DOCSLIB.ORG

Bitcoin and Beyond: Cryptocurrencies, Blockchains, and Global Governance

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Campbell-Verduyn, Malcolm (Ed.) Book — Published Version Bitcoin and beyond: Cryptocurrencies, blockchains, and global governance RIPE Series in Global Political Economy Provided in Cooperation with: Taylor & Francis Group Suggested Citation: Campbell-Verduyn, Malcolm (Ed.) (2018) : Bitcoin and beyond: Cryptocurrencies, blockchains, and global governance, RIPE Series in Global Political Economy, ISBN 978-1-315-21190-9, Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, London, http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315211909 , http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/29557 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/181975 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ www.econstor.eu Bitcoin and Beyond Since the launch of Bitcoin in 2009, several hundred different ‘cryptocurrencies’ have been developed and become accepted for a wide variety of transactions in leading online commercial marketplaces and the ‘sharing economy’, as well as by more traditional retailers, manufacturers, and even by charities and political parties. Bitcoin and its competitors have also garnered attention for their wildly fluc- tuating values as well as implication in international money laundering, Ponzi schemes and online trade in illicit goods and services across borders. These and other controversies surrounding cryptocurrencies have induced varying govern- ance responses by central banks, government ministries, international organiza- tions, and industry regulators worldwide. Besides formal attempts to ban Bitcoin, there have been multifaceted efforts to incorporate elements of blockchains, the peer- to-peer technology underlying cryptocurrencies, in the wider exchange, recording, and broadcasting of digital transactions. Blockchains are being mobil- ized to support and extend an array of governance activities. The novelty and breadth of growing blockchain-based activities have fuelled both utopian prom- ises and dystopian fears regarding applications of the emergent technology to Bitcoin and beyond. This volume brings scholars of anthropology, economics, science and techno- logy studies, and sociology together with global political economy (GPE) scholars in assessing the actual implications posed by Bitcoin and blockchains for contemporary global governance. Its interdisciplinary contributions provide academics, policymakers, industry practitioners, and the general public with more nuanced understandings of technological change in the changing character of governance within and across the borders of nation-states. Malcolm Campbell- Verduyn is an SSHRC Postdoctoral Fellow at the Balsillie School of International Affairs, Canada. RIPE Series in Global Political Economy Series Editors: James Brassett (University of Warwick, UK), Eleni Tsingou (Copenhagen Business School, Denmark) and Susanne Soederberg (Queen’s University, Canada) The RIPE Series published by Routledge is an essential forum for cutting-edge scholarship in international political economy. The series brings together new and established scholars working in critical, cultural, and constructivist political economy. Books in the RIPE Series typically combine an innovative contribu- tion to theoretical debates with rigorous empirical analysis. The RIPE Series seeks to cultivate: • field- defining theoretical advances in international political economy • novel treatments of key issue areas, both historical and contemporary, such as global finance, trade, and production • analyses that explore the political economic dimensions of relatively neg- lected topics, such as the environment, gender relations, and migration • accessible work that will inspire advanced undergraduates and graduate stu- dents in international political economy. The RIPE Series in Global Political Economy aims to address the needs of stu- dents and teachers. For a full list of titles in this series, please visit www.routledge.com/RIPE- Series-in- Global-Political- Economy/book-series/RIPE Beyond Defeat and Austerity Disrupting (the Critical Political Economy of ) Neoliberal Europe David Bailey, Monica Clua- Losada, Nikolai Huke and Olatz Ribera-Almandoz Civil Society and Financial Regulation Consumer Finance Protection and Taxation after the Financial Crisis Lisa Kastner Bitcoin and Beyond Cryptocurrencies, Blockchains, and Global Governance Edited by Malcolm Campbell- Verduyn Bitcoin and Beyond Cryptocurrencies, Blockchains, and Global Governance Edited by Malcolm Campbell- Verduyn First published 2018 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN and by Routledge 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business © 2018 selection and editorial matter, Malcolm Campbell-Verduyn; individual chapters, the contributors The right of Malcolm Campbell-Verduyn to be identified as the author of the editorial matter, and of the authors for their individual chapters, has been asserted in accordance with sections 77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. The Open Access version of this book, available at www.taylorfrancis.com, has been made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 license. Trademark notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data A catalog record for this book has been requested ISBN: 978-0-415-79214-1 (hbk) ISBN: 978-1-315-21190-9 (ebk) Typeset in Times New Roman by Wearset Ltd, Boldon, Tyne and Wear Contents List of figures vii List of tables viii Notes on contributors ix Acknowledgements xiii 1 Introduction: what are blockchains and how are they relevant to governance in the contemporary global political economy? 1 MALCOLM CAMPBELL- VERDUYN 2 Moneys at the margins: from political experiment to cashless societies 25 MORITZ HÜTTEN AND MATTHIAS THIEMANN 3 The internal and external governance of blockchain-based organizations: evidence from cryptocurrencies 48 YING- YING HSIEH, JEAN- PHILIPPE (JP) VERGNE, AND SHA WANG 4 The mutual constitution of technology and global governance: Bitcoin, blockchains, and the international anti- money-laundering regime 69 MALCOLM CAMPBELL- VERDUYN AND MARCEL GOGUEN 5 Between liberalization and prohibition: prudent enthusiasm and the governance of Bitcoin/blockchain technology 88 KAI JIA AND FALIN ZHANG 6 Cryptocurrencies and digital payment rails in networked global governance: perspectives on inclusion and innovation 109 DAIVI RODIMA- TAYLOR AND WILLIAM W. GRIMES vi Contents 7 Governing what wasn’t meant to be governed: a controversy- based approach to the study of Bitcoin governance 133 FRANCESCA MUSIANI, ALEXANDRE MALLARD, AND CÉCILE MÉADEL 8 Experiments in algorithmic governance: a history and ethnography of “The DAO,” a failed decentralized autonomous organization 157 QUINN DUPONT 9 Conclusion: towards a block age or blockages of global governance? 178 MALCOLM CAMPBELL- VERDUYN Index 198 Figures 3.1 Variation of the five cryptocurrencies in our sample along the decentralization spectrum 58 4.1 The mutually constitutive relationship between technologies and international regimes 71 5.1 Spectrum of Bitcoin/blockchain governance 91 5.2 Bitcoin price fluctuations, 2009–17 (US dollars) 94 9.1 Interrelationships between governance by, with, and of blockchains 186 Tables 2.1 Evolution of the Bitcoin money game 41 3.1 List of variables 62 3.2 Regression results 63 5.1 Key events and policies in China 102 Contributors Malcolm Campbell- Verduyn is an SSHRC postdoctoral fellow at the Balsillie School of International Affairs. His research combines a general focus on lan- guage and ideas in the global political economy, with a specific interest in the roles of private actors, technologies, and technical artefacts in contemporary global governance. His research has appeared in the journals Business and Politics, Competition and Change, Global Society, Journal of European Public Policy, New Political Economy, and New Political Science. He is the author of Professional Authority after the Global Financial Crisis, published in 2017 by Palgrave Macmillan. Quinn DuPont is a postdoctoral researcher
Recommended publications
  • Enforcement Trends in Cryptocurrency

