DOCSLIB.ORG

Degrees Conferred by the University of Melbourne

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Degrees Conferred by the University of Melbourne DEGREES CONFERRED. 137 DEGREES CONFERRED BY THE UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE. 1856. B.A. Admitted ad eundem gradum: Redmond Barry, Dublin. Hugh Culling Eardley Childers, Cambridge. William Clark Haines, Cambridge. Rev. George Oakley Vance, Oxford. M.A. Hugh Culling Eardley Childers. William Clark Haines. Rev. George Oakley Vance. Admitted ad eundem gradum: Rev. William Scoresby, Cambridge. Charles Cruikshank, Aberdeen. M.D. Admitted ad eundem gradum: Anthony Colling Brownless, St. Andrew's. 18 5 7. B.A. Admitted ad eundem gradum: Richard Fades, Dublin. Colin Campbell, Oxford. M.A. Admitted ad eundem gradum ; Rev. William Baxter, Cambridge. Rev. William Roby Fletcher, London. 138 DEGREES .CONFERRED.; -M.D. Admitted ad eundem gradum ; Godfrey Howitt, Edinburgh. John Macfarlane, Glasgow. Daniel Joseph Tierney, Glasgow. James Bridgeham Motherwell, Glasgoiv. John Thomson, Edinburgh. John Maund, St. Andrew's. Richard Thomas Tracy, Glasgow. John Macadam, Glasgoiv. LL.D. Admitted ad eundem gradum: Richard Clarke Scwell, Oxford. 18 5 8. B.A. Thomas Cornelius Cole. John McFarland. • Peter Thomas Finn. Robert Thymic. George Henry Greene. Admitted ad eundem gradum : Richard Anncsley Billing, Dublin. William Archibald Douglas, Cambridge. Charles Farewell, Cambridge. Charles Orlando Helm, Oxford. M.A. Richard Anneslcy Billing. William Archibald Douglas. Charles Farewell. Charles Orlando Helm. Admitted ad eundem gradum : Rev, John Edward Broinby, Cambridge. M.D. Admitted ad eundem gradum: Andrew Cairncross Livingston, Edinburgh. William Mackie Turnbull, Edinburgh. DEGREES CONFERRED.- 139 1859.. B.A. Peter Stevenson Davis. M.A. Richard Eadcs. Admitted ad eundem gradum : Alexander Skene, Aberdeen. M.D. Admitted ad eundem gradum : William Henry Cutts, Edinburgh. Adolphus Robert Berndt, Giittingcn. 1860. B.A. John James Beresford Bowman. John Miller. 'Thomas Middleton Biddulph Philipps. Charles Browning. Admitted ad eundem gradum : Richard Lee, London. M.A. Thomas Cornelius Cole. John McFarland. M.D. Admitted ad eundem gradum .- George Sackville Cotter Butler, St. Andrew's. Robert Fawell Hudson, Aberdeen. LL.D. Admitted ad eundem gradum : George Mackay, Dublin. 186 1. B.A. John Rovans Hallett. Alfred Claribeux Curlewis. Archibald Gilchrist. George Charles Purcell. 140 DEGREES CONFERRED. Admitted ad eundem gradum .- Richard Colles, Dublin. James Griffith, Dublin. LL.B. Admitted ad eundem gradum : Michael Prendergast, Cambridge, M.A. Richard Colles. 1862, B.A. Christopher Bromby. Arthur William Crcsswell. Charles Phillip Greene. Hickman Molesworth. Admitted ad eundem gradum : Robert Stirling Anderson, Dublin. M.B. George Graham. Charles McCarthy. Lawrence Joseph Martin. LL.B. Admitted ad eundem gradum: James Ducrdin,Zonrfo*i. M.A. Robert Stirling Anderson. Charles Browning. Admitted ad eundem gradum: Robert Wheeler, Dublin. M.D. George Graham. Charles McCarthy. Lawrence Joseph Martin. Admitted ad eundem gradum ; Samuel Dougan Bird, St. Andrew's. David John Thomas, St. Andrew's, DEGREES CONFERRED. 141 1863. B.A. Robert Craig. Admitted ad eundem gradum : Frank Stanley Dobson, Cambridge. Robert Gibton, Dublin, Henry Pares Veuables, Oxford, M.B. Harry Leigh Atkinson. 