DOCSLIB.ORG

2015 Water Quality Report This Report Summarizes Our Testing Results in Two Different Ways: 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2015 Water Quality Report This Report Summarizes Our Testing Results in Two Different Ways: 1 Riverwatch 2015 Water Quality Report This report summarizes our testing results in two different ways: 1. Water Quality Standards 2. Water Quality Index Comparison to State Water Quality Standards created by the Giving each point a numerical and letter grade using a Riverwatch 2015 NYSDEC under the Clean Water Act (CWA)1 Water Qulity Index (WQI). Water Quality Report The CWA establishes the basic structure for regulating A Water Quality Index provides a single number (like a discharges of pollutants into the waters of the United grade) that expresses overall water quality at a certain Dear Citizen, States and regulating quality standards for surface location and time period based on multiple water waters. quality parameters. The objective of an index is to turn complex water quality data into information that is Thank you for reading the 2015 Riverwatch Water Quality Report! With drinking Our State Environmental Agency, the NYSDEC, is autho- understandable and useable by the public. Riverkeeper water issues making news headlines across the country our attention should now, rized by the CWA to create these standards and does this developed a WQI based on the parameters collected and more than ever, be focused on one of our most vital natural resources—our water. by: adaptation from the National Sanitation Foundation’s Our hope is that you can use this report, containing insightful information about (NSF) WQI. 1. Designating Best Uses for each waterway based on an the water quality in our region, as an educational tool. evaluation called the Waterbody Inventory every two 1. Each parameter was given a weight based on how years.2 influential they are on determining water quality. This year’s report includes information from two distinct Buffalo Niagara Riverkeeper programs. First, our Riverwatch volunteer program consists of teams Parameter Weight A Source of Drinking Water that monitor numerous sites on the Niagara River and all its major tributaries once Dissolved Oxygen .24 a month from April through November. Our volunteer pool has grown, allowing Conductivity (TDS) .20 Chris Murawski Swimming (Primary Contact Recreation) for more sampling locations. Volunteers collect general water quality parameters Turbidity .20 Director of Citizen Engagment Wading and Paddling such as Dissolved Oxygen, pH, Conductivity, and Turbidity. The report displays pH .18 (Secondary Contact Recreation) the results of their efforts by comparing data to NYSDEC State Water Quality ΔT .18 Standards, giving each site a letter grade and comparing with data collected from Table of Contents Fishing Total 1.0 previous seasons. Second, our Young Environmental Leaders Program mentorship Letter................................................1 conducted a study of five public access sites. This study was conducted by two 2. The average seasonal value for each parameter was Water Quality Standards........2 2. Evaluating the “Best Uses” for each stream and desig- paid Buffalo Public High School interns and their teachers. The study focused on nating a stream class to support these uses. calculated for each site and plugged into equations Water Quality Index.................2 E.coli bacteria, which is an indicator of sewage pollution and is used to determine created by the NSF5 which yielded a number known as a Stream Descriptions.............3,4 if water is safe for human contact. Details of their findings are discussed and Stream Classes and Their Best Uses Q value. : Special. A source of water supply Table.................................................5 displayed. for drinking, culinary or food 3. Q values for each parameter were multiplied by the A processing purposes; primary and Map..................................................6 secondary contact recreation; and weighting factor and added together to get the WQI fishing. The waters shall be suit- number grade out of 100 for each site. YELP E. coli Report.................7,8 Riverkeeper needs your help and support to continue protecting the quality and able for fish, shellfish, and wildlife