    Enforcement Trends in Cryptocurrency

    Latham & Watkins Financial Institutions Group & White Collar December 9, 2015 | Number 1904 Defense & Investigations Practice Enforcement Trends in Cryptocurrency Cryptocurrency is on the rise...and so are enforcement actions. In less than a decade, cyptocurrencies have grown from a novelty reserved for those dealing in the illicit into a robust platform embraced by financial institutions and businesses alike. Wall Street and strategic investors have increasingly taken note, working to adapt their technology, streamline market trading and integrate cryptocurrency into everyday financial transactions. The rapid adoption of cryptocurrencies has also led to increased government enforcement activity. These actions evidence US regulators’ appetite to investigate fraud and other violations linked to cryptocurrency — often using traditional laws and regulations. Given this increased government scrutiny, financial institutions and traders should understand how regulators have policed the virtual world in the past in order to be prepared for the future. Government Enforcement Actions in the Cryptocurrency Space Unsurprisingly, government regulators, including the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Department of Justice (DOJ), the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), have become increasingly active in policing the cryptocurrency space. The below enforcement actions provide a bird’s-eye view of how the enforcement framework for cryptocurrencies
  • CRYPTOCURRENCY: a PRIMER Accept Bitcoin3—Including Amazon.Com, What Is Cryptocurrency? Target, Paypal, Ebay, Dell, and Home

