DOCSLIB.ORG

1996 Detroit River Remedial Action Plan Report Should Be Imple- Mented in a Manner Which Considers Environmental Justice Concerns Through out the Area of Concern

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1996 Detroit River Remedial Action Plan Report Should Be Imple- Mented in a Manner Which Considers Environmental Justice Concerns Through out the Area of Concern 1996 Detroit River Remedial Action Plan Re~ort "Clean-up of the Detroit River depends on an in- volved citizenry in both the United States and Canada. Only with public interests and action, can we expect governments and industry to com- mit the resources necessary for clean-up. A river free of toxic chemicals with fish and wildlife habi- tat restored are goals worth working for. We hope this binational plan helps to move us quickly toward these goals". Mike Walsh, Chairperson, Binational Public Advisory Council Table of Contents Acronyms ........................................................................................................................................... xi Conversion Tables ..........................................................................................................................xvi .. Web Site Reference Guide ..........................................................................................................XVII ... Glossery ..........................................................................................................................................XVIH Chapter 1 RAP Strategies ..........................................................................................................................................1 Work Plan ..........................................................................................................................................................3 RAP Process ......................................................................................................................................................3 Chapter 2 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 5 Description of the Detroit River Area of Concern ........................................................................... 7 Overview of Area of Concern Issues .................................................................................................. 7 Remedial Action Plan Process ............................................................................................................10 Detroit River RAP Process ...................................................................................................................10 Detroit River Technical Work Group Summary .............................................................................. 11 Beneficial Use Impairments/Water Use Goals ......................................................................................13 Primary Water Use Goal ......................................................................................................................13 General Water Use Goals .................................................................................................................... 13 Revisions to Beneficial Use Impairments Since Stage 1 Report .............................................15 Achievability of Restoring Impaired Beneficial Uses ..................................................................... 16 Priority Recommendations.......................................................................................................................... 17 Development of the Recommendations ..........................................................................................17 Detroit River RAP Implementation............................................................................................................ 21 Monitoring and Surveillance ............................................................................................................23 Chapter 3 Prioritization of Recommendations .................................................................................................. 25 RECOMMENDATIONS................................................................................................................................ 27 TWGs Development of Recommendations ....................................................................................27 Selection of Priority Recommendations........................................................................................... 29 Habitat Priority Recommendations ...........................................................................................................29 Programmatic Priority Recommendations .....................................................................................29 Outreach and Education Priority Recommendations.................................................................... 30 Monitoring and Modeling Priority Recommendations .................................................................32 Contaminated Sediments Priority Recommendations ..........................................................................33 Programmatic Priority Recommendations .......................................................................................33 Point Source/Non Point Source Priority Recommendations............................................................ 33 Programmatic Priority Recommendations .......................................................................................33 Outreach and Education Priority Recommendations.............................................................. 33 Pollution Prevention Priority Recommendations...................................... .. ................... 34 Monitoring and Modeling Priority Recommendations .................................................................34 Combined Sewer Overflows Priority Recommendations ....................................................................35 Programmatic Priority Recommendations .......................................................................................35 Pollution Prevention Priority Recommendations............................................................................ 37 Monitoring and Modeling Priority Recommendations .................................................................39 SECONDARYRECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................................. 40 Habitat TWG Secondary Recommendations.......................................................................................... 