Higher Dimensional Complex Geometry

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Higher Dimensional Complex Geometry Astérisque HERBERT CLEMENS JÁNOS KOLLÁR SHIGEFUMI MORI Higher dimensional complex geometry, A Summer Seminar at the University of Utah, Slat Lake City, 1987 Astérisque, tome 166 (1988) <http://www.numdam.org/item?id=AST_1988__166__1_0> © Société mathématique de France, 1988, tous droits réservés. L’accès aux archives de la collection « Astérisque » (http://smf4.emath.fr/ Publications/Asterisque/) implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’uti- lisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright. Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques http://www.numdam.org/ 166 ASTÉRISQUE 1988 HIGHER DIMENSIONAL COMPLEX GEOMETRY Herbert CLEMENS, János KOLLÁR, Shigefumi MORI A Summer Seminar at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, 1987 SOCIÉTÉ MATHÉMATIQUE DE FRANCE Publié avec le concours du CENTRE NATIONAL DE LA RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUE A.M.S. Subjects Classification : 14-02, 14-C-30, 14-C-99, 14-E-05, 14-E-30, 14-E-35, 14-J-30, 32-J-25, 53-B-35, 53-C-35. Introduction These notes originated a t a seminar that was held during Jul y and August o f 198 7 at Salt Lake City. Th e original aim of the seminar was to get an overview o f the following three topics: 1. Recent advances i n the classification program o f three (an d higher) dimensional algebraic varieties. 2. Existence o f rational curves and other specia l subvarieties. 3. Existence an d nature o f special metrics o n varieties. We also hoped to then go further and study the relationship s between these three approaches. Tim e however proved to be insufficient t o complete eve n the limited program. The firs t part o f the program was considered i n detail. I n that part, the central theme i s the investigatio n o f varieties on which the canonical class i s not numerically effective. Fo r smooth threefolds this was done i n [Ml ] and later extended considerably. Th e original approach o f [Ml ] is geometrically ver y clear, therefore i t i s given i n detail. Subsequen t generalizations were also considered a t length. Considerable attention was paid also to the stud y of specia l curves o n hypersurfaces an d some related examples. Ther e seem s to be a lot of experimental evidenc e to indicate that there i s a very close relationship between the Kodaira dimension o f a threefold ( a property o f a threefold fro m classification theory) and the existence o f rational curves. Thes e problems are very interestin g but they also seem quite hard. Ou r contribution i n this directio n is mostly limite d to presenting som e examples and conjectures. In the second direction, one of the questions we were interested i n was that of understanding rationa l curve s on quintic hypersurfaces i n P4. Late r this was scaled down to understand lines o n quintic hypersurfaces i n P4, but even this seem s a hard problem. W e began to understand i t more completely onl y after the seminar had ended (se e [J ] ) . Very littl e time was lef t to consider the third direction. W e were fortunat e to have a series of lectures, but we could not pursue this interestin g an d important directio n i n any detail. The styl e of the seminar s was very informal . W e tried to keep them discussion-and-problem oriented . Note s were taken by H. Clemens who typed them up by the next day. Thes e notes constituted th e firs t version o f the present text. Durin g the seminar and afterwards, these notes were considerably revised , cut, expanded an d edited. Durin g this process we tried to keep the original informalit y o f the talks alive. The regular participants o f the semina r were J . Jimenez, T. Luo, K. Matsuki and the three o f us. Severa l other people joine d us fo r various lengt h of time. A hopefully complet e lis t is: 1 HIGHER DIMENSIONAL COMPLEX GEOMETRY J. Carlson, L. Ein, M. He, Y. Ma, D. Ortland, S . Pantazis, P. Roberts, D. Toledo, S. Turner, and Stephen Yau. W e are very- grateful fo r their contributio n t o the success of the seminar. We are especially thankful to those people who gave