PROTOTYPE Said

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

PROTOTYPE Said April 11, 2019 • APG News B5 LAB Continued from Page B1 boards, desk configurations, an ergonomic mouse and more. “Originally, the basic premise was to pro- vide an opportunity for our staff to view proper office ergonomic products currently on the market and afford them the opportu- nity to demo the various pieces of equipment prior to purchasing,” York-Hubbard said. “However, it also morphed into a teaching tool for proper ergonomic positioning in the office workspace.” York-Hubbard said properly using key- boards can help reduce exposure to awkward postures, repetition and contact stress. She said the keyboard should sit directly in front of the users, shoulders should be relaxed and elbows close to the body and wrists should be straight and in line with the forearms. The new lab has a variety of items for people to try. Its current inventory includes several types of chairs to include Humans- cale, Hermon Miller, Body Built and Steel- case, alternative keyboards and mice, and various sitting and standing equipment. “We lend out the items that are portable -- Photo by Joyce M. Conant, CCDC ARL typically for two weeks and coach the staff when visiting on the stationary equipment,” Leslie York-Hubbard, center, explains the importance of proper desk configuration to employees in the new ergonom- York-Hubbard said. “Our goal is to stay cur- ics lab created by the safety office of the U.S. Combat Capabilities Development Command Army Research Laboratory. rent with industry standards and equipment they are more productive, have less lost work guide folks as to what items are truly ergo- on recommendations from other users.” and continue to provide our workforce with days and have a more positive morale, all of nomic, not just marketed as such.” To request a workstation assessment, the information, tools and expertise they which certainly benefits this organization,” Researchers from across the lab have ben- email York-Hubbard at leslie.s.york-hub- need to ensure they have an ergonomical- she said. efited by trying out the equipment prior to [email protected]. ly correct office workspace that provides An ergonomic workstation does not purchasing. The CCDC Army Research Laborato- the proper positioning for maximum com- always entail purchasing new equipment. “I engaged with Leslie after suffering a ry is an element of the U.S. Army Combat fort and to eliminate musculoskeletal stress.” Many times it is more about reconfiguring back injury,” said Dr. Scott Schoenfeld, ARL Capabilities Development Command. As the York-Hubbard said the lab is a great addi- items that are already in place and conduct- senior research scientist. “For me, this was Army’s corporate research laboratory, ARL tion to the organization and with it, she hopes ing a bit of ergonomic guidance. not a matter of comfort, but rather pain man- discovers, innovates and transitions science to help reduce discomfort while working. “The benefits of trying the equipment is agement. I struggled to tolerate the time I had and technology to ensure dominant strate- “Having this lab is important, because by really two-fold,” York-Hubbard said. “One, to sit at the desk.” gic land power. Through collaboration across providing guidance and proper workstations if someone is experiencing discomfort we Schoenfeld said he and York-Hubbard had the command’s core technical competencies, we can, in some cases, correct discomfort,” can try various options to see if we can ade- helpful conversations about basic posture. CCDC leads in the discovery, development she said. “Ultimately we would like to pre- quately address or eliminate the discomfort. “She also helped me reconfigure my work- and delivery of the technology-based capa- vent discomfort or injuries in the first place.” Second, it is a cost-savings initiative. Clear- space,” he said. “It’s too easy for an unin- bilities required to make Soldiers more lethal She added that the lab aligns well with ly there is a better success rate if people can formed consumer to purchase equipment that to win the nation’s wars. CCDC is a major ARL’s “People First” initiative. demo an item to make sure they like it and turns out to be ineffective. She guided me in subordinate command of the U.S. Army “When workers are more comfortable, it fits appropriately before they buy it. I also acquiring equipment that was helpful based Futures Command. to use on all of its armored vehicles, Milley PROTOTYPE said. APS is a system of sensors and directed energy that would counter missiles or incom- ing rounds. Continued from Page B1 Equipping four brigade combat teams with APS is an interim measure or “waypoint,” he For instance, the Next-Generation Com- said, until the entire armored force could be bat Vehicle is