King Narmer Unites Egypt and Records It on the Narmer Palette (Above)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

King Narmer Unites Egypt and Records It on the Narmer Palette (Above)

2650 BC 1670 BC 1539-1070 BC 332 BC The first pyramid, The Hyksos people This was the time Alexander the Great a step pyramid, is invade and introduce of the ‘New conquered Egypt and built the chariot Kingdom’ founded Alexandria 3100 BC 2250 BC 1648 BC 1070 BC 330 BC King Narmer unites Egyptians introduce Nilometers were Egyptians joined Ra Queen Cleopatra Egypt and records it Gods for all areas invented to track and Amun to make kills herself. on the Narmer of their lives the height of the Amun-Ra; King of Romans Palette (above) Nile the Gods conquer Egypt Some Gods of Ancient Egypt www.communication4all.co.uk Anubis Thoth Bastet Horus Hathor Pictures used available from Miles Kelly Clip Art, Dorling Kindersley, and www.istockphoto.com Rulers of Ancient Egypt Ramses II were called pharaohs. ruled Egypt Ancient Egyptians The word ‘pharaoh’ for over 60 used a system of means great house. The years. In that picture writing called pharaoh was the most time he fathered 156 hieroglyphics. Each hieroglyph powerful person in children! He was a brave represented an object or letter. Egypt and some people soldier and a great There were considered him a god. builder. about 700 different hieroglyphs. Egyptian The Pyramids were people in built using huge society were Pharaoh The River Nile stones. Each stone structured a was very weighed as much as little like two and a half Priests important to the Is shown Egyptians. It elephants! The finished pyramids in this had a white coating to protect the Scribes provided water picture. for drinking and stones underneath. Craftworkers for crops The Great Sphinx at Giza guards the Great Pyramids. It has the body of a lion and the Peasants and Slaves face of a human. .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

An Evaluation of Two Recent Theories Concerning the Narmer Palette1
Eras Edition 8, November 2006 – http://www.arts.monash.edu.au/eras An Evaluation of Two Recent Theories Concerning the Narmer Palette1 Benjamin P. Suelzle (Monash University) Abstract: The Narmer Palette is one of the most significant and controversial of the decorated artefacts that have been recovered from the Egyptian Protodynastic period. This article evaluates the arguments of Alan R. Schulman and Jan Assmann, when these arguments dwell on the possible historicity of the palette’s decorative features. These two arguments shall be placed in a theoretical continuum. This continuum ranges from an almost total acceptance of the historical reality of the scenes depicted upon the Narmer Palette to an almost total rejection of an historical event or events that took place at the end of the Naqada IIIC1 period (3100-3000 BCE) and which could have formed the basis for the creation of the same scenes. I have adopted this methodological approach in order to establish whether the arguments of Assmann and Schulman have any theoretical similarities that can be used to locate more accurately the palette in its appropriate historical and ideological context. Five other decorated stone artefacts from the Protodynastic period will also be examined in order to provide historical comparisons between iconography from slightly earlier periods of Egyptian history and the scenes of royal violence found upon the Narmer Palette. Introduction and Methodology Artefacts of iconographical importance rarely survive intact into the present day. The Narmer Palette offers an illuminating opportunity to understand some of the ideological themes present during the political unification of Egypt at the end of the fourth millennium BCE.
[Show full text]
Was the Function of the Earliest Writing in Egypt Utilitarian Or Ceremonial? Does the Surviving Evidence Reflect the Reality?”
