CSC 2110 Computer Science I Cr

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CSC 2110 Computer Science I Cr CSC 2110 Computer Science I Cr. 4 CSC - COMPUTER SCIENCE Rigorous introduction to fundamental object-oriented concepts and techniques of computer programming using an object-oriented CSC 0995 Co-op or Internship in Computer Science Cr. 0 language. Introduction to data abstraction; design of abstract data Review of computer science practical experiences resulting from types. Introduction to recursion; programming with generic data types; participation in coop/internship program. Offered Every Term. inheritance; polymorphism; and exception handlers. Concepts applied to CSC 1000 Introduction to Computer Science Cr. 3 console programs and event-driven programming using a simple graphics Provides an overview of current computing technology, organization, and API. Offered Every Term. use. Topics surveyed include data representation and storage, hardware Prerequisites: CSC 1100 with a minimum grade of C, CSC 1101 with a and software organization, communications technologies, ethical and minimum grade of C, and MAT 2010 with a minimum grade of C- security issues. Provides hands-on training in common application Restriction(s): Enrollment is limited to students with a major, minor, or software, such as word processing, spreadsheets, presentation, as concentration in Computer Technology, Computer Science, Computer well as in electronic telecommunications, such as e-mail, Internet and Science Honors , Computer Technology Honors, Information Systems database searches. The University database and Internet pages are Technology or Information Technology. emphasized. Offered Every Term. Course Material Fees: $35 Course Material Fees: $35 CSC 2200 Computer Science II Cr. 4 CSC 1002 Personal Digital Security Cr. 3 Design and implementation of fundamental abstract data types of Students learn how to reduce exposure to risks and how to identify, computer science (such as stacks, queues, trees, lists, hashing, and assess and repair infected devices. Offered Every Term. graphs), using an object-oriented language. Programming requirements include the implementation of abstract data types using arrays and CSC 1050 Introduction to C and Unix Cr. 2 dynamic links; recursion; sorting and searching; hashing; and string Introduction to Unix, Unix editor, and C Programming Language. Unix processing. Introduction to algorithm analysis. Offered Every Term. development tools and fundamentals of C language discussed. No credit Prerequisites: (CSC 1500 with a minimum grade of C and CSC 1501 with for computer science students after CSC 1100. Offered Every Term. a minimum grade of C), (CSC 2110 with a minimum grade of C and CSC Prerequisites: MAT 1800-6999 with a minimum grade of C 2111 with a minimum grade of C), MAT 2010 with a minimum grade of C-, Course Material Fees: $35 and BE 1200 with a minimum grade of C- CSC 1100 Problem Solving and Programming Cr. 4 Course Material Fees: $35 Problem solving with algorithms, and their realization as computer CSC 3010 Ethics in Computer Science Cr. 3 programs using a structured, general purpose programming language; Students will study the ethical and legal issues that arise with the data types, operators, expressions, assignment, input and output, usage and development of computing technology. Students will learn selection and repetition control structures; modularity and procedural the responsibilities of the computer professionals and how to make abstraction using functions with parameters; structured data types, appropriate decisions when faced with legal and ethical issues in arrays, pointers and strings. No credit after CSC 2000. Offered Every computing. Offered Every Term. Term. Prerequisites: CSC 2110 with a minimum grade of C and CSC 2111 with a Prerequisites: BE 1600 with a minimum grade of C- minimum grade of C Course Material Fees: $35 CSC 3020 Java Programming Cr. 3 CSC 1500 Fundamental Structures in Computer Science Cr. 4 Introduction to the fundamentals of programming using Java. Topics Introduction to fundamental control and data structures in computer include: object-oriented programming, classes, constructors, flow control science such as algorithms and complexity; recursive algorithms; statements, data types, methods, inheritance, data hiding, abstraction, program correctness using the predicate calculus; reasoning about exceptions, file I/O, Java GUI, and Java packages. Offered Fall, Winter. algorithms using mathematical induction; divide and conquer algorithms; Prerequisites: (MAT 1800 with a minimum grade of C-, MAT 2010 with recurrence relations; set properties and their computation; and a minimum grade of C-, or MAT 2020 with a minimum grade of C-), computing with relations. Graph properties and their computation, and CSC 2110 with a minimum grade of C, and CSC 2111 with a minimum tree properties and their computation, will be covered if time permits. grade of C Offered Every Term. Prerequisites: CSC 1100 with a minimum grade of C, CSC 1101 with a CSC 3100 Computer Architecture and Organization Cr. 4 minimum grade of C, and MAT 2010 with a minimum grade of C- Organization and architecture of computer systems. Topics include: Restriction(s): Enrollment