DOCSLIB.ORG

Atoll Research Bulletin No. 500 Crustacea Decapoda

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Atoll Research Bulletin No. 500 Crustacea Decapoda ATOLL RESEARCH BULLETIN NO. 500 CRUSTACEA DECAPODA AND STOMATOPODA OF EASTER ISLAND AND SURROUNDING AREAS. A DOCUMENTED CHECKLIST WITH HISTORICAL OVERVIEW AND BIOGEOGRAPHIC COMMENTS JOSEPH POUPIN ISSUED BY NATIONAL MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION WASHINGTON, D.C., U.S.A. AUGUST 2003 CONTENT ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 2 METHODS ............................................................................................................................. 2 HISTORICAL OVERVIEW .................................................................................................. 3 RESULTS ............................................................................................................................... 7 . Statistics on Taxa ............................................................................................................. 7 Ecology ............................................................................................................................... 7 Biogeographic study ......................................................................................................... 10 CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................... 14 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .................................................................................................... 15 LIST OF THE SPECIES ...................................................................................................... 17 Class Malacostraca .......................................................................................................... 17 Subclass Hoplocarida ...................................................................................................... 17 Order Stomatopoda ......................................................................................................... 17 Family Odontodactylidae ........................................................................................ 17 Family Pseudosquillidae .......................................................................................... 17 Subclass Eumalacostraca ................................................................................................. 17 Order Decapoda ............................................................................................................... 17 Suborder Dendrobranchiata .............................................................................................. 17 Family Aristaeidae .................................................................................................. 17 Family Benthesicymidae ......................................................................................... 18 Family Penaeidae .................................................................................................... 18 . Family Sicyoniidae .................................................................................................. 18 Family Solenoceridae .............................................................................................. 18 Family Sergestidae ................................................................................................. 18 Suborder Pleocyemata ..................................................................................................... 19 Infraorder Stenopodidea ............................................................................................... 19 Family Spongicolidae ........................................................................................... 19 Family Stenopodidae ............................................................................................... 19 Infraorder Caridea ........................................................................................................ 19 Family Pasiphaeidae ................................................................................................ 19 Family Oplophoridae ............................................................................................... 20 Family Disciadidae .................................................................................................. 20 . Family Nematocarcinidae ........................................................................................ 20 Family Rhynchocinetidae ..................................................................................... 21 Family Stylodactylidae ............................................................................................ 21 Family Gnathophyllidae ......................................................................................... 21 Family Palaemonidae ..............................................................................................21 Family Alpheidae ....................................................................................................21 Family Hippo1ytidae ................................................................................................22 Family Processidae ..................................................................................................22 Family Pandalidae ...................................................................................................22 Family Crangonidae ................................................................................................23 Family Glyphocrangonidae .....................................................................................23 Infraorder Thalassinidea ...............................................................................................23 Family Callianassidae ..............................................................................................23 Infraorder Palinura .......................................................................................................24 Family Polychelidae ................................................................................................24 Family Palinuridae ..................................................................................................24 Family Scyllaridae ...................................................................................................24 Infraorder Anomura .....................................................................................................24 Family Galatheidae ..................................................................................................24 Family Porcellanidae ...............................................................................................25 Family Albuneidae ..................................................................................................25 Family Diogenidae ............................................................................................... 