one of the Army’s six priorities equipped. and one of the programs embedded under it is the Optionally Manned Vehicle. The Army Entrepreneur networking released a request for proposal, or RFP, for The selection of Austin, Texas, as head- the vehicle March 29. quarters for the Army Futures Command gets the Army’s research and development com- Maturing technologies munity out from behind gates, Esper said, and “The technologies have advanced to a allows them to interact with industry and aca- level where we have confidence,” Milley said demia as Austin is home to the University of of the Optionally Manned Vehicle. Texas system. “Second, we are doing a lot of experiment- “We’re not behind walls or barbed wire,” ing and prototyping,” he said. He explained Esper said. “We’re actually out in the commu- the process is “fundamentally different” than nity. We’re working with young entrepreneurs what happened with the Future Combat Sys- and innovators and we’re also reaching out to tems under development a decade ago. academia there and in other places.” “With FCS, we got out in front of our Photo by Staff Sgt. Nicole Mejia An Artificial Intelligence Task Force was headlights, in the sense that we were trying to Army Chief of Staff Gen. Mark A. Milley testifies before the House Armed established a couple of months ago in partner- demand a requirement in a vehicle for which ship with Carnegie Mellon University in Pitts- the technology wasn’t mature,” he said. Services Committee about the FY20 National Defense Authorization budget request as Secretary of the Air Force Heather Wilson watches, April 2, 2019. burgh, Esper said. He said more than a dozen “We know factually that optionally- companies have expressed interest in the task manned or robotic vehicles work today -- a little different than driving in the terrain the vehicles which “will come off the produc- force, along with other institutions of high- they’re working in the commercial world, downrange where the Army maneuvers, so tion line in the not-too-distant future will have er learning. they’re driving and delivering goods and ser- some research and development still needs to great capability to be optionally manned,” he “We’re trying to involve all parties in this,” vices up and down the highways and byways be done and some challenges still need to be said. Esper said. of America, even as we speak.” overcome. Active protection systems is another tech- Milley added that “AFC has tentacles Milley said driving on the highways is The Army, though, is very confident that nology that the Army is developing and plans throughout the nation.” DID YOU KNOW? Potomac River. 2019 National Park Week runs Located near the community of Fort Washington, Maryland, for April 20-28. many decades, the fort was the only defensive fort protecting Washington D.C. The original fort was completed in 1809, Get ready to celebrate National Park Week 2019 when parks and was named Fort Warburton, but renamed in 1808. across the country will host a variety of special programs and During the War of 1812, the fort was destroyed by its own events. To kick off National Park Week, most parks will waive garrison during a British advance in 1814. The same year, entrance fees Saturday, April 20. Check with your destination Acting Secretary of War James Monroe, the 5th President to see if they participate. Special days, themes and events of the United States, oversaw the start of the fort’s revival during the week will highlight the many ways to enjoy to upgrade the Washington D.C. defenses. The Army national parks. Corps of Engineers completed the reconstruction 10 Themes include National Junior Ranger Day, April 20; years later at a cost of $426,000. Military & Veterans Recognition Day, April 21; Earth Day, April Over the years, Fort Howard served several functions. 22; Transportation Tuesday, April 23; Wild Wednesday, April During the Civil War, it was the only defense for the capitol 24; Throwback Thursday, April 25; Friendship Friday, April 26; but with no troops garrisoned there, it saw no action. BARK Ranger Day, April 27; and Park Rx Day, April 28. Its guns were upgraded in the 1890s during the Spanish More than 400 parks and historic sites across the nation are American War and it housed an artillery battery. At the turn of available to everyone, nearly every day of the year. the century, it was garrisoned by the 260th Coast Guard Artillery Maryland National Parks include: Regiment which was disarmed after World War I. From 1922 to 1939 Antietam National Battlefield; Appalachian Scenic Trail; Assateague Island it was occupied by the Army’s 3rd Battalion 12th Infantry which eventually National Seashore; National Heritage Area – Baltimore; Baltimore-Washington relocated to Fort Myer, Virginia. The Army Adjutant General School moved to Parkway; Capt.
