Unit 3 Pollination and Fertilization

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Unit 3 Pollination and Fertilization UNIT 3 POLLINATION AND FERTILIZATION Structure Page No. Introduction Objectives Pollination 3.2.1 Types of Pollination 3.2.2 Self- Vs Cmss-Pollination Fertilization 3.3.1 Pollen-Stigma Interaction 3.3.2 Pollen Gemination-Events on Stigma and in Style 3.3.3 Pollen Tube Growth in vitro 3.3.4 Syngamy and Triple Fusion Incompatibility 3.4.1 Intraspecific Incompatibility 3.4.2 Interspecific Incompatibility 3.4.3 Biological Significance of Incompatibility 3.4.4 Methods to Overcome Incompatibility Apomixis 3.5.1. The Recurrent Type 3.5.2 Non-recurrent Type 3.5.3 Endosperm Development in Apomicts 3.5.4 Anthers of Apomicts 3.5.5 Causes of Apomixis 3.5.6 Parthenogenesis 3.5.7 Significance of Apomivis summary Terminal Questions Answers - - - 3.1 INTRODUCTION Thi :eproductive smchlre of angiosperms including the details of formation of male and l~malegametophytes were considered in the earlier units. You my recall @at as a result of meiosis, haploid pollen grains and egg cell are formed. After the formation of the gametophytes, the next two essential steps of sexual reproduction, i.e., pollination and fertilisation take place. As a result zygote is formed, which eventually develops into the embryo. Before fertilisation can occur, the pollen must be transferred from the stamen to the stigma of the carpel. The transfer of pollen is known as pollination and it may be accomplished by a number of agencies such as wind, water or animals. Double fertilisation, a process unique to flowering plants, follows pollination. In this unit you will become familiar with the types of pollination, some of the important adaptations exhibited by plants for successful pollination, details of the structural features of the pistil, pollen-pistil interaction, double fertilisation, incompatibility and apomixis. Objectives After studying this unit you should be able to: explain the process of sexual reproduction in flowering plants; describe the methods that the plants adapt to disperse the pollen grains for effective pollinatiow, interpret as to why in certaiq- ases hybridization fails; defrne the methods to overcome incompatibility; analyse how apomixis operates to ensure survival in certain plants; e relate the control mechanism that plants have developed to avoid indiscriminate Polllnatlan and FertIUzatlon I sexwl reproduction. 3.2 POLLINATION Pollination refers to the transfer of pollen from dehiscing anthers to the pistil. Unlike animals, plants cannot move to their mates fur sexual reproduction. Hence, they need some external &vice or agency for the transfer of pollen grains from the male parent to the stigma of the female parent. Exceptionally, in Vallisnena, an aquatic plant, complete male flower may be transported to the female flowers, The physical (wind and water) and biological (insects, birds and bats) agencies promote cross-pollination. The &hiscene of anthers and the transfer of pollen are the prime requirements of pollination. Anther dehiscence: Anther dehiscence simply means the release of pollen graims from dry and mature anthers. It involves the rupturing of anther wall due to the mechanical pressure &veloped by the fibrous thickenings of endothecial cells along the stomium (the area where mechanical layer does not differentiate). If endothecium is lacking, the L mechanical role is passed on to epidermal cells. In most of the angiosperms the stomium . is a narrow strip along the entire length of the anther lobe. It may, however, also be restricted to a lid or valve (Berberidaceae) or pores (Solanurn, Cassia, Polygala). Pollen Transfer: The transfer of pollen can be autogamous (self-pollination) in which -the pollen grains of an anther reach the stigma of the same flower. In cross-pollination, the pollen of one plant reach the pistil of some other plant of the same species. If the pollination occurs between two flowers of the same plant it is termed geitonogamy and , if it is between two flowers on different plants it is xenogamy. 3.2,l Types of Pollination Self-Pollination I 1 Self-pollination refers to the transfer of pollen grains from the anther to the stigma of I the same flower. In chasmogamous flowers the mature anthers and stigma are exposed to pollinating agents. In cleistogamous flowers fertilization is accomplished without I exposing the sex organs (cleistogamy) to the abnosphere. I I Cotnmelina benghalensis produces both chasmogamous (aerial) and cleistogamous I (underground) flowers. Conversion of chasmogamous flowers to cleistogamous type depends on environmentd conditions, such as temperature. Cross-pollination In this kind of pollination the pollen &om anther of one individual is transferred to the stigma of another individual of the same species. The process is mediated by physical or biological agents thdnclu& wind, water, insect, birds or mammals. Whereas, cross- pollination is obligatory in unisexual flowers, the bisexual flowers may have adaptations that prevent self-pollination. These