DOCSLIB.ORG

RICHARD-III-Notes-On

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
RICHARD-III-Notes-On R I C H A R D I I I 1471-1485 / Wars of the Roses 1455-1485 NOTES ON KEY CHARACTERS - Updated HOUSE OF LANCASTER (Red Rose) King Henry VI: (Murdered before the start of the play.) Former King imprisoned in the Tower of London prior to the Battle of Tewkesbury and murdered by Richard prior to the start of the play; last Lancastrian King of the War of the Roses; “a wise man in the wrong place”; ”better fitted to be a monk than to rule.” Queen Margaret: Widow of King Henry VI; surprisingly still at court, she acts as a dark chorus in the play; “foul, wrinkled witch” (Richard); “remember Margaret was a prophetess” (Buckingham); ten of her eleven prophesies in Act I, Sc 3 come true in the play; after seeing most of her curses come to fruition she escapes “these English foes” and returns to her native France before the decisive battle ending the War of the Roses and giving birth to the dawn of a new Tudor Period. Edward, Prince of Wales: (Slain before the start of the play.) King Henry VI’s eldest son; Richard and Clarence stab the Prince of Wales to death on the battlefield at Tewkesbury. Lady Anne: Widow of Edward, Prince of Wales, daughter-in-law of King Henry VI of which she was especially fond; seduced more through fear than lust by Richard over the coffin of King Henry en route to his internment; later marries Richard to become Queen Anne and gives birth to one son who dies at age eleven. HOUSE OF YORK (White Rose) Duchess of York: Mother to King Edward IV, Clarence and Gloucester; very protective of her young grandchildren – the young son and daughter of Clarence and the two sons of King Edward IV: Edward the Prince of Wales and Richard, Duke of York – the “young princes” murdered most probably by Richard in the Tower of London. King Edward IV: Eldest son of Plantagenet Richard, Duke of York and presumptive usurper of the throne following the execution of Lancastrian King Henry VI and the battlefield murder of his successor, Edward, Prince of Wales; “the wanton Edward” (Margaret); “weakened by gluttony and debauchery” he died of natural causes at age forty thus clearing the way for Richard’s brutal journey to the throne. Queen Elizabeth: Widow of King Edward IV and mother to the “young princes” along with five daughters including her eldest, also Elizabeth, who later marries the new King Henry VII (former Earl of Richmond) ending the War of the Roses; Queen Elizabeth is the sister of Anthony Woodville, Earl Rivers and the mother of two sons from a prior marriage to Lancastrian John Grey: the Marquis of Dorset and Lord Grey; although a loyal & fruitful wife, Elizabeth suffered with the fact that the King had a whole series of mistresses, mostly arranged by William, Lord Hastings who was eventually imprisoned in the Tower by the Queen and her Woodville family, later released but later murdered by Richard; Richard harbors anti-Woodville venom & considers the family dangerous to his rise to the throne. George, Duke of Clarence: Third of four sons (eldest brother Edmund was slain with his father on the battlefield), George “was ambitious and faithless”, having deserted Edward and siding with forces against Edward at one point and then launching a second double-cross later by returning to his Yorkist brother when he felt the opposition was set to loose; with some of the characteristics in reality that Richard was later slanderously described as having, it proved easy for Richard to turn King Edward against their brother, George, sending him to the Tower and soon thereafter plotting his murder by drowning in a barrel of sweet malmsey wine, too late for Edward to pardon; George’s speech relating the nightmare of his own death is the most poetic section of the play. Richard, Duke of Gloucester: “Misshapen in body as in mind, but facially handsome and sinister” Richard started at young age to covet the throne, and upon the death of his brother, King Edward IV in 1483, Richard at age thirty-one knew that his way forward was blocked by six rightful successors each of which he managed to ruthlessly eliminate and then usurp the throne in short order only to meet his own death at the hands of Henry, Earl of Richmond, thus ending the York dynasty and indeed the thirty-year War of the Roses. Lady Anne: (See above) Edward, Prince of Wales: The elder son of the dead King Edward IV, son Edward was thirteen at the time of his father’s death and was first in line to succeed to the throne; in his dying days King Edward assigned his then-loyal brother Richard as Protector of his two young sons; Richard accompanied young Prince Edward to London from Ludlow then lured his younger brother, the Richard, Duke of York, away from the Queen, their