Recommended publications
  • To View the 10-Year Solid Waste Management Plan for 2020-2029
    “Prince George’s County 2020 – 2029 Solid Waste Management Plan” CR-50-2020 (DR-2) 2020 – 2029 COMPREHENSIVE TEN-YEAR SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN Prince George’s County, Maryland Acknowledgements Marilyn E. Rybak-Naumann, Resource Recovery Division, Associate Director Denice E. Curry, Resource Recovery Division, Recycling Section, Section Manager Darryl L. Flick, Resource Recovery Division, Special Assistant Kevin Roy B. Serrona, Resource Recovery Division, Recycling Section, Planner IV Antoinette Peterson, Resource Recovery Division, Administrative Aide Michael A. Bashore, Stormwater Management Division, Planner III/GIS Analyst With Thanks To all of the agencies and individuals who contributed data “Prince George’s County 2020 – 2029 Solid Waste Management Plan” CONTENTS INTRODUCTION I. State Requirements for Preparation of the Plan.…………………………………..1 II. Plan Summary…………………………………………………………………….. 1 A. Solid Waste Generation………………………………………………………. 2 B. Solid Waste Collection……………………………………………………….. 2 C. Solid Waste Disposal…………………………………………………………. 2 D. Recycling……………………………………………………………………... 2 E. Public Information and Cleanup Programs………………………………….... 3 III. Place Holder – Insertion of MDE’s Approval Letter for Adopted Plan……………4 CHAPTER I POLICIES AND ORGANIZATION I. Planning Background……………………………………………………………... I-1 II. Solid Waste Management Terms…………………………………………………. I-1 III. County Goals Statement………………………………………………………….. I-2 IV. County Objectives and Policies Concerning Solid Waste Management………..... I-3 A. General Objectives of the Ten-Year Solid Waste Management Plan………... I-4 B. Guidelines and Policies regarding Solid Waste Facilities……………………. I-4 V. Governmental Responsibilities…………………………………………………… I-5 A. Prince George’s County Government………………………………………… I-5 B. Maryland Department of the Environment…………………………………… I-9 C. Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission…………………. I-9 D. Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission (WSSC)………………………. I-9 VI. State, Local, and Federal Laws…………………………………………………… I-9 A.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Access Points Within 50 Miles of Capitol Hill
    Public Access Points within 50 Miles of Capitol Hill Public Access Point Boat Ramp Fishing Swimming Restrooms Hiking/Trekking Location 2900 Virginia Ave NW, Thompson's Boat Center X X X X Washington, DC 20037 3244 K St NW, Washington, DC Georgetown Waterfront Park X X 20007 George Washington Memorial Theodore Roosevelt Island X X X Pkwy N, Arlington, VA 22209 West Basin Dr SW, Washington, West Potomac Park X X DC 20024 Capital Crescent Trail, Washington Canoe Club X Washington, DC 20007 600 Water St SW, Washington, DC Ganglplank Marina X X X X 20024 George Washington Memorial Columbia Island Marina X X X Parkway, Arlington, VA 22202 99 Potomac Ave. SE. Washington, Diamond Teague Park X X DC 20003 335 Water Street Washington, DC The Yards Park X 20003 Martin Luther King Jr Ave SE, Anacostia Boat House X Washington, DC 20003 700-1000 Water St SW, Washington Marina X X X X Washington, DC 20024 Anacostia Park, Section E Anacostia Marina X X X Washington, DC 20003 2001-2099 1st St SW, Washington, Buzzard's Point Marina X X X DC 20003 2038-2068 2nd St SW, James Creek Marina X X X Washington, DC 20593 Anacostia Dr, Washington, DC Anacostia Park X X X 20019 Heritage Island Trail, Washington, Heritage Island X DC 20002 Kingman Island Trail, Washington, Kingman Island X DC 20002 Mt Vernon Trail, Arlington, VA Gravelly Point X X 22202 George Washington Memorial Roaches Run X X X X Pkwy, Arlington, VA 22202 1550 Anacostia Ave NE, Kenilworth Aquatic Gardens/Park X X X Washington, DC 20019 Capital Crescent Trail, Jack's Boat House X X Washington, DC 20007 Daingerfield Island X X X X 1 Marina Dr, Alexandria, VA 22314 67-101 Dale St, Alexandria, VA Four Mile Run Park/Trail X X X 22305 4601 Annapolis Rd.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Enforcement & Compliance Report