40 Programmatic .........................................................................................................................................40 Outreach and Education ....................................................................................................................40 iii Contaminated Sediments TWG Secondary Recommendations..................................................... 41 Programmatic .........................................................................................................................................41 Monitoring and Modeling ...................................................................................................................41 Point/Non Point Source TWG Secondary Recommendations ........................................................... 41 Programmatic ......................................................................................................................................... 41 Pollution Prevention .............................................................................................................................. 42 Monitoring and Modeling ..................................................................................................................42 Combined Sewer Overflow TWG Secondary Recommendations..................................................... 43 Programmatic .........................................................................................................................................43 Outreach and Education ...................................................................................................................... 43 Pollution Prevention .............................................................................................................................. 43 Monitoring and Modeling ................................................................................................................... 43 Chapter 4 Environmental Justice ...........................................................................................................................45 Background .............................................................................................................................................47 Environmental Justice & the Detroit River RAP .............................................................................. 47 Recommendations for Environmental Justice ................................................................................. 48 Chapter 5 Stage 1 RAP Update ............................................................................................................................49 Regulatory Programs ............................................................................................................................. 51 Description of the Area ........................................................................................................................ 51 Description of the Aquatic Ecosystem .............................................................................................. 52 Problem Definition ................................................................................................................................67 Pollutant
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Distribution of Fish Species at Risk
    Distribution of Fish St Clair National Wildlife Area Lake St. Clair Species at Risk Bagnall Essex Region Lake St. Bradley Dolson Drain Conservation Authority (Map 1 of 2) Clair Bradley's Marsh Jeannettes Creek Big Creek Thames River Jeannette Lighthouse Conservation Area Baptiste Creek Stoney Point Tremblay Creek Tilbury Creek Lake St. Clair Tilbury Station Ruscom River Peche IslaPnedche Island Provincial Park Northside Tilbury Conservation Area Deerbrook Haycroft Duck Creek Tilbury Riverside St. Clair Beach Detroit River Belle River St. Joachim Station Little River Puce River Puce Emeryville Tecumseh Stover Creek Fleming Channel Major Creek St. Joachim Tremblay Creek Forest Glade East Windsor Quinn Walkerville Elmstead Fontainebleau Tilbury West Conservation Area McAuliffe Woods Conservation Area Moison Creek South Walkerville Byrnedale Comber Detroit River Windsor-Walkerville Bridgeview Windsor Remington Park Big Creek Windsor Airport Puce River Sandwich Fairplay Pike Creek Ruscom Station Devonwood Conservation Area ¨ Brighton Beach Yawkey Roseland North Woodslee Ojibway Pelton Ojibway Prairie Provincial Nature Reserve Park ¤£3B Pleasant Park South Woodslee Maidstone Township Central Conservation Area Renwick 1 Oliver Detroit River Windfall Oldcastle 77 Turkey Creek Cahill Drain Staples ¤£ Henry Robinson Drain Maidstone La Salle Belle River East Two Creeks LLaakkee Maranette Drain Talbot Trail Oakland Erie Grassy Island Erie Yellow Creek 2 Two Creeks Conservation Area Fighting IslanFdighting Channel Essex Ruscom River
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Habitat Council
    8737 Colesville Road, Suite 800 Silver Spring, MD 20910 wildlifehc.org | @wildlifehc March 5, 2018 Ms Cristiana Paşca Palmer, Executive Secretary, Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, United Nations Environment Program Dear Ms Cristiana Paşca Palmer, It is my pleasure to submit relevant information to the Convention on Biological Diversity to inform the topic “Mainstreaming Biodiversity within and across sectors and other strategic actions to enhance implementation,” planned as agenda item 5 for the second meeting of the Subsidiary Body on Implementation to be held this year in Toronto. The submission has two parts. The first part is a summary of lessons learned as part of a three-decade engagement at the intersection of business and biodiversity. The second part contains several case studies from five white papers outlining the successful implementation of biodiversity programs in the industry sectors under consideration at the 14th Conference of the Parties (COP14.) The Wildlife Habitat Council’s unique perspective on corporate engagement with conservation has been formed following 30 years’ experience across industry sectors advancing a model that marries voluntary conservation efforts with a standard for recognition called Conservation Certification that currently recognizes over 600 conservation programs worldwide in industry sectors including energy and mining, infrastructure, manufacturing and, processing. While WHC’s model is unique, it is also accessible and replicable and can be easily deployed to bridge the gap between planning and implementation which is one of the greatest challenges to biodiversity health. If you have any questions about our work, our experiences or the company’s that are engaged with us, please do not hesitate to contact me.
