DOCSLIB.ORG

Analysis of Different Random Graph Models in the Identification of Network Motifs in Complex Networks

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Analysis of Different Random Graph Models in the Identification of Network Motifs in Complex Networks Analysis of Different Random Graph Models in the Identification of Network Motifs in Complex Networks Vom Fachbereich Informatik der Technischen Universität Kaiserslautern zur Verleihung des akademischen Grades Doktor der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) genenehmigte Dissertation von Wolfgang Eugen Schlauch Datum der wissenschaftlichen Aussprache: 3. Dezember 2016 Dekan: Prof. Dr. Klaus Schneider Berichtserstatter: Prof. Dr. Katharina Anna Zweig Prof. Dr. Clemence Mangien D 386 CONTENTS I introduction5 1motivation 7 1.1 General Introduction to Network Analysis . 7 1.2 Which Model to Use . 9 1.3 Subgraphs . 9 1.4 The missing ingredient . 11 II definitions 13 2 graph models 17 2.0.1 The Er˝os-Rényimodel - the random graph . 18 2.1 Fixed Degree Sequence model . 18 2.1.1 Havel-Hakimi-Algorithm . 19 2.1.2 Configuration Model . 19 2.1.3 Switching Algorithm . 21 2.1.4 Sequential Importance Sampling . 23 3mathematicaltoolkit 27 3.1 Statistical Analysis of Differences in Results . 28 3.2 Simple Independence Model . 30 3.3 Critique on the applicability of sim to all graphs . 31 3.3.1 Example 1 ................................... 32 3.3.2 Example 2 ................................... 33 III comparison of the different null models based on artificial and real-world undirected graphs 35 4 comparativeanalysisbasedonthemodels 39 4.1 Erd˝os-Rényigraph . 41 4.2 Forest-Fire graph . 43 5 sequential importance sampling—which probability distribution to use? 45 6 analysis of undirected real-world graphs 47 6.1 Datasets . 47 7 stable measures 51 7.1 Diameter . 52 7.1.1 Approximating the Diameter . 52 7.1.2 Model comparison . 53 7.2 Distance . 56 7.2.1 Approximating the Distance . 56 7.2.2 Model comparison . 57 7.3 Implications . 60 7.4 Multiple Edges and Self-Loops . 60 i Contents 8 sensitive measures 67 8.1 Average Neighbor Degree . 67 8.1.1 Approximating the Average Neighbor Degree . 68 8.1.2 Model comparison . 68 8.2 Common Neighbors . 70 8.2.1 Approximating the Co-Occurrence . 71 8.2.2 Comparison of the models . 72 8.2.3 Local Co-Occurrences . 74 8.3 Implications . 74 IV comparison of the different null models based on directed graphs 79 9analysisofdirectedgraphs 83 9.1 A short history of motif analysis . 83 9.2 Data........................................... 85 10 on motifs 87 11differentmodelsunderinvestigation 91 11.1 On the Directed Configuration Model . 91 11.2 On the Sequential Importance Sampling . 99 11.3 A Faster Option to Calculate the Expected Number of Motifs . 105 11.4 Revisiting the Bifan . 120 11.4.1 Summary . 125 12 node-basedparticipationestimationinmotifs 127 12.1 Constructing Position-Based Equations . 128 12.2 On the Sum of Equations . 130 12.3 How do the Equations for Positions Fare? . 135 12.4 Revisiting the Bifan . 137 13 on predicting co-purchased items 141 13.0.1 Television Series Prediction . 143 13.1 The model to use and open problems . 152 V summary 155 14 summary and conclusions 157 14.1 Summary . 157 14.2 Conclusions to draw . 159 14.3 Future Work . 159 VI appendix 169 comparison with the results of itzkovitz et al. 171 directed graphs - tables 175 1 On the Configuration Model . 175 2 On the Sequential Importance Sampling Model . 183 3 On the Faster Option . 191 bifan equation revisited - continued 195 publications 199 1 Journal Articles . 199 ii Contents 2 Conferences . 199 3 Other . 199 iii LISTOFFIGURES Figure 2.1 Possible two-edge swaps in an undirected graph. 21 Figure 2.2 “Unswappable” Digraph . 22 Figure 2.3 Intermediate step in the graph generating process of the sequential importance sampling. 24 Figure 3.1 Kolmogorov-Smirnoff Test . 29 Figure 3.2 Example 1 .................................. 32 Figure 3.3 Two graphs generated from the same degree sequence with different modularity-scores. 33 Figure 4.1 Measures in unskewed graphs . 42 Figure 4.2 Measures in skewed graphs . 44 Figure 5.1 First comparison of the models based on assortativity . 46 Figure 7.1 Example graph for which the cfg and the sim yield many multiple edges and self-loops. 61 Figure 7.2 G(n, m) edgeloss example . 63 Figure 7.3 Edgeloss in graphs with skewed degree distributions . 64 Figure 7.4 Comparison of multiple edges attached to a high degree node . 66 Figure 8.1 Example of a multigraph. The question is, how to calculate the av- erage neighbor degree of v......................... 67 Figure 8.2 Co-occurrence vs. multigraph . 71 Figure 8.3 Comparison of the number of neighbors . 75 Figure 11.1 Edgeloss in directed graphs . 92 Figure 11.3 Histogram of Feed-Forward Loop distribution in cfg, ecfg, and fdsm 98 Figure 11.4 Degree distributions of graphs . 