DOCSLIB.ORG

Lepton Number Conservation and Possible Lepton Violating Processes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lepton Number Conservation and Possible Lepton Violating Processes Lepton number conservation and possible lepton violating processes. Prakash Gautam [email protected] Department of Physics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA March 20, 2019 1 Introduction In the early 1936, Muon were were first detected from cosmic ray experiments. They had the same gauge quantum numbers like electrons and the Muon underwent decay by the interaction µ ! eνν¯. This led to a belief that this particle was just an excited electron. So it was expected that muon would de- excite to an electron µ ! eγ. In the 1940s searches for such decay processes began but it was found that this expected de-excitation did not occur, with the upper limit of branching ratio of 10−6. To explain this phenomenon a new hypothesis called the ‘two neutrino hypothesis‘ was presented which postulated that there were two lepton ‘flavors‘ which was each accompanied by a conserved quantum number called ‘lepton-flavor number‘. For the two particles known at that time electron-number and muon-number was given to them. 1 Leptons are fundamental particle with half-integer spin 2 . Since all leptons have half integer spin, they all obey Fermi-Dirac statistics, hence fermions. These particles do not undergo strong interaction. In the Standard Model (SM) of particle physics there are six leptons. Electron (e−), Muon (µ−) and Tau τ − and the associated neutrinos. The associated neutrinos are Electron Neutrino νe, νµ and ντ . These charged letpon with corresponding neutrinos form weak isospin doublet. 1 Table 1: Lepton number conservation example − − 0 + − µ ! νµ + e +ν ¯e 2n ! 2p + 2e Electron # 0 = 0 + 1 + -1 0 =6 0 + 2 Muon # 1 = 1 + 0 + 0 0 = 0 + 0 Tau # 0 = 0 + 0 + 0 0 = 0 + 0 SM is largely developed to explain the observation in particle physics. In every interactions observed so far, lepton number is found to be conserved. So conservation of lepton number enters SM as an empirical fact. Unlike U(1) local gauge symmetry for electromagnetic interaction or the U(2) local gauge symmetry for electroweak interaction, conservation of lepton number was not originally associated with gauge symmetries. However, there are some models which associate conservation of lepton number to a new U(1) local gauge symmetry [1] different from the U(1) symmetry for electromag- netism. According to these models, the SM Lagrangian (L) for the leptonic interaction is symmetric under the transformation L! e−iLθL, where L is the lepton number. The value of L is called lepton number and its value is one for all leptons and it is −1 for all antileptons, all other particle in standard model have L = 0. In any particle interaction in standard model the lepton number is conserved in interacting particles. − − In the example show in in Table 1 the interaction µ ! νµ + e +ν ¯e is observed while the interaction 2n0 ! 2p+ + 2e− is not observed because it violates the conservation of electron lepton number (Le). 2 Lepton violating Processes With more experimental data available and more particles discovered, it is now established that lepton number might not be a good quantum number. In some processes, they may be violated in a charged-current processes in- volving weak interaction over long distance like, neutrino oscillations. The observation of neutrino oscillation implies, all charged-lepton flavor violating processes are allowed and will occur at some level. 2 e− + AZ ! µ− + AZ−2 µ− + AZ ! e+ + AZ−2 p + AZ ! µ+ + e+ + (A + 1)Z−1 e− + e− ! π− + π− − − 0 νµ + e ! π + π There are various lepton number violating processes. Both the charged Lep- ton number violating processes and neutral lepton number violating processes are under study. Examples of possible neutral lepton number violating processes are Neutrino- less Double Beta Decay (0νββ) and for charged lepton, the lepton violating − − − − − − 0 processes are τ ! µ γ, τ ! µ µµ, τ ! µ KS. In standard model the charged lepton number violating are suppressed more than for the neutral leptons. They are in general ` ! `0γ, ` ! `0`00`00, `+X ! `0 +X and X ! ``¯0 where ` is one of charged lepton fe; µ, τg and X are all other particles with no lepton number associated. 