DOCSLIB.ORG

Data Set and Projections of Target Population

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Note related to winterization: Data set and projections of target population Table of Contents Main findings .......................................................................................................................................... 1 Method of calculation ............................................................................................................................ 1 Non-Food Items ...................................................................................................................................... 3 Shoes indicator: .................................................................................................................................. 3 Winter jacket indicator: ...................................................................................................................... 4 Blanket indicator: ............................................................................................................................... 5 Thermal underwear indicator: ........................................................................................................... 6 Socks indicator: ................................................................................................................................... 7 Mattresses indicator:.......................................................................................................................... 8 Fuel and heater....................................................................................................................................... 9 Projection of target population- frontline Luhansk.............................................................................. 10 Clustered raion district names ............................................................................................................. 11 Main findings Despite the difficulty to know the exact population baseline and need assessments, the winterization is targeting between 7.2% to 13.3% of IDP registered population1 depending on type of items and location. Part of the population of concern is actually living in NGCA but realistic projection could not be included in this document. Method of calculation The registered population in 2015 is over 1.4 million IDPs who registered due to displacement and also for other considerations. In parallel, an extract from MoSP database2 and based on renewal/extension of IDPs’ certificates has shown that 753,759 individuals are registered, a figure used here for triangulation of population baseline. The triangulation was done on very conservative manner in order to not mislead and create fake needs and potential duplication. 1 Based on Ministry of Social Policy of Ukraine official IDP registered population of 1.4 million. 2 Potentially the extract is not reflecting the entire population baseline and the exact confirmed IDPs population is higher. In same time cluster partners reported in Kharkiv that around 70% of interviewees (out of pensioner caseload) did confirm their stay in Kharkiv and Kharkiv oblast. Note on winterization: data set & projections Page 1 In parallel, winterization should also, in general, take account of feasibility in terms of capacity for distribution and also data collection/beneficiaries identification. Such statement leads to get a disaggregation of population between in GCA and NGCA3. In NGCA and due to the tremendous challenge for security and access, no educated guess could be done realistically feasible until now. For GCA, the following paragraphs aimed at summarizing key figures for IDP targeting especially focusing on Northern Donbas subnational cluster area of intervention. Calculation of need has been made using the Shelter Cluster/REACH Shelter Assessment, data for which was collected May-June 2015. Key indicators of reported need for non-food items relating to winter and access to fuel and sufficient heating are used here to project % and therefore numbers of displaced families in need of winter assistance. Data is broken down to a ‘clustered raion’ level to assist with targeting of localities, given disparities of need between areas. 