2408 Unsound PSC6 – Broad Locations for Residential Development: Poole is required to deliver a Capital substantial amount of development by the emerging RSS. The Core Strategy assumes that all of these dwellings can be delivered in the urban area. A number of the identified sources of supply involve the redevelopment of existing developed areas. There may be deliverability issues associated with this approach. Reference should be made in the Policy to the appropriate redevelopment of employment sites for mixed use purposes where this would not result in a reduction in the number of jobs available on site through increasing the employment density. Test of Soundness: •Effective- As written, the Core Strategy is not sufficiently flexible enough to accommodate unforeseen circumstances. The proposed amended will help to ensure that the strategic housing target is delivered.

1269 Mr Simon Poole Core Strategy Reps SH 04.doc Hawley (Harris Lamb Proprty Consultancy) 177

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

1271 MDL 2417 Unsound The Submission Core Strategy document identifies broad locations for development Development Ltd within Policy PSC6 and the indicative densities per hectare. However, this table does not include a time frame within the headings (i.e is the table referring to a time period of 10 or 20 years) and it is therefore difficult to interpret the information. Clear headings identifying the time frame should be included.To allow for sufficient flexibility with regard to the delivery of houses in order to meet the forthcoming RSS requirements, an additional criterion (table in PSC6) should be added in between criterion iii & iv to allow for development on previous developed (brownfield) land. Suggested wording for this criteria includes: ‘on streets or parts of streets comprised mainly of houses proposals involving the redevelopment of brownfield land’. This will allow for flexibility, which is particularly important since the RSS is in draft format and has not been adopted.

Poole Core Rep Form - Contents.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - para 6.125.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS6.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS7.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS9.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS11.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS12.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS12.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS14.pdf CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

178 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

1127 Ms Joanne Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 27.pdf Webb (Savills (Representing Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 30.pdf Bournemouth & Poole College)) Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 33.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 34.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 35.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 38.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - Strategic Objectives.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - vision 1.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - visions 2.pdf 179

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 6 1276 Neptune 2477 Unsound We support the outlining of a range of densities as this in accordance with the PPS3 Consulting Limited “Local Planning Authorities may wish ti set out a range o densities across the plan area rather than one broad density range”. However, we consider that the policy lacks clarity 1132 Ms Lindsay and its too prescriptive in its approach to development densities, especially for ‘ the Thompson (Terence Town Centre – Regeneration Area.’ The regeneration area is in highly sustainable O'Rourke) location, close to the town centre and Poole railway station. The development sites in the regeneration area will also deliver mixed-use redevelopment that will enhance the sustainability of the site. Therefore it is considered the area should support the highest densities that are achievable without causing undue detrimental impact to residential amenity and considering the context and character of the surrounding area. This is recognised by PPS3 that states “ using land efficiently is a key consideration in planning for housing” (paragraph 45). We therefore consider that the policy should allow for a more flexible approach so higher densities can come forward through the detailed design stage. Indeed PPS3 goes on recognises that “ the density of existing development should nor dictate that of new housing by stifling change or requiring replication of existing style or form. If done well, imaginative design and layout of new development can lead to a more efficient use of land without compromising the quality of the local environment”, (paragraph 50). PPS3 also recognises that “more intensive development is not always appropriate. However, when well designed and built in the right location, it can enhance the character and quality of the area” (paragraph 49). It is our view that development of the regeneration area can be designed to enhance the character and quality of the area at a higher density than described in the policy. It would seem likely that the density ranges for the regeneration area identified in these policies has emerged from the Poole Bridge Regeneration Initiative SPG. If this is the case we would also like to make reference to our objection lodged in relation to PCS12 and the continued reference to the Poole Bridge Regeneration initiative SPG. As noted in our objection to policy PCS12 and its reference to the SPG, there have been several changes that have occurred since the adoption of the SPG, not least changes to the flood risk assessment for Poole and the developments in the Government’s sustainability agenda. PPS12 states that “plans should be able to show how they will handle contingencies”, but it is not clear how this will be possible with an already outdated SPG that was CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

180 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

developed under the planning system, predating the 2004 Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act. It therefore calls into question the soundness of a policy and a plan that relies upon outdated and untested guidance. We request that the Borough of Poole update the SPG to reflect current national planning policy and test it through the formal LDF process and can not therefore support a policy that establishes a density range for the regeneration area before the thorough review of the SPG. As an example of the need to be up-to-date and flexible to changing circumstances, this representation form has already become out of date, even before the end of the consultation period, with the publication of the revised PPS12 (June 2008). This indicates how quickly the LDF system is evolving system and evolving national planning policy and objectives. The Core Strategy should be forward looking to the next 15years not backwards looking to the old system. Therefore, whilst we object to policy PCS6 on the basis of old style soundness tests, we also consider this policy to inflexible and not based on robust evidence, as set out in PPS12 paragraph 4.37 and 4.46 and we object on the basis of the new style test of failure to be justified and failure to be effective (see PPS12, para. 4.52). PCS6.pdf PCS12.pdf PCS 24.pdf PCS 33.pdf PCS 34.pdf PCS 38.pdf 181

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 6 1277 Patch Properties 2483 Unsound We support the proposed range of development densities as this is in broad accord with the PPS3 statement. “Local Planning Authorities may wish ti set out a range o 1132 Ms Lindsay densities across the plan area rather than one broad density range”. However, we Thompson (Terence consider that the policy lacks clarity and its too prescriptive in its approach to O'Rourke) development densities, especially for ‘other parts of the town centre.’ The policy does not make clear whether the indicative densities per hectare are a maximum or minimum that development would need to meet or an average target range. The use of ‘indicative’ is inappropriate in this instance as it allows scope for uncertainty as to how the density ranges should be considered. Due to the central nature of ‘other parts of the town centre’ with proximity to a range of facilities and public transport connections it is highly sustainable are for residential development. Therefore it is considered that appropriate sites within this area could support the highest densities that are achievable, without detrimentally impacting on the amenity of the surrounding uses and considering the context and character of the surrounding area. This is recognised by PPS3 that states “using land efficiently is a key consideration in planning for housing” (paragraph 45). PPS3 also recognises that “more intensive development is not always appropriate. However, when well designed and built in the right location, it can enhance the character and quality of the area” (paragraph 49). It is our view that appropriate sites in the ‘other parts of the town centre’ can be designed to enhance the character and quality of an area at a high density then outlined in the policy. PCS 24.pdf PCS 33.pdf PCS 6.pdf CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

182 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 6 1109 (Talbot Village 2513 Unsound TVT considers that a broader range of densities should be given for the indicative Trust) densities in the Table at PCS6 and that reference should be made to the fact that consideration needs to be given to site specific characteristics and to the character of 12 Ms Frances Young the surrounding area. Paragraph 16 of PPS3 states that in assessing design quality it (Nathaniel Lichfield & will be important to assess (amongst other things) how the proposed development "is Partners) well integrated with, and complements, the neighbouring buildings and the local area more generally in terms of scale, density, layout and access". However, at the same time paragraph 50 of PPS3 states that "the density of existing development should not dictate that of new housing by stifling change or requiring replication of existing style or form". It is therefore important that in order to reflect national planning guidance and to meet the test of soundness 48, housing policies within the Core Strategy are drafted to allow flexibility in terms of residential densities, and to take account of individual site circumstances. Greater flexibility in terms of the range of densities and the scope to introduce lower densities than that suggested at Policy PCS6 would also reflect paragraph 6.1.10 of the draft RSS, which states that "between 30 and 50 dph net represents a more sustainable density (although) much higher densities than this should be possible at various places in the regiorl'; and Policy H2: Housing Densities which states that "housing developments should exceed 30 dwellings per hectare (dph) in all parts of the region and averages across housing market areas will be in excess of 40 dph over the plan period. "The introduction of a greater flexibility in terms of residential density in Policy PCS 6 would therefore ensure that the Plan meets the test of soundness 4C.

Policy 6 1163 Ms Simone 2540 Town Centre North There appears to be an inconsistency between policy PCS13 and Wilding (GOSW) the new jobs forecast in Poole 2006-2026 table on page 69f. Policy PCS 13 specifies "35,000 sq.m. (net) of additional retail (Al) floor space (... )" and in addition to this (but without specifying an approximate amount of floorspace) "supporting commercial, sports and leisure uses including a cinema (... ) (Use Classes A3-A5)". The table, however, refers to a total of 35,000 sq.m. for Al to A4 uses in the Town Centre North Area. It would therefore be helpful if this could be clarified. It should also be noted that the proposed approach of concentrating retail growth in the centre and restricting growth in the retail parks (as per paragraph 6.70) is consistent with PPS 6 whereas it is 183

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

questionable whether the alternative option considered would have stood up to the tests of PPS 6.

Policy 6 1102 Mr Ian Parsons 2559 The Agency welcomes the emphasis on higher density housing developments in areas (Highways Agency) that provide opportunities for reducing the need to travel and encouraging non-car journeys, such as the town centre, major local centres, and key hubs of transport and community activity. We agree with a hierarchy of preferred housing densities prioritising access to local facilities and public transport. It is of concern however that 2,500 of the 10,000 dwellings to be delivered are anticipated in areas which do not at present benefit from high quality public transport provision within a 400m walking distance (PCS6). Whilst 7,500 houses are set to be provided in areas which may be deemed accessible by public transport, the remaining allocation appear to be directed towards less sustainable locations. The Core Strategy does not appear to indicate how sustainable access to these developments will be addressed. In terms of the overall Spatial Strategy, the Agency believes that there is a need for this to be informed by the SEDMMTS, estimated to be available after the summer of 2009.

Policy 6 1102 Mr Ian Parsons 2561 We also support the protection of the Port rail link for freight handling in PCS 4, and (Highways Agency) the reference in PCS 6 to the need for residential development to be well served by public transport services. CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

184 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 6 1239 Mr Neal 2593 We welcome the commitment set out in “The Spatial Strategy” and in detail at PCS6 Whitehead (South to delivering 10,000 dwellings over 20 years, predominantly in the Regeneration Area, West Regional which fully accords with Draft RSS, the Panel Report and the Growth Point objectives. Assembly) You will recall from Keith Woodhead’s letter that we had expressed concerns at the Preferred Options stage about the approach to housing densities and the lack of information on this issue. In order to accord with Draft RSS Policy H2 or Policy HO6 of RPG 10, densities should aim to be at least 50 dwellings per hectare (dph) since Poole is defined as a Strategically Significant City or Town in the Draft RSS and a Principal Urban Area in RPG10. The Panel Report has subsequently recommended that, to be consistent with national guidance, densities should aim to exceed the national indicative net density of 30dph. In addition for SSCTs such as Poole, the Panel proposed that the net density should be within 40-50dph and higher densities in the most accessible locations. We therefore welcome the policy approach set out in PCS6 indicating the need to specifically plan for higher densities in those parts of the Borough that are most accessible and where the bulk of new housing is proposed to be located. We do have some concerns however that in other parts of the Borough the density range proposed ie 30-50 dph is below the Panel’s suggested range of 40-50.

Table 2.80 Policy 6 185

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.38 1100 RSL (South 2411 Unsound On balance we support the principles underpinning this policy and the emphasis on West RSL Planning viability; however we do have some recommendations to improve the clarity of this Consortium) policy. In its current form it may not offer developers certainty over the level of affordable housing contributions that may be required for individual sites. In addition to this we are concerned about the use of public subsidy to support the 40% requirement across the borough. Affordable Housing Target: We support the use of the 40% benchmark across some of the borough. In accordance with PPS3 the Council has commissioned a viability assessment to demonstrate that this policy is both viable and practicable. However this viability assessment states that a 40% requirement may not be supported in every part of the borough without some sort of public subsidy. “For these sorts of residential to residential sites, whilst we would expect the high value areas (case studies Boscombe Overcliff-Southbourne Overcliff and Canford Cliffs in Poole) to deliver in line with a policy target of at least 40%, even without grant, our analysis suggests that this target will be difficult to achieve in most areas of both boroughs, without grant”.In Section 6 it goes on to state that: “…the availability or otherwise of grant may well make the difference between delivering a scheme with affordable housing or not.” PPS3 states that affordable housing targets such as these should take into account the level of public subsidy that is likely to be available. We are concerned that the Council may find it difficult to sustain this policy if it is solely relying on Housing Corporation funding which is scarce and the levels available vary over time. However, the Council is proposing to lower the level of the threshold for affordable housing to include all new developments, inevitably this will increase the amount off-site or in-lieu affordable housing contributions. This additional funding could be sufficient to support the 40% target where Housing Corporation grant is not available, but this needs to be further explored by the Council. The Council also needs to make it clearer that these targets are a starting point for negotiation. The Viability Assessment states that some areas in Poole will support an affordable housing requirement above 40%, but there are a number of other sites/ areas where meeting this 40% target will be extremely challenging if not impossible without public subsidy. In these circumstances, a number of options can be explored to maintain viability at 40%, for example allowing a higher provision of shared ownership properties within the affordable housing requirement. We consider that the Council should identify all possible areas for negotiation when economic viability is an issue for a site, before CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

186 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

it accepts a reduction in the overall affordable housing requirement. Affordable Housing Threshold The Council are proposing to remove the threshold for affordable housing requirement and simply assess the viability of each individual proposal. We are satisfied that the viability assessment demonstrates this proposal will not negatively impact on housing delivery, in accordance with PPS3 requirements. Our concerns relate to the lack of clarity in the proposed policy for developers. Paragraph 6.39 of the Submission document states that: “The evidence supports the reduction of the threshold to a single unit and that this could be on site provision, off site or a financial contribution based on an 'equivalence' payment”. We consider that this framework is too vague. Any landowner or developer will find it very difficult to calculate land values or potential profits from schemes within this policy framework. This is less than desirable at any time when credit and finance is increasingly difficult to ascertain. We recommend that the Council set different thresholds for different types of contribution. For example, any developments below three will have to provide in-lieu contributions or an equivalence payment if the affordable housing requirement is 40% as it is not possible to provide 40% or 80% of an affordable unit on or off-site, so this should be clearly stated. On developments of more than three, an off-site or on-site provision becomes a possibility, so in accordance with PPS3 (paragraph 29) the Council should state that the preferred option is for on-site provision unless it is inappropriate on that site or not economically viable. In these circumstances an off-site provision maybe considered, and when this is not possible in-lieu payments could be acceptable. Additional Issues: If the Council is to use a viability toolkit, then it must state which one this will be (in this case we presume the Three Dragons Toolkit is being referred to) and make it available on its website. We strongly support the Council’s statement on the use of planning obligations. We welcome the Council’s proposal that when RSLs are involved in the provision of affordable housing a planning obligation will not be necessary.

1219 Mr Jamie 1010-08.m4.PDF Sulivan (Tetlow King Planning) Representation form.PDF 187

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.38 1163 Ms Simone 2536 In addition, paragraph 6.38 of the Core Strategy highlights that the latest Dorset-wide Wilding (GOSW) Housing Needs and Demand survey which was produced as part of the Housing Market Assessment identified a total net annual housing need in Poole of 1,199 dwellings (it would be helpful to clarify this paragraph by referring to the net annual need for affordable dwellings). As such the suggested approach and policy PCS 7 in particular does appear justified in not setting an upper limit to the potential affordable housing provision or contribution, as it recognizes viability being the key consideration and also the need for other planning objectives to be met from the development of sites.

Table 2.81 Paragraph 6.38

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.39 188 Mr Terry Stewart 2385 Sound Para 6.39 : Since the BHM report found that 62% of required housing should be (Agent for CPRE & Affordable, it is important to maximize the level of affordable new housing in Poole. We Canford Cliffs & strongly support therefore the target of 40% of new development being affordable – Sandbanks and especially that the threshold of 15 houses should be dropped. ALL new housing Neighbourhood should make an affordable Section 106 contribution. Watch) CPRE Poole Core Strategy Response July 1 2008.msg CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

188 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.39 1163 Ms Simone 2538 Some aspects would benefit from further clarification: • Clarification of paragraph 6.39 Wilding (GOSW) would seem necessary in respect of how and when off-site provision or a financial contribution on the 'equivalence' basis is permissible instead of on-site provision to ensure consistency with PPS 3 paragraph 29 which specifies a presumption for on-site provision. • How, when and where is the 'viability toolkit!' referred to in paragraph 6.39 going to be provided; • It would be helpful if it could be clarified how the provision of affordable housing will be balanced with development contributing to other planning objectives (e.g. including heathland mitigation where appropriate, contribution to infrastructure provision etc). In this context it is also surprising that paragraph 6.51 appears to suggest that Lifetime Homes Standard will be sought for all residential units irrespective of viability/feasibility considerations?

Table 2.82 Paragraph 6.39 189

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.40 1100 RSL (South 2412 Unsound On balance we support the principles underpinning this policy and the emphasis on West RSL Planning viability; however we do have some recommendations to improve the clarity of this Consortium) policy. In its current form it may not offer developers certainty over the level of affordable housing contributions that may be required for individual sites. In addition to this we are concerned about the use of public subsidy to support the 40% requirement across the borough. Affordable Housing Target: We support the use of the 40% benchmark across some of the borough. In accordance with PPS3 the Council has commissioned a viability assessment to demonstrate that this policy is both viable and practicable. However this viability assessment states that a 40% requirement may not be supported in every part of the borough without some sort of public subsidy. “For these sorts of residential to residential sites, whilst we would expect the high value areas (case studies Boscombe Overcliff-Southbourne Overcliff and Canford Cliffs in Poole) to deliver in line with a policy target of at least 40%, even without grant, our analysis suggests that this target will be difficult to achieve in most areas of both boroughs, without grant”. In Section 6 it goes on to state that: “…the availability or otherwise of grant may well make the difference between delivering a scheme with affordable housing or not.” PPS3 states that affordable housing targets such as these should take into account the level of public subsidy that is likely to be available. We are concerned that the Council may find it difficult to sustain this policy if it is solely relying on Housing Corporation funding which is scarce and the levels available vary over time. However, the Council is proposing to lower the level of the threshold for affordable housing to include all new developments, inevitably this will increase the amount off-site or in-lieu affordable housing contributions. This additional funding could be sufficient to support the 40% target where Housing Corporation grant is not available, but this needs to be further explored by the Council. The Council also needs to make it clearer that these targets are a starting point for negotiation. The Viability Assessment states that some areas in Poole will support an affordable housing requirement above 40%, but there are a number of other sites/ areas where meeting this 40% target will be extremely challenging if not impossible without public subsidy. In these circumstances, a number of options can be explored to maintain viability at 40%, for example allowing a higher provision of shared ownership properties within the affordable housing requirement. We consider that the Council should identify all possible areas for negotiation when economic viability is an issue for a site, before CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

190 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

it accepts a reduction in the overall affordable housing requirement. Affordable Housing Threshold: The Council are proposing to remove the threshold for affordable housing requirement and simply assess the viability of each individual proposal. We are satisfied that the viability assessment demonstrates this proposal will not negatively impact on housing delivery, in accordance with PPS3 requirements. Our concerns relate to the lack of clarity in the proposed policy for developers. Paragraph 6.39 of the Submission document states that: “The evidence supports the reduction of the threshold to a single unit and that this could be on site provision, off site or a financial contribution based on an 'equivalence' payment”. We consider that this framework is too vague. Any landowner or developer will find it very difficult to calculate land values or potential profits from schemes within this policy framework. This is less than desirable at any time when credit and finance is increasingly difficult to ascertain. We recommend that the Council set different thresholds for different types of contribution. For example, any developments below three will have to provide in-lieu contributions or an equivalence payment if the affordable housing requirement is 40% as it is not possible to provide 40% or 80% of an affordable unit on or off-site, so this should be clearly stated. On developments of more than three, an off-site or on-site provision becomes a possibility, so in accordance with PPS3 (paragraph 29) the Council should state that the preferred option is for on-site provision unless it is inappropriate on that site or not economically viable. In these circumstances an off-site provision maybe considered, and when this is not possible in-lieu payments could be acceptable. Additional Issues: If the Council is to use a viability toolkit, then it must state which one this will be (in this case we presume the Three Dragons Toolkit is being referred to) and make it available on its website. We strongly support the Council’s statement on the use of planning obligations. We welcome the Council’s proposal that when RSLs are involved in the provision of affordable housing a planning obligation will not be necessary.