propagation and survival. Pollution & Solutions...............9 quantity of water in our local communities. In this report, we have included direct Example: Reservoir Park Related Projects.......................10 actions you can take to become a steward of water quality. They include both : Primary and secondary contact (97 *0.24) + (64*0.20) + (84*0.20) + (78*0.18) + (88*0.18) = 83 opportunities to directly engage with Riverkeeper as well as steps you can take at recreation and fishing. These B waters shall be suitable for fish, DO Cond. Turb pH Δ T Total home. shellfish, and wildlife propagation and survival. For more information: : Fishing. These waters shall be 4. WQI values were then given a grade A through F based We are happy to announce that in 2016 we have increased our staff capacity and suitable for fish, shellfish, and wild- bnriverkeeper.org/riverwatch on the following scale: C life propagation and survival. The A = 90-100 B =80-89 C =70-79 D =60-69 F = 59 and below have hired Elizabeth Robbe as Water Quality Specialist and Wendy Patterson as water quality shall be suitable for primary and secondary contact rec- Contact about data: Community Liaison. They will both be working on the Riverwatch Program going reation, although other factors may Elizabeth Robbe forward. limit the use for these purposes. Reservoir Park Total = 83 Water Quality Specialist 3. Setting standards for each waterway to support the Reservoir Park would get a B grade [email protected] I hope that this report can expand your knowledge of our wonderful Niagara River uses for each class. (716) 852-7483 ext 23 Here are the standards for the parameters we test3: Watershed. If you have any questions on any of the information in the report, Dissolved Oxygen, Conductivity, Temerature, and pH Parameter Standard Contact about volunteering: please feel free to contact me directly. were sampled using a YSI Pro Plus equipped with a 6 Wendy Paterson Dissolved No less than 6.0 mg/L for Niagara River quarto cable. Community Liaison Sincerely, Oxygen No less than 4.0 mg/L for all other streams Turbidity was sampled using a HACH 2100 Q [email protected] 4 Conductivity Between 150 and 500 ùs/cm Turbidimeter.7 (716) 852-7483 ext 26 pH Between 6.5 and 8.5 Turbidity No more than 5.0 NTU Chris Murawski 1 33 U.S.C. §1251 et seq. (1972) Front Cover Image: Director of Citizen Engagement 2 Part 701: Classifications-Surface Waters and Groundwaters (Statutory authority: Environmental Conservation Law, §§ 1-0101, 3-0301 [2][m],15-0313, 17-0101, 17-0301, 17-0303, Katrina Cosgrove Photography 17-0809) 721 Main Street, Buffalo, NY 14203 3 Part 703: Surface Water and Groundwater Quality Standards and Groundwater Effluent Limitations (Statutory authority: Environmental Conservation Law, §§ 3-0301[2][m], 15- http://katrinacosgrove.weebly.com/ 0313, 17-0301, 17-0809) [email protected] 4 US Environmental Protection Agency’s Water: Monitoring and Assessment 5.9 Conductivity Back Cover Image: (716)852-7483 ext 39 5 Oram, Brian B.F. Environmental Consultants Inc. (2013 January 20). Monitoring the Quality of Surfacewaters. Retrieved from http:// http://www.water-research.net/watrqual- Chloe Wasteneys ityindex/waterqualityindex.htm 6 www.ysi.com/productsdetail.php?Professional-Plus-18 7 www.hach.com/2100Q 1 Riverwatch 2015 Water Quality Report Riverwatch 2015 Water Quality Report 2 Water Quality Testing Results Buffalo Creek Niagara River Cayuga Creek (Erie County) Stream Class: B Stream Class: A (Special - Drinking Water) Stream Class: C Stream Length: 63.5 miles Stretch Monitored: Upper and Lower Main Stem, Lake Erie - Lake Ontario Stream Length: 13.5 miles Percentage of samples inside the standard range: A bar Water Quality Issues: Aquatic life and recreation are stessed by known silt/ Water Quality Issues: The Niagara is a source of drinking water for much Water Quality Issues: Aquatic life and fish consumption are stressed by graph is given for each parameter indicating the total per- sediment pollution and suspected nutrient and pathogen pollution. Known of the region. The NYSDEC considers this use to be threatened by known suspected nutrient, silt/sediment, metals, Priority Organics (PAHs) and centage of all samples taken for that site which fell inside the sources of pollution are stream bank erosion