DOCSLIB.ORG

© 2015 Navid H. Jafari

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
© 2015 Navid H. Jafari © 2015 Navid H. Jafari ELEVATED TEMPERATURES IN WASTE CONTAINMENT FACILITIES BY NAVID H. JAFARI DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Civil Engineering in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2015 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Professor Timothy D. Stark, Chair Professor Gholamreza Mesri Professor Emeritus James H. Long Professor Mark J. Rood Professor R. Kerry Rowe ABSTRACT Municipal solid waste (MSW), construction demolition debris (CDD), industrial byproducts, and many other wastes are landfilled in waste containment facilities. A number of factors can lead to elevated temperatures and thus present a hazard to the public health and safety. For instance, MSW landfills can produce obnoxious odors, toxic gases, and aggressive leachates. In addition, they can damage gas extraction, leachate collection, interim cover, and composite liner systems. These events can result in expensive remediation and warrant the permanent closure of the facility. The main objectives of this research are to: (1) identify causes and frequency of elevated temperatures; (2) develop a reactivity test for hazardous classification of aluminum production waste (APW); (3) develop an experiment to characterize gas generation and composition of APW; (4) identify progression of indicators for elevated temperatures in MSW landfills; (5) propose a classification system for landfill operators to assess the location and movement of elevated temperatures; and (6) evaluate the impact of elevated temperatures to high density polyethylene (HDPE) geomembrane service life. MSW landfills with a gas collection and control system used to comply with federal regulations (40 CFR, Part 60, Subpart WWW) operate each gas extraction well with a landfill gas temperature less than 55°C (131°F) because methane production from mesophilic bacteria starts to significantly decrease if the temperature of the waste mass exceeds 55°C (Kasali and Senior 1989; Hartz et al. 1982). At temperatures beyond 64°C, Ahring et al. (1995) report that thermophilic methanogens are inhibited and methane production slows or ceases. Therefore, in this thesis waste temperatures above 65°C is considered to be elevated because anaerobic decomposition has been curtailed. Several factors can lead to elevated landfill temperatures, including aerobic decomposition, self-heating, partially extinguished surface fires, exothermic chemical reactions, and spontaneous combustion. Although the leading mechanism of elevated temperatures is air ingress, landfills are also experiencing elevated temperatures due to exothermic reactions from APW. Because aluminum production waste does not meet hazardous waste classification criteria, they are commonly disposed in MSW landfills. As a result, a novel bench- scale calorimeter is developed and calibrated to measure potential temperature escalation. The calorimeter experiments at varying sodium hydroxide (NaOH) strengths show temperatures can ii rise to 100°C. For a landfill operator, the optimal concentration of NaOH was determined to be 1 M to 2 M NaOH because it provides sufficient alkalinity to react the metallic aluminum and fulfill the objectives of a rapid procedure to evaluate the reactivity criterion for hazardous waste classification. A gas generation test is developed and calibrated to evaluate hydrogen production and ammonia emissions from this waste stream. In addition, guidelines are provided for the disposal of APW in waste containment facilities. Whether aluminum wastes, air ingress, or other mechanisms lead to elevated temperatures, these events start in a localized area and over time can expand and consume entire landfill facilities. A case study is used to consolidate changes in landfill behavior into an ordered sequence (referred herein as progression of indicators) to permit landfill operators and first responders to detect and identify the location of elevated temperatures. Expanding on the progression of indicators, two case histories are used to develop methods to illustrate spatial and temporal changes in landfill behavior. In particular, the first case study illustrates spatial movements with gas wellhead temperature, ratio of methane to carbon dioxide, and settlement, while the second case study demonstrates subsurface temperature migration. These two case studies along with the progression of indicators are used to classify MSW landfills into five zones: anaerobic biodegradation, gas front, heating front, smoldering front, and combustion/pyrolysis zone. In addition, elevated temperatures can negatively impact engineered components in composite bottom liners, cover systems, leachate collection, and gas extraction and recovery systems. A case study is used to investigate the effect of elevated temperatures on HDPE geomembrane service life. When peak temperatures reach 60°C to 80°C, the geomembrane service life can be reduced to decades for the conditions examined and thus raises concerns regarding the integrity of the geomembrane at high temperatures. iii To my parents, who raised me with a freedom to decide my career and supported me in all my pursuits iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS It is a great pleasure to thank the people who made this thesis possible. It is difficult to overstate my gratitude to my advisor, Professor Timothy D. Stark. It has been an honor to be his Ph.D. student. Throughout my research and thesis-writing, he provided encouragement, sound advice, and good teaching, company, and ideas. The joy and enthusiasm he has for his research was contagious and motivation for me, even during tough times of my Ph.D. pursuit. I am also thankful for the excellent example he has provided me as a successful geotechnical professional and professor. I would also like to thank Professors Gholamreza Mesri, James H. Long, Mark J. Rood, and R. Kerry Rowe, for agreeing to serve as members of my committee. My special thanks to Professor R. Kerry Rowe of Queen’s University, who in addition to participating in my committee, provided me with the geomembrane data and service life spreadsheet. In my later work of laboratory gas testing, I am indebted to Professor Mark Rood. He permitted access to his laboratory and aided in my understanding of air pollution control. My time at University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign was made enjoyable in large part due to the many friends and groups that became part of my life. I am grateful for this time spent with friends and their families. I am indebted to my many student colleagues for providing a stimulating and fun environment to learn and grow, especially my first officemates Randa Asmar and Seung Jae Lee. I am especially grateful to my friends Mohamad Jammoul, Ahmad Fawaz, Adolfo Caicedo, Luis Pazmino, Andrew Tangsombotvisit, Pouyan Assem, Steve Wilk, Cassie Dumoulin, Ziyue Yang, Ryan Wong, Ahmed Baghdady, Hamid Emamipour, John Atkinson, Andony Landivar, Mario Hernandez, and many others. I would like to thank my family for all their love and constant encouragement during my studies: my brother, Kamron Jafari, and my sister Nauzanene Jafari. Most of all my supportive, encouraging, and patient mother, Faranak, and father, Mohammad, whose support during this Ph.D. is so appreciated. Lastly, I offer my regards and blessings to all of those who supported me in any aspect of my courses and research. v TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Statement of Problem ........................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Research Objectives ............................................................................................................. 2 1.3 Scope and Outline of this Study........................................................................................... 3 CHAPTER 2 CAUSES AND FREQUENCY OF ELEVATED TEMPERATURES ................... 5 2.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Occurrence of Elevated Temperatures ................................................................................. 5 2.3 Causes of Elevated Temperatures in Waste Containment Facilities ................................... 7 2.4 Summary and Conclusions ................................................................................................ 15 2.5 Tables and Figures ............................................................................................................. 16 CHAPTER 3 APW CLASSIFICATION AND REACTIVITY .................................................. 27 3.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 27 3.2 Review of APW Heat Generation ...................................................................................... 28 3.3 Waste Classification........................................................................................................... 29 3.4 Reactivity Test Criterion .................................................................................................... 32 3.5 Constant Pressure Calorimeter ........................................................................................... 33 3.6 Results ...............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Waste to Energy in the Age of the Circular Economy Best Practice Handbook
    WASTE TO ENERGY IN THE AGE OF THE CIRCULAR ECONOMY BEST PRACTICE HANDBOOK NOVEMBER 2020 ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK WASTE TO ENERGY IN THE AGE OF THE CIRCULAR ECONOMY BEST PRACTICE HANDBOOK NOVEMBER 2020 ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license (CC BY 3.0 IGO) © 2020 Asian Development Bank 6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City, 1550 Metro Manila, Philippines Tel +63 2 8632 4444; Fax +63 2 8636 2444 www.adb.org Some rights reserved. Published in 2020. ISBN: 978-92-9262-480-4 (print); 978-92-9262-481-1 (electronic); 978-92-9262-482-8 (ebook) Publication Stock No. TIM200330-2 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22617/TIM200330-2 The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) or its Board of Governors or the governments they represent. ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by ADB in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. By making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area, or by using the term “country” in this document, ADB does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license (CC BY 3.0 IGO) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/.