“Was the function of the earliest writing in Egypt utilitarian or ceremonial? Does the surviving evidence reflect the reality?” Article written by Marsia Sfakianou Chronology of Predynastic period, Thinite period and Old Kingdom..........................2 How writing began.........................................................................................................4 Scopes of early Egyptian writing...................................................................................6 Ceremonial or utilitarian? ..............................................................................................7 The surviving evidence of early Egyptian writing.........................................................9 Bibliography/ references..............................................................................................23 Links ............................................................................................................................23 Album of web illustrations...........................................................................................24 1 Map of Egypt. Late Predynastic Period-Early Dynastic (Grimal, 1994) Chronology of Predynastic period, Thinite period and Old Kingdom (from the appendix of Grimal’s book, 1994, p 389) 4500-3150 BC Predynastic period. 4500-4000 BC Badarian period 4000-3500 BC Naqada I (Amratian) 3500-3300 BC Naqada II (Gerzean A) 3300-3150 BC Naqada III (Gerzean B) 3150-2700 BC Thinite period 3150-2925 BC Dynasty 1 3150-2925 BC Narmer, Menes 3125-3100 BC Aha 3100-3055 BC
[Show full text]
From Small States to Universalism in the Pre-Islamic Near East
REVOLUTIONIZING REVOLUTIONIZING Mark Altaweel and Andrea Squitieri and Andrea Mark Altaweel From Small States to Universalism in the Pre-Islamic Near East This book investigates the long-term continuity of large-scale states and empires, and its effect on the Near East’s social fabric, including the fundamental changes that occurred to major social institutions. Its geographical coverage spans, from east to west, modern- day Libya and Egypt to Central Asia, and from north to south, Anatolia to southern Arabia, incorporating modern-day Oman and Yemen. Its temporal coverage spans from the late eighth century BCE to the seventh century CE during the rise of Islam and collapse of the Sasanian Empire. The authors argue that the persistence of large states and empires starting in the eighth/ seventh centuries BCE, which continued for many centuries, led to new socio-political structures and institutions emerging in the Near East. The primary processes that enabled this emergence were large-scale and long-distance movements, or population migrations. These patterns of social developments are analysed under different aspects: settlement patterns, urban structure, material culture, trade, governance, language spread and religion, all pointing at population movement as the main catalyst for social change. This book’s argument Mark Altaweel is framed within a larger theoretical framework termed as ‘universalism’, a theory that explains WORLD A many of the social transformations that happened to societies in the Near East, starting from Andrea Squitieri the Neo-Assyrian period and continuing for centuries. Among other inﬂ uences, the effects of these transformations are today manifested in modern languages, concepts of government, universal religions and monetized and globalized economies.
[Show full text]
The Study of Artistic Aspects of Darius Relief in Bisotun Majid Yazdanpanah Department of Arts and Sciences Technical and Vocational Universities, I .R of Iran
39971 Majid Yazdanpanah/ Elixir Social Studies 94 (2016) 39971-39974 Available online at www.elixirpublishers.com (Elixir International Journal) Social Studies Elixir Social Studies 94 (2016) 39971-39974 The study of artistic aspects of Darius relief in Bisotun Majid Yazdanpanah Department of Arts and Sciences Technical and Vocational universities, I .R of Iran. ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: This article first examines the artistic aspects of Darius in the Bisotun relief. The purpose Received: 9 February 2016; of this paper is to analyze the artistic aspects of Darius relief beyond the historical Received in revised form: documentation to show the art that world is causing this important relief to the world. 29 April 2016; The method of this article is library documents, which means the necessary information Accepted: 2 May 2016; is collected and then precisely will be analyzed. The result shows that the world's first read inscription, Bisotun inscription, is one of the world's most valuable inscriptions that Keywords can be seen in its straw Anobanini embossed effect which both of them have been Art, affected by the Assyrian Naram Sin inscriptions. This inscription gives full information Relief, to the world, which makes it's worth a hundredfold. Darius, © 2016 Elixir All rights reserved. Bisotun. Introduction Achaemenid took advantages of the achievements of architects As we know, art is the artistic reflections of social- and construction actors, art experts and craftsmen of Babylon, political, religious and cultural developments in each era. Assyria, Urartu, Egypt and Greece plentifully, but the Throughout history, significant changes and even fast indigenous traditions and accumulated experience of the past movement occurred in Iranian art, but the art of Iran has was not forgotten in these areas too.( Pakbaz, Roein.