25 Family Paguridae ..................................................................................................... 25 Family Parapaguridae ........................................................................................... 26 Infraorder Brachyura ....................................................................................................27 . Family Drormidae ....................................................................................................27 Family Dynomenidae ..............................................................................................27 Family Homolidae .............................................................................................27 . Family Latreilliidae ............................................................................................... 27 Family Calappidae ...................................................................................................28 Family Leucosiidae .................................................................................................28 .. Family Majidae ........................................................................................................28 Family Hymenosomatidae .................................................................................... 28 Family Parthenopidae .........................................................................................28 Family Atelicyclidae ............................................................................................... 29 Family Geryonidae .................................................................................................. 29 Family Portunidae ...................................................................................................29 .. Family Carpiliidae .............................................................................................. 29 Family Goneplacidae ............................................................................................. 29 .. Family Trapeziidae .................................................................................................. 29 Family Xanthidae .................................................................................................... 30 Family Cryptochiridae .............................................................................................30 Family Pinnotheridae ..............................................................................................30 Family Grapsidae .................................................................................................30
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Classification of Living and Fossil Genera of Decapod Crustaceans
    RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2009 Supplement No. 21: 1–109 Date of Publication: 15 Sep.2009 © National University of Singapore A CLASSIFICATION OF LIVING AND FOSSIL GENERA OF DECAPOD CRUSTACEANS Sammy De Grave1, N. Dean Pentcheff 2, Shane T. Ahyong3, Tin-Yam Chan4, Keith A. Crandall5, Peter C. Dworschak6, Darryl L. Felder7, Rodney M. Feldmann8, Charles H. J. M. Fransen9, Laura Y. D. Goulding1, Rafael Lemaitre10, Martyn E. Y. Low11, Joel W. Martin2, Peter K. L. Ng11, Carrie E. Schweitzer12, S. H. Tan11, Dale Tshudy13, Regina Wetzer2 1Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PW, United Kingdom [email protected] [email protected] 2Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90007 United States of America [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 3Marine Biodiversity and Biosecurity, NIWA, Private Bag 14901, Kilbirnie Wellington, New Zealand [email protected] 4Institute of Marine Biology, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 20224, Taiwan, Republic of China [email protected] 5Department of Biology and Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602 United States of America [email protected] 6Dritte Zoologische Abteilung, Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien, Austria [email protected] 7Department of Biology, University of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA 70504 United States of America [email protected] 8Department of Geology, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242 United States of America [email protected] 9Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum, P. O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands [email protected] 10Invertebrate Zoology, Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, 10th and Constitution Avenue, Washington, DC 20560 United States of America [email protected] 11Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 12Department of Geology, Kent State University Stark Campus, 6000 Frank Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com10/11/2021 08:33:28AM Via Free Access 224 E
    Contributions to Zoology, 67 (4) 223-235 (1998) SPB Academic Publishing bv, Amsterdam Optics and phylogeny: is there an insight? The evolution of superposition eyes in the Decapoda (Crustacea) Edward Gaten Department of Biology, University’ ofLeicester, Leicester LEI 7RH, U.K. E-mail: [email protected] Keywords: Compound eyes, superposition optics, adaptation, evolution, decapod crustaceans, phylogeny Abstract cannot normally be predicted by external exami- nation alone, and usually microscopic investiga- This addresses the of structure and in paper use eye optics the tion of properly fixed optical elements is required construction of and crustacean phylogenies presents an hypoth- for a complete diagnosis. This largely rules out esis for the evolution of in the superposition eyes Decapoda, the use of fossil material in the based the of in comparatively on distribution eye types extant decapod fami- few lies. It that arthropodan specimens where the are is suggested reflecting superposition optics are eyes symplesiomorphic for the Decapoda, having evolved only preserved (Glaessner, 1969), although the optics once, probably in the Devonian. loss of Subsequent reflecting of some species of trilobite have been described has superposition optics occurred following the adoption of a (Clarkson & Levi-Setti, 1975). Also the require- new habitat (e.g. Aristeidae,Aeglidae) or by progenetic paedo- ment for good fixation and the fact that complete morphosis (Paguroidea, Eubrachyura). examination invariably involves the destruction of the specimen means that museum collections Introduction rarely reveal enough information to define the optics unequivocally. Where the optics of the The is one of the compound eye most complex component parts of the eye are under investiga- and remarkable not on of its fixation organs, only account tion, specialised to preserve the refrac- but also for the optical precision, diversity of tive properties must be used (Oaten, 1994).
