From Churches in Cultural Captivity to the Church Incarnate

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

From Churches in Cultural Captivity to the Church Incarnate FROM CHURCHES IN CULTURAL CAPTIVITY TO THE CHURCH INCARNATE IN A CULTURE: ECCLESIAL MEDIATION AFTER THE DISSOLUTION OF THE SOUTHERN BAPTIST SUBCULTURE Dissertation Submitted to The College of Arts and Sciences of the UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Theology By Coleman Fannin UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON Dayton, Ohio December, 2014 FROM CHURCHES IN CULTURAL CAPTIVITY TO THE CHURCH INCARNATE IN A CULTURE: ECCLESIAL MEDIATION AFTER THE DISSOLUTION OF THE SOUTHERN BAPTIST SUBCULTURE Name: Fannin, Coleman APPROVED BY: ____________________________________________________________ William L. Portier, Ph.D. Faculty Advisor ____________________________________________________________ Kelly S. Johnson, Ph.D. Faculty Reader ____________________________________________________________ Brad J. Kallenberg, Ph.D. Faculty Reader ____________________________________________________________ William V. Trollinger, Ph.D. Faculty Reader ____________________________________________________________ Curtis W. Freeman, Ph.D. Outside Faculty Reader ____________________________________________________________ Daniel S. Thompson, Ph.D. Chairperson ii © Copyright by Coleman Fannin All rights reserved 2014 iii ABSTRACT FROM CHURCHES IN CULTURAL CAPTIVITY TO THE CHURCH INCARNATE IN A CULTURE: ECCLESIAL MEDIATION AFTER THE DISSOLUTION OF THE SOUTHERN BAPTIST SUBCULTURE Name: Fannin, Coleman University of Dayton Advisor: Dr. William L. Portier This dissertation is an analysis of how my tribe of moderate Baptists arrived at a state of theological paralysis, unable to go forward together but unwilling to critically assess their own history or constructively engage with the broader Christian tradition, and a proposal for how they might seek consensus and renewal. It resembles quite a few recent Baptist projects in that it attempts to make sense of the past in order to be faithful in the future, but it is distinct in that it focuses on the roles of southern culture and especially the Southern Baptist subculture in shaping theology and ethics. It argues that the dissolution of the subculture has distanced moderates from one another and the universal church, thereby impoverishing their thought and action and deepening their captivity to culture. However, it also argues that by exposing flaws in their conception of freedom, the dissolution of the subculture presents an opportunity to develop a robust ecclesiology and theology of tradition with the goal of again incarnating their faith in its own culture, one that both inhabits and transcends American culture. iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am indebted to the faculty of the Department of Religious Studies at the University of Dayton and to the members of the Region at Large of the National Association of Baptist Professors of Religion for their guidance, professional and personal, throughout my doctoral studies. I am particularly indebted to the members of my committee for their insights and suggestions as I developed and refined this dissertation. I am also grateful for my fellow students at UD for their friendship as well as the many hours of stimulating conversation inside and outside the classroom and for the members of the First Baptist Church of Dayton for providing a welcoming community of faith while we lived in Ohio. Finally, I could not have completed this dissertation without the love and support, and even the occasional distraction, of my wife and our two children who were born in the midst of the writing process. For their sake, I hope it contributes to a renewal of the Baptist tradition within the context of the church catholic. v TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ....................................................................................................................... iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .................................................................................................. v INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 Soul Freedom and Its Discontents .......................................................................... 1 Baptistification Takes Over Baptist Identity ......................................................... 13 Overview ............................................................................................................... 22 I. CULTURAL CAPTIVITY REVISITED ...................................................................... 25 A Cultural Establishment ...................................................................................... 26 Revivalism and Democratization .......................................................................... 36 Autonomy and Discipline ..................................................................................... 44 Sectionalism and Nationalism ............................................................................... 52 The Construction of the Subculture ...................................................................... 59 II. THE MYTH OF SOUL COMPETENCY .................................................................... 64 The Enigma of Baptist Belief ............................................................................... 64 The Centrality and Certainty of Experience ......................................................... 75 The Inevitability and Invisibility of the Church ................................................... 84 The Harmony of the Individual and the State ....................................................... 94 The Contradictions of Soul Competency .............................................................. 