Saturday 19 December,ConsultationPublic 2020 from Saturday 7 November to

KIDMORE END PARISH COUNCIL

Neighbourhood Development Plan CANE END · CHALKHOUSE GREEN · · · Pre-Submission Public Consultation: Plan Summary 2 KIDMORE END NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN Pre-Submission Public Consultation: Plan Summary

Thank you for your interest in our Neighbourhood Development Introduction Plan (NDP). This consultation marks a significant milestone in the development of our neighbourhood plan: it is an important opportunity for you to read This isis ourour thirdthird community community the first full draft of the Kidmore End Neighbourhood Development engagement eventevent and and our our Plan (KENDP) and provide your input before it goes to an independent most importantimportant consultation. consultation. examiner. The previous eventstwo events were in As a reminder, the KENDP enables local people to help shape devel- personwere in but,person due but,to Covid-19 due to opment, meet local needs and conserve what is cherished in the parish. It carries legal weight through local policies which are specific restrictions,restrictions thisassociated community with to the needs of our parish and which will be used to help determine consultationCovid-19, this is communitytaking place the outcome of future planning applications. consultationonline, in line iswith taking guidelines place SODC, like all councils, has been given a directive by central govern- fromonline, government in line with and guidelines South ment to build more houses. Even though there are no expectations fromOxfordshire government District and Council South for specific housing growth in Kidmore End Parish, planning applica- tions continue to be made and organic growth is expected to continue Oxfordshire(SODC). District Council across the parish. The KENDP will help to ensure that: Image:(SODC). Steven Plows, Flickr NN All planning applications are considered in the context of the KENDP and the requirements set out in its Policies NN These Policies are shaped by input from the residents of our parish NN Development is located in the most sustainable locations and meets Public Consultation from future needs Community input has shaped each element of the draft KENDP so Saturday 7 November to far, and we are now asking all members of the community to read, understand and give feedback on the full draft document to ensure it Saturday 19 December, 2020 continues to reflect community views. KIDMORE END NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN 3 Pre-Submission Public Consultation: Plan Summary

South Oxfordshire Local Plan The SODC Local Plan is expected to be fully ratified by December 2020. Gathering community feedback now will ensure that final changes – requested by the community and required by the Local Plan – can be made to the draft KENDP so that it can be submitted for independent inspection in early 2021. KIDMORE END NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN 4 Pre-Submission Public Consultation: Plan Summary

Map 1: Kidmore End parish boundary and KENDP area This map shows the KENDP Area which conforms with the parish boundary except for a small piece of land that forms part of Maiden Erleigh Chiltern Edge School and which is included in ’s NDP. KIDMORE END NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN 5 Pre-Submission Public Consultation: Plan Summary

The purpose of this consultation First community event and consultation is to share the full content of The first community event took place in February 2018 and was the draft KENDP with the followed in May 2018 by the Household Survey which went out community. to all houses in the parish. When you have read this Second community event and consultation document, please A further event was held in September 2019 to provide an update on the provide your feedback NDP and communicate the proposed objectives and policies, and also by completing our short the proposed approach to housing allocation. survey online at: Feedback gathered in September 2019 via a survey in conjunction with www.kepc.info/ndp/ our last event indicated: consultation2020 NN Strong support for the approach taken with the KENDP NN Strong support for the vision, objectives and suite of policies NN Strong support to include an allocated site in the KENDP NN Strong support for the proposed small site being in Tokers Green Lane, Kidmore End and comprising three to four houses

Third (final) community consultation This is the last chance for residents, landowners and stakeholders to provide feedback on the content of the draft KENDP before it goes to The purpose of this independent examination ahead of the community referendum. public consultation This document provides a summary of the key aspects of the draft KENDP. The full version of the draft KENDP along with all the associated appendices and report can be found on the parish website: www.kepc.info/ndp/consultation2020 KIDMORE END NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN 6 Pre-Submission Public Consultation: Plan Summary

A lot has happened over the last Our NDP is complex three years. We are now entering Changing housing targets are illustrative of the challenges the the final stages of the KENDP. Steering Group have faced in developing the NDP. Independent experts contracted to provide advice and guidance on the creation If all goes well we hope for of the KENDP have testified to the complexity of the task due to: the community to be invited NN There being five separate villages to vote at referendum for the NN The boundary with Reading final KENDP in early 2021. NN The parish being mostly within the Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) NN The changes to the Emerging Local Plan 2035 NN The Oxfordshire Growth Deal NN Continued risk of speculative development/unplanned growth

The Steering Group has gathered a lot of evidence and commissioned independent experts to conduct research, carry out assessments and write reports. These reports are referenced later in this document and can all be found on the parish website (www.kepc.info/ndp/consultation2020)

KENDP process and timeframes KIDMORE END NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN 7 Pre-Submission Public Consultation: Plan Summary

Support ra<fica

SODC independent examina6on

2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Sept Dec Mar June Sept Dec Mar June Sept Dec Mar June Sept Dec May

Phase 1: NDP Set up and ini6al community Phase 2: Evidence gathering engagement with support from Phase 3: Summary of independent experts evidence and engagement Phase 4: Wri6ng the NDP and gaining ra6fica6on with the community on Ini6al community current recommenda6ons Write the draE NDP in full engagement and Call for Sites Process and Pre-submission consulta6on: Regula6on 14 Today ques6onnaire associated reports Community event and led ac6vity Submission consulta6on: Regula6on 16 survey Independent Examina6on Household Survey

KENDP Steering Group Group Steering KENDP Landscape Sensi6vity Study Local community referendum to accept / reject

Plan Made! KIDMORE END NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN 8 Pre-Submission Public Consultation: Plan Summary Today Today

Independent Parish Council SODC SODC Examiner SODC

Provide ini

(6 weeks) (6 weeks) Referendum 2019 2020 2021 Sept Jan Aug Oct Dec May

Community Finalise vision, Write NDP: Pre-submission: Submission If majority vote yes, feedback: objec