is limited to students with a major, minor, or digital logic and digital systems; machine-level representation of data concentration in Computer Technology, Computer Science, Computer and programs; assembly level machine organization and programming; Science Honors , Computer Technology Honors, Information Systems register-level description of computer execution and the functional Technology or Information Technology. organization of a computer; role and function of programming languages, Course Material Fees: $35 libraries and operating systems; performance evaluation; systems programming. Offered Every Term. CSC 2000 Introduction to C++ Programming Language Cr. 3 Prerequisites: CSC 2200 with a minimum grade of C, CSC 2201 with a Elements of C++; arrays, pointers and references; operators; classes and minimum grade of C, and MAT 2010 with a minimum grade of C- objects. No credit after CSC 1100 and CSC 1101. Offered Every Term. Course Material Fees: $35 Prerequisites: MAT 1800 with a minimum grade of C-, MAT Permit to Reg ACT/SAT with a test score minimum of 4, Math Permit to Reg - (L1-L4) with a test score minimum of 4, or MAT 2010 with a minimum grade of C- Course Material Fees: $35 CSC - Computer Science 1 CSC 3110 Algorithm Design and Analysis Cr. 3 CSC 4310 IT Software Management Cr. 3 Formal techniques to support design and analysis of algorithms: Covers 12 disciplines of systems management in the approximate underlying mathematical theory and practical considerations of order in which they became prevalent and integral to an infrastructure’s efficiency. Topics include asymptotic complexity bounds, techniques operation. In doing so, it will cover the people, process, and technology of analysis, algorithmic strategies, advanced data and file structures, aspects of systems management. The people discussion shows and introduction to automata theory and its application to language the importance of executive support, customer service, and other translation. Offered Fall, Winter. management aspects of delivering and supporting IT services. The Prerequisites: BE 2100 with a minimum grade of C-, CSC 2200 with a process issues of systems management are addressed through study minimum grade of C, CSC 2201 with a minimum grade of C, MAT 2250 of IT infrastructure library (ITIL) processes. The technology aspect with a minimum grade of C-, and MAT 2020 with a minimum grade of C- covers several key developments that enable these disciplines to be CSC 3200 Programming Languages Cr. 3 implemented more productively including process automation. Offered History and overview of programming languages, virtual machines, Yearly. representation of data types; sequence control; data control, sharing Prerequisites: CSC 2110 with a minimum grade of C and CSC 2111 with a and type checking; run-time storage management; language translation minimum grade of C systems; programming language semantics; programming paradigms. CSC 4320 Systems Administration Cr. 3 Offered Yearly. Deployment and maintenance of modern computer systems in Prerequisites: CSC 2200 with a minimum grade of C-, CSC 2201 with a an operational environment. Conceptual knowledge and practical minimum grade of C-, and MAT 2010 with a minimum grade of C- experience. Topics include: architectures, heterogeneous systems, CSC 3400 Human-Computer Interaction Cr. 3 authentication and security, network services including firewalls, User interface design, usability, evaluation, user-centered design. Offered storage services, performance analysis and tuning, management and Intermittently. configuration of services and system resources, system initialization, Prerequisites: CSC 2110 with a minimum grade of C and CSC 2111 with a drivers, cross-platform services, policies and procedures. Offered Yearly. minimum grade of C Prerequisites: CSC 2110 with a minimum grade of C and CSC 2111 with a Course Material Fees: $10 minimum grade of C CSC 3750 Introduction to Web Technology Cr. 3 CSC 4330 Mobile Application Development Cr. 3 Understanding the Internet using several access methods; required Covers the primary aspects of application development for mobile software and tools. Topics include: e-mail, FTP, Telnet, Gopher, Archie, devices running the Android operating system. Offered Yearly. Newsgroups, WWW, HTML, CGI and PHP scripting and how to create an Prerequisites: CSC 2110 with a minimum grade of C, CSC 2111 with
Recommended publications
  • Xp Project Management
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2007 XP PROJECT MANAGEMENT Craig William Macholz The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Macholz, Craig William, "XP PROJECT MANAGEMENT" (2007). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 1201. