DOCSLIB.ORG

Mississippi Delta Regional Initiative

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mississippi Delta Regional Initiative MISSISSIPPI DELTA: BEYOND 2000 INVENTORY Based on issues discussed in the 1990 Report, The Delta Initiatives (This information is updated on an ongoing basis.) The following is a detailed supplement to the Report published in September 1999 entitled The Mississippi Delta: Beyond 2000 under the leadership of Secretary Rodney E. Slater, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Transportation. The Report is available on the Department of Transportation's Delta Web-site. This document is a review of federal activities in the 219- county region in seven states as defined by the Lower Mississippi Delta Development Commission in 1990. Much of the Inventory is in the form of an update of the 1990 Report of that Commission, although new issues have been added in recognition of changes that have taken place during the 1990s. The information will be updated on an ongoing basis. Inquiries can either be e-mailed to this address, or mailed to: Harold Gist, Office of Inter-Governmental Affairs United States Department of Transportation 400 7th Street, SW Room 10405 Washington, DC 20590 The Inventory deals with the following issues: HUMAN CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT Community Development Housing Education Job Growth Health NATURAL, PHYSICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSETS Transportation Agriculture Infrastructure Natural Resources and Environment BUSINESS AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT Business and Industrial Development Tourism DIVERSITY 1 I. HUMAN CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT Community Development: Empowerment Zones and Enterprise Communities In 1990, the Lower Mississippi Delta Development Commission (the Commission) recommended that communities in the 219 Delta counties should develop strategic plans that are integrated with state, regional and federal entities. The Commission noted the problems of inadequate funds, training and technical assistance, and emphasized the importance of local leadership initiatives in addressing these problems. The 1990 Report of the Commission urged the President and Congress to structure Rural Development legislation to build upon local leadership initiatives rather than creating competing ones. “Families on welfare and in crisis situations,” the Commission stated, “need a multitude of services. Breaking the welfare cycle requires more than financial assistance and a medical card. It requires a concentrated and comprehensive effort.” The Commission stressed that a joint, cooperative approach must be developed that embraced a coalition of community-based organizations, private sector partners, nonprofit foundations, as well as state and federal partners. The Empowerment Zones/Enterprise Communities Program As President, Bill Clinton has pursued the basic objectives he earlier supported as Chair of the Commission through a Presidential initiative known as the Empowerment Zones and Enterprise Communities (EZ/EC) program. EZ/EC is a Clinton administration initiative designed to create solutions to community problems of endemic poverty, high unemployment and general distress. The program is based upon four key principles: economic opportunity, sustainable community development, community-based partnerships, and strategic vision for change. The urban Empowerment Zones and Enterprise Communities are assisted by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), while the rural Empowerment Zones, Enterprise Communities and Champion Communities are assisted by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Office of Community Development. The 1990 Report contained a major section on “Community Development,” the basic principles of which are now being supported in EZ/EC communities in the Delta and in other regions throughout America. EZ/EC Round I: In 1994, USDA designated three Empowerment Zones and 30 Enterprise Communities in Round I of the program, which was created by Title XIII of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993. Each applicant community was required to engage in extensive community planning to develop a strategic plan for its EZ/EC application. Applications were rated on their degree of innovation, the extent to which the community— especially low-income residents—took part in the planning process and would be responsible for implementation, and their adherence to the basic principles of economic opportunity, sustainable community development, community-based partnerships, and strategic vision for change. The Round I communities included eight rural and five urban EZ’s and EC’s in the seven Mississippi Delta states studied by the Commission in 1990. HUD has given special assistance to the five HUD-designated Enterprise Communities in the lower Mississippi Delta. These are: Pulaski 2 County, Arkansas; Ouachita Parish, Louisiana; Memphis, Tennessee; Jackson, Mississippi and New Orleans, Louisiana. These five Enterprise Communities are quite different in their locales and their ultimate goals, but they all provide excellent examples of what can be accomplished through partnership. The eight USDA EZ’s and EC’s in Round I were: Mid-Delta Mississippi Empowerment Zone, Mississippi; North Delta Mississippi Enterprise Community, Mississippi; Macon Ridge Enterprise Community, Louisiana; Northeast Louisiana Delta Enterprise Community, Louisiana; Mississippi County Enterprise Community, Arkansas; East Central Arkansas Enterprise Community, Arkansas; Fayette/Howard Enterprise Community, Tennessee; East Prairie Enterprise Community, Missouri. In Round II, a new EZ was designated: the Southernmost Illinois Delta Empowerment Zone. Strategic plans: Each locally-developed