    [Show full text]
  • Detroit Heritage River Nomination Report
    Nomination of the Detroit River Submission Requirements This document sets out the criteria of the Canadian Heritage Rivers Board (CHRS) for the nomination of the Detroit River as a Heritage River within the Canadian Heritage Rivers System (CHRS). The CHRS is the vehicle by which the nominating agency identifies the heritage significance of a river and justifies its inclusion in the CHRS. The purpose of this format is to act as a guide to nominating agencies and to provide consistency in the nomination process. CHRS provides an opportunity for the recognition and conservation of rivers deemed to be of outstanding Canadian heritage value. This value is obtained when it has been determined that a river is an outstanding representative of or unique in a province or territory. By the inclusion of such rivers in a single coast-to-coast system, they become representative of Canada’s river heritage as a whole, thus reflecting a “Canadian value”. 1 Nomination of the Detroit River Canadian Heritage Rivers System The Canadian Heritage Rivers System (CHRS) has been established by the federal, provincial and territorial governments to recognize outstanding rivers of Canada and ensuring management which will protect these rivers and enhance their significant heritage values for the long term benefit and enjoyment of Canadians. To qualify for the Canadian Heritage Rivers System, a river or section of a river must be of outstanding significance in one or more areas: natural heritage, human heritage, or recreational values. The nominated section should be large enough to encompass these values and provide the user with an appreciation of the river’s resources, as well as an enjoyable recreational experience.
    [Show full text]
  • 58Th Annual Fighting Island Regatta
    58th Annual Fighting Island Regatta Saturday August 28, 2021 Hosted by the LaSalle Mariner’s Yacht Club (LMYC) LaSalle, Canada SAILING INSTRUCTIONS COVID-19 Requirements (Stage 3): ● Club grounds are limited to 100 persons and the clubhouse is “limited to the posted amount of people”. Participants are encouraged to stay outdoors; ● For contact tracing per the Health Unit, each skipper must sign in and confirm the number of crew on his/her boat. In the event of an outbreak, these sheets will be used to contact the Skippers who are responsible to contact their crew members in the event of an outbreak. All persons not competing but attending must sign in as an individual. Sheets will be available in the barbecue area; and ● If any participant’s health status changes, you must advise the Race Director immediately @ 226-350-3315. In the spirit of sailing, I say thank you and have a great race. 1 RULES 1.1 The regatta will be governed by the rules as defined in The Racing Rules of Sailing 2021 – 2024. The Prescriptions of Sail Canada will apply. These can be found at http://www.sailing.ca/ 1.2 Sailing Instructions will be posted on the LMYC website, and available at LMYC anytime. 1.3 The Essex County PHRF Class Rules will apply http://ec.phrf.ca/rules.html 1.4 The Equipment Rules of Sailing shall be used http://www.sailing.org/documents/equipmentrules/index.php 1.5 The Canadian Shipping Act - Small Vessel Regulation (required safety equipment) shall apply - http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/regulations/SOR-2010-91 1.6 Yachts shall carry proper sail numbers on mainsails, spinnakers and any head-sails attached having a luff perpendicular exceeding 130%.