102 Figure 11.5 Average occurrence of edges in samples . 115 Figure 11.6 Average occurrence of edges in samples, contd. 117 Figure 11.7 Histograms of the distribution of subgraphs in different graphs, com- pared with the estimated distribution via the sim............ 119 Figure 12.1 Positions in a Feed-Forward Loop . 128 Figure 12.2 Relative error for Twopaths . 133 Figure 12.3 Relative error for Feed-Forward Loops . 134 Figure 12.4 Relative error based on position . 136 Figure 12.5 Relative error of the Bifan . 140 Figure 13.1 Correctly assessed edges . 151 v LISTOFTABLES Table 6.1 Basic network statistics for the individual networks used in the article. 49 Table 7.1 Average diameter of cfg samples . 54 Table 7.2 Average diameter of sis samples . 54 Table 7.3 Two-sample z-test results, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov two-sample test result and its p-value for the diameter of the graphs generated with the fdsm and the usis............................ 55 Table 7.4 Average distance of cfg samples . 57 Table 7.5 Two-sample z-test results, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov two-sample test result and its p-value for the average distance of the graphs gener- ated with the fdsm and the cfg....................... 58 Table 7.6 Average distance of sis samples . 59 Table 7.7 Two-sample z-test results, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov two-sample test result and its p-value for the average distance of the graphs gener- ated with the fdsm and the usis...................... 59 Table 7.8 Average number of self-loops and multi-edges for samples from the cfg. The table also contains their expected value calculated with Equation (7.19), resp. Equation (7.20).................... 65 Table 8.1 Average neighbor degree in fdsm, cfg, and sim ............ 68 Table 8.2 Average neighbor degree in fdsm and sis ................ 69 Table 8.3 Two-sample z-score calculation in comparison with the fdsm to test whether results can be from the distribution indicated by the samples. 70 Table 8.4 Average co-occurrence in the different models . 73 Table 8.5 z-score calculation with the graphs from the ecfg as samples and the number of cooccurrences in the fdsm as value to test whether it can be from the distribution indicated by the samples. 73 Table 11.1 Number of Forks found in the respective models. The standard de- viation for the cfg is due to the fact that two edges between the same node do not yield a Fork. 93 Table 11.2 Number of Fans found in the respective models. 94 Table 11.3 Results of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov two-sample test between the different models for the Fork. 95 Table 11.4 Results of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov two-sample test between the different models for the Fan. 95 Table 11.5 Number of Twopaths found in the respective models. 96 Table 11.6 Results of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov two-sample test between the different models for the Twopaths. 96 Table 11.7 Number of Feed-Forward Loops found in the respective models. 97 Table 11.8 Results of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov two-sample test between the different models for the Feed-Forward Loop. 98 Table 11.9 Number of Twopaths found in the respective models. 100 vii List of Tables Table 11.10 Results of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov two-sample test between the different models for the Twopath. 101 Table 11.11 Percentage of nodes which violate the condition that the square of their out-, in-, or combined degree should be smaller than the sum of the respective degree sequence. 101 Table 11.12 Number of Feed-Forward Loops found in the respective models. 103 Table 11.13 Results of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov two-sample test between the different models for the Feed-Forward Loop. 104 Table 11.14 Results of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov two-sample test between the different models for the Out-Fan. 104 Table 11.15 Results of the two-sample z-score calculation between.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Optimal Subgraph Structures in Scale-Free Configuration