3 In GCA, usually IDPs are the population of concern, where in NGCA population of concern could also include returning IDPs and also affected population. Note on winterization: data set & projections Page 2 Projection of target population- IDP families Non-Food Items Shoes indicator: Household indicator: “Do you have at least one per person of shoes?” Total 121 788 Northern Donbas 63 218 RURAL 59 052 Rural Donetsk 32 948 Rural Luhansk 10 048 URBAN 62 736 Urban Donetsk 11 123 Urban Luhansk 9 099 Theoretical % of Triangulated Needs projected, Rural Need population confirmed population individuals Rural Dnipropetrovsk #1 30,71% 4993 58,04% 2897 889 Rural Dnipropetrovsk #2 38,37% 5666 58,04% 3288 1261 Rural Dnipropetrovsk #3 15,75% 1521 58,04% 882 138 Rural Dnipropetrovsk #4 9,25% 13273 58,04% 7703 712 Rural Donetsk #1 27,88% 29448 54,18% 15953 4448 Rural Donetsk #2 15,74% 29448 54,18% 15953 2510 Rural Donetsk #3 54,45% 57999 54,18% 31421 17109 Rural Donetsk #4 29,89% 54859 54,18% 29720 8881 Rural Kharkiv #1 20,00% 8026 46,33% 3718 743 Rural Kharkiv #2 33,62% 7834 46,33% 3629 1220 Rural Kharkiv #3 23,33% 6901 46,33% 3197 745 Rural Kharkiv #4 32,69% 16526 46,33% 7656 2502 Rural Kharkiv #5 15,08% 14463 46,33% 6700 1010 Rural Luhansk #1 35,67% 23396 67,42% 15774 5626 Rural Luhansk #2 8,56% 67021 67,42% 45188 3866 Rural Luhansk #3 11,46% 1184 67,42% 798 91 Rural Luhansk #4 7,37% 9366 67,42% 6314 465 Rural Zaporizhia #1 44,62% 12245 40,38% 4944 2206 Rural Zaporizhia #2 62,02% 18491 40,38% 7467 4630 Urban Berdiansk 66,94% 14118 40,38% 5701 3816 Dniprodzerzhynsk 44,58% 4221 58,04% 2449 1091 Dnipropetrovsk 39,27% 28149 58,04% 16336 6415 Dymytrov / Krasnoarmiisk 8,84% 69165 54,18% 37470 3310 Dzerzhynsk / Kostiantynivka 14,29% 55101 54,18% 29851 4264 Izium 7,51% 23118 46,33% 10710 804 Kharkiv 43,56% 80949 46,33% 37505 16338 Kramatorsk / Druzhkivka 2,90% 53499 54,18% 28983 840 Kryvyi Rih 41,08% 7449 46,33% 3451 1417 Mariupol 12,24% 62312 54,18% 33758 4130 Melitopol 29,86% 3798 40,38% 1533 457 Nikopol 59,15% 1975 46,33% 915 541 Pavlohrad 8,29% 5571 46,33% 2581 214 Severodonetsk 24,77% 54482 67,42% 36733 9099 Sloviansk 16,89% 29613 54,18% 16043 2709 Zaporizhia 48,89% 36936 40,38% 14915 7291 Note on winterization: data set & projections Page 3 Winter jacket indicator: Household indicator: “Do you have at least one per person of winter jackets?” Total 136 313 Northern Donbas 74 509 RURAL 59 209 Rural Donetsk 26 909 Rural Luhansk 17 054 URBAN 77 104 Urban Donetsk 20 268 Urban Luhansk 10 278 Theoretical % of Triangulated projected need Rural REACH population confirmed population in individual Rural Dnipropetrovsk #1 23,57% 4993 58,04% 2897 682 Rural Dnipropetrovsk #2 24,42% 5666 58,04% 3288 802 Rural Dnipropetrovsk #3 24,80% 1521 58,04% 882 218 Rural Dnipropetrovsk #4 16,76% 13273 58,04% 7703 1291 Rural Donetsk #1 13,94% 29448 54,18% 15953 2224 Rural Donetsk #2 9,84% 29448 54,18% 15953 1569 Rural Donetsk #3 40,41% 57999 54,18% 31421 12697 Rural Donetsk #4 35,06% 54859 54,18% 29720 10419 Rural Kharkiv #1 24,00% 8026 46,33% 3718 892 Rural Kharkiv #2 39,30% 7834 46,33% 3629 1426 Rural Kharkiv #3 27,78% 6901 46,33% 3197 888 Rural Kharkiv #4 26,15% 16526 46,33% 7656 2002 Rural Kharkiv #5 12,30% 14463 46,33% 6700 824 Rural Luhansk #1 30,67% 23396 67,42% 15774 4837 Rural Luhansk #2 22,99% 67021 67,42% 45188 10390 Rural Luhansk #3 29,17% 1184 67,42% 798 232 Rural Luhansk #4 25,26% 9366 67,42% 6314 1595 Rural Zaporizhia #1 31,01% 12245 40,38% 4944 1533 Rural Zaporizhia #2 62,79% 18491 40,38% 7467 4688 Urban REACH Berdiansk 63,67% 14118 40,38% 5701 3630 Dniprodzerzhynsk 20,00% 4221 58,04% 2449 489 Dnipropetrovsk 29,15% 28149 58,04% 16336 4761 Dymytrov / Krasnoarmiisk 14,46% 69165 54,18% 37470 5417 Dzerzhynsk / Kostiantynivka 20,71% 55101 54,18% 29851 6183 Izium 4,23% 23118 46,33% 10710 452 Kharkiv 50,50% 80949 46,33% 37505 18938 Kramatorsk / Druzhkivka 18,84% 53499 54,18% 28983 5460 Kryvyi Rih 25,41% 7449 46,33% 3451 876 Mariupol 31,65% 62312 54,18% 33758 10682 Melitopol 36,65% 3798 40,38% 1533 561 Nikopol 52,44% 1975 46,33% 915 479 Pavlohrad 12,44% 5571 46,33% 2581 321 Severodonetsk 27,98% 54482 67,42% 36733 10278 Sloviansk 20,00% 29613 54,18% 16043 3208 Zaporizhia 36,00% 36936 40,38% 14915 5369 Note on winterization: data set & projections Page 4 Blanket indicator: Household indicator: “Do you have at least one per person of blankets?” Total 77 483 Northern Donbas 31 967 RURAL 29 500 Rural Donetsk 12 951 Rural Luhansk 3 816 URBAN 47 983 Urban Donetsk 11 302 Urban Luhansk 3 898 Needs Theoretical % of Triangulated projected, Rural Need population confirmed population individuals Rural Dnipropetrovsk #1 13,21% 4993 58,04% 2897 382 Rural Dnipropetrovsk #2 19,19% 5666 58,04% 3288 630 Rural Dnipropetrovsk #3 14,17% 1521 58,04% 882 125 Rural Dnipropetrovsk #4 6,94% 13273 58,04% 7703 534 Rural Donetsk #1 15,87% 29448 54,18% 15953 2531 Rural Donetsk #2 6,23% 29448 54,18% 15953 993 Rural Donetsk #3 23,29% 57999 54,18% 31421 7317 Rural Donetsk #4 2,87% 54859 54,18% 29720 854 Rural Kharkiv #1 18,86% 8026 46,33% 3718 701 Rural Kharkiv #2 30,13% 7834 46,33% 3629 1093 Rural Kharkiv #3 15,56% 6901 46,33% 3197 497 Rural Kharkiv #4 7,31% 16526 46,33% 7656 559 Rural Kharkiv #5 13,10% 14463 46,33% 6700 877 Rural Luhansk #1 17,67% 23396 67,42% 15774 2786 Rural Luhansk #2 2,67% 67021 67,42% 45188 1208 Rural Luhansk #3 7,81% 1184 67,42% 798 62 Rural Luhansk #4 3,68% 9366 67,42% 6314
Recommended publications
  • Behind the Mask of Care

