DOCSLIB.ORG

Russia and the Contemporary World

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Russia and the Contemporary World Russia and the Contemporary World Gennady Zyuganov Chairman of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation functioning have always been at the center of Russian philosophical The problems thought, political of passions, Russia's and struggles. development The need to solve theseand prob the organization of its basic lems grows especially urgent during those transistional moments in the history of our Fatherland—a cyclical history which, unlike many other nations, is marked by achievements of sovereign power and spiritual purity, alternating with periods of state catastrophe and moral degredation. What has been happening in Russia over the past eight to ten years? What are the real, underlying reasons for the recurrent Russian conflict? Who or what is responsible? What must be done to place the situation under control once and for all? Where is the way out of its political, economic, and ideological dead end? Russian society cannot move forward without articulating answers to these questions or recognizing the particular features of its historic path, and the character of those problems standing before it. In order to approach these questions, we must consider the following issues: 1) the processes going on in the world in the spheres of material produc tion, science and technology, social, political, national, and ideological relations; 2) the condition and role of power structures in the life of modern society; 3) the role of capital concentrated in the "hands" of a few national and transnational groups which act as organizers and directors of social cataclysms; 4) the ten dencies of interrelationships among states struggling to survive within the con ditions of a growing shortage in raw materials and energy; and 5) the fierce competition for the market. Translated from Russian by David L. Gehrenbeck, Brown University Summer 1995 - Volume II, Issue 2 117 This content downloaded from 128.148.254.57 on Thu, 01 Feb 2018 21:45:04 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms Gennady Zyuganov 0 . This gamut of problems has been Communists must now developed in many scholarly works and WOrk with increased publications. It is only just beginning, how energy on ascertaining an e™r<10 * "?e s"b)e? of comprehensive OJ . ° philosophical-political research. The con authentic, and not sequences of the policy of the so-called "de illusory, concept of ideologization" of social thought are tell 1 • . 1.1 ing. Under appeals to root out the "phi history an theory« losophy of totalitarianism," many research programs have been curtailed. The promised exit of ideology into a qualitatively new branch of devel opment has not taken place. Common human values—torn out of the real con text of class, national, informational, and geopolitical interests—have ended up socially and politically eroded, and, in essence, lost any real definition. Like the formula "the more democracy, the more socialism," the ideas of "perestroika," "acceleration," "the human factor," and "qualitatively new conditions of soci ety" have only succeeded to create the illusion of a new theoretical situation. Therefore, communists must now work with increased energy on ascer taining an authentic, and not illusory, concept of history and theory. The ques tion about the theoretical activity of the party was one of the central issues at the recent plenum of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation (CC CPRF). Although far from being fully answered, it is now possible to locate the solution to the problem within the context of Russian history and contemportary life. Basic Contradictions The necessity of revamping our society and establishing a new strategic line for its development arose long ago, as the result of both internal and external cir cumstances. In the beginning of the last decade, a number of contradictions became clear within the effort towards social development: 1) a unified form of state property, and the centralized system of governance founded on it, versus the growing need for self-governance of major industrial and agricultural en terprises, scientific centers, and other highly developed sectors; 2) the intensive development of various enterprises of a particular group, primarily the entire defense complex, versus the enterprises of all other groups; 3) the high level of industrial development versus the archaic position of agriculture; 4) the stag nant production relationships versus the growing production potential; 5) the growth in volume of the production versus the decrease in consumption by the population; and 6) the tendency