    Submitted to the Annals of Applied Probability OPTIMAL SUBGRAPH STRUCTURES IN SCALE-FREE CONFIGURATION MODELS , By Remco van der Hofstad∗ §, Johan S. H. van , , Leeuwaarden∗ ¶ and Clara Stegehuis∗ k Eindhoven University of Technology§, Tilburg University¶ and Twente Universityk Subgraphs reveal information about the geometry and function- alities of complex networks. For scale-free networks with unbounded degree fluctuations, we obtain the asymptotics of the number of times a small connected graph occurs as a subgraph or as an induced sub- graph. We obtain these results by analyzing the configuration model with degree exponent τ (2, 3) and introducing a novel class of op- ∈ timization problems. For any given subgraph, the unique optimizer describes the degrees of the vertices that together span the subgraph. We find that subgraphs typically occur between vertices with specific degree ranges. In this way, we can count and characterize all sub- graphs. We refrain from double counting in the case of multi-edges, essentially counting the subgraphs in the erased configuration model. 1. Introduction Scale-free networks often have degree distributions that follow power laws with exponent τ (2, 3) [1, 11, 22, 34]. Many net- ∈ works have been reported to satisfy these conditions, including metabolic networks, the internet and social networks. Scale-free networks come with the presence of hubs, i.e., vertices of extremely high degrees. Another property of real-world scale-free networks is that the clustering coefficient (the probability that two uniformly chosen neighbors of a vertex are neighbors themselves) decreases with the vertex degree [4, 10, 24, 32, 34], again following a power law.
    [Show full text]
  • The Number of Spanning Trees in Apollonian Networks
    The Number of Spanning Trees in Apollonian Networks Zhongzhi Zhang, Bin Wu School of Computer Science and Shanghai Key Lab of Intelligent Information Processing, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China ([email protected]). Francesc Comellas Dep. Matem`atica Aplicada IV, EETAC, Universitat Polit`ecnica de Catalunya, c/ Esteve Terradas 5, Castelldefels (Barcelona), Catalonia, Spain ([email protected]). Abstract In this paper we find an exact analytical expression for the number of span- ning trees in Apollonian networks. This parameter can be related to signif- icant topological and dynamic properties of the networks, including perco- lation, epidemic spreading, synchronization, and random walks. As Apol- lonian networks constitute an interesting family of maximal planar graphs which are simultaneously small-world, scale-free, Euclidean and space fill- ing, modular and highly clustered, the study of their spanning trees is of particular relevance. Our results allow also the calculation of the spanning tree entropy of Apollonian networks, which we compare with those of other graphs with the same average degree. Key words: Apollonian networks, spanning trees, small-world graphs, complex networks, self-similar, maximally planar, scale-free 1. Apollonian networks In the process known as Apollonian packing [9], which dates back to Apollonius of Perga (c262{c190 BC), we start with three mutually tangent circles, and draw their inner Soddy circle (tangent to the three circles). Next we draw the inner Soddy circles of this circle with each pair of the original three, and the process is iterated, see Fig. 1. An Apollonian packing can be used to design a graph, when each circle is associated to a vertex of the graph and vertices are connected if their corresponding circles are tangent.
    [Show full text]
  • Detecting Statistically Significant Communities
    1 Detecting Statistically Significant Communities Zengyou He, Hao Liang, Zheng Chen, Can Zhao, Yan Liu Abstract—Community detection is a key data analysis problem across different fields. During the past decades, numerous algorithms have been proposed to address this issue. However, most work on community detection does not address the issue of statistical significance. Although some research efforts have been made towards mining statistically significant communities, deriving an analytical solution of p-value for one community under the configuration model is still a challenging mission that remains unsolved. The configuration model is a widely used random graph model in community detection, in which the degree of each node is preserved in the generated random networks. To partially fulfill this void, we present a tight upper bound on the p-value of a single community under the configuration model, which can be used for quantifying the statistical significance of each community analytically. Meanwhile, we present a local search method to detect statistically significant communities in an iterative manner. Experimental results demonstrate that our method is comparable with the competing methods on detecting statistically significant communities. Index Terms—Community Detection, Random Graphs, Configuration Model, Statistical Significance. F 1 INTRODUCTION ETWORKS are widely used for modeling the structure function that is able to always achieve the best performance N of complex systems in many fields, such as biology, in all possible scenarios. engineering, and social science. Within the networks, some However, most of these objective functions (metrics) do vertices with similar properties will form communities that not address the issue of statistical significance of commu- have more internal connections and less external links.