99 III. THE MEDIATION OF THE SOUTHERN BAPTIST SUBCULTURE ................. 107 Two Senses of Mediation .................................................................................... 107 The Grand Compromise ...................................................................................... 114 Subcultural Expansion and Cultural Captivity ................................................... 122 The Dissolution of the Subculture ...................................................................... 131 The Theological Bind of Post-Subculture Baptists ............................................. 140 IV. A POSTMODERN BAPTIST VISION .................................................................... 149 The Struggle of Baptist Theology ....................................................................... 150 vi The Postmodern Turn in Theology ..................................................................... 156 The Future of the Baptist Vision ......................................................................... 164 The Powerful Practices of Baptist Communities ................................................ 173 Baptist Catholicity .............................................................................................. 181 V. THE CATHOLICITY OF THE BAPTIST TRADITION ......................................... 193 Baptists and Tradition ......................................................................................... 193 Tradition as a Version of Moral Inquiry ............................................................. 197 Tradition as Argument ........................................................................................ 204 Tradition and Catholicity .................................................................................... 211 A New Oxford Movement .................................................................................. 221 CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................... 232 The Exact Opposite of Catholicism .................................................................... 232 The Promise of Evangelical Catholicism ............................................................ 240 BIBLIOGRAPHY ........................................................................................................... 252 vii INTRODUCTION This dissertation is an analysis of how my tribe of moderate Baptists arrived at a state of theological paralysis, unable to go forward together but unwilling to critically assess their own history or constructively engage with the broader Christian tradition, and a proposal for how they might seek consensus and renewal. It resembles quite a few recent Baptist projects in that it attempts to make sense of the past in order to be faithful in the future, but it is distinct in that it focuses on the roles of southern culture and especially the Southern Baptist subculture in shaping theology and ethics. It argues that the dissolution of the subculture has distanced moderates from one another and the universal church, thereby impoverishing their thought and action and deepening their captivity to culture. However, it also argues that by exposing flaws in their conception of freedom, the dissolution of the subculture presents an opportunity to develop a robust ecclesiology and theology of tradition with the goal of again incarnating their faith in its own culture, one that both inhabits and transcends American culture. This introduction first describes the theological stance and cultural situation of moderate Baptists, then identifies the methodology of the dissertation and summarizes its content. Soul Freedom and Its Discontents The Cooperative Baptist Fellowship (CBF), my ecclesial home, is over two decades old. Yet its members still tend to call themselves “moderates,” the name they
Recommended publications
  • REVIEW Peter Ochs Another Reformation: Postliberal Christianity and the Jews (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2011), 288 Pp
    Studies in Christian-Jewish Relations REVIEW Peter Ochs Another Reformation: Postliberal Christianity and the Jews (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2011), 288 pp. Christina Smerick, Greenville College Peter Ochs, a Jewish theologian long involved in Jewish- Christian relations, uses a pragmatic philosophical framework, based on Charles Peirce, and his own critique of the dyadic structure of modernist thought, to examine postliberal Chris- tian theologians, both in the US and Great Britain, with regard to “non-supersessionism.” Supersessionism is the doctrinal teaching arguing that Christianity is a new covenant between God and humanity, which replaces the covenant found in Torah between God and the Jewish people. Postliberal thought, Ochs argues, in its rejection of dyadic thinking, also rejects supersessionism as unnecessarily binary and undeserv- ing of a full picture of the God of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and Jesus. He focuses on the theologians George Lindbeck, Rob- ert Jenson, Stanley Hauerwas, John Howard Yoder, Daniel Hardy, and David Ford. Ochs’ main point is that postliberal theologians hold that the Church need not turn from the Gospels or from the history of church doctrine in order to reject supersessionism. Ochs at- tributes this sea change in understanding Christian doctrine to a new, third epoch in the history of Judeo-Christian relations. This epoch, that of “postliberalism,” is one of “relationality that invites both critical reason and a reaffirmation of scriptur- al revelation” (p. 4). He approaches a fuller articulation of this epoch logically, albeit via a “theo-logic” that refuses exclusion and binary oppositions in favor of a pattern of thought that seeks to be reparative and thus guided by a “relational (and thus non-dyadic) logic of inquiry” (p.
