DOCSLIB.ORG

SAL Annual Report 2008

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SAL Annual Report 2008 Redefining 08 Possibilities. 09 singapore academy of law annual report Our Mission & Values Building up the intellectual capital, capability and infrastructure of members of the Singapore Academy of Law. Promotion of ESPRIT DE CORPS among the members of the Singapore Academy of Law. Contents 02 About Singapore Academy of Law 04 The President’s Review 06 The Senate 08 The Executive Committee 10 Facts, Figures & Highlights 14 Redefining Expertise: Legal Knowledge 20 Redefining Opportunities: Legal Industry 28 Redefining Efficiency: Legal Technology 32 The Year In Review: Corporate Services 34 Key Executives 38 Financial Review Singapore Academy of Law Annual Report 2008/09 MICA (P) 181/11/2009, ISSN 1793 - 5679 about singapore academy of law The Singapore Academy of Law (the of the Law Society of Singapore, Mr Michael “Academy”) has close to 8,000 members Hwang, SC and the Dean of the Faculty of comprising all persons who are called as Law of the National University of Singapore, advocates and solicitors of the Supreme Court Professor Tan Cheng Han, SC. The Senate or who are appointed as Legal Service Officers. also comprises the High Court Judges, the The membership of the Academy comprises Solicitor-General, academia and the practising of the Bench, the Bar, and large numbers of profession. corporate counsel and faculty members of the .... The work of the Academy is focused on local law schools. three key areas: supporting the growth and .... The Academy is governed by the Senate development of the Legal Industry; building up which is headed by the Honourable the Chief the intellectual capital of the legal profession by Justice Chan Sek Keong as President. The Vice- enhancing Legal Knowledge; and improving Presidents of the Academy are the Honourable the efficiency of legal practice through Legal Attorney-General Professor Walter Woon; the Technology. The work of the Academy is driven Honourable Judge of Appeal Justice Chao Hick by these three core mandates. This in turn Tin; the Honourable Judge of Appeal Justice is directed towards raising the standard and Andrew Phang Boon Leong; the Honourable quality of legal practice and building a strong Judge of Appeal Justice V K Rajah; President and dynamic legal community in Singapore. the President’s 4 Review 5 This year 2008/09 was the number of subscribers for its rare opportunity to walk through A landmark project that will up-to-date legal research database long term funding arrangements second year which the Academy daily email updates continued to the old dungeons and corridors of come to fruition this year is from key common law jurisdictions. that had been put in place. functioned under a new structure increase at a satisfactory level. the old Supreme Court and view Three key databases were added the Singapore Law Reports to focus on three strategic areas of rare legal documents, stamps, to Legal Workbench last year. The unique strength of the work – LEGAL KNOWLEDGE, The Singapore Mediation Centre artefacts and photos that traced (Reissue) (“SLR(R)”). These include Indian Supreme Academy lies in its ability to draw LEGAL TECHNOLOGY successfully hosted the inaugural Singapore’s legal history. The SLR(R) comprising Court Cases and Australian and on the assistance of members of the and LEGAL INDUSTRY. Asian Mediation Association 78 volumes of reported New Zealand cases. In addition, Bench, the Bar, the Legal Service Conference with the former A landmark project that will come cases and six volumes of the Practitioners’ Toolkit was enhanced and the law schools in Singapore. The new structure allows each President of Finland and 2008 to fruition this year is the Singapore with the inclusion of the taxation of Without them, we could not have Consolidated Index from 1965 cluster to focus on individual Nobel Peace Prize winner, Law Reports (Reissue) (“SLR(R)”). costs database. More than 80% of done many of the things that have initiatives without losing President Martti Ahtisaari, as the The SLR(R) comprising 78 – 2009 will be launched at the Singapore practitioners now hold made the Academy a success. sight of the broad strategic keynote speaker. The conference volumes of reported cases and six opening of legal year 2010. IDs to access Legal Workbench. objectives of our work. was attended by more than 300 volumes of the Consolidated Index I would like to express my sincere participants from 19 countries from 1965 – 