DOCSLIB.ORG

Town of Springfield Vermont Planning Commission Will Hold a Public Hearing on May 3, 2017 at 7:00 PM at 96 Main St., 3Rd Floor, Town Hall, Springfield, VT

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Town of Springfield Vermont Planning Commission Will Hold a Public Hearing on May 3, 2017 at 7:00 PM at 96 Main St., 3Rd Floor, Town Hall, Springfield, VT Public Hearing Notice: Town of Springfield Vermont Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on May 3, 2017 at 7:00 PM at 96 Main St., 3rd Floor, Town Hall, Springfield, VT. The Planning Commission proposes edits and amendments to all Chapters, Maps and Appendices of the Town Plan resulting in a new Town Plan. Purpose of this public hearing is to receive public input on the proposed amendments to any and all Chapters, maps and Appendices of the Town Plan for the Town of Springfield in accordance with 24 VSA §4384. Copies of the proposed amendments are available at the Town of Springfield office of the Town Clerk, and may be found on the Town of Springfield website: www.Springfieldvt.govoffice2.com under “TOWN PLAN” on the Home Page. You may call the Administrative Officer for further information at Tel. 885 2104. This public hearing may be continued monthly until the amendments are adopted by the Planning Commission and the resulting new Plan recommended to the Board of Selectmen for adoption. Walter Clark, Chair Springfield Planning Commission Planning Commission Reporting Form for Municipal Plan Amendments In accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4384, the Planning Commission for the Town of Springfield, Vermont is holding a public hearing to get input on proposed updates to the Springfield Town Plan on May 3, 2017 at 7 p.m. located in the Town Offices at 96 Main Street, Springfield Vermont. The last time that the Town Plan was substantially updated was in 2014. Many of the amendments from that Plan to the proffered Plan deal with a renewed emphasis on economic growth and aesthetics and upkeep of houses and structures and making residential neighborhoods comfortable, useful and attractive to residents State planning laws have also changed since then, now requiring additional town plan elements. The Planning Commission has worked on these amendments over the past 12 months of public meetings involving many residents on the Town in the areas of Land Use, Conservation, Energy, Economic development, Schools, Housing, Historic Places and Structures and the Arts and Culture and Health. The following proposed 2017 Springfield Town Plan is hereby presented for review and consideration by residents. Significant changes included in this proposed 2017 Springfield Town Plan include: • Input from many resident with interests in some or all of the following areas of discussion: Land Use, Conservation, Energy, Economic Development, Schools, Housing, Historic Places and Structures and the Arts and Culture and Health. • Updated data and information. • New maps were developed using the most currently available data. • Added new required town plan elements, including flood resilience and economic development. • Added new Health Chapter • Expanded or added details per town plan requirements under 24 V.S.A. Chapter 117, including economic resources and encouraging the growth of local industries, health resources and expnse of employment opportunities in the health field, Health Chapter, Energy Chapter, consistency with State Planning Goals, compatibility with the Regional Plan and the plans of other municipalities. • Updated housing data and affordability analysis based upon available data. • Made changes to the future land use section and map in order to better reflect land use patterns and zoning district boundaries, and to promote economic development, reduce impingement of residential use on business endeavors, and promote healthy neighborhoods. This report is in accordance with 24 V.S.A.§4384(c) which states: “When considering an amendment to a plan, the planning commission shall prepare a written report on the proposal. The report shall address the extent to which the plan, as amended, is consistent with the goals established in §4302 of this title. These changes are being proposed, in part, to make substantial progress toward attainment of the State Planning Goals. The following summarizes the changes being proposed in order to address this standard of review: 1. Land Use: This goal is addressed through a combination of factors, including future land use designations and the protection of natural resources. The plan is meant to encourage growth and development in the community centers of downtown and North Springfield village with residential patterns centered on those two areas, and continue to maintain infrastructure to primarily served the currently more densely developed centers. 2. Economic Development: The new Economic Development Chapter clearly articulates how this goal pertains to Springfield. The Town Plan encourages small businesses within the villages, as well as 1 development of retail/professional/service industry businesses in the River Street/Main Street/Clinton Street General and Central business areas, and Commercial/Industrial adaptive re-use of empty large former industrial buildings in the Commercial-Industrial and Industrial Zones of the Town. 3. Education: The plan discusses educational and vocational opportunities and expansion into specialties suited to Springfield, such as the Health Industry careers. 