0 Edward Barker. Joseph Black. M.A. Archibald Gilchrist. Admitted ad eundem gradum : James Robertson, Aberdeen. Arthur Robinson, Dublin. M.D. Harry Leigh Atkinson. Edward Barker. Joseph Black. Admitted ad eundem gradum: Jacob Selig Caro, lierlin. William Crambe, Edinburgh. George Crosland, Aberdeen. George Brittou Halford, St. Andrew's. James Sutherland, Glasgow. 1864. B.A. William Charles Kernot. Henry Martyn Andrew. John Burslem Gregory. John Hcnning Thompson. John Madden. Charles Jewel Hearle. John Nicholson. John Sumner Seddon. Admitted ad eundem gradum: Robert Crooke, Dublin. 143 DEGREES CONFERRED. M.B. Gerald Henry Fcthcrstbn. James Edward Neild. M.A. John Eevans Hallett. Admitted ad eundem gradum: Rev. Septimus Lloyd Chase, Cambridge. George Higinbotham, Dublin. Patrick Marcellinus George Leonard, Dublin. Very Rev. Hussey Burgh Macartney, Dublin. Arthur Bedford Orlebar, Oxford: Rev. Arthur Haute Wyatt, Cambridge. M.D. Gerald Henry Fetherston. -James Edward Neild. Admitted ad eundem gradum: Thomas Thomson Dick, Edinburgh. James Robert Gillespie, Edinburgh. Hermann Jonasson, Wiirzburg. Bernhard Lilienfeld, Marburg. John Mackenzie, Queen's University in Ireland. Daniel Grant Robertson, Edinburgh. Robert Talbot, Edinburgh. 18 6 5. B.A. George Tait. Admitted ad eundem gradum .- Rev. Charles Peter Maca'n Bardiu, Dublin. Rev. Michael Henry Becher, Cambridge. Zepherin Pierre Edouard Permczel, France. Rev. William Wood, Cambridge. M.B: Admitted ad eundem gradum : George Bull, Cambridge. LL.B. Robert Craig. John Madden. Archibald Gilchrist. John Thomas Smith. DEGREES CONFERRED. - 143 M.A. Peter Stevenson Davis. Robert Craig. Admitted ad eundem gradum. John Carmichael, Glasgow. Henry Langtree, Dublin. Robert Oliver McCoy, Glasgow. Rev. Peter Macpherson, Edinburgh. M.D. Admitted ad eundem gradum : Alexander Stuart Paterson, Edinburgh. Anthony George Haydon Starke, St. Andrew's William Turner, Edinburgh. 1866. B.A. Charles Henry Herbert Cook. Thomas Mann. John Simeon Elkington. Marshall Singleton. George Metcalfe. Edward Hippius Bromby. Admitted ad eundem gradum; Walter Marsham Adams, Oxford. John Grice, Oxford. Harry Augustus Sasse, France. Henry John Wrixon, Dublin. LL.B. John Burslem Gregory. M.A. John Henning Thompson. William Charles Kernot. Charles Jewel Hearle. Walter Marsham Adams. 144 DEGREES CONFERRED. Admitted ad eundem gradum: Donald Macdonald, Aberdeen. Alexander Morrison, Aberdeen. George Morrison, Aberdeen. Robert Scott, Aberdeen. Patrick Smith, Aberdeen. M.D. Admitted ad eundem gradum: Walter Lindesay Richardson, Edinburgh. David Elliott Wilkie, Edinburgh. 18 67. B.A. John Thomas Mceson. Charles Alfred Topp. Samuel Copcland. John Patterson Emillius Francis. Thomas Edwin Ick. John Johnstone. Thomas Prout Webb. Admitted ad eundem gradum: Francis John Charsley Carter, Oxford. John Braccbridge Wilson, Cambridge. Henry Charles Manners Sutton, Cambridge. Rev. William Singleton, Dublin. Townscnd MacDermott, Dublin. Bryan O'Loghlen, Dublin. Antoine Mousse, France. M.B. William Carey Rees. Patrick Moloney. Admitted ad eundem gradum: Edmond Kelly, Dublin. John F'ulton, Glasgow. LL.B. Marshall Singleton. Admitted ad eundem gradum; Edmund Wright Wcstby, Cambridge. DEGREES CONFERRED. 