2009 will be launched To increase the number of thanks to members and staff of This Annual Report details the around the world, who gave it at the opening of legal year 2010. subscribers, LawNet has the Academy, whose hard work work and accomplishments of the very favourable feedback. launched Legal Workbench and dedication to the interest Academy in the preceding year Next year, the Academy will assume in Malaysia last year for the of the Academy have made in carrying out its statutory Our activity levels also remained the responsibility of providing benefit of Malaysian lawyers. possible the achievements set duties and functions. Let me high in the Legal Knowledge practical and continuing legal This was made possible with the out in this Annual Report. highlight a few of them. cluster. In publishing, Academy education through an institute support of the Malaysian Bar Publishing reached full-fledged to be called the Institute of Legal Council, and for which we thank The Legal Industry cluster had status as a law publisher. Two Education (“ILE”). The ILE the Council. This year, we will Chief Justice Chan Sek Keong an exciting and fruitful year in landmark publications were will oversee and co-ordinate the work towards promoting LawNet President promoting Singapore law and launched by me last year. Both various legal education initiatives services in Australia, New Zealand Singapore Academy of Law Alternative Dispute Resolution. Modern Advocacy: Perspectives from and programmes for the legal and the United Kingdom. Page viewership of the Singapore Singapore written by 17 Senior profession. This is a major project Law Watch (“SLW”) has Counsel and Sentencing Principles whose success is vital to the future Financially, last year was not exceeded 100,000 a month. in Singapore, one Deputy Senior efficiency and vitality of legal a good year for the Academy’s SLW is a syndicated daily news State Counsel’s monumental services in Singapore. The Academy investments and revenue from bank service on current developments effort, were published. will need the co-operation of many deposits (and for virtually everyone in Singapore law and the legal practitioners to make it successful. as well who were invested in the services sector and also the broader In July last year, we organised a financial and securities markets). national environment affecting legal heritage exhibition where In the Legal Technology cluster, our Fortunately, we were able to the law and legal services. The more than 5,000 visitors had the aim is to build a professional and weather these losses because of the REDEFINING POSSIBILITIES The President’s Review SINGAPORE ACADEMY OF LAW AR 08/09 the Senate 6 7 The Senate is headed by the Law Society of Singapore, Mr Michael seated from left to right: Solicitor-General Mrs Koh Juat Jong Mr Giam Chin Toon, SC Honourable the Chief Justice Chan Hwang, SC and the Dean of the Faculty Professor Tan Cheng Han, SC Justice Judith Prakash Mr Goh Joon Seng Sek Keong as President of the of Law of the National University of Justice Andrew Phang Boon Leong, JA Justice Belinda Ang Saw Ean Mr Joseph Grimberg, SC Academy. Singapore, Professor Tan Cheng Han, SC. Attorney-General Professor Walter Woon Justice Lai Siu Chiu Justice Tay Yong Kwang Chief Justice Chan Sek Keong Justice Choo Han Teck Mr Tan Chee Meng, SC The Vice-Presidents of the Academy The Senate also comprises the High Justice Chao Hick Tin, JA Professor Michael Furmston Professor Yeo Tiong Min are the Honourable Attorney- Court Judges, the Solicitor-General, Justice V K Rajah, JA Professor Hans Tjio Justice Lee Seiu Kin General Professor Walter Woon; the academia and the practising profession. Justice Chan Seng Onn Honourable Justice Chao Hick Tin, standing from left to right (1st row): not in picture: JA; the Honourable Justice Andrew Mr L P Thean standing from left to right (2nd row): Mr Michael Hwang, SC Phang Boon Leong, JA; the Honourable Mr Sundaresh Menon, SC Justice Tan Lee Meng Justice Woo Bih Li Justice V K Rajah, JA; President of the Justice Kan Ting Chiu Justice Andrew Ang Mr Wong Meng Meng, SC REDEFINING POSSIBILITIES The Senate SINGAPORE ACADEMY OF LAW AR 08/09 1 Chief Justice Chan Sek Keong Justice V K Rajah, JA Justice Judith Prakash the Executive 1 President of the Singapore 5 Vice-President 10 Chairperson Academy of Law Chairman Law Reform Committee Committee Professional Affairs Committee The President became Chief Justice International Promotion of Justice Judith Prakash was appointed 8 on 11 April 2006, having