DOCSLIB.ORG

Cretaceous Deposits of the Eastern · ·Gu-1F Region

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cretaceous Deposits of the Eastern · ·Gu-1F Region ·-· DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIRECTOR PROFESSIONAL PAPER 81 ·~· -:-· ..... ' . ' CRETACEOUS DEPOSITS OF THE EASTERN · ·GU-1F REGION AND .. SPECI~S OF EXOGYRA FROM THE EASTERN GULF ~- REGION AND THE CAROLINAS:-- ~·· .. •. ''. · BY LLOYD WILLIAM STEPHENSON ,...•. , .)j . .. .. .. ! : ! • •" : ! ~ •r• : •., II • ..• : :. : .~ ·~..... :. .: ·: . !. .... 'WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1914 REFERENCE 96297- CONTENTS. Page. Preface ............................................................................ ----.-.----·-·-----·.- 7 Cretaceous deposits of the eastern Gull region .............................................................. 9 Object and scope of the work ......................................... _· ................. : ............. 9 Past and present interpretation ..................................... ·_ ................................. 10 Lower Cretaceous .. ~ ....................................................................· ........ 10 Upper Cretaceous .............................................................................. 11 Eatly correlations ........................................................................... Jl Morton's correlation .................................................................. ·... 11 Tuomey's classification ............................. ·..................................... 12 Winchell's classification ................................................................. 12 Hilgard's classification ............................ ~ ..................................... 12 Smith and Johnson's classification ........................................................ 12 Tuscaloosa and Eutaw formations ............................................................ 12 East-central Mississippi. ................................................................ 12 Western Alabama .......................... : ........................................... 13 Readjustment of the nomenclature .........................................· _.. _.. _.. _... 13 Extent of the Tuscaloosa formation ..... ___ ... __ ......... ____ . _.......... _............... 14 Ext~nt of the Eutaw formation .. _................... _......... _.. _._ ............. : ... _.. 14 Selma chalk ...... _.... _............. _. __ .. _... ___ .. _. _...... _. _....... _.. _. _.... _.. _.. ____ . 15 Name .. ·-··············-······-·-·----·-······-·--··---------·-···----·······-····----- 15 Extent ...... _...... _......... _._.-- .... -........ --- ...... -- .......... -.- .... --- ... - .... 15 Character ...... __ ... : _............... _... __ . _. _. _.... _. _. __ . _....... _. _. _.............. _ 15 Lithologic subdivisions ........... __ ... __ .. __ ._ ... _....... _._ .... _......... _. __ ... _...... 16 Deposition .................. _._ ...... _._ ...... _...... _........ _._ .. -.... _.... _....... _.. _ 16 Paleontologic subdivisions .... __ ......... _.... _............ _.. _. _............ __ . _..... _.. 17 Ripley formation ...................... _....... _._. ____ ...... _._ .. _... _.. _.... _. ___ ..... _..... _. 17 11ississippi. ............. _.. _. _........ _.. ___ ........ _........ _.. __ ........ _. __ .......... 17 Tennessee and northward ..... __ ...... ___ . ____ .... ~ _...... ___ . _................ _..... _... 17 Alabama and Georgia .................. _. _. ____ ... _.... _.... _... _. _....... _........ _.. _.. 18 Summary of present classification ................. _.. __ .... _... _._._ ......... _. _. _.. _.. _....... _.... _.. 19 General sequence .............. _................ _... _. __ . ___ ... _......... - . - .... -.. -..... -.... _. _ 19 Lo,ver Cretaceous .............. _............. _. _. _. __ . ___ ........ _.... _. __ ........ _. _..... _.... _.. 20 Upper Cretaceous ............. -......... _.. _.... _... _.-.- ................. - ...... --.-.- ..... - .... 20 Tuscaloosa formation ................. _. ___ . ___ ................. _............. _....... _..... _.. 20 Eutaw formation ....... _.. _...... : . _. _. _.. _..... _...... _. _. _. _. ____ ........ _..... _.. _...... 20 TYI)ica1 beds ....... : ..... _________ ... _______ . ___ ·_________ .. ___ . ________ .... _: __ .. _. ____ _ 20 Tombigbee sand member ............. _....... _. _............ _. _. _..... _......... _..... _.. 21 Coffee sand member ............ _....... _. _........ _...... _. _. _. _..... _. _... _.. __ .. _. __ .. _ 21 Selma chalk .......... : ......... ____ .. _.. __ .. _........... _... _... _... _.:. __ ._ .... _..... _. ___ .. 21 Ri_pley formation .............. __ ..... _.... _.. _..... _............... _. _.... __ ....... _....... _. 21 Mississippi, Tennessee, Kentucky, and Illinois._._._._. ___ .... ____ . __ ... _.. _.... ____ .. _.. _. 21 Typical beds ......... _... _.... _._._._._ ............ -.... -.. -..... -................. 21 MeN airy sand member ......................................... _......... ·_ .... -.- .... _. 22 Alabama and Georgia .............. _..................................... _......... _..... 