4. Transportation: The transportation touches all aspects of local transportation. This would include the promotion and expansion of the Hartness Airport, access management for highway safety and efficient traffic circulation, as well as public transportation, bike/pedestrian paths and a walkable Springfield. 5. Natural, Scenic, and Historic Resources: Maps and descriptions are included, together with policies designed to promote preservation/conservation. An emphasis has been placed on the Black River its beauty and access to the river for recreations, as well as a desire to design regulation of the stream bank areas, so that use of the river is not unduly, adversely curtailed. 6. Air, Water, Wildlife, and Land Resources: These areas of interest and concern were well treated in the 2014 Plan. All proposed edits of the Natural and Scenic Resources, the Land Use and Recreation Chapters primarily and secondarily in the Recreation Chapter. The amendments to the Plan reinforce policies related to protection of these resources. 7. Energy: The Energy Chapter is completely new to address new power sources, as well as energy efficiency and the use of natural resources for power generation. 8. Recreation: The few amendments recognize improvements in facilities and in the delivery of fine recreational opportunities to the residents. 9. Agriculture and Forestry: The 2014 Plan well addressed issues important to the Agricultural and Forest industries, this plan enhances the encouragement of the development of these resources and continues to encourage preservation of the rural landscape where agriculture and forestry endeavors thrive. 10. Efficient use of natural resources/extraction and restoration of earth resources: The Land Use and Natural and Scenic Resources Chapters address these issues and provide direction that allows for economic development which respects the efficient use of natural resources. 11. Safe and affordable housing: Proposed data and related updates are proposed to address this goal. 12. Community Facilities and Services: Discussion about addressing or financing future needs relative to anticipated growth trends, as well as maintenance of current infrastructure needed to provide the services for Springfield are adequately presented in the Plan, particularly in the Utilities and Facilities Chapter. 13. Child Care: This necessary and highly appreciated asset is well treated in the Education Chapter. 14. Flood Resilient Communities: A new Flood Resilience Chapter was introduced to this Plan to address flood and fluvial erosion hazards and strategies for protecting life and property. If the proposal would alter the designation of any land area, the report should cover the following points: There is no proposal to alter the designation of any land area, but there are small changes suggested for the already allowed uses in the Town. 1. The probable impact on the surrounding area, including the effect of any resulting increase in traffic, and the probable impact on the overall pattern of land use. 2 The proposed changes to the will not have drastic impacts on the overall pattern of land use. Indeed, in an attempt to be more accommodating and user-friendly to business development, while preserving the rural areas of Town, the impacts should be positive for development and the environment. 2. The long-term cost or benefit to the municipality, based upon consideration of the probable impact on: (A) the municipal tax base; and The Planning Commission does foresee any change, except that commercial/industrial growth, which is encouraged, could ameliorate the burden on residential properties. (B) the need for public facilities; New public facilities are not anticipated. 3. The amount of vacant land which is: (A) already subject to the proposed new designation; and No change. (B) actually available for that purpose, and the need for additional land for that purpose. Not applicable. 4. The suitability of the area in question for the proposed purpose, after consideration of: (A) appropriate alternative locations; (B) alternative uses for the area under consideration; and (C) the probable impact of the proposed change on other areas similarly designated Minor edits that will positively impact life and environment town-wide and no changes in use. 5. The appropriateness of the size and boundaries of the area proposed for change, with respect to the area required for the proposed use, land capability and existing development
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Weathersfield Amended Munici