2.1 Neutrinoless double beta decay Paul Dirac trying to get the relativistic quantum mechanics of fundamental particles discovered the Dirac equation µ (iγ @µ − m) = 0 this equation has its adjoint equation which predicts negative energy state particles. Since no such particle with negative mass were observed Dirac argued that their existence was forbidden due to Pauli’s exclusion principle. The solution of adjoint of Dirac equation predicted the existence of anti particle. This discovery doubled the standard model particles because very particle with non-zero spin had its antiparticle. For charged particles, the antiparticles have opposite charge. But for neutral particles, it was not clear whether the particles themselves were the anti particle of itself. In 1937 Ettore Majorana, an Italian physicist took upon this theory and ar- gued that since the theory is symmetric [2, 3] it was possible to replace the complex wave function with a real one for neutral fermions. Thus the sym- metric Majorana equation predicts, for neutral fermions, that the particle and 3 ν¯ ν¯ e− e− e− ν¯ ν¯ e− p+ p+ p+ p+ W − W − W − W − n0 n0 n0 n0 (a) Double beta decay (b) Neutrinoless double beta decay. Figure 1: Feynman diagram for two neutrino double beta decay and neutri- noless double beta decay. anti particle are identical. The first idea of double beta decay was proposed by M. Goeppert-Mayer in the paper titled Double Beta-Disintegration[4] in the form. − (Z; A) ! (Z + 2;A) + 2e + 2¯νe This transition occurs regardless of whether the neutrinos are their own an- tiparticle or not, i.e., whether they are Dirac or Majorana particles. Neutrinoless double beta decay however would not produce neutrinos at all. (Z; A) ! (Z + 2;A) + 2e− Observation of this transition will confirm that neutrinos are Majorana fermions, because the virtual anti neutrino should exchange with each other, which is only possible if neutrinos are antiparticle of themselves[5]. Also clear from the interaction above the lepton number is not conserved in this interaction. Since two neutrons in such an interaction change to two proton giving off two electron n0 + n0 ! p+ + p+ + e− + e− (1) In the interaction (1) the total lepton number before the interaction is 0 ( since neutrons have lepton number 0) but the lepton umber on the right is 2. Thus the total change in lepton number is 2. ∆L = 2 The rate of 0νββ depends on the lepton number violating parameter; which is the effective Majorana mass for the exchange of light but massive virtual 4 (a) s-channel for kaon neutrinoless kaon (b) t-channel Feynman diagram for kaon decay decay Figure 2: Feynman diagram for Kaon neutrinoless double muon decay neutrino (Fig 1b). There are also other mechanisms that could require mas- sive neutrinos in 0νββ. Some of which are Leptoquark Mechanism[6], SUSY accompanied neutrino exchange mechanism [7] etc. If we denote the effective Majorana mass by mββ, the decay rate of 0νββ is related to this mass by 0ν −1 2 2 T1=2 = G(Q; Z)jM(Z; A)j hmββi , here G(Q; Z) is the phase space factor which depends on the nucleus and the decay endpoint of the isotope, M(Z; A) is the nuclear matrix element, which depends on the nucleus and the model used. The Majornana mass is given by 2 X 2 hmββi = miUai i where Uai are the elements of Pontecorvo–Maki–Nakagawa–Sakata matrix (PMNS) matrix. 2.2 K-meson neutrinoless double muon decay In SM extension with Majorana neutrinos, it is possible for for K meson to decay into two muons and a pion. One of the possible lepton number violating process is the K-meson neutrinoless double decay. K+ ! µ+ + µ+ + π− Figure. 2 show two lowest order Feynman diagram for this decay process. It involves weak interaction. 5 2.3 Neutrinoless Tau (τ) decays One Possible ways of lepton violating process is neutrinoless Tau decay. Neu- − − trinoless tau-lepton can decay into either three leptons τ ! `1 `2`3 or one 0 − − 0 lepton and one KS meson (τ ! ` Ks ) where ` is either an electron or muon. Experiments have been performed to search for such a decay, however no evidence for such a decay have been observed so far[8] with the upper limit of branching ratio of 1 × 10−7. 