towards unification of culture versus the con certed effort towards developing and maintaining national culture. The military-strategic parity between the USSR and the US abetted a turn from the Cold War to the discharging of international tension. This turn, however, being forced and limited—it touched only the level of strategic arma ments—did not remove the Soviet Union's political and economic contradic tions with the West. Known contradictions have arisen within the common 118 The Broïim Journal of World Affairs This content downloaded from 128.148.254.57 on Thu, 01 Feb 2018 21:45:04 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms Russia and the Contemporary World wealth of socialist countries as well. The situation that arose in the USSR had its mirror image reflected in the socialist countries—a situation which the West lost no time in exploiting. Finally, it is necessary to note a third group of contradictions as well— those in the Western world itself. These include primarily the contradiction between highly developed and weakly developed countries, as well as the com petition among highly developed countries for markets, energy, and material resources. Today, we can correctly draw the conclusion that the contradictions between the US and the USSR were not founded on a difference in ideology, but, rather, on a rivalry for political and economic influence in the world. One cannot help but agree with those researchers who examine the con tent of these contradictions through the prism of the changes that have taken place not only in Russia but within the spectrum of relations among civiliza tions. The major tendency of these changes, which have appeared in various regions and countries of the world with different levels of intensity, is clear. The result of these changes is the adaptation of socio-economic systems to the needs of the scientific-technical revolution, along with the establishment of a unified structure of aggregate productive forces and new social structures. The Process Has Not Begun One cannot say that the leadership of the country did not see the need for re form. From year to year, at all levels, an understanding evolved regarding the notion that a mechanism was necessary to lend the requisite dynamism to the development of the USSR. As a result, the model of perestroika took shape—a model which was directed toward the control of socio-political changes, at first within the framework of the existing state-political and social structure, and then much more widely—beyond the borders of formalized relationships, tak ing into account common processes among civilizations. In general, reforms can be successfully executed in the presence of the following conditions: a carefully thought-out program, and a clear goal of the reform; an energetic and highly intellectual team of reformers; a strong and active system of directing political phenomena; the mobilization of the mass media for the explanation of the essence, the goals, and the consequences of the reforms for the state as a whole, and for the individual; and, lastly, the preser vation and development of structures, relations, functions, and methods that have met with the approval of the population. Reforms are developing in China in approximately this manner. Gorbachev and his team, however, failed to adhere to this formula. The great tragedy for the USSR was centered around the fact that the Party nomenklatura rejected the ideas of a careful but rapid reform movement, one without a break with the historical tradition of the Russian civilization. Instead, the ideology of Eurocentrism was adopted—all must follow the path of the West. Within its framework is the social philosophy of neo-liberalism. This situation cast the country off the track of a formally declared goal—a multi-tiered, socially-ori ented economy. Thus, a qualitative social break of the counterrevolutionary Summer 1995 - Volume II, Issue 2 119 This content downloaded from 128.148.254.57 on Thu, 01 Feb 2018 21:45:04 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms Gennady Zyuganov variety began at a forced tempo, with all its inherent attributes: collapse, suf fering, violence, theft, and lawlessness. The most important tendency defining the mechanism of socio-political changes in the beginning of this decade was the growth of social conflict. The failure of perestroika as a mechanism for the resolution of agonizing—that is, irreconcilable—conflicts contributed to a transition escalating into antagonistic conflict. Not just separate individuals and pressure groups, but practically all social layers and political constituencies have become the subject of a struggle for power. "Managed Catastrophe" From the moment that a