adaptations include: self sterility, dichogarny, herkogamy and heterostyly. These have been discussed in Subsection 3.2.2. We shall now take up some of the common agents that mediate cross-pollination. (a) Anemophily: It is also commonly referred to as wind pollination, i.e., the pollen grains are carried through wind currents. To ensure good pollination the anemophilous plants produce astronomical number of small, dry, light and smooth pollen grains that are released preferably on warm and dry days. Flowers in such plants are unisexual with reduced sepals and petals so as to effectively position the t long and feathery stigma for pollen interception. Stamens have long filaments and I are exposed to facilitate convenient pollen dispersal, Palms, grasses, millets, t I bamboos are common examples. (b) Hydrophily: All hydrophytes are not necessarily pollinated hy water. In fact most of the aquatic plant. are anemophilous, e.g., Myrioph~~llr~rn,k"--t 9,geton or entomophilous, e.g.. Alisma, Nymphaea. Like arre~nophilot~stz- tb floral envelops i Plant Development-I are highly reduced or absent in hydrophilous plants. Hydrophily may involve underwater pollination referred to as hyphydrophily, e.g., Ceratophyllum, Majus, Zostera. A unique example of this type is Zostera mariana (a submerged marine perennial) in which pollen grains are long (up to 250pm) and needle-like resembling pollen tubes. Because of the specific gravity of these pollen they freely float at any depth, and when they come in contact with the stigma they coil around it. In some taxa ephydrophily operates. In these plants pollination is brought about at the surface of water. The classical example is the submerged dioecious plant, Vallisneria. The male and female flowers are produced under water but on maturity the males get detached from the stalk and float on the surface while the female flowers attached to thin, spirally coiled, long, slender stalks are brought to the surface at the time of pollination. Pollination is achieved through water currents when male flowers come in contact with pistillate flowers. After pollination the flowers are dragged down to the bottom by the recoiling of the stalk. The fruits thus develop under water. (c) Entomophily: It involves insects to carry the pollen to achieve pollination. Salvia exhibits a specialised 'tumapipe' floral mechanism that signifies classic adaptation for bee pollination. In Salvia the corolla is bilipped and the stamens are attached to corolla tube. Only one-half of each anther is fertile, the other half being sterile joins together to form a sterile plate of tissue placed above the lower lip at the mouth of the flower. However, the fertile part lies under the hood of the upper lip of the corolla. When a bee visits the flower for nec'tar it pushes against the sterile plate which consequently brings down the fertile anthers on its back dusting it with pollen. When the bee visits another flower, the forked stigmas picks up the pollen from the back of the insect. Plants that are pollinated by insects often have predominently yellow or blue petals. Among insects bees and butterflies do not perceive colour in the same manner as the humans. They are able to see in the ultraviolet range of the electromagnetic spectrum, an area that is invisible to human eye. They see blue and yellow flowers differently than humans. Red appears black to them. Consequently, flowers that are pollinated by insects are not usually red. Many insect-pollinated flowers have dramatic ultra-violet markings, that are invisible to us but direct the insect to the flower, where pollen or nectar may be located. Insects have a well developed sense of smell. Some flowers have developed "fly-trap mechanism" for their pollination, by emitting unpleasant odours, e.g., Raflesia (rotten meat), Arum (human excreta), and Aristolochia (decaying tobacco and humus). In the orchid, Ophrys speculum a highly specialized type of pollination has evolved. It is pollinated by :hairy wasp, Colpa amea. As the appearance and smell of female wasp matches with that of orchid flowers, the male wasp mistakes t'he flower as its female partner and carries our pseudo-copulation. In this process the transfer of pollinia from one flower to another takes place. An obligate symbiotic relationship has been observed between a moth Tageticula and the plant Yucca. The moth cannot complete its life cycle without the association of Yucca flower and in turn Yucca has no other pollinator. The female moth lays her eggs in the ovary. Neither would be able to reproduce successfully without the other. In case, one species were to become extinct, the other would also become extinct eventually. (d) Omithophily: In tropical areas, the birds dominate over insects as important pollinators. The most common among them are humming-birds, sun-birds and honey-eaters. Flowers pollinated by birds are usually red, orange or yellow. Birds see well in this region of visible light. Birds do not have a strong sense of smell; conseiguently, bird-pollinated flowers usually lack much scent.