strategic plan in the Delta was crafted with the support and participation of the community. Residents, community-based organizations, and private sector partners made decisions on the plan’s focus not in the traditional top-down manner, but by achieving consensus within the community, thus empowering it to create its own vision for the future. Each plan identified community priorities and goals and established goals for accomplishing them. Leveraging of funding: In Round I, the EZ/EC program provides flexible block grant funding to assist in implementing communities’ plans: two Health and Human Services Social Security block grants totaling $40 million for each EZ, and one grant for just under to $3 million for each EC. Communities succeeded in leveraging their federal funding with commitments from state, county, and local governments, private businesses, and nonprofit and foundation awards. The average leveraging ratio for communities from its beginning in 1994 to 1999 was approximately 10 dollars of additional funding for each one dollar of EZ/EC funding. Empowerment Zone employers gained tax credits equal to 20 percent of the first $15,000 in wages or training expenses for qualified employees. Tax-free facility bonds of up to $3 million were available for some EZ’s and EC’s. Further, qualified businesses could receive an additional $20,000 tax deduction for investments in Empowerment Zones. Communities also received priority consideration for many other federal programs. Champion Communities: In order to maintain ties with communities that crafted a strategic plan, 182 of the 227 rural applicants in Round I received “Champion Community” status. These communities were not designated as EZ’s or EC’s, but they still receive assistance as a response to specific requests for funding and technical assistance. Establishment of Southern EZ/EC Forum and the Mississippi Delta Regional Initiative: The Southern EZ/EC Forum began as an informal organization of rural and urban EZ’s and EC’s in Arkansas, Louisiana, and Mississippi. This organization held quarterly meetings beginning in 1995 to share program ideas and discuss issues of mutual concern. The Chair is Thelma French, New Orleans EC (urban), and the Vice Chair is Moses J. Williams, Northeast Lousiana Delta EC (rural). The USDA Office of Community Development (OCD) discussed with Forum leaders in August, 1997 the possibility of forming a Delta regional initiative similar to the multi-state Southwest Border Regional Partnership that was organized in 3 June, 1997, with Vice President Gore attending the kick-off meeting in Texas. Because of the similar cultural and economic conditions throughout the Delta, the regional approach was supported as an effective way to strengthen the area’s ability to attract resources by speaking with one united, regional voice. In October 1997, OCD began implementing a Cooperative Agreement between USDA and the Lower Mississippi Delta Development Center (LMDDC), which was formerly known as the Lower Mississippi Delta Development Commission. OCD and Forum leaders concluded that EZ and EC communities should partner with LMDDC. By using the remaining years of priority funding in Round I and leveraging other resources, they could effectively aid in implementing the recommendations of the 1990 Report of the Lower Mississippi Delta Development Commission. The Forum and OCD then cooperated in forming a Delta regional initiative consisting of LMDDC, the Enterprise Corporation of the Delta, the Forum, and the Foundation for the Mid- South. The Forum expanded to include all of the 7 states studied by the Commission, and also voted to add Alabama. April, 1998 meeting in New Orleans to sign the Delta regional Partnership Agreement: A Partnership Agreement was drafted in the form of a social compact between the organizations to work cooperatively for sustainable economic and community development to improve the quality of life in the Delta. The parties signed this agreement on April 16, 1998, at a meeting
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Yazoo-Mississippi Delta Levee Board and Staff Wish the Citizens Of
    \ Yazoo-Mississippi Delta Levee Board • HAPPY HOLIDAYS • President Sykes Sturdivant Receives Volunteer Service Award The Yazoo-Mississippi Delta Levee Board President Sykes Sturdivant was the recipient of Volunteer Yazoo-Mississippi Northwest Mississippi’s President’s Volunteer Service Award. The award, established by the President’s Delta Levee Board Council on Service and Civic Participation, was given to 25 outstanding volunteers from eight counties. The official publication of the Yazoo-Mississippi Delta Levee District WINTER 2010 Vol. 4, Number 1 Sturdivant has served as Levee Board president for and Staff 14 years. He is a long-time member of the West Tallahatchie Habitat for Humanity and serves on the FEMA Map Modernization Program Emmett Till Memorial Commission. wish the citizens Arrives in the Mississippi Delta of our region In fiscal year 2003, the Federal used by FEMA in their map moderniza- Dabney, a gray fox squirrel, lives in a tree behind Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) tion project are accurate to only 5.0 feet. the Levee Board Building and has become the ________Copywriter ________Copy Editor a safe and festive began a multiyear map modernization The Upper Yazoo Project is a federally . official Levee Board pet. project of Flood Insurance Rate Maps funded project which began actual con- (FIRM) under the National Flood struction near Yazoo City in 1976 and holiday season! Insurance program with a total cost of has progressed upstream to just south of $1.6 billion as appropriated by Congress. Mississippi Highway 32 in Tallahatchie Artist ________Art Dir These new maps are referred to as County. The project is designed to .