    [Show full text]
  • (Full-Scale Controlled Landfill Bioreactor) Project
    U.S. EPA PROJECT XL: YOLO COUNTY’S ACCELERATED ANAEROBIC AND AEROBIC COMPOSTING (FULL-SCALE CONTROLLED LANDFILL BIOREACTOR) PROJECT Ramin Yazdani Yolo County Planning and Public Works Department 292 West Beamer Street Woodland, California Don Augenstein IEM 4277 Pomona Avenue Palo Alto, California ABSTRACT million tons of waste annually (U.S. EPA, 1997). The The County of Yolo Planning and Public Works annual production of municipal solid waste in the United Department (Yolo County), will operate its next 20-acre States has more than doubled since 1960. In spite of landfill module near Davis, California as a controlled increasing rates of reuse and recycling, population and bioreactor landfill to attain and demonstrate a number of economic growth will continue to render landfilling as an environmental and cost savings benefits in a full-scale important and necessary component of solid waste landfill operation. As part of this project, Yolo County is management. requesting that the EPA grant regulatory flexibility from the Resource Conservation Recovery Act (RCRA) In a Bioreactor Landfill, controlled quantities of liquid are prohibition in 40 CFR 258.28 regarding Liquid added, and circulated through waste as appropriate. The Restrictions, which may preclude addition of useful bulk purpose is to accelerate the natural biodegradation and or non-containerized liquid amendments. Yolo County is composting of solid waste. This process significantly also requesting flexibility in state regulatory requirements increases the biodegradation rate of waste and thus for bottom linings based on project performance, available decreases the waste stabilization and composting time (5 to controls, and environmental safeguards which have been 10 years) relative to what would occur within a demonstrated in their smaller-scale 9000-ton test program conventional landfill (30 to 50 years, or more).
    [Show full text]
  • Characterizing Spontaneous Fires in Landfills
    University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2009 Characterizing Spontaneous Fires In Landfills Shadi Moqbel University of Central Florida Part of the Environmental Engineering Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Doctoral Dissertation (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Moqbel, Shadi, "Characterizing Spontaneous Fires In Landfills" (2009). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 3855. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/3855 CHARACTERIZING SPONTANEOUS FIRES IN LANDFILLS by SHADI Y. MOQBEL B.S. Jordan University of Science & Technology, 2002 M.S. Jordan University of Science & Technology, 2004 A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Civil, Environmental and Construction Engineering in the College of Engineering and Computer Science at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Spring Term 2009 Major Professor: Debra R Reinhart © 2009 Shadi Moqbel ii ABSTRACT Landfill fires are relatively common incidents that landfill operators encounter which have great impact on landfill structure and the environment. According to a U.S. Fire Administration report in 2001, an average of 8,300 landfill fires occurs each year in the United States, most of them in the spring and summer months. Subsurface spontaneous fires are considered the most dangerous and difficult to detect and extinguish among landfill fires.
    [Show full text]
  • BIOREACTOR LANDFILL OPERATION a Guide for Development, Implementation and Monitoring
    BIOREACTOR LANDFILL OPERATION A Guide For Development, Implementation and Monitoring Version 1.0 (July 1, 2008) Developed under Funding from: The Florida Department of Environment Protection and The Hinkley Center for Solid and Hazardous Waste Management Timothy G. Townsend, Dinesh Kumar and Jae Hac Ko Department of Environmental Engineering Sciences University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida Bioreactor Landfill Operation: A Guide For Development, Implementation and Monitoring: Vision 1.0 (July 1,2008) This space left intentionally blank Document citation: Townsend,T., Kumar,D., Ko,J. (2008). Bioreactor Landfill Operation: A Guide for Development, Implementation and Montoring: version 1.0 (July 1, 2008). Prepared for the Hinkley Center for Solid and Hazardous Waste Management, Gainesville, FL. Comments, questions and suggenstions should be directed to Timoty Twosend at [email protected] Table of Contents Bioreactor Landfill Fundamentals Background ....................................................................................1 Introduction .........................................................................................3 Classification ........................................................................................5 Benefits ...............................................................................................6 Concerns .............................................................................................8 Implementation ....................................................................................9
    [Show full text]