DOCSLIB.ORG

Left Wing Unity and the Indian Nationalist Movement: M

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Left Wing Unity and the Indian Nationalist Movement: M Left Wing Unity and the Indian Nationalist Movement: M. N. Roy and the Congress Socialist Party Author(s): John Patrick Haithcox Source: Modern Asian Studies, Vol. 3, No. 1 (1969), pp. 17-56 Published by: Cambridge University Press Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/312009 Accessed: 06-04-2020 17:33 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms Cambridge University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Modern Asian Studies This content downloaded from 117.240.50.232 on Mon, 06 Apr 2020 17:33:17 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms Modern Asian Studies, II, i (I969), pp. I7-56 Left Wing Unity and the Indian Nationalist Movement.: M. V. Roy and the Congress Socialist Party By JOHN PATRICK HAITHCOX* THE decade preceding the Second World War was a crucial period in the history of the Indian nationalist movement. It was at this time that the leadership of Gandhi and the 'Old Guard'-Congress veterans who, with few exceptions, were annually re-elected to the party's Working Committee-faced its most serious challenge for control of the Congress Party. The outcome of this internal party struggle determined the nature and scope of the independence movement throughout the war years and until the attainment of freedom in 1947. It also determined the political complexion of the party that was to guide the Republic of India through the early, and critical, formative years of its existence. This study focuses on the debate between M. N. Roy and Indian socialists in the I93os on the important question of the relationship between socialism and nationalism in the Indian independence struggle. Failure to resolve this issue contributed in large measure to the inability of the socialists, Royists, communists and other left-wing groups in India to unite in order to make an effective challenge for the leadership of the Congress Party. The conflict today between the Soviet Union and the People's Republic of China over the correct attitude to adopt toward 'bourgeois- nationalist' regimes in the Third World is the latest manifestation of this thorny problem which has agitated communists since the early years of the Comintern. The Indian communist leader and theoretician, Dr Gangadhar M. Adhikari, has recognized that the roots of the present dispute between the Communist Party of India-the CPI or so-called 'pro-Moscow' party-and the Communist Party of India (Marxist)-the CPI(M) or so-called 'pro-Peking' party-lie in the perennial question of the role of the national bourgeoisie in India's * The author would like to express his appreciation to the Ford Foundation which supported a field trip to India and to The Research Institute on Communist Affairs, Columbia University, and its Director, Professor Abigniew Brzezinski, for their generous support during the time when the manuscript was prepared. B This content downloaded from 117.240.50.232 on Mon, 06 Apr 2020 17:33:17 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms I8 JOHN PATRICK HAITHCOX 'national democratic revolution in its various phases', both in the struggle for 'national political independence (before liberation)' and in its extension, the struggle for 'national economic independence (after liberation)'.l For communists in India, as elsewhere in former colonial areas, the problem has always been, both before and after independence, how to unite with the national bourgeoisie without being completely absorbed. Both the CPI and the Royists were active within the Congress Socialist Party (CSP) during the period under consideration. Informa- tion is readily available elsewhere on the Indian communist party.2 Consequently, there is little need here for a description of the party or its objectives, although for convenience, a summary of its fractional activities within the socialist party will be provided. In contrast to the CPI, very little is known about the Royists and therefore attention will be concentrated on this group. It will be shown that the Royists played a more important role in the early years of the CSP than has heretofore been suspected and that they made significant contri- butions to the formulation of socialist