New Records of Megachilid Bees (Hymenoptera, Megachilidae) from the North Caucasus and Neighboring Regions of Russia1 A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

New Records of Megachilid Bees (Hymenoptera, Megachilidae) from the North Caucasus and Neighboring Regions of Russia1 A ISSN 0013-8738, Entomological Review, 2018, Vol. 98, No. 9, pp. 1165–1174. © Pleiades Publishing, Inc., 2018. New Records of Megachilid Bees (Hymenoptera, Megachilidae) from the North Caucasus and Neighboring 1 Regions of Russia A. V. Faterygaa*, M. Yu. Proshchalykinb**, Yu. V. Astafurovac***, and I. B. Popovd**** aT.I. Vyazemsky Karadag Scientific Station—Nature Reserve of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Feodosiya, 298188 Russia *e-mail: [email protected] bFederal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok-22, 690022 Russia **e-mail: [email protected] cZoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, 199034 Russia ***e-mail: [email protected] dI.T. Trubilin Kuban State Agrarian University, Krasnodar, 350044 Russia ****e-mail: [email protected] Received February 14, 2019 Revised February 18, 2019 Accepted February 18, 2019 Abstract—New data on the distribution of 37 species are reported. Eleven species are new to Russia: Lithurgus tibialis Morawitz, 1875, Anthidium spiniventre Friese, 1899, Icteranthidium ferrugineum (Fabricius, 1787), Hoplitis carinata (Stanek, 1969), Coelioxys acanthura (Illiger, 1806), C. decipiens (Spinola, 1838), Megachile al- bonotata Radoszkowski, 1886, M. pyrenaica (Lepeletier de Saint-Fargeau, 1841), M. burdigalensis Benoist, 1940, M. flavipes Spinola, 1838, and M. tecta Radoszkowski, 1888. Twenty species are new to the North Caucasus, five species are new to the south of the European part of Russia, and one species, Megachile leucomalla Gerstäcker, 1869, is new to the North Caucasus and south of the European part of Russia; the latter species is also reported for the first time from Iran. Hoplitis ravouxi (Pérez, 1902) is excluded from the list of the Russian fauna. A nest of H. carinata is described for the first time. DOI: 10.1134/S0013873818090026 The Megachilidae is one of the largest families of strictus Förster, 1853) and Megachile farinosa Smith, bees. More than 4000 species of megachilid bees are 1853 (= M. derasa Gerstäcker, 1869) from Dagestan found in a wide diversity of habitats on all the conti- by Morawitz (1874) were disregarded by Proshcha- nents except Antarctica, ranging from lowland tropical lykin and Fateryga (2017). Proshchalykin and Müller rain forests to deserts or alpine environments. These (2019) added three species of the genus Hoplitis Klug, bees are very important both ecologically and eco- 1807. Thus, a total of 202 species of megachilid bees nomically since they include many pollinators of natu- have been recorded from Russia to date. However, our ral, urban, and agricultural vegetation (Michener, knowledge of this bee family is quite far from being 2007; Proshchalykin and Fateryga, 2017). The recent understood. The purpose of the present investigation is estimation of the diversity of megachilid bees in Rus- to report new records of megachilid bees in the North sia amounts to 198 species (Proshchalykin and Caucasus and neighboring regions: the south of the Fateryga, 2017). One of them, Coelioxys conspersus European part of Russia and Crimea. Morawitz, 1874, is