    Behind the Mask of Care

    USAID Health Reform Support Project ПІДBEHIND МАСКОЮ THE MASK ТУРБОТИ OF CARE ЗВІТA REPORT ЗА BASED РЕЗУЛЬТАТАМИ ON THE RESULTS OF АНАЛІЗУ THE SITUATION СИТУАЦІЇ ANALYSIS OFВ БУДИНКАХ BABY HOMES IN ДИТИНИUKRAINE USAID Health Reform Support Project BEHIND THE MASK OF CARE A REPORT BASED ON THE RESULTS OF THE SITUATION ANALYSIS OF BABY HOMES IN UKRAINE 2020 This report is made possible by the support of the American and British People through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and through the UK Good Governance Fund/UK Government (UK aid). The contents of this report are the sole responsibility of Deloitte Consulting, LLP and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID, the United States Government, UK aid, or the UK Government’s official policies. This document was prepared under Contract Number 72012118C00001. 2 A REPORT BASED ON THE RESULTS OF THE SITUATION ANALYSIS OF BABY HOMES IN UKRAINE Authors 3 AUTHORS IMPLEMENTERS OF THE PILOT ASSESSMENT OF BABY HOMES AND DEVELOPMENT OF Yulia Sereda, PhD in Sociology, Public Health Expert, Pilot Consultant RECOMMENDATIONS FOR REFORM Halyna Postoliuk, Regional Director, Eastern Marie Hickmann, Child Protection Expert, Europe and Central Asia, Hope and Homes for international consultant of the USAID Health Children, International Charitable Organisation, Reform Support PhD in Education, expert on the development of social services and alternative family-based care, Vladyslava Bronova, Senior Legal Advisor Pilot Consultant of the USAID Health Reform Support Nadiia Tatarchuk,
  • Impact of Local Csos on Implementing Anti-Corruption Reforms in the Regions of Ukraine