and urban stormwater runoff; contamination from toxic sediment and suspected contamination from Pathogens. Suspected sources are stream bank erosion and urban/storm sustpected source is agriculture and possible sources are on-site septic combined sewer overflows and urban stormwater runoff. runoff. Possible source is agriculture. standard range for that parameter. systems and road bank eroision. Sample Chart Conductivity 81% Conductivity 100% Conductivity 67% Conductivity 9% Dissolved Oxygen 96% Dissolved Oxygen 91% Dissolved Oxygen 100% Dissolved Oxygen 100% pH 96% pH 98% pH 90% pH 94% Turbidity 27% Turbidity 66% Turbidity 33% Turbidity 36% Inside standard range Outside standard range Cazenovia Creek Scajaquada Creek Tonawanda Creek (Lower Main Stem) Stream Class: B Stream Class: B Stream Class: C Note: Percentage shown indicates percentage inside range Stream Length: 51.7 miles Stream Length: Lower: 3.0 miles (from mouth to Main St, Buffalo), Upper: 15.1 Stream Length: 11.9 miles (from mouth to NYS Barge Canal) Water Quality Issues: No known impact* miles (above Cheektowaga) Water Quality Issues: Aquatic life and recreation are stressed by pollution Water Quality Issues are referenced from NYSDEC’s “The *2010 NYSDEC Waterbody Inventory lists no known impact. Based on Water Quality Issues: Aquatic life is precluded by low dissolved oxygen, excess from known sources of PCBs, toxic contaminated sediment, urban stormwater Niagara River/Lake Erie Basin Waterbody Inventory and Priority Riverkeeper testing results and observations, recreational use may be nutrients, silt, and sediment. Public bathing is precludeded and recreation runoff, and suspected nutrient and silt pollution from sanitary discharge and Waterbodies List” (2010). impacted and more monitoring is planned for this stream in 2016.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 6: Assessment of Local Laws and Practices Affecting Water Quality
    REGIONAL NIAGARA RIVER/LAKE ERIE WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN - Phase 2 Chapter 6: Assessment of Local Laws and Practices Affecting Water Quality Local municipalities play a critical role in the stewardship of watersheds. Actions regulated at the municipal level in a home-rule state such as New York contribute greatly to the quality of local water resources. Through the development and enforcement of the municipalities’ ordinances and practices for road de-icing, stormwater management, sediment and erosion control, development standards and other activities, watersheds and water quality may be protected and improved. This chapter reviews the ability and capacity of local governments throughout the Niagara River/Lake Erie Watershed to control non-point source pollution by assessing their existing local laws and management practices. Regional Niagara River/Lake Erie Watershed Management Plan Municipalities Allegany County 2 Municipalities Towns of Centerville and Rushford Cattaraugus County 15 Municipalities Towns of Ashford, Dayton, East Otto, Ellicottville, Farmersville, Freedom, Machias, Mansfield, New Albion, Otto, Perrysburg, Persia, Yorkshire Villages of Cattaraugus and Delevan Chautauqua County 19 Municipalities City of Dunkirk Towns of Arkwright, Charlotte, Chautauqua, Dunkirk, Hanover, Mina, Pomfret, Portland, Ripley, Sheridan, Sherman, Stockton, Villenova, Westfield Villages of Brocton, Fredonia, Silver Creek, and Westfield Erie County 44 Municipalities Cities of Buffalo*, Lackawanna*, Tonawanda* Towns of Alden*, Amherst*, Aurora*,
    [Show full text]
  • Know Your Backyard: Creek Corridor Conservation in the Town of West Seneca
    Know Your Backyard Creek Corridor Conservation in the Town of West Seneca Technical Advisory Group Bird Studies Canada: Ryan Archer, wetlands assessment Buffalo Niagara RIVERKEEPER®: Margaret Wooster, Project Director Jill Jedlicka, Director of Ecological Programs Maureen Mayer, Engineer Katherine Winkler, Watershed Analyst and Editor Buffalo Ornithological Society: Mike Hamilton, bird surveys Ducks Unlimited: George Rockey, general habitat Erie Community College: Lisa Matthies, GIS specialist Erie County Federation of Sportsmen: Chuck Godfrey, habitat Erie County Soil & Water Conservation District: Mark Gaston, hydrology ERIE Program (Ecosystem Restoration through Interdisciplinary