DOCSLIB.ORG

Sustainability Report 3Rd Quarter 2011 27 October

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sustainability Report 3Rd Quarter 2011 27 October Sustainability Report 3rd Quarter 2011 27 October 1 Index Energy-Environmental Indicators Relevant ……..………..…………………………………………………… 3 Sustainability Index …………………………………………………………………………………..……………... 4 Economic Indicators ………………………………………………………………………………………………... 5 Operating Indicators ……….………………………………………………………………………………………. 7 Environmental Indicators ….………………………………………………………………………………….…… 10 Social indicators …………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 14 Recognition ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 16 Highlights …………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 23 Notes …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... 60 2 Relevant Energy-Environmental Indicators 3rd Quarter 2011 EMISSIONS NO NO xx 2111 124 286 t t CO ² 12 278 370 t SO ² Particulates 5 142 t 494 t Maximum Power Installed EBITDA Main water usage Mini-hídrica ××× 3 3 (1 017 244 10 m ) Mini-hydroelectric 159.7 MW Gás Natural (59.678 TJ) Eólica Wind 6 959.3 MW Net Electricity Biomassa Generated (1) Forest residues (3 762 TJ) Biomass 34.9 MW 42 406 GWh Hídrica Electricity Drawn from Hydroelectric 6 794.8 MW Distribution Grid NaturalCarvão Gas (51 (81 065 622 TJ) TJ) Ciclo Combinado 60 555 GWh Combined Cycle 4 611.4 MW Cogeração Electricity Supplied Coal (75 888 TJ) Cogeneration 274.5 MW 60 494 GWh Térmica Convencional (m) Fuel-oil (522 TJ) Conventional Thermal 3 586.7 MW (1) Does not include steam production. (2) Refers to sub-products. Total Hazardous Ash and Coal (2) Slag Gypsum (2) Waste Waste 385 515 t 20 884 t 168 619 t 129 457 t 3 Sustainability Index 3rd Quarter 2011 Main Factors 3rd Qtr 2010 3rd Qtr 2011 • Renewables investment 65.4% 57.0% Sustainability Index base 100:2006 (1) • Specific CO 2 emissions (t/MWh) 0.236 0.279 129.5 0.27 0.26 • Specific No x emissions (g/kWh) • Specific SO 2 emissions (g/ kWh )) 0.15 0.12 128.9 • Specific waste production(g/kWh) (2) 8.2 8.8 •% of working women in total 21 % 20% 3rd Quarter 2010 3rd Quarter 2011 employees • Training hours / Hours worked 1.9% 1.9% • EDP severity rate 119 178 (1) Sustainabiindex developed by EDP and based on 26 performance indicators in the area of sustainability (www.edp.pt/sustentabilidade lity /abordagemasustentabilidade/ ); (2) The specific production was calculated on the net 4 production of added steam. Sustainability Indicators 3rd Quarter 2011 Year-on-year Economic Indicators Q3 2010 Q3 2011 2011 Target Change 11/10 GVA per employee (€) (1) 287 596 276 042 -4.0 % 371 536 Turnover (EUR millions) 10 239 11 162 9.0% 14 873 Energy services billed (EUR thousand) 15 279 474 14 773 692 -3,.% n.d. Direct economic value generated (EUR millions ) (1) 11 015 12 014 9.1% 15 413 Net operating investment (EUR millions) 1 959 1 353 -30.9% 2 217 Investment in renewable energies (EUR millions) 1 282 770 -39.9% 1 350 Investment in renewables as a proportion of total investment (%) 65.44% 56.91% -8.54 p.p 60.89% Economic value distributed (EUR millions ) (1) 9 447 10 596 12.2% 12 598 Staff costs 525 472 -10.2% 611 Supplier costs 622 648 4.3% 941 Community costs 10 14 43.3% n.d. Community contributions 194 224 15.3% 272 Net profit (EUR millions) 774 825 6.5% 1 027 Annualised return on equity (%) 28.23% 30.07% 1.84 p.p 28.09% Market capitalisation (EUR millions) 9 193 8 955 -2.6% n.d. Economic value retained (EUR millions ) (1) 1 568 1 418 -2.6% 2 815 (1) Figures for 2010 revised in accordance with provisions of Global Reporting Initiative. 