DOCSLIB.ORG

2008 Andrea Anderson.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2008 Andrea Anderson.Pdf Association in Defence of the Wrongly Convicted - Internship Report The criminal justice system is a human enterprise; it sometimes fails. The cost, inevitably, is the loss of liberty and livelihood for the tragic victims of these systemic errors. The cases of those exonerated disclose disturbing fissures. In Canada's criminal justice system. Sadly, these errors also leave true perpetrators on the streets while the innocent are incarcerated. 1 Summary This report is a brief description of my summer experience at the Association in Defence of the Wrongly Convicted (“AIDWYC”). My placement with AIDWYC started at the beginning of May and ended in the middle of July 2008 (10 weeks). I chose to do my placement at the AIDWYC for a number of reasons. The first being that AIDWYC work relates directly with want I wanted to do in my legal career. My desire to intern there was the fact that AIDWYC acts as an advocacy agency, providing legal education and reform, as well as a resource centre for those in the wrongly convicted community. In the context of my goals, I wanted to learn more about the complexities of institutional and systemic barriers and the legal and social options for change. Overall, I have an interest in the relationship between social justice and criminal law, and I wanted to gain practicial legal experience in those areas. I enjoyed my time with AIDWYC, and would highly recommend it as a placement option for future students. AIDWYC Profile* Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere . – Martin Luther King. Based in Toronto, Ontario, AIDWYC is a not-for-profit human rights organization dedicated to preventing and rectifying wrongful convictions founded in 1993. AIDWYC is the successor to the Justice for Guy Paul Morin Committee . The Committee was a grassroots organization that formed to support Guy Paul Morin immediately following his wrongful conviction. AIDWYC has a formal chapter in Manitoba, and informal chapters currently forming in Newfoundland and Alberta. At present in Canada, there is no system in place for an independent review of claims of wrongful convictions. As such, AIDWYC fills this gap by attracting some of the top legal experts in Ontario to identify miscarriages of justice, and where warranted, prepare an application for ministerial review to the Criminal Conviction Review Group, known as the Criminal Code ‘section 696.1 application.’ With over 100 cases submitted a year, AIDWYC’s clients are mostly poor individuals who have exhausted all their legal avenues for relief. AIDWYC mandate is currently limited to murder convictions where the accused is factually innocent. 2 The cause of the wrongly convicted has taken on new significance in the wake of high profile cases in which AIDWYC has been directly involved, most recently Anthony Hanemaayer. AIDWYC has also intervened on a number of cases, such as Hill. v. Hamilton Wentworth Police Services Board et al. 3 AIDWYC is a primarily volunteer organization, with 30 lawyers and approximately 140 volunteers, including, journalists, activists, and law students. AIDWYC raises public awareness about ensuring the integrity of the criminal justice system. Full-time, paid employees are the Executive Director, and the Director of Client Services. In 2008, the Volunteer Coordinator was a new position made possible by the Ontario Trillium Foundation. 1 See Association in Defence of the Wrongly Convicted, online: < http://www.aidwyc.org/about/>. *The following description of AIDWYC ‘s profile taken from AIDWYC website. 2 ‘Factually innocent’ – where proof exits (through DNA or other means) that a person was not involved in anyway with the murder. 3 [2005] O.J. No. 4045, 76 O.R. (3d) 48 (QL). Social Justice Fellowship – AIDWYC Placement Report 2008 – Andrea Anderson 1 Process of Review In general, AIDWYC receives applications for assistance from wrongful conviction claimants on a routine basis. These are assigned to volunteers to review and assess. In the review process volunteer lawyers and students are assigned to do a case review, including obtaining documents. Following the initial review, the supervising lawyer refers the case to AIDWYC’s Review Committee to determine whether the case meets AIDWYC’s criteria. The criteria is assessed by the Board for approval, where they make recommendations for adoption (if Canadian), endorsement (case is either supported by another group or individual, or US or international) or rejected. 