22 Typical beds ........ _..................................... · ............. : . ... , ....... 22 Cusseta sand member ............... _................................................ 22 Providence sand member ........................... _.... _.......................... 22 Surficial deposits ............................. _......................................... _....... 22 Faunal zones and subzones ..................· ......................................................... 23 Stratigraphic reh~tions ............. _............................................................ 23 Fossil localities .................................................................................. 23 . 3 4 CONTENTS. Cretaceous deposits of the eastern Gulf region-Continued. Faunal zones and subzones-Continued. Page. Distribution and range of the species.............................................................. 23 Basal beds of the Eutaw formation ..................................................... ·............ 25 Range of the species.......................................................................... 25 Correlation ........................ ~ . 25 Invertebrates .............. ·. 25 Plants.................................................................................. 26 Vertebrates .............. : ....................................... ·. 27 Exogyra ponderosa zone . 27 Range of the species ..................................................................... ·...... 27 Sub zones .. , . 28 Occurrence of the fossils................................................................... 28 Mortoniceras subzone ..............................................·...................... 29 Part of Exogyra ponderosa zone between the Mortoniceras subzone and the Exogyra costata zone.. 30 Correlation................................................................................... 31 Invertebrates ........................................................................... 31 The Carolinas ....... , ............................................................... 31 Ne.w- Jersey ......................................... , ........ , ..................... 31 Texas ................................................................. .'_._ .......... 32 Vertebrates ............................................................................ 32 Plants ....... : ............ , ......................... ·.................................. 33 , I Exogyra costata zone ............................................................................ 34 Range of the species ......................................................................... 34 Subzones .................................................................................. 36 Occurrence of the fossil~ ................................................................. 36 Liopistha protexta subzone ...................................... ~·- ..............· ......... 36 Extreme Upper Cretaceous beds ......................................................... 37 Correlation ........................................................ , ......................... 37 Invertebrates .......................................................................... 37 The Carolinas .................................................·· ..................... .'. 37 New Jersey ........................................................................ 38 Texas ................................................................................ 38 Vertebrates ............................................................................ 38 Plants .................................................................................. 39 Summary ........................................................................................... 39 Species and varieties of Exogyra from the eastern Gulf region and the Carolinas ............................. 41 Introduction ...................................................... , ................................ 41 Definition of the genus .............................................................................. 41 Geologic range of the genus ............................................................... ·............. 42 General description of the species and varieties ................. ·.· ..................................... 42 Geologic and geographic range ..................................... .' ................................... 43 Eastern Gulf region and the Carolinas .......................................·
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Stratigraphy, Paleontology and Correlation of Lower Cretaceous Exposures in Southeastern New Mexico Barry S
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/44 Stratigraphy, paleontology and correlation of lower Cretaceous exposures in southeastern New Mexico Barry S. Kues and Spencer G. Lucas, 1993, pp. 245-260 in: Carlsbad Region (New Mexico and West Texas), Love, D. W.; Hawley, J. W.; Kues, B. S.; Austin, G. S.; Lucas, S. G.; [eds.], New Mexico Geological Society 44th Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 357 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 1993 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks.