mother; he then “housed” both young princes in the royal apartment in the Tower of London awaiting the Prince’s coronation as the new King Edward V; both princes were never seen again; it was assumed by the court and the populace that both boys were murdered by Richard due mainly to his lack of response to the claims; over the years, responsibility for the disappearance of the boys has been placed on Richard or on the new King Henry VII two years later; the skeletons of two male children were discovered in a box during excavations of the Tower years later. Richard, Duke of York: At age eleven the younger of two sons of the dead King Edward. (See information directly above). Edward, Earl of Warwick: The young son of George, Duke of Clarence; despite his young age of three at the time of his father’s murder, the young Earl was of course another in the line of succession to the throne; Richard imprisoned the young boy and, sadly, kept him there throughout his reign; historians claim that it was “the habit of the time” and that “Richard was merely a realistic politician, and not an unusual monster, for doing as others did.”; the Earl was never seen again. Margaret Plantagenet, Countess of Salisbury: The older sister at age five of Edward, Earl of Warwick and only daughter of the murdered George, Duke of Clarence, brother of King Edward VI and brother/murderer Richard; referring to her as one of the “brats of Clarence” Richard assigns one of his henchmen to “enquire me out some mean poor gentleman whom I will marry straight to Clarence’s daughter” (Act VI, Sc 1, Lines 53-54) thus removing one more of the rightful successors to the throne. Anthony Woodville, Earl Rivers: Brother of Queen Elizabeth; even though Rivers was forever loyal to King Edward IV, he was always hated by Richard for joining with the Queen in imprisoning William, Lord Hastings, mainly for his role as middleman to the King to satisfy his propensity for mistresses throughout his reign; eventually he was abruptly murdered by order of Richard at Pomfret along with his nephew, Lord Grey, and Sir Thomas Vaughan, counsellor to the “boy king”, Edward, Earl of Warwick. Marquis of Dorset: The older son of Queen Elizabeth from her first marriage to Lancastrian John Grey, and therefore a member of the “Woodville clan” of which Richard was both suspicious and venomous; as soon as his mother hears that Richard will be crowned the new King she sends him Dorset to Lancastrian Henry, Earl of Richmond in France to escape his sure fate at the hands of Richard; his escape proved to be the only one of eleven grim prophesies of old Queen Margaret which did not come true (she prophesied that both of Queen Elizabeth’s sons would die.) Lord Grey: The younger son of Queen Elizabeth was murdered by Richard’s order with his uncle, Anthony Woodville, Lord Rivers and Counsellor, Sir Thomas Vaughan, at Pomfret by Richard’s order thus reducing the number of key Court members from the Lancastrian Woodville family. Duke of Buckingham: A key figure in the play is “the deep-revolving, witty Buckingham” (IV.2) who exerts great effort in helping Richard to the throne; late in the play he is warned of Richard’s probable malice, he grows angry with Richard over a broken promise of the return of rightful lands, escapes the court and raises a Welsh army to combat Richard; his tragic error was returning to Richard in failure hoping to retain his position; Richard refuses his audience, has him arrested and immediately executed; Buckingham was a key courtier dying too early to impart his revenge. (The role is the second longest in the play.) William, Lord Hastings: The conniving Lord Chamberlain is also referred to as a “pursuivant, follower, Officer of the College of Arms”; in addition to many roles in the Yorkist court and especially loyal to the deceased King Edward IV Hastings is most center stage as the middleman to the King to satisfy his propensity for mistresses throughout his reign; as the result of Richard’s intensely suspicious nature, Hastings was another significant courtier abruptly murdered by order of Richard. Sir James Tyrrel: The “discontented gentleman” who honors Richard’s order to murder the two young boy Princes of the dead King Edward IV & Queen Elizabeth and direct heirs to the throne; his soliloquy quoting one of the murderers who described the children as they lay in each other’s arms is especially moving; Tyrrel was most probably murdered after reporting back to Richard confirming the suffocation of the boys who were never seen again.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Constitutional Requirements for the Royal Morganatic Marriage