4 The review process takes anywhere from 6 months to 5 years or longer on some occasions, depending on the amount of evidence, level of investigation necessary, or other information required, such as forensic testing. AIDWYC then actively prosecutes the claims of those whom it believes as having been wrongly convicted. At present, AIDWYC has been involved in 18 exonerations, and just fewer than 100 cases are under review (47 Canadians, 46 U.S. cases). Below is a brief table of a few high-profile cases that AIDWYC has been involved with: Table 1. Current Adopted Cases: Current Endorsed Cases: Robert Baltovich Greg Brown Jr. (Pennsylvania, USA) Christopher Bates Kevin Cooper (California, USA) Wilbert Coffin Cy Green, (New York) Ronald Dalton Robert Hilliard (Louisiana, USA) James Driskell William Mayo (Georgia, USA) Randy Druken Leonard Peltier (North Dakota, USA) Clayton Johnson Johnnie Savory (Illinois, USA) David Milgaard Max Soffar (Texas, USA) William Mullins-Johnson Scott Watson (New Zealand) Gregory Parsons Tim Fonseca (California) Romeo Phillion Michel Dumont (Quebec, Canada) Kyle Unger Gaston St. Pierre Sherry Sherett Steven Truscott Frank Ostrowski Erin Walsh Description of Work Completed Prior to my placement, I spoke with the Executive Director of AIDWYC, Tanya Gerber. I was told that I would be involved in working up to five cases, following the Goudge Inquiry into Pediatric Forensic Pathology (Dr. Charles Smith). As well, my work possibly would involve case reviews, summary writing, investigation, assistance on section 696.1 ( Criminal Code ) applications to the Minister of Justice, and possibly case summaries for the AIDWYC Journal and general administration on case files, such as photocopying and document delivery. 4 Endorsed cases are provided a lower level of intervention, as AIDWYC’s resources are primarly for Canadian cases. Social Justice Fellowship – AIDWYC Placement Report 2008 – Andrea Anderson 2 Once I started, I mainly worked out of Lockyer Campbell Posner (“LCP”). LCP is a criminal law firm established in 2005. Based in Toronto, LCP provides criminal, and quasi – criminal defence at both trial and appellant levels. LCP cases are diverse, ranging from drug, homicide to cases of miscarriages of justice. 5 Senior partner of LCP, James Lockyer, is a founding director of the AIDWYC. Lockyer acts on almost, if not all, of the cases that AIDWYC is involved with. I also worked with senior partner, Phil Campbell, whose extensive work includes reversal of wrongful convictions cases. My direct supervisor was Joanne McLean, also a founding director of AIDWYC, she is a sole practitioner working exclusively in criminal defence and primarily on wrongful convictions. She represented Guy Paul Morin, David Milgaard, Thomas Sophonow, Robert Baltovich and others. My work was determined depending on LCP needs, and my interest. In short, I had to compile cases, prepare files for review, obtain materials, draft letters, prepared records, conduct legal and non-legal research, and send items for expertise- which were to be completed before putting together a complex 696.1 applications to the Minister of Justice. The following is a brief summary of the main assignments/tasks I worked on: 1. Public Inquiry - Calls for Baltovich Inquiry A week before I started my placement at AIDWYC, Robert Baltovich 6 had just been acquitted in the 1990 murder of Elizabeth Bain. Baltovich was 24 years old when he was sentenced to life in prison. Baltovich always maintained his innocence, and in 2000, AIDWYC filed a defence brief at a bail hearing arguing that there was new evidence to suggest that Baltovich was innocent and the real perpetrator was Paul Bernardo. After spending 8 years in prison, Baltovich was released on bail and the Ontario Court of Appeal squashed his conviction in 2004 because of errors by the trial judge. A new trial was ordered. In April 2008, jury selections proceeded and the trial began. However, on April 22 nd , the Crown withdrew its case against Baltovich and he was acquitted by the jury. The Baltovich case went through the courts for 18 years with nothing other than circumstantial evidence. When I started AIDWYC lawyers were meeting with the Attorney General of Ontario, the Honourable Chris Bentley, to discuss the calls for a public inquiry. One of my first opportunities at LCP was to help prepare reasons to support a public inquiry into the Baltovich case. I participated in a ‘brainstorming session’ with McLean. In order to prepare for the meeting, I had to research the strengths and weaknesses of another public inquiry of wrongful convictions, and specifically the need in the Baltovich case; this required that I researched the case, and determine the possible reasons the Attorney General would be against it. My reasons for an inquiry included: o Holding the system to a higher standard, and improve the system of justice o Public Inquiry can create and restore public confidence in the administration of justice; o Checks and balance on the system; o Explore the conduct of police and prosecution; o Explanations as to why the prosecution of Baltovich went on for 18 years? And why it was abandoned at the last moment? o Bain, Baltovich and the public are owed explanations; o It could provide the opportunity for the public to evaluate the weakness of the case; o The murder still remains unsolved – air of mystery to the case; o Involvement of Paul Bernardo; and o The case has left Baltovich in a no-man’s land between guilt and innocence.