served as (a) Singapore Law Committee a Judge in April 1995 after serving 9 Judicial Commissioner from July 1986 three years as a Judicial Commissioner to June 1988; (b) Judge of the Supreme Justice V K Rajah was appointed a Judge from April 1992. She was called to the Court from July 1988 to April 1992; and of Appeal of the Supreme Court on Bar in 1975 and practised law for 18 (c) Attorney-General from May 1992 to 11 April 2007. He was also among the years before she was made a Judicial April 2006. He also holds concurrent first batch of lawyers in Singapore to be Commissioner. appointments as the President of appointed Senior Counsel in 1997. the Legal Service Commission and Justice Tan Lee Meng 01 Chief Justice Chan Sek Keong Chairman of the Presidential Council Mr Michael Hwang SC 11 Chairman 02 Attorney-General Professor Walter Woon for Minority Rights.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annual Report 2010 - 2011 Contents
    Annual Report 2010 - 2011 Contents 2 Foreword by the Attorney-General 6 Remembrance and Congratulations 10 Our Mission, Vision and Core Values 13 Our Roles 15 Our Corporate Structure A. AGC’s Management Team B. Six Legal Divisions and Two Non-Legal Divisions 29 Our Key Milestones A. As The Government’s Chief Legal Adviser and Counsel i. AGC’s Advisory Work ii. AGC’s Involvement in Litigation iii. AGC in Negotiations iv. AGC as Legislative Draftsman B. As Public Prosecutor C. In Performing Other Assigned Duties of a Legal Character D. Our Corporate Resources 61 Our Training, Development and Outreach 67 The Ties that Bind Us 71 Key Figures for 2010-2011 A. Corporate Awards B. Performance Indicators C. Financial Indicators for FY2010-FY2011 Attorney-General’s Chambers ANNUAL REPORT 2010 - 2011 1 FOREWORD BY THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL As we look back on these past years, the taxation policies and policies concerning adjust to these changes so that we can function perceptible increase in the complexity of our casino regulation. Cross-Divisional teams effectively. work is particularly striking. This growing were also engaged to deal with cases before complexity has in turn given rise to two the Singapore Courts when we were required With this in mind, I have intensified the consequences, which I elaborate on below. to address constitutional challenges and also commitment of my Chambers to the training, to defend Singapore’s judiciary in the face of development and specialisation of our officers contempt. so that we are well placed to support the THE NEED FOR Government with the highest level of legal iNTER-dIVISIONAL This is perhaps a reality that is ultimately to be services.
    [Show full text]
  • This Paper Has Been Published in the Journal of Business Law and The
    Supreme Court of Singapore, 1 Supreme Court Lane, Singapore 178879, t: (65)-6332-1020 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ This paper has been published in the Journal of Business Law and the Supreme Court Library Queensland gratefully acknowledges the permission of the editor, Professor Robert Merkin, to reprint it in the Yearbook. A version of this essay was delivered at the Current Legal Issues Seminar in the Banco Court on 12 September 2013. I would like to express my deepest appreciation to Ms Andrea Gan and Mr Jonathan Yap, Justices’ Law Clerks, Supreme Court of Singapore, as well as to Asst Prof Goh Yihan of the Faculty of Law, National University of Singapore, for their helpful comments and suggestions. I would also like to dedicate this essay to all the participants who displayed an extraordinary (and, I might add, rare) degree of enthusiasm and (above all) friendship. All errors remain mine alone. Further, all views expressed in this essay are personal views only and do not reflect the views of the Supreme Court of Singapore. Andrew Phang Our Vision: Excellence in judicial education and research. Our Mission: To provide and inspire continuing judicial learning and research to enhance the competency and professionalism of judges. The Challenge of Principled Gap-Filling — A Study of Implied Terms in a Comparative Context by The Honourable Justice Andrew Phang Boon Leong* There has been a veritable wealth of literature on implied terms — ranging from doctoral theses1 to book chapters,2 articles3 and (more recently) a book.4 What accounts for this interest? Perhaps the simplest explanation is that it is an extremely important topic with at least two important functions — one substantive, the other theoretical.
