DOCSLIB.ORG

Join Us and Get Active in 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The League of Women Voters of Utah 230 W. 200 South, Suite #2114 Salt Lake City, UT 84101 (801) 272-8683 Email: [email protected] http://www.lwvutah.org Follow us on ​Facebook​ & Twitter @LWVUtah January 2019 INSIDE: Election Trenches/p2-4 Join Us and Get Active in 2019 Vote411/p4-5 by Catherine Weller, LWVUT co-president What did you resolve to do in the new year? Since you’re League Legislative Preview/p4 members, I’m betting education and action figure in your goals. They certainly are part of mine. The League of Women Voters of Utah has a full San Juan votes/p5-6 slate planned so following up on those resolutions shouldn’t be difficult. Data Privacy/p6-7 The national League has been in meetings and on Capitol Hill helping shape the language in HR1. This piece of legislation is a comprehensive Pollution Pricing/p7-8 package of reforms aimed at issues the League has been fighting for decades, some since its inception. In the words of LWVUS President, Chris Legislative Action/p8-9 Carson, “The League of Women Voters is very excited at the prospect of ​ HR1 because it aims to include elements that align with many of the Davis Social/p9 League’s long-held positions, like election modernization and redistricting reform.” Ranked Choice/p10 Key pieces of the legislation include expanding automatic and online voter Weber/p10-11 registration, implementation of fair redistricting practices, elimination of voter roll purging, restoration of the Voting Rights Act and creation of a Ag Position/p11-12 public finance system for elections. The LWVUS blog addresses the main elements of HR1. You can read it here. ​ Civics Ed/p12 As you can see from the bill number, HR1 will be the first bill introduced in Refugees/p13 the 2019 session of the U.S. House of Representatives. You can and should act on this immediately by telling your representatives you’d like Legacy Campaign/p14 them to support HR1. When the bill moves to the Senate, reach out to your senators as well. On Saturday, January 19, I encourage you to not just march, but to run. The Utah Women’s March is that morning. The League doesn’t have 1 enough information at this time to determine League support of the march. Nevertheless I hope you all, as individual citizens, stand up and show your support of women’s issues. Real Women Run will conduct its popular Winter Training workshop on the 19th as well. This full-day event features workshops for everyone: current candidates and campaign managers, future candidates looking for information on where to start, and women who want to get more involved in public service. The number of women in 2019 Utah legislative session is at a historic high, 25 with seven of them newly elected. Of those seven women, six were Real Women Run participants. Make this the year you take your leadership to the next level. Visit their website here to sign up or get more information. Finally, the 2019 Utah State Legislature begins its session on Monday, January 28. The League was on the hill during the monthly interim Local League sessions. Now it’s time for us to join the fray for 45 days, observing Leadership hearings and votes, disseminating the information we learn, and testifying if necessary. There are plenty of opportunities to join the League’s Legislative Action Committee and assist in that process. You’ll read about them in this Davis County newsletter. I hope you’ll also watch your email inbox for Action Alerts. We Kathy Stockel send these notices during the session to let you know when the Legislature & Ann Johnson is considering policy that will affect League issues. davispresidents@lwvutah. org The key to the effectiveness of the Action Alerts, and everything the League does, is taking informed, thoughtful, and deliberate action. Whether you’re marching, running, observing or contacting an elected official, your Grand County action is essential. I truly believe an active and informed citizenry is the Darcey Brown best defense of democracy. Join me in the new year as I and League & Barb Lacy members throughout the state and nation empower voters and defend [email protected] democracy. g Salt Lake Working Election Trenches Gives Sense of Pride Kathy Biele Carole Straughn [email protected] by Tina Hose, LWVUT Leadership Consultant On the same day the Salt Lake County Clerk sent out half-a-million mail-in ballots to active, registered voters, I went to work as a full-time temporary Weber County Elections Office Specialist. As a cog in the election machinery before, Terri McCulloch during and after the recent midterm election, I had an insider’s view. On the weberpresident@lwvutah. last day I