[Show full text]
The Pharaohs of Ancient Egypt: Oppressors Or Great
order • proposal • value • oppressive • revolution • stability SoGen Unit 6.1 social THE PHARAOHS OF studies ANCIENT EGYPT: OPPRESSORS OR GREAT LEADERS? SOCIAL STUDIES ACTIVITIES Session 1 2–3 Reader’s Theater Identifying Diﬀerent Perspectives and Support Session 2 4–7 Building Background Knowledge Class Discussion Session 3 8–10 Understanding the Pharaohs Session 4 11–12 It’s Debate Time! Session 5 13–14 Writing SUPPLEMENTARY ACTIVITIES FOR OTHER CONTENT AREAS ELA 15 Twitter Revolutions Math 16 Mathematics with Knotted Ropes Science 17 Precautions in the Lab FOCUS WORDS Examining the Focus Words Closely 18 © 2015 SERP SoGen Unit 6.1 1 Session 1 order • proposal • value • oppressive • revolution • stability Reader’s Theater Comparing Parents to Pharaohs Setting: Tiana, Tray, and Ingrid are walking to school together. They stop to pick up their friend Raul. Since he hasn’t been answering their phone calls, Tiana knocks loudly on his door. After a minute, Raul storms out of his house. Raul: I swear! My parents are like…oppressors! Raul: I’m way ahead of you, Tiana. I did suggest going Tiana: What? somewhere more aﬀordable, and my parents said, “No!” Honestly, I think they just want other parents to be Raul: My parents! They act like those people we’ve been impressed because they take their kids to Disney World. studying in social studies, the pharaohs in ancient Egypt. My aunt and uncle took their kids to the Grand Canyon They’re oppressive! last summer and they can’t stop talking about it. My Tiana: So you’re saying that your parents collect taxes parents are doing this just to look good, so they really from you and force you to build pyramids? Right.
[Show full text]
Egypt: Naqada III and Early Dynastic  Copyright Bruce Owen 2009
Emergence of Civilizations / Anthro 341: Notes 17 Egypt: Naqada III and Early Dynastic Copyright Bruce Owen 2009 − Naqada III (roughly 3200 - 3050 BC): the last century of the Predynastic period − Contemporary with the last century of the Late Uruk period (3400-3100 BC) − Naqada III was a brief, eventful transitional period during which Upper and Lower Egypt became culturally and politically unified − Hence sometimes called the “unification era” − Naqada III in Upper Egypt − accelerating trends of Naqada II − the highest-status graves continued to get more elaborate − Cemetery at Abydos − rectangular tombs, mud walled − one to several rooms − roofed with wood and reed matting − example: the most elaborate Predynastic tomb at Abydos − 12 rooms − 9.10 X 7.30 m (27 x 21 feet) − despite looting, contained hundreds of pots, sorted by type − craft goods continued to get even more elaborate and expensive − such as palettes with elaborate carved decoration, many (but not all) with scenes of war − implications − these burials imply increasingly rich and powerful elites − emerging at just one or a few places in all of Upper Egypt − which probably implies the consolidation of regional Upper Egyptian chiefdoms into fewer, larger polities − since building and filling the more expensive burials would have required access to more surplus and laborers − this was probably at least in part based on military domination − which probably culminated with a single Upper Egyptian chiefdom, centered at Hierakonpolis, with its high status cemetery at Abydos −
[Show full text]
UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology
UCLA UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology Title Mace Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/497168cs Journal UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology, 1(1) Author Stevenson, Alice Publication Date 2008-09-15 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California MACE الصولجان Alice Stevenson EDITORS WILLEKE WENDRICH Editor-in-Chief Area Editor Material Culture, Art, and Architecture University of California, Los Angeles JACCO DIELEMAN Editor University of California, Los Angeles ELIZABETH FROOD Editor University of Oxford JOHN BAINES Senior Editorial Consultant University of Oxford Short Citation: Stevenson, 2008, Mace. UEE. Full Citation: Stevenson, Alice, 2008, Mace. In Willeke Wendrich (ed.), UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology, Los Angeles, http://digital2.library.ucla.edu/viewItem.do?ark=21198/zz000sn03x 1070 Version 1, September 2008 http://digital2.library.ucla.edu/viewItem.do?ark=21198/zz000sn03x MACE الصولجان Alice Stevenson Keule Massue The mace, a club-like weapon attested in ancient Egypt from the Predynastic Period onward, played both functional and ceremonial roles, although more strongly the latter. By the First Dynasty it had become intimately associated with the power of the king, and the archetypal scene of the pharaoh wielding a mace endured from this time on in temple iconography until the Roman Period. الصولجان ‘ سﻻح يشبه عصا غليظة عند طرفھا ‘ كان معروفاً فى مصر القديمة منذ عصر ما قبل اﻷسرات ولعب أحياناً دوراً وظيفياً وغالباً دوراً تشريفياً فى المراسم. في عصر اﻷسرة اﻷولى اصبح مرتبطاً على ٍنحو حميم بقوة الملك والنموذج اﻷصلي لمشھد الفرعون ممسك بالصولجان بدأ آنذاك بالمعابد وإستمر حتى العصر الروماني. he mace is a club-like weapon with that became prevalent in dynastic Egypt.
