DOCSLIB.ORG

Title Pilot-Scale Anaerobic Digestion of Municipal Biowaste with Thermal Hydrolysis Pre-Treatment( Dissertation 全文 )

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Title Pilot-Scale Anaerobic Digestion of Municipal Biowaste with Thermal Hydrolysis Pre-Treatment( Dissertation 全文 ) View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Kyoto University Research Information Repository Pilot-scale anaerobic digestion of municipal biowaste with Title thermal hydrolysis pre-treatment( Dissertation_全文 ) Author(s) Zhou, Yingjun Citation Kyoto University (京都大学) Issue Date 2013-03-25 URL http://dx.doi.org/10.14989/doctor.k17542 Right Type Thesis or Dissertation Textversion author Kyoto University Pilot-scale anaerobic digestion of municipal biowaste with thermal hydrolysis pre-treatment YINGJUN ZHOU 2013 Pilot-scale anaerobic digestion of municipal biowaste w ith thermal hydrolysis pre-treatment ith thermal hydrolysis YINGJUN ZHOU 2013 Table of Contents Chapter 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background .................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Objectives ..................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Contents ........................................................................................................................ 3 References ........................................................................................................................... 5 Chapter 2 Reference survey................................................................................................ 7 2.1 Production and disposal of municipal biowaste ........................................................... 7 2.1.1 Organic fractions of municipal solid waste .............................................................. 7 2.1.2 Restaurant kitchen waste and market fruit-vegetable waste ..................................... 8 2.1.3 Wasted sewage sludge .............................................................................................. 9 2.1.4 Strategies for municipal biowaste disposal ............................................................. 10 2.2 Anaerobic digestion: principle and application .......................................................... 12 2.2.1 Basic principles of anaerobic digestion .................................................................. 12 2.2.2 Anaerobic digestion of municipal biowaste: application ........................................ 14 2.2.3 Anaerobic digestion of municipal biowaste: economic, environmental and energetic feasibility ........................................................................................................... 15 2.3 Anaerobic digestion of municipal biowaste: limitation and solutions ....................... 16 2.3.1 Limitation from solid hydrolysis and its solution ................................................... 16 2.3.2 Limitation from microbial growth and its solution ................................................. 19 2.4 Application of thermal hydrolysis as pre-treatment before anaerobic digestion ....... 20 2.5 Anaerobic sequencing batch reactor (ASBR) ............................................................ 20 Reference ........................................................................................................................... 22 Chapter 3 Effect of thermal hydrolysis on properties of municipal biowaste .................. 31 3.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 31 3.2 Materials and methods ............................................................................................... 32 3.2.1 Municipal biowaste ................................................................................................. 32 3.2.2 Pilot-scale thermal hydrolysis facility .................................................................... 33 3.2.3 Lab-scale thermal hydrolysis facility ...................................................................... 33 I 3.2.4 Sampling and analysis ............................................................................................ 34 3.3 Effect of thermal hydrolysis on biochemical properties of MBW ............................. 36 3.3.1 Solids and sCOD ..................................................................................................... 36 3.3.2 Inhibitors and related parameters: VFA, ammonia, alkalinity and pH ................... 38 3.3.3 Digestibility ............................................................................................................ 39 3.4 Effect of thermal hydrolysis on physical properties of MBW ................................... 40 3.4.1 Particle size distribution ......................................................................................... 40 3.4.2 Viscosity ................................................................................................................. 42 3.4.3 Dewaterability ......................................................................................................... 43 3.4.4 Settling performance ............................................................................................... 44 3.5 Conclusion .................................................................................................................. 44 Reference ........................................................................................................................... 45 Chapter 4 Effect of thermal hydrolysis on anaerobic digestion of municipal biowaste ... 49 4.