    CHARTERED BY Town CHARTERED BY NEW HAMPSHIRE NEW YORK AUGUST 20, 1761 of APRIL 8, 1772 Weathersfield, Vermont Website: http://www.weathersfield.org Town Plan Adopted July 15th, 2004 Amended September 15th, 2005 TOWN OF WEATHERSFIELD, VERMONT TOWN PLAN Proposed Amendments Weathersfield Planning Commission Stephen A. Walasewicz, Chairperson Rene Bergeron Peter M. Daniels Julie A. Levy Steven J. Melanson Weathersfield Conservation Commission Marianne E. Walsh, Chairperson Annmarie J. Christensen Diana L. Day Christopher Harris Robert A. LaCasse Nathan G. McKeen Anna B. Sykas Weathersfield Select Board C. Peter Cole, Chair Henry C. Cobb, Jr., Vice-Chairperson Norman John Arrison, Board Clerk Daniel E. Boyer Patricia W. Daniels http://www.weathersfield.org Thanks to the Southern Windsor County Regional Planning Commission, Weathersfield Conservation Commission, and community members for their work on this plan. e Adopted July 15th, 2004 Amended September 15th, 2005 TOWN OF WEATHERSFIELD, VERMONT TOWN PLAN Table of Contents Acknowledgments Inside Front Cover Introduction ............................................................................... 1 Historical Background ....................................................... 1 Why and How a Town Plan is Used ..................................... 3 What is in a Town Plan? .................................................... 5 Goals and Objectives .......................................................... 8 Implementation Procedures ................................................ 9 Relationship
    [Show full text]
  • The Rockingham Meeting House / National Historic
    THE ROCKINGHAM MEETING HOUSE / NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK / ROCKINGHAM, VERMONT The Rockingham Meeting House is the oldest public building in Vermont that still exists in a condition close to its original state. The Meeting House was built between I 787 and I8ol to serve the needs of religious services and civic events in the town of Rockingham, whose first focus of settlement had been in the village immediately surrounding it. The town expected to expand rapidly and planned a meeting house large enough to meet its needs. As time went on, settlement in the town shifted to Bellows Falls and Saxtons River, while the village of Rockingham remained small and rural. The Congregational church which used the Meeting House for its services survived only until 1839, and annual Town Meetings continued to be held here until 1869. THE ROCKINGHAM MEETING HOUSE / NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK / ROCKINGHAM, VERMONT 2 The building stood unused for some decades and suffered Much of what stands today is original fabric from the vandalism and loss of its contents, but in I9o6, after a fire eighteenth century: king-post timber framing, woodworking which destroyed many buildings in the village, people of the details of the exterior, many glass panes in the twenty-over- town and the surrounding area recognized that the Meeting twentywindows,interiorplasterwork,andmostofthematerial House was a well-preserved historical and architectural of the "pig pen" box pews. The pulpit was reconstructed in treasure and raised funds for its restoration. I9o6, but the sounding board above it is original. In size and A light-handed restoration which was completed in austerity, the Meeting House is very much a Puritan building I9o7 was clne of the earliest historic preservation projects of a style already considered old-fashioned in more urban in Vermont.
    [Show full text]
  • East Montpelier Village Master Plan
    June 1, 2017 Review Draft EAST MONTPELIER VILLAGE MASTER PLAN Approved Month ##, 2017 East Montpelier Planning Commission With assistance from Central Vermont Regional Planning Commission East Montpelier Village Master Plan June 1, 2017 Review Draft This page is intentionally blank. East Montpelier Village Master Plan June 1, 2017 Review Draft The East Montpelier Village Master Plan is dedicated to the memory of Dave Coburn (1934-2017). Dave’s knowledge of the history of East Montpelier enriched town and village events. He brought history alive and showed the relevance of its lessons to the present day. When he took the microphone the crowd quietened. In addition to creating several brochures on Village history, Dave contributed to Chapter 3 of the Village Master Plan. He was one of our town’s first planning commissioners, and throughout his life he combined his vision for the future of our town with an appreciation for its past. The link he provided between the two sets the example for thoughtful and caring governance. The Planning Commission thanks him for his tremendous service to the town and his contributions to this plan. His wisdom and kind spirit will be greatly missed. East Montpelier Village Master Plan June 1, 2017 Review Draft This page is intentionally blank. East Montpelier Village Master Plan June 1, 2017 Review Draft 1 EAST MONTPELIER VILLAGE MASTER PLAN 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................................................... iv 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................... 1 6 1.0 WHY CREATE A VILLAGE MASTER PLAN? .................................... 4 7 1.1 East Montpelier Village is an Important Part of the Town ..........................4 8 1.2 Municipal Commitment to East Montpelier Village ...................................4 9 1.3 How Does a Master Plan Help the Village and the Town? .........................4 10 2.0 DEVELOPING THIS VILLAGE MASTER PLAN ...............................