    [Show full text]
  • THE LARVAL STAGES of HOMOLA BARBATA (FABRICIUS) (CRUSTACEA, DECAPODA, HOMOLIDAE) REARED in the Laboratoryl
    BIOLOGICAL RESULTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI DEEP-SEA EXPEDITIONS. 55. THE LARVAL STAGES OF HOMOLA BARBATA (FABRICIUS) (CRUSTACEA, DECAPODA, HOMOLIDAE) REARED IN THE LABORATORyl A. L. RICE British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road, London, S.W. 7, England AND ANTHONY J. PROVENZANO, JR. University of Miami, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences ABSTRACT Larvae yielded by a female collected off Yucatan were reared to the seventh, and final, zoeal stage at 20°C and 36.2%0 salinity. The larvae, the first complete series available of any species of the family, are described and illustrated. Comparison of the reared larvae with others attributed to the same species but captured in Mediterranean and South African waters confirmed the morphological differences which previously had led to sug- gestions of specific or subspecific separation of the parent populations. Examination of adult material failed to reveal positive evidence of specific status of the separated populations. The setation of the uropodal endopods in Homola appears in the third zoeal stage, earlier than for any other decapod known. Recent studies of larval forms tend to confirm the view that the Homolidae are related to the Raninidae and are close to the line of descent of the true crabs, and that the family is well separated from both the typical Anomura and the much more primitive Dromiidea. INTRODUCTION Homola barbata has been recorded in the eastern and western North Atlantic, in the Mediterranean, and in the South Atlantic near South Africa. Throughout its range (Fig. 1), H. barbata is the only recognized repre- sentative of the genus, except off the east coast of North America where a closely related species, H.
    [Show full text]
  • Microbiomes of Gall-Inducing Copepod Crustaceans from the Corals Stylophora Pistillata (Scleractinia) and Gorgonia Ventalina
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Microbiomes of gall-inducing copepod crustaceans from the corals Stylophora pistillata Received: 26 February 2018 Accepted: 18 July 2018 (Scleractinia) and Gorgonia Published: xx xx xxxx ventalina (Alcyonacea) Pavel V. Shelyakin1,2, Sofya K. Garushyants1,3, Mikhail A. Nikitin4, Sofya V. Mudrova5, Michael Berumen 5, Arjen G. C. L. Speksnijder6, Bert W. Hoeksema6, Diego Fontaneto7, Mikhail S. Gelfand1,3,4,8 & Viatcheslav N. Ivanenko 6,9 Corals harbor complex and diverse microbial communities that strongly impact host ftness and resistance to diseases, but these microbes themselves can be infuenced by stresses, like those caused by the presence of macroscopic symbionts. In addition to directly infuencing the host, symbionts may transmit pathogenic microbial communities. We analyzed two coral gall-forming copepod systems by using 16S rRNA gene metagenomic sequencing: (1) the sea fan Gorgonia ventalina with copepods of the genus Sphaerippe from the Caribbean and (2) the scleractinian coral Stylophora pistillata with copepods of the genus Spaniomolgus from the Saudi Arabian part of the Red Sea. We show that bacterial communities in these two systems were substantially diferent with Actinobacteria, Alphaproteobacteria, and Betaproteobacteria more prevalent in samples from Gorgonia ventalina, and Gammaproteobacteria in Stylophora pistillata. In Stylophora pistillata, normal coral microbiomes were enriched with the common coral symbiont Endozoicomonas and some unclassifed bacteria, while copepod and gall-tissue microbiomes were highly enriched with the family ME2 (Oceanospirillales) or Rhodobacteraceae. In Gorgonia ventalina, no bacterial group had signifcantly diferent prevalence in the normal coral tissues, copepods, and injured tissues. The total microbiome composition of polyps injured by copepods was diferent.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Classification of the Xanthoidea Sensu Lato