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Voices of Forensic Science
    Chapter 14 The Harmful Repercussions of Wrongful Convictions Preetha Jayanthan, Bailey Hennessy "No one should ever be wrongfully deprived of their rights to liberty and freedom without just cause, yet in the past 25 years alone thousands of people have been wrongfully convicted and sentenced to tens of thousands of years in prison." (Kerik, B. B., 2015) Wrongful convictions occur when the criminal justice system fails to uphold its gold standards and thus miscarriages of justice occur. This chapter will take a close look into wrongful convictions caused by, improperly implementing the gold standards of forensic science through examining the aftermath of a wrongful conviction. By paying particular attention to the process of exonerating an individual; with an emphasis on the resources, or lack thereof, available. The chapter will then move towards the supposed ‘finish line’ of being exonerated. This decision, however, does not make up for the psychological trauma caused to the victim of a wrongful conviction. For many, an incorrect conviction can cost years, if not decades, of one’s life. This often causes wrongfully convicted individuals to lose friends, family, and other important relationships, ultimately resulting in mental health issues. What is a Wrongful Conviction? A wrongful conviction occurs when an individual is accused or sentenced for a crime they did not commit, in other words, a miscarriage of justice has occurred (Denov & Campbell, 2005). The root causes of wrongful convictions are seen to be both individual and systemic in nature (Denov & Campbell, 2005). Some examples 253 Are We There Yet? The Golden Standards of Forensic Science of root causes include false confessions, and bias in the system, such as tunnel vision (Denov & Campbell, 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Rule of Law Report
    RULE OF LAW REPORT ISSUE 2 JUNE 2018 EDITOR’S NOTE Heather MacIvor 2 TWENTY-FIVE YEARS OF ADVOCACY FOR THE WRONGLY CONVICTED Win Wahrer 3 LEVEL – CHANGING LIVES THROUGH LAW Heather MacIvor 6 EDITOR’S NOTE This issue features two leading Canadian organizations dedicated to justice and the rule of law. Innocence Canada, formerly called AIDWYC (Association in Defence of the Wrongly Convicted), is dedicated to preventing and correcting miscarriages of justice. Win Wahrer Heather MacIvor has been with Innocence Canada since LexisNexis Canada the beginning. As the organization celebrates its 25th anniversary, Win tells its story. She also spotlights some of the remarkable individuals who support Innocence Canada, and those Photo by Fardeen Firoze whom it has supported in their struggles. Level, formerly Canadian Lawyers Abroad, targets barriers to justice. It aims to educate and empower Indigenous youth, enhance cultural competency in the bench and Bar, and mentor future leaders in the legal profession. This issue spotlights Level’s current programming and its new five-year strategic plan. By drawing attention to flaws in the legal system, and tackling the root causes of injustice, Innocence Canada and Level strengthen the rule of law. LexisNexis Canada and its employees are proud to support the work of both organizations. We also raise money for other worthy causes, including the #TorontoStrongFund, established in response to the April 2018 Toronto van attack. 2 TWENTY-FIVE YEARS OF ADVOCACY FOR THE WRONGLY CONVICTED Innocence Canada, formerly the Association in Defence of the Wrongly Convicted (AIDWYC), is a national, non-profit organization that advocates for the wrongly convicted across Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Wrongful Convictions: the Effect of Tunnel Vision and Predisposing Circumstances in the Criminal Justice System