talks. The following i s a list of the lecture s of a mathematician othe r than one of the three of us. J. Carlson: Maxima l variations o f Hodge structures; L. Ein: Submanifold s o f generic complet e intersection s i n Grassmanians; L. Ein: A theorem of Gruson-Lazarsfeld-Peskine an d a lemma of Lazarsfeld; K. Matsuki: Con e Theorem ; K. Matsuki: Non-vanishin g Theorem ; D. Toledo: Kahle r structure s o n locally symmetri c spaces; D. Toledo: Proo f o f Sampson's theorem ; D. Toledo: Abelia n subalgebra s o f Lie algebras. At the final editing o f these notes som e talks were lef t out. This was the fat e of the followin g talks: H. Clemens: Abel-Jacob i maps; S. Turner: Ellipti c surface s i n characteristic p ; S. Yau: Eule r characteristic o f Chow varieties. These talks were about topics that we had no time to pursue further, and therefore they did not fi t neatly int o the fina l version of the notes. Our aim was to keep the notes advanced enoug h to be of interest eve n to the specialists, but understandable enoug h s o that a person with a good general background i n algebraic geometr y would be able to understand an d enjoy them. Especiall y a t the beginning, the lectures ar e rather informal and concentrate o n the geometric picture rathe r than o n a proof that i s correct i n every technical detail. W e hope that this informa l introductio n to [Ml ] will be helpful. Thes e matters occupy the firs t two lectures. The classification theor y o f surfaces i s reviewed fro m the point o f view of threefold theory i n Lecture 3 . Thi s lead s naturally to the next lectur e which i s an introduction t o the study of cones of curves. Lectur e 5 discusses the aims of Mori's program i n more detail, concentrating mainly o n flips, the presence o f which i s perhaps the most importan t differenc e between algebraic geometry i n two and i n three dimensions. A t the end of this lecture, a table compares the basic results i n the birational geometry o f surfaces and threefolds. Eve n though the lis t was selected with bias, the similaritie s ar e striking. Lecture 6 is a little more technical. I t discusses the singularities tha t arise naturally i n the stud y of smooth threefolds. Thes e are the three dimensional analogues o f the rational double points of surfaces. Thei r structur e i s however more complicated an d not completely known. 2 INTRODUCTION Lecture 7 discusses extensions of the Cone Theorem to relative situations an d equivariant settings . I n Lecture 8 we give quick proofs o f some vanishing theorems that are needed fo r the proof of the Cone Theorem. This lead s directly t o the next big section, which i s the proof o f the general Cone Theorem. Thi s i s done i n Lectures 9-13 . Here the proofs are (o r at least are intented to be) also technically correct . Th e proof of the final step (give n in Lecture 11 ) i s new, and makes i t possible t o avoid the rathe r technical relativ e case . A t least fo r us, this made the proof much clearer. The end of the firs t part o f these notes i s a discussion o f flops and flips. I f a rational curve on a quintic threefold i n P4 can be contracted, then i t can be flopped. Thu s understandin g flops yields results about rational curve s o n quintic threefold s in P4 . Th e simples t questio n to which this approach lead s is: Is i t true that, i f C is a smooth rational curve on a quintic threefold i n P4 which has normal bundle 0t(2) +0C(-4), then some multiple o f C moves? There ar e no such lines, but this situation ca n occur fo r plane conies o n some special quintic threefolds i n P4. ( A negative answer to the question i n that cas e appears i n [C3] , written afte r the completion o f these notes.) Two lectures are devoted to flips. Lectur e 1 4 is a general introduction, and Lecture 1 5 is an essentially complet e proof of the local description o f a threefold alon g a contractible rationa l curve that has negative intersectio n wit h the canonical class. This shoul d give a fairly clear ide a of the content o f the firs t seven chapter s of [M3] , and should enable the reader to go directly to Chapter 8 (afte r reviewing som e additional definition s and statements).