    Contributions to Zoology, 75 (1/2) 23-73 (2006) A new classifi cation of the Xanthoidea sensu lato (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura) based on phylogenetic analysis and traditional systematics and evaluation of all fossil Xanthoidea sensu lato Hiroaki Karasawa1, Carrie E. Schweitzer2 1Mizunami Fossil Museum, Yamanouchi, Akeyo, Mizunami, Gifu 509-6132, Japan, e-mail: GHA06103@nifty. com; 2Department of Geology, Kent State University Stark Campus, 6000 Frank Ave. NW, North Canton, Ohio 44720, USA, e-mail: [email protected] Key words: Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura, Xanthoidea, Portunidae, systematics, phylogeny Abstract Family Pilumnidae ............................................................. 47 Family Pseudorhombilidae ............................................... 49 A phylogenetic analysis was conducted including representatives Family Trapeziidae ............................................................. 49 from all recognized extant and extinct families of the Xanthoidea Family Xanthidae ............................................................... 50 sensu lato, resulting in one new family, Hypothalassiidae. Four Superfamily Xanthoidea incertae sedis ............................... 50 xanthoid families are elevated to superfamily status, resulting in Superfamily Eriphioidea ......................................................... 51 Carpilioidea, Pilumnoidoidea, Eriphioidea, Progeryonoidea, and Family Platyxanthidae ....................................................... 52 Goneplacoidea, and numerous subfamilies are elevated
    [Show full text]
  • On a Hitherto Unknown Phyllosoma Larval Species of the Slipper Lobster Scyllarus (Decapoda, Scyllaridae) in the Hawaiian Archipelago L
    Pacific Science (1977), vol. 31, no. 2 © 1977 by The University Press of Hawaii. All rights reserved On a Hitherto Unknown Phyllosoma Larval Species of the Slipper Lobster Scyllarus (Decapoda, Scyllaridae) in the Hawaiian Archipelago l MARTIN W. JOHNSON 2 IN A PREVIOUS ANALYSIS of plankton from thorax has a short spine situated at the 140 scattered oceanographic stations in the base of each of legs 1-4 (Figure 1-2). Coxal Hawaiian area, mainly around Oahu Island, and subexopodal spines (Figure I-I, sp.) are six scyllarid larval species were found (John­ present and the exopods of legs I, 2, and 3 son 1971). Five ofthese species were assigned are provided with 21, 21, and 19 pairs of respectively to Parribacus antarcticus (Lund); swimming setae, respectively; pleopods and Scyllarides squamosus (H. Milne Edwards); uropods are bilobed buds (Figure 1-3). The Arctides regalis Holthuis; Scyllarus timidus eyestalks are 2.4 mm long and the first Holthuis; and Scyllarus modestus Holthuis. antennae are about equal in length to the These five species comprise all of the then slender second antennae (Figure 1-4). Only known adult slipper lobsters of the Hawaiian very rudimentary second maxillae and first area. The sixth larval species, a Scyllarus, maxillipeds are present and the second maxi1­ could not be identified specifically and lipeds bear no exopod buds (Figure 1-5). appears to represent an unknown adult species of that genus inhabiting the area. It is of interest to report here yet another unknown larva ofScyllarus that was probably Scyllarus sp. phyllosoma. Length 30.1 mm, produced in this relatively isolated oceanic final fully gilled stage (Figure 2-6).
    [Show full text]
  • The Crustacea Decapoda (Brachyura and Anomura) of Eniwetok Atoll, Marshall Islands, with Special Reference to the Obligate Commensals of Branching Corals 1
    The Crustacea Decapoda (Brachyura and Anomura) of Eniwetok Atoll, Marshall Islands, with special reference to the obligate commensals of branching corals 1 John S. GARTH Allan Hancock Foundation Univer5ity of Southern California 2 and Eniwetok Ma rine Biological Laboratory Introduction The brachyuran decapod crustaceans of the Marsh all Islands have been reviewed by Balss (1938) and by Miyake (1938, 1939). These reports stem from the German and Jap anese occupations, respect ively, the former being the result of the Pacific Exp edition of Dr. Sixten Bock, 1917-1918, the latter th e result of the Micronesia Expedition of Prof. Te iso Esaki, 1937-1938. According to Fosberg (1956, p. 1), J aluit Atoll was the headquarters of both the German and the Japan ese administrations, a fact that accounts for the preponderanc e of record s from the southern Marshall Isl ands. Additional coverage of the southern Marsh alls was provided by the 1950 Arno Atoll Expedition of the Coral Atoll Program of the Pa cific Science Board, the decapod crustaceans collected by Dr. R. W. Hiatt having been reported by Holthuis (1953). Carcinologically speak­ ing, the northern Marshalls ar e less well known, collections having been made only at Likieb Atoll by both Dr. Bock and Prof. Esaki and at Kwajalein Atoll by Prof . Esaki alone. Except for the shrimps, reported by Chace (1955), the extensive collections made in connection with Operation Crossroads in 1946- 1947, which includ ed Bikini, Rongelap, Rongerik, and Eniwetok atolls (Fosberg, 1956, p. 4), are at the U.S. Nationa l Museum awaiting stud y.
