DOCSLIB.ORG

INSPECTION REPORT NORWOOD GREEN JUNIOR SCHOOL Southall LEA Area: Hounslow Unique Reference Number: 102495 Headteacher: Mrs R

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
INSPECTION REPORT NORWOOD GREEN JUNIOR SCHOOL Southall LEA Area: Hounslow Unique Reference Number: 102495 Headteacher: Mrs R INSPECTION REPORT NORWOOD GREEN JUNIOR SCHOOL Southall LEA area: Hounslow Unique reference number: 102495 Headteacher: Mrs R Lamb Reporting inspector: Mrs J Richardson 6676 Dates of inspection: 27 - 28 November 2001 Inspection number: 193785 Short inspection carried out under section 10 of the School Inspections Act 1996 © Crown copyright 2002 This report may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that all extracts quoted are reproduced verbatim without adaptation and on condition that the source and date thereof are stated. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the School Inspections Act 1996, the school must provide a copy of this report and/or its summary free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. INFORMATION ABOUT THE SCHOOL Type of school: Junior School category: Community Age range of pupils: 7 - 11 Gender of pupils: Mixed School address: Thorncliffe Road Southall Middlesex Postcode: UB2 5RN Telephone number: 0208 574 1726 Fax number: 0208 813 9511 Appropriate authority: Governing Body Name of chair of governors: Mrs J Hanspal Date of previous inspection: 6 - 9 May 1997 Norwood Green Junior School - 3 INFORMATION ABOUT THE INSPECTION TEAM Team members 6676 Joy Richardson Registered inspector 13807 Christine Haggerty Lay inspector 21037 Christopher Gray Team inspector 27791 Greg Crawford Team inspector The inspection contractor was: Cambridge Education Associates Ltd Demeter House Station Road Cambridge CB1 2RS Any concerns or complaints about the inspection or the report should be raised with the inspection contractor. Complaints that are not satisfactorily resolved by the contractor should be raised with OFSTED by writing to: The Complaints Manager Inspection Quality Division The Office for Standards in Education Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE Norwood Green Junior School - 4 REPORT CONTENTS Page PART A: SUMMARY OF THE REPORT 6 - 9 Information about the school How good the school is What the school does well What could be improved How the school has improved since its last inspection Standards Pupils’ attitudes and values Teaching and learning Other aspects of the school How well the school is led and managed Parents’ and carers’ views of the school PART B: COMMENTARY WHAT THE SCHOOL DOES WELL 10 - 14 WHAT COULD BE IMPROVED 14 - 15 WHAT SHOULD THE SCHOOL DO TO IMPROVE FURTHER? 15 PART C: SCHOOL DATA AND INDICATORS 16 - 19 Norwood Green Junior School - 5 PART A: SUMMARY OF THE REPORT INFORMATION ABOUT THE SCHOOL The school has 300 pupils, aged from seven to eleven, in eleven classes. Eighty-three per cent of pupils speak English as an additional language. Fifty-four pupils, including eight who are at an early stage in learning English, are given help in school by the Hounslow Language Support team. Around half the school's pupils are from an Indian background, 16 per cent are white, mainly from the UK, and 13 per cent are of Pakistani origin. Twenty-six pupils are refugees, mostly from Afghanistan and Somalia. The school's ethnic diversity has increased in recent years. Most families live in rented houses or flats which are often overcrowded, and some are in temporary accommodation. There is a high level of mobility amongst pupils. Twenty-six per cent of pupils are eligible for free school meals and this is above the national average. Thirty-four per cent of pupils are on the school's register of special educational needs. Eight pupils with statements of special educational need are supported by the school's Hearing Impaired Centre for pupils who are profoundly or severely deaf. Most pupils join the school from the infant school on the same site. Their attainment on entry is below the national average. The staff currently includes two teachers without a UK teaching qualification. Norwood Green has recently achieved Beacon School status. HOW GOOD THE SCHOOL IS This is an excellent school. Pupils achieve high standards by the time they leave because they are very well taught. The school's leadership is exceptionally effective in creating the conditions for