Recommended publications
  • Chapter 13 the Geometry of Circles
    Chapter 13 TheR. Connelly geometry of circles Math 452, Spring 2002 Math 4520, Fall 2017 CLASSICAL GEOMETRIES So far we have been studying lines and conics in the Euclidean plane. What about circles, 14. The geometry of circles one of the basic objects of study in Euclidean geometry? One approach is to use the complex numbersSo far .we Recall have thatbeen the studying projectivities lines and of conics the projective in the Euclidean plane overplane., whichWhat weabout call 2, circles, Cone of the basic objects of study in Euclidean geometry? One approachC is to use CP are given by 3 by 3 matrices, and these projectivities restricted to a complex projective the complex numbers 1C. Recall that the projectivities of the projective plane over C, line,v.rhich which we wecall call Cp2, a CPare, given are the by Moebius3 by 3 matrices, functions, and whichthese projectivities themselves correspondrestricted to to a 2-by-2 matrices.complex Theprojective Moebius line, functions which we preservecall a Cpl the, are cross the Moebius ratio. This functions, is where which circles themselves come in. correspond to a 2 by 2 matrix. The Moebius functions preserve the cross ratio. This is 13.1where circles The come cross in. ratio for the complex field We14.1 look The for anothercross ratio geometric for the interpretation complex field of the cross ratio for the complex field, or better 1 yet forWeCP look= Cfor[f1g another. Recall geometric the polarinterpretation decomposition of the cross of a complexratio for numberthe complexz = refield,iθ, where r =orjz betterj is the yet magnitude for Cpl = ofCz U, and{ 00 } .Recallθ is the the angle polar that decomposition the line through of a complex 0 and znumbermakes with thez real -rei9, axis.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1701.01653V1 [Math.CV] 6 Jan 2017 32J25
    Bimeromorphic geometry of K¨ahler threefolds Andreas H¨oring and Thomas Peternell Abstract. We describe the recently established minimal model program for (non-algebraic) K¨ahler threefolds as well as the abundance theorem for these spaces. 1. Introduction Given a complex projective manifold X, the Minimal Model Program (MMP) predicts that either X is covered by rational curves (X is uniruled) or X has a ′ - slightly singular - birational minimal model X whose canonical divisor KX′ is nef; and then the abundance conjecture says that some multiple mKX′ is spanned by global sections (so X′ is a good minimal model). The MMP also predicts how to achieve the birational model, namely by a sequence of divisorial contractions and flips. In dimension three, the MMP is completely established (cf. [Kwc92], [KM98] for surveys), in dimension four, the existence of minimal models is es- tablished ([BCHM10], [Fuj04], [Fuj05]), but abundance is wide open. In higher dimensions minimal models exists if X is of general type [BCHM10]; abundance not being an issue in this case. In this article we discuss the following natural Question 1.1. Does the MMP work for general (non-algebraic) compact K¨ahler manifolds? Although the basic methods used in minimal model theory all fail in the K¨ahler arXiv:1701.01653v1 [math.CV] 6 Jan 2017 case, there is no apparent reason why the MMP should not hold in the K¨ahler category. And in fact, in recent papers [HP16], [HP15] and [CHP16], the K¨ahler MMP was established in dimension three: Theorem 1.2. Let X be a normal Q-factorial compact K¨ahler threefold with terminal singularities.
    [Show full text]
  • A Surface of Maximal Canonical Degree 11
    A SURFACE OF MAXIMAL CANONICAL DEGREE SAI-KEE YEUNG Abstract. It is known since the 70's from a paper of Beauville that the degree of the rational canonical map of a smooth projective algebraic surface of general type is at most 36. Though it has been conjectured that a surface with optimal canonical degree 36 exists, the highest canonical degree known earlier for a min- imal surface of general type was 16 by Persson. The purpose of this paper is to give an affirmative answer to the conjecture by providing an explicit surface. 1. Introduction 1.1. Let M be a minimal surface of general type. Assume that the space of canonical 0 0 sections H (M; KM ) of M is non-trivial. Let N = dimCH (M; KM ) = pg, where pg is the geometric genus. The canonical map is defined to be in general a rational N−1 map ΦKM : M 99K P . For a surface, this is the most natural rational mapping to study if it is non-trivial. Assume that ΦKM is generically finite with degree d. It is well-known from the work of Beauville [B], that d := deg ΦKM 6 36: We call such degree the canonical degree of the surface, and regard it 0 if the canonical mapping does not exist or is not generically finite. The following open problem is an immediate consequence of the work of [B] and is implicitly hinted there. Problem What is the optimal canonical degree of a minimal surface of general type? Is there a minimal surface of general type with canonical degree 36? Though the problem is natural and well-known, the answer remains elusive since the 70's.
