DOCSLIB.ORG

Land Degradation Monitoring Programme of the National

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Land Degradation Monitoring Programme of the National LAND DEGRADATION MONITORING PROGRAMME OF THE NATIONAL ENVIRONlMENT AND HUMAN SETTLEMENTS SECRETARIAT MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES KIAMBU DISTRICT, T KENYA HE FIRST PILOT STUDY (Preliminary Report) Laurence A. Lewis Clark University/NEHSS with assistance 7r)m G. Kamau/NEHSS aid R.C. Cheruiyot/NEHSS September, 1982 Funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development, ETMA Program (AID/afr-C-1697) and The Government of Kenya OBJECTIVES This pilot study, begun in July, 1981, is the first stage in developing a methodology to provide basic information on soil erosion to planners, district officials and operating ministries in Kenya. The results of this programme will provide some of the crucial environmental data that will help NES to exe­ cute its mandate to monitor the state of the national environment. The speci­ fic objectives of the Erosional Monitoring Programme are to: - develop a methodology that can rapidly be applied and used in the diverse environmental settings found throughout Kenya; - quantify the amount of erosion occurring in rural areas; - identify the general rural environmental settings in which erosion is a major problem; - develop a simulation technique to determine if proposed activities will be deleterious to the existing land resource base, and, if so, what changes in land use plans might be suggested to minimize negative impact; and, - this should help the NEHSS to suggest priorities for remedial action and appropriate strategies to use. As one intent of the Secretariat is to make this infcrmation available to any ministry concerned with ameliorating land degradation; the data provided will be in a format that can be utilized in designing general safe criteria for land use planning as well as for legislative purposes. Personnel and Governmental Organizations Involved in the Pilot Study The success of the pilot study required the cooperation of numerous organizations and individuals that had first-hand experience and knowledge of the soil erosion situation within Kiambu District. No matter where future 1 monitoring programs will occur in Kenya, the need exists to obtain the crucial cooperation of the individuals living and working in the area if information is to be rapidly and accurately gathered. Several individuals cooperated with this project and insured its success. Particular appreciation is given to Mr. P.M. N'jenga who acted as liaison with Ministry of Agriculture personnel in Kiambu District and assisted this project continuously throughout the field portion of this project. The following were particularly helpful : Mr. Kobia ­ formerly District Commissioner Kiambu District (now Western Province) P.C. and the seven district officers in Kiambu District Mr. Kibage - District Agricultural Mr. Office P.M. N'jenga - Kiambu Crop Specialist, District Office Kiambu Divisional Extension Agricultural Officers - Mr. Stephen K. Ng'ososei (Gatundu) Mr. K.C. N'getich (Githunguri) Mr. H.P. Obade (Kiambaa) Mrs. G.N. Maingi (Kikuyu) Miss G.W. Kamakia (Lari) Mr. Keinduiwa (Limuru) Miss Amenya (Limuru) Mr. J.M. Karanja (Thika) Dr. Lawrence Ulsaker - Kenyan Agricultural Research Institute allowed NES to utilize the laboratory facilities to dry and weigh the soil samples Almost all of the farmers interviewed in Kiambu were very much concerned with the problem of soil loss and realize the need to minimize it. I. the whole District, no farmer was ever unwilling to cooperate with the project. In particular, the following farmers need to be mentioned as they both permit­ ted measurements of soil loss to be made on their farms and watched the equip­ ment placed on their farms. In addition, they provided us with numerous agri­ cultural insights on the environmental problems affecting their farms and how they deal with them. Mr. Hiuhi; Mr. F. Gichuki; Mr. C. Njiriri; A'r. R. Kangeth; Mr. P.K. Kinundu; Mr. Njenda; Mrs. P.M. Gachigua; Mr. N. Kinyita; Mr. P. Kimani and Mr. G. Gichuki; Mrs. T.W. Kago; Mr. K. Mugatha; Mr. K. Njugunaj; Mr. R. Mwithuria. 