    The Constitutional Requirements for the Royal Morganatic Marriage Benoît Pelletier* This article examines the constitutional Cet article analyse les implications implications, for Canada and the other members of the constitutionnelles, pour le Canada et les autres pays Commonwealth, of a morganatic marriage in the membres du Commonwealth, d’un mariage British royal family. The Germanic concept of morganatique au sein de la famille royale britannique. “morganatic marriage” refers to a legal union between Le concept de «mariage morganatique», d’origine a man of royal birth and a woman of lower status, with germanique, renvoie à une union légale entre un the condition that the wife does not assume a royal title homme de descendance royale et une femme de statut and any children are excluded from their father’s rank inférieur, à condition que cette dernière n’acquière pas or hereditary property. un titre royal, ou encore qu’aucun enfant issu de cette For such a union to be celebrated in the royal union n’accède au rang du père ni n’hérite de ses biens. family, the parliament of the United Kingdom would Afin qu’un tel mariage puisse être célébré dans la have to enact legislation. If such a law had the effect of famille royale, une loi doit être adoptée par le denying any children access to the throne, the laws of parlement du Royaume-Uni. Or si une telle loi devait succession would be altered, and according to the effectivement interdire l’accès au trône aux enfants du second paragraph of the preamble to the Statute of couple, les règles de succession seraient modifiées et il Westminster, the assent of the Canadian parliament and serait nécessaire, en vertu du deuxième paragraphe du the parliaments of the Commonwealth that recognize préambule du Statut de Westminster, d’obtenir le Queen Elizabeth II as their head of state would be consentement du Canada et des autres pays qui required.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNE MOWBRAY, DUCHESS of YORK: a 15Th-CENTURY CHILD BURIAL from the ABBEY of ST CLARE, in the LONDON BOROUGH of TOWER HAMLETS
    London and Middlesex Archaeological Society Transactions, 67 (2016), 227—60 ANNE MOWBRAY, DUCHESS OF YORK: A 15th-CENTURY CHILD BURIAL FROM THE ABBEY OF ST CLARE, IN THE LONDON BOROUGH OF TOWER HAMLETS Bruce Watson and †William White With contributions by Barney Sloane, Dorothy M Thorn and Geoffrey Wheeler, and drawing on previous research by J P Doncaster, H C Harris, A W Holmes, C R Metcalfe, Rosemary Powers, Martin Rushton, †Brian Spencer and †Roger Warwick SUMMARY FOREWORD Dorothy M Thorn (written 2007) In 1964 during the redevelopment of the site of the church of the Abbey of St Clare in Tower Hamlets, a During the 1960s, my future husband, the masonry vault containing a small anthropomorphic late James Copland Thorn FSA, and I were lead coffin was discovered. The Latin inscription actively involved in London archaeology as attached to the top of the coffin identified its occupant part of Dr Francis Celoria’s digging team.1 as Anne Mowbray, Duchess of York. She was the child Naturally all the members of the group bride of Richard, Duke of York, the younger son of were very interested in such an important Edward IV. Anne died in November 1481, shortly discovery, and when Anne Mowbray was before her ninth birthday. As the opportunity to study identified we were all impressed (possibly scientifically a named individual from the medieval no-one more so than James). When the day period is extremely rare, the London Museum quickly came for Anne Mowbray to be reburied in organised a comprehensive programme of analysis, Westminster Abbey, the BBC wanted to which included the study of Anne’s life, her hair, teeth, interview Celoria, but he could not be found, skeletal remains and the metallurgy of her coffin.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses A history of Richmond school, Yorkshire Wenham, Leslie P. How to cite: Wenham, Leslie P. (1946) A history of Richmond school, Yorkshire, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/9632/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk HISTORY OP RICHMOND SCHOOL, YORKSHIREc i. To all those scholars, teachers, henefactors and governors who, by their loyalty, patiemce, generosity and care, have fostered the learning, promoted the welfare and built up the traditions of R. S. Y. this work is dedicated. iio A HISTORY OF RICHMOND SCHOOL, YORKSHIRE Leslie Po Wenham, M.A., MoLitt„ (late Scholar of University College, Durham) Ill, SCHOOL PRAYER. We give Thee most hiomble and hearty thanks, 0 most merciful Father, for our Founders, Governors and Benefactors, by whose benefit this school is brought up to Godliness and good learning: humbly beseeching Thee that we may answer the good intent of our Founders, "become profitable members of the Church and Commonwealth, and at last be partakers of the Glories of the Resurrection, through Jesus Christ our Lord.