    Impact of Local Csos on Implementing Anti-Corruption Reforms in the Regions of Ukraine

    Report 12/2019 IMPACT OF LOCAL CSOS on ImplementIng AntI-corruptIon reforms In the regIons of ukrAIne Oksana Nesterenko (ACREC of NAUKMA) | Max Bader (Leiden University) 1 This report is issued within the Think Tank Development Initiative for Ukraine, implemented by the International Renaissance Foundation in partnership with the Open Society Initiative for Europe (OSIFE) with financial support from the Embassy of Sweden to Ukraine. The opinions and content expressed in this Policy Brief are the authors’ and do not necessarily reflect those of the Embassy of Sweden to Ukraine, the International Renaissance Foundation and the Open Society Initiative for Europe (OSIFE). 2 PREFACE PART I PART II Part ІІІ Cherkasy Region Conclusions and recommendations Why support anti-corruption Chernihiv Region activism in the regions of Ukraine? Chernivtsi Region Attachment 1. Dnipropetrovsk Region (Dnіpro, Kryvyi Rіh, Nіkopol, Impact Rating Scale of Local Activities and impact of Marhanets) Anti-corruption CSOs regional activists Donetsk Region Kharkiv Region Attachment 2. Instruments and activities Kherson Region Anti-corruption CSOs Map Zhytomyr Region Impact Mykolayiv Region Rivne Region The significance of local context Volyn Region Ivano-Frankivsk Region The importance of Khmelnytsky Region strengthening capacity Sumy Region Kirovograd Region Odesa Region Zakarpattya Region Zaporizhzhya Region Lviv Region Ternopil Region Vinnytsya Region Poltava Region Luhansk Region Kyiv Region 3 PREFACE The success of Ukraine’s anti-corruption drive hinges on its implementation at different administrative levels, especially in light of the ongoing decentralization reform. Given that civil society organizations can fulfill an important role in anti-corruption, it is important that such organizations develop sufficient capacity not only at the national level, but in the regions of Ukraine as well.
  • Participatory Budgeting in Eastern Ukraine 2019

    Participatory Budgeting in Eastern Ukraine 2019

    PARTICIPATORY BUDGETING Practical experiences from cities and amalgamated communities in Eastern Ukraine Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) Initiative for the Infrastructure Program for Ukraine Project “Strengthening Ukrainian Communities Hosting Internally Displaced Persons” PARTICIPATORY BUDGETING IN THE EAST OF Content UKRAINE – INTEGRATION FOR DEVELOPMENT The project supports the implementation of 1 Introduction...............................................................................................................7 Participatory Budgeting (PB) in 5 cities and 5 amalgamated territorial communities in Zaporizhzhia, Dnipro, and Kharkiv 2 General Description of Approach..............................................................11 oblasts. 3 Results..........................................................................................................................17 5 cities: 5 ATCs: 3.1 General results of initiative............................................................19 Kryvyi Rih Prymorska ATC 3.2 Specific results per partner.....................................................26 Kamianske Chernihivska ATC 3.2.1 Kryvyi Rih ...........................................................................................28 Melitopol Tomakivska ATC 3.2.2 Kamianske.........................................................................................30 Chuguiv Shyrokivska ATC 3.2.3 Melitopol............................................................................................32 Pervomaiskyi
  • ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE REVIEWS UKRAINE Second Review

    ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE REVIEWS UKRAINE Second Review

    ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE Committee on Environmental Policy ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE REVIEWS UKRAINE Second Review UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 2007 Environmental Performance Reviews Series No. 24 NOTE Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. ECE/CEP/133 UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales No. 07.II.E.6 ISBN 978-92-1-116958-4 ISSN 1020-4563 iii Foreword Environmental Performance Reviews (EPRs) for countries in transition were initiated by Environment Ministers at the second “Environment for Europe” Conference in Lucerne, Switzerland in 1993. As a result, the UNECE Committee on Environmental Policy decided to make the EPRs a part of its regular programme. Ten years later, at the fifth Ministerial Conference “Environment for Europe” (Kiev, 2003), the Ministers confirmed that the UNECE programme of EPRs had made it possible to assess the effectiveness of the efforts of countries with economies in transition to manage their environment. The Programme has addressed tailor-made recommendations to the Governments concerned on improving environmental management to reduce their pollution load, to better integrate environmental policies into sectoral policies and to strengthen cooperation with the international community. The Ministers also reaffirmed their support for the EPR programme as an important instrument for countries with economies in transition, and they decided that the programme should proceed with a second cycle of reviews.
  • Ukraine Nuclear Fuel Cycle Chronology

    Ukraine Nuclear Fuel Cycle Chronology

    Ukraine Nuclear Fuel Cycle Chronology Last update: April 2005 This annotated chronology is based on the data sources that follow each entry. Public sources often provide conflicting information on classified military programs. In some cases we are unable to resolve these discrepancies, in others we have deliberately refrained from doing so to highlight the potential influence of false or misleading information as it appeared over time. In many cases, we are unable to independently verify claims. Hence in reviewing this chronology, readers should take into account the credibility of the sources employed here. Inclusion in this chronology does not necessarily indicate that a particular development is of direct or indirect proliferation significance. Some entries provide international or domestic context for technological development and national policymaking. Moreover, some entries may refer to developments with positive consequences for nonproliferation. 2003-1993 1 August 2003 KRASNOYARSK ADMINISTRATION WILL NOT ALLOW IMPORT OF UKRAINE'S SPENT FUEL UNTIL DEBT PAID On 1 August 2003, UNIAN reported that, according to Yuriy Lebedev, head of Russia's International Fuel and Energy Company, which is managing the import of spent nuclear fuel to Krasnoyarsk Kray for storage, the Krasnoyarsk administration will not allow new shipments of spent fuel from Ukraine for storage until Ukraine pays its $11.76 million debt for 2002 deliveries. —"Krasnoyarskiy kray otkazhetsya prinimat otrabotannoye yadernoye toplivo iz Ukrainy v sluchaye nepogasheniya 11.76 mln. dollarov dolga," UNIAN, 1 August 2003; in Integrum Techno, www.integrum.com. 28 February 2002 RUSSIAN REACTOR FUEL DELIVERIES TO COST $246 MILLION IN 2002 Yadernyye materialy reported on 28 February 2002 that Russian Minister of Atomic Energy Aleksandr Rumyantsev and Ukrainian Minister of Fuel and Energy Vitaliy Gayduk signed an agreement under which Ukraine will buy reactor fuel worth $246 million from Russia in 2002.
  • Ukraine's Foreign Affairs

    Ukraine's Foreign Affairs

    No. 2 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, JANUARY 12, 2003 5 2002: THE YEAR IN REVIEW came in a letter to the National Remembrance Institute, and Germany, while meeting in St. Petersburg, signed a Ukraine’s foreign affairs: addressed to a conference being held on the matter. statement of understanding and cooperation on the con- Poland and Ukraine also worked to continue to tinued use of Ukraine’s pipeline for transporting Russian strengthen economic ties in 2002. Poland’s recently natural gas to Germany. pluses and minuses elected Prime Minister Leszek Miller made his first visit The document envisaged European participation in a to Kyiv on February 4 to meet with his Ukrainian coun- multinational consortium that would guarantee the gas kraine’s foreign affairs this past year, like a terpart, Anatolii Kinakh, as well as with President supply. The signing came a day after Presidents Kuchma potluck dinner, consisted of good and bad Kuchma. Talks centered on the Odesa-Brody-Gdansk oil and Putin signed a separate declaration of strategic coop- moments. At the top of a very uneven year in for- pipeline. Prime Minister Miller expressed his full sup- eration in the natural gas sector, which would give eign relations was the Kolchuha affair, which increasing- port for the plan and Poland’s intention to find business Russia joint management and developmental influence ly overshadowed other developments as the year wore U partners to complete the pipeline’s Polish section over the Ukrainian tube in return for its agreement to on. However, even with accusations of President Leonid through to the Baltic seaport city of Gdansk.
  • Ukraine: Travel Advice