actually a synonym of another spe- cies (see the comments on C. polycentris Förster, MATERIALS AND METHODS 1853). At the same time, the records of Coelioxys ar- genteus Lepeletier de Saint-Fargeau, 1841 (= C. con- The material for the present study was collected mainly in 2018 by the authors. The specimens were _____________ deposited in the collection of the Federal Scientific 1 This article was originally submitted by the authors in English Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity of the and is first published here. Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 1165 1166 FATERYGA et al. Vladivostok, Russia [FSCV], the collection of the 24.VI.2018, 1 ♀, 2 ♂ (M.P., V.L., M.M.) [FSCV], Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sci- 1 ♀, 10 ♂ (Y.A.) [ZISP]; 26.VI.2018, 1 ♀ (M.P., V.L., ences, St. Petersburg, Russia [ZISP], the collection of M.M.) [FSCV], 1 ♂ (Y.A.); Derbent (42°06′N, A.V. Fateryga, Feodosiya, Russia [CAFK], and the 48°17′E), 28–29.VI.2018, 1 ♂ (Y.A.) [ZISP]; Mak- collection of I.B. Popov, Krasnodar, Russia [CIPK]. hachkala Distr., vicinity of Talgi Vill. (42°52′N, Some additional specimens were examined in ZISP as 47°26′E), 25.VI.2018, 3 ♀ (M.P., V.L., M.M.) well as in the collection of the Zoological Museum of [FSCV], 4 ♀, 3 ♂ (Y.A.) [ZISP]; Derbent Distr., Ka- M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, myshchay River valley (41°54′N, 48°13′E), Russia [ZMMU] and the collection of the Taurida 16.VI.2018, 1 ♂ (A.F.) [CAFK]; 29.VI.2018, 4 ♀ Academy of the V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal Uni- (M.P., V.L., M.M.) [FSCV], 1 ♀, 1 ♂ (Y.A.); Izber- versity, Simferopol, Russia [CFUS]. The bees were bash (42°35′N, 47°49′E), 27.VI.2018, 1 ♂ (Y.A.) identified mainly by comparison of newly collected [ZISP]; Magaramkent Distr., Samur Reserve, 3 km material with the relevant material stored in ZISP and NW of Primorsky (41°52′N, 48°33 ′E), 2–4.VII.2018, ZMMU. However, some old (Warncke, 1980) and 8 ♀, 15 ♂ (Y.A.) [ZISP]; 3.VII.2018, 5 ♀ (M.P., V.L., recently published keys (Müller, 2016; Dorchin and M.M.) [FSCV]. Praz, 2018) were also used. Identification of some Distribution. Russia: European part (Central, Cri- specimens was confirmed by C.J. Praz (Neuchâtel, mea, *North Caucasus), Urals.—Western, Southern, Switzerland) and A. Müller (Zurich, Switzerland). and Eastern Europe, North Africa, Georgia, Azerbai- Distribution of species generally follows Proshcha- jan, Turkey, Syria, Israel, Middle Asia, Iran. Intro- lykin and Fateryga (2017) and references therein (par- duced to North America. ticularly, Kuhlmann et al., 2015; Ascher and Pickering, 2019; Müller, 2019), taking into account Lithurgus tibialis Morawitz, 1875 additional data published by Byvaltsev et al. (2018), Material. Russia. Dagestan: Derbent (42°06′N, and Dorchin and Praz (2018). Regionalization in the 48°17′E), 28–29.VI.2018, 1 ♀ (M.P., V.L., M.M.) description of the distribution follows that in Be- [CAFK], 1 ♀ (Y.A.) [ZISP]. lokobylskij and Lelej (2017): the North Caucasus in- Distribution. *Russia: European part (North Cau- cludes Krasnodar and Stavropol territories, and the casus).