Physical Properties Used in Mineral Identification
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Download PDF About Minerals Sorted by Mineral Name
MINERALS SORTED BY NAME Here is an alphabetical list of minerals discussed on this site. More information on and photographs of these minerals in Kentucky is available in the book “Rocks and Minerals of Kentucky” (Anderson, 1994). APATITE Crystal system: hexagonal. Fracture: conchoidal. Color: red, brown, white. Hardness: 5.0. Luster: opaque or semitransparent. Specific gravity: 3.1. Apatite, also called cellophane, occurs in peridotites in eastern and western Kentucky. A microcrystalline variety of collophane found in northern Woodford County is dark reddish brown, porous, and occurs in phosphatic beds, lenses, and nodules in the Tanglewood Member of the Lexington Limestone. Some fossils in the Tanglewood Member are coated with phosphate. Beds are generally very thin, but occasionally several feet thick. The Woodford County phosphate beds were mined during the early 1900s near Wallace, Ky. BARITE Crystal system: orthorhombic. Cleavage: often in groups of platy or tabular crystals. Color: usually white, but may be light shades of blue, brown, yellow, or red. Hardness: 3.0 to 3.5. Streak: white. Luster: vitreous to pearly. Specific gravity: 4.5. Tenacity: brittle. Uses: in heavy muds in oil-well drilling, to increase brilliance in the glass-making industry, as filler for paper, cosmetics, textiles, linoleum, rubber goods, paints. Barite generally occurs in a white massive variety (often appearing earthy when weathered), although some clear to bluish, bladed barite crystals have been observed in several vein deposits in central Kentucky, and commonly occurs as a solid solution series with celestite where barium and strontium can substitute for each other. Various nodular zones have been observed in Silurian–Devonian rocks in east-central Kentucky. -
The Anjahamiary Pegmatite, Fort Dauphin Area, Madagascar
The Anjahamiary pegmatite, Fort Dauphin area, Madagascar Federico Pezzotta* & Marc Jobin** * Museo Civico di Storia Naturale, Corso Venezia 55, I-20121 Milano, Italy. ** SOMEMA, BP 6018, Antananarivo 101, Madagascar. E-mail:<[email protected]> 21 February, 2003 INTRODUCTION Madagascar is among the most important areas in the world for the production, mainly in the past, of tourmaline (elbaite and liddicoatite) gemstones and mineral specimens. A large literature database documents the presence of a number of pegmatites rich in elbaite and liddicoatite. The pegmatites are mainly concentrated in central Madagascar, in a region including, from north to south, the areas of Tsiroanomandidy, Itasy, Antsirabe-Betafo, Ambositra, Ambatofinandrahana, Mandosonoro, Ikalamavony, Fenoarivo and Fianarantsoa (e.g. Pezzotta, 2001). In general, outside this large area, elbaite-liddicoatite-bearing pegmatites are rare and only minor discoveries have been made in the past. Nevertheless, some recent work made by the Malagasy company SOMEMEA, discovered a great potential for elbaite-liddicoatite gemstones and mineral specimens in a large, unusual pegmatite (the Anjahamiary pegmatite), hosted in high- metamorphic terrains. The Anjahamiary pegmatite lies in the Fort Dauphin (Tôlanaro) area, close to the southern coast of Madagascar. This paper reports a general description of this locality, and some preliminary results of the analytical studies of the accessory minerals collected at the mine. Among the most important analytical results is the presence of gemmy blue liddicoatite crystals with a very high Ca content, indicating the presence in this tourmaline crystal of composition near the liddicoatite end-member. LOCATION AND ACCESS The Anjahamiary pegmatite is located about 70 km NW of the town of Fort Dauphin (Tôlanaro) (Fig. -
The Surface Reactions of Silicate Minerals