    Ukraine: Travel Advice

    Ukraine: Travel Advice WARSZAWA (WARSAW) BELARUS Advise against all travel Shostka RUSSIA See our travel advice before travelling VOLYNSKA OBLAST Kovel Sarny Chernihiv CHERNIHIVSKA OBLAST RIVNENSKA Kyivske Konotop POLAND Volodymyr- OBLAST Vodoskhovyshche Volynskyi Korosten SUMSKA Sumy Lutsk Nizhyn OBLAST Novovolynsk ZHYTOMYRSKA MISTO Rivne OBLAST KYIV Romny Chervonohrad Novohrad- Pryluky Dubno Volynskyi KYIV Okhtyrka (KIEV) Yahotyn Shepetivka Zhytomyr Lviv Kremenets Fastiv D Kharkiv ( ni D pr ni o Lubny Berdychiv ep Kupiansk er LVIVSKA OBLAST KHMELNYTSKA ) Bila OBLAST Koziatyn KYIVSKA Poltava Drohobych Ternopil Tserkva KHARKIVSKA Khmelnytskyi OBLAST POLTAVSKA Starobilsk OBLAST OBLAST Stryi Cherkasy TERNOPILSKA Vinnytsia Kremenchutske LUHANSKA OBLAST OBLAST Vodoskhovyshche Izium SLOVAKIA Kalush Smila Chortkiv Lysychansk Ivano-Frankivsk UKRAINEKremenchuk Lozova Sloviansk CHERKASKA Luhansk Uzhhorod OBLAST IVANO-FRANKIVSKA Kadiivka Kamianets- Uman Kostiantynivka OBLAST Kolomyia Podilskyi VINNYTSKA Oleksandriia Novomoskovsk Mukachevo OBLAST Pavlohrad ZAKARPATSKA OBLAST Horlivka Chernivtsi Mohyliv-Podilskyi KIROVOHRADSKA Kropyvnytskyi Dnipro Khrustalnyi OBLAST Rakhiv CHERNIVETSKA DNIPROPETROVSKA OBLAST HUNGARY OBLAST Donetsk Pervomaisk DONETSKA OBLAST Kryvyi Rih Zaporizhzhia Liubashivka Yuzhnoukrainsk MOLDOVA Nikopol Voznesensk MYKOLAIVSKA Kakhovske ZAPORIZKA ODESKA Vodoskhovyshche OBLAST OBLAST OBLAST Mariupol Berezivka Mykolaiv ROMANIA Melitopol CHIȘINĂU Nova Kakhovka Berdiansk RUSSIA Kherson KHERSONSKA International Boundary Odesa OBLAST
  • The Ukrainian Weekly 1992, No.26