2 Data Collection Approach Kiambu District, Central Province was chosen as the first pilot area. Data gathered in this pilot study are aimed primarily at developing the meth­ odology to permit NEHSS to rapidly assess existing and potential land degrada­ tion throughout the nation. Kiambu has many advantages for this initial inquiry. First there are a diverse number of physical environmental settings found within the district ranging from humid to almost semi-arid; flat to extremely steep; and rich volcanic highly resistant soils to poor clay highly erodable soils. In addition there are diverse human-economic situations rang­ ing from large estates to small individual farms less than 1/8 of an acre in extent; part-time and full-time commercial and subsistence farms; farms large­ ly export oriented to farms oriented to the domestic market including the Nairobi market; nonirrigated and irrigated farms; farms long established and farms in newly settled areas some of which are largely unplanned and others which are in government developed schemes. Finally the proximity of Kiambu to Nairobi minimizes the logistic problems during the first year when unexpected problems should occur in greater frequency than in future years. Littie soil erosional data were available at the onset of this study. Given the relatively weak data base for soil loss throughout Kenya, one cri­ tical need for this study is to develop a rapid approach that can evaluate soil loss in a resource context within the constraints of the Kenyan situa­ tion. This is crucial if the objectives of this study are to be met and information is to be made available to farmers. The strategy decided upon to evaluate the soil resource for Kiambu was to first simulate soil loss for the whole district under 'natural' vegetation conditions. The justification for this approach is that this is the condition under which the soils formed. This simulated soil loss is assumed to approximate the normal or geologic 3 erosion and represents a non-degrading soil condition under natural condi­ tions. The simulated values are assumed to be the minimal soil loss values possible. A major purpose of this study is to apply the methodology being developed to determine if soil degradation exists in Kiambu, and if so, its magnitude and areai extent. Thus it is necessary to compare actual soil loss (data collected in the field) with the simulated 'natural' soil loss. As the ratio between actual soil loss to the 'natural' soil loss increases, degradation increases. Areas where large ratio values exist are potential problem areas in terms of high soil loss for agricultural purposes and high sediment produc­ tion for that could limit projects. The assessment of 'natural' soil loss for Kiambu District was completed December, 1981. This information is available at the Natural Resources Division National Environment and Human Settlements Secretariat (Nairobi) and Internation Development Program, Clark University (Worcester). The assessment of actual soil loss took place over a six month period from January to July, 1982. The initial phase of the assessment was a reconnaissance of the district to determine the agro/economic settings found in the area as well as to observe the obvious soil erosion and conservation practices. The purpose of the reconnaissance was to insure that each (f Kiambu's major environmental settings would be included in the sample-of soil loss measurements during the 1982 long rains. In each of the seven divisions, a divisional agricultural officer, and often a D.O. and district agricultural officer accompanied NEHSS personnel on the initial erosion survey. The com­ plete spectrum of conditions ranging from major problem areas to well managed areas from their perspectives were examined. Conversations with the farmers and landowners added insights into reasons for crop selection, conserv,,tion 4 practices and other factors affecting land utilization. During this phase vegetation types (including crops) and location, topography, qully location and conservation practices were noted. The next phase of the investigation was the ir,.tallation of equipment to measure soil loss in the diverse settings found in Kiambu to determine their relations to environmental conditions. Beginning in the middle of February four automatic recording raingages were installed; one in Lari, Kikuyu, Kiambu and Gatundu Divisions. These gages measure both the quantity and i,,tensity of precipitation. In addition, data from the existing raingage at KARl was made available for our use. After the completion of raingage instal­ lation, 27 soil traps were placed in individual fields that constitute a sample of the environmental conditions found throughout Kiambu. At the end of March, the rains