    Wrongful Convictions: The Effect of Tunnel Vision and Predisposing Circumstances in the Criminal Justice System Bruce A. MacFarlane 0 Table of Contents Part I: Introduction............................................................................................................... 2 Part II: “Predisposing Circumstances” in the Criminal Justice System............................ 5 A. Public and media pressure on law enforcement agencies..........................................7 B. Public reaction to the background of an offender. ...................................................16 C. Noble cause corruption.............................................................................................20 D.Distortions due to extraneous influences ..................................................................25 Part III: Tunnel Vision in the Criminal Justice System ............................................28 A. What is tunnel vision? ..............................................................................................28 1. Commission of Inquiry in Canada and the United States a) The Morin Public Inquiry b) Commission of Inquiry into the Wrongful Conviction of Stephen Sophonow c) Report of the Commission on Capital Punishment (Illinois) d) The Lamer Commission of Inquiry 2. Critical elements of tunnel vision B. How does tunnel vision occur?...............................................................................33 1. Psychological Roots.....................................................................................34
    [Show full text]
  • In the Matter of Steven Truscott
    IN THE MATTER OF STEVEN TRUSCOTT ADVISORY OPINION ON THE ISSUE OF COMPENSATION THE HONOURABLE SYDNEY L. ROBINS, Q.C. March 28, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 1 I. MY MANDATE ........................................................................................................................... 2 II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND....................................................................................................... 3 III. REFERENCE TO THE COURT OF APPEAL............................................................................ 7 IV. DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEAL ................................................................................ 9 (i) The First Pillar Evidence Elated to the Time of Lynne Harper's Death ........................ 9 (it) The Second Pillar Eyewitness Evidence as to Where and When Steven Truscott was Seen on the Evening of June 9 .................................................. 11 (Hi) The Third Pillar. Post-Offence Conduct......................................................................... 13 (iv) The Fourth Pillar The Penis Lesions Evidence .............................................................. 14 (v) Other Evidence Considered by the Court of Appeal ........................................................ 15 The Court of Appeal's Conclusion................................................................................................. 17 V. ENTITLEMENT
    [Show full text]
  • Timothy Fonseca Case 26 Book Reviews Injustice Anywhere Ten Years 31 Is a Threat to Justice Final Remarks Everywhere
    spring 2008 • volume 9 ERIN WALSH He wins justice after 33 years, against overwhelming odds see page 3 photo: canadian press (andrew vaughn) photo: canadian 14 POLICE CAN BE SUED FOR 26 BILL MULLINS- negligence JOHNSON: Louis Sokolov Timothy the day he’ll never reports Fonseca: forget: Oct. 15, 2007 25 wrongly identified contents ◆ executive director’s report the aidwyc journal spring 2008 • volume 9 • issue 38 Development through Columns & News the strength of our people Evolution takes people 2 Erin Walsh exonerated 3 s you’ll read in the following pages, aidwyc is crucial, cases show 5 the length of time, commitment Student involvement in aidwyc 6 A and patience it takes to shepherd a Congrats to Jerome Kennedy 7 wrongful conviction case through the criminal AIDWYC agm 07: celebration! 8 justice system is enormous. Organizational Four condolences 10 change and development, albeit with much, Can you help AIDWYC? 12 much less heartache, also takes time, com- mitment and patience – especially on a shoe- Can AIDWYC help you? 13 string budget. photo: kristen watts Canadian Case Updates Organizational development provides ex- Tanya Gerber citing opportunity for new ideas to take flight Robert Baltovich 14 and tried-and-true methods to be installed. AIDWYC is committed to be- Bill Mullins-Johnson 14 coming a stronger, more efficient organization with one main goal in Romeo Phillion 15 mind: to help more people whose lives have been decimated by a wrong- Sherry Sherett 16 ful conviction. Steven Truscott 18 We’re evolving with the strength of our people, hiring new staff, ex- panding our Toronto office and establishing new protocols.