all pupils to succeed. The school gives very good value for money. What the school does well · The school achieves high standards in English, mathematics and science. · Pupils are very skilfully taught so that they succeed in their learning. · The school's leadership brings the best out of staff and pupils. · Very careful attention is paid to pupils' personal and social development. · Additional support is very well matched to pupils' individual needs. · The school is very effective in evaluating its work and sharing good practice. What could be improved · The school has more to do in working to improve writing standards. The areas for improvement will form the basis of the governors’ action plan. HOW THE SCHOOL HAS IMPROVED SINCE ITS LAST INSPECTION The school was last inspected in May 1997. Since then it has built further on its strengths, to very good effect. Standards have risen and the quality of teaching has improved. Issues raised in the last inspection report have been successfully addressed. In particular, the school's expectations of pupils have risen and are now made more explicit to staff, pupils and parents. The school's increasing success in recent years has been recognised in national awards. These include a School Achievement Award for improved results, the Basic Skills Agency Quality Mark and the Investor in People award. Designated a Beacon School, from September 2001, the school is now developing a programme to share and extend good practice. The significant strength of its leadership and management means that the school is well placed to continue to move forward. Norwood Green Junior School - 6 STANDARDS The table shows the standards achieved by pupils at the end of Year 6 based on average point scores in National Curriculum tests. compared with similar Performance in: all schools Key schools in the highest 5% of A* 1999 2000 2001 2001 schools well above average A English C A A A* above average B average C Mathematics C C B A below average D well below average E Science A A A A In the national tests for eleven-year-olds in 2001, results were well above average in English and science and above average in mathematics, when compared with all schools. In comparison with similar schools, results were in the highest 5 per cent in English, and well above average in mathematics and science. Eighty-six per cent of pupils reached Level 4, the standard expected at this age, in English and mathematics, exceeding the school target of 80 per cent in each subject. Many pupils achieved beyond this and in English and science half reached Level 5, the standard expected of thirteen-year olds. Standards have improved significantly in recent years from below the national average in 1998 to well above the national average in 2001, taking English, mathematics and science together. This improvement has been particularly marked among girls. The work seen during the inspection shows that high standards are being maintained. Pupils achieve very well by the time they leave the school in relation to their attainment on entry. Those with special educational needs, including pupils with hearing impairment, make very good progress. Pupils, including those for whom it is an additional language, achieve exceptionally well in English. The school places a strong emphasis on language and literacy and basic skills are taught very thoroughly. All pupils benefit from the school's expertise in providing structured teaching for those with specific language needs. Throughout the school, pupils enjoy reading and exploring the use of words. The school has been successful in raising standards in writing, although it has more to do. Pupils achieve well in mathematics and they are confident in working with numbers in their head. Their progress is accelerating as a result of the school's implementation of the National Numeracy Strategy. Pupils achieve high standards in science because their knowledge is steadily extended, and their understanding is reinforced through practical investigation and discussion. They develop a good grasp of scientific principles and terminology. Pupils are making good progress in information and communication technology, particularly in word processing and in finding information. PUPILS’ ATTITUDES AND VALUES Aspect Comment Attitudes to the school Pupils develop very positive attitudes to the school, and to their work, and this makes