    [Show full text]
  • D.C. School Breakfast Scorecard
    The District of Columbia’s School Breakfast Scorecard for School Year 2017–2018 Acknowledgments D.C. Hunger Solutions gratefully acknowledges the support of the following funders to improve and expand participation in the child nutrition programs in 2017–2018: n The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation; n Clark Charitable Foundation; n Naomi and Nehemiah Cohen Foundation; n Consumer Health Foundation; n John Edward Fowler Memorial Foundation; n Hunger Is, a program of Albertsons Companies Foundation; n Kaiser Permanente of the Mid-Atlantic States; n Eugene and Agnes E. Meyer Foundation; n The Moriah Fund; n Morningstar Foundation; n Prince Charitable Trusts; n Share Our Strength; n Walmart Foundation; and n World Bank Community Connections Campaign. This report was written by Paige Pokorney, anti-hunger program associate for child nutrition programs at D.C. Hunger Solutions. About D.C. Hunger Solutions D.C. Hunger Solutions, founded in 2002 as an initiative of the Food Research & Action Center, seeks to create a hunger-free community and improve the nutrition, health, economic security, and well-being of low-income residents in the District of Columbia. To learn more about D.C. Hunger Solutions, visit www.dchunger.org. The District of Columbia’s School Breakfast Scorecard n dchunger.org 3 Introduction On an average day during the 2017–2018 but the District has been losing ground in school year, more than 30,000 low-income the last few years. In the 2010–2011 school students in the nation’s capital ate school year, D.C. ranked first in the nation, but has breakfast. With 69.1 low-income students since fallen in the rankings as other states participating in school breakfast for every have prioritized expanding access to school 100 who received school lunch, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resources Overview
    United States Department of Agriculture Cultural Resources Overview F.orest Service National Forests in Mississippi Jackson, mMississippi CULTURAL RESOURCES OVERVIEW FOR THE NATIONAL FORESTS IN MISSISSIPPI Compiled by Mark F. DeLeon Forest Archaeologist LAND MANAGEMENT PLANNING NATIONAL FORESTS IN MISSISSIPPI USDA Forest Service 100 West Capitol Street, Suite 1141 Jackson, Mississippi 39269 September 1983 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page List of Figures and Tables ............................................... iv Acknowledgements .......................................................... v INTRODUCTION ........................................................... 1 Cultural Resources Cultural Resource Values Cultural Resource Management Federal Leadership for the Preservation of Cultural Resources The Development of Historic Preservation in the United States Laws and Regulations Affecting Archaeological Resources GEOGRAPHIC SETTING ................................................ 11 Forest Description and Environment PREHISTORIC OUTLINE ............................................... 17 Paleo Indian Stage Archaic Stage Poverty Point Period Woodland Stage Mississippian Stage HISTORICAL OUTLINE ................................................ 28 FOREST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ............................. 35 Timber Practices Land Exchange Program Forest Engineering Program Special Uses Recreation KNOWN CULTURAL RESOURCES ON THE FOREST........... 41 Bienville National Forest Delta National Forest DeSoto National Forest ii KNOWN CULTURAL RESOURCES ON THE
    [Show full text]
  • White House Staffs: a Study
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Supervised Undergraduate Student Research Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects and Creative Work 5-1997 White House Staffs: A Study Eric Jackson Stansell University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj Recommended Citation Stansell, Eric Jackson, "White House Staffs: A Study" (1997). Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj/241 This is brought to you for free and open access by the Supervised Undergraduate Student Research and Creative Work at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNIVERSITY HONORS PROGRAM SENIOR PROJECT - APPROVAL Name: _Er~ __ ~t~~~g.Jl ____________________________________ _ College: J:..t"j.§_~ __~=i.~~~,=-~___ Department: _Cc:.ti~:a-t:;..-_~~_~~l~!:"~ __ - Faculty Mentor: __Q~!.. ___ M~~69&-1 ___ f~j"k%~.r~ld _________________ _ PROJECT TITLE: __~_\i.hik_H<?.~&_~t",-{:f~~ __ ~__ ~jM-/_: ________ _ I have reviewed this completed senior honors thesis with this student and certify that it is a project commensurate with honors level undergraduate research in this field. Signed: ~~#_~::t~~ Faculty Mentor ______________ , Date: ~/l7.t-~EL ______ --- Comments (Optional): "White House Staffs: A Study" by Eric Stansell August 11, 1997 "White House StatTs: A Study" by Eric Stansell Abstract In its current form, the modem presidency consists of much more than just a single individual elected to serve as the head of government.