    [Show full text]
  • The Crabs from Mayotte Island (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura)
    THE CRABS FROM MAYOTTE ISLAND (CRUSTACEA, DECAPODA, BRACHYURA) Joseph Poupin, Régis Cleva, Jean-Marie Bouchard, Vincent Dinhut, and Jacques Dumas Atoll Research Bulletin No. 617 1 May 2018 Washington, D.C. All statements made in papers published in the Atoll Research Bulletin are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Smithsonian Institution or of the editors of the bulletin. Articles submitted for publication in the Atoll Research Bulletin should be original papers and must be made available by authors for open access publication. Manuscripts should be consistent with the “Author Formatting Guidelines for Publication in the Atoll Research Bulletin.” All submissions to the bulletin are peer reviewed and, after revision, are evaluated prior to acceptance and publication through the publisher’s open access portal, Open SI (http://opensi.si.edu). Published by SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION SCHOLARLY PRESS P.O. Box 37012, MRC 957 Washington, D.C. 20013-7012 https://scholarlypress.si.edu/ The rights to all text and images in this publication are owned either by the contributing authors or by third parties. Fair use of materials is permitted for personal, educational, or noncommercial purposes. Users must cite author and source of content, must not alter or modify the content, and must comply with all other terms or restrictions that may be applicable. Users are responsible for securing permission from a rights holder for any other use. ISSN: 0077-5630 (online) This work is dedicated to our friend Alain Crosnier, great contributor for crab sampling in Mayotte region between 1958-1971 and author of several important taxonomic contributions in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Crustacea: Decapoda: Gnathophyllidae)
    Memoirs of Museum Victoria 60(2): 237-242 (2003) ISSN 1447-2546 (Print) 1447-2554 (On-line) http://www.museum.vic.gov.au/memoirs Gnathophyllum taylori, a new species of caridean shrimp from south-eastern Australia (Crustacea: Decapoda: Gnathophyllidae) S h a n e T. Ah y o n g Department of Marine Invertebrates, Australian Museum, 6 College St, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia (shanea@ austmus.gov.au) A b stra c t Ahyong, S. T. 2003. Gnathophyllum taylori, a new species of caridean shrimp from south-eastern Australia (Crustacea: Decapoda: Gnathophyllidae). Memoirs o f Museum Victoria 60(2): 237-242. Anew species of caridean shrimp, Gnathophyllum taylori sp.nov., is described from south-eastern Australia. The new species most closely resembles two Atlantic species, G. modestum Hay, 1917, and G. elegans Risso, 1816, but is readily distinguished by its banded rather than spotted body colour pattern. Gnathophyllum taylori is the third Indo-West Pacific species to be recognised. It differs from G. americanum, with which it can be sympatric, by having fewer and narrower dark bands on the body as well as by the rostral dentition, morphology of the orbit and dactyli of the walking legs. The identity of G. fasciolatum Stimpson, 1860, a junior synonym of G. americanum, is fixed by neotype selection. K eyw ords Crustacea, Decapoda, Caridea, Gnathophyllum taylori, new species Introduction Gnathophyllum taylori sp. nov. The most recent treatment of the caridean genus Figures 1-2 Gnathophyllum Latreille, 1819, recognised eight species Gnathophyllum americanum.—Healy and Yaldwyn, 1970: 46, fig. worldwide with two in the Indo-West Pacific - G.