    [Show full text]
  • Symmoriiform Sharks from the Pennsylvanian of Nebraska
    Acta Geologica Polonica, Vol. 68 (2018), No. 3, pp. 391–401 DOI: 10.1515/agp-2018-0009 Symmoriiform sharks from the Pennsylvanian of Nebraska MICHAŁ GINTER University of Warsaw, Faculty of Geology, Żwirki i Wigury 93, PL-02-089 Warsaw, Poland. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: Ginter, M. 2018. Symmoriiform sharks from the Pennsylvanian of Nebraska. Acta Geologica Polonica, 68 (3), 391–401. Warszawa. The Indian Cave Sandstone (Upper Pennsylvanian, Gzhelian) from the area of Peru, Nebraska, USA, has yielded numerous isolated chondrichthyan remains and among them teeth and dermal denticles of the Symmoriiformes Zangerl, 1981. Two tooth-based taxa were identified: a falcatid Denaea saltsmani Ginter and Hansen, 2010, and a new species of Stethacanthus Newberry, 1889, S. concavus sp. nov. In addition, there occur a few long, monocuspid tooth-like denticles, similar to those observed in Cobelodus Zangerl, 1973, probably represent- ing the head cover or the spine-brush complex. A review of the available information on the fossil record of Symmoriiformes has revealed that the group existed from the Late Devonian (Famennian) till the end of the Middle Permian (Capitanian). Key words: Symmoriiformes; Microfossils; Carboniferous; Indian Cave Sandstone; USA Midcontinent. INTRODUCTION size and shape is concerned [compare the thick me- dian cusp, almost a centimetre long, in Stethacanthus The Symmoriiformes (Symmoriida sensu Zan- neilsoni (Traquair, 1898), and the minute, 0.5 mm gerl 1981) are a group of Palaeozoic cladodont sharks wide, multicuspid, comb-like tooth of Denaea wangi sharing several common characters: relatively short Wang, Jin and Wang, 2004; Ginter et al. 2010, figs skulls, large eyes, terminal mouth, epicercal but ex- 58A–C and 61, respectively].
    [Show full text]
  • Chemostratigraphy of the Cenomanian-Turonian Shallow-Water Carbonate: New Correlation for the Rudist Levels from North Sinai, Egypt
    Arab J Geosci (2016) 9:755 DOI 10.1007/s12517-016-2775-1 ORIGINAL PAPER Chemostratigraphy of the Cenomanian-Turonian shallow-water carbonate: new correlation for the rudist levels from north Sinai, Egypt Yasser F Salama1,2 & Gouda I Abdel-Gawad1 & Shaban G Saber1 & Soheir H El-Shazly1 & G. Michael Grammer2 & Sacit Özer 3 Received: 19 December 2015 /Accepted: 29 November 2016 # Saudi Society for Geosciences 2016 Abstract The present study aims to provide carbon-isotope out on both rudists and surrounding carbonate units. Based on curves for the Cenomanian to Turonian rudist-dominated suc- the variations in the carbon-isotope signals, 12 chrono- cessions in north Sinai. The high-resolution carbon-isotope stratigraphic segments were identified in the studied sections. curves obtained from north Sinai sections provide new insight The Cenomanian carbon-isotope segments (C23–C30) were for calibrating the age of rudists as well as for evaluating the obtained from the Halal Formation at Gabal Yelleg and Gabal effects of the oceanic anoxic event 2 (OAE2) on rudist com- Maaza sections, while the Turonian segments (C30–C34) munities. The primary goals are (1) to provide a high- were measured from the Wata Formation at Gabal Yelleg sec- resolution sequence stratigraphic framework for the tion. The carbon-isotope record from the studied sections is Cenomanian-Turonian succession, (2) to use rudist and am- consistent with the trends documented in previous studies of monite biostratigraphic data to distinguish the stratigraphic the Tethyan realm. The Cenomanian-Turonian boundary is levels of the rudist species, and (3) to integrate the placed at the onset of falling carbon-isotope values (δ13C) chemostratigraphic (δ13C) profile and the rudist levels to im- from 2.61 to −0.25‰ in the upper part of OAE2 with the prove the biostratigraphy based on the rudist distributions and carbon-isotope segment C30 at Gabal Yelleg.