RESEARCH BULLETIN 614 SEPTEMBER, 1956 UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION J. H. Longwell, Director The Surface Reactions Of Silicate Minerals PART II. REACTIONS OF FELDSPAR SURFACES WITH SALT SOLUTIONS. V. E. NASH AND C. E. MARSHALL (Publication authorized September 5, 1956) COLUMBIA, MISSOURI TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .......... .. 3 The Interaction of Albite with Salt Solutions . .. 4 The Interaction of Anorthite with Salt Solutions ........ .. 7 Relative Effectiveness of Ammonium Chloride and Magnesium Chloride on the Release of Sodium from Albite . .. 9 Surface Interaction of Albite with Salt Solutions in Methanol . .. 13 Experiments on Cationic Fixation ............................... 16 Detailed Exchange and Activity Studies with Individual Feldspars .......... .. 19 Procedure .. .. 20 Microcline . .. 21 Albite .................................................... 22 Oligoclase . .. 23 Andesine . .. 24 Labradori te . .. 25 Bytownite ................................................. 25 Anorthite . .. 27 Discussion ........ .. 28 Summary ..................................................... 35 References .. .. 36 Most of the experimental material of this and the preceding Research Bulletin is taken from the Ph.D. Thesis of Victor Nash, University of Missouri, June 1955. The experiments on cation fixation were carried our with the aid of a research grant from the Potash Rock Company of America, Lithonia, Georgia, for which the authors wish to record their appreciation. The work was part of Department of Soils Research Project No.6, entitled, "Heavy Clays." The Surface Reactions of Silicate Minerals PART II. REACTIONS OF FELDSPAR SURFACES WITH SALT SOLUTIONS. v. E. NASH AND C. E. MARSHALL INTRODUCTION The review of literature cited in Part I of this series indicates that little is known of the interaction of feldspar surfaces with salt solutions. The work of Breazeale and Magistad (1) clearly demonstrated that ex change reactions between potassium and calcium occur in the case of or thoclase surfaces. -
Noritic Anorthosite Bodies in the Sierra Nevada Batholith
MINERALOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, SPECIAL PAPER 1, 1963 INTERNATIONALMINERALOGICAL ASSOCIATION,PAPERS, THIRD GENERAL MEETING NORITIC ANORTHOSITE BODIES IN THE SIERRA NEVADA BATHOLITH ALDEN A. LOOMISl Department of Geology, Stanford University, Stanford, California ABSTRACT A group of small noritic plutons were intruded prior to the immediately surrounding granitic rocks in a part of the composite Sierra Nevada batholith near Lake Tahoe. Iron was more strongly concentrated in the late fluids of individual bodies than during the intrusive sequence as a whole. Pyroxenes are more ferrous in rocks late in the sequence, although most of the iron is in late magnetite which replaces pyroxenes. Both Willow Lake type and normal cumulative layering are present. Cumulative layering is rare; Willi ow Lake layering is common and was formed early in individual bodies. Willow Lake layers require a compositional uniqueness providing high ionic mobility to explain observed relations. The Sierran norites differ from those in large stratiform plutons in that (1) the average bulk composition is neritic anorthosite in which typical rocks contain over 20% AbO" and (2) differentiation of both orthopyroxene and plagioclase produced a smooth progressive sequence of mineral compositions. A plot of modal An vs. En for all the rocks in the sequence from early Willow Lake-type layers to late no rite dikes defines a smooth non-linear trend from Anss-En76 to An,,-En54. TLe ratio An/ Ab decreased faster than En/Of until the assemblage Anso-En65 was reached and En/Of began to decrease more rapidly. Similar plots for large stratiform bodies show too much scatter to define single curves. -
The New IMA List of Gem Materials – a Work in Progress – Updated: July 2018