5 Sustainability Indicators 3rd Quarter 2011 GVA per employee (EUR) Investment (EUR millions) 1,959 287,596 1,353 Net operating investment (milhões €) 276,042 Investment in renewable energy (milhões €) 1,282 770 3rd Quarter 2010 3rd Quarter 2011 3rd Quarter 2010 3rd Quarter 2011 Economic value distributed (EUR millions) Net profit (EUR millions) 825 10,596 ,9.447 774 3rd Quarter 2010 3rd Quarter 2011 3rd Quarter 2010 3rd Quarter 2011 6 Sustainability Indicators 3rd Quarter 2011 Year-on-year Operating Indicators Q3 2011 2011 Target Q3 2010 Change 11/10 Electricity generation Maximum installed capaciy EBITDA (MW) 21 163 22 421 5.9% 22 763 Renewables capacity EBITDA (MW) 13 118 13 949 6.3% 14 279 Renewables capacity as a proportion of total capacity (%) 61.99% 62.21% 0.22 p.p 62.73% Net electricity generated (1) (GWh) 42 381 42 406 0.1% 61 778 Generation from steam (GWh) 1 504 1 577 4.9% n.d. Net generation from renewables (GWh) 27 841 27 019 -3.0% 37 636 Renewables generation as a proportion of total net generation (%) 65.69% 63.72% -1.98 p.p 60.92% Total GWh generated per employee 3.51 3.53 0.4% 5.07 Distribution of electricity Electricity distributed (GWh) 60 158 60 555 0.7% 82 648 Electricity supply points 9 503 636 9 616 108 1.2% 9 406 666 Installed Capacity Equivalent Interruption Time (TIEPI) (min) (1) 123 80 -35.1% 180 Equivalent Interruption Time per Consumer (DEC) (hours) (2) 27 21 -23.3% 23 Total GWh distributed per employee 4.99 5.04 1.0% 6.79 Electricity Supplied (GWh) 62 840 60 494 -3.7% 80 566 Free market supply (GWh) 28 004 29 986 7.1% 41 584 Supply of last resort (GWh) 34 837 30 508 -12.4% 38 982 (1) Related to Portugal and Spain; (2) Related to Brazil 7 Sustainability Indicators 3rd Quarter 2011 Year-on-year Operating Indicators Q3 2011 2011 Target Q3 2010 Change 11/10 Number of electricity supply customers 9 816 151 9 909 309 0.9% 9 972 187 Free market supply 919 802 988 010 7.4% 334 848 Supply of last resort 8 896 349 8 921 299 0.3% 8 637 339 Green tariff Energy sold (GWh) 8 808 19 544 121.9% n.d. Number of customers 386 884 348 884 -9.8% n.d. Social Tariff Energy sold (GWh) 284 320 12.4% n.d. Number of customers 424 870 392 988 -7.5% n.d. Special Needs costumers Energy sold (MWh) 724 805 11.2% n.d. Number of customers 718 863 20.2% n.d. Gas distributed (GWh) 39 251 40 692 3.7% 49 633 Gas supply points (GWh) 1 220 254 1 253 694 2.7% 1 260 964 Gas supplied (GWh) 26 703 27 018 1.2% 35 494 Number of gas customers 1 064 954 1 060 287 -0.4% 1 104 784 Free market 676 598 680 550 0.6% 751 169 Last resort 388 356 379 737 -2.2% 353 615 8 Sustainability Indicators 3rd Quarter 2011 Installed capacity (MW) Net electricity generation (GWh) 22,421 42,381 42,406 21,163 Installed capacity (MW) Produção de electricidade Installed líquida (GWh) renewables Produção de capacity (MW) electricidade líquida renovável 13,118 13,949 27,841 27,019 (GWh) 3rd Quarter 2010 3rd Quarter 2011 9M 2010 9M 2011 GWh generated per employee Electricity distribution and electricity supply points 3.53 9,616,108 60.600 9.640.000 9.620.000 60.500 9.600.000 60.400 9.580.000 60,555 60.300 9.560.000 9,503,636 9.540.000 3.51 60.200 9.520.000 60.100 9.500.000 9.480.000 60.000 60,158 9.460.000 59.900 9.440.000 3rd Quarter 2010 3rd Quarter 2011 3rd Quarter 2010 3rd Quarter 2011 Electricity distribution (GWh) Electricity supply point 9 Sustainability Indicators 3rd Quarter 2011 Year-on-year Environmental Indicators Q3 2011 2011 Target Q3 2010 Change 11/10 Primary energy