    [Show full text]
  • Minlaw) Invited Applications for the Second Round of Qualifying Foreign Law Practice (QFLP) Licences on 1 July 2012
    PRESS RELEASE AWARD OF THE SECOND ROUND OF QUALIFYING FOREIGN LAW PRACTICE LICENCES The Ministry of Law (MinLaw) invited applications for the second round of Qualifying Foreign Law Practice (QFLP) licences on 1 July 2012. Twenty-three applications were received by the closing date of 31 August 2012. 2 QFLP licences will be awarded to the following four firms (listed in alphabetical order): Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher; Jones Day; Linklaters, and Sidley Austin. 3 The firms will have up to six months from 1 April 2013 to commence their operations as QFLPs, and their licences will be valid for an initial period of five years from the respective start dates. Background 4 The QFLP scheme was introduced in 2008 following the recommendations of the Committee to Develop the Legal Sector chaired by Justice V K Rajah. The Committee, which included senior lawyers from top local firms, assessed that local firms and local lawyers would benefit from the increased foreign presence and competition over time. 5 The QFLP licences allow Foreign Law Practices (FLPs) to practise in permitted areas of Singapore law1. The scheme seeks to support the growth of key economic sectors, grow the legal sector, as well as to offer additional 1 Permitted areas are all areas except domestic areas of litigation and general practice, for example, criminal law, retail conveyancing, family law and administrative law. The QFLPs can practise the permitted areas through Singapore-qualified lawyers with practising certificates or foreign lawyers holding the foreign practitioner certificate. 1 opportunities for our lawyers. A total of six FLPs2 were awarded QFLP licences in the first round in 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of Singapore Law: a Bicentennial Retrospective1
    (2020) 32 SAcLJ 804 (Published on e-First 8 May 2020) THE DEVELOPMENT OF SINGAPORE LAW: A BICENTENNIAL RETROSPECTIVE1 The present article reviews (in broad brushstrokes) the status of Singapore law during its bicentennial year. It is not only about origins but also about growth – in particular, the autochthonous or indigenous growth of the Singapore legal system (particularly since the independence of Singapore as a nation state on 9 August 1965). The analysis of this growth is divided into quantitative as well as qualitative parts. In particular, the former constitutes an empirical analysis which attempts – for the very first time − to tell the development of Singapore law through numbers, building on emerging techniques in data visualisation and empirical legal studies. Andrew PHANG Judge of Appeal, Supreme Court of Singapore. GOH Yihan Professor of Law, School of Law, Singapore Management University. Jerrold SOH Assistant Professor of Law, School of Law, Singapore Management University; Co-Founder, Lex Quanta. I. Introduction 1 The present article, which reviews (in broad brushstrokes) the status of Singapore law during its bicentennial year since the founding of Singapore by Sir Stamford Raffles in 1819, is of particular significance as English law constitutes the foundation of Singapore law. The role of Raffles and his successors, therefore, could not have been more directly 1 All views expressed in the present article are personal views only and do not reflect in any way the views of the Supreme Court of Singapore, the Singapore Management University or Lex Quanta. Although this article ought, ideally, to have been published last year, the immense amount of case law that had to be analysed has led to a slight delay.
    [Show full text]
  • Contract Law Chee Ho THAM Singapore Management University, [email protected]
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Research Collection School Of Law School of Law 2007 Contract law Chee Ho THAM Singapore Management University, [email protected] Pearlie KOH Singapore Management University, [email protected] Pey Woan LEE Singapore Management University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research Part of the Asian Studies Commons, and the Contracts Commons Citation THAM, Chee Ho; KOH, Pearlie; and LEE, Pey Woan. Contract law. (2007). Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review of Singapore Cases. 8, 150-195. Research Collection School Of Law. Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/347 This Journal Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Research Collection School Of Law by an authorized administrator of Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University. For more information, please email [email protected]. 150 SAL Annual Review (2007) 8 SAL Ann Rev 10. CONTRACT LAW Pearlie KOH LLB (Hons) (National University of Singapore), LLM (University of Melbourne); Advocate and Solicitor (Singapore); Associate Professor, Singapore Management University, School of Law. THAM Chee Ho LLB (Hons) (National University of Singapore), BCL (Oxford); Solicitor (England and Wales), Advocate and Solicitor (Singapore), Attorney and Counsellor-at-Law (New York State); Associate Professor, Singapore Management University, School of Law.