Exchange) SUNY Buffalo: David Blersch, Director Graduate students: Stacey Blersch, Bernie Clabeaux, Nate Drag, Robert Earle, Michael Habberfield, Shannon Seneca Penn Dixie Paleontological Center (Hamburg NY): Jerold Bastedo, Director (assistance with Section 3) Tifft Nature Preserve: David Spiering, ecologist USDA-Natural Resource Conservation Service: John Whitney, soils and habitat analysis West Seneca Commission for the Conservation of the Environment: Evelyn Hicks and Richard Rutkowski Special thanks to the Town of West Seneca for their ongoing stewardship of the Buffalo River Watershed. Know Your Backyard: Creek Corridor Conservation in the Town of West Seneca Prepared for: The Buffalo River Watershed Restoration Project by: Margaret Wooster March, 2010 With grant support from: National Fish and Wildlife Foundation Grant # 2008-0063-009 The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the U.S. Government or the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation. Contents Page Number 1. Summary………………………………………………………..1 2. The Great Lakes, Buffalo River, and Town of West Seneca.….2 3.
    [Show full text]
  • A-4 Glacial Geology of the Erie Lowland and Adjoining Allegheny Plateau, Western New York
    A-4 GLACIAL GEOLOGY OF THE ERIE LOWLAND AND ADJOINING ALLEGHENY PLATEAU, WESTERN NEW YORK PARKER E. CALKIN - Department of Geological Sciences, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14226 GEOMORPHIC SETTING The Allegheny section of the Appalachian Plateau (Allegheny Plateau) in western New York may be divided into three physiographic areas; from the Pennsylvania border northward, these include: 1) the high and rugged, unglaciated Salamanca Re-entrant, south of the Allegheny River; 2) the glaciated southern New York Uplands with rounded summits and a network of 11 through valleys 11 and breached drainage divides (Cole, 1941; Muller, 1963); and 3) the Erie County portion north of the east-west Cattaraugus Valley. This area is furrowed by deep parallel north-trending troughs separated by broad interfluves and strongly developed to accommodate glacier flow (Donahue, 1972, Calkin and Muller, 1980). Bordering on the west and north, respectively, are the Erie and Ontario lowlands blanketed by glaciolacustrine and ice contact drift, and traversed by subdued, waterlaid end moraines. The Erie County portion of the plateau and the Lake Erie Lowland are the areas spanned by the accompanying field trip log (Fig. 1). At the close of Paleozoic sedimentation in the Appalachian geosyn­ cline (see Frontispiece I) and prior to glaciation, the area underwent epeirogenic uplift and gentle southward tilting of about 8 m km-• (40 ft 1 mi- • Initial southward consequent drainage on this surface was even­ tually reversed to a northwesterly obsequent system and episodic uplift resulted in deep entrenchment of these north-flowing rivers (Calkin and Muller, 1980). The most prom inent drainage lines headed south of the present Cattaraugus Valley and included from west to east: 1) the preglacial Allegheny, flowing westward past the Salamanca Re-entrant and northward through Gowanda to Lake Erie along the path of the present Conewango and lower Cattaraugus valley (Ellis, 1980; Frontispiece II); 2) the Connisarauley and 3) the Buttermilk rivers (LaFleur, 1979; D.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Infrastructure Solutions to BUFFALO’S SEWER OVERFLOW CHALLENGE
    Green Infrastructure Solutions TO BUFFALO’S SEWER OVERFLOW CHALLENGE Draft Feasibility Study March 31, 2011 SUBMITTED TO The Residents of WNY and The Buffalo Sewer Authority New York State Department of Environmental Conservation United States Environmental Protection Agency BY BUFFALO NIAGARA RIVERKEEPER WITH FUNDING PROVIDED BY The Community Foundation of Greater Buffalo and the John R. Oishei Foundation Green Infrastructure Solutions pg/ 1 This report was made possible through funding provided by the John R. Oishei Foundation and the Community Foundation of Greater Buffalo. Special gratitude is owed to our Technical Advisory Committee who helped shape all of the recommendations in this report, refined our methodology, and provided invaluable assistance in data collection and approach. This report would not have been possible without the many hours they donated to the project. Bruce