political group of radical "Westernizers"—with the support of the world oligarchy—managed to take political power in Russia, at the cost of the fall of the USSR, it became clear that a significant portion of Russians would not accept the path of development embarked upon by the radical democrats. It is equally clear that the number of those dissatisfied will begin to grow in accordance with the impoverishment of the masses—the un avoidable consequences of the political and economic course of the new Rus sian leadership. At a certain stage, the dissatisfaction will reach a chaotic, criti cal point, when the efforts of many years of activity by powerful international forces striving to distance Russia from the geopolitical arena by any means— and attain global sovereignity—will wind up in danger.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Russia's 2012 Presidential Election
    Russia’s 2012 Presidential Election: Yet Another Term for Putin? By Paweł Piotr Styrna l February 27, 2012 The next presidential election in post-Soviet Russia is scheduled for March 4, 2012. The roster of candidates Russian voters can choose from is rather limited, both in terms of the number of candidates and their backgrounds. The upcoming contest pits five candidates against each other: the Sovietonostalgic chekist, Vladimir Putin; the unreconstructed and unrepentant communist, Gennady Zyuganov; the socialist - and long-time Chairman of the Federation Council (Russia’s upper house) - Sergey Mironov, the nominee of the “Just Russia” Party; the infamous, rabid chauvinist, Vladimir Zhirinovsky; and the “independent” oligarch, Mikhail Prokhorov. Not surprisingly, all these men embody different, yet often overlapping, facets of post-communism. One will notice the conspicuous and telling absence of a conservative, Christian, anti-communist alternative of the Alexander Solzhenitsyn variety. This seems to correspond with what some have argued to constitute one of the essential features of post-communism (particularly in the former USSR), i.e. an ostensible political pluralism serving as a façade, disguising an establishment jealously guarding the post-communist status quo, and attempting to marginalize threats to it. Thus, the faux pluralism appears designed to cater to multiple ideological persuasions in society without jeopardizing the main continuities between communism-proper and post-communism, not to mention the privileges, perks, and golden parachutes retained or acquired by the post-communist oligarchy. This is not to claim that the post-bolshevik establishment is a monolith or that no spheres of freedom exist, but that these are significantly limited.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise and Decline of Catching up Development an Experience of Russia and Latin America with Implications for Asian ‘Tigers’
    Victor Krasilshchikov The Rise and Decline of Catching up Development An Experience of Russia and Latin America with Implications for Asian ‘Tigers’ ENTELEQUIA REVISTA INTERDISCIPLINAR The Rise and Decline of Catching up Development An Experience of Russia and Latin America with Implications for Asian `Tigers' by Victor Krasilshchikov Second edition, July 2008 ISBN: Pending Biblioteca Nacional de España Reg. No.: Pending Published by Entelequia. Revista Interdisciplinar (grupo Eumed´net) available at http://www.eumed.net/entelequia/en.lib.php?a=b008 Copyright belongs to its own author, acording to Creative Commons license: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 made up using OpenOffice.org THE RISE AND DECLINE OF CATCHING UP DEVELOPMENT (The Experience of Russia and Latin America with Implications for the Asian ‘Tigers’) 2nd edition By Victor Krasilshchikov About the Author: Victor Krasilshchikov (Krassilchtchikov) was born in Moscow on November 25, 1952. He graduated from the economic faculty of Moscow State University. He obtained the degrees of Ph.D. (1982) and Dr. of Sciences (2002) in economics. He works at the Centre for Development Studies, Institute of World Economy and International Relations (IMEMO), Russian Academy of Sciences. He is convener of the working group “Transformations in the World System – Comparative Studies in Development” of European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI – www.eadi.org) and author of three books (in Russian) and many articles (in Russian, English, and Spanish). 2008 THE RISE AND DECLINE OF CATCHING UP DEVELOPMENT Entelequia.Revista Interdisciplinar Victor Krasilshchikov / 2 THE RISE AND DECLINE OF CATCHING UP DEVELOPMENT C O N T E N T S Abbreviations 5 Preface and Acknowledgements 7 PART 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Gennady Zyuganov's Communist Party Finished First 187