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/1201 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. XP PROJECT MANAGEMENT By Craig William Macholz BS in Business Administration, The University of Montana, Missoula, MT, 1997 Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Computer Science The University of Montana Missoula, MT Autumn 2007 Approved by: Dr. David A. Strobel, Dean Graduate School Dr. Joel Henry Computer Science Dr. Yolanda Reimer Computer Science Dr. Shawn Clouse Business Administration i Macholz, Craig, M.S., December 2007 Computer Science Extreme Programming Project Management Chairperson: Dr. Joel Henry Extreme programming project management examines software development theory, the extreme programming process, and the essentials of standard project management as applied to software projects. The goal of this thesis is to integrate standard software project management practices, where possible, into the extreme programming process. Thus creating a management framework for extreme programming project management that gives the extreme programming managers the management activities and tools to utilize the extreme programming process within a wider range of commercial computing organizations, relationships, and development projects.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Methodologies Debate: Part 1
    ACCESS TO THE EXPERTS The Journal of Information Technology Management December 2001 Vol. 14, No. 12 The Great Methodologies Debate: Part 1 Resolved “Today, a new debate rages: agile software Traditional methodologists development versus rigorous software are a bunch of process- development.” dependent stick-in-the-muds who’d rather produce flawless Jim Highsmith, Guest Editor documentation than a working system that meets business needs. Opening Statement Jim Highsmith 2 Rebuttal Lightweight, er, “agile” Agile Can Scale: Inventing and Reinventing methodologists are a bunch of SCRUM in Five Companies glorified hackers who are going to be in for a heck of a surprise Jeff Sutherland 5 when they try to scale up their “toys” into enterprise-level software. Agile Versus Traditional: Make Love, Not War! Robert L. Glass 12 Business Intelligence Methodologies: Agile with Rigor? Larissa T. Moss 19 Agility with the RUP Philippe Kruchten 27 Extreme Requirements Engineering Larry Wagner 34 Exclusion, Assumptions, and Misinterpretation: Foes of Collaboration Lou Russell 39 Opening Statement by Jim Highsmith In the early 1980s, I participated in rigorous software development. others be able to understand the one round of methodology debate. Agile approaches (Extreme similarities and differences and be Structured analysis and design Programming, Crystal Methods, able to apply the right mix to their champions such as Tom DeMarco, Lean Development, Feature-Driven own organization. Both the SEI and Ed Yourdon, and Tim Lister were Development, Adaptive Software Rational have made wonderful on one side of the debate, while Development, SCRUM, and contributions to software develop- data-driven design aficionados like Dynamic Systems Development ment, but it is important to Ken Orr, Jean-Dominique Warnier, Methodology) populate one camp.
    [Show full text]
  • VALLATH NANDAKUMAR 3105 Eaneswood Dr, Austin, TX 78746 (512)-923-9658 (Cell); [email protected]
    VALLATH NANDAKUMAR 3105 Eaneswood Dr, Austin, TX 78746 (512)-923-9658 (Cell); [email protected] EDUCATION • 1990 University of California, Berkeley, CA Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering. • 1985 University of California Berkeley, CA M.S. in Electrical Engineering. • 1982 Indian Institute of Technology, Madras, India BTech in Electrical Engineering (Electronics). EXPERIENCE • Teaching in the ECE and CS Department at the University of Texas, Austin (5 years) o C, C++, Java programming, Algorithm Design • Taught course modules at the graduate level in cell phone technology, VLSI testing, VLSI design, Internet hardware, technical writing, physics. (5 years) • Research and development activities in superconducting electronics, high-end optical communication, integrated circuit design methodologies, Computer-Aided Design tools, and cyber security software. • Published 6+ papers in IEEE journals on superconducting electronics. • Six patents granted in VLSI and superconductors. • Managed teams of 30+ people spanning multiple countries. • Have conducted computer programming contests with 400+ student participants from all over Asia coming together. EMPLOYMENT HISTORY AND EXPERIENCE Aug. 2013-Present Full-time Lecturer in the Departments of Computer Science, and Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Texas, Austin • Courses taught: Algorithms, basic and advanced programming, Ethics of Computer Science, Writing for CS majors • Texas University Interscholastic League Director for Computer Science, 2013-2014. Mar 2012-Jun 2013 Substitute Teacher, Eanes Independent School District, Austin, TX • Substitute teacher for grades K-12 and all subjects. Mar 2012-Jun 2013 Tutor, Austin Community College, Austin, TX • Taught Algebra and Calculus, Business Economics, Statistics, Physics, English, German. Oct 2006-Jun 2013 Professor/Adjunct Professor, Amrita University, Amritapuri Campus, India (http://www.amrita.edu) • Director of Center of Excellence in Cyber Security • Taught courses in VLSI architecture, design and testing, and on Wireless systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Factor Analysis of Pair Programming Based on PSP