Recommended publications
  • Genetic Dissection of Apomixis in Dandelions Identifies a Dominant
    G C A T T A C G G C A T genes Article Genetic Dissection of Apomixis in Dandelions Identifies a Dominant Parthenogenesis Locus and Highlights the Complexity of Autonomous Endosperm Formation Peter J. Van Dijk 1,*, Rik Op den Camp 1 and Stephen E. Schauer 2 1 Keygene N.V., Agro Business Park 90, 6708 PW Wageningen, The Netherlands; [email protected] 2 Keygene Inc., Rockville, MD 20850, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +31-317-466-866 Received: 20 July 2020; Accepted: 18 August 2020; Published: 20 August 2020 Abstract: Apomixis in the common dandelion (Taraxacum officinale) consists of three developmental components: diplospory (apomeiosis), parthenogenesis, and autonomous endosperm development. The genetic basis of diplospory, which is inherited as a single dominant factor, has been previously elucidated. To uncover the genetic basis of the remaining components, a cross between a diploid sexual seed parent and a triploid apomictic pollen donor was made. The resulting 95 triploid progeny plants were genotyped with co-dominant simple-sequence repeat (SSR) markers and phenotyped for apomixis as a whole and for the individual apomixis components using Nomarski Differential Interference Contrast (DIC) microscopy of cleared ovules and seed flow cytometry. From this, a new SSR marker allele was discovered that was closely linked to parthenogenesis and unlinked to diplospory. The segregation of apomixis as a whole does not differ significantly from a three-locus model, with diplospory and parthenogenesis segregating as unlinked dominant loci. Autonomous endosperm is regularly present without parthenogenesis, suggesting that the parthenogenesis locus does not also control endosperm formation.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Control of Autonomous Embryo and Endosperm Development
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by RERO DOC Digital Library Sex Plant Reprod (2008) 21:79–88 DOI 10.1007/s00497-007-0061-9 REVIEW Molecular control of autonomous embryo and endosperm development Mark Douglas Curtis Æ Ueli Grossniklaus Received: 26 November 2007 / Accepted: 3 December 2007 / Published online: 19 December 2007 Ó Springer-Verlag 2007 Abstract Precocious seed development is usually pre- success. The developmental program of the seed is initiated vented by a series of mechanisms that ensure seed by double fertilization and requires the coordinated production results from double fertilization. These events development of the maternal seed coat together with the are circumvented in natural apomictic plant species that two fertilization products, the embryo and endosperm reproduce clonally through seed. Recent advances in (reviewed in Berger et al. 2006). For double fertilization to molecular genetics using mutagenic approaches in model take place, the pollen tube that carries the two sperm cells sexual plant species, such as Arabidopsis and Zea mays, enters the embryo sac through the micropyle guided by have revealed some of the mechanisms that prevent such signals from the synergids (for a detailed description see precocious seed development. An understanding of these Punwani and Drews 2008; Higashiyama and Hamamura mechanisms may lead to the development of techniques 2008, this issue). The pollen tube penetrates the degener- that will allow future crop plant species exhibiting hybrid ating synergid cell, releasing the sperm cells contained vigor to be engineered such that their complex genomes within—a process that is under the control of the embryo can be fixed indefinitely, thereby maintaining high yields.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductive Biology of Leafy Spurge (Euphorbia Esula L.): Breeding System Analysis1
    Reprinted with permission from: Canadian Journal of Botany 77:1684-1688 (1999). Published and copyrighted by: National Research Council of Canada, http://www.nrc.ca/cisti/journals/. Reproductive biology of leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula L.): Breeding system 1 analysis SARENA M. SELBO and JEFFREY S. CARMICHAEL* Department of Biology, University of North Dakota Grand Forks, ND 58202, Phone: (701) 777-4666, Fax: (701) 777- 2623, *Author for correspondence e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula L.) represents a non-native, invasive weed that dominates many regions across North America. While many research efforts are aimed at controlling the growth and spread of this plant, rela- tively little is known about its breeding system. This study provides evi- dence that leafy spurge is self-compatible, with