    Why Gennady Zyuganov 's Communist Party Finished First ALEXANDER S. TSIPKO t must be said that the recent Communist Party of the Russian Federation (KPRF) victory in the Duma elections was not a surprise. All Russian Isociologists predicted Gennady Zyuganov's victory four months before the elections on 17 December 1995. The KPRF, competing against forty-two other parties and movements, was expected to receive slightly more than 20 percent of the votes (it received 21.7 percent) and more than fifty deputy seats according to single-mandate districts (it received fifty-eight). Before the elections, there were obvious signals that the vote would go to the KPRF. It was expected that the older generation would vote for the KPRF. The pensioners, who suffered the most damage from shock therapy, would most certainly vote for members representing the ancién regime (for social guarantees, work, and security; things the former social system gave them). Even before the elections, the image of the KPRF as a real party had been formed. In my opinion, the victory of the KPRF in the elections is a critical event in Russia's post-Soviet history, which demands both more attention and clearer comprehension. The simplistic reason often given for the KPRF victory was the sudden introduction of the monetarist method of reform, which resulted in an inevitable leftward shift in the mood of society and a restoration of neo-communism. The heart of the problem is not so simple and orderly-it is found in Russian affairs and in Russian nature. First of all, it is evident that the Duma election victory of KPRF leader Gennady Zyuganov has a completely different moral and political meaning than the victory of the neo-communist party of Aleksander Kwasniewski in the November 1995 Polish presidential elections.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislatures, Cooptation, and Social Protest in Putin's
    LEGISLATURES, COOPTATION, AND SOCIAL PROTEST IN PUTIN’S RUSSIA An NCEEER Working Paper by Ora John Reuter Graeme B. Robertson National Council for Eurasian and East European Research University of Washington Box 353650 Seattle, WA 98195 [email protected] http://www.nceeer.org/ TITLE VIII PROGRAM Project Information* Principal Investigator: Ora John Reuter NCEEER Contract Number: 827-10g Date: October 10, 2013 Copyright Information Individual researchers retain the copyright on their work products derived from research funded through a contract or grant from the National Council for Eurasian and East European Research (NCEEER). However, the NCEEER and the United States Government have the right to duplicate and disseminate, in written and electronic form, reports submitted to NCEEER to fulfill Contract or Grant Agreements either (a) for NCEEER’s own internal use, or (b) for use by the United States Government, and as follows: (1) for further dissemination to domestic, international, and foreign governments, entities and/or individuals to serve official United States Government purposes or (2) for dissemination in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act or other law or policy of the United States Government granting the public access to documents held by the United States Government. Neither NCEEER nor the United States Government nor any recipient of this Report may use it for commercial sale. * The work leading to this report was supported in part by contract or grant funds provided by the National Council for Eurasian and East European Research, funds which were made available by the U.S. Department of State under Title VIII (The Soviet-East European Research and Training Act of 1983, as amended).
    [Show full text]
  • Berezovsky-Judgment.Pdf
    Neutral Citation Number: [2012] EWHC 2463 (Comm) Royal Courts of Justice Rolls Building, 7 Rolls Buildings, London EC4A 1NL Date: 31st August 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Case No: 2007 Folio 942 QUEEN’S BENCH DIVISION COMMERCIAL COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim Nos: HC08C03549; HC09C00494; CHANCERY DIVISION HC09C00711 Before: MRS JUSTICE GLOSTER, DBE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between: Boris Abramovich Berezovsky Claimant - and - Roman Arkadievich Abramovich Defendant Boris Abramovich Berezovsky Claimant - and - Hine & Others Defendants - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Laurence Rabinowitz Esq, QC, Richard Gillis Esq, QC, Roger Masefield Esq, Simon Colton Esq, Henry Forbes-Smith Esq, Sebastian Isaac Esq, Alexander Milner Esq, and Ms. Nehali Shah (instructed by Addleshaw Goddard LLP) for the Claimant Jonathan Sumption Esq, QC, Miss Helen Davies QC, Daniel Jowell Esq, QC, Andrew Henshaw Esq, Richard Eschwege Esq, Edward Harrison