    I S S N 2 2 7 7 - 3 0 6 1 V o l u m e 1 5 N u m b e r 0 4 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTERS & TECHNOLOGY Multi-factor analysis of pair programming based on PSP methodology Nabiollah Bayatmoghadam1 (M.S), Ashkan Sami (Ph.D.)2 1Department of Computer Science, Engineering, Shiraz University Email: [email protected] 2Department of Computer Science, Engineering, Shiraz University ABSTRACT In regard with designing software, users play key role. In order to design software, it is necessary to observe standard principles of designation, using templates and using modern methods. Over the decades, using development methods, XP and one of the XP methodologies of paired programming used to design software. These methods have been designed for purpose of enhancing quality of product and rapidresponse to need of market and customer and overcoming weaknesses of traditional methods based on long-term programming and waterfall method. Therefore, every programmer and developer can pass a series of processes for constructing computer software. The processes can be changed daily and efficient processes maynot be effective and useful; although they can be considered as process. The main objective of the present study is multi-factor analysis of pair programming based on PSP methodology. Practical and analytical methodand two PSP methods have been applied for investigations. Key words: software engineering, XP, pair programming, PSP methodology, multi-factor analysis INTRODUCTION In designing software, users play key role. In order to design software, it is necessary to observe standard principles of designation and using templates and using modern technologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Enhancing Learnability of Pair Programming Practice When Introducing Novices
    MASARYKOVA UNIVERZITA FAKULTA INFORMATIKY Enhancing Learnability of Pair Programming Practice when Introducing Novices DIPLOMOVÁ PRÁCE Pavel Januš Brno, jaro 2014 Declaration I declare that this paper is my original authorial work, which I have worked out by my own. All sources, references and literature used or excerpted during elaboration of this work are properly cited and listed in complete reference to the due source. Advisor: Bruno Rossi, PhD. i Acknowledgement I would like to express my gratitude to my supervisor Bruno Rossi for leading me through the creation of my diploma thesis. I am grateful to him for stimulating discus- sions about the content of the thesis and supporting developing of my own ideas. I also want to appreciate his provided time, knowledge, valuable information and his patience and willingness. I express special thanks to my parents for their understanding, and my girlfriend for her support. ii Abstract The current thesis focuses on understanding the mechanisms that lead novice develop- ers to better learn the Pair Programming (PP) practice, one of the pillars of Agile Metho- dologies. The main aim is to provide theoretical-grounded suggestions that could help to improve the process by which novices are introduced to PP and start mastering it. To contextualize PP, we review the emergence of Agile development methodology com- pared to more heavy-weight methodologies and we evaluate the importance of PP as one of the key practices of Extreme Programing (XP). We then delve into empirical stu- dies that investigate the efficacy of PP in software development and into the identifica- tion of the state of the art in terms of the introduction of PP to novices.
    [Show full text]
  • A Social Collaborative Distributed Software Development Environment,” Has Been Reviewed in Final Form
    A Social Collaborative Distributed Software Development Environment A Dissertation Presented in Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy with a Major in Computer Science in the College of Graduate Studies University of Idaho By Hani Ahmad Bani-Salameh August 16, 2011 Major Professor: Dr. Clinton Jeffery Copyright © 2010-2011 Hani Bani-Salameh. All rights reserved. ii Authorization to Submit Dissertation This dissertation of Hani Ahmad Bani-Salameh, submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy with a major in Computer Science and entitled “A Social Collaborative Distributed Software Development Environment,” has been reviewed in final form. Permission, as indicated by the signatures and dates given below, is now granted to submit final copies to the College of Graduate Studies for approval. Major Professor: Date: Dr. Clinton Jeffery Committee member: Date: Dr. Jim Alves-Foss Committee member: Date: Dr. Robert Rinker Committee member: Date: Dr. Barry Willis Department Administrator: Date: Dr. Gregory W. Donohoe Discipline’s College Dean: Date Dr. Larry A. Stauffer Final Approval and Acceptance by the College of Graduate Studies: Date: Dr. Jie Chen iii Abstract Software engineering is usually a team effort. Distributed software development needs real-time collaboration tools that help replicate the benefits of face-to-face meetings and support interaction among team members. Unfortunately, most of the tools that exist have limited capabilities, such as source code editing, and developers face collaboration and communication challenges in working with each other. Over the past decade software researchers have invented various development tools that integrate collaborative features. Unfortunately, most software developers still lack the right means and level of communication to coordinate their work and perform their tasks effectively, particularly in distributed settings.