145 M.A. George Charles Purcoll. Arthur William Cresswell. Henry Martyn Andrew. Frank Stanley Dobson. Rev. William Wood. John Braoebridge Wilson. Henry Charles Manners Sutton. Rev. William Singleton. Townsend MaeDcrmott. Admitted ad eundem gradum: The Hon. Sir John Henry Thomas Manners Sutton, K.C.B., Cambridge. John Warrington Rogers, Oxford. James Wilberforce Stephen, Cambridge. Rev. William Hall, Cambridge. Henry Ralph Francis, Cambridge. William Parkinson Wilson, Cambridge. The Venerable Archibald Crawford, Dublin. Rev. William Newton Guinness, Dublin. Thomas Brodribb, London. William Bowcn, Glasgoiv. John Moir, Aberdeen. Duncan Mackenzie, Aberdeen. Paul Howard MacGillivray, Aberdeen. Rev. William Wallace, Aberdeen. Rev. Thomas Mackenzie Frazer, Aberdeen. John Macrae, Edinburgh. Martin llowy Irving, Oxford. CH.M. Admitted ad eundem gradum .- James Thomas Brudenell Laurie, Glasgow. M.D. Admitted ad eundem gradum : Andrew Plummer, Edinburgh. Alexander Robertson, Edinburgh, John William Hadden, Edinburgh. William Henry Semple, Edinburgh. Charles Henry Hardy, Glasgow. Edward Hunt, Glasgow. James Alexander Martin, Glasgow. William Leslie Gordon, Glasgoiv. H 146 DEGREES CONFERRED. James Thomas Brudenell Laurie, Glasgow. George Owen'Rigby, Aberdeen. Antoinc Mousse, France. LL.D. Admitted ad eundem gradum ; William Edward Hearn, Dublin. James Corrigan, Dublin. 1868. , i January 3rd. M.A. Admitted ad eundem gradum; Viscount Newry and Morne, Oxford. LL.D. Admitted ad eundem gradum ; His Royal Highness the Duke of Edinburgh, K.G. Edinburgh. April 18th. B.A. Andrew Harper. Joseph Henry Hood. Alexander Millie. George Henry Neighbour. Charles Lindlcy Perry. James Scott. Admitted ad eundem gradum : Eugene Adolphe Lissignol, France. John Hubert Plunkctt, Dublin. William Robertson, Oxford, Sir William J"oster Stawell, Dublin. M.B. Francis Long. Admitted ad eundem gradum : Henry Widenhara Maunsell, Dublin. LL.B. Charles Henry Herbert Cook. DEGREES CONFERRED. 147 M.A. Alfred Claribeux Curlcwis. Sir William Foster Stawcll. Admitted ad eundem gradum : Gowen Edward Evans, Oxford. Rev. William Brown Hutchison, Glasgow. Rev. James Lynar, Dublin. Robert Morrison, Edinburgh. Donald Pctrie, Aberdeen. M.D. Admitted ad eundem gradum : Thomas James Sturt, London. John Singleton, Glasgow. LL.D. Admitted ad eundem gradum: Michael Callanan Howe, Dublin. Charles Sladen, Cambridge. December 2nd. B.A. Admitted ad eundem gradum: Charles Frend Maunsell, Dublin. M.B. Octavius Vernon Lawrence. Admitted ad eundem gradum: William McCrca, London. LL.B. Joseph Henry Hood. Frederick Henry McCoy. Admitted ad eundem gradum: Robert William Kirby Martin, Cambridge. M.D. Admitted ad eundem gradum : James Jackson, London. II'2 148 DEGREES CONFERRED. 1869. April 3rd. B.A. Jeremiah Dwycr. George William Gillam Butler. James Clezy. Samuel Summons. Admitted ad eundem gradum: Clement Wilks, France. Frederick Leopold Smyth, Dublin. William Crompton, Sydney. Richard Davies Ireland, Dublin. LL.B. Charles Alfred Topp. James Maitland Campbell. M.A. Charles Alfred Topp. Thomas Edwin Ick. Frederick Leopold Smyth. John Patterson Emillius Francis. John Johnstone. Richard
Load more

Recommended publications
  • St Cuthbert's Trail
