MMWR Dispatch Vol
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Los Angeles Paralegal Association
www.lapa.org reporter JUNE 2021 VOLUME 49 / ISSUE 06 IN REVIEW... LAPA PRIDE 1 LAPA Pride: Celebrate Pride Month 1 President’s Message: Celebrate Pride Month Back on Track by Susan Kastner – LAPA Director 3 Paralegal Career Growth: Are You Riding the Horse in the LGBTQ+ Awareness is celebrated in Los Angeles starting Direction It Is Going? How Inability to Change Can Bust Your Career. Friday, June 11 to Sunday, June 13. LA’s Pride will be 7 LAPA’s Crossword Puzzle: broadcasted on ABC7/KABC-TC Los Angeles and will air Pioneers in LGBTQ History this Pride a one-hour prime time special. It is a lighthearted fun and Caribbean American Heritage Month of June celebration that features celebrities, good music, and a 8 Family Law Section: lively entertainment. 3 Strikes – You’re Out! Recommendations to Court to Though, the origins of LA Pride originates from the Stonewall Riots; LGBTQ+ Address Custodial Interference & Coercive Control (Alternately Awareness is synonymous with the Stonewall Riots. It occurred 52 years ago Relationship Estrangement and at the Stonewall Inn. As a result of the social and political discrimination in Interference) Consequences and Applications 1969 that many marginalized people in the community endured, different 12 Pro Bono Corner: groups of the LGBTQ umbrella banded together to form a solidarity against the Survival After a Disaster oppression and discrimination that they experience during the time. 13 LAPA Helpful Tips: Organization Tips Series: Passion The Stonewall Riots became the catalyst to a movement that brought us LA Planners Pride and LGBTQ+ awareness events. It was the pivotal moment that started 14 Events - In The Time of COVID-19: the LGBTQ+ movement. -
Protectmarriage.Com–Yes on 8 Concerning NPRM 2014-121
Comments of ProtectMarriage.com–Yes on 8 Concerning NPRM 2014-121 James Bopp, Jr. & Richard E. Coleson2 January 14, 2015 ProtectMarriage.com Yes on 8 (“ProtectMarriage”) comments on NPRM 2014-12 regarding the serious ill effects that sometimes result from disclosure of contributors to citizen-advocacy groups. James Bopp, Jr. requests to testify at the scheduled hearing on this NPRM. These comments are in response to FEC’s solicitation of comments concerning “collection . of campaign finance data.” 79 Fed. Reg. at 62363 (emphasis added), coupled with the State- ment of Vice Chair Ann M. Ravel, Commissioner Steven T. Walther, and Commissioner Ellen L. Weintraub on Rulemaking in Response to McCutcheon v. FEC (Oct. 4, 2014). In that Statement, three members of the Commission particularly invited comments as follows: We think it is essential to hear from anyone who cares about money in politics especially the citizens and campaign volunteers who have an equal stake in making our democracy work. We know there is growing public concern about the deluge of undisclosed spending to sway our votes. [T]he Commission should consider based on public comments and testimony how to strengthen its disclosure rules so that voters know who is behind the messages intended to influence their votes. ProtectMarriage was a citizen-advocacy group in California’s Proposition 8 campaign, which sought a constitutional amendment to protect traditional marriage. Disclosure of Protect-Mar- riage’s supporters led to their widespread, serious harassment. Filed with these comments is Plain- tiffs’ Statement of Undisputed Facts (“SUF”), filed in support of summary judgment in Protect- Marriage v. -
Case 2:09-Cv-00058-MCE -DAD Document 250 Filed 08/25/11 Page 1 of 35 Undertaken the Matter Unless He Believed He Had the Firm’S Full Backing