1219 Mr Jamie 1010-08.m4.PDF Sulivan (Tetlow King Planning) Representation form.PDF

Table 2.83 Paragraph 6.40 191

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.41 1100 RSL (South 2413 Unsound On balance we support the principles underpinning this policy and the emphasis on West RSL Planning viability; however we do have some recommendations to improve the clarity of this Consortium) policy. In its current form it may not offer developers certainty over the level of affordable housing contributions that may be required for individual sites. In addition to this we are concerned about the use of public subsidy to support the 40% requirement across the borough. Affordable Housing Target: We support the use of the 40% benchmark across some of the borough. In accordance with PPS3 the Council has commissioned a viability assessment to demonstrate that this policy is both viable and practicable. However this viability assessment states that a 40% requirement may not be supported in every part of the borough without some sort of public subsidy. “For these sorts of residential to residential sites, whilst we would expect the high value areas (case studies Boscombe Overcliff-Southbourne Overcliff and Canford Cliffs in Poole) to deliver in line with a policy target of at least 40%, even without grant, our analysis suggests that this target will be difficult to achieve in most areas of both boroughs, without grant”. In Section 6 it goes on to state that: “…the availability or otherwise of grant may well make the difference between delivering a scheme with affordable housing or not.” PPS3 states that affordable housing targets such as these should take into account the level of public subsidy that is likely to be available. We are concerned that the Council may find it difficult to sustain this policy if it is solely relying on Housing Corporation funding which is scarce and the levels available vary over time. However, the Council is proposing to lower the level of the threshold for affordable housing to include all new developments, inevitably this will increase the amount off-site or in-lieu affordable housing contributions. This additional funding could be sufficient to support the 40% target where Housing Corporation grant is not available, but this needs to be further explored by the Council. The Council also needs to make it clearer that these targets are a starting point for negotiation. The Viability Assessment states that some areas in Poole will support an affordable housing requirement above 40%, but there are a number of other sites/ areas where meeting this 40% target will be extremely challenging if not impossible without public subsidy. In these circumstances, a number of options can be explored to maintain viability at 40%, for example allowing a higher provision of shared ownership properties within the affordable housing requirement. We consider that the Council should identify all possible areas for negotiation when economic viability is an issue for a site, before CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

192 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

it accepts a reduction in the overall affordable housing requirement. Affordable Housing Threshold: The Council are proposing to remove the threshold for affordable housing requirement and simply assess the viability of each individual proposal. We are satisfied that the viability assessment demonstrates this proposal will not negatively impact on housing delivery, in accordance with PPS3 requirements. Our concerns relate to the lack of clarity in the proposed policy for developers. Paragraph 6.39 of the Submission document states that: “The evidence supports the reduction of the threshold to a single unit and that this could be on site provision, off site or a financial contribution based on an 'equivalence' payment”. We consider that this framework is too vague. Any landowner or developer will find it very difficult to calculate land values or potential profits from schemes within this policy framework. This is less than desirable at any time when credit and finance is increasingly difficult to ascertain. We recommend that the Council set different thresholds for different types of contribution. For example, any developments below three will have to provide in-lieu contributions or an equivalence payment if the affordable housing requirement is 40% as it is not possible to provide 40% or 80% of an affordable unit on or off-site, so this should be clearly stated. On developments of more than three, an off-site or on-site provision becomes a possibility, so in accordance with PPS3 (paragraph 29) the Council should state that the preferred option is for on-site provision unless it is inappropriate on that site or not economically viable. In these circumstances an off-site provision maybe considered, and when this is not possible in-lieu payments could be acceptable. Additional Issues: If the Council is to use a viability toolkit, then it must state which one this will be (in this case we presume the Three Dragons Toolkit is being referred to) and make it available on its website. We strongly support the Council’s statement on the use of planning obligations. We welcome the Council’s proposal that when RSLs are involved in the provision of affordable housing a planning obligation will not be necessary.

1219 Mr Jamie 1010-08.m4.PDF Sulivan (Tetlow King Planning) Representation form.PDF

Table 2.84 Paragraph 6.41 193

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.42 1268 Bertie Bowman 2396 Unsound It is considered the policy of seeking affordable housing contributions for extensions, (Dorset Lake alterations or replacement dwellings involving a gain of 50% or more net floor area Residents' where the existing floor area exceeds 100 sq. metres would place an unreasonable Association) burden upon the majority of our residents seeking to improve their homes. The reference to owner occupiers wishing to extend or improve their homes should be deleted under this heading.

SUBMISSION_STAGE_Representation_Form_PINS_model.doc

Paragraph 6.42 1100 RSL (South 2414 Unsound On balance we support the principles underpinning this policy and the emphasis on West RSL Planning viability; however we do have some recommendations to improve the clarity of this Consortium) policy. In its current form it may not offer developers certainty over the level of affordable housing contributions that may be required for individual sites. In addition to this we are concerned about the use of public subsidy to support the 40% requirement across the borough. Affordable Housing Target: We support the use of the 40% benchmark across some of the borough. In accordance with PPS3 the Council has commissioned a viability assessment to demonstrate that this policy is both viable and practicable. However this viability assessment states that a 40% requirement may not be supported in every part of the borough without some sort of public subsidy. “For these sorts of residential to residential sites, whilst we would expect the high value areas (case studies Boscombe Overcliff-Southbourne Overcliff and Canford Cliffs in Poole) to deliver in line with a policy target of at least 40%, even without grant, our analysis suggests that this target will be difficult to achieve in most areas of both boroughs, without grant”. In Section 6 it goes on to state that: “…the availability or otherwise of grant may well make the difference between delivering a scheme with affordable housing or not.” PPS3 states that affordable housing targets such as these should take into account the level of public subsidy that is likely to be available. We are concerned that the Council may find it difficult to sustain this policy if it is solely relying on Housing Corporation funding which is scarce and the levels available vary over time. However, the Council is proposing to lower the level of the threshold for affordable housing to include all new developments, CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

194 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

inevitably this will increase the amount off-site or in-lieu affordable housing contributions. This additional funding could be sufficient to support the 40% target where Housing Corporation grant is not available, but this needs to be further explored by the Council. The Council also needs to make it clearer that these targets are a starting point for negotiation. The Viability Assessment states that some areas in Poole will support an affordable housing requirement above 40%, but there are a number of other sites/ areas where meeting this 40% target will be extremely challenging if not impossible without public subsidy. In these circumstances, a number of options can be explored to maintain viability at 40%, for example allowing a higher provision of shared ownership properties within the affordable housing requirement. We consider that the Council should identify all possible areas for negotiation when economic viability is an issue for a site, before it accepts a reduction in the overall affordable housing requirement. Affordable Housing Threshold: The Council are proposing to remove the threshold for affordable housing requirement and simply assess the viability of each individual proposal. We are satisfied that the viability assessment demonstrates this proposal will not negatively impact on housing delivery, in accordance with PPS3 requirements. Our concerns relate to the lack of clarity in the proposed policy for developers. Paragraph 6.39 of the Submission document states that: “The evidence supports the reduction of the threshold to a single unit and that this could be on site provision, off site or a financial contribution based on an 'equivalence' payment”. We consider that this framework is too vague. Any landowner or developer will find it very difficult to calculate land values or potential profits from schemes within this policy framework. This is less than desirable at any time when credit and finance is increasingly difficult to ascertain. We recommend that the Council set different thresholds for different types of contribution. For example, any developments below three will have to provide in-lieu contributions or an equivalence payment if the affordable housing requirement is 40% as it is not possible to provide 40% or 80% of an affordable unit on or off-site, so this should be clearly stated. On developments of more than three, an off-site or on-site provision becomes a possibility, so in accordance with PPS3 (paragraph 29) the Council should state that the preferred option is for on-site provision unless it is inappropriate on that site or not economically viable. In these circumstances an off-site provision maybe considered, and when this is not possible in-lieu payments could be acceptable. Additional Issues: If the Council is to use a viability 195

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

toolkit, then it must state which one this will be (in this case we presume the Three Dragons Toolkit is being referred to) and make it available on its website. We strongly support the Council’s statement on the use of planning obligations. We welcome the Council’s proposal that when RSLs are involved in the provision of affordable housing a planning obligation will not be necessary.

1219 Mr Jamie 1010-08.m4.PDF Sulivan (Tetlow King Planning) Representation form.PDF

Table 2.85 Paragraph 6.41 CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

196 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 7 1257 Mr Ken Parke 2286 Unsound Core Strategy Policy 7 Objection (Affordable housing): The evidence base utilised for (Ken Parke Planning the formulation of this policy is already out of date due to changes in the market where Consultants) prices have dramatically fallen over the past 12 months. Developers are already subjected to prohibitive contributions which are increasing. The LPAs policy in relation to flats will not allow good and efficient use to be made of existing urban land or prevent the provision of additional housing thus effecting supply and thus housing prices. The LPA would be much better facilitating additional development across the whole of the urban area which will in turn release sufficient housing affordable and otherwise. Requiring affordable housing on small sites will result in those sites being unable to come forward for development which will affect overall housing supply which will have a knock on effect to affordability. The objectives of the LDF are to deliver both market and affordable housing and such an onerous policy will be counter productive. I would wish the opportunity to make any further representations at the LDF inquiry. 197

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

525 Mr Tim Watton 2318 Unsound Paragraph 29 of PPS requires any targets for affordable housing to reflect an assessment (House Builders of the likely economic viability of land for housing within the area, taking into account Federation Ltd) the risks to delivery and drawing on informed assessments of the likely levels of finance available for affordable housing, including public subsidy and the level of developer contributions that can be reasonably secured. Paragraph 29 of PPS 3 also requires LPAs to include within viability assessments the impact of thresholds and proportions on the overall level of housing delivery.The Council’s policy of seeking 40% affordable housing on sites is fundamentally flawed as it is based upon an unsound and in a large part absence evidence base. The HBF has provided evidence that the current proposal will seriously impede housing delivery in Poole and undermine the delivery of the Council’s entire Core Strategy. This is the case on the basis that: 1. The viability assessment is based upon Section 106 contributions being of the region of £5,000 per dwelling where as the true cost of infrastructure provision through CIL, by way of the Council’s own evidence is likely to be in the region of at least £15,000 per dwellings.2. The Council is making assumptions in developing long term policy on the current housing market3. The Council’s viability assessment attributes a zero value for the delivery of extremely ambitious targets for sustainable construction techniques that seek to introduce code level 6 of the Code for Sustainable Homes by 2011. The Council has not assessed the risk to housing delivery as a result of this policy. There is no evidence to demonstrate that housing can still be delivered in accordance with the Council’s housing trajectory with a requirement of 40% affordable housing alongside such high sustainable construction requirements. The Council’s viability assessment chooses to ignore this added construction cost despite the Three Dragons Model being able to accommodate it within its calculations. This omission needs to be rectified immediately.The viability assessment is fundamentally flawed as paragraph 8.4.2 of the assessment states that planning obligations have been set at £5,000 per dwelling for the purposes of the viability assessment due to the uncertainty of the housing market and the timing of the implementation of the Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL). Firstly, while there is a degree of uncertainty in the detail implementation of CIL there is a high level of certainty that it will be introduced as programmed in 2009. The Government has published documentation and statements to this effect. Therefore it is incorrect to assume the former is the case.This is further substantiated as the Council has itself acknowledged CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

198 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

it’s understanding and certainty of CIL in the publication of it’s recent Issues and Options Infrastructure Development Plan Document that seeks to develop a CIL based approach to funding future infrastructure to support the Core Strategy.While this document is currently in its early stages it provides the evidence to support a CIL based approach in the Borough of Poole that is in excess of £10 per dwelling. This position is also supported in paragraph A5.1 which clearly reflects this position in stating that infrastructure requirements in Poole are likely to be high. The sensitivity testing that has been undertaken in Appendix 5 of the Viability Assessment is therefore more reflective of the future position for scheme viability by way of the Council’s own proposals and evidence of the potential costs associated with CIL. It is therefore unsound to state that there is uncertainty around CIL and base infrastructure contributions on a figure of £5,000 per dwelling in the context of paragraph 29 of PPS3 that states that the Council should consider the risks to delivery along with assess the impacts in the context of housing delivery.The Conclusions to the viability assessment in Appendix 5 state that the findings should not be influenced by CIL, on which there is a good degree of uncertainty. However, it is clear from the above that there is no uncertainty surrounding the fact evidence is available to illustrate that infrastructure costs associated with Poole are likely to be in the region of £10,000 to £15,000 per dwelling. A policy that seeks to ignore this evidence and be based upon a planning contribution of only £5,000 is clearly unsound and does not assess fully the risks associated with housing delivery.Secondly the Core Strategy is establishing a housing delivery programme to the year 2026 and therefore the policies that it contains need to deliver housing across this period. It is therefore inappropriate to establish and test long term policy based upon any current housing market conditions. Fundamentally the viability assessment does also not consider the full cost implications of the Council seeking higher construction costs associated with the Council’s proposals for dwellings to meet higher levels of the Code for Sustainable Homes in advance of the national and regional timescales. The HBF notes that the Three Dragons Model construction costs includes an element for Exceptional Costs within which there is an element for the additional costs associated with the Code for Sustainable Homes. This is incorporated into the Three Dragons Model on the basis that higher levels of the code at present time in advance of the national timescale will incur additional construction costs. However, it appears from the 199

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

report that this factor has not comprised any element of the assessment for Poole, despite the Council’s Core Strategy actually seeking an acceleration of the Code for Sustainable Homes to that of the national and regional timescales.Any affordability viability assessment that has not considered the addition costs associated with the Council’s own ambitions for sustainable construction is therefore fundamentally flawed, especially in light of the Borough of Poole’s particular ambitions to achieve Code Level 6 by 2011 on sites of 50+ dwellings.Therefore in the context of a full viability assessment the HBF would have expected the Council to have included an allowance for its sustainable construction policy PCS33. However it has applied a zero cost to this factor which is completely unsound and unrealistic. The HBF would refer the Inspector to the Cyril Sweett Report on such costs. The HBF also considers that achieving Code Level 5 could be as high as £30,000 over current build costs alone, which combined with the requirements to test levels of CIL at £15,000 are likely to render 40% affordable housing contributions unviable. The HBF would also question whether 30% is in fact viable and such proportions based should be tested for soundness again against the risks to housing delivery.The only manner in which this policy can be made sound is through a full and proper assessment of the implications of the Council’s own ambitions for CIL and CSHomes requirements. As such the policy is unsound.

Final Submission 6 34 - ecoonic impact.doc

Final Submission - 6.34 lifetime homes.doc

Final Submission - p6.34.doc

Final Submission PCS6 windfall.doc

Final Submission PCS7 affordable housing.doc

Final Submission PCS9 lifetime homes buildign control.doc CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

200 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Final Submission PCS11.doc

Final Submission PCS33 - energy targets.doc

Final Submission PCS33 - viabilty.doc

Final Submission PCS33.doc 201

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 7 1100 RSL (South 2410 Unsound On balance we support the principles underpinning this policy and the emphasis on West RSL Planning viability; however we do have some recommendations to improve the clarity of this Consortium) policy. In its current form it may not offer developers certainty over the level of affordable housing contributions that may be required for individual sites. In addition to this we are concerned about the use of public subsidy to support the 40% requirement across the borough. Affordable Housing Target: We support the use of the 40% benchmark across some of the borough. In accordance with PPS3 the Council has commissioned a viability assessment to demonstrate that this policy is both viable and practicable. However this viability assessment states that a 40% requirement may not be supported in every part of the borough without some sort of public subsidy. “For these sorts of residential to residential sites, whilst we would expect the high value areas (case studies Boscombe Overcliff-Southbourne Overcliff and Canford Cliffs in Poole) to deliver in line with a policy target of at least 40%, even without grant, our analysis suggests that this target will be difficult to achieve in most areas of both boroughs, without grant”. In Section 6 it goes on to state that: “…the availability or otherwise of grant may well make the difference between delivering a scheme with affordable housing or not.” PPS3 states that affordable housing targets such as these should take into account the level of public subsidy that is likely to be available. We are concerned that the Council may find it difficult to sustain this policy if it is solely relying on Housing Corporation funding which is scarce and the levels available vary over time. However, the Council is proposing to lower the level of the threshold for affordable housing to include all new developments, inevitably this will increase the amount off-site or in-lieu affordable housing contributions. This additional funding could be sufficient to support the 40% target where Housing Corporation grant is not available, but this needs to be further explored by the Council. The Council also needs to make it clearer that these targets are a starting point for negotiation. The Viability Assessment states that some areas in Poole will support an affordable housing requirement above 40%, but there are a number of other sites/ areas where meeting this 40% target will be extremely challenging if not impossible without public subsidy. In these circumstances, a number of options can be explored to maintain viability at 40%, for example allowing a higher provision of shared ownership properties within the affordable housing requirement. We consider that the Council should identify CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

202 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

all possible areas for negotiation when economic viability is an issue for a site, before it accepts a reduction in the overall affordable housing requirement.

1219 Mr Jamie 1010-08.m4.PDF Sulivan (Tetlow King Planning) Representation form.PDF 203

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

1271 MDL 2418 Sound Policy PSC7 refers to individual site viability to determine the capacity of a site to deliver Development Ltd a level of affordable housing that can be supported financially. This approach is supported as it will allow for reasonable flexibility to enable the delivery of market and affordable housing to meet housing number requirements for Poole that are prescribed by the RSS.

1127 Ms Joanne Poole Core Rep Form - Contents.pdf Webb (Savills (Representing Poole Core Rep Form - para 6.125.pdf Bournemouth & Poole College)) Poole Core Rep Form - PCS6.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS7.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS9.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS11.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS12.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS12.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS14.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 27.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 30.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 33.pdf CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

204 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 34.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 35.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 38.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - Strategic Objectives.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - vision 1.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - visions 2.pdf 205

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 7 1163 Ms Simone 2537 In addition, paragraph 6.38 of the Core Strategy highlights that the latest Dorset-wide Wilding (GOSW) Housing Needs and Demand survey which was produced as part of the Housing Market Assessment identified a total net annual housing need in Poole of 1,199 dwellings (it would be helpful to clarify this paragraph by referring to the net annual need for affordable dwellings). As such the suggested approach and policy PCS 7 in particular does appear justified in not setting an upper limit to the potential affordable housing provision or contribution, as it recognizes viability being the key consideration and also the need for other planning objectives to be met from the development of sites.

Table 2.86 Policy 7

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.47 188 (Agent for CPRE 2386 Para 6.47 : We strongly advocate that there should be a separate planning policy for & Canford Cliffs & Sheltered Housing, separate from Care Homes and Lifetime Homes. If elderly people Sandbanks are to retain their independence and not go into expensive Care and Nursing Homes, Neighbourhood the interim stage of Sheltered Housing is a strongly supportive answer. There has been Watch) a growth in these homes, but they need a separate set of criteria covering parking, access, etc.

CPRE Poole Core Strategy Response July 1 2008.msg CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

206 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 8 1109 (Talbot Village 2514 Sound TVT supports PCS8 which allows for the provision of care homes for the elderly, in Trust) order to meet the anticipated demand over the plan period. The Core Strategy sets out the evidence to demonstrate a need for such uses. The Plan should allow flexibility in 12 Ms Frances Young terms of the location of this form of development. (Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners)

Table 2.87 Policy 8 207

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

525 Mr Tim Watton 2319 Unsound The HBF object to the inclusion of a policy requiring all dwellings to meet the Lifetime (House Builders Homes Standard in a spatial planning policy. The Lifetime Homes Standard is not a Federation Ltd) planning policy matter let alone of strategic nature enough to be included within a Core Strategy.The lifetime homes standard has no status as far as town and country planning legislation is concerned. PPS1: Delivering Sustainable Development states in paragraph 30 that “…planning policies should not replicate, cut across, or detrimentally affect matters within the scope of other legislative requirements, such as those set out in Building Regulations for energy efficiency”. The HBF considers that this is largely a matter already dealt with by way of Part M of the building regulations. Developers must, as a matter of law comply with the Building Regulations and they are subject to frequent change and update unlike LDDs. The purpose of these references in the two Planning Policy Statements is to avoid confusion and potentially conflicting advice being given by different regulating authorities. Thus whilst it may be appropriate for planning authorities to seek to negotiate with developers for a proportion of dwellings to be built to lifetime homes standards, it is considered excessive and unwarranted to require a specific percentage to be built to such standards. This policy should be removed.

Final Submission 6 34 - ecoonic impact.doc

Final Submission - 6.34 lifetime homes.doc

Final Submission - p6.34.doc

Final Submission PCS6 windfall.doc

Final Submission PCS7 affordable housing.doc

Final Submission PCS9 lifetime homes buildign control.doc

Final Submission PCS11.doc CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

208 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Final Submission PCS33 - energy targets.doc

Final Submission PCS33 - viabilty.doc

Final Submission PCS33.doc 209

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

210 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

1271 MDL 2419 Unsound Many of the elements included in the Lifetime Homes Standards (as indicated on pages Development Ltd 99 and 100) are covered by Building Regulations and therefore this system of regulation will ensure that many of the Lifetime Homes Standards will be implemented as a matter of course. Those not included within Building Regulations could be difficult to implement and enforce, an additional system would have to be put in place to ensure such measures were implemented. In addition, Policy PSC9 could affect the delivery of market housing during the plan period due to the costs associated and therefore impinge on allowing flexibility within the plan to deal with changing market conditions. In addition, the Lifetimes Homes Standard could be superseded, replaced or removed in the future and therefore the Policy would become irrelevant in part. The requirement for this policy is questionable due to national regulations that will ensure residential units meet the Lifetime Homes policy through Building Regulations and other emerging national legislation i.e Code for Sustainable Homes.

Poole Core Rep Form - Contents.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - para 6.125.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS6.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS7.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS9.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS11.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS12.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS12.pdf 211

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

1127 Ms Joanne Poole Core Rep Form - PCS14.pdf Webb (Savills (Representing Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 27.pdf Bournemouth & Poole College)) Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 30.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 33.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 34.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 35.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 38.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - Strategic Objectives.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - vision 1.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - visions 2.pdf CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

212 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 9 1111 Mrs Joan Jarvis 2486 Life Time Homes (Policy 9): This policy is supported and likely to be welcomed by many people in different life situations. Those who want to care for relatives or are in need of care themselves and wish to remain in their own homes: also families who would find life particularly stressful in dwellings where these improvements have not been carried out. Parents can be under considerable pressure when sandwiched together with undisciplined neighbours in high-density housing and struggle to control their children in face of bad influences. Lifetime Homes Standards would help ease some of the tensions within their own four walls.

Mrs Joan Jarvis.doc

Policy 9 1109 (Talbot Village 2515 Unsound TVT considers that the requirement for lifetime homes for all new residential Trust) developments is too onerous and that account should be taken of site specific considerations, government and regional guidance and building regulations. PPS3 and 12 Ms Frances Young the draft South West RSS do not set out specific requirements for the provision of (Nathaniel Lichfield & lifetime homes within new residential schemes. Moreover, TVT consider that the cost Partners) of providing all housing to lifetime homes standards must be set against other factors such as "improving affordability across the housing market, including by increasing the supply of housing'. (paragraph 9 of PPS3). Therefore in order to meet the tests of soundness 48 and 4C, and to accord with national and regional housing policy, which do not currently require 100% housing to lifetime housing standards, Policy PCS9 should be written to state that the Council will encourage the provision of new residential development to meet Lifetime Home Standards, but that account will be taken of specific site circumstances, the overall development and the viability of individual schemes.