    CRYPTOCURRENCY: a PRIMER Accept Bitcoin3—Including Amazon.Com, What Is Cryptocurrency? Target, Paypal, Ebay, Dell, and Home

    CRYPTOCURRENCY: A PRIMER accept bitcoin3—including Amazon.com, What is cryptocurrency? Target, PayPal, eBay, Dell, and Home Depot—with anywhere from 80,000 to There is no one standard definition of 220,000 transactions occurring per day, cryptocurrency.1 At the most basic level representing over $50 million in estimated cryptocurrency—or digital currency or daily volume.4 virtual currency—is a medium of exchange that functions like money (in Cryptocurrencies allow for increased that it can be exchanged for goods and market efficiencies and reduced services) but, unlike traditional currency, transaction costs. At base, is untethered to, and independent from, cryptocurrency transactions are: national borders, central banks, sovereigns, or fiats. In other words, it . Private—no personal information is exists completely in the virtual world, required to complete a transaction;5 traded on multiple global platforms. These currencies are designed to . Fast—they are settled almost incorporate and exchange digital instantaneously, unlike credit card information through a process made transactions or wire transfers that possible by principles of cryptography, require days; which makes transactions secure and . Irrevocable—because transactions are verifiable. The most well-known settled almost immediately, there are cryptocurrency is bitcoin, which was no resulting chargebacks or possibility created back in 2009 and which still for disputes between buyer and seller; dominates the virtual currency market today.2 . Inexpensive—transaction costs are generally less than 1% if an intermediary is used, rather than the Why do they matter? customary credit card processing fee of roughly 2.5%; and Cryptocurrency is relevant to most . Global—neither buyer nor seller businesses and financial firms.
  • Motion Record of the Trustee (Returnable

    Motion Record of the Trustee (Returnable

    - 32 - cryptocurrency business. In its investigation and review of text and email communications, the Monitor noted that certain TPPs were instructed by Mr. Cotten to provide limited information to the financial institutions in relation to the intended use of the account and its association with the cryptocurrency industry to limit scrutiny by the financial institutions. 80. The Monitor identified a number of accounts that were frozen or closed subsequent to the financial institution becoming aware of the nature of the underlying transactions. The Monitor’s investigation indicates that frequently, Quadriga’s approach to addressing financial institution queries into the nature of the account usage was often to simply move on to another financial institution to avoid further questioning. 81. The Monitor’s investigation also identified many “cash” transactions where certain Users repeatedly funded their Accounts with large cash deposits. The Monitor has been advised that this involved the User physically handing cash in the form of legal tender to a representative of Quadriga. As an example, the Platform recorded $12.1 million of “In person Payments” received from one User through a series of nineteen (19) cash transactions over a 5-month period. The Monitor has been unable to verify how or if these cash deposits were appropriately deposited into the Quadriga treasury system through TPP accounts or other accounts. The Monitor has also reviewed communications which appear to indicate that Mr. Cotten sometimes credited a User’s account with a deposit with the understanding that the User would deliver cash at some point in the future. The deposits, once credited to the User’s Account, were subsequently used by the User to trade and remove Cryptocurrency off Platform.
  • Pay Plan Fy 2020-21

    Pay Plan Fy 2020-21

    PAY PLAN FY 2020-21 JOB SALARY ANALYSIS SUPPLEMENTS JOB CLASSIFICATION COMPENSATION PAY RATES Miami-Dade County First Edition Human Resources Department Eective September 21, 2020 FY 2020-21 MIAMI-DADE COUNTY PAY PLAN FIRST EDITION EFFECTIVE: September 21, 2020 Carlos A. Gimenez Mayor BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Audrey M. Edmonson Chairwoman Rebeca Sosa Vice Chairwoman Barbara J. Jordan Daniella Levine Cava District 1 District 8 Jean Monestime Dennis C. Moss District 2 District 9 Audrey M. Edmonson Senator Javier D. Souto District 3 District 10 Sally A. Heyman Joe A. Martinez District 4 District 11 Eileen Higgins Jose “Pepe” Diaz District 5 District 12 Rebeca Sosa Esteban L. Bovo, Jr. District 6 District 13 Xavier L. Suarez District 7 Harvey Ruvin Clerk of Courts Pedro J. Garcia Property Appraiser Abigail Price-Williams County Attorney 2 FY 2020-21 Table of Contents I. GROSS COMPENSATION .................................................................................................................. 6 II. WORKWEEK HOURS ......................................................................................................................... 6 III. FURLOUGH LEAVE ............................................................................................................................ 6 IV. OVERTIME COMPENSATION ............................................................................................................ 6 V. SPECIAL PAY PROVISION .................................................................................................................
  • Consensus: Immutable Agreement for the Internet of Value