    [Show full text]
  • New Records of Marine Ornamental Shrimps (Decapoda: Stenopodidea and Caridea) from the Gulf of Mannar, Tamil Nadu, India
    12 6 2010 the journal of biodiversity data 7 December 2016 Check List NOTES ON GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION Check List 12(6): 2010, 7 December 2016 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15560/12.6.2010 ISSN 1809-127X © 2016 Check List and Authors New records of marine ornamental shrimps (Decapoda: Stenopodidea and Caridea) from the Gulf of Mannar, Tamil Nadu, India Sanjeevi Prakash1, 3, Thipramalai Thangappan Ajith Kumar2* and Thanumalaya Subramoniam1 1 Centre for Climate Change Studies, Sathyabama University, Jeppiaar Nagar, Rajiv Gandhi Salai, Chennai - 600119, Tamil Nadu, India 2 ICAR - National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources, Canal Ring Road, Dilkusha Post, Lucknow - 226002, Uttar Pradesh, India 3 Current address: Department of Biological Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA * Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Marine ornamental shrimps found in from coral reefs have greatly affected their diversity and tropical coral reef waters are widely recognized for the distribution (Wabnitz et al. 2003). aquarium trade. Our survey of ornamental shrimps in Among all the ornamental shrimps, Stenopus the Gulf of Mannar, Tamil Nadu (India) has found three spp. and Lysmata spp. are the most attractive and species, which we identify as Stenopus hispidus Olivier, extensively traded organisms in the marine aquarium 1811, Lysmata debelius Bruce, 1983, and L. amboinensis industry (Calado 2008). Interestingly, these shrimps are De Man, 1888, based on morphology and color pattern. associates of fishes, in particular, the groupers and giant These shrimps are recorded for the first time in Gulf of moray eels (Gymnothorax spp.). These shrimps display a Mannar, Tamil Nadu.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of New Zealand Decapoda (Arthropoda: Crustacea)
    Tuhinga 22: 171–272 Copyright © Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa (2011) Annotated checklist of New Zealand Decapoda (Arthropoda: Crustacea) John C. Yaldwyn† and W. Richard Webber* † Research Associate, Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa. Deceased October 2005 * Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, PO Box 467, Wellington, New Zealand ([email protected]) (Manuscript completed for publication by second author) ABSTRACT: A checklist of the Recent Decapoda (shrimps, prawns, lobsters, crayfish and crabs) of the New Zealand region is given. It includes 488 named species in 90 families, with 153 (31%) of the species considered endemic. References to New Zealand records and other significant references are given for all species previously recorded from New Zealand. The location of New Zealand material is given for a number of species first recorded in the New Zealand Inventory of Biodiversity but with no further data. Information on geographical distribution, habitat range and, in some cases, depth range and colour are given for each species. KEYWORDS: Decapoda, New Zealand, checklist, annotated checklist, shrimp, prawn, lobster, crab. Contents Introduction Methods Checklist of New Zealand Decapoda Suborder DENDROBRANCHIATA Bate, 1888 ..................................... 178 Superfamily PENAEOIDEA Rafinesque, 1815.............................. 178 Family ARISTEIDAE Wood-Mason & Alcock, 1891..................... 178 Family BENTHESICYMIDAE Wood-Mason & Alcock, 1891 .......... 180 Family PENAEIDAE Rafinesque, 1815 ..................................
    [Show full text]
  • Genus Panopeus H. Milne Edwards, 1834 Key to Species [Based on Rathbun, 1930, and Williams, 1983] 1
    610 Family Xanthidae Genus Panopeus H. Milne Edwards, 1834 Key to species [Based on Rathbun, 1930, and Williams, 1983] 1. Dark color of immovable finger continued more or less on palm, especially in males. 2 Dark color of immovable finger not continued on palm 7 2. (1) Outer edge of fourth lateral tooth longitudinal or nearly so. P. americanus Outer edge of fourth lateral tooth arcuate 3 3. (2) Edge of front thick, beveled, and with transverse groove P. bermudensis Edge of front if thick not transversely grooved 4 4. (3) Major chela with cusps of teeth on immovable finger not reaching above imaginary straight line drawn between tip and angle at juncture of finger with anterior margin of palm (= length immovable finger) 5 Major chela with cusps of teeth near midlength of immovable finger reaching above imaginary straight line drawn between tip and angle at juncture of finger with anterior margin of palm (= length immovable finger) 6 5. (4) Coalesced anterolateral teeth 1-2 separated by shallow rounded notch, 2 broader than but not so prominent as 1; 4 curved forward as much as 3; 5 much smaller than 4, acute and hooked forward; palm with distance between crest at base of movable finger and tip of cusp lateral to base of dactylus 0.7 or less length of immovable finger P. herbstii Coalesced anterolateral teeth 1-2 separated by deep rounded notch, adjacent slopes of 1 and 2 about equal, 2 nearly as prominent as 1; 4 not curved forward as much as 3; 5 much smaller than 4, usually projecting straight anterolaterally, sometimes slightly hooked; distance between crest of palm and tip of cusp lateral to base of movable finger 0.8 or more length of immovable finger P.
    [Show full text]