Table 2.88 Policy 9 213

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.54 1239 2594 Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation: We welcome the provision of a specific policy PCS10 to cover this issue and the reference in para 6.54 to the role of the RSS in Mr Neal Whitehead establishing the number of pitches required. As referred to above the Panel Report on this issue has been recently published which has recommended revised allocations for permanent and transit pitch numbers in the Bournemouth & Poole and Weymouth & Dorchester Housing Market Area. Although definitive numbers will not be established (South West Regional until the publication of the final RSS, expected to be published later this year, we are Assembly) pleased to note the commitment in PCS10 to continuing joint working across the Dorset authorities on this issue and look forward to these being taken forward in the site specific DPD.

Table 2.89 Paragraph 6.54 CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

214 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 10 188 Mr Terry Stewart 2387 PCS10 : Poole should resist the Regional pressure to maximize the number of Gypsy (Agent for CPRE & & Traveller transit sites since they cause so much friction, waste, crime and impact on Canford Cliffs & the environment. The strategy must be to minimize the sites in order to achieve to level Sandbanks giving the police the power to move them on under Section 60. Identifying suitable sites Neighbourhood will be extremely difficult and should not be near protected Open Spaces or the Green Watch) Belt.

CPRE Poole Core Strategy Response July 1 2008.msg

Policy 10 1163 Ms Simone 2534 It is positively recognized that a pro-active approach has been taken to meeting the Wilding (GOSW) needs of Gypsies and Travelers including a commitment to providing the number of fixed and transit Gypsies and Traveler pitches required by the emerging RSS.

Policy 10 1239 Mr Neal 2595 Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation: We welcome the provision of a specific policy Whitehead (South PCS10 to cover this issue and the reference in para 6.54 to the role of the RSS in establishing the number of pitches required. As referred to above the Panel Report on this issue has been recently published which has recommended revised allocations for permanent and transit pitch numbers in the Bournemouth & Poole and Weymouth & Dorchester Housing Market Area. Although definitive numbers will not be established until the publication of the final RSS, expected to be published later this year, we are pleased to note the commitment in PCS10 to continuing joint working across the Dorset 215

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

West Regional authorities on this issue and look forward to these being taken forward in the site specific Assembly) DPD.

Table 2.90 Policy 10

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.55 1102 Mr Ian Parsons 2562 The Agency fully supports proposals outlined in paras 6.55 and 6.56 to revitalise Poole (Highways Agency) Town Centre as the focus for growth during the Plan period, and Policy PCS11 indicating that this will be the most suitable location for major developments which generate large numbers of trips. We would suggest, however, that the policy should also require that proposals are subject to appropriate transport assessments in line with guidance given in the DfT’s Guidance on Transport Assessments (March 2007), PPG13, and DfT Circular 02/2007 Planning and the Strategic Road Network. Where an application is of a scale to warrant a transport assessment it should also be accompanied by a travel plan offering a package of appropriate measures promoting walking, cycling and the use of public transport in order to reduce the number of single occupancy car trips.

Table 2.91 Paragraph 6.55 CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

216 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Picture 6.4 Poole 1267 Mr Barry 2343 Unsound We support the principle of Council’s approach to defining broad ‘Character Areas’ to Town Centre Houlston recognise and reinforce local distinctiveness. However we do take issue within Appendix 1: Character Area Profiles for Area 1: Town Centre. Whilst we accept these profiles are meant to be generalised, we do feel that recognition should be given to the role Barclays House and the Network Rail and Stadium sites play to defining a particular character to the northern edge of the town centre. Accordingly, we ask that the description for Profile Area 1: the Town Centre, be supplemented to reflect the impact that Barclays House has a defining prominent building on an important axis site and ‘gateway’ into the town. Similarly the railway station and stadium land uses also define the character of the surrounding area. Atisreal request to be notified, at the above specified address, of the publication of the recommendations of the Inspector and/or the adoption of the DPD.

1266 Mr Martin Poole BC Core Strategy Sub Stage Reps Form 1v3m.pdf Pendlebury (Atisreal) Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 2.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 3.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 4.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 5.pdf

Table 2.92 Picture 6.4 Poole Town Centre 217

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.56 1102 Mr Ian Parsons 2563 The Agency fully supports proposals outlined in paras 6.55 and 6.56 to revitalise Poole (Highways Agency) Town Centre as the focus for growth during the Plan period, and Policy PCS11 indicating that this will be the most suitable location for major developments which generate large numbers of trips. We would suggest, however, that the policy should also require that proposals are subject to appropriate transport assessments in line with guidance given in the DfT’s Guidance on Transport Assessments (March 2007), PPG13, and DfT Circular 02/2007 Planning and the Strategic Road Network. Where an application is of a scale to warrant a transport assessment it should also be accompanied by a travel plan offering a package of appropriate measures promoting walking, cycling and the use of public transport in order to reduce the number of single occupancy car trips.

Table 2.93 Paragraph 6.56 CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

218 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 11 525 Mr Tim Watton 2320 Unsound The HBF object to the emphasis that a planning application should be required to submit (House Builders an Appropriate Assessment. This is not consistent with national and European legislation. Federation Ltd) The Council should ensure that it has conducted an Appropriate Assessment for all of it’s proposals within the Core Strategy and not defer this requirement to the planning application process. Nor should it defer the consideration of such issues to subsequent Development Plan Documents. The soundness of the Core Strategy should not be undermined by deferral of such matters.

Final Submission 6 34 - ecoonic impact.doc

Final Submission - 6.34 lifetime homes.doc

Final Submission - p6.34.doc

Final Submission PCS6 windfall.doc

Final Submission PCS7 affordable housing.doc

Final Submission PCS9 lifetime homes buildign control.doc

Final Submission PCS11.doc

Final Submission PCS33 - energy targets.doc

Final Submission PCS33 - viabilty.doc

Final Submission PCS33.doc 219

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 11 189 Mr Renny 2349 Unsound PCS 11 sets out the opportunities for major town centre developments. These Henderson (RSPB development sites (and other sites in the Borough) have potential for supporting existing South West Region) biodiversity interest. Paragraph 13 pf PPS9 identifies this, and we recommend that appropriate safeguards are put in place which recognise the potential for development sites to host valuable biodiversity and seeks measures to incorporate/safeguard such resources.

PCS Submission Form Biodiversity in new developments.doc

PCS Submission Form Biodiversity of existing development.doc

PCS Submission Form Habitat creation.doc

PCS Submission Form HRA.doc

PCS Submission Form Networks.doc

PCS Submission Form Proposals Map.doc

PCS Submission Form SSSIs.doc CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

220 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

1271 MDL 2420 Unsound Figure 6.4 is misleading and needs to be more clearly defined in order for appropriate Development Ltd mechanisms to be implemented to monitor the Town Centre Area in the future, this will be difficult to achieve if those sites included in this area are not clearly detailed. For example only parts of Cobb’s Quay is included within the Town Centre; the redline in figure 6.4 covers part of the pontoon area, but not the whole site.Cobb’s Quay should be fully included in the Town Centre as it is an important leisure site which contributes to the economy and provides activities to add to the leisure and tourism offer available in Poole. The plan should be redrawn to carefully consider which sites should be included within the Town Centre area in order to contribute towards the aims of revitalising the Town Centre (Policy PSC11). The figure currently includes a oval shape to define the Town Centre, which cuts across sites. Another area of confusion concerning figure 6.4 is the tittles and labels. Figure 6.4 is titled Poole Town Centre, however the red line is label Poole Central Area. The title and labels need to be clearly identified.

Poole Core Rep Form - Contents.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - para 6.125.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS6.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS7.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS9.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS11.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS12.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS12.pdf 221

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

1127 Ms Joanne Poole Core Rep Form - PCS14.pdf Webb (Savills (Representing Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 27.pdf Bournemouth & Poole College)) Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 30.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 33.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 34.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 35.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 38.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - Strategic Objectives.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - vision 1.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - visions 2.pdf CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

222 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 11 326 Ms Rose 2449 Sound We support your Submission Core Strategy in respect of Policies PCS 11, PCS 12, Freeman (The PCS 13 but with some observations. Reasons: These policies contain all the elements Theatres Trust) required for a thoughtful and forward looking framework for the future cultural needs of the Borough. Good quality community and cultural facilities are essential components in the development of sustainable communities. It is important to protect and promote cultural facilities for their leading role in the quality of cultural life and for their valuable contribution to the character and function of Poole town centre.

Theatre Trust - Ross Freeman.msg

Policy 11 527 Ms Alice Ordidge 2504 PCS 11 is fully supported although it is suggested that reference is made to sustainable (South West RDA) development ( Code for Sustainable Homes, BREEAM, Modern Methods of Construction, energy efficiency etc.)

Alice Ordidge - SWRDA.doc

Policy 11 1239 Mr Neal 2596 We welcome the commitment in the Strategic Objectives and the Detailed Strategy to Whitehead (South planning for a successful economy with an emphasis on the Regeneration and Town West Regional Centre area (PCS 11 and 12). This is consistent with the Draft RSS, the Panel Report Assembly) recommendations and the role of Poole as a Growth Point.

Table 2.94 Policy 11 223

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.59 1267 Mr Barry 2328 Sound We support in broad terms the Council’s aspirations for the town of Poole and related Houlston Core Strategy Policies. However, recent changes in circumstance have shown that the Barclays House site together with associated buildings immediately adjacent to the presently defined Town Centre North Area will be subject to significant change in the plan period. There is clear evidence in relation to a recent related planning application and discussions with Council Officers that the Barclays House site will be the subject of regeneration development schemes in the near future. For this reason we would wish to explore further with Council Officers the merits and potential drawbacks from the inclusion of the Barclays House site within an extended Town Centre North Area Action Plan. We believe this review would also be beneficial and timely, particularly in terms of the new plan preparation guidance (Planning Policy Statement 12: Local Spatial Planning - paragraphs 5.4 – 6 relating to guidance on Action Area Plans) and companion document. We also note that the Council has recently secured Poole as having ‘new growth point status’ which further supports our contention that such a review would be helpful. In addition we note that the Barclays House site compares favourably as a potential regeneration development site in terms of the Council’s Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA). Atisreal request to be notified, at the above specified address, of the publication of the recommendations of the Inspector and/or the adoption of the DPD.

1266 Mr Martin Poole BC Core Strategy Sub Stage Reps Form 1v3m.pdf Pendlebury (Atisreal) Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 2.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 3.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 4.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 5.pdf CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

224 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.59 1077 Ms Theresa 2590 Not only is economic-growth a feature, but specifically retail-led growth. Retail-led McManus (Poole growth is not sustainable, and is often not ethical. Here are some alternative suggestions Agenda 21) for the space that is earmarked for retail developments: Allotments, to encourage people living in densely populated areas to grow their own food., More public spaces for people to relax in and enjoy., More incubator units – to encourage more local working and cottage industries, More pavement cafés.

Table 2.95 Paragraph 6.59

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 12 189 Mr Renny 2348 Unsound PCS 12 sets out protection for the natural environment from development in the Henderson (RSPB regeneration area. We welcome this. However, the regeneration area along with other South West Region) development areas within the Borough provide significant opportunities for factoring in biodiversity, and opportunities should be taken to promote this through the plan, which is in accordance with paragraph 14 of PPS9.

PCS Submission Form Biodiversity in new developments.doc

PCS Submission Form Biodiversity of existing development.doc

PCS Submission Form Habitat creation.doc

PCS Submission Form HRA.doc

PCS Submission Form Networks.doc

PCS Submission Form Proposals Map.doc 225

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

PCS Submission Form SSSIs.doc

Policy 12 188 Mr Terry Stewart 2388 PCS12 : The list of Key Requirements must include provision for the Poole Sea Scouts. (CPRE - Dorset Para d. viii : We strongly support the need for the Hamworthy power station site to avoid Branch) ANY – not “significant” harm to the Poole Harbour SPA..

CPRE Poole Core Strategy Response July 1 2008.msg CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

226 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

1271 MDL 2421 Unsound Policy PSC12 refers to the priority to deliver a second lifting bridge, which will link Development Ltd Hamworthy and the Port to the central part of Poole. Policy CS12 does not make reference to the potential negative impacts and disruption on other land uses and allocations up river, such as water based tourism and leisure and employment. An additional point should be included in this policy to protect such land uses and allocations to ensure they are not adversely affected and continued investment occurs.

1127 Ms Joanne Poole Core Rep Form - Contents.pdf Webb (Savills (Representing Poole Core Rep Form - para 6.125.pdf Bournemouth & Poole College)) Poole Core Rep Form - PCS6.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS7.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS9.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS11.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS12.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS12.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS14.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 27.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 30.pdf 227

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 33.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 34.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 35.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 38.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - Strategic Objectives.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - vision 1.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - visions 2.pdf CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

228 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 12 326 Ms Rose 2450 Sound We support your Submission Core Strategy in respect of Policies PCS 11, PCS 12, Freeman (The PCS 13 but with some observations. Reasons: These policies contain all the elements Theatres Trust) required for a thoughtful and forward looking framework for the future cultural needs of the Borough. Good quality community and cultural facilities are essential components in the development of sustainable communities. It is important to protect and promote cultural facilities for their leading role in the quality of cultural life and for their valuable contribution to the character and function of Poole town centre.

Theatre Trust - Ross Freeman.msg

Policy 12 1276 Neptune 2478 Unsound We object to policy PCS12 on the grounds that the policy is unsound. It does not reflect Consulting Limited national planning policy and objectives, and does not present a flexible approach to development. The policy states that development will be permitted on condition that it 1132 Ms Lindsay delivers the principles set out in the Poole Bridge Regeneration Initiative SPG (part I). Thompson (Terence However, this SPG is not a development plan document. It was adopted by the Borough O'Rourke) of Poole as supplementary guidance to the Local Plan in 2004. It has not gone through the rigours of the LDF system and does not now comply with national planning policy. It is now out of date. The SPG does not comply or respond to recent national planning policy and objectives particularly: PPS3: Housing (2006), Draft PPS4: Planning for sustainable economic development (2007), PPS6 Town Centres (2005), PPS25: Development and Flood Risk. Policy PCS12 is not considered to offer a flexible approach as advocated by PPS12 (June 2008), particularly as the Core Strategy is expected to take an approach to development over a long time frame (15 years) and as PPS12 recognises that “the arena of the built and natural environment” changes over time. This has been shown above. There has been several changes that have occurred since the adoption of the SPG, not least changes to the flood risk assessment for Poole and the development in the Governments sustainability agenda. PPS12 states that “plans should be able to show how they will handle contingencies”, but it is not clear how this 229

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

will be possible with an already outdated SPG that was developed under the planning system, predating the 2004 Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act. It therefore calls into question the soundness of a policy and a plan that relies upon outdated and untested guidance. We request that the Borough of Poole update the SPG to reflect current national planning policy and test it through the formal LDF process. In the meantime, we request that the Borough of Poole reconsider the evidence for the regeneration area that is to be used in the Core Strategy. The borough of Poole’s local development scheme (April 2007) refers to the SPG being used to continue to supplement the policies of the local plan (not the Core Strategy) and over time this guidance will be replaced. It is therefore incorrect to refer directly to the principles of this guidance in the Core Strategy as it is recognised in the LDS that the SPG will be replaced and therefore could make the Core Strategy out of date very quickly. This policy is therefore not in conformity with the LDS, which indicates the SPG will have only a limited lifetime. From a development perspective Policy 12 is too prescriptive in its requirements for the regeneration area sites. The sites are expected to deliver a substantial amount of public benefit and then development is currently being frustrated by a dated supporting document that is too prescriptive for Core Strategy policy. A flexible approach needs to be retained to ensure the Core Strategy fulfils the Councils own vision for Poole, which seeks to develop a dynamic economy, this will be driven by the development of the regeneration area. The SPG does not fully reflect the Councils own vision for the Core Strategy. If an SPD is required for the regeneration area, it should supplement and support the Core Strategy, not the other way around. As the SPG has not been through the Local Development Framework process and is therefore not a LDD, it cannot be considered as part of the spatial planning framework. The policies contained within PCS 12 therefore do not meet PPS12 (June 2008) test of soundness, in particular the need to retain flexibility national planning policy. As an example of the need to be –up-to-date and flexible, this representation form has already become out of date, even before the end of the consultation period, with the publication of the revised PPS12. This indicates how quickly the LDF system is evolving system and evolving national planning policy and objectives. The Core Strategy should be forward looking to the next 15years not backwards looking to the old system. Therefore, whilst we object to policy PCS12 on the basis of old style soundness tests, we also object on the basis of the CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

230 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

new style test of failure to be consistent with national policy, failure to be justified and failure to be effective (see PPS12, para 4.52).

Policy 12 649 Ms Carroll 2492 Unsound The Poole Harbour Bridge is a lifeline to the communities in Hamworthy and Upton Rawlings (Blandford along the Blandford Road. If anything happened to the old bridge before the new one Road Action Group is built there would be chaos. It cannot be assumed that the 80 year old bridge is capable Upton) of sustaining modern heavy transport long term. The funding and building of the new bridge is very urgent for the whole area including the continental transport (E.B) and needs to be part of the Core Strategy as a priority.

Policy 12 1102 Mr Ian Parsons 2564 The Agency has concerns regarding criteria ii of PCS 12 - The Regeneration Area (Highways Agency) (second lifting bridge and supporting road infrastructure) as we believe there should be supporting evidence from the SEDMMTS available prior to taking forward proposals involving links to the SRN.

Policy 12 1239 Mr Neal 2597 We welcome the commitment in the Strategic Objectives and the Detailed Strategy to Whitehead (South planning for a successful economy with an emphasis on the Regeneration and Town West Regional Centre area (PCS 11 and 12). This is consistent with the Draft RSS, the Panel Report Assembly) recommendations and the role of Poole as a Growth Point.

Table 2.96 Policy 12 231

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.60 1267 Mr Barry 2329 Sound We support in broad terms the Council’s aspirations for the town of Poole and related Houlston Core Strategy Policies. However, recent changes in circumstance have shown that the Barclays House site together with associated buildings immediately adjacent to the presently defined Town Centre North Area will be subject to significant change in the plan period. There is clear evidence in relation to a recent related planning application and discussions with Council Officers that the Barclays House site will be the subject of regeneration development schemes in the near future. For this reason we would wish to explore further with Council Officers the merits and potential drawbacks from the inclusion of the Barclays House site within an extended Town Centre North Area Action Plan. We believe this review would also be beneficial and timely, particularly in terms of the new plan preparation guidance (Planning Policy Statement 12: Local Spatial Planning - paragraphs 5.4 – 6 relating to guidance on Action Area Plans) and companion document. We also note that the Council has recently secured Poole as having ‘new growth point status’ which further supports our contention that such a review would be helpful. In addition we note that the Barclays House site compares favourably as a potential regeneration development site in terms of the Council’s Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA). Atisreal request to be notified, at the above specified address, of the publication of the recommendations of the Inspector and/or the adoption of the DPD.

1266 Mr Martin Poole BC Core Strategy Sub Stage Reps Form 1v3m.pdf Pendlebury (Atisreal) Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 2.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 3.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 4.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 5.pdf

Table 2.97 Paragraph 6.60 CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

232 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.61 1267 Mr Barry 2330 Sound We support in broad terms the Council’s aspirations for the town of Poole and related Houlston Core Strategy Policies. However, recent changes in circumstance have shown that the Barclays House site together with associated buildings immediately adjacent to the presently defined Town Centre North Area will be subject to significant change in the plan period. There is clear evidence in relation to a recent related planning application and discussions with Council Officers that the Barclays House site will be the subject of regeneration development schemes in the near future. For this reason we would wish to explore further with Council Officers the merits and potential drawbacks from the inclusion of the Barclays House site within an extended Town Centre North Area Action Plan. We believe this review would also be beneficial and timely, particularly in terms of the new plan preparation guidance (Planning Policy Statement 12: Local Spatial Planning - paragraphs 5.4 – 6 relating to guidance on Action Area Plans) and companion document. We also note that the Council has recently secured Poole as having ‘new growth point status’ which further supports our contention that such a review would be helpful. In addition we note that the Barclays House site compares favourably as a potential regeneration development site in terms of the Council’s Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA). Atisreal request to be notified, at the above specified address, of the publication of the recommendations of the Inspector and/or the adoption of the DPD.

1266 Mr Martin Poole BC Core Strategy Sub Stage Reps Form 1v3m.pdf Pendlebury (Atisreal) Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 2.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 3.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 4.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 5.pdf

Table 2.98 Paragraph 6.61 233

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.62 1267 Mr Barry 2331 Sound We support in broad terms the Council’s aspirations for the town of Poole and related Houlston Core Strategy Policies. However, recent changes in circumstance have shown that the Barclays House site together with associated buildings immediately adjacent to the presently defined Town Centre North Area will be subject to significant change in the plan period. There is clear evidence in relation to a recent related planning application and discussions with Council Officers that the Barclays House site will be the subject of regeneration development schemes in the near future. For this reason we would wish to explore further with Council Officers the merits and potential drawbacks from the inclusion of the Barclays House site within an extended Town Centre North Area Action Plan. We believe this review would also be beneficial and timely, particularly in terms of the new plan preparation guidance (Planning Policy Statement 12: Local Spatial Planning - paragraphs 5.4 – 6 relating to guidance on Action Area Plans) and companion document. We also note that the Council has recently secured Poole as having ‘new growth point status’ which further supports our contention that such a review would be helpful.In addition we note that the Barclays House site compares favourably as a potential regeneration development site in terms of the Council’s Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA). Atisreal request to be notified, at the above specified address, of the publication of the recommendations of the Inspector and/or the adoption of the DPD.