    Consensus: Immutable Agreement for the Internet of Value

    Consensus Immutable agreement for the Internet of value kpmg.com Seizing opportunity – blockchain and beyond Contents ack in early 2009, the high-profile journey of the first About the authors Bitcoin overshadowed the ingenuity of its underlying The terms 1 Seizing opportunity – Blockchain and beyond Blockchain, distributed ledgers, Sigrid Seibold technology, the blockchain protocol. These days, however, B and consensus mechanisms are Principal, Advisory Capital 2 The basics behind blockchain blockchain is garnering its own share of headlines. Inspired by sometimes used interchangeably. Markets, KPMG LLP 3 Consensus the original blockchain protocol, a variety of new consensus For purposes of this paper, we use Sigrid looks back at 25 years mechanisms and new types of distributed ledger technologies the following definitions: of working in the banking 10 Key observations are continuing to emerge. As innovation accelerates, proponents and capital markets industry. 14 Is blockchain right for your organization Blockchain: A type of distributed She primarily focuses on are eagerly seeking solutions that may work within the current ledger database that maintains a the major investment banks, leveraging her areas of 15 Maneuvering the road ahead regulatory confines of financial services and other industries. continuously growing list of transaction specialization, such as data management and digital 17 Appendix 1: Key terminology records ordered into blocks with various technologies, including financial and blockchain. As a As a result, more and more financial services companies and venture capital (VC) firms protections against tampering and respected industry thought leader, she has published 19 Appendix 2: Consensus mechanism valuation are looking closely at blockchains and other distributed ledgers, and with good reason.
  • Face-Off: Is Harrisonburg Safe ? See Opinion Page A

    Face-Off: Is Harrisonburg Safe ? See Opinion Page A

    Face-off: Is Harrisonburg safe ? see opinion Page a WEATHER / .TODAY: Rain, high 77°F, /low 59°F. FRIDAY: Partly cloudy, dTl^Td high 78°F, low 56. d <J SATURDAY: Partly cloudy Peek inside Theatre II high 77°F, low 56°F. See Style page 11 THURSDAY JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY Rape report filed in 45 TH PARALLEL "ALFWAY BETWEEN frat house incident THE EQUATOR AND THE NORTH POLE But McKone initially responded to the allegation by Courtney A. Crowley through a press release Tuesday night. "Due to the news editor sensitive nature of this issue, neither myself nor any A non-student filed a rape incident report with brother feel it-is appropriate to comment at mis time. Harrisonburg Police Department early Sunday morn- It is a police investigation being handled by the ing after allegedly being raped by an acquaintance at Harrisonburg Police Department. Furthermore, I feel the a fraternity house Saturday night. it is premature to comment since no charges have The alleged victim is a 19-year-old woman from been filed." New Jersey who reportedly was visiting her sister, a Sites wouldn't say if alcohol was involved in the JMU student, for the weekend. alleged rape at Pi Kappa Alpha, but said, "The Yesterday afternoon Pi Kappa Alpha president alleged rape occurred somewhere between four and Brian McKone said, "The alleged incident involved seven hours before [the incident report was filed at an individual who is an inactive alum of our chap- 6:28 a.m. Sunday morning). There is a three-hour gap ter." apparently when the victim was not 100 percent sure No arrests have been made in the case.
  • Cryptocurrencies Exploring the Application of Bitcoin As a New Payment Instrument

    Cryptocurrencies Exploring the Application of Bitcoin As a New Payment Instrument