—Southern Europe, Cyprus, Turkey, Syria, republics of Adygea, Karachay-Cherkessia, Kabar- Jordan, Israel, UAE, Uzbekistan, Iran, Afghanistan, dino-Balkaria, North Ossetia—Alania, Ingushetia, Pakistan. Chechnya, and Dagestan; the south of the European part of Russia includes Rostov, Volgograd, and Astra- Tribe ANTHIDIINI khan provinces and the republic of Kalmykia. The new records are asterisked (*). The abbreviations of the Anthidium (Anthidium) cingulatum collectors’ names are as follows: A.F.—A.V. Fa- Latreille, 1809 teryga; I.P.—I.B. Popov; M.M.—M.V. Mokrousov; Material. Russia. Krasnodar Terr.: Anapa Distr., M.P.—M.Yu. Proshchalykin; V.L.—V.M. Loktionov, Bolshoy Utrish (44°46′N, 37°23′E), 2.VI.2018, 1 ♂ Y.A.—Yu.A. Astafurova. (A.F.). Dagestan: Kurakh Distr., 1 km W of Shtul (41°33′N, 47°54′E), 15.VI.2018, 2 ♂ (A.F.) [CAFK]; LIST OF SPECIES Rutul Distr., vicinity of Kufa Vill. (41°34′N, 47°22′E), 1400 m, 29.VI–1.VII.2018, 1 ♀ (Y.A.) [ZISP]; Ta- Tribe LITHURGINI basaranskii Distr., 5 km N of Darvag (42°05′N, Lithurgus chrysurus Fonscolombe, 1834 48°05′E): on Securigera varia, 14.VI.2018, 1 ♀ (A.F.); on Echium biebersteinii, 14.VI.2018, 1 ♂ Material. Russia. Dagestan: Nogayskii Distr., (A.F.) [CAFK]. 22 km SW of Terekli-Mekteb (44°02′N, 45°38′E), 21.VI.2018, 2 ♀ (M.P., V.L., M.M.) [FSCV]; 21– Distribution. Russia: European part (Central, 22.VI.2018, 1 ♂ (Y.A.); Tarumovskii Distr., Ko- South, Crimea, *North Caucasus), Urals.—Western, chubey (44°24′N, 46°32′E), on Convolvulus arvensis, Southern, and Eastern Europe, North Africa, Cyprus, 19.VI.2018, 2 ♂ (Y.A.) [ZISP]; Kumtorkalinskii Georgia, Azerbaijan, Turkey, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Distr., Sarykum Sand Dune (43°00′N, 47°14′E), 23– Iran, Kyrgyzstan, China, India. ENTOMOLOGICAL REVIEW Vol. 98 No. 9 2018 NEW RECORDS OF MEGACHILID BEES 1167 Anthidium (Anthidium) loti Perris, 1852 Distribution. Russia: European part (*South, Cri- mea, North Caucasus).—Western, Southern, and East- Material. Russia. Krasnodar Terr.: Anapa Distr.: ern Europe, North Africa, Cyprus, Armenia, Turkey, Bolshoy Utrish (44°46′N, 37°23′E), 2.VI.2018, 2 ♂ Syria, Lebanon, Israel, Iran, Kyrgyzstan. (A.F.) [CFUS]; Sukko Vill. (44°47′N, 37°22′E), 20.VII.2018, 1 ♂ (I.P.); Varvarovskaya Shchel Valley Remarks. The previous record of this species from (44°48′N, 37°22′E), 19.VI.2014, 1 ♀ (I.P.) [CIPK]. Dagestan (Fateryga, 2017) was erroneous and based Dagestan: Tabasaranskii Distr., 5 km N of Darvag on misidentification of I. ferrugineum (see below). (42°05′N, 48°05′E), on Securigera varia, 14.VI.2018, 1 ♀ (A.F.) [CAFK]; Magaramkent Distr., Samur Re- Icteranthidium ferrugineum (Fabricius, 1787) serve, 3 km NW of Primorsky (41°52′N, 48°33′E), Material. Russia. Astrakhan Prov.: Volzhskii 2–4.VII.2018, 3 ♀, 3 ♂ (Y.A.) [ZISP]; 3.VII.2018, Distr., vicinity of Volzhskii (46°58′N, 47°32′E), 2 ♀, 6 ♂ (M.P., V.L., M.M.) [FSCV]. 8.VII.2018, 2 ♀, 3 ♂ (M.P., V.L., M.M.). Kalmykia: Distribution. Russia: European part (Crimea, Davsna Sands, 20 km E of Khulkhuta (46°17′N, *North Caucasus), Urals.—Western, Southern, and 46°40′E), 16.VI.2018, 6 ♀, 4 ♂ (M.P., V.L., M.M.) Eastern Europe, Cyprus, Azerbaijan, Turkey, Syria, [FSCV], 2 ♀ , 1 ♂ (Y.A.) [ZISP]; Kuma River, 12 km Lebanon, Israel, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Iran. W of Artezian (44°56′N, 46°30′E), 7.VII.2018, 1 ♀ (M.P., V.L., M.M.). Dagestan: Nogayskii Distr., Anthidium (Anthidium) spiniventre 22 km SW of Terekli-Mekteb (44°02′N, 45°38′E), Friese, 1899 21.VI.2018, 1 ♀, 5 ♂ (M.P., V.L., M.M.) [FSCV], 2 ♀ (Y.A.); Derbent (42°06′N, 48°17′E), 28–29.VI.2018, Material.