    [Show full text]
  • CEN 304 SECOND EDITION Sailing Corrected to Monthly Edition No
    CEN 304 SECOND EDITION Sailing Corrected to Monthly Edition No. 02/2021 Directions Detroit River Lake St. Clair St. Clair River The Canadian Hydrographic Service produces and distributes Nautical Charts, Sailing Directions, Tide and Current Tables and the Atlas of Tidal Currents of the navigable waters of Canada. These publications are available from authorized Canadian Hydrographic Service Chart Dealers. For information about these publications, please contact: Canadian Hydrographic Service Fisheries and Oceans Canada 200 Kent Street Ottawa, Ontario Canada K1A 0E6 Phone: 613-998-4931 Toll free: 1-866-546-3613 E-mail: [email protected] or visit the CHS web site for dealer location and related information at: www.charts.gc.ca Fisheries and Oceans Canada information line 1-613-993-0999 Canadian Coast Guard Search and Rescue Rescue Co-ordination Centre Trenton (Great Lakes area) 1-800-267-7270 © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2020. DFO/2020-2034 Catalogue No. Fs72-3/4-2020E-PDF ISBN 978-0-660-35797-3 Ottawa, 2020 (Aussi disponible en français) Cover photograph Capt. Henry Jackman, unloading in Sarnia Photo by: CHS, Rick Martin Pictograph legend Anchorage Light Pilotage Caution Lifesaving station Radio calling-in point Current Marina Wharf CEN 304 SECOND EDITION Sailing Corrected to Monthly Edition No. 02/2021 Directions Detroit River Lake St. Clair St. Clair River Second Edition 2020 Nautical Charts Protect Lives, Property and the Marine Environment Fisheries and Oceans Canada Users of this publication are requested to forward information regarding newly discovered dangers, changes in aids to navigation, the existence of new shoals or channels, printing errors, or other information that would be useful for the correction of nautical charts and hydrographic publications affecting Canadian waters to: Director General Canadian Hydrographic Service Fisheries and Oceans Canada Ottawa, Ontario Canada K1A 0E6 Table of Contents Lake Huron Preface.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    THE WINDSOR BORDER REGION INTRODUCTION A. VISITORS BEFORE 1700 THIS historical survey is intended to serve as an introduction to a series of documents relating to the exploration and settlement of Canada's southernmost frontier. A glance at the map of Canada suffices to locate that frontier-the Detroit River region.1 At 42° latitude the eye quickly focuses on a 20-by-30-mile rectangular peninsula whose south, west, and north shores are washed by the waters of Lake Erie, the Detroit River, and Lake St. Clair respec- tively. Today this peninsula is Essex County in the Province of Ontario. Local Chambers of Commerce refer to it as the Sun Parlour of Canada. A recent book which records the development of the county and its chief city, Windsor, during the past century is entitled Garden Gateway to Canada. These last two appellations indicate its frontier position, its mild climate, and its fertile fields. The exploration of the Detroit River region was retarded by the warring expeditions of the Father of New France. In 1609 and 1615, when Champlain accompanied Algonquin and Huron Indians on forays against their Iroquois enemies, whose strongholds were located between the Hudson and Genesee rivers in the present State of New York, he sealed the friendship between the French and the Hurons and Algonquins. At the same time, however, he provoked later alignments of the Iroquois with their Dutch and English neighbours of the Atlantic seaboard, because the savages became convinced that the French were the allies of their Indian enemies. Because of this enmity of the Iroquois for the French, for half a century the French explorers and missionaries could not follow the St.
    [Show full text]
  • Detroit River Canadian Remedial Action Plan: Stage 2 Report
    DETROIT RIVER CANADIAN REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN STAGE 2 REPORT 2010 Edited by: Natalie Green, Luca Cargnelli, Ted Briggs, Richard Drouin, Matthew Child Jennifer Esbjerg, Marcia Valiante, Tom Henderson, David McGregor, and David Munro Detroit River Canadian RAP Stage 2 Report Detroit River Canadian Remedial Action Plan Stage 2 Report 2010 Edited by: Natalie D. Green, Detroit River Canadian Cleanup Luca Cargnelli, Environment Canada Ted Briggs, Ontario Ministry of the Environment Richard Drouin, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Matthew Child, Essex Region Conservation Authority Jennifer Esbjerg, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Marcia Valiante, DRCC Outreach Committee Tom Henderson, Public Advisory Council David