consumption (TJ) 126 949 141 298 11.3% n.d. Total for generation 126 765 141 046 11.3% 209 365 Coal 54 557 75 888 39.1% 117 235 Fuel-oil 729 522 -28.4% 212 Natural gas 59 678 51 065 -14.4% 78 089 Balst furnace gas 6 121 7 418 21.2% n.d. Coke gas 1 016 1 130 11.3% n.d. Diesel 329 63 -80.8% n.d. Forestry waste 3 165 3 762 18.9% 4 102 Steel plant gas 1 171 1 198 2.3% 9 726 Vehicle fleet fuel 184 253 37.6% n.d. Electricity consumption Power stations (MWh) 1 244 904 1 427 675 14.7% n.d. Administrative buildings (MWh) 23 769 20 485 -13.8% n.d. Certification ISO 14001 No. of production facilities certified (ISO 14 001) 83 108 30.1% 164 Net maximum installed capacity certified (%) 68% 70% 1.67 p.p. 72% No. of substations certified (ISO 14 001) 21 43 104.8% 93 Installed capacity of substations certified (%) 3% 7% 4.30 p.p 23% Certified gas distribution (ISO 14 001) (%) 100% 100% 0.0 p.p 100% 10 Sustainability Indicators 3rd Quarter 2011 Primary energy consumption (TJ) Primary energy consumption 3rd Quarter 2010 141,298 Coal 5% Fuel-oil Natural Gas 126,949 43% Balst Furnance Gas Coke Gas 47% Diesel Forestry waste 3rd Quarter 2010 3rd Quarter 2011 Vehicle Fleet 1% Primary energy consumption 3rd Quarter 2011 Coal 5% Fuel-oil Natural Gas Balst Furnance Gas Coke Gas 37% 54% Diesel Forestry waste Vehicle Fleet 0% 11 Sustainability Indicators 3rd Quarter 2011 Year-on-year Environmental Indicators Q3 2011 2011 Target Q3 2010 Change 11/10 (1) CO 2 emissions (kt) 10 373 12 279 18.4% 14 583 CO 2 emissions from vehicle fleet (kt) 13.3 14.5 8.7% n.d. NO x emissions (kt) 12.0 11.3 -5.6% 24,98 SO 2 emissions (kt) 6.6 5.1 -22.2% 16,38 Particulate emissions (kt) 0.299 0.494 65.2% 1,46 (2) Overall specific CO 2 emissions (g CO 2/kWh) 236 279 18.1% 236 (2) Overall specific NO x emissions (g NOx/kWh) 0.27 0.26 -5.8% 0,40 (2) Overall specific SO 2 emissions (g SO 2/kWh) 0.15 0.12 -22.3% 0,27 CO 2 emissions intensity (g/€) 1 013 1 100 8.6% 981 Main Water usage (10 3 m3) 751 642 1 017 244 35.3% n.d.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Jp Elektroprivrede Hz Herceg Bosne
    Vjesnik JP ELEKTROPRIVREDE HZ HERCEG BOSNE CHE Čapljina – 30 godina www.ephzhb.ba INFORMATIVNO - STRUČNI LIST / Godina X. / Broj 44 / Mostar, srpanj 2009. Informativno-stručni list, Vjesnik Glavni i odgovorni urednik: JP Elektroprivreda HZ HB d.d., Mostar Vlatko Međugorac Izdaje: Uredništvo: Sektor za odnose s javnošću Vlatko Međugorac, Mira Radivojević, mr. sc. Irina Budimir, Vanda Rajić, Zoran Pavić Ulica dr. Mile Budaka 106A, Mostar tel.: 036 335-727 Naklada: 800 primjeraka faks: 036 335-779 e-mail: [email protected] Tisak: www.ephzhb.ba FRAM-ZIRAL, Mostar Rukopisi i fotografije se ne vraćaju. 2 INFORMATIVNO STRUČNI LIST JAVNOGA PODUZEĆA ELEKTROPRIVREDE HZ HERCEG BOSNE Sadržaj Novim informacijskim sustavom (SAP-om) do boljega poslovanja .......4 Održana VII. skupština Elektroprivrede HZ HB ................................7 Izvješće neovisnoga revizora ..................................................................8 str. 4 Potpisani ugovori o istražnim radovima na CHE Vrilo.......................10 Elektroprivreda i liberalizacija tržišta ..................................................11 30. rođendan CHE Čapljina ...............................................................13 Posjet njemačkoga veleposlanika i predstavnika KfW banke hidroelektrani Rama ............................................................................14 Primjena novih Općih uvjeta i Pravilnika o priključcima ....................16 HE Mostarsko Blato u izgradnji .........................................................17 str. 7 Uspješno provedena