Recommended publications
  • Komandorsky Zapovednik: Strengthening Community Reserve Relations on the Commander Islands
    No. 36 Summer 2004 Special issue: Russia’s Marine Protected Areas PROMOTING BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION IN RUSSIA AND THROUGHOUT NORTHERN EURASIA CONTENTS CONTENTS Voice from the Wild (A letter from the editors)......................................1 Komandorsky Zapovednik: Strengthening Community Reserve Relations on the Commander Islands......................................24 AN INTRODUCTION TO MARINE Lazovsky Zapovednik: PROTECTED AREAS Working to Create a Marine Buffer Zone...................................................28 MPAs: An Important Tool in Marine Conservation......…………………...2 Kurshskaya Kosa National Park: Tides of Change: Tracing the Development Preserving World Heritage on the Baltic Sea ..........................................30 of Marine Protected Areas in Russia .................................................................4 Dalnevostochny Morskoi Zapovednik: How Effective Are Our MPAs? Looking for Answers An Important Role to Play.........................................................................................6 with Russia’s First Marine Protected Area..................................................32 The Challenges that Lie Ahead.....................………………………………………………8 Russia’s Marine Biosphere Reserves......………………………………………………10 MPA Workshop Offers Opportunities for Dialogue..........................13 THE FUTURE Plans for the Future: Developing a Network of Marine Protected Areas .....................................................……....………………...35 CASE STUDIES An Introduction .............................................................................……....………………...14
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus
    STATUS AND PROTECTION OF GLOBALLY THREATENED SPECIES IN THE CAUCASUS CEPF Biodiversity Investments in the Caucasus Hotspot 2004-2009 Edited by Nugzar Zazanashvili and David Mallon Tbilisi 2009 The contents of this book do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of CEPF, WWF, or their sponsoring organizations. Neither the CEPF, WWF nor any other entities thereof, assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, product or process disclosed in this book. Citation: Zazanashvili, N. and Mallon, D. (Editors) 2009. Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus. Tbilisi: CEPF, WWF. Contour Ltd., 232 pp. ISBN 978-9941-0-2203-6 Design and printing Contour Ltd. 8, Kargareteli st., 0164 Tbilisi, Georgia December 2009 The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) is a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Développement, Conservation International, the Global Environment Facility, the Government of Japan, the MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank. This book shows the effort of the Caucasus NGOs, experts, scientific institutions and governmental agencies for conserving globally threatened species in the Caucasus: CEPF investments in the region made it possible for the first time to carry out simultaneous assessments of species’ populations at national and regional scales, setting up strategies and developing action plans for their survival, as well as implementation of some urgent conservation measures. Contents Foreword 7 Acknowledgments 8 Introduction CEPF Investment in the Caucasus Hotspot A. W. Tordoff, N. Zazanashvili, M. Bitsadze, K. Manvelyan, E. Askerov, V. Krever, S. Kalem, B. Avcioglu, S. Galstyan and R. Mnatsekanov 9 The Caucasus Hotspot N.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia) 265-280 © Entomofauna Ansfelden/Austria; Download Unter