    [Show full text]
  • February 25, 2011 Page 1 of 12 MEMORANDUM TO
    MEMORANDUM TO: Windham Regional Commission Attn. Susan McMahon, Associate Director FROM: Alan Liptak, CPG, KAS, Inc. DATE: February 25, 2011 RE: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Update Mill Street Turnaround, Bellows Falls, Vermont KAS, Inc. of Williston, Vermont (KAS) conducted a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) update of a portion of land and premises at 20-24 Mill Street in Bellows Falls, Vermont (herein referred to as “the property” or “Mill Street Turnaround property”; see Attachment 1, Site Location Map1 and Attachment 2, Site Map2). This assessment was conducted for the Windham Regional Commission (WRC) of Brattleboro, Vermont, herein referred to as client. The owner of record of the property as of the date of this report is the Bellows Falls Historical Society (BFHS), herein referred to as owner. The user of this assessment, e.g., the entity deriving Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) Bona Fide Prospective Purchaser (BFPP) exclusion, is the Bellows Falls Village Corporation. At the request of the WRC, KAS conducted necessary tasks to update a previous ASTM E 1527-05 Phase I ESA for the referenced property. 3 KAS reviewed the previous Phase I ESA report and has updated the following aspects of it: Owner and user interviews Database report Site visit Additional historical and technical reviews Conclusions presented herein are not materially different than those presented in the referenced Phase I ESA report. 1 USGS, 1985. 2 DiBernardo Associates, 2009. 3 Nobis Engineering, February 2010. February 25, 2011 Page 1 of 12 General Description The property is a proposed 0.5 acre parcel that will be created via subdivision concurrent with a pending ownership transaction.
    [Show full text]
  • Newport Water Bond Defeated
    A new-old Meet Barton kind of classroom Graded School’s in Jay. new principal. 14 10 the Chronicle THE WEEKLY JOURNAL OF ORLEANS COUNTY TWO SECTIONS, 48 PAGES VOLUME 44, NUMBER 45 NOVEMBER 8, 2017 ONE DOLLAR Newport Congratulations, Rangers! water bond defeated by Joseph Gresser NEWPORT — Fewer than one out of ten Newport voters turned out Tuesday to defeat a proposed $3-million bond issue to supply water to the city’s east side. The measure was defeated 154 to 136, an 18- vote margin. Had the vote gone the other way, the bond would have paid for a 450,000-gallon water tower, a booster pump station, and a new floating cover for the Palin reservoir. Although the loan would have been for the full $3-million, the state loan fund would have charged a negative 3 percent interest rate on the 30-year bond. As a result, it would have cost the city only $1.8-million to repay the loan. The entire project was meant to replace water currently supplied by Derby Center. The village The Lake Region Union High School soccer team with their championship trophy and medallions on the field at water company and the city signed an agreement South Burlington High School following Saturday’s Division II final. The members of the team are Keith Herman, Dylan Gagnon, Logan Ingalls, Parker Perron, Riley Urie, Noah Royer, Caleb Rodgers, Brady Perron, Evan Inkel, in 1997 setting terms under which the village Mathew Menard, Chad Royer, Hunter Matte, Bradey Kerr, Mason Svag, Connor Lanou, Isaiah Braithwaite, would provide water for a proposed industrial Jackson King, Gabe Riendeau, Drew Dragesett, and Liam Kennedy.
    [Show full text]
  • Folklore of Springfield Vermont
    nn.,^'r.'=^"''CH LIBRARIES 3 3433 07954360 3 FOI.KLORE SPRINGFIELD VERMONT :.«OWN l>>CilNT rx.OCK HO'./SC hij iM. Eva Baker ^1 ^t u.-^^:,".^ Folklore of Springfield iPnlklor? nf ^prmgftiHh mm By MARY EVA BAKER 4. ti Illusirated by Russell W. Porter and Horace S. Brown Springfield, Vermont 1922 THE NC"/ VG-^K PUBLIC lib..a:^y 427259 A ASrOR, LENOX AND TILDEN FOUXDATIONS R 1929 L Copyright, 1922 by M. E. Baker ^ , Publishers Th^ Altrurian Club of Springfield. Vt. Printers Springfield printing Corp.. Springfielc TO THE General Lewis Morris Chapter, Daughters of the American Revolution, Descendants of those Heroes Whose Fortitude and Patriotism is Unparalleled in History AND TO The Altrurian Club, That so Loyally Serves Its Motto, ".Vo/ for Ourselves, but for Others." These Pages are Dedicated "Thy Hork. faithful daughters, is noble as wise, ''The soul with its love is aglow; "A nation uill hail thee! thine own hearts approve, '\ind thy deeds through the centuries go.'' Credit is due the Misses Grace and Alice Wheeler, Mrs. Mary Toivnsend Bow- en, Miss Edna I. Lockwood, Clarence E. Morse, H. G. Tapper and E. W. Barnard for some of the incidents found in this book; also Mr. and Mrs. Everett Eaton for help in tracing certain subjects. Contents PAGE NO. I. Making a Wilderness Into a Township 1 II. How a Swamp Became the Village Square 7 III. The Common and Incidents Connected With It ... 17 IV. Old Bridges 24 V. The Romance of the Trees 32 VI. Old Weathervanes and Old Bells 39 VII. Revolutionary Heroes 43 VIII.