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 49 4.2 Materials and methods ............................................................................................... 49 4.2.1 Digesters ................................................................................................................. 49 4.2.2 Operating parameters .............................................................................................. 50 4.2.3 Sampling and analysis ............................................................................................ 51 4.2.4 Batch monitoring during one treatment cycle ......................................................... 51 4.3 Digester stability ........................................................................................................ 51 4.3.1 Effluent properties .................................................................................................. 52 4.3.2 Batch monitoring during one treatment cycle ......................................................... 55 4.4 Digester performance ................................................................................................. 57 4.4.1 Biogas and methane production .............................................................................. 57 4.4.2 Removal of VS ....................................................................................................... 58 4.4.3 Methane production ................................................................................................ 59 4.5 Discussion on energy consumption ............................................................................ 62 4.6 Conclusion .................................................................................................................. 63 Reference ........................................................................................................................... 64 II Chapter 5 Application of anaerobic sequencing batch reactors for the digestion of thermally hydrolyzed municipal biowaste ............................................................................... 67 5.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 67 5.2 Materials and methods ............................................................................................... 68 5.2.1 Digesters ................................................................................................................. 68 5.2.2 Operating parameters .............................................................................................. 68 5.2.3 Sampling and analysis ............................................................................................ 69 5.3 Solid settling in ASBR ............................................................................................... 69 5.3.1 Settling theory ......................................................................................................... 69 5.3.2 Solid settling and accumulation at relative lower OLRs ........................................ 71 5.3.3 Solid settling and accumulation at a relative higher OLR: effect of biogas production .......................................................................................................................... 74 5.3.4 Relationship between viscosity and SS concentration ............................................ 75 5.4 Digester stability and performance: comparison with CSTR ..................................... 77 5.4.1 Digester stability ..................................................................................................... 77 5.4.2 Digester performance .............................................................................................. 81 5.5 Conclusion .................................................................................................................. 82 Reference ..........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Review of Pretreatment Methods to Enhance Solids Reduction During
    applied sciences Review A Review of Pretreatment Methods to Enhance Solids Reduction during Anaerobic Digestion of Municipal Wastewater Sludges and the Resulting Digester Performance: Implications to Future Urban Biorefineries Bimi Shrestha 1, Rafael Hernandez 1, Dhan Lord B. Fortela 1, Wayne Sharp 2, Andrei Chistoserdov 3, Daniel Gang 2 , Emmanuel Revellame 4, William Holmes 5 and Mark E. Zappi 1,* 1 Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, LA 70504, USA; [email protected] (B.S.); [email protected] (R.H.); [email protected] (D.L.B.F.) 2 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, LA 70504, USA; [email protected] (W.S.); [email protected] (D.G.) 3 Department of Biology, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, LA 70504, USA; [email protected] 4 Department of Industrial Technology, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, LA 70504, USA; [email protected] 5 Energy Institute of Louisiana, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, LA 70503, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 18 November 2020; Accepted: 18 December 2020; Published: 21 December 2020 Abstract: The rapid increase in the population is expected to result in the approaching of design capacity for many US wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) over the next decade. WWTPs treat both municipal and industrial wastewater influents, resulting in the production of biosolids after digestion. Biogas, a potential recovered alternative energy source, is also produced as an output from successful anaerobic digestion. More than 7M of dry tons/year of biosolids produced in the US are most often disposed in either landfills or land-applied (~80%).