1266 Mr Martin Poole BC Core Strategy Sub Stage Reps Form 1v3m.pdf Pendlebury (Atisreal) Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 2.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 3.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 4.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 5.pdf CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

234 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.62 1017 (Highcross 2471 Unsound We consider the assumptions in paragraphs 6.62 and 6.68 and Policy PCS13 that retail Group Ltd) development should be restricted in out of town locations goes beyond the tests of PPS6 – retail need, retail impact and sequential approach, which relate to edge and out of centre proposals. On this basis there is no need to restrict development further than the tests of PPS6, as they are sufficient to assess the appropriateness of an edge or out of centre retail development.

1016 Ms Vanessa Vanessa Clipstone - Highcross Group Ltd.pdf Clipstone (RPS Planning)

Table 2.99 Paragraph 6.62 235

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.63 1267 Mr Barry 2332 Sound We support in broad terms the Council’s aspirations for the town of Poole and related Houlston Core Strategy Policies. However, recent changes in circumstance have shown that the Barclays House site together with associated buildings immediately adjacent to the presently defined Town Centre North Area will be subject to significant change in the plan period. There is clear evidence in relation to a recent related planning application and discussions with Council Officers that the Barclays House site will be the subject of regeneration development schemes in the near future. For this reason we would wish to explore further with Council Officers the merits and potential drawbacks from the inclusion of the Barclays House site within an extended Town Centre North Area Action Plan. We believe this review would also be beneficial and timely, particularly in terms of the new plan preparation guidance (Planning Policy Statement 12: Local Spatial Planning - paragraphs 5.4 – 6 relating to guidance on Action Area Plans) and companion document. We also note that the Council has recently secured Poole as having ‘new growth point status’ which further supports our contention that such a review would be helpful. In addition we note that the Barclays House site compares favourably as a potential regeneration development site in terms of the Council’s Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA). Atisreal request to be notified, at the above specified address, of the publication of the recommendations of the Inspector and/or the adoption of the DPD.

1266 Mr Martin Poole BC Core Strategy Sub Stage Reps Form 1v3m.pdf Pendlebury (Atisreal) Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 2.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 3.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 4.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 5.pdf

Table 2.100 Paragraph 6.63 CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

236 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.64 1267 Mr Barry 2333 Sound We support in broad terms the Council’s aspirations for the town of Poole and related Houlston Core Strategy Policies. However, recent changes in circumstance have shown that the Barclays House site together with associated buildings immediately adjacent to the presently defined Town Centre North Area will be subject to significant change in the plan period. There is clear evidence in relation to a recent related planning application and discussions with Council Officers that the Barclays House site will be the subject of regeneration development schemes in the near future. For this reason we would wish to explore further with Council Officers the merits and potential drawbacks from the inclusion of the Barclays House site within an extended Town Centre North Area Action Plan. We believe this review would also be beneficial and timely, particularly in terms of the new plan preparation guidance (Planning Policy Statement 12: Local Spatial Planning - paragraphs 5.4 – 6 relating to guidance on Action Area Plans) and companion document. We also note that the Council has recently secured Poole as having ‘new growth point status’ which further supports our contention that such a review would be helpful. In addition we note that the Barclays House site compares favourably as a potential regeneration development site in terms of the Council’s Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA). Atisreal request to be notified, at the above specified address, of the publication of the recommendations of the Inspector and/or the adoption of the DPD.

1266 Mr Martin Poole BC Core Strategy Sub Stage Reps Form 1v3m.pdf Pendlebury (Atisreal) Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 2.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 3.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 4.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 5.pdf

Table 2.101 Paragraph 6.64 237

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.65 1267 Mr Barry 2334 Sound We support in broad terms the Council’s aspirations for the town of Poole and related Houlston Core Strategy Policies. However, recent changes in circumstance have shown that the Barclays House site together with associated buildings immediately adjacent to the presently defined Town Centre North Area will be subject to significant change in the plan period. There is clear evidence in relation to a recent related planning application and discussions with Council Officers that the Barclays House site will be the subject of regeneration development schemes in the near future. For this reason we would wish to explore further with Council Officers the merits and potential drawbacks from the inclusion of the Barclays House site within an extended Town Centre North Area Action Plan. We believe this review would also be beneficial and timely, particularly in terms of the new plan preparation guidance (Planning Policy Statement 12: Local Spatial Planning - paragraphs 5.4 – 6 relating to guidance on Action Area Plans) and companion document. We also note that the Council has recently secured Poole as having ‘new growth point status’ which further supports our contention that such a review would be helpful. In addition we note that the Barclays House site compares favourably as a potential regeneration development site in terms of the Council’s Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA). Atisreal request to be notified, at the above specified address, of the publication of the recommendations of the Inspector and/or the adoption of the DPD.

1266 Mr Martin Poole BC Core Strategy Sub Stage Reps Form 1v3m.pdf Pendlebury (Atisreal) Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 2.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 3.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 4.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 5.pdf

Table 2.102 Paragraph 6.65 CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

238 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 13 1267 Mr Barry 2337 Sound We support in broad terms the Council’s aspirations for the town of Poole and related Houlston Core Strategy Policies. However, recent changes in circumstance have shown that the Barclays House site together with associated buildings immediately adjacent to the presently defined Town Centre North Area will be subject to significant change in the plan period. There is clear evidence in relation to a recent related planning application and discussions with Council Officers that the Barclays House site will be the subject of regeneration development schemes in the near future. For this reason we would wish to explore further with Council Officers the merits and potential drawbacks from the inclusion of the Barclays House site within an extended Town Centre North Area Action Plan. We believe this review would also be beneficial and timely, particularly in terms of the new plan preparation guidance (Planning Policy Statement 12: Local Spatial Planning - paragraphs 5.4 – 6 relating to guidance on Action Area Plans) and companion document. We also note that the Council has recently secured Poole as having ‘new growth point status’ which further supports our contention that such a review would be helpful. In addition we note that the Barclays House site compares favourably as a potential regeneration development site in terms of the Council’s Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA). Atisreal request to be notified, at the above specified address, of the publication of the recommendations of the Inspector and/or the adoption of the DPD.

1266 Mr Martin Poole BC Core Strategy Sub Stage Reps Form 1v3m.pdf Pendlebury (Atisreal) Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 2.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 3.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 4.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 5.pdf 239

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 13 1035 Mr Tony Christie 2365 Sound The policy approach and requirements of Policy PCS 13 are fully supported. The policy (Grosvenor Shopping provides clear support for bringing forward new retail development within Town Centre Centre Fund) North. However, for the sake of completeness, we feel it is appropriate for an inset plan to be included within the Core Strategy highlighting an extension to the Primary Shopping Area to accommodate the identified 35,000 sq m (net) of additional retail floorspace. This is consistent with both PPS 6 and PPS12.Paragraph 2.16 of PPS6 makes clear that Local Planning Authorities should assess the need for new floorspace for retail and other main town centres uses and that they should define the extent of the Primary Shopping Area and the town centre, for the centres in their area on their Proposals Map. Furthermore, the recent guidance set out in Paragraph 4.6 of PPS 12 states that Core Strategies may allocate strategic sites for development and that these should be those sites considered central to achievement of the strategy.

1113 Mr David Roach PCS 5.doc (GVA Grimley) PCS 13 Rep.doc

PCS 14 Rep.doc

PCS 33 Rep.doc

PCS 34 Rep.doc CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

240 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 13 188 Mr Terry Stewart 2389 PCS13 : It is essential that the site for the new Bus Station is identified since this will (Agent for CPRE & affect pedestrian flow and inter-modal transfer, and relationships to the new railway Canford Cliffs & station and shopping development. The location and criteria for the new railway station Sandbanks MUST be included in the Poole Core Strategy. Neighbourhood Watch) CPRE Poole Core Strategy Response July 1 2008.msg

Policy 13 326 Ms Rose 2451 Sound We support your Submission Core Strategy in respect of Policies PCS 11, PCS 12, Freeman (The PCS 13 but with some observations. Reasons These policies contain all the elements Theatres Trust) required for a thoughtful and forward looking framework for the future cultural needs of the Borough. Good quality community and cultural facilities are essential components in the development of sustainable communities. It is important to protect and promote cultural facilities for their leading role in the quality of cultural life and for their valuable contribution to the character and function of Poole town centre.

Theatre Trust - Ross Freeman.msg 241

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 13 1096 Mr Stuart Laird 2457 Sound We further welcome the commitment to produce an Area Action Plan to secure student (Bournemouth accommodation, promote vitality in the centre and to support the creation of opportunities University) for graduates in the local economy (PCS13, criteria vii). However there should be explicit reference to the need to consolidate and expand existing centres of student accommodation in the Poole area. The University already provides student residences off campus and is concerned to ensure that these are of sufficient size to be self-sustaining in terms of welfare and social facility provision. In addition, and in the interests of sustainability, the centres of student accommodation need to be large enough to assist the University with its provision of student transport services and the implementation of its Travel Plan. Bournemouth University, in conjunction with its preferred student residential development partners, provides and maintains a range of student accommodation across the Borough. Talbot campus is currently the focus for a significant proportion of the University’s teaching accommodation and student services within the Borough of Poole. Whilst the development of student accommodation in the Town Centre and Town Centre North is essential to the growth of the University within Poole, it is vital that the Core Strategy also recognises the ongoing need to provide University facilities at Talbot campus. The current Poole Local Plan (adopted March 2004) appropriately identifies the considerable potential for the future growth and reorganisation of the Talbot campus. As such it contains Policy CF2, which reads as follows: ‘Proposals to extend either Bournemouth University or the Arts Institute at Bournemouth will be permitted providing that applications are accompanied by measures to limit private vehicle trips, including public transport access, cycle and pedestrian facilities and other innovative schemes’. This policy supports the role and function of Bournemouth University. It provides an acknowledgement of the potential need for the University to change its built environment over the plan period and ensures that there is 'in principle' support for the expansion of educational facilities to enable the University to provide better facilities for its existing disciplines and continue to facilitate growth in new sectors. The University continues to regard the future utilisation of Talbot campus as fundamental to the growth of the higher education sector in Poole and the wider subregion. This, in turn, will play a significant role in strengthening the economic profile and skills base. The Core Strategy should acknowledge the capacity for the future growth of student teaching accommodation, student services and residential student CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

242 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

accommodation at Talbot campus. Well-planned student accommodation can help bring vitality and activity to town centre areas. This is turn can act as a catalyst for regeneration, with the service sector responding to student needs and the revenue they generate.

29 Mr Peter Lamb Rep Form.pdf (Terence O'Rourke Ltd) L 080708 PL PBC.pdf 243

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 13 1034 Mr Jamie 2463 Sound As you are aware Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd are taking an active interest in the Cowen (Sainsbury's formulation of the LDF and accompanying documents and as such have considered Supermarkets Ltd) the above document in detail. In earlier drafts of the Core Strategy Sainsbury’s has broadly supported the aims and objectives of concentrating further retail development in the defined town centre in accord with the aims and objectives of PPS6. At this submission stage, Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd wish to express their continued general support for the Council’s Core Strategy submission document and the policy provision in support of substantial additional retail development in the defined Poole Town Centre North Area over the plan period. As you are aware, the Town centre North Area includes existing Sainsbury’s site at Pitwines. It is acknowledged that the site offers significant scope for delivery additional retail floor space through more efficient use of the space and a redeveloped foodstore that is better able to meet modern customer needs and expectations. To this end, our client has aspirations to work alongside the council in working towards the mixed use redevelopment of the site, in line with the emerging planning policy set out in the document.

51 Mr David Lowin A011386 Letter 8 July 2008.pdf (White Young Green Planning (Representing Sainsburys)) CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

244 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 13 1017 (Highcross 2472 Unsound We consider the assumptions in paragraphs 6.62 and 6.68 and Policy PCS13 that retail Group Ltd) development should be restricted in out of town locations goes beyond the tests of PPS6 – retail need, retail impact and sequential approach, which relate to edge and out of centre proposals. On this basis there is no need to restrict development further than the tests of PPS6, as they are sufficient to assess the appropriateness of an edge or out of centre retail development.

1016 Ms Vanessa Vanessa Clipstone - Highcross Group Ltd.pdf Clipstone (RPS Planning)

Policy 13 1163 Ms Simone 2539 Town Centre North There appears to be an inconsistency between policy PCS13 and Wilding (GOSW) the new jobs forecast in Poole 2006-2026 table on page 69f. Policy PCS 13 specifies "35,000 sq.m. (net) of additional retail (Al) floor space (... )" and in addition to this (but without specifying an approximate amount of floorspace) "supporting commercial, sports and leisure uses including a cinema (... ) (Use Classes A3-A5)". The table, however, refers to a total of 35,000 sq.m. for Al to A4 uses in the Town Centre North Area. It would therefore be helpful if this could be clarified. It should also be noted that the proposed approach of concentrating retail growth in the centre and restricting growth in the retail parks (as per paragraph 6.70) is consistent with PPS 6 whereas it is questionable whether the alternative option considered would have stood up to the tests of PPS 6. 245

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 13 1102 Mr Ian Parsons 2565 We support the priorities in PCS 13 – Town Centre North, involving improved pedestrian (Highways Agency) links and creating a more attractive and safe environment for bus users.

Table 2.103 Policy 13 CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

246 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.66 1267 Mr Barry 2335 Sound We support in broad terms the Council’s aspirations for the town of Poole and related Houlston Core Strategy Policies. However, recent changes in circumstance have shown that the Barclays House site together with associated buildings immediately adjacent to the presently defined Town Centre North Area will be subject to significant change in the plan period. There is clear evidence in relation to a recent related planning application and discussions with Council Officers that the Barclays House site will be the subject of regeneration development schemes in the near future. For this reason we would wish to explore further with Council Officers the merits and potential drawbacks from the inclusion of the Barclays House site within an extended Town Centre North Area Action Plan. We believe this review would also be beneficial and timely, particularly in terms of the new plan preparation guidance (Planning Policy Statement 12: Local Spatial Planning - paragraphs 5.4 – 6 relating to guidance on Action Area Plans) and companion document. We also note that the Council has recently secured Poole as having ‘new growth point status’ which further supports our contention that such a review would be helpful. In addition we note that the Barclays House site compares favourably as a potential regeneration development site in terms of the Council’s Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA). Atisreal request to be notified, at the above specified address, of the publication of the recommendations of the Inspector and/or the adoption of the DPD.

1266 Mr Martin Poole BC Core Strategy Sub Stage Reps Form 1v3m.pdf Pendlebury (Atisreal) Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 2.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 3.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 4.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 5.pdf

Table 2.104 Paragraph 6.66 247

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.67 1267 Mr Barry 2336 Sound We support in broad terms the Council’s aspirations for the town of Poole and related Houlston Core Strategy Policies. However, recent changes in circumstance have shown that the Barclays House site together with associated buildings immediately adjacent to the presently defined Town Centre North Area will be subject to significant change in the plan period. There is clear evidence in relation to a recent related planning application and discussions with Council Officers that the Barclays House site will be the subject of regeneration development schemes in the near future. For this reason we would wish to explore further with Council Officers the merits and potential drawbacks from the inclusion of the Barclays House site within an extended Town Centre North Area Action Plan. We believe this review would also be beneficial and timely, particularly in terms of the new plan preparation guidance (Planning Policy Statement 12: Local Spatial Planning - paragraphs 5.4 – 6 relating to guidance on Action Area Plans) and companion document. We also note that the Council has recently secured Poole as having ‘new growth point status’ which further supports our contention that such a review would be helpful. In addition we note that the Barclays House site compares favourably as a potential regeneration development site in terms of the Council’s Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA). Atisreal request to be notified, at the above specified address, of the publication of the recommendations of the Inspector and/or the adoption of the DPD.

1266 Mr Martin Poole BC Core Strategy Sub Stage Reps Form 1v3m.pdf Pendlebury (Atisreal) Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 2.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 3.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 4.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 5.pdf

Table 2.105 Paragraph 6.67 CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

248 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.68 1017 (Highcross 2473 Unsound We consider the assumptions in paragraphs 6.62 and 6.68 and Policy PCS13 that retail Group Ltd) development should be restricted in out of town locations goes beyond the tests of PPS6 – retail need, retail impact and sequential approach, which relate to edge and out of centre proposals. On this basis there is no need to restrict development further than the tests of PPS6, as they are sufficient to assess the appropriateness of an edge or out of centre retail development.

1016 Ms Vanessa Vanessa Clipstone - Highcross Group Ltd.pdf Clipstone (RPS Planning)

Table 2.106 Paragraph 6.68 249

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.69 1017 (Highcross 2474 Unsound Controlling the range of goods sold is a matter for planning conditions and enforcement. Group Ltd) Paragraph 6.70 seeks to limit proposed out of centre retail space. This approach conflicts with PPS6 which acknowledges that a sequential test needs to be applied to retail developments.Policy PCS14 and the supporting text should be adapted to reflect the sequential test and guidance in PPS6.

1016 Ms Vanessa Vanessa Clipstone - Highcross Group Ltd.pdf Clipstone (RPS Planning)

Table 2.107 Paragraph 6.69 CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

250 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.70 848 (Bournemouth 2306 Sound The paragraph correctly emphasises the need to diversify the types of employment and West Hampshire allowed for on employment sites, in particular in the health sectors. Water Plc)

24 Mr Mark Axford Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps para 3.15 06.08.doc (Goadsby) Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps para 3.46 06.08.doc

Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps para 6.7 06.08.doc

Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps para 6.28 06.08.doc

Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps para SO5 06.08.doc

Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps PCS1 06.08.doc

Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps PCS5 06.08.doc

Core Strategy Sub Doc Reps SS 06.08.doc 251

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.70 1017 (Highcross 2475 Unsound Controlling the range of goods sold is a matter for planning conditions and enforcement. Group Ltd) Paragraph 6.70 seeks to limit proposed out of centre retail space. This approach conflicts with PPS6 which acknowledges that a sequential test needs to be applied to retail developments. Policy PCS14 and the supporting text should be adapted to reflect the sequential test and guidance in PPS6.

1016 Ms Vanessa Vanessa Clipstone - Highcross Group Ltd.pdf Clipstone (RPS Planning)

Table 2.108 Paragraph 6.70 CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

252 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 14 1035 Mr Tony Christie 2366 Sound A further test for retail development outside of the Town Centre should be added in (Grosvenor Shopping accordance with PPS6 that states:“need is demonstrated that does not prejudice the Centre Fund) delivery of retail as part of the Town Centre North allocation.”

1113 Mr David Roach PCS 5.doc (GVA Grimley) PCS 13 Rep.doc

PCS 14 Rep.doc

PCS 33 Rep.doc

PCS 34 Rep.doc 253

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

1271 MDL We support Policy PSC14, specifically criterion i which identifies that retail development Development Ltd will be permitted where it is appropriate to the location and does not undermine the strategy for retail growth in the Town Centre. This allows sufficient flexibility for retail units to be located in out of town locations to support the viability of other uses on the site or provide a specialist retail offer that is appropriate to the location.

1127 Ms Joanne Poole Core Rep Form - Contents.pdf Webb (Savills (Representing Poole Core Rep Form - para 6.125.pdf Bournemouth & Poole College)) Poole Core Rep Form - PCS6.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS7.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS9.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS11.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS12.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS12.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS14.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 27.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 30.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 33.pdf CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

254 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 34.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 35.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 38.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - Strategic Objectives.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - vision 1.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - visions 2.pdf 255

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 14 1275 L and C 2435 Unsound Retail Growth outside the Town Centre. The objectors own Canford Heath Local Centre Properties Ltd which is located some 4km north east of Poole Town Centre. The Centre is anchored by an ASDA store (25000sqm), a terrace of 3 retail units and 8 service units (1500sqm), 1274 Mr D S Dunlop public house, petrol filling station and car park (371 spaces). The Centre has a relatively (D2 Planning Limited) small amount of retail floorspace but serves a significant catchment area. It is in need of considerable attention if it is to fulfil its role as an attractive retail and community services destination. The Centre is tired and dated having received no appreciable enhancement since it was built approximately 30 years ago. In Particular: - I) The street furniture is of mixed styles without a unified theme and lacks quality. Ii) The car park layout and circulation routes are confusing and can cause conflict between pedestrians and drivers, iii) Much of the existing landscaping requires reorganisation and replacement. The only way that such enhancement and revitalisation can take place is on the back of a significant increase in its overall retailing floorspace. The extent of the retail expansion would be to at least double the size of the Centre and expand the Asda store and provide other retail units. At present it is considered that the policy is vague and imprecise. It is unclear what is meant by: “it is appropriate to the location”. Furthermore it could be deemed that any retail development would undermine the strategy for retail growth in the Town Centre. An indication of the levels of growth would be more appropriate. Objections are lodged to the policy until more clarification is provided. CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

256 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 14 1017 (Highcross 2476 Unsound Controlling the range of goods sold is a matter for planning conditions and enforcement. Group Ltd) Paragraph 6.70 seeks to limit proposed out of centre retail space. This approach conflicts with PPS6 which acknowledges that a sequential test needs to be applied to retail developments. Policy PCS14 and the supporting text should be adapted to reflect the sequential test and guidance in PPS6.

1016 Ms Vanessa Vanessa Clipstone - Highcross Group Ltd.pdf Clipstone (RPS Planning)

Policy 14 1102 Mr Ian Parsons 2566 In terms of retail growth outside the town centre, the Agency would expect Policy PCS (Highways Agency) 14 to indicate that this will only be permitted where good quality public transport services exist along with the benefit of cycling and pedestrian infrastructure, or where such provision would be delivered as part of the development.