    [Show full text]
  • "Newport City's Age-Friendly Community Action Plan
    2016 Newport City’s Age Friendly Community Action Plan Table of Contents Advisory Council Members and Workgroups………………………………………. page 2 Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………. page 4 Why Newport is Pursuing Age Friendly Community Status…………………. page 6 Newport’s Domains of Age Friendliness……………………………………………… page 8 Domain 1: Town Information……………………………………………. page 9 Domain 2: Outdoor Spaces and Buildings…………………………... page 11 Domain 3: Transportation………………………………………………… page 15 Domain 4: Job Opportunities………………………………………………page 18 Domain 5: Health …………...………………………………………………….page 20 Domain 6: Housing…………………………………………………………….page 22 Domain 7: Caregiving…………………………………………………………page 24 Domain 8: Social Participation……………………………………………page 27 1 | Page Newport’s Age Friendly Community Advisory Council Members Council members include: Kathy Austin, Community National Bank Paul Dreher, Newport City Renaissance Corporation (NCRC) Design Committee, Northeast Kingdom Learning Services (NEKLS) & Dreher Design Harriet Hall, Vermont Association of Blind & Visually Impaired (VABVI) & Community member Eileen Illuzzi, North Country Career Center Trisha Ingalls, RuralEdge Pam Ladds, NCRC Design Committee & Community member Jennifer Leithead, NCRC Design Committee; Fresh Start Community Farm Alison Low, Northeastern Vermont Development Association (NVDA) Mike Marcotte, Vermont State Representative Paul Monette, Newport City Mayor Barbara Morrow, Orleans County Restorative Justice Center (OCRJC) Kelly Stoddard Poor, AARP Vermont Patricia Sears, Chair of Age
    [Show full text]
  • Morrisville/Morristown Town Plan
    2020-2030 Morrisville/Morristown Town Plan Photo Credit: Jasmine Farrell Authored by Planning Director Todd Thomas, with assistance from Morrisville/Morristown Planning Council Members: Allen Van Anda, Steven Foster, Joshua Goldstein, Etienne Hancock (Chair), Tom Snipp. Thanks to Lyndon Burkholder for editorial assistance. Table of Contents by Chapter Chp 1: Policies guiding future development & environmental protection p. 2 Chp 2: Land use p. 5 Chp 3: Transportation p. 11 Chp 4: Utility and facility p. 17 Chp 5: Historic, scenic, rare and irreplaceable natural resources p. 27 Chp 6: Education p. 32 Chp 7: Implementation p. 59 Chp 8: Statement concerning development trends & adjacent municipalities p. 36 Chp 9: Energy p. 39 Chp 10: Housing p. 45 Chp 11: Economic development p. 49 Chp 12: Flood resiliency p. 52 Chp 13: Wellness p. 56 1 | P a g e 2020-2030 Morrisville / Morristown Town Plan Chapter 1: Statement of Policies Guiding Future Development & Environmental Protection Welcome to Morrisville, and welcome to the Town Plan for this fantastic quintessentially Vermont community. This plan, which is dated from 2020 to 2030, provides both a template, and a wish-list, for the development and growth of our community over the coming decade. This Town Plan includes the elements required by 24 VSA §4382, and is separated into chapters that are ordered to match the requirements found, as enumerated, in this same State Statute. As you read the plan, agreed upon community priorities therein have been bolded for emphasis, and objectives of the community (i.e. goals we want to accomplish within the coming decade) are highlighted via underlined italics.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Champlain Voyages of Discovery: Bringing History Home
    “The Congress fi nds and declares that the spirit and direction of the Nation are founded upon and refl ected in its historic heritage; [and that] the historical and cultural foundations of the Nation should be preserved as a living part of our community life and development in order to give a sense of orientation to the American people…..” National Historic Preservation Act of 1966. Front cover photograph: South Lake Champlain Bridge, Chimney Point State Historic Site, Addison to right. Credit: William J. Costello, WILLCIMAGES. Back cover photographs credit: Eric A. Bessett e, Shadows & Light Design. Cover design: Eric A. Bessett e, Shadows & Light Design. Content Design and Layout: Rosemary A. Cyr, Hutch M. McPheters, Ellen R. Cowie. Lake Champlain Voyages of Discovery: Bringing History Home By: Giovanna M. Peebles, State Archeologist, Vermont Division for Historic Preservation Elsa Gilbertson, Regional Historic Site Administrator, Vermont Division for Historic Preservation Rosemary A. Cyr, Laboratory Director, Archaeology Research Center, University of Maine at Farmington Stephen R. Scharoun, Historian and Field Director, Archaeology Research Center, University of Maine at Farmington Ellen R. Cowie, Director, Archaeology Research Center, University of Maine at Farmington Robert N. Bartone, Assistant Director, Archaeology Research Center, University of Maine at Farmington With Contributions By: Joseph-André Senécal, Professor of Romance Languages, University of Vermont Paul Huey, New York State Offi ce of Parks, Recreation and Historic