    [Show full text]
  • AIDWYC the Association in Defence of the Wrongly Convicted
    AIDWYC the association in defence of the wrongly convicted AIDWYC is a Canadian based volunteer organization dedicated to preventing and rectifying wrongful convictions. AIDWYC has two broad objectives: first, eradicating the conditions that give rise to miscarriages of justice; and second, participating in the review and, where warranted, correction of wrongful convictions. AIDWYC is an entirely voluntary, non-profit association dedicated to assisting factually innocent persons who have been wrongfully convicted. AIDWYC was founded in 1993. It is the direct successor to the Justice for Guy Paul Morin Committee, a grass-roots organization that came into existence in support of Guy Paul Morin immediately following his wrongful conviction in the summer of 1992. When Guy Paul Morin was released on bail in February 1993, pending his appeal, this Committee reconstituted itself as AIDWYC having consciously decided to broaden its perspective and to act in defence of all persons who had been wrongly convicted. AIDWYC’s Honourary President is the Honourable Gregory T. Evans, the former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the Province of Ontario and one of the three Commissioners who presided over the "Royal Commission on the Donald Marshall, Jr., Prosecution". For some ten years ending September 2004 AIDWYC’s Executive Director was Rubin Hurricane Carter who himself spent 20 years in prison for crimes he did not commit. The directors of AIDWYC include lawyers, academics and other interested members of the public. AIDWYC has sponsored or co-sponsored a number of international conferences including the 1994 conference, "Innocents Behind Bars"… the 1995 conference "Justice on Trial: The Wrongful Conviction of Guy Paul Morin", the 1996 conference "Coffin’s Legacy: Keeping the Death Penalty at Bay”, the 1998 conference in Chicago, Illinois "The National Conference on Wrongful Convictions and the Death Penalty" (of which AIDWYC was a co-sponsor).
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring News Media Constructions in Cases of Wrongful Conviction
    Wilfrid Laurier University Scholars Commons @ Laurier Theses and Dissertations (Comprehensive) 2015 Critical Champions or Careless Condemners? Exploring News Media Constructions in Cases of Wrongful Conviction Katherine Rozad Wilfrid Laurier University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.wlu.ca/etd Part of the Criminology Commons, Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons, Journalism Studies Commons, Mass Communication Commons, Other Sociology Commons, Quantitative, Qualitative, Comparative, and Historical Methodologies Commons, and the Social Control, Law, Crime, and Deviance Commons Recommended Citation Rozad, Katherine, "Critical Champions or Careless Condemners? Exploring News Media Constructions in Cases of Wrongful Conviction" (2015). Theses and Dissertations (Comprehensive). 1764. https://scholars.wlu.ca/etd/1764 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations (Comprehensive) by an authorized administrator of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CRITICAL CHAMPIONS OR CARELESS CONDEMNERS? EXPLORING NEWS MEDIA CONSTRUCTIONS IN CASES OF WRONGFUL CONVICTION by Katy Rozad B.A. (Honours), Wilfrid Laurier University, 2013 THESIS Submitted to the Department of Criminology in partial fulfilment of the requirements for Master of Arts in Criminology Wilfrid Laurier University © Katy Rozad 2015 Abstract Countless incidences occur throughout the world each and every day. However, only a few of these occurrences are deemed newsworthy by the media. One area of information quite often categorized as “newsworthy” is that surrounding crime. Within crime-related news coverage are occasionally cases of wrongful conviction – miscarriages of justice in which the innocent are labeled “guilty” and wrongly punished.