    Maryland Department of the Environment ANNUAL ENFORCEMENT & COMPLIANCE REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2017 Larry Hogan Boyd K. Rutherford Ben Grumbles Horacio Tablada Governor Lieutenant Governor Secretary Deputy Secretary TABLE OF CONTENTS Section One – REPORT BASIS AND SUMMARY INFORMATION 3 Statutory Authority and Scope 4 Organization of the Report 4 MDE Executive Summary 5 MDE Performance Measures – Executive Summary 6 Enforcement Workforce 6 Section 1-301(d) Penalty Summary 7 MDE Performance Measures Historical Annual Summary FY 1998 – 2004 8 MDE Performance Measures Historical Annual Summary FY 2005 – 2010 9 MDE Performance Measures Historical Annual Summary FY 2011 – 2017 10 MDE Enforcement Actions Historical Annual Summary FY 1998 – 2017 11 MDE Penalties Historical Annual Summary Chart FY 1998 - 2017 11 MDE’s Enforcement and Compliance Process and Services to Permittees 12 and Businesses The Enforcement and Compliance Process 12 Enforcement Process Flow Chart 13 Supplemental Environmental Projects (SEPs) 14 Contacts or Consultations with Businesses 15 Compliance Assistance 15 Consultations with Businesses 15 Section Two - ADMINISTRATION DETAILS 17 Measuring Enforcement and Compliance 18 Performance Measures Table Overview and Definitions 19 Enforcement and Compliance Performance Measures Table Format 23 Air and Radiation Administration (ARA) 25 ARA Executive Summary 26 ARA Performance Measures 27 Ambient Air Quality Control 28 Air Quality Complaints 34 Asbestos 38 Radiation Machines 42 Radioactive Materials Licensing and Compliance 46 Land
    [Show full text]
  • Inside the Civil War Defenses of Washington: an Interview with Steve T
    The Gettysburg Compiler: On the Front Lines of History Civil War Institute 12-18-2017 Inside The Civil War Defenses of Washington: An Interview with Steve T. Phan Ashley Whitehead Luskey Gettysburg College Follow this and additional works at: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/compiler Part of the Military History Commons, Public History Commons, and the United States History Commons Share feedback about the accessibility of this item. Recommended Citation Luskey, Ashley Whitehead, "Inside The Civil War Defenses of Washington: An Interview with Steve T. Phan" (2017). The Gettysburg Compiler: On the Front Lines of History. 315. https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/compiler/315 This is the author's version of the work. This publication appears in Gettysburg College's institutional repository by permission of the copyright owner for personal use, not for redistribution. Cupola permanent link: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/compiler/315 This open access blog post is brought to you by The Cupola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of The Cupola. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Inside The Civil War Defenses of Washington: An Interview with Steve T. Phan Abstract Over the course of this year, we’ll be interviewing some of the speakers from the upcoming 2018 CWI conference about their talks. Today we are speaking with Steve T. Phan, a Park Ranger and historian at the Civil War Defenses of Washington. Prior to his arrival at CWDW, Steve worked as an intern and park guide at Richmond National Battlefield ark,P Hopewell Culture National Historical Park, and Rock Creek Park.
    [Show full text]
  • News and Notes 1980-1989
    NEWS AND NOTES FROM The Prince George's County Historical Society Vol. VIII, no. 1 January 1980 The New Year's Program There will be no meetings of the Prince George's County Historical Society in January or February. The 1980 meeting program will begin with the March meeting on the second Saturday of that month. Public Forum on Historic Preservation The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission will sponsor a public forum on the future of historic preservation in Prince George's County on Thursday, January 10, at the Parks and Recreation Building, 6600 Kenilworth Avenue, in Riverdale. This forum, is the first step in the process of drafting a county Historic Sites and Districts Plan by the commission. (See next article). The purpose of the forum is to receive public testimony on historic preservation in Prince George's county. Among the questions to be addressed are these: How important should historic preservation, restoration, rehabilitation, and revitalization be to Prince George's County? What should the objectives and priorities of a historic sites and districts plan be? What should be the relative roles of County government and private enterprise be in historic preservation and restoration? To what extent should the destruction of historic landmarks be regulated and their restoration or preservation subsidized? How should historic preservation relate to tourism, economic development, and revitalization? Where should the responsibility rest for making determinations about the relative merits of preserving and restoring individual sites? Members of the Historical Society, as well as others interested in historic preservation and its impact on county life, are invited to attend and, if they like, to testify.