selfed plants producing roughly half as many seeds as outcrossed plants. Unpollinated flowers failed to set seed and thus preliminary tests for apomixis were negative. However, microscopic examination of pollinated flowers revealed that pollen tubes did not appear to enter ovules in either selfed or outcrossed flowers. Therefore, leafy spurge exhibits structural evidence that suggests pseudogamy may play a role in the reproductive strategies of this invasive weed. Keywords: Leafy spurge, Euphorbiaceae, Euphorbia, apomixis, breeding system, self- compatibility. Introduction Leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula L.) is a herbaceous perennial that has flourished as a weed of economic and ecological importance. This plant was introduced to North Amer- ica from continental Europe and Asia in the early nineteenth century as a contaminant in 1 Submitted to Canadian Journal of Botany, December 22, 1998 Page 1 of 8 seed grain (Messersmith 1983).
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Apomixis: Recent Advances and Remaining Conundrums
    The Plant Cell, Vol. 16, S228–S245, Supplement 2004, www.plantcell.org ª 2004 American Society of Plant Biologists Understanding Apomixis: Recent Advances and Remaining Conundrums Ross A. Bicknella and Anna M. Koltunowb,1 a Crop and Food Research, Private Bag 4704, Christchurch, New Zealand b Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Plant Industry, Adelaide, Glen Osmond, South Australia 5064, Australia INTRODUCTION model systems remains essential for the development of suc- cessful strategies for the greater application and manipulation It has been 10 years since the last review on apomixis, or asexual of apomixis in agriculture. seed formation, in this journal (Koltunow, 1993). In that article, emphasis was given to the commonalties known among apomictic processes relative to the events of sexual reproduc- tion. The inheritance of apomixis had been established in some WHAT IS APOMIXIS? species, and molecular mapping studies had been initiated. The Apomixis in flowering plants is defined as the asexual forma- molecular relationships between apomictic and sexual repro- tion of a seed from the maternal tissues of the ovule, avoiding duction, however, were completely unknown. With research the processes of meiosis and fertilization, leading to embryo progress in both sexual and apomictic systems in the intervening development. The initial discovery of apomixis in higher plants is years, subsequent reviews on apomixis in the literature have attributed to the observation that a solitary female plant of considered the economic advantages of providing apomixis to Alchornea ilicifolia (syn. Caelebogyne ilicifolia) from Australia developing and developed agricultural economies (Hanna, 1995; continued to form seeds when planted at Kew Gardens in Savidan, 2000a) and strategies to gain an understanding of England (Smith, 1841).
    [Show full text]
  • Heredity Volume 10 Part 2 August 1956
    HEREDITY VOLUME 10 PART 2 AUGUST 1956 SUBSEXUAL REPRODUCTION IN AGROPYRON JOHN BRUCE HAIR Botany Division, D.S.!.R., Christchurch, New Zealand Receivedi .X.55 I.INTRODUCTION THEgrass Agropyron scabrum is found in both islands of New Zealand, in Norfolk Island and in eastern Australia. It is a complex of morpho- logically distinct populations which preserve their separate character both in nature and in cultivation. They do so because they are self- pollinated and true-breeding, and they form no natural hybrids (Connor, 1954). A preliminary study of meiosis in this complex showed that whereas in so me populations chromosome pairing was normal, in others it was less regular, and in one population there was little or no pairing at all. Four populations were therefore selected for further investiga- tion, the results of which are described in the present paper. 2. MATERIALAND METHODS Theparental material, derived from four areas (table i), consisted of 30 selected plants,* which were multiplied clonally in culture and also bred. The seedling progenies totalled 664 plants. Mitosis was studied in Feulgen squashes of root tips, following pretreatment in -bromonaphthalene or o2 per cent. colchicine (-hours)and fixation overnight in 2BD. For good maceration and staining, hydrolysis at 6o° C. was extended to 18-24 minutes. Meiosis in PMC was examined in temporary acetocarmine squashes, following Thomas's method (1940). Storage was satisfactory in ordinary acetic alcohol at 450 C. Embryo-sacs, embryos andendospermwere traced in paraffin sections of whole buds or excised ovaries after fixing briefly in Carnoy, overnight in CrAF. The stain was crystal-violet.