began. Precipitation data and soil loss data for the whole 1982 rainy season from the 29th of March to 30th of June were continuously collected and recorded. In addition 5 soil samples were sent to N.V. Philips in Allmelo, Netherlands to determine the major mineral properties of the soils found in Kiambu in order to approximate the erodabil­ ity of the soils. Simultaneous with the measurement of soil loss, all the major gullies found in the district were measured and the environmental situa­ tion in which the gullies were situated was noted. These measurements were done by both NEHSS personnel and the division agricultural officers. With the cessation of the rains, the analysis of the data began. 5 DATA ANALYSIS Four types of soil erosion were identified in Kiambu District during the pilot study. These are: soil loss (sheet wash) resulting from agricultural activities; gully erosion resulting largely from runoff of roads; erosion resulting from small individual quarry operations; and massive hillslope fail­ ure resulting from tree clearing on very steep slopes and tea/agricultural crop substitutions. While the primary focis of this study is on soil loss resulting from agricultural activities, the other three types of erosion are briefly discussed since they all affect the soil resource.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cholera Outbreak Has Affected 7 Counties: Nairobi, Migori, Homa Bay, Bomet, Mombasa, Nakuru and Muranga Counties
    MINISTRY OF HEALTH CHOLERA SITUATION REPORT IN KENYA AS AT 5TH MAY 2015 Weekly Situation Summary Since 26th December 2014, Cholera outbreak has affected 7 counties: Nairobi, Migori, Homa Bay, Bomet, Mombasa, Nakuru and Muranga Counties. Migori, Homabay and Bomet Cholera outbreaks are now considered successfully controlled The outbreak first started in Nairobi County on 26th December 2014. Later the outbreak was reported in Migori County on 30th January 2015, Homa Bay County on 2nd February 2015, Bomet County on 12th March 2015, Mombasa County on 6th April 2015, Nakuru 8th April and Muranga county on 18th April 2015. As of 5th May 2015, a total of 2156 cases and 42 deaths (CFR=1.9%) had been reported nationally distributed as follows: Nairobi 145 cases, 5 deaths (CFR 3.4%); Migori 915 cases, 12 deaths (CFR 1.3%); Homa Bay 377 cases, 5 deaths (CFR 1.4%) , Bomet 272 cases, 2 deaths (CFR 1.5%) ,Mombasa 69 cases, 5 deaths (CFR 7.2%), Muranga 278 cases, 1 death (0.4%), and Nakuru 100 cases, 12 deaths (CFR 12%) Cumulatively, 274 new cases were reported in the last one week (164 in Muranga, 73 in Nakuru, 17 in Mombasa and 20 in Nairobi). This is an increase from the previous week where 35 new cases were reported. 6 new deaths were reported in the last one week (5 in Nakuru and 1 in Nairobi). There are 34 current admissions in Mombasa, Nakuru and Nairobi Counties. 1 | Page New cases reported in Nairobi were detected in new epicentres- Kibera, Mukuru Kayiaba and Mukuru Kwa Njenga slums.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Provincial Consultative Mtg., Central, Nyeri
    CONSTITUTION OF KENYA REVIEW COMMISSION NOTES ON CENTRAL PROVINCE PROVINCIAL VISIT – 18.07.01 CONSULTATIVE MEETING AT NYERI COUNTY HALL PRESENT: Prof. Yash Pal Ghai - Chairperson Prof. A. Idha Salim - 1st Vice-Chairperson Mrs. Abida Ali-Aroni - Vice-Chairperson Pastor Zablon Ayonga - Commissioner Dr. M.A. Swazuri - “ Mr. Isaac Lenaola - “ Mr. Riunga Raiji - “ Dr. Charles Maranga - “ Mr. John M. Kangu - “ Ms. Nancy Baraza - “ Mr. Ahamed I. Hassan - “ Bishop Kariuki Njoroge - “ Mr. Zein Abubakar - “ Dr. Abdirizak Arale Nunow - “ Dr. Mosonik arap Korir - “ Mr. Domiziano Ratanya - “ Hon. Mrs. Phoebe Asiyo - “ Mr. Paul M. Wambua - “ Ms. Salome Muigai - “ Ms. Kavetsa Adagala - “ Mrs. Alice Yano - “ Mr. Ibrahim Lethome - “ Mr. Githu Muigai - “ Mr. Arthur Okoth-Owiro - “ ABSENT WITH APOLOGY: Dr. Oki Ooko Ombaka - Vice-Chairperson Dr. Wanjiku Kabira - Commissioner Mr. Keriako Tobiko - “ Prof. H.W.O. Okoth-Ogendo - “ Hon. Amos Wako - Ex-Officio The meeting assembled at 10.00 a.m. at Nyeri County Hall and was opened with Christian and Muslim prayers. 1 The Deputy PC welcomed the Commissioners to Nyeri. The Commissioners introduced themselves and the participants also introduced themselves and included representatives from Mt. Kenya Law Society, Shelter Women of Kenya, Supkem, Safina, Sustainable Empowerment and Agricultural Network, Citizen Small and Medium Industries of Kenya, Build Kenya, Maendeleo ya Wanawake – Kiambu, Councillors, Catholic Dioceses, Justice and Peace, NGO’s, Chamber of Commerce, Mau Mau Veterans Society, KNUT, DP, Churches and individuals. Com. Lethome invited Prof. Ghai to give opening remarks on the Commission’s work and civic education. Prof. Ghai welcomed participants to the meeting and apologised for keeping them waiting as some of them had arrived as early as 8.00 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • The Children and Youth Empowerment Centre (CYEC), Nyeri
