Birds and Other Plays Free
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Political Comedy in Aristophanes
This is a repository copy of Political Comedy in Aristophanes. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/3588/ Book: Heath, M. (1987) Political Comedy in Aristophanes. Hypomnemata, 87 . Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht , Göttingen . ISBN 978-3525251867 Reuse Unless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved. The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version - refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item. Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder, users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher’s website. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Hypomnemata 87, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 1987 © Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht (1987) and Malcolm Heath (2007) Political Comedy in Aristophanes* MALCOLM HEATH (UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS) ABSTRACT: This paper argues that Aristophanic comedy, although it takes contemporary political life as its point of departure, is not political in the sense of aiming to influence politics outside the theatre. Brief discussions of Clouds, Knights, Lysistrata and Acharnians are used to cast initial doubt on interpretations that attribute serious intent to Aristophanes. -
Classical Greek Comedy
Chapter 8: Early Greek Comedy and Satyr Plays Mark Damen (2012) !I. Introduction: An Overview of Classical and Post- Classical Greek Comedy Though comedy in the broadest sense of the term—any kind of humorous material—is at least as old as Greek civilization, historical evidence suggests dramatic comedy first arose in or just before the Classical Age. Like tragedy, ancient Greek komoidia, the word from which we get "comedy," eventually found a home at the Dionysia, though it achieved official status only significantly later than its close theatrical kin. The data further suggest this so-called Old Comedy was probably not the first form of comic drama performed at the Dionysia. Instead, pre-classical playwrights were composing short humorous "satyr plays" featuring boisterous bands of lusty, mischievous woodland spirits called satyrs. During the Classical Age, satyr plays followed the presentation of tragic trilogies, making them the oldest form of comic drama extant. If slower to rise than the satyr play, Old Comedy eventually gained attention and acclaim—and finally pre-eminence—by the end of the fifth century. Indeed, the first writer of this genre whose works are preserved entire is Aristophanes, a late classical comic poet whose plays, like Old Comedy in general, are raucous and political, closely tied to current affairs. He often satirizes Athenian politicians and public figures with ribald wit, usually proposing wild and extravagant solutions, both serious and satirical, to a wide range of problems confronting society in his day: everything from tactics for ending the Peloponnesian War to tips on keeping the devilish Euripides Source URL: http://www.usu.edu/markdamen/ClasDram/chapters/081earlygkcom.htm Saylor URL: http://www.saylor.org/ENGL401#2.1.1 Attributed to: Mark Damen www.saylor.org Page 1 of 23 in line. -
Review of Thomas K. Hubbard, the Mask of Comedy. Aristophanes and the Intertextual Parabasis
University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Departmental Papers (Classical Studies) Classical Studies at Penn March 1992 Review of Thomas K. Hubbard, The Mask of Comedy. Aristophanes and the Intertextual Parabasis Ralph M. Rosen University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/classics_papers Recommended Citation Rosen, R. M. (1992). Review of Thomas K. Hubbard, The Mask of Comedy. Aristophanes and the Intertextual Parabasis. Retrieved from https://repository.upenn.edu/classics_papers/22 Reprinted from Bryn Mawr Classical Review, March 1, 1991. Publisher URL: http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/bmcr/1992/ 03.02.13.html This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/classics_papers/22 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Review of Thomas K. Hubbard, The Mask of Comedy. Aristophanes and the Intertextual Parabasis Abstract Few formal elements of Old Comedy have troubled scholars as much as the parabasis. In its typical form, this choral "digression" appears to interrupt the dramatic fiction of the play with commentary on contemporary social or political issues and often brazen trumpeting of the poet's virtues. Its apparent discontinuity with the rest of the play encouraged scholars of an earlier age to consider it the original kernel of Comedy onto which dramatic episodes were eventually grafted. Comments Reprinted from Bryn Mawr Classical Review, March 1, 1991. Publisher URL: http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/ bmcr/1992/03.02.13.html This review is available at ScholarlyCommons: https://repository.upenn.edu/classics_papers/22 Bryn Mawr Classical Review 03.02.13 Thomas K. Hubbard, The Mask of Comedy. -
Dan Goad Thesis Final
The Performance Reception of Frogs in the English Language, Past and Potential Royal Holloway, University of London Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Ph.D. By Daniel Goad 1 Declaration of Authorship I Daniel Goad hereby declare that this thesis and the work presented in it is entirely my own. Where I have consulted the work of others, that is always clearly stated. Signed: ________________________ Date: __________________________ 2 Abstract This thesis is an analysis of the performance reception of Aristophanes’ Frogs across the English-speaking world; in which I include Britain, North America, Africa and Australasia. It will draw on the growing trend of performance reception as a branch of Classical Reception, approaching the material from both a classical and dramatic outlook. Following an introduction which outlines the methodology, models and background literature, Chapter One outlines the academic reception of the play in the 20th and 21st centuries, drawing out key themes that have been interpreted as being within the play. Chapter Two discusses transmission and translation of the play, following the manuscript’s journey from ancient Athens to modern day English translations. Chapter Three discusses reflections on the play, that is other plays that are not direct adaptations, but can be seen to have been influenced by it in some way. Chapters Four, Five, Six and Seven focus on the theatrical reception of the play, divided geographically. Chapter three therefore focuses on Britain, chapter four North America and chapter six Africa and Australasia. Chapter five focuses solely on the most influential and high-profile adaptation, the 2004 Broadway version with music by Stephen Sondheim.