The New IMA List of Gem Materials – A Work in Progress – Updated: July 2018 In the following pages of this document a comprehensive list of gem materials is presented. The list is distributed (for terms and conditions see below) via the web site of the Commission on Gem Materials of the International Mineralogical Association. The list will be updated on a regular basis. Mineral names and formulae are from the IMA List of Minerals: http://nrmima.nrm.se//IMA_Master_List_%282016-07%29.pdf. Where there is a discrepancy the IMA List of Minerals will take precedence. Explanation of column headings: IMA status: A = approved (it applies to minerals approved after the establishment of the IMA in 1958); G = grandfathered (it applies to minerals discovered before the birth of IMA, and generally considered as valid species); Rd = redefined (it applies to existing minerals which were redefined during the IMA era); Rn = renamed (it applies to existing minerals which were renamed during the IMA era); Q = questionable (it applies to poorly characterized minerals, whose validity could be doubtful). Gem material name: minerals are normal text; non-minerals are bold; rocks are all caps; organics and glasses are italicized. Caveat (IMPORTANT): inevitably there will be mistakes in a list of this type. We will be grateful to all those who will point out errors of any kind, including typos. Please email your corrections to [email protected]. Acknowledgments: The following persons, listed in alphabetic order, gave their contribution to the building and the update of the IMA List of Minerals: Vladimir Bermanec, Emmanuel Fritsch, Lee A. -
Minerals of the San Luis Valley and Adjacent Areas of Colorado Charles F
New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/22 Minerals of the San Luis Valley and adjacent areas of Colorado Charles F. Bauer, 1971, pp. 231-234 in: San Luis Basin (Colorado), James, H. L.; [ed.], New Mexico Geological Society 22nd Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 340 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 1971 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks. Copyright Information Publications of the New Mexico Geological Society, printed and electronic, are protected by the copyright laws of the United States. -
A Database of Plagioclase Crystal Preferred Orientations (CPO)
Solid Earth, 4, 511–542, 2013 Open Access www.solid-earth.net/4/511/2013/ doi:10.5194/se-4-511-2013 Solid Earth © Author(s) 2013. CC Attribution 3.0 License. A database of plagioclase crystal preferred orientations (CPO) and microstructures – implications for CPO origin, strength, symmetry and seismic anisotropy in gabbroic rocks T. Satsukawa1,2,*, B. Ildefonse2, D. Mainprice2, L. F. G. Morales3, K. Michibayashi1,4, and F. Barou2 1Graduate School of Science and Technology, Shizuoka University, Ohya 836, Shizuoka 422-8529, Japan 2Géosciences Montpellier, Université Montpellier 2 and CNRS, CC 060, 34095 Montpellier cedex 5, France 3Helmholtz Zentrum Potsdam, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum (GFZ), Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam, Germany 4Institute of Geosciences, Shizuoka University, Ohya 836, Shizuoka 422-8529, Japan *present address: ARC Center of Excellence for Core to Crust Fluid Systems (CCFS) and GEMOC National Key Centre, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia Correspondence to: T. Satsukawa ([email protected]) Received: 3 August 2013 – Published in Solid Earth Discuss.: 14 August 2013 Revised: 14 November 2013 – Accepted: 19 November 2013 – Published: 18 December 2013 Abstract. This study presents a unique database of 172 pla- ture compared with magmatic flow, and the large number gioclase Crystallographic Preferred Orientations (CPO) of of possible slip-systems in plagioclase probably account for variously deformed gabbroic rocks. The CPO characteris- these differences. Calculated seismic properties (P wave and tics as a function of the deformation regime (magmatic or S wave velocities and anisotropies) of plagioclase aggregates crystal-plastic) are outlined and discussed. The studied sam- show that anisotropy (up to 12 % for P wave and 14 % for ples are dominantly from slow- and fast-spread present-day S wave) tends to increase as a function of ODF J index. -
Minerals - Properties and Identification Lab