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Offshore Wind Market Report & Insights 2020
    RAMPION OFFSHORE WIND FARM — COURTESY OF ATKINS THE BUSINESS NETWORK FOR OFFSHORE WIND U.S. OFFSHORE WIND MARKET REPORT & INSIGHTS 2020 MEMBERS ONLY The Business Network for Offshore Wind’s2020 U.S. Offshore Wind Market and Insights offers an analysis of federal and state government activity to better understand how it may affect your business planning and the industry holistically. The federal government has turned its attention to the burgeoning industry to offer more regulation. Congress and federal agencies beyond the Department of Interior’s Bureau of Ocean and Energy Management and U.S. Department of Energy are now affecting how the offshore wind industry will operate into the future. This report also discusses how some of the challenges facing offshore wind are being addressed. The health and safety of workers – whether onshore or offshore – are a paramount tenet within the industry. Particular- ly at this time, the offshore industry remains proactive in its response to the coronavirus epidemic, having put in place telework directives, eliminating unnecessary travel, and following government guidelines. As a result of these protocols, Europe has reported minimal disruptions to the supply chains and the 15 offshore wind projects in the U.S., remain in the planning and development stages. It is too soon to know exactly how the global COVID-19 epidemic disruption will affect the U.S. offshore wind in- dustry. Our main concern centers around the economic hardship a long-term shutdown and recession would place on secondary and tertiary U.S. suppliers. It is important to point out, however, that there is almost 10GWs of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Oklahoma | Rose Rock
    Oklahoma | Rose Rock Location Rose Rock Wind Farm will be located on Oklahoma ranchland amoung the Arbuckle Mountains in Murray and Carter Counties. The turbines will be approximately 15 miles north of Ardmore on the rolling, windy landscape of south central Oklahoma. Energy Output Rose Rock Wind Farm will have an installed capacity of 100 megawatts (MW) – enough to power approximately 25,717 average homes with clean energy each year.1 Benefits to the Community Rose Rock Wind Farm will contribute significant economic benefits to the surrounding community in the form of payments to land owners, local spending, and annual community investment. The development, construction, and operation of the wind farm will also generate a significant number of jobs in the area. Environmental Benefits Rose Rock Wind Farm avoids adding over 166,090 tons of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere per year, the equivalent of removing 29,293 cars from the road.2 Blue Canyon Wind Farm O&M Office 3109 State Highway 19. Carnegie, OK 73015 T: 580.654.1955 F: 580.654.1949 Power Purchasers Lincoln Electric System (LES) out of Lincoln, Nebraska will be the purchaser of the clean, domestic energy generated by Rose Rock Wind Farm. Serving more than 114,00 residential and 15,000 commercial and industrial customers, LES provides electricity to 200 square miles within Lancaster County in Nebraska. Technology The Rose Rock Wind Farm will incorporate 50 turbines rated at 2 MW each. These modern wind turbine generators are robust, sophisticated, high-tech machines designed to capture the kinetic energy of the wind and convert it into electricity.