    [Show full text]
  • Increasing STEM Awareness in Under-Served Communities
    Increasing STEM Awareness in Under-Served Communities Dr. Dan Trent Associate Professor Engineering Technology Mississippi Valley State University Increasing STEM Awareness in Under-Served Communities Actualizing STEM Potential in the Mississippi Delta National Science Foundation Award #1511792 Increasing STEM Awareness in Under-Served Communities Actualizing STEM Potential in the Mississippi Delta The Mississippi Delta Often called “The most southern place on Earth” because of its unique racial, cultural, and economic history. It is 200 miles long and 87 miles across at its widest point, encompassing some 7,000 square miles of alluvial floodplain Increasing STEM Awareness in Under-Served Communities Actualizing STEM Potential in the Mississippi Delta The Population Gentry High School Indianola, Mississippi Increasing STEM Awareness in Under-Served Communities Actualizing STEM Potential in the Mississippi Delta The Population Sunflower County, Mississippi Population = 25,981 Down 11.6% since 2010 74% Black 24.6% White Increasing STEM Awareness in Under-Served Communities Actualizing STEM Potential in the Mississippi Delta The Population Sunflower County, Mississippi In civilian workforce 47.5% Poverty rate = 34.6% Black in poverty 89.5% White in poverty 8.9% Increasing STEM Awareness in Under-Served Communities Actualizing STEM Potential in the Mississippi Delta The Population Sunflower County, Mississippi Per capita income = $14,427 ($1,202/month) Households with a computer = 73.7% With Internet access 54% Increasing STEM Awareness in
    [Show full text]
  • Wic, Medicaid, and Snap: Teaming up to Improve the Health of Women and Children
    WIC, MEDICAID, AND SNAP: TEAMING UP TO IMPROVE THE HEALTH OF WOMEN AND CHILDREN THE IMPORTANCE OF THE IMPORTANCE NWA’S MISSION MEDICAID FOR WIC OF SNAP FOR WIC PARTICIPANTS PARTICIPANTS The National The vast majority of WIC participants WIC benefits are not meant to cover WIC Association rely on Medicaid and/or the Children’s a full grocery basket of food each (NWA) provides its Health Insurance Program (CHIP)— month. Instead, targeted foods members with tools which provides coverage to uninsured address nutritional gaps in the diets of and leadership to children who are not eligible for pregnant women, new mothers, and expand and sustain Medicaid, but cannot afford private young children, For families lacking effective nutrition insurance—for healthcare coverage.3 resources to afford foods beyond the services for In addition to covering nearly half scope of WIC, SNAP plays a vital role. mothers and young of all births in the US, Medicaid A large body of research demonstrates children. provides a range of prenatal and that SNAP reduces the number of postpartum services that are key households facing food insecurity.7 8 to improving outcomes for WIC This is particularly true of households mothers and babies during these with children, with conservative vital periods.4 Most states’ Medicaid estimates attributing a reduction in OVERVIEW OF WIC programs cover access to prenatal childhood food insecurity of at least The Special Supplemental Nutrition vitamins, ultrasounds, amniocentesis, 8.1% to SNAP.9 Other studies assert Program for Women, Infants, and chorionic villus sampling (CVS) tests, that a mere six months of participation Children (WIC), the nation’s premier genetic counseling, breast pumps, in SNAP reduces the likelihood of public health nutrition program, has and postpartum home visiting.5 This food insecurity by one-third compared improved the health of women, infants, coverage plays a critical role in to similarly situated households.10 and children for 46 years.