Table 2.109 Policy 14 257

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.78 1252 Mr Graham 2301 Unsound Change required:Regional ContextIt would be useful to consider the following issues Clarke (Dorset County are outlined in the draft RSS:• improved connectivity to the rest of the region – concerns Council) poor N-S links (A350) to Bristol. Same concerns with rail – better services are required to London, and possible links to Bristol.• Recognition of the important role of demand management. (See RSS policy TR1).We are concerned that there is too much reliance on LTP2 and not enough forward thinking in the context of what the RSS is trying to achieve. There has also been much concern that concentrating development around the PTCs may raise air quality issues.Paragraphs 6.80 to 6.82 concentrate upon demand management and we agree with the need for Travel Plans and strategic park and ride. There is no mention of the important role parking plays in demand management, both management of existing parking and the setting of standard for new development. There also needs to be an explanation of the important role of demand management in reducing the use of the private car and making sustainable alternatives more attractive. Personalised travel planning could also be addressed. The Core Strategy should also include the following:• improved connectivity of all modes (including freight) to and from Poole and provision of more reliable connections with the rest of the region including:- Improved N – S links (A350)- Rail- Links to Airport• reducing the need to travel and promote sustainable travel- role of parking strategies and car park charging- personalised travel planning.PCS 16 vii states ensure new development or transport initiatives do not have a significant adverse impact upon the integrity of Dorset Heathlands or Poole Harbour SPA/RAMSAR sites’ This is of concern because ‘significant’ is too strong a test. This clause should seek to avoid “adverse effects” This process will be managed through SA/SEA and Appropriate Assessment.Why this change makes the Core Strategy sound:The Core Strategy should take into account a wider range of credible alternatives.

Graham Clarke DCC.doc

Graham Clarke DCC.msg CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

258 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.78 1077 Ms Theresa 2584 Whilst it is good too see that it is recognised that Poole, as part of the South East Dorset McManus (Poole conurbation, provides opportunities to reduce the need for travel, not enough is made Agenda 21) of this opportunity. Being one of the largest conurbations in the UK, it also offers the possibility of encouraging more people to transfer to lower-carbon forms of transport. This opportunity can be most effectively grasped by incorporating the DARTS scheme into the Core Strategy : Dorset Area Rapid Transport System (see http://www.geocities.com/poole_la21/train_orig.htm#Proposals). This scheme provides a rail network for the conurbation, incorporating a number of hubs (e.g. Castlepoint, Hurn, Ferndown, Wimborme, Broadstone) in additional to Bournemouth, Poole and Christchurch from which bus services can then be run. This would then provide an effective and fast public transport system to the suburbs, thus removing a significant amount of traffic from the roads. In addition to this, a key part of any improved transport scheme is transport integration, so that residents in the conurbation can get on a bus or train and go anywhere in the conurbation on a single ticket, regardless of service provider.

Table 2.110 Paragraph 6.78 259

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.79 1077 Ms Theresa 2585 Whilst it is good too see that it is recognised that Poole, as part of the South East Dorset McManus (Poole conurbation, provides opportunities to reduce the need for travel, not enough is made Agenda 21) of this opportunity. Being one of the largest conurbations in the UK, it also offers the possibility of encouraging more people to transfer to lower-carbon forms of transport. This opportunity can be most effectively grasped by incorporating the DARTS scheme into the Core Strategy : Dorset Area Rapid Transport System (see http://www.geocities.com/poole_la21/train_orig.htm#Proposals). This scheme provides a rail network for the conurbation, incorporating a number of hubs (e.g. Castlepoint, Hurn, Ferndown, Wimborme, Broadstone) in additional to Bournemouth, Poole and Christchurch from which bus services can then be run. This would then provide an effective and fast public transport system to the suburbs, thus removing a significant amount of traffic from the roads. In addition to this, a key part of any improved transport scheme is transport integration, so that residents in the conurbation can get on a bus or train and go anywhere in the conurbation on a single ticket, regardless of service provider.

Table 2.111 Paragraph 6.79

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.80 1254 Andrew Smith 2265 Unsound The use of travel plans need to be considered in the context of inclusive public transport and not excluding any sectors of society to avoid unsustainable two or three tier transport systems. Provision needs to be explicit to examine and encourage transport alternatives as a whole rather than individual 2packages" in isolation. CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

260 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.80 1077 Ms Theresa 2586 Whilst it is good too see that it is recognised that Poole, as part of the South East Dorset McManus (Poole conurbation, provides opportunities to reduce the need for travel, not enough is made Agenda 21) of this opportunity. Being one of the largest conurbations in the UK, it also offers the possibility of encouraging more people to transfer to lower-carbon forms of transport. This opportunity can be most effectively grasped by incorporating the DARTS scheme into the Core Strategy : Dorset Area Rapid Transport System (see http://www.geocities.com/poole_la21/train_orig.htm#Proposals). This scheme provides a rail network for the conurbation, incorporating a number of hubs (e.g. Castlepoint, Hurn, Ferndown, Wimborme, Broadstone) in additional to Bournemouth, Poole and Christchurch from which bus services can then be run. This would then provide an effective and fast public transport system to the suburbs, thus removing a significant amount of traffic from the roads. In addition to this, a key part of any improved transport scheme is transport integration, so that residents in the conurbation can get on a bus or train and go anywhere in the conurbation on a single ticket, regardless of service provider.

Table 2.112 Paragraph 6.80 261

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.81 1077 Ms Theresa 2587 Whilst it is good too see that it is recognised that Poole, as part of the South East Dorset McManus (Poole conurbation, provides opportunities to reduce the need for travel, not enough is made Agenda 21) of this opportunity. Being one of the largest conurbations in the UK, it also offers the possibility of encouraging more people to transfer to lower-carbon forms of transport. This opportunity can be most effectively grasped by incorporating the DARTS scheme into the Core Strategy : Dorset Area Rapid Transport System (see http://www.geocities.com/poole_la21/train_orig.htm#Proposals). This scheme provides a rail network for the conurbation, incorporating a number of hubs (e.g. Castlepoint, Hurn, Ferndown, Wimborme, Broadstone) in additional to Bournemouth, Poole and Christchurch from which bus services can then be run. This would then provide an effective and fast public transport system to the suburbs, thus removing a significant amount of traffic from the roads. In addition to this, a key part of any improved transport scheme is transport integration, so that residents in the conurbation can get on a bus or train and go anywhere in the conurbation on a single ticket, regardless of service provider.

Table 2.113 Paragraph 6.81

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.82 1102 Mr Ian Parsons 2567 The Agency supports the use of travel plans as outlined in para 6.82 in order to both (Highways Agency) directly influence travel choice, such as with car sharing schemes, and to indirectly increase the feasibility of sustainable modes, for example with provision of cycle parking and showering facilities. CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

262 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.82 1077 Ms Theresa 2588 Whilst it is good too see that it is recognised that Poole, as part of the South East Dorset McManus (Poole conurbation, provides opportunities to reduce the need for travel, not enough is made Agenda 21) of this opportunity. Being one of the largest conurbations in the UK, it also offers the possibility of encouraging more people to transfer to lower-carbon forms of transport. This opportunity can be most effectively grasped by incorporating the DARTS scheme into the Core Strategy : Dorset Area Rapid Transport System (see http://www.geocities.com/poole_la21/train_orig.htm#Proposals). This scheme provides a rail network for the conurbation, incorporating a number of hubs (e.g. Castlepoint, Hurn, Ferndown, Wimborme, Broadstone) in additional to Bournemouth, Poole and Christchurch from which bus services can then be run. This would then provide an effective and fast public transport system to the suburbs, thus removing a significant amount of traffic from the roads. In addition to this, a key part of any improved transport scheme is transport integration, so that residents in the conurbation can get on a bus or train and go anywhere in the conurbation on a single ticket, regardless of service provider.

Table 2.114 Paragraph 6.82

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 16 188 Mr Terry Stewart 2390 PCS16 : With the latest news, what is the timing and reality for “secure delivery of the (Agent for CPRE & 2nd lifting bridge and associated infrastructure in the Regeneration Area” ? This must Canford Cliffs & be expanded on. Sandbanks Neighbourhood CPRE Poole Core Strategy Response July 1 2008.msg Watch) 263

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 16 1102 Mr Ian Parsons 2568 We welcome this policy, in particular the strategy to improve the attractiveness of (Highways Agency) alternatives to the private car, particularly along the Prime Transport Corridors, and the indication that the Council will work with regional and national partners to develop consistent approaches to transport across the conurbation and sub-region. The Agency would wish to be one of these partners. The Agency does, however, reiterate its comments above in response to PCS 12 regarding the proposed delivery of the second lifting bridge and associated infrastructure in the Regeneration area.

Policy 16 1239 Mr Neal 2599 There are no major transport issues but although the identification of transport corridors Whitehead (South as foci for development is mentioned, these are not defined in the Core Strategy. Instead West Regional there is a reference to the LTS, but this is still not entirely clear when looking at that Assembly) separate document. This issue needs to be elaborated on in the Core Strategy.

Table 2.115 Policy 16 CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

264 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 17 1102 Mr Ian Parsons 2569 The Agency notes para 6.86 indicating that the A35 corridor offers the highest levels (Highways Agency) of accessibility by public transport outside the town centre as it is served by the Waterloo-Weymouth rail link and high frequency bus services. The corridor also includes two of the Borough’s largest local centres. Policy PCS 17 provides for significant new development and transport infrastructure within the corridor. Whilst welcoming proposed enhancements to public transport provision and cycling/pedestrian links, it is not evident to what extent transport proposals in the corridor may be sufficient to meet the travel demands in a sustainable manner. The transport evidence base to support this and other transport policies in the Core Strategy is intended to be provided by the SEDMMTS not due to report until summer 2009. Consequently we suggest that the Core Strategy should include a mechanism to review transport policies and proposals in the light of the outcome of the Study.

Table 2.116 Policy 17 265

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 18 1096 Mr Stuart Laird 2458 Sound At the Core Strategy Preferred Option consultation stage, our client welcomed the (Bournemouth Council’s vision to implement measures to reduce traffic congestion impacts, improve University) public transport, cycling and walking links and to reduce the adverse impacts of traffic along Prime Transport Corridors (such as the A3049 East-West corridor which passes Talbot campus). PCS18 of the Core Strategy Submission Document states that this corridor will now be subject to improvements designed to promote means of transport other than the private car in order to (amongst other things) improve cycle and pedestrian routes to and from the University. This approach is strongly supportedby our client. The goal of decreasing travel by private transport and encouraging public transport and pedestrian/cycle access is key to the University’s travel plan and remains essential to the future sustainable growth of the campus. The University acknowledges the impact that student and staff trips have on the local road network and recognises the importance of encouraging sustainable transport options wherever practicable. As well as sustainable transport initiatives, it is also important for alternative access options to be safe and our Client welcomes any policy to safeguard students and staff travelling to and from Talbot campus.

29 Mr Peter Lamb Rep Form.pdf (Terence O'Rourke Ltd) L 080708 PL PBC.pdf CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

266 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 18 1109 (Talbot Village 2516 Unsound PCS 18: The A3049 East-West Corridor TVT notes that the last paragraph of Policy Trust) PCS1S: The A3049 East-West Corridor states: "Residential development which would be likely to lead to additional recreational pressures upon nearby heathland ... will be 12 Ms Frances Young carefully controlled to ensure there is no adverse impact upon these internationally (Nathaniel Lichfield & protected habitats." However, TVT considers that the last paragraph of policy PCS18 Partners) is not needed, given that PCS29 addresses more fully the Dorset Heathland matter.

Policy 18 1102 Mr Ian Parsons 2570 The Agency welcomes proposals to increase the attractiveness of sustainable travel (Highways Agency) choices. However, as with Policy 17, it would be prudent to indicate that the measures will be reviewed and developed further in light of the conclusions of the SEDMMTS.

Table 2.117 Policy 18

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 19 1102 2571 As previously indicated, the Agency has undertaken strategic level modelling of the SRN in the South West and by 2026 the A31 north of Poole will be operating in excess Mr Ian Parsons of capacity, leading to congestion during both peak and off-peak times. The Agency welcomes the indication in PCS 19 that the Council will work with national partners to promote improved links between Poole Town Centre, the Port and the A31 Trunk Road. The Agency wishes to be involved in this collaborative work which will need to fully investigate the implications of this objective on the SRN, which should become clearer through the SEDMMTS. This is in the early stages and, at present, the building of a 267

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

(Highways Agency) model (Phase 2) is estimated to finish in the summer of 2009. The study findings are not expected to be known until after this date.

Table 2.118 Policy 19

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 20 1102 Mr Ian Parsons 2572 The Agency welcomes proposals to improve public transport, cyclist and pedestrian (Highways Agency) provision and to direct higher density development to locations accessible by high frequency public transport. We agree with the findings of the Sustainability Appraisal in that ‘measures to improve efficiency of movement of vehicles should not be at the expense of sustainable forms of travel or lead to community severance’. The SRN services the South West but Poole in particular relies on the A31 for access to and from the Port. As such there should be even greater priority given towards promoting integrated sustainable travel choices in order to avoid additional journeys on the SRN.

Table 2.119 Policy 20

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 21 660 Mr Justin Milward 2288 Unsound In the Delivery Framework table accompanying this Policy, specifically in the (Woodland Trust) Environmental Enhancements at key locations. Box, we would like to see reference to accessible greenspace highlighted as a key component in the creation of sustainable communities. It is important that natural greenspace such as woodland is accessible to the general public to maximise its quality of life benefits for amenity, recreation and health. Recognising this, the Woodland Trust has researched and developed a Woodland CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

268 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Access Standard for local authorities to aim for, as set out in our Space for People publication. This standard is endorsed by Natural England. The Woodland Trust Woodland Access Standard recommends: that no person should live more than 500m from at least one area of accessible woodland of no less than 2ha in size, that there should also be at least one area of accessible woodland of no less than 20ha within 4km (8km round-trip) of peoples homes. Space for People is the first UK-wide assessment of any form of greenspace and, while the targets may seem challenging, they represent the result of detailed analysis. We would be pleased to see the Poole Core Strategy adopt the Woodland Access Standard as an aspirational target. The full Space for People report can be found at www.woodland-trust.org.uk/publications.Accessible woodland is particularly useful as a key element in Green Infrastructure strategies. The term Green Infrastructure has evolved in response to the Governments wider sustainable communities and regeneration policies to identify an environmental network of green spaces. However it needs to be understood, not simply as a series of linear green corridors linking biodiversity areas, but as a broader network of multifunctional greenspace which helps provide a natural life support system for people (Green Infrastructure in the Thames Gateway, National Urban Forestry Unit, 2005). In other words, exploiting the wider functionality of green space rather than simply looking at its structural connectivity. Government is increasingly promoting the benefits of green infrastructure PPS9 on Biodiversity and Geological Conservation (ODPM, 2005 p2) includes the objective of enhancing biodiversity in green spaces and amongst developments so that they are used by wildlife and valued by people, recognising that healthy functional ecosystems can contribute to a better quality of life and to peoples sense of well-being. A Strategy for Englands Trees, Woods and Forests (Defra, 2007, para 30) sets out the Governments vision for Englands tree and woodland resource over the next 50 years, stating that Green infrastructure is a network of green spaces in and around towns, and between urban and rural areas. It may include open spaces, parks, water bodies and nature reserves as well as street trees and woodlands.Trees and woodlands from a country park to an urban street are a very important element of green infrastructure for several reasons. The SW Regional Forestry Framework (Forestry Commission 2005) in Objective 269

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Q1D sets out the aim Community forestry and woodlands and green infrastructure more widely understood and adopted throughout the region.

Table 2.120 Policy 21

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.109 805 Mrs Ann Smeaton 2493 With regards to the development of the Regeneration area (within the Hamworthy (Holes Bay Residents peninsula), the implementation of the well considered proposals very much depends & Preservation on the successful construction the Twin Sails bridge. However, maybe the delay in the Association) bridge construction is fortuitous, because lessons can be learnt from issues that are being manifested as a result of the Harbour Reach development on the southern edge of the Hamworthy Peninsula. The requirement that 40% of regeneration development dwellings be earmarked as affordable housing is very commendable paper, but in practise causes problems. More thought needs to be given to the allocation of such housing. The mix needs to be varied. Too much disadvantaged people lump together in a confined area gives rise to anti-social problems. Such difficulties are exacerbated when there is a dearth of community facilities. The dilemma raises concerns re: 6.109 Paragraph In regards to the table in Paragraph 6.109: Healthier communities and Older People: Why is not existing Hamworthy/ Regeneration Area included in this category? Recreation facilities can help to increase participation in sport: There is a lack of Recreational Space in Lower Hamworthy NOW – let alone when Regeneration takes place. Important role for the community: Lower Hamworthy soon will have one small community resource within the proposed new Library, but this will not be of sufficient size to accommodate the needs of the ever increasing population – especially following regeneration. Local Surgeries will need to expand role in order to assist greater independence and self- management of medicine: Currently, there is only one surgery in Hamworthy. Patients often required to attend Surgery’s sister establishment in Upton to which there is NO bus service. Local centres are key to serving local needs: Hamworthy does NOT have a Local Centre – despite the fact such a centre has been ‘on the cards’ for over 30years!!! In addition to the foregoing, may I also ask that better consideration be given to the architecture of regeneration developments as well as CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

270 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

some thought given to the sustainability of construction materials – especially bearing in mind the close proximity to the sea.

Table 2.121 Paragraph 6.109

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 23 1263 Somerfield 2302 Unsound PPS12 notes that an Inspector is charged with ensuing the soundness of core strategies, Stores Ltd and that to be sound they must be justified, effective and consistent with national policy.The Poole Core Strategy Submission Document designates Canford Heath as 1262 Mr Richard a Local Centre. Annex A, Table 1 of PPS6 notes that: Local centres include a range of Lemon (Roger Tym & small shops of a local nature, serving a small catchment. Typically, local centres might Partners) include, amongst other shops, a small supermarket, a newsagent, a sub-post office and a pharmacy. Other facilities could include a hot-food takeaway and launderette. In rural areas, large villages may perform the role of a local centre. PPS6 also notes at paragraph 2.42 that: Given their characteristics, local centres will generally be inappropriate locations for large scale new development, even when a flexible approach is adopted. Accordingly, it is likely to be inappropriate in most cases to include local centres within the search area to be applied under the sequential approach for large-scale developments. Local planning authorities should therefore consider setting an indicative upper limit for the scale of developments likely to be permissible in different types of centres, and developments above these limits should be directed to centres higher up the town centre hierarchy. As the centre is already served by a Somerfield store, which performs the role of small supermarket identified in Annex A, Table 1, we suggest that, as recommended by paragraph 2.42 of PPS6, an indicative upper limit for the scale of new development which is likely to be acceptable is included in Policy 23. This would provide greater clarity on the amount of future development which will be acceptable in the centre, ensuring that it does not put at risk the centres position in the hierarchy, and reflecting the fact that it already has the small supermarket typical of a local centre. Moreover, it would help to ensure the soundness of the core strategy, by better reflecting advice in national policy, one of the three tests of soundness. 271

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 23 1263 Somerfield 2303 Unsound PPS12 notes that an Inspector is charged with ensuing the soundness of core strategies, Stores Ltd and that to be sound they must be justified, effective and consistent with national policy.The Poole Core Strategy Submission Document designates Canford Heath as 1262 Mr Richard a Local Centre. Annex A, Table 1 of PPS6 notes that: Local centres include a range of Lemon (Roger Tym & small shops of a local nature, serving a small catchment. Typically, local centres might Partners) include, amongst other shops, a small supermarket, a newsagent, a sub-post office and a pharmacy. Other facilities could include a hot-food takeaway and launderette. In rural areas, large villages may perform the role of a local centre. PPS6 also notes at paragraph 2.42 that: Given their characteristics, local centres will generally be inappropriate locations for large scale new development, even when a flexible approach is adopted. Accordingly, it is likely to be inappropriate in most cases to include local centres within the search area to be applied under the sequential approach for large-scale developments. Local planning authorities should therefore consider setting an indicative upper limit for the scale of developments likely to be permissible in different types of centres, and developments above these limits should be directed to centres higher up the town centre hierarchy. As the centre is already served by a Somerfield store, which performs the role of small supermarket identified in Annex A, Table 1, we suggest that, as recommended by paragraph 2.42 of PPS6, an indicative upper limit for the scale of new development which is likely to be acceptable is included in Policy 23. This would provide greater clarity on the amount of future development which will be acceptable in the centre, ensuring that it does not put at risk the centres position in the hierarchy, and reflecting the fact that it already has the small supermarket typical of a local centre. Moreover, it would help to ensure the soundness of the core strategy, by better reflecting advice in national policy, one of the three tests of soundness. CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

272 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 23 1275 L and C 2439 Unsound Local Centres; The objectors support the identification of Canford Heath Local Centre Properties Ltd as a Centre which could benefit from a variety of local improvements. Indeed in 2006 the objectors submitted an application for an additional 3400sqm of retail floorspace to 1274 Mr D S Dunlop enhance the vitality of the Centre and also fund a variety of improvements. Unfortunately (D2 Planning Limited) this application was refused planning permission. The objectors still wish to pursue proposals to provide additional floorspace at the Centre probably in the form of an extension to the Asda store and the creation of additional retail units. However they object to the policy as currently drafted in that it is unclear what level of retail floor is appropriate to the Centre. The objectors do not wish to commit to significant expenditure as they previously did, only to find that the Council object to the level of floorspace proposed. The objector considers that to provide more certainty a certain level of floorspace should be specified i.e. at least a doubling of the Centre would be appropriate. This would assist in paying for the necessary environmental and other transportation improvements that would be sought. Objections are therefore lodged to the policy until further clarification is provided. D2 Planning Limited.pdf

Policy 23 1102 Mr Ian Parsons 2573 The Agency supports the implementation of highway schemes that promote better (Highways Agency) pedestrian and cycle links with the surrounding residential areas and recognises the role of local transport schemes in encouraging self-containment within Poole.