policy. Before exploring this question, however, we shall first discuss the origins of the CSP and the dissatisfaction of its founders with Gandhi's leadership. THE CONGRESS SOCIALIST PARTY In Patna, Bihar, on 18 and 19 May I934, the All-India Congress Committee (AICC), meeting for the first time since the resumption of the civil disobedience campaign in January 1932, made two impor- tant decisions which were to alienate a considerable section of the Congress Party. First, formal approval was given to Gandhi's decision to suspend, except for himself, the individual civil disobedience campaign. Secondly, the proposal of the All-India Swarajya Party to contest the forthcoming elections to the central Legislative Assembly was endorsed.3 Three weeks later the government's ban on the party was lifted. The decision of the AICC to adopt a new tack was a tacit admission that the civil disobedience campaign had failed. As a result of the government's suppression the movement had been demoralized. After the first year, the Congress had been put on the defensive and, in the 1 Gangadhar M. Adhikari, Communist Party and India's Path to National Regeneration and Socialism, New Delhi, i964, pp. 55-7. 2 See, for example, Gene D. Overstreet and Marshall Windmiller, Communism in India, Berkeley, 1959. 3 Indian National Congress, General Secretaries Report, 1933-34, Bombay, 1934, p. 9. This content downloaded from 117.240.50.232 on Mon, 06 Apr 2020 17:33:17 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms LEFT WING UNITY I9 words of a contemporary party spokesman, the campaign had been reduced to 'sporadic attempts at defiance of authority by individual Congressmen'.4 After Patna the Congress secured a new lease on life, not by having vanquished its enemy but through its sufferance. Its members now had to behave constitutionally or face another round of persecution. To make matters more galling for the nationalists, the government had not granted a full and unreserved amnesty. Its proscription of many organizations affiliated with the Congress, such as the Hindustani Seva Dal and the Khudai Khidmatgars (Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan's Redshirts in the Northwest Frontier Province) continued, and not all political prisoners were released.5 When the Congress convened its annual session in October, Jawaharlal Nehru was still in prison and unable to attend. Also at Patna, on the eve of the AICC meeting, the first All-India Socialist Conference was convened, at which time a decision was taken to organize an All-India Congress Socialist Party.6 Conference delegates were moved to take such action by a common dissatisfaction with the policies of the Congress Party, to which they all belonged. The abandonment of the civil disobedience movement had left a residue of bewilderment and disillusionment, especially among the younger and more impatient Congressmen, and had inflamed smoulder- ing doubts about the efficacy of Gandhian tactics. Those who attended the Conference vehemently opposed the decision to enter the central Legislative Assembly. To their minds, this was a clear violation of the 1929 Lahore resolution7 which had called for boycotting the legis- latures and had demanded nothing less than complete independence. To the socialists this new policy was further proof that the nationalist movement, under the leadership of Gandhi and the 'Old Guard', was drifting inevitably toward constitutionalism and accommodation with the British. Furthermore, they felt that the Congress Party had deliberately refrained from adopting programmes which would bring any substantial relief to the sufferings and deprivations of India's peasants and workers. They were unhappy with the 193I Karachi resolution, widely acclaimed as the first public commitment on the part of the nationalist movement on behalf of social and economic reform. Its implementation, they felt, would not alter substantially the 4 Address of K. F. Nariman, Chairman of the Reception Committee, 26 October 1934, at the 48th Session of the Indian National Congress, Bombay. 5 AICC Newsletter, No. 38, 27 February 1936, p. 3. 