    [Show full text]
  • I. Overview of Activities, April, 2005-March, 2006 …
    MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES RESEARCH INSTITUTE ANNUAL REPORT FOR 2005-2006 I. Overview of Activities, April, 2005-March, 2006 …......……………………. 2 Innovations ………………………………………………………..... 2 Scientific Highlights …..…………………………………………… 4 MSRI Experiences ….……………………………………………… 6 II. Programs …………………………………………………………………….. 13 III. Workshops ……………………………………………………………………. 17 IV. Postdoctoral Fellows …………………………………………………………. 19 Papers by Postdoctoral Fellows …………………………………… 21 V. Mathematics Education and Awareness …...………………………………. 23 VI. Industrial Participation ...…………………………………………………… 26 VII. Future Programs …………………………………………………………….. 28 VIII. Collaborations ………………………………………………………………… 30 IX. Papers Reported by Members ………………………………………………. 35 X. Appendix - Final Reports ……………………………………………………. 45 Programs Workshops Summer Graduate Workshops MSRI Network Conferences MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES RESEARCH INSTITUTE ANNUAL REPORT FOR 2005-2006 I. Overview of Activities, April, 2005-March, 2006 This annual report covers MSRI projects and activities that have been concluded since the submission of the last report in May, 2005. This includes the Spring, 2005 semester programs, the 2005 summer graduate workshops, the Fall, 2005 programs and the January and February workshops of Spring, 2006. This report does not contain fiscal or demographic data. Those data will be submitted in the Fall, 2006 final report covering the completed fiscal 2006 year, based on audited financial reports. This report begins with a discussion of MSRI innovations undertaken this year, followed by highlights
    [Show full text]
  • Mori Dream Spaces and Birational Rigidity of Fano 3-Folds
    Ahmadinezhad, H., & Zucconi, F. (2016). Mori dream spaces and birational rigidity of Fano 3-folds. Advances in Mathematics, 292, 410- 445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2016.01.008 Peer reviewed version Link to published version (if available): 10.1016/j.aim.2016.01.008 Link to publication record in Explore Bristol Research PDF-document University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research General rights This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/red/research-policy/pure/user-guides/ebr-terms/ MORI DREAM SPACES AND BIRATIONAL RIGIDITY OF FANO 3-FOLDS HAMID AHMADINEZHAD AND FRANCESCO ZUCCONI Abstract. We highlight a relation between the existence of Sarkisov links and the finite generation of (certain) Cox rings. We introduce explicit methods to use this relation in order to prove birational rigidity statements. To illustrate, we complete the birational rigidity results of Okada for Fano complete intersection 3-folds in singular weighted projective spaces. 1. Introduction Rationality question for varieties covered by rational curves (e.g. unirational varieties) has been a fundamental problem in algebraic geometry, the answer to which has opened various subjects across the field. The first examples of unirational varieties that are irrational were found about the same time by Clemens and Griffiths [10], Iskovskikh and Manin [18], Artin and Mumford [3]. While the results of [10] and [3] indicate that the varieties under study (respectively, a smooth cubic 3-fold and some special singular quartic 3-folds in the weighted projective space P(1; 1; 1; 1; 2)) are irrational, the result in [18] shows that a smooth quartic 3-fold is not birational to any conic bundle or fibration into del 3 Pezzo surfaces, or any other Fano variety, including P , that is to say it is irrational in a strong sense.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Award for Distinguished Public Service
    2008 Award for Distinguished Public Service The 2008 Award for Distinguished and continuation of the Park City/IAS Mathemat- Public Service was presented at the ics Institute. 