L. Fisher, Director, Center for Economic and Policy Studies, Buffalo State College Robert Galucci, P.E. Dharma Iyer, P.E. Joy Kuebler, R.L.A., A.S.L.A. Dave Majewski, Premium Landscape Sean Myers, NBT Salutions Lynda Schneekloth, A.S.L.A., Professor of Landscape Architecture, University of Buffalo 1250 Niagara Street, Buffalo, NY 14213 . TEL 716.852.7483 . FAX 716.885.0765 . Email [email protected] Buffalo Niagara RIVERKEEPER Green Infrastructure Solutions pg/2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Proposed Green Roofs in Buffalo, NY Source: Buffalo Niagara RIVERKEEPER uffalo is blessed with an abundance of one of the Onondaga County and Kansas City have chosen to utilize world’s most important natural resources: fresh water. “green infrastructure” to solve a significant portion of their BOur location on the Great Lakes places us in the midst combined sewer overflow problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Concord Comprehensive Plan Update
    DRAFT TOWN OF CONCORD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Town of Concord Comprehensive Plan Update was made possible through the efforts of the following: Comprehensive Plan Advisory Committee Clyde M. Drake Current Supervisor Gary Eppolito Former Supervisor & Chairman Concord IDA Mark Alianello Town Engineer Robin Sion Zoning Board Kenneth D. Zittel Town Board Kenneth Kassel Edwin F. Heary Chairman, Zoning Board Edwin R. Heary Bill Gugino Bruce Luno Planning Board Concord Town Board James M. Krezmien Deputy Town Supervisor Philip Drozd William F. Snyder, III Other Contributors Mariely Ortiz Erie County Department of Environment and Planning Town of Concord Residents Village of Springville Residents Project Consultant Andrew Reilly, AICP Wendel Leanne Voit, AICP Wendel Matthew Bowling Wendel CONCORD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Regional and Local Setting ............................................................................................... x 1.2 Previous Comprehensive Planning Endeavors .............................................................. x 1.3 Reasons for Preparing a Comprehensive Plan Update .............................................. x 1.4 How will the Plan be Utilized? ........................................................................................... x 2 Existing Conditions and Analyses ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Plan
    TOWN OF WEST SENECA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN November 2005 (Amended October 2006) TOWN OF WEST SENECA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Adopted: October 2006 ACKNOWLEDGMENT The Town of West Seneca Comprehensive Plan was made possible through the efforts of: Steering Committee Members: Christopher Osmanski, Joseph Ciancio, Paul Notaro, Joyce Mallett, John Kennedy, Nancy Lesakowski, Delores Mendolia, David Lawrence, William Czuprynski, George Montz, and Michael Krasner (In Memory of) Town Board: Supervisor Paul T. Clark, Deputy Supervisor Chris Osmanski, Councilman Vincent J. Graber, Jr., Councilman Craig J. Hicks, Councilwoman Christina Wleklinski Bove, and former Town Councilman Timothy Wroblewski. West Seneca Town Departments West Seneca Central School District Erie County and The Citizens of the Town of West Seneca Funding provided by the Community Development Block Grant Program (U.S.HUD), Erie County, and the Town of West Seneca TOWN OF WEST SENECA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Table of Contents Introduction I. Existing Conditions A. Demographics i. Population ii. Housing B. Environmental i. Creeks and Watersheds ii. Floodplains iii. Wetlands iv. Water Quality v. Soils vi. Open Space/Greenspace C. Transportation i. Highway Network ii. AADT/LOS for Major Roadways iii. Transportation Improvement Projects iv. Public Transportation v. Air vi. Rail vii. Recreation Paths and Trails D. Cultural i. Educational Facilities ii. Parks and Recreation iii. Communities and Hamlet Locations iv. Historic and Architectural Resources E. Economic i. Workforce Profile ii. Commercial Activity F. Land Use/Zoning i. Existing Land Use Patterns ii. Land Use by Area iii. Existing Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map iv. Other Land Use Controls G. Infrastructure i. Sewer ii. Water iii. Drainage and Flooding H.