    [Show full text]
  • Offshore Wind Market Report: 2021 Edition Offshore Wind Market Report: 2021 Edition
    Offshore Wind Market Report: 2021 Edition Offshore Wind Market Report: 2021 Edition Disclaimer This work was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors or their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or any third party’s use or the results of such use of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof or its contractors or subcontractors. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof, its contractors or subcontractors. ii Offshore Wind Market Report: 2021 Edition Authors The authors of this report are: Walter Musial, National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) Paul Spitsen, U.S. Department of Energy Philipp Beiter, NREL Patrick Duffy, NREL Melinda Marquis, NREL Aubryn Cooperman, NREL Rob Hammond, NREL Matt Shields, NREL. iii Offshore Wind Market Report: 2021 Edition Acknowledgments The authors would like to extend thanks to Patrick Gilman and Nate McKenzie from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Wind Energy Technologies Office for supporting this research. Thanks also to Liz Hartman, Dan Beals, Gage Reber, and Monica Maher from the DOE Wind Energy Technologies Office for their support and strategic guidance.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Offshore Wind Technology Data Update
    2019 Offshore Wind Technology Data Update Walter Musial,1 Philipp Beiter,1 Paul Spitsen,2 Jake Nunemaker,1 Vahan Gevorgian,1 Aubryn Cooperman,1 Rob Hammond,1 and Matt Shields1 1 National Renewable Energy Laboratory 2 U.S. Department of Energy NREL/TP-5000-77411 October 2020 Table of Contents Slide Numbers 1 Data and Methodology 3‒6 2 U.S. Offshore Wind Data 7‒25 3 Global Offshore Wind Data 26‒36 4 Global Floating Offshore Wind Data 37‒47 5 2019 Offshore Wind Technology Trends 48‒62 6 2019 Offshore Wind Cost Data 63‒70 7 References 71‒77 7 Notice and Acknowledgments 78 Data and Methodology Data Sources This update draws data from the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) National Renewable Energy Laboratory’s (NREL’s) internal offshore wind database, which is built on internal research and a wide variety of data sources, including peer-reviewed literature, press releases, industry news reports, manufacturer specification sheets, and global offshore wind project announcements. For the database, NREL has verified and sourced data from the following publications: • The 4C Offshore Wind Database (4C Offshore 2020) • Bloomberg New Energy Finance (BNEF) Renewable Energy Project Database (BNEF 2020) • 4C Offshore Vessel Database (4C Offshore 2020) • Wood Mackenzie Wind Turbine Trends (Wood Mackenzie 2020). • Link to 2019 Data Table NREL | 4 Scope and Pipeline Definitions • This work defines the offshore wind project pipeline as potential offshore wind development indicated by developer announcements or by areas made available for offshore wind development by regulatory agencies. • The scope of this report covers the global fleet of projects in the pipeline through December 31, 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Analyzing the US Wind Power Industry
    +44 20 8123 2220 [email protected] Analyzing the US Wind Power Industry https://marketpublishers.com/r/A2BBD5C7FFBEN.html Date: June 2011 Pages: 230 Price: US$ 300.00 (Single User License) ID: A2BBD5C7FFBEN Abstracts The rise of wind energy is no longer being looked upon as an alternate source of energy. The United States is a leader in the field of wind energy and the US in 2010 was the second largest user of wind energy in the world, just behind China. In fact, the US had over 40,000 megawatts of installed capacity of wind power by the end of 2010. Aruvian’s R’search presents an analysis of the US Wind Power Industry in its research report Analyzing the US Wind Power Industry. In this research offering, we carry out an in-depth analysis of the wind power market in the United States. We begin with an analysis of the market profile, market statistics, wind power generation by state, installed