KENDP Steering Group led ac6vity KIDMORE END NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN 9 Pre-Submission Public Consultation: Plan Summary

By its very nature, a Why is the KENDP being created? neighbourhood development NN The purpose of the KENDP is to protect the five villages in the parish plan (NDP) is a long and from unsuitable development and to ensure the development that detailed document. occurs in the parish over the next 15 years corresponds with community needs. The following summary NN Work started on the KENDP three years ago, and it has never been provides the highlights more important: we face multiple threats of large developments along of the draft Kidmore the parish boundary with Reading as well as potential for out of charac- ter development within our villages. End Neighbourhood Development Plan (KENDP). What are the key points in the KENDP? Image: Dean Hutchinson, Flickr NN The KENDP has been built on robust evidence: from the community as well as from independent experts and advisors. NN A community questionnaire and two surveys have indicated that the community places great importance on conserving and enhancing the rural environment and character of the parish. These priorities are reflected in the KENDP Vision. NN KENDP Objectives have been written, describing what we want the KENDP to achieve. These six objectives support the KENDP Vision. NN Draft policies have now been written. These reflect our local require- ments and are aligned to the KENDP Vision and Objectives. The KENDP Overview of our policies will form part of the evidence base for planning inspectors to either support or reject planning applications. Neighbourhood Plan NN The KENDP should demonstrate a positive approach to planning. The KENDP includes the proposal to allocate a small site in Kidmore End village with 3 to 4 houses. This proposal was published at the last com- munity event in September 2019. KIDMORE END NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN 10 Pre-Submission Public Consultation: Plan Summary

What stage are we now at? NN The KENDP is now at pre-submission consultation phase. This is a compulsory stage in the creation of NDPs (referred to as Regulation 14), and means that we need to ask residents, landowners and stakeholders for feedback on all aspects of the draft KENDP. NN All feedback at this pre-submission phase will be logged, given due consideration, and used by the Steering Group to inform appropriate amendments to the KENDP. NN Following ratification of the SODC Local Plan, the draft KENDP will also be updated with correct references to any new/amended policies. The Steering Group has been keeping abreast of changes to the SODC Local Plan and we expect any changes to the draft KENDP to be minor. NN Once the updates are made, the KENDP will be submitted to SODC for wider consultation and, following any further amendments, will be assessed by an independent examiner. Once the examiner is satisfied, the KENDP will be put to the community for a final time at referendum. KIDMORE END NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN 11 Pre-Submission Public Consultation: Plan Summary

Neighbourhood The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) Development Plans Sets out the government’s planning policies and their application. Enable local communities to influence the nature of Oxfordshire Plan 2050 (op2050) housing development in Government funding has been provided to support the delivery of their area by reflecting local 100,000 new homes (the Oxfordshire Growth Deal). The op2050 is being developed to set out how to deliver that by 2050. needs as well as supporting the achievement of the Local Plans broader county vision. Created by each district within Oxfordshire to provide a vision and Once in place, the NDP objectives for housing development as well as economic, social and carries legal weight environmental priorities within South Oxfordshire. regardless of whether or not Note: The SODC Local Plan is expected to be ratified in December 2020. In the interest of future proofing the KENDP, the Steering Group intend the Local Plan and OP2050 to wait for confirmation of the Local Plan policies before submitting have been ratified. the KENDP to SODC for wider consultation followed by independent examination.

How does our NDP fit with local and government housing plans?

= not yet approved KIDMORE END NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN 12 Pre-Submission Public Consultation: Plan Summary

Housing growth targets Start of the KENDP process, growth target, provide important context for September 2017: 6 to 13 additional dwellings an NDP as they determine in Kidmore End how many houses are NN In September 2017, the South Oxfordshire Emerging Local Plan stated required to be planned for that 5% to 10% extra housing was expected within ‘Smaller Villages’ by 2033. At this time, the Emerging Local Plan included Kidmore End to 2035. as the only designated ‘smaller village’ in the parish, with Gallowstree Housing targets for the Common downgraded to ‘other’. Accordingly, SODC advised that the KENDP have changed a primary location for development was Kidmore End village, with 5–10% growth in the village based on approximate housing numbers in 2017 few times since we began amounting to 6–13 dwellings. the process. Growth target, November 2018: 26 to 52 additional dwellings in the parish NN The requirement was clarified by SODC as being 5% to 10% growth (based on the 2011 census) across the KENDP designated area, not just in Kidmore End village. This meant a requirement of 26–52 additional dwellings. Further advice stated that all dwellings that had been either completed or committed to in the parish between 2011 and 2033 would count towards the growth target. 31 additional dwellings were built or had planning approved across the parish between 2011 and 2018, Housing growth targets meaning that the minimum growth target had already been met. KIDMORE END NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN 13 Pre-Submission Public Consultation: Plan Summary

Growth target, January 2019: zero new dwellings NN When the South Oxfordshire Emerging Local Plan was updated in January 2019 the requirement for smaller villages to deliver 5–10% growth was removed. The removal of this requirement means that the parish is able to decide what level of growth is appropriate to include in the KENDP, based on levels of growth across the different villages in the parish, the information received through the household survey and the capacity of local infrastructure.

Growth target, December 2020: zero new dwellings NN The SODC Local Plan is expected to be ratified in December 2020. We don’t expect there to be any changes to the zero growth target for Kidmore End Parish. Despite the current zero growth target stipulated by SODC, contin- ued growth is expected in the parish. The role of the KENDP is to ensure that future growth fulfils parish needs and is appropriate and proportionate.