    [Show full text]
  • BEFORE the ORIGINAL POSITION the Neo-Orthodox Theology of the Young John Rawls
    BEFORE THE ORIGINAL POSITION The Neo-Orthodox Theology of the Young John Rawls Eric Gregory ABSTRACT This paper examines a remarkable document that has escaped critical at- tention within the vast literature on John Rawls, religion, and liberalism: Rawls’s undergraduate thesis, “A Brief Inquiry into the Meaning of Sin and Faith: An Interpretation Based on the Concept of Community” (1942). The thesis shows the extent to which a once regnant version of Protestant the- ology has retreated into seminaries and divinity schools where it now also meets resistance. Ironically, the young Rawls rejected social contract liber- alism for reasons that anticipate many of the claims later made against him by secular and religious critics. The thesis and Rawls’s late unpublished remarks on religion and World War II offer a new dimension to his intellec- tual biography. They show the significance of his humanist response to the moral impossibility of political theology. Moreover, they also reveal a kind of Rawlsian piety marginalized by contemporary debates over religion and liberalism. KEY WORDS: John Rawls, community, liberalism, religion, political theology, public reason PROTESTANT THEOLOGIAN REINHOLD NIEBUHR DIED IN 1971. In that same year, philosopher John Rawls published his groundbreaking work, A The- ory of Justice. These two events symbolically express transformations in American intellectual and political culture that remain significant today. In the academy, religious defenders of a liberal consensus had been chal- lenged by ascendant secular liberalisms and emergent religious voices critical of liberalism of any kind. Parallel developments in the political culture had begun to see the fracturing of coalitions that transcended di- verse religious and secular commitments in order to support democratic institutions and practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Seminary Olume 78, Number 1 V
    WINTER 2010 VOLUME 78, NUMBER 1 SOUTHERN SEMINARY 1 A Letter from the President t is an encouraging time to be They are complementarians who a Southern Baptist, particularly affirm the biblical roles for men and with the reality that so many young women in both the church and the home. pastors who are driven by the They love God’s gift of marriage and IGospel, animated by the authority and the blessing of children, and they make sufficiency of God’s Word and riveted clear that Christian discipleship requires on seeing God glorified in all things, are faithfulness in marriage, family, parent- leading our churches. hood and sexuality, and they embrace the Recently, I spent a really encouraging Bible’s teaching concerning the roles of few hours with a group of younger pas- men and women. They motivate younger tors — men who are being greatly used men to embrace God’s plan for their of God to reach their own generation lives and lead. They talk openly about and far beyond. That experience made their joy in their wives and children. They me thankful, and also led me to think change diapers. about why Southern Baptists should be They are men of vision. especially thankful for the rising genera- They apply intelligence and discern- tion of young pastors. ment to the building up of the church They are deeply committed to the Gos- and the cause of the Gospel. They see pel and to the authority of Scripture. and seize opportunities. They are plant- They are men driven by conviction ing and building churches that glorify and the ability to “connect the dots” God by reaching the world, preaching theologically.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory to the Baptist World Congress Collection
    BAPTIST CONGRESS PROCEEDINGS COLLECTION AR 40 2 Baptist Congress Proceedings Collection AR 40 Prepared by: Taffey Hall, Archivist Southern Baptist Historical Library and Archives August 2004 Updated October, 2011 Summary Main Entry: Baptist Congress Proceedings Collection Date Span: 1885 – 1912 Abstract: Collection contains papers, addresses, and discussions from Baptist Congress meetings. Title page of proceedings includes list of speakers and topics. Baptist intellectual think tank from 1882 – 1912 and forum for theological, social, and ethical discussions and debates among members of Baptist churches. Modeled after the Episcopal Church Congress and existed to “promote a healthful sentiment among Baptists through free and courteous discussion of current questions by suitable persons.” Size: 1.5 linear ft. Collection#: AR 40 Biographical Sketch The Baptist Congress, a pioneering Baptist intellectual think tank and forum for theological, social, and ethical discussions and debates among members of Baptist churches, existed from 1882 to 1912. The need for an intellectual outlet through which Baptists from various traditions could discuss important and relevant issues of the time was first proposed by Providence, Rhode Island pastor Elias Henry Johnson. Johnson and thirteen other prominent Baptist scholars met in New York City November 29, 1881 and held an informal discussion panel on germane topics. At the meeting, Johnson officially proposed the formation of a Baptist Congress. The first official meeting of the organization was held in Brooklyn, New York in 1882. The Baptist Congress met annually for the next thirty years across the United States and Canada, with the exception of 1891 when no meeting was held. Due to decreasing attendance, the Baptist Congress held its last meeting in Ithaca, New York in 1912.