    [Show full text]
  • War of Roses: a House Divided
    Stanford Model United Nations Conference 2014 War of Roses: A House Divided Chairs: Teo Lamiot, Gabrielle Rhoades Assistant Chair: Alyssa Liew Crisis Director: Sofia Filippa Table of Contents Letters from the Chairs………………………………………………………………… 2 Letter from the Crisis Director………………………………………………………… 4 Introduction to the Committee…………………………………………………………. 5 History and Context……………………………………………………………………. 5 Characters……………………………………………………………………………….. 7 Topics on General Conference Agenda…………………………………..……………. 9 Family Tree ………………………………………………………………..……………. 12 Special Committee Rules……………………………………………………………….. 13 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………………. 14 Letters from the Chairs Dear Delegates, My name is Gabrielle Rhoades, and it is my distinct pleasure to welcome you to the Stanford Model United Nations Conference (SMUNC) 2014 as members of the The Wars of the Roses: A House Divided Joint Crisis Committee! As your Wars of the Roses chairs, Teo Lamiot and I have been working hard with our crisis director, Sofia Filippa, and SMUNC Secretariat members to make this conference the best yet. If you have attended SMUNC before, I promise that this year will be even more full of surprise and intrigue than your last conference; if you are a newcomer, let me warn you of how intensely fun and challenging this conference will assuredly be. Regardless of how you arrive, you will all leave better delegates and hopefully with a reinvigorated love for Model UN. My own love for Model United Nations began when I co-chaired a committee for SMUNC (The Arab Spring), which was one of my very first experiences as a member of the Society for International Affairs at Stanford (the umbrella organization for the MUN team), and I thoroughly enjoyed it. Later that year, I joined the intercollegiate Model United Nations team.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidance on the Use of Royal Arms, Names and Images
    GUIDANCE ON THE USE OF ROYAL ARMS, NAMES AND IMAGES 1 The following booklet summarises the legal position governing the use, for commercial purposes, of the Royal Arms, Royal Devices, Emblems and Titles and of photographs, portraits, engravings, effigies and busts of The Queen and Members of the Royal Family. Guidance on advertising in which reference is made to a Member of the Royal Family, and on the use of images of Members of the Royal Family on articles for sale, is also provided. The Lord Chamberlain’s Office will be pleased to provide guidance when it is unclear as to whether the use of “Arms” etc., may give the impression that there is a Royal connection. 2 TRADE MARKS Section 4 (1) of the Trade Marks Act 1994 states: “A trade mark which consists of or contains – (a) the Royal arms, or any of the principal armorial bearings of the Royal arms, or any insignia or device so nearly resembling the Royal arms or any such armorial bearing as to be likely to be mistaken for them or it, (b) a representation of the Royal crown or any of the Royal flags, (c) a representation of Her Majesty or any Member of the Royal Family, or any colourable imitation thereof, or (d) words, letters or devices likely to lead persons to think that the applicant either has or recently has had Royal patronage or authorisation, shall not be registered unless it appears to the registrar that consent has been given by or on behalf of Her Majesty or, as the case may be, the relevant Member of the Royal Family.” The Lord Chamberlain's Office is empowered to grant the consent referred to in Section 4(1) on behalf of Her Majesty The Queen.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin N U M B E R 2 9 7 November/December 1995
    Registered Charity No: 272098 ISSN 0585-9980 SURREY ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY CASTLE ARCH, GUILDFORD GU1 3SX Guildford 32454 Bulletin N u m b e r 2 9 7 November/December 1995 COUNCIL NEWS SAS Annual General Meeting. A Reminder! 3rd December 1995 at Brooklands Museum. (See Bulletin 295 for details) South Park Medieval Moated Site An Artist's Impression The Moated Site as it may have appeared ca 1350 AD The moat and adjacent area of woodland was donated in 1991 to the Surrey Archaeological Society by Mrs D M Fedoruk, the owner of South Park Farm, so that the site could be researched, partly restored and opened to the public. As members will have read in previous issues of the Bulletin a dedicated band of volunteers' led by Greta Turner, cleared the site and restored the moat, whjch was formally opened in 1994 (see Bulletin 284). The stewardship of this site represents an exciting venture and challenge for the Society. It is intended to be a focus for long term archaeological and documentary research of the site itself and its influence on and relationship to the surrounding area. The moat, which is a scheduled ancient monument in recognition of its archaeological importance, will be of particular interest to schools as it illustrates aspects of archaeology and man's use of the landscape. A teaching pack has been prepared to interpret the archaeology and natural history of the site, copies of which are available from the Society at Castle Arch, price £4.60 including postage and packing. History The identity of this medieval homestead is obscure.