    [Show full text]
  • Erie County, New York (All Jurisdictions)
    VOLUME 1 OF 5 ERIE COUNTY, NEW YORK (ALL JURISDICTIONS) Erie County Community Name Community Community Name Community Community Name Community Number Number Number Akron, Village of 361553 Depew, Village of 360236 Newstead, Town of 360251 Alden, Town of 360225 East Aurora, Town of 365335 North Collins, Town of 360252 Alden, Village of 360224 Eden, Town of 360238 North Collins, Village of 360252 Amherst, Town of 360226 Elma, Town of 360239 Orchard Park, Town of 360255 Angola, Village of 360982 Evans, Town of 360240 Orchard Park, Village of 360254 Aurora, Town of 360227 Farnham, Village of 361588 Sardinia, Town of 360256 Blasdell, Village of 361489 Gowanda, Village of 360075 Sloan, Village of 361589 Boston, Town of 360228 Grand Island, Town of 360242 Springville, Village of 360258 Brant, Town of 360229 Hamburg, Town of 360244 Tonawanda, City of 360259 Buffalo, City of 360230 Hamburg, Village of 360243 Tonawanda, Town of 360260 Cheektowaga, Town of 360231 Holland, Town of 360245 Wales, Town of 360261 Clarence, Town of 360232 Lackawanna, City of 360247 West Seneca, Town of 360262 Colden, Town of 360233 Lancaster, Town of 360249 Williamsville, Village of 360263 Collins, Town of 360234 Lancaster, Village of 360248 Concord, Town of 360235 Marilla, Town of 360250 PRELIMINARY: DECEMBER 31, 2009 Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 36 029CV001B NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) may not contain all data available within the repository. It is advisable to contact the community repository for any additional data.
    [Show full text]
  • Resilient New York Flood Mitigation Initiative
    RESILIENT NEW YORK FLOOD MITIGATION INITIATIVE Cayuga Creek, NY Prepared by: OBG, Part of Ramboll 101 First Street, 4th Floor Utica, NY 13501 (315) 956-6950 https://www.ramboll.com OBG, PART OF RAMBOLL | APRIL 2020 RESILIENT NEW YORK FLOOD MITIGATION INITIATIVE IN NOVEMBER 2018, NEW YORK STATE GOVERNOR ANDREW CUOMO COMMITTED FUNDING TO UNDERTAKE ADVANCED MODELING TECHNIQUES AND FIELD ASSESSMENTS OF 48 FLOOD-PRONE STREAMS TO IDENTIFY PRIORITY PROJECTS AND ACTIONS TO REDUCE COMMUNITY FLOOD AND ICE JAM RISKS, WHILE IMPROVING HABITAT. THE OVERALL GOAL OF THE PROGRAM IS TO MAKE NEW YORK STATE MORE RESILIENT TO FUTURE FLOODING. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 625 Broadway Albany, New York 12233 NOTICE This copyrighted material represents the proprietary work product of OBG. This material was prepared for the specific purpose of securing a contract with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. No other use, reproduction, or distribution of this material or of the approaches it contains, is authorized without the prior express written consent of OBG, Part of Ramboll. However, the recipient may make as many copies of this document as deemed necessary for the sole purpose of evaluating this document for final selection and © 2020 OBG, Part of Ramboll All Rights Reserved All materials printed on recycled paper. OBG, PART OF RAMBOLL | APRIL 2020 FINAL | i Project #SC806 RESILIENT NEW YORK FLOOD MITIGATION INITIATIVE TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Occasional Papers of the Buffalo Society of Natural Sciences 1: 1–47