Esq and Craig Morrison Esq (instructed by Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP) for the Defendant Ali Malek Esq, QC, Ms. Sonia Tolaney QC, and Ms. Anne Jeavons (instructed by Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP) appeared for the Anisimov Defendants to the Chancery Actions David Mumford Esq (instructed by Macfarlanes LLP) appeared for the Salford Defendants to the Chancery Actions Jonathan Adkin Esq and Watson Pringle Esq (instructed by Signature Litigation LLP) appeared for the Family Defendants to the Chancery Actions Hearing dates: 3rd – 7th October 2011; 10th – 13th October 2011; 17th – 19th October 2011; 24th & 28th October 2011; 31st October – 4th November 2011; 7th – 10th November 2011; 14th - 18th November 2011; 21st – 23 November 2011; 28th November – 2nd December 2011; 5th December 2011; 19th & 20th December 2011; 17th – 19th January 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia: Political Parties in a 'Managed Democracy'
    At a glance December 2014 Russia: political parties in a 'managed democracy' From the October 1917 Bolshevik Revolution until 1989, the Communist Party of the Soviet Union was the country's only legal party. Since then, the number has grown, with a record 69 parties participating in the September 2014 regional elections. However, this apparent diversity does not mean that Russian voters have a real choice, as Vladimir Putin's grip on power is increasingly unchallenged, gradually reversing the gains made in the post-1989 democratisation process. United Russia – the 'party of power' (UR) In an inversion of the usual democratic procedure whereby political parties choose their leaders, the party was set up in 1999 to mobilise support for Vladimir Putin, at the time serving as prime minister under Boris Yeltsin. (Initially it went by the name of Unity, but was renamed United Russia after a merger in 2001). Thanks to the popularity of Putin's strong action on Chechnya, UR quickly became the dominant party in both national and most regional parliaments. It has held onto its majority in the lower house of the national parliament (State Duma) ever since 2003, despite a large drop in its share of the vote in 2011 (from 64% to 49%). Regional elections held in September 2014, in which UR-nominated candidates won in 28 out of 30 provinces, suggest that UR's grip on power is likely to remain as firm as ever for the foreseeable future. Ideology: in its manifestos, UR advocates centrist policies which will appeal to the largest possible number of voters while remaining consistent with the government's general approach – economic liberalism but with state regulation and social protection, alongside an emphasis on conservative values and patriotism.
    [Show full text]
  • Globalization and Russia V.I
    Globalization and Russia V.I. Dobrenkov No social phenomenon can be considered outside the globalization context any more in modern social science. The essence of globalization, to my mind, is, in the shortest definition, that it is an objective, natural process of integration of the mankind. Globalization appears in the fact that social processes in one part of the world determine what is going on in all other parts of the world in a more influential way and are themselves affected by the latter. Space compression takes place, time is being pressed down, geographical and international borders become more transparent and easy to overcome. Flows of goods, services, information, people, and capital circulate around the planet with growing intensity. Various forms of union of peoples have been known since the ancient times, but the processes of integration of the mankind only embrace the whole planet for the first time in history in the end of the 20th century due to wild changes in communication means, economic, political, spiritual spheres. One can only speak about globalization in a strict sense of this word since that time. Globalization appears as a multilevel and many-sided system of various integration phenomena. The main ones are the emergence of global communication, global economics, global politics, global culture, a global language, and a global way of life. But it would be insufficient to restrict oneself with stating these changes. Globalization is seen as an extremely contradictory and complex process, if analyzed more thoroughly. On the one hand, globalization is a regular and necessary process of integration of the mankind, accompanied by the growth of the quality of life and well-being level of the mankind, accelerating of the economic and political development of countries, activation of interchange with technological, scientific, and cultural achievements among various countries and peoples.