6 Acharya Narendra Deva, Socialism and the National Revolution, Bombay, 1946, p. xii. 7 Address of K. F. Nariman, Chairman of the Reception Committee, 26 October I934, at the 48th Session of the Indian National Congress, Bombay. This content downloaded from 117.240.50.232 on Mon, 06 Apr 2020 17:33:17 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms 20 JOHN PATRICK HAITHCOX inequities endemic to Indian society.8 The CSP was thus conceived as a party within the Indian National Congress which would press for the adoption of more militant tactics in the nationalist, anti-colonialist struggle and for a more progressive position on the question of social and economic reform.9 Socialism at this time was in vogue among young, educated Indians, but it more closely represented an ill-defined sentiment than a distinct ideology. The leadership of the CSP in the 193os reflected the inchoate nature of Indian socialism. Among the party's ten most influential leaders, no less than three disparate political orientations were to be found. Narayan and Acharya Narendra Deva were Marxists. Minoo R. Masani, a former member of the British Labour Party, and Asoka Mehta were democratic socialists.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Social Life of Khadi: Gandhi's Experiments with the Indian
    The Social Life of Khadi: Gandhi’s Experiments with the Indian Economy, c. 1915-1965 by Leslie Hempson A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (History) in the University of Michigan 2018 Doctoral Committee: Associate Professor Farina Mir, Co-Chair Professor Mrinalini Sinha, Co-Chair Associate Professor William Glover Associate Professor Matthew Hull Leslie Hempson [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5195-1605 © Leslie Hempson 2018 DEDICATION To my parents, whose love and support has accompanied me every step of the way ii TABLE OF CONTENTS DEDICATION ii LIST OF FIGURES iv LIST OF ACRONYMS v GLOSSARY OF KEY TERMS vi ABSTRACT vii INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER 1: THE AGRO-INDUSTRIAL DIVIDE 23 CHAPTER 2: ACCOUNTING FOR BUSINESS 53 CHAPTER 3: WRITING THE ECONOMY 89 CHAPTER 4: SPINNING EMPLOYMENT 130 CONCLUSION 179 APPENDIX: WEIGHTS AND MEASURES 183 BIBLIOGRAPHY 184 iii LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 2.1 Advertisement for a list of businesses certified by AISA 59 3.1 A set of scales with coins used as weights 117 4.1 The ambar charkha in three-part form 146 4.2 Illustration from a KVIC album showing Mother India cradling the ambar 150 charkha 4.3 Illustration from a KVIC album showing giant hand cradling the ambar charkha 151 4.4 Illustration from a KVIC album showing the ambar charkha on a pedestal with 152 a modified version of the motto of the Indian republic on the front 4.5 Illustration from a KVIC album tracing the charkha to Mohenjo Daro 158 4.6 Illustration from a KVIC album tracing
    [Show full text]
  • Chap 2 PF.Indd
    Credit: Shankar I ts chptr… The challenge of nation-building, covered in the last chapter, was This famous sketch accompanied by the challenge of instituting democratic politics. Thus, by Shankar appeared electoral competition among political parties began immediately after on the cover of his collection Don’t Spare Independence. In this chapter, we look at the first decade of electoral Me, Shankar. The politics in order to understand original sketch was • the establishment of a system of free and fair elections; drawn in the context of India’s China policy. But • the domination of the Congress party in the years immediately this cartoon captures after Independence; and the dual role of the Congress during the era • the emergence of opposition parties and their policies. of one-party dominance. 2021–22 chapter 2 era of one-party dominance Challenge of building democracy You now have an idea of the difficult circumstances in which independent India was born. You have read about the serious challenge of nation-building that confronted the country right in the beginning. Faced with such serious challenges, leaders in many other countries of the world decided that their country could not afford to have democracy. They said that national unity was their first priority and that democracy will introduce differences and conflicts. In India,…. Therefore many of the countries that gained freedom from colonialism …hero-worship, plays a part “ experienced non-democratic rule. It took various forms: nominal in its politics unequalled democracy but effective control by one leader, one party rule or direct in magnitude by the part army rule.