    St Cuthbert’s Trail St Cuthbert’s Bayside Architectural Trail 3 Trail Architectural Bayside Get the Bayside Walks & Trails App Distance: Distance: Brighton Bay Street Undulations: 2.8kms Gentle Walking Time: Walking 76 Royal Avenue, Sandringham PO Box 27 Sandringham VIC 3191 T (03) 9599 4444 [email protected] 50mins www.bayside.vic.gov.au 500 Metres September 2013 1 Former ES&A Bank Address 279 Bay St, Brighton (cnr Asling St) Bayside Architecutral Trail Style Gothic Revival Trail 3 Architects Terry & Oakden Property 1 Date 1882 Other name: ANZ Bank The steeply sloped roof has gabled ends capped with unpainted cement render. Window and door heads are painted and finished with cement render portico projects A small motifs. flower with adorned from the symmetric façade and contains the word ‘Bank’ embossed on either side, with other text formed in these rendered panels. Brighton’s was first the English bank1874 in Scottish & Australian Bank (ES&A), which merged with the The ANZ ES&A in 1970. Bank, first established moved into this building in 1874, in It functioned1882. in its intended fashion until 2002. ES&A were known for their series of banks in the Gothic Revival style, many designed by William Wardell, who also designed the ES&A head office, the Gothic Bank, in Collins St, Melbourne This(1883). branch is another example of that style, brick. tuck-pointed in executed The North Brighton branch of the Commercial Bank was the second bank in Brighton and rented a building on the corner of Bay and Cochrane Streets when it opened in The 1883.
    [Show full text]
  • Victorian Historical Journal
    VICTORIAN HISTORICAL JOURNAL VOLUME 89, NUMBER 2, DECEMBER 2018 ROYAL HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF VICTORIA VICTORIAN HISTORICAL JOURNAL ROYAL HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF VICTORIA The Royal Historical Society of Victoria is a community organisation comprising people from many fields committed to collecting, researching and sharing an understanding of the history of Victoria. The Victorian Historical Journal is a fully refereed journal dedicated to Australian, and especially Victorian, history produced twice yearly by the Publications Committee, Royal Historical Society of Victoria. PUBLICATIONS COMMITTEE Judith Smart and Richard Broome (Editors, Victorian Historical Journal) Jill Barnard Rozzi Bazzani Sharon Betridge (Co-editor, History News) Marilyn Bowler Richard Broome (Convenor) (Co-Editor, History News) Marie Clark Jonathan Craig (Review Editor) Don Garden (President, RHSV) John Rickard Judith Smart Lee Sulkowska Carole Woods BECOME A MEMBER Membership of the Royal Historical Society of Victoria is open. All those with an interest in history are welcome to join. Subscriptions can be purchased at: Royal Historical Society of Victoria 239 A’Beckett Street Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia Telephone: 03 9326 9288 Email: [email protected] www.historyvictoria.org.au Journals are also available for purchase online: www.historyvictoria.org.au/publications/victorian-historical-journal VICTORIAN HISTORICAL JOURNAL ISSUE 290 VOLUME 89, NUMBER 2 DECEMBER 2018 Royal Historical Society of Victoria Victorian Historical Journal Published by the Royal Historical Society of Victoria 239 A’Beckett Street Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia Telephone: 03 9326 9288 Fax: 03 9326 9477 Email: [email protected] www.historyvictoria.org.au Copyright © the authors and the Royal Historical Society of Victoria 2018 All material appearing in this publication is copyright and cannot be reproduced without the written permission of the publisher and the relevant author.