    [Show full text]
  • SOL LLM Brochure 2021 Copy
    SMU – Right in the Heart of Asia’s Hub, Singapore Masters of Laws In the dynamic, cosmopolitan hub that is Singapore, you will find a vibrant city-state that pulses with the diversity of both East and West. LL.M. in Judicial Studies Situated at the cross-roads of the world, Singapore is home to multinational companies and thousands of small and medium-sized LL.M. in Cross-border Business and Finance Law in Asia enterprises flourishing in a smart city renowned for its business excellence and connectivity. With its strong infrastructure, political Dual LL.M. in Commercial Law (Singapore & London) stability and respect for intellectual property rights, this City in a Garden offers you unique opportunities to develop as a global citizen. Thorough. Transnational. Transformative. Tapping into the energy of the city is a university with a difference — the Singapore Management University. Our six schools: the School of Accountancy, Lee Kong Chian School of Business, School of Computing and Information Systems, School of Economics, Yong Pung How School of Law, and School of Social Sciences form the country’s only city campus, perfectly sited to foster strategic links with businesses and the community. Modelled after the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, SMU generates leading-edge research with global impact and produces broad-based, creative and entrepreneurial leaders for a knowledge-based economy. Discover a multi-faceted lifestyle right here at SMU, in the heart of Singapore. The SMU Masters Advantage GLOBAL RECOGNITION SMU is globally recognised as one of the best specialised universities in Asia and the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Rule of Law Without Democratization: Cambodia and Singapore in Comparative Perspective
    Griffith Asia Institute Research Paper Rule of Law without Democratization: Cambodia and Singapore in Comparative Perspective Stephen McCarthy and Kheang Un ii About the Griffith Asia Institute The Griffith Asia Institute produces relevant, interdisciplinary research on key developments in the politics, security and economies of the Asia-Pacific. By promoting knowledge of Australia’s changing region and its importance to our future, the Griffith Asia Institute seeks to inform and foster academic scholarship, public awareness and considered and responsive policy making. The Institute’s work builds on a long Griffith University tradition of providing multidisciplinary research on issues of contemporary significance in the region. Griffith was the first University in the country to offer Asian Studies to undergraduate students and remains a pioneer in this field. This strong history means that today’s Institute can draw on the expertise of some 50 Asia–Pacific focused academics from many disciplines across the university. The Griffith Asia Institute’s ‘Research Papers’ publish the institute’s policy-relevant research on Australia and its regional environment. The texts of published papers and the titles of upcoming publications can be found on the Institute’s website: www.griffith.edu.au/asiainstitute ‘Rule of Law without Democratization: Cambodia and Singapore in Comparative Perspective’ 2018 iii About the Authors Stephen McCarthy Stephen McCarthy is a Senior Lecturer in South East Asian politics in the School of Government and International Relations and a member of the Griffith Asia Institute at Griffith University. He received his PhD in political science from Northern Illinois University and has published widely on Burmese politics and South East Asia in international journals including The Pacific Review, Asian Survey, Pacific Affairs, Democratization and International Political Science Review.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of the Singapore Criminal Justice Process
    (2019) 31 SAcLJ 1042 (Published on e-First 23 July 2019) THE EVOLUTION OF THE SINGAPORE CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROCESS This article analyses the Singapore criminal justice process in the context of Herbert Packer’s Crime Control and Due Process models. It begins by analysing the features and goals of the two models before applying them to recent changes and developments in the Singapore criminal justice system. The article will focus in particular on developments in societal attitudes and values, legislative and executive policy, detention without trial, amendments to the Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 68, 2012 Rev Ed), the statement of facts in guilty-plea cases, Kadar disclosure and the judicial discretion to exclude evidence. Following an analysis of these developments, the article will then assess the change in balance between the two models in the Singapore criminal justice system as well as comment on the trend and future of our criminal justice process. Keith Jieren THIRUMARAN LLB (Hons) (National University of Singapore) I. Introduction 1 The criminal justice process is the backbone of society that provides the context in which the substantive criminal law operates. The process includes all the activities “that operate to bring the substantive law of crime to bear (or to keep it from coming to bear)” on accused persons.1 In his seminal book2 and article,3 Herbert Packer espoused two renowned models that elucidate the framework for analysing the criminal justice process: the Crime Control Model and the Due Process Model. This article will analyse the unique Singapore criminal justice process to determine where it currently lies on the spectrum between the two models.
    [Show full text]
  • Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon
    RESPONSE BY CHIEF JUSTICE SUNDARESH MENON OPENING OF THE LEGAL YEAR 2018 Monday, 8 January 2018 Mr Attorney, Mr Vijayendran, Members of the Bar, Honoured Guests, Ladies and Gentlemen: I. Introduction 1. It is my pleasure, on behalf of the Judiciary, to welcome you all to the Opening of this Legal Year. I particularly wish to thank the Honourable Chief Justice Prof Dr M Hatta Ali and Justice Takdir Rahmadi of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, the Right Honourable Tun Md Raus Sharif, Chief Justice of Malaysia, and our other guests from abroad, who have made the effort to travel here to be with us this morning. II. Felicitations 2. 2017 was a year when we consolidated the ongoing development of the Supreme Court Bench, and I shall begin my response with a brief recap of the major changes, most of which have been alluded to. 1 A. Court of Appeal 3. Justice Steven Chong was appointed as a Judge of Appeal on 1 April 2017. This was in anticipation of Justice Chao Hick Tin’s retirement on 27 September 2017, after five illustrious decades in the public service. In the same context, Justice Andrew Phang was appointed Vice-President of the Court of Appeal. While we will feel the void left by Justice Chao’s retirement, I am heartened that we have in place a strong team of judges to lead us forward; and delighted that Justice Chao will continue contributing to the work of the Supreme Court, following his appointment, a few days ago, as a Senior Judge.
