ﻴﻣ ﺰﺍﻥ ﺩﺭﺳﺘ ﻲ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﺩﻭ ﻣﺠﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻤ ﻲ - ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸﻲ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﻱ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﭘﺰﺷﻜ ﻲ ﺷﻬﺮ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ

ﻣﻌﺼﻮﻣﻪ ﺣ ﺪﺭﻴ ﻱ١، ﻧﺎﺻﺮ ﻭﻻﻳ ﻲ٢

١. ﺩﺍﻧﺸﻜﺪﻩ ﭘﺮﺳﺘﺎﺭ ﻱ ﻭ ﻣﺎﻣﺎﻳﻲ، ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ، ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ، ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ۲. ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﺎﺕ ﺗﺎﻻﺳﻤﻲ، ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﭘﺰﺷﻜﻲ ﻣﺎﺯﻧﺪﺭﺍﻥ، ﺳﺎﺭ ﻱ، ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ

ﻧﺸﺮﻳﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺶ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺳﻴﺰﺩﻫﻢ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻡ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﺩ - ﺷﻬﺮﻳﻮﺭ ١٣٩٣ ﺻﺺ ٥٠٤-٤٩٧ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ: ۱۳۹۲/۶/۲۳ [ﻧﺸﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺮﻭﻧﻴﻚ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ۱۳۹۳/۲/۲- ] ]

ﭼﻜﻴﺪﻩ ﻣﻬﻢ ﻳﺗﺮ ﻦ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸﻲ ﺍﻋﻀﺎ ﻱ ﻫﻴﺌﺖ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ، ﮐﻤﻴﺖ ﻭﻛﻴﻔﻴﺖ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﭼﺎﭖ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺗﻮﺳ ﻂ ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺩﻗﺘ ﻲ ﻛﻪ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺩﺍﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﭖ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻣ ﻲﮐﻨﻨﺪ، ﺑﺎﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺎﺳﺘ ﻲﻫﺎﻳ ﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﭼﺎﭖ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ. ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻸ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗ ﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺖ ﻧ ﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﭼﺎﭖ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭ ﻣﺠﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻤ ﻲ ـ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸ ﻲ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻫﺎ ﻱ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﭘﺰﺷﻜ ﻲ ﺷﻬﺮ ﺗﻬـﺮﺍﻥ ، ﺍﻳـﻦ ﺗﺤﻘﻴـﻖ ﺑـﺎ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻴﻣ ﺰﺍﻥ ﺩﺭﺳﺘ ﻲ ﺭﻭﺵ ﺷﻨﺎﺳ ﻲ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﭼﺎﭖ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻣﺠﻠﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ۱۳۸۹ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ . . ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺵ ﻣﻘﻄﻌ ﻲ ﺭﻭ ﻱ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﺻﻴﻞ ﺩﻭ ﻣﺠﻠﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺍ ﻱ ﺭﺗﺒﻪ ﻋﻠﻤ ﻲ ـ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸ ﻲ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻫﺎ ﻱ ﻋﻠـﻮﻡ ﭘﺰﺷـﻜ ﻲ ﺷـﻬﺮ ﺗﻬـﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻧﺠـﺎﻡ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ. ﺗﻤﺎﻣ ﻲ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺴﻤﺖﻫﺎ ﻱ ﺧﻼﺻﻪ، ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ، ﻣﻮﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺵﻫﺎ، ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪﻫﺎ، ﺑﺤﺚ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺒﻊ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻲ، ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ، ﺑﺎ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ٥٢ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ، ﺑﺮﺭﺳ ﻲ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻴﻒ ﺳﻪ ﮔﺎﻧﻪ «ﺩﺭﺳﺖ»، «ﻧﺴﺒﺘﺎﹰ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ» ﻭ «ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺳﺖ» ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﺑﻨﺪ ﻱ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ. ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻧـﺮﻡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭ SPSS ﻭﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯﺁﻣﺎﺭ ﺗﻮﺻ ﻲﻔﻴ ﻭﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ ﻛﺎ ﻱ ﺩﻭ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﺪ . . ﺩﺭﺳﺘ ﻲ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﮐﻠ ﻲ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﺩﺭ ٤٧ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ، ٥/٥٠ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻧﺴﺒﺘﺎﹰ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ٥/٢ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺑﻮﺩ. ﻋﺪﻡ ﺩﺭﺳﺘ ﻲ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻔﻜﻴﻚ ﺳﺮ ﻓﺼﻞ ﻫﺎ ﻱ ﺍﺻﻠ ﻲ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺮﺗﻴ ﺐ ﺩﺭ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ، ۶/۳۱ ﺩﺭﺻـﺪ، ﻣﻘﺪﻣـﻪ، ٥/٣٥ ﺩﺭﺻـﺪ، ﻣـﻮﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺵ ﻫـﺎ، ٤٤ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ، ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻫﺎ، ٢١ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ، ﺑﺤﺚ، ٦/٦٨ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻨـﺎﺑﻊ، ٤١ ﺩﺭﺻـﺪ ﺑـﻮﺩ . ﺑـﻪ ﻧﻈـﺮ ﻣـ ﻲﺭﺳـﺪ ﻛﺎﺳـﺘﻲ ﻫـﺎﻳ ﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻧ ﮕـﺎﺭﺵ ﻣﻘـﺎﻻﺕ ﺩﻭ ﻣﺠﻠـﻪ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ ـ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ . . ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺵ ﺷﻨﺎﺳ ﻲ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺶﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺳﺎﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫ ﻲ ﻣﻨﺎﺳ ﺐ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ، ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﻭ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻱ ﺿﺮﻭﺭ ﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ . .

ﻛﻠﻴﺪﻭﺍﮊﻩﻫﺎ: ﺭﻭﺵ ﺷﻨﺎﺳ ﻲ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ، SIDﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ، ﻣﺠﻼﺕof ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﭘﺰﺷﻜﻲ، ﻋﻠﻤ ﻲ ـ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸﻲ، ﺷﺎﺧﺺﻫﺎ ﻱ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ Archive

 ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﻩ ﭘﺎﺳﺨ ﮕﻮ: ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ، ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ ﻭﻟﻴﻌﺼﺮ (ﻋﺞ)، ﻧﺮﺳﻴﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻃﺎﻟﻘﺎﻧﻲ، ﺩﺍﻧﺸﻜﺪﻩ ﭘﺮﺳﺘﺎﺭ ﻱ ﻭ ﻣﺎﻣﺎﻳﻲ، ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﺗﻠﻔﻦ : ٦٦٤١٨٥٩٠ E-mail: [email protected]

www.SID.ir

ﻓﺼﻠﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸﻜﺪﻩ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺑﻬﺪﺍﺷﺘ ﻲ ﺟﻬﺎﺩﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻫﻲ

ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻫﺎ ﻣﺸﮑﻼﺗﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ. ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺩﺍﻧﺶ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺬﺭ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺶ ﻭ ﺑـﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻘـﺎﻝ ﺍﻃﻼﻋـﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻳﺎﻓﺘـﻪ ﻫـﺎ ﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ، ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﻧﺘﻘـﺎﺩ ﻱ ﻗـﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﻧـﺪ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ. ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺵﻫﺎ ﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﻘـﺎﻝ ﺍﻃﻼﻋـﺎﺕ، [۷] ﻳ، ﺯ ﺮﺍ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﻫﺎ ﻱ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻨﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﺯ ﭼ ﮕﻮﻧ ﮕﻲ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﻣﻘـﺎﻻﺕ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﺳـﺖ . ﺍﻣـﺮﻭﺯﻩ ﻋﻤﻠﻜـﺮﺩ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸـﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯﻃﺮﻳـﻖ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﺩﺍﺭﺩ [۸ ]. ]. ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻭﺁﺛﺎﺭﻋﻠﻤﻲ ﻣﻜﺘﻮﺏ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ [۱ ]. ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻫﺎ ﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻔﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨـﻪ ﺍﻧﺠـﺎﻡ ﺷـﺪﻩ ﺍﺳـﺖ، ﻧﺸـﺎﻥ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ، ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﺎﺭ ﻱ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺗﺒﺎﺩﻝ ﺍﻃﻼﻋـﺎﺕ ﻣﻴـﺎﻥ ﻣﻲ ﺩﻫﺪ ﻣﺠﻼﺕ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠـﻲ ﻧﻴـﺰ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈـﺮ ﻃﺮﺍﺣـﻲ ﺗﺤﻘﻴـﻖ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻠﻴـﻞ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﻋﻠﻤـﻲ ﻣﺸﺨﺼـﻲ ﺑﺮﺧـﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﻫﺎ ﺩﺍﺭﺍ ﻱ ﺍﺷﻜﺎﻻﺗﻲ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ [۹-۱۲ ]. ]. ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺍﻛﺰ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ، ﺳﻌﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺑـﺎﻻ ﺑـﺮﺩﻥ ﻣﻬـﺎﺭﺕ ﻫـﺎ ﻱ ﻧ ﮕـﺎﺭﺵ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺕ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ، ﺑـﻪ ﻣﻨﻈـﻮﺭ ﺗﻌ ﻴـﻴ ﻦ ﻣﻴـ ﺰﺍﻥ ﺩﺭﺳـﺘﻲ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﺗﻮﺳ ﻂ ﻣﺤﻘﻘﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ، ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺎﺳـﺘﻲ ﻫـﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺠﻼﺕ، ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻣﻘـﺎﻻﺕ ﭼـﺎﭖ ﺷـﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭ ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺖ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻼﺕ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ ـ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸﻲ ﺭﻭﺑﺮﻭ ﻫﺴـﺘﻴﻢ ﻭ ﻣﺠﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ ـ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸﻲ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻫﺎ ﻱ ﻋﻠـﻮﻡ ﭘﺰﺷـﻜﻲ ﺷـﻬﺮ ﺗﻬـﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﻩ ﻲﮑﻳ ﺍﺯ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﻱﻫﺎ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﺸـﺎﺭ ﻣﻘـﺎﻻﺕ، ﻣﺴـﺌﻠﻪ ﺳﺎﻝ ۱۳۸۹ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ . . ﻴﻔﻴﮐ ﺖ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ . ﺩﺭ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺭﻭ ﻱ ۸۳ ﻣﻘﺎﻟـﻪ ﻋﻠﻤـﻲ ـ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸـﻲ ﭘﺮﺳـﺘﺎﺭ ﻱ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺭﻭ ﺵ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﺎﻣﺎﻳﻲ ﺷﻬﺮ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ۱۳۸۹ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﺪ، ﻣﺸـﺨﺺ ﮔﺮﺩﻳـﺪ ﻋـﺪﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻧـﻮﻉ ﻣﻘﻄﻌـﻲ ﺑـﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻃـﻲ ﺁﻥ ﺗﻤـﺎﻣﻲ ﺷـﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﻫـﺎ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺳﺘﻲ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ، ﺑﻪ ﺗﻔﻜﻴﻚ ﺳﺮ ﻓﺼـﻞ ﻫـﺎ ﻱ ﺍﺻـﻠﻲ ﻣﻘﺎﻟـﻪ ﺑـﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﺩﻭ ﻣﺠﻠﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺍ ﻱ ﺭﺗﺒﻪ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ ـ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸـﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸـﮕﺎﻩ ﻋﻠـﻮﻡ ﺗﺮﺗﻴ ﺐ ﺩﺭ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﻣﻘﺪﻣـﻪ ٧/٦٩ ﺩﺭﺻـﺪ، ﻧ ﮕـﺎﺭﺵ ﺑﺤـﺚ ٤٨ ﺩﺭﺻـﺪ، ﭘﺰﺷﻜﻲ ﺷﻬﺮ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ (ﺩﺍﻧﺸﻮﺭ ﭘﺰﺷﮑﻲ ﻭ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺶ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺰﺷـﮑ ﻲ) ﺩﺭ ﺳـﺎﻝ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ٤/٤٥ ﺩﺭﺻـﺪ، ﻣـﻮﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺵ ﻫـﺎ ٢/٣٢ ﺩﺭﺻـﺪ ﻭ ﻧ ﮕـﺎﺭﺵ ١٣٨٩ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻗـﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓـﺖ . ﺍﺑﺘـﺪﺍ ﻣﻘـﺎﻻﺕ ﻣـﻮﺭﺩﻱ، ﻣـﺮﻭﺭ ﻱ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ٣/٢٥ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ [٢ ]. ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﺑﺎ ﻃﺮﺍﺣـﻲ ﻛﻴﻔـﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌـﻪ ﻛﻨـﺎﺭ ﮔﺬﺍﺷـﺘﻪ ﺷـﺪﻧﺪ . ﺳـﭙﺲ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺤﻘ ﻲﻘﻴ ﮐﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺭﻭﻱ ١٠٧ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﺷﺪﻩ، ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻼﺕ ﻋﻠﻤـ ﻲ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﻫﺮ ﻣﺠﻠﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈـﺮ ﺩﺭﺳـﺘﻲ ﺍﺻـﻮﻝ ﻧ ﮕـﺎﺭﺵ ﻣﻘـﺎﻻﺕ ﻭ ﻋﻮﺍﻣـﻞ ــ ﭘــﮋﻭ ﻫﺸــ ﻲ ﺩﻧﺪﺍﻧﭙﺰﺷــﻜﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ ١٣٨٧ ﺍﻧﺠــﺎﻡ ﺷــﺪ، ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻣﺮﺗﺒ ﻂ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﮔﺮﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻳـﻚ ﻓـﺮﻡ ﺍ ﻃﻼﻋـﺎﺗﻲ ﺛﺒـﺖ ﺷـﺪﻧﺪ . ﻛﺎﺳﺘﻲ ﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻧ ﮕـﺎﺭﺵ ﻣﻘـﺎﻻﺕ ﻭﺟـﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ : ﻧ ﮕـﺎﺭﺵ ﻣﻘﺪﻣـﻪ ٤/٦٦ ﭘﺮﺳﺸﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻣﺘـﻮﻥ ﻭ ﻣﻨـﺎﺑﻊ ﻣﻮﺟـﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨـﻪ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ، ﻣـﻮﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺵ ﻫـﺎ ١/٤٠ﺩﺭﺻـﺪ، ﻧ ﮕـﺎﺭﺵ ﻳﺎﻓﺘـﻪ ٩/٤٨ ﺩﺭﺻـﺪ، ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﭘﺮﺳﺸﻨﺎﻣﻪﻫـﺎ ﻱ ﺍﺳـﺘﺎﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﺭﺯﻳـﺎﺑﻲ ﻧ ﮕـﺎﺭﺵ ﺑﺤـﺚ ١/٥٥ ﺩﺭﺻـﺪ ﻭ ﻧ ﮕــﺎﺭﺵ ﻣﻨـﺎﺑﻊ ١/٨ ﺩﺭﺻـﺪ ﺑــﻮﺩ [٣]. ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﭘﺰﺷﻜﻲ ﺗﻬﻴﻪ ﺷﺪ . . ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ١٣٨٠ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄـﻪ ﺑـﺎ ﺑﺮﺭﺳـ ﻲ ﺩﺭﺳــﺘﻲ ﺭﻭﺵ ﺷﻨﺎﺳــﻲ ﺗﺤﻘﻴــﻖ ﻭ ﻧﺤــﻮﻩ ﻧ ﮕــﺎﺭﺵ ﻣﻘــﺎﻻﺕ ﺑــﺎ ٥٢ ﻴﻔﻴﮐ ﺖ ﺫﮐﺮ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸـ ﻲ ﻣﺠـ ﻼﺕ ﻋﻠﻤـ ﻲ ـ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸـ ﻲ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﺷﺪ . . ﮐﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ٧٦ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ، SIDﻣﻨﺒﻊ ﻧﻮ ﻳﺴـ ﻲ of ﻣﻘـﺎﻻﺕ ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﺎ٨ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ: Archiveﺳﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﻭ ﻫﺪﻑ، ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﻫﺪﻑ، ﻣﻮﺍﺩ ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ [٤]. ﺩﺭ ﺗﺤﻘ ﻲﻘﻴ ﻣﺸﺎﺑﻪ ﮐـﻪ ﺭﻭ ﻱ ﻣﺠـﻼﺕ ﭘﺰﺷـﮑ ﻲ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺵ، ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪﻫﺎ ﻱ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ، ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﮔﻴﺮ ﻱ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻪﻫﺎ،ﻛﻠﻤـﺎﺕ ﻛﻠﻴـﺪﻱ، ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﺭﺗﺒﻪ ISI ﺩﺭ ﮐﺸﻮﺭ ﭘﺎﮐﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ، ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻧﻮﺍﻗﺺ ﻣﻨﺒـﻊ ﻫﻢ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻲ ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ﻓﺎﺭﺳﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺴﻲ ﻭ ﺣﺠﻢ ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻟـﻪ ﺍﺭﺯﻳـﺎﺑﻲ ﻲﺴﻳﻧﻮ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺵ ﻭﺍﻧﮑﻮﺭ ٧٥ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ [٥ ]. ﺷﺪ. ﺑﺨﺶ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ ﺑﺎ ٦ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ: ﺣﺠـﻢ ﻣﻘﺪﻣـﻪ، ﺫﻛـﺮ ﻣﻨـﺎﺑﻊ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘــﻲ ﻛــﻪ ﺑــﺮ ﺭﻭ ٤ﻱ ﻣﺠﻠــﻪ ﻋﻠﻤــﻲ ـ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸــﻲ ﻳﻜــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺮﺗﻴ ﺐ ﺁﻥ ﻫﺎ، ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ، ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻧﮕﺮ ﻱ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻫـﺪﻑ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻫـﺎ ﻱ ﻋﻠـﻮﻡ ﭘﺰﺷـﻜﻲ ﻛﺸـﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺳـﺎﻝ ١٣٨٩ ﺍﻧﺠـﺎﻡ ﮔﺮﻓـﺖ، ﺑﺎ ﻗﻴﺪ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﺤﺘﻮ ﻱ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻣﻘﺪﻣـﻪ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺷـﺪ ﺑﺨـﺶ ﻣـﻮﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺵ ﻫـﺎ ﻱ ﻣﻘـﺎﻻﺕ ﺑـﺎ ٥٣/٣ ﺍﻣﺘﻴـﺎﺯ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﺷﺪ. ﻗﺴﻤﺖ ﻣﻮﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺵ ﻫﺎ ١٧ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨ ﮕﻲ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ ٤ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯ، ﻗﻮ ﻱ ﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻭ ﻗﺴﻤﺖ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﮔﻴﺮ ﻱ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ، ﺑﺎ ﻫﺪﻑ ﻭ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻲ، ﺟﺎﻣﻌـﻪ ﻣـﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﺭﺳـﻲ (ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭﻫـﺎ ﻱ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﻭ ﺧـﺮﻭﺝ )، ﻛﺴ ﺐ ٩٢/١ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯ، ﺿﻌﻴﻒﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﺑـﻮﺩ [٦]. ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﺁﻥ، ﺭﻭﺵ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﮔﻴـﺮﻱ، ﺗﻌﺮﻳـﻒ ﺷـﺎﺧﺺ ﻫـﺎ ﻱ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﺎﹰ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﻣﻮﺟ ﺐ ﺑﻲ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﻱ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸـﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺑـﻪ ﻧﺘـﺎﻳﺞ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﻣـﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﺭﺳـﻲ، ﭘﺎﻳـﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺍﻳـﻲ ﺍﺑـﺰﺍ ﺭ، ﺗﺸـﺎﺑﻬﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻣﻐـﺎﻳﺮﺍﺕ ﻳﺍ ﻦ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ؛ ﺿﻤﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮐﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻳﺎﻓﺘـﻪ ﻫـﺎ ﻱ ﺣﺎﺻـﻞ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻫﺎ، ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﻣﺪﺍﺧﻠﻪ، ﻣﺪﺕ ﭘﻲ ﮔﻴﺮﻱ، ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈـﺮ ﻛـﻮﺭ www.SID.ir ٤٩٨

ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺩﺭﺳﺘ ﻲ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﺩﻭ ﻣﺠﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻤ ﻲ ـ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸ ﻲ ... ﻣﻌﺼﻮﻣﻪ ﺣﻴﺪﺭ ﻱ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺻﺮ ﻭﻻﻳﻲ

ﺑﻮﺩﻥ، ﺟﻠ ﺐ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭ ﻱ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﻫﺎ، ﺗﺄﺛﻴﺮ ﻣﺪﺍﺧﻠـﻪ، ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣـﻪ ﺁﻣـﺎﺭ ﻱ ﻭ ﻋـﺪﻡ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪﻫﺎ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﻓﺖ . ٧٧ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﺻﻴﻞ ﭼﺎﭖ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭ ﻣﺠﻠـﻪ ﻣـﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻈـﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺳـﺎﻝ ١٣٨٩ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ٧ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ: ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺗﻌﻬﺪﺍﺕ، ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺑـﻪ ﺳـﺆﺍﻝ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﮔﺮﻓـﺖ . ٣٩ﺩﺭﺻـﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻘـﺎﻻﺕ ﺗﻮﺻـﻴﻔﻲ ـ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠـﻲ، ﺍﺻﻠﻲ، ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﺍﻱ، ﺩﺭﺳﺘﻲ ﻧـﺎﻡ ﺳـﻄﺮ ﻭ ﺳـﺘﻮﻥ ﺟـﺪﻭﻝ ﻫـﺎ، ٤/٥٨ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺪﺍﺧﻠﻪ ﺍ ﻱ ﻭ ٦/٢ ﺩﺭﺻـﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻫـﺎ ﺗﺸﺨﻴﺼـﻲ ﺩﺭﺳﺘﻲ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺳﻄﺮ ﻭ ﺳﺘﻮﻥ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﺍﺭ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺳﺘﻲ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥﻫـﺎ ﻱ ﺁﻣـﺎﺭ ﻱ ﻣـﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﻮﺩ. ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻪ ﻋﻠﻤـﻲ ﻧﻮﻳﺴـﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﺴـﺌﻮﻝ ﻣﻘـﺎﻻﺕ ﺩﺭ ٧/٣٧ ﺩﺭﺻـﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ . ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ، ﻣﺮﺑﻲ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ٣/٦٢ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺩﻳﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺑـﺎﻻ ﺑـﻮﺩ . ٧/٣٧ ﺩﺭﺻـﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺴﻤﺖ ﺑﺤﺚ، ٨ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ، ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻝ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ، ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺎﭖ ﻣﺠﻠـﻪ ﻣـﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻫﺎ ﻱ ﻣﺸﺎﺑﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺫﻛﺮ ﻣﻨﺒﻊ، ﺑﻴـﺎﻥ ﻳﺎﻓﺘـﻪ ﻫـﺎ ﻱ ﻣﻐـﺎﻳﺮ ﺑـﺎ ﺫﻛـﺮ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻭ ٣/٦٢ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ، ﺷﺎﻏﻞ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻫﺎ ﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺷﺎﻏﻞ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ. ﻓﺎﺻـﻠﻪ ﻣﻨﺒﻊ، ﺗﺠﺰﻳﻪ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻭ ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮ ﻳﺎﻓﺘـﻪ ﻫـﺎ، ﺑﻴـﺎﻥ ﻣﺤـﺪﻭﺩﻳﺖ ﺗﺤﻘﻴـﻖ، ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻭﺻﻮﻝ ﺗﺎ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ٩/١±٧/٣ ﻭ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻧﻘﺎﻁ ﻗﻮﺕ ﻭ ﺿﻌﻒ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ، ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﮔﻴﺮ ﻱ ﺗﺤﻘﻴـﻖ، ﭼ ﮕـﻮﻧ ﮕﻲ ﺑـﻪ ﺗﺎ ﭼﺎﭖ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ٢ ± ٦/٢ ﻣﺎﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ. ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺭﺳﺘﻲ ﻧ ﮕـﺎﺭﺵ ﻛﻠـﻲ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﻱ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻪﻫﺎ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ. ﻗﺴﻤﺖ ﻣﻨﺒـﻊ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﺍﺭ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ١ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎ ٦ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﺻـﻮﻝ ﻧ ﮕـﺎﺭﺵ ﺩﺭﺳـﺖ ﻣﻨﺒـﻊ، ﺗﻌـﺪﺍﺩ ٤٧ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ، ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻭ ٥٣ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻧﺎ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺑـﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﻧـﺪ . ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ، ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ، ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺩﺭ ﻣـﺘﻦ ﻭ ﻣﻴـ ﺰﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﻫﺎ، ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻧﻲ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺁﻥ (CI) ﺑﺎ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻓﺎﺭﺳﻲ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺟﺪﻳـﺪ (٢٠٠٦ ﺑـﻪ ٩٥ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ، ﺑﻴﻦ ٤٢ ﺗﺎ ٤٦ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺑﺮﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﮔﺮﺩﻳﺪ . . ﺑﻌﺪ) ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﺷﺪ [١٠ ٩، ٢، ]. ) ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻂ، ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻃﺮﺍﺣـ ﻲ ﺗﺤﻘﻴـﻖ ﺗﻮﺻـﻴﻔﻲ، ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠـﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺪﺍﺧﻠﻪ ﺍ ﻱ)، ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ، ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻪ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻝ ﻣﻘﺎﻟـﻪ، ﻣﺤﻞ ﺍﺷﺘﻐﺎﻝ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻝ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ، ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻭﺻـﻮﻝ ﻣﻘﺎﻟـﻪ ﺗـﺎ ﺗﺄﻳﻴﺪ ﻭ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﺗﺄﻳﻴﺪ ﺗﺎ ﭼﺎﭖ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﺗﻮﺳ ﻂ ﻣﺠﻠﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ. ﺗﻚ ﺗﻚ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﻃﺒﻖ ﭼﻚ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺗﻬﻴﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺗﻮﺳ ﻂ ﻣﺤﻘـﻖ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻜـﺎﺭ ﺭﻭﺵ ﺷـﻨﺎﺱ، ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍ ﻱ ﻫﺮ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻓﺮﻡ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﻲ ﭘﺮ ﺷـﺪ . ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﮔﻴﺮ ﻱ ﺷﺎﺧﺺﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﻃﻴﻒ ﺳﻪ ﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ، ﻧﺴﺒﺘﺎﹰ ﺩﺭﺳـﺖ ﻭ ﻧﺎ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺑﻮﺩ. ﺿﻤﻨﺎﹰ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻳـﻚ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌـﻪ ﻣـﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ، ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ «ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ» ﻣﺤﺴـﻮﺏ ﻭ ﺍﻣﺘﻴـﺎﺯ ﺑـﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺗﻌﻠـﻖ ﻧﻤﻲ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ. ﻣﺜﻼﹰ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ، ﭘـﻲ ﮔﻴـﺮ ﻱ ﻭﺟـﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺷـﺖ (ﺩﺭ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻲ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻔﻲ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ـ ﺷﺎﻫﺪﻱ )، ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻـﻮﺭﺕ، ﺗﻌـﺪﺍﺩ ﻛـﻞ Archive of SID . ﺷﺎﺧﺺﻫـﺎ ﻱ ﺁﻥ ﻛﻤﺘـﺮ ﺍﺯ ٥٢ ﺑـﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳـﺖ، ﺍﮔـﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻣـﻮﺭﺩ ﻳـﻚ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ، ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ٧٥ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯ ﻛﺴ ﺐ ﻣﻲ ﺷﺪ، ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭﺳـﺖ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﻴﻦ ٥٠ ﺗﺎ ٧٥ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯ ﺗﻌﻠﻖ ﻣﻲ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ، ﻧﺴـﺒﺘﺎﹰ ﺩﺭﺳـﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ٥٠ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﺎ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻣﺤﺴﻮﺏ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ . ﻧﻤﻮﺩﺍﺭ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ١ - ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊ ٧٧ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﺻﻴ ﻞ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﺭﺳ ﻲ ﺑـﺮ ﺣﺴـ ﺐ ﻣﻴـﺰﺍﻥ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﻲ ﻳﺍ ﻦ ﭘﺮﺳﺸﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﺎﺕ ﻗﺒﻠﻲ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﺄﻳﻴﺪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﺩﺭﺳﺘ ﻲ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﻛﻠ ﻲ ﺷﺎﺧﺺﻫﺎ ﻱ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ [٢] ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ﺣﺼﻮﻝ ﭘﺎ ﻳﻲﺎﻳ ، ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﺁﺯﻣﺎﻳﺸﻲ، ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ١٠ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ١٠ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺳﻴﻠﻪ ﺁﺯﻣـﻮﻥ ﺍﺳـﭙﻴﺮﻣﻦ ﺑﺮﺭﺳـﻲ ﻭ ﻣﻴـﺰﺍﻥ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺩﺭﺳﺘﻲ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﺑﺮ ﺣﺴ ﺐ ﺷﺎﺧﺺﻫـﺎ ﻱ ﻛﻠـﻲ ﻣﻘﺎﻟـﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺒﺴﺘ ﮕﻲ ﺁﻥ ٩٥/٠ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺁﻣﺪ . ﺟﺪﻭﻝ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ١ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ. ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ ﺿـﻌﻴﻒ ﺗـﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﻣﺮﺗﺒ ﻂ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺭﺳﺘﻲ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑـﺎ ﺁﺯﻣـﻮﻥ ﻛـﺎ ﻱ ﺩﻭ ﻗﺴﻤﺖ ﻧ ﮕـﺎﺭﺵ ﻣﻘـﺎﻻﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭ ﻣﺠﻠـﻪ، ﻧ ﮕـﺎﺭﺵ ﺑﺤـﺚ ﻣﻘـﺎﻻﺕ ﻭﻛـﻢ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻗﻀﺎﻭﺕ ﺁﻣﺎﺭﻱ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ . ﺍﺷﻜﺎﻝﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻗﺴﻤﺖ، ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ . .

٤٩٩ www.SID.ir

ﻓﺼﻠﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸﻜﺪﻩ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺑﻬﺪﺍﺷﺘ ﻲ ﺟﻬﺎﺩﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻫﻲ

ﺟﺪﻭﻝ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ۱ - ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﺭﺳ ﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺣﺴـ ﺐ ﻣﻴـﺰﺍﻥ ﺩﺭﺳـﺘﻲ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻫﺎ ﻱ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ، ﻋﺪﻡ ﺩﺭﺳـﺘﻲ ﺗﺴـﺖ ﻫـﺎ ﻱ ﺁﻣـﺎﺭ ﻱ ﺩﺭ ٣٠ ﺩﺭﺻـﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻔﻜﻴﻚ ﻗﺴﻤﺖﻫﺎ ﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﻮﺩ.ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺴﻤﺖ ﻧ ﮕـﺎﺭﺵ ﺑﺤـﺚ، ﻋـﺪﻡ ﺑﻴـﺎﻥ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺩﺭﺳﺘﻲ ﺷﺎﺧﺺﻫﺎ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ (ﺩﺭﺻﺪ) ﻧﺎ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ (ﺩﺭﺻﺪ) ﻧﻘﺎﻁ ﻗﻮﺕ ﻭ ﺿﻌﻒ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺮﺗﻴـ ﺐ ﺩﺭ٦٩ ٧٣ﻭ ﺩﺭﺻـﺪ ﺑـﻮﺩ . ﻧﺘـﺎﻳﺞ ﺷﺎﺧﺺﻫﺎ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺪﻭﻝ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ٢ ﻧﺸـﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷـﺪﻩ ﺍﺳـﺖ . ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ٣٥/٦٨ ٦٥/٣١ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ ٥/٦٤ ٥/٣٥ ﻧ ﮕــﺎﺭﺵ ﻣﻘــﺎﻻﺕ ﺩﺭ ٥٩ ﺩﺭﺻــﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣــﻮﺍﺭﺩ، ﺩﺭﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ٤١ ﺩﺭﺻــﺪ ﻣﻮﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺵﻫﺎ ٥٦ ٤٤ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺑﻮﺩ . . ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪﻫﺎ ۷۹ ٢١ ﺑﺤﺚ ٤/٣١ ٦/٦٨ ﺟﺪﻭﻝ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ٢ - ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﺭﺳ ﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺣﺴـ ﺐ ﻣﻴـﺰﺍﻥ ﺩﺭﺳـﺘﻲ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ٦٥/٥٨ ٣٥/٤١ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻔﻜﻴﻚ ﺷﺎﺧﺺﻫﺎ ﻱ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ M SD± ﺩﺍﻣﻨﻪ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺭﺳﺘﻲ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﺧﻼﺻـﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻟـﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻤـﻮﺩﺍﺭ ﺷـﻤﺎﺭﻩ ٢ ﺷﺎﺧﺺﻫﺎ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ. ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ ﺿﻌﻴﻒﺗـﺮﻳﻦ ﺷـﺎﺧﺺ ﻧ ﮕـﺎﺭﺵ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ٢/١±٥/٢٤ ٨٧-٩ ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭ ﻣﺠﻠـﻪ، ﻧ ﮕـﺎﺭﺵ ﻣـﻮﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺵ ﻫـﺎ ﻭ ﻋـﺪﻡ ﺑﻴـﺎﻥ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ١/١±٥/٢١ ٨٧-٦ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻓﺎﺭﺳﻲ ٨/٥±٣ ٣٤-٠ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﻫﺪﻑ ﻭ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪﻫﺎ ﻱ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﺑﻮﺩ . . ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ (٢٠٠٦ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ) ٧/٤±١/٦ ٢١-٠