McGregor, Brighton Beach Power David Munro, Public Advisory Council Includes bibliographical references ISBN: 978-0-9865752-0-4 ISBN (Digital copy): 978-0-9865752-1-1 Suggested Citation: Green N.D., Cargnelli L., Briggs T., Drouin R., Child M., Esbjerg J., Valiante M., Henderson T., McGregor D., and D. Munro, eds. 2010. Detroit River Canadian Remedial Action Plan: Stage 2 Report. Detroit River Canadian Cleanup, Publication No. 1, Essex, Ontario, Canada. For more information, contact: Detroit River Canadian Cleanup 311-360 Fairview Avenue West Essex, Ontario N8M 1Y6 [email protected] Tel: 519-982-3722 Fax: 519-776-8688 Report also available at: www.detroitriver.ca ii Detroit River Canadian RAP Stage 2 Report Acknowledgements Many individuals were involved in providing guidance and direction for the development of the
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation and Comparison of a Habitat Suitability Model for Postdrift Larval Lake Sturgeon in the St
    North American Journal of Fisheries Management 38:1091–1104, 2018 © 2018 American Fisheries Society ISSN: 0275-5947 print / 1548-8675 online DOI: 10.1002/nafm.10217 ARTICLE Evaluation and Comparison of a Habitat Suitability Model for Postdrift Larval Lake Sturgeon in the St. Clair and Detroit Rivers Joseph R. Krieger* School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, 440 Church Street, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA Ryan T. Young School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, 440 Church Street, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA; and U.S. Geological Survey, Great Lakes Science Center, 1451 Green Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105, USA James S. Diana School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, 440 Church Street, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA Abstract We evaluated composition and spatial distribution of riverine nursery habitat for larval Lake Sturgeon Acipenser fulvescens in the Middle Channel of the St. Clair River, Michigan, and Fighting Island Channel of the Detroit River, Ontario, using a habitat suitability model (HSM) and fish collections. Although model outputs indicated similar por- tions of high-quality habitat in the Middle Channel (16.9%) and Fighting Island Channel (15.7%), larval abundance and dispersal patterns varied between these systems. Analysis with Akaike’s information criterion indicated that a regression model using sand–silt substrate performed best at predicting the observed water-volume-standardized CPUE (number of larvae·h−1·m−3) in the Middle Channel. Of 93 larvae that were collected in the Middle Channel, most were found to cluster at three distinct areas of high- and moderate-quality habitat, which was composed predominately of sand–silt substrate.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Habitat Restoration in the Detroit River
    Canadian Habitat Restoration in the Detroit River Jacqueline Serran, Detroit River Canadian Cleanup, [email protected] Claire Sanders, Detroit River Canadian Cleanup, [email protected] Background The Detroit River is a 51-km connecting channel that links Lake St. Clair to the western basin of Lake Erie. The river runs through two major urban areas (Detroit, MI and Windsor, ON) and has long been used for industrial and recreational purposes. Over the past 100 years, the river, its shoreline, and watershed have been impacted by considerable industrial, urban, and agricultural development. As these pressures became more intense, habitat for species began to disappear and become degraded. The construction of shipping channels, dumping of dredge spoils, hardening of the shoreline, and destruction of shallow wetlands all contributed to the loss and modification of habitat on the Detroit River (Manny et al., 1988). For example, habitat for Lake Whitefish and Lake Sturgeon spawning in the river was removed during dredging of the river bottom for navigational purposes, resulting in large populations decreases for both species and near extirpation (Roseman et al. 2007). The loss of habitat in the Detroit River and on its shores was one of the factors that led to the river to be designated a Great Lakes Area of Concern in 1985 (Green et al., 2010). The Detroit River Canadian Cleanup (DRCC) partnership and the agencies responsible for implementing the Remedial Action Plan that addresses habitat loss and other concerns in the river, have been exploring and implementing actions to reduce the impacts of habitat loss. Actions include protecting remaining habitat, replacing lost habitats through restoration, or enhancing or improving the function of existing natural features.
