A Character Assessment of Oxford in Its Landscape Setting
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Oxford Cambridge Expressway – Submission to Highways England the Environmental Impact of the S2 Corridor
OXFORD CAMBRIDGE EXPRESSWAY – SUBMISSION TO HIGHWAYS ENGLAND THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF THE S2 CORRIDOR “I hold the very strong opinion that in no circumstances should a motorway be routed through any part of Ot Moor nor through the Bernwood Forest complex” – M40 Enquiry Inspector’s report. 1.1 Nature Conservation A recent Highways England document lists five broad Strategic Objectives for the Expressway. Number four is ‘Protect the historic and environmental assets of the region.’ 1 This section of evidence will show that the east-of-Oxford subroute (‘S2’), far from protecting historic and environmental assets, is the subroute corridor most likely to harm them; most significantly, by impacting on the irreplaceable habitats and species of Otmoor, the historic landscape of semi-wild wetland and grazing marsh that stretches from Beckley in the south to Fencott in the north, and from Islip in the west to Horton-cum-Studley in the east. 1.1.1 Shotover to Otmoor Before it reaches Otmoor, S2 appears – from the information released – to cross Shotover Hill and the A40 between Thornhill and Forest Hill before heading north through Green Belt to the vicinity of Beckley. In addition to being a Conservation Target Area, Shotover is itself an important SSSI and nature reserve with over 4100 species recorded in recent years, including species new to science, species new to Britain, and species recorded less than a dozen times in the UK in the past century. (Source: Shotover Wildlife.) Ivan Wright, Chair of Shotover Wildlife, particularly highlights its national importance as a habitat for bees and beetles. -
Cherwell Local Plan 2011-2031 (Part 1) Partial Review - Oxford’S Unmet Housing Needs
Cherwell Local Plan 2011-2031 (Part 1) Partial Review - Oxford’s Unmet Housing Needs Proposed Submission Document Statement of Consultation Part 2 - Options June 2017 1 Contents 1. Introduction 2. The ‘Duty to Cooperate’ 3. Previous Consultation 4. Consultation and Engagement • Consultation arrangements • How did we consult? • Distribution • Press Coverage • Social Media • Public Exhibitions 5. Consultation with Statutory and Non-Statutory Bodies • Oxfordshire Growth Board • Other Meetings/Discussions with Statutory and Non-Statutory Bodies • Town & Parish Council/ Meeting Workshops • Stakeholder Workshop 6. Sustainability Appraisal 7. Representations – Summary of Issues Raised and how they have been considered Appendices 1. Public Notice 2. Consultation letters/emails 3. Consultation Summary Leaflet 4. Consultation Poster 5. Representation Form 6. Oxfordshire Growth Board – Signed Memorandum of Co-operation 7. Town and Parish Council Workshops – Attendees and Main Issues Raised 8. Stakeholder Workshop – Attendees and Main Issues Raised 9. List of Attendees: Cherwell Local Strategic Partnership Board (27 April 2017) 10. Representations to the Options Consultation 2 1. Introduction This Statement of Consultation describes the consultation undertaken in progressing with the Partial Review of the adopted Cherwell Local Plan 2011-2031 (Part 1). It will be updated as the Council proceeds through the statutory stages of plan-making. This statement has been prepared to support a formal proposed submission plan under Regulation 19 of the Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012. It reports on public consultation, engagement and co-operation undertaken in reaching this stage. The Council has a statutory duty to consult and seek representations in preparing a Local Plan. It must also ensure that there is on-going co-operation with prescribed bodies under a ‘Duty to Co- operate’. -
Licence Annex B: Provisions Relating to Licensed Actions Within the Cull Area, Including on Or Around Special Areas of Conservat
Licence Annex B: Provisions relating to licensed actions within the cull area, including on or around Special Areas of Conservation (SACs), Special Protection Areas (SPAs), Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs), and/or Ramsar sites within the county of Oxfordshire Notes W, Y and Z to this Annex must be considered on any land where operations permitted under this licence are proposed or are undertaken. Notes A and B apply only on and/or around Protected Sites and only in respect to Protected Sites where these Notes are cited in the ‘Licence Condition’ column of the table below for that site. SSSI name European Designated Site Licence condition name (where applicable) Alvescot All vehicles must be restricted to existing tracks. Meadows SSSI Limit location of traps to existing sett footprint. Delay access until after hay cut, mid-July. Appleton Lower All vehicles must be restricted to existing tracks. Common SSSI Limit location of traps to existing sett footprint or/ and areas of Rhododendron, Cherry Laurel scrub or conifer plantation. Ardley Cutting All vehicles must be restricted to existing tracks. and Quarry SSSI Limit location of traps to existing sett footprint. Ardley Trackways No additional conditions imposed. SSSI Arncott Bridge All vehicles must be restricted to existing tracks. Meadows SSSI Limit location of traps to existing sett footprint or areas of scrub. Ashdown Park All vehicles must be restricted to existing surfaced SSSI tracks. Limit location of traps to existing sett footprint or areas of scrub. Aston Upthorpe All vehicles must be restricted to existing tracks. Downs SSSI Limit location of traps to existing sett footprint. -