    [Show full text]
  • Wrongful Conviction Day 2020 with Guest Exoneree Robert Baltovich
    Wrongful Conviction Day 2020 with guest exoneree Robert Baltovich | Text Transcript This is a text transcript for the Wrongful Conviction Day 2020 event, presented by the Criminal Justice & Public Policy and Criminology & Criminal Justice Policy programs at the University of Guelph. Guest speaker Robert Baltovich shared his experience of wrongful conviction and exoneration with attendees. The event was moderated by Prof. Dennis Baker and Prof. Carolyn Yule and was recorded on October 1, 2020. Transcript: Dennis Baker: Okay good evening everyone and welcome to our event honouring Wrongful Conviction Day. My name is Dennis Baker and I'm the Director of the Criminal Justice programs here at Guelph. I'm here tonight as the emcee but you won't be hearing much from me tonight, to my students’ great relief I'm sure. But, I'm going to try and keep things organized so we use this new forum effectively. I hope you'll bear with us as we will no doubt have a few technical bumps this evening. This is CJPP's first major event in this very different academic year. So, the plan for the evening is to have an introduction from Dean Byron Sheldrick and then Professor Yule will introduce our guest Rob Baltovich. And, ask some opening questions for about 30 minutes before you'll have the opportunity to ask yours. That's assuming I could figure out how Zoom works. We'll be taking questions via the chat function, so feel free to type yours as the evening progresses. They will come to me and then we'll have readers read them out.
    [Show full text]
  • THE TRIALS of STEVEN TRUSCOTT Introduction
    THE TRIALS OF STEVEN TRUSCOTT Introduction The acquittal of Steven Truscott, With public sympathy more and more Focus On August more than 48 years after his trial and on his side, Steven Truscott himself 28, 2007, the conviction for murder, resolved one stepped back into the limelight. With Ontario Court of of Canada’s lengthiest miscarriages the aid of lawyer James Lockyer and Appeal (www. of justice. In 1959, at the age of 14, other members of the Association in ontariocourts. Truscott was convicted of the rape and Defence of the Wrongly Convicted, on.ca/appeal.htm) murder of a 12-year-old girl. Following Truscott filed an official request with the overturned the a brief trial, he was sentenced to be Justice Minister for a review of his case. 1959 conviction of Steven Truscott hanged—a sentence that made him the Following an official inquiry, the Justice for the murder of youngest person ever to be sentenced for Minister referred the case to the Ontario 12-year-old Lynn execution by a Canadian court. Court of Appeal. It took nearly six years Harper. News in Truscott’s sentence was commuted from the filing of his request, but Steven Review looks back to life imprisonment, and he served 10 Truscott finally won his day in court. at the original years before being paroled. Following The appeal resulted in Truscott’s trial and Truscott’s lengthy battle to his release, he assumed a new name acquittal and a vindication for all those clear his name, and lived, worked, and raised a family who had supported him over the years.