    [Show full text]
  • Construction of Shipping Channels in the Detroit River: History and Environmental Consequences
    In cooperation with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Construction of Shipping Channels in the Detroit River: History and Environmental Consequences Scientific Investigations Report 2011–5122 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Construction of Shipping Channels in the Detroit River: History and Environmental Consequences By David H. Bennion and Bruce A. Manny In cooperation with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Scientific Investigations Report 2011–5122 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2011 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Bennion, D.H., and Manny, B.A., 2011, Construction of shipping channels in the Detroit River—History and environmental consequences: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2011–5122, 14 p. Cover photo: View of the Detroit River after construction of the Livingston Channel.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Benefits of Habitat Modification
    ECOLOGICAL BENEFITS OF HABITAT MODIFICATION DETROIT RIVER AND WESTERN LAKE ERIE 2010 Cover photos: DTE’s River Rouge Power Plant in Michigan by Chris Lehr/Nativescape LLC; Lower left: Legacy Park in Windsor, Ontario by Essex Region Conservation Authority; Lower middle: Elizabeth Park in Trenton, Michigan by Emily Wilke/Detroit River International Wildlife Refuge; Lower right: Fort Malden in Amherstburg, Ontario by Essex Region Conservation Authority. STATE OF THE STRAIT ECOLOGICAL BENEFITS OF HABITAT MODIFICATION Edited by: John H. Hartig, Michael A. Zarull, Lynda D. Corkum, Natalie Green, Rose Ellison, Anna Cook, Greg Norwood, and Ellen Green 2010 STATE OF THE STRAIT ECOLOGICAL BENEFITS OF HABITAT MODIFICATION 2010 Edited by: John H. Hartig, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Michael A. Zarull, Environment Canada Lynda D. Corkum, University of Windsor Natalie Green, Detroit River Canadian Cleanup Rose Ellison, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Anna Cook, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Greg Norwood, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ellen Green, University of Windsor Based on the 2009 State of the Strait Conference held at University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario Suggested citation: Hartig, J.H., M.A. Zarull, L.D. Corkum, N. Green, R. Ellison, A. Cook, G. Norwood, and E. Green, eds. 2010. State of the Strait: Ecological Benefits of Habitat Modification. Great Lakes Institute for Environmental Research, Occasional Publication No. 6, University of Windsor, Ontario, Canada. ISSN 1715-3980 Report also available at: www.StateoftheStrait.org 5.9 ECOLOGICAL RESULTS OF RESTORING FIGHTING ISLAND Introduction BASF Corporation and its predecessor companies have owned Fighting Island since 1918. The southern three-quarters of the island were divided into three settling beds (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Race
    Notice of Race 58th Annual Fighting Island Regatta Saturday August 28, 2021 Hosted by the LaSalle Mariner’s Yacht Club (LMYC) LaSalle, Canada Due to continuing COVID-19 Restrictions on international travel, this is to invite all Canadian sailors in and around the Detroit River, Lake Erie and Lake St Clair area, to participate in our Annual “Fighting Island Regatta” We want to acknowledge and thank the volunteers who helped organize this event and we look forward to seeing our American Friends in 2022. 1 Race Rules 1.1 The regatta will be governed by the rules as defined in The Racing Rules of Sailing 2021 – 2024. The Prescriptions of Sail Canada will apply. These can be found at http://www.sailing.ca/ 1.2 Sailing Instructions will be posted on the LMYC website and will be available at LMYC clubhouse. 1.3 The Essex County PHRF Class Rules will apply http://ec.phrf.ca/rules.html . 1.4 The Equipment Rules of Sailing shall be used http://www.sailing.org/documents/equipmentrules/index.php 1.5 The Canadian Shipping Act - Small Vessel Regulation (required safely equipment) shall apply - http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/regulations/SOR-2010-91 1.6 Yachts shall carry proper sail numbers on mainsails, spinnakers and any head-sails attached having a luff perpendicular exceeding 130%. Yachts without proper sail numbers shall be subject to protest. 2 Eligibility 2.1 This regatta is open to all yachts that have a valid PHRF Class Certificate, subject to Paragraph 7 - Handicap Rules. To be eligible, all sailboats must be self-righting and not less than 20ft.
    [Show full text]