    [Show full text]
  • Preservation and Partners: a History of Piscataway Park
    Preservation and Partners: A History of Piscataway Park Janet A. McDonnell, PhD December 2020 Resource Stewardship and Science, National Capital Area, National Park Service and Organization of American Historians EXECUTIVE SUMMARY During the early republic period of American history, President George Washington was the most renowned resident of the Potomac River valley. His sprawling Mount Vernon estate sat on a hill directly across the Potomac River from the 17th century Marshall Hall estate in Maryland. There is ample evidence that Washington and his guests enjoyed and very much appreciated the stunning view. Many years later preserving this view would become the major impetus for establishing what we know today as Piscataway Park (PISC), a few miles south of Washington, DC. These lands along the Maryland shore of Potomac River were actively cultivated during George Washington’s time, and the existing park setting, which includes agricultural lands and open spaces interspersed with forests and wetlands, closely approximates that historic scene. The National Park Service’s (NPS) primary goal and responsibility in managing the park has been, and continues to be, preserving this historic scene of open fields and wooded areas and ensuring that it does not authorize any landscape alterations except those that would restore previously undisturbed sites, reduce visual intrusions, or maintain open fields. The NPS continues to take into account the slope and orientation of the terrain and the tree cover when considering the location of any new facilities. Piscataway Park and its associated lands are for the most part held under scenic easements and constitute a National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) historic district made up of nearly 5,000 acres of meadow, woodland, and wetland, along six miles of the Potomac River shoreline from the head of Piscataway Creek to the historic Marshall Hall in Maryland’s Prince George’s and Charles counties.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil War to Civil Rights Commemoration
    National Park Service U.S Department of the Interior Washington Support Office: Cultural Resources, Partnerships and Science Interpretation, Education and Volunteers Civil War to Civil Rights Commemoration Summary Report DEDICATION This report honors all those who suffered and died in this nation’s struggles for freedom and equality. It is also dedicated to our colleague, Tim Sinclair, who was taken from us too soon. Timothy D. Sinclair, Sr. (1974-2016) Chief of Interpretation Selma to Montgomery NHT Tuskegee Airmen NHS and Tuskegee Institute NHS You took us on a walk from Selma to Montgomery. To keep your vision and memory alive, “We’re still marching!” Silent sentinels stood watch for 22 hours to commemorate the 22 hours of combat that took place at Spotsylvania’s Bloody Angle. FREDERICKSBURG AND SPOTSYLVANIA NMP Cover Graphic: Courtesy of Chris Barr FOREWORD The Civil War to Civil Rights Commemoration has been quite a journey. Thanks to all of you who helped make it a meaningful and memorable one for our country. We hope our efforts have helped Americans understand the connection between these two epic periods of time as a continuous march toward freedom and equality for all–a march that continues still today. Along the way, perhaps the National Park Service learned something about itself, as well. When we first began planning for this commemorative journey, there were several Civil War parks that had difficultly acknowledging slavery as the cause of the war. Both Civil War sites and civil rights sites questioned whether a combined “Civil War to Civil Rights” Commemoration would water down and weaken each.