    [Show full text]
  • Emplacement of the Jurassic Mirdita Ophiolites (Southern Albania): Evidence from Associated Clastic and Carbonate Sediments
    Int J Earth Sci (Geol Rundsch) (2012) 101:1535–1558 DOI 10.1007/s00531-010-0603-5 ORIGINAL PAPER Emplacement of the Jurassic Mirdita ophiolites (southern Albania): evidence from associated clastic and carbonate sediments Alastair H. F. Robertson • Corina Ionescu • Volker Hoeck • Friedrich Koller • Kujtim Onuzi • Ioan I. Bucur • Dashamir Ghega Received: 9 March 2010 / Accepted: 15 September 2010 / Published online: 11 November 2010 Ó Springer-Verlag 2010 Abstract Sedimentology can shed light on the emplace- bearing pelagic carbonates of latest (?) Jurassic-Berrasian ment of oceanic lithosphere (i.e. ophiolites) onto continental age. Similar calpionellid limestones elsewhere (N Albania; crust and post-emplacement settings. An example chosen N Greece) post-date the regional ophiolite emplacement. At here is the well-exposed Jurassic Mirdita ophiolite in one locality in S Albania (Voskopoja), calpionellid lime- southern Albania. Successions studied in five different stones are gradationally underlain by thick ophiolite-derived ophiolitic massifs (Voskopoja, Luniku, Shpati, Rehove and breccias (containing both ultramafic and mafic clasts) that Morava) document variable depositional processes and were derived by mass wasting of subaqueous fault scarps palaeoenvironments in the light of evidence from compara- during or soon after the latest stages of ophiolite emplace- ble settings elsewhere (e.g. N Albania; N Greece). Ophiolitic ment. An intercalation of serpentinite-rich debris flows at extrusive rocks (pillow basalts and lava breccias) locally this locality is indicative of mobilisation of hydrated oceanic retain an intact cover of oceanic radiolarian chert (in the ultramafic rocks. Some of the ophiolite-derived conglom- Shpati massif). Elsewhere, ophiolite-derived clastics typi- erates (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Survey
    DEPABTMENT OF THE INTEKIOR BULLETIN OF THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY N~o. 151 WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1898 UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIEECTOR THE LOWER CRETACEOUS GRYPMAS OF THK TEX.AS REGION ROBERT THOMAS HILL THOMAS WAYLA'ND VAUGHAN WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT FEINTING OFFICE 18.98 THE LOWER CRETACEOUS GRYPHJ1AS OF THE TEXAS REGION. BY I EOBEET THOMAS HILL and THOMAS WAYLAND VAUGHAN. CONTENTS. Page. Letter of transmittal....._..........._....._ ............................ 11 Introduction ...---._._....__................._....._.__............._...._ 13 The fossil oysters of the Texas region.._._.._.___._-..-._._......-..--.... 23 Classification of the Ostreidae. .. ...-...---..-.......-.....-.-............ 24 Historical statement of the discovery in the Texas region of the forms referred to Gryphsea pitcher! Morton ................................ 33 Gryphaea corrugata Say._______._._..__..__...__.,_._.________...____.._ 33 Gryphsea pitcheri Morton............................................... 34 Roemer's Gryphsea pitcheri............................................ 35 Marcou's Gryphsea pitcheri............................................ 35 Blake's Gryphaea pitcheri............................................. 36 Schiel's Gryphsea pitcheri...........................,.:................ 36 Hall's Gryphsea pitcheri (= G. dilatata var. tucumcarii Marcou) ...... 36 Heilprin's Gryphaea pitcheri.....'..................................... 37 Gryphaea pitcheri var. hilli Cragin...................................