2.4 Possibility of ∆L > 2 So far the various processes we discussed violate the lepton flavor conservation by two units. There have been studies done for the existence of processes that violate the lepton number conservation by more than two units. One would assume that the next lepton violating process similar to 0νββ is 0ν3β. But such decays are forbidden as they do not respect Lorentz sym- metry. The next in series is Neutrinoless Quadrapule Beta Decay (0ν4β) [9]. Existence of such a decay would imply the interaction of the type (A; Z) ! (A; Z + 4) + 4e− This decay process is allowed if the neutrinos are Dirac particles. This process changes the lepton number by four units. ∆L = 4 The lower limit for the half life of 0ν4β is more than 1 × 1041yrs[10]. This makes this process extremely unlikely to be observed with our current tech- nology. Other processes have been proposed which violate lepton flavor con- servation by more than four units ∆L = 5; 6;::: but none have been put to experimental tests so far. 3 Conclusion Observation of neutrino oscillation confirms that neutrinos are massive.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Five Common Particles
    The Five Common Particles The world around you consists of only three particles: protons, neutrons, and electrons. Protons and neutrons form the nuclei of atoms, and electrons glue everything together and create chemicals and materials. Along with the photon and the neutrino, these particles are essentially the only ones that exist in our solar system, because all the other subatomic particles have half-lives of typically 10-9 second or less, and vanish almost the instant they are created by nuclear reactions in the Sun, etc. Particles interact via the four fundamental forces of nature. Some basic properties of these forces are summarized below. (Other aspects of the fundamental forces are also discussed in the Summary of Particle Physics document on this web site.) Force Range Common Particles It Affects Conserved Quantity gravity infinite neutron, proton, electron, neutrino, photon mass-energy electromagnetic infinite proton, electron, photon charge -14 strong nuclear force ≈ 10 m neutron, proton baryon number -15 weak nuclear force ≈ 10 m neutron, proton, electron, neutrino lepton number Every particle in nature has specific values of all four of the conserved quantities associated with each force. The values for the five common particles are: Particle Rest Mass1 Charge2 Baryon # Lepton # proton 938.3 MeV/c2 +1 e +1 0 neutron 939.6 MeV/c2 0 +1 0 electron 0.511 MeV/c2 -1 e 0 +1 neutrino ≈ 1 eV/c2 0 0 +1 photon 0 eV/c2 0 0 0 1) MeV = mega-electron-volt = 106 eV. It is customary in particle physics to measure the mass of a particle in terms of how much energy it would represent if it were converted via E = mc2.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepton Flavor and Number Conservation, and Physics Beyond the Standard Model
    Lepton Flavor and Number Conservation, and Physics Beyond the Standard Model Andr´ede Gouv^ea1 and Petr Vogel2 1 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, 60208, USA 2 Kellogg Radiation Laboratory, Caltech, Pasadena, California, 91125, USA April 1, 2013 Abstract The physics responsible for neutrino masses and lepton mixing remains unknown. More ex- perimental data are needed to constrain and guide possible generalizations of the standard model of particle physics, and reveal the mechanism behind nonzero neutrino masses. Here, the physics associated with searches for the violation of lepton-flavor conservation in charged-lepton processes and the violation of lepton-number conservation in nuclear physics processes is summarized. In the first part, several aspects of charged-lepton flavor violation are discussed, especially its sensitivity to new particles and interactions beyond the standard model of particle physics. The discussion concentrates mostly on rare processes involving muons and electrons. In the second part, the sta- tus of the conservation of total lepton number is discussed. The discussion here concentrates on current and future probes of this apparent law of Nature via searches for neutrinoless double beta decay, which is also the most sensitive probe of the potential Majorana nature of neutrinos. arXiv:1303.4097v2 [hep-ph] 29 Mar 2013 1 1 Introduction In the absence of interactions that lead to nonzero neutrino masses, the Standard Model Lagrangian is invariant under global U(1)e × U(1)µ × U(1)τ rotations of the lepton fields. In other words, if neutrinos are massless, individual lepton-flavor numbers { electron-number, muon-number, and tau-number { are expected to be conserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Accessible Lepton-Number-Violating Models and Negligible Neutrino Masses