    [Show full text]
  • Thermal Hydrolysis Process for Effective and Sustainable Sludge Treatment at Sludge Centers Davide Ferraro1; Ashish Sahu2; Alejandro Jimenez3; Torleiv Næss Ugland4
    Thermal Hydrolysis Process for effective and sustainable sludge treatment at sludge centers Davide Ferraro1; Ashish Sahu2; Alejandro Jimenez3; Torleiv Næss Ugland4 1 [email protected],Cambi Group AS, Asker (NO) 2 [email protected], Cambi Group AS, Asker (NO) 3 [email protected], Cambi Group AS, Asker (NO) 4 [email protected], HØST Verdien i Avfall AS, Grimstad (NO) Abstract For several small towns in close proximity equipped with wastewater treatment plants (wwtps), a common Sludge Treatment Center (STC) has been found to be a cost effective and a practical solution for sustainable sludge management. Sustainable sludge management is achieved when dewatered sludge from wwtps are treated anaerobically to produce bioenergy. In order to speed up the anaerobic digestion process, the use of thermal hydrolysis process (THP) is used as an effective pretreatment. The aim of this paper is to present the benefits for sludge treatment by applying a THP before anaerobic digestion. Cambi is currently the world leader in Thermal Hydrolysis Process (THP) technology and has more than 60 plants all around the world since 1995. THP has been proven for increasing biogas production, increase the sludge load to existing digesters, and generating a low volume of non- odorous, well dewatered, homogenous and pathogen free biosolids. This in turn reduces the overall carbon footprint of several wwtps and the biosolids can be further used as soil conditioners for agricultural purpose. This has been tried in the UK where nearly 45% of UK sludge is treated by CambiTHP technology. By importing sludges in a single plant (STC) and treating them with THP followed by advanced anaerobic digestion, is an effective way to increase sludge valorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Thermal Hydrolysis of Sewage Sludge: a Case Study of a WWTP in Burgos, Spain
    applied sciences Article Thermal Hydrolysis of Sewage Sludge: A Case Study of a WWTP in Burgos, Spain José García-Cascallana 1, Xiomar Gómez Barrios 2 and E. Judith Martinez 2,* 1 Department of Electrical, Systems and Automatic Engineering, University of León, Campus de Vegazana, 24071 León, Spain; [email protected] 2 Chemical and Environmental Bioprocess Engineering Group, Natural Resources Institute (IRENA), University of Leon, Av. de Portugal 41, 24009 Leon, Spain; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +34-987291845/5313 Abstract: An evaluation of the energy and economic performance of thermal hydrolysis technologies is carried out on a theoretical basis. The wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) of Burgos (Spain) was the base scenario of this evaluation. Energy and mass balances were established considering the registered data of primary and secondary thickened sludge in the WWTP for 2011 to 2016. These balances were analysed considering five different scenarios, taking as Scenario 1, the plant operating with conventional mesophilic digestion. The scenarios considered commercially available technologies. The best results were obtained when hydrolysis was applied to digested sludge and sludge from the Solidstream® process. These two scenarios showed the best performance regarding volatile solid removal and lower demand for live steam, achieving a higher amount of biogas available for valorisation using combined heat and power (CHP) units. The main advantage of the hydrolysis process is the decrease in the volume of digesters and the amount of dewatered sludge needing final disposal. The Solidstream® process allowed a 35% increase in biogas available for engines and a 23% increase in electricity production. Citation: García-Cascallana, J.; Keywords: pretreatment; biogas enhancement; hydrolysis; energy Barrios, X.G.; Martinez, E.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Maximising Biogas in Anaerobic Digestion by Using Engine Waste Heat for Thermal Hydrolysis Pre-Treatment of Sludge
    Maximising biogas in anaerobic digestion by using Water Science & Technology engine waste heat for thermal hydrolysis pre-treatment of sludge B. Pickworth*, J. Adams**, K. Panter*** and O.E. Solheim**** *Black & Veatch Contracting UK (E-mail: [email protected]) **Celtic Anglian Water (E-mail: [email protected]) ***Ebcor Ltd, Cheyney House, Strande Lane, Cookham, Berkshire, SL6 9DL, UK Vol 54 No 5 pp 101–108 (E-mail: [email protected]) ****Cambi AS Norway, Solbra˚vn. 10, 1383 Asker, Norway (E-mail: [email protected]) Abstract Dublin’s Ringsend WWTP was designed to serve a population of approximately 1.2 million p.e. with a sludge production of 37,000 dry tonnes per year after upgrading to full secondary treatment. Several technical solutions were put forward as part of a design, build, finance and operate (DBFO) competition, with the chosen solution being a proposal by Black and Veatch for a combination of sequencing batch reactor (SBR) technology and anaerobic digestion with Cambi thermal hydrolysis pre-treatment (THP). The THP plant was built by Cambi and handed over to B&V in 2002. The plant is now operated by Celtic Q IWA Publishing 2006 Anglian Water. In September 2004 a test was carried out on the mass and energy balance of the plant following 2 years of operation and is detailed in this paper. The process enables digestion at very high dry solids feed and low hydraulic retention time. The plant was built with three digesters of 4,250 m3 each and is fed with hydrolysed sludge at 11% DS.