    [Show full text]
  • The Importance of Team Skills for Software Development
    The Importance of Team Skills for Software Development by Carolyn Tanya Wick B.Sc., SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY, 1995 A thesis submitted in partial fulfdment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science IN THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard: THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Vancouver, Canada December 1998 Copyright © 1998, Carolyn Tanya Wick In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purpose may be granted by the head of my department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis in whole or in part for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. THESIS TITLE: THE IMPORTANCE OF TEAM SKILLS FOR SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA 2366 MAIN MALL VANCOUVER, BC, CANADA V6T 1Z4 Abstract Software does not just happen - it must be engineered systematically through the collaboration of individuals with necessary software development skills and appropriate tools. Similarly, effective software teams do not just happen - they too are built over time through the collaboration of individuals with appropriate team skills, tools and resources. This thesis outlines the need for superior software teams, reviews the literature on team performance and argues that a practical way to begin improving the effectiveness of software teams is in training software engineers in the skills necessary for effective teamwork.
    [Show full text]
  • This Article Appeared in a Journal Published by Elsevier. the Attached Copy Is Furnished to the Author for Internal Non-Commerci
    This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues. Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited. In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or institutional repository. Authors requiring further information regarding Elsevier’s archiving and manuscript policies are encouraged to visit: http://www.elsevier.com/copyright Author's personal copy Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Information and Software Technology 50 (2008) 1114–1126 www.elsevier.com/locate/infsof Exploring the underlying aspects of pair programming: The impact of personality Kyungsub S. Choi a,*, Fadi P. Deek b,IlImc a Faculty of Computer Information Systems, School of Business, Manhattan College, Riverdale, NY 10471-4098, USA b Faculty of Information Systems, College of Computing Sciences, New Jersey Institute of Technology, 323 M.L. King Boulevard, University Heights, Newark, NJ 07102-1982, USA c Faculty of Information Systems Department, School of Business, Yonsei University, 134 Shinchon-Dong, Seodaemoon-Ku, Seoul 120-749, Republic of Korea Received 2 July 2007; received in revised form 30 October 2007; accepted 2 November 2007 Available online 19 November 2007 Abstract With the recent advent of agile software process methods, a number of seldom used and unorthodox practices have come to the fore- front in the field of computer programming.
    [Show full text]
  • P Pair Programming and Gender
    1 Pair Programming and Gender P Linda L. Werner University of California, USA Brian Hanks Fort Lewis College, USA Charlie McDowell University of California, USA INTRODUCTION methods by stating that cooperative learning in- volves students taking responsibility for subtasks, Studies of pair programming both in industry and whereas collaborative learning requires that the academic settings have found improvements in pro- group works together on all aspects of the task gram quality, test scores, confidence, enjoyment, (Underwood & Underwood, 1999). The consensus and retention in computer-related majors. In this from numerous field and laboratory investigations is article we define pair programming, summarize the that academic achievement such as performance on results of pair programming research, and show why a test is enhanced when an individual learns informa- we believe pair programming will help women and tion with others as opposed to individually (O’Donnell men succeed in IT majors. & Dansereu, 1992; Slavin, 1996; Totten, Sills, & Digby, & Russ, 1991). Cooperative activities have been taught and prac- BACKGROUND ticed for other software system development tasks such as design and software engineering but not for Traditional undergraduate introductory programming programming (Basili, Green, Laitenburger, Lanubile, courses generally require that students work indi- Shull, Sorumgard, et al., 1996; Fagan, 1986, Sauer, vidually on their programming assignments. In these Jeffrey, Land, & Yetton, 2000; Schlimmer, Fletcher, courses, working with another student on program- & Hermens, 1994). Often cooperative methods are ming homework constitutes cheating and is not used in upper division computer science (CS) courses tolerated. The only resources available to help stu- such as compiler design and software engineering in dents with problems are the course instructor, the which group projects are encouraged or required.