KIDMORE END NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN 14 Pre-Submission Public Consultation: Plan Summary

Over the last 10 years, organic In addition to new dwellings, many of the bungalows and smaller growth in Kidmore End Parish houses in the villages have been extended, resulting in a considerable change in housing stock across the parish. The cost of housing in the has led to 34 additional area has increased considerably resulting in a significant reduction in dwellings (either built or with home affordability. planning approved). Growth by Village This represents an increase of just over 6%. The majority of growth has taken place in Gallowstree Common (+14 houses), Cane End (+11 houses) and Tokers Green (+8 houses). Planning applications throughout the parish continue to be submitted and, if recent trends continue, future organic growth is expected on infill land. The SODC Local Plan, due to be ratified in December 2020, states that growth through infill is expected in ‘smaller’ villages (i.e. Kidmore End) and ‘other’ villages (i.e. Gallowstree Common and Tokers Green). It considers Cane End and Chalkhouse Green as open countryside,

where there is no expectation for infill.

Housing growth in Kidmore End Parish, 2011 to 2020 KIDMORE END NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN 15 Pre-Submission Public Consultation: Plan Summary

The Household Survey was The responses indicated that: undertaken in May 2018, at a time NN There is a perceived need for smaller and less expensive houses in when growth targets had been the parish (e.g. three bedroom semi-detached houses or bungalows). applied to the parish. NN The strong preference was to limit development to between one and four dwellings per site. 550 responses were received NN Residents expressed a preference for semi-detached or detached with good representation houses or bungalows achieved across villages and NN The majority of respondents felt there was scope for housing age groups. development within Kidmore End village NN Approximately half of respondents thought there was also a need for more houses in the other villages NN The majority of respondents felt that it was very important to con- sider housing design, build quality, impact on neighbours, road safety, access and off-street parking as part of the planning process.

Community feedback from the Household Survey was used to create the KENDP Vision, Objectives and suite of Policies. The full results of the Household Survey are available on the parish council website. The Household Survey has shaped the direction of the KENDP KIDMORE END NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN 16 Pre-Submission Public Consultation: Plan Summary

A ‘Call for Sites’ is a process by In the context of housing growth targets, the KENDP Call for Sites Process was initiated on 14 May, 2018 with the invitation for any which landowners and their resident, landowner, business, developer or agent to submit a site agents can put forward land for or sites for consideration. potential future development. Thirteen sites were put forward. In addition, sites from the South It can then potentially Oxfordshire Housing and Land Availability Assessment (HELAA) conducted in March 2017 and the South Oxfordshire Strategic Housing become part of allocated and Land Availability Assessment (SHELAA) conducted in October 2017 development within the were added, resulting in twenty-one sites being put forward for assess- Neighbourhood Plan. ment by independent consultants AECOM. AECOM’s Site Options and Assessment Report 2018, updated 2019 The purpose of the report was to provide a clear independent assessment of the twenty one sites to identify which site/s might be appropriate for allocation in the KENDP. Nine were discounted due to their lack of conformity with relevant national and local policies on development. Twelve sites in the parish were assessed in detail.

Red ratings Eight sites were given red ratings, meaning they are not currently Call for Sites Process suitable for allocation.

Amber ratings Three were given amber ratings, meaning they are potentially suitable for allocation subject to the resolution or mitigation of medium scale constraints. KIDMORE END NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN 17 Pre-Submission Public Consultation: Plan Summary

Green ratings One site was given a green rating, meaning it is considered broadly suitable for allocation subject to the mitigation or resolution of minor constraints.

Potential Growth identified by the Call for Sites process NN 207 potential new homes could be built on sites rated either amber or green NN 195 of these would lie within a single site on the edge of Reading away from the core settlements of the parish and far exceed the housing target required in the October 2017 version of the SODC Emerging Local Plan and any subsequent updates. NN 12 potential new homes were put forward on three sites within or adjoining Kidmore End Village.

The full AECOM report is available on the parish website. KIDMORE END NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN 18 Pre-Submission Public Consultation: Plan Summary

Sites assessed for the Kidmore End NDP KIDMORE END NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN 19 Pre-Submission Public Consultation: Plan Summary

Site List and Assessment

Green Rating Failed initial desktop review CFS8 Land on north side of Mill Lane, Kidmore End CFS2/834 Land North of Gravel Hill, Emmer Green CFS5 Land at Kidmore End Road, Emmer Green Amber Rating CFS7 Land North of Bardolph’s Wood, Tokers Green Lane CFS4 Land at Old Farmyard, Kidmore End CFS11 Land between Tanners Lane and Kidmore End Road CFS6 Land at Trees, Wood Land, Kidmore End (site withdrawn) CFS12 Land North of Tanners Farm CFS10 Land off Coopers Pightle, Kidmore End HSH181 Cemetery, Kidmore End HSH1056 Palmers Riding Stable, Emmer Green HSH834 Land North of Gravel Hill, Emmer Green Red Rating HSH894 Land East of Kidmore End Road, Emmer Green CFS1 Land West of Chambers Copse, Kidmore End Road HSH970 Land South of A4074, Cane End. CFS3 Land at Oldfield House, Gallowstree Common HSH1017 Land East of Golf Course, Chazey Heath CFS9 Land South of Horsepond Road, Gallowstree Common

HSH69 Land at Dysons Wood, Dysons Wood, Tokers Green HSH71 Land at Reading Golf Club HSH80 Land North of Horsepond Road, Gallowstree Common CFS: sites identified through the Call for Sites process HSH: sites identified through the HELAA/SHELAA 1269 Land East of Tokers Green Lane KIDMORE END NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN 20 Pre-Submission Public Consultation: Plan Summary

Despite the removal of a formal Neighbourhood development plans are used to specify the conditions for planned and organic growth and, once the KENDP is ratified, it will housing growth target, planning be used to assess all planning applications. applications continue to be The KENDP seeks to strike a balance between demonstrating a submitted across the parish. positive approach to growth (as required for ratification) and preserv- There continues to be a risk ing the rurality of our parish by protecting it from inappropriate and uncharacteristic development. of large scale speculative development on the parish At the September 2019 community event, the Steering Group commu- nicated its proposal to include a small, allocated site in the KENDP. boundary with Reading, as evidenced by the The rationale for this recommendation submission of proposed NN Protection against speculative development If the KENDP demon- sites with a combined strates a positive and proactive approach to planning it will be better capacity for 207 new homes. protected against speculative development if SODC don’t meet their five year land supply targets. A positive approach to planning is encouraged in the SODC emerging Local Plan. NN Household survey: Indicated an appetite for a small amount of growth in the form of a small development. NN Green site identified through call for sites process: one ‘green’ site was identified in Kidmore End as a result of AECOM’s independent assessment. This means it has been assessed as suitable, available Housing Allocation and achievable for housing development. KIDMORE END NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN 21 Pre-Submission Public Consultation: Plan Summary