    [Show full text]
  • How Orthodox and Non-Orthodox Christians
    HOW ORTHODOX AND NON-ORTHODOX CHRISTIANS DIFFER Two Separate Models of Spirituality and Salvation By The Most Reverend Chrysostomos Former Archbishop and Metropolitan Emeritus of Etna I. Orthodoxy, Non-Traditionalist Orthodoxy, and Non-Orthodox Christianity It is difficult, in trying to explain to non-Orthodox (heterodox) Western Christians how Or - thodoxy and Western Christianity differ, without first explaining why, in the Orthodox world, there is an internal division between so-called traditionalist and non-traditionalist Orthodox (or ecu - menists and anti-ecumenists, a distinction that I will address subsequently). I shall, therefore, try to address that very complex issue, before presenting a model for understanding the things that separate Orthodox and non-Orthodox Christians. Traditionalists often, though not exclusively, operate under the banner of the Old Calendar (more precisely, the Church or Festal Calendar) and resistance to the adoption of the Papal or so- called “Revised Julian Calendar” by some Orthodox, and almost all Orthodox in America, in the twentieth century. Non-traditionalists have abandoned many of the traditions of Orthodoxy, some - times the Church Calendar—for which reason they are, in that instance, called “New Calen - darists”—and sometimes, though holding to the Church Calendar, other traditions, such as traditional forms of clerical dress, fasting, and worship, emphasis on monasticism, and so on. Be - tween the traditionalists and non-traditionalists there are varying degrees of interaction, variously marked by brotherly toleration of differences in practice and belief and, unfortunately, shockingly opprobrious hostility and enmity. This division in Orthodoxy not only makes it difficult to explain how Orthodox and non- Orthodox Christianity differ, but occasions immense confusion, since the non-traditionalist Ortho - dox, and especially in America, have adopted many of the traditions, much of the language, and a great deal of the ethos of Western Christianity, creating a sort of ethnically-centered but hybrid Or - thodoxy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin, Theology, Transmission, and Recurrent Impact of Landmarkism in the Southern Baptist Convention (1850-2012)
    THE ORIGIN, THEOLOGY, TRANSMISSION, AND RECURRENT IMPACT OF LANDMARKISM IN THE SOUTHERN BAPTIST CONVENTION (1850-2012) by JAMES HOYLE MAPLES submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF THEOLOGY in the subject CHURCH HISTORY at the UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA Supervisor: PROF M. H. MOGASHOA March 2014 © University of South Africa ABSTRACT OF GRADUATE STUDENT RESEARCH DOCTORAL PROJECT UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA Title: THE ORIGIN, THEOLOGY, TRANSMISSION, AND RECURRENT IMPACT OF LANDMARKISM IN THE SOUTHERN BAPTIST CONVENTION (1850-2012) Name of researcher: James Hoyle Maples Promoter: M. H. Mogashoa, Ph.D. Date Completed: March 2014 Landmarkism was a sectarian view of Baptist church history and practice. It arose in the mid-eighteenth century and was a dominant force in the first half-century of the life of the Southern Baptist Convention, America’s largest Protestant denomination. J. R. Graves was its chief architect, promoter, and apologist. He initiated or helped propagate controversies which shaped Southern Baptist life and practice. His influence spread Landmarkism throughout the Southern Baptist Convention through religious periodicals, books, and educational materials. Key Landmark figures in the seminaries and churches also promoted these views. After over fifty years of significant impact the influence of Landmarkism seemed to diminish eventually fading from sight. Many observers of Southern Baptist life relegated it to a movement of historical interest but no current impact. In an effort to examine this assumption, research was conducted which explored certain theological positions of Graves, other Landmarkers, and sects claimed as the true church by the promoters of Baptist church succession.