    Floristics and Environmental Planning in Western New York and Adjacent Ontario: Distribution of Legally Protected Plants and Plant Sanctuaries RICHARD H. ZANDER Curator of Botany, Buffalo Museum of Science, Buffalo, New York 14211 Occasional Papers of the Buffalo Society of Natural Sciences No. 1 Buffalo, N.Y. 1976 The author thanks Dr. Robert Andrle, Associate Director of the Buffalo Museum of Science, for critically reviewing the manuscript. Cover photograph by Sheldon Memtt of the Buffalo Audubon Society. Uncommon aberrant fonns of Trillium grandiflorum; the upper plant approaches fonna 'Yiride, with green petals almost leaf­ like in texture, while the lower is near forma striatum, with broad, green stripes on the petals. TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Abstract iv Conservation and Plant Mapping 1 Local Floristics . 8 Geologic and Climatic Factors 4 Legally Protected Plants 5 Distribution Maps 6 Wetland Species 8 Calciphilic Species 10 Orchids 18 Ferns. 14 Club Mosses 15 Trilliums 16 Rare Species 16 Individual Species 17 Significant Habitats 21 Summary 30 Literature Cited 80 ABSTRACT A dot map survey compares the geographic distribution of limited­ access sanctuaries with known stations of plant species of the Niagara Frontier recognized as threatened by New York State law. Wetland species are well represented in sanctuaries, but calciphilic species are not. Minor political districts are ranked by richness in numbers of species, especially those of restricted habitat. Botanically significant areas are listed. iv Floristics and En,ironmental Planning CONSERVATION AND PLANT MAPPING This publication is primarily intended for persons concerned with environmental planning and conservation. Analysis of the known distribution of plant species by the compilation of "dot maps" enables areas of species richness, diversity, and habitat restriction to be dis­ tinguished.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Plain in Formation Buffalo Creek N.Y
    FLOOD PLAIN IN FORMATION BUFFALO CREEK N.Y. IN THE TOWNS OF ELMA AND WEST SENECA MAIN REPORT AND TECHNICAL APPENDIX TO PREPARED FOR ERIE COUNTY WITH COORDINATION OF STATE OF NEW YORK WATER RESOURCES COMMISSION AND DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ---~--..r r ,-- -~ ·.·.. ';~ DISTRIBUTED THROUGH ERIE-NIAGARA BASIN REGIONAL WATER RESOURCES PLANN lNG AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD PREPARED BY BUFFALO DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS APRIL 1966 (REPRINTED JUNE 1971) PROJECT-n FLOOD) 11 FLOOD Elma Methodist Church during March 1962 flood. FRONTISPIECE FIDOD PLAIN INFO'lMATION RUl<'FAID C':P.O:K, NEVI YORK in the TOvmS OF ELMA AND ~ST 9ENECA MAIN REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS Paragraph Frontispiece - Elma Methodist Church during March 1962 flood GENERAL 1 Introduction 1 3 Authorization 1 4 Purpose of the Study 2 5 Scope of the Study 2 7 Use of the Report 3 9 Acknowledgments 4 10 Continuing Assistance of Corps of 4 Engineers DESCRIPTION Ql<' PROBLEM 11 General Description of the Study Area 5 12 General nescrintion of the \·latershed 5 13 Land Use '.·!i thin the Flood Plain 6 14 Prospective Developments Affecting the 6 Flood Plain 16 Flood Har;un!" and Forecasting Services 7 18 Nature and O:Xt'>nt of ;;'lood Problems 7 19 Existing and Authorized Flood Control and 17 Related Projects 21 Existing Regulations 18 PRECIPITATION AND FLCODS 23 General 19 24 Climatology 19 25 Stream Flow Records 20 27 Flood Frequencies 20 31 Need for Continuing Observation 21 32 Flood Profiles and Estimated Limits 22 of Flooding 35 High !iater Marks 23 a TARLE OF CONTE~TS (Contd) Paragraph
    [Show full text]
  • Erie County Water Quality Strategy