Habitat Regulations Assessment Screening Report”
Partial Review of the Cherwell Local Plan 2011- 2031 (Part 1): Oxford’s Unmet Housing Needs Proposed Submission Plan Habitat Regulations Assessment Screening Report Cherwell District Council June 2017 Notice This document and its contents have been prepared and are intended solely for Cherwell District Council’s information and use in relation to their Local Plan. No liability is accepted for any costs claims or losses arising from the use of this document, or any part thereof, for any purpose other than that for which it has specifically been prepared or for use by any party other than Cherwell District Council. The information which Atkins Limited has provided has been prepared by an environmental specialist in accordance with the Code of Professional Conduct of the Chartered Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management. Atkins Limited confirms that the opinions expressed are our true and professional opinions. This document does not purport to provide legal advice. Atkins Limited This document has 87 pages including the cover. Document history Job number: 5073978 Document Ref: P:\GBWAI\DE2\EM&R_AF0024_1070\5073978.402 Cherwell HRA\HRA Screening Part 1 Update\Cherwell Local Proposed Submission Plan HRA Draft 1 Version Purpose description Originated Checked Reviewed Authorised Date 01 Draft A Watson L Gorman L Gorman June 2017 Client Signoff Client Cherwell District Council Project Cherwell District Council Local Plan Part 1 Partial Review Proposed Submission Plan Document Title Habitat Regulations Assessment Report on the Partial Review of the Cherwell Local Plan 2011-2031 (Part 1): Oxford’s unmet housing needs Proposed Submission Plan Job No. 5073978 Copy No. -
Strategic Environmental Assessment
Screening Statement on the determination of the need for a Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) in accordance with the Environmental Assessment of Plans and Programmes Regulations 2004 and European Directive 2001/42/EC for the Beckley and Stowood Neighbourhood Development Plan 19 MAY 2021 SUMMARY Following consultation with the statutory bodies, South Oxfordshire District Council (the ‘Council’) determines that Beckley and Stowood Neighbourhood Development Plan (NDP) does require a Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA). INTRODUCTION 1. An initial screening opinion was used to determine whether or not the contents of the emerging Beckley and Stowood Neighbourhood Development Plan (NDP) requires a Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) in accordance with the European Directive 2011/42/EC (the Directive) and associated Environmental Assessment of Plans and Programmes Regulations 2004 (the Regulations). 2. Any land use plan or programme ‘which sets the framework for future development consent of projects’ must be screened according to a set of criteria from Annex II of the Directive and Schedule 1 of the Regulations. These criteria include exceptions for plans ‘which determine the use of a small area at local level’ or which only propose ‘minor modifications to a plan’, if it is determined that the plan is unlikely to have significant environmental effects. 3. The initial screening opinion was subject to consultation with Historic England, the Environment Agency and Natural England. The results of the screening process are detailed in this Screening Statement. THE SCREENING PROCESS 1. Using the criteria set out in Annex II of the Directive and Schedule 1 of the Regulations, a Screening Opinion determines whether a plan or programme is likely to have significant environmental effects. -
Shotover Country Park Management Plan
OXFORD CITY COUNCIL SHOTOVER COUNTRY PARK MANAGEMENT PLAN lac/jw/keep/shotover 1 FORWARD This management plan for Shotover County Park was prepared in 1988 and supersedes Shotover’s original plan prepared in 1979-80. The intention of the plan is to provide a tool to enable the Oxford City Council to ensure the long term wise management of the Country Park. A draft of this plan has been read by many individuals and organisations and their comments led to many changes in the plan. Another value of the approved plan is that it will provide a ready means of informing interested members of the public about the background to all that goes on in the Country Park. The format of the plan is recommended by the Nature Conservancy Council, is identical to that used for Oxford City’s Local Nature Reserves and is similar to that used world-wide for forest management plans. lac/jw/keep/shotover 2 CONTENTS Forward Contents List of Figures PART ONE: DESCRIPTION 1.1 General Information on Shotover 1.1. Location 1.1.2 Summary description 1.1.3 Land tenure 1.1.4 Photographic coverage 1.2 Environmental Information 1.2.1 Physical 1.2.1.1. Climate 1.2.1.2. Hydrology 1.2.1.3 Geology 1.2.2 Biological 1.2.2.1 Vegetation 1.2.2.1.1 Woodland 1.2.2.1.2 Scrub and hedges 1.2.2.1.3 Grassland 1.2.2.1.4 Heathland 1.2.2.1.5 Wetlands 1.2.2.1.6 Arable/improved pasture 1.2.2.2 Floral 1.2.2.3 Fauna 1.2.3 Cultural Information 1.2.3.1 Historical 1.2.3.2 Land use history 1.2.3.3 Past management by Oxford City 1.2.3.4 Public interest 1.3 Bibliography PART TWO: EVALUATION AND OBJECTIVES lac/jw/keep/shotover 3 2.1.1 Scientific history 2.1.2 SSSI status 2.1.3 Site definition and boundaries 2.2.1 Evaluation 2.2.2. -
Risk Maps for Individual Host Species and Lists of Designated Sites at Risk