114th Annual Meeting of the AMS in San Diego in January 2008. Biographical Sketch The Award for Distinguished Public Herbert Clemens earned his Ph.D. in 1966 from Service is presented every two years the University of California, Berkeley, under the to a research mathematician who has direction of Phillip A. Griffiths. He has taught at made a distinguished contribution to Columbia University, the University of Utah, and the mathematics profession during the preceding five years. The purpose of the Ohio State University, where he has been on the award is to encourage and recog- the faculty since 2002. He has served as director nize those individuals who contribute of the NSF Regional Geometry Institute, Park City, their time to public service activities UT, and chair of the Steering Committee for the IAS in support of mathematics. The award Park City Mathematics Institute. He was an invited Herbert Clemens carries a cash prize of US$4,000. speaker at the International Congress of Mathema- The Award for Distinguished Public ticians in 1974 and in 1986. His academic honors Service is made by the AMS Council include a Silver Medal from the Italian Mathemati- acting on the recommendation of a selection com- cal Society and a Laurea de honoris causa from the mittee. For the 2008 award the members of the Universita di Torino, among others. His research selection committee were: William J. Lewis, Carolyn R.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1407.7478V1 [Math.AG]
    THE STRUCTURE OF ALGEBRAIC VARIETIES JANOS´ KOLLAR´ Abstract. The aim of this address is to give an overview of the main questions and results of the structure theory of higher dimensional algebraic varieties. 1. Early history: Euler, Abel, Jacobi, Riemann Our story, like many others in mathematics, can be traced back at least to Euler who studied elliptic integrals of the form dx . Z √x3 + ax2 + bx + c The study of integrals of algebraic functions was further developed by Abel and Jacobi. From our point of view the next major step was taken by Riemann. Instead of dealing with a multi-valued function like √x3 + ax2 + bx + c, Riemann looks at the complex algebraic curve C := (x, y): y2 = x3 + ax2 + bx + c C2. ⊂ Then the above integral becomes dx ZΓ y for some path Γ on the algebraic curve C. More generally, a polynomial g(x, y) implicitly defines y := y(x) as a multi-valued function of x and for any meromorphic function h(u, v), the multi-valued integral h x, y(x) dx Z becomes a single valued integral arXiv:1407.7478v1 [math.AG] 28 Jul 2014 h x, y dx Z Γ for some path Γ on the algebraic curve C(g) := g(x, y)=0 C2. Substitutions ⊂ that transform one integral associated to a polynomial g1 into another integral associated to a g2 can be now seen as algebraic maps between the curves C(g1) and C(g2). Riemann also went further. As a simple example, consider the curve C defined by (y2 = x3 + x2) and notice that (t3 t)2 (t2 1)3 + (t2 1)2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Birational Isomorphism Types of Smooth Real Elliptic Curves
    Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Rose-Hulman Scholar Mathematical Sciences Technical Reports (MSTR) Mathematics 8-17-2004 The Birational Isomorphism Types of Smooth Real Elliptic Curves Sean A. Broughton Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.rose-hulman.edu/math_mstr Part of the Algebraic Geometry Commons, and the Geometry and Topology Commons Recommended Citation Broughton, Sean A., "The Birational Isomorphism Types of Smooth Real Elliptic Curves" (2004). Mathematical Sciences Technical Reports (MSTR). 44. https://scholar.rose-hulman.edu/math_mstr/44 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Mathematics at Rose-Hulman Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mathematical Sciences Technical Reports (MSTR) by an authorized administrator of Rose-Hulman Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Birational Isomorphism Types of Smooth Real Elliptic Curves S.A. Broughton Mathematical Sciences Technical Report Series MSTR 04-05 August 17, 2004 Department of Mathematics Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology http://www.rose-hulman.edu/math Fax (812)-877-8333 Phone (812)-877-8193 The Birational Isomorphism Types of Smooth Real Elliptic Curves S. Allen Broughton Department of Mathtematics Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology August 17, 2004 Contents 1 Introduction 1 2Definitions and background information 2 3 Weierstrass form, double covers, and invariants 4 4 Reduction to a Weierstrass normal form 5 5 The real moduli space in complex moduli space 8 6 Real forms and real birational isomorphism 9 7 Real forms and symmetries of elliptic curves 12 8 The birational isomorphism types of real elliptic curves 13 1Introduction In this note we determine all birational isomorphism types of real elliptic curves and show that it is the same as the orbit space of smooth cubic real curves in P 2(R) under linear projective equivalence.