Table 2.122 Policy 23 273

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.124 188 Mr Terry Stewart 2391 Para 6.124 : As explained, we do not think the proposed Sub-Area Character (Agent for CPRE & Descriptions will be strong enough to prevent inappropriate flat development and removal Canford Cliffs & of green amenity. Sandbanks Neighbourhood CPRE Poole Core Strategy Response July 1 2008.msg Watch)

Table 2.123 Paragraph 6.124

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 24 660 Mr Justin Milward 2289 Unsound PCS 24 Local Distinctiveness: We are pleased to see section F relating specifically to (Woodland Trust) woodland, with its three sub-sections, but believe this could be improved even more. 1. We would like to see sub-section 1 include wording to provide absolute protection for the irreplaceable semi-natural habitat of ancient woodland. Although Poole contains only 0.24% ancient woodland cover compared to 2% for the whole of Great Britain, ancient woodland is our richest habitat for wildlife conserving more species of conservation concern than any other habitat (232 species as outlined in the UK Biodiversity Action Plan, 1994). It is therefore essential that there is no more loss of ancient woodland, and this is backed up by- Planning Policy Statement 9 on Biodiversity and Geological Conservation clearly states: Ancient woodland is a valuable biodiversity resource both for the diversity of species and for its longevity as woodland. Once lost it cannot be recreated. Local planning authorities should identify any areas of ancient woodland in their areas that do not have statutory protection (e.g. as an SSSI). They should not grant planning permission for any developments that would result in its loss or deterioration...Aged or 'veteran' trees found outside ancient woodland are also particularly valuable for biodiversity and their loss should be avoided. Planning authorities should encourage the conservation of such trees as part of development proposals." (ODPM, PPS9, 2005, paragraph 10). Under section 74 of the Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000, the Government has a statutory duty to publish lists of priority conservation habitats. Under section 40 of the Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006, all public authorities now have a statutory duty to conserve CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

274 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

biodiversity. The just published revised UK BAP targets includes Native Woodland as a priority habitat which specifies a clear maintenance target of no more loss of ancient woodland. It is therefore follows that Poole Borough Council has a statutory obligation to protect ancient woodland. The Government's published policy on ancient and native woodland states that "The existing area of ancient woodland should be maintained and there should be a net increase in the area of native woodland." It also states that "The cultural heritage associated with ancient woodland and veteran trees should be protected and conserved." (Keepers of time - A statement of policy for England's ancient and native woodland, 2005 , p10). This is also supported in the Recommendations and Priority Actions section of the Dorset Trees Woods and Forests Strategy - http://www.dorsetaonb.org.uk/uploads/Woodland_section6.pdf - p.37. We would therefore like to see sub-section 1 include additional wording at the end of the paragraph in the form of with no loss of ancient woodland. 2. We would like the reference in the first line of sub-section 1 of section F of Policy PCS 24 to read It retains woodland and ancient or mature trees. Ancient, mature or notable trees are an under-valued and under-recorded resource, and some may still exist of which we are not aware. We would like to see protection of ancient and veteran trees, in the first instance by way of a Borough wide audit to establish location of the resource (see the Woodland Trust/Ancient Tree Forums Ancient Tree Hunt -http://www.ancienttreehunt.org.uk/. This is also supported in the Recommendations and Priority Actions section of the Dorset Trees Woods and Forests Strategy - http://www.dorsetaonb.org.uk/uploads/Woodland_section6.pdf - p.37. 3. We would also like to see support for new woodland creation in development situations, together with recognition of the role that woodland creation can play in providing accessible greenspace to enhance peoples quality of life. The UK is one of the least wooded countries in Europe with only 11.6 percent woodland cover. Trees and forests are crucial to life on our planet. They stabilise the soil, generate oxygen, store carbon, play host to a spectacular variety of wildlife, and provide us with raw materials and shelter. They offer us respite, inspire our imagination, creativity and culture, and refresh our souls. A world without trees and forests would be barren, impoverished and intolerable. Woods bring many benefits, and people appreciate them in all sorts of ways. But for everyone to enjoy them, visit them or indirectly gain from them, they need to be located near to 275

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

where people live. Numerous studies on greenspace and particularly woodland have shown that they are highly valued by communities (MORI, 2002, The Environment: Who cares?) and that access to woodland is not only important for health benefits through exercise but also makes visitors feel happy, relaxed and close to nature (Coles R.W. and Bussey S.C. 2000, Urban forest landscapes in the UK - progressing the social agenda. Landscape and Urban Planning 52, pp181- 8). Nature is able to improve the quality of peoples lives and we believe everyone should experience it and have easy access to it. The need for this has been recognised by Government: indeed Margaret Beckett, as then Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, stated in a speech to the Labour Conference, Brighton, Sept 26th 2004 - locally, everyone has the right to the cleaner, greener, safer neighbourhoods which improve their quality of life. Again, this is also supported in the Recommendations and Priority Actions section of the Dorset Trees Woods and Forests Strategy - http://www.dorsetaonb.org.uk/uploads/Woodland_section6.pdf - p.37. CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

276 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 24 1267 Mr Barry 2342 Unsound We support the principle of Council’s approach to defining broad ‘Character Areas’ to Houlston recognise and reinforce local distinctiveness. However we do take issue within Appendix 1: Character Area Profiles for Area 1: Town Centre. Whilst we accept these profiles are meant to be generalised, we do feel that recognition should be given to the role Barclays House and the Network Rail and Stadium sites play to defining a particular character to the northern edge of the town centre. Accordingly, we ask that the description for Profile Area 1: the Town Centre, be supplemented to reflect the impact that Barclays House has a defining prominent building on an important axis site and ‘gateway’ into the town. Similarly the railway station and stadium land uses also define the character of the surrounding area. Atisreal request to be notified, at the above specified address, of the publication of the recommendations of the Inspector and/or the adoption of the DPD.

1266 Mr Martin Poole BC Core Strategy Sub Stage Reps Form 1v3m.pdf Pendlebury (Atisreal) Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 2.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 3.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 4.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 5.pdf 277

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 24 188 Mr Terry Stewart 2392 PCS24 B : We are very worried about the plans for developing the Thistle Hotel site on (Agent for CPRE & the Quay, following the disaster of the Dolphin Quays development where they still Canford Cliffs & have not let the retail units. This is such an iconic, important, “Face of Poole” location Sandbanks that there should be specific criteria for this site in the Core Strategy, not just subsumed Neighbourhood under the “Town Centre and Associated Waterfronts” heading. Architectural design, Watch) parking, non-dominance of the site, etc. are going to be critical. Architectural design and optimum urban concepts must be central to the Local Distinctiveness of the whole Town Centre and Regeneration Area. Para Fii : Please add the Parkstone Golf Course to the key list of natural areas.

CPRE Poole Core Strategy Response July 1 2008.msg

Policy 24 1276 Neptune 2479 Unsound We support PCS24’s general requirement that proposals for development will exhibit Consulting Limited a high standard design. However we consider that there are shortcomings with how this objective will be met, in particularly in the Town Centre and Associated Waterfronts. 1132 Ms Lindsay In particular we object to the prescriptive requirements of Bii. This demands that new Thompson (Terence development on Poole Quay respects the historic environment, this is considered O'Rourke) onerous and their ‘blanket’ application across the Town Centre and Associated and Waterfronts area is inappropriate. Any development needs to relate to its immediate surroundings as well as its wider context and this needs to include modern developments as well as the historic environment. The policy doesn’t recognise that development needs to equally relate to modern development as it does that historic environment in order to deliver a high standard of design. Nor does it consider emerging Government guidance and policy, in particular PPS25 and the rising flood protection level required. As an example of the need to be up-to-date and flexible, this representation form has already become out of date, even before the end of the consultation period, with the publication of the revised PPS12. This indicates how quickly the LDF system is evolving system and evolving national planning policy and objectives. The Core Strategy should be forward looking to the next 15years not backwards looking to the old system. CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

278 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Therefore, whilst we object to policy PCS24 on the basis of old style soundness tests. We therefore consider this policy to inflexible and not based on robust evidence, as set out in PPS12 paragraph 4.37 and 4.46. We also object on the basis of the new style test of failure to be consistent with national policy, failure to be justified and failure to be effective (see PPS12, para 4.52).

Policy 24 1277 Patch Properties 2484 Unsound We support PCS24’s requirement that proposals for development will exhibit a high standard of design and will complement or enhance Poole’s character, local identity 279

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

1132 Ms Lindsay and cultural vitality. However we consider that there are shortcomings with how this Thompson (Terence objective will be measured or delivered, particularly in the most sensitive areas of the O'Rourke) town, such as the town centre and waterfronts. The prescriptive requirements of Bii, which demands that new development on Poole Quay respects the historic environment, are considered non-specific, lacking in guidance and potentially onerous, and their ‘blanket’ application across the ‘Town Centre and Associated Waterfronts’ area inappropriate. Any development needs to be related to its immediate surroundings as well as its wider context and will inevitably include contemporary development as well as conservation of the historic environment. The policy as drafted does not relate equally to modern development as it does the historic environment in order to deliver a high standard of design. For example, development at our clients site, the Poole Quay Thistle Hotel, should relate to Dolphin Quays, which is adjacent to the western boundary of the site, and to the adjoining 1970’s and earlier housing to the north and east of the site. Delivering development at our client’s site in strict accordance with section Bii of the policy would result in a wholly inappropriate and potentially mundane development that would not relate to the surrounding buildings, would have a detrimental impact on the wider setting at this part of the Quay, and would fail to meet the understood objective of the Council to increase vitality and interest to the Quay. Through careful and innovative design, development at this site can relate appropriately to Dolphin Quays, the surrounding residential area and the wider historical environment, which is particularly important given the site’s location within the designated Poole Quay Conservation Area. The Policy is too limited in its scope and guidance as to how development at sites in the ‘Town Centre and Associated Waterfronts’ area should relate to their immediate surroundings and wider settings.

Table 2.124 Policy 24 CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

280 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.125 801 Martin Drennan 2326 Sound No Comment (Sport England - South West Region) 281

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

1271 MDL 2416 Unsound Paragraph 6.125 refers to Recreation, Leisure and the District Park Catchments and Development Ltd identifies that the aim is to make more strategic and sustainable use of Poole’s principle recreation sites and facilities. Key priorities will thus include: ‘Ensuring public access to the harbour, via footpaths, slipways and boatyards, is promoted, but in a manner which does not have an adverse effect upon the integrity of Poole Harbour SPA’. An additional statement should be added to the end of this sentence ‘…SPA or any maritime operational requirement’. It is important that maritime operational requirements are considered with regard to public assess as it may not be appropriate for access to go through such sites due to public safety and operational issues. This additional comment will allow for sufficient flexibility so that public access can be appropriately balanced against environmental and economic aims (business operations).

Poole Core Rep Form - Contents.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - para 6.125.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS6.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS7.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS9.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS11.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS12.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS12.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS14.pdf CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

282 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

1127 Ms Joanne Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 27.pdf Webb (Savills (Representing Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 30.pdf Bournemouth & Poole College)) Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 33.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 34.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 35.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 38.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - Strategic Objectives.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - vision 1.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - visions 2.pdf 283

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Table 2.125 Paragraph 6.125

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 27 801 Martin Drennan 2327 Sound No Comment (Sport England - South West Region) CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

284 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

1271 MDL 2423 Unsound PSC 27 identifies elements that will contribute to creating high quality, locally distinctive Development Ltd environments that meet the varied needs of local communities. However, this policy does not include reference to the waterfront as a distinctive characteristic of the Borough of Poole that should be positively contributed to. A point should therefore be added that makes reference to ‘Retaining and creating a high quality waterfront setting that is distinctive to Poole’ as this is an important asset and characteristic. This is supported by the Community Strategy which identifies that: ‘Poole is a town rich in history with an outstanding natural environment which has grown considerably in the last fifty years. It is now entering a new phase of development with ambitious plans for the town’s regeneration offering exciting opportunities for a new public waterfront, housing, leisure and shopping which will transform Poole over the next ten years or so’ (pg 6, Poole’s Sustainable Communities Strategy, 2006-2012’). Reference to the distinctive waterfront setting should therefore be made to support the Community Strategy. The inclusion of the suggested wording would also ensure the most appropriate circumstances was represented with regard to retaining and creating a high quality waterfront, which is an important asset to Poole.

Poole Core Rep Form - Contents.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - para 6.125.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS6.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS7.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS9.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS11.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS12.pdf 285

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

1127 Ms Joanne Poole Core Rep Form - PCS12.pdf Webb (Savills (Representing Poole Core Rep Form - PCS14.pdf Bournemouth & Poole College)) Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 27.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 30.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 33.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 34.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 35.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 38.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - Strategic Objectives.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - vision 1.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - visions 2.pdf CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

286 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Table 2.126 Policy 27

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 28 1163 Ms Simone 2541 Safer Communities It is welcomed that PCS 28 and supporting text sets out clear Wilding (GOSW) measures to improve community safety through spatial planning in line with section 17 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 (albeit this hasn't been referenced).

Table 2.127 Policy 28 287

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 29 1267 Mr Barry 2339 Sound We support the Council’s approach regarding addressing the issue of development Houlston impacts on the Dorset healthlands & Poole Harbour Special Protection Area (SPA) / RAMSAR Sites. In particular the strategic provision of measures to mitigate the impact of development, including relevant Supplementary Planning Guidance combined with appropriate management of the ecologically important sites. Atisreal request to be notified, at the above specified address, of the publication of the recommendations of the Inspector and/or the adoption of the DPD.

1266 Mr Martin Poole BC Core Strategy Sub Stage Reps Form 1v3m.pdf Pendlebury (Atisreal) Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 2.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 3.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 4.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 5.pdf CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

288 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 29 189 Mr Renny 2354 Unsound SSSIs not also designated as being of international importance should be given a high Henderson (RSPB degree of protection in accordance with PPS9 paragraphs 7 and 8. We recommend South West Region) appropriate policy wording be added to the plan.

PCS Submission Form Biodiversity in new developments.doc

PCS Submission Form Biodiversity of existing development.doc

PCS Submission Form Habitat creation.doc

PCS Submission Form HRA.doc

PCS Submission Form Networks.doc

PCS Submission Form Proposals Map.doc

PCS Submission Form SSSIs.doc

Policy 29 1241 Mr Michael 2355 Sound No Comment Holm (Environment Agency)

Policy 29 188 Mr Terry Stewart 2393 PCS29 : In i – NO development must be allowed within 400 metres of Heathland. In ii, (Agent for CPRE & access for firefighting must be allowed for heathland areas, we have had far too much Canford Cliffs & arson. Sandbanks Neighbourhood CPRE Poole Core Strategy Response July 1 2008.msg Watch) 289

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 29 1109 (Talbot Village 2517 Sound PCS29: Dorset Heathland SPA and Ramsar sites TVT supports the approach taken in Trust) Policy PCS29: Dorset Heathland SPA and Ramsar sites which states: "Development in Poole will not be permitted where it would be likely to lead to a significant adverse 12 Ms Frances Young effect upon the integrity, directly or indirectly, of the Dorset Heathlands Special Protection (Nathaniel Lichfield & Area, Special Area of Conservation and Ramsar sites. To ensure these sites are not Partners) harmed: i. no development involving a net increase in dwellings will be permitted within a suitable buffer area around the heathlands (normally 400 metres) unless, as an exception, the form of residential development would not have an adverse impact upon the sites' integrity; (our emphasis) ii. between 400 metres and 5 km, development will be expected to take all necessary steps on-site to avoid or mitigate any adverse impact upon the sites' integrity or where this can not be achieved within the development, make provision for mitigation measures designed to avoid such adverse impacts taking place.... " TVT fully supports the reference to "as an exceptiorl', which sensibly allows for appropriate residential development to be undertaken where there is no adverse impact on the integrity of the heathland and the potential effect on designated land is managed with careful design and appropriate works, including for example the use of a buffer zone or the provision of alternative areenspace, or where a contribution is provided for the manaaement of the heathland (or a combination of these measures). TVT therefore strongly supports the scope within Policy PCS29 for individual sites/schemes to be considered on their own merits, depending on the type of housing, the characteristics of the site and the type of mitigation measures that can be provided. This is a sound approach that recognises that a general planning policy can not deal with every situation. CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

290 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 29 1163 Ms Simone 2542 Safer Communities It is welcomed that PCS 28 and supporting text sets out clear Wilding (GOSW) measures to improve community safety through spatial planning in line with section 17 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 (albeit this hasn't been referenced). Heathland It would be helpful if the Core Strategy could consistently refer to the Dorset Heathlands SPA, SAC and Ramsar Sites when referring to all the Natura 2000 sites within the Borough. Currently it omits 'SAC' in a number of cases, which is inconsistent and confusing (e.g. title to PCS 29 and at PCS 37 iii). It is also not clear why the Habitats Regulation Assessment of the Core Strategy has identified a need for a Poole Harbour SPA European Site management Scheme in April 2008, despite the pre-existence of the Poole Harbour Aquatic management Plan (2006), which apparently incorporates the European Site Management Scheme (as per para. 6.147). It would therefore seem necessary to clarify Policy PCS30 ii (which requires development proposals to contribute towards the implementation of the Poole Harbour SPA European Site Management Scheme).

Table 2.128 Policy 29 291

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.147 189 Mr Renny 2351 Comments on the Habitats Regulations Assessment and Habitats Regulations Henderson (RSPB Assessment Final Check We have considered the Habitats Regulations Assessment South West Region) (HRA) and Habitats Regulations Assessment Final Check (HRAFC) submitted in conjunction with the draft Core Strategy. We are pleased to note the comprehensive nature of this work. We do however have a number of concerns, as discussed briefly below. General approach,We have considered the methodology applied by the Council and its consultants, as illustrated in Figure 1 in both the HRA and HRAFC. We have concerns over the approach to the assessment, given its apparent focus on ‘elements’ of the Core Strategy, rather than an assessment of the overall impact of the Strategy. The conclusions thus drawn from the assessment of its constituent parts may not equate to the sum of those parts, i.e. the impact of the overall plan.Off-plan measures Within the HRA and HRAFC, in addition to suggested alterations to policy and supporting text, are recommendations for various measures necessary to ensure the Core Strategy submission draft will not have an adverse effect upon the integrity of any European site. We note the comments within the Core Strategy at paragraph 6.147, but would welcome further information on how certainty can be attached to the delivery of all these wide ranging measures as given in the Strategy and within section 4 of the HRAFC. The HRAFC (page 14) makes the point that: In conclusion it is advised that, if all amendments are undertaken as recommended within this final check document, and all additional measures outlined at section 4 are adequately implemented, it can be ascertained that the Poole Core Strategy submission draft will not have an adverse effect upon the integrity of any European site. This is an absolutely critical statement. In-combination assessment We dispute the assertion that an in-combination assessment of the Core Strategy is not needed. This is made at paragraph 6.7 of the HRA.

PCS Submission Form Biodiversity in new developments.doc

PCS Submission Form Biodiversity of existing development.doc

PCS Submission Form Habitat creation.doc CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

292 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

PCS Submission Form HRA.doc

PCS Submission Form Networks.doc

PCS Submission Form Proposals Map.doc

PCS Submission Form SSSIs.doc

Paragraph 6.147 1239 Mr Neal 2591 We very much welcome the preparation and publication of the Habitats Regulations Whitehead (South Assessment (Appropriate Assessment) in association with the Sustainability Appraisal West Regional of this document, in line with Policy SR28 of the Draft RSS and in the revised wording Assembly) submitted by the RPB to the EiP, which was supported in the Panel Report.

Table 2.129 Paragraph 6.147 293

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 30 1267 Mr Barry 2340 Sound We support the Council’s approach regarding addressing the issue of development Houlston impacts on the Dorset healthlands & Poole Harbour Special Protection Area (SPA) / RAMSAR Sites. In particular the strategic provision of measures to mitigate the impact of development, including relevant Supplementary Planning Guidance combined with appropriate management of the ecologically important sites. Atisreal request to be notified, at the above specified address, of the publication of the recommendations of the Inspector and/or the adoption of the DPD.

1266 Mr Martin Poole BC Core Strategy Sub Stage Reps Form 1v3m.pdf Pendlebury (Atisreal) Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 2.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 3.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 4.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 5.pdf

Policy 30 1241 Mr Michael 2356 Sound No Comment Holm (Environment Agency) CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

294 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

1271 MDL 2424 Unsound Policy PCS 30 should be made more concise. Criterion iii reiterates the first sentence Development Ltd of this policy which identifies that development that would lead to a direct or indirect adverse effect on the SPA and Ramsar site will not be allowed. The inclusion of criterion iii indicates that all the relevant alternatives have not been considered; slipways and other infrastructure may not have impacts and should not be ruled out at this early stage. Criterion iii should also be deleted to allow for sufficient flexibility to meet changing circumstances.

Poole Core Rep Form - Contents.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - para 6.125.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS6.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS7.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS9.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS11.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS12.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS12.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS14.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 27.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 30.pdf 295

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

1127 Ms Joanne Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 33.pdf Webb (Savills (Representing Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 34.pdf Bournemouth & Poole College)) Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 35.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 38.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - Strategic Objectives.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - vision 1.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - visions 2.pdf CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

296 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 30 1163 Ms Simone 2543 Safer Communities It is welcomed that PCS 28 and supporting text sets out clear Wilding (GOSW) measures to improve community safety through spatial planning in line with section 17 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 (albeit this hasn't been referenced). Heathland It would be helpful if the Core Strategy could consistently refer to the Dorset Heathlands SPA, SAC and Ramsar Sites when referring to all the Natura 2000 sites within the Borough. Currently it omits 'SAC' in a number of cases, which is inconsistent and confusing (e.g. title to PCS 29 and at PCS 37 iii). It is also not clear why the Habitats Regulation Assessment of the Core Strategy has identified a need for a Poole Harbour SPA European Site management Scheme in April 2008, despite the pre-existence of the Poole Harbour Aquatic management Plan (2006), which apparently incorporates the European Site Management Scheme (as per para. 6.147). It would therefore seem necessary to clarify Policy PCS30 ii (which requires development proposals to contribute towards the implementation of the Poole Harbour SPA European Site Management Scheme).