    [Show full text]
  • Apomixis in the Asteraceae: Diamonds in the Rough
    Functional Plant Science and Biotechnology ©2007 Global Science Books Apomixis in the Asteraceae: Diamonds in the Rough Richard D. Noyes University of Central Arkansas, Conway, Arkansas 72035, USA Correspondence : [email protected] ABSTRACT The Asteraceae is commonly listed, along with Poaceae and Rosaceae, as one of the principal families within which asexual reproduction by seed, i.e., apomixis, is prolific. A review of the literature indicates that naturally occurring apomixis is robustly indicated for 22 genera in seven tribes of Asteraceae (Lactuceae, Gnaphalieae, Astereae, Inuleae, Heliantheae, Madieae, and Eupatorieae), all but one of which occurs in the subfamily Asteroideae. Apomixis has been proposed for an additional 46 genera. However, consideration of the evidence indicates that the trait is contra-indicated for 30 of these cases in which developmental abnormalities or components of apomixis are recorded for otherwise sexual taxa. Accumulation and perpetuation of these reports through generations of reviews has inflated the actual number of genera in which apomictic reproduction occurs in the family. Data are strongly indicative or equivocal for effective apomixis for the remaining 16 genera, but thorough documentation is wanting. Our state of knowledge of apomixis in the Asteraceae is generally poor. Interpreting the phylogenetic distribution and evolution of the trait in the family will require systematic effort involving cytological documentation and genetic analysis of reproduction for many candidate genera. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Apomixis and Differential Expression Analyses Using Microarrays
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Plan B and other Reports Graduate Studies 8-2013 A Review of Apomixis and Differential Expression Analyses Using Microarrays Jonathan Harris Cardwell Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/gradreports Part of the Plant Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Cardwell, Jonathan Harris, "A Review of Apomixis and Differential Expression Analyses Using Microarrays" (2013). All Graduate Plan B and other Reports. 289. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/gradreports/289 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Plan B and other Reports by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A REVIEW OF APOMIXIS AND DIFFERENTIAL EXPRESSION ANALYSES USING MICROARRAYS By Jonathan Cardwell A Plan B paper submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Plant Science Approved: _________________________ _________________________ John G. Carman Paul Johnson Major Professor Committee Member _________________________ John Stevens Committee Member UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 2013 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my wife, Katy, for all of her support and enCouragement throughout my degree. Without her, I would not have ever finished. Thanks to my committee members, Drs. John Stevens and Paul Johnson for their assistanCe and willingness to help, and speCial thanks to my major professor, Dr. John Carman, for his constant motivation to help me to finally Complete my degree. Thanks also to Gao Lei, Mayelyn Bautista, and David Sherwood, for all of their help the lab, whiCh was integral to my experienCe at USU.