    [Show full text]
  • Eyewitness ID Pamphlet
    CONTACT US DID YOU KNOW? 416 - 504 - 7500 Eyewitness Identification Error ADDRESS of wrongful convictions are a 111 Peter St. Suite 408 THE LEADING CAUSE OF result of eyewitness WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS misidentification Toronto, ON M5V 2H1 93% W E B S I T E of cases end in a plea bargain, i n n o c e n c e c a n a d a . c o m rather than the uncertain outcome of a trial Find us on In 29% of our clients' Social Media cases, no crime was committed @InnocenceCanada "If I have learnt anything through this $115,000 battle, it is that justice in the courts is @InnocenceCanada not something guaranteed, it is is the cost of keeping an something that must be fought for innocent person in prison for one and won" year Innocence Canada - Joyce Milgaard GLEN ASSOUN ROBERT BALTOVICH O'NEIL BLACKETT RICHARD BRANT JAMES DRISKELL ANTHONY HANEMAAYER LEIGHTON HAY CLAYTON JOHNSON DINESH KUMAR TAMMY MARQUARDT DAVID MILGAARD GUY PAUL MORIN WILLIAM How do Mistaken MULLINS-JOHNSON FRANK OSTROWSKI ROMEO PHILLION JOHN SALMON MARIA The Cross-Race Effect SHEPHERD SHERRY SHERRETT-ROBINSON THOMAS SOPHONOW STEVEN Eyewitness TRUSCOTT KYLE UNGER ERIN WALSH JACK WHITE ANTHONY'S CASE Identifications Occur? The cross-race effect adds to the unreliability of eyewitness testimony. Eyewitness identifications are extremely Studies examining this phenomenon have powerful sources of evidence in a criminal shown that a person is 1.4 times more likely to remember, and correctly identify, trial. Eyewitness identifications can be the face of an individual who is the same On September 29, 1987, a man broke into the bedroom unreliable for many reasons including race as she or he is when compared to of a 15-year-old girl at about 5:00 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Wrongful Convictions in Canada
    University of Cincinnati Law Review Volume 80 Issue 4 Article 19 September 2013 Wrongful Convictions in Canada Kent Roach Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.uc.edu/uclr Recommended Citation Kent Roach, Wrongful Convictions in Canada, 80 U. Cin. L. Rev. (2013) Available at: https://scholarship.law.uc.edu/uclr/vol80/iss4/19 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by University of Cincinnati College of Law Scholarship and Publications. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Cincinnati Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Cincinnati College of Law Scholarship and Publications. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Roach: Wrongful Convictions in Canada WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS IN CANADA Kent Roach*† I. INTRODUCTION An awareness of the alarming reality of wrongful convictions in both Canada and other criminal justice systems led the Supreme Court of Canada in 2001 to overturn prior jurisprudence that allowed Canada to extradite fugitives to face the death penalty.1 The Court decided that extradition to face the death penalty would generally violate the principles of fundamental justice in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.2 The Court stressed that DNA would not be available in all cases,3 and that even “a fair trial does not always guarantee a safe verdict.”4 This case presents a challenge to all courts and policy-makers to do better in responding to the risk of wrongful convictions.5 It is also a reminder that all criminal justice systems that use the death penalty run an unacceptable risk of executing an innocent person.
    [Show full text]
  • Aidwychistory
    AIDWYC HISTORY ______________________________________________ AIDWYC is a Canadian based volunteer organization dedicated to preventing and rectifying wrongful convictions. AIDWYC has two broad objectives: first, eradicating the conditions that give rise to miscarriages of justice; and second, participating in the review and, where warranted, correction of wrongful convictions. AIDWYC is a voluntary, non-profit association dedicated to assisting factually innocent persons who have been wrongfully convicted of a serious crime. AIDWYC was founded in 1993. It is the direct successor to the Justice for Guy Paul Morin Committee, a grass-roots organization that came into existence in support of Guy Paul Morin immediately following his wrongful conviction in the summer of 1992. When Guy Paul Morin was released on bail in February 1993, pending his appeal, this Committee reconstituted itself as AIDWYC having consciously decided to broaden its mandate and to act in defence of all persons who had been wrongly convicted. Until his death in May 2010, AIDWYC’s Honourary President was the Honourable Gregory T. Evans, the former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the Province of Ontario and one of the three Commissioners who presided over the "Royal Commission on the Donald Marshall, Jr., Prosecution". For some ten years ending in September 2004 AIDWYC’s Executive Director was Rubin Hurricane Carter who himself spent 20 years in prison for crimes he did not commit. The directors of AIDWYC include lawyers, academics and other interested members of the public. AIDWYC CONFERENCES AIDWYC has sponsored or co-sponsored a number of international conferences including the 1994 conference, "Innocents Behind Bars"… the 1995 conference "Justice on Trial: The Wrongful Conviction of Guy Paul Morin", the 1996 conference "Coffin’s Legacy: Keeping the Death Penalty at Bay”, the 1998 conference in Chicago, Illinois "The National Conference on Wrongful Convictions and the Death Penalty" (of which AIDWYC was a co-sponsor).
    [Show full text]