them successful learners. Behaviour, in and out of Pupils behave very well. They understand what is expected of them, and classrooms why, and generally live up to the school's high standards. They are polite and friendly and show respect for people and property. There have been no exclusions in the last two years. Norwood Green Junior School - 7 Personal development and Pupils take pride in belonging to the school community and in contributing relationships to it, for example through the work of the school council. Older pupils take their responsibilities seriously as prefects and playground friends. Relationships, including those between pupils of different ethnic backgrounds, are harmonious and pupils co-operate well in groups. Attendance The overall attendance rate, and the extent of unauthorised absence, are broadly in line with the national average. TEACHING AND LEARNING Teaching of pupils in: Years 3 – 6 Quality of teaching very good Inspectors make judgements about teaching in the range: excellent; very good; good; satisfactory; unsatisfactory; poor; very poor. ‘Satisfactory’ means that the teaching is adequate and strengths outweigh weaknesses. The quality of teaching is very good overall and this is a major strength of the school. Effective methods are used consistently by teachers throughout the school to promote successful learning and to meet the needs of all pupils.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Neighbourhood Governance Note of Norwood Green Ward Forum Meeting ______
    Neighbourhood Governance Note of Norwood Green Ward Forum Meeting ______________________________________________________________________________________ Norwood Green Ward Forum meeting – held on Friday 17 October 2008 at 7pm at St Mary’s Church, Norwood Green Road, UB2 Present: Councillors Sharma (Chair), Aslam, Mann Attendees: Over 26 people attended with 24 signing the attendance sheet. Sgt. Andy Storr – Norwood Green Safer Neighbourhood Team Note taker: Kofi Nyamah (KN) - Neighbourhood Co-ordinator (West) Apologies: None No. Note Action Point/Information 1. Welcome and introductions The meeting started at 7pm in the hall of St Mary’s Church, Norwood Green Road. Councillor Sharma (Chair) welcomed those present and introduced Councillors Aslam, Mann and Ealing council officer, Kofi Nyamah. 1 No. Note Action Point/Information 2. The role of ward forums KN outlined the role of ward forums: - Replacing Area Committees - Acting as consultation group on issues of local and borough wide concern - Problem-solving local issues with residents, Councillors and Council officers - £40,000 of funding available to implement local ward improvement projects, such as: local traffic & highways schemes local environmental improvements parks improvements additional clean-up and rubbish removal schemes alley gating schemes - Councillor Sharma explained the process for spending £40,000 for ward improvements. Proposals put forward by ward residents, assessed and recommended by ward councillors. Formal decisions on whether to implement recommendations taken by appropriate council portfolio holder - A number of residents complained that they had not - KN to investigate ‘Neighbourhood Matters’ leaflet received the ‘Neighbourhood Matters’ leaflet and were distribution only aware of the ward forum through friends or via an email sent by KN 2 No.
    [Show full text]
  • A Rare Opportunity to Acquire This Grade II Listed Family House
    A rare opportunity to acquire this Grade II Listed family house Fairfax Road, Bedford Park, Chiswick, London, W4 £2,800,000 Freehold ◆ 6 bedrooms ◆ 2 reception rooms ◆ kitchen / dining room ◆ 3 bathrooms ◆ fabulous garden ◆ semi-detached ◆ Grade II Listed ◆ roof terrace ◆ storage ◆ off-street parking ◆ 253.95 sq m (2,734 sq ft) Local Information room / sitting room with doors Fairfax Road is considered to be opening out onto the mature one of the best addresses garden. This floor also in Bedford Park, located in central accommodates a bathroom. Chiswick close to Turnham Green The first floor offers three Terrace. Fairfax Road sits in the bedrooms and a family bathroom. heart of Bedford Park, London’s The bedroom at the back of the first garden suburb and house has the popular Bedford Chiswick's most sought-after Park palisade fencing roof enclave. It is a short distance terrace. The second floor houses from the excellent shops, a