    [Show full text]
  • Zoological Philosophy
    ZOOLOGICAL PHILOSOPHY AN EXPOSITION WITH REGARD TO THE NATURAL HISTORY OF ANIMALS THE DIVERSITY OF THEIR ORGANISATION AND THE FACULTIES WHICH THEY DERIVE FROM IT; THE PHYSICAL CAUSES WHICH MAINTAIN LIFE WITHIr-i THEM AND GIVE RISE TO THEIR VARIOUS MOVEMENTS; LASTLY, THOSE WHICH PRODUCE FEELING AND INTELLIGENCE IN SOME AMONG THEM ;/:vVVNu. BY y;..~~ .9 I J. B. LAMARCK MACMILLAN AND CO., LIMITED LONDON' BOMBAY' CALCUTTA MELBOURNE THE MACMILLAN COMPANY TRANSLATED, WITH AN INTRODUCTION, BY NEW YORK • BOSTON . CHICAGO DALLAS • SAN FRANCISCO HUGH ELLIOT THE MACMILLAN CO. OF CANADA, LTD. AUTHOR OF "MODERN SCIENC\-<: AND THE ILLUSIONS OF PROFESSOR BRRGSON" TORONTO EDITOR OF H THE LETTERS OF JOHN STUART MILL," ETC., ETC. MACMILLAN AND CO., LIMITED ST. MARTIN'S STREET, LONDON TABLE OF CONTENTS P.4.GE INTRODUCTION xvii Life-The Philo8ophie Zoologique-Zoology-Evolution-In. heritance of acquired characters-Classification-Physiology­ Psychology-Conclusion. PREFACE· 1 Object of the work, and general observations on the subjects COPYRIGHT dealt with in it. PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE 9 Some general considerations on the interest of the study of animals and their organisation, especially among the most imperfect. PART I. CONSIDERATIONS ON THE NATURAL HISTORY OF ANIMALS, THEIR CHARACTERS, AFFINITIES, ORGANISATION, CLASSIFICATION AND SPECIES. CHAP. I. ON ARTIFICIAL DEVICES IN DEALING WITH THE PRO- DUCTIONS OF NATURE 19 How schematic classifications, classes, orders, families, genera and nomenclature are only artificial devices. Il. IMPORTANCE OF THE CONSIDERATION OF AFFINITIES 29 How a knowledge of the affinities between the known natural productions lies at the base of natural science, and is the funda- mental factor in a general classification of animals.
    [Show full text]
  • Microfacies Analysis and Diagenetic Settings of Upper Cretaceous Shallow Water Carbonates from the Borizana Section (Kruja Zone, Albania)
    E-ISSN 2281-4612 Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies Vol 4 No 2 ISSN 2281-3993 MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy July 2015 Microfacies Analysis and Diagenetic Settings of Upper Cretaceous Shallow Water Carbonates from the Borizana Section (Kruja Zone, Albania) M.Sc. Ana Qorri Department of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Geology and Mining, Tirana, Albania Email: [email protected] Doi:10.5901/ajis.2015.v4n2p95 Abstract This paper deals with the preliminary results of a detailed study based on the microfacies analysis and diagenetic settings of the Upper Cretaceous shallow water carbonate deposits from Borizana section, Kruja zone, Albania. In the Makareshi structure, the Upper Cretaceous deposits, in the mainly consists of limestones, dolomitic limestones and different levels of dolomite intercalations. The study was carried out after a systematic sampling of a total of 230 rock samples and then by studying selected thin sections from individual beds and from different parts of the same bed. 250 thin sections were studied from a 1000m thick section in order to analyse its sedimentology, microfacies assemblages and diagenetic featuress. Different types of microfacies mainly represented by laminated, peloidal and bioclastic grainstones along with presence of dolomitized microfacies at some levels were determined. Also different types of cement and diagenetic features such as compaction, dolomitization and neomorphism were also observed in Borizana section. All these microfacies associations and their diagenetic features indicate that this formation has been deposited in a restricted platform interior facies belt (FZ8, FZ9). Keywords: Upper Cretaceous, carbonates, microfacies, diagenesis. 1. Introduction The Kruja Zone is located in the central part of Albania and represents a carbonate platform that extends toward south, in Greece with Gabrovo Zone (Papa, 1970; Peza, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1982; I.S.P.GJ.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating Sexual Dimorphism in Ceratopsid Horncores