worked, and since then, I carry with me a sense of pride in the org Salt Lake County election process, confidence in its reliability, and a commitment to share what I had done, seen and learned. As Election Office Specialists, we worked with databases and provided voter information.The ballot handling and counting was done in a separate area, the Ballot Processing Center. The first few weeks of work for myself, and other Election Office Specialists, focused on creating and updating electronic voter records from voter registration campaigns, motor-voter 2 registrations, walk-in voter registrations and online registrations. In the creation and updating of those voter records, we electronically “captured” signatures and placed those inside the voter’s record. After the Ballot Processing Center had scanned in images of the signatures on ballot envelopes, we would compare the signatures to verify a match. The following weeks, we would associate all prior records with the latest Elections Office records to eliminate multiple registrations. This process also allowed staff to fulfill requests to send a ballot to a temporary address Utah League while the voter is living at another short-term location. I also learned that Leadership military personnel, and only military personnel, can receive their ballots online through a request on a federal website. Families sometimes Co-Presidents requested a ballot for an absent military member to forward, but requests Catherine Weller have to be made by the military person themselves. Ballots are sent to the & Vickie Samuelson email address of the requesting military person. [email protected] While doing daily updating of voter records, we also began taking calls from Executive Director voters, many who were concerned about the status of their mail-in ballot. Emeritus Because the voter information was also updated by the Ballot Processing Sandy Peck Center, we could access a caller’s individual voter data and tell them the [email protected] date their ballot was sent, the address to which it was mailed, the date the ballot was received back, and the ballot status (if counted). A sample of Voter Editors calls received and responses given illustrates the wide range of voter Charles Bernard & Amy questions and voter services: McCarty [email protected] “What’s going to be on my ballot?” Voters were referred to www.got.vote.org for sample ballot. Elections staff Office Manager could also file an electronic request to mail the voter a hard copy of the Trixi Sieger State’s Voter Information Pamphlet. [email protected] “​I’ve moved to a Senior home and have voted in every election since Franklin Delano Roosevelt and I am not going to miss this one. Can I get my ballot sent here?” Yes. The ballot sent to her home was “spoiled” (cancelled), and a new mail-in ballot was generated and sent to her new residence. Two weeks later the database indicated that her ballot had been mailed back and counted. “Wow, I don’t think my signature is exactly the same as last time I voted — how does that work?” Staff is trained to look for signature similarities. Questionable signatures are sent on for review by at least four other election workers. If questions remain, the voter is contacted by text and/or phone to sign an affidavit verifying that the signature is theirs. “Do I have to fill in circle by circle if I want to vote for a candidate outside of my straight ticket preference?​” Voting circles filled in for candidates outside of a straight party vote are counted as indicated. 3 “My return ballot envelope has water stains and is ripped; it’s wrecked. Now what do I do?” If a ballot envelope was still usable, the voter could tape it and send. Voters could also get a replacement envelope at any Early Voting Location or Voting Center. Much to Learn at Legislative “It doesn’t look like my local grade school is going to be my place to vote. Preview Where do I go?” Depending on date of call, Early Voting locations were provided as an The annual Legislative option, as well as the location of 43 Election Day Vote Centers. Callers Forum sponsored by the were pleased and surprised to learn they could receive a ballot associated AAUW and the LWVSL with their residential address and vote at ANY Vote Center throughout Salt will be held on Saturday, Lake County. January 12 at 9 a.m. at “I like to vote in person on Election Day. Can I just take my mail-in ballot to the Girl Scout office, 445 the polls?” E. 4500 South. Light Yes. You can go right up to the front of the line and drop off your filled out, refreshments will be signed and sealed mail-in ballot at any Voting Center. served and the panel will begin at 9:30.
Recommended publications
  • The Utah Taxpayer