APPENDIX 2: RISK MAPS FOR INDIVIDUAL HOST SPECIES AND LISTS OF DESIGNATED SITES AT RISK. Figure 1 Risk posed to V. myrtillus under the three different risk scenarios. .......................... 2 Figure 2 Risk posed to V. vitis-idaea under the three different risk scenarios. ....................... 3 Figure 3. Risk posed to C. vulgaris under the three different risk scenarios. .......................... 4 Figure 4 Risk posed to SSSIs for species V. myrtillus, V. vitis-idaea, A. uva-ursi and C. vulgaris under the three different risk scenarios. ............................................................. 5 Figure 5 Risk posed to SSSIs for species V. myrtillus, V. vitis-idaea and A. uva-ursi under the three different risk scenarios. ..................................................................................... 6 Figure 6 Risk posed to SPAs for species V. myrtillus, V. vitis-idaea, A. uva-ursi and C. vulgaris under the three different risk scenarios. ............................................................. 7 Figure 7 Risk posed to SPAs for species V. myrtillus, V. vitis-idaea and A. uva-ursi under the three different risk scenarios. ........................................................................................... 8 Figure 8 Risk posed to SACs for species V. myrtillus, V. vitis-idaea, A. uva-ursi and C. vulgaris under the three different risk scenarios. ............................................................. 9 Figure 9 Risk posed to SACs for species, V. myrtillus, V. vitis-idaea and A. uva-ursi under the three different risk scenarios. ................................................................................... 10 Table 1 Lists of all SPAs selected out as potentially suitable, with details of the total suitable area and their inclusion in each of the risk scenarios. ................................................... 11 Table 2 Lists of all SACs selected out as potentially suitable, with details of the total suitable area and their inclusion in each of the risk scenarios. -
South Oxfordshire District Council Local Plan 2034 PUBLICATION VERSION
Local Plan 2034 PUBLICATION VERSION South Oxfordshire District Council 242 South Oxfordshire District Council Local Plan 2034 PUBLICATION VERSION Appendix 1 Glossary Access to Natural Greenspace Standard (ANGSt) need not be a registered provider); and (c) it ANGSt is a tool in assessing current levels of accessible includes provisions to remain at an affordable price natural greenspace, and planning for better provision. for future eligible households, or for the subsidy The three underlying principles of ANGSt are: to be recycled for alternative affordable housing a) Improving access to greenspaces provision. For Build to Rent schemes affordable b) Improving naturalness of greenspaces housing for rent is expected to be the normal c) Improving connectivity with greenspaces form of affordable housing provision (and, in this ANGST sets a maximum recommended standard context, is known as Affordable Private Rent). on walking distance people should have to travel b) Starter homes: is as specified in Sections 2 and 3 to have access to accessible natural greenspace. of the Housing and Planning Act 2016 and any For more information see “Nature Nearby” secondary legislation made under these sections. publication from Natural England, available online The definition of a starter home should eflectr the at: http://publications.naturalengland.org.uk/ meaning set out in statute and any such secondary publication/40004 legislation at the time of plan-preparation or For more information please visit: decision-making. Where secondary legislation has www.naturalengland.org.uk/ the effect of limiting a household’s eligibility to regions/east_of_england/ourwork/gi/ purchase a starter home to those with a particular accessiblenaturalgreenspacestandardangst.aspx maximum level of household income, those restrictions should be used. -
Oxford to Cambridge Expressway Corridor Assessment Report 2018
Oxford to Cambridge expressway Corridor Assessment Report 2018 Contents 0. Executive summary .................................................................................................................................. 1 0.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1 0.2 Project Objectives ....................................................................................................................................... 2 0.3 Description of Corridors .............................................................................................................................. 6 0.4 Common Corridors existing conditions ....................................................................................................... 8 0.5 Corridor A existing conditions ................................................................................................................... 10 0.6 Corridor B existing conditions ................................................................................................................... 12 0.7 Corridor C Constraints and Opportunities ................................................................................................. 14 0.8 Sifting Methodology .................................................................................................................................. 16 0.9 Detailed Assessment of Corridor A ..........................................................................................................