    [Show full text]
  • The Beaufort Family
    FRIENDS OF WOKING PALACE The Beaufort Family The Beauforts were the children of John of Gaunt and his mistress, Katherine Swynford. Although the children were born whilst John was married to Constance, Queen of Castile, the line was legitimised by Papal Bull and Act of Parliament and became the House of Tudor in 1485 when Henry VII defeated Richard III at the Battle of Bosworth Field. The connection of the Beauforts with Woking house began when John Beaufort married Margaret Holland the sister and coheir of the childless Edmund Holland, Earl of Kent. John Beaufort, (c1371-16 March 1409/10) illegitimate son of John of Gaunt and Katherine Swynford created Earl of Somerset 9 February 1396/7 and Marquess of Dorset and Marquess of Somerset 29 September 1397, married before 28 September 1397, Margaret Holland, daughter, Thomas, Earl of Kent John died 16 March 1409/10 in the hospital of St Catherine by the Tower of London and was buried in St Michael's chapel in Canterbury Cathedral. His widow married secondly Thomas, Duke of Clarence (1387-1421) see later. TCP John, Duke of Somerset son of above died 27 May 1444 married Margaret Beauchamp of Bletso in or about 1442, widow of Sir Oliver St John, sister and heir of John, Lord Beauchamp, created Earl of Kendal and Duke of Somerset 28 August 1443. After the death of John, Duke of Somerset, his wife married Leo Welles who was slain at Towton 29 March 1461. She died at a great age shortly before 3 June 1482. The only child and heir of this marriage was Lady Margaret Beaufort born 31 May 1443.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Image and Political Influence of Princess Charlotte and Queen Adelaide
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 2003 Reform, Radicalism, and Royalty: Public Image and Political Influence of Princess Charlotte and Queen Adelaide Eileen Robin Hintz College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the European History Commons, and the Women's Studies Commons Recommended Citation Hintz, Eileen Robin, "Reform, Radicalism, and Royalty: Public Image and Political Influence of Princess Charlotte and Queen Adelaide" (2003). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539626412. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-ehge-1b89 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. REFORM, RADICALISM, AND ROYALTY: Public Image and Political Influence of Princess Charlotte and Queen Adelaide A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Eileen Hintz 2003 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Eileen Hintz Approved by the Committee, December 2003 _ ___ James McCord Chandos Brown ff — Gilbert McArthur TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iv LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS v ABSTRACT vi INTRODUCTION 2 CHAPTER I. THE DEATH OF PRINCESS CHARLOTTE [NOVEMBER 1817] 6 CHAPTER II.
    [Show full text]
  • Characters and Events in Wales
    HERITAGE FOR SCHOOLS TIMELINE Characters and Events in Wales This timeline shows some of Wales’ key characters and events ranging from Caradog and the Roman invasion of the Britons to World War II. Illustrations: Dref Wen Caradog Lord Rhys or battles Yr Arglwydd Rhys holds against a gathering at Cardigan the Roman Castle. This became the Invasion of first ever Eisteddfod. the Britons. Circa 462 AD 43 – 515 AD 1176 1188 St David was born during Gerald of Wales this period. The exact year is or Gerallt Gymro unknown. In 550 he founded (1146 – 1223) a monastery in St David’s, travelled Wales Pembrokshire on the site of the accompanying cathedral today. On Tuesday 1st the Archbishop of March 589 AD St David, believed Cantebury, writing to be over 100 years old, dies. about their journey. Llywelyn ap Gruffydd, also known as Llywelyn the Last (Llywelyn ein Llyw Olaf) is known as the last leader of a united Wales. In 1255, on the request of many leaders, he became known as the Prince of Wales. Killed by soldiers of Edward I in Cilmeri on 11th December 1282 where a memorial stands today. 1223 1283 1349 Edward I orders the The Black building of castles in Death arrives Wales. Between 1276 – 1295 in Wales. he built or repaired 17 Within a year castles. There are over 600 it would kill in Wales today. How many a third of the have you visited? How population. many can you name? Owain Glyndŵr is born. On 16th September Henry VIII created the 1400 he begins a rebellion against Henry Act of Union meaning IV and begins to fight for an independent Wales is officially Wales.