AECOM’s assessment resulted A second site (referenced as cfs10, land off Coopers Pightle, Kidmore End), previously rated ‘red’, was re-assessed as ‘amber’ by the Steering in one ‘green’ rated site in the Group in 2019 following additional information from the landowner, parish (referenced as CFS8, and, following a second independent assessment, as ‘amber’ by land on north side of Mill AECOM in September 2020. Lane, Kidmore End). The Steering Group’s proposal is to include one allocated site in Note: allocated sites in an NDP are the KENDP; the one ‘green’ rated site, cfs8, from AECOM’s site still subject to the normal planning assessment. As it is probable, although not definite, that a planning approval process. The size of the application would be approved on a green rated site, the Steering plot/area has not been agreed, and Group see benefits in working with the landowner to ensure that the the red line is an indication of site planning application is in line with KENDP policies and community location only needs. Information and evidence gathered to date indicates that a small, allocated development of 3 to 4 dwellings in the village of Kidmore End would be beneficial to the community and demonstrates a posi- tive approach to sustainable development as required by national and local policy. The proposal is for the allocation of a small site on Tokers Green Lane, Kidmore End, limited to 3 to 4 dwellings.

Proposed Allocated Site KIDMORE END NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN 22 Pre-Submission Public Consultation: Plan Summary

The KENDP vision was written KENDP Vision for 2035 following the Household Survey in 2018. Preserve the rural character and retain the open spaces in It has remained consistent and around the parish through appropriate housing develop- ment and by being geographically separate from nearby larger since then and reflects the settlements, supporting and enhancing the Chilterns AONB, key aims of the KENDP. engaging with our parish communities, and prioritising road safety.

KENDP Objectives In response to the Household Survey in 2018, five policy objectives were drafted for the KENDP. After the household survey was completed, the issue of climate change became more urgent and, following the com- munity event in September 2019, an additional objective was added.

The KENDP Objectives relate to: NN Local Character NN Housing Development NN Landscape NN Local Travel and Safety KENDP Vision NN Environment and Sustainability NN Community Spirit and Objectives All future planning will be underpinned by this Vision Statement and Objectives. Together with the more detailed policies they reflect what the community holds dear and wants to protect, preserve and enhance, both now and in the future. KIDMORE END NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN 23 Pre-Submission Public Consultation: Plan Summary

KENDP Vision for 2035 Preserve the rural character and retain the open spaces in and around the Parish through appropriate housing development and by being geographically separate from nearby larger settlements, supporting and enhancing the Chilterns AONB, engaging with our Parish communities, and prioritising road safety.

a) Protect, maintain and where possible enhance existing open space between and around our villages and hamlets, with particular emphasis on retaining space between our Parish and nearby larger urban / suburban developments, and Local Character b) Promote and support local design principles and encourage setting-sensitive, environmentally friendly development with a view to enhancing and complementing what exists.

Enable suitable residential development that meets any needs of our Parish and is in accordance with South Oxfordshire’s Local Plan, Housing Development recognising and reflecting the distinct character of each of our villages and hamlets, enriching our communities with new residents to our Parish as well as facilitating those who wish to remain.

Conserve and enhance the AONB-designated land within our Parish and its setting. Protect the valued landscape in the south of the Parish Landscape .. and essential gap between Tokers Green and Caversham.

Uphold the current network of roads, lanes and footpaths, which reflect the rural nature of our Parish, for all users (by car, bike, horse or foot) Local Travel and Safety and promote road safety, appropriate traffic quantity, size and speed, road maintenance and considerate parking on narrow lanes and roads.

Environment and Encourage sustainability by considering the current and future effects of climate change and provisioning for energy efficiency and Sustainability carbon offset as well as promoting renewable energy in new and modified dwellings.

Engage with the Parish’s communities at all stages in the development and implementation of the NDP to ensure the Plan meets their Community Spirit different needs and expectations, thus maintaining a strong sense of community. This is not a land use objective, however, it is an intrinsic part of our NDP.

KENDP Vision and Objectives The KENPD Objectives support the KENDP Vision for 2035 KIDMORE END NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN 24 Pre-Submission Public Consultation: Plan Summary

Policies are the centrepiece of the Government guidelines Kidmore End Neighbourhood In writing the KENDP policies the Steering Group has adhered to Development Plan. They: the following government guidelines for policy writing: 1) set out requirements NN Demonstrate a positive approach to future development in advance for planning NN Align policies to delivering the KENDP Vision and Objectives applications NN Support with robust evidence including community feedback NN Avoid duplication with SODC Local Plan policies 2) inform and guide NN Ensure policies are clear, relevant and deliverable decisions on planning applications. Visual and Spatial Character Appendices 3) provide local context A key area of complexity for our NDP is the fact that our parish is so that individual planning made up of five distinct villages. The Local Character policies are supplemented by five Village Character appendices which provide applications aren’t assessed details on the characteristics of each village, as well as a Green Spaces in isolation report which highlights valued green spaces across the parish. These appendices are an integral part of the Local Character policies.