further three bedrooms and a boutiques and restaurants of family bathroom. central Chiswick, and close to Overall this is a tremendously Turnham Green Underground versatile house with further station (District Line). Central potential to create a stunning London and Heathrow (A4/M4) family home. are easily accessible, as are several leading independent Tenure schools. Freehold About this property Local Authority Located on a very popular Hounslow Council residential tree lined street in Bedford Park. This Grade II Listed Energy Performance Norman Shaw semi-detached EPC Rating = Listed Building family house offers a secluded westerly facing garden and Viewing superb potential. A Virtual Tour Viewing of the The house is currently arranged house is available on request over three floors retaining a largely original arrangement of All viewings will be accompanied space with many period features, and are strictly by prior whilst several of the rooms are of arrangement through Savills grand proportions with ceiling Chiswick Office.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Feltham Rediscovering the Identity of a Post-Industrial Town
    London Borough of Hounslow ৷ Feltham ৷ 2019 Our Feltham Rediscovering the Identity of a Post-Industrial Town An Interactive Qualifying Project Report submitted to the Faculty of the WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science by: Meredith Forcier ৷ BME ৷ ‘20 Hannah Mikkila ৷ ME ৷ ‘20 Kyle Reese ৷ RBE/CS ৷ ‘20 Jonathan Sanchez ৷ ME/RBE ৷ ‘20 Nicholas Wotton ৷ MA ৷ ‘20 Advisors: Professor Fabio Carrera & Professor Esther Boucher-Yip https://sites.google.com/view/lo19-of/home [email protected] | [email protected] This report represents the work of WPI undergraduate students submitted to the faculty as evidence of completion of a degree requirement. WPI routinely publishes these reports on its website without editorial or peer review. For more information about the projects program at WPI, please see http://www.wpi.edu/academics/ugradstudies/project-learning.html Abstract The London Borough of Hounslow is implementing a fifteen-year revitalization plan for Feltham. Through interviews and community engagement, our project highlighted the elements that make up the identity of the town to be incorporated in the next steps in the redesign of the town center. The team created a website that incorporates project deliverables, a comprehensive list of bibliographical sources, an Encyclopedia of important town assets, a walking tour of key elements of town identity, and a promotional video. ii Acknowledgments There were many people who made the completion of this project possible. It has been a long journey since we began work on the project in January 2019, but a few people have been there all along the way to help us.
    [Show full text]
  • Traffic Noise Maps of Public Parks in Hounslow May 2018
    Traffic noise maps of public parks in Hounslow May 2018 This document shows traffic noise maps for parks in the borough. The noise maps are taken from http://www.extrium.co.uk/noiseviewer.html. Occasionally, google earth or google map images are included to help the reader identify where the park is located. Similar documents are available for all London Boroughs. These were created as part of research into the impact of traffic noise in London’s parks. They should be read in conjunction with the main report and data analysis which are available at http://www.cprelondon.org.uk/resources/item/2390-noiseinparks. The key to the traffic noise maps is shown here to the right. Orange denotes noise of 55 decibels (dB). Louder noises are denoted by reds and blues with dark blue showing the loudest. Where the maps appear with no colour and are just grey, this means there is no traffic noise of 55dB or above. London Borough of Hounslow 1 1. Beaversfield Park 2. Bedfont Lake Country Park 3. Boston Manor Park 2 4. Chiswick Back Common 5. Crane Valley Park, South West Middlesex Crematorium Gardens, Leitrim Park 6. Dukes Meadows 3 7. Feltham Park, Blenheim Park, Feltham Arena, Glebelands Playing Fields 8. Gunnersbury Park 9. Hanworth Park 4 10. Heston Park 11. Hounslow Heath 12. Inwood Park 5 13. Jersey Gardens, Ridgeway Road North Park 14. Redlees Park 15. Silverhall Park 6 16. St John’s Gardens 17. Thornbury Park (Woodland Rd) 18. Thornbury Park (Great West Road) 7 19. Turnham Green 20. Lampton Park 21.