[Show full text]
Lesson 3 Egypt.Pdf
NAME _________________________________________ DATE _____________ CLASS _______ Ancient Egypt and Kush Lesson 3 Egypt’s Empire ESSENTIAL QUESTION Terms to Know incense a material burned for its pleasant smell Why do civilizations rise and fall? envoy a person who represents his country in a GUIDING QUESTIONS foreign place 1. Why was the Middle Kingdom a “golden age” for Egypt? 2. Why was the New Kingdom a unique period in ancient Egypt’s history? 3. How did two unusual pharaohs change ancient Egypt? 4. Why did the Egyptian empire decline in the late 1200s b.c.? When did it happen? 5000 b.c. 3000 b.c. 2000 b.c. 1000 b.c. 750 b.c. 5000 b.c. 2600 b.c. 2055 b.c. 1070 b.c. 750 b.c. Settlement Old Kingdom Middle New Kingdom Kush begins in Nile begins Kingdom ends conquers River valley begins Egypt You Are Here in History What do you know? Read the list of pharaohs. Circle the names that you know or have heard before. For each circled name, write one fact that you know about that pharaoh. Ahmose Hatshepsut Copyright by McGraw-Hill Education. Thutmose III Akhenaton King Tut Ramses II 49 NAME _________________________________________ DATE _____________ CLASS _______ Ancient Egypt and Kush Lesson 3 Egypt’s Empire, Continued A Golden Age The Middle Kingdom lasted from about 2055 b.c. to 1650 b.c. It was a time of power, wealth, and achievement for Egypt. During the Middle Kingdom, Egypt took control of new lands. The Categorizing pharaoh required tribute, or payments from the conquered peoples.
[Show full text]
Page 60 Next Page >
< previous page page_60 next page > Page 60 2 The intellectual foundations of the early state With the imagined community—the nation—people feel that they share bonds of common interest and inherited values with others, most of whom they will never see. It is a vision of people. By contrast, the state is a vision of power, a mixture of myth and procedure that twines itself amidst the sense of community, giving it political structure. In the modern world the state has become the universal unit of supreme organization. No part of the land of planet Earth does not belong to one. Like it or not most people are born members of a state, even if they live in remote and isolated communities. The stateless are the disadvantaged of the world, anachronistic. Its powers have grown so inescapable that, at least in the English language, the word ‘state’ has taken on a sinister overtone. What are the roots of this condition, this vast surrender by the many and presumption by the few? People have recognized the state as an abstract entity only since the time of the Classical Greeks. But the real history of the state is much longer. If we move further back in time to the early civilizations—of which Egypt was one—we can observe the basic elements of modern states already present and functioning vigorously, yet doing so in the absence of objective awareness of what was involved. The existence of the state was either simply taken for granted or presented in terms which do not belong to the vocabulary of reason and philosophy which is part of our inheritance from the Classical world.
[Show full text]
Images of Power
IMAGES OF POWER: PREDYNASTIC and OLD KINGDOM EGYPT: FOCUS (Egyptian Sculpture of Predynastic and Old Kingdom Egypt) ONLINE ASSIGNMENT: http://smarthisto ry.khanacademy .org/palette-of- king- narmer.html TITLE or DESIGNATION: Palette of Narmer CULTURE or ART HISTORICAL PERIOD: Predynastic Egyptian DATE: c. 3100- 3000 B.C.E. MEDIUM: slate TITLE or DESIGNATION: Seated Statue of Khafre, from his mortuary temple at Gizeh CULTURE or ART HISTORICAL PERIOD: Old Kingdom Egyptian DATE: c. 2575-2525 B.C.E. MEDIUM: diorite ONLINE ASSIGNMENT: https://www.khanacademy.org/human ities/ancient-art-civilizations/egypt- art/predynastic-old-kingdom/a/king- menkaure-mycerinus-and-queen TITLE or DESIGNATION: King Menkaure and his queen (possibly Khamerernebty) CULTURE or ART HISTORICAL PERIOD: Old Kingdom Egyptian DATE: c. 2490-2472 B.C.E. MEDIUM: slate ONLINE ASSIGNMENT: https://www.khanacademy. org/humanities/ancient- art-civilizations/egypt- art/predynastic-old- kingdom/v/the-seated- scribe-c-2620-2500-b-c-e TITLE or DESIGNATION: Seated Scribe from Saqqara CULTURE or ART HISTORICAL PERIOD: Old Kingdom Egyptian DATE: c. 2450-2325 B.C.E. MEDIUM: painted limestone with inlaid eyes of rock crystal, calcite, and magnesite IMAGES OF POWER: PREDYNASTIC and OLD KINGDOM EGYPT: SELECTED TEXT (Egyptian Sculpture of Predynastic and Old Kingdom Egypt) The Palette of King Narmer, c. 3100-3000 BCE, slate Dating from about the 31st century BCE, this “palette” contains some of the earliest hieroglyphic inscriptions ever found. It is thought by some to depict the unification of Upper and Lower Egypt under the king Narmer. On one side, the king is depicted with the bulbous White crown of Upper (southern) Egypt, and the other side depicts the king wearing the level Red Crown of Lower (northern) Egypt.