Clement Quits King & Spalding Over Marriage Act Decision - Bloomberg http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-04-25/clement-quits-king-spaldin... Case 2:09-cv-00058-MCE -DAD Document 250 Filed 08/25/11 Page 1 of 35 undertaken the matter unless he believed he had the firm’s full backing. Advertisement ‘Honorable Course’ “But having undertaken the representation, I believe there is no honorable course for me but to complete it,” Clement said in his letter to Hays. “If there were problems with the firm’s vetting process, we should fix the vetting process, not drop the representation.” Clement, a native of Cedarburg, Wisconsin, served as the U.S. solicitor general, arguing the government’s side in cases before the U.S. Supreme Court, from June 2005 to June 2008, during the presidency of George W. Bush. He rejoined King & Spalding in November 2008. “We’re sorry to see Paul Clement leave. He’s been a good partner and we wish him the best,” Les Zuke, a spokesman for the firm, said today in an e-mail. Most Popular Stories To contact the reporter on this story: Sophia Pearson in Philadelphia at Biggest Tax Avoiders Would Win on Tax Break [email protected] To contact the editor responsible for this story: Michael Hytha at [email protected] Home Prices in 20 U.S. Cities Fell 4% in April Email Print Share More Greek Protests Overshadow Budget Vote Updated 2 hours ago Videos You May Like ‹ Prev 1 of 3 Next › Microsoft Puts Office on Web to Fight Google 9 Best Stocks to Updated 1 hour ago Own Now Here's a list of More Most Popular Stories » recommendations that several top analysts Sponsored Links agree on www.DailyTradeAlert.com Kellermann Interview on Al Hunt on Palin's Bus Gross, Pelosi, Prasad's Lockheed Cyber Attack Tour, Potential GOP N… Own Words on Straus… by Taboola Advertisement Advertisements Exhibit 4 Page 549 2 of 3 6/28/2011 5:22 PM Case 2:09-cv-00058-MCE -DAD Document 250 Filed 08/25/11 Page 2 of 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Exhibit 4-136 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Exhibit to Pls.’ Memo in Supp. -
NO. 11-17255 KRISTIN PERRY, Et Al., Plaintiffs
Case: 11-17255 09/23/2011 ID: 7905255 DktEntry: 3-1 Page: 1 of 29 (1 of 501) NO. 11-17255 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KRISTIN PERRY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr. et al., Defendants, and DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH, et al., Defendant-Intervenors-Appellants. Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of California Civil Case No. 09-CV-2292 JW (Honorable James Ware) EMERGENCY MOTION UNDER CIRCUIT RULE 27-3 _________________________________________________________ DEFENDANT-INTERVENORS-APPELLANTS DENNIS HOLLINGWORTH, GAIL J. KNIGHT, MARTIN F. GUTIERREZ, MARK A. JANSSON, AND PROTECTMARRIAGE.COM’S EMERGENCY MOTION FOR STAY PENDING APPEAL Andrew P. Pugno Charles J. Cooper LAW OFFICES OF ANDREW P. PUGNO David H. Thompson 101 Parkshore Drive, Suite 100 Howard C. Nielson, Jr. Folsom, California 95630 Peter A. Patterson (916) 608-3065; (916) 608-3066 Fax COOPER AND KIRK, PLLC 1523 New Hampshire Ave., N.W. Brian W. Raum Washington, D.C. 20036 James A. Campbell (202) 220-9600; (202) 220-9601 Fax ALLIANCE DEFENSE FUND 15100 North 90th Street Scottsdale, Arizona 85260 (480) 444-0020; (480) 444-0028 Fax Attorneys for Defendant-Intervenors-Appellants Case: 11-17255 09/23/2011 ID: 7905255 DktEntry: 3-1 Page: 2 of 29 (2 of 501) Circuit Rule 27-3 Certificate Pursuant to Circuit Rule 27-3, Appellants respectfully certify that their motion for a stay pending appeal is an emergency motion requiring at least temporary “relief … in less than 21 days” in order to “avoid irreparable harm.” Appellants are official Proponents of Proposition 8 and the official Yes on 8 campaign (collectively, “Proponents”), who were permitted to intervene in this case to defend that California ballot initiative against a challenge by two same-sex couples (“Plaintiffs”). -
USA Carrot Grower Study Tour 2013
USA Carrot Grower Study Tour 2013 Richard Mulcahy AUSVEG Ltd Project Number: VG12707 VG12707 This report is published by Horticulture Australia Ltd to pass on information concerning horticultural research and development undertaken for the vegetables industry. The research contained in this report was funded by Horticulture Australia Ltd with the financial support of: AUSVEG Ltd the vegetables industry All expressions of opinion are not to be regarded as expressing the opinion of Horticulture Australia Ltd or any authority of the Australian Government. The Company and the Australian Government accept no responsibility for any of the opinions or the accuracy of the information contained in this report and readers should rely upon their own enquiries in making decisions concerning their own interests. ISBN 0 7341 3239 5 Published and distributed by: Horticulture Australia Ltd