    [Show full text]
  • R-Rated" Wildlife Film
    GETTING NAUGHTY WITH NATURE: "R-RATED" WILDLIFE FILM by Kevin Michael Collins A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Fine Arts in Science and Natural History Filmmaking MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY Bozeman, Montana May 2015 ©COPYRIGHT by Kevin Michael Collins 2015 All Rights Reserved ii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................1 2. DEFINING "R-RATED" .................................................................................................3 3. MATURE CONTENT IN WILDLIFE PROGRAMS .....................................................5 4. THE VALUE OF AN "R-RATED" APPROACH ..........................................................7 5. TRUE FACTS BY ZE FRANK ......................................................................................11 6. GREEN PORNO STARRING ISABELLA ROSSELLINI ...........................................13 7. WILD SEX STARRING DR. CARIN BONDAR ..........................................................16 8. MATURE CONTENT IN INSEX EPISODE 1: "LUMINESCENT LOVERS" ...........18 9. CONCLUSION ..............................................................................................................21 REFERENCES CITED ......................................................................................................23 iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Spotted Hyena Birth Canal ..................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamic Phenomena on Complex Networks Luca Dall’Asta
    Dynamic Phenomena on Complex Networks Luca Dall’Asta To cite this version: Luca Dall’Asta. Dynamic Phenomena on Complex Networks. Data Analysis, Statistics and Probabil- ity [physics.data-an]. Université Paris Sud - Paris XI, 2006. English. tel-00093102 HAL Id: tel-00093102 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00093102 Submitted on 12 Sep 2006 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. UNIVERSITE` DE PARIS 11 - U.F.R. DES SCIENCES D’ORSAY Laboratoire de Physique Theorique´ d’Orsay THESE` DE DOCTORAT DE L’UNIVERSITE´ PARIS 11 Sp´ecialit´e: PHYSIQUE THEORIQUE´ pr´esent´epar Luca DALL’ASTA pour obtenir le grade de DOCTEUR DE L’UNIVERSITE´ PARIS 11 Sujet: Ph´enom`enes dynamiques sur des r´eseaux complexes Jury compos´ede: M. Alain Barrat (Directeur de th`ese) M. Olivier Martin M. R´emi Monasson M. Romualdo Pastor-Satorras (Rapporteur) M. Cl´ement Sire (Rapporteur) M. Alessandro Vespignani Juin, 2006 Contents List of Publications iv 1 Introduction 1 1.1 A networked description of Nature and Society . ............. 1 1.2 RelationbetweenTopologyandDynamics . ........... 3 1.3 Summaryofthethesis .............................. ...... 4 2 Structure of complex networks: an Overview 7 2.1 Introduction...................................
    [Show full text]
  • Stefan Felsnery Institut FUrmathematik Technische UniversitAtberlin
    4-Connected Triangulations on Few Lines£ Stefan Felsnery Institut furMathematik Technische UniversitatBerlin Abstract. We show that every 4-connected plane triangulation with n vertices can be drawn suchp that edges are represented by straight segments and the vertices lie on a set of at most 2n lines each of them horizontal or vertical. The same holds for plane graphs on n vertices without separating triangle. The proof is based on a corresponding result for diagrams of planar lattices which makes use of orthogonal chain and antichain families. 1 Introduction Given a planar graph G we denote by π(G) the minimum number ` such that G has a plane straight-line drawing in which the vertices can be covered by a collection of ` lines. Clearly π(G) = 1 if and only if G is a forest of paths. The set of graphs with π(G) = 2, however, is already surprisingly rich, it contains trees, outerplanar graphs and subgraphs of grids [1, 9]. The parameter π(G) has received some attention in recent years, here is a list of known results: It is NP-complete to decide whether π(G) = 2 (Biedl et al. [2]). For a stacked triangulation G, a.k.a. planar 3-tree or Apollonian network, let dG be the stacking depth (e.g. K4 has stacking depth 1). On this class lower and upper bounds on π(G) are dG + 1 and dG + 2 respectively, see Biedl et al. [2] and for the lower bound also Eppstein [8, Thm. 16.13]. 3 Eppstein [9] constructed a planar, cubic, 3-connected, bipartite graph G` on O(` ) ver- tices with π(G`) `.