    The Utah Taxpayer

    The Volume Utah Taxpayer 34 JuJulyly 2009 2009 Number 7 Page 1 The Utah Taxpayer A Publication of the Utah Taxpayers Association 1578 West 1700 South♦Suite 201♦Salt Lake City, Utah 84104♦(801) 972-8814 July 2009 Articles 2009 Federal, State, and Local Tax Burden on 2009 Federal, State, and a Median-income Utah Family Local Taxes on a Mediam income Utah Family A median-income Utah household consisting of two parents and three children pays 24.2% of its income in direct federal, state, and local taxes, according to an analysis by the Utah Taxpayers Asso- My Corner – Iranian style ciation. A median-income Utah family with two parents and three children earns $63,074 in wages elections in Utah? and salary. Additionally, the family earned $5,474 in the form of employer-paid payroll taxes for a total income of $68,548. Highlights from the Taxes Now Conference The following chart illustrates the tax impact. These taxes do not include the taxes that businesses pay and pass The costs taxpayers pay on to their customers in because of UTOPIA Percent of Percent of the form of 2009 Taxes Amount Taxes Income RDAs: Corporate welfare higher prices, disguised as “economic to employees Social Security $7,821 47.1% 11.4% development” in the form of Sales tax 2,106 12.7% 3.1% reduced State income tax 1,967 11.9% 2.9% compensation, Medicare 1,829 11.0% 2.7% and to Property tax 1,347 8.1% 2.0% shareholders in Automobile taxes 922 5.6% 1.3% the form of Employment taxes 649 3.9% 0.9% reduced divi- dends and Excise taxes 306 1.8% 0.4% stock prices.
  • Does Vote-By-Mail Cause Voters to Gather Information About Politics?∗

    Does Vote-By-Mail Cause Voters to Gather Information About Politics?∗

    Does Vote-by-Mail Cause Voters to Gather Information About Politics?∗ James Szewczyk Department of Political Science Emory University [email protected] June 28, 2019 Abstract In this paper, I examine the effects of vote-by-mail on voter behavior and voter knowledge. I argue that vote-by-mail electoral systems result in a more informed electorate, because voters have additional time with their ballot and access to resources to conduct research about races on the ballot that they know nothing about. I present the results of two empirical studies that support this prediction. First, I find that all-mail elections in Utah cause a 6.368 percentage point decrease in straight ticket voting. This is con- sistent with the logic that voters spend more time with their ballots when voting by mail relative to when they are voting at a polling place. Second, I estimate the effects of vote-by-mail on voter knowledge using an original repeated cross-sectional survey that was fielded during the 2018 general election in California. The research design exploits the implementation of the California Voters Choice Act (VCA), which resulted in five counties in the state switching to an election system in which all voters in the counties are sent a mail-in ballot. I find that the VCA causes an increase in voter knowledge and an increase in time that voters spend gathering information about the election. However, the reform does not affect the prevalence of political discussion or levels of knowledge about the party identification and ideology of candidates. ∗I thank the MIT Election Data and Science Lab and the Madison Initiative of the William Flora Hewlett Foundation for generously funding this research.
  • F O R T H E W O R

    F O R T H E W O R

    University of Utah Health Sciences Center CARING2002 Donor Report for the world Mission Statement The University of Utah Health Sciences Center supports the mission and vision of the University of Utah and serves the public by improving health and quality of life through excellence in education, research and clinical care. We educate competent and caring practitioners, educators and scientists for the state of Utah and beyond. We advance knowledge through innovative basic and clinical research and scholarship and translate our discoveries into applications that help people. We rovide compassionate, state-of-the art clinical care to our patients. We antici ate and respond to the needs of our communities through outreach, advocacy and service. University of Utah Health Sciences Center 2002 CONTENTS 2 Senior Vice President’s Message A. Lorris Betz, M.D., Ph.D. 4 Caring for the World Olympic Photo Essay 8 Profiles in Philanthropy Rod and Mitzi Brady Jack Goodman Thomas Rees, M.D. 14 In Review School of Medicine College of Pharmacy College of Health College of Nursing University of Utah Hospitals & Clinics Spencer S. Eccles Health Sciences Library 20 In the Headlines 22 Endowed Chairs 24 Passages 27 Donor Report 58 Organizations Senior Vice President’s Message A. L ORRIS B ETZ This has been a year of triumph and trouble. is dedicated to providing the best medical care possible. The athletes were dedicated to University of Utah Health Sciences has the best possible performance in their sport. not only survived its shining Olympic 2 But in addition, many Olympians told us moment, but we have done so much better they were dedicated to making their national than anyone else before.
  • The School of the Prophets: Its Development and Influence in Utah Territory