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Entomofauna Jahr/Year: 2016 Band/Volume: 0037 Autor(en)/Author(s): Poltawski Alexander N., Ilyina Elena V. Artikel/Article: New records of some rare Noctuoidea and Pyraloidea in Daghestan Republic (Russia) 265-280 © Entomofauna Ansfelden/Austria; download unter www.zobodat.at Entomofauna ZEITSCHRIFT FÜR ENTOMOLOGIE Band 37, Heft 16: 265-280 ISSN 0250-4413 Ansfelden, 4. Januar 2016 New records of some rare Noctuoidea and Pyraloidea in Daghestan Republic (Russia) Alexander N. POLTAVSKY & Elena V. ILYINA Abstract New and rare Lepidoptera species in Daghestan republic in the period 2013–2014 are reported. Among them the first records for Russia: Aglossa asiatica (ERSCHOFF, 1872) and Ecpyrrhorrhoe diffusalis (GUENÉE, 1854) (Pyraloidea), Agrotis lasserrei (OBER THÜR, 1881) and Arcyophora dentula (LEDERER, 1870) (Noctuoidea); the first records for Daghestan: Stiphrometasia monialis (ERSCHOFF, 1872), Achyra nudalis (HÜBNER, 1796), Paratalanta cultralis (STAUDINGER, 1867), Udea austriacalis (HERRICH-SCHÄFFER, 1851), Agrotera nemoralis (SCOPOLI, 1763), Loxostege aeruginalis (HÜBNER, 1796) and Ephelis cruentalis (GEYER, 1832) (Pyraloidea), Photedes morrisii (DALE, 1837) (Noctuoidea). Key words: Noctuoidea, Pyraloidea, republic of Daghestan, North-East Caucasus, Russia, first records. 265 Heft 16- 265-280 Poltavsky-New records of some rare Noctuoidea_Z2.indd 265 23.11.15 20:29 © Entomofauna Ansfelden/Austria;
    [Show full text]
  • THE CONTEMPORARY HEIGHT of AEOLIAN ACCUMULATIVE COMPLEX SARYKUM (REPUBLIC of DAGESTAN) and the CAUSES of ITS CHANGE Artem V
    ИЗВЕСТИЯ РАН. СЕРИЯ ГЕОГРАФИЧЕСКАЯ, 2017, № 6, с. 89–98 РЕГИОНАЛЬНЫЕ ГЕОГРАФИЧЕСКИЕ ПРОБЛЕМЫ УДК 551.435.74 СОВРЕМЕННАЯ ВЫСОТА ЭОЛОВО-АККУМУЛЯТИВНОГО КОМПЛЕКСА “САРЫКУМ”(РЕСПУБЛИКА ДАГЕСТАН) И ПРИЧИНЫ ЕЕ ИЗМЕНЕНИЯ © 2017 г. Артем В. Гусаров1, Айдар Г. Шарифуллин1, Гаджибек С. Джамирзоев2,3 1Казанский (Приволжский) федеральный университет, Казань, Россия 2Государственный заповедник “Дагестанский”, Махачкала, Россия 3Институт экологии горных территорий им. А.К. Темботова РАН, Нальчик, Россия e-mail: [email protected] Поступила в редакцию 27.12.2016 г. Аннотация. Эолово-аккумулятивный комплекс “Сарыкум” (далее Сарыкум) – крупнейший в России и один из высочайших в Евразии изолированных (т.е. сформированных вдали от пустынь) песчаных массивов, расположенный на Терско-Сулакской низменной равнине у подножия Предгорного Да- гестана (северо-восточный мегасклон Большого Кавказа). С конца XIХ в. и до настоящего времени отмечается снижение его максимальной абсолютной высоты более чем на 16 м (с середины ХХ в. – на 5.7 м) – с 262 до 245.8 м, что связано, по мнению авторов, с естественными природными (преж де всего климатическими) изменениями в регионе – уменьшением суммарного количества умеренных, сильных и очень сильных ветров (с 1966–1986 гг. по 1987–2015 гг. в среднем почти на 41%, особенно в летнее (наиболее сухое и дефляционно опасное) и зимнее время года), и увеличением годового ко- личества осадков (с 1966–1986 гг. по 1987–2015 гг. в среднем почти на 25%). Последнее обстоятель- ство благоприятствовало широкой экспансии травянисто-кустарниковой растительности на склонах Сарыкума и повышало противодефляционную устойчивость его песков. Дополнительной природной причиной отмеченного снижения могло выступить сильное землетрясение 14 мая 1970 г., эпицентр которого располагался недалеко от Сарыкума. На фоне природных изменений потенциальная роль антропогенного фактора проявилась, в основном, через карьерные разработки песка в начале ХХ в.
    [Show full text]
  • Том 14. Вып. 1 Vol. 14. No. 1
    РОССИЙСКАЯ АКАДЕМИЯ НАУК Южный научный центр RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES Southern Scientific Centre ISSN 1814−3326 CAUCASIAN ENTOMOLOGICAL BULLETIN Том 14. Вып. 1 Vol. 14. No. 1 Ростов-на-Дону Rostov-on-Don 2018 РЕДАКЦИОННАЯ КОЛЛЕГИЯ EDITORIAL BOARD Главный редактор Виктор Анатольевич Кривохатский Максим Витальевич Набоженко Prof. Dr. Sci. Victor Anatolievich Krivokhatsky Editor-in-chief Зоологический институт Российской академии наук, Dr. Maxim Vitalievich Nabozhenko Университетская наб., 1, Санкт-Петербург 199034 Россия Прикаспийский институт биологических ресурсов Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Дагестанского научного центра Российской академии наук, Universitetskaya nab., 1, St. Peterburg 199034 Russia ул. М. Гаджиева, 45, Махачкала, Республика Дагестан 367000 Россия Алексей Юрьевич Солодовников Caspian Institute of Biological Resources of Dagestan Scientific Dr. Alexey Yurievich Solodovnikov Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, M. Gadzhiev str., 45, Natural History Museum of Denmark / University of Makhachkala, Republic of Dagestan 367000 Russia Copenhagen, Zoological Museum, Universitetsparken 15, Copenhagen DK-2100 Denmark Дагестанский государственный университет, ул. М. Гаджиева, 43а, Махачкала, Республика Дагестан 367000 Россия Дмитрий Александрович Дубовиков Dagestan State University, M. Gadzhiev str., 43a, Makhachkala, Dr. Dmitry Alexandrovich Dubovikoff Republic of Dagestan 367000 Russia Санкт-Петербургский государственный университет, Университетская наб., 7/9, Санкт-Петербург 199034 Россия Ответственный