    [Show full text]
  • Asexual Reproduction, Sexual Reproduction, and Apomixis
    Plant Reproduction Gene transfer, asexual reproduction, sexual reproduction, and apomixis viachicago.wordpress.com birdsandbloomsblog.com tinyfarmblog.com Asexual reproduction The clone is immortal Example: Allium sativum “As far as we know, garlic in cultivation throughout history has only been propagated asexually by way of vegetative cloves, bulbs, and bulbils (or topsets), not from seed. These asexually propagated, genetically distinct selections of garlic we cultivate are more generally called "clones". Yet this asexual lifestyle of cultivated garlic forgoes the possibility of combining traits proffered by interpollinating diverse parental stocks.” Source: http://www.ars.usda.gov/Research/docs.htm?docid=5232 Asexual reproduction The clone is immortal Example: Populus tremuloides • The world's heaviest living thing • 1 clone in the Wasatch Mountains of Utah • 47,000 stems of genetically identical aspen trees • Total weight: 6 million kilograms • Aspen is dioecious species - this clone is one big male source: http://waynesword.palomar.edu/ww0601.htm#aspen Sexual reproduction Advantages > disadvantages • Advantages: • Genetic variation: • Allele exchange via cross-pollination • New combinations of alleles via meiosis • Purge deleterious mutations • Stay ahead in the host-pathogen “arms race” • Potential adaptation to a changing climate Sexual reproduction Advantages > disadvantages • Disadvantages: • In a dioecious species, half the reproductive effort is wasted in producing males • Meiosis produces some "unfit" combinations of alleles
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Variation for Apomictic Reproduction in Diploid Paspalum Rufum
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CONICET Digital Annals of Botany 113: 1211–1218, 2014 doi:10.1093/aob/mcu056, available online at www.aob.oxfordjournals.org Analysis of variation for apomictic reproduction in diploid Paspalum rufum Luciana Delgado1,2,*, Florencia Galdeano1, Marı´a E. Sartor1, Camilo L. Quarin1, Francisco Espinoza1 and Juan Pablo A. Ortiz1,2 1Instituto de Bota´nica del Nordeste–IBONE–(UNNE-CONICET), Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional del Nordeste, Sgto. Cabral 2131, 3400 Corrientes, Argentina and 2Laboratorio de Biologı´a Molecular, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Rosario (UNR), Parque Villarino s/n CC 14 (S2125ZAA), Zavalla, Santa Fe, Argentina * For correspondence. E-mail [email protected] Received: 27 November 2013 Returned for revision: 23 January 2014 Accepted: 3 March 2014 Published electronically: 16 April 2014 † Background and Aims The diploid cytotype of Paspalum rufum (Poaceae) reproduces sexually and is self-sterile; however, recurrent autopolyploidization through 2n + n fertilization and the ability for reproduction via apomixis have been documented in one genotype of the species. The objectives of this work were to analyse the variation in the functionality of apomixis components in diploid genotypes of P. rufum and to identify individuals with contrast- ing reproductive behaviours. † Methods Samples of five individuals from each of three natural populations of P. rufum (designated R2, R5 and R6) were used. Seeds were obtained after open pollination, selfing, conspecific interploidy crosses and interspecific inter- ploidy self-pollination induction. The reproductive behaviour of each plant was determined by using the flow cyto- metric seedscreen (FCSS) method.
    [Show full text]
  • Fertility and Reproductive Pathways of Triploid Flowering Pears (Pyrus Sp.)
    HORTSCIENCE 51(8):968–971. 2016. development of triploids. Triploids typi- cally have low fertility due to a reproductive barrier whereby three sets of chromosomes Fertility and Reproductive Pathways of cannot be divided evenly during meiosis yielding unbalanced segregation of chro- Triploid Flowering Pears (Pyrus sp.) mosomes. Seedless bananas (Musa sp.), 1 2,5 3 watermelons (Citrullus lanatus), and some Whitney D. Phillips , Thomas G. Ranney , Darren H. Touchell , citrus (Citrus sp.) are notable examples of 4 and Thomas A. Eaker triploid plants that have been purposefully Mountain Crop Improvement Lab, Department of Horticultural Science, developed to minimize seeds (Rounsaville, Mountain Horticultural Crops Research and Extension Center, North 2011). This approach has also been used to Carolina State University, 455 Research Drive, Mills River, NC 28759- develop highly infertile triploid cultivars of various species that are valuable nursery crops, 3423 but potentially weedy in some environments, · Additional index words. aneuploidy, invasive, ornamental trees, polyploidy, reproductive including trumpet vine (Campsis tagliabuana) biology, sterility (Oates et al., 2014), tutsan (Hypericum andro- saemum) (Trueblood et al., 2010), maiden Abstract. Flowering pears are popular landscape plants due to a combination of desirable grass (Miscanthus sinensis) (Rounsaville traits including broad adaptability, pest resistance, and attractive ornamental features. et al., 2011), and ruellia (Ruellia simplex) However, in some areas, flowering pears readily reseed and naturalize. Considering the (Freyre and Moseley, 2012). value and utility of these trees, the development of infertile cultivars would be desirable. Triploids are typically highly infertile; Breeding of triploid plants is one of the approaches that has been successfully used to however, limited fertility and seed produc- develop seedless cultivars of many crops.