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D 100, 075033 (2019) Accessible lepton-number-violating models and negligible neutrino masses † ‡ Andr´e de Gouvêa ,1,* Wei-Chih Huang,2, Johannes König,2, and Manibrata Sen 1,3,§ 1Northwestern University, Department of Physics and Astronomy, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA 2CP3-Origins, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark 3Department of Physics, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA (Received 18 July 2019; published 25 October 2019) Lepton-number violation (LNV), in general, implies nonzero Majorana masses for the Standard Model neutrinos. Since neutrino masses are very small, for generic candidate models of the physics responsible for LNV, the rates for almost all experimentally accessible LNV observables—except for neutrinoless double- beta decay—are expected to be exceedingly small. Guided by effective-operator considerations of LNV phenomena, we identify a complete family of models where lepton number is violated but the generated Majorana neutrino masses are tiny, even if the new-physics scale is below 1 TeV. We explore the phenomenology of these models, including charged-lepton flavor-violating phenomena and baryon- number-violating phenomena, identifying scenarios where the allowed rates for μ− → eþ-conversion in nuclei are potentially accessible to next-generation experiments. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.075033 I. INTRODUCTION Experimentally, in spite of ambitious ongoing experi- Lepton number and baryon number are, at the classical mental efforts, there is no evidence for the violation of level, accidental global symmetries of the renormalizable lepton-number or baryon-number conservation [5]. There Standard Model (SM) Lagrangian.1 If one allows for are a few different potential explanations for these (neg- generic nonrenormalizable operators consistent with the ative) experimental results, assuming degrees-of-freedom SM gauge symmetries and particle content, lepton number beyond those of the SM exist.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Drawing Feynman Diagrams
    1 Drawing Feynman Diagrams 1. A fermion (quark, lepton, neutrino) is drawn by a straight line with an arrow pointing to the left: f f 2. An antifermion is drawn by a straight line with an arrow pointing to the right: f f 3. A photon or W ±, Z0 boson is drawn by a wavy line: γ W ±;Z0 4. A gluon is drawn by a curled line: g 5. The emission of a photon from a lepton or a quark doesn’t change the fermion: γ l; q l; q But a photon cannot be emitted from a neutrino: γ ν ν 6. The emission of a W ± from a fermion changes the flavour of the fermion in the following way: − − − 2 Q = −1 e µ τ u c t Q = + 3 1 Q = 0 νe νµ ντ d s b Q = − 3 But for quarks, we have an additional mixing between families: u c t d s b This means that when emitting a W ±, an u quark for example will mostly change into a d quark, but it has a small chance to change into a s quark instead, and an even smaller chance to change into a b quark. Similarly, a c will mostly change into a s quark, but has small chances of changing into an u or b. Note that there is no horizontal mixing, i.e. an u never changes into a c quark! In practice, we will limit ourselves to the light quarks (u; d; s): 1 DRAWING FEYNMAN DIAGRAMS 2 u d s Some examples for diagrams emitting a W ±: W − W + e− νe u d And using quark mixing: W + u s To know the sign of the W -boson, we use charge conservation: the sum of the charges at the left hand side must equal the sum of the charges at the right hand side.