    [Show full text]
  • Processes on Complex Networks. Percolation
    Chapter 5 Processes on complex networks. Percolation 77 Up till now we discussed the structure of the complex networks. The actual reason to study this structure is to understand how this structure influences the behavior of random processes on networks. I will talk about two such processes. The first one is the percolation process. The second one is the spread of epidemics. There are a lot of open problems in this area, the main of which can be innocently formulated as: How the network topology influences the dynamics of random processes on this network. We are still quite far from a definite answer to this question. 5.1 Percolation 5.1.1 Introduction to percolation Percolation is one of the simplest processes that exhibit the critical phenomena or phase transition. This means that there is a parameter in the system, whose small change yields a large change in the system behavior. To define the percolation process, consider a graph, that has a large connected component. In the classical settings, percolation was actually studied on infinite graphs, whose vertices constitute the set Zd, and edges connect each vertex with nearest neighbors, but we consider general random graphs. We have parameter ϕ, which is the probability that any edge present in the underlying graph is open or closed (an event with probability 1 − ϕ) independently of the other edges. Actually, if we talk about edges being open or closed, this means that we discuss bond percolation. It is also possible to talk about the vertices being open or closed, and this is called site percolation.
    [Show full text]
  • Percolation Thresholds for Robust Network Connectivity
    Percolation Thresholds for Robust Network Connectivity Arman Mohseni-Kabir1, Mihir Pant2, Don Towsley3, Saikat Guha4, Ananthram Swami5 1. Physics Department, University of Massachusetts Amherst, [email protected] 2. Massachusetts Institute of Technology 3. College of Information and Computer Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst 4. College of Optical Sciences, University of Arizona 5. Army Research Laboratory Abstract Communication networks, power grids, and transportation networks are all examples of networks whose performance depends on reliable connectivity of their underlying network components even in the presence of usual network dynamics due to mobility, node or edge failures, and varying traffic loads. Percolation theory quantifies the threshold value of a local control parameter such as a node occupation (resp., deletion) probability or an edge activation (resp., removal) probability above (resp., below) which there exists a giant connected component (GCC), a connected component comprising of a number of occupied nodes and active edges whose size is proportional to the size of the network itself. Any pair of occupied nodes in the GCC is connected via at least one path comprised of active edges and occupied nodes. The mere existence of the GCC itself does not guarantee that the long-range connectivity would be robust, e.g., to random link or node failures due to network dynamics. In this paper, we explore new percolation thresholds that guarantee not only spanning network connectivity, but also robustness. We define and analyze four measures of robust network connectivity, explore their interrelationships, and numerically evaluate the respective robust percolation thresholds arXiv:2006.14496v1 [physics.soc-ph] 25 Jun 2020 for the 2D square lattice.
    [Show full text]
  • Building a Larger Class of Graphs for Efficient Reconfiguration
    Building a larger class of graphs for efficient reconfiguration of vertex colouring by Owen Merkel A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Mathematics in Computer Science Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2020 c Owen Merkel 2020 This thesis consists of material all of which I authored or co-authored: see Statement of Contributions included in the thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii Statement of Contributions Owen Merkel is the sole author of Chapters 1, 2, 3, and 6 which were written under the supervision of Prof. Therese Biedl and Prof. Anna Lubiw and were not written for publication. Exceptions to sole authorship are Chapters 4 and 5, which is joint work with Prof. Therese Biedl and Prof. Anna Lubiw and consists in part of a manuscript written for publication. iii Abstract A k-colouring of a graph G is an assignment of at most k colours to the vertices of G so that adjacent vertices are assigned different colours. The reconfiguration graph of the k-colourings, Rk(G), is the graph whose vertices are the k-colourings of G and two colourings are joined by an edge in Rk(G) if they differ in colour on exactly one vertex. For a k-colourable graph G, we investigate the connectivity and diameter of Rk+1(G). It is known that not all weakly chordal graphs have the property that Rk+1(G) is connected.