MINERALS - PROPERTIES AND IDENTIFICATION LAB INTRODUCTION TO THE MINERALS - is a description of 30 important minerals for GLG 103. Each mineral species has its properties described, as well as a link to other images of that mineral. A geologic description of the particular image is also included. This group of pictures is intended to give you an overview of how the mineral may look in different geologic settings. MINERALS TO IDENTIFY - is the identification of 20 minerals. It consists of an “interactive” PowerPoint that duplicates the lab setting. It allows you to perform tests on each unknown mineral and to make decisions as to its properties for the mineral’s identification. To assist you in your quest for mineral identification, an 8 page MINERAL IDENTIFICATION KEY is provided as a separate PowerPoint. It is required that you print this 8 page key (not the entire PowerPoint) and use it during the mineral identification process. You will enter your answers in the Mineral Identification Quiz in BlackBoard. This is an interactive PowerPoint and it is intended that you click on various links throughout the lesson. However, if you do accidently hit a key it may advance to the next slide in the list, which may not be the one you want to observe. You can go back by using either the “Backspace” key or the link to “Back to Page 1” box in the bottom right hand corner of each page. WARNING – This PowerPoint is over 200 pages in length so if you want to print out certain pages make sure to tell your printer which pages to print - not the entire powerpoint. -
1469 Vol 43#5 Art 03.Indd
1469 The Canadian Mineralogist Vol. 43, pp. 1469-1487 (2005) BORATE MINERALS OF THE PENOBSQUIS AND MILLSTREAM DEPOSITS, SOUTHERN NEW BRUNSWICK, CANADA JOEL D. GRICE§, ROBERT A. GAULT AND JERRY VAN VELTHUIZEN† Research Division, Canadian Museum of Nature, P.O. Box 3443, Station D, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 6P4, Canada ABSTRACT The borate minerals found in two potash deposits, at Penobsquis and Millstream, Kings County, New Brunswick, are described in detail. These deposits are located in the Moncton Subbasin, which forms the eastern portion of the extensive Maritimes Basin. These marine evaporites consist of an early carbonate unit, followed by a sulfate, and fi nally, a salt unit. The borate assemblages occur in specifi c beds of halite and sylvite that were the last units to form in the evaporite sequence. Species identifi ed from drill-core sections include: boracite, brianroulstonite, chambersite, colemanite, congolite, danburite, hilgardite, howlite, hydroboracite, kurgantaite, penobsquisite, pringleite, ruitenbergite, strontioginorite, szaibélyite, trembathite, veatchite, volkovskite and walkerite. In addition, 41 non-borate species have been identifi ed, including magnesite, monohydrocalcite, sellaite, kieserite and fl uorite. The borate assemblages in the two deposits differ, and in each deposit, they vary stratigraphically. At Millstream, boracite is the most common borate in the sylvite + carnallite beds, with hilgardite in the lower halite strata. At Penobsquis, there is an upper unit of hilgardite + volkovskite + trembathite in halite and a lower unit of hydroboracite + volkov- skite + trembathite–congolite in halite–sylvite. At both deposits, values of the ratio of B isotopes [␦11B] range from 21.5 to 37.8‰ [21 analyses] and are consistent with a seawater source, without any need for a more exotic interpretation. -
Optical Properties of Common Rock-Forming Minerals
AppendixA __________ Optical Properties of Common Rock-Forming Minerals 325 Optical Properties of Common Rock-Forming Minerals J. B. Lyons, S. A. Morse, and R. E. Stoiber Distinguishing Characteristics Chemical XI. System and Indices Birefringence "Characteristically parallel, but Mineral Composition Best Cleavage Sign,2V and Relief and Color see Fig. 13-3. A. High Positive Relief Zircon ZrSiO. Tet. (+) 111=1.940 High biref. Small euhedral grains show (.055) parallel" extinction; may cause pleochroic haloes if enclosed in other minerals Sphene CaTiSiOs Mon. (110) (+) 30-50 13=1.895 High biref. Wedge-shaped grains; may (Titanite) to 1.935 (0.108-.135) show (110) cleavage or (100) Often or (221) parting; ZI\c=51 0; brownish in very high relief; r>v extreme. color CtJI\) 0) Gamet AsB2(SiO.la where Iso. High Grandite often Very pale pink commonest A = R2+ and B = RS + 1.7-1.9 weakly color; inclusions common. birefracting. Indices vary widely with composition. Crystals often euhedraL Uvarovite green, very rare. Staurolite H2FeAI.Si2O'2 Orth. (010) (+) 2V = 87 13=1.750 Low biref. Pleochroic colorless to golden (approximately) (.012) yellow; one good cleavage; twins cruciform or oblique; metamorphic. Olivine Series Mg2SiO. Orth. (+) 2V=85 13=1.651 High biref. Colorless (Fo) to yellow or pale to to (.035) brown (Fa); high relief. Fe2SiO. Orth. (-) 2V=47 13=1.865 High biref. Shagreen (mottled) surface; (.051) often cracked and altered to %II - serpentine. Poor (010) and (100) cleavages. Extinction par- ~ ~ alleL" l~4~ Tourmaline Na(Mg,Fe,Mn,Li,Alk Hex. (-) 111=1.636 Mod. biref. -