    Cryptocurrencies Exploring the Application of Bitcoin as a New Payment Instrument By Shinnecock Partners in association with Sophia Bak, Jimmy Yang, Peter Shea, and Neil Liu About the Authors Shinnecock Partners undertook this study of cryptocurrencies with the authors to understand this revolutionary payment system and related technology, explore its disruptive potential, and assess the merits of investing in it. Shinnecock Partners is a 25 year old investment boutique with an especial focus on niche investments offering higher returns with less risk than more traditional investments in long equities and bonds. Sophia Bak is an analyst intern at Shinnecock Partners. She is an MBA candidate at UCLA Anderson School of Management with a focus on Finance. Prior to Anderson, she spent five years at Mirae Asset Global Investments, working in equity research, global business strategy, and investment development. She holds a B.S. in Business Administration from Carnegie Mellon University with concentration in Computing and Information Technology. Jimmy Yang is a third-year undergraduate student at UCLA studying Business Economics and Accounting. Peter Shea is a third-year undergraduate student at UCLA studying Mathematics, Economics and Statistics. Neil Liu is a third-year undergraduate student at UCLA studying Applied Mathematics and Business Economics. Acknowledgements We are grateful to the individuals who shared their time and expertise with us. We want to thank John Villasenor, UCLA professor of Electrical Engineering and Public Policy, Brett Stapper and Brian Lowrance from Falcon Global Capital, and Tiffany Wan and Max Hoblitzell from Deloitte Consulting LLP. We also want to recognize Tracy Williams and Steven Kroll for their thoughtful feedback and support.
  • Virtual Currency

    Virtual Currency

    Office of Legislative Research Research Report December 12, 2014 2014-R-0290 BITCOINS - VIRTUAL CURRENCY By: Michelle Kirby, Associate Analyst ISSUE BITCOINS The use of bitcoins as virtual currency, the laws that Bitcoin is a form of virtual or digital currency. It is govern it, and other states’ attempts to regulate it. not legal tender and is not backed by any This report updates OLR Report 2014-R-0050. government. Federal agencies such as SUMMARY the U.S. Treasury “Bitcoin” is a form of virtual or digital currency, that Department, the Government Accountability allows financial transactions to be conducted on a Office, the Internal network using computer codes. It is a form of Revenue Service, and the exchange that operates like a currency but does not Congressional Research Services have issued have all the attributes of real currency. guidance on how existing laws apply to virtual There are no federal or state laws that specifically currency activities. govern bitcoins. However, many existing laws apply to A proposed federal law certain virtual currency activities. calls for a five-year moratorium on bitcoin The U.S. Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes regulation. Enforcement Network (FinCEN) has provided guidance New York has proposed indicating that, under federal law, a virtual currency regulation that would, user is not a money transmitter and is therefore not among other things, subject to the registration, reporting, and require firms engaged in virtual currency to have a recordkeeping regulations for money services BitLicense. businesses (MSBs). However, virtual currency California has enacted a administrators and exchangers may be regulated as law that allows the use of money transmitters but should not be considered alternative currency.
  • Privacy in Atlantis*

    Privacy in Atlantis*

    Harvard Journal of Law & Technology Volume 18, Number 1 Fall 2004 PRIVACY IN ATLANTIS* Jerry Kang & Benedikt Buchner** TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.................................................................................230 SCENE I: PRIVACY’S FORM...............................................................231 A. Market-Talk..............................................................................231 B. Dignity-Talk .............................................................................234 SCENE II: PRIVACY’S SUBSTANCE....................................................236 A. The Core Similarities ...............................................................237 1. Dignity’s Consent (or the Market’s Initial Allocation) .........237 2. Data Protection Regulations (or Intangible Property Regulations) ....................................................................240 B. Too Little Control.....................................................................244 1. The Problem: Hard Choices ..................................................244 2. The Response: Fortifying the Individual...............................246 C. Too Much Control....................................................................251 1. The Problem: Societal Overrides ..........................................251 2. The Response: Interest Balancing .........................................252 CONCLUSION ....................................................................................255 APPENDIX .........................................................................................257
  • Bitcoin: Technology, Economics and Business Ethics