[Show full text]
Before the Pyramids Oi.Uchicago.Edu
oi.uchicago.edu Before the pyramids oi.uchicago.edu before the pyramids baked clay, squat, round-bottomed, ledge rim jar. 12.3 x 14.9 cm. Naqada iiC. oim e26239 (photo by anna ressman) 2 oi.uchicago.edu Before the pyramids the origins of egyptian civilization edited by emily teeter oriental institute museum puBlications 33 the oriental institute of the university of chicago oi.uchicago.edu Library of Congress Control Number: 2011922920 ISBN-10: 1-885923-82-1 ISBN-13: 978-1-885923-82-0 © 2011 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved. Published 2011. Printed in the United States of America. The Oriental Institute, Chicago This volume has been published in conjunction with the exhibition Before the Pyramids: The Origins of Egyptian Civilization March 28–December 31, 2011 Oriental Institute Museum Publications 33 Series Editors Leslie Schramer and Thomas G. Urban Rebecca Cain and Michael Lavoie assisted in the production of this volume. Published by The Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago 1155 East 58th Street Chicago, Illinois 60637 USA oi.uchicago.edu For Tom and Linda Illustration Credits Front cover illustration: Painted vessel (Catalog No. 2). Cover design by Brian Zimerle Catalog Nos. 1–79, 82–129: Photos by Anna Ressman Catalog Nos. 80–81: Courtesy of the Ashmolean Museum, Oxford Printed by M&G Graphics, Chicago, Illinois. The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Service — Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984 ∞ oi.uchicago.edu book title TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword. Gil J.
[Show full text]
Resolving the Chronology of the Hyksos Kings
RESOLVING CHRONOLOGY OF THE 2nd MILLENNIUM B.C. James B. Parkinson Several puzzling problems of Canaanite archaeology and Hyksos times can be resolved by looking for Israel’s Exodus and entry into Canaan rather earlier than has been commonly considered. Key findings include: The Mediterranean campaign of Ur-Nammu, king of Ur and Sumer, fourteen years before he died, corresponds well to the campaign of Amraphel, king of Shinar, fourteen years before Abram’s victory over him. Nearly 430 years later, Moses would have been contemporary with Pharaoh Khyan/Iannas (as attested in the N.T.); hence the Exodus from Egypt in B.C. 1615 must have begun the decline of the Hyksos kings. The once unexplained end of the Middle Bronze age in the mid-16th century B.C. is readily explained by the Israelite invasion of Canaan. The Habiru threat of the el-Amarna letters apparently follows the contemporary victories of Deborah/Barak and Gideon. The Biblical accounts appear both reliable and precise. Introduction Israel’s Exodus from Egypt and entry into Canaan are central to its early history. Over the past many decades scholars have argued only whether it was around the time of Thutmose III (mid-14th century B.C.) or around the end of the reign of Ramesses II (c. BC1237-1212). Abetted by lack of positive evidence for the former and by progressive lowerings of the reigns of the kings of the United Monarchy, the latter has been strongly favored of late. In the light of Palestinian archaeology, this view has made it fashionable to doubt the conquest tradition of Israel, or that any pre-Kings historical details should be taken more seriously than, say, the bizarre Gilgamesh Epic.
[Show full text]