    [Show full text]
  • The Marks of a True Church Jackson Lawson Bi
    The Nature of the Distinction between the Universal and Local Church in the NT: The Marks of a True Church Jackson Lawson Bi 480 Biblical Studies Seminar April 23, 2019 1 Introduction Although many have used the term “true church,” there has been confusion and disagreement over what is required to have a legitimate NT church. Particularly, there is disagreement over whether discipline as a mark of the church is a mark of a true church or simply a mark of a healthy church (or more biblical church). Rolland McCune states that, “Bible- believing Christians would probably agree on all three” marks that followed the reformation (the third being discipline).1 Albert Mohler Jr., in his journal article titled, “Church Discipline: The Missing Mark,” asserts that, “Evangelicals have long recognized discipline as the ‘third mark’ of the authentic church,” citing the Belgic Confession (1561), that includes discipline as a mark of the true church.2 In the end of his article, Mohler quotes John Leadley Dagg as saying, “It has been remarked, that when discipline leaves a church, Christ goes with it.” Mohler follows this quote by saying, “If so, and I fear it is so, Christ has abandoned many churches who are blissfully unaware of His departure.”3 And yet, as we shall see, John Hammett4 and Mark Dever5 disagree: the mark of discipline is not necessarily required in order for there to be a true church. Does Mohler (as well as McCune) confuse what is required for there to be a true church with what is required for a healthy church? Or are Hammett and Dever wrong? I will establish that they both agree in principle.
    [Show full text]
  • James Madison Pendleton
    SELECTED WRITINGS OF JAMES MADISON PENDLETON VOLUME I Historical and Autobiographical JAMES MADISON PENDLETON (1811-1891) SELECTED WRITINGS OF JAMES MADISON PENDLETON IN THREE VOLUMES k Volume I k Historical and Autobiographical • James Madison Pendleton and His Contribution to Baptist Ecclesiology • Reminiscences of a Long Life • The Funeral of Dr. J. M. Pendleton k COMPILED AND EDITED BY THOMAS WHITE Printed in 2006 by THE BAPTIST STANDARD BEARER, INC. No. 1 Iron Oaks Drive Paris, Arkansas 72855 (479) 963-3831 THE WALDENSIAN EMBLEM lux lucet in tenebris “The Light Shineth in the Darkness” ISBN# 1579780466 SELECTED WRITINGS OF JAMES MADISON PENDLETON IN THREE VOLUMES VOLUME ONE — HISTORICAL AND AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL • James Madison Pendleton and His Contribution to Baptist Ecclesiology by THOMAS WHITE • Reminiscences of a Long Life by JAMES MADISON PENDLETON • Article on the Death of J. M. Pendleton by M. M. RILEY VOLUME TWO — ECCLESIASTICAL • Selected Writings on Various Aspects of the New Testament Church by JAMES MADISON PENDLETON VOLUME THREE — THEOLOGICAL • Selected Writings on Various Topics of Theology by JAMES MADISON PENDLETON v TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME I Historical and Autobiographical k PAGE Acknowledgements . ix Introduction . xi James Madison Pendleton and His Contribution to Baptist Ecclesiology . 1 by Thomas White Reminiscences of a Long Life . 279 by James Madison Pendleton The Funeral of Dr. J. M. Pendleton . 443 by M. M. Riley vii k ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS —————— must extend a thank you to those who made this process I possible. First, I would like to thank Bill Lee and his associates at the Baptist Standard Bearer who agreed to publish this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Can Two Walk Together Unless They Be Agreed?" the Origins of the Primitive Baptists, 1800-1840
    "CAN TWO WALK TOGETHER UNLESS THEY BE AGREED'' THE ORIGINS OF THE PRIMITIVE BAPTISTS, 1800-1840 By JAMES R MATHIS A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 1997 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This dissertation, by any human standard, should never have been completed. It has survived personal difficulties which necessitated my getting a job, cutting severely into the amount of time I was able to spend in research and writing. It has survived a fire which led to a hard drive crash and necessitated a slow process of reconstructing notes and drafts which added about six to nine months of work to the project. It survived bouts of despair, depression, and disillusionment, a pervasive sense that it was never going to be finished. But here it is—late, but finished. I have accumulated innumerable debts I will never be able to repay. I would like to thank, first, my father, James D. Mathis, who did not live to see his son earn first a master's and then a doctorate degree. He introduced me to libraries and the wonders contained in their shelves at an early age. He passed onto me a thirst for knowledge and love of writing which sustained me through many hours trying to piece one fi-agment after another together into something resembling coherence. My mother, Oleta O. Mathis, carefiilly avoided the topic of the dissertation during the time when I had not been near the computer in months.