    Bitcoin: Technology, Economics and Business Ethics

    Bitcoin: Technology, Economics and Business Ethics By Azizah Aljohani A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies in partial fulfilment of the degree requirements of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN SYSTEM SCIENCE FACULTY OF ENGINEERING University of Ottawa Ottawa, Ontario, Canada August 2017 © Azizah Aljohani, Ottawa, Canada, 2017 KEYWORDS: Virtual currencies, cryptocurrencies, blockchain, Bitcoin, GARCH model ABSTRACT The rapid advancement in encryption and network computing gave birth to new tools and products that have influenced the local and global economy alike. One recent and notable example is the emergence of virtual currencies, also known as cryptocurrencies or digital currencies. Virtual currencies, such as Bitcoin, introduced a fundamental transformation that affected the way goods, services, and assets are exchanged. As a result of its distributed ledgers based on blockchain, cryptocurrencies not only offer some unique advantages to the economy, investors, and consumers, but also pose considerable risks to users and challenges for regulators when fitting the new technology into the old legal framework. This paper attempts to model the volatility of bitcoin using 5 variants of the GARCH model namely: GARCH(1,1), EGARCH(1,1) IGARCH(1,1) TGARCH(1,1) and GJR-GARCH(1,1). Once the best model is selected, an OLS regression was ran on the volatility series to measure the day of the week the effect. The results indicate that the TGARCH (1,1) model best fits the volatility price for the data. Moreover, Sunday appears as the most significant day in the week. A nontechnical discussion of several aspects and features of virtual currencies and a glimpse at what the future may hold for these decentralized currencies is also presented.
  • Is Bitcoin Really Untethered?

    Is Bitcoin Really Untethered?

    THE JOURNAL OF FINANCE • VOL. LXXV, NO. 4 • AUGUST 2020 Is Bitcoin Really Untethered? JOHN M. GRIFFIN and AMIN SHAMS∗ ABSTRACT This paper investigates whether Tether, a digital currency pegged to the U.S. dollar, influenced Bitcoin and other cryptocurrency prices during the 2017 boom. Using al- gorithms to analyze blockchain data, we find that purchases with Tether are timed following market downturns and result in sizable increases in Bitcoin prices. The flow is attributable to one entity, clusters below round prices, induces asymmetric auto- correlations in Bitcoin, and suggests insufficient Tether reserves before month-ends. Rather than demand from cash investors, these patterns are most consistent with the supply-based hypothesis of unbacked digital money inflating cryptocurrency prices. INNOVATION, EXCESSIVE SPECULATION, AND DUBIOUS behavior are often closely linked. Periods of extreme price increases followed by implosion, commonly known as “bubbles,” are often associated with legitimate inventions, technolo- gies, or opportunities. However, they can be carried to excess. In particu- lar, financial bubbles often coincide with the belief that a rapid gain can be ∗John M. Griffin is at the McCombs School of Business, University of Texas at Austin. Amin Shams is at the Fisher College of Business, Ohio State University. Helpful comments were received from Stefan Nagel (the editor); an associate editor; two anonymous referees; Cesare Fracassi; Sam Kruger; Shaun MaGruder; Gregor Matvos; Nikolai Roussanov; Clemens Sialm; and seminar and conference
  • Cryptocurrency: the Economics of Money and Selected Policy Issues

    Cryptocurrency: the Economics of Money and Selected Policy Issues

    Cryptocurrency: The Economics of Money and Selected Policy Issues Updated April 9, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45427 SUMMARY R45427 Cryptocurrency: The Economics of Money and April 9, 2020 Selected Policy Issues David W. Perkins Cryptocurrencies are digital money in electronic payment systems that generally do not require Specialist in government backing or the involvement of an intermediary, such as a bank. Instead, users of the Macroeconomic Policy system validate payments using certain protocols. Since the 2008 invention of the first cryptocurrency, Bitcoin, cryptocurrencies have proliferated. In recent years, they experienced a rapid increase and subsequent decrease in value. One estimate found that, as of March 2020, there were more than 5,100 different cryptocurrencies worth about $231 billion. Given this rapid growth and volatility, cryptocurrencies have drawn the attention of the public and policymakers. A particularly notable feature of cryptocurrencies is their potential to act as an alternative form of money. Historically, money has either had intrinsic value or derived value from government decree. Using money electronically generally has involved using the private ledgers and systems of at least one trusted intermediary. Cryptocurrencies, by contrast, generally employ user agreement, a network of users, and cryptographic protocols to achieve valid transfers of value. Cryptocurrency users typically use a pseudonymous address to identify each other and a passcode or private key to make changes to a public ledger in order to transfer value between accounts. Other computers in the network validate these transfers. Through this use of blockchain technology, cryptocurrency systems protect their public ledgers of accounts against manipulation, so that users can only send cryptocurrency to which they have access, thus allowing users to make valid transfers without a centralized, trusted intermediary.