ﻳﻧﺘﺎ ﺞ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺩﺭﺳﺘﻲ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﻛﻠـﻲ ﻣﻘـﺎﻻﺕ ﺑـﺎ ﻋﻮﺍﻣـﻞ ﻣـﺮﺗﺒ ﻂ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺩﺭﺳﺘﻲ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻣﺠﻠﻪ ﺍﺭﺗﺒـﺎﻁ ﻣﻌﻨـﻲ ﺩﺍﺭ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ (P<۰/۰۰۵)، ﻭﻟﻲ ﺑـﺎ ﻣﺮﺗﺒـﻪ ﻋﻠﻤـﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺤـﻞ ﺍﺷـﺘﻐﺎﻝ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻝ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ، ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ، ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻭﺻـﻮﻝ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﺗﺎ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﻭ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﺗﺎ ﭼـﺎﭖ ﻣﻘﺎﻟـﻪ ﺍﺭﺗﺒـﺎﻁ ﻣﻌﻨﻲ ﺩﺍﺭ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ . .

ﻧﻤﻮﺩﺍﺭ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ٢ - ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﺭﺳ ﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺣﺴـ ﺐ ﻣﻴـﺰﺍﻥ ﺩﺭﺳـﺘﻲ ﺑﺤ ﺚ ﻭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪﮔﻴﺮ ﻱ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻔﻜﻴﻚ ﺷﺎﺧﺺﻫﺎ ﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﻛﻠﻲ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﺩﺭ ٥/٥٠ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﻏﻠ ﻂ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﭘﺮ ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻭ ﺿﻌﻴﻒﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻗﺴﻤﺖ ﻧ ﮕـﺎﺭﺵ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺭﺳﺘﻲ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﻗﺴﻤﺖﻫﺎ ﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻣﻘﺎﻟـﻪ ﻧﺸـﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴـﺰ ﺍﻥ ٦/٦٨ ﺩﺭﺻـﺪ ﺑـﻮﺩ . ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺩﺭ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻟـﻪ، SIDﻋـﺪﻡ ﺭﻋﺎﻳـﺖ of ﺳـﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺩﺭﺳﺘﻲ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﺑﻪ Archiveﺗﻔﻜﻴﻚ ﺳﺮ ﻓﺼﻞ ﻫﺎ ﻱ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﺑـﻪ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ ﺩﺭ ٥/٥٨ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻭ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻫـﺪﻑ ﺗﺤﻘﻴـﻖ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺮﺗﻴ ﺐ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ۶۵/۳۱ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ، ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ ٥/٣٥ ﺩﺭﺻـﺪ، ﻣـﻮﺍﺩ ﻭ ٢/٤٤ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﻮﺩ. ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺣﺠﻢ ﻣﻘﺪﻣـﻪ ﺩﺭ ١/٣٥ ﺩﺭﺻـﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺵ ﻫﺎ ٤٤ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ، ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻫﺎ ٢١ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ، ﺑﺤﺚ ٦/٦٨ ﺩﺭﺻـﺪ ﻭ ﻧ ﮕـﺎﺭﺵ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻃﻮﻻﻧﻲ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﺧﻴﻠـﻲ ﻣﺨﺘﺼـﺮ ﻧﻮﺷـﺘﻪ ﺷـﺪﻩ ﺑـﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ٢٦ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ٣٥/٤١ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ. ﺩﺭ ﺗﺤﻘﻴـﻖ ﺷـﻴﺒﺎﻧﻲ ﻧﻴـﺎ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻜـﺎﺭﺍﻥ، ١٠٠ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ، ﻫﺪﻑ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ، ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ. ﺿﻌﻴﻒﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﻣﺠﻼﺕ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ ـ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸﻲ ﺩﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﭘﺰﺷﻜﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺳـﺎﻝ ١٣٨٥ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻣﻮﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺵﻫـﺎ، ﻋـﺪﻡ ﺑﻴـﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﺟﻴـﻪ ﺗﻌـﺪﺍﺩ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻗـﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓـﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺸـﺨﺺ ﺷـﺪ ﻣﻴـﺰﺍﻥ ﻧ ﮕـﺎﺭﺵ ﻏﻠـ ﻂ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ٥/٦٧ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻭ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﻲ ﻭ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﮔﻴﺮ ﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺴــﻤﺖ ﻣﻘﺪﻣــﻪ ٤/٦٦ ﺩﺭﺻــﺪ، ﻳﺎﻓﺘــﻪ ﻫــﺎ ٩/٤٨ ﺩﺭﺻــﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺤــﺚ ﻭ ﺗﺮﺗﻴ ﺐ ﺩﺭ ٣/٥٣ ٢ﻭ /٦٦ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﻮﺩ. ﺩﺭ ٣٥ ﺩﺭﺻـﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣـﻮﺍﺭﺩ، ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﮔﻴﺮ ﻱ ٤/٥٥ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ [٣]. ﺩﺭ ﺗﺤﻘﻴـﻖ ﺣﻴـﺪﺭ ﻱ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻜـﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺁﻣﺎﺭ ﻱ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ٤٠ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻧﻴـﺰ ﺭﻭﺵ ﻧﻤﻮﻧـﻪ ﮔﻴـﺮ ﻱ ﺑـﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺭﻭ ﻱ ۸۳ ﻣﻘﺎﻟـﻪ ﻋﻠﻤـﻲ ـ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸـﻲ ﭘﺮﺳـﺘﺎﺭ ﻱ ﻭ ﻣﺎﻣـﺎﻳﻲ ﺷـﻬﺮ ﺧـﻮﺑﻲ ﺗﻮﺿـﻴﺢ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻧﺸــﺪﻩ ﺑـﻮﺩ . ﺿـﻌﻴﻒ ﺗــﺮﻳﻦ ﺷـﺎﺧﺺ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺴــﻤﺖ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ۱۳۸۸ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﮔﺮﺩﻳﺪ، ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻋـﺪﻡ ﺩﺭﺳـﺘﻲ

www.SID.ir ٥٠٠

ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺩﺭﺳﺘ ﻲ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﺩﻭ ﻣﺠﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻤ ﻲ ـ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸ ﻲ ... ﻣﻌﺼﻮﻣﻪ ﺣﻴﺪﺭ ﻱ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺻﺮ ﻭﻻﻳﻲ

ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ، ﺑﻪ ﺗﻔﻜﻴﻚ ﺳﺮ ﻓﺼﻞ ﻫﺎ ﻱ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﻣﻘﺎﻟـﻪ ﺑـﻪ ﺗﺮﺗﻴـ ﺐ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻫـﺎ ﻱ ﻣ ﻬـﻢ ﻭ ﻴﺑﺴـ ﺎﺭ ﺗـ ﻴﺛﺄ ﺮ ﮔـﺬﺍﺭ ﻳـ ﻚ ﻣﻘﺎﻟـﻪ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ ٧/٦٩ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ، ﺑﺤـﺚ ٤٨ ﺩﺭﺻـﺪ، ﻳﺎﻓﺘـﻪ ٤/٤٥ ﺩﺭﺻـﺪ، ﻣـﻮﺍﺩ ﻭ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸﻲ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺻﺘﻲ ﻱﺑﺮﺍ ﺟﻠ ﺐ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ. ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺪﻣـﻪ ، ﺑﺎ ﻳـ ﺪ ﻳـ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﺵ ٢ﻫﺎ /٣٢ ﺩﺭﺻـﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻨـﺎﺑﻊ ٣/٢٥ ﺩﺭﺻـﺪ ﺑـﻮﺩ [٢ ]. ﻫﻤﭽﻨـﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﭼﻨﺎﻥ ﺟﺎﻟ ﺐ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺁﻳﺪ ﮐﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﺸﺘﺎﻕ ﺷـﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻘﺎﻟـﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺭﻭ ﻱ ٤ ﻣﺠﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ ـ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸﻲ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﻧﺸـﮕﺎﻩ ﻫـﺎ ﻱ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﻛﻨﺪ. ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﻣ ﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺗـ ﻴﺛﺄ ﺮ ﺑﺴـﺰﺍ ﻳﻲ ﺑـﺮ ﻧﻈـﺮ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﭘﺰﺷﻜﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ١٣٨٩ ﺍﻧﺠـﺎﻡ ﮔﺮﻓـﺖ، ﻧﺘـﺎﻳﺞ ﻧﺸـﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ ﺩﺍﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﻣﺠﻠــﻪ ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ ﺑــﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻟــﻪ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ، ﻳــﺯ ﻜــﻳﺮﺍ ﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭﻟــ ﻴﻦ ﻴ ﻗﺴﻤﺖ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﮔﻴﺮ ﻱ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ، ﺑﺎ ﻛﺴ ﺐ ٩٢/١ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ ﻗﺴﻤﺖ ﻱﻫﺎ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﺍﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﻣ ﻲﮔﺬﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻧﻮﻳﺴـﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﻘﺎﻟـﻪ ٤ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯ، ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ [٦ ]. ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑـﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ ﺧـﻮﺏ، ﺗﺄﻛﻴـﺪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪﻛـﻪ ﺗﻔـﺎﻭﺕ ﺍ ﻳـ ﻦ ﺗﺤﻘﻴـ ﻖ ﺑـﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺘـﺎﻳﺞ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘـﺎﺕ ﺍﻧﺠـﺎﻡ ﺷـﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻴﻄـﻪ ﭘﺰﺷـﻜﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺑـﺎﻟﻴﻦ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﺎﺕ ﻗﺒﻠﻲ ﭼﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ [١ ] . . ] ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ، ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻱ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﺎﺕ ﻣﺨﺘﻠـﻒ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻭ ﺳﺎﻳﺮ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﻧﺠـﺎﻡ ﺷـﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺭﺳﺘﻲ ﺭﻭﺵ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﻭ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺳـﺖ ﻗﺴـﻤﺖ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﻱ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ، ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﻣﻘﺪﻣـﻪ ﻭ ﺑﻴـﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﺟﻴـﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺵﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﻗﺴﻤﺖ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﮔﻴﺮ ﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻬﻢﺗـﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭ ﻣﺠﻠﻪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ، ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻳﺮ ﻣﺠـﻼﺕ ﺑـﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻗﺴﻤﺖ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﺎﺗﻲ ﻭ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ، ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧـﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑـﻪ ﻭﺟـﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺴـﻤﺖ ﻣﻲ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎ ﭼﻪ ﺣﺪ ﻣﻲ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﺎﺗﻲ ﻛـﻪ ﺭﻭﺵ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﻱ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ . . ﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﺁﻥ ﻧﺎ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ، ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩ [١]. ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻧﺸـﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺴﻤﺖ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﻣﻮﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺵ ﻫﺎ، ﺿـﻌﻴﻒ ﺗـﺮﻳﻦ ﺷـﺎﺧﺺ ، ﺗﻮﺟﻴـﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺴﻤﺖ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ ﻣﻘـﺎﻻﺕ، ﺩﺭ ٢/٤٤ ﺩﺭﺻـﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣـﻮﺍﺭﺩ، ﻫـﺪﻑ ﺍﻧﺠـﺎﻡ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻥ ﺣﺠﻢ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﺑـﻮﺩ ﻛـﻪ ﺩﺭ ٥/٦٧ ﺩﺭﺻـﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻘـﺎﻻﺕ، ﺑـﻪ ﭼﺸـﻢ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻱ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ، ﺑﻪ ﺻـﻮﺭﺕ ﺻـﺤﻴﺢ ﺑﻴـﺎﻥ ﻣﻲ ﺧﻮﺭﺩ. ﺩﺭﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﻣﺸﺎﺑﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺭﻭ ﻱ ﻣﺠﻼﺕ ﺩﻧﺪﺍﻧﭙﺰﺷـﻜﻲ، ﻧﺸـﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ. ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ٢٦ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ، ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺗﺤﻘﻴـﻖ، ﺑـﻪ ﺷﺪ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ٩٣ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ، ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ [٣]. ﺑـﺎ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﻴﺑ ﺎﻥ ﻧﺸـﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺳـﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﻧ ﮕـﺎﺭﺵ ﻣﻘﺪﻣـﻪ ﻣﻘـﺎﻻ ﺕ ﻧﻴـﺰ ﺩﺭ ٤/٥٨ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺄﺛﻴﺮ ﺣﺠﻢ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﺑﺮ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ، ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲ ﺭﺳﺪ ﻣﺤﻘﻘﺎﻥ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ. ﺩﺭ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﻭﻻﻳﻲ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ١٨٢ ﻳﺑﺎ ﺪ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﺩﻗﻴﻖ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﺗﻮﺳ ﻂ ﻳـ ﮏ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌـﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﻪ ﺩﺍﻧﺸـﮕﺎﻩ ﻋﻠـﻮﻡ ﭘﺰﺷـﻜﻲ ﻣﺎﺯﻧـﺪﺭﺍﻥ ﻛـﻪ ﻃـﻲ ﺳـﺎﻝ ﻫـﺎﻱ ﻲﺸﻳﺁﺯﻣﺎ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ. ﻋﺪﻡ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﻲ ﻭ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﮔﻴﺮ ﻱ ﺑﻪ ٨٤-١٣٨٠ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﮔﺮﺩﻳﺪ، ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻣﻘﺪﻣـﻪ ﺑـﻪ ﻣﻴـﺰﺍﻥ ٦/٦٣ ﺗﺮﺗﻴ ﺐ ﺩﺭ ٣/٥٣ ٢ﻭ /٦٦ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻘـﺪﺍﺭ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ، ﻋﺪﻡ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﺑﺎ ﻗﻴﺪ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺕ ﻣﺸﺎﺑﻪ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ [ ٣ ٢، ]. ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﻲ ٤/٥٦ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﺸـﺎﺭ ﻣﻘـﺎﻻﺕ ﺩﺭ ٩٨ ﺩﺭﺻـﺪ ﻣـﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﮔﻴﺮ ﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﮔﻴﺮ ﻱ ﻣﺘﻐﻴﺮﻫﺎ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻣـﺆﺛﺮ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﺷﺪ [١٣]. ﺩﺭ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﻧﺠﻮﻣﻲ، ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﭼﺎﭖ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠـﻼﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻲ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺩﻫﺪ، ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻣﺤﻘﻘـﺎﻥ ﺑـﻪ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﻲﺮﺍﻧﻳﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻲ ﻣﺪﺍﺧﻠﻪ ﻱﺍ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓـﺖ ﻭ ﻧﺘـﺎﻳﺞ ﻧﺸـﺎﻥ ﻧﻜﺘــﻪ ﻣﻬــﻢ ﺍﺳــﺖ . ﺩﺭ ﻧ ﮕــﺎﺭﺵ ﻳﺎﻓﺘــﻪﻫــﺎ، ﺩﺭ ٣٠ ﺩﺭﺻــﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣــﻮﺍﺭﺩ، ﺩﺍﺩ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ ﺩﺭ ٤/١٣ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ، ﺧﻮﺏ ﻧﺒـﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ٩/٢٦ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ ﻫﺎ ﻱ ﺁﻣﺎﺭ ﻱ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺑﻮﺩ. ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺩﺭﺳـﺘﻲ . Archive of .[ SID] ﺩﺭﺻﺪ، ﻫﺪﻑ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﺷﻔﺎﻑ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ١٤ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﺳﻄﺮ ﻭ ﺳﺘﻮﻥ ﺟﺪﺍﻭﻝ ﻭ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﺍﺭﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻴﻮﺏ ﺷﺎﻳﻊ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﺑـﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺤﻘﻴــﻖ ﺷــﻴﺒﺎﻧﻲ ﻧﻴــﺎ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻜــﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﻣﺸــﺨﺺ ﺷــﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠــﻼﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻼﺕ ﭘﺰﺷﻜﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺍ ﻱ ﺭﺗﺒﻪ ISI، ﻣﻴـﺰﺍﻥ ﻧـ ﻮﺍﻗﺺ ﻣﻮﺟـﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺍﺋـﻪ ﺩﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﭘﺰﺷﻜﻲ، ﺩﺭ٩٠ ﺩﺭﺻـﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻘـﺎﻻﺕ، ﻫـﺪﻑ ﺗﺤﻘﻴـﻖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﻬـﺎ ﻱ ﺟﺪﻭﻝ ﻭ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﺍﺭ، ٩/٧ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ [٥]. ﻳﺩﺭ ﺍ ﻦ ﺗﺤﻘﻴـ ﻖ، ﻣﺸـﺨﺺ ﺷـﺪ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﻭ ٧٢ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ٧٥ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﺸﺎﻭﺭ ﺁﻣﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣـﺎﻝ، ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ [٣]. ﺩﺭ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﺣﻴﺪﺭ ﻱ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠـﻼﺕ ﭘﺮﺳـﺘﺎﺭ ﻱ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻫﻢ ﻛﺎﺳﺘﻲ ﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ ﻫﺎ ﻱ ﺁﻣـﺎﺭ ﻱ ﻣﺸـﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﺷـﺪ . ﻣﺎﻣﺎﻳﻲ، ﻗﺴﻤﺖ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﺩﺭ ٥/٨٥ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﺭﺳـﺖ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﺩ ﮕﺮﻳ ﻱ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ ٨٠ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﭼﺎﭖ ﺷﺪﻩ، ﻣﺸـﺎﻭﺭ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻱ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ ﻧﺸـﺪﻩ ﻱﺭﺁﻣﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ [١٣ ]. ]. ﺑﻮﺩ، ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ٨٢ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ، ﺗـﻮﺟﻴﻬﻲ ﻣﻨﻄﻘـﻲ ﺑـﺮﺍ ﻱ ﺍﻧﺠـﺎﻡ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺴﻤﺖ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﺑﺤﺚ، ﺩﺭ ٨/٦٨ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻧﻘﺎﻁ ﺿﻌﻒ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺷـﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ٢/٨٩ ﺩﺭﺻـﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻘـﺎﻻﺕ، ﺣﺠـﻢ ﻣﻘﺪﻣـﻪ ٧ﻭ /٧٢ ﺩﺭﺻــﺪ ﺑﻴــﺎﻥ ﻧﻘــﺎﻁ ﻗــﻮﺕ ﺗﺤﻘﻴــﻖ ﻭ ٢٥ ﺩﺭﺻــﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣــﻮﺍﺭﺩ، ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻃﻮﻻﻧﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ [٢ ] . ﭼ ﮕﻮﻧ ﮕﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﻱ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪﻫﺎ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺑـﻮﺩ . ﺑﺤـﺚ، ﻣﻌﻤـﻮﻻﹰ ﺑـﺎ ﺑﻴـﺎﻥ