    [Show full text]
  • Marxism, Bengal National Revolutionaries and Comintern
    SOCIAL TRENDS137 Journal of the Department of Sociology of North Bengal University Vol. 5, 31 March 2018; ISSN: 2348-6538 UGC Approved Marxism, Bengal National Revolutionaries and Comintern Bikash Ranjan Deb Abstract: The origin and development of national revolutionary movement in India, particularly in Bengal, in the beginning of the twentieth century constituted one of important signposts of Indian freedom struggle against the colonial British rule. The Bengal national revolutionaries dreamt of freeing India through armed insurrection & individual terrorism. But in spite of supreme sacrifices made by these revolutionaries, almost after thirty years of their movement, in the thirties of the twentieth century, they came to the realisation about the futility of the method which neglected involvement of the general masses so long. In the first half of the thirties most of these revolutionaries were detained. While in detention in different jails & camps for a pretty long period many of the revolutionaries came in contact with Marxist literature there. Imbibed by the Marxist view of social change they gave up ‘terrorism’ as a method altogether after coming out of jails/camps in 1938 or later. However, a sharp debate developed among them on the perception of the Communist International (CI), its colonial policy in general and the policy with respect to the Indian freedom struggle in particular. Further, CPI’s policy of following Comintern decisions as its national section also came under scrutiny. A large number of revolutionary converts questioned the applicability of the Comintern formulations in the perspective of late colonial Bengal. They were not ready either to accept CPI as a real communist party or to pay unquestionable obedience to the dictates of the Comintern.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Contributors
    Notes on Contributors Harriss-White, Barbara: University of Oxford, Queen Elizabeth House, United Kingdom. Hegewald, Julia: University of Manchester, School of Arts, Histories and Cultures, United Kingdom. Lall, Marie: University of London, Institute of Education, Department of Educa- tional Foundations and Policy Studies, United Kingdom. Manor, James: University of London, Institute of Commonwealth Studies, United Kingdom. Mishra, Deepak: Associate Professor, Social Sciences, Centre for the Study of Regional Development , Jawarhalal Nehru University, New Delhi, India Mitra, Subrata K.: Heidelberg University, South Asia Institute, Department of Political Science, Heidelberg, Germany. Nayak, Prasanna: Utkal University, Department of Anthropology, Bhubaneshwar, Orissa, India. Pfetsch, Frank: University of Heidelberg, Institute of Political Science, Germany. Prakash, Aseem: Senior Research Fellow at the Institute for Human Development, New Delhi, India. Scho¨ttli, Jivanta: Heidelberg University, South Asia Institute, Department of Political Science, Heidelberg, Germany. Spiess, Clemens: Heidelberg University, South Asia Institute, Department of Political Science, Heidelberg, Germany. Zavos, John: University of Manchester, School of Arts, Histories and Cultures, United Kingdom. S.K. Mitra (ed.), Citizenship as Cultural Flow, Transcultural Research – Heidelberg 265 Studies on Asia and Europe in a Global Context, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-34568-5, # Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013 Bibliography Acharya, Ashok. 2001. “Equality, Difference and Group Rights: The Case of India.” Doctoral Thesis, University of Toronto. www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk3/ftp05/NQ63760.pdf Adeney, Kathrine and Marie Lall. 2005. “Institutional Attempts to Build a ‘National’ Identity in India: Internal and External Dimensions.” India Review 4 (3): 258–286. Alston, P. (1994) ‘International Law and the Right to Food’ in B.
    [Show full text]
  • The Persistent Problem: Inequality, Difference, and the Challenge of Development" (2008)
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont CMC Faculty Publications and Research CMC Faculty Scholarship 7-1-2008 The eP rsistent Problem: Inequality, Difference, and the Challenge of Development Aseema Sinha Claremont Mckenna College John Echeverri-Gent University of Virginia Leslie Elliott Armijo Portland State University Marc Blecher Oberlin College Daniel Brumberg Georgetown University See next page for additional authors Recommended Citation Sinha, Aseema; Echeverri-Gent, John; Elliott Armijo, Leslie; Blecher, Marc; Brumberg, Daniel; Bunce, Valerie; Chaudhry, Kiren A.; Harbeson, John W.; Huber, Evelyne; Leebaw, Bronwyn; Hoeber Rudolph, Susanne; Ryter, Loren; and Woodward, Susan L., "The Persistent Problem: Inequality, Difference, and the Challenge of Development" (2008). CMC Faculty Publications and Research. 573. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_fac_pub/573 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the CMC Faculty Scholarship at Scholarship @ Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in CMC Faculty Publications and Research by an authorized administrator of Scholarship @ Claremont. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors Aseema Sinha, John Echeverri-Gent, Leslie Elliott Armijo, Marc Blecher, Daniel Brumberg, Valerie Bunce, Kiren A. Chaudhry, John W. Harbeson, Evelyne Huber, Bronwyn Leebaw, Susanne Hoeber Rudolph, Loren Ryter, and Susan L. Woodward This report is available at Scholarship @ Claremont: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_fac_pub/573 THE PERSISTENT PROBLEM: INEQUALITY, DIFFERENCE, AND OF THE DEVELOPMENT CHALLENGE THE PERSISTENT PROBLEM: INEQUALITY, The Persistent Problem: Inequality, Difference, and the Challenge of Development Report of the Task Force on Difference, Inequality, and Developing Societies hy should we be concerned with inequality in a world where economic W growth has created unprecedented abundance? The per capita income of the United States is 64 times that of the world’s poorest country, and the income of the richest 1% is 415 times the income of the poorest 1%.