    The Children and Youth Empowerment Centre (CYEC), Nyeri. The Centre is located approximately 175 kilometers north of Nairobi on the outskirts of Nyeri town, the administrative headquarters of both Nyeri East District and Kenya’s Central Province. CYEC is an initiative of the national program for street dwelling persons and is intended to play a central role in the innovation of holistic and sustainable solutions for the population of street dwelling young people in Kenya. The Pennsylvania State University has been involved with the CYEC since 2009. Students from both the Berks and Main campuses of Penn State have focused on areas including bio-medical engineering, architectural engineering, teaching/literacy, and agriculture to help the CYEC. At the Center we have participated in constructing a green house, a drip irrigation center, creating books for the children, conducting various types of research, and much more. In 2010 the CYEC asked if Penn State would focus on the creation of an Eco-Village in Lamuria, a sustainable and eco-friendly village where the street children could go once they have reached adulthood to work and participate in a community environment and economy. Under the direction of Janelle Larson and Sjoerd Duiker, the 497C Agricultural Systems in East Africa class was The undeveloped Eco-Village site created at the Main campus. Our class consisted of only (2010) six students (five of whom were able to travel to Kenya) and met once every other Friday for two hours. This specific course focused on conducting research on agricultural production in semi-arid regions of east Africa, culminating with an opportunity for application through on-site assessment work in Kenya.
    [Show full text]
  • KENYA POPULATION SITUATION ANALYSIS Kenya Population Situation Analysis
    REPUBLIC OF KENYA KENYA POPULATION SITUATION ANALYSIS Kenya Population Situation Analysis Published by the Government of Kenya supported by United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) Kenya Country Oce National Council for Population and Development (NCPD) P.O. Box 48994 – 00100, Nairobi, Kenya Tel: +254-20-271-1600/01 Fax: +254-20-271-6058 Email: [email protected] Website: www.ncpd-ke.org United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) Kenya Country Oce P.O. Box 30218 – 00100, Nairobi, Kenya Tel: +254-20-76244023/01/04 Fax: +254-20-7624422 Website: http://kenya.unfpa.org © NCPD July 2013 The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the contributors. Any part of this document may be freely reviewed, quoted, reproduced or translated in full or in part, provided the source is acknowledged. It may not be sold or used inconjunction with commercial purposes or for prot. KENYA POPULATION SITUATION ANALYSIS JULY 2013 KENYA POPULATION SITUATION ANALYSIS i ii KENYA POPULATION SITUATION ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................iv FOREWORD ..........................................................................................................................................ix ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ..........................................................................................................................x EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................xi
    [Show full text]
  • Muranga County
    ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE INDEX (EPI): 2018 MURANGA COUNTY i National Environment Management Authority, Kenya (NEMA) © National Environment Management Authority, 2019 First published 2019 Extracts may be published if the source is duly acknowledged For more information contact Director General National Environment Management Authority Popo Road, off Mombasa Road P.O. Box 67839- 00200, Nairobi, Kenya Tel: 020 2103696, 020 2101370, 0724 253398, 0735 013046, 0735 010237 Report incidences and complaints: NEMA Incidence line: 0786 101 100 Email: [email protected] Website: www.nema.go.ke Facebook: National Environment Management Authority – Kenya Twitter:@nemakenya Our Environment, Our Life, Our Responsibility Mazingira Yetu, Uhai Wetu, Wajibu Wetu ii TABLE OF CONTENT PREFACE ............................................................................................................................................ iv COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE INDEX: 2018 ................................................ 1 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1. What Purpose an EPI? .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2. How Well is the County Performing Overall? ...................................................................................... 1 1.3. How Well is the County Doing by Sector? ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Devolution in Kenya: an Opportunity for Increased Public Participation, Reduced Corruption, and Improved Service Delivery
    DEVOLUTION IN KENYA: AN OPPORTUNITY FOR INCREASED PUBLIC PARTICIPATION, REDUCED CORRUPTION, AND IMPROVED SERVICE DELIVERY by HAYLEY ELSZASZ Ngonidzashe Munemo, Advisor A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Arts with Honors in Political Science WILLIAMS COLLEGE Williamstown, Massachusetts MAY 11, 2016 Table of Contents Introduction…………………………………………………………………………..1 Chapter I: History of Local Government in Kenya………………………………..32 Independence and the Kenyatta Presidency The Moi Era Period of Democratization Constitutional Reforms Chapter II: Participation and Corruption in Post-Devolution Kenya……..……...61 Participation in Kenya’s Local Governments Disengagement Corruption Post-2010 Actions to Counter Corruption Perceptions of Corruption Chapter III: Healthcare Delivery in Post-Devolution Kenya……………………..94 Constitutional Framework Financing Local Healthcare Healthcare in Counties Healthcare System Post-Devolution Health Sector Explanations and Predictions Conclusion………………………………………………………………………….120 Bibliography………………………………………………………………………..137 ii Figures and Tables Figure 2.1 Voter Turnout 1992-2013 69 Table 0.1: Vote Margins in County Elections 24 Table 0.2: Party in Power: County Government 25 Table 0.3: Presidential Outcomes 2013 27 Table 0.4: Centrality of Counties 29 Table 1.1: The Provincial Administration: Kenyatta 36 Table 1.2: The Provincial Administration: Moi 46 Table 1.3: Devolved Local Government 57 Table 2.1: Voter Turnout 1992-2013 by Province 70 Table 2.2: Members of County Assemblies 77 Table 2.3: Qualities of the Most Corrupt Counties 83 Table 2.4: Bribes in Exchange for Services 91 Table 3.1: Tiers of Health Services 95 Table 3.2 Local Revenue & Central Government Grants 100 Table 3.3 Central Government Grants to the Counties 102 Table 3.4: Vaccination Rates by Province 113 Table 3.5: Births Delivered in a Health Facility by Province 114 Table 3.6: Infant Mortality by Province 115 Table 3.7: Antenatal Care by Province 116 Note on currency usage: All figures are given in Kenyan Shillings (KSh).
    [Show full text]
  • County Name County Code Location
    COUNTY NAME COUNTY CODE LOCATION MOMBASA COUNTY 001 BANDARI COLLEGE KWALE COUNTY 002 KENYA SCHOOL OF GOVERNMENT MATUGA KILIFI COUNTY 003 PWANI UNIVERSITY TANA RIVER COUNTY 004 MAU MAU MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL LAMU COUNTY 005 LAMU FORT HALL TAITA TAVETA 006 TAITA ACADEMY GARISSA COUNTY 007 KENYA NATIONAL LIBRARY WAJIR COUNTY 008 RED CROSS HALL MANDERA COUNTY 009 MANDERA ARIDLANDS MARSABIT COUNTY 010 ST. STEPHENS TRAINING CENTRE ISIOLO COUNTY 011 CATHOLIC MISSION HALL, ISIOLO MERU COUNTY 012 MERU SCHOOL THARAKA-NITHI 013 CHIAKARIGA GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL EMBU COUNTY 014 KANGARU GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL KITUI COUNTY 015 MULTIPURPOSE HALL KITUI MACHAKOS COUNTY 016 MACHAKOS TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE MAKUENI COUNTY 017 WOTE TECHNICAL TRAINING INSTITUTE NYANDARUA COUNTY 018 ACK CHURCH HALL, OL KALAU TOWN NYERI COUNTY 019 NYERI PRIMARY SCHOOL KIRINYAGA COUNTY 020 ST.MICHAEL GIRLS BOARDING MURANGA COUNTY 021 MURANG'A UNIVERSITY COLLEGE KIAMBU COUNTY 022 KIAMBU INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY TURKANA COUNTY 023 LODWAR YOUTH POLYTECHNIC WEST POKOT COUNTY 024 MTELO HALL KAPENGURIA SAMBURU COUNTY 025 ALLAMANO HALL PASTORAL CENTRE, MARALAL TRANSZOIA COUNTY 026 KITALE MUSEUM UASIN GISHU 027 ELDORET POLYTECHNIC ELGEYO MARAKWET 028 IEBC CONSTITUENCY OFFICE - ITEN NANDI COUNTY 029 KAPSABET BOYS HIGH SCHOOL BARINGO COUNTY 030 KENYA SCHOOL OF GOVERNMENT, KABARNET LAIKIPIA COUNTY 031 NANYUKI HIGH SCHOOL NAKURU COUNTY 032 NAKURU HIGH SCHOOL NAROK COUNTY 033 MAASAI MARA UNIVERSITY KAJIADO COUNTY 034 MASAI TECHNICAL TRAINING INSTITUTE KERICHO COUNTY 035 KERICHO TEA SEC. SCHOOL