Our Neighbourhood Development Plan Policies KIDMORE END NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN 25 Pre-Submission Public Consultation: Plan Summary

KENDP Objectives KENDP Policies Visual & Spatial Character Appendices: 1.1 Infill (LCI) 1. Cane End 2. Chalkhouse Green 1. Local Character 1.2 Quiet Lanes (LCQL) 3. Gallowstree Common 1.3 Design Principles (LCDP) 4. Kidmore End 5. Tokers Green 6. Green Spaces 2. Housing 2.1 Housing Allocation (HDA) Development N.B. The Visual and Spatial Character Appendices support the Local Character 3.1 Chilterns AONB and its Setting (LPCS) Policies by providing addi- tional information on the 3. Landscape 3.1 Local Gap (LPLG) specific character of each village 3.1 Local Valued Landscape (LPLV) 4.1 Safety for All Road Users (LTSRU) 4. Local Travel 4.2 Preservation of Footpaths, Bridleways and Tracks (LTPFBT) and Safety 4.3 Safe Access and Parking (LTSAP)

5. Environment Included within relevant policies (LCDP, HDA, LTPFBT) and Sustainability

6. Community Spirit Underpins all policies KIDMORE END NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN 26 Pre-Submission Public Consultation: Plan Summary

The Policy section of the KENDP Our NDP Policies are aligned with will be used to guide planning the Plan’s Objectives decisions. This is the most important part of the KENDP Objectives KENDP Policies document, however, due to 1.1 Infill (LCI) its technical nature it is long 1. Local Character 1.2 Quiet Lanes (LCQL) and detailed. 1.3 Design Principles (LCDP) 2. Housing The next few pages 2.1 Housing Allocation (HDA) Development provide an overview of the background information 3.1 Chilterns AONB and its Setting (LPCS) 3. Landscape supporting each policy 3.1 Local Gap (LPLG) 3.1 Local Valued Landscape (LPLV) as well as the policies 4.1 Safety for All Road Users (LTSRU) 4. Local Travel themselves which are 4.2 Preservation of Footpaths, Bridleways and Tracks (LTPFBT) and Safety shown in pink boxes. 4.3 Safe Access and Parking (LTSAP)

Image credit: Clive Ormonde 5. Environment Included within relevant policies (LCDP, HDA, LTPFBT) and Sustainability

The Policies within 6. Community Spirit Underpins all policies our Neighbourhood Development Plan KIDMORE END NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN 27 Pre-Submission Public Consultation: Plan Summary

Supplementary to these three Local Character Policies are six appendi- 1 Local Character Policies ces recording details of the visual and spatial character specific to each individual settlement; namely Cane End, Chalkhouse Green, Gallowstree In Kidmore End Parish, the Steering Committee have concluded that in Common, Kidmore End and Tokers Green; as well as a Green Spaces order to conserve the rural feel and character of the overall parish as appendix recording valued green spaces within the five settlements that well as the identity of each individual settlement within the NDP desig- make a significant contribution to local character. nated area, the following three character based considerations should drive the Local Character policies: These appendices are integral to the Local Character Policies and development proposals should have regard to these appendices when Visual and Spatial Character of each settlement designing and situating developments, (whether new builds, extensions This seeks to conserve the characteristic and treasured spatial arrange- or alterations to existing buildings), in order to show that efforts have ment and appearance of the settlements. This enables limited suitable been made to best reflect the local character of the relevant settlement infill development, where supported by Local and National policies. and enhancing, rather than diminishing it. This is supported by the Local Character Infill Policy (LCI).

Visual and Spatial Character of the separation between each 1.1 Infill Policy (LCI) settlement within the boundaries of the NDP area Infill development is identified as development on a site This addresses the open countryside between each settlement and the that is: preservation of the quiet lane qualities of the linking roads. • within the built-up area of a settlement and is well-connected to the This is supported by the Local Character Quiet Lanes Policy (LCQL). current built form of that settlement • not separated from the built-up area by farmland, paddock land, large Building design and its contribution to local character gardens or other land with an open and undeveloped character This addresses how new buildings or extensions might look and ways Infill development proposals will be supported where: in which they should contribute to existing character rather than dilute 1. they show clearly how the scale, mass, density, layout and design of the or diminish it. site fits in with the character of the immediate area and wider context within the village This is supported by the Local Character Design Principles Policy (LCDP). 2. they show clearly how existing settlement character as detailed in Appendix D is conserved 3. they address and mitigate long and short term impact on the amenities of adjacent residential properties

KIDMORE END NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN 28 Pre-Submission Public Consultation: Plan Summary

1.2 Quiet Lanes Policy (LCQL) Development proposals in the KENDP area should demon- strate that the character of any particular settlement is retained, and that a physical and visual separation is main- tained between the different settlements. In particular new development should maintain the separation between the following settlements within the KENDP area: • between Kidmore End and Gallowstree Common • between Kidmore End and Tokers Green • between Kidmore End and Chalkhouse Green • between Gallowstree Common and Cane End And, insofar as it affects the KENDP area: • between Gallowstree Common and Sonning Common • between Kidmore End and Sonning Common • between Tokers Green and Reading • between Chalkhouse Green and Reading • between Cane End and Hook End • between Gallowstree Common and And development proposals: • should preserve and enhance the rural look and feel of the lanes and roads linking the settlements listed here (insofar as this affects the KENDP area) • will be supported subject to other development plan policies pro- vided that the development, individually or cumulatively, would not result in an extended linear form of development along a geograph- ical feature, such as a road, that would be out of keeping with the historic nucleated development form of the settlements. This policy does not seek to prevent development that may otherwise be suited to an AONB or its setting, the Local Valued Landscape or Local Gap, but to ensure that the scale, massing and height of proposals do not result in the char- acter of the physical and visual separation of settlements being undermined or the rural quiet nature of the road links between settlements being diminished. • Development proposals should have regard to Appendix D: Visual and Spatial Characteristics KIDMORE END NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN 29 Pre-Submission Public Consultation: Plan Summary