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Revision of the Rudbeckia Fulgida Complex (Asteraceae), with Description of a New Species from the Blacklands of Southern USA
    Campbell, J.J.N. and W.R. Seymour, Jr. 2013. Towards a revision of the Rudbeckia fulgida complex (Asteraceae), with description of a new species from the blacklands of southern USA. Phytoneuron 2013-90: 1–27. Published 22 November 2013. ISSN 2153 733X TOWARDS A REVISION OF THE RUDBECKIA FULGIDA COMPLEX (ASTERACEAE), WITH DESCRIPTION OF A NEW SPECIES FROM THE BLACKLANDS OF SOUTHERN USA J.J.N. CAMPBELL Bluegrass Woodland Restoration Center 3525 Willowood Road Lexington, Kentucky 40517 [email protected] W.R. SEYMOUR , JR. Roundstone Native Seed Inc. 9764 Raider Hollow Road Upton, Kentucky 42784-9216 ABSTRACT Taxonomy of the Rudbeckia fulgida Ait. complex is reviewed, resulting in description of a new species, Rudbeckia terranigrae J.J.N. Campbell & Seymour, sp. nov. , and notes on other poorly understood taxa. This species is known mostly from the Black Belt and Jackson Prairie regions of Alabama and Mississippi. However, it appears closely related to a few outlying collections from southwest Missouri and central Texas, plus a larger group of collections centered in the cedar glade region of Tennessee, which could include another undescribed species. Rudbeckia terranigrae and these other plants are southern relatives of previously described taxa with more central or northern ranges in eastern states, especially R. tenax and R. speciosa sensu stricto. Appropriate taxonomic treatment for all of these plants remains uncertain, but their morphology and biogeography suggests that they should not be simply combined with R. fulgida sensu stricto, which is largely restricted to southern Appalachian regions, the Piedmont, and mid-Atlantic Coastal Plain. They all produce stoloniferous offsets after flowering, their paleae are generally eciliate or weakly ciliate at apices, and they tend to occur on calcareous substrates.
    [Show full text]
  • Breeding Systems in Diploid and Polyploid Hawthorns (Crataegus): Evidence from Experimental Pollinations of C
    Article Breeding Systems in Diploid and Polyploid Hawthorns (Crataegus): Evidence from Experimental Pollinations of C. monogyna, C. subsphaerica, and Natural Hybrids Dominika Vašková * and Vladislav Kolarˇcik Institute of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Science, P. J. Šafárik University, Mánesova 23, SK-041 54 Košice, Slovakia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 27 September 2019; Accepted: 19 November 2019; Published: 21 November 2019 Abstract: Background and Objectives: Polyploidisation and frequent hybridisation play an important role in speciation processes and evolutionary history and have a large impact on reproductive systems in the genus Crataegus. Reproductive modes in selected diploid and polyploid taxa in eastern Slovakia were investigated and analysed for the first time. Materials and Methods: Diploid, triploid, and tetraploid hawthorns were tested for self-pollination, self-compatibility, and self-fertilisation. Pollination experiments were performed within and between diploid and triploid species to determine the possibilities and directions of pollen transfer under natural conditions. Seeds from crossing experiments and open pollinations were analysed using the flow cytometric seed screen method. Results: These experiments demonstrated that sexual reproduction, cross-pollination, and self-incompatibility are typical of the diploid species Crataegus monogyna and C. kyrtostyla. Seeds produced by self-fertile tetraploid C. subsphaerica were derived from both meiotically reduced and unreduced megagametophytes. Conclusions: Experimental results concerning triploid C. subsphaerica and C. laevigata C. subsphaerica are ambiguous but suggest that seeds are almost exclusively created × through apomixis, although a few sexually generated seeds were observed. In the genus Crataegus, pseudogamy is a common feature of polyploid taxa, as in all cases pollination is essential for regular seed development.
    [Show full text]