    [Show full text]
  • 15 Netsci Configuration Model.Key
    Configuring random graph models with fixed degree sequences Daniel B. Larremore Santa Fe Institute June 21, 2017 NetSci [email protected] @danlarremore Brief note on references: This talk does not include references to literature, which are numerous and important. Most (but not all) references are included in the arXiv paper: arxiv.org/abs/1608.00607 Stochastic models, sets, and distributions • a generative model is just a recipe: choose parameters→make the network • a stochastic generative model is also just a recipe: choose parameters→draw a network • since a single stochastic generative model can generate many networks, the model itself corresponds to a set of networks. • and since the generative model itself is some combination or composition of random variables, a random graph model is a set of possible networks, each with an associated probability, i.e., a distribution. this talk: configuration models: uniform distributions over networks w/ fixed deg. seq. Why care about random graphs w/ fixed degree sequence? Since many networks have broad or peculiar degree sequences, these random graph distributions are commonly used for: Hypothesis testing: Can a particular network’s properties be explained by the degree sequence alone? Modeling: How does the degree distribution affect the epidemic threshold for disease transmission? Null model for Modularity, Stochastic Block Model: Compare an empirical graph with (possibly) community structure to the ensemble of random graphs with the same vertex degrees. e a loopy multigraphs c d simple simple loopy graphs multigraphs graphs Stub Matching tono multiedgesdraw from theno config. self-loops model ~k = 1, 2, 2, 1 b { } 3 3 4 3 4 3 4 4 multigraphs 2 5 2 5 2 5 2 5 1 1 6 6 1 6 1 6 3 3 the 4standard algorithm:4 3 4 4 loopy and/or 5 5 draw2 from5 the distribution2 5 by sequential2 “Stub Matching”2 1 1 6 6 1 6 1 6 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Toward an Irreverent Ecocriticism
    Journal of Ecocriticism 4(2) July 2012 Toward an Irreverent Ecocriticism Nicole Seymour (University of Arkansas at Little Rock)* Abstract I see an irreverent ecocriticism as being indebted to two major developments in and around the field: poststructuralist ecocriticism and queer ecology. Poststructuralist ecocriticism, as many readers no doubt know, can be traced to scholars such as William Cronon, Dana Phillips, and David Mazel. In his American Literary Environmentalism (2000), Mazel stresses that his work is not “about some myth of the environment, as if the environment were an ontologically stable, foundational identity we have a myth about. Rather, the environment is itself a myth, a ‘grand fable’ … a discursive construction, something whose ‘reality’ derives from the way we write, speak, and think about it” (xii). Similarly, the essays in Cronon’s 1996 collection Uncommon Ground taKe aim at simple, essentialist ideals of nature and wilderness; N. Katherine Hayles, for instance, argues that “the distinction between simulation and nature … is a crumbling diKe, springing leaks everywhere we press upon it” (411). Some of this worK may seem dated to those who engaged with poststructuralism much earlier. But, judging by the negative reactions of many ecocritics and environmentalists, it can also be viewed as quite the opposite: reactionary, overstated, heretical.1 Indeed, this worK could be described as perverse for how it breaks with its forebears, which include not just “classic” ecocriticism but also first-wave or conservationist environmentalism. My students often ask me if I think there’s hope for the future of the planet. I tell them I think it’s probably going to hell in a handbasket, and all of us with it.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Properties of Random Apollonian Networks
    Some Properties of Random Apollonian Networks Alan Frieze, Charalampos E. Tsourakakis Department of Mathematical Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, USA [email protected], [email protected] Abstract. In this work we analyze fundamental properties of Random Apollonian Networks [37,38], a popular random graph model which generates planar graphs with power law properties. Specifically, we analyze (a) the degree distribution, (b) the k largest degrees, (c) the k largest eigenvalues and (d) the diameter, where k is a constant. 1 Introduction Due to the surge of interest in social networks, the Web graph, the Internet, biological networks and many other types of networks, a large amount of research has focused on modeling real-world networks in recent years. Existing well-known models include the preferential attachment model [7], Kronecker graphs [31], the Cooper-Frieze model [17], the Aiello-Chung-Lu model [1], protean graphs [34] and the Fabrikant- Koutsoupias-Papadimitriou model [23]. Despite the fact that the family of planar graphs is a particularly important family of graphs [29] and models important real-world graphs such as road networks, there exists few generators of real-world planar graphs. In this work we focus on Random Apollonian Networks (RANs), a popular random graph model for generating planar graphs with power law properties [38]. Before we state our main results we briefly describe the model. Model: An example of a RAN is shown in Figure 1. At time t = 1 the RAN is shown in Figure 1a. At each step t ≥ 2 a face F is chosen uniformly at random among the faces of Gt.
    [Show full text]