capacity growth, analysis of wind resources in the US, and many other points that are important for investors looking to invest in the US wind power sector. This report also undertakes a cost analysis of wind power in the US, along with an analysis of the major market trends and challenges facing the industry. The small wind turbines market in the US is analyzed comprehensively in this report as well and includes a market profile, market statistics, the emergence and importance of hybrid small wind turbines, very small wind turbines, wind-diesel hybrid turbine systems, and the economics of small wind turbines.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Western Kansas Wind Power Characteristics During 2003 Kansas City Heat Waves
    July 15, 2006 ANALYSIS OF WESTERN KANSAS WIND POWER CHARACTERISTICS DURING 2003 KANSAS CITY HEAT WAVES By Craig Volland, QEP The Issue Electric Utility companies serving Kansas communities have been reluctant to commit to the purchase or installation of a significant amount of wind power in the state. Though KCP&L is investing in one 100.5 MW wind farm near Spearville, they are also proceeding to build a 850 MW coal- fired power plant by 2010 near Weston, Mo., Westar has announced plans for a large coal plant by 2013. Sunflower Electric, with partners, has announced plans for three 650 MW coal-fired boilers near Holcomb, Kansas, and the Bureau of Public Utilities of Kansas City, Kansas has announced plans to build a 250 MW or larger coal plant by 2012 next to their Nearman power station. Both KCP&L and Westar have indicated that wind power is too unreliable for their needs. That is, wind generation may not be sufficient when they need power the most such as during summer heat waves in their service areas. For example, Westar indicated this concern in their slide presentation to the Senate Utilities Committee in the Kansas legislative committee on February 1, 20051. They showed a slide comparing the power generated by the Blue Canyon Wind Farm in Oklahoma during August 2, 2004 compared to their load that day. In proceedings of the Kansas Corporation Commission KCP&L has noted that only 5 to 10 % of wind power output will be accredited by the WPP, the regional transmission authority, as “dispatchable” for meeting peak demand.2 The wind industry responds that temporary declines in wind generation can be reasonably well predicted in advance and compensated for by other sources on the grid, such as gas-fired “spinning reserve” or by purchased power.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Woody Tanya Thesis.Pdf (2.403Mb)
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLEGE ‘WHEN THE WIND COMES RIGHT BEHIND THE’ … SALES PITCH: ALTERNATIVE VIEWS TO WIND ENERGY DEVELOPMENT IN A RURAL OKLAHOMA HOST COMMUNITY A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE By TANYA S. WOODY Norman, Oklahoma 2020 ‘WHEN THE WIND COMES RIGHT BEHIND THE’ … SALES PITCH: ALTERNATIVE VIEWS TO WIND ENERGY DEVELOPMENT IN A RURAL OKLAHOMA HOST COMMUNITY A THESIS APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF GEOGRAPHY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY APPROVED BY THE COMMITTEE CONSISTING OF: Dr. Jeffrey Widener, Chair Dr. Scott Greene Dr. Travis Gliedt © Copyright by TANYA S. WOODY 2020 All Rights Reserved. ABSTRACT ‘WHEN THE WIND COMES RIGHT BEHIND THE’ … SALES PITCH: ALTERNATIVE VIEWS TO WIND ENERGY DEVELOPMENT IN A RURAL OKLAHOMA HOST COMMUNITY By Tanya S. Woody Wind energy development has expanded across the prairie of northwest Oklahoma over the past 17 years. Several factors contributed to the success of wind energy in the state including a volatile economy history spurring a need to diversify the energy-based economy, ideal wind power potential, and state and host community support fueled by a rural benefit narrative. Starting in the early 2000s, the state and rural oil and gas communities familiar with the hardships of volatile fuel markets embraced wind projects as a means to strengthen their local economies and ameliorate rural disadvantages. Literature on the impacts and perceptions of wind energy benefits for host communities, however, remains divided, and little is known about realistic effects and perceptions in the context of a pre-existing energy culture and economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary Multi-Objective Energy Production Optimization: an Empirical Comparison