Level 7 179 Elizabeth Street Sydney NSW 2000 Telephone: (02) 8295 2300 Fax: (02) 8295 2399 © Copyright 2013 VG12707 USA Carrot Grower Study Tour 2013 Project Leader: Mr Richard Mulcahy AUSVEG Project Number: VG12707 (15/05/2013 – 30/11/2013) USA Carrot Grower Study Tour August 2013 Project Number: VG12707 Milestone 190: Final Report Milestone completion date: 30/11/2013 VG12707 - Final Report for 2013 USA Carrot Grower Study Tour pg. 2 Project Number: VG12707 Project Leader: Mr Richard Mulcahy Chief Executive Officer AUSVEG Ltd PO Box 138 Camberwell VIC 3124 Ph:(03) 9882 0277 E: [email protected] Purpose: The purpose of this report is to detail the findings resulting from the 2013 Carrot Grower Study Tour to the United States of America (VG12707), in line with the reporting requirements outlined in the project contract. -
A House Divided: Same-Sex Marriage and Dangers to Civil Rights
Liberty University Law Review Volume 4 Issue 3 Article 6 October 2015 A House Divided: Same-Sex Marriage and Dangers to Civil Rights Lynn D. Wardle Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/lu_law_review Recommended Citation Wardle, Lynn D. (2015) "A House Divided: Same-Sex Marriage and Dangers to Civil Rights," Liberty University Law Review: Vol. 4 : Iss. 3 , Article 6. Available at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/lu_law_review/vol4/iss3/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Liberty University School of Law at Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in Liberty University Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLE A HOUSE DIVIDED: SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AND DANGERS TO CIVIL RIGHTS Lynn D. Wardle I. INTRODUCTION Can the United States long endure as a patchwork quilt of states in which same-sex marriages are prohibited in some states while simultaneously permitted in others? Will the federal government, through congressional action or judicial rulings, impose one regime or the other on all of the people in all of the states? For example, in 2004 and 2006, resolutions proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States that would define marriage nationally as the union between a man and a woman were considered (and in 2006 received majority votes in both houses).1 However, since 2009 a bill to repeal the federal Defense of Marriage Act (with 108 co-signers) has been pending in the U.S. House of Representatives.2 What are the implications of the legalization of same-sex marriage for religious liberties? For example, President Obamas nomination of distinguished law professor Chai Feldblum to serve on the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission sparked intense controversy, at least in part because of her writings that advocate giving preference to sexual liberty over religious liberty.3 These and related issues are the focus of this Article. -
Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition Fiscal Year 2007 ______
Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition Fiscal Year 2007 _________________________________________________________________________________________ Chapter 4 – Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition Contents Allergens . 4- 3 Canned Food . 4- 4 Cosmetics . 4- 9 Dairy . 4-11 Dietary Supplements . 4-13 “Cyber” Letters . 4-18 Food Storage . 4-21 Imports . 4-22 Juice . 4-26 Nuts . 4-28 Oil . 4-30 Prepared Foods . 4-31 Restaurants . 4-32 Seafood . 4-34 ______________________________________________________________________ 4-1 Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition Fiscal Year 2007 _________________________________________________________________________________________ Snack Foods . 4-39 Vegetables . 4-41 Symptoms of Foodborne Illnesses . 4-46 Enforcement Statistics . 