    [Show full text]
  • Baptist Heritage Internet Fall 2016
    HIST 5223 BAPTIST HERITAGE INTERNET FALL 2016 James W Roberts, PhD Adjunct Instructor of Theology & History [email protected] I am excited to be on this journey with you. Please feel free to email me. Since I live overseas, it isn’t easy to call me but I will be accessible by appointment via Skype or Facetime if you are having problems. I want to help you in any way I can. After thoroughly reading the ENTIRE syllabus, if you have a problem or question please contact me. Please do not wait until it is too late for me to help! I. Mission Statement The mission of New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary is to equip leaders to fulfill the Great Commission and the Great Commandments through the local church and its ministries. II. Core Values Focus New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary has five core values: Doctrinal Integrity, Spiritual Vitality, Mission Focus, Characteristic Excellence, and Servant Leadership. This course addresses Doctrinal Integrity specifically in that the course is designed to prepare the student to grow in the understanding and interpreting of the Word of God. Characteristic Excellence is also addressed in that the student should be as prepared as possible to be ministers for Christ. Mission Focus is emphasized in that interpreting the Bible is a key element in presenting the Good News of the Gospel to the world. Proper interpretation is vital in fulfilling the Great Commission. This course addresses the competency of Biblical Exposition by preparing the student to interpret and communicate the Bible accurately. The Core Value for this Academic Year is Characteristic Excellence.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Colonial Life
    Early Colonial Life The 16th century was the age of mercantilism, an extremely competitive economic philosophy that pushed European nations to acquire as many colonies as they could. As a result, for the most part, the English colonies in North America were business ventures. They provided an outlet for England’s surplus population and more religious freedom than England did, but their primary purpose was to make money for their sponsors. The first English settlement in North America was established in 1587, when a group of colonists (91 men, 17 women and nine children) led by Sir Walter Raleigh settled on the island of Roanoke. Mysteriously, the Roanoke colony had vanished entirely. Historians still do not know what became of its inhabitants. In 1606, King James I divided the Atlantic seaboard in two, giving the southern half to the Virginia Company and the northern half to the Plymouth Company. In 1606, just a few months after James I issued its charter, the London Company sent 144 men to Virginia on three ships: the Godspeed, the Discovery and the Susan Constant. They reached the Chesapeake Bay in the spring of 1607 and headed about 60 miles up the James River, where they built a settlement they called Jamestown. The Jamestown colonists had a rough time of it: They were so busy looking for gold and other exportable resources that they could barely feed themselves. It was not until 1616, when Virginia’s settlers learned to grow tobacco and John Smith’s leadership helped the colony survive. The first African slaves arrived in Virginia in 1619.
    [Show full text]
  • JOURNAL of THEOLOGY 42- 14.2 Fall
    MJT for the Church Preachers and Preaching, II Preachers and Preaching, II and Preaching, Preachers MIDWESTERN JOURNAL OF THEOLOGY 14.2 - Fall 2015 MIDWESTERN BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY Fall 2015 Vol. 14 No.2 MIDWESTERN JOURNAL OF THEOLOGY EDITORIAL BOARD ISBN: 1543-6977 Jason K. Allen, Executive Editor Jason G. Duesing, Academic Editor Michael D. McMullen, Managing Editor N. Blake Hearson, Book Review Editor Th e Midwestern Journal of Th eology is published biannually by Midwestern Baptist Th eological Seminary, Kansas City, MO, 64118, and by Th e Covington Group, Kansas City, MO. Information about the journal is available at the seminary website: www.mbts.edu. Th e Midwestern Journal of Th eology is indexed in the Southern Baptist Periodical Index and in the Christian Periodical Index. Address all editorial correspondence to: Editor, Midwestern Journal of Th eology, 5001 N. Oak Traffi cway, Midwestern Baptist Th eological Seminary, Kansas City, Mo, 64118. Address books, software, and other media for review to: Book Review Editor, Midwestern Journal of Th eology, 5001 N. Oak Traffi cway, Midwestern Baptist Th eological Seminary, Kansas City, Mo, 64118. All submissions should follow the SBL Handbook of Style in order to be considered for publication. Th e views expressed in the following articles and reviews are not necessarily those of the faculty, the administration, or the trustees of the Midwestern Baptist Th eological Seminary. © Copyright 2015 All rights reserved by Midwestern Baptist Th eological Seminary MJT Fall 2015 Cover v6.indd 2 11/11/15 8:48 AM MIDWESTERN JOURNAL OF THEOLOGY FALL 2015 (Vol. 14/ No.
    [Show full text]