10. Landscaping schemes which include local indigenous trees and fea- 1.3 Design Principles Policy (LCDP) tures that already form part of the immediate locality Development proposals should have regard to the Chilterns 11. In a form that is complementary to the character of the immediate Buildings Design Guide (CBDG) within the AONB and its set- and surrounding locality, environmentally friendly materials, methods ting, and Appendix D: Visual and Spatial Character in making and energy sources should be incorporated, provided that there are designs for any proposed development. no significant adverse effects on the amenity of neighbouring uses Proposed development will be supported, where it comple- 12. Minimising or avoiding harm or damage to local wildlife, trees and ments, enhances and reinforces the local distinctiveness of flowers and monitoring and repairing any such damage with a view the relevant settlement and where appropriate is designed to achieving net gains of 10% or more compared with the pre-devel- to enhance the landscape setting of these settlements; and opment baseline in biodiversity with minimal impacts on wildlife and where the following design considerations have been incor- plant life. porated, as appropriate: Additionally in the case of proposed extensions or altera- 1. Retention of the dark visual ambiance of the settlement via minimal tions (“extensions”) to existing dwellings, proposals will be external illumination supported where planning permission is required and the extension design incorporates the following considerations; 2. Regard for good quality locally characteristic building materials and styles of workmanship • the extension is of an appropriate scale, bulk and mass, having regard to the size of the existing property 3. Being in keeping with the character of neighbouring properties, as • the extension is designed and laid out so as to secure a reasonable appropriate degree of privacy for the occupiers that does not unacceptably harm 4. Regard for historic plot boundaries, hedgerows, trees and enclosure • the amenities of neighbouring properties through loss of privacy, walls daylight or sunlight • the extension maintains the existing space between plots 5. New garages, extensions, outbuildings or garden walls must be • the extension is generally of a similar design and materials as the subservient in scale and, whether of a traditional or modern design, existing property, unless contemporary additions can be well inte- should draw from the local vernacular building materials grated; and 6. Not installing pavements or kerbs to existing village lanes • particular care should be taken to ensure that extensions to listed 7. Boundary treatments to highways and village lanes should comprise buildings do not diminish the special historical or architectural quali- the use of native hedgerow, stone, brick or flint boundary walls or iron ties of the building. railings as appropriate to the immediate context of the site 8. Seeking innovative solutions to parking arrangements that do not necessitate large expanses of driveway nor the loss of vegetation along the highway nor parking on village lanes 9. Minimizing impacts on residential amenity of the construction arrangements by way of lorry movement, deliveries, working times, lighting and loss of vegetation wherever possible KIDMORE END NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN 30 Pre-Submission Public Consultation: Plan Summary

2.1 Housing Allocation Policy (HDA) Our Community has indicated Land at CFS8 is supported for residential development of up to a preference for a small level four open market dwellings subject to the following criteria: 1. The development of the site must respond to and be in keeping with of growth. KENDP supports local character using Local Character and Landscape Policies as a guide; one suitable small scale 2. The development must protect and where possible enhance existing development of new homes tree and hedgerow boundaries to the site, or 3. Where there are no tree and hedgerow boundaries, landscaping in Tokers Green Lane, consistent with the neighbouring and opposite residential properties Kidmore End. should be complemented and where possible, copied; and 4. The development should include a mix of housing sizes, meaning no It is envisaged that such a suitable more than 3 bedrooms in any of the proposed dwellings, and that the development will not exceed more mix should include dwellings with less than 3 bedrooms; and than 4 homes on one allocated 5. Consistent with its position at the edge of Kidmore End, at the end of site, consistent with the character Tokers Green Lane the development should preserve and establish and feel of the parish and its very a clearly defined “end” of the village, emphasising the start of Open gradual growth over time. There are Countryside. no “housing estates” as such within the 6. Consistent with the character of Tokers Green Lane, dwellings should parish, rather an incrementally growing be placed in a linear, road facing arrangement, with no back fill; and linear format in each village or hamlet, 7. Adequate off-road parking, turning and bin storage should be provided in a manner commensurate with the reasonable requirements for the with the occasional cul de sac comprising size of each dwelling; and a mix of housing styles and adaptations. 8. No street lighting or unnecessary or intrusive safety lighting is to be incorporated into the design for the site; and 9. Safe access by car or foot from the site should be carefully considered and incorporated into the site plans, taking account of both the needs of the site itself and of the neighbours and passers by; and 10. Impact on residential amenity of the construction arrangements are 2. Housing Development minimized by way of lorry movement, deliveries, working times, lighting and loss of vegetation wherever possible; 11. Building materials should be sustainable and design proposals should take account of opportunities to be carbon neutral and maximise sus- tainable materials and renewable energy sources; and 12. There should be a net gain for biodiversity of at least 10% and there should be vigilance in protecting and enhancing the natural biodiversity of this site. KIDMORE END NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN 31 Pre-Submission Public Consultation: Plan Summary

The Landscape Sensitivity Study and Valued Landscape Study are included in Appendix C of the draft KENDP. We live in a parish which is mostly The Landscape Policies reflect the desire of the community to: within the AONB (see Map 2). 1) protect the AONB, 2) protect the green space and gap between Tokers Green and Caversham, and 3) protect the valued landscape in The Landscape Sensitivity Study carried the parish which isn’t designated as AONB land. out by independent consultancy, terra firma, concluded that the area outside the AONB to the south of the parish is of high sensitivity and value, sharing many of the special qualities of the 3.1 The Chilterns AONB and its AONB. It is also deemed important Setting Policy (LPCS) as it provides local gaps of open countryside between the small The highest status of protection is to be given to the land- settlements of Tokers Green and scape and scenic beauty of the Chilterns Area of Outstanding Chalkhouse Green and the urban Natural Beauty (AONB). Development in the AONB, or affect- ing the setting of the AONB in the south of the parish, will only area of Reading. be permitted where: Image credit: Mark O’Neill • it conserves and enhances the character and natural beauty of the AONB and its special qualities, distinctive character and sense of tranquillity in accordance with national planning policy and the overall purpose of the AONB designation; • is appropriate to the economic, social and environmental wellbe- ing of Kidmore End Parish or is desirable for its understanding and enjoyment; • has regard to the aims of the statutory Chilterns AONB Management Plan; • avoids adverse cumulative impacts unless these can be satisfactorily 3. Landscape Policies mitigated in keeping with the character and appearance of the AONB. KIDMORE END NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN 32 Pre-Submission Public Consultation: Plan Summary

Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty

Map 2: The designated KENDP area and AONB

3. Landscape Policies KIDMORE END NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN 33 Pre-Submission Public Consultation: Plan Summary

3.2 Local Gap between Tokers Green and Landscape: Local Gap Caversham Landscape Policy (LPLG) Any proposals for development within the Local Gap as Map 3: Gap between Tokers Green shown in Map 3 should not, either individually or cumulatively, and Reading unacceptably detract from the character and/or the scale of the remaining gap between the small settlement of Tokers Green and Caversham and should conserve the open and tranquil character of the landscape and its views.