    [Show full text]
  • National Forests in Mississippi
    The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TTY). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Land and Resource Management Plan National Forests in Mississippi Forest Supervisor’s Office – Jackson, Mississippi Bienville National Forest – Forest, Mississippi Delta National Forest – Rolling Fork, Mississippi De Soto National Forest: Chickasawhay Ranger District – Laurel, Mississippi De Soto Ranger District - Wiggins, Mississippi Holly Springs National Forest – Oxford, Mississippi (Includes the Yalobusha Unit) Homochitto National Forest – Meadville, Mississippi Tombigbee National Forest – Ackerman, Mississippi (Includes the Ackerman and Trace Units) Responsible Official: Elizabeth Agpaoa, Regional Forester Southern Region
    [Show full text]
  • FCC Should Evaluate the Efficiency and Effectiveness of the Lifeline Program
    United States Government Accountability Office T estimony Before the Subcommittee on Communications, Technology, Innovation and the Internet, Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, U.S. S enate For Release on Delivery Expected at 9:30 a.m. ET Tuesday, June 2, 2015 TELECOMMUNICATIONS FCC Should Evaluate the Efficiency and Effectiveness of the Lifeline Program Statement of Michael Clements, Acting Director Physical Infrastructure Issues ACCESSIBLE VERSION GAO-15-638T Letter Letter Chairman Wicker, Ranking Member Schatz, and Members of the Subcommittee: I am pleased to be here today as you discuss the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) efforts to promote telephone subscribership among low-income households. Through the Lifeline program, companies provide discounts to eligible low-income households for telephone service. The Lifeline program supports these companies through the Universal Service Fund, which is funded through mandatory fees that are usually passed along to consumers through a charge applied to their monthly telephone bills. The Lifeline program was created in the mid-1980s and has traditionally centered on wireline residential telephone service. However, FCC actions in 2005 and 2008 paved the way for prepaid wireless companies to begin offering Lifeline service in 2008; at the time, FCC did not quantify or estimate the potential increases in participation from its decision. Subsequently, Lifeline experienced rapid growth in participation and disbursements. In particular, from mid-2008 to mid-2012, Lifeline
    [Show full text]
  • Administration Officials' Biographies
    THE PRESIDENT ’S MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD Administration Officials Senior Executive Service (SES) Session Scott Gould, Deputy Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs Seth Harris, Deputy Secretary, Department of Labor Christine Kluh, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs David Lebryk, Commissioner of the Financial Management Service, Department of the Treasury Katie Malague, Performance Manager, White House Office of Management and Budget Catherine Murphy, Regional Solicitor, Department of Labor Stephen Shih, Deputy Associate Director for Executive Resources and Employee Development, Office of Personnel Management Denise Wells, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Human Resources and Chief Human Capital Officer, Department of Health and Human Services W. SCOTT GOULD, DEPUTY SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS W. Scott Gould was nominated by President Obama to serve as Deputy Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and subsequently confirmed by the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee on April 2, 2009. As Deputy Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Gould serves as the chief operating officer of the federal government's second largest department, responsible for a nationwide system of health care services, benefits programs and national cemeteries for America’s veterans and their dependents. Prior to his appointment to the VA, Gould was Vice President for public sector strategy at IBM Global Business Services where he focused on strategy and innovation. Previously, he was Chief Executive Officer of The O’Gara Company, a strategic advisory and investment services firm, and Chief Operating Officer of Exolve, a technology services company. The former Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary for Administration at the Department of Commerce, Gould has also served as Deputy Assistant Secretary for Finance and Management at the Treasury Department.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 1: Evaluating Borrower Income Chapter 4
    HB-1-3550 CHAPTER 4: BORROWER ELIGIBILITY 4.1 OVERVIEW Ensuring that all applicants served are eligible and receive the correct amount of assistance is a significant responsibility of Loan Originators and Loan Approval Officials. A borrower must be income-eligible, demonstrate a credit history that indicates ability and willingness to repay a loan, and meet a variety of other program requirements. This chapter provides guidance for each of these areas. • Section 1: Evaluating Borrower Income provides instructions for calculating and verifying annual, adjusted, and repayment income. • Section 2: Evaluating Borrower Assets discusses Agency requirements for cash contributions to the purchase and methods for computing income from assets. • Section 3: Credit History identifies indicators of acceptable and unacceptable credit and provides instructions for reviewing an applicant’s credit history. • Section 4: Other Eligibility Requirements addresses a variety of other requirements applicants must meet to be eligible for the program. • Section 5: Processing the Certificate of Eligibility provides policies and procedures for processing Form FD 1944-59, Certificate of Eligibility. SECTION 1: EVALUATING BORROWER INCOME 4.2 OVERVIEW [7 CFR 3550.53(a) and (g), 7 CFR 3550.54] Loan Originators use income information to: (1) help determine whether an applicant is eligible for a loan; (2) calculate the applicant’s ability to repay a loan; and (3) determine the amount of the loan and the amount of payment subsidy the household can obtain. When reviewing an applicant’s repayment income, the Loan Originator must determine whether the income is stable and dependable. This will typically be accomplished by reviewing information provided in the application, paystubs, tax returns, and oral verifications.