    [Show full text]
  • Hounslow Local Plan Reviews Examination Library 29/03/2021
    Hounslow Local Plan Reviews Examination Library 29/03/2021 This list sets out all the documentation that has been submitted to the Planning Inspectorate for the examination of the London Borough of Hounslow’s Local Plan Review. Each of the documents has a unique reference number, and can be viewed using the links provided in the document title. Documents in bold have been updated with a revised version, designated alphabetically. Reference Document No. Core Documents Core01 Core01 LBH LPR Volume 2 - Site Allocations (Regulation 19 Version) Core02 Core02 LBH LPR Volume 3 - West of Borough Plan (Regulation 19 Version) Core03 Core03 LBH LPR Volume 4 - Great West Corridor Plan (Regulation 19 Version) Core04-Main Core04-Main LBH LPR Volume 3 Table of Main Modifications Core04-Add Core04-Add LBH LPR Volume 3 Table of Additional Modifications Core05-Main Core05-Main LBH LPR Volume 4 Table of Main Modifications Core05-Add Core05-Add LBH LPR Volume 4 Table of Additional Modifications Core06-A Core06-A LBH LPR Volume 2 - Site Allocations (Submission Track Version) Core07-A Core07-A LBH LPR Volume 3 - West of Borough Plan (Submission Track Version) Core08-A Core08-A LBH LPR Volume 4 - Great West Corridor Plan (Submission Track Version) Core09 Core09 LBH LPR Volume 2 - Site Allocations (Submission Clean Version) Core10 Core10 LBH LPR Volume 3 - West of Borough Plan (Submission Clean Version) Core11 Core11 LBH LPR Volume 4 - Great West Corridor Plan (Submission Clean Version) Core12 Core12 LBH LPR Integrated Impact Assessment - Volume 3 (Regulation
    [Show full text]
  • Bedford Park Conservation Area Character Appraisal
    Bedford Park Conservation Area Character Appraisal BEDFORD PARK CONSERVATION AREA CHARACTER APPRAISAL 1. INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................3 1.1. THE DEFINITION AND PURPOSE OF CONSERVATION AREAS ..................................................................3 1.2. THE PURPOSE AND STATUS OF THIS APPRAISAL.................................................................................3 1.3. SUMMARY OF SPECIAL INTEREST .....................................................................................................5 2. LOCATION AND SETTING...............................................................................................6 2.1. LOCATION AND CONTEXT ................................................................................................................6 2.2. GENERAL CHARACTER AND PLAN FORM............................................................................................6 2.3. LANDSCAPE SETTING .....................................................................................................................6 3. HISTORIC DEVELOPMENT AND ARCHAEOLOGY.........................................................7 3.1. HISTORIC DEVELOPMENT................................................................................................................7 3.2. ARCHAEOLOGY ...........................................................................................................................16 4. SPATIAL ANALYSIS .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • London Borough of Richmond Upon Thames Employment Land Study
    Final Report London Borough of Richmond upon Thames Employment Land Study Prepared for: London Borough of Richmond upon Thames Prepared by: URS Corporation Ltd With: Knight Frank June 2006 44406786 Employment Land Study June 2006 Final Report Issue No 5 44406786 / 5921 06-06-01 LBRuT ELS Final.doc Employment Land Study Project Title: Employment Land Study Report Title: Project No: 44406786 Report Ref: 5921 Status: Draft Client Contact Name: Caroline Steenberg Client Company Name: London Borough of Richmond upon Thames Issued By: St George's House 5 St George's Road Wimbledon London SW19 4DR Document Production / Approval Record Issue No: 2 Name Signature Date Position Prepared Trina Gaddes, 1 June 2006 Consultant by Robert Salkeld, Project Manager Checked Rory Brooke 1 June 2006 Project Director by Approved Rory Brooke 1 June 2006 Project Director by Document Revision Record Issue No Date Details of Revisions 1 February 2006 Original issue 2 20th March 2006 2nd Draft 3 3rd April 3rd Draft, Recommendations only 4 4th May Final Report 5 1st June Revised Final Report 06-06-01 LBRuT ELS Final.doc 01/06/2006 44406786 / 5921 Employment Land Study LIMITATION URS Corporation Limited (URS) has prepared this Report for the sole use of London Borough of Richmond upon Thames in accordance with the Agreement under which our services were performed. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this Report or any other services provided by us. This Report may not be relied upon by any other party without the prior and express written agreement of URS.