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded and Viewed on the Sketchfab Page (Figure9)
    drones Article The Methodological Aspects of Constructing a High-Resolution DEM of Large Territories Using Low-Cost UAVs on the Example of the Sarycum Aeolian Complex, Dagestan, Russia Artur Gafurov Department of Landscape Ecology, Kazan Federal University, 420008 Kazan, Russia; [email protected] Abstract: Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) have long been well established as a reliable way to construct highly accurate, up-to-date digital elevation models (DEM). However, the territories which were modeled by the results of UAV surveys can be characterized as very local. This paper presents the results of surveying the Sarycum area of the Dagestan Nature Reserve of Russia with an area of 15 sq. km using a DJI Phantom 4 UAV, as well as the methodological recommendations for conducting work on such a large territory. As a result of this work, a DEM with 0.5 m resolution as well as an ultrahigh resolution orthophotoplane were obtained for the first time for this territory, which make it possible to assess the dynamics of aeolian processes at a qualitatively different level. Keywords: dem; uav; large territory; Sarycum; field work; sfm; photogrammetry 1. Introduction Digital elevation models (DEM) are the main source of information about relief, mak- Citation: Gafurov, A. The ing it possible to perform geomorphological surveys in laboratory conditions. DEMs are Methodological Aspects of necessary for performing calculations of such parameters as slope, profile and longitudinal Constructing a High-Resolution DEM curvature of the relief, terrain roughness index and length-slope factor (LS-factor), on the of Large Territories Using Low-Cost basis of which estimates are made according to erosion models, to predict the development UAVs on the Example of the Sarycum of landslides and other exogenous processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Dalnevostochny Morskoi Zapovednik
    Voice from the Wild (A letter from the editors) n this special issue of Russian Conservation News, we continue our cover- Iage of Russia’s unique protected areas system by focusing specifically on those reserves that protect the country’s many and varied marine environ- ments. Why a marine focus? These marine areas are a vital part of Russia’s natural and cultural heritage. They are also crucial to the country’s future EDITORIAL BOARD economic development and as such, are under intense exploitation. In fact, Russia’s vast territorial waters comprise approximately twenty percent of the Executive Editor: Margaret Williams Assistant Editor: Melissa Mooza World Ocean. For Russia, and indeed, for the entire world, they are a treas- Managing Editor: Natalya Troitskaya ure and a resource to be preserved. Graphics Artist: Maksim Dubinin Design and Layout: Design Group A4 In the journal’s introductory section, we offer a series of articles that provide Computer Consultation: Natalie Volkova a fundamental understanding of marine protected areas (MPA’s) and their Intern: Dominic Johnson Translation: Melissa Mooza role in the conservation and management of coastal and marine environ- Subscriptions Manager: John Deever ments. After first placing them for you in the broader global context, we Contributing Authors: A. Astafyev, A. then refine the focus of our examination, and turn our attention to Russia. Koryakin, V. Chuprov, I. Chuprova, U. We trace the historic development of Russia’s marine protected areas, from Graebener, S. Khokhryakov, G. 1978, when Russia’s first marine reserve, Dalnevostochny Morskoi Magomedov, V. Mokievsky, N. Pavlov, and V. Spiridonov Zapovednik, was established, through to the present.