    [Show full text]
  • Aruna Asaf Ali Aruna Asaf Ali Was a Freedom Fighter Who Rose to Prominence During the Quit India Movement
    Aruna Asaf Ali Aruna Asaf Ali was a freedom fighter who rose to prominence during the Quit India Movement. She is known as the ‘Grand Old Lady of Indian Independence’ for her role in the freedom struggle. This article will give details about Aruna Asaf Ali within the context of the IAS Exam The early life of Asaf Ali Aruna Asaf Ali was born Aruna Ganguly on 16 July 1909, in Kalka Punjab (now a part of the Haryana state). Her parents were Upendranath Ganguly and Ambalika Devi. Ambalika Devi was the daughter Trailokyanath Sanyal was a prominent leader of the Brahmo Samaj Aruna completed her education at the Sacred Heart Convent in Lahore and All Saints College in Nanital. Upon her graduation, she worked as a teacher at the Gokhale Memorial School in Calcutta where she would meet Asaf Ali, a leader in the Indian National Congress (Founded on December 28, 1885). Despite familial opposition, they both got married and she would become an active participant during the independence struggle. Role of Aruna Asaf Ali in the Indian Freedom Struggle Aruna Asaf Ali participated in a number of public processions during the Salt Satyagraha and arrested under many trumped-up charges. Despite the Gandhi-Irwin Pact that promised release of all political parties, she was still not released in 1931. A public agitation by other women freedom fighters and direct intervention by Mahatma Gandhi himself would secure her release later. While serving her jail sentence at Tihar Jail she protested against the severe treatment meted out to political prisoners by launching a hunger strike.
    [Show full text]
  • Regimes of Dispossession: Special Economic Zones and the Political Economy of Land in India
    Regimes of Dispossession: Special Economic Zones and the Political Economy of Land in India By Michael James Levien A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in Charge: Professor Michael Burawoy, Chair Professor Raka Ray Professor Peter Evans Professor Michael Watts Spring 2013 Abstract Regimes of Dispossession: Special Economic Zones and the Political Economy of Land in India by Michael James Levien Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology University of California, Berkeley Professor Michael Burawoy, Chair The aim of the present work is to advance a theoretical framework for the comparative study of dispossession by explaining how the political economy of land dispossession has transformed from state-led developmentalism to neoliberalism in India. The dissertation compares the archetypical forms of dispossession in each period and argues that they constitute different regimes of dispossession. A regime of dispossession is an institutionalized way of expropriating landed assets from their current owners or users. Each regime of dispossession is distinguished by: 1) a set of purposes for which a state is willing to dispossess land and 2) a way of producing compliance to that dispossession. Under different regimes, dispossession facilitates different kinds of accumulation with variable developmental consequences. These consequences crucially effect the long-term political stability of a regime of dispossession. Between independence in 1947 and economic liberalization in the early 1990s, India operated under a developmentalist regime of dispossession. Under this regime, the Indian state dispossessed land for state-led industrial and infrastructural projects, ensuring compliance through coercion and powerful ideological appeals to national development.