    The School of the Prophets: Its Development and Influence in Utah Territory

    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Theses and Dissertations 1970 The School of the Prophets: Its Development and Influence in Utah Territory John R. Patrick Brigham Young University - Provo Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd Part of the History Commons, Mormon Studies Commons, and the Sociology Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Patrick, John R., "The School of the Prophets: Its Development and Influence in Utah erritT ory" (1970). Theses and Dissertations. 5019. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/5019 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. D 1661 THE SCHOOL OF THE PROPHETS ITS development AND INFLUENCE IN UTAH TERRITORY A thesis L L presented to the department of history brigham young university in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree master of arts by john R patrick june 1970 acknowledgments it is with deep appreciation and gratitude that I1 extend these ac- knowledgmentsknowledgments at this time to those who have been instrumental in helping complete this study first I1 wish to thank drs eugene E campbell and thomas G alexander members of the brigham young university history department and members of my committee for their time and effort expended in helping obtain permission to work on this topic for their reading and critical
  • KNOW the TRUTH About Utah’S Neighborhood Caucus Elections

    KNOW the TRUTH About Utah’S Neighborhood Caucus Elections

    KNOW THE TRUTH about Utah’s Neighborhood Caucus Elections NeighborhoodElections.com Utah’s Neighborhood Caucus Election System ensures that anyone can run for office. Our system levels the playing field for all candidates, not just the famous, wealthy or incumbents! With our current system the best qualified candidates, even with very little money, can win over someone with millions. Please watch this video to learn more about Utah’s Neighborhood Caucus Elections: http://tinyurl.com/NeighborhoodElections Our Neighborhood Elections are under attack. A small, well-connected and elite group of individuals is attempting to use their money and power to neutralize Utah’s election system. Count My Vote (CMV) is an initiative to change from our current Neighborhood Caucus Election system to a Direct Primary. This makes it easier for big money and lobbyists to dominate our elections. Who’s Behind Count My Vote? LaVarr Webb – political consultant, lobbyist, publisher of Utah Policy, and partner at the Exoro Group. Exoro profited $86,250 for work on Orrin Hatch's latest reelection efforts and $25,705 from Bob Bennett's 2010 campaign. As of Jan. 2014, Exoro had been paid $211,233.91 by Count My Vote. Michael O. Leavitt - former governor of Utah and Secretary of Health and Human Services Richard B. McKeown - President and CEO of Leavitt Partners - He has served as Chief of Staff for Michael O. Leavitt at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the E.P.A. Maura Carabello - original owner and managing partner of The Exoro Group. She often works as the lead partner for strategy and management of large-scale political efforts.
  • A Contemporary Study to Determine the Perceived Influence of the Mormon Church on Utah Politics

    A Contemporary Study to Determine the Perceived Influence of the Mormon Church on Utah Politics

    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 5-1973 Mormon Myth or Monopoly: A Contemporary Study to Determine the Perceived Influence of the Mormon Church on Utah Politics Douglas S. Foxley Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Foxley, Douglas S., "Mormon Myth or Monopoly: A Contemporary Study to Determine the Perceived Influence of the Mormon Church on Utah Politics" (1973). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 7651. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/7651 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MORMON MYTH OR MONOPOLY:A CONTEMPORARY STUDY TO DETERMINE THE PERCEIVED INFLUENCE OF THE MORMONCHURCH ON UTAH POLlTlCS by Douglas S. Foxley A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Political Science Utah State University Logan, Utah 1973 ii To My Parents, G. Melvin and Beth S. Foxley iii \CKNOWLEDGEMENTS In preparing this thesis, I am most grateful to my parents for their encouragement and support which has enabled me to complete this work. I especially appreciate Dr. Dan E. Jones, for his willingness to give of his time and talents in aiding me throughout this study. Also, I thank all of the members of the Department of Political Science for the help which they have given me through the years; and to the Bureau of Government and Opinion Research and its most competent secretary, Ellen Gertsch, I say thank ~ so much.
  • Read the 2020 Utah Statewide Voter Information Pamphlet