    [Show full text]
  • Using a Chemically Hydrolyzed Biosolids for Co-Digestion Joshua Registe1, Joshua Perez1, Jeanette Brown1, George Nakhla2, Ajay Singh3 and Robert Sharp1
    IWA Specialist Conference On Sludge Management SludgeTech 2017 Full Paper Using a Chemically Hydrolyzed Biosolids for Co-digestion Joshua Registe1, Joshua Perez1, Jeanette Brown1, George Nakhla2, Ajay Singh3 and Robert Sharp1. 1Manhattan College, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, New York, USA; 2Western University, Canada; 3Lystek, Canda. [email protected] Abstract Manhattan College performed an independent study on the use of a chemically hydrolyzed biosolids product for co-digestion studies. The biosolids material is produced by Lystek, Cambridge, Ontario Canada. The objective of this study was to determine if the hydrolyzed Lystek product (Lystek) could be used in anaerobic digestion (AD) to potentially increase gas yields and methane content. The AD study was divided into two phases; Phase 1, an initial study using a bioassay procedure to determine the amount of Lystek to add in the anaerobic digestion process for optimal gas yield and methane concentration and Phase 2, a more in- depth study of Lystek using bench scale anaerobic digesters. The results of the bioassay indicated that gas yields increase within a Lystek feed volume range of 15-25% with 20% to 25% yielding optimal results. This information was then use in the bench scale anaerobic digesters. The digesters were operated at an SRT of 15 days. Primary sludge was used in both the control and experimental reactor. The results indicated that the addition of Lystek increased biogas production as well as increased methane content of biogas. In addition, there appears to be little or no hydrogen sulfide in the biogas when using Lystek. There was an increase in ammonia and orthophosphate concentration possibly due to the higher volatile solids reduction in the Lystek reactor.
    [Show full text]
  • INCINERATION VS. THERMAL HYDROLYSIS Bigot, B.1 and Taylor, T.2 1Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies, 2Yorkshire Water Services, UK
    16th European Biosolids and Organic Resources Conference INCINERATION VS. THERMAL HYDROLYSIS Bigot, B.1 and Taylor, T.2 1Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies, 2Yorkshire Water Services, UK Abstract Yorkshire Water Services (YWS) is seeking to move away from the use of incineration for sludge disposal in favour of Advanced Anaerobic Digestion (AAD) which comprises pre-treatment of the sludge using thermal hydrolysis, followed by mesophilic anaerobic digestion. The first plant in this programme is to be built at Esholt STW, Bradford, using the Biothelys thermal hydrolysis process as supplied by Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies (VWS). This paper discusses the rationale behind YWS’s decision to move to AAD together with the procedures which culminated in the choice of thermal hydrolysis process for Esholt, and also describes the Biothelys process in detail. Key words Thermal hydrolysis, incineration, anaerobic digestion, Biothelys, Enhanced Treated Sludge, Bio- Energy Strategy What is Thermal Hydrolysis? Thermal hydrolysis (subsequently abbreviated in this document to TH) is a process which is used to treat sewage sludge, either raw primary or secondary (e.g. surplus activated), or a mixture of both by the application of high temperature and pressure (i.e. approximately 140-170 oC and 6-8 bar) for a period of 20-30 minutes. Its effect is to disintegrate the cellular structure of the sludge and break down high molecular weight organic materials into smaller molecules. It also dissolves naturally occurring cell polymers (a form of protein) into an easily digestible feed for anaerobic digestion, resulting in a considerable increase in biogas yield. The sludge produced by the TH process is also much less viscous than raw sludge, allowing the mass loading of sludge fed to an anaerobic digestion plant to be considerably increased (in some cases even doubling digester throughput).