    ERIE COUNTY WATER QUALITY STRATEGY ERIE COUNTY WATER QUALITY COMMITTEE JANUARY 2011 ERIE COUNTY WATER QUALITY STRATEGY TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTIONS PAGES Introduction 2 A "Snapshot" of Erie County, New York 2 - 3 Mission Statement 4 Committee Structure 4 Committee Reporting 4 - 5 Committee Functions 5 Statement of Objectives 5 - 6 Action Plan for Objectives 7 - 11 Committee Bylaws 12 - 14 APPENDIX A – Full Committee Members Federal Agencies 15 New York State Agencies 15 - 16 Erie County Agencies 16 - 18 Nonprofit Organizations 18 - 20 Municipalities 20 - 22 Municipal Coalitions 22 Private Interests 22 - 23 APPENDIX B – Reference Maps Erie County Waterways and Municipalities 24 New York Drainage Basins 25 Erie County Watersheds 26 Agricultural District Map 27 Watersheds & Hydrologic Watershed Codes 28 Erie County Tributary Ranking 29 APPENDIX C – Projects List of Completed Projects 30 - 34 APPENDIX D Minimum Contents of a Water Quality Strategy 35 - 1 - INTRODUCTION Water quality issues, particularly those that involve nonpoint source pollution, are a great concern for people living in New York State. Government agencies, private sector groups, and the general public all have an interest in protecting and restoring water quality. The citizens of New York State realize the critical role that good quality water plays for economic, social, and environmental health. This document defines the structure and goals of the Erie County Water Quality Committee (ECWQC). The ECWQC was established in 1992 and is organized using the format from Guidelines for Establishing County Water Quality Strategies, which was prepared by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and the New York State Soil and Water Conservation Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Resilient NY Flood Mitigation Initiative: Cazenovia Creek, Erie
    Intended for New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 625 Broadway Albany, New York 12233 Document type Report Date October 2020 RESILIENT NEW YORK FLOOD MITIGATION INITIATIVE CAZENOVIA CREEK, ERIE COUNTY, NEW YORK Prepared for: Project Team: Ramboll - Resilient New York Flood Mitigation Initiative RESILIENT NEW YORK FLOOD MITIGATION INITIATIVE CAZENOVIA CREEK, ERIE COUNTY, NEW YORK Ramboll Project name Resilient New York Flood Mitigation Initiative – Cazenovia Creek, Erie 101 First Street County, New York 4th Floor Project no. SC805 Utica, NY 13501 USA Recipient New York State Office of General Services Document type Report T 315-956-6950 F 315-790-5434 Version 2 https://ramboll.com Date October 19, 2020 Prepared by Ryan Hastings, EIT Checked by Kadir Goz, Maggie Reilly, P.E., Ahintha Kandamby, Ph.D., P.E., CFM Approved by Shaun B. Gannon, P.E., D.WRE, P.H., CFM OBG, PART OF RAMBOLL | OCTOBER 2020 Ramboll - Resilient New York Flood Mitigation Initiative IN NOVEMBER 2018, NEW YORK STATE GOVERNOR ANDREW CUOMO COMMITTED FUNDING TO UNDERTAKE ADVANCED MODELING TECHNIQUES AND FIELD ASSESSMENTS OF 48 FLOOD-PRONE STREAMS TO IDENTIFY PRIORITY PROJECTS AND ACTIONS TO REDUCE COMMUNITY FLOOD AND ICE JAM RISKS, WHILE IMPROVING HABITAT. THE OVERALL GOAL OF THE PROGRAM IS TO MAKE NEW YORK STATE MORE RESILIENT TO FUTURE FLOODING. Ramboll 101 First Street 4th Floor Utica, NY 13501 USA T 315-956-6950 F 315-790-5434 https://ramboll.com This copyrighted material represents the proprietary work product of Ramboll. This material was prepared for the specific purpose of securing a contract with the above client.
    [Show full text]