Table 2.130 Policy 30

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.150 1163 Ms Simone 2546 Green Belt It is considered that it has been insufficiently explained at paragraphs 6.150ff Wilding (GOSW) that it is justified to include in the Green Belt two areas of land that were previously safeguarded for a mix of housing and employment development (North Poole) in the Poole Local Plan First Alteration (adopted March 2004). However, there does not appear to be any conflict with the emerging RSS, as the draft RSS (policy SR27) states "the inner boundary of the Green Belt shall generally follow the limits of existing development or that already committed". Consequently inclusion in the Green Belt appears justified 297

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

whether or not the land had been part of the Green Belt prior to being safeguarded for development. It would be helpful if this could be made explicit in the Core Strategy. In addition, it is not clear when it is proposed to modify the Proposals Map accordingly. It is suggested that as a minimum an Addendum to the Proposals Map highlighting the change will be required at the same time as adoption of the Core Strategy to ensure consistency between the Core Strategy and the Proposals Map until the latter is fully revised through the Site Allocations DPD.

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.151 188 Mr Terry Stewart 2395 Page 177 Sustainability Appraisal Recommendations : strongly object to “wording of (Agent for CPRE & restrictions should allow for types of residential development which will not adversely Canford Cliffs & affect habitats due to the type of residential development or the opportunities for on-site Sandbanks mitigation.” The residents may have visitors with dogs or cats, they cannot be banned. Neighbourhood Watch) CPRE Poole Core Strategy Response July 1 2008.msg

Table 2.131 Paragraph 6.151 CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

298 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.158 1163 Ms Simone 2547 Preparing Poole for Climate Change Overall the proposed approach appears reasonably Wilding (GOSW) justified and consistent with the PPS1 supplement Planning and Climate Change. Paragraph 6.158 should, however, be updated to reflect the Code for Sustainable Homes having come into effect in April 2008 therefore introducing Code level 6 as mandatory from 2016 nationally. In addition, the reference to 'minimum' potable water consumption in the table on page 179 seems counterintuitive. should this rather read 'maximum'? With regards to the performance of commercial buildings it should be noted that the Government introduced in the March 2008 budget a commitment for all commercial buildings to be zero carbon from 2019 and all public sector buildings to be zero carbon from 2018.

Table 2.132 Paragraph 6.158

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.162 1077 Ms Theresa 2275 Unsound On the whole, I think the approach to sustainable homes is great. Well done. However, McManus (Poole the core strategy should incorporate a strategy for improving the energy-efficiency of, Agenda 21) and increasing the proportion of renewable energy used by, the existing built environment.

Table 2.133 Paragraph 6.162 299

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Paragraph 6.163 1077 Ms Theresa 2276 Unsound Given that there is a stated commitment to grow environment technology industry in McManus (Poole the area, why not propose Poole as a site for experimenting with wave and tidal power Agenda 21) generation ?

Table 2.134 Paragraph 6.163

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 32 1241 Mr Michael 2357 Sound No Comment Holm (Environment Agency)

Policy 32 1163 Ms Simone 2548 It is positively recognised that Policy PCS32 makes explicit how Poole Borough Council Wilding (GOSW) is supporting the sustainable use and generation of energy, through all the key tools at its disposal, namely procurement, as a responsible land owner and as planning authority. It is further welcomed that the policy requires development to minimise demand for energy consumption without being prescriptive in technology terms.

Table 2.135 Policy 32 CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

300 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

525 Mr Tim Watton 2321 Unsound The Council’s interpretation of the Planning Policy for Climate Change is fundamentally (House Builders incorrect and the Policy as drafted is unsound on that basis. The HBF has set out a Federation Ltd) number of interrelated objections as part of this below as it believes the whole policy is fundamentally unsound on a number of points that should be read in the context of each other.The Companion Guide to PPS: Planning for Climate Change clarifies in paragraph 3.49 the manner in which paragraph 20 of the PPS requires policies to require targets to be decentralised and renewable or low-carbon energy’, a term which is explained in the glossary to the PPS. This means that they should be flexible enough to consider building or site specific technologies, and also wider community schemes in the locality. The current policy PCS33 specifies energy targets, however, in terms of meeting a ‘predicted percentage level of energy use’ of either 10% or 20%. This is not in conformity with the requirements of national policy set out in paragraph 20 of PPS on Climate Change which requires it to be set out as the paragraph above.It is also not clear as to what a percentage of predicted energy use is or is defined as. It is also unclear as to how this related to regulated and unregulated energy provision requirements as should be explicitly stated by specifying targets as decentralised and renewable or low-carbon energy. Paragraph 3.59 of the companion guide to the PPS on Climate Change gives more context to this requirement, however, the policy is conflicting with itself in terms of the definitions of what it is seeking to achieve with carbon reductions through the CSHomes, unregulated or regulated targets and the requirement to reduce predicted energy use.As set out above, the Policy is also conflicting with itself. The Code for Sustainable Homes (CSHomes) sets out the targets against the Minimum percentage reduction in dwelling emission rate (CO2 ) over target emission rate and Policy PCS33 sets out that new dwelling should achieve higher levels of the Code than is required to meet the Government’s timetable for zero carbon homes by 2016. However, it is conflicting with itself in that it seeks two levels of contribution and for two different measures, predicted energy use and carbon reductions. It is unsound to require both as they are entirely different concepts and contrary to national policy.The Council’s Policy is therefore unsound and cannot be made sound as it there is no evidence available to support such a policy, nor an amendment to it. It should be removed and the Council seek to implement the national time table for the introduction of the Code for Sustainable Homes. 301

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Final Submission 6 34 - ecoonic impact.doc

Final Submission - 6.34 lifetime homes.doc

Final Submission - p6.34.doc

Final Submission PCS6 windfall.doc

Final Submission PCS7 affordable housing.doc

Final Submission PCS9 lifetime homes buildign control.doc

Final Submission PCS11.doc

Final Submission PCS33 - energy targets.doc

Final Submission PCS33 - viabilty.doc

Final Submission PCS33.doc CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

302 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 33 1267 Mr Barry 2338 Unsound Whilst we support in broad terms the Council’s aspirations for sustainable homes we Houlston feel that Policy PCS 33 is unduly prescriptive in terms of requirement iii. Levels of the Code for Sustainable Homes. In particular we contend that the requirement all new residential development >50 dwellings (including residential conversions) must meet Code for Sustainable Homes Level 6 by 2011 is unreasonable as a mandatory requirement. In our submissions it should be treated as an aspiration and not mandatory. We are not aware of a credible evidence base that shows how it would be possible to achieve Code Level 6 on a residential conversion scheme in a financially viable way at the moment, when factoring in the ‘abnormal’ conversion costs which burden many such development schemes. The Code appears to rely on as yet unidentified and untried new technological solutions when it comes to trying to meet Code Level 6 standards on high density urban conversion schemes. The mandatory imposition of the Code for Sustainable Homes in these terms would make the cost of many such conversion schemes prohibitive by producing a cost of conversion greater than the market value for each dwelling. This would stifle Government and the Council’s strategic objectives in terms of delivery of new additional dwellings in the plan period. Policy PCS 33 should be amended to make it an aspiration to meet this Code standard as the technology and development economics evolve. Atisreal request to be notified, at the above specified address, of the publication of the recommendations of the Inspector and/or the adoption of the DPD.

1266 Mr Martin Poole BC Core Strategy Sub Stage Reps Form 1v3m.pdf Pendlebury (Atisreal) Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 2.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 3.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 4.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 5.pdf 303

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 33 1241 Mr Michael 2358 Sound No Comments Holm (Environment Agency)

Policy 33 1035 Mr Tony Christie 2367 Sound Whilst we support the objective of delivering sustainable housing, the current policy is (Grosvenor Shopping considered onerous. The Code for Sustainable Homes targets set out in Policy PCS Centre Fund) 33 exceed the timescales put in place by Central Government, which is expected to only require Code Level 3 by 2011 and Code Level 4 by 2014. Given current market conditions and availability of affordable technologies, requiring schemes of more than 50 units to meet Code Level 6 by 2013 will have a significant impact upon viability and will severely prejudice the ability of developers to bring forward much needed residential developments in order to meet the Borough’s housing targets. Furthermore, at present the threshold of 50 units is not sufficiently large enough to enable expensive sustainable measures to incorporated in a cost effective manner.We recommend that the Council’s targets are relaxed to coincide with Government guidelines.

1113 Mr David Roach PCS 5.doc (GVA Grimley) PCS 13 Rep.doc

PCS 14 Rep.doc

PCS 33 Rep.doc

PCS 34 Rep.doc CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

304 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

1271 MDL 2425 Unsound The main part of this objection relates to the timetable for proposals to be determined Development Ltd against with regard to the Code for Sustainable Homes. This timetable is not in conformity with National Planning Policy, specifically Planning Policy Statement: 1 Supplement: Planning and Climate Change (Nov 2007). Paragraph 8 of this document identifies that the: ‘The planning system needs to support the delivery of the timetable for reducing carbon emissions from domestic and non-domestic buildings. Building a Greener Future7 sets out a progressive tightening of Building Regulations to require major reductions in carbon emissions from new homes to get to zero carbon by 2016. There are similar ambitions to cut carbon emissions from new non-domestic buildings8. This PPS sets out how regional and local planning can best support achievement of the zero-carbon targets alongside meeting community needs for economic and housing development’. (para 8, PPS1 Supplement, 2007) Paragraph 30 of this document goes onto state that ‘Planning authorities should help to achieve the national timetable for reducing carbon emissions from domestic and non-domestic buildings’. In light of the information included in this national guidance document, it is recommended that the table within Policy PCS 33 is altered to respect the prevailing national timetable for the implementation of Code Level 4,5 & 6 homes. A policy that requires Code Level homes above the national timetable could restrict housing supply due to the associated costs with regard to building to such standards. Policy PCS33 gives specific detail about how all new residential development will contribute to making Poole a more sustainable place. Criterion i and ii should be deleted as Criterion iii refers to the delivering homes in accordance with the Code for Sustainable Homes, which will cover aspects including on-site renewable sources and sustainable drainage systems.

Poole Core Rep Form - Contents.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - para 6.125.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS6.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS7.pdf 305

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

1127 Ms Joanne Poole Core Rep Form - PCS9.pdf Webb (Savills (Representing Poole Core Rep Form - PCS11.pdf Bournemouth & Poole College)) Poole Core Rep Form - PCS12.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS12.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS14.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 27.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 30.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 33.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 34.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 35.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 38.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - Strategic Objectives.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - vision 1.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - visions 2.pdf CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

306 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 33 1276 Neptune 2481 Unsound We object to policy PCS33 as it is advancing the provision of the Code for Sustainable Consulting Limited Homes beyond that which is mandatory and that recommended by the draft South West RSS Panel Report. We are concerned that advancing the delivery of Code Level 6 at 1132 Ms Lindsay this time could make the Core Strategy undeliverable, as it is not ye certain whether Thompson (Terence Code Level 6 can be achieved technically. In addition this may prejudice the economic O'Rourke) viability of certain development sites, particularly those in the regeneration area that are expected to deliver a sustainable amount of community infrastructure and economic regeneration. Paragraph 4.33 of PPS12 (June 2008) states that “ the local planning authority should be consistent with national policy and in general conformity with the regional spatial strategy”. Policy G of the draft South West RSS, proposed to be modified by the Panel Report, requires development to achieve minimum standard of Code Level 3, and in the case of large scale development sets a more realistic time frame for the achievement of other Code Levels. This requires Code level 4 between 2008-2010, Code Level 5 between 2011 and 2015 and Code Level 6 by 2016. we therefore suggest that the Core Strategy should adopt a policy on the implementation of the Code for Sustainable Homes that is compliant with the forthcoming Proposed Modifications to the draft South West RSS. As the government sets out in the recent published document, “The Code for Sustainable Homes: Setting the standard in sustainability for new homes” (February 2008), it is mandatory for homes to be rated against the Code (from 1 May 2008) but not mandatory to achieve a code level. It is clear from this document that the Government anticipate the Code levels to become mandatory through Building regulations: “ The code is linked to Building Regulations, which are minimum building standards required by law. Minimum standards for Code compliance have been set above the requirements of Building Regulations. The Code signals the future direction of Building Regulations in relation to Carbon emissions fro, and energy use in homes, providing greater regulatory certainty for the homebuilding industry.” As an example of the need to be up-to-date and flexible to changing circumstances, this representation form has already become out of date, even before the end of the consultation period. With the publication of the revised PPS12 (June 2008). Therefore, whilst we object to policy PCS33 on the basis of old style soundness tests, we also consider this policy to 307

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

inflexible and not consistent with regional policy, as set out in PPS12 Para. 4.33 and 4.37.

Policy 33 1277 Patch Properties 2485 Unsound We are concerned that policy PCS33 is advancing the provisions of the Code of Sustainable Homes beyond that which is mandatory and recommended by the draft 1132 Ms Lindsay South West RSS Panel report. We are concerned that advancing the delivery of Code Thompson (Terence Level 6 at this time could make the Core Strategy undeliverable, as it is not ye certain O'Rourke) whether Code Level 6 can be achieved technically. In addition this may prejudice the economic viability of certain development sites. Policy G of the draft South West RSS, proposed to be modified by the Panel report, requires development to achieve a minimum standard of Code Level 3, and in the case of large scale development sets a more realistic time frame for the achievement of other Code Levels. This Code Level 6 by 2016. We therefore suggest that the Core Strategy should adopt a policy regarding the implementation of the Code for Sustainable Homes, that is compliant with the forthcoming Proposed Modifications to the draft South West RSS

Table 2.136 Policy 33 CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

308 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

1271 MDL 2427 Unsound Paragraph 6.172 refers to BREEAM standards for private commercial development Development Ltd and identifies that ‘For larger schemes (in excess of 1,000 square meters net floorspace), there is potential to achieve the higher BREEAM ‘excellent’ rating. Policy PSC 34 identifies that for development 1,000 sq (net) floorspace should be a BREEAM ‘Excellent’ rating. This is therefore in contrast to paragraph 6.172 that identifies that there is the potential to achieve this rating. Achieving an ‘Excellent’ rating for such a small floorspace could affect the financial viability of further commercial buildings. Policy PSC 34 should reconsider the threshold to building to ‘Excellent’ level and should conform with National Guidance and/or insert a viability assessment criteria that will allow for financial consideration on a site by site basis. This will ensure a level of flexibility and allow for the supply of commercial units not to be adversely affect by cost constraints associate with building to ‘Excellent’ rating for such small scale buildings. Paragraph 6.173 identifies that the emerging RSS may set out targets for on-site carbon dioxide reductions and include minimum-on site renewable energy generation targets for developments in excess of 1,000 sqm, but the RSS has not been adopted. The Core Strategy needs to be reasonably flexible enough to allow for the fact that the RSS is still in draft format.

Poole Core Rep Form - Contents.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - para 6.125.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS6.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS7.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS9.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS11.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS12.pdf 309

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

1127 Ms Joanne Poole Core Rep Form - PCS12.pdf Webb (Savills (Representing Poole Core Rep Form - PCS14.pdf Bournemouth & Poole College)) Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 27.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 30.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 33.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 34.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 35.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 38.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - Strategic Objectives.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - vision 1.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - visions 2.pdf CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

310 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Table 2.137 Paragraph 6.172 311

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

1271 MDL 2428 Unsound Paragraph 6.172 refers to BREEAM standards for private commercial development Development Ltd and identifies that ‘For larger schemes (in excess of 1,000 square meters net floorspace), there is potential to achieve the higher BREEAM ‘excellent’ rating. Policy PSC 34 identifies that for development 1,000 sq (net) floorspace should be a BREEAM ‘Excellent’ rating. This is therefore in contrast to paragraph 6.172 that identifies that there is the potential to achieve this rating. Achieving an ‘Excellent’ rating for such a small floorspace could affect the financial viability of further commercial buildings. Policy PSC 34 should reconsider the threshold to building to ‘Excellent’ level and should conform with National Guidance and/or insert a viability assessment criteria that will allow for financial consideration on a site by site basis. This will ensure a level of flexibility and allow for the supply of commercial units not to be adversely affect by cost constraints associate with building to ‘Excellent’ rating for such small scale buildings. Paragraph 6.173 identifies that the emerging RSS may set out targets for on-site carbon dioxide reductions and include minimum-on site renewable energy generation targets for developments in excess of 1,000 sqm, but the RSS has not been adopted. The Core Strategy needs to be reasonably flexible enough to allow for the fact that the RSS is still in draft format.

Poole Core Rep Form - Contents.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - para 6.125.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS6.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS7.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS9.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS11.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS12.pdf CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

312 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

1127 Ms Joanne Poole Core Rep Form - PCS12.pdf Webb (Savills (Representing Poole Core Rep Form - PCS14.pdf Bournemouth & Poole College)) Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 27.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 30.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 33.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 34.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 35.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 38.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - Strategic Objectives.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - vision 1.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - visions 2.pdf 313

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Table 2.138 Paragraph 6.173

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 34 1261 Siemens Real 2297 Unsound Siemens Real Estate are the owners of land at Sopers Lane occupied by various Estate Ltd Siemens companies (see attached plan). Currently, Siemens occupy a building on land to the wet of its ownership (know as A Shop) on a leasehold basis. Siemens are due to vacate the western half of the site in 2010. In addition, there are proposals to potentially relocate other Siemens businesses from elsewhere in the sub-region. Siemens are in discussion with Poole Borough Council I relation to a planning application for a new production facility on the vacant land within its retained site. The proposals, particularly the external appearance of the propose facility, have been worked in consultations with officers of the Borough Council. It is anticipated that this application will be made in Summer 2008. Siemens supports the Core Strategy Submission Document in so far as it proposes continued employment use on land within its ownership. However, we consider the Core Strategy should be amended as follows: 1) The Core Strategy advocates a Master Plan approach to guide development. It is intended that this would be prepared alongside the Site-Specific Allocations Development Plan Document. Siemens do not object in principle to the preparation of the Master Plan to guide development. However, its development requirements are specific in terms of design (layout, design, building height and plot size) to the processes undertaken. Furthermore, the programme for the delivery of the new facility most likely will be in advance of the preparation of the Master Plan or the Site-specific Allocations Development Plan Document. Therefore, Siemens propose that the Core Strategy provides sufficient flexibility to allow for employment development within the Master Plan area in advance of the Master Plan or the Site-Specific Allocations Development Plan Document being prepared subject to the general criteria within PCS 2 – Existing Employment Areas. 2) Siemens support the objective of sustainable development generally and specifically at this site. Siemens support the approach that all major applications should be supported by an energy and resources framework and that the aspiration should be to strive for the highest possible standards in terms of energy CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

314 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

efficiency and renewable energy generation. Nethertheless, Siemens consider that Policy PCS 3 is too prescriptive in its aim for the BREEAM “excellent” and 20% on-site renewable energy. Policy PCS 3 or the explanatory text should acknowledge site specific circumstances and allow for the submission of a full and complete explanation in those circumstances where the target can not be met. These comments also apply to PCS34.

1260 Mr Craig Craig Blatchford - Blue Sky - Siemens Real Estate.msg Blatchford (Blue Sky Planning Limited) Craig Blatchford - Blue Sky - Siemens Real Estate.pdf

Policy 34 1241 Mr Michael 2359 Sound No Comments Holm (Environment Agency) 315

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 34 1035 Mr Tony Christie 2368 Sound The requirement for achieving sustainable development through energy efficiency (Grosvenor Shopping measures is fully supported, and indeed the setting of targets is consistent with national Centre Fund) policy. However, the policy needs to recognise that these targets are subject to scheme viability. Paragraph 26, bullet (i) of the Planning and Climate Change Supplement to PPS1 states that ‘planning authorities should set out a target percentage of the energy to be used in new development to come from decentralised and renewable or low-carbon energy sources where it is viable’. To accord with national guidance, Policy PCS14 should be amended to acknowledge this point of viability, so as not to fetter the ability to bring forward much needed regeneration and development. It would be acceptable to include a requirement that where these targets can not be achieved due to issues of viability, supporting evidence needs to be submitted to justify the departure.

1113 Mr David Roach PCS 5.doc (GVA Grimley) PCS 13 Rep.doc

PCS 14 Rep.doc

PCS 33 Rep.doc

PCS 34 Rep.doc CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

316 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

1271 MDL 2426 Unsound Paragraph 6.172 refers to BREEAM standards for private commercial development Development Ltd and identifies that ‘For larger schemes (in excess of 1,000 square meters net floorspace), there is potential to achieve the higher BREEAM ‘excellent’ rating. Policy PSC 34 identifies that for development 1,000 sq (net) floorspace should be a BREEAM ‘Excellent’ rating. This is therefore in contrast to paragraph 6.172 that identifies that there is the potential to achieve this rating. Achieving an ‘Excellent’ rating for such a small floorspace could affect the financial viability of further commercial buildings. Policy PSC 34 should reconsider the threshold to building to ‘Excellent’ level and should conform with National Guidance and/or insert a viability assessment criteria that will allow for financial consideration on a site by site basis. This will ensure a level of flexibility and allow for the supply of commercial units not to be adversely affect by cost constraints associate with building to ‘Excellent’ rating for such small scale buildings. Paragraph 6.173 identifies that the emerging RSS may set out targets for on-site carbon dioxide reductions and include minimum-on site renewable energy generation targets for developments in excess of 1,000 sqm, but the RSS has not been adopted. The Core Strategy needs to be reasonably flexible enough to allow for the fact that the RSS is still in draft format.