    [Show full text]
  • {Replace with the Title of Your Dissertation}
    Selfsame Spaces: Gandhi, Architecture and Allusions in Twentieth Century India. A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Venugopal Maddipati IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Catherine Asher, Adviser May, 2011 @ Venugopal Maddipati 2011 i Acknowledgements I would like to thank the following institutions and people for supporting my work. I am grateful to the American Institute of Indian Studies in Delhi, The Center of Science for Villages in Wardha and Kumarappapuram, The Indira Gandhi Institute of Developmental Research in Mumbai, The Gandhi Memorial Library in Delhi, The Center for Developmental Studies in Trivandrum, The Kutch Nav Nirman Abhiyaan and the University of Minnesota. I would like to thank the following individuals: Bindia Thapar, Purnima Mehta, Bindu Rajasenan, Soman Nair, Tilak Baker, Laurie Baker, Varsha Kaley, Vibha Gupta, Sameer Kuruve, David Faust, Donal Johnson, Eleanor Zelliot, Jane Blocker, Ajay Skaria, Anna Clark, Sarah Sik, Lynsi Spaulding, Riyaz Latif, Radha Dalal, Aditi Chandra, Sugata Ray, Atreyee Gupta, Midori Green, Sinem Arcak, Sherry, Dick, Jodi, Paul Wilson, Madhav Raman, Dhruv Sud, my parents, my sister Sushama, my mentors and my beloved Gurus, Frederick Asher and Catherine Asher. i Dedication Dedicated to my Tatagaru, Surapaneni Venugopal Rao. Tatagaru, if you can read this: You brought me up and taught me how to go beyond myself. ii Abstract In this dissertation, I suggest that the Indian political leader Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi infused deep and enigmatic meanings into everyday physical objects, particularly buildings. Indeed, the manner in which Gandhi named the buildings in his famous Satyagraha Ashram in Ahmedabad in the early part of the twentieth century, makes it somewhat difficult to write, in isolation, about their physical appearance.
    [Show full text]
  • Presenting the Past: Anxious History and Ancient Future in Hindutva India / S
    "Presenting" the Past This page intentionally left blank "Presenting" the Past Anxious History and Ancient Future in Hindutva India S.P. UDAYAKUMAR Wespor, connecticut PRAEGER London Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Udayakumar, S. P. Presenting the past: anxious history and ancient future in Hindutva India / S. P. Udayakumar. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-275-97209-7 (alk. paper) 1. India—Historiography. 2. Nationalism—India—History. 3. Hinduism and politics—India. I. Title. DS435.U33 2005 954'.0072'054—dc22 2005000450 British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data is available. Copyright © 2005 by S. P. Udayakumar All rights reserved. No portion of this book may be reproduced, by any process or technique, without the express written consent of the publisher. Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 2005000450 ISBN: 0-275-97209-7 First published in 2005 Praeger Publishers, 88 Post Road West, Westport, CT 06881 An imprint of Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc. www.praeger.com Printed in the United States of America The paper used in this book complies with the Permanent Paper Standard issued by the National Information Standards Organization (Z39.48-1984). 10 9 987654321 The author and publisher gratefully acknowledge permission for use of the following material: Reprinted from FUTURES, Vol. 28, No. 10, S. P. Udayakumar: "Betraying a Futurist," pp. 971-85, Copyright 1996, with permission from Elsevier. To the memory of Harry J. Friedman This page intentionally left blank Contents Acknowledgments
    [Show full text]
  • THE MARXIST, XXVIII 3, J P. Sundarayya
    THE MARXIST, XXVIII 3, JULY–SEPTEMBER 2012 PRAKASH KARAT P. Sundarayya: The Builder of the Communist Party The birth centenary of Putchalapalli Sundarayya, who was born on May 1, 1913 is being observed this year. P. Sundarayya is recognized as a builder of the Communist Party, strategist of the agrarian revolution, a defender of Marxist Leninist principles and a man closely associated with the masses. As General Secretary of the CPI(M) from its inception in 1964 to 1976, Sundarayya played a key role in the formation and the development of the Communist Party of India (Marxist). Three years ago in 2009, the birth centenary of his colleague and contemporary in the Indian communist movement, EMS Namboo-diripad was observed. Both were leaders with similarities in terms of their political upbringing, their experience in the Congress-led national movement and their evolution into leading communists of the pre-independence generation. Both emerged as leaders of the Communist Party of India and later the Communist Party of India (Marxist). EMS & PS: PARALLEL TRAJECTORIES EMS and PS joined the national movement as students. Neither completed their college studies. Both of them participated in the civil disobedience movement of 1930-31. Both were jailed in the satyagraha. It is in this period that they got disillusioned with the Gandhian movement and began looking for radical alternatives. P. Sundarayya came to communism earlier. While studying in college in Madras, PS joined a youth group set up by H.D. Raja a communist and was later recruited by Amir Hyder Khan into the Party. Later he joined the Congress Socialist Party as per the Party’s decision.