    [Show full text]
  • The Civil War Defenses of Washington
    A Historic Resources Study: The Civil War Defenses of Washington Part I: Appendices A Historic Resources Study: The Civil War Defenses of Washington Part I: Appendices United States Department of Interior National Park Service National Capital Region Washington, DC Contract No. 144CX300096053 Modification# 1 Prepared by CEHP, Incorporated Chevy Chase, Maryland A Historic Resources Study: The Civil War Defens es of Washington Part I Appendices Appendix A: Alphabetical Listing of Forts, Batteries, and Blockhouses Appendix B: Alphabetical Listing of Known Fortification Owners, Their Representatives, and Fortifications on Their Land Appendix C: Naming of Forts Appendix D: Correspondence Concerning Appropriations for the Defenses of Washington Appendix E: General Reports about the Defenses Appendix F: Supplement to Commission Report Appendix G: Mostly Orders Pertaining to the Defenses of Washington Appendix H: A Sampling of Correspondence, Reports, Orders, Etc., Relating to the Battle of Fort Stevens Appendix I: Civil War Defenses of Washington Chronology Bibliography Appendix A. Alphabetical Listing of Forts,. Batteries, and Blockhouses Civil War Defenses of Washington Page A-1 Historic Resources Study Part I-Appendix A Appendix A: Alphabetical Listing of Forts, Batteries, and Blockhouses Fortification Known Landowner or their Representative Fort Albany James Roach and heirs, J.R. Johnson Battery Bailey Shoemaker family Fort Baker · Sarah E. Anderson, Ann A.C. Naylor & Susan M. Naylor Fort Barnard Philip J. Buckey, Sewall B. Corbettt Fort Bennett Wm. B. Ross, Attorney John H. Bogue, B.B. Lloyd Fort Berry Sewall B. Corbettt Blockhouse south of Fort Ellsworth Elizabeth Studds' heirs, George Studds Blockhouse between Fort Ellsworth & Fort Lyon, also battery Henry Studds Fort Bunker Hill Henry Quinn Fort C.F.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil War Forts, Present-Day Parks
    Maryland National Park Service Virginia U.S. Department of the Interior Civil War Defenses of Washington Washington, D.C. A 15-inch Rodman Cannon overlooking the Potomac River at Fort Foote NPS / RON HILTON Civil War Forts, Present-Day Parks Forested heights and inviting parklands—a rare backdrop to most out in 1861, Union forces quickly built a ring of earthen fortifications By latest accounts urban settings—wrap a mantle of contrast around Washington, D.C. around the nation’s capital and moved massive cannons into place. Even more uncommon are the exceptional natural elements and rem- Hospitals and settlements sprang up nearby, providing shelter and the enemy is nants of history located among the hills encircling the city. work for many, including African American “contrabands” of war. moving on High ground around Washington played a vital role in protecting the Most of the fortifications were dismantled or abandoned by 1866. Washington. nation’s capital during the Civil War. In 1860 slave states sympathetic Decades later, a plan to connect the historic sites with a scenic auto- to the Confederacy surrounded the District of Columbia, which was mobile route paved the way for their preservation. Although some Let us be protected only by the brittle brick bastions of Fort Washington, 16 elements of the Civil War Defenses of Washington eventually sur- vigilant, but keep miles south on the Potomac. As the prospect for war grew, tensions rendered to time and urbanization, many fortifications and associated escalated, and Washington, D.C., lay vulnerable to attack. The Lincoln lands remain protected within the National Park System.
    [Show full text]
  • View the Vertical File List
    Maryland Historical Trust Library Vertical Files The vertical file collection at the Maryland Historical Trust library contain a wealth of information related to historic buildings and properties from across the state. These files include material which complements reports completed for the Maryland Inventory of Historic Properties and National Register of Historic Places, including architectural drawings, newspaper clippings from national, state, and local newspapers, photographs, notes, and ephemera. The vertical files can be viewed in the library, Tuesday through Thursday, by appointment. To schedule an appointment, researchers should contact Lara Westwood, librarian, at [email protected] or 410-697-9546. Please note that this list is incomplete and will be updated. For more information, please contact the librarian or visit the website. Annapolis – Anne Arundel County AA- Annapolis (Anne Arundel County) Development Impacts Annapolis, Md. AA- Annapolis (Anne Arundel County) Maps Annapolis, Md. AA-2046 Annapolis (Anne Arundel County) Annapolis Historic District Annapolis, Md. AA-2046 Annapolis (Anne Arundel County) Annapolis Historic District – Research Notes Annapolis, Md. AA- Annapolis (Anne Arundel County) Annapolis Emergency Hospital Association Annapolis, Md. AA-360 Annapolis (Anne Arundel County) Acton 1 Acton Place, Annapolis, Md. AA- Annapolis (Anne Arundel County) Acton Notes Annapolis, Md. AA- Annapolis (Anne Arundel County) Acton Place Spring House 11 Acton Place, Annapolis, Md. AA-393 Annapolis (Anne Arundel County) Adams-Kilty House 131 Charles Street, Annapolis, Md. AA- Annapolis (Anne Arundel County) Alleys Annapolis, Md. AA- Annapolis (Anne Arundel County) Annapolis Dock & Market Space Annapolis, Md. AA-1288 Annapolis (Anne Arundel County) Annapolis Elementary School 180 Green Street, Annapolis, Md.