Poole Core Rep Form - Contents.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - para 6.125.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS6.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS7.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS9.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS11.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS12.pdf 317

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

1127 Ms Joanne Poole Core Rep Form - PCS12.pdf Webb (Savills (Representing Poole Core Rep Form - PCS14.pdf Bournemouth & Poole College)) Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 27.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 30.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 33.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 34.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 35.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 38.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - Strategic Objectives.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - vision 1.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - visions 2.pdf CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

318 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 34 1276 Neptune 2480 Unsound Paragraph 4.33 of PPS12 (June 2008) states that “ the local planning authority should Consulting Limited be consistent with national policy and in general conformity with the regional spatial strategy”. Policy G of the draft South West RSS, proposed to be modified by the Panel 1132 Ms Lindsay Report, requires such development to achieve a minimum BREEAM Very Good standard. Thompson (Terence We therefore suggest that the Core Strategy should adopt a policy on the implementation O'Rourke) that is compliant with the forthcoming Proposed Modifications to the draft South West RSS and does not exceed the requirement. The policy could instead be used to encourage a higher requirement without dictating it, therefore retaining some flexibility. As an example of the need to be up-to-date and flexible to changing circumstances, this representation form has already become out of date, even before the end of the consultation period, with the publication of the revised PPS12 (June 2008). Therefore, whilst we object to Policy PCS34 on the basis of old style soundness tests, we also consider the policy to inflexible and not consistent with regional policy, as set out in para. 4.33 and 4.37.

Table 2.139 Policy 34 319

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

1241 Mr Michael 2360 Unsound We consider this policy is unsound as it is based upon the Strategic Flood Risk Holm (Environment Assessment (SFRA) Level 1 and 2 which do not comprehensively deal with flood risk Agency) within the Authority’s area. The SFRA Level 1 has not clearly defined the area of all sources of flood risk for the lifetime of development within Poole, and therefore is not in accordance with Planning Policy Statement 25. The mapping output (Figure 6.1) of the SFRA Level 1 is based upon a superseded policy NE 31 in the Poole Local Plan, as advised by Borough of Poole Strategic Planning. It has been indicated that the text in the SFRA has considered all sources of flooding, however, this information does not tally with the defined ‘Potential Flood Risk’ in Figure 6.1. We are aware that Poole have identified this and are looking to rectify this issue but based upon the current documentation the policy is unsound.The Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA) Level 2 for the Central Area identifies the need to provide strategic flood defences to protect development. However, it does not detail what the flood defence requirements are. Without this information being included within the SFRA, development in the Central Area may be unsafe.The changes that we would require to make the core strategy sound:- SFRA Level 1 to be updated to incorporate and map all sources of flooding-Provision of an addendum to the SFRA Level 2 to summarise the strategic flood defence requirement for the Borough of Poole for the next 100 years including phasing and funding.

PCS29 representation - sound.doc

dps1.rtf

PCS30 representation - sound.doc

PCS32 representation - sound.doc

PCS33 representation - sound.doc CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

320 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

PCS34 representation - sound.doc

PCS35 representation - unsound Test 7.doc

PCS35 representation - unsound.doc

PCS36 representation - sound.doc

PCS38 representation - unsound Test 7.doc

PCS38 representation - unsound Test 8.doc 321

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

322 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

1271 MDL 2429 Unsound Criterion i and ii in policy PSC 35 should be deleted as a Flood Risk Assessment must Development Ltd be carried out in areas at risk from flooding (as identified in PPS25) and therefore within these reports appropriate mitigation measures specific to the location of the site and proposed development will be identified. Criterion i and ii may restrict appropriate mitigation measures being suggested and adopted for the site and does not readily allow for changing circumstances and the evolving best practice for flooding mitigation measures to be applied.

Poole Core Rep Form - Contents.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - para 6.125.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS6.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS7.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS9.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS11.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS12.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS12.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS14.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 27.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 30.pdf 323

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

1127 Ms Joanne Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 33.pdf Webb (Savills (Representing Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 34.pdf Bournemouth & Poole College)) Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 35.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 38.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - Strategic Objectives.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - vision 1.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - visions 2.pdf CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

324 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 35 1163 Ms Simone 2549 It would be beneficial if policies PCS 35 and 36 could be clarified in terms of which Wilding (GOSW) zones in their Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA) are referred to by 'development in areas at risk from flooding' (PCS 35) and 'affected areas' (PCS 36 iii). It would also seem useful to indicate here the approach to be taken over time in order to ensure that the strategy remains aligned with the SFRA which will need to be updated regularly. I.e. how often is Poole intending to update the SFRA, where will this information be available to prospective developers and how will this updated information be considered in planning applications?

Policy 35 1077 Ms Theresa 2581 1.Coastal Flooding. The IPCC data, which predicts less than a 1m rise in the next 100 McManus (Poole years, does not yet include in its calculations the meltwater from glaciers, ice caps or Agenda 21) ice sheets. It has been estimated that if just the Greenland ice cap melts than sea levels would rise 7metres. The areas at risk from this are Sandbanks, Liliput, the Town Centre sites, Sterte, Fleetsbridge, Hamworthy, Creekmoor, and Canford Heath Consequently, any redevelopment should be on higher ground: Broadstone, Corfe Mullen, Merley, Upper Parkstone; i.e. beyond Poole. Poole has to move, and in a controlled fashion, not as the result of a catastrophe.

Policy 35 1239 Mr Neal 2592 We also welcome the undertaking of the Strategic Flood Risk Assessment in line with Whitehead (South taking forward Policy F1 of the Draft RSS (see para 7.2.21 of the Draft RSS). This was West Regional also supported in the Panel Report Recommendations – revised policy F1. Assembly)

Table 2.140 Policy 35 325

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 36 1241 Mr Michael 2361 Sound No comments Holm (Environment Agency)

Policy 36 1163 Ms Simone 2550 It would be beneficial if policies PCS 35 and 36 could be clarified in terms of which Wilding (GOSW) zones in their Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA) are referred to by 'development in areas at risk from flooding' (PCS 35) and 'affected areas' (PCS 36 iii). It would also seem useful to indicate here the approach to be taken over time in order to ensure that the strategy remains aligned with the SFRA which will need to be updated regularly. I.e. how often is Poole intending to update the SFRA, where will this information be CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

326 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

available to prospective developers and how will this updated information be considered in planning applications?

Table 2.141 Policy 36 7 Monitoring and Implementation Framework

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 37 1243 Mr Rohan 2399 PCS 37 Joint working Throughout the document the commitment to a step change in Torkildsen (English highway design and the ongoing improvement to the public realm and street scene is Heritage) welcomed as these matters have a profound effect on the environmental quality and attractiveness of the town including its historic setting and integrity. As a consequence it is vital the opportunity is taken to confirm the commitment of the Highways Authority to the expectations of this statutory plan to such a “high standard of design of all buildings, streets and spaces…” and state clearly how the positive and very welcome agenda advocated will be delivered across the Borough. Reference to Manual for Streets (CLG 2007), Transport Management and Streetscape (DoT 2008), Civilised Streets (CABE 2008) and Streets for All (EH 2007) will support your approach.

response to Core Strategy submission version.pdf 327

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 37 527 Ms Alice Ordidge 2505 With regard to PCS 37, the South West RDA is fully committed to working alongside (South West RDA) Poole Borough Council to assist in the delivery of RES priorities and sustainable economic growth in South East Dorset.

Alice Ordidge - SWRDA.doc

Policy 37 1163 Ms Simone 2545 Safer Communities It is welcomed that PCS 28 and supporting text sets out clear Wilding (GOSW) measures to improve community safety through spatial planning in line with section 17 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 (albeit this hasn't been referenced). Heathland It would be helpful if the Core Strategy could consistently refer to the Dorset Heathlands SPA, SAC and Ramsar Sites when referring to all the Natura 2000 sites within the Borough. Currently it omits 'SAC' in a number of cases, which is inconsistent and confusing (e.g. title to PCS 29 and at PCS 37 iii). It is also not clear why the Habitats Regulation Assessment of the Core Strategy has identified a need for a Poole Harbour SPA European Site management Scheme in April 2008, despite the pre-existence of the Poole Harbour Aquatic management Plan (2006), which apparently incorporates the European Site Management Scheme (as per para. 6.147). It would therefore seem necessary to clarify Policy PCS30 ii (which requires development proposals to contribute towards the implementation of the Poole Harbour SPA European Site Management Scheme).

Policy 37 1102 Mr Ian Parsons 2574 We support the adoption of a Bournemouth, Dorset and Poole Multi-Area Agreement. (Highways Agency) In particular, an integrated approach to transport, traffic and parking management could make a significant contribution towards reducing congestion on the SRN. The Agency would wish to see further elaboration on the types of schemes to be considered under CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

328 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

this Multi-Area Agreement, in particular those promoting modal shift away from single occupancy car use.

Table 2.142 Policy 37 329

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

1241 Mr Michael 2362 Unsound We consider this policy is unsound as it is based upon the Strategic Flood Risk Holm (Environment Assessment (SFRA) Level 1 and 2 which do not comprehensively deal with flood risk Agency) within the Authority’s area. The SFRA Level 1 has not clearly defined the area of all sources of flood risk for the lifetime of development within Poole, and therefore is not in accordance with Planning Policy Statement 25. The mapping output (Figure 6.1) of the SFRA Level 1 is based upon a superseded policy NE 31 in the Poole Local Plan, as advised by Borough of Poole Strategic Planning. It has been indicated that the text in the SFRA has considered all sources of flooding, however, this information does not tally with the defined ‘Potential Flood Risk’ in Figure 6.1. We are aware that Poole have identified this and are looking to rectify this issue but based upon the current documentation the policy is unsound.The Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA) Level 2 for the Central Area identifies the need to provide strategic flood defences to protect development. However, it does not detail what the flood defence requirements are. Without this information being included within the SFRA, development in the Central Area may be unsafe.The changes that we would require to make the core strategy sound:- SFRA Level 1 to be updated to incorporate and map all sources of flooding-Provision of an addendum to the SFRA Level 2 to summarise the strategic flood defence requirement for the Borough of Poole for the next 100 years including phasing and funding.

PCS29 representation - sound.doc

dps1.rtf

PCS30 representation - sound.doc

PCS32 representation - sound.doc

PCS33 representation - sound.doc CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

330 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

PCS34 representation - sound.doc

PCS35 representation - unsound Test 7.doc

PCS35 representation - unsound.doc

PCS36 representation - sound.doc

PCS38 representation - unsound Test 7.doc

PCS38 representation - unsound Test 8.doc 331

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

332 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

1241 Mr Michael 2363 Unsound We consider this policy is unsound as it is based upon the Strategic Flood Risk Holm (Environment Assessment Level 1 and 2 which do not comprehensively deal with flood risk within the Agency) Authority’s area. The implementation of key elements of the Core Strategy relies on managing the Flood Risk, especially in the Central Area. The Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA) Level 2 for the Central Area identifies the need to provide strategic flood defences to protect development; and Strategic Objective 8 of the Core Strategy Submission document states that “100% of the Town Centre defences to be built or programmed by 2016”. However, neither document has sufficiently considered what the flood defence requirements are and whether they can be delivered within this timescale. Without this information being included within the SFRA, development in the Central Area may be surrounded by significant depths of water during a major flood event. Therefore, we consider without this information being included the document is unsound. The changes that we would require to make the core strategy sound:- Provision of an addendum to the Strategic Flood Risk Assessment to summarise the strategic flood defence requirement for the Borough of Poole for the next 100 years including phasing and funding. - Assessment to identify and provide additional evidence to demonstrate that the Community Infrastructure Levy will be able to fund off site defences proposed in the above SFRA addendum required to ensure compliance with part c) of the exception test as set out in paragraph D9 of Planning Policy Statement 25 - Development and Flood Risk.

PCS29 representation - sound.doc

dps1.rtf

PCS30 representation - sound.doc

PCS32 representation - sound.doc

PCS33 representation - sound.doc 333

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

PCS34 representation - sound.doc

PCS35 representation - unsound Test 7.doc

PCS35 representation - unsound.doc

PCS36 representation - sound.doc

PCS38 representation - unsound Test 7.doc

PCS38 representation - unsound Test 8.doc CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

334 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 38 1243 Mr Rohan 2400 PCS 38 Developer contributions Pt (i) please add buildings, places and spaces. Torkildsen (English Heritage) response to Core Strategy submission version.pdf 335

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

1271 MDL 2430 Unsound Policy PSC 38 identifies priority areas for developer contributions. This approach is Development Ltd contrary to Circular 05/05 Planning Obligations, where paragraph B5 (iv) identifies that Planning Obligations must be ‘fairly and reasonably related in scale and kind to the proposed development’. By identifying priority locations for the use of developer contributions, this implies that contributions triggered by a development proposal would not meet this criteria set out in Circular 05/05. The wording of Policy PSC 38 should be altered to reassert the position that where developer contributions will be used they will be ‘fairly and reasonable’ related to the proposed development. This alteration would allow for sufficient flexibility and represents the most appropriate situation in all circumstances.

Poole Core Rep Form - Contents.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - para 6.125.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS6.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS7.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS9.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS11.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS12.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS12.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PCS14.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 27.pdf CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

336 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

1127 Ms Joanne Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 30.pdf Webb (Savills (Representing Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 33.pdf Bournemouth & Poole College)) Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 34.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 35.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - PSC 38.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - Strategic Objectives.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - vision 1.pdf

Poole Core Rep Form - visions 2.pdf 337

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 38 1275 L and C 2442 Unsound The role of Developer Contribution in Shaping Places The objectors own Canford Heath Properties Ltd Local Centre which they propose to develop with additional retail floorspace. Whilst they have no objections in principle to the various key principles identified in the policy 1274 Mr D S Dunlop they object to the lack of any references to the advice in Circular 5/05 Planning (D2 Planning Limited) Obligation. Clearly any contributions must be reasonable and necessary for the development and linked to the tests in Circular 5/05. The policy is unsound and should make reference to the advice in that Circular.

Policy 38 326 Ms Rose 2452 Sound We also support Policy PCS 38 on page 199 in the Core Strategy for an overall approach Freeman (The to Developer Contributions with appropriate references to strategic sites and clear links Theatres Trust) to the details set out in the forthcoming DPD. The Trust recognises the importance of planning obligations to assist theatre owners in becoming more self-reliant and to obtain better buildings by using the planning system and working with the private sector. We are concerned that theatre buildings do not benefit appropriately under the terms of S106 and other agreements, and that it will increasingly be necessary to unlock new sources of funding to help pay for significant improvements to them. However, generally, we found the Core Strategy to be an unnecessarily lengthy document with a large number of policies, many overlapping, and much repetition. In many cases the reasoned justification contains more detail than is necessary or expands excessively on the policy it supports. We recommend some trimming and consolidation of both the policies and the accompanying text.

Theatre Trust - Ross Freeman.msg CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

338 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 38 1276 Neptune 2482 Unsound We welcome the policy’s suggestion that there will be certainty for developers provided Consulting Limited through the Borough of Poole’s infrastructure Development Plan Document. However we would like to comment, as we are sure the Borough of Poole is aware that Circular 1132 Ms Lindsay 05/2005 in annex B states that: “ in some instances, perhaps arising from different Thompson (Terence regional or site specific circumstances, it may not be feasible for the proposed O'Rourke) development to meet all the requirements set out in the local, regional and national planning policies and still be economically viable. In such instance, and where the development is needed to meet the aims of the development plan, it is for the local authority and other public sectors agencies to decide what is to be the balance of contributions made by the developer and by the public sector infrastructure providers in its area” (para B10) The Borough of Poole should be minded of this central government guidance when considering the production of their infrastructure DPD and in the use of Policy PCS38. In addition, more recent Government statements on the Community Infrastructure Levy (2008) also reflect the need to ensure development is viable. It states “because it it the purpose of CIL to ensure that more development is delivered, the level of CIL must be set to ensure it supports and does not prevent development” (para 7) We note, as an example of the need to be up-to-date and flexible to changing circumstances, this representation form has already become out of date, even before the end of the consultation period, with the publication of the revised PPS12 (June 2008). Therefore, whilst we object to Policy PCS38 on the basis of old style soundness tests, we also consider the policy to inflexible and not consistent with national policy, as set out in PPS12 para. 4.33 and 4.37. 339

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Policy 38 1109 (Talbot Village 2518 Unsound PCS38: The Role of Developer Contributions in Shaping Places. Whilst TVT accepts Trust) that new development should assist in creating sustainable communities, TVT considers that it will be important for Policy PC838 to allow for each case to be considered on its 12 Ms Frances Young own merits, taking into account the nature of the development, the likely impact on the (Nathaniel Lichfield & local community and surrounding environment and the costs of development. TVT also Partners) objects to the identification within PC838 of priority locations for the use of developer contributions, and considers that 8106 contributions should be directly related to the impact of the proposed development and should not be used to fund schemes in other areas of the borough which are unrelated to the proposed development. Moreover, in order to meet the test of soundness 48, TVT considers that specific reference should be made to any contribution sought being: (i) directly related to the proposed development; and (ii) fairly and reasonably related in scale and kind, as set out at paragraph 85 of Circular OS/2005.

Policy 38 1102 Mr Ian Parsons 2575 We believe that development has an important role in contributing to the funding of (Highways Agency) supporting transport provision. Higher value locations will inevitably generate greater capacity for developers to fund the required range of infrastructure. However, the Agency’s key priority is mitigating traffic generation from developments through the promotion of sustainable travel options. Where impacts on the SRN are significant there is a need for non-Agency funding to fully mitigate these impacts, and therefore location of developments and their value cannot be used as an indicator of funding need alone. The Agency would wish to see appropriate modeling for potentially traffic-generating developments in order to ascertain the level of mitigation required. The Agency notes that Policy PCS 38 indicates that a framework for financial contributions from development will be set out in a DPD entitled ‘Delivering Poole’s Infrastructure’. We CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

340 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

would refer you to our comments submitted recently to the Council in response to the Issues & Options stage of that document.

Table 2.143 Policy 38 8 Key Diagram

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

8 Key Diagram 189 Mr Renny 2353 Unsound Key diagram is poor and does not illustrate clearly internationally designated sites, as Henderson (RSPB is required by Para 6 PPS9. South West Region) PCS Submission Form Biodiversity in new developments.doc

PCS Submission Form Biodiversity of existing development.doc

PCS Submission Form Habitat creation.doc

PCS Submission Form HRA.doc

PCS Submission Form Networks.doc

PCS Submission Form Proposals Map.doc

PCS Submission Form SSSIs.doc 341

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

8 Key Diagram 1273 (W H White plc) 2448 Unsound The LPA has been unwilling to discuss the employment strategy, and the complexity of the issues about the inadequacy of employment land in the South East Dorset conurbation. The lack of response to the RSS EiP Panel’s recommendations warrants a wide strategic examination of the Core Strategy employment land proposals. Soundness: Following the search for additional employment land recommended by the RSS Panel to the Secretary of State, amend Policy Key Diagram (and PCS1) by the addition of required new sites and include any phasing requirements to provide flexibility and recognise the Core Strategy regeneration focus.

1272 Mr Geoff Cross Objections to submitted Poole Core Strategy May 2008.pdf (Savills)

Canford sustainable employment location.jpg

Objection version Illustrative Masterplan p2.jpg

Objection version Illustrative Masterplan pg1.jpg CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

342 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

Objection version Illustrative Masterplanpg3.jpg

Table 2.144 8 Key Diagram 9 Appendix 1: Character Area Profiles

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

1267 Mr Barry 2341 Unsound We support the principle of Council’s approach to defining broad ‘Character Areas’ to Houlston recognise and reinforce local distinctiveness. However we do take issue within Appendix 1: Character Area Profiles for Area 1: Town Centre. Whilst we accept these profiles are meant to be generalised, we do feel that recognition should be given to the role Barclays House and the Network Rail and Stadium sites play to defining a particular character to the northern edge of the town centre. Accordingly, we ask that the description for Profile Area 1: the Town Centre, be supplemented to reflect the impact that Barclays House has a defining prominent building on an important axis site and ‘gateway’ into the town. Similarly the railway station and stadium land uses also define the character of the surrounding area. Atisreal request to be notified, at the above specified address, of the publication of the recommendations of the Inspector and/or the adoption of the DPD.

1266 Mr Martin Poole BC Core Strategy Sub Stage Reps Form 1v3m.pdf Pendlebury (Atisreal) Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 2.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 3.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 4.pdf

Poole BC Core Strategy Subs Stage Reps Form 5.pdf 343

Item ID / Name ID / Type Summary

9 Appendix 1: Character Area Profiles

Table 2.145 9 Appendix 1: Character Area Profiles Representations for Sustainability Appraisal for Poole Core Strategy Submission Document:

Item ID / Name ID / Type Representation CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

344 two responses

Item ID / Name ID / Type Representation

2 Scoping is a key 1256 Mr Tony 2277 Unsound The unacknowledged scope of the Core Strategy is that it assumes a continuing increase stage of the Hamilton (Poole in prosperity of both the town, and the UK and world economies. This leads to Sustainability Agenda 21) development plans which are insufficiently defensive. A retail-led development plan Appraisal process…. takes no account of the downturn in consumption, necessitated by global warming and the challenge of resource limitation caused by an increasing shortage of world resources and an increasing world population. The recent increase in oil and food prices is evidence of the challenges we face.

Table 2.146 Sustainability Appraisal Representations

Item ID / Name ID / Type Representation

8 The purpose of 1256 Mr Tony 2278 Unsound The threat of sea-level rise is greater than is recognised by the government. The latest Strategic Flood Risk Hamilton (Poole IPCC report says in effect that sea-level rise consequent upon the melting of the Assessment (SFRA), Agenda 21) Greenland and other ice-sheets is unpredictable but that they consitute a real threat. …. Such melting could result in much larger sea-level rises than are currently envisaged and allowed for. The Core Strategy for Poole, as a town at risk, should incorporate much stronger plans for investigating defence measures and strategies that may be required. 345

Item ID / Name ID / Type Representation

The Spatial Vision 1102 Mr Ian Parsons 2557 In response to the Sustainability Appraisal, the Core Strategy Submission Document and Strategic (Highways Agency) addresses the need to mitigate increased air pollution arising from higher densities of Objectives development in the vicinity of the Prime Transport Corridors. The Agency supports the outlined approach of promoting the use of walking, cycling and public transport. CORE STRATEGY 2008 RESPONSES TO POOLE CORE STRATEGY SUBMISSION DOCUMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL

346 two responses

CORE STRATEGY 2008 responses to poole core strategy submission document and sustainability appraisal