    Read the 2020 Utah Statewide Voter Information Pamphlet

    GENERAL ELECTION TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 2020 POLLS ARE OPEN FROM 7:00 A.M. TO 8:00 P.M. ON ELECTION DAY BALLOTS BEGIN BEING MAILED OCTOBER 13 UTAH’S OFFICIAL VOTER INFORMATION PAMPHLET Note: This electronic version of the voter information pamphlet contains general voting information for all Utah voters. To view voting information that is specific to you, visit vote.utah.gov, enter your address, and click on “Sample Ballot, Profiles, Issues.” For audio and braille versions of the voter information pamphlet, please visit blindlibrary.utah.gov. VOTE.UTAH.GOV A message from the Elections Office Utah Voter, Welcome to Utah’s 2020 General Election Voter Information Pamphlet. We designed this pamphlet to provide voters accross our state with important information that will help them navigate the upcoming election. Each of our elections is unique, and this one is no different. Voters across the state will embark on making decisions that will guide the government that they have for years to come. Throughout this pamphlet you will find information on the candidates that will represent you federally, in statewide office, in the state senate and state house, and on the state board of education. You will be able to read about the seven Constitutional Amendments that will appear on your ballot as well as judicial retention elections. In this pamphlet you will also find information aimed at helping you with the voting process like voter registration, voting methods, and communicating with your county clerk’s office. If you have questions about this information or the voting process, there is contact information for your local elections officials on page 129.
  • CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-HOUSE. :1\Iarcn 13

    CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-HOUSE. :1\Iarcn 13

    1836 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-HOUSE. :1\IARcn 13, Mr. HARRIS. By no means is the Senate ready for that question, The SPEAKER. The objection ismadetoolate. Someothergen­ I am sure, at this time. tlemen have like resolutions to present. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Tennessee moves Mr. TOWNSHEND, of Illinois. Let them all come in under the that the Senate proceed to the consideration of executive business. regular call of States. Mr. SHERMAN. Before the question is put, if there is no special The concurrent resolution presented by Mr. LORD is as follows : occasion to go into executive session, I suggest that we take up the Concurrent resolution. Ca:lendar under the Anthony rule. Whereas the system of polgam.y existin~ in certain sections of our country Mr. MORRILL. Why not allow the Senator from Florida to go on is degrading to the individuals and demoralizing to the communities adopting it, with his speech 'f and is both repugnant to the Christian sentimenta of the age and is a national disgrace: Therefore, Mr. BAYARD. He does not desire to speak now. Resolved, (the senate concurring,) That our Senators and Representatives in Mr. SHERMAN. Why not go on with the Calendar under the Congress be respectfully requested to use nJ1. reasonable and honorable means to Anthony rnle f ~!~b.U:es~~~~:i~~!£fation which shall promptly and effectually extirpa.~ Mr. HARRIS. When we have got through with the executive busi­ Resolved, That the governor be requested to forward copies of these resolutions ness, if it is desirable that the Senate shall sit longer, we can take to each of our Senators and Representatives in Congress.
  • Utah Political Trends Panel March 2020

    Utah Political Trends Panel March 2020

    UTAH POLITICAL TRENDS PANEL MARCH 2020 TOPLINE REPORT METHODOLOGY DETAILS n=1,331 likely Utah 2020 General Election voters Online interviews fielded March 21-30, 2020 Margin of error +- 2.7 In January of 2020, 115,126 likely Utah voters were sampled from the state’s file of registered voters and invited to join in the Utah Political Trends Panel–a representative, statewide panel of Utah voters (see sampling details below). Utah voters who opted-in to join this panel were contacted again in March, 2020 and invited to participate in the next wave of the Utah Political Trends Panel. 1,331 of our 2,296 panelists responded by participating in this survey, resulting in an overall response rate of 1% of the original sample (AAPOR RR#2) and an eligible response rate of 58% of panelists (AAPOR Contact Rate #3). Survey invitations were sent via email and interviews were completed online. Before drawing the sample, a model of 2020 general election turnout was estimated using age, party registration status, length of registration, permanent absentee status, and past election turnout (one recent general election is used as the “dependent variable,” in this case the 2016 general election). This model produces a sampling pool of registered voters that can be randomly sampled based on their likelihood of voting. A Probability Proportionate to Size (PPS) sample was drawn using this predicted turnout estimate such that voters with a higher probability of voting have a higher probability of being selected in the sample. Thus, the final sample accurately approximates a population of general election voters.
  • Vision for 2050