    [Show full text]
  • ROBERT L. FOOTE CURRICULUM VITA March 2017 Address
    ROBERT L. FOOTE CURRICULUM VITA March 2017 Address/Telephone/E-Mail Department of Mathematics & Computer Science Wabash College Crawfordsville, Indiana 47933 (765) 361-6429 [email protected] Personal Date of Birth: December 2, 1953 Citizenship: USA Education Ph.D., Mathematics, University of Michigan, April 1983 Dissertation: Curvature Estimates for Monge-Amp`ere Foliations Thesis Advisor: Daniel M. Burns Jr. M.A., Mathematics, University of Michigan, April 1978 B.A., Mathematics, Kalamazoo College, June 1976 Magna cum Laude with Honors in Mathematics, Phi Beta Kappa, Heyl Science Scholarship Employment 1989–present, Wabash College Department Chair, 1997–2001, 2009–2012 Full Professor since 2004 Associate Professor, 1993–2004 Assistant Professor, 1991–1993 Byron K. Trippet Assistant Professor, 1989–1991 1983–1989, Texas Tech University, Assistant Professor (granted tenure) 1983, Kalamazoo College, Visiting Instructor 1976–1982, University of Michigan, Graduate Student Teaching Assistant 1976, 1977, The Upjohn Company, Mathematical Analyst Research Visits 2009, Korea Institute for Advanced Study (KIAS), Visiting Scholar Three weeks at the invitation of C. K. Han. 2009, Pennsylvania State Univ., Shapiro Visitor Four weeks at the invitation of Sergei Tabachnikov. 2008–2009, Univ. of Georgia, Visiting Scholar (sabbatical leave) 1996–1997, 2003–2004, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Visiting Scholar (sabbatical leave) 1991, Pohang Institute of Science and Technology, Pohang, Korea Three months at the invitation of C. K. Han. 1990, Texas Tech University Ten weeks at the invitation of Lance D. Drager. Current Fields of Interest Primary: Differential Geometry, Integral Geometry Professional Affiliations American Mathematical Society, Mathematical Association of America. Teaching Experience Graduate courses Differentiable manifolds, real analysis, complex analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Group of Automorphisms of a Quasi-Affine Variety 3
    ON THE GROUP OF AUTOMORPHISMS OF A QUASI-AFFINE VARIETY ZBIGNIEW JELONEK Abstract. Let K be an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero. We show that if the automorphisms group of a quasi-affine variety X is infinite, then X is uniruled. 1. Introduction. Automorphism groups of an open varieties have always attracted a lot of attention, but the nature of this groups is still not well-known. For example the group of automorphisms of Kn is understood only in the case n = 2 (and n = 1, of course). Let Y be a an open variety. It is natural to ask when the group of automorphisms of Y is finite. We gave a partial answer to this questions in our papers [Jel1], [Jel2], [Jel3] and [Jel4]. In [Iit2] Iitaka proved that Aut(Y ) is finite if Y has a maximal logarithmic Kodaira dimension. Here we focus on the group of automorphisms of an affine or more generally quasi-affine variety over an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero. Let us recall that a quasi-affine variety is an open subvariety of some affine variety. We prove the following: Theorem 1.1. Let X be a quasi-affine (in particular affine) variety over an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero. If Aut(X) is infinite, then X is uniruled, i.e., X is covered by rational curves. This generalizes our old results from [Jel3] and [Jel4]. Our proof uses in a significant way a recent progress in a minimal model program ( see [Bir], [BCHK], [P-S]) and is based on our old ideas from [Jel1], [Jel2], [Jel3] and [Jel4].