    The Ukrainian Weekly 1992, No.26

    www.ukrweekly.com Published by the Ukrainian National Association Inc.ic, a, fraternal non-profit association! ramian V Vol. LX No. 26 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY0, JUNE 28, 1992 50 cents Orthodox Churches Kravchuk, Yeltsin conclude accord at Dagomys summit by Marta Kolomayets Underscoring their commitment to signed by the two presidents, as well as Kiev Press Bureau the development of the democratic their Supreme Council chairmen, Ivan announce union process, the two sides agreed they will Pliushch of Ukraine and Ruslan Khas- by Marta Kolomayets DAGOMYS, Russia - "The agree­ "build their relations as friendly states bulatov of Russia, and Ukrainian Prime Kiev Press Bureau ment in Dagomys marks a radical turn and will immediately start working out Minister Vitold Fokin and acting Rus­ KIEV — As The Weekly was going to in relations between two great states, a large-scale political agreements which sian Prime Minister Yegor Gaidar. press, the Ukrainian Orthodox Church change which must lead our relations to would reflect the new qualities of rela­ The Crimea, another difficult issue in faction led by Metropolitan Filaret and a full-fledged and equal inter-state tions between them." Ukrainian-Russian relations was offi­ the Ukrainian Autocephalous Ortho­ level," Ukrainian President Leonid But several political breakthroughs cially not on the agenda of the one-day dox Church, which is headed by Metro­ Kravchuk told a press conference after came at the one-day meeting held at this summit, but according to Mr. Khasbu- politan Antoniy of Sicheslav and the conclusion of the first Ukrainian- beach resort, where the Black Sea is an latov, the topic was discussed in various Pereyaslav in the absence of Mstyslav I, Russian summit in Dagomys, a resort inviting front yard and the Caucasus circles.
  • Jewish Cemetries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine

    Jewish Cemetries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine

    Syracuse University SURFACE Religion College of Arts and Sciences 2005 Jewish Cemetries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine Samuel D. Gruber United States Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/rel Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Gruber, Samuel D., "Jewish Cemeteries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine" (2005). Full list of publications from School of Architecture. Paper 94. http://surface.syr.edu/arc/94 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts and Sciences at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Religion by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. JEWISH CEMETERIES, SYNAGOGUES, AND MASS GRAVE SITES IN UKRAINE United States Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad 2005 UNITED STATES COMMISSION FOR THE PRESERVATION OF AMERICA’S HERITAGE ABROAD Warren L. Miller, Chairman McLean, VA Members: Ned Bandler August B. Pust Bridgewater, CT Euclid, OH Chaskel Besser Menno Ratzker New York, NY Monsey, NY Amy S. Epstein Harriet Rotter Pinellas Park, FL Bingham Farms, MI Edgar Gluck Lee Seeman Brooklyn, NY Great Neck, NY Phyllis Kaminsky Steven E. Some Potomac, MD Princeton, NJ Zvi Kestenbaum Irving Stolberg Brooklyn, NY New Haven, CT Daniel Lapin Ari Storch Mercer Island, WA Potomac, MD Gary J. Lavine Staff: Fayetteville, NY Jeffrey L. Farrow Michael B. Levy Executive Director Washington, DC Samuel Gruber Rachmiel
  • Identification of the Conditions of a Mine Locomotive Brake System As Well As Its Functional and Morphological Model with the Stressed Closed Kinematic Circuit

    Identification of the Conditions of a Mine Locomotive Brake System As Well As Its Functional and Morphological Model with the Stressed Closed Kinematic Circuit

    E3S Web of Conferences 201, 01033 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202020101033 Ukrainian School of Mining Engineering - 2020 Identification of the conditions of a mine locomotive brake system as well as its functional and morphological model with the stressed closed kinematic circuit Oleksandr Koptovets1*, Jamil Sami Haddad2, Dmytro Brovko3, Liudmyla Posunko4, and Valeriia Tykhonenko5 1Dnipro University of Technology, Department of Transport Systems and Technologies, 19 Yavornytskoho Ave., 49005 Dnipro, Ukraine 2Al-Balqa Applied University, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Technology, Marka Ave., 11134 Amman, Jordan 3Kryvyi Rih National University, Department of Building Geotechnologies, 11 Matusevycha St., 50027 Kryvyi Rih, Ukraine 4Dnipro University of Technology, Pavlohrad College, 63 Svitlychna Hanna St., 51400 Pavlohrad, Ukraine 5Dnipro University of Technology, Department of Foreign Languages, 19 Yavornytskoho Ave., 49005 Dnipro, Ukraine Abstract. The common tendency of mine rail haulage improvement is to increase axial power of electrical equipment traction, wagon capacity, and enhancing the speed of movement. In this context, it is typical for mine machine-building design to equip only locomotives with brake facilities. Thus, specific value of braking force of a train cannot exceed basic specific resistance to its movement. Test results of carriage rolling stock as for its braking efficiency as well as for its structural and dynamic analysis of braking mechanism have shown that a shoe-wheel brake of mine locomotives is not efficient under operation brake conditions in terms of the parametric reliability indices; hence, it is not applicable as an analogue for a trailing train part. The objective of the research is to determine a type of structural uncertainty while identifying brake conditions for adaptive control of alternative-structure tribologic system.
  • Defying the Government, Marchers in Kyiv Honor The