    [Show full text]
  • Queen Elizabeth II the Queen’S Early Life the Queen Was Born at 2.40Am on 21 April 1926 at 17 Bruton Street in Mayfair, London
    Queen Elizabeth II The Queen’s early life The Queen was born at 2.40am on 21 April 1926 at 17 Bruton Street in Mayfair, London. She was the first child of The Duke and Duchess of York, who later became King George VI and Queen Elizabeth. At the time she stood third in line of succession to the throne after Edward, Prince of Wales (later King Edward VIII), and her father, The Duke of York. But it was not expected that her father would become King, or that she would become Queen. The Duke and Duchess of York with Princess Elizabeth The Queen’s early life The Princess was christened Elizabeth Alexandra Mary in the private chapel at Buckingham Palace. She was named after her mother, while her two middle names are those of her paternal great-grandmother, Queen Alexandra, and paternal grandmother, Queen Mary. The Princess's early years were spent at 145 Piccadilly, the London house taken by her parents shortly after her birth, and at White Lodge in Richmond Park. She also spent time at the country homes of her paternal grandparents, King George V and Queen Mary, and her mother's parents, the Earl and Countess of Strathmore. In 1930, Princess Elizabeth gained a sister, with the birth of Princess Margaret Rose. The family of four was very close. The Queen’s early life When she was six years old, her parents took over Royal Lodge in Windsor Great Park as their own country home. Princess Elizabeth's quiet family life came to an end in 1936, when her grandfather, King George V, died.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Public Life of a Twentieth Century Princess Princess Mary Princess Royal and Countess of Harewood Wendy Marion Tebble
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by SAS-SPACE 1 The Public Life of a Twentieth Century Princess Princess Mary Princess Royal and Countess of Harewood Wendy Marion Tebble, Institute of Historical Research Thesis submitted for Degree of Master of Philosophy, 2018 2 Table of Contents Abstract 3 Acknowledgements 5 Abbreviations 7 Acronyms 8 Chapters 9 Conclusion 136 Bibliography 155 3 Abstract The histiography on Princess Mary is conspicuous by its absence. No official account of her long public life, from 1914 to 1965, has been written and published since 1922, when the princess was aged twenty-five, and about to be married. The only daughter of King George V, she was one of the chief protagonists in his plans to include his children in his efforts to engage the monarchy, and the royal family, more deeply and closely with the people of the United Kingdom. This was a time when women were striving to enter public life more fully, a role hitherto denied to them. The king’s decision was largely prompted by the sacrifices of so many during the First World War; the fall of Czar Nicholas of Russia; the growth of socialism; and the dangers these events may present to the longevity of the monarchy in a disaffected kingdom. Princess Mary’s public life helps to answer the question of what role royal women, then and in the future, are able to play in support of the monarchy. It was a time when for the most part careers of any kind were not open to women, royal or otherwise, and the majority had yet to gain the right to vote.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bretons and Normans of England 1066-1154: the Family, the Fief and the Feudal Monarchy*
    © K.S.B. Keats-Rohan 1991. Published Nottingham Mediaeval Studies 36 (1992), 42-78 The Bretons and Normans of England 1066-1154: the family, the fief and the feudal monarchy* In memoriam R.H.C.Davis 1. The Problem (i) the non-Norman Conquest Of all the available studies of the Norman Conquest none has been more than tangentially concerned with the fact, acknowledged by all, that the regional origin of those who participated in or benefited from that conquest was not exclusively Norman. The non-Norman element has generally been regarded as too small to warrant more than isolated comment. No more than a handful of Angevins and Poitevins remained to hold land in England from the new English king; only slightly greater was the number of Flemish mercenaries, while the presence of Germans and Danes can be counted in ones and twos. More striking is the existence of the fief of the count of Boulogne in eastern England. But it is the size of the Breton contingent that is generally agreed to be the most significant. Stenton devoted several illuminating pages of his English Feudalism to the Bretons, suggesting for them an importance which he was uncertain how to define.1 To be sure, isolated studies of these minority groups have appeared, such as that of George Beech on the Poitevins, or those of J.H.Round and more recently Michael Jones on the Bretons.2 But, invaluable as such studies undoubtedly are, they tend to achieve no more for their subjects than the status of feudal curiosities, because they detach their subjects from the wider question of just what was the nature of the post-1066 ruling class of which they formed an integral part.
    [Show full text]