    [Show full text]
  • Being Kikuyu in Meru: Challenging the Tribal Geography of Colonial Kenya*
    Journal of African History, (), pp. –. © Cambridge University Press doi:./S BEING KIKUYU IN MERU: CHALLENGING THE TRIBAL GEOGRAPHY OF COLONIAL KENYA* BY TIMOTHY PARSONS Washington University ABSTRACT: Faced with a confusing range of fluid ethnicities when they conquered Kenya, colonial officials sought to shift conquered populations into manageable administrative units. In linking physical space to ethnic identity, the Kenyan re- serve system assumed that each of these ‘tribes’ had a specific homeland. Yet the reserves in the central Kenyan highlands soon became overcrowded and socially restive because they could not accommodate population growth and private claims to land for commercial agriculture. Although colonial officials proclaimed them- selves the guardians of backward tribal peoples, they tried to address this problem by creating mechanisms whereby surplus populations would be ‘adopted’ into tribes living in less crowded reserves. This article provides new insights into the nature of identity in colonial Kenya by telling the stories of two types of Kikuyu migrants who settled in the Meru Reserve. The first much larger group did so legally by agreeing to become Meru. The second openly challenged the colonial state and their Meru hosts by defiantly proclaiming themselves to be Kikuyu. These diverse ways of being Kikuyu in the Meru Reserve fit neither strict pri- mordial nor constructivist conceptions of African identity formation. The peoples of colonial Kenya had options in deciding how to identify themselves and could assume different political and social roles by invoking one or more of them at a time and in specific circumstances. KEY WORDS: Kenya, colonial administration, ethnicity. TEMPERS ran high at Meru local native council (LNC) meetings in early .
    [Show full text]
  • Th E Kenya Gazette
    w * e e < ) % ( * @ z4 'u z% x9*o T H E K E N Y A G A Z E T T E Pubhshed under the Authonty of H ls Excellency the G overnor of the Colony and Protectorate of K enya (Reglstered as a Newspaper at the G P O ) Vol. L XIV- N O. 8 N AIR O BI, 20th February, 1962 Pl lce Sh l CON TENIY GAZEW E NOTICE: GAZET'I'E Noncws- lcontd ) PAGE PAGE A ppolntm ents, etc 198 Tho Trade U m ons Ordlnance- N otlscatlon of D eferm ent of Reglstratlon 208 The Konya (Constltutlon) Order m Councll- D eclaratlon of Incapaclty of M em bers 198 The Trust Land Ordm ance- lntended Lease of L 4nd Appolntm ent of Tem porary M em bers 198 Admlsnon of Clalm s under the Co-operatlve Socletles Declaratton ot Resum ed Capaclty of M em bers 199-201 Ordlnance Appolntm ent of Actlng Chld Justlce 201 Tne C o operatlve Socletles O rdlnance- talquldatlon O rder 209 The C ourts O rdlnance- A ppolntm ents 201 The Leglslatlve C ouncll Electlon R ules, 1960- E1ectlon 'ï Result 209 The Trade Dlsputes (Arbltratlon and Inqulry) Ordln- ance-Reference of Matters to Board of Inqutry 201 Llquor Llcenslng 209-21 1 East M rlcan Rallways and H arbours- Last A frlcan Pow er and Llghtlng C om pany- u nclalm ed Tarll of H arbour D ue.s and Charges 202 D lvldends 21 1 Amendm ents to Tanfi Book N o 3 202 Loss of Pohcles 211 The Records (Dsposal) Ordmance- Notlce of lntended Transport Llcenslng 212-215 Destructlon of Court Records 202 Bankruptcles The Cattle Cleaslng Ordlnance- N otlce of M eetm g 203 The C om panles O rdlnance The M lnlng Regulatlons- Explry of Locatlons 203 The Socletles Ordlnance-
    [Show full text]
  • Country Policy and Information Note Kenya: Female Genital Mutilation (FGM)
    Country Policy and Information Note Kenya: Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) Version 1.0 June 2021 Preface Purpose This note provides country of origin information (COI) and analysis of COI for use by Home Office decision makers handling particular types of protection and human rights claims (as set out in the Introduction section). It is not intended to be an exhaustive survey of a particular subject or theme. It is split into two main sections: (1) analysis and assessment of COI and other evidence; and (2) COI. These are explained in more detail below. Assessment This section analyses the evidence relevant to this note – i.e. the COI section; refugee/human