    [Show full text]
  • Pair Programming: More Learning and Less Anxiety in a First Programming Course Susan F
    Pair Programming: More Learning and Less Anxiety in a First Programming Course Susan F. Freeman, Ph.D. *, Beverly K. Jaeger, Ph.D.*, Jennifer C. Broughamª *Northeastern University, ªMonash University Pair Programming is a recent development in education designed to enhance the student’s learning experience through teamwork. Specifically, it involves the students undertaking and completing some aspect of their programming work as a team of two. In engineering it is generally utilized for computer coding projects, such that partners work conjointly on the same design, algorithm, code, or assignment. For this study, this approach was used in a first programming course entitled “Engineering Problem Solving with Computation” by adapting the XP: eXtreme Programming method that is used in industry. The objective of this course is to teach first-year engineering students logic and problem solving skills through algorithmic programming. The programming language in the course of interest was C++. Pair programming was a voluntary element of the course and the students, under certain conditions, could opt in or out of it. The primary objective in offering this option was to reduce students' frustration when programming for the first time, as this often causes them to abandon attempts to understand the nuances of programming logic and syntax, and thereby the intended educational value of the course is lost. Pair-programming methodology requires that participants assume specified roles in a partnership. The course is administered and this option is selected with this understanding. Through various assessment tools, it was found that pair programming inspired confidence in the students, specifically in their ability to achieve the task at hand.
    [Show full text]
  • Software Engineering
    Chapter 15 Software Engineering So far we have talked in terms of one programmer designing an already speci- fied system. Software development in real life is seldom like this. Software is typically developed by programmers for customers who do not know precisely what they want. Programmers must understand the customer’s needs and then define exactly what the software should do before they can do any actual design. Software development is also typically done by teams of programmers, ranging from a small group of two to four people to a large team involving hundreds of people. Testing and deployment of software is also a major effort, often done by yet another group. Moreover, most of the effort put into a soft- ware system, especially a successful one, is spent fixing bugs and adding new features once the system has been “completed,” rather than on the system’s initial development. The study of software development, from a crude need on the part of a cus- tomer, through design and coding of a software system, and on through the ever-continuing process of fixing and improving the software, is called soft- ware engineering. This field has as its goal making software development sim- pler and the resultant software better. This chapter provides a brief overview of software engineering, describing the terminology and basic ideas developed by researchers and practitioners over the past thirty years. We first consider the problems that led to the field in the first place, proceed to describe the var- ious phases of software development, and finally discuss the ways in which these parts can be put together.
    [Show full text]
  • Programming for TV, Radio, and the Internet: Strategy, Development, and Evaluation
    Programming for TV, Radio, and the Internet: Strategy, Development, and Evaluation Philippe Perebinossoff Brian Gross Lynne S. Gross ELSEVIER Programming for TV, Radio, and the Internet Programming for TV, Radio, and the Internet Strategy, Development, and Evaluation Philippe Perebinossoff California State University, Fullerton Brian Gross EF Education, Jakarta, Indonesia Lynne S. Gross California State University, Fullerton AMSTERDAM · BOSTON · HEIDELBERG · LONDON NEW YORK · OXFORD · PARIS · SAN DIEGO SAN FRANCISCO · SINGAPORE · SYDNEY · TOKYO Focal Press is an imprint of Elsevier Acquisition Editor: Amy Jollymore Project Manager: Bonnie Falk Editorial Assistant: Cara Anderson Marketing Manager: Christine Degon Cover Design: Dardani Gasc Focal Press is an imprint of Elsevier 30 Corporate Drive, Suite 400, Burlington, MA 01803, USA Linacre House, Jordan Hill, Oxford OX2 8DP, UK Copyright © 2005, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Permissions may be sought directly from Elsevier’s Science & Technology Rights Department in Oxford, UK: phone: (+44) 1865 843830, fax: (+44) 1865 853333, e-mail: [email protected] may also complete your request on-line via the Elsevier homepage (http://elsevier.com), by selecting “Customer Support” and then “Obtaining Permissions.” Recognizing the importance of preserving what has been written, Elsevier prints its books on acid-free paper whenever possible. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.
    [Show full text]