    [Show full text]
  • Autumn/Winter 2017 2 Bedford Park Journal Autumn/Winter 2017
    THE BEDFORD PARK JOURNAL Celebrating the architecture, people and history of the suburb For members of the Bedford Park Society Autumn/Winter 2017 2 Bedford Park Journal Autumn/Winter 2017 Research pays off Local resident A few years ago my wife and I bid for a charming old black and white photograph of Priory Road (later renamed Priory Ralph Palmer Gilhooly’s Avenue) on an internet auction site. When it arrived I was surprised to find that it was a postcard with a message in and his wife Georgina French from a boy to his father and mother. Handwritten on Mitford’s keen interest in the photograph was the date, le 17 Juillet 1912, and a cross on what looked like our front door! Bedford Park history led Using a magnifying glass and with the help of a lovely friend to his discovery of an (fluent in French) we finally managed to decipher the text intriguing link between addressed to Mr and Mrs L Arnoult in Rouen, France: I realised that George Derville Rowlandson was a well-known Priory Avenue and a painter who lived in the house next door to ours in 1912 so 1920s’ Tour de France the cross had been drawn to show his house rather than ours. George had two sons, one of whom was called Paulin, cyclist. and who would at that time have been eight years old. Dear Parents I am writing this card mostly to announce the arrival of my bicycle. This morning I made it into London by bike and it took me a long time.
    [Show full text]
  • Gunnersbury 2026 Masterplan
    GUNNERSBURY PARK REGENERATION PROJECT GUNNERSBURY 2026 MASTERPLAN Contents 1. 0 Introduction 1.1 Background to the project 1.2 The Regeneration of Gunnersbury Park 1.3 Vision for Gunnersbury Park and Local History Museum 1.4 Geographical Area of the Park 1.5 Ownership and Project management 1.6 Masterplan Development 1.7 Brief Outline of the Proposals 1.8 People Engagement 2.0 Phase One Priorities – Delivery Stage 2012 to 2016 2.1 Restoration of Landscape 2.2 Restoration of Buildings 2.3 Enhanced Museum 3.0 Phase Two Priorities – Delivery Stage 2015 to 2020 3.1 Small Mansion and Stables 3.2 Café, Catering and Events 3.3 Wider Parkland – Biodiversity and Potomac lake 4.0 Phase Three Priorities – Delivery Stage 2020 to 2026 4.1 Pitch and Putt 4.2 Amenity Facilities 4.3 Walled Garden 4.4 Playground 4.5 Sports 4.6 Japanese Garden 4.7 Management and Maintenance 5.0 Business Plan and Future Governance 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Background to the Project Gunnersbury Park is a Grade II* English Heritage Registered Park containing 22 Grade II* and Grade II English Heritage listed buildings making it one of the top 30% of Registered Parks and Gardens containing some of the top 10% of historic buildings in England. The Park has a rich history and a strong historic significance having been owned and developed as private ‘country’ estates by both Princess Amelia, daughter of George II in the C18th and Baron Lionel de Rothschild and his family in C19th, before finally becoming a public park in 1926.
    [Show full text]
  • Hounslow Borough Profile
    Travel in Hounslow will be affected during the Games Olympic Games: 27 July – 12 August 2012 Paralympic Games: 29 August – 9 September 2012 Transport for London Road events Get around more easily by planning ahead The Cycling Road Races will take place on Saturday 28 July and Sunday This year brings the largest sporting events to the world to 29 July in neighbouring boroughs. The route and surrounding roads will the UK – the Olympic and Paralympic Games. Because we’re be closed to traffic but emergency and local access will be maintained hosting these large events, you’d expect roads and public as far as possible. transport to be much busier than usual. On Saturday 28 July, road closures will begin at 03:00 with roads reopening after the race as soon as it is safe to do so. On Sunday 29 July, We will be working hard to host a great Games and keep roads will begin to be closed from 05:00 and will be reopened as soon London moving. The information on this map will help you as possible. understand where the transport network will be busiest in your Olympic Torch Relay area and how your journey could be affected. The Olympic Torch Relay will pass through Hounslow on Tuesday 24 July. There will be a rolling road closure as it travels through the borough, so expect some delays to your journey if you travel on this day. The Olympic and Paralympic Route Network (ORN/PRN) and Games Lanes Public transport A number of temporary road changes will be in place in your area to Some stations and lines will be particularly busy.