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies The Vault: Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2013-01-25 Investigating Sexual Dimorphism in Ceratopsid Horncores Borkovic, Benjamin Borkovic, B. (2013). Investigating Sexual Dimorphism in Ceratopsid Horncores (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. doi:10.11575/PRISM/26635 http://hdl.handle.net/11023/498 master thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY Investigating Sexual Dimorphism in Ceratopsid Horncores by Benjamin Borkovic A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES CALGARY, ALBERTA JANUARY, 2013 © Benjamin Borkovic 2013 Abstract Evidence for sexual dimorphism was investigated in the horncores of two ceratopsid dinosaurs, Triceratops and Centrosaurus apertus. A review of studies of sexual dimorphism in the vertebrate fossil record revealed methods that were selected for use in ceratopsids. Mountain goats, bison, and pronghorn were selected as exemplar taxa for a proof of principle study that tested the selected methods, and informed and guided the investigation of sexual dimorphism in dinosaurs. Skulls of these exemplar taxa were measured in museum collections, and methods of analysing morphological variation were tested for their ability to demonstrate sexual dimorphism in their horns and horncores.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark, Vol. 27/03-04, Pp. 105-116
    Bivalves from the white chalk (Maastrichtian) of Denmark, II: Arcoida CLAUS HEINBERG Heinberg, C: Bivalves from the white chalk (Maastrichtian) of Denmark, II: Arcoida. Bull. geol. Soc. DGF Denmark, vol. 27, pp. 105-116, Copenhagen, March 23rd, 1979. Eight new species of Arcoida (Bivalvia) are described, the genus belonging to the families Limopsidae, Arcidae, Noetidae and Parallelodontidae. Two species (Barbatia) are redescribed and revised. Pseudo- grammatodon Aikell, 1930, is reinstated. Claus Heinberg, Institut for historisk Geologi og Palæontologi, Øster Voldgade 10, DK-1350 København K, Denmark. July 4th, 1978. The present paper is the continuation of a pro­ Type locality: Stevns Klint, north of Kulsti. ceeding one on Limopsidae (Heinberg 1976). Type stratum: The top hardground in the Upper The first paper contained information on biome- Maarstrichtian white chalk. tric parameters, collecting procedures, localities and lithostratigraphic position of the hardground Diagnosis: An equilateral, smooth shelled Li­ which has yielded the material. mopsis, flat lenticular in shape, subcircular in outline; umbo small; shell margins moulding each Systematic descriptions other, the right margin having a commarginal ridge which fits into the commarginal furrow of Family: Limposidae Dall, 1895 the left margin; equal sized adductor scars with Genus: Limopsis Sassi, 1827 myophoric flanges; area circumscribed by pallial Type species: Area aurita Brocchi, 1814 line bearing radiating striae. Limopsis maggae n. sp. Description: The shell is flat lenticular having a Fig. 1 subcircular outline. It is nearly equilateral, the Holotype: MGUH 14400. Height 5.4 mm, length anterodorsal shell margin being straighter than ca 6.5 mm the postero-dorsal one. The orthogyrate umbo is Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Uppermost Campanian–Maestrichtian Strontium Isotopic, Biostratigraphic, and Sequence Stratigraphic Framework of the New Jersey Coastal Plain
    Uppermost Campanian–Maestrichtian strontium isotopic, biostratigraphic, and sequence stratigraphic framework of the New Jersey Coastal Plain Peter J. Sugarman New Jersey Geological Survey, CN 427, Trenton, New Jersey 08625, and Department of Geological Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903 Kenneth G. Miller Department of Geological Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903, and Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades, New York 10964 David Bukry U.S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road, Menlo Park, California 94025 Mark D. Feigenson Department of Geological Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903 ABSTRACT boundaries elsewhere in the Atlantic Recent stratigraphic studies have concen- Coastal Plain (Owens and Gohn, 1985) and trated on the relationships between these se- Firm stratigraphic correlations are the inferred global sea-level record of Haq quences, their bounding surfaces (unconfor- needed to evaluate the global significance of et al. (1987); they support eustatic changes mities), and related sea-level changes. The unconformity bounded units (sequences). as the mechanism controlling depositional shoaling-upward sequences described by We correlate the well-developed uppermost history of this sequence. However, the latest Owens and Sohl (1969) have been related to Campanian and Maestrichtian sequences Maestrichtian record in New Jersey does recent sequence stratigraphic terminology of the New Jersey Coastal Plain to the geo- not agree with Haq et al. (1987); we at- (e.g., Van Wagoner et al., 1988) by Olsson magnetic polarity time scale (GPTS) by in- tribute this to correlation and time-scale (1991) and Sugarman et al. (1993). Glauco- tegrating Sr-isotopic stratigraphy and bio- differences near the Cretaceous/Paleogene nite beds are equivalent to the condensed stratigraphy.