    [Show full text]
  • And Others the National Evaluation of School Nutrition Programs. System
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 218 opl PS 012 919 AUTHOR Nelson, Kathryn; Ed.; And Others TITLE The National Evaluation of School Nutrition Programs. Review of Research :. Volume' 2. INSTITUTION System Development Corp., Santa Monica, Calif. SPONS:AdENCY Ftiod and Nutrition Service (DOA), Washington, DC. Office of Policy, Planning and Evaluation. )PUBDATE Apr 81 El 330p.; For related documents, see PS 012 918-920. EDRS RICE MF01/PC14 Plus Postage. DESCRI TORS *Breakfast Programs; Delivery Systems; Elementary Secondary Oducation; Federal Legislation; *Federal Programs; Literature Reviews; *Lunch Programs; *Nutrition; Participant Characteristics; Program -Effectiveness; *Program Evaluation; Research Methodology IDENTIFIERS Food Consumption; *Milk Programs ABSTRACT 'Findings of a review 4f research pertaining to federally subsidized school nutriition-programs are preSented in this :report. The aim of iimarreview of Tesearch ii to-provide guidante for the-desig*-of the sUbseguerit parts of the evaluation by describing , the-;t0hool nutrition programs and their operations and by providing- -haseliniAnformation on nutritional status assessment,on the nutritional status of school -age children,on program impact, and on the ctrrespendence between- targeting- -of prOgrat:benefits- and teCipients' needs. The review identifies areasthat need fUrther inVestigation and also identifies methodological approaches that lead to 10C-teased-knowledge of the programs and their effects. Chapter 4 in ,thIS-SecOnd volume of iht review describes the few large and several smaller studies which have investigated the impact of,ichool -nutrition Programs: Much of this chapter is concerned withan .analysis of the methodologies used in the reported studies. Chapter 5 first eXamines how benefits are targetid, next focusing on the correspondence between the nutritional needs of schoOl-age children .and the'- programs' nutritional benefits.
    [Show full text]
  • January 1972
    1- -/- r-FI - M . , 2 1. I ./ r..1 1 ..1 .91"r«Fr 11 'L ' 4 *L :,1 1 1 15'i'&11& ..-t *4-**4,- '+ , 1 ,#146*1\ :1,#F'i- ihlf,1,r. 'flijh/f»--,1~.Ati ·, 4 <A/ 1,11 -. , . NNU -A . * IA- 1 IIi,_ %4'1 r'll,I, , . ...... ........ ..~..1.... - 9, , .t 1, 14., '.,r'. - 4-- . 3 8 . il- . 191 01, t . Ad v - » r'* _ , , I I r V '- 4 \ '111 11 4 1, 14, , 4 7S* . GOLD CARD PRESENTATIONS signifying Honorary Membership in Ope- 4/36, Reg, 231681; C. J. Mahan, Init. 7/27, Reg. 179387: Don E. Malhiot, rating Engineers Local Union No. 3 were made by Business Manager Al Init. 12/32, Reg. 202738; Meryl D. Mayes, Init. 12/36, Reg. 238116; John Clen- a- the Semi-Annual Meeting to Brothers E. J. Blood, Int. 7/17, Reg. F. Regallo, Init. 5/36, Reg. 232718; C. A. Schroff, Init. 4/30, Reg. 195110: 87915· C. C. Clark, Init. 3/30, Reg. 194797; Earl Dooley, Init. 9/35, Reg. Hobart Simpson, Init. 9/32, Reg. 202429; C. W. Stevens, Init. 9/28, Reg. 227545 George Ernst, Init. 4/36, Reg. 230898; Barney Felix, Init. 4/36, 187508: George W. Stevens, Init, 2/31, Reg, 198375 and Earl Stiles, Init. Reg. 23 1675; Ralph L, Foy, Init. 5/36, Reg. 23652; Robert Hall, Init. 9/35, 12/36, Reg. 239392. A standing ovation followed the presentations. Reg. 226889; F, M. Lauritzen, 9/35, Reg. 227,552; Philip Perrin, Init. "Serving the men who move tbe earth.'" ~~ ENGINEERS Cr »~ iNH :W 48 <tlESN>- PUBLISHED TO PROMOTE THE GENERAL WELFARE OF ALL ENGINEERS AND THEIR FAMILIES 1.
    [Show full text]