    [Show full text]
  • Imagereal Capture
    A HISTORICAL SURVEY OF THE VICTORIAN CONSTITUTION, 1856 TO 1956 The first Victorian Parliament elected under the provisions of the Constitution Act 1855 met on 21 November 1856. It was celebrated as a great event and the day was proclaimed a holiday. A future Premier of the Colony recorded his impressions of the day's events. 'The Corporation headed by the ~a~or,-theJudges in their-robes, the Town Councillors in their uniforms, the Foreign Consuls looking as like Ambassadors as thev could contrive to do, and the Governor accompanied by a staff and escorted by volunteer cavalry arrived at a chamber crowded with ladies.'l he occasion was n&eworthy in more ways than one. Not only was this the first Victorian parliament to be elected under the regime of responsible government, but Victoria blazed a trail by conducting the election by secret ballot. The legislation enacting ;he secret ballot had been adopted in 1856 by the Legislative Council established in 1850, though not without vehement opposition and expressions of foreboding.' This new- fangled method of voting proved a great success, and the conduct of the election was applauded by contemporary observer^.^ Under the Constitution Act, thirty members were elected to the Legis- lative Councile and sixty to- the A~sembly.~No person was eligible for election to the Legislative Council unless he was thirty years of age and owned freehold property to the value of Egooo or the annual value of The qualification for election to the Assembly was the attainment of the age of twenty-one and the ownership df freehold land to the value 07 Ez,ooo, ors the annual value of ~200.' * M.A., B.C.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 1 – Version 31
    Port Phillip Heritage Review Volume 1 – Version 31 February 2020 Port Phillip Heritage Review Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Port Phillip Heritage Review .................................................................................................................................. 4 1.2 Updating the Port Phillip Heritage Review ............................................................................................................ 5 2. Brief ........................................................................................................................................................................ 6 3. Study Method ....................................................................................................................................................... 7 3.1 Thematic Environmental History ........................................................................................................................... 7 3.2 Field Survey ........................................................................................................................................................... 7 3.3 Heritage Overlay Areas.......................................................................................................................................... 8 3.4 Data Sheets ..........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Imprisonment for Debt in Colonia Victoria, 1857–90
    ‘CONTRARY TO THE SPIRIT OF THE AGE’:1 IMPRISONMENT FOR DEBT IN COLONIAL VICTORIA, 1857–90 JODIE B OYD, * IAN RAMSAY† AND PAUL ALI‡ The reintroduction in 1857 of imprisonment for debt in colonial Victoria flew in the face of international momentum for its abolition. In its criminalisation of debt and poverty, the Fellows Act 1857 (Vic) (21 Vict, No 29) also defied the rapid advancement of democratic and egalitarian principles in the fledgling colony. Frequently referred to as ‘gross class legislation’, the law was used unabashedly to target poor small debtors, leaving ‘mercantile men’ with significant debt untroubled by the prospect of a debtors’ gaol. Despite consistent and broad opposition to the Fellows Act 1857 (Vic) (21 Vict, No 29), its advocates resisted repeated attempts to abolish or meaningfully amend it. It is argued here that the law, and its survival against the ‘spirit of the age’, can be understood as part of a broader story of conservative resistance to the democratic innovations that threatened the power of the Victorian mercantilist establishment. CONTENTS I Introduction .............................................................................................................. 738 II ‘Enacted by a Tradesman’s Parliament’ ................................................................. 746 A Establishing Imprisonment for Debt Prior to Universal Manhood Suffrage ....................................................................................... 747 B ‘The Barbarism of Our Law of Imprisonment for Debt Is Only Surpassed