    [Show full text]
  • Neutrino Vs Antineutrino Lepton Number Splitting
    Introduction to Elementary Particle Physics. Note 18 Page 1 of 5 Neutrino vs antineutrino Neutrino is a neutral particle—a legitimate question: are neutrino and anti-neutrino the same particle? Compare: photon is its own antiparticle, π0 is its own antiparticle, neutron and antineutron are different particles. Dirac neutrino : If the answer is different , neutrino is to be called Dirac neutrino Majorana neutrino : If the answer is the same , neutrino is to be called Majorana neutrino 1959 Davis and Harmer conducted an experiment to see whether there is a reaction ν + n → p + e - could occur. The reaction and technique they used, ν + 37 Cl e- + 37 Ar, was proposed by B. Pontecorvo in 1946. The result was negative 1… Lepton number However, this was not unexpected: 1953 Konopinski and Mahmoud introduced a notion of lepton number L that must be conserved in reactions : • electron, muon, neutrino have L = +1 • anti-electron, anti-muon, anti-neutrino have L = –1 This new ad hoc law would explain many facts: • decay of neutron with anti-neutrino is OK: n → p e -ν L=0 → L = 1 + (–1) = 0 • pion decays with single neutrino or anti-neutrino is OK π → µ-ν L=0 → L = 1 + (–1) = 0 • but no pion decays into a muon and photon π- → µ- γ, which would require: L= 0 → L = 1 + 0 = 1 • no decays of muon with one neutrino µ- → e - ν, which would require: L= 1 → L = 1 ± 1 = 0 or 2 • no processes searched for by Davis and Harmer, which would require: L= (–1)+0 → L = 0 + 1 = 1 But why there are no decays µµµ →→→ e γγγ ? 2 Splitting lepton numbers 1959 Bruno Pontecorvo
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Flavour Physics
    Introduction to flavour physics Y. Grossman Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA Abstract In this set of lectures we cover the very basics of flavour physics. The lec- tures are aimed to be an entry point to the subject of flavour physics. A lot of problems are provided in the hope of making the manuscript a self-study guide. 1 Welcome statement My plan for these lectures is to introduce you to the very basics of flavour physics. After the lectures I hope you will have enough knowledge and, more importantly, enough curiosity, and you will go on and learn more about the subject. These are lecture notes and are not meant to be a review. In the lectures, I try to talk about the basic ideas, hoping to give a clear picture of the physics. Thus many details are omitted, implicit assumptions are made, and no references are given. Yet details are important: after you go over the current lecture notes once or twice, I hope you will feel the need for more. Then it will be the time to turn to the many reviews [1–10] and books [11, 12] on the subject. I try to include many homework problems for the reader to solve, much more than what I gave in the actual lectures. If you would like to learn the material, I think that the problems provided are the way to start. They force you to fully understand the issues and apply your knowledge to new situations. The problems are given at the end of each section.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 5: Quarks & Leptons, Mesons & Baryons
    Physics 3: Particle Physics Lecture 5: Quarks & Leptons, Mesons & Baryons February 25th 2008 Leptons • Quantum Numbers Quarks • Quantum Numbers • Isospin • Quark Model and a little History • Baryons, Mesons and colour charge 1 Leptons − − − • Six leptons: e µ τ νe νµ ντ + + + • Six anti-leptons: e µ τ νe̅ νµ̅ ντ̅ • Four quantum numbers used to characterise leptons: • Electron number, Le, muon number, Lµ, tau number Lτ • Total Lepton number: L= Le + Lµ + Lτ • Le, Lµ, Lτ & L are conserved in all interactions Lepton Le Lµ Lτ Q(e) electron e− +1 0 0 1 Think of Le, Lµ and Lτ like − muon µ− 0 +1 0 1 electric charge: − tau τ − 0 0 +1 1 They have to be conserved − • electron neutrino νe +1 0 0 0 at every vertex. muon neutrino νµ 0 +1 0 0 • They are conserved in every tau neutrino ντ 0 0 +1 0 decay and scattering anti-electron e+ 1 0 0 +1 anti-muon µ+ −0 1 0 +1 anti-tau τ + 0 −0 1 +1 Parity: intrinsic quantum number. − electron anti-neutrino ν¯e 1 0 0 0 π=+1 for lepton − muon anti-neutrino ν¯µ 0 1 0 0 π=−1 for anti-leptons tau anti-neutrino ν¯ 0 −0 1 0 τ − 2 Introduction to Quarks • Six quarks: d u s c t b Parity: intrinsic quantum number • Six anti-quarks: d ̅ u ̅ s ̅ c ̅ t ̅ b̅ π=+1 for quarks π=−1 for anti-quarks • Lots of quantum numbers used to describe quarks: • Baryon Number, B - (total number of quarks)/3 • B=+1/3 for quarks, B=−1/3 for anti-quarks • Strangness: S, Charm: C, Bottomness: B, Topness: T - number of s, c, b, t • S=N(s)̅ −N(s) C=N(c)−N(c)̅ B=N(b)̅ −N(b) T=N( t )−N( t )̅ • Isospin: I, IZ - describe up and down quarks B conserved in all Quark I I S C B T Q(e) • Z interactions down d 1/2 1/2 0 0 0 0 1/3 up u 1/2 −1/2 0 0 0 0 +2− /3 • S, C, B, T conserved in strange s 0 0 1 0 0 0 1/3 strong and charm c 0 0 −0 +1 0 0 +2− /3 electromagnetic bottom b 0 0 0 0 1 0 1/3 • I, IZ conserved in strong top t 0 0 0 0 −0 +1 +2− /3 interactions only 3 Much Ado about Isospin • Isospin was introduced as a quantum number before it was known that hadrons are composed of quarks.