    Mathematical and Computational Applications Article Evolutionary Multi-Objective Energy Production Optimization: An Empirical Comparison Gustavo-Adolfo Vargas-Hákim 1,*, Efrén Mezura-Montes 1 and Edgar Galván 2 1 Artificial Intelligence Research Center, University of Veracruz, Sebastián Camacho 5, Col. Centro, Xalapa 91000, Veracruz, Mexico; [email protected] 2 Naturally Inspired Computation Research Group, Department of Computer Science, Maynooth University, Maynooth W23 F2K8, Kildare, Ireland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 21 April 2020; Accepted: 15 June 2020; Published: 16 June 2020 Abstract: This work presents the assessment of the well-known Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) and one of its variants to optimize a proposed electric power production system. Such variant implements a chaotic model to generate the initial population, aiming to get a better distributed Pareto front. The considered power system is composed of solar, wind and natural gas power sources, being the first two renewable energies. Three conflicting objectives are considered in the problem: (1) power production, (2) production costs and (3) CO2 emissions. The Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm based on Decomposition (MOEA/D) is also adopted in the comparison so as to enrich the empirical evidence by contrasting the NSGA-II versions against a non-Pareto-based approach. Spacing and Hypervolume are the chosen metrics to compare the performance of the algorithms under study. The obtained results suggest that there is no significant improvement by using the variant of the NSGA-II over the original version. Nonetheless, meaningful performance differences have been found between MOEA/D and the other two algorithms.
    [Show full text]
  • Offshore Wind in the US
    Offshore Wind: A Primer on Trends and Opportunities January 2021 Contents 1. Introduction to Offshore Wind 2. Global Trends 3. Offshore Wind in the US 4. US Philanthropic Landscape 5. EU Foundations & CSOs 6. East Asian Context 7. Conclusion 2 Section 1 Introduction to Offshore Wind Introduction to Offshore Wind Ocean-based renewable energy provides the largest opportunity to mitigate carbon at sea. Ocean-based renewables represent 10% of the global emissions Offshore wind and other marine renewables reductions needed by 2050 to stay under a 1.5°C warming represent 45% of emissions reduction potential in scenario. It represents the largest opportunity to reduce carbon the ocean according to the High-Level Panel emissions through marine activities. Of the existing technologies that generate electricity from the ocean, offshore wind is the most commercially advanced. The sector has grown ~30% per year since 2010 and contributed 1% to global electricity generation in 2019, but its future is far from certain. Project development can take a decade, costs billions of dollars, and can be derailed by multiple stakeholders including fishers, local communities, shifting political regimes, regulatory uncertainty, and conservation concerns. To date, there has been surprisingly little investment by the philanthropic community despite the need. We believe that philanthropy can have an outsized impact in this key climate-wedge through targeted grantmaking. Source: https://oceanpanel.org/sites/default/files/2019-10/HLP_Report_Ocean_Solution_Climate_Change_final.pdf 4 Introduction to Offshore Wind Offshore wind is by far the most developed marine renewable technology. Offshore Wind Other Marine Renewables Technology Turbines are installed offshore and Wave, current, tidal, and ocean thermal energy conversion are affixed directly to the seafloor or (OTEC) are all early-stage technologies that seek to harness float on a platform that is anchored.