    [Show full text]
  • Ryan William Haddrick LLB Jamescook, LLM Qldut, Graddiplegprac ANU
    The Queen’s Ministers of State for the Commonwealth: The Relationship between the Prerogatives of the Crown and the Executive Power of the Commonwealth Ryan William Haddrick LLB JamesCook, LLM QldUT, GradDipLegPrac ANU A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2017 T.C. Beirne School of Law i ii ABSTRACT The orthodox view is that the prerogatives of the Crown are textually incorporated, or sourced, in the language of s 61 of the Australian Constitution. This work challenges that assumption by examining the text, structure and history of ss 2, 61 and 64 of the Constitution. In particular, the inclusion of the words “under the Crown” and “shall be the Queen’s Ministers of State for the Commonwealth” in the preamble and s 64 respectively are, it is argued, textual indicators (and devices) that the prerogative is textually recognised or affirmed by those provisions, and ought to be seen as emanating from the Crown, and recognised by common law – and not as emanating from s 61 of the Constitution. Having argued that the executive power of the Commonwealth (that is, s 61) is not the textual source, or recognition, of the prerogatives of the Crown, this dissertation then posits a theory as to how s 61 should be construed. True to its Montesquieuian heritage, it is argued that the executive power of the Commonwealth ought to be understood in a functionalist sense. The evidence considered to support these propositions is the text, structure and history of the constitutional provisions. In particular, this dissertation examines the historical concept of the prerogatives of the Crown; the way that body of constitutional doctrine became part of the Australian constitutional landscape; and how the prerogative was understood to operate in pre-Federation Imperial and colonial case law.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography Abbey, B. (1987) ‘Power, Politics and Business’, Australian Journal of Political Science, 22 (2), 46–54. Ackerman, B. (2000) ‘The New Separation of Powers’, Harvard Law Review, 113 (3), 633–729. ADB (2008) Australian Dictionary of Biography Online Edition, at http://www.adb.online.anu. edu.au/adbonline.htm, accessed 29 July 2008. Adcock, R., M. Bevir and S. Stimson (eds) (2006a) Modern Political Science: Anglo-American Exchanges since 1880 (Princeton: Princeton University Press). ——— (2006b) ‘A History of Political Science. How? What? Why?’, in R. Adcock, M. Bevir and S. Stimson (eds), Modern Political Science, 1–17. Adelman, H., A. Borowski, M. Burstein and L. Foster (eds) (1994) Immigration and Refugee Policy: Australia and Canada Compared, 2 vols (Carlton: Melbourne University Press). Adeney, D. (1986) ‘Machiavelli and Political Morals’, in David Muschamp (ed.), Political Thinkers (South Melbourne: Macmillan), 51–65. Adorno, T. W., E. Frenkel-Brunswik, D. J. Levinson, and R. N. Sanford (1950) The Authoritarian Personality (New York: Harper and Row). Ahluwalia, P. (2001b) ‘When Does a Settler Become a Native? Citizenship and Identity in a Settler Society’, Pretexts, 10 (1), 63–73. Aimer, P. (1974) Politics, Power and Persuasion: The Liberals in Victoria (Sydney: James Bennett). Aitkin, D. (1969) The Colonel: A Political Biography of Sir Michael Bruxner (Canberra: Australian National University Press). ——— (1972a) The Country Party in New South Wales: A Study of Organisation and Survival (Canberra: Australian National University Press). ——— (1972b) ‘Perceptions of Partisan Bias in the Australian Mass Media’, Politics, VII (2), 160–9. ——— (1977) Stability and Change in Australian Politics (Canberra: Australian National University Press).