    [Show full text]
  • Neutrino Masses-How to Add Them to the Standard Model
    he Oscillating Neutrino The Oscillating Neutrino of spatial coordinates) has the property of interchanging the two states eR and eL. Neutrino Masses What about the neutrino? The right-handed neutrino has never been observed, How to add them to the Standard Model and it is not known whether that particle state and the left-handed antineutrino c exist. In the Standard Model, the field ne , which would create those states, is not Stuart Raby and Richard Slansky included. Instead, the neutrino is associated with only two types of ripples (particle states) and is defined by a single field ne: n annihilates a left-handed electron neutrino n or creates a right-handed he Standard Model includes a set of particles—the quarks and leptons e eL electron antineutrino n . —and their interactions. The quarks and leptons are spin-1/2 particles, or weR fermions. They fall into three families that differ only in the masses of the T The left-handed electron neutrino has fermion number N = +1, and the right- member particles. The origin of those masses is one of the greatest unsolved handed electron antineutrino has fermion number N = 21. This description of the mysteries of particle physics. The greatest success of the Standard Model is the neutrino is not invariant under the parity operation. Parity interchanges left-handed description of the forces of nature in terms of local symmetries. The three families and right-handed particles, but we just said that, in the Standard Model, the right- of quarks and leptons transform identically under these local symmetries, and thus handed neutrino does not exist.
    [Show full text]
  • GRAND UNIFIED THEORIES Paul Langacker Department of Physics
    GRAND UNIFIED THEORIES Paul Langacker Department of Physics, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104-3859, U.S.A. I. Introduction One of the most exciting advances in particle physics in recent years has been the develcpment of grand unified theories l of the strong, weak, and electro­ magnetic interactions. In this talk I discuss the present status of these theo­ 2 ries and of thei.r observational and experimenta1 implications. In section 11,1 briefly review the standard Su c x SU x U model of the 3 2 l strong and electroweak interactions. Although phenomenologically successful, the standard model leaves many questions unanswered. Some of these questions are ad­ dressed by grand unified theories, which are defined and discussed in Section III. 2 The Georgi-Glashow SU mode1 is described, as are theories based on larger groups 5 such as SOlO' E , or S016. It is emphasized that there are many possible grand 6 unified theories and that it is an experimental problem not onlv to test the basic ideas but to discriminate between models. Therefore, the experimental implications are described in Section IV. The topics discussed include: (a) the predictions for coupling constants, such as 2 sin sw, and for the neutral current strength parameter p. A large class of models involving an Su c x SU x U invariant desert are extremely successful in these 3 2 l predictions, while grand unified theories incorporating a low energy left-right symmetric weak interaction subgroup are most likely ruled out. (b) Predictions for baryon number violating processes, such as proton decay or neutron-antineutnon 3 oscillations.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepton Number Violation at the LHC with Leptoquarks and Diquarks\*
    EPJ Web of Conferences 49, 18002 (2013) DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/ 20134918002 C Owned by the authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2013 Lepton number violation at the LHC with leptoquarks and diquarks? Hiroaki Sugiyama1 1Department of Physics, University of Toyama, Toyama 930-8555, Japan Abstract. We investigate a model in which tiny neutrino masses are generated at the two-loop level by using scalar leptoquark and diquark multiplets. The diquark can be singly produced at the LHC, and it can decay into a pair of leptoquarks through the lepton number violating interaction. Subsequent decays of the two leptoquarks can provide a clear signature of the lepton number violation, namely two QCD jets and a pair of same-signed charged leptons without missing energy. We show that the signal process is not suppressed while neutrino masses are appropriately suppressed. 