3. Landscape Policies KIDMORE END NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN 34 Pre-Submission Public Consultation: Plan Summary

3.3 Local Valued Landscape Policy (LPLV) Landscape: Local Valued The Kidmore End Parish Local Valued Landscape is identified Landscape in Map 4. Development proposals should only be permit- ted where they protect and enhance the physical and visual Map 4: The designated KENDP attributes of the character, quality and appearance of this area and Valued Landscape valued landscape.

3. Landscape Policies KIDMORE END NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN 35 Pre-Submission Public Consultation: Plan Summary

The two main roads in the parish The majority of roads and lanes in Kidmore End Parish are unmarked are the A4074 which runs through and do not have pavements, street lighting or significant amounts of signage. There are no cycle lanes. Cane End and Horsepond Road Policies must ensure that any new development does not adversely in Gallowstree Common. affect the safety of walkers, cyclists, horse riders and drivers while Other than these two, most respecting and protecting the historic fabric of the parish. roads are too narrow for easy Although safe use and enjoyment of roads and paths in the parish was a passing by two-way traffic. very common concern raised by our Community, the countryside feel of unlit, narrow hedgerowed lanes without pavements is cherished by the Community as being a vital part of our distinctive local character. Lighting, speed bumps, roundabouts and modern traffic calming inter- ventions were not seen as welcome improvements, rather a cautious approach to valuing and preserving these lanes, footpaths and bridle- ways was favoured.

4. Local Travel and Safety KIDMORE END NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN 36 Pre-Submission Public Consultation: Plan Summary

4.1 Safety For All Road Users (LTSRU) 4.2 Preservation of Footpaths, Bridleways Proposed developments should not cause an unacceptable and Tracks (LTPFBT) reduction in road safety including that of pedestrians, cyclists, Proposed development should protect the existing rights of horse riders and other road users. way network and their ambiance. Planning decisions should take account of local impacts on: Development proposals should also: • Traffic speeds and volumes in the relevant settlement; • encourage sustainable means of transport, including measures to • Ability to share all transport infrastructure safely between all road provide for and where possible enhance ease of use by pedestrians, users; and cyclists and horse riders; • Locations where the existing road system is constrained or already in • be well located to reduce reliance on private cars and instead to disrepair. provide safe and convenient walking riding and cycling routes to local • Mitigation measures to improve road safety should avoid urbanising services and facilities; and features such as lights, signage, speed bumps or pavements where • seek to preserve the open countryside characteristics of this network. none already exist. KIDMORE END NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN 37 Pre-Submission Public Consultation: Plan Summary

4.3 Safe Access and Parking (LTSAP) Proposed development should make adequate provision for parking and not envisage or rely on roadside parking. Any new development proposals should provide off road parking to meet the County Council’s standards by delivering innovative and attractive arrangements which complement the charac- ter of the area. Parking provision should: • Wherever practicable, be provided off-road; • Be sufficient for the full life of the development and should avoid the increase in on-street parking or use of existing public car parks in the future; • Minimise the impact of the private car on the street scene and any need for street parking. KIDMORE END NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN 38 Pre-Submission Public Consultation: Plan Summary

Community Concerns The KENDP Steering Group has kept a log of concerns raised by the community and used them to shape the wording of the KENDP policies.

Policy(ies) addressing or partly addressing the issue R/A/G Issues & concerns raised by the community or concern Rating Comments

1. Protection against large scale speculative LCI / LCQL / HDA / A Cannot be overtly included. A range of policies implicitly rather than explicitly development LPCS / LPLG / LPLV address this issue by protecting gaps, character, density, etc

2. Improved variety of properties in the parish HDA G Smaller houses specified for housing allocation. Cannot specify for infill or design principles policies

3. Small sites with small number of houses HDA / LCI G Specific to HDA. LCI refers to appropriate scale, mass and density.

4. Smaller, more affordable homes HDA G Relates only to allocation, cannot influence market value within more general development policies

5. Housing design in keeping with surrounding LCI, LCDP G The exception is HDA where housing variety (i.e. smaller houses) is purposefully houses planned for.

6. Impact of continued organic growth LCI / LCQL / LPCS / G LPLG / LPLV

7. Support of infill LCI G

8. Control of infill LCI G

9. Management of housing densities LCI / LCQL G Specific guidance is provided for each settlement in the appendices relating to village characteristics

10. Protection of sites adjacent to allocated site LCQL / LPCS / LPLG / A Not explicit (protect against site extension) LPLV

Policy Codes Local Character: LCI, LCQL, LCDP | Housing Development: HDA | Landscape: LPCS, LPLG, LPLV | Local Travel and Safety: LTSRU, LTPFBT, LTSAP R/A/G Rating Red: Not addressed by NDP policies | Amber: Partly or implicitly addressed by NDP policies | Green: Addressed by NDP policies KIDMORE END NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN 39 Pre-Submission Public Consultation: Plan Summary

Policy(ies) addressing or partly addressing the issue R/A/G Issues & concerns raised by the community or concern Rating Comments

11. Improved affordability of smaller houses HDA A Smaller houses promoted in HDA policy. NDP cannot influence market value.