    [Show full text]
  • Chinese Litigants in Late Colonial Court-Rooms’, Journal of Chinese Overseas 9, 2
    Law as Politics: Chinese Litigants in Australian Colonial Courts Author Finnane, Mark Published 2013 Journal Title Journal of Chinese Overseas DOI https://doi.org/10.1163/17932548-12341259 Copyright Statement © 2013 Brill Academic Publishers. This is the author-manuscript version of this paper. Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the journal website for access to the definitive, published version. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/59114 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au This is the pre-print manuscript version of this article which has been published as ‘Chinese litigants in late colonial court-rooms’, Journal of Chinese Overseas 9, 2, 2013, pp. 193-211: DOI: 10.1163/17932548-12341259 Law as Politics: Chinese Litigants in Australian Colonial Courts Mark Finnane Abstract The recent historiography of Chinese in Australia has emphasised their vigorous formation of a local identity and community even in the face of recurrent and expanding threats of exclusion from colonial life. In their ready embrace of legal remedies to redress what they saw as discrimination or other harms, the Chinese were exemplar colonial settlers who looked to the law to protect them. In colonial appeal courts, Chinese litigants challenged migration controls, contested convictions under opium restriction and gambling laws, sought equitable outcomes in property inheritance and challenged exclusionary regulation under the Factory Acts. In contrast to another kind of history of the Chinese in Australian law, as defendants in criminal prosecution, this article draws attention to the Chinese engagement in legal remedies as an assertion of their entitlement to recognition and fair play.
    [Show full text]
  • A Biography of George William Knight
    Of Railways, Wine and Flowers: A Biography of George William Knight Robyn Hunter Bachelor of Arts (La Trobe University), Graduate Diploma of Education (La Trobe University), Master of Education Studies (Federation University) This thesis is submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Faculty of Education and the Arts Federation University P.O. Box 663 University Drive, Mount Helen Ballarat, Victoria, 3353, Australia Submitted for examination 1 May 2018 Abstract The title page photograph1 has been used for many decades as the quintessential representation of George William Knight (1832–1923), railway engineer, viticulturist, horticulturist and Bendigo Council’s building surveyor and city surveyor. He is cursorily remembered by railway, viticultural and horticultural historians and enthusiasts. However, he remained unknown by some of his descendants, including me. Yet, his contribution deserves to be recognised. Knight is representative of English, middle-class, liberal young men who flocked to Australia in the 1850s, but who did not obtain high political office or financial success. This study uses a biographical approach to explore his role in building Victoria. It examines his conflict with Bendigo councillors who could not abide his forthright stance or his refusal to acquiesce to their whims, a conflict that exploded into a vicious battle that Knight lost. Unshackled from council, he expended his huge intellectual and physical energy developing nurseries and vineyards. Yet, these battles with council are remembered, and Knight’s reputation has suffered because of them. This thesis examines misunderstandings surrounding class and reveals Knight to have been a member of the petty bourgeoisie—aspirational, yet understanding and empathetic towards working people.