    Vision for 2050

    YOUR UTAH, YOUR FUTURE VISION FOR 2050 Your Utah, Your Future TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreward 3 Introduction 6 Vision for 7 2050 Implementation 11 Background 25 Overall 33 Cornerstones and Process Findings Key Strategies 57 About Envision 65 by Topic Utah YOUR UTAH, YOUR FUTURE VISION FOR 2050 3 FOREWORD: YOUR UTAH, YOUR FUTURE “If you don’t know where you are going, you might wind up some place else.” —Yogi Berra YOUR UTAH, YOUR FUTURE VISION FOR 2050 4 THE “YOUR UTAH, YOUR FUTURE” VISION FOR 2050 IS THE CULMINATION OF MORE THAN TWO YEARS OF COLLABORATIVE EFFORTS TO HELP UTAH RESIDENTS ENVISION OUR OWN FUTURE. More than 400 experts from across the state worked together to identify critical choices we have to make in 11 key areas. Most importantly, more than 60,000 Utahns participated in the process of creating a clear idea for the future we want, which included a landmark statewide public survey. The result is a shared vision that will keep Utah beautiful, prosperous, healthy, and neighborly for current and future generations. Today, three million people call Utah home, but our population is projected to almost double by 2050. The face of Utah will continue to change, as we welcome people from around the world to be a part of what Utah offers. The high quality of life and good jobs we enjoy also mean that those who grow up here want to raise their own families here. The Utahns of the coming decades will be our kids, our grandkids, our coworkers, and our friends.
  • Election Brief

    Election Brief

    Election Brief October 2018 Dear Utah Voter, The 2018 elections in Utah pose important questions to voters about health care, motor fuel taxes, representation, and the future of our state. Additional considerations will be on voters’ minds as they decide on a new U.S. senator, members of congress, state legislators, and local government officials. To help inform these decisions, the Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute and Hinckley Institute of Politics produced this election brief and will host debate watch parties and forums throughout the Fall. This INFORMED DECISIONS 2018 Election Brief helps voters navigate this important election year with analysis of critical issues impacting our state. To help inform voters, the brief includes a summary of Utah’s demographics and economy as well as findings from several roundtable/focus group discussions. We are excited to combine the energies and talent of both the Hinckley Institute and Gardner Policy Institute to engage the public, analyze issues, and ultimately, help the public make informed decisions. Sincerely, Natalie Gochnour Jason P. Perry Associate Dean, David Eccles School of Business Vice President of Government Relations Director, Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute Director, Hinckley Institute of Politics Table of Contents 2 3 4 6 8 10 We Are Utah Utah’s Issue Brief Issue Brief Issue Brief Policy Expert Economic Medicaid Education Housing Prices Roundtables Headwinds Expansion: Funding: Ballot and the Threat and Voter and Tailwinds Proposition 3 Question 1 to Affordability Focus Group Description and Methodology Informed Decisions 2018 1 We are Utah Utah surpassed three million residents in 2015 and population growth was maintained between 2016 and 2017, continues to be among the most rapidly growing states.
  • Nancy Valentine Young Oct

    Nancy Valentine Young Oct

    Nancy Valentine Young Oct. 16, 1935 ~ April 10, 2021 Born October 16, 1935 to Grant Lovegreen and Mary Merrell Valentine, Nancy died April 10, 2021 in Salt Lake City, following complications from cancer. Growing up in Salt Lake, she graduated from East High School and the University of Utah, earning a degree in Political Science. On May 31, 1957 Nancy and her one true love Robert L. (Bob) Young were married. For the next two decades, she focused primarily on raising her three children – Christian Young (Lisa) Tanya Beaulieu (Jean) and Kimberly Kniveton (Juan) – while also managing her parents’ businesses and investments. Always passionate about Democratic politics, in 1976 Nancy joined Scott Matheson’s first successful gubernatorial campaign and acted as its Treasurer. Preferring always to be the organizer and supporter versus the leader, she declined opportunities in his cabinet and, instead, became Chief of Staff to Norma Matheson. Among many other projects, she supervised the renovation of the Kearns House and the new Governor’s Mansion. In her late 40’s, Nancy decided to go back to school and earned a Masters of Library Science from Brigham Young University. As a result, she began an 18-year career at the University of Utah’s Marriott Library heading their Manuscript Division of Special Collections, where she became an Associate Professor. Nancy was always involved and interested in the Salt Lake community. Among many organizations, she was an active participant and organizer in the League of Women Voters, Committee on Foreign Relations and, in her early years, the Junior League, where she helped create the first Heritage Cookbook.