    [Show full text]
  • Combining Thermal Hydrolysis with Drying and Downstream Thermal Processes to Optimize Energy Recovery from Sewage Sludge
    Combining thermal hydrolysis with drying and downstream thermal processes to optimize energy recovery from sewage sludge W. P. F. Barber*, and P. Christy*, * Cambi Inc., 279 Great Valley Parkway, Malvern, 19355, PA, USA (E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]) Abstract Thermal hydrolysis of sewage sludge prior to subsequent anaerobic digestion is a well-established process with nearly 90 facilities worldwide. Cambi, the market leader, has two thirds of the installations ranging in size from 11 – 450 t DS/d. The majority of plants are combined with land use of the biosolids as a low carbon fertilizer due to the biosolids meeting Class A standard under the US EPA 503 regulations. In addition, the dewatered biosolids are friable, have low odor and high dry solids which make it a desirable product. However, there are instances where land application is limited due to regulations or topography, or clients have existing thermal infrastructure and want to maximize its use. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate how combining thermal hydrolysis with digestion prior to thermal systems such as drying and incineration can be beneficial and highlights full-scale case studies to quantify the influence in the field. Keywords Anaerobic Digestion; thermal hydrolysis; drying; incineration INTRODUCTION Thermal processing of sludge, such as drying or incineration, can play an important role within the development of a water company’s strategic plan for biosolids management. In addition to regulatory requirements which may exist, there may be insufficient local land available (due to topographical limitation for example), or the sludge may contain other materials limiting its use.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambi Solidstream® : Thermal Hydrolysis As a Pre-Treatment for Dewatering to Further Reduce Operating Costs
    WEFTEC 2017 Cambi SolidStream® : Thermal Hydrolysis as a pre-treatment for dewatering to further reduce operating costs Bill Barber1, Paal Jahre Nilsen2, Paul Christy1 1. Cambi, Inc., 279 Great Valley Parkway, Malvern, PA, 19382 2. Cambi AS, Skysstasjon 11A, NO-1383 Asker. 3. Bucknell University, Lewisburg, PA. Email: [email protected]; Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT Introduction Thermal hydrolysis has been successfully used for over 20 years as a pre-treatment to anaerobic digestion. It has allowed digesters to be operated at typically double their loading rates thus reducing the size of new build facilities, or doubling capacity of existing ones, and fundamentally improved dewatering. This improved dewatering has resulted in significantly lower Biosolids recycling costs and, if used, smaller energy requirements for downstream dryers and incinerators. However, looking through the literature reveals that the initial aim of thermal hydrolysis was not to improve the performance of anaerobic digestion, but rather to improve dewatering. Work between the 1950s and mid 1970s found that when raw undigested sludge was exposed to conditions of thermal hydrolysis, the resultant material dewatered routinely above 50% DS, and depending on sludge type, as high as 60% DS. Subsequent work has shown that, by reintroducing materials known to influence dewatering, downstream anaerobic digestion deteriorates the dewatering potential of the Biosolids. Although use of thermal hydrolysis with digestion improves dewatering by approximately 10% points compared with a case with no pre- treatment, the dewaterability would have been higher without the digestion process at all. Considering this, Cambi have developed a process known as SolidStream® whereby the thermal hydrolysis unit is installed downstream of the digestion plant immediately prior to dewatering.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Thermal Hydrolysis Pretreatment on Solubilization of Primary Sludge and Thickened Waste Activated Sludge (TWAS) During Dark Fermentation Process
    Effect of Thermal Hydrolysis Pretreatment on Solubilization of Primary Sludge and Thickened Waste Activated Sludge (TWAS) During Dark Fermentation Process By Alborz Mahmoudi B.C.E., Islamic Azad University, Mashhad Branch, 2013 A Major Research Project presented to Ryerson University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Engineering in the program of Civil Engineering Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2019 © Alborz Mahmoudi, 2019 Author’s Declaration I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this MRP. This is a true copy of the MRP, including any required final revisions. I authorize Ryerson University to lend this MRP to other institutions or individuals for scholarly research. I further authorize Ryerson University to reproduce this MRP by photocopying or by other means, in total or in part, at the request of other institutions or individuals for scholarly research. I understand that my MRP may be made electronically available to the public. ii Abstract Effect of Thermal Hydrolysis Pretreatment on Solubilization of Primary Sludge and Thickened Waste Activated Sludge (TWAS) During Dark Fermentation Process Master of Engineering, 2019 Alborz Mahmoudi Civil Engineering Ryerson University The objective of this research was to evaluate the effect of thermal hydrolysis pre-treatment on the solubilization of primary sludge (PS) and thickened waste activated sludge (TWAS) through the semi-continuous fermentation process under the mesophilic conditions. For this measure, the inoculum (anaerobic digestate), Primary Sludge (PS) and Thickened waste activated Sludge (TWAS) was subjected to the pre-treatment condition. The pre-treatment temperature ranged from 20°C to170°C. Then both raw and pre-treated sample was introduced the semi-continuous reactors for the fermentation process.