    Defying the Government, Marchers in Kyiv Honor The

    INSIDE: • Rule of law in retreat in Yanukovych’s Ukraine – page 2. • Volodymyr Viatrovych on “excising” Ukrainian history – page 8. • Annual swim meet at Soyuzivka Heritage Center – page 13. THEPublished U by theKRAINIAN Ukrainian National Association Inc., a fraternal Wnon-profit associationEEKLY Vol. LXXVIII No. 42 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, OCTOBER 17, 2010 $1/$2 in Ukraine Bus-train collision in Ukraine kills 43 Legitimacy of elections in doubt as rules changes are questioned by Zenon Zawada Kyiv Press Bureau KYIV – Ukraine’s local elections on October 31 have begun to lose their legitimacy both domestically and within the international commu- nity, which has criticized rules that have tilted con- trol of election commis- sions in favor of the rul- ing Party of Regions of Ukraine. “At the given moment, we have the impression that your legislation doesn’t conform to international Oleksander Prylepa/UNIAN standards,” Gudrun Mosler- A view of the aftermath of the deadly collision between a passenger bus and a Ternstrem, an Austrian Oleksander Prokopenko/UNIAN train outside of Marhanets, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, Ukraine. election observer represent- Volodymyr Podriezov, a deputy of the Kyiv Oblast RFE/RL life” and urged tougher requirements for the ing the Council of Europe, Council, leads a hunger strike outside the Central told the Komersant-Ukraina “physical and psychological condition” of Election Committee. Batkivschyna party activists are KYIV – Officials say 43 people died and newspaper, published on demanding that election commissions register the real passenger vehicle drivers. several were seriously injured when a pas- October 13. “Already we candidates of Batkivschyna instead of the “clone candi- senger bus collided with a train in eastern Road and railway accidents are common have the impression that dates” that were officially registered.
  • 1 Introduction

    1 Introduction

    State Service of Geodesy, Cartography and Cadastre State Scientific Production Enterprise “Kartographia” TOPONYMIC GUIDELINES For map and other editors For international use Ukraine Kyiv “Kartographia” 2011 TOPONYMIC GUIDELINES FOR MAP AND OTHER EDITORS, FOR INTERNATIONAL USE UKRAINE State Service of Geodesy, Cartography and Cadastre State Scientific Production Enterprise “Kartographia” ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Prepared by Nina Syvak, Valerii Ponomarenko, Olha Khodzinska, Iryna Lakeichuk Scientific Consultant Iryna Rudenko Reviewed by Nataliia Kizilowa Translated by Olha Khodzinska Editor Lesia Veklych ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ © Kartographia, 2011 ISBN 978-966-475-839-7 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ................................................................ 5 2 The Ukrainian Language............................................ 5 2.1 General Remarks.............................................. 5 2.2 The Ukrainian Alphabet and Romanization of the Ukrainian Alphabet ............................... 6 2.3 Pronunciation of Ukrainian Geographical Names............................................................... 9 2.4 Stress .............................................................. 11 3 Spelling Rules for the Ukrainian Geographical Names....................................................................... 11 4 Spelling of Generic Terms ....................................... 13 5 Place Names in Minority Languages