    [Show full text]
  • Complex Analysis and Complex Geometry
    Complex Analysis and Complex Geometry Finnur Larusson,´ University of Adelaide Norman Levenberg, Indiana University Rasul Shafikov, University of Western Ontario Alexandre Sukhov, Universite´ des Sciences et Technologies de Lille May 1–6, 2016 1 Overview of the Field Complex analysis and complex geometry form synergy through the geometric ideas used in analysis and an- alytic tools employed in geometry, and therefore they should be viewed as two aspects of the same subject. The fundamental objects of the theory are complex manifolds and, more generally, complex spaces, holo- morphic functions on them, and holomorphic maps between them. Holomorphic functions can be defined in three equivalent ways as complex-differentiable functions, convergent power series, and as solutions of the homogeneous Cauchy-Riemann equation. The threefold nature of differentiability over the complex numbers gives complex analysis its distinctive character and is the ultimate reason why it is linked to so many areas of mathematics. Plurisubharmonic functions are not as well known to nonexperts as holomorphic functions. They were first explicitly defined in the 1940s, but they had already appeared in attempts to geometrically describe domains of holomorphy at the very beginning of several complex variables in the first decade of the 20th century. Since the 1960s, one of their most important roles has been as weights in a priori estimates for solving the Cauchy-Riemann equation. They are intimately related to the complex Monge-Ampere` equation, the second partial differential equation of complex analysis. There is also a potential-theoretic aspect to plurisubharmonic functions, which is the subject of pluripotential theory. In the early decades of the modern era of the subject, from the 1940s into the 1970s, the notion of a complex space took shape and the geometry of analytic varieties and holomorphic maps was developed.
    [Show full text]
  • Party Time for Mathematicians in Heidelberg
    Mathematical Communities Marjorie Senechal, Editor eidelberg, one of Germany’s ancient places of Party Time HHlearning, is making a new bid for fame with the Heidelberg Laureate Forum (HLF). Each year, two hundred young researchers from all over the world—one for Mathematicians hundred mathematicians and one hundred computer scientists—are selected by application to attend the one- week event, which is usually held in September. The young in Heidelberg scientists attend lectures by preeminent scholars, all of whom are laureates of the Abel Prize (awarded by the OSMO PEKONEN Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters), the Fields Medal (awarded by the International Mathematical Union), the Nevanlinna Prize (awarded by the International Math- ematical Union and the University of Helsinki, Finland), or the Computing Prize and the Turing Prize (both awarded This column is a forum for discussion of mathematical by the Association for Computing Machinery). communities throughout the world, and through all In 2018, for instance, the following eminences appeared as lecturers at the sixth HLF, which I attended as a science time. Our definition of ‘‘mathematical community’’ is journalist: Sir Michael Atiyah and Gregory Margulis (both Abel laureates and Fields medalists); the Abel laureate the broadest: ‘‘schools’’ of mathematics, circles of Srinivasa S. R. Varadhan; the Fields medalists Caucher Bir- kar, Gerd Faltings, Alessio Figalli, Shigefumi Mori, Bào correspondence, mathematical societies, student Chaˆu Ngoˆ, Wendelin Werner, and Efim Zelmanov; Robert organizations, extracurricular educational activities Endre Tarjan and Leslie G. Valiant (who are both Nevan- linna and Turing laureates); the Nevanlinna laureate (math camps, math museums, math clubs), and more.
    [Show full text]