4-48 ______________________________________________________________________ 4-2 Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition Fiscal Year 2007 _________________________________________________________________________________________ The Warning Letters presented in this chapter were chosen to provide examples of the types of Warning Letters issued for violationsAllergens of FDA laws and regulations. A list of Warning Letters issued by FDA is available at: http://www.fda.gov/foi/warning.htm. Allergens Warning Letter for Undeclared Milk Protein ________________________________________ On July 13, 2007, FDA’s New Jersey District Office issued a Warning Letter to the President and Chairman of Quality Formulation Laboratories, Inc., Paterson, New Jersey. FDA concluded a seven day inspection of this manufacturing facility in February 2007. The FDA inspection found serious Current Good Manufacturing Practices (CGMP) and labeling violations at the firm. The Warning Letter addressed two of the firm’s products: Egg Protein III Vanilla powder mix and American Sports NutritionTM MAJOR EGGTM powder mixes (in Double Chocolate, Vanilla and Wildberry flavors). FDA analyzed samples of the Egg Protein III Vanilla powder mix collected during the inspection. -
New Tools for Food Safety Enhancement
WWW.PRODUCEBUSINESS.COM FEB 2014 •VOL. 30 • NO. 02 • $9.90 New Tools For Food Safety Enhancement INSIDE: THE PUNDIT LOOKS AT OPPORTUNITIES IN THE U.K. PRODUCE MARKET PROTECTED PRODUCE (PART I) • BLUEBERRY DEMAND ON RISE FLORIDA PRODUCE • ROCHE BROS. • SPRING MERCHANDISING MEXICAN MANGOS • FRUIT LOGISTICA AWARD RECAP MERCHANDISING PACKAGED NUTS • MERCHANDISING CARROTS ONIONS ON THE MENU • VALUE-ADDED POTATOES • PALLET INNOVATIONS FEB. 2014 • VOL. 30 • NO. 02 • $9.90 p.29 p.66 cover story features departments 21 NEW TOOLS FOR FOOD 32 SPRING AWAKENING FOODSERVICE MARKETING SAFETY ENHANCEMENT The spring months are ideal to increase 66 Onions Dominate Technological advancements in sales by capitalizing on merchandising Foodservice Menus testing, communication devices, data efforts using holiday, produce seasonality, From fast food to upscale restaurants, analysis and sanitation are among the and local-sourcing opportunities. onions are winning the hearts of chefs resources to strengthen the segment. and consumers’ taste buds. 38 PROCURING PROFITS FROM commentary PROTECTED PRODUCE - PART I FRESH CUT MARKETING Challenges and opportunities for retailers 70 Make Your Value-Added 10 THE FRUITS OF THOUGHT to market greenhouse-grown produce. Potato Sales Spud-Tacular A Value Beyond Price Learn about what’s new in the category 50 MEXICAN MANGOS: CROSSING THE and how to capture consumers’ attention 84 RETAIL PERSPECTIVE CHASM TO POPULARITY by discovering what works best for Facing Crossroads In 2014 Industry players share their advice and your business. tactics on how to increase mango 86 EUROPEAN MARKET consumption by a broader consumer base. MERCHANDISING REVIEW 2014 Fruit Logistica Innovation Award 76 Orange Is The New Green 55 FLORIDA SPRING Industry advice on the best ways to in this issue PRODUCE REPORT market carrots. -
Prop 8 Were Posted on the Inter
Kristin Perry, et al v. Dennis Hollingsworth, et al Doc. 9 Att. 3 NOS. 09-17241, 09-17551 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KRISTIN M. PERRY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH, et al. Defendant-Intervenors-Appellees. Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of California Civil Case No. 09-CV-2292 VRW (Honorable Vaughn R. Walker) DEFENDANT-INTERVENORS-APPELLANTS’ RELEVANT PARTS OF THE RECORD VOLUME III OF IV Andrew P. Pugno Charles J. Cooper LAW OFFICES OF ANDREW P. PUGNO David H. Thompson 101 Parkshore Drive, Suite 100 Howard C. Nielson, Jr. Folsom, California 95630 Nicole J. Moss (916) 608-3065; (916) 608-3066 Fax Jesse Panuccio Peter A. Patterson Brian W. Raum COOPER AND KIRK, PLLC James A. Campbell 1523 New Hampshire Ave., N.W. ALLIANCE DEFENSE FUND Washington, D.C. 20036 15100 North 90th Street (202) 220-9600 Scottsdale, Arizona 85260 (202) 220-9601 Fax (480) 444-0020; (480) 444-0028 Fax Attorneys for Defendant-Intervenors-Appellants Dockets.Justia.com INDEX TO RELEVANT PARTS OF THE RECORD NAME OF DOCUMENT LOCATION PAGE Volume I Order re In Camera Discovery Review USDC Dkt # 252 RR 1-10 Order Denying Motion to Stay USCD Dkt # 237 RR 11-23 Order Denying in part Defendant-Intervenors’ Motion USDC Dkt # 214 RR 24-41 for Protective Order (October 1, 2009) Volume II Notice of Filing of Sealed Documents for In Camera USDC Dkt # 251 RR 42-44 Review Letter from Nicole J. Moss USDC Dkt # 249 RR 45-48 Minute Entry re Telephonic Discovery Hearing USDC Dkt # 247 RR 49 Transcript of Proceedings, November 2, 2009 USDC Dkt # 246 RR 50-96 Letter from Charles J.