rights laws and policies; and applicable caselaw – by describing this and its inter-relationships, and provides an assessment of, in general, whether one or more of the following applies: x A person is reasonably likely to face a real risk of persecution or serious harm x The general humanitarian situation is so severe as to breach Article 15(b) of European Council Directive 2004/83/EC (the Qualification Directive) / Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights as transposed in paragraph 339C and 339CA(iii) of the Immigration Rules x The security situation presents a real risk to a civilian’s life or person such that it would breach Article 15(c) of the Qualification Directive as transposed in paragraph 339C and 339CA(iv) of the Immigration Rules x A person is able to obtain protection from the state (or quasi state bodies) x A person is reasonably able to relocate within a country or territory x A claim is likely to justify granting asylum, humanitarian protection or other form of leave, and x If a claim is refused, it is likely or unlikely to be certifiable as ‘clearly unfounded’ under section 94 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • Situation Analysis of Children and Women in Kenya, 2017 Situation Analysis
    Situation Analysis of Children and Women in Kenya, 2017 Situation Analysis Situation Analysis of Children and Women in Kenya, 2017 Suggested citation: UNICEF (2018) Situation Analysis of Children and Women in Kenya 2017, UNICEF, Nairobi, Kenya. Cover photo © UNICEF Kenya/2016/Noorani. ii of Children and Women in Kenya Situation Analysis of Children and Women in Kenya, 2017 iii Situation Analysis Table of Contents Foreword xiii Acknowledgements xiv Executive Summary xv Introduction xv Key findings xv Enabling environment xvi Surviving and thriving xvii Learning xix Protection from violence, abuse, exploitation and family separation xx Safe and clean environment xxii Children and emergencies xxiv Equitable chances in life xxv Introduction 1 Chapter 1: Background 2 Geographical and climatic overview 3 Demographic overview 4 Economic overview 6 Social overview 7 Gender overview 8 Political overview 9 Chapter 2: The framework for children’s rights in Kenya 10 The Sustainable Development Goals and Kenya Vision 2030 11 Children’s rights framework 12 Devolution 12 Financing and coordination of government policy on children and youth 14 Information and data on children’s rights 15 Role of private sector in development 16 Chapter 3: Surviving and thriving 18 Healthcare system 19 Healthcare workforce 20 Financing and planning 21 Health information 24 Community level healthcare 25 Maternal and child health 27 Maternal health 27 Newborn health 30 Infant and child health 31 Immunization 33 Childhood disease and healthcare-seeking behaviour 36 Malaria
    [Show full text]
  • Kenya 2020 Human Rights Report
    KENYA 2020 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Kenya is a republic with three branches of government: an executive branch, led by a directly elected president; a bicameral parliament consisting of the Senate and National Assembly; and a judiciary. In the 2017 general elections, the second under the 2010 constitution, citizens cast ballots for president, deputy president, and parliamentarians, as well as county governors and legislators. International and domestic observers judged the elections generally credible, although some civil society groups and the opposition alleged there were irregularities. The Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission declared Jubilee Coalition Party candidate Uhuru Kenyatta had won re-election as president over opposition candidate Raila Odinga. The Supreme Court subsequently annulled the results for president and deputy president, citing irregularities, and the court ordered a new vote for president and deputy president that the opposition boycotted. The Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission declared President Kenyatta winner of the new vote, and the Supreme Court upheld the results. The National Police Service maintains internal security and reports to the Ministry of Interior and Coordination of National Government. The National Intelligence Service collects intelligence internally as well as externally and reports directly to the president. The Kenya Defense Forces report to the Ministry of Defense and are responsible for external security but have some domestic security responsibilities,
    [Show full text]