Ancient Potash Ores
www.saltworkconsultants.com John Warren - Friday, Dec 31, 2018 BrineSalty evolution Matters & origins of pot- ash: primary or secondary? Ancient potash ores: Part 3 of 3 Introduction Crossow of In the previous two articles in this undersaturated water series on potash exploitation, we Congruent dissolution looked at the production of either Halite Mouldic MOP or SOP from anthropo- or Porosity genic brine pans in modern saline sylvite lake settings. Crystals of interest formed in solar evaporation pans Dissolved solute shows stoichiometric match to precursor, and dropped out of solution as: dissolving salt goes 1) Rafts at the air-brine interface, A. completely into solution 2) Bottom nucleates or, 3) Syn- depositional cements precipitated MgCl in solution B. 2 within a few centimetres of the Crossow of depositional surface. In most cases, undersaturated water periods of more intense precipita- Incongruent dissolution tion tended to occur during times of brine cooling, either diurnally Carnallite Sylvite or seasonally (sylvite, carnallite and halite are prograde salts). All Dissolved solute does not anthropogenic saline pan deposits stoichiometrically match its precursor, examples can be considered as pri- while the dissolving salt goes partially into solution and a mary precipitates with chemistries new daughter mineral remains tied to surface or very nearsurface Figure 1. Congruent (A) versus incongruent (B) dissolution. brine chemistry. In contrast, this article discusses the Dead Sea and the Qaidam sump most closely resemble ancient potash deposits where the post-deposition chem- those of ancient MgSO4-depleted oceans, while SOP fac- istries and ore textures are responding to ongoing alter- tories in Great Salt Lake and Lop Nur have chemistries ation processes in the diagenetic realm. -
OCCURRENCE of BROMINE in CARNALLITE and SYLVITE from UTAH and NEW MEXICO* Manrr Loursp Lrnosonc
OCCURRENCE OF BROMINE IN CARNALLITE AND SYLVITE FROM UTAH AND NEW MEXICO* Manrr Loursp LrNosonc ABSTRACT Both carnallite and sylvite from Eddy County, New Mexico, contain 0.1 per cent of bromine. The bromine content of these minerals from Grand county, utah, is three times as great. No bromine was detected in halite, polyhalite, l5ngbeinite, or anhydrite from New Mexico. Iodine was not detected in any of these minerals. on the basis of the bromine content of the sylvite from New Mexico, it is calculated that 7,000 tons of bromine were present in potash salts mined from the permian basin during the period 1931 to 1945. INrnooucrroN The Geological Survey has previously made tests for bromine and iodine in core samples of potash salts from New Mexico.r Bromine was found to be present in very small amounts. No systematic quantitative determinations were made, nor was the presenceof bromine specificalry correlated with quantitative mineral composition. Sections of potash core from four recently drilled wells and selected pure saline minerals from Eddy County, New Mexico, together with two cores from Grand County, Utah, were therefore analyzed for their bromine and iodine content. The percentage mineral composition was then correlated with the bromine content. rt was found that bromine was restricted to carnall- ite and sylvite. fodine was not detected in any of the samples analyzed. If present, its quantity must be less than .00570. Brine and sea water are the present commercial sourcesof bromine in the United States, though both Germany and U.S.S.R. have utilized potash salts as a source of bromine.