    [Show full text]
  • Rheological Characterisation of Thermally Hydrolysed Waste Activated Sludge
    RHEOLOGICAL CHARACTERISATION OF THERMALLY HYDROLYSED WASTE ACTIVATED SLUDGE A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Kevin Hii B. Eng. (Chemical), RMIT University School of Engineering College of Science, Engineering and Health RMIT University May 2019 DECLARATION I certify that except where due acknowledgement has been made, the work is that of the author alone; the work has not been submitted previously, in whole or in part, to qualify for any other academic award; the content of the thesis is the result of work which has been carried out since the official commencement date of the approved research program; any editorial work, paid or unpaid, carried out by a third party is acknowledged; and, ethics procedures and guidelines have been followed. I acknowledge the support I have received for my research through the provision of an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship. Kevin Hii April 2019 I ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I would like to express sincere gratitude to my senior supervisor Associate Prof. Nicky Eshtiaghi for her dedicated support and encouragement throughout my PhD candidature, going above and beyond in providing guidance and mentorship. Additionally, I would like to thank the rest of my supervisory team, Professor Rajarathinam Parthasarathy, Dr. Saeid Baroutian and Dr. Daniel Gapes for their insight and advice throughout the research project. Special thanks go to the administrative staff from the School of Engineering and technical staff in the Rheology and Materials Processing laboratory, including Dr. Muthu Pannirselvam and Dr. Babu Iyer, for ensuring a safe and healthy journey throughout my candidature.
    [Show full text]
  • The Potential for Co-Digestion of Organics Using Thermal Hydrolysis at Blue Plains Advanced Wastewater Treatment Works
    THE POTENTIAL FOR CO-DIGESTION OF ORGANICS USING THERMAL HYDROLYSIS AT BLUE PLAINS ADVANCED WASTEWATER TREATMENT WORKS Bill Barber1, Chris Peot2, Matt Higgins3, Bo Bodniewicz1, Jim Marx1, Walter Bailey2, Bernhard Wett, Saul Kinter2, Ahmed Al-Omari2, Sudhir Murthy2 1. AECOM, 2. DC Water, 3. Bucknell University ABSTRACT The District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority (DC Water) have recently installed a state of the art biosolids processing facility at its Blue Plains wastewater treatment works. The facility, the first of its kind in North America, will generate approximately 10 MW electricity by thermally hydrolyzing and digesting site-generated sewage sludge. In addition, it will produce Class A biosolids cake which further reduces DC Water’s carbon and environmental footprint. In order to optimize the use of this facility, DC Water are investigating the impact of co-digesting other organic waste materials to further increase renewable energy and provide financial benefits for its rate-payers. Tests looking specifically at food-waste show it to be a good candidate for co- digestion. When compared to two control reactors in a laboratory study, a digester supplemented thermally hydrolyzed food-waste to similarly processed sludge, as an increase in COD loading, resulted in an increase in biogas consistent with the loading rate and improved biodegradability of the food-waste fraction. This increased the total COD destruction and volatile solids destruction (by mass balance) compared to the controls. Due to high degradability, the solids yield produced from the food-waste was much lower than that from sludge. As the food-waste had a higher carbon:nitrogen ratio, its addition resulted in a statistically significant drop in pH which helped reduce free ammonia levels, known to limit the anaerobic digestion process, although not found to be inhibitory in the trials.
    [Show full text]