    [Show full text]
  • Master Plan Montpelier, Vermont
    “October Crossing,” Robin LaHue MASTER PLAN MONTPELIER, VERMONT Montpelier Planning Commission enVision Montpelier Stakeholders Department of Planning and Community Development Final Adopted Version: September 23, 2015 Expires: December 1, 2017 (per condition of approval) 2 Alexandria Heather, Montpelier resident Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................... 13 Master Plan Process ..................................................................................................................... 13 National Citizens Survey ............................................................................................................. 17 Survey Findings ............................................................................................................................ 17 Consistency with Act 200 ............................................................................................................. 18 Background ............................................................................................................................. 22 Development History ................................................................................................................... 22 State and Regional Context ......................................................................................................... 25 Montpelier’s Magic .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Merger: Town & Village of Johnson, Vermont
    Promising Solutions Government & Education | Economics & Public Finance | Health & Human Services | Nonprofits & Communities Merger: Town & Village of Johnson, Vermont Assessment of Benefits & Costs February, 2020 draft January, 2021 final Prepared for: Town Selectboard & Village Trustees, Johnson, Vermont Prepared by: Kent Gardner, Ph.D. Project Director © CGR Inc. 2021 – All Rights Reserved 1 South Washington Street, Suite 400, Rochester, New York 14614 (585) 325-6360 • [email protected] www.cgr.org i Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1 Johnson town and village ......................................................................................................... 2 Demographic profile ........................................................................................................................... 2 Service responsibilities ....................................................................................................................... 2 Fiscal profile............................................................................................................................................. 5 How should the cost of public services be shared? .............................................................. 6 Should Johnson have both a town and a village? .............................................................. 7 Towns and villages in Vermont ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Vermont Incorporated Villages: a Vanishing Institution
    Vermont Incorporated Villages: A Vanishing Institution As the number of village governments continues to decline, it is important to recognize that they have been—and remain—an integral part of the structure of local governmental units in Vermont. In addition, many of them have served as the setting for several aspects of growth within the state, particularly its economic development. By Edward T. Howe n October 30, 2003, village and town voters in separate meet- ings in Bradford (Orange County) approved the merger of Otheir two local governments. Under terms of the proposal, the incorporated village of Bradford—created in 1891 with broad func- tional and regulatory powers—ceased to exist as of December 1, 2004.1 Shortly before the Bradford voters went to the polls, the incorporated village of Milton (created in 1905 in Chittenden County) dissolved in April 2003.2 These recent dissolutions are the latest in a long trend that has seen the disappearance of almost one-half of the total number of in- corporated villages ever created in the State of Vermont. As a result of this decline, only forty village governments currently remain in existence. The disappearance of these incorporated villages and their predeces- sors represents a loss of a unique form of local government for both Vermont and the New England region. Several other New England ..................... EDWARD T. HOWE is Professor of Economics at Siena College in Loudonville, New York. He is the author of numerous journal articles on state and local government issues. Vermont History 73 (Winter/Spring 2005): 16–39. © 2005 by the Vermont Historical Society.
    [Show full text]