٥٠١ www.SID.ir

ﻓﺼﻠﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸﻜﺪﻩ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺑﻬﺪﺍﺷﺘ ﻲ ﺟﻬﺎﺩﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻫﻲ

ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻫﺎ ﻱ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺶ، ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻭ ﺿﻤﻦ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻫـﺎ ﻱ ﻗﺒﻠـﻲ ﻛـﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻳﺖ ﻫﺎ ﻱ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ، ﻣﺴﺌﻠﻪ ﺍﻓﺘﺮﺍﻕ ﺑـﻴﻦ ﺩﺭﺳـﺖ ، ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ، ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﻓﻌﻠﻲ ﻣﻲﭘـﺮﺩﺍﺯﺩ ﻧﺴﺒﺘﺎﹰ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻧﺎ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺑﻮﺩﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻗﺖ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺯﻳـﺎﺩ، ﺑﻌﻀـﻲ ﻭ ﻧﻘﺎﻁ ﺿﻌﻒ ﻭ ﻗﻮﺕ ﺁﻥ ﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻗﻀﺎﻭﺕ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣـﻲ ﺩﻫـﺪ . ﻫﻤﭽﻨـﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﺍﻓﺘﺮﺍﻕ ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﺸـﻜﻞ ﺑـﻮﺩ . ﺍﺯ ﻧﻘـﺎﻁ ﻗـﻮﺕ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﺗﺤﻘﻴـﻖ، ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻳﺖﻫﺎ ﻱ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ، ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻛـﻪ ﻣﺤﻘـﻖ ﺑـﺎ ﻣﻲ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﻗﺒﻠﻲ ﺗﻴﻢ ﺑﺮﺭﺳـﻲ ﻛﻨﻨـﺪﻩ ﻣﻘـﺎﻻﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺫﻛـﺮ ﻛـﺮﺩ ﻛـﻪ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻳﺖ ﻫﺎ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺑﺮﺳﺎﻧﺪ [١٥]. ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻱ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻧﻘﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺯﻳـﺎﺑﻲ ﻣﻘـﺎﻻﺕ ﻭ ﻧﻘـﺪ ﭘﺎﻳـﺎﻥ ﻧﺎﻣـﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻣـﻲ ﻛﻨـﻴﻢ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﻗﺴـﻤﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ . . ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ، ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻻﹰ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﻧﻤﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻋﺪﻩ ﺍ ﻱ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨـﺪ ﺑـﺎ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻫﺎ ﻱ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﺭﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻭﭼـﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻳﺖ ﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺿﻌﻒ ﻫﺎ ﻱ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ، ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺶ ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺳﺆﺍﻝ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﺳﺎﻳﺮ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺕ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ ﺭﻭﺵ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﻧ ﮕـﺎﺭﺵ ﻣﻘﺎﻟـﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ [١٨-١٦ ] . ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻄﺎﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺌﻠﻪ، ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻫـﺎ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ، ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺩﺭ ٥٩ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺩﺭﺳـﺖ ﺑـﻮﺩ . ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﮔﻴﺮ ﻱ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺨﺪﻭﺵ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ. ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﻛـﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﻱ، ﺭﻭﺵ ﻫﺎ ﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻔـﻲ ﻣﻄـﺮﺡ ﺍﺳـﺖ، ﺍﻣـﺎ ﺻـﺮﻑ ﻧﻈـﺮ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺰﺷﻜﻲ، ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﭘﻞ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ، ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ، ﺟﺰﻳﻴﺎﺕ، ﻫﻤ ﮕﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺒﻚ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﻕ ﻧﺴﺒﺘﺎﹰ ﻳﻜﺴـﺎﻧﻲ ﺗﺒﻌﻴـﺖ ﻣـﻲ ﻛﻨﻨـﺪ . ﻟﺬﺍ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻋﻠﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺑﺮﺍ ﻱ ﻛـﺎﻫﺶ ﺁﻥ ﺗﻮﺻـﻴﻪ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺳﻠﻮﺏ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﻧﮕﺎﺭ ﻱ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﻭﺣﺪﺕ ﺭﻭﻳـﻪ ﻭ ﺳـﻬﻮﻟﺖ ﻣﻲ ﮔﺮﺩﺩ. ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﻱ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻫﺎ ﻱ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺷﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺭﻭﺵ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﺎﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲ ﮔﺮﺩﺩ. ﻭ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ، ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﺳـ ﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﻭﺭﻫـﺎ ﻱ ﻣﺠـﺮﺏ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨـﻪ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺕ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩﻱ، ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺍﺷـﻜﺎﻻﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺟـﻊ ﻧ ﮕـﺎﺭ ﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠـﻼﺕ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ، ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﮔﺎﻡ ﻣﻬﻤﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻘﺎﺋﺺ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ . . ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺑﻴﻦ ٣٠ ﺗﺎ ٥٠ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﻧﺪ. ﺩﺭ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﻋﺰ ﻱﺰﻳـ ﺑـﺎ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻴﻔﻴﮐ ﺖ ﺫﮐﺮ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸﻲ ﻣﺠﻼﺕ ﻋﻠﻤـ ﻲ ﺳﻬﻢ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ـ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸﻲ ﮐﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻫﺎﻱ ١٣٧٢ﺗﺎ ١٣٧٩ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﭘﺰﺷﮑﻲ ﻣﻌﺼﻮﻣﻪ ﺣﻴﺪﺭ ﻱ: ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻲ، ﺍﺟﺮﺍ، ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﻴﺷﻬ ﺪ ﺑﻬﺸﺘﻲ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﺪ، ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﮐﻪ ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺩﺭ ٧٦ ﻧﺎﺻﺮ ﻭﻻﻳﻲ: ﻣﺸﺎﻭﺭ ﺭﻭﺵ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﻭﺁﻣﺎﺭ ﻃﺮﺡ، ﺗﺠﺰﻳﻪ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺁﻣﺎﺭ ﻱ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﺍﺯ ٥٢ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﺯﻣﺠﻠﻪ، ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ [٤]. ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻼﺕ ﭘﺮﺳﺘﺎﺭ ﻱ ﻭ ﻣﺎﻣﺎﻳﻲ، ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺳـﺘﻲ ﻧ ﮕـﺎﺭﺵ ﻣﻨـﺎﺑﻊ، ﺗﺸﻜﺮ ﻭ ﻗﺪﺭﺩﺍﻧ ﻲ ٢٥ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ [٢ ] . ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﺡ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺤـﻞ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺎﻧـﻪ ﻭ ﻣﺴـﺎﻋﺪﺕ ﻣـﺎﻟﻲ ﻣﻌﺎﻭ ﻧـﺖ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸـﻲ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﻩ ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﻧ ﮕﺎﺭ ﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺮﻡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭﻫﺎ ﻱ ﻭﻳـﮋﻩ ﺁﺳـﺎﻥ ﺷـﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﮔﺮﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ. ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺩﻭ ﻣﺠﻠﻪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ. ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺮﻡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭﻫﺎ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺗﻨﻈـﻴﻢ ﻣـﺘﻦ ﻣﻘﺎﻟـﻪ، ﺩﺭﺝ ﻣﺮﺍﺟـﻊ ﻭﺗﻨﻈـﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭ ﻱ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻋﺰﻳﺰﺍﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﺖ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸﻲ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ، ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻬﺮﺳﺖ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺍﻟ ﮕـﻮ ﻱ ﻣﺠـﻼﺕ ﻣﺨﺘﻠـﻒ ﺗﺴـﻬﻴﻞ ﻛـﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﻳﺎﺭ ﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺳﭙﺎﺳﮕﺰﺍﺭ ﻱ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ . . ﺍﺳﺖ [٢٠، ١٩ ]. Archive of SID ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ

1. Habibi GH, Shirani A. Principles of scientific journals’ articles. Medical Research 2009; 33: 5-11 writing. 1 st Edition, Marze Fekr Publication: , [Persian] 2008 [Persian] 4. Azizi F, Reiszadeh F, Zarei SH. The quality of 2. Heidari M, Valaie N, Azizi F. The evaluation of accuracy of references in article. Journal of accuracy of article writing in scientific journals of Research in Medical Sciences 2001; 4: 249-55 nursing-midwifery in Tehran. Journal of Research in [Persian] Medical Sciences 2011; 35: 1-5 [Persian] 5. Jawaid SA, Jawiad M, Jafari MH. Deficiencies in original articles accepted for publication in Pakistan 3. Sheibaninia A, Valayi N, Mohamadsadeqi SH, Journal of Medical Sciences: a retrospective analysis. Azizi F. Evaluation of publication accuracy of dental Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences 2009; 26: 1-6

www.SID.ir ٥٠٢

ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺩﺭﺳﺘ ﻲ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﺩﻭ ﻣﺠﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻤ ﻲ ـ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸ ﻲ ... ﻣﻌﺼﻮﻣﻪ ﺣﻴﺪﺭ ﻱ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺻﺮ ﻭﻻﻳﻲ

6. Gohari MR, Salehi M, Vahabi N, Bazrafshan A. 13. Valaei N, Khosaroan M, Nasiri E, Mosavi F. The Analysis of medical sciences articles structure quality survey of quality. Journal of Mazandaran University during 2002-2008. Payavard Salamat 2012; 6: 79-89 of Medical Sciences 2006; 52: 131-9 [Persian] [Persian] 14. Nojomi M, Ramezani M, Ghafari Anvar A. Quality 7. Asefzadeh S. Critical analysis of studies in medical of reports on randomized controlled trials published in science. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences Iranian journals: application of the new version of 2005; 29: 195-201 [Persian] consolidated standards of reporting trials 8. Asefzadeh S. Assessment of managerial skills of the (CONSORT). Archives of Iranian Medicine 2013; 16: research managers at the universities of medical 20-2 sciences. Journal of Medical Faculty Guilan 15. Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submittee University of Medical Sciences 2004; 12: 86-95 of Medical Editors. Annals of Internal Medicine 1997; [Persian] 126: 36-47 9. Altman DG. Poor quality medical research: what 16. Clarke M, Alderson P, Chalmers I. Discussion can journals do? The Journal of American Medical sections in reports of controlled trials published in Association 2002; 287: 2765-7 general medical journals. The Journal of American 10. Yen-Hong K. Extrapolation of correlation between Medical Association 2002; 287: 2799-2800 2 variables in 4 general medical journals The Journal 17. Docherty M, Smith R. The case for structuring the of American Medical Association 2002; 287: 2815-7 discussion of scientific papers. British Medical Journal 11. Wager E & Philippa M. Effects of technical editing 1999; 318: 1224-5 in biomedical journals: a systematic review. The 18. Jefferson T. Structuring the discussion of scientific Journal of American Medical Association 2002; 287: papers. British Medical Journal 1999; 319: 580 2821-4 19. Lukic IK, Lukic A, Glunicic V. Citation and 12. Avram MJ, Shanks C, Dykes M, Ronai AK, Stiers quotation accuracy in three anatomy journals. Clinical WM. Statistical methods in anesthesia articles: an Anatomy 2004; 17: 534-9 evaluation of two American journals during two six- 20. Theuniversity of Toledo, Health Science Campus. month periods. Anesthesia and Analgesia 1985; 64: Instructions to authors in the health science. Available 607-11 at: 7 Dec 2006. http://mulford.mco.edu/instr

Archive of SID

٥٠٣ www.SID.ir

PAYESH

Science s ﻓﺼﻠﻨﺎﻣﻪ for Health ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸﻜﺪﻩ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ Institute ﺑﻬﺪﺍﺷﺘ ﻲ of the Iranian ﺟﻬﺎﺩﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻫﻲJournal

ABSTRACT

Accuracy of writing of published papers in two biomedical research journals in Tehran,

Maasoumeh Heidari1, Naser Valaie2

1. Department of Midwifery, Faculty of Midwifery & Nursing, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran 2. Mazandaran University of Medical sciences, Sari, Iran

Payesh 2014; 13: 497-504 Accepted for publication: 14 September 2013 [EPub a head of print-22 April 2014]

Objective (s): To evaluate accuracy of writing of published papers in biomedical scientific journals in Tehran, Iran. Methods: In this cross sectional study, all original articles published in two scientific journals in 2010 were evaluated. Different topics of articles, including abstract, introduction, methods and materials, results, discussion and references were assessed. Totally, 52 items were evaluated and classified as 3 categories of “correct”, “relatively correct” and “incorrect”. Results: Seventy-seven original articles were evaluated in two journals. Accuracy of writing were as follows: 47% correct, 50.5% relatively correct, and 2.5% incorrect. Inaccuracy among incorrect writing articles were: abstract 31.65%t, introduction 35.5%, methods and materials 44%, results 21%, discussion 68.6%, and references 41.35%. Conclusion: The findings suggest that there is considerable inaccuracy in published articles of scientific research journals. Implementation of measures to prevent such scientific mistakes seems necessary.

Key Words: Article writing, Scientific Research, Tehran, Methodology, Accuracy

Archive of SID

 Corresponding author: Department of Midwifery, Faculty of Midwifery & Nursing, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran, Sari, Iran. Tel: + 98 21 66814590 E-mail: [email protected] ٥٠٤ www.SID.ir