    [Show full text]
  • Singapore C of a on Consideration in Variation of Contracts.Pdf
    IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE [2020] SGCA 106 Civil Appeal No 45 of 2019 Between Ma Hongjin … Appellant And SCP Holdings Pte Ltd … Respondent In the matter of HC/Suit No 765 of 2016 Between Ma Hongjin … Plaintiff And (1) SCP Holdings Pte Ltd (2) Biomax Technologies Pte Ltd … Defendants GROUNDS OF DECISION [Contract] — [Consideration] — [Necessity] [Contract] — [Consideration] — [Failure] [Contract] — [Variation] — [Consideration] [Civil Procedure] — [Pleadings] [Civil Procedure] — [No case to answer] TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION............................................................................................1 BACKGROUND ..............................................................................................4 THE DECISION BELOW ..............................................................................7 THE PARTIES’ ARGUMENTS ON APPEAL.............................................9 ISSUES ............................................................................................................10 OUR DECISION ............................................................................................11 ISSUE 1: THE APPLICABLE TEST UPON A SUBMISSION OF NO CASE TO ANSWER ........................................................................................................11 ISSUE 2: WHETHER THE APPELLANT HAD ADEQUATELY PLEADED THAT THE SA WAS SUPPORTED BY CONSIDERATION ...............................................16 ISSUE 3: WHETHER CL 9.3 OF THE CLA DISPENSED WITH THE NEED FOR FRESH CONSIDERATION
    [Show full text]
  • OPENING of the LEGAL YEAR 2021 Speech by Attorney-General
    OPENING OF THE LEGAL YEAR 2021 Speech by Attorney-General, Mr Lucien Wong, S.C. 11 January 2021 May it please Your Honours, Chief Justice, Justices of the Court of Appeal, Judges of the Appellate Division, Judges and Judicial Commissioners, Introduction 1. The past year has been an extremely trying one for the country, and no less for my Chambers. It has been a real test of our fortitude, our commitment to defend and advance Singapore’s interests, and our ability to adapt to unforeseen difficulties brought about by the COVID-19 virus. I am very proud of the good work my Chambers has done over the past year, which I will share with you in the course of my speech. I also acknowledge that the past year has shown that we have some room to grow and improve. I will outline the measures we have undertaken as an institution to address issues which we faced and ensure that we meet the highest standards of excellence, fairness and integrity in the years to come. 2. My speech this morning is in three parts. First, I will talk about the critical legal support which we provided to the Government throughout the COVID-19 crisis. Second, I will discuss some initiatives we have embarked on to future-proof the organisation and to deal with the challenges which we faced this past year, including digitalisation and workforce changes. Finally, I will share my reflections about the role we play in the criminal justice system and what I consider to be our grave and solemn duty as prosecutors.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Comparative Law and Constitutional Interpretation in Singapore: Insights from Constitutional Theory 114 ARUN K THIRUVENGADAM
    Evolution of a Revolution Between 1965 and 2005, changes to Singapore’s Constitution were so tremendous as to amount to a revolution. These developments are comprehensively discussed and critically examined for the first time in this edited volume. With its momentous secession from the Federation of Malaysia in 1965, Singapore had the perfect opportunity to craft a popularly-endorsed constitution. Instead, it retained the 1958 State Constitution and augmented it with provisions from the Malaysian Federal Constitution. The decision in favour of stability and gradual change belied the revolutionary changes to Singapore’s Constitution over the next 40 years, transforming its erstwhile Westminster-style constitution into something quite unique. The Government’s overriding concern with ensuring stability, public order, Asian values and communitarian politics, are not without their setbacks or critics. This collection strives to enrich our understanding of the historical antecedents of the current Constitution and offers a timely retrospective assessment of how history, politics and economics have shaped the Constitution. It is the first collaborative effort by a group of Singapore constitutional law scholars and will be of interest to students and academics from a range of disciplines, including comparative constitutional law, political science, government and Asian studies. Dr Li-ann Thio is Professor of Law at the National University of Singapore where she teaches public international law, constitutional law and human rights law. She is a Nominated Member of Parliament (11th Session). Dr Kevin YL Tan is Director of Equilibrium Consulting Pte Ltd and Adjunct Professor at the Faculty of Law, National University of Singapore where he teaches public law and media law.
    [Show full text]