    [Show full text]
  • Not Free 5.5
    Russia | Freedom House Page 1 of 4 About Us DONATE Blog Contact Us Reports Programs Initiatives News Experts Events Donate FREEDOM IN THE WORLD - View another year - Russia Russia Freedom in the World 2012 - Select year - OVERVIEW: 2012 SCORES President Dmitry Medvedev announced in September 2011 that he would not seek reelection in 2012 so STATUS that Prime Minister Vladimir Putin could return to the presidency. Putin had changed titles in 2008 to avoid violating the constitutional ban on serving more than two consecutive terms as president. Heavy Not Free manipulation of State Duma elections in early December barely preserved United Russia’s majority in the lower house of parliament, as voters apparently sought to punish the ruling party by casting ballots for FREEDOM RATING three Kremlin-approved opposition groups. In the weeks following the vote, tens of thousands of antigovernment demonstrators turned out to protest electoral fraud and official corruption in an 5.5 unprecedented Putin-era display of peaceful dissent. Also during the year, insurgent and other violence originating in the North Caucasus continued, with a high-profile attack on Moscow’s Domodedovo airport CIVIL LIBERTIES in January. 5 With the collapse of the Soviet Union in December 1991, the Russian Federation emerged as an independent POLITICAL RIGHTS state under the leadership of President Boris Yeltsin. In 1993, Yeltsin used force to thwart an attempted coup by parliamentary opponents of radical reform, after which voters approved a new constitution establishing a powerful 6 presidency and a bicameral national legislature, the Federal Assembly. The 1995 parliamentary elections featured strong support for the Communist Party and ultranationalist forces.
    [Show full text]
  • Directions of Financial Security Enforcement in the Central Asia Countries
    ,nternational Journal of ,nnovative Technologies in Economy ,SS1 2412-8368 D,RECT,21S 2F ),1A1C,A/ SEC8R,TY E1)2RCE0E1T I1 THE CE1TRAL AS,A C281TR,ES 1urymova Saule, Yessentay Aigerim .azakhstan, Almaty, ,nstitute of Economics of the Committee of Science of the 0inistry of Education and Science of the Republic of .azakhstan, 3hD doctoral student !wd//[9 /ECh !.^dw!/d Received 06 0arch 2018 Article is devoted to the assessment and analysis of the level of financial Accepted 04 April 2018 security of the economies of the countries of Central Asia, and the definition 3ublished 01 0ay 2018 of the criteria for the development of the financial system, its support and approval in the current economic situation. The urgency of the article is due Y9zthw5^ to the fact that in the current situation the proElem of ensuring financial security Eecomes systemic, it affects and connects individual countries, government, regions, economic entities, politics, economy, finance, etc. ,ntegration of finance, countries with a guarantee of financial security will contriEute to the security, sustainaEle development of the region's economy to financial risks. management, indicators, Eenchmarks, economy © 2018 The Authors. 9irtually there is no aspect of the country's national security that does not directly depend on the level of its financial security. At the same time, the level of financial security itself mostly depends on the level of other aspects of national security. Consideration of interrelations and dependence between various aspects of national security allows finding measures to prevent or overcome threats to the national interests. The dependence of all aspects of the country's national security on its financial security is at first glance extremely simple: the lack of financial resources leads to underfunding of the most urgent needs in various sectors of the economy and poses a threat to national security.
    [Show full text]
  • On December 31, 1999,Yeltsin's Russia Became Putin's Russia
    PROLOGUE n December 31, 1999,Yeltsin’s Russia became Putin’s Russia. Boris Yeltsin—a political maverick who until the end tried to Oplay the mutually exclusive roles of democrat and tsar, who made revolutionary frenzy and turmoil his way of survival—unexpect- edly left the Kremlin and handed over power, like a New Year’s gift, to Vladimir Putin, an unknown former intelligence officer who had hardly ever dreamed of becoming a Russian leader. Yeltsin—tired and sick, disoriented and having lost his stamina— apparently understood that he could no longer keep power in his fist. It was a painful and dramatic decision for a politician for whom nonstop struggle for power and domination was the substance of life and his main ambition. His failing health and numerous heart attacks, however, were not the main reasons behind his unexpected resignation. The moment came when Yeltsin could not control the situation much longer and—more important—he did not know how to deal with the new challenges Russia was facing. He had been accustomed to making breakthroughs, to defeating his enemies, to overcoming obstacles. He was not prepared for state building, for the effort of everyday governance, for consensus making, for knitting a new national unity. By nature he was a terminator, not a transformational leader. It was time for him to gra- ciously bow out and hand over power to his successor. And Russia had to live through a time of real suspense while the Kremlin was preparing the transfer of power. The new Russian leader Vladimir Putin has become a symbol of a staggering mix of continuity and change.