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material
    06_250317 part1-3.qxd 12/13/05 7:32 PM Page 15 Phylum Chordata Chordates are placed in the superphylum Deuterostomia. The possible rela- tionships of the chordates and deuterostomes to other metazoans are dis- cussed in Halanych (2004). He restricts the taxon of deuterostomes to the chordates and their proposed immediate sister group, a taxon comprising the hemichordates, echinoderms, and the wormlike Xenoturbella. The phylum Chordata has been used by most recent workers to encompass members of the subphyla Urochordata (tunicates or sea-squirts), Cephalochordata (lancelets), and Craniata (fishes, amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals). The Cephalochordata and Craniata form a mono- phyletic group (e.g., Cameron et al., 2000; Halanych, 2004). Much disagree- ment exists concerning the interrelationships and classification of the Chordata, and the inclusion of the urochordates as sister to the cephalochor- dates and craniates is not as broadly held as the sister-group relationship of cephalochordates and craniates (Halanych, 2004). Many excitingCOPYRIGHTED fossil finds in recent years MATERIAL reveal what the first fishes may have looked like, and these finds push the fossil record of fishes back into the early Cambrian, far further back than previously known. There is still much difference of opinion on the phylogenetic position of these new Cambrian species, and many new discoveries and changes in early fish systematics may be expected over the next decade. As noted by Halanych (2004), D.-G. (D.) Shu and collaborators have discovered fossil ascidians (e.g., Cheungkongella), cephalochordate-like yunnanozoans (Haikouella and Yunnanozoon), and jaw- less craniates (Myllokunmingia, and its junior synonym Haikouichthys) over the 15 06_250317 part1-3.qxd 12/13/05 7:32 PM Page 16 16 Fishes of the World last few years that push the origins of these three major taxa at least into the Lower Cambrian (approximately 530–540 million years ago).
    [Show full text]
  • Characteristic Marine Molluscan Fossils from the Dakota Sandstone and Intertongued Mancos Shale, West-Central New Mexico
    Characteristic Marine Molluscan Fossils From the Dakota Sandstone and Intertongued Mancos Shale, West-Central New Mexico GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1009 Characteristic Marine Molluscan Fossils From the Dakota Sandstone and Intertongued Mancos Shale, West-Central New Mexico By WILLIAM A. COBBAN GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1009 Brief descriptions, illustrations, and stratigraphic sequence of the more common fossils at the base of the Cretaceous System UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1977 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR CECIL D. ANDRUS, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Cobban, William Aubrey, 1916- Characteristic marine molluscan fossils from the Dakota sandstone and intertongued Mancos shale, West- central New Mexico. (Geological Survey professional paper ; 1009) Bibliography: p. Includes index. 1. Lamellibranchiata, Fossil. 2. Gastropoda, Fossil. 3. Ammonoidea. 4. Paleontology Cretaceous. 5. Paleontol­ ogy New Mexico. I. Title: Characteristic marine molluscan fossils from the Dakota sandstone ***!!. Series: United States. Geological Survey. Professional paper ; 1009. QE811.G6 564'.09789'8 76-26956 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Stock Number 024-001-03003-9 CONTENTS Page Abstract ________________________________________--__- 1 Introduction ________________________________________ Acknowledgments _____________________________ Stratigraphic summary _________________________
    [Show full text]