1 Introduction Table 1. List of scalar particles added to the SM. Although the lepton number is conserved in the standard SU(3)C SU(2)L U(1)Y L# B# model (SM) of particle physics, the addition of the Ma- S α 3 1 −1=3 1 1=3 jorana mass term of neutrinos (ννc where c denotes the LQ αβ − = = charge conjugation) breaks the lepton number conserva- S DQ 6 1 2 3 0 2 3 tion by two units. The measurement of the lepton number violating (L#V) processes such as the neutrinoless dou- ble beta decay is extremely important because it gives ev- SU(2)L, and hypercharge Y = −1=3. We also introduce a idence that neutrinos are Majorana particles.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 18 - Beyond the Standard Model
    Lecture 18 - Beyond the Standard Model Why is the Standard Model incomplete? • Grand Unification • Baryon and Lepton Number Violation • More Higgs Bosons? • Supersymmetry (SUSY) • Experimental signatures for SUSY • 1 Why is the Standard Model incomplete? The Standard Model does not explain the following: The relationship between different interactions • (strong, electroweak and gravity) The nature of dark matter and dark energy • The matter-antimatter asymmetry of the universe • The existence of three generations of quarks and leptons • Conservation of lepton and baryon number • Neutrino masses and mixing • The pattern of weak quark couplings (CKM matrix) • 2 Grand Unification The strong, electromagnetic and weak couplings αs, e and g are 15 running constants. Can they be unified at MX 10 GeV? ≈ We would also like to include gravity at the Planck scale 19 MX 10 GeV. Is string theory a candidate for this? ≈ 3 SU(5) Grand Unified Theory (GUT) Simplest theory that unifies strong and electroweak interactions (Georgi & Glashow) 15 Introduces 12 gauge bosons X and Y at MX 10 GeV ≈ These are known as leptoquarks. They make charged and neutral couplings between leptons and quarks Explains why Qν Qe = Qu Qd − − Existence of three colors is related to fractional quark charges Predicts proton decay p π0e+ → 4 2 Prediction of sin θW Loop diagram with ff¯ pair couples a Z0 boson to a photon In electroweak theory the Z0 and γ are orthogonal states The sum of loop diagrams over all fermion pairs must be zero: 2 2 P QI3 X Q(I3 Q sin θW )=0 sin θW = 2 − P Q
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 7: Symmetries II
    Lecture 7: Symmetries II • Charge Conjugation • Time Reversal • CPT Theorem • Baryon & Lepton Number • Strangeness • Applying Conservation Laws Useful Sections in Martin & Shaw: Sections 3.1-3.4, 5.3, 5.4, 5.6 C-Parity (charge conjugation) Changes particle to anti-particle (without affecting linear or angular momentum) Electromagnetism is obviously symmetric with respect to C-parity (flip the signs of all charges and who would know?). It turns out that the strong force is as well. But, again, not the weak force (otherwise there would be left-handed anti-neutrinos... there aren’t !) For particles with distinct anti-particles (x = e-, p, π-, n, ...) a state characterized C ∣x, ψ> = ∣ x, ψ > ! where∣x, ψ > ≡ by a particle x and a wave function ψ For particles which no not have distinct anti-particles (y = γ, π0, ...) where C is a ''phase factor" of ±1 ∣ ∣ y C y, ψ > = Cy y, ψ > ! (like for parity) used to determine C-conservation in interactions For multi-particle systems ∣ ∣ | C x, ψ1; x, ψ2 > = x, ψ1; x, ψ2 > = ± x, ψ1; x, ψ2 > depending on whether the system is symmetric or antisymmetric under the operation Example: consider a π+π- pair in a state of definite orbital angular momentum L C ∣ π+π-, L > = (-1)L ∣ π+π-, L > since interchanging π+ and π- reverses their relative position vector in the spatial wave function Example: Experimentally, π0 → γ + γ but never π0 → γ + γ + γ How is this reconciled with the concept of C-parity ?? using a similar argument 0 0 C ∣ π > = C ∣ π > as for parity, π° Cγ = -1 C = +1 π° ∣ ∣ C ∣ γγγ = C C C ∣ γγγ
    [Show full text]