12. Control against extensions in order to protect R NDP can’t protect against extensions. affordability of houses on allocated sites

13. Protection against future unsympathetic LCDP G Extensions must conform with design principles extension of smaller houses

14. Phasing of development and longer term - R Although not covered in policies, the longer term impact is accounted for in the impact NDP review cycle. Phased development is not relevant as the NDP proposes just one small allocation. 15. Protection of green spaces LCQL / LPCS / LPLG / G Also included in the Green Spaces document which is an appendix to the Local LPLV Character policies

16. Protection of village boundaries LCQL A There are no specified village boundaries within the parish. The NDP protects against coalescence between settlements

17. Protection of AONB land LPCS / LPLV G

18. Protection of agricultural land LPCS / LPLV A Implicitly rather than explicitly addressed. Local policies relate more specifically to change of use for agricultural land.

19. Protection of community buildings such as - R Out of scope of NDP, however, the protection of The Reformation is a separate pub community project.

20. Consideration for traffic / road use during LCDP / HDA G construction

21. Consideration for ongoing impact on traffic / LCDP / LTSRU / G road use / parking LTPFBT / LTSAP / HDA

22. Improved public transport - R Outside NDP scope.

Policy Codes Local Character: LCI, LCQL, LCDP | Housing Development: HDA | Landscape: LPCS, LPLG, LPLV | Local Travel and Safety: LTSRU, LTPFBT, LTSAP R/A/G Rating Red: Not addressed by NDP policies | Amber: Partly or implicitly addressed by NDP policies | Green: Addressed by NDP policies KIDMORE END NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN 40 Pre-Submission Public Consultation: Plan Summary

Policy(ies) addressing or partly addressing the issue R/A/G Issues & concerns raised by the community or concern Rating Comments

23. Impact on local services / infrastructure - R The majority of infrastructure and services supporting the parish are situated in (school, doctors, etc) Sonning Common and therefore out of scope of our NDP.

24. Creation and enforcement of design brief LCDP / HDA A The NDP sets the desired design parameters. SODC are responsible for permission and enforcement.

25. Quality materials used in house design LCDP G The NDP sets the desired design parameters. SODC are responsible for permission and enforcement.

26. Sustainable, environmentally friendly design LCDP / HDA G features

27. Low carbon construction LCDP / HDA A Difficult to specify and enforce.

28. Protection of wildlife / biodiversity LCDP / HDA / LPCS / G Also implicitly covered by Landscape policies. LPLV

Policy Codes Local Character: LCI, LCQL, LCDP | Housing Development: HDA | Landscape: LPCS, LPLG, LPLV | Local Travel and Safety: LTSRU, LTPFBT, LTSAP R/A/G Rating Red: Not addressed by NDP policies | Amber: Partly or implicitly addressed by NDP policies | Green: Addressed by NDP policies KIDMORE END NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN 41 Pre-Submission Public Consultation: Plan Summary

Following this period of 1. Household Survey 2018: conducted by the Steering Group in May 2018 to gather feedback from the community on current consultation, the KENDP will be and future housing needs. assessed by an independent 2. Landscape Sensitivity Study 2018, updated 2020: a report by terra examiner. Approval of the plan firma detailing the relative value of the land in the parish outside the depends on the provision designated AONB. of robust evidence. To that 3. Site Options and Assessment Report 2018, updated 2019: written end, the Steering Group by AECOM to provide details of the call for sites process and how have been working with the potential sites have been assessed. independent consultants 4. Facilitation Report 2018: written by AECOM in conjunction with the Site Options and Assessment Report to provide greater clarity on to carry out relevant and how aspects of SODC’s emerging local plan should be interpreted detailed research and to and applied to our neighbourhood plan. produce the reports listed 5. Housing Requirement and Allocation Topic Paper 2019, updated here. 2020: written by the Steering Group with input from SODC. This paper summarises all the evidence gathered to date with particular focus on the call for sites process and the rationale for including an allocated site within our NDP. 6. Facilitation Report 2020 (draft): written by AECOM in September 2020 and relating to the re-assessment of CFS10 following addi- tional information from the landowner. Evidence gathered: reports These reports are all available for you to read on the parish website: www.kepc.info/ndp/consultation2020 KIDMORE END NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN 42 Pre-Submission Public Consultation: Plan Summary

This document provides a Once you have all the information you need, please complete a short survey to provide your feedback. summary of the key information provided in the draft KENDP. This is the formal process by which you can provide your feedback on the draft KENDP. Input from the community will shape the final KENDP. The full document can be Please complete the survey electronically if you can. Go to the survey found on the parish website: link on the website: www.kepc.info/ndp/consultation2020 or use the www.kepc.info/ndp/ QR code below to complete the survey on your mobile phone. The consultation2020 survey will be open from Saturday 7 November to Saturday 19 December, 2020 in line with the mandatory six week consultation process. Alternatively you can email: [email protected] or write to the parish council clerk, whose address is available on the parish website.

Keep up to date by regularly checking the following sources of information: NN www.kepc.info/ndp/ NN The parish newsletter NN Email or speak to members of the Steering Group NN www.southoxon.gov.uk/neighbourhoodplans Please provide your feedback on the draft KENDP KIDMORE END NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN 43 Pre-Submission Public Consultation: Plan Summary

Thank you for reading the draft Steering Group Members are all volunteers KENDP Summary. who live within the parish. Current members are: NN Sue Biggs – Chair (Kidmore End) The full draft KENDP and all NN Lyn Stewart-Ashley – Vice Chair (Chalkhouse Green) the appendices are on the NN Anna Vorster – Secretary (Gallowstree Common) parish website. NN Jane Williams (Kidmore End) Please complete the survey NN Judith Wright (Kidmore End) and give your village a voice. NN Rex Butters (Tokers Green) NN Mike Bishop (Kidmore End) NN Peter Ward (Tokers Green) NN Bettina Kirkham (Chalkhouse Green) NN Sonia Rayner (Cane End) NN Iain Pearson (Kidmore End) NN Anna Cronin-Scott (Kidmore End)

Thank you! KIDMORE END PARISH COUNCIL OXFORDSHIRE

Design for Print · 0118 9693633 · www.designforprint.org