    [Show full text]
  • Arid Ecosystems" on the Main Trends of Research and Organization of Scientific Work on the Problem of Combat Against 1995 1 1 Z.G
    Year Vol N Authors Title 1995 1 1 V.E. Sokolov, Z.G. Zalibekov About journal "Arid ecosystems" On the main trends of research and organization of scientific work on the problem of combat against 1995 1 1 Z.G. Zalibekov desertification 1995 1 1 V.M. Neronov Biodiversity of desert ecosystems (proposals for the International program of scientific studies) 1995 1 1 Olga A. Lachko, Oleg A. Lachko Phytoecolgical conceptions and principles in the combat against desertification Irrigational desertification and environmental destabilization as elements of ecological influence of 1995 1 1 V.S. Zaietaev irrigation in arid zones 1995 1 1 E.S. Pavlovskyi, V.I. Petrov Problems of agrobiological development of desert lands in Pricaspyi Prognosis of Kalmykiya Black Lands broken sands dynamics according to the instructing succession of 1995 1 1 B.V. Vinogradov, AN. Kapstov, K.N. Kulik aerocosmic photographs V.M. Kharchenko, Z.M. Sankueva, S.V. Veselova, 1995 1 1 Desertification processes in Kalmykiya in conditions of the changing Caspian sea regime M.N. Shipitsin , G.O. Suslyeakova, V.P. Rojentsev 1995 1 1 B.N. Mozhaev The Earth crust resent influence on desertification processes (by remote sensing data) 1995 1 1 V.P. Zvolinskyi, B.A. Zimovets, Y.V. Petruk Scientific maintenance of Pricaspisky Regions : arid agriculture and tasks for future 1995 1 1 L.N. Tashninova, A.P. Bogun Kalmykiya Red Book of soils and ecosystems Coordinating Conference on the Problem of the Struggle Against Desertification in Southern Russia. 1995 1 1 G.G. Gamzatov, N.I. Reznikov, G.N. Gasanov Resolution of Conference.
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus
    STATUS AND PROTECTION OF GLOBALLY THREATENED SPECIES IN THE CAUCASUS CEPF Biodiversity Investments in the Caucasus Hotspot 2004-2009 Edited by Nugzar Zazanashvili and David Mallon Tbilisi 2009 The contents of this book do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of CEPF, WWF, or their sponsoring organizations. Neither the CEPF, WWF nor any other entities thereof, assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, product or process disclosed in this book. Citation: Zazanashvili, N. and Mallon, D. (Editors) 2009. Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus. Tbilisi: CEPF, WWF. Contour Ltd., 232 pp. ISBN 978-9941-0-2203-6 Design and printing Contour Ltd. 8, Kargareteli st., 0164 Tbilisi, Georgia December 2009 The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) is a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Développement, Conservation International, the Global Environment Facility, the Government of Japan, the MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank. This book shows the effort of the Caucasus NGOs, experts, scientific institutions and governmental agencies for conserving globally threatened species in the Caucasus: CEPF investments in the region made it possible for the first time to carry out simultaneous assessments of species’ populations at national and regional scales, setting up strategies and developing action plans for their survival, as well as implementation of some urgent conservation measures. Contents Foreword 7 Acknowledgments 8 Introduction CEPF Investment in the Caucasus Hotspot A. W. Tordoff, N. Zazanashvili, M. Bitsadze, K. Manvelyan, E. Askerov, V. Krever, S. Kalem, B. Avcioglu, S. Galstyan and R. Mnatsekanov 9 The Caucasus Hotspot N.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts Volume
    1 CONTENT 11TH SEPTEMBER 2018: KEYNOTE THE GLOBAL GEOPARKS NETWORK ________________________________________________ 21 Nickolaos Zouros UNESCO GLOBAL GEOPARKS AND AGENDA 2030 _____________________________________ 22 Patrick J. Mc Keever UNESCO GLOBAL GEOPARKS AND THEIR CONTRIBUTION TO THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS. THE NEW CHALLENGE OF ADAMELLO BRENTA UNESCO GLOBAL GEOPARK IN PARTNERSHIP WITH AUDI FOR EMISSIONS REDUCTION AND CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION ____________________________________________________ 23 Fabrizio Longo 11TH SEPTEMBER 2018: ORAL PLANNING SMARTER, INCREASING IMPACT _________________________________________ 25 Sophie Justice, Amélie Giroux ASO UNESCO GLOBAL GEOPARK: PROMOTING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AFTER A SERIES OF DISASTERS ______________________________________________________________ 26 Shino Miyakita & Shin‘ichiro Ikebe TRAINING AND DESIGN WITH LOCALS (GEO-DESIGN) ________________________________ 27 Maziar Qaseminejad Abdolmalaki, Satoko Hara GEO-SERVICES FOR PEOPLE - REFLECTIONS ON THE CONCEPT OF ECOSYSTEM SERVICES AND THE GEOPARK APPROACH __________________________________________ 28 Roman Lenz, Siegfried Roth MARKETING PLACE – THE STUDY CASE OF PAIVA WALKWAYS IN AROUCA UNESCO GLOBAL GEOPARK (PORTUGAL) ____________________________________________________ 29 Antonio Duarte, Margarida Belém & Verónica Bernardo GEOPARK SUSTAINS LOCAL COMMUNITIES: AN EXAMPLE IN ZIGONG UGGP _________ 30 Li Sun, Lulin Wang & Mingzhong Tian THE INDIGENOUS VOICE IN LATIN AMERICAN UNESCO GLOBAL GEOPARKS _________ 31 Gorfinkiel Denise,
    [Show full text]
  • Complete File of the 26Th Icc Documents
    SC-14/CONF.226/1/REV Paris, 4 April Original: English UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION International Co-ordinating Council of the Man and the Biosphere (MAB) Programme Twenty-sixth session Jönkoping, East Vättern Landscape Biosphere Reserve, Sweden 10 to 13 June 2014 PROVISIONAL AGENDA 1. Opening by the Chair of the ICC 2. Opening remarks by the UNESCO Director-General 3. Report by the outgoing Chair of the ICC 4. Election of the Chair, Vice-Chairs and Rapporteur 5. Adoption of the agenda and timetable 6. Report by the Secretary of the MAB Programme 7. Reports on actions undertaken by Member States / regional and thematic MAB Networks in the context of MAB and discussion on collaborative thematic and research projects 8. Evaluation of the Madrid Action Plan (MAP) 9. MAB and World Network of Biosphere Reserves (WNBR) – post Rio+20 opportunities and towards a strategy for 2014-2021 10. Proposals for new biosphere reserves and extensions/modifications to biosphere reserves that are part of the WNBR 11. Update on the exit strategy 12. Periodic review of biosphere reserves and follow-up of recommendations 13. UNESCO MAB policy on open access to MAB/biosphere reserve documentation 14. Michel Batisse Award for Biosphere Reserve Management 15. MAB Young Scientists Award Scheme 16. Information on the Seaflower Biosphere Reserve Case 17. Date and venue of the 27th session of the MAB-ICC 18. Other matters 19. Adoption of the report 20. Closure of the session SC-14/CONF.226/2 Paris, 09 April 2014 Original: English
    [Show full text]
  • Ent28 2 189 191 Nartshuk Et Al.Pmd
    Russian Entomol. J. 28(2): 189–191 © RUSSIAN ENTOMOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 2019 First record of a bee fly (Diptera: Bombyliidae) parasitic on antlions (Myrmeleontidae) in Russia Ïåðâûé ñëó÷àé ïàðàçèòèðîâàíèÿ ìóõ-æóææàë (Diptera: Bombyliidae) íà ìóðàâüèíàõ ëüâàõ (Myrmeleontidae) â Ðîññèè E.P. Nartshuk1, V.A. Krivokhatsky1, N.L. Evenhuis2 Ý.Ï. Íàð÷óê1, Â.À. Êðèâîõàòñêèé1, Í.Ë. Ýâåíóèñ2 1 Zoological Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab. 1, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 1 Зоологический институт РАН, Университетская наб. 1, Санкт-Петербург 199034, Россия. 2 Bishop Museum, 1525 Bernice Street, Honolulu, Hawaii 96817, USA. E-mail: [email protected] KEY WORDS: bee flies, antlion, parasite, Dagestan, Russia. КЛЮЧЕВЫЕ СЛОВА: мухи-жужжала, муравьиные львы, паразиты, Дагестан, Россия. ABSTRACT. A review of the bee flies (Diptera: Geer, 1773 in North America, later Leech and Mac- Bombyliidae) parasitic on preimaginal stages of antlion Donald-Leech [1989] reared the same species of Bom- (Myrmeleontidae) is given. A first case of Micomitra byliidae from a pupa in the cocoon of Myrmeleon stupida (Rossi, 1790) as a parasite of an antlion, proba- immaculatus in California. Steffan [1967] published a bly Euroleon nostras (Geoffroy in Fourcroy, 1785), in case of parasitism of Bombyliidae on antlions in the Dagestan, Russia is presented. The distribution of M. Old World. He bred four specimens of Micomitra stupida is mapped. stupida (Rossi, 1790) from cocoons of Euroleon nos- tras (Geoffroy in Fourcroy, 1785), Myrmeleon incon- РЕЗЮМЕ. Дан обзор паразитирования мух-жуж- spicuous Rambur, 1842, Megistopus flavicornis (Ros- жал (Diptera: Bombyliidae) на муравьиных львах si, 1790) and Creoleon lugdunensis (Villers, 1789) on (Myrmeliontidae).
    [Show full text]