    [Show full text]
  • Oleksandr SHAROV GLOBALIZATION
    JOOUURNALL 5 O F E UU R O P E A N EECC O N O M Y Vol. 19. № 1 (72). January–March 2020 Publication of Ternopil National Economic Universit y International Economics Oleksandr SHAROV GLOBALIZATION: LATEST TRENDS OR PERMANENT DEVELOPMENT DIRECTION? Abstract The article views economic globalization in the theoretical and historical context. Analysing the origins of terminological interpretations, a new approach is being developed regarding the globalization’s objectivity and irreversibility as an inherent element in the development of the human community and international economic relations. Its commonalities and differences from the internationaliza- tion of the world economy are indicated. This raises the question of the globaliza- tion’s timing as a process, to answer which there are different approaches. The author examines the existing variants of periodization of globalization processes, as well as its peculiarities in the times of the global financial crisis of 2008–2010. He concludes that globalization is an objective process of the human community (economic) development of the area of its residence and that it is characteristic for the whole period of humanity’s existence. It is caused by the innate propensity of humanity for cooperation. However, it revealed its clear orientation after the Age of Discovery, intensified in the late nineteenth century (due to the industriali- zation of leading European nations and the colonization of the African continent and other non-European territories) and became a major trend in world economic development in the late 20 th – early 21 st centuries. Particular attention is paid to © Oleksandr Sharov, 2020. Sharov Oleksandr, Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor, Chief of the Foreign Economic Policy Department, National Institute for Strategic Studies, Ukraine.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Business and Economics Studies Вестник Исследований Бизнеса И Экономики
    Т. 8 • № 3 • 2020 ISSN 2308-944X (Print) ISSN 2311-0279 (Online) Review of Business and Economics Studies Вестник исследований бизнеса и экономики DOI: 10.26794/2308-944X The edition is reregistered Издание перерегистрировано in the Federal Service for Supervision в Федеральной службе по надзору of Communications, в сфере связи, информационных Informational Technologies технологий and Mass Media: и массовых коммуникаций: PI No. ФС77–67072 ПИ № ФС77–67072 of 15, September, 2016 от 15 сентября 2016 г. Publication frequency — Периодичность издания — 4 issues per year 4 номера в год Founder: “Financial University” Учредитель: «Финансовый университет» The Journal is included in the core of the Журнал включен в ядро Российского Russian Science Citation Index (RSCI) индекса научного цитирования (РИНЦ) The Journal is distributed by subscription. Журнал распространяется по подписке. Subscription index: 42137 Подписной индекс 42137 in the consolidated в объединенном catalogue “The Press of Russia” каталоге «Пресса России» Vol. 8 • No. 3 • 2020 Review of Business and Economics Studies DOI: 10.26794/2308-944X Review of Business and Economics Studies EDITOR-IN-CHIEF Kern K. Kwong Alan Sangster Alexander Ilyinsky D. Sc. in Economics, Professor, Asian D. Sc. in Economics, Professor, Doctor of Engineering, Professor Pacific Business Institute, California Business School, University Dean, Faculty of International State University, Los Angeles, USA of Aberdeen, King’s College, Economic Relations, Financial Aberdeen, UK University, Moscow, Russia Laura Marsiliani [email protected] D. Sc. in Economics, Assistant Dmitry Sorokin Professor, Department D. Sc. in Economics, Professor, MANAGING EDITOR of Economics and Finance, Corresponding member of the Dr Zbigniew Mierzwa University of Durham, Durham, UK Russian Academy of Sciences, [email protected] Scientific Supervisor at the Financial Dimitrios Mavrakis University, Moscow, Russia EDITORIAL BOARD D.
    [Show full text]