    [Show full text]
  • The Families of French of Belturbet and Nixon of Fermanagh, and Their
    UC 929.2 F8871S 1127710 GENEALOGY COLLECTION \j ALLEN COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY 3 1833 01239 9322 HUMPHREY FRENCH. "TuK CJouu LuKU Mavuk." 1733-6. See 9-1 J. Lur.l Miiyur of J )ublin, 1732-3, M.P. for Dublin, pp. FroiitUpkrr—Froiii a Mczs.utiiil in pos>:c>i>'io/i <;/' tin lt( r. II. li. Siruirj/. THE FAMILIES French of Belturbet Nixon of Fermanagh -,^Cr ^N^ THEIR DESCENDANTS The Rev. HENRY BIDDALL SWANZY, M.A. iPRINTED FOR PRIVATE CIRCULATION.^ 1908. DUBLIN : PRIMTED BY ALEX. THOM & CO. LIMITED. PREFATORY NOTE. iiST'T'jf.O An attempt has been made in the following pages to put on record what can be discovered concerning the descendants of two Irish families which became allied in 1737 by the marriage of the Rev. Andrew Nixon with Mariaime French. The various families detailed on pp. 83-127, are descended from that marriage. The PubHc Record Office contains evidence of the existence of many other persons of the names of French and Nixon, who, from the localities in which they lived, were very probably of the same stock, but as no proof of their relationship has been forthcoming, as a rule they have not been mentioned in the book. It has been found necessary to condense the work as much as possible, and to leave out some biographical details which might have been inserted. I have tried in most instances to give chiefly those which come from unfamiliar sources. The evidence for the earlier generations in the 17th and 18th centuries is in almost every case clear and complete.
    [Show full text]
  • The Federal Story the Inner History of the Federal Cause 1880-1900
    The Federal Story The Inner History of the Federal Cause 1880-1900 Deakin, Alfred (1856-1919) Edited by J. A. La Nauze A digital text sponsored by New South Wales Centenary of Federation Committee University of Sydney Library Sydney 2000 http://setis.library.usyd.edu.au/fed/ © University of Sydney Library. The texts and Images are not to be used for commercial purposes without permission Source Text: Prepared from the print edition published by Melbourne University Press Melbourne 1963 The work by J. A. La Nauze is reproduced here in electronic form with the kind permission of Barbara La Nauze, 21 September 2000. All quotation marks retained as data All unambiguous end-of-line hyphens have been removed, and the trailing part of a word has been joined to the preceding line. First Published: 1944 Languages: French Italian Latin 342.94/D Australian Etexts autobiographies political history 1910-1939 prose nonfiction federation 2001 Creagh Cole Coordinator Final Checking and Parsing The Federal Story The Inner History of the Federal Cause 1880-1900 Melbourne Melbourne University Press 1963 (1944) Introduction J. A. La Nauze Alfred Deakin died in 1919. His ‘Inner History of the Federal Cause’ was first published in 1944 by Messrs Robertson and Mullens of Melbourne, in an edition edited by his son-in-law, Herbert Brookes, who gave it the title of The Federal Story. The present edition, published with the permission of Mr and Mrs Brookes, has been newly collated with the manuscript, passages omitted from the 1944 edition have been restored, and new material has been added.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lost Opportunity of Melbourne's Outer Circle Railway
    The Lost Opportunity of Melbourne’s Outer Circle Railway Trevor McKenna, B.A. Dip. Ed. This thesis is submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts (By Research) Faculty of Education and the Arts Federation University P.O. Box 663 University Drive, Mount Helen Ballarat, Victoria, 3353 Australia Submitted for re-examination 7 December, 2017 ii ABSTRACT This thesis examines a little known railway line in Melbourne, the Outer Circle Railway (OCR) running from Oakleigh in the south-east to Fairfield in the north. There is great significance to its east-north trajectory, because I will argue, it was conceptualised as a major part of the Melbourne system, for the future; a future that ostensibly lasted only two years, before the economic depression of the 1890s caused it to close in stages. It further brought in many more strands to the Melbourne transport nexus, as it circumnavigated the inner suburbs. I ask the key question ‘was the Outer Circle Railway a lost opportunity’? Though considered one of the great public transport cities of the world, Melbourne with its extensive rail and tramway networks succumbed to the winds of change, embodied by the Fordist principles of private car ownership, freeway building and traffic systems. The public transport budget was cut in the second half of the twentieth century – leaving Greater Melbourne in constant gridlock, in the twenty-first century. I use documentary analysis to examine primary and secondary documents, to comprehend whether the almost immediate denigration of the OCR, by newspapers and most historians, was warranted.
    [Show full text]