    [Show full text]
  • The Civil War Defenses of Washington Part I: Appendices
    A Historic Resources Study: The Civil War Defenses of Washington Part I: Appendices A Historic Resources Study: The Civil War Defenses of Washington Part I: Appendices United States Department of Interior National Park Service National Capital Region Washington, DC Contract No. 144CX300096053 Modification# 1 Prepared by CEHP, Incorporated Chevy Chase, Maryland A Historic Resources Study: The Civil War Defens es of Washington Part I Appendices Appendix A: Alphabetical Listing of Forts, Batteries, and Blockhouses Appendix B: Alphabetical Listing of Known Fortification Owners, Their Representatives, and Fortifications on Their Land Appendix C: Naming of Forts Appendix D: Correspondence Concerning Appropriations for the Defenses of Washington Appendix E: General Reports about the Defenses Appendix F: Supplement to Commission Report Appendix G: Mostly Orders Pertaining to the Defenses of Washington Appendix H: A Sampling of Correspondence, Reports, Orders, Etc., Relating to the Battle of Fort Stevens Appendix I: Civil War Defenses of Washington Chronology Bibliography Appendix A. Alphabetical Listing of Forts,. Batteries, and Blockhouses Civil War Defenses of Washington Page A-1 Historic Resources Study Part I-Appendix A Appendix A: Alphabetical Listing of Forts, Batteries, and Blockhouses Fortification Known Landowner or their Representative Fort Albany James Roach and heirs, J.R. Johnson Battery Bailey Shoemaker family Fort Baker · Sarah E. Anderson, Ann A.C. Naylor & Susan M. Naylor Fort Barnard Philip J. Buckey, Sewall B. Corbettt Fort Bennett Wm. B. Ross, Attorney John H. Bogue, B.B. Lloyd Fort Berry Sewall B. Corbettt Blockhouse south of Fort Ellsworth Elizabeth Studds' heirs, George Studds Blockhouse between Fort Ellsworth & Fort Lyon, also battery Henry Studds Fort Bunker Hill Henry Quinn Fort C.F.
    [Show full text]
  • Auction Information Packet
    Auction Information Packet 13820 Piscataway Dr. Fort Washington, MD 20744 __________________________________________________________________________________________________ 6820 Elm St. McLean, VA 22101 www.primeauctionsolutions.com 703.889.8949 Email: [email protected] Auction OnSite & Online 13820 Piscataway Dr. | Fort Washington, MD 20744 Friday | March 16th | 12:00 PM Pre-Register or register auction day 11.00 am ▪ $25,000 cashier’s check (made out to Prime Auction Solutions) ▪ Proof of funds ▪ Close within 30 days required ▪ 10% of contract price due Auction day Property Preview & Inspection Periods Sundays | 1.00pm - 3.00pm Feb 25 | Mar 4 | Mar 11 Property Tax ID Number 17050364778 2017 Total Tax $10,355 2017 Total Tax Assessed Value $670,100 Pre-Register now by contacting 703.889.8949 & Visit www.PrimeAuctionSolutions.com to download the App for Online Bidding from anywhere using your smartphone! Auction License # 2908000975 Terms: $25,000 cashier’s check or bank wire to register plus provide proof/source of funds to close and/or pre -approval letter. 10% Buyers Premium will be added to the final bid, to become the contract price. Property sold as-is and is not contingent. 10% of contract price is due Auction Day, 30 days to close. Buyer pays all closing costs. Property sold as is where is, potential bidders should inspect the property prior to bidding. Announcements made day of auction take precedence over any oral or written statements made prior. Owner is a RE professional. Not responsible for typographical errors and omissions. Executive Summary PUBLIC AUCTION ‘Seller Ordered Sale’ 13820 Piscataway Dr. Fort Washington, Maryland 20744 Prime Auction Solutions has been retained to sell The Villa on Piscataway Bay, at Public Auction on March 16, 2018 at 12:00 pm.
    [Show full text]