    [Show full text]
  • Communism and Religion in North India, 1920–47
    "To the Masses." Communism and Religion in North India, 1920–47 Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades doctor philosophiae (Dr. phil.) eingereicht an der Kultur-, Sozial- und Bildungswissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin von Patrick Hesse Präsident der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Prof. Dr. Jan-Hendrik Olbertz Dekanin der Kultur-, Sozial- und Bildungswissenschaftlichen Fakultät Prof. Dr. Julia von Blumenthal Gutachter: 1. Michael Mann 2. Dietrich Reetz Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 20. Juli 2015 Abstract Among the eldest of its kind in Asia, the Communist Party of India (CPI) pioneered the spread of Marxist politics beyond the European arena. Influenced by both Soviet revolutionary practice and radical nationalism in British India, it operated under conditions not provided for in Marxist theory—foremost the prominence of religion and community in social and political life. The thesis analyzes, first, the theoretical and organizational ‘overhead’ of the CPI in terms of the position of religion in a party communist hierarchy of emancipation. It will therefore question the works of Marx, Engels, and Lenin on the one hand, and Comintern doctrines on the other. Secondly, it scrutinizes the approaches and strategies of the CPI and individual members, often biographically biased, to come to grips with the subcontinental environment under the primacy of mass politics. Thirdly, I discuss communist vistas on revolution on concrete instances including (but not limited to) the Gandhian non-cooperation movement, the Moplah rebellion, the subcontinental proletariat, the problem of communalism, and assertion of minority identities. I argue that the CPI established a pattern of vacillation between qualified rejection and conditional appropriation of religion that loosely constituted two diverging revolutionary paradigms characterizing communist practice from the Soviet outset: Western and Eastern.
    [Show full text]
  • {PDF EPUB} Words of Freedom Ideas of a Nation by Aruna Asaf Ali
    Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} Words of Freedom Ideas of a Nation by Aruna Asaf Ali , 1942. ‘ ’ . 16 1909 ( ) 29 , 1996. 23 1928 - 1930 , - , 1932 10 1942 8 ‘ ’ 5000 26 1946 1948 1955 1958 , 1960 1975 1991 29 1996 1998 ‘ ’ , Words Of Freedom: Ideas Of a Nation. ‘ ’ 1944 ‘ ’ , ‘ - , ’. ‘ ’ ‘1942 ’ ‘ ’ , , , : Purnima Banerji (1911 – 1951) Purnima Banerji* was a part of the constituent assembly from 1946 – 1950. She represented the United Provinces in the assembly. She was serving as a member of the Uttar Pradesh legislative assembly in 1946. Apart from her many debates in the assembly, she also led the chorus in singing Jana Gana Mana after its official adoption as the national anthem on January 24th, 1950. Purnima Banerji was one among a radical network of women from Uttar Pradesh who stood at the forefront of the freedom movement in late 1930’s and 40’s. Her colleagues included Sucheta Kripalani, Vijaylakshmi Pandit, Uma Nehru, Rameshwari Nehru, Hajra Begum and many more. She was a member of the Congress Socialist Party since its inception in 1934, and a secretary for the Indian National Congress’ city committee in Allahabad. In 1941, she and Sucheta Kripalani were arrested for offering Individual Satyagraha. She was later arrested again for her participation in the Quit India Movement. She is said to have pursued her B.A in prison **. She was a close friend of the Nehru family, often sharing jail space with Nehru’s sisters, nieces, and with Indira Gandhi. Purnima Banerji was also the younger sister of freedom fighter Aruna Asaf Ali. One of the more striking aspects of Purnima Banerji’s speeches in the constituent assembly was her steadfast commitment to a socialist ideology.
    [Show full text]