    [Show full text]
  • Threshold Power Trust
    A copy of this preliminary prospectus has been filed with the securities regulatory authorities in each of the provinces and territories of Canada but has not yet become final for the purpose of the sale of securities. Information contained in this preliminary prospectus may not be complete and may have to be amended. The securities may not be sold until a receipt for the prospectus is obtained from the securities regulatory authorities. No securities regulatory authority has expressed an opinion about these securities and it is an offence to claim otherwise. This prospectus constitutes a public offering of these securities only in those jurisdictions where they may be lawfully offered for sale and therein only by persons permitted to sell such securities. The securities offered hereby have not been, and will not be, registered under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended (‘‘U.S. Securities Act’’), or the securities laws of any state or other U.S. jurisdiction, and except pursuant to an exemption from registration under the U.S. Securities Act and the applicable securities law of any state or other U.S. jurisdiction, may not be offered or sold in the United States or to, or for the account or benefit, of a U.S. person (as defined in Regulation S under the U.S. Securities Act (‘‘Regulation S’’)). This prospectus does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any of these securities within the United States. See ‘‘Plan of Distribution’’. PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS Initial Public Offering July 4, 2013 17JUN201313321386 THRESHOLD POWER TRUST C$ ɀ ɀ Units This prospectus qualifies the distribution of ɀ trust units (‘‘Units’’) of Threshold Power Trust (the ‘‘Trust’’), an unincorporated open-ended limited purpose trust established under the laws of the Province of Ontario, to be issued at a price of C$10.00 per Unit (the ‘‘Offering’’).
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2014 Report Annual |
    INFIGEN ENERGY INFIGEN | ANNUAL REPORT 2014 INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 A LEADING SPECIALIST RENEWABLE ENERGY BUSINESS CONTENTS 02 Business Highlights 51 Directors’ Report 04 About Us 56 Remuneration Report 06 Chairman’s Report 68 Auditor’s Independence Declaration 08 Managing Director’s Report 69 Financial Statements 12 Management Discussion and Analysis 75 Notes to Financial Statements 33 Safety and Sustainability 137 Directors’ Declaration 38 Infigen Board 138 Independent Auditor’s Report 40 Infigen Management 140 Additional Investor Information 42 Corporate Governance Statement 143 Glossary 43 Corporate Structure 145 Corporate Directory All references to $ is a reference to Australian dollars and all years refer to financial year ended 30 June unless specifically marked otherwise. INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 | 1 BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS We successfully implemented cost savings initiatives and generated $93.5 million in cash to repay liabilities PRODUCTION REVENUE EBITDA INCREASED BY INCREASED BY INCREASED BY 1% 6% 7% to 4,670 GWh to $303 million to $170 million GLOBAL FACILITY PROFIT ON SALE ACQUISITION BORROWINGS OF US SOLAR OF US CLASS A REDUCED BY DEVELOPMENTS INTERESTS $35.3M $4.4M US$95M 2 | INFIGEN ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 INCREASE IN REVENUE 303 286 $17M 267 ($ million) FY12 FY13 FY14 INCREASE IN EBITDA 170 158 $12M 141 ($ million) FY12 FY13 FY14 INCREASE IN NET 96 OPERATING CASH FLOW 84 $12M 62 ($ million) FY12 FY13 FY14 BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS | 3 ABOUT US DEVELOPER OWNER OPERATOR Infigen Energy has an extensive Infigen Energy owns interests Infigen Energy manages predictive and geographically diverse in 24 operating wind farms and and preventive maintenance pipeline of prospective renewable one solar farm (1,646 megawatts programs, supply chain, maintenance energy projects at various stages equity interest) across Australia management systems, inventory of development.
    [Show full text]