    [Show full text]
  • Travel to British Standards Institution
    L D A V E C R S D E A T E S R A N Based on Bartholomews mapping. ReproducedB by permissionB Di L W S R E NEWTON AV U R st A Y O of HarperCollins Publishers Ltd., Bishopbriggs, Glasgow.Y 2012 r E A ic 272 D R A D A t R A RO V N C M 272 LD www.bartholomewmaps.com Y E L T HA Route27 until NovBBO 2012 in AN D O N A O C V C By Train e U L N E Digital Cartography by Pindar Creative n w L Getting to BSI mi alk 15 ing N A Acton0- t Route27 from Nov 2012 E V 1 imE Q • The London Overground runs between L e B491 D E ROAD N t e SOUTHFIELD E Ya Town f R U mR B 440 r B E i O o (subject to confirmation) Address: Chiswick Tower, Richmond and Stratford stopping at Travel to E U x L AD mD R o B L A R S O RO O r E Y R R G R s SPELDHUR E p EY L ID i ST R 389 Chiswick High Road, London W4 4AL. Gunnersbury. A R R O M NR B E t AD O p NU N H e A B E LLO C L A SU O T Y British Standards D RG B E T E ERSE 91 N L SOM T N F BEDFORD U N SOUTH H All visitors must enter the building through • The ‘Hounslow Loop’ has stations at E3 G ROAD B44 E B O R PARK the main entrance on Chiswick High Road Kew Bridge, Richmond, Weybridge, NE O Institution A ACTON L D L S A A D A R N E O E O 272 fields E U D EL A E V R E T U 94 and report to Reception on arrival.
    [Show full text]
  • LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES JERSEY FAMILY and ESTATE ACC/1401 Page 1 Reference Description Dates Osterley and Other Estate Reco
    LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 1 JERSEY FAMILY AND ESTATE ACC/1401 Reference Description Dates Osterley and other estate records No. 38 Berkeley Square ACC/1401/040 Account and related papers of J. Watkin, house 1870-1872 Access by written permission agent, for letting No. 38 Berkeley Square. only ACC/1401/041 Receipt of Lord Londesborough 1872 1 Feb Access by written permission For £1000 received from Earl of Jersey for only internal repairs to 38 Berkeley Square. ACC/1401/042 Bundle of correspondence, vouchers, accounts, 1871-1874 Access by written permission specifications only For repairs to and letting of No. 38 Berkeley Square to Lord Londesborough, including detailed descriptive particulars of interior of house (Acc. 1401/042/007) Sales particulars of parts of Osterley estate ACC/1401/043 Particulars of Osterley House to be let c 1868 Access by written permission furnished. With plan of Park annexed. only ACC/1401/044 Sales particulars of building land 1903 Access by written permission In new road off the Uxbridge Road, Southall only and piece of accommodation land or building land near Southall Green. With plans. 3 copies ACC/1401/045 Sales particulars of building land 1908 Access by written permission In Southall at Wolf Meadow, Frogmore Green, only The Grange, Farm Cottage, and in High Street and North Road. With plans. ACC/1401/046 Sales particulars of building land 1912 Access by written permission At North Hyde, Frogmore Green and Top only Locks, Southall and at Lampton near Hounslow. with plans. ACC/1401/047 Sales particulars of building land, etc. 1919 Access by written permission At Southall and Park Farm, Hanwell With plans.
    [Show full text]